User talk:The JPS/archive 2

3624:

notable, but since you don't attend the school you probably don't understand the magnitude of the Asian Business Association. I don't understand what the point is of deleting someone's article ONLY based on "non-notability", which is a completely subjective criteria anyways. I'm contributing to a database of general knowledge with facts and content - it's not like I'm putting up some stupid crap. Even the editors who nominated the page for deletion said it was a "nice bio" and that it was a shame to be deleted. I really don't see any harm in keeping the page - if you would like me to edit it because I'm violating some other guideline, I would be more than happy to do so. Personally, I think that the criteria of non-notability came about because people will get jealous of people who have profiles on Knowledge who aren't rockstars, political figures, or someone with "distinguishable hits on Google" (another completely subjective criteria, btw.) Just thought I'd let you know my opinion. --

2304:. Unless a user explictly tells us that they are the copyright holder, we can presume nothing. 'Found on the web' image outnumber user-created images by a significant number on Knowledge. Just because a picture doesn't look professional doesn't mean that it is any less likely that it was simply 'found on the web'. With the booming popularity of sites like flikr we can only expect the number of amateure looking, high res, and illegially uploaded by a third party to increase. :) -- 3256:(current): 35.71 Edits on top: 36.82% Significant article edits (non-minor/reverts): 4.4% Breakdown of edits: All significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 62.98% Minor edits (non reverts): 32.36% Quick reverts: 4.48% Unmarked edits: 0.18% Namespace: Article: 58.48% Article talk: 3.02% User: 1.52% User talk: 9.64% Knowledge: 6.4% Knowledge talk: 0.6% Image: 19.04% Template: 0.36% Category: 0.78% Portal: 0% Help: 0% MediaWiki: 0% Other talk pages: 0.16% 1131: 719:

provided sourcing evidence for them, and they will be removed. However i cant provide sourcing evidence for them as they are publicity photos that are sent out to fans, and the images are not put on the net to source back to. Each image does contain copyright information on it, saying that its copyrighted to the BBC, the actors name and the character's name, and i have put the necessary tag stating that it is a publicity photo (on this page

2344: 444:. Please leave the tag alone. If it is decided that it is kept, then it will be removed by an experienced editor. I have already explained that the uploader should not remove the tags. Also, I cannot seem to locate these 'extended discussions' where the copyright issues have been discussed "to death". It would be very helpful if you could provide a specific link to them. Under which archive and subheading can we find them? 3377:(or whatever you want to name it) as a place to test out formatting etc. You can do practically what you like in there! That way you can draft your articles, so they are fully formed and referenced articles by the time you put them in 'main' space. Many users have subpages like that for various reasons. I have one at the moment for an article I'm working on that isn't good enough to create in main space yet. 2461:! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on 1109:), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. In the meantime, I will do my best to address your concerns in the hope that when the opportunity for adminship arises once again, you will reconsider your position. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Knowledge, you are more than 3264: 3766:

I tried to explain that I was doing my best, but that apparently wasn't good enough. I know I am slow, and you guys have to rocket through thousands of these a day, but what should I have done differently??? FunFurious is a viable entity in our area, and is original. Thanks for your help. Snowman 16:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

3410: 3819:

I have no problem removing the link if that's all. As a group, we are working on Incorporation, though probably will do so under a different name. But this has been our group name for some time here in the Decatur, GA area, and noone else uses the name (why would they!) - If you google us, you only

3765:

Good day... When creating the "FunFurious" article, I was trying to make it more appropriate and it was deleted before I was able to understand which principles I had not conformed to. I posted it again, making every attempt to conform to the "Tollerant" Wiki standards, and you deleted it as well.

2835:

be blocked"...), comes back today and vandalizes again. I understand that he wasn't actively vandalizing pages at the moment I posted him/her, that he had been idle for 8 hours, which your edit summary implied was the rationale for emptying the page without blocking, but if that's the only reason for

2585:

hello "The JPS", im a new somebody around here, and as i have seen in your user page, you have been here for way longer, so you probebly now a lot more about wikipedia then me. to get to the point,I was wondering why you deleted my article.Since this is a prity big thing here,(enschede, holland) and

2100:

Three images you listed has been already deleted in the past and restored by me with proper tags. If you think that deleting properly tagged images is fun, go on, delete it - I'll reupload them to Commons with {PD-self} license, as less scrupulous editors than me always do. Seriously, can't you find

852:

Thanks for the advice, I wasnt aware that i was doing anything wrong deleting messages about images that I'd orphaned and had been deleted a while back. It's not that i'm trying to hide things, I just thought it looked messy and was getting annoyed about having to scroll down the page everytime i got

723:

for example). I contacted Feyday, who has said that without sourcing noone can tell that its cOpyrighted to the BBC (even though it says so on the image) and he says i should contact someone else with the query. Do you think it will be ok to source the image back to their character profile on the bbc

1713:

I like it. Clean, clear and informative - just what's needed to clean up articles that have been on the drift of late. A consideration needs to be given to contracts that weren't the same after a franchise round: Granada (north weekdays 56-68, northwest all week 68+) is the most obvious; and, whilst

1501:

Hi JPS, I have been going through the images that you have highlighted for deletion, I notice on this one 'Image:Shooting876868.jpg' that you say that if the year and actors are provided it could possibly remain, so I put that info in. Not that it really matters if its deleted, but I thought I'd add

1391:

I was not aware i was using unfree image, this was not done on purpose on my part. The other warnings I have received were about promotional photos not screen shots, which it seems everyone else but me is allowed to upload without scrutiny. I will refrain from uploading anymore images from now on.It

604:

Because that means that yet another person has to do all the work in finding an appropriate tag and source. Most, if not all, fair use tags require a description and source. It is the responsibility of the uploader to provide these. This is made clear during the upload process. If the uploader fails

3623:

Hey, I'm a new user here, and I just wanted to say that it makes me really sad that you deleted my article on Milan Agarwal. Yes, I read the guidelines on biographies and on notability, but I must object because who is to say whether someone is notable or not anyways? At UC Berkeley, Milan is quite

3235:

Not only are you a great contributor, but you are now an admin. Ever since I became an admin, I've gotten to busy with admining and programming javascript to do much major article work; I mainly just protect and monitor the articles we have. I thinks its time to get back into regular editing. Don't

1602:

Hi, JPS thanks for telling me about the EastEnders images I uploaded. There is no need to notify me for every single image that I uploaded for EastEnders though. One message would have been enough. There have been a large number of other EastEnders images uploaded by other users that are autographs

1473:

is called for. This project is a collaborative effort. I brought your project to the attention of the community via talk pages. This gave other wikipedians the opportunity to assess the appropriateness of your project. Since everyone else who has contributed to the discussions have expressed doubts

1417:

can you clarify something for me please? Many of those images that you say are not screenshots were actually taken from various BBC programmes about eastenders that I have on dvd and i have paused the image then captured it on my pc. So in actual fact they are screen shots of Photos on a television

1194:

Just checked with the Channel 4 Press Office, they insist on keeping their promotional images for the UK media only, which doesn't include US-based Knowledge. I *have* found a fair-use drawing of the logo from Endemol West (which they've been offering to any DOND site under fair-use). Is it safe to

1157:

Well, Newcastle under Lyme isn't a city -- Newcastle upon Tyne is. Since the noun is preceded by "the city of", cohesion suggests that it is Tyne? I was concerned with DABbing Newcastle (accurately, hopefully, of course), rather than researching this specific subject, so I'm afraid I can't help you

2251:

Statistics for: The JPS (Permissions: N/A) - Total: 10649 - Main: 7800 Talk: 388 User: 186 User talk: 496 Knowledge: 581 Knowledge talk: 64 Image: 965 Image talk: 2 Template: 40 Template talk: 3 Category: 113 Category talk: 9 Portal: 2 ------------------- Total edits: 10649 Minor edits: 4972 Edits

1428:

I went through all of your images (taking me nearly an hour) and assessed them. Most of them were photographs, not screenshots. If they were from a programme about EastEnders, then your source information was inaccurate -- it should have cited the exact source (i.e. the title of the programmes you

1146:

I note you fixed a link in this article from Newcastle to Newcastle upon Tyne. Have you any evidence that it is Newcastle upon Tyne, not Newcastle under Lyme. I have done an extensive Google search and found nothing to verify the details of his life as set out in this article. I have added that he

718:

Hi sorry to bother you, but i need a bit of advice on sourcing and as you oversee the EastEnders project I thought you were the right person to ask. Ive uploaded several publicity photos for the characters in the show. However on several i have received a message from 'feyday' saying that I havent

242:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to

3337:

OK -- the article now expresses notability. However, you cannot use those album covers in the article at present, because you are not providing a commentary about them. They are only there for illustration. You could have used them on articles about the albums themselves. You also need to provide

3314:

featured in metal magazines in europe. I have no affiliation with the band other than having seen them twice at large venues/events. This is a genuine article which is significant!! Please reply and lift the restraint on me adding the information I've spent the last 1hr formatting. Please reply --

2045:

Although I sympathise with your observations that my edits are sometimes negative, dealing with copyright violations are an important part of wikipedia's work. I can assure you, adding copyrighted images and text to articles (as has been done numerous times to the article you mention) is not only

1853:

I have not removed the sockpuppet blocking report you put on WP:AIV, because I assume you know better, but it certainly seems like that's not the right place for such a request. I, at least, while being totally comfortable blocking clear and obvious vandals, are not sure how to judge or verify a

