113:
valuable resources such as oil or gold on inherited land. Moderate examples might be that after working at a job, the employee is paid, or after a well-done concert, the musician receives a round of applause. Failing to pay for items or services (or paying then not receiving them) would be considered a breach of contract and expectations and has at least some moral heft. High moral relevance examples can be more abstract and less related directly to the actor's expectation, and often come up with punishments. For the job example, perhaps a very valuable employee is paid their "true" worth rather than their agreed upon salary: a bonus for someone single-handedly providing the employer exceptional value, or their salary is clawed back if the employee is an active negative for the company (perhaps they are committing embezzlement). Evildoers have bad things happen to them, even if not directly intended by a human justice system; a freak accident that wounds or kills a criminal would be considered by some to be some sort of deserved
213:. She points out that there seems to be a subterranean assumption in Nozick's rejection of Rawls' account of natural endowments as collective assets. This assumption is the idea that the choices individuals make regarding how they will use their labor and their property are ones for which they should be held responsible. People who do not work hard and invest imprudently should be held responsible for those choices and not receive assistance from an egalitarian welfare state. If they do work hard and invest well however, they should also be held responsible for those choices and allowed to reap the benefits from their strivings. Hampton asks the question "whether the ground of Nozick's conception of absolute rights is not only a conception of liberty but also a conception of moral responsibility that is closely associated to our notion of liberty."
181:. Nozick claimed that to treat peoples' natural talents as collective assets is to contradict the very basis of the deontological liberalism Rawls wishes to defend, i.e., respect for the individual and the distinction between persons. Nozick argued that Rawls' suggestion that not only natural talents but also virtues of character are undeserved aspects of ourselves for which we cannot take credit, "...can succeed in blocking the introduction of a person's autonomous choices and actions (and their results) only by attributing everything noteworthy about the person completely to certain sorts of 'external' factors. So denigrating a person's autonomy and prime responsibility for his actions is a risky line to take for a theory that otherwise wishes to buttress the dignity and self-respect of autonomous beings."
201:
of desert and therefore does not provide a more precise notion of the bases of desert, but rather dissolves entirely the concept of desert and with it justice. The many debates over justice in political life and in philosophy concern the actual substantive question of what are the proper bases of desert. That is, underlying every conception of justice must be a claim of right, a positive claim of desert. The great failing of Rawls' argument is that he provides no substantive basis for a claim right or desert; but this failing is, paradoxically, also the source of the great appeal or excitement about Rawls' theory. His approach seems to avoid the difficulties of the traditional debates and the value questions they necessarily raise and yet seems to enable him to discuss normative questions such as justice.
174:. Rawls, writing in the mid to late twentieth century, claimed that a person cannot claim credit for being born with greater natural endowments (such as superior intelligence or athletic abilities), as it is purely the result of the "natural lottery". Therefore, that person does not morally deserve the fruits of his or her talents and/or efforts, such as a good job or a high salary. However, Rawls was careful to explain that, even though he dismissed the concept of moral Desert, people can still legitimately expect to receive the benefits of their efforts and/or talents. The distinction here lies between Desert and, in Rawls' own words, "Legitimate Expectations".
193:
destroys the character of desert to demand, as Rawls does, that the basis of desert be itself deserved. For example, if we say a man deserves some primary good because of some quality or action "Y", we can always ask, as Rawls does, "but does he deserve 'Y'?" and so on. We then either have an infinite regress of bases of desert or arrive at some basis, some beginning point, which the individual cannot claim to have deserved or to be responsible for, but only to have or have been given by nature. After all, no human being exists
105:), which has the same meaning. While "deserve" is common as a verb, the noun result "desert" is rare in colloquial speech; it is almost exclusively used in the phrase "just deserts" (e.g., "Although she was not at first arrested for the crime, she later on received her just deserts."). The alternate spelling "just desserts" is a pun on this original term.
382:, in the foreword to the report, said "this elite will need to reduce their footprint by a factor of 30 to stay in line with the Paris Agreement targets." A 2022 report by Oxfam found that the business investments of the wealthiest 125 billionaires emit 393 million metric tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually.
