Knowledge

:External peer review - Knowledge

Source 📝

1096:"Many of these details in Knowledge are either incorrect (14) or unverifiable (37) as compared to the four unverified facts in DAH and the three partially incorrect facts in the two Britannicas. For example, the Knowledge article includes several details of Kidd’s childhood that were not confirmed in three principal biographies (Harris, 2002; Ritchie, 1986; Zacks, 2002), and the essay suggests he turned to piracy before most of the biographers indicate. One paragraph of the essay references a children’s book on Kidd, which may oversimplify the man’s career." 4005:— when compared to other samples from the project, including featured article removal candidates, pages marked as NPOV disputes, and a selection of random pages. According to the paper, the study showed how seriously the Knowledge project views issues of article quality. The authors concluded that as a quality standard, the featured article process "is not ideal, but it does seem relatively rigorous." They also noted that the process is not as resource-intensive as other possibilities, such as blind judging. 1086:"this entry in Knowledge is written so that small skirmishes have more prominence than major battles (and some major battles were missing entirely), and readers may have difficulty determining the chronology of the war without reference to specific dates because the entry did not sequence events in chronological order. Unlike the other two samples evaluated, this entry obviously is written by multiple authors with little apparent concern for the overall flow and readability of the article." 3698:
the terms that did not have any entry in Britannica (they all appeared in Knowledge), and any for which the entries were vastly different in length. Sometimes the lengths were balanced by amalgamating two or three Britannica entries into one coherent piece – for example, 'ethanol' was done this way. We felt this represented 'everything Britannica had to say on the subject' – at least, everything we could find by a quick search of Britannica online, exactly the way a user would approach
972:"The study did reveal inaccuracies in eight of the nine entries and exposed major flaws in at least two of the nine Knowledge articles. Overall, Knowledge's accuracy rate was 80 percent compared with 95-96 percent accuracy within the other sources. This study does support the claim that Knowledge is less reliable than other reference resources. Furthermore, the research found at least five unattributed direct quotations and verbatim text from other sources with no citations." 2030:
that we didn't consider to be significant errors, so we're also writing up an accompanying document to explain which errors we counted, and how we arrived at all the numbers. We're also asking the reviewers if they mind being identified, so we'll name those who give permission. That's all quite a bit of work, especially with Jim being away, but I hope we can send this to you by the end of next week, as well as putting it up (free) on our own website. Thanks for your patience!
1552: 1517: 1434: 1297: 1118:"One area of further study may be to examine and evaluate Knowledge’s histories themselves. In the brief review of the more detailed history of the Mexican-American War, for instance, this study found that references were deleted and correct facts were modified incorrectly. Also, it would appear that some inaccuracies may have been typing errors. A more detailed study of individual histories may lead to deeper analysis as to the nature of Knowledge’s contributors." 4304:(Grade: C): "While there are no glaring inaccuracies, Mr. McAdam says, the entry does not provide any analytical context as to what led to the civil-rights movement or what happened afterward." Example: "Mr. McAdam notes the insufficiency of links to events before and after this particular 13 years of the movement, not to mention the lack of any broader analysis of what brought about the fight for civil rights, and the movement's political and cultural impacts." 1076:"Despite the disparity in length and depth of the two articles, the Knowledge entry has only one fewer incorrect fact that DAH and has one more unverifiable fact. Still, the Knowledge article has a rather long direct quote in the last paragraph of the John Brown section without attribution, and the one citation included in that section does not accurately reflect the original source (the Knowledge entry lists a different date than the original)." 4058:: "Non-partisan ratings compiled by National Journal magazine say LaTourette is middle-of-the-road on social issues, not conservative. The National Rifle Association approves of his voting record, but isn't among LaTourette's biggest backers. Ohio's GOP-dominated state legislature eliminated Akron Democrat Tom Sawyer's congressional district after the 2000 Census and gave LaTourette's district its old number, 14." 3888:
WikiMedia foundation advisers and personnel and the employees of Wikia) do not and never will understand these concepts correctly and with depth. One user in particular, Pinktulip, did demonstrate such intellectual mastery and made a steady single-handed effort during January 2006 to ensure that another month did not pass before all the corrections were accomplished. Pinktulip also then
5180:"The St. Petersburg Times recently asked two University of South Florida professors to read a few Knowledge articles on topics in their expertise. Chemistry professor Bill Baker said he was surprised at the amount of technical knowledge posted on the site, but said he found several small errors. "The cancer drug Taxol, for example, is not produced by microbial fermentation." 4310:(Grade: A): "The main section on flow cytometry was well-done and accurate, ... but as you drop into the subsections, the accuracy drops off. I went in and actually made some corrections to these — I said, 'I can't leave these and let the record stand like this.'" Example: "At one point in the entry, the word "homologous" was misused in talking about blood transfusions." 1106:"Knowledge’s entry follows ANB in terms of length and comprehensiveness; it includes 67 facts. All except two are verifiable. Of the remaining 65, ten contain errors. Some of these are minor errors, such as year of birth and number of siblings; others are more significant, such as the number of rescue attempts she made and the number of slaves she helped escaped." 4446:"This would undoubtedly serve as a useful introduction for those with little idea about the subject; this entry would actually be more useful to the average inquirer with its links than would anything in the Encyclopedia Britannica...its politics are probably closest to those of Liberal Democrats... I am considerably impressed with the quality of information" 4663:"To find out how it performs on basic terms in business and economics, we asked Professor Fariba Alamdari, an economist at Cranfield University, to take a look. She says: "I am very impressed. It offers a fairly accurate and comprehensive definition of business terms, with links to other related websites or articles, and sometimes statistics." 2234:
words is probably better than 1 error in a 1000 words); and it might make even less sense to mix both categories in an attempt to gauge any bias in favour or against Knowledge (or Britannica) in the Nature experiment. I would therefore be very careful in drawing any conclusions based on the numbers in the table below. --
4382:"Yesterday, the entry "Muslim" was changed 12 times. Over the past week, it was changed more than 50 times...these ranged from the puerile...to suggestions which are deliberately offensive...Knowledge, which constantly checks that changes improve rather than insult, reverted to the previous entry in less than a minute." 4559:
I think there was another reference which had escaped me which was in the intro and has also been removed (it was a too literal interpretation of the supposed Granita pact). Incidentally the reviewer makes his own howler when he says Lord Liverpool became Prime Minister in 1824. It was actually 1812.
3883:
were not just syntactical corrections: they required an understanding at the semantic level on these scientifically non-controversial and well-understood topics for which there are, in an absolute and objective sense, right and wrong answers that are not intuitively obvious but require the ability to
537:
Hasty, Robert; Garvalosa, Ryan; Barbato, Vincenzo; Valdes, Pedro; Powers, David; Hernandez, Emmanuel; John, Jones; Suciu, Gabriel; Qureshi, Farheen; Popa-Radu, Matei; San Jose, Sergio; Drexler, Nathaniel; Patankar, Rohan; Paz, Jose; King, Christopher; Gerber, Hilary; Valladares, Michael; Somji, Alyaz
5211:
Anne Lundin is a retired professor from the School of Library and Information Studies University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is knowledgeable in Victorian picture books in England and the United States and has documented the history of reviewing of children's books in the late 19th century. She is an
3530:
As a note of caution, since Nature said the lengths of articles they compared were roughly equal, the versions they compared must be different from those whose length we compare here (since our versions are now longer than the EB articles.). This isn't surprising considering the lead time needed to
1311:
Overview: Knowledge article broadly accurate, but messy. Britannica's entry "contained an error in its opening paragraph", "too long for most people's needs", and "reminded me of one of my worst lectures at university". Encarta "clearly written by an expert" and "the only one to display enthusiasm
1038:
Knowledge and DAH have more comprehensive articles than Britannica, though the Knowledge and DAH articles have different focuses. Though the Knowledge article has more unverifiable facts (eight) and inaccuracies (nine) than does DAH, it still holds a higher ratio of accuracy because it includes more
4221:
There is really only one astonishing inaccuracy in this one, under the “Comparisons to Digg” section. ShoutWire doesn’t filter the word “Digg” at all. As a test, I submitted an article titled “Digg.com – Best Site On Earth” and sure enough it appeared on the submissions page. The rest of it was OK,
3817:
While some progress was made in the days immediately after the report came out, the effort stalled as the Christmas 2005 holiday approached. When one examines the progress made before Christmas, one can see that much of the work was "low hanging fruit" in the form of easy corrections to superficial
3650:
I've emailed the news editor and asked if they could provide the exact article date/time versions that they sent to those 50 experts. That should be useful for figuring out if the errors have already been fixed, and for comparing the versions they sent and the soon-to-be more accurate ones. It's
2061:
Of the 42 articles reviewed, 38 were found to have at least one error – Britannica had 40 articles with at least one error. (NOTE: Nature took some of the excerpts for the study from the version of Britannica for children and youths rather than use the official version for adults. Britannica claims
3797:
After failing to make an article contribution to the failed Nupedia proeject, Wales explained years later that even he was intimidated at the thought of submitting an article (in economics: his area of training and experience) to it because was intimidated that experts (rather than amateurs) would
3697:
Each of the reporters that worked on the survey chose 10 to 15 scientific terms that were roughly in their scientific beat – the sorts of things we ourselves would check in an encyclopaedia. We had not looked at any of these entries in either encyclopaedia when we selected them. Then we weeded out
2233:
If it seems to make sense to calculate and compare the ratio errors/words, it probably makes less sense to compare the ratio omissions/words (1 omission in a 5000 words article might be considered to be more serious than 1 omission in a 1000 words article on the same topic, whereas 1 error in 5000
2029:
In light of the amount of interest, we have decided to make the reviews public as far as possible, although obviously we'll have to edit them to remove the names of the reviewers, any libellous statements etc. The reviewers didn't all respond in the same format, and some of them highlighted points
5186:
Professor Philip Levy, an expert on Colonial America, said that "in many respects it's very good," but he, too, had misgivings. He said some articles contained a mishmash of information - the established scholarly knowledge of 15 years ago was mixed in with newer, more controversial theories with
4170:
I searched for “milling”, and found a very general article about milling. Nothing mining-specific was in the article, although a great amount of information on the process of milling was listed. Since I don’t give up that easily, I tried looking up specific milling-related techniques. Nothing for
4148:
Uh oh. Right away I noticed a glaring inaccuracy. Entering “electro-refining” redirected me to “Electrowinning.” Anyone involved in extractive metallurgy can tell you that the two processes are different. Electro-refining should definitely have had it’s own article, since electrowinning pulls the
4670:
She was impressed by the way Knowledge dealt with such terms as Chapter 11 bankruptcy and return on investment, and those with multiple interpretations such as CRM - which an IT manager would read as Customer Relationship Management but a marketing executive would see as Cause-Related Marketing.