3255:

User contributions Contribution data for this user (over the 5000 edit(s) shown on this page): Time range: 140 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 18hr (UTC) -- 03, May, 2006 Oldest edit on: 21hr (UTC) -- 15, November, 2005 Edit summary use: 99.82% Average edits per day

2851:

Thanks for your message. I think you've summed up pretty much why I decided not to block. Officially (according to the rules on AIAV), the user must have vandalised within the last two hours. I apologize for not informing you on your talk page, which I should have done -- though my edit summary

1614:

Thanks for getting in touch. Yes, I know the avalanche of messages seemed overkill, but it was the quickest way of doing it. I spent a considerable amount of time yesterday going through all of the image uploads of another user and have tagged most of them for deletion, so please don't feel that

3884:

I've attempted to unblock the IP for you (should be OK in a couple of minutes). My block was based on the page full of warnings and previous blocks. It's one of those cases were a few pricks are spoiling it for genuine editors. I don't know how to solve that, other than attempt to educate other

3313:

Viking Skull are an important musical force within the United Kindgom, they ahve performed on the main stage at the DOWNLOAD festival to over 50,000 people. There albums are available and have sold in large quantities through highstreet retailers as well as online retailers. They are frequently

2283:

Your complaints on the images are technically correct. You are just more zealous about enforcing these items then I would be. Nothing wrong with that, but the slackers out ther will see it as an "abuse" of admin power. Choose your battles carefully or you could spend a lot of valuable time just

3870:

Is there anyway you could unblock this user beacuse as it says on its talk page it is used by many people including me, I like to contribute from school and even though I have a user name it still blocks me due to the I.P block. I think two page blankings which were reverted pretty fast is not

1034:

images (Frazz Davies) were uploaded at the beginning on February -- it's only now I've been able to tag them for deletion (I removed them from the article because they weren't eligible as fair use). As a media studies type person myself, though, my paranoid/cynical hat suggests that he's being

3590:

I am responding to your comments in the Media Copyright Questions pages. The images that I uploaded are from the same site that the previous image on the Shaw Clifton page came from. How can one have permission and the other have not? I agree that if these rae copyrighted then all should be

1716:

Also, where do we stand on © and fair use in using old logos in a box-out? IANAL, but the UK's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is fortunately deliberately vaguely worded in order to allow schools to photocopy anything they like (to save money, natch) and thus doesn't seem to notice a

3640:

help us make it more transparent. Unfortunately we get so much 'stupid crap' from students who think that their band/film club -- we have to be consistent. I'm sure the Asian Business Association is held in very high regard in UCB, but I very much doubt the rest of the world cares. Regards.

421:

I'm going to ask nicely that you lay off the Star Trek rank images. By slapping unfree image notices on them, it almost sounds like you are saying people are not being truthful about where they came from. The sources of the Star Trek rank images was brought up, beaten to death, re-hashed,

365:

category and b) it is not detrimental to Knowledge to do so - i) per WP developers, large categories are not a problem for the servers, and ii) slightly "cluttering" articles with more categories is a secondary concern to having useful categories for browsing. The general discussion about

3204:

Cheers. I have been doing it myself in batches, unless someone else did it first, but I've been leaving it on a lil' to let others see what I'd decided. There was a while today that I was wasting so much time with edit conflicts on that page that I didn't want to edit for every action.

1714:

too much weight is given to the 7pm/5.15pm Thames/LWT thing by presentation enthusiasts, is there a way to note the difference between the RedLon/ATV 5+2 and the THS/LWT 4.5+2.5 contract pattern (people often wrongly believe that AR/Rediffusion handed over to ATV at 7pm on Fridays).

176:

entry. I wasn't entirely familiar with Knowledge's fair use policy considering publicity stills. I will continue to look for a photo designated as publicity. If you have any tips on this process I would love to hear them. I think the page would really benefit from a photo. Thanks.

3608:

Hi. I see you added the Stadium of Light to Category:Premier League Stadia. I know this might be a sore spot, but, umm... is it being used according to the cat's description? The JPS talk to me 22:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Somebody took it out, I put it back. Season ain't over yet...

2323:

Heil ;) Fair enough; thanks for the note. There were several very similar images from the same uploader, which I marked as nsd. This one was being used in an article and assumed good faith. I take yur advice about asking for clarifiaction: is there boilerplate text for that?

864:

My name is Jeremy Sefton-Parke. I am appaled by those amongst you who have chosen to delete the original entry. This was not authored by Mr Lasher. Also, someone else has noted that the login for Kinopanorama widescreen is something called a sockpuppet, whatever that means.

2626:

I didn't vote in your adminship only because I didn't want anyone to claim I only supported you because of the disagreement with Ghirlandajo. I looked over your history, and it appears that you are find admin material. I wish you the best of luck, keep up the good work.

2252:

with edit summary: 10544 Edits with manual edit summary: 10482 Percent minor edits: 46.68% * Percent edit summary use: 99.01% * Percent manual edit summary use: 98.43% * ------------------- * - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth. -------------------

746:

Hi JPS, thanks for getting back to me and explaining. Most of the images i uploaded are publicity photos and I have only uploaded 2 images from the BBC website (I had seen others had done it so i had assumed it was ok to do).But I will delete those 2 like you said.

2034:

article. I am very much aware that such images may not reside on Knowledge, but your edits are fairly useless, considering you do not add anything to the article, you merely remove. If you could suggest an image instead, then it would be a lot more useful.

1515:

Thanks. I'm unsure -- it could be a screenshot that has been cropped, or it could be a publicity photo. The quality and the framing suggests that it could be a photo, but I'm happy to give it the benefit of the doubt now that you've expanded the source.

287:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1720:

These are just rhetorical questions that occur to me: the infobox idea is brilliant and should be implemented immediately as it (a) gives readers what they need quickly and (b) makes keeping the pages uncluttered and clear easier for editors. Fab! ➨

533:

You have not gone against policy. CoolCat was confused (he really does mean well, though). The tag has been restored. Our new image tag will most liekly solve this problem. I hope it gets accepted by the wider (or wierder?) community. Thanks

301:

Hello. You've only changed the tag, but still haven't provided a source. What is the text? Exactly where is this from? I appreciate the details you have provided, but can we have a link to the source, so the status can be verified by other users?

2681:

Not sure if you realised he'd just moments before received an indefinite block by another admin. I don't know if your 15 minute cancels out the prior indefinite but if it does I thought I should let you know (incase you weren't aware). Thanks! -

790:

You tagged this image for speedy deletion, with the reason "not currently used in any article. Knowledge is not an image repository". However, "not currently used in any article. Knowledge is not an image repository" is not currently one of our

1789:

If you are accusing me of having anything to do with the Hamish Ross sockpuppetry thing I suggest you retract that accusation, as I am getting very close to reporting you for wiki-stalking and bad faith. And where did this test3 come from?

1755:

FYI, I have removed the db tag; you're welcome to AFD it if you insist, but it doesn't fall under speedy in my opinion, and I believe it to certainly be notable enough, he's a local celebrity here in fenland. The user is a separate matter.

108:) were quite alike. Ain't they? - i'm not gonna do any quotes, because tags are also used to go quick -:) I'm really sorry for my lack of Wicketikett! though, if you really think they shouldn't be merged, then don't bother... Peace man! 2840:

inform me that you are really serious over at WP:AIAV that the vandalism be within a short time frame of listing the vandal and that eight hours doesn't cut it? Or have I misinterpreted your edit summary entirely? Thanks for any reply

3513:

Hey i knoe you deleted my thing ; thats ok. I forgive you. i was just being an idiot so i could tell my friends i was in the largest online encyclopedia. i wont do it again. my opoliges. reply back me cuz i wanna see if you got this.

2188:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 637:

It had a source listed and a fair use notice provided. The uploader claims it a still from a TV show. If not, then it's certainly a promotional image. Either way, it fair use to use it in an article about the show. All the best, –

398:

yesterday. We had also intended to place explanatory notes on applicable Category talk pages, however this has only been done in a couple places as of yet. I see by your User page that you have been working on categorization of

1603:

and they have been tagged as publicity photographs as well. How come they have not got tagged for copyright violation. I have provided a source for my images and they are fair use. There is no problem using them for wikipedia. (

3553:

If you read the article you will see that the person is "notable". There are external links providing proof of how notable Ruadhri Conroy is. As for the photo, I was unable to resize it. Please reconsider the deletion.

2389:

on becoming an administrator! A 98% success rate; congrats! And it isn't official yet, but that is because the bureaucrats are resting. Oh, and I would bring champagne, but I was low on money. Anyway, enjoy the new tools!

314:

I took the screen shot myself. It is from COSMOS by Carl Sagan. There is no on-line source to link to. I do not maintain a web-page. What else do I need to tell you. This is not a new item. Why have you waited until

825:

Sorry, I hope the above didn't cause any offence. You must know how disheartening it is, though, when you trawl through dozens of articles to correct various things, and the only feedback is about what you've done wrong.

2184: 3193:

Then a small bit of advice: on AIV instead of leaving a comment saying 'blocked' just remove the report from the page with the edit summary "(user) blocked (for optionally give time), (list empty/NOT EMPTY)". Cheers,

3591:

removed, I don't want to get into illegality! (I am not trying to be awkward because I feel the images on the relevant pages are important in conveying the information, but I am trying to be consistent - and legal!)

