3349:
first place? How is not winning a tournament, not winning a title, not winning a championship even notable at all then in the grand scheme of things. You got a silver medal...I say big deal. You did not win a cup, you did not win a title, you did not win a tournament, you did not win a trophy, you did not win any championship. You were just like in the case of the World Cup, all the other 23 teams. You were a loser, you were simply one of 23 teams that did not win the tournament. So this logic that a medal should be given a template, and nothing else (even 4th place should) is not even at all logical. It's actually completely illogical. Because it implies that the value or worth to have a template was based on winning something. No one except a gold medalist wins. From the silver medal to last place, everyone is a loser. So claiming that a silver or bronze medal should have a template, but no one from 4th or lower place should, is arbitrary. It does not make much sense at all. The argument that a silver or bronze medal matters because - they actually won nothing. If the argument is team success is what should determine a template, then only the gold medal winners should have one. Because then we are just making up that 2nd and 3rd places somehow really truly matter, when in reality, they most certainly don't. Remember the
Olympics is largely symbolic and political, and that's the only reason it even has a silver and bronze medal. And in these other non Olympics tournaments, those medals are fairly meaningless, as to winning anything, simply because they didn't win anything. If anyone can make an argument that a silver or bronze medal at the FIBA Oceania Championship, FIBA Asian Championship, or FIBA Americas Championship holds merit and value and should have a template, but a 4th place finish at the FIBA World Cup or Olympics does not, then please make that argument, because that is one of the arguments that is being used as a justification for deletion here. Despite that no one here voting for deletion is actually explaining why that is true. Why is that true? Why are silver or bronze medals from those tournaments more important than a 4th place at a worldwide tournament?
3460:
anything in US basketball (even at amateur level) is deemed as having some merit. On the other hand, no one can possibly reasonably attempt to explain why these would be deleted, but templates from FIBA Oceania, FIBA Americas, or FIBA Asia tournaments would be kept. Precisely because no one can make that argument, because it would be silly and nonsensical. Which again, turns it back to, the objective here seems to be about getting all the templates deleted, not out of concern over site creep, but out of the practical terms of how do you get templates deleted under site rules and discussions? You do it by deleting all the ones from the most important tournament first, then use that as a justification to delete everything you want after, but only ones that are cherry picked (national team tournaments), and not some much lesser stuff like McDonald's high school tournaments and such. If this is a real problem, and a real solution, and if this is all simply worry over site creep, then someone here voting for deletion should be able to outline specifically how this violates site creep, and specifically why templates from much less important tournaments are not deleted, or are not here in this discussion instead. Seems fairly simple and straight forward to me. We should have these things clearly outlined and explained when referencing site creep, rather than simply linking to the creep article, and saying it's creep, without giving any explanation as to why or how.
3334:
somehow sneak through the FIBA World Cup templates being deleted first. Well, I believe then that if this happens, it will only be fair to delete everything in the basketball templates of a similar nature. As others here pointed out, some of LeBron James linked templates can be a topic of several deletion discussions then, with delete being the only fair outcome. We are not supposed to cherry pick what templates get deleted here. If all the templates without a medal get deleted, then it's being totally wrong not to delete many, many, many other templates, otherwise it would strongly seem like a clear cherry picking of what templates to delete. It's not right just to single out templates related to national teams and international basketball tournaments. Templates for dozens of high school and college basketball things in the US - not deleted or even discussed, but the world's biggest international basketball tournament (with over 1 billion TV viewers at each of the 3 last tournaments (2006, 2010, 2014)) is obviously just site creep. McDonanld's high school or Big Sky tournament, or whatever similar such stuff - those are not creep...This seems like an obvious case of real definite cherry picking what templates to delete based on personal opinions or world view here.
3089:
runs both), and happens just once every 4 years. So it's very odd that these are all deleted, yet something like FIBA Asian
Championship, or FIBA Oceania Championship templates are not. And so how come just 2010 templates? So basically then, the next thing is to delete all templates having to do with national team tournaments in the sport of basketball. Because if these should be deleted (the most important tournament by far), then every basketball one for an international national team tournament in basketball should be deleted. How can we possibly justify deleting these, when all other tournaments (all of which are of less importance) are not deleted? So is this the route to go? The next time someone nominates one of these templates for deletion, then this discussion will be used to justify that. So this is basically saying that all the templates for international basketball tournaments between national teams need to be deleted. And as others here have asked several times in this discussion, where is the site rule or justification or precedent for that? I cannot see it existing anywhere, and neither can some other editors here in this discussion.
3456:
well we deleted the most important tournament's templates, so of course these ones for lesser tournaments must be deleted also...this in no way comes across as there is a problem of creep, so let's see how to fix that, or let's see what templates maybe should be deleted. Which is how the discussion would go if that was really the objective or concern. If it was, then we would be discussing the FIBA Oceania team templates, and not the ones for the world cup. It seems clear why we are not though. To get all the templates deleted, you would have to first delete the ones of the biggest tournament, in order to use that as the standard for other lesser tournament's templates to be deleted. If the concern here was solely site creep, and if the concern here was what templates can go, then lesser tournament templates would be here in this discussion, and as others here in this discussion have noted, things like basketball templates for high school and college tournaments in USA.
2930:, Ah! I see. I missed a "as these" on my first sentence, thus the misunderstanding. Sure, I am not claiming that editors are making templates for every team at every competition, for every player, nor any danger of such thing happening... That was completely out of my mind, as a given and well established fact. I was thinking about teams like these ones, at World level competitions, I think that we do not need every team of these. Note that I voted "per Plastikspork" and that is their reasoning, so I have written in that mindset (not your fault for not catching that, a little bit of mine for not being clearer, mostly a common difficulty of discussing in writing). Also note that I believe this to be a borderline case, WP would not collapse if we had templates for every team of a World Cup, but I believe that we are better off without them -
3504:
said that. When this has been brought up, one of the responses has been, well once these get deleted, those others will most likely be brought up for deletion also. So it's actually just a basic fact of practical terms of what exactly would probably happen. Unless we want to just arbitrarily delete the world cup templates with no basis on why, as to in turn keeping other basketball tournament templates of much less merit (that does not help site creep, but actually probably makes it even a bigger problem). Which is why this should have to define clearly that it is site creep for these specific templates, and that's not really the case. It's a tournament that happens once every 4 years. Most players that play in it, only play in 1 tournament, and few ever in more than 2 tournaments.
3395:- Again, no one explains why that violated creep. I read it over and over and nothing on the creep article says that. Nothing there suggests that a medal winning template would be fine, and one for a 4th placed team for example would not. I am not agreeing this violates creep in any way until someone explains how it does. The creep article doe snot in any way show that these templates are violating that said policy. If anything, it more likely implies that templates for the major international basketball tournament would be well within bounds.
