283:. One well known result that can seem hard to reconcile is that of a priest hearing a murder confession, but being unable to reveal details to the authorities. However, had it not been for the assumed confidentiality, it is unlikely that the information would have been shared in the first place, and to breach this trust would then discourage others from confiding with priests in the future. So, even if justice was served in that particular case (assuming the confession led to a correct conviction), it would result in fewer people taking part in what is generally considered a beneficial process. This could also be said of a patient sharing information with a psychiatrist, or a client seeking legal advice from a lawyer.
165:
403:
63:
22:
254:
The access to a client's data as provided by the institution in question is usually limited to law enforcement agencies and requires some legal procedures to be accomplished prior to such action (e.g.:
267:. In some cases the data is by definition inaccessible to third parties and should never be revealed; this can include confidential information gathered by
297:
175:
127:
99:
444:
80:
35:
106:
328:
113:
227:
209:
146:
49:
468:
247:
to a third party without the consent of the client or a clear legal reason. This concept, sometimes referred to as
95:
84:
463:
437:
187:
41:
120:
191:
73:
418:
183:
430:
243:
is the principle that an institution or individual should not reveal information about their
292:
8:
379:
371:
324:
244:
363:
414:
264:
457:
375:
318:
276:
272:
260:
256:
383:
351:
402:
367:
62:
280:
268:
251:, is outlined in numerous laws throughout many countries.
410:
320:
Obfuscation: A User's Guide for
Privacy and Protest
298:
Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
87:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
316:
455:
317:Brunton, Finn; Nissenbaum, Helen (2015-09-04).
438:
172:The examples and perspective in this article
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
445:
431:
228:Learn how and when to remove this message
210:Learn how and when to remove this message
147:Learn how and when to remove this message
349:
456:
397:
356:The University of Chicago Law Review
158:
85:adding citations to reliable sources
56:
15:
13:
14:
480:
249:social systems of confidentiality
31:This article has multiple issues.
401:
163:
61:
20:
259:issued, etc.). This applies to
72:needs additional citations for
39:or discuss these issues on the
343:
310:
1:
352:"Lawyers and Confidentiality"
323:. The MIT Press. p. 46.
303:
417:. You can help Knowledge by
7:
350:Fischel, Daniel R. (1998).
286:
186:, discuss the issue on the
10:
485:
396:
96:"Client confidentiality"
469:Legal terminology stubs
241:Client confidentiality
293:Privilege (evidence)
192:create a new article
184:improve this article
174:may not represent a
81:improve this article
464:Information privacy
426:
425:
330:978-0-262-02973-5
238:
237:
230:
220:
219:
212:
194:, as appropriate.
157:
156:
149:
131:
54:
476:
447:
440:
433:
405:
398:
388:
387:
347:
341:
340:
338:
337:
314:
233:
226:
215:
208:
204:
201:
195:
167:
166:
159:
152:
145:
141:
138:
132:
130:
89:
65:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
484:
483:
479:
478:
477:
475:
474:
473:
454:
453:
452:
451:
394:
392:
391:
368:10.2307/1600183
348:
344:
335:
333:
331:
315:
311:
306:
289:
263:information or
234:
223:
222:
221:
216:
205:
199:
196:
181:
168:
164:
153:
142:
136:
133:
90:
88:
78:
66:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
482:
472:
471:
466:
450:
449:
442:
435:
427:
424:
423:
406:
390:
389:
342:
329:
308:
307:
305:
302:
301:
300:
295:
288:
285:
265:medical record
236:
235:
218:
217:
178:of the subject
176:worldwide view
171:
169:
162:
155:
154:
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
481:
470:
467:
465:
462:
461:
459:
448:
443:
441:
436:
434:
429:
428:
422:
420:
416:
413:article is a
412:
407:
404:
400:
399:
395:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
346:
332:
326:
322:
321:
313:
309:
299:
296:
294:
291:
290:
284:
282:
278:
277:psychologists
274:
273:psychiatrists
270:
266:
262:
258:
252:
250:
246:
242:
232:
229:
214:
211:
203:
200:December 2010
193:
189:
185:
179:
177:
170:
161:
160:
151:
148:
140:
129:
126:
122:
119:
115:
112:
108:
105:
101:
98: –
97:
93:
92:Find sources:
86:
82:
76:
75:
70:This article
68:
64:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
419:expanding it
408:
393:
359:
355:
345:
334:. Retrieved
319:
312:
261:bank account
253:
248:
240:
239:
224:
206:
197:
173:
143:
134:
124:
117:
110:
103:
91:
79:Please help
74:verification
71:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
362:(1): 1–33.
257:court order
137:August 2007
458:Categories
411:legal term
336:2019-12-14
304:References
107:newspapers
36:improve it
376:0041-9494
269:attorneys
188:talk page
42:talk page
287:See also
182:You may
384:1600183
281:priests
245:clients
121:scholar
382:
374:
327:
123:
116:
109:
102:
94:
409:This
380:JSTOR
279:, or
190:, or
128:JSTOR
114:books
415:stub
372:ISSN
325:ISBN
100:news
364:doi
83:by
460::
378:.
370:.
360:65
358:.
354:.
275:,
271:,
45:.
446:e
439:t
432:v
421:.
386:.
366::
339:.
231:)
225:(
213:)
207:(
202:)
198:(
180:.
150:)
144:(
139:)
135:(
125:·
118:·
111:·
104:·
77:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
