991:
contract. This is based on objective intentions i.e. the repudiating party's words or conduct.; This unwillingness or inability to perform a condition must deprive the aggrieved party of substantially the whole of the benefit that they would have received if the remaining obligations were performed under the contract. When such an event occurs, the performing party to the contract is excused from having to fulfill his or her obligations. However, the repudiation can be retracted by the promising party so long as there has been no material change in the position of the performing party in the interim. A retraction of the repudiation restores the performer's obligation to perform on the contract.
168:
255:
66:
1026:
anticipatory repudiation can occur is where a party has reason to believe the other party is not going to perform and requests reasonable assurances that the other party will perform (see UCC 2-609(1)). If such reasonable assurances are not given, it will constitute anticipatory repudiation, for which the performing party has various remedies, including termination. However, anticipatory repudiation only applies to a bilateral
1044:
25:
1125:(1) If an action based on anticipatory repudiation comes to 2-723 trial before the time for performance with respect to some or all of the goods, any damages based on market price (Section UCC 2-708 or Section UCC 2-713) shall be determined according to the price of such goods prevailing at the time when the aggrieved party learned of the repudiation.
1014:, a car seller's conduct went beyond mere assertion of such an opinion, and in demanding more money for a sale than the agreed price, and in forcing the intending buyer into loss of his deposit, the conduct was held to be repudiatory. This was the case even though the demand for a higher price was made
1108:
According to UCC 2-713(1), damages are to be measured at the time when the buyer learned of the breach. This is easy with a one transaction sale, e.g. a widget at the purchaser's door step on X date; but when does the purchaser learn of the breach in an anticipatory repudiation? There are three main
1002:
If the promising party's repudiation makes it impossible to fulfil its promise, then retraction is not possible and no act by the promising party can restore the performing party's obligations under the contract. For example, if A promises to give B a unique sculpture in exchange for B painting A's
994:
Another rationale for the doctrine of repudiation is based on the breach of an implied term not rendering future performance futile: "ne essential promise which is implied in every contract is that neither party will without just cause repudiate his obligations under the contract, whether the time
1025:
The question arises as to why any party would want to provide notice of anticipatory breach. The reason is that once the performing party is informed of the anticipatory breach, a duty is then created for the performing party to mitigate damages as a result of the breach. Another situation where
998:
Repudiation of a contract by one party entitles the other party the right to terminate and claim for damages. However, it is possible that the repudiating party does not repudiate the entire contract but only certain obligations. In this case, the aggrieved party will only acquire the right to
990:
A party is considered to have repudiated a contract when they evidence a lack of willingness or an inability to perform their contractual obligations. A repudiation of a contract by one party (the repudiating party) will entitle the other party (the aggrieved party) to elect to terminate the
1003:
house, but A then sells the sculpture to C before B begins the job, this act by A constitutes an anticipatory repudiation which excuses B from performing. Once the sculpture has left A's possession, there is no way that A can fulfil the promise to give the sculpture to B.
516:
982:
which describes words or conduct by a contracting party that evinces an intention not to perform or not to be bound by provisions of the agreement that require performance in the future.
1010:
ruled in 1966 that a party who asserts "a genuinely held but erroneous view as to the effect of the contract" should not be treated as in repudiation, but in the case of
1100:
In some or all common law jurisdictions, the measure of damages for an anticipatory breach is no different from the measure of damages for any other breach of contract.
521:
1119:
UCC 2-610(a) gives this indication, the purchaser would be waiting at your risk if the vendor determined the market price at the time you learn of repudiation.
789:
894:
3 Historically restricted in common law jurisdictions but generally accepted elsewhere; availability varies between contemporary common law jurisdictions
735:
784:
909:
476:
178:
130:
1187:
The Law of
Contracts, 2d ed, 2012 (Canada), as cited in Supreme Court of Canada, Potter v. New Brunswick, 2015 SCC 10 at paragraph 149
102:
83:
38:
723:
1122:
UCC 2-723(1) would indicate this, but it would be superfluous with 2-713 so 2-713 must have something other than the plain meaning.
109:
954:
927:
116:
1087:
230:
212:
149:
98:
52:
1069:
1283:
540:
504:
999:
terminate if the repudiating party repudiates an obligation which, if breached, would grant a right to terminate.