3060:
then this needs to be brought to a broader and more wide open discussion. Because we can't use this one template as a justification for deleting all of them, without any reason being given that is justifiable. So far I have seen no justifiable reason given for all the templates to be deleted, as creep does not apply to a world cup and that happens every 4 years only. A world cup that is also seeing more attendance, more TV viewers, and more revenues at each tournament than
Olympics basketball also accxording to FIBA. So that is not creep.
3410:
player had more than 4 world cup roster templates in any of their articles - look it up if you don't believe it. So to be site creep, we now simply assume based on opinion that this will be a violation of site creep, even though it actually is not an actual creep violation. Again, the creep article does not read that way. Nowhere does it say templates should be deleted because some editors think that in the future their could possibly be a violation without there actually being any sign of that currently being an actual issue at all.
2968:
3141:'s participation in the 2010 championship was discussed in the article. His subsequent participation in the 2014 championship, where his brother Zoran was his teammate was also discussed. One could perhaps expand the section about Goran's participation on national teams so that his other teammates would be mentioned, thus satisfying guideline #5, and perhaps even an entire article, fully satisfying guideline #4. –
2735:(and others arguing to keep): there is no need to have a policy specifically telling to keep or delete anything. Evidently policy based arguments have more weight, because they reflect common established practice, not because they are "the rules" or "the law"; but ultimately the discussion makes the decision, and in the long run may even change the (de facto) policy. Infuriating and weird at times? yes...
2075:, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a competition which only once every four years (like the World Cup).
2510:. It's quite helpful, to say the least. You could argue that for these players, something about their participation in tournaments such as this would satisfy guidelines nos. 1, 2 and 4, #3, not so much, and #5, rarely, if at all. Does the "standard" pass for the templates listed on this TFD? I dunno. Maybe? –
3459:
There seems to be no logical argument nor reason to make a case for a high school or college tournament template being more important than one of the FIBA World Cup. The only explanation is that international basketball tournaments of national teams are being deemed to carry little to no value, while
3088:
OK, Bagumba, but it was argued that using
Slovenia, or their 8 place finish as a reason all should be deleted (as in nothing less than a medal.) Besides the point that again, it's the largest and most important basketball competition in the world internationally (more than the Olympics per FIBA that
3059:
templates were deleted. Look at this discussion, every single one of them were deleted. This isn't just about the
Slovenian template, it's about why were all of them deleted. If people want this to be just about the Slovenian template, but then want to use that to justify deleting all the templates,
3028:
Relisting is to allow others who have not participated a chance to !vote, to help reach a clearer consensus. You are more than welcome to continue to discuss, but are typically limited to one !vote (e.g. the bold text that reads "Strong Keep"). One options is to take your earlier "Strong Keep" and
2951:
this does not meet the creep rules, as this is the World Cup and happens once every 4 years. The argument to delete one specific template of a team which did not medal at the tournament, is then being falsely justified as a reason to delete all such templates. While, then we have other templates for
916:. I cannot see any reason not to merge the two templates; both have the same parameters and similar layout, and current sports car championship articles show no problem in using the generic infobox. Whatever rationale existed for two templates (they were created concurrently) appears to be obsolete.
3455:
But, this comes across totally as let's delete all the national team templates, so to do so, let's delete the most important tournament first (world cup), then use that as a justification for deleting all the other less important tournaments. Using the argument when those come up for deletion, that
2749:
It's not "for just about every team". Stop making straw men. Not everyone gets to be selected to a national team. Not everyone selected accepts to be a part of it. And this doesn't happen every year. This argument is as valid as every argument not grounded on "common established practice" elsewhere
2324:
of the templates that were deleted were similar to this, A competition that recurs quadriennally, involving senior national teams, that's higher than the continental level. Plastikspork said "The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a competition which only once every
3503:
It's not any conspiracy. It's simply logic. It makes no sense to delete the world cup templates, but keeps others from things that are totally mealiness by comparison (Asia championship, Oceania championship, high school, etc.). I am not the only editor pointing that out here, several editors have
3333:
So that is the real objective here?.... Delete the ones for the most important and biggest tournament, then use that as a justification to delete everything. By citing then that if the FIBA World Cup templates were deleted, then everything else must be deleted. The whole key to this strategy is to
1989:. There's a long-standing consensus that we don't keep navboxes for these, as they aren't defining characteristics of these players and result in serious template creep. Footy players can play on their national squad for a decade, sometimes. Imagine if we put up a navbox on each of their pages for
3488:
Metaphorically speaking, it's like me saying "all of our fruit is seven days old, so we should check if they're still ripe" and you replying that because the grapes have gone off they've all gone bad. Each type of fruit has to be checked separately. Just because you happen to like grapes the most
3244:
Can someone here voting for deletion actually explain how this is creep (and cite actual parts of the creep guidelines and how this violates it)? So far no one has done that, they simply say it is creep, yet they don' give any actual proper explanation for that, not anything from creep guidelines
3348:
Also, this idea that anything with a medal is worthy, anything without a medal is site creep...who decides that a 3rd place finish matters in some tournament, but a 4th place finish in another is totally irrelevant? Who decided that even a silver medal or bronze medal is even notable then in the
3318:
be nominating/deleting similar templates for non-winning teams in the future. Just because this is the first mass-nomination does not mean it will be the last. To your first point, see my example in the thread above yours regarding excessive navboxes - in my opinion it's absolutely crazy to have
3292:
FIBA World
Championship is after Olympic games most important international basketball competition, so this should not be deleted. If we have templates for some high school or NCAA college basketball stuff, then we can not delete this. If you delete this then you also must delete all other World
3409:
I looked it up, no one ever played at more than 5 World Cups. One player appeared in 5, and no one else appeared in more than 4 (11 players - all of them retired). So some are claiming site creep here, when just 12 players in history would even qualify for 4 templates, and actually not a single
3175:
to mention the other team members, thus WP:NAVBOX #5 is generally not met. That would be more suitable for the specific team article, not for the bios, especially if the team didn't even finish above 3rd place. Your example of Goran and Zoran is a rare exception of brothers playing on the same
2505:
LOL my bad. "D" was originally for "deletion". I'm old. I'm not saying essays don't have weight, it's just if we're using essays solely as the argument for deletion, which is currently being done, it's on very shaky ground. As for against deletion, I've actually looked (just) for policies and
2207:
We had a bit of an edit conflict, but the official TFD policy (which I mentioned below) allows for a consensus opinion to delete a template (even if it doesn't meet any specific TFD reason). When multiple TFDs over multiple months and years all agree that TCREEP is a valid reason for deleting
2580:
just has one(!) FIBA Basketball World Cup navbox, plus 3 Olympic navboxes and 1 Americas navbox. That's 5 in total. Meanwhile, he also has navboxes for things such as "NBA season minutes leaders", "Jordan Brand
Classic All-American Game – Boys' MVPs", "Hickok Belt winners", all of which are
2585:
listed on the infobox. The best
American basketball players should get at least a maximum of five national team navboxes. Most play only during the Olympics, and that's just once in four years, and most players play for only two. (It's quite different for non-Americans, but that's another
3267:, he has 24 navigation templates at the bottom of the article; that's a bit excessive, no? Having a navbox for every little thing someone has done over the course of their life is unnecessary and adds clutter to a page. Another relevant example (for the basketball players) is
2952:
less important tournaments and that happen more often, which then if you use that as an argument, those will all have to be deleted also. This isn't site creep, this is in fact site over delete. Because eventually, if this holds, all such templates will have to be deleted.
