Knowledge

Affinity space

Source πŸ“

38:, affinity spaces are locations where groups of people are drawn together because of a shared, strong interest or engagement in a common activity. Often but not always occurring online, affinity spaces encourage the sharing of knowledge or participation in a specific area, and informal learning is a common outcome. In his coining of the term, Gee takes the notion of participatory cultures, and reframes it to the idea of "space". To Gee, what is happening in these online cultures is not merely a "culture" – and far different from a "community". In Gee's view, the word "community" conjures up images of belongingness and membership (p. 70). Instead, he has defined these worlds as "spaces" – a term that allows for the "robust characterization of the ebbs and flows and differing levels of involvement and participation exhibited by members" 45:
Gee (2004) refers to affinity spaces and states, "Learners 'apprentice' themselves to a group of people who share a certain set of practices (e.g. learning to cook in a family, learning to play video games with a guild, learning to assemble circuit boards in a workplace, learning to splice genes in a
49:
What Gee (2004) tries to explain about Affinity Spaces is not an attempt to label a group of people. By affinity space, he means a space where people can interact and share a lot with each other. The people who are interacting in a space might find themselves as sharing a community with some others
115:
status, and educational level, and thus allow each user to participate as he/she chooses, and both experts and novices are equally legitimate participants in the affinity space While not everyone in affinity spaces is an expert, they are not places where the "blind are leading the blind." Many
71:
Everyone can, if they so wish, produce and not just consume. The idea that creation can come not only from a space's designers, but also from its users, is a hallmark of these spaces. Users – not just site designers – can help create, shape, and reshape the site and its content. Suggestions are
132:
sites are examples of affinity spaces. While the goal of the sites is usually to share and read other people's fan fiction creations, informal learning takes place as people have their work read and commented on by "'beta readers.'" It is up to the author then to decide what to do with this
106:
Because members of an affinity space are interested in a common practice/belief/activity, they have common ground and motivation together. Gee says that because of this common interest, affinity spaces are able to bridge barriers of age,
41:
According to Gee (2004), "An affinity space is a place or set of places where people affiliate with others based primarily on shared activities, interests, and goals, not shared race, class culture, ethnicity, or gender" (p. 67).
50:
in that space, while other people might view their interactions in the space differently. Gee (2004) adds, " In any case, creating spaces within diverse sorts of people can interact is a leitmotif of the modern world" (p. 71).
78:
Both intensive and extensive knowledge are encouraged. Extensive knowledge is seen as broad, less specialized knowledge about many aspects of the space. Intensive knowledge is in-depth knowledge about certain aspects of the
62:
The affinity in these spaces is to the endeavor, not other people. People from all ages, ethnicities, educational levels, and cultures play/create together – often anonymously or using alter-identities.
144:
mistakes. As community members criticize other people's work, they reach new levels of sophistication in their evaluations, creating extended vocabularies of terms and categorizing mistakes. In
88:
Tacit knowledge is encouraged and honored. Members do not have to lead or design; those who wish to β€œjust play” are valued as much as those who wish to contribute more substantially to the site.
46:
biology lab), pick up these practices through joint action with more advanced peers, and advance their abilities to engage and work with others in carrying out such practices" (p. 70).
140:
Other examples come from "snark sites" or "rant communities." The goal of these sites is typically to make fun of particular problems, such as poorly written fan fiction, or digital
401:. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 366:"I don't know if that'd be English or not": Third space theory and literacy instruction. In "Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy", 53 (7), (pp. 555–563). 116:
spaces have unwritten rules that while sharing information, you must share only what you know, provide sources to back up what you say, and in general, leave
224:
Neely, A.D.; Marone, V. (2016). "Learning in parking lots: Affinity spaces as a framework for understanding knowledge construction in informal settings".
137:; often, it is used to revise and edit the work, and at the same time, it may aid the author in pinpointing his or her own overall writing flaws. 363: 251:
Marone, Vittorio (2015). "From discussion forum to discursive studio: Learning and creativity in design-oriented affinity spaces".
412: 65:
Not segregated by age; there is no assumption that older or more senior participants are the only ones with something to teach.
108: 333: 72:
welcome and encouraged, and site designers often use the suggestions of users to reform site designs and configurations.
430: 389: 381: 212: 204: 446: 279: 152:. Since either authors or their friends and fans are likely to come to the defense of works being criticized, 149: 413:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100820191022/http://www.gamebasedlearning.org.uk/content/view/59
451: 8: 281:
Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century
399:
Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From The Age of Mythology to Today's Schools
68:
Not segregated by experience; newbies, masters, and everyone else share a common space.
426: 385: 377: 208: 200: 313: 260: 233: 304:
Black, Rebecca W. (2006). "Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction".
337: 330: 404: 395: 369: 237: 145: 112: 35: 409:
Public Pedagogy through Video Games: Design, Resources & Affinity Spaces.
317: 440: 418: 264: 141: 58:
Gee described twelve hallmarks of what he terms "nurturing" affinity spaces:
20: 129: 75:
Content within the space is not fixed, but is transformed by interaction.
348: 374:
Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling
197:
Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling
153: 134: 117: 31: 157: 160:
are two areas where much active learning takes place.
91:
Many forms and routes to participation are available.
423:
Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
94:
Different routes to status are inherent in the game.
438: 82:Individual and distributed knowledge are valued. 97:Leadership is porous and leaders are resources. 53: 425:. New York: New York University Press, 2006. 223: 176:Gee, 2004; Gee, 2005; Gee & Hayes, 2009 148:'s taxonomy, evaluation is at the top of 226:Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 277: 439: 250: 303: 192: 190: 188: 186: 184: 182: 120:and comments only in areas you know. 411:Game Based Learning. Retrieved from 101: 13: 179: 85:Dispersed knowledge is encouraged. 14: 463: 342: 324: 297: 288: 271: 244: 217: 170: 1: 376:. New York: Routledge, 2004. 357: 199:. New York: Routledge, 2004. 150:higher order thinking skills 54:Hallmarks of Affinity Spaces 7: 123: 10: 468: 238:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.05.002 18: 318:10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.170 407:& Elisabeth Hayes. 265:10.1177/1555412014557328 163: 19:Not to be confused with 16:Place of shared learning 447:Educational environment 34:happens. According to 278:Jenkins, H. (2009). 349:Photoshop Disasters 336:2009-01-12 at the 253:Games and Culture 30:is a place where 459: 351: 346: 340: 328: 322: 321: 301: 295: 292: 286: 285: 275: 269: 268: 248: 242: 241: 221: 215: 194: 177: 174: 102:Educational uses 467: 466: 462: 461: 460: 458: 457: 456: 437: 436: 405:Gee, James Paul 396:Gee, James Paul 370:Gee, James Paul 360: 355: 354: 347: 343: 338:Wayback Machine 329: 325: 302: 298: 293: 289: 276: 272: 249: 245: 222: 218: 195: 180: 175: 171: 166: 126: 104: 56: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 465: 455: 454: 449: 435: 434: 419:Jenkins, Henry 416: 402: 393: 367: 359: 356: 353: 352: 341: 323: 312:(2): 170–184. 296: 287: 270: 243: 216: 178: 168: 167: 165: 162: 146:Benjamin Bloom 125: 122: 113:socio-economic 103: 100: 99: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 63: 55: 52: 36:James Paul Gee 28:affinity space 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 464: 453: 450: 448: 445: 444: 442: 432: 431:0-8147-4281-5 428: 424: 420: 417: 414: 410: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 390:0-415-31776-2 387: 383: 382:0-415-31777-0 379: 375: 371: 368: 365: 362: 361: 350: 345: 339: 335: 332: 327: 319: 315: 311: 307: 300: 291: 283: 282: 274: 266: 262: 259:(1): 81–105. 258: 254: 247: 239: 235: 231: 227: 220: 214: 213:0-415-31776-2 210: 206: 205:0-415-31777-0 202: 198: 193: 191: 189: 187: 185: 183: 173: 169: 161: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142:image editing 138: 136: 131: 121: 119: 114: 110: 96: 93: 90: 87: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: 64: 61: 60: 59: 51: 47: 43: 39: 37: 33: 29: 22: 422: 408: 398: 373: 344: 326: 309: 305: 299: 290: 284:. MIT Press. 280: 273: 256: 252: 246: 232:(4): 58–65. 229: 225: 219: 196: 172: 139: 127: 105: 57: 48: 44: 40: 27: 25: 21:affine space 452:Game design 331:FanFicRants 130:fan fiction 441:Categories 364:Bensen, S. 358:References 306:E-learning 294:Gee, 2005 133:informal 334:Archived 154:rhetoric 135:feedback 124:Examples 118:feedback 32:learning 415:. 2009. 128:Online 429:  388:  380:  211:  203:  79:space. 164:Notes 158:logic 427:ISBN 386:ISBN 378:ISBN 209:ISBN 201:ISBN 156:and 109:race 314:doi 261:doi 234:doi 26:An 443:: 421:. 384:, 372:. 308:. 257:10 255:. 230:11 228:. 207:, 181:^ 111:, 433:. 392:. 320:. 316:: 310:3 267:. 263:: 240:. 236:: 23:.

Index

affine space
learning
James Paul Gee
race
socio-economic
feedback
fan fiction
feedback
image editing
Benjamin Bloom
higher order thinking skills
rhetoric
logic






ISBN
0-415-31777-0
ISBN
0-415-31776-2
doi
10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.05.002
doi
10.1177/1555412014557328
Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century
doi
10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.170

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