Knowledge

Corporate donations

Source 📝

140:(PACs); PACs generally have strict limits on their ability to advocate on behalf of specific parties or candidates, or even to coordinate their activities with political campaigns. PACs are subject to disclosure requirements at the federal and state levels. The ability of corporations to engage in such independent expenditures has been subject to intense debate after the US Supreme Court struck down, on free-speech grounds, limits in 179:
During the 2013 election cycle in Germany, corporations and other organizations made direct contributions to German political parties in the amount of at least 24.2 million Euros. Due to public subsidies of political parties and membership dues, such donations in Germany generally represent about 15%
166:
issue and subject to intense political debate in the US. Proponents of tighter regulations of political donations by corporations argue that corporate donations corrupt democracy. Other research suggests that post-election lobbying and access to politicians, rather than campaign contributions, shapes
35:
According to a 2020 study of large United States-based corporations, "6.3 percent of corporate charitable giving may be politically motivated, an amount 2.5 times larger than annual PAC contributions and 35 percent of federal lobbying. Absent of disclosure requirements, charitable giving may be a
175:
In Germany, both individuals and corporations may make unlimited contributions to political parties. These contributions are partially tax exempt and partially matched by government funds; contributions of more than 10000 Euros are reportable.
57:
Corporate charitable giving can be divided into direct cash and non-cash contributions. Direct cash giving comes from corporate headquarters, regional offices, or company sponsored foundations. Examples of direct cash contributions include:
31:
refers to any financial contribution made by a corporation to another organization that furthers the contributor's own objectives. Two major kinds of such donations deserve specific consideration, charitable as well as political donations.
192:
Australia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey have no limits on either contributions for parliamentary elections or on spending on such elections.
104:
Total corporate cash donations in 2010 are estimated to be $ 15.29 billion in the United States. Of that, ~80%-85% came from corporate grants and sponsorship of fundraising events while ~15%-20% or $ 2–$ 3 billion came from corporate
44:
Corporations give to charitable causes, either because of the personal convictions of influential leaders within the corporation, or more commonly to help establish the public perception that the corporation is a good
159:. Such organizations often group donations under specific corporations, but such donations refer to contributions from individuals and PACs associated with the corporation, not "corporate donations". 133:
In the US, corporations are prohibited from making expenditures to influence federal elections. Similar restrictions exist in many state elections and have been upheld by the US Supreme Court.
82:
Donation of new or used equipment or supplies, such as computers and other electronic equipment, office supplies, and targeted supplies such as clothing, canned goods, or paper products.
85:
Use of organizational services/facilities, such as financial and administrative support, computer services, printing, mailing or copying, or targeted professional services and support.
62:
Community grants to support local community efforts or nonprofits - 100% of Fortune 500 companies provide some form of community grant or sponsor at least one fundraising event.
88:
Application of professional services, such as tax and financial advice, strategic planning and organizational development, graphic arts and copy writing, and legal assistance.
196:
In Belgium, Canada, Chile, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Poland, and Slovenia, there are limits on both contributions and spending
353: 565:
Unternehmenspenden in der Parteien- und Wahlkampffinanzierung. Die USA, Kanada, die Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Großbritannien im internationalen Vergleich
459: 78:
Non-cash contributions are contributions of equipment, supplies or time, and do not include cash contributions. Examples of non-cash contributions include:
304: 74:- Giving to nonprofits in recognition of employee-volunteer service to that organization. Approximately 40% of Fortune 500 companies offer these programs. 163: 471: 216: 614: 485: 384: 199:
Austria, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Slovakia, the United Kingdom have no limits on contributions but do have limits on spending.
68:- Corporate donations to nonprofits as a match to employee giving. Approximately 65% of Fortune 500 companies offer these programs. 742: 754: 747: 695: 504: 360: 732: 727: 231: 17: 607: 315: 685: 441: 528: 712: 211: 137: 125:
in democracies; political donations by individuals and organizations are one of many sources of funding.
779: 722: 705: 600: 398: 659: 700: 690: 181: 92:
Non-cash contributions can also be interpreted through an organization's policy to allow employees
737: 717: 664: 654: 572: 557: 141: 149: 46: 8: 36:
form of corporate political influence undetected by voters and subsidized by taxpayers."
587:
If Money Talks, What Does It Say? Corruption and Business Financing of Political Parties
335: 623: 378: 283: 221: 122: 250:
Bertrand, Marianne; Bombardini, Matilde; Fisman, Raymond; Trebbi, Francesco (2020).
648: 637: 416: 273: 263: 226: 110: 519:
The literature given here refers to political donations by corporate donors only:
472:
Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives
774: 669: 145: 71: 202:
Finland and the United States have limits on contributions but not on spending.
252:"Tax-Exempt Lobbying: Corporate Philanthropy as a Tool for Political Influence" 106: 768: 287: 93: 65: 568: 553: 268: 251: 156: 278: 592: 545:. 4th ed., Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1992, pp. 10–20, 54-70. 155:
Donations are closely tracked by several organizations including
580:
The Costs of Democracy. Party Funding in Modern British Politics
442:"Supreme Court declines to hear Iowa campaign finance challenge" 486:"Parteispenden – Welche Unternehmen wem wie viel zahlen - WELT" 249: 505:"How Our Campaign Finance System Compares to Other Countries" 543:
Financing Politics. Money, Elections & Political Reform
144:, a case involving the creation of a film critical of 180:
of the total revenue of major political parties; see
99: 582:. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007, pp. 87–142. 162:Corporate donations to PACs and Super PACs are a 766: 474:, American Political Science Review 84(2), 1990. 167:and reinforces policy decision by politicians. 608: 538:. Umea: CWK Gleerup: 1983, pp. 149–164. 589:, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. 615: 601: 217:Corporate political donations in Australia 277: 267: 502: 39: 14: 767: 383:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 336:"Double the Donation Customer Support" 299: 297: 116: 622: 596: 460:Political donations corrupt democracy 330: 328: 525:British Political Finance, 1830-1980 483: 294: 136:Corporations may make donations to 121:There is a wide range of models of 24: 531:: 1983, pp. 137–140, 228-238. 325: 187: 25: 791: 232:Party funding in the Netherlands 128: 100:Annual charitable giving figures 96:when performing volunteer work. 496: 477: 503:Waldman, Paul (4 April 2014). 464: 452: 434: 409: 391: 346: 243: 13: 1: 529:American Enterprise Institute 514: 484:Merz, Frederik (April 2015). 237: 550:Die Republik der Amtsinhaber 212:Corporate political spending 7: 523:Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael, 421:Legal Information Institute 205: 138:Political Action Committees 10: 796: 170: 678: 630: 340:www.doublethedonation.com 312:www.givingusareports.org 256:American Economic Review 182:Party finance in Germany 52: 560:, 1993, pp. 56–65. 541:Alexander, Herbert E., 655:Grassroots fundraising 417:"52 U.S. Code § 30118" 305:"givingusareports.org" 142:Citizens United v. FEC 150:nonprofit corporation 534:Gidlund, Gullan M., 269:10.1257/aer.20180615 40:Charitable donations 643:Corporate donations 117:Political donations 527:. Washington, DC: 29:corporate donation 780:Political funding 762: 761: 624:Political finance 585:McMenamin, Iain, 578:Ewing, Keith D., 563:Römmele, Andrea, 222:Political finance 123:political finance 47:corporate citizen 16:(Redirected from 787: 706:Party foundation 649:Follow the money 638:Campaign finance 617: 610: 603: 594: 593: 509: 508: 500: 494: 493: 481: 475: 470:John R. Wright: 468: 462: 456: 450: 449: 438: 432: 431: 429: 427: 413: 407: 406: 399:"Home - FEC.gov" 395: 389: 388: 382: 374: 372: 371: 365: 359:. Archived from 358: 350: 344: 343: 332: 323: 322: 320: 314:. Archived from 309: 301: 292: 291: 281: 271: 262:(7): 2065–2102. 