3477:, you're starting to get into the realm of conspiracies. The reason why every single template that shows the squads of every single non-top-three team is that a) it would be a massive TFD nomination, and (more importantly) b) nominations should take place between
1726:
1762:
854:. Through merging the sports car championship into the motorsport championship infobox template, all the sports car championship articles will use the same template, making the articles not only appear more cohesive, but also more user friendly to edit. --
1722:
1798:
1758:
3293:
championship templates (from all years not just 2010), all
European championship, all continental championship templates... Its absolute crazy to have templates for Oceania championship and to remove most important competition FIBA world cup.--
1794:
1438:
1222:
1114:
1618:
1582:
3190:
Yes, I understand that satisfying WP:NAVBOX #5 for cases such as this would be a shot from your own free-throw line, unlike the first 3 criteria. Aside from brothers, maybe teammates from club teams could be a good mention, like the
1006:
1510:
1258:
1078:
1654:
1546:
1474:
1434:
1402:
1366:
1330:
1218:
1150:
1110:
1042:
1910:
1750:
1690:
1294:
1732:
1614:
1578:
1186:
1914:
1002:
954:
1938:
To that similar templates deleted in selective situations, it is not disputed. But i still have not said where it says in the rules that it must. As I said, if indicated a rule by which it is done, I will not complain. —
1786:
1506:
1254:
1074:
1768:
1650:
1542:
1470:
1398:
1362:
1326:
1146:
1038:
2362:
mention and/or link to it). Also, just because those other templates exist doesn't automatically mean that these should exist as well (and vice versa), so using them is an OTHERSTUFF argument which should be avoided.
2148:
1686:
1290:
1182:
1822:
3432:
these templates will cause template creep. They're saying that these templates, along with the other half-dozen tournaments someone may play in, would result in template creep. I'm not sure you saw my example of
3054:
Oh, OK thanks. Anyway, why were all of the templates deleted? No one is even mentioning that. This isn't just about the
Slovenian template, which is how the argument is being shaped. This is about how all of the
2325:
four years (like the World Cup)." Clearly, either we don't follow this standard, or this standard doesn't exist, as mere qualification in a competition that happens quadriennially involving senior national teams
1890:
1878:
1804:
746:
3489:
doesn't mean that we're going to just blindly throw out all the produce to spite you. The oranges might be perfectly good, and the apples might have spoiled. We won't know until we actually decide to look.
1738:
1462:
1246:
1138:
1774:
1444:
1228:
1120:
408:
1642:
1606:
817:
742:
690:
1624:
1588:
1030:
2100:
IS only once in four years, and a World Cup, of a Olympic sport. I am not arguing for keep, I am simply noting that you may need to amend you reasoning, or your vote, as it seams inconsistent. -
1860:
The only reason for deletion is that it is not winnig one of the first three places? Where in the regulations it says so. If you show a valid reason that should be deleted, I would not object. —
1534:
1282:
1102:
1012:
2392:. Those who want to delete must base their arguments on policy, even more so on those who insist to keep. If a discussion is closed as "Delete as per WP:TCREEP", which is a cuter way of saying "
2300:
is the only thing being violated, it has been demonstrated time and time again (not only in the TFDs listed above but on dozens of other templates) to be a valid reason for deleting a template.
1810:
995:
2780:, we are not discussing the notability of members of these teams, we are discussing if their articles should have a template with every such team they've been at. (so, who's making straw men?)
1678:
1570:
1516:
1498:
1426:
1390:
1354:
1264:
1174:
1084:
1066:
3481:
templates. Nominating a Rugby World Cup team and a FIFA World Cup team in the same nomination makes no sense. Nominating multiple RWC or FWC templates, though, keeps them all contained to one
1714:
1660:
1552:
1480:
1408:
1372:
1336:
1318:
1156:
1048:
404:
351:
1902:
1886:
608:
1696:
1450:
1300:
1234:
1210:
1126:
119:
2650:
and "The best American basketball players should get at least a maximum of five national team navboxes" implies that the level of notability is equal to the number of navigational boxes.
1630:
1594:
1192:
2169:
1979:
1898:
1847:
1018:
1522:
1270:
1090:
1666:
1558:
1486:
1414:
1378:
1342:
1162:
1054:
1702:
1306:
953:
268:
1198:
2292:
mean deleting these others" is not an argument any more than "we shouldn't throw away this mouldy cheese because we might also have to throw away some other cheese in the future".
863:
3441:
with 24 navboxes (which is completely unnecessary in my opinion), but creep does exist, and this TFD (along with future nominations, I'm sure) are trying to keep it to a minimum.
115:
60:
3411:
1894:
189:
3263:, but the delete arguments have been more or less quoting it. Examples have also been mentioned multiple times (e.g. footballers who play for one team for decades). Looking at
841:
3234:
3159:
2686:
2659:
2645:
2618:
2414:
2372:
2353:
2217:
2202:
891:
794:
758:
735:
483:
3513:
3358:
3343:
3213:
3185:
3098:
3069:
2604:
2528:
2500:
2466:
2435:
806:
770:
525:
2048:
547:
457:
2939:
2916:
2846:
2823:
2789:
2768:
2084:
2067:
908:
788:
752:
502:
3498:
3469:
3450:
3404:
3328:
3302:
3280:
3254:
3016:
2961:
2021:
925:
420:
397:
3083:
3046:
2998:
2719:
2309:
3385:
3125:
2123:
2109:
2268:
2004:
1906:
165:
when WikiProject Yu-Gi-Oh! was absorbed into WikiProject Anime and manga in 2009. All transclusions have been updated. The following redirects should also be deleted:
2567:
1948:
1926:
1869:
647:
624:
320:
306:
283:
252:
131:
2444:, there should be clear consensus based on policy to delete (we sometimes forget this). There's actually no policy that this is a **bad** navbox, unless your citing
432:
2744:
108:
414:
224:
1882:
42:
37:
689:
294:
3195:
in the 2016 team. It's not like I'm recommending mentioning every player in a specific person's team, just those who were previously related at some point. –
2727:, per Plastikspork et al., we do not need templates for just about every team as it would create caos in the footer of too many athletes articles. A note to
850:, to create unity. Currently, many sports car championships are already using the infobox template for motorsport championships in general, most notably the
659:
264:
I checked seven other work groups. Two of them never had dedicated templates. Of the other five, all of them were deleted (some at your request), except for
169:
2280:
are the strongest argument for deleting these templates. The "we'll just have to delete these other dozens of templates" is a spurious argument because a)
641:
1744:
3372:
Top 3 teams is enough as they are the most important (this includes Olympics, FIBA World Championship, EuroBasket and other international competitions).