3834:
which lists appromixate 1000 users for a realistic list of contributors who have ever contributed substantial amounts of original quality content (with perhaps a factor of 5X for substantial sub unlisted collaborators). There are about 1000 administrators, and less than 100 other users with more
3850:
article was a Featured article at the time of the review and that this article is fortunate to have three PhD chemistry candidates as caretakers (having such expertise involved on an extended basis is a rare situation at Knowledge). The remaining articles required a conceptual understanding of
3829:
Around minute 70 of audio track. March 17, 2006. This further propagates the misconception prompted by the fact that Knowledge has millions of accounts registered. More realistically, Knowledge has only a few thousand active editors (or ten thousand if you use a generous definition of "active
1729:
I got a reply, which sais, basically, that "About the errors, the questionnaire was completed anonymously so there is no list of the articles that contained the errors, let alone the errors themselves." With that, I think we can archive the study, as with such design it is not really a usable
3887:
For the academically honest, these later corrections were not subject to public opinion or Knowledge's style of consensus building akin to voting since most people (and probably most Wikipedians, including the Board of Trustees and past and present members of the Arbitration committee, other
4531:
all relate to assertions added over that weekend to the leading paragraph which were never previously present in the article and were quickly reverted (by me, once I had got back from a weekend break). I think it's a pity because it gives a completely misleading impression of the article.
4196:
Quite frankly, I expected to be overwhelmed with detail on this one. After all, nickel is something that most people come into contact with every day. However, the article glazed over some of nickel’s unique history, and that kind of irked me because the story of nickel is actually quite
3574:
Oh @#$ #@, no it's my fault. I miscounted the EB Vesalius article — it's one of the (very few) EB articles which is spread over multiple pages, and I only counted one page. Similarly with the Woodward article. I'll go back and recheck any others where the imbalance seems to be large.
4463:"A good and fair account. It sounds approving of Larkin, which is nice, but it is overall a dispassionate account, as one would expect from a dictionary...Though I can see there is an opportunity to whitewash with Knowledge, the few times I have used it, I have been impressed with it." 3846:, one sees the pattern: easy fixes or articles with a small number of errors were addressed at the start of the effort. Many of the easy fixes were biographical or narrative in nature and of a "coffee table book" level of understanding typical of an English major. Note that only the 3554:
article (which is one of the egregious examples where WP is 10 times the word count of EB), and you have to go back to 2002 to get significantly shorter than it is now, which seems unlikely. I find it more likely that the editors simply tossed out any obvious stubs or near-stubs.
5116:
A feature of the Knowledge that Hill likes are the links to original sources. It's pretty handy when reading about De Tocqueville to be able to click a link and read the man's own words. But Hill also noted a link that led to a "very brief and shallow essay" about states'
4284:(Grade: B-): "The entry provides 'a plethora of links' and more information than the typical literary encyclopedia, says Mr. Firchow, but it is flawed by 'the annoying inaccuracies, the glaring omissions, and the inconsistencies.'" Example: "The article says Huxley wrote 3839:, there will be only about 2000 "trusted" users, but all users will be rated with new "reliability" software to be implemented. Of course, one's personal relationship with Jimmy Wales or one's popularity within the community will still be able to override this number. 4496:"I am impressed by the amount of information on punting; the two key books on punting are mentioned, as are the clubs...I am impressed. It works on the presumption that by and large people will correct things, and I changed one small thing on my own biography." 81:
are more than welcome and can help to improve Knowledge's articles. In most cases Knowledge will also see an increase in traffic to the articles mentioned, which means that those with poor reviews should be improved to as high a standard as is possible.
2322:
Your fluff is another person's interesting tidbits. =) Honestly, it's hard to make a quantitative assessment of information content, but if there is a large difference in article length then it is a hint that apples are not being compared to apples.
3779:
In the long run, it seems that the project survived the tagging of all articles in which Nature's experts found errors. I would suggest that the tagging was even constructive and usefu. I note that we tag tens of thousands of articles as part of the
4758:: Even the Knowledge people admit the list isn't complete, but it is amazing that someone would try to develop one. Among the local notables: Pinkey Whitney, Joel Horlen, Steve Kerr and Dennis Rodman. Among the MIA: David Robinson and Tim Duncan. 1115:"Eight Knowledge articles contain unattributed quotes and at least five cases of possibly plagiarized content (material found verbatim elsewhere). The researcher found these cases easily without intense scrutiny; more text may have been copied." 3549:
I find that a bit dubious. By that theory, we should be able to date the review by going back to the last time the articles were comparable to the EB articles (which presumably haven't changed much recently). However, I just checked the
4743:: There's a thorough article about the legendary Negro Leaguer from Seguin, although a link to the San Antonio Black Bronchos, where Williams got his start, is available for the enterprising writer to complete (good luck, by the way). 3592:
specifically states "All entries were chosen to be approximately the same length in both encyclopaedias. In a small number of cases some material, such as reference lists, was removed to make the lengths of the entries more similar."
3515:
program. This gives a slight over-estimate because it counts anything surrounded by whitespace as a "word". Britannica counts were taken from Britannica Online. Knowledge articles were from 14 December 2005 except where otherwise
2357:
review did not consider referencing quality. Nature refers to "factual errors, omissions or misleading statements", so some of the "errors" listed below may be errors of omission in incomplete articles, rather than factual errors.
1753:
study then. How can they be sure that those who found Knowledge inaccurate were accurate about the inaccuracies in Knowledge? Ah. That last sentence felt good to write, though I suppose it is not so nice for those who read it. -
4171:
magnetofloatation, but ore dressing finally turned up a shitty little article. The author could have gone into waaaay more detail. This article is inaccurate because of the amount of detail that has been omitted. My conclusion?
4200:
The extractive process was reasonably accurate except for what I can only assume was a typo (substitute “sulfide” for “lateridic” in the first sentence) but no information on milling techniques (some specific to nickel) were
4420:"I think overall that the entry is much better than Dod's parliamentary guide...The references to the 2001 leadership election are categorically wrong...The entry is pretty good though, I would give them 9.5 out of 10." 3766: 2331:(see below) where the WP article has apparently been almost 5 times longer than EB's for a year now.) The size differences seem large enough that I'm inclined to think that the 30% difference between EB and WP in the 982:"All the facts are verifiable and correct; the difference here lay in the facts included." Comparisons were made difficult by the varied focus of the articles, but Britannica Online's article was the most extensive. 4433:"That is the problem with Knowledge - most of it is very good and reliable, but it depends on people interested in a subject being able to pontificate... It is opinionated and written from an anti-war point of view" 4152:
Though they could have gone into more detail, the rest of the article is pretty accurate. That being said, I certainly wouldn’t recommend this article as a source for someone researching either electro-refining or
1817:"This extraordinary freedom and cooperation make Knowledge the most important application of the principles of the free and open-source software movement to the world of cultural, rather than software, production." 3636:
According to their website (to which my university gives me access), I am searching the full EB. (They also have "student", "concise", and "elementary" versions of EB, but I'm not using those.) I'm not accusing
1608: 1380: 3617:
article, even one year ago, was 1108 words or 4.5 times the word count of the EB article. I've searched around EB, and I can't find any huge alternative article on this virus that they could have used instead.
4666:
Prof Alamdari cites the case of gross domestic product. Knowledge provides a definition, shows how it is calculated and gives the GDP by country both in nominal terms and based on PPP (purchasing power parity).
1056:"Knowledge has a single fact error – the number of party representatives in Congress after the 1848 election. Additionally, Knowledge contains a quote apparently from the party’s platform with no attribution." 1149: 151: 2016:
We're trying to see if we can publish the full list of errors found by our reviewers, or least send them to you (and to Britannica if they want). We'll post an update here as soon as we have a firm answer.
859:
Candelario, Danielle M.; Vazquez, Victoria; Jackson, William; Reilly, Timothy (January 2017). "Completeness, accuracy, and readability of Knowledge as a reference for patient medication information".
2223:
Please post below a table of errors/word statistics, based upon the Nature article and the word counts in the corresponding articles, so that we can see a more controlled comparison of error rates.
918: 4407:"Factually, this is dead accurate, though it is cloaked in po-faced language...it does not mention that she never gives interviews and has never been known to purposefully utter a word in public" 3784:
by rank amateurs and teen-agers with Ă©clat. Perhaps our amateurs are simply uncomfortable being reviewed by experts — just as Jimmy Wales finds working with domain experts to be "intimidating".
449:
Archambault, Patrick M; Belt, Tom H van de; III, Francisco J Grajales; Faber, Marjan J; Kuziemsky, Craig E; Gagnon, Susie; Bilodeau, Andrea; Rioux, Simon; Nelen, Willianne LDM (8 October 2013).
4480:"Accurate, but with an odd conglomeration of facts without a clear idea of what purpose Radio 1 serves or who listens to it. The odd mixture of facts does not tell you about the wider picture." 3794:
March 24, 2006. Quote: "Nupedia’s 7-step peer review process was heavily biased toward Ph.D holders and other alleged "true experts in their fields," and was evidently elaborate and daunting.
2255: 888: 73:
This list aims to be both a record of the findings of these reviews and a way to highlight any problems (or indeed positive aspects) that were encountered. Although Knowledge has its own
144: 127: 3565:
So something is amiss. I somehow doubt Nature compared a 62 word EB article on Robert Burns Woodward to his Knowledge 2300 word article. (And found no significant omissions in EB!) -
5107:. 'In each case, the program responded with information that was accurate and pertinent, if brief,' he wrote. 'I thought the coverage of De Tocqueville, however, was too superficial.' 4671:
Cracks did start to appear, however, with a warning about links to potentially biased commercial sites on the entry for the first interpretation, and no entry at all for the second."
4124:
Sudbury, Ontario is not the most well known city on Earth. I figured that this relatively obscure town would have a paltry Knowledge entry with very little information, and even less
3738: 134: 3913:
Britannica has replied to Nature's article and claim the nature article was itself innacurate in a number of ways. It would probably be good for Wikipedians to check the sources
3806: 752:
KrÀenbring, Jona; Monzon Penza, Tika; Gutmann, Joanna; Muehlich, Susanne; Zolk, Oliver; Wojnowski, Leszek; Maas, Renke; Engelhardt, Stefan; Sarikas, Antonio (24 September 2014).
4731:: The city's one-year adventure into becoming a little bit o' Canada is chronicled in more detail than the Missions' history, which only dates to 1888. It all looks right, too. 955: 1811:"History is probably the category encompassing the largest number of articles", but the collaborative editing makes it unlike virtually any other scholarly work in that field. 831:
Reilly, Timothy; Jackson, William; Berger, Victoria; Candelario, Danielle (November 2016). "Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Knowledge medication monographs".