310:
According to a 2020 study, global earnings inequality has decreased substantially since 1970. During the 2000s and 2010s, the share of earnings by the world's poorest half doubled. Two researchers claim that global income inequality is decreasing due to strong economic growth in developing countries.
200:
To demand, as Rawls does, that no just claim rest on an undeserved base simply means that we must cease speaking about justice, for on the basis of that demand there can never be any just claims - not even for equality. Rawls' analysis of justice rests on a notion of desert which violates the concept
341:
in the United States. The wealth gap between
Caucasian and African-American families studied nearly tripled, from $ 85,000 in 1984 to $ 236,500 in 2009. The study concluded that factors contributing to the inequality included years of home ownership (27%), household income (20%), education (5%), and
302:
estimated in 2007 that the lower 80% of families were receiving $ 664 billion less income than they would be with a 1979 income distribution, or approximately $ 7,000 per family. Not receiving this income may have led many families to increase their debt burden, a significant factor in the 2007–2009
188:
assessment of procedural justice, which maintains that while it might be true that people's actions are wholly or partly determined by factors that are morally arbitrary, this is irrelevant to assignments of distributive shares. Individuals are self-owners with inviolable rights in their bodies and
192:
Others have suggested that Rawls has entirely mistaken the very logic of desert. If justice is getting what one is due, then the basis of desert must ultimately be undeserved. However, desert is a relational concept that expresses a relationship between a deserved and a basis of desert. It simply
328:
Widening income inequality is the defining challenge of our time. In advanced economies, the gap between the rich and poor is at its highest level in decades. Inequality trends have been more mixed in emerging markets and developing countries (EMDCs), with some countries experiencing declining
279:
Across the board, a number of industries are stratified across the genders. This is the result of a variety of factors. These include differences in education choices, preferred job and industry, work experience, number of hours worked, and breaks in employment (such as for bearing and raising
112:
must be morally relevant in some way. For example, a low moral relevance example might be a person purchasing a lottery ticket and winning the grand prize; they may be entitled to the money, and they did pay for the ticket, but the moral connection is loose. A similar example might be finding
307:, as highly leveraged homeowners suffered a much larger reduction in their net worth during the crisis. Further, since lower income families tend to spend relatively more of their income than higher income families, shifting more of the income to wealthier families may slow economic growth.
161:
desert claims—that is, claims wherein Z means simply to be X. Less controversially, if one (X) uses steroids to win in a footrace, one is said not to deserve to win (Y) because one is not responsible for, and so does not deserve, one's enhanced physical abilities (Z).
216:
There are other political philosophers who endorse the position
Hampton outlines. Their main observation is that sometimes people who are badly off might be so because of their own irresponsible conduct, and the charge is that theories favoring policies of
237:
in their appeal to undeservingness. They refer to the allegedly bad consequences of a redistributive social system and do not necessarily involve any reference to the moral worthiness of those who make greater efforts, wiser investments, and so on.
319:
over the period 1990–2015. In 2015, the OECD reported in 2015 that income inequality is higher than it has ever been within OECD member nations and is at increased levels in many emerging economies. According to a June 2015 report by the
157:. Considering this stipulation, one does not deserve respect simply because one is a human being, because one is not responsible for being a human being (Z). Arguments such as this are contentious as they suggest an untenability of
254:
Deserving something generally builds from some action and what should ideally result from it. Many people invert this process, consciously or unconsciously. A trivial example might be "lawbreakers deserve to go to jail", with the
245:
unfair regardless of further consequences. For example, the charge against Rawls is that people actually might deserve the gains flowing from their natural endowments, or at least those they achieve by striving conscientiously.
365:
says that the wealthiest 10% of the global population were responsible for more than half of global carbon dioxide emissions from 1990 to 2015, which increased by 60%. According to a 2020 report by the
280:
children). Men also typically go into higher paid and higher risk jobs when compared to women. These factors result in 60% to 75% difference between men's and women's average aggregate
241:
At other times however, the argument invokes a moral ideal holding desert valuable for its own sake. On this view, helping the undeserving and failing to help the deserving is deemed
197:; even to reduce the basis of claims to the very narrow one of life itself reveals Rawls' difficulty: surely no one can "deserve" or "claim credit for" their own existence.