2329:
209:
199:
179:
143:
1780:
350:
125:
2326:
2332:
274:. Frankly, I don't see any need to retain this template for historical reference. There is no useful information there, not even on the talk page.
2012:: it makes no sense to delete this, and then dozens of other templates have to also be deleted. There is absolutely zero reason to delete these.
1816:
574:
2358:
TCREEP can apply (and it does) without it having specifically been used in the previous discussions (of course, about half those discussions
2180:
exists, but do we have specific policy or guideline or even an essay that clearly stipulates on which navboxes are good to go, not which are
1835:
782:
3260:
59:
1456:
1240:
1132:
510:
I completely agree with the above... Pointless template but the content should be moved to the article before the template is deleted. --
1636:
1600:
2572:
8th place, everyone! 8th place out of 32 who even qualified, 100+ who participated, and 100+ who didn't. Bravo, indeed! If we're using
1024:
1528:
1276:
1096:
1672:
1564:
1492:
1420:
1384:
1348:
1168:
1060:
1708:
1312:
1204:
821:
778:
3414:
shows that the argument that this is violating site creep is just the personal opinion of some editors, and not an actual problem.
21:
3485:
group of templates. The reasons for deletion may be the same between the two groups, but the groups themselves are different.
3207:
3153:
2910:
2817:
2762:
2680:
2639:
2598:
2522:
2460:
2408:
2347:
2196:
2136:
1961:
635:
465:
800:
764:
155:
3245:
that this is actually violating anything. So now we just cite something that is an opinion, and that justifies deletions?
1831:
887:
1993:
international competition they participated in during that time, in addition to teams and such. That would be lunacy. ~
2484:
2097:
426:
17:
2984:
2426:
Is there a policy or guideline supporting its inclusion? If not, this is ultimately a subjective decision anyways.—
826:
I see no reason to have a separate template that is only used on a half dozen pages, unless I am missing something?
2712:
2623:
If there's something that irritates me aside from crazy little children, it's straw men. No one said that navboxes
2041:
851:
834:
653:
631:
575:
518:
233:
as has been done with a number of other project templates that were later adopted as work groups or task forces of
137:
248:
2184:? Full disclosure: I've asked Primefac to relist this discussion, on which he was gracious enough to do so. –
859:
2208:
templates, it can be extended to other TFDs as past precedent. I believe this is what's being invoked here.
2384:. Battle of the essays. If we're basing any of our arguments here, it's very weak ground indeed! Remember,
1917:, ... many of these are for football or junior-level competitions, but the first one is directly related.
3007:
I thought you had to re-vote since the discussion was closed and then re-opened. Isn't that how it works?
95:
3230:
991:
441:
3538:
3202:
3148:
2905:
2812:
2757:
2675:
2634:
2593:
2517:
2455:
2403:
2342:
2191:
974:
944:
710:
680:
595:
565:
371:
341:
80:
855:
883:
2118:
2079:
2063:
963:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
699:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
584:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
478:
360:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
69:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
3533:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
969:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
939:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
705:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
675:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
590:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
366:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
336:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
75:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
3534:
3509:
3465:
3419:
3400:
3354:
3339:
3298:
3250:
3226:
3192:
3094:
3065:
3012:
2980:
2957:
2393:
2296:
allows "Templates for which none of these apply may be deleted by consensus here" - so while
2017:
987:
970:
940:
706:
676:
591:
561:
367:
337:
76:
3037:: it makes no sense to delete this ...", or just begin your later comments with "Comment:" —
3225:
per nomination. Navbox doesn't serve much purpose and definitely contributes to WP:TCREEP.
3197:
3166:
3143:
2925:
2900:
2832:
2807:
2775:
2752:
2730:
2670:
2629:
2588:
2512:
2450:
2421:
2398:
2337:
2281:
2186:
904:
541:
451:
8:
3381:
3121:
3056:
2488:
921:
54:
3494:
3446:
3434:
3324:
3276:
3268:
3172:
2655:
2614:
2368:
2305:
2264:
2213:
2165:
1975:
1922:
1843:
874:
731:
620:
498:
393:
302:
244:
104:
3271:, who has 8 navboxes at the bottom, only three of which are from championship teams.
3181:
3079:
3042:
2994:
2668:
has three national team navboxes, the same number of his high school(!!!) navboxes. –
2563:
2496:
2431:
2250:
2246:
2115:
2093:
2076:
2059:
1944:
1865:
475:
316:
279:
220:
2837:, evidently someone is doing some, otherwise they wouldn't be here to be discussed.
1721:
3505:
3474:
3461:
3425:
3415:
3396:
3373:
3350:
3335:
3311:
3294:
3246:
3134:
3113:
3090:
3061:
3030:
3023:
3008:
2976:
2953:
2573:
2551:
2507:
2445:
2381:
2315:
2297:
2277:
2242:
2177:
2028:
2013:
2288:
delete these other templates. Simply saying "we shouldn't delete these because it
2935:
2842:
2785:
2740:
2705:
2105:
2034:
1793:
1757:
900:
827:
536:
511:
446:
234:
3138:
3074:
This was a group nomination of templates for national teams that did not medal.—
2898:. Clearly, no one's making navboxes for every team this person has played for. –
2895:
383:, now that the template has been (slightly out-of-order) substed onto the page.
3438:
3377:
3264:
3117:
917:
723:
612:
385:
2153:
3490:
3442:
3320:
3272:
2664:
I'm not saying the norm is five; it's like it is the exemption. For example,
2651:
2610:
2385:
2377:
2364:
2301:
2293:
2260:
2238:
2230:
2209:
2161:
2058:: There is absolutely no reason to delete these. And no regulations on that.
1994:
1971:
1933:
1918:
1855:
1839:
727:
616:
494:
389:
298:
259:
239:
100:
1433:
1217:
1109:
3177:
3075:
3038:
2990:
2577:
2559:
2492:
2427:
2234:
1940:
1874:
1861:
312:
275:
216:
1613:
1577:
2665:
2558:
everyone! Do not need the Knowledge equivalent of a participation award.—
1001:
1505:
1253:
1073:
2931:
2853:
2838:
2796:
2781:
2736:
2254:
2101:
1649:
1541:
1469:
1397:
1361:
1325:
1145:
1037:
1685:
1289:
1181:
440:
A whole template for three games that are already fully described by
3259:
I believe you're talking about how we're not explicitly linking to
2396:", is then the closures of such discussions have to be revisited. –
3137:, guidelines nos. 1, 2 and 3, and somewhat 4. For example, in the
3527:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
933:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
669:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
554:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
330:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1723:
Template:Senegal squad – 2010 FIBA World Championship for Women
2139:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
1964:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
777:
741:
468:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
3437:
with 8 navboxes (more than half from non-winning teams), or
1795:
Template:Canada Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship for Women
1759:
Template:Mali squad – 2010 FIBA World Championship for Women
2576:
as a valid argument", this isn't the first place to start.