2353:
Note that, for a fair comparison, we shouldn't include tables of contents, external links, "see also", or references — most Britannica articles do not include these, and the
2310:
Is this really more controlled? The average WP article has lots of fluff, with no space-pressure to remove same. Errors/omissions-per-article seem a reasonable metric to me.
3831: 4131:
The entry for my hometown is absolutely exhaustive. Not a single detail had been overlooked. From history to geography to demographics, the entry could not be more perfect.
393:
Lavsa, Stacey M.; Corman, Shelby L.; Culley, Colleen M.; Pummer, Tara L. (April 2011). "Reliability of Knowledge as a medication information source for pharmacy students".
1714:
I received an initial reply without a list of articles or errors but the possibility of some more information later; but nothing since then. I suggest that only 1 person,
3826: 4820: 3641:
of dishonesty, but I admit I'm mystified. I wouldn't be surprised if they thought a factor of two was "comparable" length, but a factor of almost 5 seems like a lot.
1890: 1837: 1671: 5113:
merits 1,893.) Hill said he would discourage his students from using it as a 'serious source,' but noted that he discourages the use of normal encyclopedias as well.
2073: 4585:
The reference to 1ft is too narrow; the narrowest punt is 1ft 3 inches. The reason given for racing punters to stand in the middle of the punt is slightly bizarre
1028:"Knowledge again has a much higher proportion of unverifiable (three) and factual errors (six) than does either DAH (two incorrect) or Britannica (one incorrect)" 683: 3830:
editor"), with varying levels of knowledge and maturity and many of whom contribute little to mainspace articles outside of reverting obvious vandalism. Refer to
5183:"That bothers me," Baker said of the errors. "I think that even if 99 percent of your facts check out, it is a disservice to promulgate 1 percent inaccuracies." 3952: 2275: 2182:"several Nature reviewers" found the Knowledge article they reviewed to be "poorly structured and confusing" — a criticism that the report notes is common among 268:
Devgan, Lara; Powe, Neil; Blakey, Brittony; Makary, Martin (September 2007). "Wiki-Surgery? Internal validity of Knowledge as a medical and surgical reference".
3964:
Besiki Stvilia, Michael B. Twidale, Les Gasser, Linda C. Smith (graduate students at Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois)
1665: 1245:
Overview: Knowledge article judged best. Encarta is "extremely superficial"; Britannica is "polished and factually correct although ... less richly detailed".
1066:"Although all of the entries are brief, there are still disputable facts; Knowledge has the most with four unverifiable facts and three containing errors ..." 5248:
Excellent article! I corrected the date for Greenaway's UNDER THE WINDOW which is 1879. Congratulations on your exemplary piece, rich and full. - Anne Lundin
4725:: Pretty much on the ball, although describing Henry the Puffy Taco as a "child-friendly mascot themed after local cuisine" seems a little cold and clinical. 1876: 1814:
Knowledge articles have numerous authors, many of whom may be anonymous, and there is no expectation that their names are used when discussing their articles.
2235: 2189:
unnamed information scientists also "point to other problems with article quality, such as undue prominence given to controversial scientific theories" (see
2051: 1213:
Overview: The Knowledge article is poorly written in places and not as comprehensive as Britannica. Encarta "lacks the detail offered in the Wiki piece".
709: 113:
Academic peer reviews are those performed by independent experts in a topic, sometimes with resulting corrected articles published in scholarly journals.
289:
Clauson, K. A; Polen, H. H; Boulos, M. N K.; Dzenowagis, J. H (18 November 2008). "Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Knowledge".
4301: 2008:
science articles and sent them to experts in the field. The number of "factual errors, critical omissions and misleading statements" were recorded.
2279: 1758: 2238: 896: 414:
Phillips, Jennifer; Lam, Connie; Palmisano, Lisa (2014). "Analysis of the accuracy and readability of herbal supplement information on Knowledge".
2190: 3664: 3655: 2317: 803:
Venkatraman, Anand; Garg, Neetika (2015). "Greater freedom of speech on Web 2.0 correlates with dominance of views linking vaccines to autism".
5305:
A blog that continuously publishes dubiously correct, informal, or humorous excerpts from Knowledge articles. Most of these are not yet fixed.
3791: 2218: 1451:"Following the links takes the interested reader into greater and greater depth, probably further than any traditional encyclopedia I've seen" 956:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=6D46A9381C4560FE3E2565C7FDBD8A83?contentType=Article&contentId=1674221
4568: 4554: 3645: 3631: 3622: 3600: 3583: 3569: 3559: 1744: 1709: 1419:"The Denver Post asked five Colorado scholars to review the Knowledge entries on Islam, Bill Clinton, global warming, China and evolution." 3943: 2264: 1623: 1399: 3928: 3771:
Putting a "This article has been identified as possibly containing errors" tag on the front page of each and every articles identified by
3703:
So, the criterion was not "vastly different" in length, which would allow e.g. a factor of two difference, and maybe even a factor of 5.
913: 4209: 4079: 1670:
Email sent asking for a list of the articles with errors (or a list of the errors) if possible, so we can create a to-do list similar to
3821:
To be clear: it took several weeks before even 50% of the listed corrections were made. Unfortunately, some Knowledge commentators like
5324: 4603: 3843: 3535: 2339: 2201: 1655: 3707: 2227: 5130:
West listed more than half a dozen of these, including the wrong year of birth and a picture of Muller that's not actually Muller."
2024:
also received a private email from them in response to a request for more information. I hope they don't mind me posting it below:
4840: 66:
posted by newspapers, magazines, and other agencies outside of Knowledge. Peer reviews are different from general articles about
3903: 3812: 1322:"slightly messy description of outer Earth layering, which reappears elsewhere in the text, suggesting a lack of decent editing" 961:
A comparison of Knowledge, Encyclopaedia Britannica, The Dictionary of American History and American National Biography Online
663: 5127:
would look very detailed and well-researched. But to West, who has written a biography of Muller, it was 'fraught with errors.'
4844: 1775: 95:
on their talk page. Articles that have undergone an external peer review and publication in scholarly journals are tagged with
70:
because they give a critique of one or more articles specifically, often noting problems or highlighting their good qualities.
1572:
first reference cited for the authoritative textbook on evolution by Douglas Futuyma, "so that is excellent, as it should be,"
1375: 1207: 5121:"Dave West, a retired Virginia Tech biology professor, looked up three biology-related sites. One was good, but two were bad. 3761: 3748: 3825:
were under the false impression that "almost all" of the corrections were made within the first 24 hours of the effort. See
2208:
that Knowledge's strongest suit is the speed at which it can be updated, a factor not considered by the journal's reviewers.
2077: 1454:
pleasantly surprised how the main articles "stick to the science and avoid confusing the reader with political controversy."
1941: 1541:
where important translations of Arabic language or fine religious distinctions are required, Knowledge acquits itself well.
1013: 455: 1413: 5237: 4197:
entertaining. They could have gone into more detail with the “Old Nick’s Copper” story, for example. Maybe I’m just anal.
3651:
possible that they didn't think to check their versions, but they probably did. I'll pass on the reply when it comes. --
3588:
If there winds up being a significant difference, then the explanation is most likely error or a difference in versions.
2069: 1600: 1367: 1338: 4856: 3851:
chemistry, math, physics and engineering at around the college undergraduate level. The criticisms of articles such as
1535:"It looks like something that might have been done by a young graduate student, or assistant professor, or two or three" 167:
Many academic studies have attempted to assess the overall accuracy of topics in Knowledge (especially medical topics).
148: 4755: 3996: 3836: 1569:
If a student read through the main entry and the primary links to supporting concepts, he would get a fine introduction
116: 4767:: The one-year experiment in independent baseball, cleverly positioned in San Antonio the year Wolff Stadium opened." 3712: 1827: 1690: 1136: 4246: 4234: 2335:
study is washed out by systematic problems, although that of course depends on the type and severity of the errors.
538:(2014). "Knowledge vs Peer-Reviewed Medical Literature for Information About the 10 Most Costly Medical Conditions". 4540: 4298:. Actually, Huxley wrote Brave New World primarily in France and said later that he had not known of We at the time" 2062:
the study is invalid as a result because none of the articles taken from Knowledge were "for children or youths.")
1122: 964: 162: 5212:
expert in Walter Crane, Randolph Caldecott, and Kate Greenaway and has published several books/papers on the topic
5092:. 'I found the terminology and ages used to be quite accurate and consistent with the most recent data,' he said." 4652: 1923: 1579: 754:"Accuracy and Completeness of Drug Information in Knowledge: A Comparison with Standard Textbooks of Pharmacology" 621: 5314: 4545:
The comment about him "saying he would only serve 2 terms" was only there for 19 minutes before I removed it! --
2194: 2183: 1793: 261: 99: 3889: 1355: 5339: 1918: 59: 4047: 3935: 2056: 1972:
Nature mag cooked Knowledge study - Britannica hits back at junk science - By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
1144: 1046:
contains quotes without attribution. Quotes from Theodore Roosevelt and Sinclair Lewis are also unattributed.
5319: 1971: 89: 4719:" Well, if you're a sports fan, consider this elsewhere. Among the articles that are substantially correct: 3627:
Is there an alternative EB website? Are we counting the words in an EB "junior" site? Just a possibility. -
2327:
claims that the article lengths were comparable, but I'm finding this hard to reconcile in some cases, e.g.
4063:"LaTourette spokeswoman Deborah Setliff said LaTourette's Knowledge entry contains numerous other mistakes" 4025: 2245:
Britannica displays the word count for each article, doesn't it? At least that part shouldn't take long.
1661:"five reported seeing mistakes and one of those five reported spelling mistakes rather than factual errors" 131: 4322: 3908: 3531:
select the articles, send them out for review, gather the reviews, and compile and publish the results. -
1326: 1239: 4599: 4508: 4002: 3718: 3250: 2598: 1820:
The freedom of reuse allowed by open licensing of content is an important advantage for educational uses.
1585: 1271: 1184: 641: 55: 3920: 5193: 4388: 3896: 3781: 2498: 2157: 949:
Comparison of Knowledge and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles
1805: 1305: 4870: 4645:
Knowledge’s search for the truth - The online encyclopaedia may soon be as credible as it is popular.
2623: 1441: 1277:
Overview: Knowledge "performs well", Britannica "fares poorly", and Encarta "earns the Dunce's Cap".
1070: 928: 3594: 1901: 1881: 717:
Hwang, Thomas J.; Bourgeois, Florence T.; Seeger, John D. (2014). "Drug Safety in the Digital Age".
217: 4855:
Many of the articles were quickly improved and the Mail & Guardian published a second article "
4749:: Trust me, this one about our other member of the Baseball Hall of Fame is correct, if too short. 4689: 4677: 1886: 1503:
The bulk of it appeared to have been written by the Clinton Museum and Library in Little Rock, Ark.
