2102:(This link has been retired - need it for another purpose). It now deals with all of the formatting issues that I'm aware of (no % suffix, leading zeros, thousand separators, −, etc). It also now calculates the %age change from the 2001 election (for most seats - Scotland is an exception and there are a few dozen places that were named inconsistently by the various sources). There's also a couple more buttons that will open up the corresponding Knowledge article providing it's name follows the standard format. Oh, and the results are sorted in rank order.
658:. I went through the list of bluelinks that already existed when building the original list of hyperlinks at Wikinews. (Not all of them end in "(UK Parliament constituency)", notice. This is why.) I also drew other editors' attentions to the duplication that was occurring from our all working off different lists (some of which weren't up-to-date), and we worked out a plan. The assertion that "in many cases constituency pages already exist" is false. They
2176:
town, district and constituency, but in cases like those disambiguation should not be used, instead it should be mentioned in the body of those articles that the geographical area is used for other political/administrative uses. Additionally policy discourages editors from creating disambiguation pages full of red links or premtively linking to non existant dab pages.
506:, and has plenty of scope for continuing to do so considering the commonality of names. No doubt Australia, New Zealand, and other Commonwealth countries will get in on the act also, if they aren't already. Given how many place names, and thus probably constituency names, there are in common across all of these countries, something like
433:
disambiguation only when necessary will leave several naming schemes, and as
Knowledge grows people will change the suffixes and they might not bring them into line with others. I know this isn't ideal, but it does mean that each and every article gets a clear and concise name that truely represents it's content.
1727:
differ. I've been wrestling with myself for weeks over whether to go to the local count and see some candidates declared live, or to stay at home and get a full picture of what's giong on across the country. Pub never occured to me, but none of my friends have mentioned it so I'm guessing I'd be alone.
1516:
I hesitate to bring this up, because there is clearly a lot of work going on by a lot of dedicated people on short timescales. However one of the consequences of this project is the creation of a large number of aricles containing verifiable information (lists of MPs, results data for 2001, etc.) and
695:
It has become more apparent as I have approached the south of
England that disambiguation will also involve splitting existing articles. Several articles combine towns and boroughs of the same name into one, and several articles have two or three sentences (or an infobox) describing the constituency
1960:
As a typographical pedant, can I just add that when using pluses and minuses typing − will give you a minus sign that's specifically intended to be the same width as a plus ( − ), instead of a hyphen which is a bit shorter ( - ). This just makes the tables look a little more professional I
1773:
for the first prototype. Type in the results at the top and press the update button. The results will be sorted and displayed in the pink section in a format that can be pasted into the wikipedia article. I plan to do some more on it to calculate majorities and %age shares etc. Let me know if it
1549:
accurately. Ultimately the results should be double checked against a definitive source, but that won't be available for some time I suspect. In the meantime it would make sense to indicate the source of the data so that it's pedigree can be judged by the reader. To that end I've just had a first
890:
As many of you will have noticed, the page has been tidied and improved, and now matches the
Wikinews page. The list has all 646 constituencies. There may be some minor discrepancies in naming conventions, but nothing a redirect couldn't fix. The work done has been great so far, with mistakes rarely
727:
There is no need to create whole disambiguation pages if there will only ever be 2 other articles linked to - these can both be specified at the top of article. "For the town see {name}, for the borough see {name}". Further, unnecessary disambiguation is completely unacceptable - if there is nothing
589:
of disambiguation and article splitting to do. If I finish re-colouring the redlinks before election day, which I might well do at this rate, then whilst other editors are scurrying around, spreadsheets in hand, filling in the empty tables with the actual candidate lists (the hard part ☺) I plan on
294:
I see no reason whatsoever to impose an over elaborate system of disambiguation on the title of constituency names. Where there is no other possibility of confusion with another entity no disambiiguation is required, where there is a possibility in of confusion between the name of a constituency and
2175:
Removed the
Otheruses template because that is used for disambiguation purposes, but either there isn't need for disambiguation or the page is already disambiguated by using the suffix. I know a couple of pages where the otheruses template and a disambiguation page have been used to link between a
641:
But others are making this inference and moving pages which should not be moved. My revised instructions did not say to create articles with the wrong names, they said that the disambiguation format was not compulsory. Some editors may wish to take the time to check these things, especially since
1961:
think, and I don't think there are many browsers that have a problem with that character. Great work on our coverage, everyone! I've been doing a little bit and I'll do some more, but I can't see myself meeting the fantastic rate of updates achieved by the dedicated contributors to this project. —
1752:
you mean we should each watch each other drop from exhaustion! indeed a sensible idea though. Could I suggest that trying to keep the 'state of the parties' updated should either be the task of one person or left until the morning. Much of
Scotland and some other areas won't be declared until well
1996:
I'll be fixing that problem shortly - I didn't notice it myself at first. I'm going to try to get it to generate %age change as well which should save some more work. BTW the when a new party stands the BBC is reporting the %age change figure as though they had 0 votes in the previous election,
1602:
One thing about a 'free for all' though is that we're all likely to go for them in the order in which they hit the screens so highly likely to get conflicts before 1:30am and after 3am. I'd suggest that we each take a region as our focus and then catch up on the missing ones on a 'fill-in' basis.