1640:. It is a selection of media (photos, sounds, video clips, etc.) explicitly licensed for reproduction in other media. These days, press kits are often released in electronic form, either as a CD/DVD, or on a website 2877:

against blocking a vandal for his/her vandalism? For that I certainly take blame, but shouldn't the vandal not be "rewarded" for my blunder? I may not be familiar with the relevant policy page, but I see nothing at

515:

I am tired of dealing with people paranoid about copyrights. Not only are we required to tag images now, we are also required to defend them frequently. You are the 3 person/group I am discussing images' copyright

1717:

difference between a box-out and a page with the relevant critical commentary or educational purpose. But the US rules depend on case law, IIRC: would they see the box-out as a different "page" to the main text?

3800:

I think there is a procedure, somewhere -- I haven't used it yet so I'd have to go digging. I think 'inappropriate content' is mainly to do with disparaging people/pornographic images, etc. The best info is at

695:

Back in April 2005, you with absolutely no real evidance, accused my of being a vandal (i.e. on the page on actor Dennis Quaid). That had to be one of the most ridiculous accuastions I've never heard of quite

349:, and over the past month or so, I've been trying to help with consistency in the manner of categorizing articles in the Actors heirarchy tree. In the second half of January 2006, a discussion took place at 3490:

I congratulate you on your elevation as an administrator. I know that you shall be a fine administrator as only good editors can be good administrators in the long run - and you are sure one among the same.

1440:

I have to concur with JPS in this matter, promotional photographs shouldn't be uploaded with the screenshot licence (they have no episode info etc.). P.S. thanks JPS for reverting vandalism on my user page.

2716:

Thanks, yeah, I noticed it. I'll keep an eye on it, and if my shorted(!) block cancels it out, then I'll re-block for indefinate (per Zoe). She beat me to it: by the time I'd deleted a couple more article!

1456:... it would seem apparent that for someone as craving of recognition and approval as yourself, Big Brother (which you profess to be a fan of) may be a more fitting outlet for your energies than wikipedia. 3135:

Mmm, well after three years being single, I tend to see naked chicks everywhere. But, umm, I'm fairly sure I've never had any on my user page. (I suspect "your site" means the entire Knowledge). Cheers :)

1862:

Mmm, I don't know better, I'm afraid (contrary to what's on WP:AN, I'm not an admin!). I put it there because I thought it would be the quickest way to bring him to the attention of people with expertise.

1286:

Hi JPS, thanks for the changes to my userpage, half of which were helpful. However, the auto-capitalising of Newcastle in Uni-of-newcastle-crest-150.png caused a minor problem as well as in the webpage

2902:

Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate your comments and would like to help you verify my info. If you did Google me, you would see, I am there. Here are a few links from Google and my listing on IMDB.

3338:

refernces for your article. To prevent further speedy deletions, it would be a good idea to complete the article in your user space first (perhaps as a subpage) before transferring it to main space.

3218:

Yeh, edit conflicts can get bad there. Sometimes I just get on with the blocking and let others clear the reports off (obviously I would if no-one had after I'd finished dealing with them all).

3110:

I would really like to make friends with people on Knowledge. But, you have an image on your site that is not helpful. Its the image with the nude lady on it. Please take it off. Cheers! {{

2836:

not instituting the block, isn't that form over substance? More to the point, shouldn't you block the ip for vandalizing after a proper test4 no matter where you get that information, and then

460:

I will also give you the opportunity to read everything I've just spent 10 minutes writing, and then I would like you to rvt your own rvt. Faiure to do so is a clear breach of policy. Thanks.

3823:

I'm not overly bothered about it, but, yes, generally it's not a good idea to advertise on Knowledge. If you don't need the advertising, then its probably best to delete it. Good luck, tho'

901:

There is nothing to say other than what has been said on AfD. I'm not interested in corresponding on this issue. I have voted, and there appears to be a clear consensus against the article.

677:

You recently expressed interest in helping people with putting the correct copyright tags on their images. I've created a page for people notified by OrphanBot to ask about image tagging:

2852:(which I assumed you were watching) did the job. Sorry -- I know vandals are frustrating: if I catch him/her during a spate, then I'd be happy to block. Otherwise, I'm bound by the rules. 2111:

If you have any questions, please discuss them on the proper page rather than polluting my takl page with insults. You have not provided proper sources. You have not provided proper tags.

1255:. Anyway, yeah, just delete it for now. Without the themes (boo to the MCPS), a link to Jeremy's site is sufficient. There shouldn't be any other links to my site on wikipedia now anyway. 426:. If you have problems with these images, discuss it there instead of simply labeling them as possible unfree images. This is a major project which took hours of work by several users. - 328:

I have not "waited until now." It's that I've only just come across it to verify. There are more people uploading images than there are verifying them. That is why there has been a delay.

283:

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1938:

certainly be fair use, but only in articles about that movie (or about the poster itself, even). Outside of this, though, they are not fair use, and their use is copyright infringement.

1018:

Apart from the complete waste of time on his part (not my problem, but...), isn't this just a nuisance for everyone else? Perhaps something could (or should) be done about this. Hmm...

2451: 1675: 154:. That thing is a mess. One of my other projects is looking for and catagorizing film templates. I think I tripled the category for them and cleaned out non-templates. Thanks again. 2296: 1232:

Are all the links to your website all dead now? I saw on the front page the site is closed and all content moved to wikipedia. If so I'll remove any links I see such as the one on

1081:

to Knowledge project space (as has been suggested). I don't mind either of those. If you feel able to help, that would be nice, but otherwise don't worry about it! Many thanks.

918: 3724:

Yes sir I understand how sentiments are good in their time and place. Thank you for keeping me in check...and pass on to the creators or whoever's in charge: WIKIPEDIA ROCKS!

881: 1924:

Yes, but it also states on the picture's uplink page that movie posters are considered to be fair use when used in the english wikipedia; if I am incorrect, I apologize. --

1175:

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.

3068:. To allow for proper discussion and put out the edit wars, I have taken the interim step of restoring the article, therefore, a more appropriate AfD can be held. Thanks -- 3925: 1015:

Does it strike you as a bit strange that this user keeps uploading images, but *never* tags them correctly (nor seems to care about it) so that they keep getting deleted?

60: 2831:

at WP:AIAV. Here's a vandal who had just come off a block, had blatantly vandalized three pages yesterday, and after three warnings yesterday, the last, a test4 (..."you

3661: 2419: 2373: 3278:

For all your hard work keeping articles and external links up to par and good article contributions. Keep of the good work! Don't let the mop get you too wrapped up :)

1209: 1618:

Some of your images can be used as fair use, but most can't, I'm afraid. The tag clearly says that promophotos must come a press kit. Your source is not a press kit.

2688: 546: 234: 223: 2586:

like i sayed it is local, but does that nessecarily mean bad? If there is a way to make the article better, please let me now instead of deleting the whole page.

3324:

I have re-created the page despite your objections and I will endeavour to find new information and finish it when I finish my current block of nightshifts --: -->

2308: 1568: 784: 340: 3839:

People are more tolerant of user pages than 'main space'. If someone has a problem with it they should politely let you know first. All I'd say is don't recreate

3836:

That's easy - No complaints here... If I repost it, am I going to have a problem - I don't want to get flagged for vandalism... Snowman 17:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

499:

unfree and listed it on the relevant page for discussion by the wider community. The tag directs attention to the discussion allowing more people to participate.

3701: 3374: 1554: 1069:

but it has been nominated for deletion. I am hoping that you might recognize a decent cultural phenomenon when you see one - and if so, you might cast a vote at

631: 3610: 3125:

What? I didn't see no naked chicks! Anyway. Congrats on your RfA its the first and only one I've voted in! Keep up the good work, use it wisely etc. etc. -

548: 1996:

Talking of fair use images on userpages, you'll be pleased to know I've got rid of all the fair use images on my userpage! I liked it better before though :(

3752: 3731: 3476:

Hi JPS. I'm sorry about the mistakes I've made to pages on WikiPedia. I'm new and I'm only just understanding some of the things I need to do to edit pages.

1887: 2806: 2536: 1948: 1188: 1110: 357:; the end result being a consensus given here in summary: a) it is beneficial for the browsing preferences of some users to have articles appear in both a 198: 3770:

Hello! Thing is, we can't have an article about every website or forum out there, otherwise we'll have 11 year old AOL users advertising their site. See

2792: 2271: 1269: 1241: 1139: 486: 411: 120: 3751:

I'm so unobservant I didn't notice you'd been made an admin. Nonetheless, you've done quite a lot of everything, and I just wanted to congratulate you.

562: 3899:

It would be better if the user and not the I.P was blocked or the I.P was blocked but logged in users could still edit. BTW thanks for unblocking it.--

3709: 1978:

Oooh, it's on my talk page now :) I was going to add some comments about the lovely blue sky and fluffy white clouds but the article was gone by then.

884: 350: 2666: 1402:

Oh, and if you see any similar photos uploaded by others that you think shouldn't be there, let me know. I'm assessing them in batches by uploader...

472:

I answered all your questions and saw you reverted to the Unfree Tag. Keep it that way if you want. Take a look at the new PD tag I am proposing on

1305: 889: 812:

Thanks for your advice and message. Since we are both contributing positively to the project, I would have appreciated a slightly friendlier tone. I

2159:

Hey, I just noticed that you are NOT an administator, I had always assumed that you were. I wondered if you would be interested in being nominated?