1054:
1007:
533:
87:
190:
44:
1182:
799:
389:
284:
947:
819:
545:
898:
123:
794:
753:
665:
1303:
1259:
1235:
1203:
314:
194:
1061:
186:
1307:
1263:
1239:
1223:
1065:
923:
774:
583:
433:
76:
1279:
499:
459:
384:
360:
342:
1128:
This is the majority view: when repudiation is accepted or within a commercial reasonable time
1356:
940:
916:
779:
347:
1030:
with non-performed duties on both sides. Additionally, the repudiation must be unequivocal.
1299:
1255:
1231:
1211:
807:
644:
494:
373:
279:
274:
732:(also implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing or duty to negotiate in good faith)
8:
1320:
1215:
563:
454:
319:
299:
1148:
1027:
1019:
926:, and Canadian jurisprudence in both Québec and the common law provinces pertaining to
849:
812:
654:
626:
592:
485:
470:
464:
438:
706:
695:
416:
365:
356:
337:
294:
729:
616:
611:
573:
568:
411:
394:
621:
351:
328:
1338:
Uniform
Commercial Code § 2-713. Buyer's Damages for Non-delivery or Repudiation
867:
758:
689:
674:
422:
269:
1133:
Time of performance, when the trail that occurs after the time of performance
1350:
1167:
Trans-lex.org, The Lex
Mercatoria (Old and New) and the TransLex Principles:
658:
406:
379:
309:
401:
862:
857:
844:
635:
289:
1337:
1116:
When the buyer learns of repudiation plus a commercially reasonable time
700:
606:
511:
428:
902:
885:
304:
853:
528:
254:
1072:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
65:
979:
683:
578:
246:
1168:
649:
177:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
839:
975:
829:
1228:
Laurinda Pty Ltd v
Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd
919:
both in Québec and in the country's common law provinces
1136:
This is different from the plain reading for UCC 2-713.
922:
7 Specific to civil law jurisdictions, the
American
90:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1321:Vaswani v Italian Motors (Sales and Services) Ltd.
1276:Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd v Luna Park (NSW) Ltd
736:Contract A and Contract B in Canadian contract law
1348:
1217:
891:2 Specific to civil and mixed law jurisdictions
985:
948:
175:The examples and perspective in this article
928:contractual and pre-contractual negotiation
53:Learn how and when to remove these messages
1103:
955:
941:
1088:Learn how and when to remove this message
1022:, had increased during the order period.
231:Learn how and when to remove this message
213:Learn how and when to remove this message
150:Learn how and when to remove this message
1113:When the buyer learns of the repudiation
1018:because the supply price for the car, a
1180:
1349:
1200:Universal Cargo Carriers Corp v Citati
724:Duty of honest contractual performance
995:for performance has arrived or not."
912:of International Commercial Contracts
1037:
1033:
161:
88:adding citations to reliable sources
59:
18:
901:and other civil codes based on the
13:
1325:Contract Law Cases & Materials
1252:Progressive Mailing House v Tabali
14:
1368:
34:This article has multiple issues.
1042:
726:(or doctrine of abuse of rights)
541:Enforcement of foreign judgments
505:Hague Choice of Court Convention
253:
166:
64:
23:
75:needs additional citations for
42:or discuss these issues on the
16:Concept in the law of contracts
1330:
1313:
1289:
1269:
1245:
1193:
1174:
1161:
534:Singapore Mediation Convention
1:
1154:
908:5 Explicitly rejected by the
675:Quasi-contractual obligations
1340:, accessed 16 September 2023
1327:, accessed 16 September 2023
7:
1142:
1068:the claims made and adding
189:, discuss the issue on the
10:
1373:
1280:[1938] NSWStRp 632
1208:Carr v JA Berriman Pty Ltd
1171:, accessed 2 January 2022.
986:Repudiation and retraction
546:Hague Judgments Convention
99:"Anticipatory repudiation"
1183:"Supreme Court of Canada"
897:4 Specific to the German
1012:Vaswani v Italian Motors
968:Anticipatory repudiation
602:Anticipatory repudiation
352:unequal bargaining power
1104:Uniform Commercial Code
924:Uniform Commercial Code
899:BĂĽrgerliches Gesetzbuch
584:Third-party beneficiary
556:Rights of third parties
434:Accord and satisfaction
1181:McCamus, John (2015).
655:Liquidated, stipulated
500:Forum selection clause
385:Frustration of purpose
1300:[1989] HCA 51
1286:(NSW, Australia).