1477:
with it listing by region, with a link to the category as this will contain the entire list in alphabetical order (remembering that lists in alphabetical order are considered poor style). I used
Wikinews as the source for the progress page (and it has been double checked) so it's just a matter of
874:
I am making amendments to the structure as it is unclear whether we have all constituencies on the list. Please use the new tables in preference to the rest of the page, they will appear over the next couple of days. This should hopefully make it clear what the state of each page is and what work
621:
There is no such implication. It's only your inference. The text is explicit talking about what to call "new pages". It uses those very words. It nowhere actually instructs people to rename pages. If that's your reason for continually changing the plan so that people are instructed to create
436:
We are more then prepared to make sure everything is cross referenced properly and that each term links to the ambig. page and vice versa. But for the time being, we have less than a week to get over 550 pages up-to-date with the 2001 results and 2005 candidates as wikinews will be linking to our
77:
Good point, although who is to say that we didn't use the spreadsheet, and then found out the name from searching the BBC website? As it's information that is already in the public domain I don't see much of an issue (especially as we are finding out somebody's first name. Copying article content
1531:
Whilst I can understand your intention, I tend to work on the basis of "If it is trivial to find the same fact from other sources then citation is nice but superfluous" and only insist on them where it took a lot of work to discover the relevant information. For most of the seat information and
673:
by taking exactly that approach. The original instructions say to create "new pages" with the suffix, a safe name that won't step on other people's redlinks. The next task, which I'm about to embark upon I hope, then involves going over all of the articles and putting what disambiguations are
2075:
Just want to point out that the BBC is not infallable. While they do an amazing job of getting the results out, they are just as prone to error as the rest of us. At some point the results should be systematically verified against the ONS figures (don't know how many years before they become
1726:
I have no idea why I linked up regions to where people actually live. Sometimes my logic confuses even me. I can't find ITN's results pages, and I'd say the BBC was more reputable than Sky. On the other hand, Sky's figures can be copied and pasted. Check both, and leave the pages alone if they
1684:
Will be home and online (Blueyonder permitting). I think there are benefits to geographical rather than alphabetically, which means
Scotland is a light load and Midlands / London heavier but each manageable. Thanks to the templates on most constituencies it should be fairly quick and easy. One
1569:
Add your name here if you'll be here on election night. That way, we'll be able to divide the work of updating the constituencies between us. I suggest dividing things alphabetically. Per-region wouldn't work because I don't think we're evenly spread (I don't even know if we're all in the UK).
2028:
Should the 2005 results be ranked in descending votes cast order, as the 2001 results are?. I'd assumed they should be, and ranked a few, but it seems that leaving them in candidate surname order is the norm. I'd say ranking is more useful for the future reader, but what is the consensus?. --
432:
we would not know whether it was part of the UK or
Scottish parliament and it would be ambiguous. It is not a given that people know the location of Telford. Above all else, the name the article should represent it's contents, ideally we should not need such detailed disambiguation. But using
668:
Your statement about your instructions is false, too. Your instructions clearly say to create "new pages" without any suffix "unless there is an existing page", entirely ignoring the possibility that in doing so an editor could well be recolouring the redlinks of some other project,
248:(election ready) now reflect the new table names. I'll be able to crack on with this tomorrow and hopefully we'll get all the constituencies ready on time! I'm glad there's only an election every four years! Mind you, next election should be easier as the templates are now in place.
958:. We have deliberated this at length, and we came to an agreement on the matter. In summary: large numbers of conflicts of varying types (with existing towns, football teams, Welsh/Scottish Parliament), it would be even more confusing if we only disambiguated when necessary.
891:
appearing in the pages done so far. Now all that stands between us and election day is 400 pages. By my estimates, that means that we need every major contributor to add 25 or so a day? I may crack on with page creation tonight, but first I need to catch up with laundry ;)
2012:
Heh, I don't know about invincible... never thought about the − I've been obsessed with using – so far. Considering we had never attempted something on such a scale before it went quite well. I'm sure we'll get everything together in next week ;)
1492:, it now sorts by region. There is a "disambiguation" pointing people towards the category for alphabetical listing now. I am still undecided on whether to use the "by region" suffix as if it isn't alphabetical, what else would make sense in the context of the UK?
1190:
You could probably use the
Knowledge search feature to find individual parties to check against. We should also enable extinct party colours, for historical results ('01, '97, '92, etc.). Further, I don't see a colour for the Official Monster Raving Looney Party?
2057:
I have been ranking them in vote order as well and I have changed any that I find which are in surname order. Ranking will match the 2001 results as well. The non-sorted ones I have seen have arisen where users are updating the results outside of this project.
387:
A large proportion of these constituency names clash with varying other places, football teams, scottish parliament regions etc. as discussed before. A good 70% are going to clash with the normal place name so will need disambiguation. If we disbiguate to just
1474:
1616:
I've added a "Results by" column to the
Progress page to allow folks to designate which region they will process. I've plumped for Wessex, for now. Given the number of people active in this project we'll each probably need to cover several areas.
728:
currently at "Liverpool West", why not put it there? It goes against Knowledge policy to unnecessarily disambiguate, it is counterproductive and confusing. Of course, a redirect could lead from the disambiguate name, making it easy to find. --
375:
because thats what the links on this page were. None of these pages require additional disambiguation with similar named constituencies in any other parliament. So what objection do you have to these pages using the minimal disambiguatino of
448:
Given the time constraints I agree that using a consistent disambiguation makes sense. You've convinced me. So now you need to fix at lease two of the tables (last time I checked anyway) on this page which still link to ....(constituency).
1288:
for information on the "continuing" Liberal Party - it is legally distinct from the old Liberal Party. The Workers Party, Loony Party and National Front do still exist, but with a lower profile and fewer candidates than in the past.
766:
371:. I created three constituencies earlier today (before this modification was made to this page, and using the previous links on this page), these pages were subsequently moved. I moved them back and you have moved them again. I used
1744:
I have taken on of the regions for tonight (make take another later if there are still gaps). Can I suggest that when people finally go to bed they remove themselves from the region list so that anybody still up can take over that
1429:
to change the structure and hence the names of the meta pages - maybe this should happen first. Should we just invent a colour for significant parties, or should we only use a colour where there actually is an official colour?