1226:"leaves out the prominent theme of the Bismarck cult that flowered after his departure from office" 1010: 4314: 3799: 324:
Haigh, CA (February 2011). "Knowledge as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students".
5096: 3914: 3868: 3734: 3497: 2799: 1950: 1928: 1551: 1516: 1433: 1296: 1235: 1203: 27: 20: 4273: 3775:
seemed to some to be a bit of an overreaction. Others were quite comfortable with the practice.
4440: 4015: 3926: 3872: 3174: 2849: 2473: 2167: 1559: 1525: 1468: 1301: 1267: 997: 4108:
This text is copied from the review, which I feel is fair use for improving our encyclopedia:
5100: 4836: 4812: 4550: 4517: 3925:
Nature has now issued comments on Britannica's rebuttal, and stands by its original article.
3722: 3425: 1363: 1039:
facts than other sources. The Knowledge entry is "relatively succinct and tightly written".
74: 1978: 5222: 5150: 5138: 4722: 4099:
http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/56188/The_Accuracy_of_Wikipedia The Accuracy of Knowledge
3852: 3745: 3199: 2065: 1755: 1351: 1335: 1080: 765: 255: 178: 4394:"reads like the work of a second-rate undergraduate student... It is a simplistic account" 1723: 1679: 1642: 8: 5252: 5095:"Roanoke College political science professor Bill Hill looked up 19th century politician 5089: 4773: 4764: 4740: 4714: 4267: 4204:
Other than that, the article was of acceptable quality. My hometown even got a shout-out.
3803: 3730: 1422: 1231: 1132: 1032: 1006: 209: 170: 63: 5084:
Three college professors were asked to evaluate articles in their areas of expertise.
4918: 4361: 3985: 769: 4785: 4728: 4176: 2548: 2398: 2100: 1500:
thorough and unbiased, giving fair weight to both Clinton accomplishments and scandals.
1414:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080109025645/https://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_5786064
787: 753: 569: 521: 495: 478: 450: 377: 353: 313: 244: 42: 34: 1895: 1647: 281: 5175: 5104: 4734: 3551: 3350: 3024: 2090: 1737: 1702: 1347:
being a featured article I think we need to at least review the issues raised here.
1199: 876: 848: 820: 792: 741: 734: 703: 562: 555: 526: 483: 438: 431: 382: 341: 306: 247: 237: 198: 4850: 4826: 4737:: Wow. This reads like NBA.com, which may be why the Baseline Bums aren't included. 1913: 1637: 572: 496:"Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Knowledge: Opportunities for Improvement" 5229: 5073: 4546: 4289: 4136: 4112: 4055: 4008: 3856: 3822: 3661: 3652: 3400: 2573: 1996: 1951:"Fatally flawed: refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal 1848: 1493: 1359: 1060: 889:"JAPhA study shows incomplete and inaccurate patient drug information on Knowledge" 868: 840: 812: 783: 773: 726: 547: 517: 507: 474: 464: 423: 402: 373: 365: 333: 316: 298: 277: 229: 190: 1933: 1284:
of more benefit to the serious student than its Encarta and Britannica equivalents
816: 682:
Chatterjee, Anwesh; Cooke, Robin M.T.; Furst, Ian; Heilman, James (23 June 2014).
233: 155: 138: 4863: 4624: 4612: 4596: 4334: 4280: 3758: 3742: 3614: 3375: 2723: 2328: 1597: 1348: 1344: 1332: 1292: 1263: 1193: 1050: 778: 4658: 4367: 2254: 1719: 1675: 194: 4930: 4859:" which said, in part, "...most of the entries have been edited and improved." 4653:
http://www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp?layout=printer_friendly&doc_id=7931
4565: 4537: 4483: 4449: 4414: 4307: 3847: 3818:
criticisms or where specific corrections were offered by the expert reviewers.
3754: 3074: 2924: 2448: 2125: 2044: 1784: 1506:"a great place for a student to begin building his or her knowledge" on Clinton 1428: 1128: 1100: 906: 872: 844: 646: 451:"Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review" 406: 369: 337: 5079: 581: 5333: 5045: 5033: 4979: 4969: 4938: 4929:
Experts review 7 articles and rated them on a 0 to 10 scale. Controversially
4924: 4588: 4466: 4457: 3900: 3628: 3597: 3566: 3532: 3275: 2874: 2824: 737: 558: 434: 427: 240: 201: 122: 1788: 5233: 5194: 5124: 5110: 5019: 4999: 4934: 4891: 4879: 4832: 4499: 4158: 3704: 3642: 3619: 3580: 3556: 2423: 2336: 2314: 2293: 2224: 2021: 1733: 1715: 1698: 1687: 1617:
Thomas Chesney (Information Systems, Nottingham University Business School)
1486: 1090: 879: 851: 823: 795: 744: 601: 565: 529: 486: 441: 385: 354:"Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Knowledge: an assessment" 344: 309: 78: 3519:
Tables of contents, external links, see also, and reference sections were
551: 512: 4959: 4746: 4698: 4633: 4580: 4490: 4474: 4343: 3300: 3099: 2974: 2698: 2523: 2246: 2200:
In Knowledge's defense, Michael Twidale, an information scientist at the
1857: 1528:
religious studies professor Frederick Denny, 40-year specialist in Islam
1390: 730: 4149:
metal out of a solution whereas electro-refining involves a solid anode.
4103: 5159: 4900: 4794: 4592: 4528: 4427: 4293: 4255: 3605:
Note that the references, external links, and "see also" sections were
2949: 2292:
No doubt, but this seems the quickest reasonable statistic to gather.
2110: 2005: 1022: 4226: 1596:
are specifically, otherwise it looks like we just need to bask. :-) --
1481:"and the context of the Silk Road in China's international relations." 1185:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/119640/wikipedia-vs-the-old-guard.html
469: 302: 5294: 5009: 4942: 4561: 4533: 4401: 4070: 3939: 3512: 3124: 2999: 2120: 2001: 1983: 1593: 1546: 751: 152:
Knowledge articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
85:
Articles that have undergone an external peer review are tagged with
67: 4222:
though. I found the section on editorials to be quite entertaining.
1836:
A complete list of errors with their current status can be found at
1609:
An empirical examination of Knowledge's credibility (November 2006)
1004:
look at paired articles in two of the other three encyclopedias. --
121:
Mechanisms for peer review of individual articles are summarised at
4989: 4001:
The focus of the paper was on assessing the information quality of
3049: 1986: 993: 976: 1789:"Can History be Open Source? Knowledge and the Future of the Past" 5300: 5123:
To the average person, the article about 19th century naturalist
4087: 4034: 3880: 3864: 3860: 3726: 3505: 3325: 2773: 2748: 2673: 2311: 2145: 2135: 582:"Dr. Robert Hasty - Knowledge vs. Peer-Reviewed Medical Articles" 3767:
Tagging every Nature-reviewed articles w/errors an overreaction?
3613:
of my counts. I still find discrepancies I can't explain. Our
1444:'s Scott Denning, the Monfort Professor of Atmospheric Science. 622:"Don't Trust Knowledge When It Comes to Your Health, Study Says" 5088:"Virginia Tech geologist Bob Bodnar looked up the entry on the 5054: 4409:- Marcel D'Argy Smith, former editor of 'Cosmopolitan' magazine 4376: 4184: 1457:
wishes Knowledge offered better links to basic weather science.
1158: 5109:(Note: De Tocqueville's entry weighs in at 1,011 words, while 3989: 1584:
Looks like we got lucky, since 3/5 of the articles picked are
858: 3876: 3832:
Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations
3225: 3149: 2899: 2648: 2215:
the detailed reviewer reports are now available (see above).
2172: 2162: 2130: 1589: 1511: 1462: 830: 3892:
of the completion of the overall effort on 25 January 2006.
3757:
is now tended by a few PhD Chemistry candidates and is FA.--
3737:
status with the latter being a former featured article (see
288: 218:"The Battle for Knowledge: The New Age of 'Lost Victories'?" 5163: 5058: 4904: 4821:
Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2005-11-14/Article evaluations
4798: 4702: 4637: 4347: 4259: 4091: 4038: 3971: 3509: 1860: 1686:
Bleh... I had not noticed this yet, and just sent another.