1256:[1985] HCA 14
1232:[1989] HCA 23
1212:[1953] HCA 31
917:Canadian contract law
285:Abstraction principle
1336:Cornell Law School,
974:is a concept in the
746:Related areas of law
645:Specific performance
495:Choice of law clause
460:Contract of adhesion
374:Culpa in contrahendo
280:Meeting of the minds
275:Offer and acceptance
195:create a new article
187:improve this article
84:improve this article
972:anticipatory breach
910:UNIDROIT Principles
684:Promissory estoppel
564:Privity of contract
517:New York Convention
477:UNIDROIT Principles
320:Collateral contract
315:Implication-in-fact
300:Invitation to treat
1149:Breach of contract
1053:possibly contains
1028:executory contract
1020:Ferrari Testarossa
730:Duty of good faith
627:Fundamental breach
593:Breach of contract
522:UNCITRAL Model Law
486:Dispute resolution
471:Contra proferentem
465:Integration clause
439:Exculpatory clause
1098:
1097:
1090:
1055:original research
1034:Measuring damages
965:
964:
808:England and Wales
716:Duties of parties
707:Negotiorum gestio
696:Unjust enrichment
417:Statute of frauds
366:Unconscionability
338:Misrepresentation
295:Mirror image rule
241:
240:
233:
223:
222:
215:
197:, as appropriate.
160:
159:
152:
134:
57:
1364:
1341:
1334:
1328:
1317:
1311:
1293:
1287:
1273:
1267:
1249:
1243:
1219:
1197:
1191:
1190:
1178:
1172:
1165:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1073:
1070:inline citations
1046:
1045:
1038:
957:
950:
943:
785:China (mainland)
754:Conflict of laws
617:Efficient breach
612:Exclusion clause
412:Illusory promise
395:Impracticability
257:
243:
242:
236:
229:
218:
211:
207:
204:
198:
170:
169:
162:
155:
148:
144:
141:
135:
133:
92:
68:
60:
49:
27:
26:
19:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1335:
1331:
1318:
1314:
1294:
1290:
1274:
1270:
1250:
1246:
1198:
1194:
1179:
1175:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1145:
1106:
1094:
1083:
1077:
1074:
1059:
1047:
1043:
1036:
988:
961:
932:
804:United Kingdom
767:By jurisdiction
237:
226:
225:
224:
219:
208:
202:
199:
184:
171:
167:
156:
145:
139:
136:
93:
91:
81:
69:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1370:
1360:
1359:
1343:
1342:
1329:
1323:, 1 WLR 270,
1312:
1288:
1268:
1244:
1206:401; See also
1192:
1173:
1169:Principle VI.5
1159:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1114:
1105:
1102:
1096:
1095:
1050:
1048:
1041:
1035:
1032:
987:
984:
963:
962:
960:
959:
952:
945:
937:
934:
933:
931:
930:
920:
915:6 Specific to
913:
906:
895:
892:
889:
884:1 Specific to
881:
878:
877:
873:
872:
871:
870:
865:
860:
847:
842:
834:
833:
825:
824:
823:
822:
817:
816:
815:
810:
802:
797:
792:
787:
782:
777:
769:
768:
764:
763:
762:
761:
759:Commercial law
756:
748:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
727:
718:
717:
713:
712:
711:
710:
703:
698:
693:
690:Quantum meruit
686:
678:
677:
671:
670:
669:
668:
663:
662:
661:
647:
639:
638:
632:
631:
630:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
604:
596:
595:
589:
588:
587:
586:
581:
576:
571:
566:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
538:
537:
536:
526:
525:
524:
519:
509:
508:
507:
497:
489:
488:
482:
481:
480:
479:
474:
467:
462:
457:
455:Parol evidence
449:
448:
447:Interpretation
444:
443:
442:
441:
436:
431:
426:
423:Non est factum
419:
414:
409:
404:
399:
398:
397:
392:
387:
377:
370:
369:
368:
354:
345:
340:
332:
331:
325:
324:
323:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
297:
292:
287:
282:
277:
272:
264:
263:
259:
258:
250:
249:
239:
238:
221:
220:
181:of the subject
179:worldwide view
174:
172:
165:
158:
157:
72:
70:
63:
58:
32:
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1369:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1339:
1333:
1326:
1322:
1316:
1309:
1305:
1302:, (1989) 168
1301:
1297:
1296:Foran v Wight
1292:
1285:
1284:Supreme Court
1281:
1277:
1272:
1265:
1261:
1258:, (1985) 157
1257:
1253:
1248:
1241:
1238:623 at p647,
1237:
1234:, (1989) 166
1233:
1229:
1226:(Australia);
1225:
1221:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1188:
1184:
1177:
1170:
1164:
1160:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1101:
1092:
1089:
1081:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1051:This section
1049:
1040:
1039:
1031:
1029:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1008:Privy Council
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
983:
981:
977:
973:
969:
958:
953:
951:
946:
944:
939:
938:
936:
935:
929:
925:
921:
918:
914:
911:
907:
904:
900:
896:
893:
890:
888:jurisdictions
887:
883:
882:
880:
879:
875:
874:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
855:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
838:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
826:
821:
820:United States
818:
814:
811:
809:
806:
805:
803:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
772:
771:
770:
766:
765:
760:
757:
755:
752:
751:
750:
749:
745:
744:
737:
734:
733:
731:
728:
725:
722:
721:
720:
719:
715:
714:
709:
708:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
691:
687:
685:
682:
681:
680:
679:
676:
673:
672:
667:
664:
660:
659:penal damages
656:
653:
652:
651:
650:Money damages
648:
646:
643:
642:
641:
640:
637:
634:
633:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
591:
590:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
561:
560:
559:
555:
554:
547:
544:
543:
542:
539:
535:
532:
531:
530:
527:
523:
520:
518:
515:
514:
513:
510:
506:
503:
502:
501:
498:
496:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
484:
483:
478:
475:
473:
472:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
446:
445:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
429:Unclean hands
427:
425:
424:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
396:
393:
391:
390:Impossibility
388:
386:
383:
382:
381:
380:Force majeure
378:
376:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
362:
361:public policy
358:
355:
353:
349:
346:
344:
341:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
327:
326:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
310:Consideration
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
260:
256:
252:
251:
248:
245:
244:
235:
232:
217:
214:
206:
196:
192:
188:
182:
180:
173:
164:
163:
154:
151:
143:
132:
129:
125:
122:
118:
115:
111:
108:
104:
101: –
100:
96:
95:Find sources:
89:
85:
79:
78:
73:This article
71:
67:
62:
61:
56:
54:
47:
46:
41:
40:
35:
30:
21:
20:
1357:Contract law
1332:
1324:
1315:
1310:(Australia).
1295:
1291:
1275:
1271:
1266:(Australia).
1251:
1247:
1242:(Australia).
1227:
1207:
1199:
1195:
1186:
1176:
1163:
1107:
1099:
1084:
1078:January 2017
1075:
1052:
1024:
1015:
1011:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
971:
967:
966:
863:Criminal law
845:Property law
800:Saudi Arabia
705:
688:
601:
469:
421:
372:
290:Posting rule
247:Contract law
227:
209:
200:
176:
146:
137:
127:
120:
113:
106:
94:
82:Please help
77:verification
74:
50:
43:
37:
36:Please help
33:
1319:Young, M.,
701:Restitution
512:Arbitration
1308:High Court
1264:High Court
1240:High Court
1224:High Court
1216:(1953) 89
1155:References
1062:improve it
903:pandectist
886:common law
666:Rescission
574:Delegation
569:Assignment
357:Illegality
305:Firm offer
110:newspapers
39:improve it
1066:verifying
1016:bona fide
980:contracts
905:tradition
775:Australia
622:Deviation
529:Mediation
262:Formation
191:talk page
45:talk page
1351:Category
1143:See also
868:Evidence
840:Tort law
813:Scotland
636:Remedies
579:Novation
402:Hardship
329:Defences
270:Capacity
203:May 2022
185:You may
140:May 2022
1109:views:
1060:Please
858:estates
790:Ireland
407:Set-off
348:Threats
343:Mistake
124:scholar
856:, and
854:trusts
828:Other
780:Canada
126:
119:
112:
105:
97:
1306:385,
1298:
1278:
1254:
1230:
1210:
876:Notes
850:Wills
832:areas
795:India
657:, or
607:Cover
193:, or
131:JSTOR
117:books
1262:17,
1006:The
359:and
350:and
103:news
1304:CLR
1260:CLR
1236:CLR
1220:327
1218:CLR
1064:by
978:of
976:law
970:or
830:law
86:by
1353::
1282:,
1222:,
1214:,
1204:QB
1202:2
1185:.
852:,
48:.
1189:.
1091:)
1085:(
1080:)
1076:(
1058:.
956:e
949:t
942:v
234:)
228:(
216:)
210:(
205:)
201:(
183:.
153:)
147:(
142:)
138:(
128:·
121:·
114:·
107:·
80:.
55:)
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