2491:
that suggests that an essay has no weight in a discussion.—
986:. Good discussion, but there's clear consensus to delete.
3261:
Knowledge:Avoid template creep#Navigational template creep
1877:, for related discussions which resulted in deletion, see
3376:
is another reason to delete all templates below Top 3. –
2805:, is making navboxes "every such team they've been at". –
403:
1435:
Template:New Zealand Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1219:
Template:Ivory Coast squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1111:
Template:Puerto Rico Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
2506:
guidelines concerning navboxes, and was redirected to
1830:
4th or lower place squad, not notable, and duplicates
295:
Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga/Yu-Gi-Oh!/Banner
1615:
Template:Argentina Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1579:
Template:Australia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
630:
1003:
Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
955:
Template:Slovenia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
2160:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
1970:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
1507:
Template:Croatia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1255:
Template:Tunisia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1075:
Template:Lebanon Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
474:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
114:
2440:That's actually my question above. As this is a TF
1651:Template:France Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1543:Template:Greece Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1471:Template:Angola Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1399:Template:Canada Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1363:Template:Serbia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1327:Template:Russia Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1147:Template:Jordan Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1039:Template:Brazil Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
2554:. Slovenia did not even medal; they finished in
1687:Template:China Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1291:Template:Spain Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
1183:Template:Iran Squad 2010 FIBA World Championship
92:per the discussion. Redirects will be deleted.
1836:2010 FIBA World Championship for Women squads
297:, delete the redirects, and mark historical.
493:the content with the article, then delete.
2704:per nomination. No reason to have this. --
822:Template:Infobox motorsport championship
818:Template:Infobox Sports Car Championship
779:Template:Infobox motorsport championship
743:Template:Infobox Sports Car Championship
691:Template:Infobox Sports Car Championship
41:
14:
33:
405:Template:1866 college soccer records
352:Template:1866 college soccer records
2609:navigation boxes are not trophies.
1832:2010 FIBA World Championship squads
27:
3319:eight (or 24) navboxes on a page.
2485:Knowledge:Templates for discussion
2033:that is NOT a reason to keep... --
28:
18:Knowledge:Templates for discussion
3553:
3412:FIBA Basketball World Cup records
2987:) has already cast a vote above.
2858:I've yet to see someone making a
2098:FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup
982:The result of the discussion was
718:The result of the discussion was
603:The result of the discussion was
379:The result of the discussion was
88:The result of the discussion was
2966:
2586:discussion.) That's not a lot. –
852:FIA World Endurance Championship
632:Template:Denial of Mass Killings
576:Template:Denial of Mass Killings
2879:{{2015–16 Phoenix Suns roster}}
2873:{{2014–15 Phoenix Suns roster}}
2867:{{2013–14 Phoenix Suns roster}}
2861:{{2012–13 Phoenix Suns roster}}
3314:, it is very possible that we
444:. In my opinion, superfluous.
151:This template was replaced by
116:Template:WikiProject Yu-Gi-Oh!
61:Template:WikiProject Yu-Gi-Oh!
13:
1:
3171:In most cases, it would be a
3126:20:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
3099:20:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
3084:19:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
3070:19:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
3047:19:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
3017:19:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2999:19:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2962:18:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2891:{{2016–17 Miami Heat roster}}
2885:{{2015–16 Miami Heat roster}}
2790:22:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2769:02:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2745:22:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2720:21:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2619:18:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
2605:20:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2568:19:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2529:21:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2501:21:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2467:20:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2436:20:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2415:20:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2373:19:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2354:18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2310:17:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2276:Rob's points above regarding
2269:17:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2218:17:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2203:17:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2170:17:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2124:18:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
2110:14:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
2085:00:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
2068:14:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
2049:21:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
2022:16:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
2005:00:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
1949:11:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
1927:14:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
1870:16:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
1848:16:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
864:23:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
842:21:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
503:18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
484:22:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
458:18:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
253:14:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
225:23:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
30:
2318:doesn't apply here, because
2147:Reopening and relisting per
1980:01:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
7:
3514:00:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
3499:00:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
3470:03:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
3451:02:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
3405:23:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3386:22:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3359:23:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3344:23:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3329:17:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3303:00:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
3281:17:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3255:23:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
3235:19:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
3214:10:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
3186:06:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
3160:14:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
2940:22:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
2917:21:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
2847:18:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
2824:14:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
2687:10:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
2660:22:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
2646:14:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
996:07:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
926:23:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
909:20:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
892:21:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
736:00:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
625:00:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
548:23:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
526:06:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
398:00:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
321:22:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
307:14:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
284:08:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
156:WikiProject Anime and manga
109:00:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
10:
3558:
442:1866 college soccer season
2314:There is the difference,
3530:Please do not modify it.
3428:, no one is saying that
2894:navboxes which includes
966:Please do not modify it.
936:Please do not modify it.
702:Please do not modify it.
672:Please do not modify it.
587:Please do not modify it.
557:Please do not modify it.
363:Please do not modify it.
333:Please do not modify it.
311:That sounds good to me.
90:move and mark historical
72:Please do not modify it.
534:, template now unused.
269:WikiProject Sailor Moon
2487:. There's nothing in
163:|yugioh-work-group=yes
190:WikiProject Yu-Gi-Oh
3112:Totally agree with
3057:2010 FIBA World Cup
2489:Knowledge:Consensus
2388:is an argument for
856:FactualCollector7d1
724:(non-admin closure)
613:(non-admin closure)
386:(non-admin closure)
2284:, and b) maybe we
2145:Relisting comment:
231:Mark as historical
2988:
2714:What I been doing
2176:Question: I know
2172:
2043:What I been doing
2002:
1982:
836:What I been doing
726:
615:
520:What I been doing
486:
388:
99:
96:non-admin closure
51:
50:
3549:
3532:
3227:Vasemmistolainen
3210:
3205:
3200:
3170:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3027:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2929:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2893:
2892:
2887:
2886:
2881:
2880:
2875:
2874:
2869:
2868:
2863:
2862:
2857:
2836:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2800:
2779:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2734:
2715:
2708:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2525:
2520:
2515:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2425:
2411:
2406:
2401:
2350:
2345:
2340:
2258:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2159:
2156:
2142:
2140:
2044:
2037:
2032:
1998:
1969:
1967:
1965:
1937:
1859:
1826:
1790:
1754:
1718:
1682:
1646:
1610:
1574:
1538:
1502:
1466:
1430:
1394:
1358:
1322:
1286:
1250:
1214:
1178:
1142:
1106:
1070:
1034:
988:Opabinia regalis
968:
938:
890:
881:
877:
837:
830:
810:
774:
722:
704:
674:
663:
611:
589:
559:
546:
539:
521:
514:
473:
471:
469:
456:
449:
436:
384:
365:
335:
273:
267:
263:
214:
208:
204:
198:
194:
188:
184:
178:
174:
168:
164:
160:
154:
147:
93:
74:
47:
36:
31:
3557:
3556:
3552:
3551:
3550:
3548:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3539:deletion review
3528:
3208:
3203:
3198:
3193:Splash Brothers
3167:Howard the Duck
3164:
3154:
3149:
3144:
3021:
2974:Duplicate vote:
2967:
2926:Howard the Duck
2923:
2911:
2906:
2901:
2890:
2889:
2884:
2883:
2878:
2877:
2872:
2871:
2866:
2865:
2860:
2859:
2851:
2833:Howard the Duck
2830:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2794:
2776:Howard the Duck
2773:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2750:in Knowledge. –
2731:Howard the Duck
2728:
2717:
2713:
2706:
2681:
2676:
2671:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2599:
2594:
2589:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2422:Howard the Duck
2419:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2348:
2343:
2338:
2259:of the reopen.
