Knowledge

Bulbous bow

Source 📝

189: 20: 106: 437:. A ship designer can compare the length at the water line for a design with and without a bulb necessary to power the vessel at its operating speed. The higher the speed, the bigger the benefit of the bulbous bow in diminishing the necessity for a longer water line to achieve the same power requirement. Bulbs typically are v-shaped on the bottom to minimise slamming in rough seas. 394:
definitively studied by Thomas Havelock, Cyril Wigley and Georg Weinblum, including Wigley's 1936 work "The Theory of the Bulbous Bow and its Practical Application" which examined the issues of wave production and damping. Inui's initial scientific papers on the effect of bulbous bow on wave-making resistance were collected into a report published by the
159:
deal of its time at a slow speed, the increase in drag will not be offset by the benefit in damping bow wave generation. As the wave counter effects are only significant at the vessel's higher range of speed, bulbous bows are not energy efficient when the vessel cruises outside of these ranges, specifically at lower speeds.
158:
The addition of a bulb to a ship's hull increases its overall wetted area. As wetted area increases, so does drag. At greater speeds and in larger vessels it is the bow wave that is the greatest force impeding the vessel's forward motion through the water. For a vessel that is small or spends a great
393:
during the 1950s and 1960s, independently of Japanese naval research. Inui based his research on earlier findings by scientists made after Taylor discovered that ships fitted with a bulbous forefoot exhibited substantially lower drag characteristics than predicted. The bulbous bow concept was first
55:, and stability. Large ships with bulbous bows generally have twelve to fifteen percent better fuel efficiency than similar vessels without them. A bulbous bow also increases the buoyancy of the forward part and hence reduces the pitching of the ship to a small degree. 147:. While inducing another wave stream saps energy from the ship, cancelling out the second wave stream at the bow changes the pressure distribution along the hull, thereby reducing wave resistance. The effect that pressure distribution has on a surface is known as the 154:
A sharp bow on a conventional hull form would produce waves and low drag like a bulbous bow, but waves coming from the side would strike it harder. The blunt bulbous bow also produces higher pressure in a large region in front, making the bow wave start earlier.
402:
in 1962. It was eventually found that drag could be reduced by about five per cent. Experimentation and refinement slowly improved the geometry of bulbous bows, but they were not widely exploited until computer modelling techniques enabled researchers at the
432:
While the primary purpose of such bulbs is to reduce the power required to drive a vessel at its operating speed, their sea-keeping characteristics are also important. A ship's wave-making characteristics at its operating speed are reflected in its
143:. A bulb alone forces the water to flow up and over it forming a trough. Thus, if a bulb is added to a conventional bow at the proper position, the bulb trough coincides with the crest of the bow wave, and the two cancel out, reducing the vessel's 519: 62:, which is proportional to mass and the square of the velocity, benefit from having a bulbous bow that is designed for their operating speed; this includes vessels with high mass (e.g. 162:
Bulbous bows may be configured differently, according to the designed interaction between the bow wave and the countering wave from the bulb. Design parameters include:
109:
The combined influence of a subsurface bulb and a conventional bow on wave formation where the wave created by the bulb cancels that created by the conventional bow
729:
Seventeenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics: Wakes, Free Surface Effects, Boundary Layers and Viscous Flows, Two-phase Flow, Propeller/appendage/hull Interaction
23:
A "ram" bulbous bow curves upwards from the bottom, and has a "knuckle" if the top is higher than the juncture with the hull—the through-tunnels in the side are
399: 306:
combining a bulbous forefoot with massive size and a redesigned hull shape. She was able to achieve speeds in excess of 30 knots (56 km/h).
293:
passenger liners launched in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Still, the idea was viewed as experimental by many shipbuilders and owners.
816: 474: 727: 879: 839: 767: 644: 345: 180:, when they are ballasted, by increasing the mass at a distance removed from the ship's longitudinal centre of gravity. 351: 800: 703: 654: 376: 226:, which entered service in 1910. The bow design did not initially enjoy wide acceptance, although it was used in the 591: 398:
in 1960. His work came to widespread attention with his paper "Wavemaking Resistance of Ships" published by the
902: 404: 912: 726:
Grosenbaugh, M.A.; Yeung, R.W. (1989), "Non-linear bow flows—An experimental and theoretical investigation",
227: 323:, achieved equivalent speeds using traditional stem and hull design. However, a crucial difference was that 89:
Bulbous bows have been found to be most effective when used on vessels that meet the following conditions:
370: 364: 86:
that occur in those cases; examples include tugboats, powerboats, sailing vessels, and small yachts.
339: 310:
was famous for many things, including her clean entry into the water and markedly reduced bow wave.
693: 133: 616: 907: 357: 237: 434: 561: 536: 465:
In marine hydrodynamic applications, the Froude number is usually referenced with the notation
395: 338:. A modest bulbous bow was used in a number of their ship designs, including the light cruiser 335: 188: 917: 759: 356:. A far more radical bulbous bow design solution was incorporated into their massively large 289: 83: 863: 220: 193: 8: 390: 283: 207:
reduced resistance through the water before 1900. The bulbous bow concept is credited to
303: 212: 75: 875: 796: 773: 763: 733: 699: 650: 256:. They were referred to as Germany's North Atlantic greyhounds, two large commercial 44: 105: 19: 251: 245: 241: 846: 260:
that competed for the trans-Atlantic passenger trade. Both ships won the coveted
818:
Uncle Sam Enters The Atlantic Race (article on the new construction in the 1930s)
268:
in 1929 with a crossing speed of 27.9 knots (51.7 km/h; 32.1 mph), and
216: 208: 177: 52: 327:
achieved these speeds with approximately thirty per cent less engine power than
166:
a) upward curvature (a "ram" bulb) versus straight forward (a "faired-in" bulb),
557: 318: 144: 67: 59: 48: 896: 737: 233: 777: 446: 244:. This lack of acceptance changed in the 1920s, with Germany's launching of 219:
and who used the concept (known as a bulbous forefoot) in his design of the
297: 24: 275:
The design began to be incorporated elsewhere, as seen in the U.S. built
261: 257: 79: 63: 199:
is visible on the left, while the vessel was under construction in 1925.
71: 36: 236:
to great success after the two ships of that class which survived the
871: 755: 277: 204: 148: 40: 132:
The effect of the bulbous bow can be explained using the concept of
793:
Record breakers of the North Atlantic, Blue Riband Liners 1838-1952
140: 407:
to increase their performance to a practical level in the 1980s.
93:
The waterline length is longer than about 15 metres (49 ft).
43:. The flare or bulb modifies the way the water flows around the 732:, Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research, pp. 195–214, 389:
The modern bulbous bow was developed by Dr. Takao Inui at the
96:
The bulb design is optimised for the vessel's operating speed.
272:
surpassing her in 1930 with a crossing speed of 27.91 knots.
203:
Towing tests of warships had demonstrated that a below-water
415:
Bulbous bows embody the following defining characteristics:
672:
The Theory of the Bulbous Bow and its Practical Application
211:, a naval architect who served as Chief Constructor of the 82:) have a reduced benefit from bulbous bows, because of the 514:{\displaystyle \mathrm {Fn} _{L}={\frac {u}{\sqrt {gL}}}} 556:
It is an important parameter with respect to the ship's
529:
is the relative flow velocity between the sea and ship,
334:
Bulbous bow designs were also developed and used by the
78:) and those that operate at slower speeds (less than 12 545:
is the length of the ship at the water line level, or
428:
Position of the shape's axis (e.g. forward or upwards)
477: 169:
b) bulb position with respect to the waterline, and
35:is a streamlined flaring or protruding bulb at the 691: 513: 646:Ship Design and Performance for Masters and Mates 894: 725: 614: 592:"What's The Importance Of Bulbous Bow Of Ships?" 400:Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 752:U.S. Battleships: An Illustrated Design History 692:Bertram, Volker; Schneekluth, H. (1998-10-15). 589: 331:and a corresponding reduction in fuel use. 721: 719: 717: 715: 74:). Vessels of lower mass (less than 4,000 749: 560:, or resistance, especially in terms of 410: 187: 104: 18: 712: 642: 590:Chakraborty, Soumya (October 9, 2017). 125:Waterline and region of cancelled waves 100: 895: 862: 790: 695:Ship Design for Efficiency and Economy 669: 16:Protruding bulb at the front of a ship 784: 384: 139:A conventionally shaped bow causes a 687: 685: 683: 681: 638: 636: 585: 583: 581: 176:Bulbous bows also decrease a ship's 39:(or front) of a ship just below the 13: 821:. Popular Mechanics. February 1931 483: 480: 51:and thus increasing speed, range, 14: 929: 678: 633: 578: 317:s great rival, the British liner 122:Wave created by conventional bow 66:) or a high service speed (e.g. 856: 832: 615:Bray, Patrick J. (April 2005). 459: 192:The flaring bulbous bow of the 809: 743: 663: 608: 405:University of British Columbia 296:In 1935 the French superliner 183: 1: 828:– via books.google.com. 643:Barrass, Bryan (2004-07-09). 571: 870:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: 425:Length of forward projection 7: 537:acceleration due to gravity 440: 116:Profile of bow without bulb 10: 934: 750:Friedman, Norman (1985). 447:Axe bow § LEADGE-bow 375:and the aircraft carrier 452: 134:destructive interference 113:Profile of bow with bulb 791:Kludas, Arnold (2000). 670:Wigley, W.C.S. (1936). 363:battleships, including 238:Washington Naval Treaty 674:. Newcastle upon Tyne. 562:wave making resistance 515: 396:University of Michigan 336:Imperial Japanese Navy 200: 129: 28: 903:Watercraft components 864:Newman, John Nicholas 760:Naval Institute Press 535:is in particular the 516: 411:Design considerations 290:SS President Coolidge 191: 108: 22: 913:Nautical terminology 868:Marine hydrodynamics 554:in some notations. 475: 119:Wave created by bulb 101:Underlying principle 795:. London: Chatham. 469:and is defined as: 391:University of Tokyo 284:SS President Hoover 511: 385:Modern bulbous bow 344:and the carriers 304:Vladimir Yurkevich 240:were converted to 213:United States Navy 201: 130: 58:Vessels with high 29: 881:978-0-262-14026-3 769:978-0-87021-715-9 621:www.dieselduck.ca 509: 508: 419:Length-wise shape 242:aircraft carriers 925: 887: 885: 860: 854: 853: 851: 845:. Archived from 844: 836: 830: 829: 827: 826: 813: 807: 806: 788: 782: 781: 747: 741: 740: 723: 710: 709: 689: 676: 675: 667: 661: 660: 640: 631: 630: 628: 627: 612: 606: 605: 603: 602: 587: 565: 553: 544: 534: 528: 520: 518: 517: 512: 510: 501: 497: 492: 491: 486: 468: 463: 316: 302:was designed by 933: 932: 928: 927: 926: 924: 923: 922: 893: 892: 891: 890: 882: 861: 857: 849: 842: 840:"Yamato Museum" 838: 837: 833: 824: 822: 815: 814: 810: 803: 789: 785: 770: 762:. p. 235. 