342:. During the mid-1980s, both the Cabazon and Morongo Bands each owned and operated on their reservation lands small bingo parlors. In addition, the Cabazon Band operated a card club for playing poker and other card games. Both the bingo parlors and the Cabazon card club were open to the public and frequented predominantly by non-Indians visiting the reservations. In 1986, California State officials sought to shut down the Cabazon and Morongo Band's games, arguing that the high-stakes bingo and poker games violated state regulations. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court before a decision was rendered on February 25, 1987.
96:
355:(1953) Congress had granted six states – Alaska, California, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oregon, and Wisconsin – criminal jurisdiction over Native American tribal lands within the state's borders. If California's regulatory laws prohibited gambling on a criminal basis, then it is likely Public Law 280 would have given the State of California the authority to enforce them on tribal lands. However, as the Cabazon Band argued, California's laws on gambling were civil regulatory laws, and therefore the tribal lands would not in fact fall under the lawful jurisdiction of the state.
35:
386:(NIGC) was formed and Indian gaming was divided into 3 classes: Class I, Class II, and Class III. Class I encompasses charitable and social gaming with nominal prizes; Class II includes bingo and other punch-board/pull-tab style games; and Class III includes high-stakes bingo, casinos, slot machines, and other commercial gaming.
390:
sales, hotel accommodations and other services. After expenses, this amounted to $ 1.9 billion in net income, $ 1.6 billion of which went straight to the tribes on which the casinos were operating. As of 2007, the tribal gaming industry had become a $ 25 billion industry generated by over 350 tribal casinos in 28 states.
389:
As of 1996, there were 184 tribes operating 281 gaming facilities. These facilities were spread across a total of 24 states, 14 of which have physical casinos on Indian reservations. In 1995, Class III gaming revenues totaled over $ 4.5 billion, with an additional $ 300 million in revenues from food
365:
had lasting implications regarding the sovereignty of Native
American tribes in the United States. The ruling established a broader definition of tribal sovereignty and set the precedent that if the few states that with some lawful jurisdiction over tribal lands could not impose state regulations on
358:
The
Supreme Court held, as the Cabazon band argued, that because California state law did not prohibit gambling as a criminal act – and in fact encouraged it via the state lottery – they must be deemed regulatory in nature. As such, the authority to regulate gaming activities on tribal lands was
350:
The State of
California contended that the Bands’ high-stakes bingo and poker games violated state law and requested that the Court recognize its statute governing the operation of bingo games. Riverside County additionally sought legal recognition of its ordinances regulating bingo play and
377:
coincided with a period of rapid growth in the reservation gambling industry. What just years before had been a modest and relatively isolated phenomenon of reservation bingo and card games saw steady growth following the
Supreme Court decision. Congress responded by passing the
182:
Indian reservations may not engage in a form of gaming when that form is illegal in the state; conversely, Indian reservations may engage in a form of gaming when that form is legal in the state.
662:
414:
366:
reservation gaming, then no state could have such a right. Indian gaming could thus only be called into question in states where gambling was deemed criminal by state law.
657:
382:(IGRA) in 1988, which expanded the kinds of games that tribal casinos could offer, and provided a framework for regulating the industry. As part of the act, the
637:
576:
399:
137:
409:
677:
632:
17:
404:
335:
642:
652:
100:
52:
492:
456:
383:
70:
331:
667:
318:. The Supreme Court's decision effectively overturned the existing laws restricting gaming/gambling on U.S.
605:
379:
339:
296:
165:
647:
311:
45:
587:
474:
315:
241:
205:
528:
510:
580:
129:
8:
229:
338:
are two small
Cahuilla Indian tribes that occupy reservation lands near Palm Springs in
596:
319:
547:
435:
351:
prohibiting the operation of poker and other card games. California argued that under
672:
237:
217:
197:
132:
352:
249:
225:
626:
481:. Office of Justice Programs: National Institute of Justice. April 27, 2023.
614:
213:
144:
169:
359:
found to fall outside those powers granted by the Public Law 280.
415:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
266:
White, joined by
Rehnquist, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell
95:
119:
California, et al. v. Cabazon band of
Mission Indians, et al.
162:
663:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
400:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 480
410:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
369:
555:Opening the Door to Indian Gaming – 20 Years Later
443:Opening the Door to Indian Gaming – 20 Years Later
624:
658:Abrogated United States Supreme Court decisions
493:"California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians"
457:"California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians"
573:California v. Cabazon Tribe of Mission Indians
638:United States Native American gaming case law
307:California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
89:California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
533:National Gambling Impact Study Commission
515:National Gambling Impact Study Commission
405:List of United States Supreme Court cases
71:Learn how and when to remove this message
345:
14:
625:
678:Native American history of California
83:1987 United States Supreme Court case
284:18 U.S.C. § 1151; 28 U.S.C.S. § 1162
28:
274:Stevens, joined by O'Connor, Scalia
24:
314:case involving the development of
101:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
689:
633:United States Supreme Court cases
583:202 (1987) is available from:
565:
545:
433:
384:National Indian Gaming Commission
370:Effect on Native American gaming
336:Morongo Bands of Mission Indians
94:
33:
643:1987 in United States case law
539:
521:
503:
485:
467:
449:
427:
42:This article needs editing to
13:
1:
420:
325:
310:, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), was a
172:1986) (affirmed and remanded)
380:Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
340:Riverside County, California
297:Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
7:
653:Legal history of California
393:
312:United States Supreme Court
10:
694:
615:Oyez (oral argument audio)
475:"Tribal Crime and Justice"
18:California v. Cabazon Band
295:
288:
283:
278:
270:
262:
257:
191:
186:
181:
176:
157:
152:
124:
114:
110:Decided February 25, 1987
107:
93:
88:
529:"Native American Gaming"
511:"Native American Gaming"
44:comply with Knowledge's
108:Argued December 9, 1986
548:"The Cabazon Decision"
546:Light, Steven Andrew.