366:
discussion, of which I have not been party, but I am bringing that discussion to this page because this project page has been modified today so that all of the links to yet to be constructed constituencies now include the words
761:
From what I can tell people are going through the news article section by section (which is great). However, I don't think this page is being as useful as it could be. Before I go and start making changes I have a suggestion.
1710:). The BBC at least tries to be unbiased, and is effectively owned by the electorate. Where Sky News may report a seat on a semi-good source for the sake of appearing first, and bouying their viewership, the BBC would not. --
1424:
I read somewhere that it is traditional for independent candidates to wear a white rosette. There should probably be a colour entry for generic independent candidates. Before adding too many colours there is a proposal at
534:
The most amusing disambiguation so far (and I haven't looked at them all, by a long chalk, since I'm trying to resist the temptation to do the disambiguations now, when they can safely be left until after the election), is
1583:
there there are not that many people it may be easier to allow a free-for-all. Once the first few come in there should be a steady stream of results to ensure that few edit conflicts occur. So long as people change the
1682:, although I had been planning to go to a local count then pub (booked until 5am!) but I'm now feeling like I'd rather do my usual watch-it-on-three-TVs version of election night. If I'm home I'll definitely be online.
1949:
Once again, a thank you for all the good natured polite discussion of the many issues that surrounded this project and the speed at which people contributed. It wasn't just the vote counters who stayed up all night.
1653:
I don't know if I will yet, I may be going to the Guildhall (to see the candidates and announcement) followed by an all nighter with some friends. If I am here, however, count me in. I will say definately tomorrow.
715:) have expressed the desire for more explicit links between the three that the wording of the standard disambiguation templates, which just talks vaguely about "uses", is inadequate for. Suggestions are welcome.
2182:
Suggested that where the boundaries are already described in another article or where there is very little to say about the boundaries they are put in the introduction, as two line sections are also discouraged.
1592:
in the tables conflicts should be rare. I'd probably tend to take Midlands entries, but it's not a given. Users are more likely to be from cities by probability than rural areas. Just my $ 0.02 on the matter.
941:
I think we should move all of those with "(UK parliament constituency)" which are not also Scottish or EU to simply "(constituency)". It is Knowledge convention to not over-disambiguate or do so preemptively.
1943:
843:
I think this may make life easier on the night as well. I can do this without too much disruption to other people. What do others think? It could be used for any future elections to by adding a new column.
789:
972:
There are a lot of other things that need doing, especially after the election. This seems to the most active page on the election so has anybody got ideas or a better page to push the following forward:
1482:
355:. The disambiguations are lower priority than the constituency articles, and so will come later. There's a deadline for the constituency articles. There's no deadline for the disambiguation articles.
295:
some other entity that is not a constituency in another parliament the (constituency) should be used, ONLY when a constituency name clashes with the name of a constituency in another parliament (i.e.
143:
2216:
1063:
These were not common at the beginning and the template colours were only added midway through. I am going to add another column in the summary table, so people can do a quick double check.
1979:'s, and didn't notice for ages that it was puting % symbols in. I also abandoned a lot of details in the rush to get all the results in. I'll fill them in later - although the invincible
2155:
557:
When I changed the policy in the help section I was not arguing that there is no need for dabing the titles, I agree with most of these discussions. But is wrong to put as policy that
2046:
1442:
2033:
1731:
1540:
1407:
2271:
2017:
1987:
1817:
1801:
1792:
1761:
1693:
1661:
1646:
1597:
1394:
1198:
46:
would be better than using initials, I don't know whether that is down to information sources people are using, but it is what goes on the ballot paper and it's easier to Wikilink.
1954:
1849:
1717:
1611:
1496:
962:
949:
936:
1970:
1293:
2193:
2165:
1344:
2062:
649:
616:
1835:
532:
Not even the constituency names with points of the compass in them are safe. They can and do conflict with the projects to write articles about railway stations, for example.
441:) are extremely consistent in the naming of tables and layout, this should show how commited we have been on getting standards sorted out. Hope this helps to clear things up.
601:
articles that way. I'm not asking those participating in the election coverage/constituencies wikiproject not to go on naming new articles in that fashion, but they should
491:
320:
1336:
but this is based purely on my own observations of the sections I have worked on, and those I have heard of. This list of number of candidates being fielded by each party (
546:
Another amusing one, that puts another nail in the coffin of the notion that names with points of the compass in them are safe and aren't going to conflict with anything:
2141:
895:
1893:
1813:
is done, I've updated the Member of Parliament Section. Perhaps easiest to wait until BBC news carries info as they have constituency sizes, and so can give all %ages.
2105:
Let me know if it helps. Also mention here if you find any problems with it. BTW it works better with Firefox, but then I'd guess everyone here uses Firefox anyway.
1470:
1448:
507:
503:
1916:
Firstly a big thank you to all those helping out on this project, I know you don't expect any thanks – working on Knowledge is thanks enough – but it is appreciated!
1525:
1045:
Now all the constituencies are ready (great work btw), I think it's worth doing a quick double check to ensure that all parties that have a colour are not listed as
700:
with the town/borough. These descriptions will be out of date after the election, and I intend to modify them to more brief pointers to the constituency articles.
498:
their articles, too. (So "(House of Commons)" is inappropriate as a disambiguation suffix, since there's more than one House of Commons in the mix here.) This has
1184:
678:
as simple as merely checking whether there's an existing page by the main name. At the very least it also involves checking "what links here" (which tells us that
66:
that suggest to me that they shouldn't be used as a primary source. I assume the BBC paid the Press Association good money for their lists of election candidates.