288:, depending on the source. Various explanations for the remaining 25% to 40% have been suggested, including women's lower willingness and ability to negotiate salary and
189:
talents, and they have the freedom to take advantage of these regardless of whether the self-owned properties are theirs for reasons that are morally arbitrary or not.
1166:
312:
1120:
664:
1066:
271:
is the worldview that "everything happens for a reason", and that seemingly random events are actually morally fitting, if perhaps on a delayed timescale.
233:
political theorists might have disastrous consequences in that they promote sloth and allow free riding on the productive by the lazy. These arguments are
691:
108:
In ordinary usage, to deserve is to earn or merit a reward or penalty. In moral philosophy, it is generally argued that any reward or penalty that is
827:
970:
378:, and the wealthiest 1% of the world's population are responsible for more than double the greenhouse gas emissions of the poorest 50% combined.
158:
931:
267:, where when a terrible event happens to someone, an observer concludes that it is merely just retribution for some misdeed in the past. The
342:
familial financial support and/or inheritance (5%). In an analysis of the
American Opportunity Accounts Act, a bill to introduce
601:
Zuckert, Michael (1981), Justice deserted: a critique of Rawls' "A Theory of
Justice", Polity, Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 466-483
859:
765:
221:
from the rich to the poor ignore this crucial point, i.e. that people might be unequally deserving because of their actions.
1038:
1158:
350:
reported that by 2019 white families had more than seven times the wealth of the average Black family, according to the
337:
Institute on Assets and Social Policy which followed the same sets of families for 25 years found that there are vast
752:
379:
338:
1004:
801:
710:
673:
362:
592:(1981) Justice deserted: a critique of Rawls' "A Theory of Justice", Polity, Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 466-483
20:
259:
being "people in jail must have been lawbreakers." This may often be true but ignores the possibility of a
986:
Era Dabla-Norris; Kalpana
Kochhar; Nujin Suphaphiphat; Frantisek Ricka; Evridiki Tsounta (June 15, 2015).
315:, economic inequality between states had declined, but intrastate inequality has increased for 70% of the
1181:
492:
351:
321:
170:
One of the most controversial rejections of the concept of desert was made by the political philosopher
946:"Rising inequality affecting more than two-thirds of the globe, but it's not inevitable: new UN report"
184:
Nozick's critique has been interpreted in different ways. The conventional understanding of it is as a
1191:
487:
787:
304:
218:
263:
where an entirely innocent person might be suffering. At its extremes, the converse can lead to
987:
417:
260:
69:
is the condition of being deserving of something, whether good or bad. It is sometimes called
329:
inequality, but pervasive inequities in access to education, health care, and finance remain.
289:
268:
971:
Improving job quality and reducing gender gaps are essential to tackling growing inequality
482:
477:
8:
1015:
1005:"The Roots of the Widening Racial Wealth Gap: Explaining the Black-White Economic Divide"
467:
412:
392:
334:
293:
1121:"Billionaires emit a million times more greenhouse gases than the average person: Oxfam"
1094:
908:
775:
733:
1167:
Sorin Baiasu on "Distributive justice and the epistemological argument against desert"
912:
855:
761:
737:
462:
447:
437:
397:
347:
1186:
898:
888:
725:
589:
442:
316:
256:
39:
1149:
432:
371:
209:
Another, more unconventional interpretation of Nozick's critique is proposed by
1000:
945:
402:
375:
264:
185:
177:
Rawls' remarks about natural endowments provoked an often-referred response by
27:
729:
1175:
1153:
849:
452:
299:
296:
direct discrimination only explains a small part of gender wage differences.
178:
97:
Both of the
English words "deserve" and "desert" derive from the Old French
1071:
1062:
636:
Cf. Arneson, Richard J. (1997), "Egalitarianism and the
Undeserving Poor",
210:
1095:"Climate change: Global 'elite' will need to slash high-carbon lifestyles"
1067:"World's richest 1% cause double CO2 emissions of poorest 50%, says Oxfam"
155:
if X is responsible for Z (or, alternatively, if X is also deserving of Z)
147:
Cincinnati (X) deserves to be praised (Y) because it is a pretty city (Z).