681: 536: 5308: 4857:
Knowledge springs into action after M&G Online article
4813:
http://mg.co.za/article/2005-11-07-can-you-trust-wikipedia
2259: 1891:
Knowledge:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005/Errors
1838:
Knowledge:External peer review/Nature December 2005/Errors
1672:
Knowledge:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005/Errors
988:
Unfortunately, the author failed to notice that Knowledge
108: 4396:- Orlando Figes, professor of history at Birkbeck College 2083:
The following articles had the highest number of errors:
1319:
good for the bare facts but didn't read particularly well
1478:"mishandled the issue of Korean independence from China" 179:"Glaring Chemical Errors Persist for Years on Knowledge" 135:
Knowledge articles published in peer-reviewed literature
1643:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061127-8296.html
1190:
A comparison between Knowledge, Encarta and Britannica
448: 392: 1592:
needs work, not sure what "stylistic infelicities" in
1255:
a few recent studies are missing from the bibliography
267: 4919:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1599116,00.html
4362:
http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article345103.ece
3986:
http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~stvilia/papers/qualWiki.pdf
1575:
rest of the source list appropriate, and well-rounded
500:
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
4933:(former Editor-in-Chief of Britannica) reviewed the 4048:
Congressman's Knowledge entry mixes fact and fiction
2273:
You'd think that not all words are created equal. —
2052:
Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2005-12-19/Nature study
1000:; as a result, her comparison was flawed, since she 716: 664:"Is Knowledge a reliable source for medical advice?" 413: 5260: 3504:Word counts were computed by pasting text from the 1648:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/28/1622217
1631:
An empirical examination of Knowledge's credibility
1354:16:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC) It's changed a lot since 1258:
Military and technical details are ... well handled
540:
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association
4302:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968) 3741:, though there is virtually no discussion there). 2178:Nature's special report also noted the following: 2153:The following articles had no errors highlighted: 1475:"simplistic, and in some places, even incoherent." 684:"Is Knowledge's medical content really 90% wrong?" 602:"Trust your doctor, not Knowledge, say scientists" 4583:article mentioned two specific minor criticisms: 1638:http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/ 358:Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 5331: 4161:(The author was looking for ore milling, Grade: 2039:: The reviewer reports are now available on the 1566:"good," even if "stylistic infelicities abound." 1178:Knowledge Uncovered: Knowledge vs. The Old Guard 708:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 351: 5074:http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/xp-26511 2191:Knowledge:Guidelines for controversial articles 1877:Nature blog: Comparing Knowledge and Britannica 861:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 833:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 802: 416:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 4710:David King: Knowledge accurate for S.A. sports 4591:has fixed both and added a section on racing. 1783: 3721:status, and none have undergone our internal 1538:clinical and straightforward, but not boring. 5066:Professors give online resource mixed grades 4355:Knowledge under the microscope over accuracy 3979:Information Quality Discussions in Knowledge 3954:Information Quality Discussions in Knowledge 642:"Are Knowledge Health Tips Making You Sick?" 4502:, director of the National Portrait Gallery 4452:, fertility expert and television presenter 4372:The paper reviewed the following articles: 992:(and still does) have separate articles on 886: 690:. Archived from the original on 2 July 2014 270:Journal of the American College of Surgeons 5325:Category:Externally peer reviewed articles 5099:of Caroline County, political philosopher 4866:rewrote the Media in South Africa article. 2202:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1492:Bob Loevy, political science professor at 1287:"the layman may find too much information" 395:Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 352:Kupferberg, N; Protus, BM (October 2011). 3917:and note needed changes in our articles. 1889:(pdf) - link dead, contents available at 1882:"Internet encyclopaedias go head to head" 1044:Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance 786: 777: 520: 511: 477: 468: 376: 4835:and gave them scores ranging from 2/10 ( 4435:- John Rentoul, biographer of Tony Blair 3827:Web of Ideas: The Authority of Knowledge 2197:for guidelines related to this problem); 1549: 1514: 1431: 1223:"a marked deterioration towards the end" 599: 5236:. (A copy of the email can be found at 4937:article. The scores ranged from 0/10 ( 4841:South Africa national rugby league team 1979:Britannica 'still rules' over web rival 661: 176: 5332: 4845:South Africa national rugby union team 4752:Among those that could use your help: 4513:Most of the articles were tagged with 1868:Internet encyclopedias go head to head 1734:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1699:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1172:154 (August 2007), pages 134 & 135 639: 619: 222:The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 215: 5232:sent an email asking for feedback on 3899:is an ongoing problem at Knowledge.-- 3884:master technical concepts and facts. 1407:"Grading Knowledge", By Michael Booth 579: 323: 3792:The Trends Underlying Enterprise 2.0 3688:From the editors (see supplementary 3579:: counts should be corrected now.) 1960:. EncyclopĂŠdia Britannica, Inc. 2006 1496:and frequent writer on Bill Clinton 456:Journal of Medical Internet Research 5238:User:Smallman12q/Emails/Anne Lundin 3717:None of the articles reviewed have 3660:No reply. Ah, well. We'll see. -- 493: 58:list of reviews of the accuracy of 13: 4756:List of athletes on Wheaties boxes 4268:Can Knowledge Ever Make the Grade? 3800:Interview: Knowledge to the people 1562:biology professor Jeffrey Mitton 177:Mandler, Michael D. (2017-01-26). 117:Assessments of individual articles 14: 5351: 5295:http://citationneeded.tumblr.com/ 4761:And among the missing in action: 4288:in Britain and was influenced by 4247:The Chronicle of Higher Education 4236:The Chronicle of Higher Education 282:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.190 4831:Reviewed 8 articles relating to 2253: 1588:, we could hope they'd be good. 1550: 1515: 1432: 1295: 914:Reference Services Review (2008) 893:American Pharmacists Association 163:Assessments of multiple articles 5315:Template:Academic peer reviewed 4869:Inaccuracies were removed from 2195:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 1794:The Journal of American History 1448:"a great primer on the subject" 719:New England Journal of Medicine 640:Gagnon, Tiffany (28 May 2014). 600:Stephens, Pippa (28 May 2014). 262:Health information on Knowledge 3904:20:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 3835:elevated access. Also, in the 1471:history professor William Wei 1236:Britannica (Franco-German War) 1042:The last paragraph discussing 662:Dillner, Luisa (1 June 2014). 1: 5320:Template:External peer review 4604:08:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 4569:09:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 4555:23:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 4541:15:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 3749:19:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3708:17:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 3665:19:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 3656:23:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 3646:08:14, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3632:08:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3623:07:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3601:07:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3584:07:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3570:06:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3560:06:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3536:06:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2340:08:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2318:07:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2280:03:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2265:03:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2228:02:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2078:00:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 1691:23:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 1252:"clearer" and "more elegant" 817:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.078 234:10.1080/13518046.2018.1487198 183:Journal of Chemical Education 16:"WP:EPR" redirects here. For 3988:(draft version submitted to 1777:Journal of American History 1272:Encarta (Circulatory System) 1220:"Largely sound on the facts" 1110:Additional overall comments: 779:10.1371/journal.pone.0106930 580:Hasty, Robert (8 May 2014). 216:Stahel, David (2018-07-03). 7: 4179:20:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)) 4003:Knowledge:featured articles 3844:status at the start of 2006 3807:22:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 3762:22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 3251:Royal Greenwich Observatory 2599:Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan 2239:20:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 2050:This review was covered at 1586:Knowledge:Featured articles 620:Kedmey, Dan (27 May 2014). 195:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00478 56:Knowledge project namespace 10: 5356: 4389:Russian Revolution of 1917 3897:Knowledge:Expert retention 3782:Category:Knowledge backlog 2499:Australopithecus africanus 2219:Errors per word comparison 2158:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar 1745:17:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1710:22:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1376:The Denver Post (May 2007) 1368:00:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 887:Mary Warner (2017-01-30). 873:10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.063 845:10.1016/j.japh.2016.10.007 407:10.1016/j.cptl.2011.01.007 370:10.3163/1536-5050.99.4.010 338:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.004 259: 32: 15: 4871:African National Congress 4175:(Emphasis added is mine. 2372: 2369: 2366: 1896:List of articles reviewed 1759:10:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1695:Same here. Any replies?-- 1601:01:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1442:Colorado State University 1339:15:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 1137:06:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 1014:21:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 929:Reference Services Review 291:Annals of Pharmacotherapy 4912:Can you trust Knowledge? 4806:Can you trust Knowledge? 4690:San Antonio Express-News 4679:San Antonio Express-News 4648:Author - Robert Matthews 3725:process. Two articles, 2047:format. See above URL. 1934:Scientific American blog 1071:Battle of Harper's Ferry 428:10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13181 4128:info. I was dead wrong. 