2230:
1841:
myself, I'm using their vote/percentage figures as my source. ITV seems to be off in in its own little world with far more declarations that BBC or Sky have ... --
1067:
2262:
and add redirects for all the constituencies? I have changed the links in the current version to use _and_ instead of _&_ but redirects would be nice too. —
1279:
912:
17:
2120:
1574:
464:
It is very easy to underestimate the amount of disambiguation that is needed here. The thing to remember is that these are United Kingdom place names, possibly
735:
511:
1169:
745:
I have noticed some constituencies are duplicated, so some may disappear, but you may find that it still exists somewhere else on the page. I will copy over
576:
1035:
2151:
to provide a place which summarises all the chat that has been going. Anyone with queries on formatting can be directed here. All improvements welcome :) —
1521:. I guess this can be rectified after the election, provided all contributors have taken notes of the articles they updated and the sources they used. --
59:
2246:
Since the election's now over, I've altered this page to reflect this. I'm also updating the tables so we can get more information out of them. --
2135:
2077:
1109:
1545:
There are likely to be errors in data from most sources at the moment, just because it's very difficult to capture all that information quickly
1180:
When we come to earlier election results, we will also need "template enabling" for historic parties such as the Liberal Party, SDP, ILP, etc.
323:. The amount of disambiguation that will be needed has been grossly underestimated, as you are grossly underestimating it here. I've done a
1810:
1703:
2253:
1022:
1015:
1911:
712:
1685:
question though - whose figures should we take as 'gospel' given that past experience shows BBC, SKY and ITV sometimes 'disagree' ... --
1997:
whereas it has been our convention to put N/A in the change column in such cases. Watch for this if you take your figures from there.
1238:
1454:
Should there also be a definitive article listing all constituencies by region (this can be lifted from the Wikinews list I suppose).
662:. We've already checked. (There were a handful created during the hiatus that we didn't catch, which have been caught and merged by
307:. The purpose of disambiguation is disambiguation and NOT categorisation. That is what categories are for. 19:32, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
279:
Feel free to, this project has only been around for a month judging by the history. Words like "ball" and "rolling" spring to mind!
1831:
has a live desktop ticker and self updating pages. Handy to check off results as they come in. I'm poised for Sunderland South...
1451:
contains a lot of redlinks. Now that we know that we have an article for each constituency this list really needs to be updated.
100:). Call me paraniod, but if I was the BBC, I would seed my data with fingerprint errors like this the way that cartographers do.
1823:
2221:
Can we either take this down or at least remove the categories - the page is starting to show up with convention entries now.
1458:
852:
Greg, you are doing a great job on this. It really helps to see exactly what needs doing. Much better than the old list.
191:
The election is just over a week away now – but I know we'll be ready on time and will show what Knowledge is capable of!
1788:
I have used Excel to generate %ages as well, your webpage is very useful however. In the meantime, I'll try and keep up!
1781:
My first attempt to use it with Sunderland South was a bit of a dismal failure. Improved version will be along shortly!
1642:
I'm glad elections only come once every four years... The number of edits I've made has gone through the roof this week!
1322:
1224:
208:
1275:
Don't know about the others, but the Liberal Party still has a couple of local councillors, so not completely historic.
859:
Thanks, I'm hoping to get the rest of them up today and remove the old list. After than, it's on with article creation!
2179:
Removed the stuff about always disambiguating the page name: overdisambiguating page names is against wikipedia policy.
1698:
It doesn't really matter, as long as we cite which. I would say the best is the BBC - the other two are openly biased (
1400:
1124:
336:
2233:. I think it was mostly used for creating the articles, since they've been created this is the logical conclusion. --
1517:
there isn't a reference or source in sight on the pages I've looked at. This is in contravention of Knowledge policy
1114:
97:
1144:
1076:. Any that are not in this list are missing because they don't have {{Election box metadata}} on their talk page.
905:
After all are election ready, are we planning on improving the quality of some of the worse Ss to Ls or even Es? --
885:
226:
It would make sense, especially if people copy the tables into other programs. The UK bit isn't necessary either.
1855:
565:
on the end, to do so goes against Knowledge policy. Pages should only be moved to titles with a suffix if it
414:
However this does not solve all our problems as Gordon is also a constituency of the Scottish government, so:
2259:
1376:
1254:
328:
1031:
Guess there are more areas that need doing and we really need to keep a track to make sure it all gets done
518:
Canadian constituencies.) The disambiguations really do have to be quite specific, because these names are
96:
from the House of Commons Library contains first names and is probably more authoratative than the BBC (see
2204:
It seems section 2 and section 4 of the main page here are the same. Perhaps one of them could be deleted.
1326:
1511:
1134:
1119:
539:, where the UK parliamentary constituency shares an article name with a radio show character and a cake.
78:
word for word is obviously wrong of course. Perhaps put a link to the spreadsheet on the progress page?
1385:- small party which has constitently stood in NI and is again standing in several constituencies (red).
1159:
1040:
477:
469:
2070:
756:
268:
information be moved up to the main WikiProject page rather than be hidden here on the progress page?
2091:
1154:
1149:
495:
740:
93:
1139:
900:
696:
of the same name as the town or the borough, even though it isn't the same as the town/borough and
481:
340:
304:
303:
etc..) should it be required to use (UK Parliament constituency). This follows Knowledge policy on
1570:
Per-party wouldn't work because of the radical differences in size between parliamentary parties.
403:
However both of these places may exist in other countries, either now or in the future so we use:
351:
of conflicting constituencies, towns, boroughs, rivers, names, clans, and football teams. Please
1382:
1259:
1129:
1089:
536:
473:
35:
There is now a checklist to ensure everything is done, so there is no extra legwork on the night.
1944:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Progress#Scottish highlands & islands
1564:
1370:
1285:
1249:
1174:
1084:
332:
289:
1457:
Now that we've done all this work it would be good to get a link to these lists from the main
233:
The name change is a good point. I'll create further new articles with the new title format.