3595: 2127: 2072:

I think my reasons are well stated in the article themselves. The pictures are fair use, uploaded from with kind permission from the proprietor.--

2000: 1591: 1151: 905: 3913:

Brookie here - I restored to protect against recreation and saw you zapped as well - have now protected it - so hopefully that's the last of it.

3298:

Congrats. The only appropriate quote I can think of is "I love it when a plan comes together" even though thats US tv rather than UK. Good luck.

2886: 2860: 2705: 2693: 2685: 1120: 1113:. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on 524: 295: 3613: 2782: 2747: 2261: 1265: 1237: 318: 221: 73: 2082:

The problem is that site is an unofficial page and does not have the right to grant permission for reproduction. We need the original source.

2009: 1991: 1982: 1973: 1964: 1955: 1810: 1794: 1784: 1657: 1648: 1631: 288: 139: 3792: 3633: 2765: 2675: 2615: 2115: 2056: 2036: 1355: 1340: 1070: 579: 3964: 3598: 3576: 3545: 3445:

I thought I would leave you a comment while you were working to scare you ;) Nice to see you are an admin now, more image admins yipee :D -

3099: 2869:

to block a vandal at any time after they have vandalized subsequent to a test4 even if it is long afterwards? Isn't the prohibition against

2572: 2086: 1052: 1039: 1003: 3840: 3332: 3222: 3213: 3049: 2650: 2603:. Many editors felt that your article can be interpreted as being offensive for little perceptible gain. There is a discussion going on at 2318: 2210: 1622: 1615:

you're being singled out! If you do see any similar images uploaded by others, please let me know so I can verify their contributions also.

3820:

get links related to us. (And some random unrelated wedding dress typo.) We don't need the advertising. Snowman 17:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

3465: 3385: 3368: 3355: 3346: 3001: 2750: 2725: 2328: 2105: 1520: 1433: 1406: 1219: 538: 528: 321: 306: 215: 3893: 3851: 3831: 3686: 3674:

Hi. It was nominated as a speedy by someone else, and I agreed, and deleted it. It offered very little assertion of nobility. Take it to

3144: 2148: 1942: 1532: 1531:

As you would seem to be a teacher, I sentence you to 500 lines of "I will trust the good Judge and his colleagues of the law." regarding

1445: 1273: 1259: 1140: 1085: 1048:

Ah, yep. Sorry, I thought that all his/her older work had been marked for removal, so assumed that this was in response to a new upload.

464: 455: 332: 3812: 3795: 2314:

Oh, and when you do use that tag, unless that image is years old please leave the users a note to ask them to put a correct tag on it.--

2059: 2050: 839: 830: 820: 573: 354: 3976: 3065: 2223: 1488: 1460: 1245: 1162: 962: 618: 609: 599: 586: 3950: 2768:

to revert vandalism. It allows you to automatically revert vandalism if you see it on a page, and then (again, automatically) leave a

1147:

was an MP and details of his birth, death, father, succession etc., but nothing about his life story seemed verified. Can you help? --

871:

I have authored a new entry from this email address. Mr Lasher, who is away, is not aware of the deletions or any changes made by me.

3993: 3585: 2737: 1867: 1481: 1102: 595:

instead of ones that try to intiate it to be deleted ASAP. It's like you don't accept my opinion that I believe it to be fair use. --

3711: 181: 2429: 1774: 922: 493: 2925:

Please let my listing stay on Knowledge. More to greatness to come. Also, I will spend more time to improve my article formating.

2131: 1295: 3791:'s userpage. I'll put a message on the user's talk page, but is there proper process to delete inappropriate userpage content? -- 2479: 2473: 1487:

Surely there are better ways for you to spend time, even in the North East of England. Why don't you just go and watch Friends?

1225: 1179: 1065:

Hi The JPS. Thanks for all your work on Knowledge pages that we have a mutual interest in! Meanwhile ... I created the entry for

512:

If you had any intention want to seek the attention of a wider community you would use the talk page of articles using the image.

447:

I resent accusations that I am making accusations! There must be verifiable sources for images. This is policy. You, me and even

284: 1123: 3649: 3603: 2492: 1843: 874:

This is most certainly not a "vanity" entry. You should source John Steven Lasher on google for a look at his accomplishments.

859: 806: 642: 205: 2558: 1607: 1555:

http://www.herts-essex-news.co.uk/news/mercury/royston_mercury/2006/03/31/moss%20murder%20police%20chief%20admits%20errors.lpf

1491: 1463: 3558: 3529: 3159: 3017: 2845: 2579: 2495:

to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at

2095: 1199: 3318: 2956: 2213: 1571: 707: 246:

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use

3903: 3878: 3739: 3692: 1928: 1895: 1848: 1396: 877:

I leave it to you to discuss the matter with the others about retaining the present biography, which meets Wiki standards.

853:

a new message. It seems to me that feyday needs to brush up on his/her/its people skills. Thanks again for your advice JPS

757: 740: 503: 211:

I'll try to get round to it, but you really must not upload any more images if you are unprepared to add the correct tags.

123: 3190:

I'll start off by giving the usual congratulations etc on your recent bucket and spade, or is that supposed to be mop ;-)

2761:

Have fun with your new admin tools, JPS! I'm sure you'll blocking vandals and deleting pages better than any other admin.

2196: 2163: 2076: 1880:

so let me get this straight... you're a big brother fan, watch friends, enjoy nude contribution and you're NOT on drugs?!

614:

You may delete the aforementioned image. I have uploaded a new one with better tagging and rational. You may review it. --

3755: 2979: 2814: 2604: 1760: 1330: 1024: 480: 430: 3495: 3250: 3178: 3026: 2526: 273: 3924: 2965: 2794: 2607:, which you've already contributed to, but I don't think the article will last much longer. It shouldn't be recreated. 2101:

something more useful to do than importuning me and other prolific, good-faith editors with your copyright paranoia? --

1800: 970: 963: 778: 685: 3919: 3155:

Don't ban me with your new admin powers? Haha. Have fun, sure you'll help out the site & community immensely. :)--

2242: 2710: 2039: 2005:

Thanks -- I know there are other people dealing with images on user pages. There's even been talk of a bot to do it!

1909: 1451: 1168: 1060: 473: 441: 423: 167: 3085: 2302: 957: 582:

are not listed on that combined page... I'll try and see if I can fix it. If I can't, I'm sure someone will notice.

3942: 3782: 2882:, for instance, that prohibits blocking a persistent ip vandal just because the last vandalism is some time ago. -- 2631: 2550: 2291: 2273: 2175: 816:

that you did not mean to sound rude, but it is easy to misinterpret discourse without paralinguistic cues. Cheers.

437: 162: 150:

Thank you for your support. I will more than likely stick to the background. I am currently diambiguating (sp) the

90: 76: 3480: 3451: 1422: 3198: 3129: 1509: 783: 3302: 3114: 2865:

Thanks for the reply. The thing I was getting at (and maybe I didn't speak with perfect clarity) is, aren't you

2592: 1745: 3999:

The above discussions are preserved as an archive of my talk page, because tak page blanking is frowned upon.

3618: 3402:

I will give you barn star for your kindness to other wikipedians. I saw your ID usually. So, I recognized you.

2701: 1502:

the information and show you just in case, I dont want to alter the image status in case I am breaking rules.

1090: 630: 277: 29:

The below discussions are preserved as an archive of my talk page, because tak page blanking is frowned upon.

3668: 1475: 1251:

Mmm... I had closed the themes site, but I'd kept the T-Bag page up. For some reason its redirecting to theme

3637: 2663: 2202: 1765: 1742: 1699: 1587:

tag was that those references might perhaps be more appropriate on the article itself, and not my talk page?

1470: 954: 267: 186: 3979: 3568:

separate editors decided that it should be deleted (one person to nominate; one person -- me -- to delete).

2138: 667: 440:

is that there are more editors who frequent that page who are experienced in these issues than there are at

3946: 3236:

forget, editing is fun! Not to infect you with editcountities, but your last 5000 edits were pretty solid.

2554: 2462: 2154: 555: 1317: 201:

picture for me, please could you do the rest of them, as I'm just starting to know what to do with this.

2822: 2404: 2358: 1597: 1281: 1187: 690: 105: 3865: 3771: 3308: 2826: 2746:

i recreate before seeing message, then left appology to first admin. i will make more neutral article.

2530: 1917: 485: 53: 3150: 2564:

Thnaks for letting me know. :) I've been playing with my new toys tonight: quite therapeutic, really.

2434: 727:

Sorry if none of this makes sense, im fairly new to this and am not as clued up as I would like to be

3675: 3520: 2465:(provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few 1820: 1412: 1386: 1169: 713: 678: 3735: 2934: 2660: 2466: 2458: 2441: 2336: 1891: 1805: 1802: 987: 416: 1544: 3485: 3164: 2818: 2810: 383: 3537:

IIRC, it was an 'article' about a non-notable person with a massive photo in the middle of it.

2916: 2879: 2756: 2394: 2348: 2067: 1731: 1688: 943: 763: 724:

website? which dispays similar images of the person (but not the exact image that I uploaded).

592: 129:

That's if The Mekon doesn't get me first, eh? (confused people should see the edit history to

3908: 3011: 2031: 2025: 1581: 1349: 1324: 1008: 977: 929:- I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please 672: 159: 114: 2920: 1539: 1459:

If you intend replying to this with a 'witty' riposte, could you attempt better than above.