893:
876:
513:
457:
230:
988:
Causes and
Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
903:
229:
Sometimes the claim is that the redistributive systems often favored by
999:
666:
An
Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women
343:
171:
86:
66:
194:
143:
I (X) deserve a good grade on my test (Y) because I studied hard (Z)
82:
472:
422:
407:
78:
708:
427:
285:
74:
73:
to clarify the intended usage and distinguish it from the dry
16:
Condition of being deserving of something, whether good or bad
358:
114:
54:
974:
367:
281:
711:"The Gender Pay Gap – Have Women Gone as Far as They Can?"
649:
Cf. Kernohan, Andrew (1993), "Desert and Self-Ownership",
45:
514:"Are We Giving Free Rei(g)n to New Spellings? | OUPblog"
313:
United
Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
149:
Some authors have added a further criterion, qualifying
990:. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
662:
692:"On Equal Pay Day, key facts about the gender pay gap"
51:
85:: that good deeds should be rewarded and evil deeds
57:
42:
26:"Deserve" redirects here. For the Kris Wu song, see
48:
19:"Just deserts" redirects here. For other uses, see
874:
841:
754:Tackling the gender pay gap in the European Union
1173:
925:
1003:; Tatjana Meschede; Sam Osoro (February 2013).
750:
1039:"Can Baby Bonds Shrink the Racial Wealth Gap?"
932:Peterson Institute for International Economics
689:
627:, New York: Cornell University Press, p. 132f.
153:. That is, Agent X deserves Y in virtue of Z
125:Desert claims may be generally expressed as:
77:biome. It is a concept often associated with
1118:
802:"What are the causes? - European Commission"
928:The Future of Worldwide Income Distribution
828:"Harness market forces to share prosperity"
709:Francine D. Blau; Lawrence M. Kahn (2007).
576:Levine, Andrew (1999), "Rewarding Effort",
374:by the rich is a significant driver of the
875:Hammar, Olle; Waldenström, Daniel (2020).
339:differences in wealth across racial groups
311:According to a January 2020 report by the
1119:Ward-Glenton, Hannah (November 8, 2022).
993:
926:Hellebrandt, Tomáš; Mauro, Paolo (2015).
902:
892:
825:
165:
847:
1092:
1036:
877:"Global Earnings Inequality, 1970–2018"
1174:
1061:
1018:Institute on Assets and Social Policy
702:
1159:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1093:McGrath, Matt (December 10, 2020).
638:The Journal of Political Philosophy
578:The Journal of Political Philosophy
274:
13:
718:Academy of Management Perspectives
14:
1203:
1148:
1142:
541:, Oxford: Oxford University Press
1037:Szapiro, Aron (6 October 2020).
690:Patten, Eileen (14 April 2015).
614:, Oxford: Westview Press, p. 150
38:
1112:
1086:
1055:
1030:
980:
964:
938:
919:
868:
848:Mian, Atif; Sufi, Amir (2014).
819:
794:
744:
683:
656:
643:
630:
567:, New York: Basic Books, p. 214
554:, New York: Basic Books, p. 228
363:Stockholm Environment Institute
224:
204:
92:
617:
604:
595:
583:
570:
557:
544:
531:
506:
120:
1:
663:CONSAD Research Corporation,
499:
21:Just deserts (disambiguation)
7:
493:List of basic income models
385:
352:Survey of Consumer Finances
322:International Monetary Fund
249:
10:
1208:
565:Anarchy, State, and Utopia
552:Anarchy, State, and Utopia
25:
18:
1012:Research and Policy Brief
854:. University of Chicago.
730:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286161
488:Guaranteed minimum income
651:Journal of Value Inquiry
640:5: 327-350, at pp. 330f.
537:See Rawls, John (1972),
305:subprime mortgage crisis
219:redistribution of wealth
580:7: 404-418, at p. 406f.
563:Nozick, Robert (1974),
550:Nozick, Robert (1974),
1065:(September 20, 2020).