2222:
2148:
1426:
597:
I agree that's probably the case, but that doesn't mean editors should be instructed to name
1899:
The BBC results are posting a %age change for parties that did not previously stand. Enter
215:. The UK bit in the title is redundant as it is already specified by the context it is in.
54:
is the best format. However, the source I've been using for some election results only has
2267:
1846:
1770:
I'm working on a web-page that will (hopefully) make it easier to update the results. See
1758:
1714:
1690:
1670:
1658:
1608:
1537:
1532:
candidate names these are available from so many sources that is effectively not needed. --
1195:
946:
909:
825:– Have the double redirects been removed? (We have made lots in the process of doing this).
732:
1004:
Update the bios of each MP (including those who became MPs and those who ceased to be MPs)
207:, where the constituency name is that used at the time of the election. See, for example
8:
1966:
1797:
Heh, saw that. Not a complete disaster, the results were there and it was fixed quickly.
1337:
300:
296:
1938:
Double check the entries that are marked "done", they might not be filled in completely.
2190:
2117:
1352:
1330:
1244:
1217:
1008:
924:
Disambiguation pages, that are complete. Redlinked disambiguation pages are not useful.
646:
613:
573:
2081:
119:
We should treat the government report as authoritative. I'll add it to the resources.
2030:
1522:
1364:
1234:
1164:
1094:
2043:
1984:
1889:
Keep up the good work, this is the first time we have had major election coverage!
1798:
1728:
1630:
1571:
1404:
1391:
1358:
1290:
1229:
1205:
1181:
663:
487:
749:
attributes where necessary. This should make it easier to see what needs doing :)
2263:
2152:
2042:
Ranking seems standard to me - all the South Yorkshire results have been ranked.
2014:
1980:
1951:
1890:
1874:
Update the MP section! I recommend the following format (but it is not official):
1842:
1832:
1814:
1789:
1754:
1711:
1686:
1679:
1666:
1655:
1643:
1635:
1604:
1594:
1533:
1493:
1479:
1341:
1192:
1064:
959:
943:
933:
906:
892:
879:
860:
845:
750:
729:
654:
That last statement is false. We dealt with the pre-existing constituency names
442:
280:
249:
227:
192:
174:
120:
79:
1926:
Numbers of 1,000 or greater should use commas to make the numbers more readable.
1962:
1699:
1518:
1318:
1264:
707:
Another thing that needs addressing as part of the disambiguation work is that
31:
As the main aim is to get everything election ready I have made a few changes.
2205:
2187:
2162:
2114:
1554:
that can be used at the bottom of each results table to indicate its source.
1276:
643:
610:
570:
212:
977:
Byelection results need adding. I have done two but that still leaves four:
514:, one of the UK Parliament constituencies, is also the name of no less than
716:
701:
683:
679:
635:
609:
articles which are already correctly named, as your instructions implied.
591:
551:
547:
540:
356:
234:
62:, which I believe is OK to use. Most other sources (such as the BBC) have
1099:
494:: There's an informal project to give parliamentary constituencies in the
437:
pages. I'm sure you will notice that the election ready pages (denoted by
198:
1707:
1373:- modern Liberal Party, came second in one constituency in 2001 (orange).
1104:
450:
381:
316:
2247:
2234:
2059:
1741:
1032:
144:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Progress/2001/A-C
2258:
Could someone on this project please go through the Voting section of
2217:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Progress/Example
869:
38:
Added links to key pages to save having to ferret around all the time.
1983:
seems to be finishing things up. Meanwhile, I'm sneaking off to bed.
1923:
Don't put % symbols in the actual data rows. Just in the the headings
1860:
Just a few issues at this early stage in what may be a long night...
1204:
Maybe we could make a list of parties which deserve a colour page? --
671:
just as the Canadian constituency project re-coloured several of ours
642:
in many cases constituency pages already exist at other page names.
2113:
Is there any need to use {{Template:xyz}} rather than just {{xyz}}?
2084:
from 41,689 to 41,869 which has led to all their %ages being wrong.
1475:
List of Parliamentary constituencies in the United Kingdom by region
765:
For each area I propose making a table using the same strucuture as
2126:
2106:
2085:
1998:
1976:
1904:
1782:
1775:
1736:
1618:
1555:
1502:
1462:
1431:
1077:
853:
466:
one of the most re-used sets of names in the English-speaking world
269:
216:
147:
101:
67:
2211:
2096:
I've just put up a new version of the results generator (V3.1) at
711:
the {{otheruses}} and {{otheruses2}} templates, some editors (see
26:
2199:
2125:
No, none at all. Caused by lack of sleep and a faulty brain...
1309:
Have been long standing (to the best of my limited knowledge)...
258:
1027:
Then there will be things like ministerial changes to follow up
63:
1919:
As we consolidate the edits there is a few thing to remember:
875:
needs to be done, it should also help come the next election.
1501:
I don't think there is a need to add the "by region" suffix.
630:
names, then it's wholly unfounded. Furthermore: They aren't
492:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK House of Commons constituencies
2241:
878:
Instructions are given at the beginning of the new section.
2142:
Knowledge:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Style
1932:
Use + or - on any change values (unless no change: use 0.0)
1868:
in the table cells. Use 1 decimal place, i.e. 34.0% not 34%
1471:
List of Parliamentary constituencies in the United Kingdom
1449:
List of Parliamentary constituencies in the United Kingdom
1443:
List of Parliamentary constituencies in the United Kingdom
504:
List of Parliamentary constituencies in the United Kingdom
203:
I'd like to propose that the title for the results box be
2098:
526:
have to be specific to avoid stepping on the redlinks of
2231:
Knowledge:WikiProject_UK_Parliament_constituencies/Style
1935:
Make sure the MPs are listed in a bulleted list as well.
1829:
921:
Checking all the Wikinews links go to the correct pages.