3869:Field effect transistor 3496:* - Articles marked as 2800:Field effect transistor 1887:Nature reviewer reports 1718:, does a follow up. -- 1127:None that I have seen. 64:other Knowledge content 28:Knowledge:Edit requests 5250: 4441:In vitro fertilisation 4224: 4206: 4181: 4155: 4133: 4016:Plain Dealer July 2007 3873:Kinetic isotope effect 3426:Woodward, Robert Burns 3175:Punctuated equilibrium 2850:Kinetic isotope effect 2184:information scientists 2168:Punctuated equilibrium 1909:Related news articles: 1469:University of Colorado 998:Badlands National Park 100:academic peer reviewed 79:respected publications 77:process, reviews from 5340:Knowledge peer review 5246: 5187:little distinction." 5101:Alexis De Tocqueville 4837:Media in South Africa 4219: 4194: 4173:Worst. Article. Ever. 4168: 4146: 4122: 2474:Archimedes' principle 552:10.7556/jaoa.2014.035 494:Koo, Malcolm (2014). 326:Nurse Education Today 5171:There's no end to it 5151:St. Petersburg Times 5140:St. Petersburg Times 4723:San Antonio Missions 4579:The reviewer of the 3890:informed Jimmy Wales 3853:Archimedes Principle 3842:If one examines the 1946:Britannica rebuttal 1081:Mexican-American War 731:10.1056/NEJMp1401767 90:external peer review 52:External peer review 5090:geologic time scale 4786:Mail & Guardian 4775:Mail & Guardian 4765:San Antonio Tejanos 4741:Smokey Joe Williams 3936:made a presentation 3813:Correction progress 3731:Pythagorean theorem 3200:Pythagoras' theorem 1232:Franco-Prussian War 1033:Chautauqua movement 770:2014PLoSO...9j6930K 513:10.1155/2014/105186 75:article peer review 5244:The response was: 5209:Expert background: 4729:San Antonio Texans 4527:The criticisms of 4292:'s dystopic novel 3909:Britannica's Reply 3705:—Steven G. Johnson 3643:—Steven G. Johnson 3620:—Steven G. Johnson 3581:—Steven G. Johnson 3557:—Steven G. Johnson 2549:Cambrian explosion 2399:Acheulean industry 2337:—Steven G. Johnson 2294:—Steven G. Johnson 2225:—Steven G. Johnson 2121:Acheulean industry 2101:Cambrian explosion 2032:(15 December 2005) 2011:From their blog: 1358:. Over 800 edits. 1312:for the subject". 1145:PC Pro (June 2007) 60:Knowledge articles 5105:Federalist Papers 5028: 5027: 4818:Signpost article: 4735:San Antonio Spurs 3921:Nature's Response 3552:Vesalius, Andreas 3523:from word counts. 3508:browser into the 3500: 3493: 3492: 3351:Vesalius, Andreas 3025:Mendeleev, Dmitry 2068:comment added by 1532:"quite impressed" 1200:Otto von Bismarck 867:(2): 197–200.e1. 839:(2): 193–196.e1. 811:(33): 1422–1425. 725:(26): 2460–2462. 470:10.2196/jmir.2787 303:10.1345/aph.1L474 297:(12): 1814–1821. 5347: 5274: 5273: 5269: 5230:User:Smallman12q 4948: 4947: 4522: 4516: 4422:- Ann Widdecombe 4290:Yevgeny Zamyatin 4137:Electro refining 4113:Sudbury, Ontario 4056:Steve LaTourette 4026:The Plain Dealer 3915:Britannica gives 3857:Dmitri Mendeleev 3823:David Weinberger 3719:featured article 3495: 3401:Wolfram, Stephen 2574:Cavity magnetron 2364: 2363: 2278: 2276:Ambush Commander 2262: 2258: 2257: 2250: 2091:Dmitry Mendeleev 2080: 1968: 1966: 1965: 1959: 1902:Nature editorial 1802: 1742: 1740: 1707: 1705: 1555: 1554: 1520: 1519: 1494:Colorado College 1437: 1436: 1299: 1061:Niagara Movement 1009: 900: 895:. Archived from 883: 855: 827: 799: 790: 781: 748: 713: 707: 699: 697: 695: 678: 676: 674: 658: 656: 654: 636: 634: 632: 616: 614: 612: 596: 594: 592: 576: 533: 524: 515: 490: 481: 472: 445: 410: 389: 380: 348: 320: 285: 251: 205: 157: 150: 140: 133: 104: 98: 94: 88: 45: 25: 19: 5355: 5354: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5330: 5329: 5311: 5303: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5265: 5264: 5255: 5225: 5218:: July 28, 2010 5199: 5178: 5143: 5082: 5038: 4954:Mark out of 10 4927: 4884: 4853: 4829: 4778: 4717: 4682: 4661: 4625:Financial Times 4617: 4614:Financial Times 4520: 4514: 4511: 4469:, Poet Laureate 4370: 4335:The Independent 4327: 4324:The Independent 4317: 4286:Brave New World 4281:Brave New World 4276: 4239: 4229: 4153:electrowinning. 4106: 4073: 4018: 4011: 3999: 3958: 3923: 3911: 3837:new master plan 3815: 3769: 3715: 3692:report above): 3615:West Nile virus 3376:West Nile Virus 2329:West Nile virus 2274: 2260: 2252: 2248: 2221: 2063: 2059: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1949: 1940:other links at 1833: 1831:(December 2005) 1808: 1781: 1756:Ta bu shi da yu 1743: 1738: 1732: 1708: 1703: 1697: 1668: 1658: 1611: 1582: 1425: 1381:Discussion page 1378: 1345:plate tectonics 1329: 1293:Plate tectonics 1264:Atherosclerosis 1196: 1150:Discussion page 1147: 1125: 1051:Free Soil party 1005: 967: 919:Discussion page 916: 909: 701: 700: 693: 691: 672: 670: 668:theguardian.com 652: 650: 630: 628: 610: 608: 590: 588: 264: 258: 212: 173: 165: 160: 159: 158: 147: 143: 142: 141: 130: 119: 111: 102: 96: 92: 86: 49: 48: 41: 37: 31: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 5353: 5343: 5342: 5328: 5327: 5322: 5317: 5310: 5307: 5302: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5289: 5283: 5263: 5259: 5256: 5254: 5251: 5242: 5241: 5224: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5213: 5206: 5198: 5192: 5189: 5177: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5166: 5154: 5142: 5137: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5119: 5093: 5081: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5067: 5061: 5049: 5037: 5032: 5029: 5026: 5025: 5022: 5016: 5015: 5012: 5006: 5005: 5002: 4996: 4995: 4992: 4986: 4985: 4982: 4976: 4975: 4972: 4966: 4965: 4962: 4956: 4955: 4952: 4931:Robert McHenry 4926: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4913: 4907: 4895: 4883: 4878: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4867: 4852: 4849: 4828: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4815: 4807: 4801: 4789: 4777: 4772: 4769: 4716: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4705: 4693: 4681: 4676: 4673: 4660: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4649: 4646: 4640: 4628: 4616: 4611: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4510: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4484:Simon Garfield 4472: 4471: 4470: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4450:Robert Winston 4438: 4437: 4436: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4415:Ann Widdecombe 4412: 4411: 4410: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4369: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4356: 4350: 4338: 4326: 4321: 4318: 4316: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4308:Flow cytometry 4305: 4299: 4275: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4262: 4250: 4238: 4233: 4230: 4228: 4225: 4218: 4217: 4193: 4192: 4167: 4166: 4145: 4144: 4121: 4120: 4105: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4094: 4082: 4072: 4069: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4052: 4051: 4041: 4028: 4017: 4014: 4010: 4007: 3998: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3980: 3974: 3965: 3957: 3951: 3948: 3922: 3919: 3910: 3907: 3848:Aldol reaction 3814: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3804:76.204.176.148 3802:31 Jan 2007.-- 3795: 3777: 3768: 3765: 3755:Aldol reaction 3714: 3713:Article status 3711: 3701: 3700: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3658: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3525: 3524: 3517: 3491: 3490: 3487: 3484: 3481: 3478: 3475: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3465: 3462: 3459: 3457: 3454: 3451: 3447: 3446: 3443: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3431: 3428: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3415: 3412: 3409: 3406: 3403: 3397: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3387: 3384: 3381: 3378: 3372: 3371: 3368: 3365: 3362: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3347: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3337: 3334: 3331: 3328: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3306: 3303: 3297: 3296: 3293: 3290: 3287: 3284: 3281: 3278: 3272: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3247: 3246: 3243: 3240: 3237: 3234: 3231: 3228: 3222: 3221: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3203: 3196: 3195: 3192: 3189: 3186: 3183: 3180: 3177: 3171: 3170: 3167: 3164: 3161: 3158: 3155: 3152: 3146: 3145: 3142: 3139: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3127: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3105: 3102: 3096: 3095: 3092: 3089: 3086: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3075:Neural network 3071: 3070: 3067: 3064: 3061: 3058: 3055: 3052: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3027: 3021: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3005: 3002: 2996: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2977: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2955: 2952: 2946: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2925:Lomborg, Bjorn 2921: 2920: 2917: 2914: 2911: 2908: 2905: 2902: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2871: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2861: 2858: 2855: 2852: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2836: 2833: 2830: 2827: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2796: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2770: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2704: 2701: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2670: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2595: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2585: 2582: 2579: 2576: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2562:702 (13 Dec.) 2560: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2545: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2526: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2449:Aldol reaction 2445: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2420: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2385: 2382: 2379: 2375: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2361: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2268: 2267: 2242: 2241: 2236:83.180.100.151 2220: 2217: 2210: 2209: 2198: 2187: 2176: 2175: 2170: 2165: 2160: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2126:Neural network 2123: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2058: 2055: 2045:Microsoft Word 2034: 2033: 2019: 2018: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1974: 1969: 1944: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1931: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1899: 1893: 1884: 1879: 1869: 1863: 1852: 1841: 1840: 1832: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1807: 1804: 1785:Roy Rosenzweig 1780: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1731: 1696: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1645: 1632: 1626: 1618: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1557: 1556: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1522: 1521: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1490: 1489: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1466: 1465: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1439: 1438: 1429:Global warming 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1408: 1402: 1394: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1309: 1308: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1275: 1274: 1260: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1243: 1242: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1211: 1210: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1179: 1173: 1167: 1161: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1104: 1103: 1101:Harriet Tubman 1094: 1093: 1084: 1083: 1074: 1073: 1064: 1063: 1054: 1053: 1036: 1035: 1026: 1025: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1007:John Broughton 980: 979: 966: 963: 959: 958: 950: 944: 943:vol. 26, no. 1 938: 932: 915: 912: 908: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 899:on 2017-01-30. 