1316:

Hi. I'm assume this was accidental, but you removed a references section while stub sorting

3938: 3802: 3727: 3079: 3044: 2952: 2883: 2842: 2799: 2546: 2203: 1883: 1873: 1831: 1311: 379: 151: 3471: 681:. If you could keep an eye on it and help answer questions, that would be appreciated. -- 8: 2944: 2787: 2674: 2639: 2266: 1750: 1706:

for a great idea that simplifies work on, and increases usefulness to the reader of, the

1082: 973:, pretty much the same thing as the old Orphanbot help page just not in user space, also 911: 519:

No one outside of wikipedia is paranoid about copyrights and I am staring to get annoyed.

407:

articles; I'd welcome your perspective after consideration of this topic. Respectfully,

3457:

Yeah, seeing that orange box was one of those "what have I done wrong now?" moments. :)

3760: 3230: 2995: 2648: 2278: 2229: 1918: 1336:

Eek, responsibility for that gaffe rests with me, not AWB. Thanks for pointing it out.

1302: 1292: 395: 292: 261: 67: 2599:

Hello. Thanks for getting in touch. When creating articles, it is important to follow

1370:

What I was trying to say was that the article could do with some background info from

4006: 3917: 3871:

sufficent enough to block the I.P when it says "take care when blocking this user".

3746: 3280: 3238: 3174: 3156: 2975: 2621: 2521: 2505: 2496: 2457:

Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an

2288: 2055:

Might I suggest that you find a suitable image to replace, instead of merely remove.

1997: 1988: 1979: 1961: 1952: 1840: 1791: 1771: 1757: 1722: 1679: 1654: 1628: 1526: 1364: 934: 930: 795:. Please review these criteria before you mark a page for speedy deletion in future. 87: 36: 17: 3064:

Just so you are aware, there was a dispute over the notability, etc, of the article

2539:, but you forgot to close AfD. Wishing you many happy days deleting crap! Cheers! - 2487:

have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your

2182:

to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at

2046:

useles, it is a liability to both the legality and integrity of the entire project.

663:

I added a source. I took the screenshot myself, but that's the program it was from.

3440: 3120: 3059: 3008: 2589: 2257: 2237:

I'm giving you your edit count, as I thought it might help you in your RfA. I used

2102: 1377: 1346: 1321: 798:

If an image is not used in any articles, then feel free to mark it for deletion at

703:

Errm, OK... glad you've finally got over it. It's only been ten and a half months.

448: 173: 155: 3424:

Hi JPC, This star is for your kindness, and keep to be kind to other wikipedians.

3263: 1474:

over the validity of yor project, I took this as consensus, something you seem to

3975:

Thankyou for your help, I shall remove such images as do not pertain to articles.

3970: 3933: 3555: 3526: 3434: 3425: 3069: 3038: 2948: 2912: 2541: 2238: 2073: 1855: 1669: 1549: 1496: 1049: 1021: 1291:. Not a big problem to fix, but just so you know for future automated fixups. -- 100:

Hello! sorry, i put the tag because maybe some people thought the two articles (

3625: 3219: 3195: 3183: 3111: 2600: 2179: 1604: 1381: 1372: 664: 243:

the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

178: 145: 3500: 1320:. Does AWB do this automatically? You might want to look out for that anyway. 774:

darn, I see I am mistaken, itr is infact a copy that is used , my apologies --

95: 3788: 3655: 3447: 3365: 3352: 3329: 3315: 3184: 3105: 2990: 2772: 2735: 2644: 2628: 2315: 2305: 1506: 1419: 1393: 1196: 1066: 1009: 995: 926: 813: 799: 792: 754: 737: 682: 250: 202: 86:

No mate just delete it can't remember where I got it so it's probly illegal.

81: 3505:

how is it that you know when all these changes happen. this is a huge site!

3397: 2905: 1363: 3986: 3957: 3914: 3900: 3886: 3875: 3844: 3824: 3805: 3775: 3679: 3665: 3642: 3569: 3538: 3492: 3477: 3458: 3378: 3339: 3325: 3206: 3170: 3137: 3126: 3092: 2971: 2853: 2718: 2608: 2565: 2516: 2512: 2500: 2325: 2285: 2220: 2145: 2135: 2112: 2083: 2047: 2006: 1970: 1939: 1925: 1906: 1874: 1864: 1807: 1781: 1736: 1726: 1693: 1683: 1645: 1619: 1588: 1517: 1478: 1430: 1403: 1337: 1256: 1216: 1159: 1036: 948: 938: 902: 827: 817: 775: 704: 697: 639: 606: 583: 535: 500: 477: 461: 452: 427: 408: 346: 329: 303: 212: 136: 3525:

Can I have an explaination for why you deleted my Ruadhri Conroy page?. --

3706: 3698: 3564:

It's gone now - exactly what are the claims to notability? Remember that

3373:

Yeah, but you can expand 'user space'. So, for example, you could create

3023: 2578: 2121: 1442: 1176: 836: 803: 476:. How would this become an offcial copyright tag for use on Knowledge? - 238:. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the 131: 3774:. Thanks for getting in touch, and I hope you decide to stick around :) 2871:

posting at WP:AIAV by users where the vandalism hasn't occurred recently

2241:

Tool (the others are out of whack), so the information is correct as of

4009:. No further edits should be made to this page by anyone other than me. 2962: 2908: 1148: 615: 596: 559: 351:

Knowledge talk:Categorization#Professions subcategorized by Nationality

189: 109: 39:. No further edits should be made to this page by anyone other than me. 3409: 2030:

I notice you frequently remove images (and text), especially from the

3299: 2488: 2193: 2169: 2160: 1637: 720: 647: 239: 101: 2471:

Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at

2450: 1674: 1288: 1130: 2731: 495:

In what way have I gone against policy? I have tagged the image as

3719: 3678:

if you want, but I feel that it met the speedy comfortably. Best.

3351:

Ok, I understand your objections. But User-Space? What is this? --

2894: 2343: 1226: 3664:, and it got speedied. Could i ask you to undelete it? Thanks. -- 1429:

have used). I still don't think you can use them, unfortunately.

993:

link there, if you want to keep helping that would be great :D -

355:

Category talk:Actors#Categorization of professions by nationality

3874:

I understand if you cannot unblock it but I had to ask Thanks.--

3364:, ok. Yeah, good idea. that had not occured to me, thank you -- 1825:

I'm taking Fred Moss to mediation, and am thus required to put

1545:

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/search/?keywords=fred+moss

1418:

programme (hope that makes sense).are these still not allowed?

1376:, her involvement in the first film and her involvement in the 1205:

Logos tend to be much safer than photographs, yes. Tag it with

1780:

I'm not the one with multiple accounts named after murderers.

605:

to provide the relevant information, then it will be deleted.

591:

I don't understand why you and Carnildo can't tag images with

260:. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read 1854:

sockpuppet report... Explanation/help/response appreciated.

1233: 1099:

The JPS/archive 2, thank you for your constructive opposition

925:

and the kind words. The RfA passed at 105/1/0, putting me in

917: 2985:

Congrats from me too. If you ever need a hand with your new

2917:

http://www.bcdb.com/cartoon_characters/29890-Titan_A.E..html

1105:. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared ( 257: 3697:

Thanks for removing the mass-blanking on my userpage :) --

3508: 835:

Yes, it applies to both of us. Apologies for being blunt.

2986: 2921:

http://www.animationartist.com/movies/titanae/Artists.htm

2297:

A note from your friendly neighborhood copyright nazi. ;)

1707: 1540:

http://www.cambs.police.uk/camops/major_incidents/ancona/

868:

This Italian bloke is definately bent against Mr Lasher.

291:. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- 48:

criticism and comments. New posts to the bottom, please.

3985:

Hi. yeah, that's probably best. Tag them {{db-author}}.

378:

articles. So it was decided to begin with repopulating

3885:

members of your network (a poster on the noticeboard?)