581:
Which is the case for the overwhemling majority, if not
1213:
Other Historic patrties deserving colours if such exist
327:
of the necessary disambiguation pages already, such as
18:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies
60:
Electoral Commission's spreadsheet of results for 2001
1771:
1170:
Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern
932:Then I can see improving content as the next item.
819:– State of the article (Stub, Minimal, Substantial)
590:attacking the disambiguations and article splits.
918:I think there are a few things that need doing...
1355:- formerly one of the three big parties (yellow).
2080:where the BBC has transposed the turnout figure
2078:Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency)
1110:Speaker of the House of Commons (United Kingdom)
1367:- stood in large numbers of seats in 92 and 97.
1317:...I think that the following deserve colours:
1929:Don't forget the hold/gain rows at the bottom!
2161:I've added some comments on the talk page...
392:we are going to confuse people. For example:
1023:MPs_elected_in_the_UK_general_election, 2001
1016:MPs_elected_in_the_UK_general_election, 2005
1007:Update the MPs for each region. For example
927:Removing double (and even triple) redirects.
1903:rather than the BBC figure in these cases.
713:Talk:Blackburn (UK Parliament constituency)
472:should convince you of that. (If not, try
767:Results of 2005 GE#Results by constituency
1871:For numbers of 1,000 or over use a comma.
420:Gordon (Scottish Parliament constituency)
1312:Have many candidates in this election...
347:more to come in that vein. There are a
14:
2076:available though). As an example see
835:: for when the candidates are listed;
1459:United Kingdom general election, 2005
1390:Also red for the Socialist Alliance.
1361:- very successful in the 97 election.
839:: when the results have been entered.
173:Thanks for those, a great timesaver!
2254:Adding Redirects for ampersands, etc
1072:The following parties are currently
634:instructions. I didn't write them.
423:Telford (UK Parliament constituency)
1912:The morning after the night before.
1323:Official Monster Raving Loony Party
1225:Official Monster Raving Loony Party
955:
682:is a breed of sheep, by the way).
502:trodden on some of the redlinks in
417:Gordon (UK Parliament constituency)
353:leave the article names as they are
209:Na h-Eileanan an Iar (constituency)
23:
1401:Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1125:Social Democratic and Labour Party
1049:. I am thinking in particular of:
337:Vale of Glamorgan (disambiguation)
311:As I told you before, today: Read
24:
2282:
1478:transferring sections and names.
1115:United Kingdom Independence Party
1021:Update the constituency links in
674:necessary in place. This task is
490:pointed out near to the start of
98:Talk:North_Belfast_(constituency)
1145:Green Party of England and Wales
510:simply isn't going to cut it. (
343:, and so forth, but there are a
2136:New "Manual of Style" sub-page
1552:{{Election box source|source=}}
1237:(? Stood at least twice on the
2071:BBC Results are not definitive
1946:for how to style the entries.
1864:If adding manually, don't put
1824:BBC News is going to be useful
954:Please see the above section:
757:Changing the page structure...
13:
1:
1942:See the first few entries of
1377:Ulster Popular Unionist Party
1340:) may be of use in deciding.
1255:Ulster Popular Unionist Party
1018:and fix the consituency links
741:FYI: Constituency duplication
329:Macclesfield (disambiguation)
2272:17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
2147:This is intended to go with
1327:Social Democratic Party (UK)
563:(UK parliament constinuency)
369:(UK Parliament constituency)
321:plenty of discussion on this
146:etc are based on this data.
142:The pre-generated tables at
42:As an aside, I think naming
7:
1379:- had an MP from 1980 - 95.
1135:Socialist Labour Party (UK)
1120:RESPECT The Unity Coalition
1056:Socialist Labour Party (UK)
1053:RESPECT The Unity Coalition
10:
2287:
1975:I used that handy tool of
1885:* ], ] (yearA–''present'')
1160:Communist Party of Britain
856:16:08, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
666:and other editors, since.)
478:Southport (disambiguation)
470:Blackburn (disambiguation)
219:22:05, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
2225:09:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2208:21:03, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
2172:I've made a few changes:
2109:14:39, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
2088:12:28, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
1785:21:51, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
1778:21:41, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
1465:15:29, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1333:following not long after.
1208:16:00, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1155:Democratic Unionist Party
1150:Veritas (political party)
1080:11:42, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
882:09:06, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
848:10:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
753:10:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
496:Canadian House of Commons
445:22:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
409:Telford (UK constituency)
384:21:35, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
359:20:14, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
272:20:42, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
195:19:10, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
150:10:48, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
104:00:32, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
70:21:58, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
2250:5 July 2005 01:01 (UTC)
2237:28 June 2005 11:34 (UTC)
2129:18:19, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
2001:07:20, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
1907:00:10, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
1753:into tomorrow anyway. --
1621:07:35, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
1558:15:27, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
1505:21:56, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1434:22:03, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1140:Scottish Socialist Party
886:Project progress so far.