856: 828: 800: 764:(9): e106930. 749: 714: 679: 659: 637: 617: 597: 577: 546:(5): 368–373. 534: 491: 446: 411: 401:(2): 154–158. 390: 349: 321: 286: 276:(3): S76–S77. 257: 254: 253: 252: 228:(3): 396–402. 211: 208: 207: 206: 189:(3): 271–272. 172: 169: 164: 161: 146: 145: 129: 128: 118: 115: 110: 107: 47: 46: 38: 33: 26:requests, see 21:edit protected 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5352: 5341: 5338: 5337: 5335: 5326: 5323: 5321: 5318: 5316: 5313: 5312: 5306: 5296: 5293: 5290: 5287: 5284: 5282: 5280: 5277: 5276: 5270: 5262: 5258: 5249: 5245: 5239: 5235: 5231: 5227: 5226: 5217: 5214: 5210: 5207: 5205:: Anne Lundin 5204: 5201: 5200: 5197:Expert Review 5196: 5191: 5188: 5184: 5181: 5170: 5167: 5165: 5161: 5158: 5155: 5153: 5152: 5148: 5145: 5144: 5141: 5136: 5131: 5128: 5126: 5120: 5118: 5114: 5112: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5094: 5091: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5075: 5071: 5068: 5065: 5062: 5060: 5056: 5053: 5050: 5048: 5047: 5046:Roanoke Times 5043: 5040: 5039: 5036: 5035:Roanoke Times 5031: 5023: 5021: 5018: 5017: 5013: 5011: 5008: 5007: 5003: 5001: 4998: 4997: 4993: 4991: 4988: 4987: 4983: 4981: 4980:Basque people 4978: 4977: 4973: 4971: 4970:Haute couture 4968: 4967: 4963: 4961: 4958: 4957: 4953: 4951:Article name 4950: 4949: 4946: 4944: 4940: 4939:Haute couture 4936: 4932: 4920: 4917: 4914: 4911: 4908: 4906: 4902: 4899: 4896: 4894: 4893: 4889: 4886: 4885: 4882: 4877: 4872: 4868: 4865: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4858: 4848: 4846: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4822: 4819: 4816: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4805: 4802: 4800: 4796: 4793: 4790: 4788: 4787: 4783: 4780: 4779: 4776: 4771: 4768: 4766: 4762: 4759: 4757: 4753: 4750: 4748: 4744: 4742: 4738: 4736: 4732: 4730: 4726: 4724: 4720: 4709: 4706: 4704: 4700: 4697: 4694: 4692: 4691: 4687: 4684: 4683: 4680: 4675: 4672: 4668: 4664: 4654: 4650: 4647: 4644: 4641: 4639: 4635: 4632: 4629: 4627: 4626: 4622: 4619: 4618: 4615: 4610: 4605: 4601: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4577: 4570: 4567: 4563: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4539: 4535: 4530: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4519: 4501: 4497: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4473: 4468: 4467:Andrew Motion 4464: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458:Philip Larkin 4456: 4451: 4447: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4439: 4434: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4426: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4413: 4408: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4400: 4395: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4387: 4383: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4354: 4351: 4349: 4345: 4342: 4339: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4329: 4328: 4325: 4320: 4309: 4306: 4303: 4300: 4297: 4296: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4282: 4278: 4277: 4269: 4266: 4263: 4261: 4257: 4254: 4251: 4249: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4232: 4223: 4215: 4211: 4208: 4207: 4205: 4202: 4198: 4190: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4180: 4178: 4177:Jesse Viviano 4174: 4164: 4160: 4157: 4156: 4154: 4150: 4142: 4138: 4135: 4134: 4132: 4129: 4127: 4118: 4114: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4098: 4095: 4093: 4089: 4086: 4083: 4081: 4078: 4075: 4074: 4068: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4054: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4042: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4029: 4027: 4023: 4020: 4019: 4013: 4006: 4004: 3991: 3987: 3984: 3981: 3978: 3975: 3973: 3969: 3966: 3963: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3950: 3947: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3932: 3930: 3927: 3918: 3916: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3893: 3891: 3885: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3849: 3845: 3840: 3838: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3819: 3808: 3805: 3801: 3796: 3793: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3785: 3783: 3776: 3774: 3764: 3763: 3760: 3756: 3751: 3750: 3747: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3710: 3709: 3706: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3691: 3666: 3663: 3659: 3657: 3654: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3644: 3640: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3621: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3582: 3578: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3558: 3553: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3537: 3534: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3499: 3498:good articles 3488: 3485: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3466: 3463: 3460: 3458: 3455: 3452: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3435: 3432: 3429: 3427: 3424: 3423: 3419: 3416: 3413: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3402: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3385: 3382: 3379: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3366: 3363: 3360: 3357: 3354: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3341: 3338: 3335: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3291: 3288: 3285: 3282: 3279: 3277: 3276:Royal Society 3274: 3273: 3269: 3266: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3254: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3244: 3241: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3229: 3227: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3216: 3213: 3210: 3207: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3197: 3193: 3190: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3168: 3165: 3162: 3159: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3140: 3137: 3134: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3115: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3093: 3090: 3087: 3084: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3068: 3065: 3062: 3059: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3034: 3031: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2990: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2890: 2887: 2884: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2875:Kin selection 2873: 2872: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2834: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2825:Haber process 2823: 2822: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2809: 2806: 2803: 2801: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2755: 2752: 2750: 2747: 2746: 2742: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2702: 2700: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2689: 2686: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2675: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2586: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2558: 2555: 2552: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2514: 2511: 2508: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2472: 2471: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2376: 2367:Article name 2365: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2256: 2251: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2237: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2216: 2214: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2122: 2119: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2099: 2098: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2070:64.134.40.134 2067: 2054: 2053: 2048: 2046: 2043:web site, in 2042: 2038: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1998: 1988: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1956: 1954: 1948: 1947: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1932: 1930: 1927: 1925: 1924:Aljazeera.net 1922: 1920: 1919:Business Week 1917: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1825: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1803: 1801:(1): 117–146. 1800: 1796: 1795: 1790: 1787:(June 2006). 1786: 1778: 1773: 1760: 1757: 1752: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1741: 1735: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1700: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1660: 1659: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1561: 1553: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1518: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1495: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1435: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1420: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1246: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1191: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1040: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 978: 975: 974: 973: 971: 962: 957: 954: 951: 948: 945: 942: 939: 936: 933: 931: 930: 926: 923: 922: 921: 920: 911: 898: 894: 890: 885: 884: 881: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 857: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 829: 825: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 801: 797: 794: 789: 785: 780: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 750: 746: 743: 739: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 715: 711: 705: 689: 685: 680: 669: 665: 660: 649: 648: 647:Men's Fitness 643: 638: 627: 623: 618: 607: 603: 598: 587: 583: 578: 574: 571: 567: 564: 560: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 535: 531: 528: 523: 519: 514: 509: 505: 501: 497: 492: 488: 485: 480: 476: 471: 466: 462: 458: 457: 452: 447: 443: 440: 436: 433: 429: 425: 422:(4): 406–14. 421: 417: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 391: 387: 384: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 350: 346: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 318: 315: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 265: 263: 249: 246: 242: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 214: 213: 203: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 175: 174: 168: 153: 149: 136: 132: 126: 124: 114: 106: 101: 91: 83: 80: 76: 71: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 44: 40: 39: 36: 29: 22: 5304: 5291: 5285: 5281: 5278: 5261: 5257: 5247: 5243: 5234:Edmund Evans 5228:Anne Lundin- 5215: 5208: 5202: 5195:Edmund Evans 5190: 5185: 5182: 5179: 5168: 5156: 5149: 5146: 5139: 5135: 5129: 5125:Fritz Muller 5122: 5115: 5111:Katie Holmes 5108: 5083: 5069: 5063: 5051: 5044: 5041: 5034: 5030: 5020:Encyclopedia 5000:Samuel Pepys 4935:encyclopedia 4928: 4915: 4909: 4897: 4892:The Guardian 4890: 4887: 4881:The Guardian 4880: 4876: 4854: 4839:) to 10/10 ( 4833:South Africa 4830: 4817: 4809: 4803: 4791: 4784: 4781: 4774: 4770: 4763: 4760: 4754: 4751: 4745: 4739: 4733: 4727: 4721: 4718: 4707: 4695: 4688: 4685: 4678: 4674: 4669: 4665: 4662: 4642: 4630: 4623: 4620: 4613: 4609: 4584: 4518:High-traffic 4512: 4500:Sandy Nairne 4495: 4479: 4462: 4445: 4432: 4419: 4406: 4393: 4381: 4371: 4358: 4352: 4340: 4333: 4330: 4323: 4319: 4294: 4285: 4279: 4264: 4252: 4245: 4242: 4235: 4231: 4220: 4213: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4188: 4172: 4169: 4162: 4159:Ore dressing 4151: 4147: 4140: 4130: 4125: 4123: 4116: 4107: 4096: 4084: 4076: 4067: 4043: 4030: 4021: 4012: 4000: 3982: 3976: 3967: 3961: 3953: 3949: 3933: 3924: 3912: 3894: 3886: 3841: 3820: 3816: 3787:References: 3786: 3778: 3772: 3770: 3752: 3735:good article 3716: 3702: 3696: 3689: 3687: 3638: 3610: 3606: 3589: 3576: 3548: 3520: 3494: 2424:Agent Orange 2393:Errors/word 2384:Errors/word 2360: 2354: 2352: 2332: 2324: 2222: 2212: 2211: 2205: 2177: 2152: 2082: 2064:— Preceding 2060: 2049: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2028: 2020: 2015: 2010: 1995: 1994: 1977: 1962:. Retrieved 1952: 1908: 1871: 1865: 1854: 1847: 1844: 1828: 1824: 1798: 1792: 1782: 1776: 1772: 1750: 1722:, 2007-03-17 1716:User:Piotrus 1678:, 2006-11-29 1669: 1634: 1628: 1620: 1614: 1605: 1583: 1558: 1523: 1491: 1487:Bill Clinton 1467: 1440: 1418: 1410: 1404: 1396: 1389: 1386: 1379: 1372: 1356:this version 1342: 1330: 1314: 1310: 1279: 1276: 1247: 1244: 1215: 1212: 1189: 1181: 1175: 1169: 1163: 1155: 1148: 1141: 1126: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1095: 1091:William Kidd 1085: 1075: 1065: 1055: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1027: 1001: 989: 981: 969: 968: 960: 952: 946: 940: 934: 927: 924: 917: 910: 897:the original 892: 864: 860: 836: 832: 808: 804: 761: 757: 722: 718: 692:. Retrieved 688:cochrane.org 687: 671:. Retrieved 667: 651:. Retrieved 645: 629:. Retrieved 625: 609:. Retrieved 605: 589:. Retrieved 585: 543: 539: 503: 499: 463:(10): e210. 