247: 227:Campaign finance 111:volunteer grants 72:Volunteer grants 21: 18:Corporate donors 795: 794: 790: 789: 788: 786: 785: 784: 765: 764: 763: 758: 750: 674: 670:Party subsidies 660:Party broadcast 626: 621: 517: 512: 507:. prospect.org. 501: 497: 482: 478: 469: 465: 458:Warwick Smith, 457: 453: 448:. 7 April 2014. 440: 439: 435: 425: 423: 415: 414: 410: 397: 396: 392: 376: 375: 369: 367: 363: 356: 354:"Archived copy" 352: 351: 347: 334: 333: 326: 318: 307: 303: 302: 295: 248: 244: 240: 208: 190: 188:Other countries 173: 164:First Amendment 146:Hillary Clinton 131: 119: 102: 55: 42: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 793: 783: 782: 777: 760: 759: 755:European Union 752: 751: 745: 743:United Kingdom 740: 735: 730: 725: 720: 715: 710: 709: 708: 698: 693: 688: 682: 680: 676: 675: 673: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 645: 640: 634: 632: 628: 627: 620: 619: 612: 605: 597: 591: 590: 583: 576: 561: 546: 539: 532: 516: 513: 511: 510: 495: 476: 463: 451: 433: 408: 390: 345: 324: 321:on 2011-08-12. 293: 241: 239: 236: 235: 234: 229: 224: 219: 214: 207: 204: 189: 186: 172: 169: 130: 127: 118: 115: 107:matching gifts 101: 98: 90: 89: 86: 83: 76: 75: 69: 66:Matching gifts 63: 54: 51: 41: 38: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 792: 781: 778: 776: 773: 772: 770: 757: 756: 749: 748:United States 746: 744: 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 729: 726: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 707: 704: 703: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 687: 684: 683: 681: 677: 671: 668: 666: 665:Party funding 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 650: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 635: 633: 629: 625: 618: 613: 611: 606: 604: 599: 598: 595: 588: 584: 581: 577: 574: 570: 566: 562: 559: 555: 551: 548:Ruß, Sabine, 547: 544: 540: 537: 533: 530: 526: 522: 521: 520: 506: 499: 491: 487: 480: 473: 467: 461: 455: 447: 443: 437: 422: 418: 412: 404: 400: 394: 386: 380: 366:on 2011-11-11 362: 355: 349: 341: 337: 331: 329: 317: 313: 306: 300: 298: 289: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 261: 257: 253: 246: 242: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 209: 203: 200: 197: 194: 185: 183: 177: 168: 165: 160: 158: 153: 151: 147: 143: 139: 134: 129:United States 126: 124: 114: 112: 108: 97: 95: 94:paid time off 87: 84: 81: 80: 79: 73: 70: 67: 64: 61: 60: 59: 50: 48: 37: 33: 30: 19: 753: 642: 586: 579: 573:Nomos Verlag 564: 558:Nomos Verlag 549: 542: 535: 524: 518: 498: 489: 479: 466: 454: 445: 436: 424:. Retrieved 420: 411: 402: 393: 368:. Retrieved 361:the original 348: 339: 316:the original 311: 279:10419/262676 259: 255: 245: 201: 198: 195: 191: 178: 174: 161: 154: 135: 132: 120: 103: 91: 77: 56: 43: 34: 28: 26: 733:New Zealand 728:Netherlands 569:Baden-Baden 554:Baden-Baden 426:28 November 157:OpenSecrets 769:Categories 679:By country 515:Literature 370:2012-04-05 238:References 686:Australia 536:Partistöd 288:0002-8282 27:The term 490:DIE WELT 379:cite web 206:See also 713:Ireland 701:Germany 691:Austria 575:, 1995. 446:Reuters 403:FEC.gov 171:Germany 775:Giving 738:Sweden 718:Israel 696:Canada 286:  723:Japan 631:Terms 364:(PDF) 357:(PDF) 319:(PDF) 308:(PDF) 148:by a 53:Types 428:2018 385:link 284:ISSN 109:and 274:hdl 264:doi 260:110 771:: 571:: 567:. 556:: 552:. 488:. 444:. 419:. 401:. 381:}} 377:{{ 338:. 327:^ 310:. 296:^ 282:. 272:. 258:. 254:. 184:. 152:. 113:. 49:. 651:" 647:" 616:e 609:t 602:v 492:. 430:. 405:. 387:) 373:. 342:. 290:. 276:: 266:: 20:)

Index

Corporate donors
corporate citizen
Matching gifts
Volunteer grants
paid time off
matching gifts
volunteer grants
political finance
Political Action Committees
Citizens United v. FEC
Hillary Clinton
nonprofit corporation
OpenSecrets
First Amendment
Party finance in Germany
Corporate political spending
Corporate political donations in Australia
Political finance
Campaign finance
Party funding in the Netherlands
"Tax-Exempt Lobbying: Corporate Philanthropy as a Tool for Political Influence"
doi
10.1257/aer.20180615
hdl
10419/262676
ISSN
0002-8282


"givingusareports.org"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.