Knowledge

Close order formation

Source 📝

452: 241: 165: 411:, a formation in which shields were held edge-to-edge or overlapped. Close order was routinely used by infantry in the later Middle Ages, the intention being to avoid the enemy penetrating and disrupting their formation. A common literary image was that an apple should not be able to pass between their lances. In the 15th century, the Swiss developed pike tactics that used closely packed deep columns. A reconstruction of the deployment of 585:. The Scottish Brigade, consisting of 3,500 men shoulder to shoulder in 90 lines with a front of only 45 yards, moved forward in pre-dawn darkness to attack the entrenched Boer positions. Two of the four Highland regiments kept their tight formation with long ropes carried by the left hand man of each file. The result was a rout of the brigade after nine hours fighting, with nearly a quarter of the Scottish soldiers killed or wounded. 63: 22: 392: 329: 541:
in the center, along with reserve forces. That formation enabled the defenders to fire on cavalry on all sides of the formation although there was some risk that fire from one square might reach other squares formed nearby. The effectiveness of a square depended on the ability of the infantry to hold
612:
still feature soldiers standing and marching in close order formations for ceremonial purposes. Many armies maintain special ceremonial units, whose soldiers hold rigorous training in holding such formations, including armies established in the 20th century, which themselves have no experience of
517:
attacks as rifling technology, which significantly increased the range and accuracy of firearms at the expense of a substantially reduced rate of fire, began to see increased use in the late 18th century. Fortifications were designed to break up formations by reducing the effectiveness of volley
432:
From 1490 to 1520 saw the emergence of a consensus in military thinking that armies should be increasingly ordered on the battlefield and that neat, rectilinear formations were the key. The uniform bodies of pikes would be ordered based on an area occupied by a soldier of three paces frontage and
433:
seven paces depth, the soldier being positioned at the centre of the rectangle. Pikes did not stand alone on the battlefield, however, and new formations of horns or sleeves of shot were developed to support the pike blocks with firearms. In the late 16th century, a system called
512:
to increase the chances of inflicting casualties on the enemy. Such tactics were used throughout the 18th century. Line formations were, however, not without risks. Line commanders and other field officers were often highly visible targets and became the target of
315:
had made any such dense formation increasingly hazardous and less effective. The technological concentration of increased firepower to fewer soldiers had rendered the close order formation obsolete by the end of the 19th century. Modern infantry now use
371:, a long pike used in two hands. The normal frontage per man remained the same, but the normal depth grew to 16 ranks. An innovation was the introduction of a "locked shield order" (synaspismos), with a frontage of only about 18 in. The 437:
was developed to enable an exchange of ranks of shooters. That led to the development of thinner formations and set tacticians on the road to developing the linear fire tactics of the 18th century.
574:. After that humiliating defeat, the British army found that close-order infantry formations were necessary to concentrate firepower to break the Zulu warriors' formidable massed charges. 419:
consisted of 10,000 men, and experiments have estimated its area of as little as 60 m by 60 m. The knightly cavalry of the Middle Ages could also fight in close order, stirrup to stirrup.