436:"The Cabazon Decision"
434:Light, Steven Andrew.
316:Native American gaming
206:William J. Brennan Jr.
668:Casinos in California
147:244; 55 U.S.L.W. 4225
346:Arguments and ruling
143:107 S. Ct. 1083; 94
606:Library of Congress
497:480 U.S. 202 (1987)
461:480 U.S. 202 (1987)
320:Indian reservations
242:Sandra Day O'Connor
230:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
53:improve the content
648:1987 in California
202:Associate Justices
303:
302:
218:Thurgood Marshall
198:William Rehnquist
81:
80:
73:
16:(Redirected from
685:
619:
613:
610:
604:
601:
595:
592:
586:
559:
558:
552:
543:
537:
536:
525:
519:
518:
507:
501:
500:
489:
483:
482:
471:
465:
464:
453:
447:
446:
440:
431:
187:Court membership
98:
97:
86:
85:
76:
69:
65:
62:
56:
37:
36:
29:
21:
693:
692:
688:
687:
686:
684:
683:
682:
623:
622:
617:
611:
608:
602:
599:
593:
590:
584:
568:
563:
562:
550:
544:
540:
527:
526:
522:
509:
508:
504:
491:
490:
486:
473:
472:
468:
455:
454:
450:
438:
432:
428:
423:
396:
372:
348:
328:
291:
240:
238:John P. Stevens
228:
216:
148:
109:
103:
84:
77:
66:
60:
57:
50:
46:Manual of Style
38:
34:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
691:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
621:
620:
588:Google Scholar
567:
566:External links
564:
561:
560:
538:
520:
502:
484:
479:Public Law 280
466:
448:
425:
424:
422:
419:
418:
417:
412:
407:
402:
395:
392:
371:
368:
353:Public Law 280
347:
344:
327:
324:
301:
300:
293:
292:
289:
286:
285:
281:
280:
276:
275:
272:
268:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
250:Antonin Scalia
226:Harry Blackmun
203:
200:
195:
189:
188:
184:
183:
179:
178:
174:
173:
159:
155:
154:
150:
149:
142:
126:
122:
121:
116:
115:Full case name
112:
111:
105:
104:
99:
91:
90:
82:
79:
78:
41:
39:
32:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
690:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
630:
628:
616:
607:
598:
589:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
556:
549:
542:
534:
530:
524:
516:
512:
506:
498:
494:
488:
480:
476:
470:
462:
458:
452:
444:
437:
430:
426:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
397:
391:
387:
385:
381:
376:
367:
364:
360:
356:
354:
343:
341:
337:
333:
323:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
298:
294:
290:Superseded by
287:
282:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
258:Case opinions
256:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:Chief Justice
193:
192:
190:
185:
180:
175:
171:
167:
164:
160:
156:
151:
146:
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
123:
120:
117:
113:
106:
102:
92:
87:
75:
72:
64:
61:December 2015
54:
49:
47:
40:
31:
30:
27:
19:
572:
554:
541:
532:
523:
514:
505:
496:
487:
478:
469:
460:
451:
442:
429:
388:
374:
373:
362:
361:
357:
349:
329:
306:
305:
304:
279:Laws applied
245:
233:
221:
209:
153:Case history
136:
118:
67:
58:
51:Please help
43:
26:
214:Byron White
627:Categories
421:References
326:Background
145:L. Ed. 2d
125:Citations
673:Cahuilla
571:Text of
394:See also
263:Majority
170:9th Cir.
375:Cabazon
363:Cabazon
332:Cabazon
271:Dissent
177:Holding
618:
612:
609:
603:
600:
597:Justia
594:
591:
585:
299:(1988)
248:
246:·
244:
236:
234:·
232:
224:
222:·
220:
212:
210:·
208:
579:
551:(PDF)
439:(PDF)
158:Prior
581:U.S.
334:and
330:The
163:F.2d
161:783
138:more
130:U.S.
128:480
577:480
166:900
133:202
629::
575:,
553:.
531:.
513:.
495:.
477:.
459:.
441:.
322:.
557:.
535:.
517:.
499:.
463:.
445:.
168:(
141:)
135:(
74:)
68:(
63:)
59:(
55:.
48:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.