2228:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2173:
2152:
2135:
2133:
2121:
2082:
2046:
2042:
2035:
2026:
2001:
1983:
1960:
1958:
1931:
1853:
975:deletion review
964:
958:
951:
945:deletion review
934:
879:
873:
872:
839:
835:
828:
815:Propose merging
711:deletion review
700:
694:
687:
681:deletion review
670:
596:deletion review
585:
579:
572:
566:deletion review
555:
537:
535:
532:Merge completed
523:
519:
512:
487:
481:
464:
462:
447:
445:
372:deletion review
361:
355:
348:
342:deletion review
331:
271:
265:
257:
212:
206:
202:
196:
192:
186:
182:
176:
172:
166:
162:
158:
152:
81:deletion review
70:
64:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3555:
3544:
3543:
3524:
3523:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3516:
3501:
3486:
3457:
3439:Diego Maradona
3389:
3388:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3331:
3306:
3305:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3265:Diego Maradona
3238:
3237:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3128:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3086:
3049:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2722:
2711:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2394:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
2271:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2158:
2154:permanent link
2143:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2119:
2088:
2087:
2080:
2070:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2040:
2007:
1999:
1968:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1828:
1827:
1791:
1755:
1719:
1683:
1647:
1611:
1575:
1539:
1503:
1467:
1431:
1395:
1359:
1323:
1287:
1251:
1215:
1179:
1143:
1107:
1071:
1035:
980:
979:
959:
957:
952:
950:
949:
929:
928:
911:
894:
866:
833:
825:
812:
811:
775:
716:
715:
695:
693:
688:
686:
685:
665:
664:
609:2017 January 6
601:
600:
580:
578:
573:
571:
570:
529:
528:
517:
505:
479:
472:
461:
438:
437:
377:
376:
356:
354:
349:
347:
346:
326:
325:
324:
323:
288:
287:
286:
149:
148:
86:
85:
65:
63:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3554:
3542:
3540:
3536:
3531:
3525:
3515:
3511:
3507:
3502:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3487:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3467:
3463:
3458:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3448:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3435:Matjaž Smodiš
3431:
3427:
3424:
3423:
3421:
3417:
3413:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3391:
3390:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3368:
3367:
3360:
3356:
3352:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3341:
3337:
3332:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3317:
3313:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3291:
3288:
3287:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3269:Matjaž Smodiš
3266:
3262:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3243:
3240:
3239:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3221:
3215:
3212:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3194:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3174:
3168:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3158:
3157:
3152:
3147:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3108:
3107:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3087:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3067:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3050:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3025:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3005:
3000:
2996:
2992:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2975:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2950:
2947:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2927:
2922:
2918:
2915:
2914:
2909:
2904:
2897:
2855:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2834:
2829:
2825:
2822:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2804:
2798:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2777:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2767:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2742:
2738:
2732:
2726:
2723:
2721:
2716:
2709:
2703:
2700:
2688:
2685:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2667:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2644:
2643:
2638:
2633:
2626:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2603:
2602:
2597:
2592:
2584:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2546:
2530:
2527:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2509:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2465:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2423:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2413:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2361:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2352:
2351:
2346:
2341:
2334:
2331:
2328:
2323:
2322:
2317:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2226:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2201:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2155:
2150:
2146:
2141:
2138:
2125:
2122:
2117:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2086:
2083:
2078:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2050:
2045:
2038:
2030:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2008:
2006:
2003:
1997:
1992:
1988:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1966:
1963:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1935:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1857:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1824:
1821:
1818:
1815:
1812:
1811:transclusions
1809:
1806:
1803:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1775:transclusions
1773:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1743:
1740:
1739:transclusions
1737:
1734:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1703:transclusions
1701:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1667:transclusions
1665:
1662:
1659:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1632:
1631:transclusions
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1595:transclusions
1593:
1590:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1559:transclusions
1557:
1554:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1524:
1523:transclusions
1521:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1487:transclusions
1485:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1451:transclusions
1449:
1446:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1419:
1416:
1415:transclusions
1413:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1379:transclusions
1377:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1343:transclusions
1341:
1338:
1335:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1307:transclusions
1305:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1271:transclusions
1269:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1236:
1235:transclusions
1233:
1230:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1199:transclusions
1197:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1163:transclusions