558:, and technological improvements also simplified the targeting of large, mobile bodies of enemy forces. This, coupled with improved infantry weapons and automatic weapons such as the 504:
mechanism, which became the weapon of choice because it could be fired relatively rapidly (six shots per minute). Because of their poor accuracy, such weapons were typically used in
364:, a large round bronze faced shield and a large spear. The frontage per man was the width of the shield (about 3 ft), and the normal formation depth was four to eight men. 588:
In peace-time the major European armies persisted in training their infantry in close-order tactics that were to ensure very heavy casualties in August 1914. During the
550:
In the 19th century, advances in firearms technology rendered the use of close formations obsolete. The widespread use of rifled artillery and the advent of reliable
927: 440:
On horseback, the old knightly tactics slowly gave way to new tactics involving firearms, which led to the development of pistol-armed cavalry known as
415:
forces in 1443 gives a formation 56 men wide by 20 deep, the formation having a width of 168 ft and a depth of 140 ft. The Swiss main formation at the
577:
One of the last occasions involving the deployment in the face of the enemy of substantial numbers of British troops in close order occurred at the
434: 175: 127: 99: 538: 80: 35: 722: 106: 910:
Website devoted to 17th. century drill which explains "close order" as it relates to pike and musket formation from the
113: 889: 864: 809: 775: 747: 694: 660: 227: 209: 146: 49: 95: 84: 509: 932: 852: 537:. Designed to defend against cavalry charges, an infantry battalion would form a square with the unit's 451: 187: 41: 522:
fire. In the latter, an enemy that could fire down the length of a line with an inaccurate weapon or
459: 191: 120: 554:
altered the tactical landscape. These weapons had a significantly increased fire rate compared to
589: 578: 73: 622: 444:, who specialised in manoeuvring in deep, close formations and practiced a tactic known as the 183: 551: 519: 480: 304: 907: 571: 240: 8: 593: 485:
In the 17th century, European armies expanded their use of firearms, which were at first
763: 710: 300: 284:
tactics, to multiply their effective weight of arms by their weight of numbers. In the
261: 911: 885: 860: 805: 771: 743: 718: 690: 656: 627: 582: 400: 357: 349: 245: 505: 472: 285: 265: 609: 534: 476: 416: 367:
The later Macedonian phalanx used a smaller shield but replaced the spear with a
348:
in close order formation. That tradition continued in the ancient world with the
273: 597: 567: 269: 921: 555: 396: 372: 289: 448:
in which successive ranks of men rode forward, shot and retired to reload.
293: 559: 277: 600:
the German regiments went forward "as if advancing on a parade ground".
566:, made close formations incredibly costly. A major exception was in the 632: 408: 317: 563: 527: 501: 486: 312: 296:
used close order formations that were similar to ancient phalanxes.
412: 264:
in which soldiers are close together and regularly arranged for the
62: 689:. Hockwold-cum-Wilton, Norfolk: Anglo-Saxon Books. pp. 182–5. 490: 445: 308: 523: 494: 455: 441: 380: 368: 333: 281: 596:
the French attacked in shoulder to shoulder masses while at the
328: 859:. London: Macdonald & Co (Publishers) Ltd. pp. 203–6. 514: 497: 391: 353: 376: 361: 345: 341: 249: 344:
kingdom from the 3rd millennium BC clearly show men with
458:
infantry in close order linear formation attack at the
530:
greatly increased their chances of hitting something.
608:
Though of no military value under modern conditions,
320:, which is effectively the opposite of close order. 252:
phalanx of spearmen with large shields (c. 2450 BC).
87:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 307:of soldiers became uncommon since improvements in 717:. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 162–3. 919: 715:Soldiers' Lives Through History: The Middle Ages 687:The English Warrior from earliest times to 1066 383:on a similar frontage per man to the phalanx. 172:The examples and perspective in this article 407:In the early Middle Ages, infantry used the 399:confront Holy Roman imperial cavalry at the 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 928:Tactical formations of the Napoleonic Wars 684: 613:using such formations on the battlefield. 508:in which a commanding officer would order 466: 762: 228:Learn how and when to remove this message 210:Learn how and when to remove this message 147:Learn how and when to remove this message 851: 450: 390: 375:also fought in close order by using the 327: 239: 533:Another formation that saw use was the 268:concentration of force. It was used by 920: 879: 799: 737: 709: 542:their ground against cavalry charges. 422: 655:. London: Salamander. pp. 34–7. 650: 360:. The Greek phalanx fought with the 158: 85:adding citations to reliable sources 56: 15: 603: 13: 804:. London: Cassel. pp. 65–72. 770:. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 231. 14: 944: 901: 31:This article has multiple issues. 493:. They were later supplanted by 163: 61: 20: 873: 845: 836: 827: 427: 72:needs additional citations for 39:or discuss these issues on the 818: 793: 784: 756: 731: 703: 678: 669: 653:Warfare in the Classical World 644: 386: 336:marching in phalanx formation. 1: 908:Moving 17th. Century Soldiers 638: 332:Close order formation: Greek 685:Pollington, Stephen (1996). 323: 7: 884:. Hutchinson. p. 109. 616: 526:loaded with anti-personnel 244:Close order formation: The 186:, discuss the issue on the 10: 949: 740:The Swiss at War 1300–1500 545: 518:fire or to expose them to 470: 842:Arnold (2001), pp. 98-100 738:Miller, Douglas (1979). 460:Battle of Hohenfriedberg 833:Arnold (2001), pp.78-81 800:Arnold, Thomas (2001). 590:Battle of the Frontiers 579:Battle of Magersfontein 467:17th and 18th centuries 96:"Close order formation" 802:The Renaissance at War 768:War in the Middle Ages 742:. Osprey. p. 17. 675:Warry (1980), pp. 72-3 623:Night attack formation 552:breech-loading weapons 463: 404: 337: 253: 880:Keegan, John (1998). 790:Rogers (2007), p. 191 481:Enfilade and defilade 454: 394: 331: 258:close order formation 243: 651:Warry, John (1980). 594:Battle of the Sambre 572:Battle of Isandlwana 395:In close formation, 192:create a new article 184:improve this article 174:may not represent a 81:improve this article 933:Tactical formations 882:The First World War 824:Arnold (2001), p.71 764:Contamine, Philippe 423:Growth in firepower 358:Ancient Macedonians 276:, as the basis for 464: 405: 338: 303:(1861–1865), such 301:American Civil War 262:tactical formation 254: 912:English Civil War 724:978-0-313-33350-7 628:Phalanx formation 583:South African War 401:Battle of Dornach 350:phalanx formation 246:Stele of Vultures 238: 237: 230: 220: 219: 212: 194:, as appropriate. 157: 156: 149: 131: 54: 940: 896: 895: 877: 871: 870: 853:Pakenham, Thomas 849: 843: 840: 834: 831: 825: 822: 816: 815: 797: 791: 788: 782: 781: 760: 754: 753: 735: 729: 728: 711:Rogers, Clifford 707: 701: 700: 682: 676: 673: 667: 666: 648: 610:military parades 604:Military parades 473:Line (formation) 340:Images from the 286:Late Middle Ages 233: 226: 215: 208: 204: 201: 195: 167: 166: 159: 152: 145: 141: 138: 132: 130: 89: 65: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 948: 947: 943: 942: 941: 939: 938: 937: 918: 917: 904: 899: 892: 878: 874: 867: 850: 846: 841: 837: 832: 828: 823: 819: 812: 798: 794: 789: 785: 778: 761: 757: 750: 736: 732: 725: 708: 704: 697: 683: 679: 674: 670: 663: 649: 645: 641: 619: 606: 548: 535:infantry square 506:line formations 483: 477:infantry square 469: 