748: 744: 724: 713: 706: 690: 679: 668: 664: 657: 641: 634: 625: 623: 613: 609: 600: 598: 588: 579: 574: 569: 568: 555: 552: 546: 540: 530: 524: 496: 487: 479: 478: 476: 473: 472: 466: 464: 460: 455: 443: 413: 387: 314: 217:First World War 209:David W. Taylor 186: 178:pitching motion 172:c) bulb volume. 128: 103: 68:passenger ships 53:fuel efficiency 17: 12: 11: 5: 931: 921: 920: 915: 910: 908:Fluid dynamics 905: 889: 888: 880: 855: 852:on 2011-06-27. 831: 808: 801: 783: 768: 742: 711: 704: 677: 662: 655: 632: 617:"Bulbous bows" 607: 596:Marine Insight 576: 575: 573: 570: 567: 566: 550: 522: 521: 507: 504: 500: 495: 490: 485: 482: 457: 456: 454: 451: 450: 449: 442: 439: 430: 429: 426: 423: 420: 412: 409: 386: 383: 185: 182: 174: 173: 170: 167: 127: 126: 123: 120: 117: 114: 110: 102: 99: 98: 97: 94: 60:kinetic energy 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 930: 919: 916: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 900: 898: 883: 877: 873: 869: 865: 859: 848: 841: 835: 820: 819: 812: 804: 802:1-86176-141-4 798: 794: 787: 779: 775: 771: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 739: 735: 731: 730: 722: 720: 718: 716: 707: 705:9780080517100 701: 697: 696: 688: 686: 684: 682: 673: 666: 658: 656:9780080454948 652: 648: 647: 639: 637: 622: 618: 611: 597: 593: 586: 584: 582: 577: 563: 559: 549: 543: 538: 533: 527: 505: 502: 498: 493: 488: 471: 470: 462: 458: 448: 445: 444: 438: 436: 435:Froude number 427: 424: 422:Cross-section 421: 418: 417: 416: 408: 406: 401: 397: 392: 382: 380: 379: 374: 373: 368: 367: 362: 360: 355: 354: 349: 348: 343: 342: 337: 332: 330: 326: 322: 321: 313: 309: 305: 301: 300: 294: 292: 291: 286: 285: 280: 279: 273: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 249: 248: 243: 239: 235: 234:battlecruiser 232: 230: 225: 224: 218: 214: 210: 206: 198: 197: 190: 181: 179: 171: 168: 165: 164: 163: 160: 156: 152: 150: 146: 142: 137: 135: 124: 121: 118: 115: 112: 111: 107: 95: 92: 91: 90: 87: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 26: 25:bow thrusters 21: 918:Interference 867: 858: 847:the original 834: 823:. Retrieved 817: 811: 792: 786: 758:, Maryland: 751: 745: 728: 698:. Elsevier. 694: 671: 665: 649:. Elsevier. 645: 624:. Retrieved 620: 610: 599:. Retrieved 595: 547: 541: 531: 525: 461: 431: 414: 388: 377: 371: 365: 358: 352: 346: 340: 333: 328: 324: 319: 311: 307: 298: 295: 288: 282: 276: 274: 269: 265: 258:ocean liners 252: 246: 228: 222: 202: 195: 175: 161: 157: 153: 138: 131: 88: 64:supertankers 57: 32: 30: 262:Blue Riband 215:during the 184:Development 149:form effect 72:cargo ships 47:, reducing 33:bulbous bow 897:Categories 825:2023-12-09 626:2023-12-09 601:2019-03-17 572:References 329:Queen Mary 320:Queen Mary 136:of waves: 872:MIT Press 756:Annapolis 738:0082-0849 325:Normandie 312:Normandie 308:Normandie 299:Normandie 278:SS Malolo 229:Lexington 221:USS  205:ram shape 196:Lexington 41:waterline 886:, p. 28. 866:(1977). 778:12214729 441:See also 223:Delaware 141:bow wave 378:Shinano 372:Musashi 347:Shōkaku 878:  799:  776:  766:  736:  702:  653:  539:, and 523:where 366:Yamato 361:-class 359:Yamato 270:Europa 266:Bremen 253:Europa 247:Bremen 231:-class 84:eddies 70:, and 850:(PDF) 843:(PDF) 453:Notes 353:Taihō 341:Ōyodo 315:' 876:ISBN 797:ISBN 774:OCLC 764:ISBN 734:ISSN 700:ISBN 651:ISBN 558:drag 350:and 287:and 250:and 194:USS 145:wake 49:drag 45:hull 80:kts 76:dwt 37:bow 899:: 874:. 772:. 754:. 714:^ 680:^ 635:^ 619:. 594:. 580:^ 551:wl 467:Fn 381:. 369:, 281:, 264:, 151:. 31:A 884:. 805:. 780:. 708:. 659:. 629:. 604:. 564:. 548:L 542:L 532:g 526:u 506:L 503:g 499:u 494:= 489:L 484:n 481:F 27:.

Index


bow thrusters
bow
waterline
hull
drag
fuel efficiency
kinetic energy
supertankers
passenger ships
cargo ships
dwt
kts
eddies

destructive interference
bow wave
wake
form effect
pitching motion

USS Lexington
ram shape
David W. Taylor
United States Navy
First World War
USS Delaware
Lexington-class
battlecruiser
Washington Naval Treaty

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