653:27: 197-202, at p. 202
623:Cf. Kekes, John (1997)
610:Hampton, Jean (1997),
418:Distribution of wealth
331:
261:miscarriage of justice
166:Critique by John Rawls
751:European Commission.
326:
290:sexual discrimination
269:just-world hypothesis
881:The Economic Journal
612:Political Philosophy
483:Socioeconomic status
478:Criticism of welfare
1016:Brandeis University
696:Pew Research Center
539:A Theory of Justice
468:Theories of poverty
413:Income distribution
393:Economic inequality
335:Brandeis University
294:European Commission
292:. According to the
1182:Concepts in ethics
952:. January 21, 2020
894:10.1093/ej/ueaa109
887:(632): 2526–2545.
625:Against Liberalism
861:978-0-226-08194-6
767:978-92-79-36068-8
679:on 8 October 2013
463:Causes of poverty
448:Social inequality
438:Economic mobility
398:Gender inequality
357:A 2020 report by
1199:
1192:Normative ethics
1163:
1150:Zalta, Edward N.
1136:
1135:
1133:
1131:
1116:
1110:
1109:
1107:
1105:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1079:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1034:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1023:
1009:
997:
991:
984:
978:
968:
962:
961:
959:
957:
942:
936:
935:
923:
917:
916:
906:
896:
872:
866:
865:
845:
839:
838:
836:
834:
823:
817:
816:
814:
812:
798:
792:
791:
785:
781:
779:
771:
759:
748:
742:
741:
715:
706:
700:
699:
687:
681:
680:
678:
672:, archived from
671:
660:
654:
647:
641:
634:
628:
621:
615:
608:
602:
599:
593:
590:Zuckert, Michael
587:
581:
574:
568:
561:
555:
548:
542:
535:
529:
528:
526:
525:
510:
443:Effort heuristic
317:world population
275:Political issues
257:logical converse
101:(modern French:
64:
63:
60:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
44:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1172:
1171:
1145:
1140:
1139:
1129:
1127:
1117:
1113:
1103:
1101:
1091:
1087:
1077:
1075:
1060:
1056:
1047:
1045:
1043:Morningstar.com
1035:
1031:
1021:
1019:
1007:
998:
994:
985:
981:
977:, May 21, 2015.
969:
965:
955:
953:
944:
943:
939:
924:
920:
873:
869:
862:
846:
842:
832:
830:
826:Larry Summers.
824:
820:
810:
808:
800:
799:
795:
783:
782:
773:
772:
768:
757:
749:
745:
713:
707:
703:
688:
684:
676:
669:
661:
657:
648:
644:
635:
631:
622:
618:
609:
605:
600:
596:
588:
584:
575:
571:
562:
558:
549:
545:
536:
532:
523:
521:
512:
511:
507:
502:
497:
433:Social mobility
388:
372:overconsumption
333:A study by the
277:
252:
227:
207:
168:
123:
95:
41:
37:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1205:
1195:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1170:
1169:
1164:
1144:
1143:External links
1141:
1138:
1137:
1111:
1085:
1054:
1029:
1001:Thomas Shapiro
992:
979:
963:
937:
918:
867:
860:
840:
818:
793:
784:|journal=
766:
743:
701:
682:
655:
642:
629:
616:
603:
594:
582:
569:
556:
543:
530:
504:
503:
501:
498:
496:
495:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
465:
460:
455:
450:
445:
440:
435:
430:
425:
420:
415:
410:
405:
403:Discrimination
400:
395:
389:
387:
384:
380:Inger Andersen
376:climate crisis
276:
273:
265:victim blaming
251:
248:
226:
223:
206:
203:
167:
164:
122:
119:
115:karmic justice
94:
91:
28:Deserve (song)
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1204:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1126:
1122:
1115:
1100:
1096:
1089:
1078:September 22,
1074:
1073:
