Knowledge

China Film Giant Screen

Source 📝

78:
competing businesses. Despite a court injunction it was noted that Gary Tsui had ignored the court orders, and his businesses had evolved into a venture known as DMAX, later to change its name to CFGS. In 2014 IMAX won a court victory in Canada upholding that Tsui had stolen the technology to build up his competing company. IMAX hoped that the Canadian court victory would allow successful legal action in China. IMAX and CFGS's lawsuit finally reached a settlement, and IMAX canceled the lawsuit against the defendant(Gary Tsui).
77:
IMAX sued CFGS and related companies for theft of intellectual property; this court action was heard on 18 June 2014. IMAX alleged that Gary Tsui (Chinese name: Cui Xiaoyu, 崔晓宇), a former employee that worked for IMAX from 1999-2009, stole confidential information on proprietary technology and set up
62:. It was created in an attempt to challenge the IMAX film format that dominated the premium large format movie market until that point. The aim was to lower costs and to allow the development of Chinese film projection technology using indigenous Chinese technology and 55: 269: 273: 329: 144: 243: 197: 121: 309: 170: 97: 59: 43: 294: 314: 34:, with the name also referring to the film technology. It has been described as a competitor to 63: 24: 310:
Ontario Superior Court of Justice document summarising IMAX court action against Gary Tsui
8: 148: 220: 177:. Ontario Superior Court of Justice/Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2014-07-03 87: 35: 323: 27: 270:"IMAX wins $ 7-million victory against ex-employee who stole technology" 295:
http://n.iphouse.cn/cases/list.html?litigantid=68744&anyouid=121
315:
PDF scan of United States District Court lawsuit against Gary Tsui
244:"RoboCop 3D and the Battle over Bigger Big Screens in China" 171:"IMAX Corp. v. Trotum Systems Inc., 2014 ONSC 3863 (CanLII)" 92: 39: 56:
China Research Institute of Film Science & Technology
198:"Imax Sues Movie Theater Tech Co. Over Trade Secrets" 321: 263: 261: 69:The format was put into commercial use in 2012. 54:The CFGS format was apparently developed by the 258: 30:company. The company was previously known as 221:"IMAX Says Trade Secrets Ended Up in China" 145:"Makers of DMAX Aim to Break IMAX Monopoly" 136: 115: 113: 195: 241: 235: 322: 142: 119: 110: 267: 218: 189: 163: 175:Canadian Legal Information Institute 13: 330:Premium large format movie formats 212: 120:Coonan, Clifford (13 April 2012). 14: 341: 303: 272:. Canadian Lawyer. Archived from 242:Quigley, J.T. (3 February 2014). 169: 196:Prochilo, Dan (13 August 2013). 147:. CRIENGLISH.com. Archived from 122:"China bows own version of Imax" 219:Kearn, Rebekah (28 June 2013). 288: 1: 268:Kauth, Glenn (14 July 2014). 103: 98:China Film Group Corporation 60:China Film Group Corporation 44:China Film Group Corporation 7: 81: 10: 346: 72: 49: 42:. The company is owned by 223:. Courthouse News Service 143:Yihang (9 April 2012). 17:China Film Giant Screen 64:intellectual property 151:on April 17, 2012 337: 297: 292: 286: 285: 283: 281: 265: 256: 255: 253: 251: 239: 233: 232: 230: 228: 216: 210: 209: 207: 205: 193: 187: 186: 184: 182: 167: 161: 160: 158: 156: 140: 134: 133: 131: 129: 117: 93:IMAX film format 88:IMAX Corporation 40:IMAX film format 36:IMAX Corporation 345: 344: 340: 339: 338: 336: 335: 334: 320: 319: 306: 301: 300: 293: 289: 279: 277: 276:on 4 March 2016 266: 259: 249: 247: 240: 236: 226: 224: 217: 213: 203: 201: 194: 190: 180: 178: 168: 164: 154: 152: 141: 137: 127: 125: 118: 111: 106: 84: 75: 52: 23:) is a Chinese 12: 11: 5: 343: 333: 332: 318: 317: 312: 305: 304:External links 302: 299: 298: 287: 257: 246:. The Diplomat 234: 211: 188: 162: 135: 108: 107: 105: 102: 101: 100: 95: 90: 83: 80: 74: 71: 51: 48: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 342: 331: 328: 327: 325: 316: 313: 311: 308: 307: 296: 291: 275: 271: 264: 262: 245: 238: 222: 215: 199: 192: 176: 172: 166: 150: 146: 139: 123: 116: 114: 109: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 79: 70: 67: 65: 61: 57: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 26: 25:premium large 22: 18: 290: 278:. Retrieved 274:the original 248:. Retrieved 237: 225:. Retrieved 214: 202:. Retrieved 191: 179:. Retrieved 174: 165: 153:. Retrieved 149:the original 138: 126:. Retrieved 76: 68: 53: 31: 20: 16: 15: 280:13 December 250:12 December 227:12 December 204:12 December 181:13 December 28:film format 104:References 124:. Variety 324:Category 200:. Law360 155:15 April 128:15 April 82:See also 58:and the 38:and its 73:Lawsuit 50:History 282:2015 252:2015 229:2015 206:2015 183:2015 157:2012 130:2012 32:DMAX 21:CFGS 326:: 260:^ 173:. 112:^ 66:. 46:. 284:. 254:. 231:. 208:. 185:. 159:. 132:. 19:(

Index

premium large
film format
IMAX Corporation
IMAX film format
China Film Group Corporation
China Research Institute of Film Science & Technology
China Film Group Corporation
intellectual property
IMAX Corporation
IMAX film format
China Film Group Corporation


"China bows own version of Imax"
"Makers of DMAX Aim to Break IMAX Monopoly"
the original
"IMAX Corp. v. Trotum Systems Inc., 2014 ONSC 3863 (CanLII)"
"Imax Sues Movie Theater Tech Co. Over Trade Secrets"
"IMAX Says Trade Secrets Ended Up in China"
"RoboCop 3D and the Battle over Bigger Big Screens in China"


"IMAX wins $ 7-million victory against ex-employee who stole technology"
the original
http://n.iphouse.cn/cases/list.html?litigantid=68744&anyouid=121
Ontario Superior Court of Justice document summarising IMAX court action against Gary Tsui
PDF scan of United States District Court lawsuit against Gary Tsui
Category
Premium large format movie formats

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.