3636:. I agree that notability can be subjective, but our 3007:

Congratulations! I like the new wine-flavoured sig :)

1563:

Lines to be with me by Monday. Copying and pasting is

847: 280:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

172:

I think you are probably right about the image on the

2440:

Hi, The JPS/archive 2, Congratulations on Becoming a

578:

I left you your message. For some reason, all of the

390:

categories, while still leaving the articles in the

61:

Archive of my talk page interactions Jan-10 May 2006

3632:Hello. I deleted the article via easy consensus at 2939:Congrats on the adminship you so greatly deserved! 1987:Though is it fair use to have the image there now? 492:Hi. I'm very surprised at your removal of the tag. 4005:Subsequent comments should be made on the current 2185:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/The JPS/archive 2 2172:would like to nominate you to be an administrator. 769: 35:Subsequent comments should be made on the current 1799:Your user contributions. The test3 tag came from 2284:defending your actions. Keep up the good work. - 341:Film Directors and Film Directors by Nationality 768:your assertion is incorrect, image is used in 2913:http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/562 2209:The image NVBuildings.jpg was taken by myself. 1550:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4755128.stm 3634:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Milan Agarwal 2804:I was wondering why you decided not to block 2347:All I could bring were these lousy balloons. 1380:, but I can't do it by myself. Please help - 1264:OK. It can always be re-added at later date. 3787:The article's content has now been added to 3169:It's what I do when I'm bored in school. :) 894:You have not replied to the previous entry. 880:Contact me direct at kinopanorama@msn.com -- 54:Archive of my talk page interactions in 2005 2178:to see what this process entails, and then 1141:Hamilton Boyle, 6th Earl of Cork and Orrery 2260:, The JPS has 10, 649 edits! Beat that! -- 2219:Thanks. I'll ammend the description page. 2192:Alrighty, it's listed, fingers crossed :) 1535:. If you require sources, here are a few: 572:added it to the page per the instructions 2659:Congratulations from the land of winter. 2248:And now (drum roll, please), your stats: 1577:Thanks, Judge, but my intention with the 1195:replace the image in the affected pages? 1158:further in verifying the bio. Good luck. 890:John Steven Lasher. Your reply requested. 509:Hi. I do not find the above most sincere. 353:, which was later moved and continued at 2906:http://jcpenney.imdb.com/name/nm1419005/ 2342: 1673: 1653:Finding images for Knowledge is hard :( 1345:Ok, no problem. Keep up the good work! 274:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use 14: 3407: 3261: 2144:Welcome, and good luck on your RfA :) 1392:was not my intention to cuse problems 72:Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. -- 3931:Please also zap the above. Thanks. - 2483:before you get started (although you 2730:Not a prob, I took care of it. :) 2469:that exist on Knowledge up to date. 1627:What exactly is a press kit anyway? 921:Hi JPS! Thank you for supporting my 436:The benefit of taking the debate to 2909:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1419005/ 2605:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sdw 422:discussed, discussed again, etc at 272:or one of the other tags listed at 23: 3036:Best wishes! Use your mop well. -- 2449: 971:Knowledge:Image legality questions 964:Knowledge:Image legality questions 24: 4021: 3915:Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! 3586:Shaw Clifton/Robin Dunster images 2989:, feel free to drop me a note :) 2961:Congratulations from me as well! 1289:http://newcastle.esperanto.org.au 474:Talk:Starfleet ranks and insignia 442:Talk:Starfleet ranks and insignia 424:Talk:Starfleet ranks and insignia 370:articles began specifically with 3408: 3262: 2970:Yes, congrats from me as well -- 2474:The Administrators' how-to guide 2176:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 1129: 916: 770:http://en.wikipedia.org/Breskens 438:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images 3022:Best wish for your adminship.-- 1960:Aww it was speedily deleted :( 1227:http://www.the-jps.co.uk/themes 730:I would appreciate any advice. 3604:Category:Premier League Stadia 3272:The Valuable Editor's Barnstar 2637:Congrats! You deserve this! -- 1469:I'm sorry, I don't think this 860:Deletion of John Steven Lasher 278:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 197:Thank you for sorting out the 13: 1: 2511:Please also add your name to 2096:No copyright paranoia, please 969:Hi, we started a new page at 802:, with reason OR (orphaned). 708:10:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 686:05:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 668:17:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 643:19:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 619:16:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 610:15:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 600:14:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 587:02:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 563:00:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC) 539:01:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 529:01:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 504:00:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 481:22:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 465:21:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 456:21:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 431:21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 412:12:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 333:02:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 322:04:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 307:04:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 296:19:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 264:, and then use a tag such as 3693:Userpage vandalism reversion 3091:OK, thanks. I wasn't aware. 2480:Administrators' reading list 2134:on the admins notice board. 1969:Shame I missed the content! 1856:JesseW, the juggling janitor 1849:Sockpuppet reports on WP:AIV 793:criteria for speedy deletion 556:Knowledge:Copyright problems 554:Don't you need to add it to 547:RE: Copyright problems with 394:category. Hence my edit to 289:criteria for speedy deletion 229:In my talk page, you wrote: 216:18:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 206:18:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 182:00:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 163:21:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 140:00:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 124:21:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 91:19:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 77:13:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 7: 2493:Administrators' noticeboard 2130:impersonated you. I placed 1858:23:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 106:Critical discourse analysis 10: 4026: 3926:Talk:Baruch Sterman, Ph.D. 3772:Knowledge:Notability (web) 3428:, 01:23, 4 May 2006(UTC). 3418:The Barnstar of Good Humor 2430:07:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 2329:10:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 2319:03:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 2309:03:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 2292:15:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 2274:08:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 2243:08:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 2224:21:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2214:21:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2197:22:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2164:10:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2149:15:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 2139:23:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2116:20:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2106:19:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2087:12:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2077:12:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2060:09:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 2051:11:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2040:10:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2010:11:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 2001:11:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 1992:09:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 1983:09:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 1974:16:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1965:14:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1956:14:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1943:13:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1929:12:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1910:10:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 1868:23:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 1844:16:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1811:15:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1795:13:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1785:12:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1775:12:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1761:00:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 1746:19:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 1658:14:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 1649:19:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 1632:19:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 1623:18:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 1608:18:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 1592:21:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1572:18:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1521:21:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1510:18:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1492:15:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1482:12:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1464:12:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1446:15:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1434:13:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1423:12:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1407:13:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1397:12:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 1356:17:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1341:17:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1331:17:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1086:12:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC) 1053:14:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1040:13:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1025:13:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1004:06:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC) 958:21:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 906:13:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 885:02:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 558:so it can be discussed? -- 3676:Knowledge:Deletion review 3662:Steve Watson (researcher) 3437:, 01:25, 4 May 2006(UTC) 3414: 3268: 1452:Having read your page ... 1306:09:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 1296:12:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC) 1274:21:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1260:21:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1246:20:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1220:19:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1200:19:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 1180:12:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC) 1170:Wikipedia_talk:Censorship 1163:23:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1152:22:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1124:05:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 1061:Support the PocketPacket! 