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1127:transclusions
1125:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1091:transclusions
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1055:transclusions
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1019:transclusions
1017:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
993:
989:
985:
978:
976:
972:
967:
961:
960:
956:
948:
946:
942:
937:
931:
930:
927:
923:
919:
915:
912:
910:
906:
902:
898:
895:
893:
889:
885:
880:Pigsonthewing
876:
870:
867:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
838:
831:
823:
819:
816:
808:
805:
802:
799:
796:
795:transclusions
793:
790:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
766:
763:
760:
759:transclusions
757:
754:
751:
748:
744:
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
714:
712:
708:
703:
697:
696:
692:
684:
682:
678:
673:
667:
666:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
648:transclusions
646:
643:
640:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
599:
597:
593:
588:
582:
581:
577:
569:
567:
563:
558:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
544:
540:
533:
527:
522:
515:
509:
506:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
488:
485:
482:
477:
470:
467:
460:
459:
455:
454:
450:
443:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
421:transclusions
419:
416:
413:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
375:
373:
369:
364:
358:
357:
353:
345:
343:
339:
334:
328:
327:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
270:
261:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
241:
236:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
211:
201:
191:
181:
171:
157:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
132:transclusions
130:
127:
124:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
106:
102:
97:
91:
84:
82:
78:
73:
67:
66:
62:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
3529:
3526:
3482:
3478:
3429:
3392:
3369:
3315:
3289:
3241:
3222:
3196:
3142:
3139:Goran Dragić
3130:
3109:
3051:
3034:
2973:
2948:
2899:
2896:Goran Dragić
2806:
2802:
2751:
2724:
2701:
2669:
2628:
2624:
2587:
2582:
2578:LeBron James
2555:
2547:
2511:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2449:
2441:
2397:
2389:
2359:
2336:
2320:
2319:
2289:
2285:
2278:navbox creep
2273:
2251:Plastikspork
2247:IndexAccount
2224:
2185:
2181:
2149:user request
2144:
2134:
2116:Plastikspork
2096:, note that
2094:Plastikspork
2077:Plastikspork
2072:
2060:IndexAccount
2055:
2009:
1995:
1990:
1986:
1959:
1829:
1819:
1813:
1807:
1801:
1783:
1777:
1771:
1765:
1747:
1741:
1735:
1729:
1711:
1705:
1699:
1693:
1675:
1669:
1663:
1657:
1639:
1633:
1627:
1621:
1603:
1597:
1591:
1585:
1567:
1561:
1555:
1549:
1531:
1525:
1519:
1513:
1495:
1489:
1483:
1477:
1459:
1453:
1447:
1441:
1423:
1417:
1411:
1405:
1387:
1381:
1375:
1369:
1351:
1345:
1339:
1333:
1315:
1309:
1303:
1297:
1279:
1273:
1267:
1261:
1243:
1237:
1231:
1225:
1207:
1201:
1195:
1189:
1171:
1165:
1159:
1153:
1135:
1129:
1123:
1117:
1099:
1093:
1087:
1081:
1063:
1057:
1051:
1045:
1027:
1021:
1015:
1009:
983:
981:
965:
962:
935:
932:
913:
896:
888:Andy's edits
884:Talk to Andy
875:Andy Mabbett
868:
847:
814:
813:
803:
797:
791:
785:
767:
761:
755:
749:
719:
717:
701:
698:
671:
668:
656:
650:
644:
638:
604:
602:
586:
583:
556:
553:
542:
531:
530:
507:
490:
476:Plastikspork
463:
452:
439:
429:
423:
417:
411:
380:
378:
362:
359:
332:
329:
290:
238:
230:
150:
140:
134:
128:
122:
89:
87:
71:
68:
3506:Bluesangrel
3475:Bluesangrel
3462:Bluesangrel
3426:Bluesangrel
3416:Bluesangrel
3397:Bluesangrel
3351:Bluesangrel
3336:Bluesangrel
3312:Bozalegenda
3295:Bozalegenda
3247:Bluesangrel
3173:WP:COATRACK
3114:Bluesangrel
3091:Bluesangrel
3062:Bluesangrel
3035:Strong Keep
3024:Bluesangrel
3009:Bluesangrel
2977:Bluesangrel
2954:Bluesangrel
2949:Strong keep
2666:Kobe Bryant
2627:trophies. –
2243:Bluesangrel
2114:Corrected.
2056:Strong Keep
2029:Bluesangrel
2014:Bluesangrel
2010:Strong Keep
55:December 29
43:December 30
38:December 28
2801:, no one,
2707:Zackmann08
2481:discussion
2282:OTHERSTUFF
2227:notifying
2036:Zackmann08
901:DH85868993
829:Zackmann08
538:The Banner
513:Zackmann08
448:The Banner
170:WPYU-GI-OH
3535:talk page
3378:Sabbatino
3374:WP:TCREEP
3135:WP:NAVBOX
3118:Asturkian
3033:it e.g. "
2574:WP:TCREEP
2556:8TH PLACE
2552:WP:TCREEP
2508:WP:NAVBOX
2446:WP:TCREEP
2382:WP:TCREEP
2316:WP:TCREEP
2298:WP:TCREEP
2178:WP:TCREEP
971:talk page
941:talk page
918:QueenCake
899:per nom.
871:per nom.
707:talk page
677:talk page
592:talk page
562:talk page
368:talk page
338:talk page
77:talk page
3537:or in a
3491:Primefac
3443:Primefac
3321:Primefac
3273:Primefac
2985:contribs
2652:Frietjes
2611:Frietjes
2390:deletion
2365:Primefac
2333:standard
2302:Primefac
2261:Primefac
2239:BU Rob13
2231:Frietjes
2210:Primefac
2162:Primefac
2137:Relisted
1972:Primefac
1962:Relisted
1934:Frietjes
1919:Frietjes
1856:Frietjes
1840:Frietjes
1823:subpages
1787:subpages
1751:subpages
1715:subpages
1679:subpages
1643:subpages
1607:subpages
1571:subpages
1535:subpages
1499:subpages
1463:subpages
1427:subpages
1391:subpages
1355:subpages
1319:subpages
1283:subpages
1247:subpages
1211:subpages
1175:subpages
1139:subpages
1103:subpages
1067:subpages
1031:subpages
973:or in a
943:or in a
807:subpages
771:subpages
728:Primefac
709:or in a
679:or in a
660:subpages
617:Primefac
605:Relisted
594:or in a
564:or in a
495:Frietjes
466:Relisted
433:subpages
390:Primefac
370:or in a
340:or in a
299:Frietjes
260:TheFarix
235:WP:ANIME
210:Yu-gi-oh
200:Yu-Gi-Oh
180:WPYUGIOH
144:subpages
101:Primefac
79:or in a
20: |
3483:related
3479:similar
3393:Comment
3370:Delete.
3242:Comment
3178:Bagumba
3133:as per
3076:Bagumba
3052:Comment
3039:Bagumba
2991:Bagumba
2560:Bagumba
2493:Bagumba
2479:is for
2428:Bagumba
2253:, and
2235:Nn94 14
2225:Comment
1941:Nn94 14
1875:Nn94 14
1862:Nn94 14
1805:history
1769:history
1733:history
1697:history
1661:history
1625:history
1589:history
1553:history
1517:history
1481:history
1445:history
1409:history
1373:history
1337:history
1301:history
1265:history
1229:history
1193:history
1157:history
1121:history
1085:history
1049:history
1013:history
789:history
753:history
642:history
415:history
313:Kaldari
276:Kaldari
217:Kaldari
126:history
3223:Delete
3176:team.—
3031:redact
2803:no one
2725:Delete
2702:Delete
2548:Delete
2386:WP:TFD
2378:WP:OSE
2294:WP:TFD
2286:should
2274:Delete
2073:Delete
1987:Delete
984:delete
381:delete
2932:Nabla
2854:Nabla
2839:Nabla
2797:Nabla
2782:Nabla
2737:Nabla
2290:might
2255:Nabla
2102:Nabla
1991:every
914:Merge
897:Merge
869:Merge
848:Merge
820:with
720:merge
508:Merge
491:merge
240:Farix
161:with
46:: -->
16:<
3510:talk
3495:talk
3466:talk
3447:talk
3430:only
3420:talk
3401:talk
3382:talk
3355:talk
3340:talk
3325:talk
3316:will
3299:talk
3290:Keep
3277:talk
3251:talk
3231:talk
3182:talk
3131:Keep
3122:talk
3110:Keep
3095:talk
3080:talk
3066:talk
3043:talk
3013:talk
2995:talk
2981:talk
2958:talk
2936:talk
2843:talk
2786:talk
2741:talk
2656:talk
2615:talk
2564:talk
2550:per
2497:talk
2471:The
2432:talk
2380:vs.