863:16:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
806:The structure would be:
638:03:29, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
594:03:02, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
543:01:01, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
508:Blackburn (constituency)
482:Preston (disambiguation)
453:23:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
406:Gordon (UK constituency)
341:Rhondda (disambiguation)
305:Knowledge:Disambiguation
283:19:28, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
252:07:54, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
237:02:01, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC)
230:22:22, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
211:which used to be called
177:16:51, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
123:07:19, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
82:23:00, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
2194:21:23, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
2166:13:03, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
2156:11:34, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
2121:16:14, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
2063:15:57, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
2047:13:50, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
2034:13:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
2018:08:26, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1988:06:30, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1971:05:58, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1955:05:43, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1894:23:53, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1856:Notes for those helping
1850:00:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1836:21:30, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1818:22:15, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1802:22:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1793:21:58, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1762:19:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1732:20:11, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1718:01:53, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1694:19:23, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1662:19:09, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1647:17:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1612:00:01, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
1598:23:03, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1575:16:49, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1550:stab at a new template
1541:19:27, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1526:10:58, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1497:18:05, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1483:17:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1408:16:03, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1395:09:53, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1383:Workers Party (Ireland)
1345:18:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1294:16:42, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1280:16:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1260:Workers Party (Ireland)
1199:15:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1185:12:28, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1130:Scottish National Party
1090:Conservative Party (UK)
1068:11:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1036:20:25, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
963:11:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
950:08:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
937:18:04, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
913:11:58, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
896:17:10, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
736:15:26, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
719:03:02, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
704:03:02, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
686:13:24, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
650:03:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
617:03:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
585:, articles. There's a
577:00:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
554:18:01, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
537:Eccles (disambiguation)
474:Gordon (disambiguation)
2229:I've redirected it to
1473:should be by moved to
1371:Liberal Party (modern)
1286:Liberal Party (modern)
1250:Liberal Party (modern)
1175:British National Party
1085:Liberal Democrats (UK)
1059:British National Party
996:Birmingham, Hodge Hill
813:– Name of constituency
698:isn't even coterminous
486:To remind you of what
430:Telford (constituency)
428:If we left Telford as
398:Telford (constituency)
333:Neath (disambiguation)
244:All entries listed as
2149:Template:Election box
1427:Template:Election box
395:Gordon (constituency)
1879:* ], ] (yearA–yearB)
1469:I was thinking that
205:]: constituency name
94:RESEARCH PAPER 01/54
1706:), and commercial (
1512:Citation of Sources
1349:The other parties:
1011:has two MPs listed.
301:Scottish Parliament
297:European Parliament
1828:BBC News Homepage
1683:
1353:Liberal Party (UK)
1331:Socialist Alliance
1245:Socialist Alliance
1218:Liberal Party (UK)
1041:Party double check
1009:Reading, Berkshire
561:pages should have
2092:Results Generator
1677:
1365:Natural Law Party
1235:Natural Law Party
1165:UK Unionist Party
1095:Labour Party (UK)
804:
803:
605:be instructed to
56:surname, initials
52:firstname surname
44:firstName surname
2278:
2223:Timrollpickering
1902:
1811:Sunderland South
1399:And we need the
1359:Referendum Party
1230:Referendum Party
1074:template enabled
901:After completion
772:
771:
319:. There's been
199:Result box title
58:. This is the
2286:
2285:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2256:
2244:
2214:
2202:
2138:
2094:
2073:
1914:
1900:
1858:
1826:
1567:
1514:
1445:
1306:Of those that:
1043:
993:Leicester South
956:#Disambiguation
903:
888:
872:
759:
743:
626:pages with the
528:other countries
468:. One look at
373:(constutuency)'
292:
261:
201:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2284:
2255:
2252:
2243:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2213:
2210:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2177:
2169:
2168:
2140:Available at:
2137:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2093:
2090:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2037:
2036:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1991:
1990:
1973:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1933:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1825:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1795:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1747:
1746:
1739:
1734:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1674:
1673:
1664:
1650:
1649:
1639:
1638:
1633:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1566:
1565:Election night
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1513:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1486:
1485:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1380:
1374:
1368:
1362:
1356:
1334:
1319:National Front
1315:
1314:
1313:
1310:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1265:National Front
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1220:
1202:
1201:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1061:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1042:
1039:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1019:
1012:
1005:
1002:
1001:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
988:
983:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
930:
929:
928:
925:
922:
902:
899:
887:
884:
871:
870:Page structure
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
841:
840:
829:Election name'
826:
820:
814:
802:
801:
798:
795:
792:
790:Aberdeen South
786:
785:
782:
779:
776:
758:
755:
742:
739:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
709:in addition to
705:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
667:
555:
544:
533:
531:
485:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
434:
426:
425:
424:
421:
418:
412:
411:
410:
407:
401:
400:
399:
396:
390:(constituency)
378:(constituency)
291:
290:Disambiguation
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
274:
273:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
239:
238:
231:
200:
197:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
110:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
86:
85:
84:
83:
72:
71:
40:
39:
36:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2283:
2274:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2251:
2249:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2224:
2219:
2218:
2209:
2207:
2195:
2192:
2189:
2186:
2181:
2178:
2174:
2173:
2171:
2170:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2154:
2150:
2145:
2143:
2128:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2119:
2116:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2108:
2103:
2101:
2100:
2089:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2064:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2035:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2019:
2016:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2000:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1989:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1953:
1947:
1945:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1928:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1906:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1892:
1884:
1881:
1878:
1877:
1873:
1870:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1851:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1834:
1830:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1809:
1803:
1800:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1784:
1780:
1779:
1777:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1725:
1724:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1681:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1657:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1640:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1620:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1610:
1606:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1591:
1587:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1557:
1553:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1524:
1520:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1464:
1460:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1308:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1295:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1239:Isle of Wight
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1048:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1026:
1024:
1020:
1017:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1003:
998:
995:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
978:
976:
975:
974:
964:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
948:
945:
940:
939:
938:
935:
931:
926:
923:
920:
919:
917:
916:
915:
914:
911:
908:
898:
897:
894:
883:
881:
876:
862:
858:
857:
855:
851:
850:
849:
847:
838:
834:
830:
827:
824:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
808:
807:
799:
796:
793:
791:
788:
787:
783:
780:
777:
774:
773:
770:
768:
763:
754:
752:
748:
738:
737:
734:
731:
718:
714:
710:
706:
703:
699:
694:
685:
681:
677:
672:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:
651:
648:
645:
640:
639:
637:
633:
629:
625:
620:
619:
618:
615:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
593:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
553:
549:
545:
542:
538:
529:
525:
522:overloaded.