840:14:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 831:14:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 821:13:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 807:13:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 779:13:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 758:18:13, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 741:14:36, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 679:User talk:Carnildo/images 368:Profession by Nationality 363:Profession by Nationality 168:Image copyright violation 4002:Please do not modify it. 3994:21:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 3980:21:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 3965:18:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 3951:18:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 3920:12:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 3559:22:58, 04 May 2006 (UTC) 3530:22:37, 04 May 2006 (UTC) 1702:awards this Barnstar to 256:to release it under the 235:Image:Daedaluscap158.JPG 224:Image:Daedaluscap158.JPG 32:Please do not modify it. 3904:18:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3894:18:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3879:18:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3852:17:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3832:17:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3813:17:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3796:17:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3783:16:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3756:16:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 3712:16:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 3687:14:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 3669:14:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 3650:09:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 3614:11:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 3599:10:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 3577:22:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3546:21:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3496:14:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3481:10:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3466:09:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3452:09:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3386:00:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3369:00:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3356:00:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3347:00:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3333:00:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3319:00:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 3303:20:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3251:19:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3223:17:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3214:17:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3199:17:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3179:16:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3160:04:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3145:06:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3130:04:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3115:00:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3100:22:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 3086:22:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 3050:17:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3027:12:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3018:01:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 3002:01:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 2980:00:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 2966:22:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2957:22:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2887:21:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2861:20:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2846:20:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2795:02:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2778:warning on their page. 2751:23:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2738:23:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2726:23:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2711:23:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2667:22:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2651:04:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 2632:21:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2616:20:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2593:19:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2573:20:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2559:18:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2527:10:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2167: 1115:the most righteous path 882:Kinopanorama widescreen 785:Image:Torenbreskens.jpg 451:has to to abide be it. 384:Category:Film directors 119:I'll get you, The JPS. 3619:Deletion of M. Agarwal 2880:Knowledge:Block policy 2535:Congrats! You deleted 2454: 2383: 2126:Just to let you know, 1711: 1710:contractors' articles. 1091:RfA Results and Thanks 632:Image:Willandgrace.jpg 593:Template:Fairusereview 3375:User:Filthish/Sandbox 2453: 2346: 2204:Image:NVBuildings.jpg 2032:One Foot In The Grave 1766:What is your problem? 1677: 1301:Lol, no worries ;-)-- 897:Jeremy Sefton-Parke. 750:Thanks for your help 549:Image:JamesLabire.jpg 232:Thanks for uploading 3803:Knowledge:User pages 2155:Administrator status 568:Thanks. Actually, I 386:from the descendant 380:Category:Film actors 268:Non-free fair use in 152:List of horror films 46:polite, constructive 2661:CambridgeBayWeather 2491:. Also, please add 1839:on your talk page. 1471:aggressive response 1282:Newcastle AWB fixup 1189:Image:DOND-Noel.jpg 691:Calling me a vandal 199:Image:Linda Day.gif 3866:User:212.219.82.39 3501:How do you do that 3309:Hey! Viking Skull! 2537:Lucky Zion Designs 2531:Lucky Zion Designs 2463:Votes for deletion 2455: 2384: 1919:Syracuse, New York 1712: 1644:labelled as such. 580:entires for Feb 16 487:Image:St1AdPic.jpg 396:Michael Cacoyannis 96:Various discourses 3949: 3743: 3730:comment added by 3628:7:09, 7 May 2006 3521:Rory Conroy pages 3432: 3431: 3398:This is Barnstar. 3295: 3294: 2998: 2708: 2557: 1899: 1886:comment added by 1821:Mediation Request 1598:EastEnders images 1569:Judge Ian Huntley 1387:EastEnders images 1365:Catherine Tramell 1137: 1136: 714:Sourcing problems 527: 44:I always welcome 18:User talk:The JPS 4017: 4004: 3991: 3962: 3937: 3891: 3849: 3829: 3810: 3780: 3725: 3704: 3684: 3647: 3574: 3543: 3463: 3412: 3405: 3404: 3383: 3344: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3266: 3259: 3258: 3247: 3244: 3241: 3211: 3142: 3097: 3083: 3073: 3047: 3041: 3015: 2996: 2955: 2942: 2935:Another Congrats 2858: 2830: 2790: 2785: 2777: 2771: 2723: 2699: 2691: 2647: 2642: 2613: 2570: 2545: 2524: 2519: 2508: 2503: 2444: 2427: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2402: 2393: 2387:Congratulations! 2381: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2356: 2338:Congratulations! 2269: 2264: 1881: 1836: 1830: 1739: 1734: 1729: 1696: 1691: 1686: 1586: 1580: 1560:Amongst others. 1505:Regards Shirley 1353: 1328: 1214: 1208: 1133: 1111:welcome to do so 1095: 1094: 1002: 1000: 992: 986: 982: 976: 951: 946: 941: 920: 660: 659: 655: 523: 417:Star trek images 285:my contributions 271: 255: 249: 174:David O. Russell 34: 4025: 4024: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4007:discussion page 4000: 3987: 3973: 3958: 3929: 3911: 3887: 3868: 3845: 3825: 3806: 3776: 3763: 3749: 3722: 3702: 3695: 3680: 3658: 3643: 3621: 3611:John the mackem 3606: 3588: 3570: 3539: 3523: 3511: 3503: 3488: 3486:Congratulations 3474: 3459: 3443: 3400: 3379: 3340: 3311: 3287: 3284: 3281: 3257: 3245: 3242: 3239: 3233: 3207: 3188: 3167: 3165:Re: pat on back 3153: 3151:Don't ban me k? 3138: 3123: 3108: 3093: 3077: 3071: 3062: 3045: 3039: 3013: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2897: 2884:Fuhghettaboutit 2854: 2843:Fuhghettaboutit 2805: 2802: 2788: 2783: 2775: 2769: 2759: 2719: 2704: 2689: 2679: 2640: 2638: 2624: 2609: 2583: 2566: 2533: 2522: 2517: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2467:protected pages 2447: 2446: 2442: 2437: 2435:You're a sysop! 2426: 2420: 2414: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2401: 2395: 2391: 2380: 2374: 2368: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2349: 2341: 2299: 2281: 2267: 2262: 2253: 2232: 2207: 2189: 2157: 2124: 2098: 2070: 2028: 1922: 1878: 1851: 1834: 1828: 1823: 1768: 1753: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1672: 1636:Take a look at 1600: 1584: 1578: 1529: 1499: 1454: 1415: 1389: 1368: 1351: 1326: 1314: 1284: 1230: 1212: 1210:tv-program-logo 1206: 1192: 1173: 1144: 1093: 1063: 1013: 996: 994: 990: 988:image copyright 984: 980: 974: 967: 949: 944: 939: 914: 892: 862: 850: 788: 766: 761: 716: 693: 675: 661: 657: 653: 651: 650: 635: 552: 490: 419: 361:category and a 343: 325: 324: 319:Jason Palpatine 270:|article name}} 265: 253: 247: 227: 195: 170: 148: 117: 98: 84: 70: 37:discussion page 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4023: 4012: 4011: 3996: 3972: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3928: 3923: 3910: 3907: 3897: 3896: 3867: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3762: 3759: 3753:Matthew Platts 3748: 3745: 3732:Lillykane90909 3721: 3718: 3716: 3694: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3657: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3620: 3617: 3605: 3602: 3587: 3584: 3582: 3580: 3579: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3522: 3519: 3517: 3510: 3507: 3502: 3499: 3487: 3484: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3442: 3439: 3430: 3429: 3421: 3420: 3415: 3413: 3399: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3358: 3310: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3293: 3292: 3275: 3274: 3269: 3267: 3254: 3232: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3187: 3182: 3166: 3163: 3152: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3122: 3119: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3005: 3004: 2936: 2933: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2801: 2798: 2758: 2757:Good Luck, JPS 2755: 2754: 2753: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2700: 2678: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2654: 2653: 2623: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2532: 2529: 2448: 2439: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2421: 2408: 2396: 2375: 2362: 2350: 2340: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2298: 2295: 2280: 2277: 2255: 2250: 2231: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2206: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2069: 2068:Oasis pictures 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 1985: 1958: 1934:Movie posters 1921: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1888:203.48.107.240 1877: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1850: 1847: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1767: 1764: 1752: 1749: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1616: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1498: 1495: 1485: 1484: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1437: 1436: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1388: 1385: 1373:Basic Instinct 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1191: 1186: 1184: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1143: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1127: 1107:final: 65/29/7 1092: 1089: 1083:Davidgauntlett 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1043: 1042: 1012: 1007: 966: 961: 931:drop me a line 913: 910: 909: 908: 891: 888: 861: 858: 849: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 823: 787: 782: 765: 764:Breskens Tower 762: 752: 715: 712: 711: 710: 692: 689: 674: 671: 649: 646: 634: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 551: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 520: 517: 513: 510: 489: 484: 470: 469: 468: 467: 445: 418: 415: 392:by Nationality 388:by Nationality 376:Film directors 342: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 316: 313: 310: 309: 226: 222:Image Tagging 220: 219: 218: 194: 185: 169: 166: 147: 144: 143: 142: 116: 113: 97: 94: 83: 80: 69: 66: 65: 64: 57: 42: 41: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4022: 4010: 