435:countermarching 430: 425: 417:Battle of Morat 389: 326: 274:ancient warfare 234: 223: 222: 221: 216: 205: 199: 196: 181: 168: 164: 153: 142: 136: 133: 90: 88: 78: 66: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 946: 936: 935: 930: 916: 915: 903: 902:External links 900: 898: 897: 890: 872: 865: 844: 835: 826: 817: 810: 792: 783: 776: 755: 748: 730: 723: 702: 695: 677: 668: 661: 642: 640: 637: 636: 635: 630: 625: 618: 615: 605: 602: 598:Battle of Mons 568:Anglo-Zulu War 547: 544: 468: 465: 429: 426: 424: 421: 388: 385: 356:and later the 325: 322: 318:skirmish order 270:heavy infantry 260:is a military 236: 235: 218: 217: 178:of the subject 176:worldwide view 171: 169: 162: 155: 154: 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 945: 934: 931: 929: 926: 925: 923: 913: 909: 906: 905: 893: 891:0-09-180178-8 887: 883: 876: 868: 866:0-7474-0976-5 862: 858: 854: 848: 839: 830: 821: 813: 811:0-304-35270-5 807: 803: 796: 787: 779: 777:0-631-13142-6 773: 769: 765: 759: 751: 749:0-85045-334-8 745: 741: 734: 726: 720: 716: 712: 706: 698: 696:1-898281-10-6 692: 688: 681: 672: 664: 662:0-86101-034-5 658: 654: 647: 643: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 620: 614: 611: 601: 599: 595: 591: 586: 584: 580: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556:muzzleloaders 553: 543: 540: 536: 531: 529: 525: 521: 516: 511: 507: 503: 499: 496: 492: 489:weapons like 488: 482: 478: 474: 461: 457: 453: 449: 447: 443: 438: 436: 420: 418: 414: 410: 402: 398: 397:Swiss pikemen 393: 384: 382: 378: 374: 373:Roman legions 370: 365: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 335: 330: 321: 319: 314: 310: 306: 305:organizations 302: 297: 295: 291: 290:Swiss pikemen 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 251: 248:represents a 247: 242: 232: 229: 214: 211: 203: 193: 189: 185: 179: 177: 170: 161: 160: 151: 148: 140: 129: 126: 122: 119: 115: 112: 108: 105: 101: 98: –  97: 93: 92:Find sources: 86: 82: 76: 75: 70:This article 68: 64: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 881: 875: 857:The Boer War 856: 847: 838: 829: 820: 801: 795: 786: 767: 758: 739: 733: 714: 705: 686: 680: 671: 652: 646: 607: 587: 581:during the, 576: 549: 532: 484: 439: 431: 428:16th century 406: 366: 339: 298: 294:Landsknechts 257: 255: 224: 206: 197: 173: 143: 134: 124: 117: 110: 103: 91: 79:Please help 74:verification 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 560:Gatling gun 510:volley fire 500:fired by a 387:Middle Ages 299:Around the 292:and German 278:shield wall 137:August 2008 922:Categories 639:References 633:Shieldwall 570:after the 520:enfilading 491:arquebuses 471:See also: 409:shieldwall 107:newspapers 36:improve it 564:Maxim Gun 528:grapeshot 502:flintlock 487:matchlock 324:Antiquity 313:artillery 200:July 2016 188:talk page 42:talk page 855:(1991). 766:(1984). 713:(2007). 617:See also 592:and the 562:and the 539:standard 495:unrifled 456:Prussian 446:caracole 379:and the 342:Sumerian 334:hoplites 309:firearms 266:tactical 250:Sumerian 182:You may 546:Eclipse 524:cannons 498:muskets 462:, 1745. 442:reiters 403:, 1499. 381:gladius 369:sarissa 352:of the 282:phalanx 121:scholar 888:  863:  808:  774:  746:  721:  693:  659:  515:sniper 479:, and 413:Zürich 354:Greeks 346:spears 123:  116:  109:  102:  94:  377:pilum 362:aspis 190:, or 128:JSTOR 114:books 914:era. 886:ISBN 861:ISBN 806:ISBN 772:ISBN 744:ISBN 719:ISBN 691:ISBN 657:ISBN 311:and 280:and 100:news 272:in 83:by 924:: 475:, 288:, 256:A 45:. 894:. 869:. 814:. 780:. 752:. 727:. 699:. 665:. 231:) 225:( 213:) 207:( 202:) 198:( 180:. 150:) 144:( 139:) 135:( 125:· 118:· 111:· 104:· 77:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Close order formation"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message

Stele of Vultures
Sumerian
tactical formation
tactical
heavy infantry
ancient warfare
shield wall
phalanx
Late Middle Ages

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.