2369:talk
2321:none
2306:talk
2265:talk
2214:talk
2166:talk
2106:talk
2064:talk
2018:talk
1976:talk
1945:talk
1923:talk
1915:here
1911:here
1907:here
1903:here
1899:here
1895:here
1891:here
1887:here
1883:here
1879:here
1866:talk
1844:talk
1817:logs
1799:talk
1781:logs
1763:talk
1745:logs
1727:talk
1709:logs
1691:talk
1673:logs
1655:talk
1637:logs
1619:talk
1601:logs
1583:talk
1565:logs
1547:talk
1529:logs
1511:talk
1493:logs
1475:talk
1457:logs
1439:talk
1421:logs
1403:talk
1385:logs
1367:talk
1349:logs
1331:talk
1313:logs
1295:talk
1277:logs
1259:talk
1241:logs
1223:talk
1205:logs
1187:talk
1169:logs
1151:talk
1133:logs
1115:talk
1097:logs
1079:talk
1061:logs
1043:talk
1025:logs
1007:talk
992:talk
922:talk
905:talk
860:talk
801:logs
783:talk
765:logs
747:talk
732:talk
654:logs
636:talk
621:talk
543:talk
499:talk
453:talk
427:logs
409:talk
394:talk
317:talk
303:talk
291:move
280:talk
221:talk
138:logs
120:talk
105:talk
35:<
2625:are
2583:not
2477:TfD
2475:in
2448:. –
2360:did
2335:. –
2330:the
2182:not
1996:Rob
882:);
607:on
293:to
237:. —
22:Log
3541:).
3512:)
3497:)
3468:)
3449:)
3422:)
3403:)
3384:)
3357:)
3342:)
3327:)
3301:)
3279:)
3253:)
3233:)
3184:)
3124:)
3116:.
3097:)
3082:)
3068:)
3045:)
3015:)
2997:)
2983:•
2972:—
2960:)
2938:)
2888:,
2882:,
2876:,
2870:,
2864:,
2845:)
2788:)
2743:)
2718:)
2710:(/
2658:)
2617:)
2566:)
2499:)
2483::
2434:)
2371:)
2327:is
2308:)
2267:)
2249:,
2245:,
2241:,
2237:,
2233:,
2216:)
2168:)
2157:).
2120:―Œ
2108:)
2081:―Œ
2066:)
2047:)
2039:(/
2020:)
2000:13
1978:)
1947:)
1925:)
1913:,
1909:,
1905:,
1901:,
1897:,
1893:,
1889:,
1885:,
1881:,
1868:)
1846:)
1838:.
994:)
977:).
947:).
924:)
907:)
886:;
862:)
840:)
832:(/
734:)
713:).
683:).
623:)
598:).
568:).
524:)
516:(/
501:)
480:―Œ
396:)
374:).
344:).
319:)
305:)
282:)
272:}}
266:{{
251:)
247:|
223:)
215:.
213:}}
207:{{
205:,
203:}}
197:{{
195:,
193:}}
187:{{
185:,
183:}}
177:{{
175:,
173:}}
167:{{
159:}}
153:{{
107:)
83:).
3508:(
3493:(
3464:(
3445:(
3418:(
3399:(
3380:(
3353:(
3338:(
3323:(
3297:(
3275:(
3249:(
3229:(
3209:D
3204:T
3199:H
3180:(
3169::
3165:@
3155:D
3150:T
3145:H
3120:(
3093:(
3078:(
3064:(
3041:(
3026::
3022:@
3011:(
2993:(
2989:—
2979:(
2956:(
2934:(
2928::
2924:@
2912:D
2907:T
2902:H
2856::
2852:@
2841:(
2835::
2831:@
2819:D
2814:T
2809:H
2799::
2795:@
2784:(
2778::
2774:@
2764:D
2759:T
2754:H
2739:(
2733::
2729:@
2682:D
2677:T
2672:H
2654:(
2641:D
2636:T
2631:H
2613:(
2600:D
2595:T
2590:H
2562:(
2524:D
2519:T
2514:H
2495:(
2473:d
2462:D
2457:T
2452:H
2442:D
2430:(
2424::
2420:@
2410:D
2405:T
2400:H
2367:(
2349:D
2344:T
2339:H
2304:(
2263:(
2257::
2229:@
2212:(
2198:D
2193:T
2188:H
2164:(
2151:(
2104:(
2062:(
2031::
2027:@
2016:(
1974:(
1943:(
1936::
1932:@
1921:(
1864:(
1858::
1854:@
1842:(
1834:/
1825:)
1820:·
1814:·
1808:·
1802:·
1797:(
1789:)
1784:·
1778:·
1772:·
1766:·
1761:(
1753:)
1748:·
1742:·
1736:·
1730:·
1725:(
1717:)
1712:·
1706:·
1700:·
1694:·
1689:(
1681:)
1676:·
1670:·
1664:·
1658:·
1653:(
1645:)
1640:·
1634:·
1628:·
1622:·
1617:(
1609:)
1604:·
1598:·
1592:·
1586:·
1581:(
1573:)
1568:·
1562:·
1556:·
1550:·
1545:(
1537:)
1532:·
1526:·
1520:·
1514:·
1509:(
1501:)
1496:·
1490:·
1484:·
1478:·
1473:(
1465:)
1460:·
1454:·
1448:·
1442:·
1437:(
1429:)
1424:·
1418:·
1412:·
1406:·
1401:(
1393:)
1388:·
1382:·
1376:·
1370:·
1365:(
1357:)
1352:·
1346:·
1340:·
1334:·
1329:(
1321:)
1316:·
1310:·
1304:·
1298:·
1293:(
1285:)
1280:·
1274:·
1268:·
1262:·
1257:(
1249:)
1244:·
1238:·
1232:·
1226:·
1221:(
1213:)
1208:·
1202:·
1196:·
1190:·
1185:(
1177:)
1172:·
1166:·
1160:·
1154:·
1149:(
1141:)
1136:·
1130:·
1124:·
1118:·
1113:(
1105:)
1100:·
1094:·
1088:·
1082:·
1077:(
1069:)
1064:·
1058:·
1052:·
1046:·
1041:(
1033:)
1028:·
1022:·
1016:·
1010:·
1005:(
990:(
920:(
903:(
878:(
858:(
824:.
809:)
804:·
798:·
792:·
786:·
781:(
773:)
768:·
762:·
756:·
750:·
745:(
730:(
662:)
657:·
651:·
645:·
639:·
634:(
619:(
497:(
435:)
430:·
424:·
418:·
412:·
407:(
392:(
315:(
301:(
278:(
262::
258:@
249:c
245:t
243:(
219:(
146:)
141:·
135:·
129:·
123:·
118:(
103:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.