1068:
1064:
1063:Harvey, Fiona
1058:
1044:
1040:
1033:
1017:
1013:
1006:
1002:
996:
989:
983:
976:
972:
967:
951:
947:
941:
933:
929:
922:
914:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
886:
882:
878:
871:
863:
857:
853:
852:
851:House of Debt
844:
829:
822:
807:
803:
797:
789:
777:
769:
763:
756:
755:
747:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
712:
705:
697:
693:
686:
675:
668:
667:
659:
652:
646:
639:
633:
626:
620:
613:
607:
598:
591:
586:
579:
573:
566:
560:
553:
547:
540:
534:
519:
515:
509:
505:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
453:Social stigma
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
360:
355:
353:
349:
345:
340:
336:
330:
325:
323:
318:
314:
308:
306:
301:
300:Larry Summers
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
247:
244:
243:intrinsically
239:
236:
232:
222:
220:
214:
212:
202:
198:
196:
190:
187:
182:
180:
179:Robert Nozick
175:
173:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:For example,
140:
138:
135:in virtue of
134:
130:
118:
116:
111:
106:
104:
100:
90:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
62:
35:
29:
22:
1157:
1128:. Retrieved
1124:
1114:
1104:December 11,
1102:. Retrieved
1098:
1088:
1076:. Retrieved
1072:The Guardian
1070:
1057:
1046:. Retrieved
1042:
1032:
1020:. Retrieved
1011:
995:
982:
966:
956:September 6,
954:. Retrieved
949:
940:
927:
921:
904:10419/161385
884:
880:
870:
850:
843:
833:21 September
831:. Retrieved
821:
809:. Retrieved
806:ec.europa.eu
805:
796:
753:
746:
721:
717:
704:
695:
685:
674:the original
665:
658:
650:
645:
637:
632:
624:
619:
611:
606:
597:
585:
577:
572:
564:
559:
551:
546:
538:
533:
522:. Retrieved
520:. 2007-10-18
517:
508:
356:
332:
327:
309:
298:
278:
253:
242:
240:
235:instrumental
234:
228:
225:Consequences
215:
211:Jean Hampton
208:
205:Jean Hampton
199:
191:
183:
176:
169:
154:
150:
146:
142:
136:
132:
128:
126:
124:
109:
107:
102:
98:
96:
93:Nomenclature
71:moral desert
70:
33:
32:
1130:November 8,
811:18 February
724:(1): 7–23.
458:Meritocracy
348:Morningstar
231:egalitarian
186:libertarian
121:Formulation
1176:Categories
1048:2021-08-04
524:2018-11-28
500:References
344:Baby Bonds
172:John Rawls
67:philosophy
913:157907204
786:ignored (
776:cite book
738:152531847
195:causa sui
159:intrinsic
131:deserves
103:desservir
1154:"Desert"
1022:16 March
386:See also
361:and the
286:salaries
250:Converse
110:deserved
99:deservir
87:punished
83:morality
1187:Justice
1152:(ed.).
950:UN News
518:OUPblog
473:Welfare
423:Poverty
408:Justice
79:justice
911:
858:
764:
736:
428:Racism
324:(IMF):
127:Thing
75:desert
34:Desert
1008:(PDF)
909:S2CID
758:(PDF)
734:S2CID
714:(PDF)
677:(PDF)
670:(PDF)
359:Oxfam
282:wages
65:) in
1132:2022
1125:CNBC
1106:2020
1080:2020
1024:2013
975:OECD
958:2020
856:ISBN
835:2015
813:2016
788:help
762:ISBN
368:UNEP
81:and
1099:BBC
899:hdl
889:doi
885:130
726:doi
284:or
117:.
55:ɜːr
1178::
1156:.
1123:.
1097:.
1069:.
1041:.
1014:.
1010:.
973:.
948:.
930:.
907:.
897:.
883:.
879:.
804:.
780::
778:}}
774:{{
760:.
732:.
722:21
720:.
716:.
694:.
516:.
370:,
354:.
346:,
145:;
89:.
1162:.
1134:.
1108:.
1082:.
1051:.
1026:.
960:.
934:.
915:.
901::
891::
864:.
837:.
815:.
790:)
770:.
740:.
728::
698:.
527:.
151:Z
139:.
137:Z
133:Y
129:X
61:/
58:t
52:z
49:ˈ
46:ɪ
43:d
40:/
36:(
30:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.