248:
63:
22:
165:
453:
tribunal's expertise and specialization, and finally the court must consider whether the attorney general of the province will participate in the proceedings before the Labour
Relations Board. However, the court limited this ability by denying the tribunal any power to strike down any part of the law. Justice
418:, Local 175, the union of several employees of Cuddy Chicks Ltd. (a chicken hatcher), filed a complaint to the Labour Relations Board that included a challenge of the constitutionality of the board's enabling statute which excluded agricultural workers. The union claimed the exclusion violated the right to
452:
The court outlined three factors to be considered before a tribunal can hear a constitutional challenge. First, it "must already have jurisdiction over the whole of the matter before it, namely, the parties, subject matter and remedy sought". Second, the court must consider the nature of the
457:
said that "a formal declaration of invalidity is not a remedy which is available to the board. Instead, the board simply treats any impugned provision as invalid for the purposes of the matter before it".
499:
80:
35:
462:
41:
127:
415:
99:
493:
106:
113:
486:
95:
613:
583:
424:
623:
588:
120:
428:
and the right to equality under section 15. Cuddy Chicks disputed the ability of the board to consider constitutional issues.
449:
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the tribunal's authority to rule in constitutional issues of its enabling statute.
593:
598:
222:
204:
146:
49:
273:
Cuddy Chicks
Limited v Ontario Relations Board and United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175
431:
The board found that it was able to consider the issue by virtue of its requirement under subsection 24(2) of the
175:
633:
84:
566:
628:
618:
608:
403:
520:
340:
360:
182:
558:
395:
253:
73:
461:
This test has the same three criteria as the test for a "court of competent jurisdiction" under
562:
437:
419:
603:
8:
454:
336:
473:
356:
279:
247:
348:
472:
The court further held that decisions of constitutionality can be reviewed on a
181:
The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style of
186:
577:
375:
La Forest, joined by Lamer, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, and
Stevenson
332:
325:
344:
352:
469:, except here it does not matter if the tribunal is a "court" or not.
62:
399:
500:
TĂ©treault-Gadoury v Canada (Employment and
Immigration Commission)
96:"Cuddy Chicks Ltd v Ontario" Labour Relations Board
416:
United Food and
Commercial Workers International Union
494:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
391:
Cuddy Chicks Ltd v
Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
302:
Cuddy Chicks Ltd v
Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
241:
Cuddy Chicks Ltd v
Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
87:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
575:
487:Douglas/Kwantlen Faculty Assn v Douglas College
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
540:
538:
223:Learn how and when to remove this message
205:Learn how and when to remove this message
147:Learn how and when to remove this message
535:
425:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
576:
304:, 1989 CanLII 4139 (8 September 1989)
406:of the tribunal's enabling statute.
158:
85:adding citations to reliable sources
56:
15:
521:SCC Case Information - Docket 21675
13:
614:United Food and Commercial Workers
14:
645:
551:
31:This article has multiple issues.
584:Canadian constitutional case law
398:decision on the jurisdiction of
383:Wilson, joined by L'Heureux-Dubé
246:
163:
61:
20:
72:needs additional citations for
39:or discuss these issues on the
526:
514:
1:
624:Canadian trade union case law
589:Supreme Court of Canada cases
507:
409:
422:under paragraph 2(d) of the
235:Supreme Court of Canada case
7:
479:
10:
650:
594:Labour relations in Canada
599:1991 in Canadian case law
444:
404:constitutional challenges
379:
371:
366:
321:
316:
308:
296:
288:
278:
268:
262:Hearing: 7 November 1990
261:
245:
240:
394:, 2 SCR 5 is a leading
559:Supreme Court of Canada
523:Supreme Court of Canada
396:Supreme Court of Canada
254:Supreme Court of Canada
438:Constitution Act, 1867
435:and section 52 of the
420:freedom of association
634:Agriculture in Canada
341:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
264:Judgment: 6 June 1991
81:improve this article
629:Agricultural labor
619:Ontario litigation
609:Canadian tribunals
476:of "correctness".
357:Beverley McLachlin
387:
386:
361:William Stevenson
233:
232:
225:
215:
214:
207:
157:
156:
149:
131:
54:
641:
545:
542:
533:
530:
524:
518:
463:subsection 24(1)
455:GĂ©rard La Forest
349:Charles Gonthier
337:GĂ©rard La Forest
330:Puisne Justices:
317:Court membership
312:Appeal dismissed
250:
238:
237:
228:
221:
210:
203:
199:
196:
190:
167:
166:
159:
152:
145:
141:
138:
132:
130:
89:
65:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
574:
573:
554:
549:
548:
543:
536:
531:
527:
519:
515:
510:
482:
447:
412:
328:
263:
257:
236:
229:
218:
217:
216:
211:
200:
194:
191:
180:
174:has an unclear
168:
164:
153:
142:
136:
133:
90:
88:
78:
66:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
647:
637:
636:
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
570:
569:
553:
552:External links
550:
547:
546:
534:
525:
512:
511:
509:
506:
505:
504:
496:
491:
481:
478:
446:
443:
411:
408:
385:
384:
381:
377:
376:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
323:Chief Justice:
319:
318:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:
298:
294:
293:
290:
286:
285:
282:
276:
275:
270:
269:Full case name
266:
265:
259:
258:
251:
243:
242:
234:
231:
230:
213:
212:
176:citation style
171:
169:
162:
155:
154:
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
581:
579:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:Full text of
556:
555:
541:
539:
529:
522:
517:
513:
502:
501:
497:
495:
492:
489:
488:
484:
483:
477:
475:
470:
468:
464:
459:
456:
450:
442:
440:
439:
434:
429:
427:
426:
421:
417:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:Reasons given
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:Bertha Wilson
331:
327:
326:Antonio Lamer
324:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
297:Prior history
295:
291:
287:
283:
281:
277:
274:
271:
267:
260:
256:
255:
249:
244:
239:
227:
224:
209:
206:
198:
188:
184:
178:
177:
172:This article
170:
161:
160:
151:
148:
140:
129:
126:
122:
119:
115:
112:
108:
105:
101:
98: –
97:
93:
92:Find sources:
86:
82:
76:
75:
70:This article
68:
64:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
604:Jurisdiction
571:
561:decision at
528:
516:
498:
490:, 3 SCR 570
485:
471:
466:
460:
451:
448:
436:
432:
430:
423:
413:
390:
389:
388:
345:John Sopinka
329:
322:
301:
300:APPEAL from
272:
252:
219:
201:
192:
173:
143:
134:
124:
117:
110:
103:
91:
79:Please help
74:verification
71:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
503:, 2 SCR 22
380:Concurrence
578:Categories
565: and
508:References
410:Background
353:Peter Cory
289:Docket No.
195:April 2023
187:footnoting
137:April 2023
107:newspapers
36:improve it
400:tribunals
280:Citations
42:talk page
544:para. 17
480:See also
474:standard
402:to hear
372:Majority
183:citation
467:Charter
465:of the
433:Charter
284:2 SCR 5
121:scholar
567:CanLII
445:Ruling
309:Ruling
292:21675
123:
116:
109:
102:
94:
563:LexUM
532:p. 14
128:JSTOR
114:books
414:The
185:and
100:news
83:by
580::
537:^
441:.
359:,
355:,
351:,
347:,
343:,
339:,
335:,
45:.
226:)
220:(
208:)
202:(
197:)
193:(
189:.
179:.
150:)
144:(
139:)
135:(
125:·
118:·
111:·
104:·
77:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