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
452:
447:
446:
444:
440:
435:
431:
427:
422:
419:
416:
415:
413:
408:
405:
404:
402:
397:
394:
393:
391:
386:
385:
383:
379:
374:
370:
365:
362:The has been
361:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
306:
302:
298:
282:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
229:
225:
222:
221:
220:
218:
214:
213:Western Isles
210:
206:
196:
194:
176:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
122:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
113:
112:
111:
103:
99:
95:
92:
91:
90:
89:
88:
87:
81:
76:
75:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:I agree that
49:
48:
47:
45:
37:
34:
33:
32:
19:
2257:
2245:
2220:
2215:
2212:Example page
2203:
2146:
2139:
2104:
2097:
2095:
2074:
2031:Chris j wood
1948:
1941:
1918:
1915:
1888:
1865:
1859:
1827:
1702:), tabloid (
1589:
1585:
1580:
1568:
1551:
1546:
1523:Chris j wood
1515:
1489:
1456:
1453:
1446:
1212:
1203:
1179:
1073:
1071:
1062:
1046:
1044:
1030:
985:
980:
971:
904:
889:
877:
873:
842:
836:
832:
828:
822:
816:
810:
805:
769:as follows:
764:
760:
746:
744:
726:
708:
697:
680:South Dorset
675:
670:
659:
656:at the start
655:
631:
627:
623:
606:
602:
598:
586:
582:
566:
562:
558:
548:Dudley North
527:
523:
519:
515:
499:
465:
438:
429:
389:
377:
372:
368:
363:
352:
348:
344:
325:bare handful
324:
312:
293:
265:
245:
223:
204:
202:
190:
64:terms of use
55:
51:
43:
41:
30:
27:Page updates
2200:Duplication
2153:Greg Robson
2099:www.gj0.net
2044:Warofdreams
2015:Greg Robson
1985:Mibblepedia
1952:Greg Robson
1891:Greg Robson
1833:Greg Robson
1815:Greg Robson
1799:Mibblepedia
1790:Greg Robson
1729:Mibblepedia
1708:corporation
1704:celebritism
1678:Similar to
1644:Greg Robson
1636:Greg Robson
1631:Mibblepedia
1595:Greg Robson
1572:Mibblepedia
1494:Greg Robson
1480:Greg Robson
1405:Warofdreams
1392:Warofdreams
1342:Greg Robson
1291:Warofdreams
1182:Warofdreams
1105:Plaid Cymru
1065:Greg Robson
1047:Independent
960:Greg Robson
934:Greg Robson
893:Greg Robson
880:Greg Robson
861:Greg Robson
846:Greg Robson
751:Greg Robson
664:Mibblepedia
488:Earl Andrew
443:Greg Robson
315:you write,
281:Greg Robson
266:How to help
264:Should the
259:How to help
250:Greg Robson
228:Greg Robson
193:Greg Robson
175:Greg Robson
121:Greg Robson
80:Greg Robson
1981:GregRobson
1680:OldakQuill
1403:(yellow).
999:Hartlepool
990:Brent East
583:nearly all
569:clashes.
567:definitely
2260:this page
2242:This page
1963:Trilobite
1490:Update...
1447:The page
1100:Sinn Féin
823:Redirects
797:Unchecked
781:Redirects
2264:Nicholas
2206:Maltaran
2163:Shimgray
1277:Shimgray
981:Ipswitch
784:2005 GE
512:Richmond
1901:''N/A''
1774:helps.
1745:region.
1700:Murdoch
1519:WP:CITE
1461:page.
1325:, with
1014:Update
817:Quality
794:Minimal
778:Quality
717:Uncle G
702:Uncle G
684:Uncle G
636:Uncle G
592:Uncle G
552:Uncle G
541:Uncle G
520:heavily
500:already
357:Uncle G
299:or the
235:Uncle G
1847:Willow
1759:Willow
1691:Willow
1671:Willow
1609:Willow
1538:Willow
986:Ogmore
800:Ready
480:, and
451:Jooler
382:Jooler
317:Jooler
313:before
2268:reply
2248:Joolz
2235:Joolz
2188:Joe D
2115:Joe D
2060:MarkS
1742:MarkS
1715:Quill
1712:Oldak
1659:Quill
1656:Oldak
1586:Ready
1196:Quill
1193:Oldak
1033:MarkS
947:Quill
944:Oldak
910:Quill
907:Oldak
833:Ready
733:Quill
730:Oldak
660:don't
644:Joe D
628:wrong
611:Joe D
571:Joe D
516:three
224:Agree
16:<
2270:) @
2082:here
1967:Talk
1843:Vamp
1755:Vamp
1687:Vamp
1667:Vamp
1605:Vamp
1590:Done
1534:Vamp
1338:link
1329:and
1321:and
1284:See
837:Done
811:Name
775:Name
747:(ER)
607:move
439:(ER)
364:some
246:(ER)
2191:(t)
2127:80N
2118:(t)
2107:80N
2086:80N
1999:80N
1977:80N
1905:80N
1783:80N
1776:80N
1737:80N
1619:80N
1588:to
1556:80N
1547:and
1503:80N
1463:80N
1432:80N
1206:Neo
1078:80N
854:80N
676:not
647:(t)
624:new
614:(t)
603:not
599:all
587:lot
574:(t)
559:all
349:lot
345:lot
335:,
270:80N
217:80N
148:80N
102:80N
68:80N
2144:.
1969:)
1882:or
1654:--
1603:--
1581:If
1241:).
1191:--
942:--
831:–
632:my
550:.
524:We
484:.)
476:,
380:?
339:,
331:,
2266:(
1965:(
1866:%
1845::
1757::
1689::
1669::
1607::
1536::
530:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.