460: 454: 419: 415: 398: 394: 364:(4): 310–3. 361: 357: 332:(2): 135–9. 329: 325: 294: 290: 273: 269: 225: 221: 186: 182: 166: 156:(3 C, 124 P) 139:(10 C, 79 P) 120: 112: 84: 72: 51: 50: 5097:John Taylor 4960:Steve Reich 4941:) to 8/10 ( 4747:Ross Youngs 4699:December 16 4634:December 23 4581:punt (boat) 4491:Punt (boat) 4475:BBC Radio 1 4344:February 12 3956:(Fall 2005) 3743:violet/riga 3723:peer review 3662:Mr. Billion 3653:Mr. Billion 3301:Synchrotron 3220:0.00052659 3100:Nobel prize 2975:Mayr, Ernst 2944:0.00066622 2734:0.00074963 2699:Dirac, Paul 2524:Bethe, Hans 2387:Word count 2378:Word count 2370:Britannica 1976:James Bone 1858:14 December 1779:(June 2006) 1391:Denver Post 1360:LeadSongDog 1349:violet/riga 1333:violet/riga 1331:None yet. 586:youtube.com 5160:November 8 4901:October 24 4864:Elf-friend 4795:7 November 4529:Tony Blair 4428:Tony Blair 4256:27 October 3944:2006-08-04 3934:Jim Giles 3895:Note that 3798:review it. 3759:SupperBird 3753:Note that 3489:0.0035798 3480:0.0054106 3445:0.0012931 3420:0.0035778 3411:0.0042105 3395:0.0037879 3386:0.0040816 3370:0.0034072 3361:0.0021505 3345:0.0047978 3336:0.0068611 3320:0.0012579 3311:0.0025974 3295:0.0023015 3270:0.0093985 3236:0.0044964 3211:0.0014535 3185:0.0010604 3169:0.0044220 3160:0.0063425 3144:0.0043384 3135:0.0095847 3119:0.0024366 3110:0.0097800 3094:0.0056772 3085:0.0035907 3069:0.0038536 3035:0.0061256 3010:0.0065789 2994:0.0039841 2969:0.0056980 2960:0.0020877 2950:Lymphocyte 2935:0.0019305 2910:0.0085960 2894:0.0074257 2885:0.0032503 2869:0.0035149 2860:0.0047619 2844:0.0037665 2835:0.0041494 2810:0.0051020 2794:0.0019004 2785:0.0095238 2768:0.0085106 2743:0.0049566 2718:0.0086207 2693:0.0066964 2684:0.0053476 2668:0.0029603 2659:0.0046802 2643:0.0036417 2634:0.0033841 2593:0.0017841 2584:0.0050761 2543:0.0010971 2534:0.0015198 2518:0.0020161 2509:0.0042553 2493:0.0032949 2484:0.0057143 2468:0.0045455 2443:0.0015748 2373:Knowledge 2111:Paul Dirac 2097:11 errors 2087:19 errors 2006:Britannica 1964:2006-03-23 1624:2006-11-06 1598:AnonEMouse 1400:2007-05-01 1302:Britannica 1268:Britannica 1204:Britannica 1023:Sand Creek 260:See also: 5010:Bob Dylan 4943:Bob Dylan 4851:Responses 4509:Responses 4402:Kate Moss 4315:Responses 4227:Responses 4210:Shoutwire 4080:Shoutwire 4071:Shoutwire 3940:Wikimania 3929:(archive) 3286:0.014423 3261:0.012766 3125:Pheromone 3060:0.010989 3044:0.016755 3019:0.010676 3000:Meliaceae 2759:0.028090 2709:0.011947 2609:0.010959 2559:0.019268 2459:0.030769 2418:0.016787 2142:5 errors 2117:7 errors 2107:9 errors 2002:Knowledge 2000:compared 1984:The Times 1929:USA Today 1749:Hardly a 1594:Evolution 1547:Evolution 1166:June 2007 1129:Mangostar 738:0028-4793 559:0098-6151 435:1544-3191 248:150237156 241:1351-8046 202:0021-9584 68:Knowledge 5334:Category 5309:See also 5301:Findings 5253:Response 5223:Findings 5176:Findings 5117:rights." 5103:and the 5080:Findings 4990:TS Eliot 4925:Findings 4827:Findings 4715:Findings 4659:Findings 4589:Thruston 4368:Findings 4274:Findings 4201:present. 4187:(Grade: 4139:(Grade: 4126:accurate 4115:(Grade: 4104:Findings 4009:Informal 3997:Findings 3901:Simongar 3629:Nunh-huh 3607:excluded 3598:Nunh-huh 3567:Nunh-huh 3533:Nunh-huh 3521:excluded 3050:Mutation 2819:0.00322 2434:0.00793 2066:unsigned 2057:Findings 1987:March 25 1942:Wikinews 1914:BBC News 1806:Findings 1666:Response 1656:Findings 1580:Response 1524:Retired 1423:Findings 1327:Response 1315:Quotes: 1280:Quotes: 1248:Quotes: 1216:Quotes: 1194:Findings 1123:Response 994:Badlands 977:Badlands 970:Summary: 965:Findings 880:28139458 852:27866956 824:25665960 805:Vaccines 796:25250889 758:PLOS ONE 745:24963564 704:cite web 626:time.com 573:40519767 566:24778001 530:24864148 487:24103318 442:25063262 386:22022226 345:20646799 310:19017825 256:Medicine 109:Academic 35:Shortcut 5288:Ongoing 5279:Source: 5147:Source: 5042:Source: 4888:Source: 4782:Source: 4686:Source: 4621:Source: 4331:Source: 4243:Source: 4212:(Grade: 4088:March 7 4077:Source: 4035:July 13 3990:CIKM'05 3962:Source: 3881:Thyroid 3865:Epitaxy 3861:Colloid 3733:, have 3727:Ethanol 3506:Firefox 3486:3.8571 3483:1077.5 3477:2.9286 3474:541.26 3326:Thyroid 2774:Ethanol 2749:Epitaxy 2674:Colloid 2568:0.0157 2390:Errors 2381:Errors 2213:Update: 2204:, told 2146:Ethanol 2136:Thyroid 1845:Source: 1726:06:07z 1720:JeandrĂ© 1688:Circeus 1682:08:10z 1676:JeandrĂ© 1615:Source: 1387:Source: 1306:Encarta 1240:Encarta 1208:Encarta 1156:Source: 925:Source: 788:4174509 766:Bibcode 694:23 June 606:bbc.com 522:4016830 506:: 1–4. 479:3929050 378:3193353 317:2072846 210:History 171:Science 5266:": --> 5203:Expert 5169:Title: 5064:Title: 5055:July 1 4910:Title: 4804:Title: 4708:Title: 4651:URI - 4643:Title: 4377:Muslim 4353:Title: 4265:Title: 4185:Nickel 4097:Title: 4022:Source 3977:Title: 3773:Nature 3690:Nature 3639:Nature 3590:Nature 3577:Update 3516:noted. 3461:45254 3453:22733 3450:Total 2409:0.002 2355:Nature 2333:Nature 2325:Nature 2206:Nature 2041:Nature 2037:Update 1997:Nature 1953:Nature 1866:Title: 1849:Nature 1829:Nature 1751:useful 1730:EPR.-- 1629:Title: 1405:Title: 1176:Title: 1170:Issue: 1159:PC Pro 947:Title: 941:Issue: 907:Formal 673:4 June 653:4 June 631:4 June 611:4 June 591:4 June 123:WP:W2J 43:WP:EPR 5286:Date: 5157:Date: 5052:Date: 4898:Date: 4792:Date: 4696:Date: 4631:Date: 4593:Telsa 4562:David 4547:Arwel 4534:David 4341:Date: 4253:Date: 4085:Date: 4044:Title 3983:URLs: 3970:Fall 3968:Date: 3877:Prion 3609:from 3471:Mean 3439:2320 3389:1320 3364:1174 3339:1459 3314:1590 3239:2060 3230:1112 3226:Quark 3214:1899 3188:1265 3163:1583 3150:Prion 3113:2052 3088:1233 3063:1557 3038:1134 3029:1306 2938:1501 2900:Lipid 2788:2631 2728:1334 2724:Dolly 2712:1044 2662:1689 2649:Cloud 2637:1373 2587:1121 2537:1823 2437:1270 2173:Quark 2163:Lipid 2131:Prion 1958:(PDF) 1898:(doc) 1872:URLs: 1855:Date: 1739:talk 1704:talk 1674:. -- 1635:URLs: 1621:Date: 1590:China 1512:Islam 1463:China 1397:Date: 1343:With 1164:Date: 935:Date: 570:S2CID 314:S2CID 245:S2CID 54:is a 5292:URL: 5268:edit 5216:Date 5164:2004 5059:2005 4916:URL: 4905:2005 4843:and 4810:URL: 4799:2005 4703:2005 4638:2005 4566:Talk 4551:talk 4538:Talk 4359:URL: 4348:2006 4260:2006 4092:2007 4039:2007 4031:Date 3972:2005 3739:here 3729:and 3596:. - 3510:Unix 3464:162 3456:123 3430:873 3414:559 3405:475 3380:245 3355:930 3330:583 3305:770 3289:869 3280:416 3264:532 3255:235 3205:688 3179:943 3154:473 3138:461 3129:313 3104:409 3079:557 3054:728 3013:281 3004:152 2988:753 2979:357 2963:351 2954:479 2929:518 2913:676 2904:349 2888:404 2879:923 2863:569 2854:210 2838:531 2829:241 2813:933 2804:588 2779:315 2762:235 2753:178 2737:807 2703:837 2687:896 2678:561 2653:641 2628:591 2612:417 2603:365 2578:394 2553:519 2528:658 2512:496 2503:235 2487:607 2478:350 2462:660 2453:130 2428:252 2412:417 2403:500 2312:+sj 2193:and 2074:talk 2004:and 1989:2006 1861:2005 1411:URL: 1364:talk 1182:URL: 1133:talk 1011:(♫♫) 996:and 953:URL: 937:2008 877:PMID 849:PMID 821:PMID 793:PMID 742:PMID 735:ISSN 710:link 696:2014 675:2014 655:2014 633:2014 613:2014 593:2014 563:PMID 556:ISSN 527:PMID 504:2014 484:PMID 439:PMID 432:ISSN 383:PMID 342:PMID 307:PMID 238:ISSN 199:ISSN 62:and 5070:URL 4945:). 4847:). 4600:(c) 4597:(t) 4117:A++ 4046:: " 3942:on 3938:at 3875:, 3746:(t) 3611:all 3041:19 2706:10 2624:CJD 2565:11 2556:10 1982:in 1352:(t) 1336:(t) 1002:did 990:did 869:doi 841:doi 813:doi 784:PMC 774:doi 727:doi 723:370 548:doi 544:114 518:PMC 508:doi 475:PMC 465:doi 424:doi 403:doi 374:PMC 366:doi 334:doi 299:doi 278:doi 274:205 230:doi 191:doi 5336:: 5162:, 5072:- 5057:, 5024:5 5014:8 5004:6 4994:6 4984:7 4974:0 4964:7 4903:, 4797:, 4701:, 4636:, 4602:) 4587:. 4564:| 4553:) 4536:| 4523:. 4521:}} 4515:{{ 4498:- 4482:- 4465:- 4448:- 4346:, 4295:We 4258:, 4214:B+ 4189:B- 4165:): 4163:D- 4143:): 4141:C- 4119:): 4090:, 4037:, 4033:: 4024:: 3946:. 3931:. 3879:, 3871:, 3867:, 3863:, 3859:, 3855:, 3513:wc 3442:3 3436:0 3433:0 3417:2 3408:2 3392:5 3383:1 3367:4 3358:2 3342:7 3333:4 3317:2 3308:2 3292:2 3283:6 3267:5 3258:3 3245:0 3242:0 3233:5 3217:1 3208:1 3202:* 3194:0 3191:0 3182:1 3166:7 3157:3 3141:2 3132:3 3116:5 3107:4 3091:7 3082:2 3066:6 3057:8 3032:8 3016:3 3007:1 2991:3 2985:0 2982:0 2966:2 2957:1 2941:1 2932:1 2919:0 2916:0 2907:3 2891:3 2882:3 2866:2 2857:1 2841:2 2832:1 2816:3 2807:3 2791:5 2782:3 2776:* 2765:2 2756:5 2740:4 2731:1 2715:9 2690:6 2681:3 2665:5 2656:3 2640:5 2631:2 2618:0 2615:0 2606:4 2590:2 2581:2 2540:2 2531:1 2515:1 2506:1 2490:2 2481:2 2465:3 2456:4 2440:2 2431:2 2415:7 2406:1 2249:ᓛᖁ 2076:) 1799:93 1797:. 1791:. 1560:CU 1526:CU 1366:) 1304:- 1300:- 1270:- 1266:- 1238:- 1234:- 1206:- 1202:- 1135:) 891:. 875:. 865:57 863:. 847:. 837:57 835:. 819:. 809:17 807:. 791:. 782:. 772:. 760:. 756:. 740:. 733:. 721:. 706:}} 702:{{ 686:. 666:. 644:. 624:. 604:. 584:. 568:. 561:. 554:. 542:. 525:. 516:. 502:. 498:. 482:. 473:. 461:15 459:. 453:. 437:. 430:. 420:54 418:. 397:. 381:. 372:. 362:99 360:. 356:. 340:. 330:31 328:. 312:. 305:. 295:42 293:. 272:. 243:. 236:. 226:31 224:. 220:. 197:. 187:94 185:. 181:. 154:‎ 137:‎ 125:. 105:. 103:}} 97:{{ 93:}} 87:{{ 24:}} 18:{{ 5272:] 5240:) 4595:( 4549:( 4216:) 4191:) 4050:" 3992:) 3575:( 2323:( 2315:+ 2261:ᑐ 2247:‣ 2186:; 2072:( 2022:I 1967:. 1955:" 1736:| 1724:t 1701:| 1680:t 1362:( 1131:( 882:. 871:: 854:. 843:: 826:. 815:: 798:. 776:: 768:: 762:9 747:. 729:: 712:) 698:. 677:. 657:. 635:. 615:. 595:. 575:. 550:: 532:. 510:: 489:. 467:: 444:. 426:: 409:. 405:: 399:3 388:. 368:: 347:. 336:: 319:. 301:: 284:. 280:: 250:. 232:: 204:. 193:: 30:.

Index

edit protected
Knowledge:Edit requests
Shortcut
WP:EPR
Knowledge project namespace
Knowledge articles
other Knowledge content
Knowledge
article peer review
respected publications
external peer review
academic peer reviewed
WP:W2J

Knowledge articles published in peer-reviewed literature

Knowledge articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
"Glaring Chemical Errors Persist for Years on Knowledge"
doi
10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00478
ISSN
0021-9584
"The Battle for Knowledge: The New Age of 'Lost Victories'?"
doi
10.1080/13518046.2018.1487198
ISSN
1351-8046
S2CID
150237156
Health information on Knowledge

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