4008: 4003: 3997: 3995: 3992: 3990: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3966: 3963: 3961: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3935: 3927: 3922: 3921: 3918: 3916: 3909:Dan mcsweeney 3906: 3905: 3902: 3895: 3892: 3890: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3877: 3872: 3853: 3850: 3848: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3830: 3828: 3822: 3821: 3818: 3814: 3811: 3809: 3804: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3794: 3790: 3789:User:Davesnow 3786: 3785: 3784: 3781: 3779: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3758: 3757: 3754: 3744: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3717: 3714: 3713: 3710: 3708: 3705: 3700: 3688: 3685: 3683: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3667: 3663: 3651: 3648: 3646: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3627: 3616: 3615: 3612: 3601: 3600: 3597: 3592: 3583: 3578: 3575: 3573: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3557: 3547: 3544: 3542: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3528: 3518: 3515: 3506: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3483: 3482: 3479: 3467: 3464: 3462: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3438: 3436: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3419: 3416: 3411: 3406: 3403: 3387: 3384: 3382: 3376: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3357: 3354: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3317: 3304: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3291: 3290: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3270: 3265: 3260: 3253: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3224: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3197: 3191: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3162: 3161: 3158: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3081: 3075: 3074: 3067: 3051: 3048: 3043: 3042: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3010: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2903: 2900: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2844: 2839: 2834: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807:170.158.48.13 2797: 2796: 2793: 2791: 2786: 2779: 2774: 2767: 2762: 2752: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2692: 2687: 2677: 2668: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2630: 2617: 2614: 2612: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2581: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2538: 2528: 2525: 2520: 2514: 2509: 2504: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2475: 2470: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459:administrator 2452: 2445: 2432: 2431: 2428: 2424: 2418: 2413: 2412: 2403: 2400: 2388: 2382: 2378: 2372: 2367: 2366: 2357: 2354: 2345: 2339: 2330: 2327: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2303: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2276: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2265: 2259: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2240: 2235: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2205: 2198: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2177: 2174:Please visit 2173: 2171: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128:User:'the JPS 2117: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2093: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2033: 2026:Image removal 2011: 2008: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1998:Sweetie Petie 1995: 1994: 1993: 1990: 1989:Sweetie Petie 1986: 1984: 1981: 1980:Sweetie Petie 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1963: 1962:Sweetie Petie 1959: 1957: 1954: 1953:Sweetie Petie 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1920: 1911: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1876: 1869: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1857: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1826: 1812: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1724: 1718: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1681: 1676: 1659: 1656: 1655:Sweetie Petie 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1629:Sweetie Petie 1626: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1593: 1590: 1583: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1534: 1522: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1503: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1447: 1444: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1366: 1357: 1354: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1323: 1319: 1307: 1304: 1303:Sumthingweird 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1293:Sumthingweird 1290: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1228: 1221: 1218: 1211: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1190: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1171: 1164: 1161: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1142: 1132: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103:my recent RfA 1100: 1097: 1096: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073:for it to be 1072: 1068: 1067:Pocket packet 1054: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035:satirical... 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1016: 1011: 1010:User:Dustybin 1006: 1005: 1001: 999: 989: 979: 972: 965: 960: 959: 956: 953: 952: 947: 942: 936: 932: 928: 924: 919: 907: 904: 900: 899: 898: 895: 887: 886: 883: 878: 875: 872: 869: 866: 857: 854: 841: 838: 834: 833: 832: 829: 824: 822: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 808: 805: 801: 796: 794: 786: 781: 780: 777: 772: 771: 759: 756: 751: 748: 744: 742: 739: 734: 731: 728: 725: 722: 709: 706: 702: 701: 700: 699: 688: 687: 684: 680: 673:Image tagging 670: 669: 666: 656: 645: 644: 641: 633: 620: 617: 613: 612: 611: 608: 603: 602: 601: 598: 594: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 574: 571: 567: 566: 565: 564: 561: 557: 550: 540: 537: 532: 531: 530: 526: 521: 518: 514: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 502: 498: 494: 488: 483: 482: 479: 475: 466: 463: 459: 458: 457: 454: 450: 446: 443: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 429: 425: 414: 413: 410: 406: 402: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 334: 331: 327: 326: 323: 320: 312: 311: 308: 305: 300: 299: 298: 297: 294: 290: 286: 281: 279: 275: 269: 263: 259: 252: 244: 241: 237: 236: 230: 225: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 200: 192: 191: 184: 183: 180: 175: 165: 164: 161: 157: 153: 141: 138: 134: 133: 128: 127: 126: 125: 122: 115:*shakes fist* 112: 111: 107: 103: 93: 92: 89: 79: 78: 75: 63: 62: 58: 56: 55: 51: 50: 49: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 4001: 3998: 3988: 3974: 3959: 3934:CrazyRussian 3932: 3930: 3912: 3898: 3888: 3873: 3869: 3846: 3826: 3807: 3777: 3764: 3750: 3723: 3720:I understand 3715: 3696: 3681: 3659: 3644: 3622: 3607: 3593: 3589: 3581: 3571: 3565: 3552: 3540: 3524: 3516: 3512: 3504: 3489: 3475: 3460: 3446: 3444: 3433: 3417: 3401: 3380: 3361: 3341: 3326:Viking Skull 3312: 3279: 3271: 3237: 3234: 3208: 3192: 3189: 3168: 3154: 3139: 3124: 3109: 3094: 3076: 3070: 3063: 3037: 3021: 3006: 2994: 2969: 2960: 2938: 2930: 2927: 2924: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2895:Kelly Nelson 2874: 2870: 2866: 2855: 2837: 2832: 2803: 2800:Not blocking 2780: 2763: 2760: 2720: 2698: 2684: 2683: 2680: 2625: 2610: 2595:frederikhak 2588: 2584: 2567: 2542:CrazyRussian 2540: 2534: 2499:. Have fun! 2497:My talk page 2484: 2478: 2472: 2456: 2422: 2410: 2409: 2398: 2386: 2385: 2376: 2364: 2363: 2352: 2337: 2300: 2282: 2254: 2247: 2239:Flcelloguy's 2236: 2234:Hi The JPS, 2233: 2208: 2183: 2180:contact Tim! 2168: 2158: 2125: 2099: 2091: 2071: 2029: 1935: 1923: 1879: 1875:James Bracey 1852: 1841:83.146.55.85 1838: 1827: 1824: 1792:83.146.55.85 1772:83.146.55.85 1769: 1758:83.146.55.85 1754: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1703: 1682: 1641: 1601: 1582:unreferenced 1567:acceptable. 1564: 1562: 1559: 1530: 1504: 1500: 1486: 1458: 1455: 1416: 1390: 1371: 1369: 1315: 1312:Stub sorting 1285: 1252: 1231: 1193: 1183: 1174: 1145: 1118: 1114: 1106: 1098: 1078: 1074: 1064: 1031: 1030:Well, those 1020: 1017: 1014: 997: 978:image source 968: 937: 933:. Cheers! ➨ 915: 896: 893: 879: 876: 873: 870: 867: 863: 855: 851: 797: 789: 773: 767: 749: 745: 735: 732: 729: 726: 717: 698:User:TMC1982 694: 676: 662: 636: 575: 569: 553: 496: 491: 471: 420: 404: 400: 391: 387: 375: 371: 367: 362: 358: 347:User:LiniShu 345:Hello! I'm 344: 282: 245: 233: 231: 228: 196: 188: 171: 149: 130: 121:82.71.33.246 118: 99: 88:ZephyrAnycon 85: 71: 59: 52: 45: 43: 31: 28: 3726:—Preceding 2987:superpowers 2941:~Linuxerist 2766:VandalProof 2676:User:N0 w0n 2590:Frederikhak 1882:—Preceding 1832:RFM-Request 1751:Hamish Ross 1378:second film 912:RfA thanks! 372:Film actors 156:Lady Aleena 132:Going Live! 3841:FunFurious 3761:FunFurious 3660:I created 3638:guidelines 3556:Dr.Boogins 3527:Dr.Boogins 3435:Daniel5127 3426:Daniel5127 3360:Oh, on my 3175:Ταλκ το mε 2838:separately 2823:block user 2819:page moves 2706:(Stollery) 2301:Regarding 2279:PUI advice 2230:Edit Count 2074:Crestville 1236:. Thanks, 1077:, or else 1050:Fourohfour 1032:Press Gang 1022:Fourohfour 359:Profession 190:Press Gang 68:RFA thanks 3747:Adminship 3626:Joiberrie 3596:AllisterH 3472:I'm sorry 3362:user-page 3220:Petros471 3196:Petros471 3112:Lord Dude 2827:block log 2764:P.S. Try 2622:Congrats! 1638:press kit 1605:Shakirfan 1533:Fred Moss 1527:Fred Moss 1382:SGCommand 1071:this page 665:Esteffect 240:copyright 179:Nscheffey 102:Discourse 3943:contribs 3740:contribs 3728:unsigned 3509:Srry man 3448:cohesion 3366:Filthish 3353:Filthish 3330:Filthish 3316:Filthish 3231:Congrats 3121:congrats 3066:The puya 3060:The Puya 2991:Grutness 2928:Thanks, 2915:and.... 2911:also... 2815:contribs 2732:User:Zoe 2629:Gmaxwell 2551:contribs 2518:=Nichalp 2502:=Nichalp 2477:and the 2316:Gmaxwell 2306:Gmaxwell 1896:contribs 1884:unsigned 1507:Gungadin 1420:Gungadin 1413:question 1394:Gungadin 1197:Elcondor 1121:joturner 998:cohesion 755:Gungadin 738:Gungadin 696:frankly. 683:Carnildo 525:Cool Cat 497:possibly 405:Director 401:Producer 293:Carnildo 262:fair use 203:Dustybin 3989:The JPS 3960:The JPS 3901:Childzy 3889:The JPS 3876:Childzy 3847:The JPS 3827:The JPS 3808:The JPS 3778:The JPS 3682:The JPS 3666:Striver 3645:The JPS 3572:The JPS 3541:The JPS 3493:Bhadani 3478:GarryMc 3461:The JPS 3381:The JPS 3342:The JPS 3209:The JPS 3171:Luigi30 3140:The JPS 3127:MrFizyx 3095:The JPS 3040:Andy123 2972:Deville 2919:or.... 2867:allowed 2856:The JPS 2748:Iamfree 2721:The JPS 2645:iva1979 2611:The JPS 2601:WP:NPOV 2568:The JPS 2523:«Talk»= 2507:«Talk»= 2326:The JPS 2286:Nv8200p 2256:And to 2221:The JPS 2113:The JPS 2084:The JPS 2048:The JPS 2007:The JPS 1971:The JPS 1951:is ok? 1940:The JPS 1926:Gizzakk 1907:The JPS 1865:The JPS 1808:The JPS 1782:The JPS 1704:The JPS 1670:ITV box 1646:The JPS 1642:clearly 1620:The JPS 1589:The JPS 1518:The JPS 1479:The JPS 1431:The JPS 1404:The JPS 1338:The JPS 1257:The JPS 1217:The JPS 1160:The JPS 1037:The JPS 903:The JPS 856:Shirly 828:The JPS 818:The JPS 776:Isolani 733:Shirly 705:The JPS 652:]": --> 640:Quadell 607:The JPS 584:The JPS 536:Husnock 516:status. 501:The JPS 478:Husnock 462:The JPS 453:The JPS 428:Husnock 330:The JPS 304:The JPS 276:. See 213:The JPS 137:The JPS 74:TimPope 3956:done. 3793:mtz206 3441:Thanks 3185:WP:AIV 3157:Andeee 3046:(talk) 3024:Jusjih 3009:Flower 2963:Jayjg 2784:Primat 2664:(Talk) 2489:powers 2485:should 2263:Primat 2258:Ghirla 2146:Renata 2136:Renata 2132:a note 2103:Ghirla 2057:M3Plus 2037:M3Plus 1476:ignore 1443:feydey 1347:Flower 1322:Flower 1177:Loom91 927:WP:100 848:Thanku 837:Stifle 814:assume 804:Stifle 800:WP:IFD 576:before 193:Images 146:Thanks 3971:Hello 3947:email 3656:Hello 3282:Voice 3240:Voice 3106:Um hi 3080:Reply 3012:party 2555:email 2513:WP:LA 2443:Sysop 2211:BillZ 1738:DVERS 1695:DVERS 1497:image 1350:party 1325:party 1234:T-Bag 1149:Bduke 1079:moved 950:DVERS 616:UVnet 597:UVnet 560:UVnet 449:Jimbo 110:Lapaz 82:Image 16:< 3939:talk 3736:talk 3699:Xyra 3300:Tim! 3285:-of- 3243:-of- 2997:wha? 2976:Talk 2931:Kel 2899:Hi, 2873:and 2833:will 2811:talk 2773:test 2547:talk 2289:talk 2194:Tim! 2170:Tim! 2161:Tim! 1949:this 1905:lol 1892:talk 1804:and 1318:here 1270:meep 1242:meep 1119:--- 1075:kept 983:and 721:here 654:edit 409:Lini 403:and 382:and 374:and 315:now? 258:GFDL 251:GFDL 187:Re: 160:Talk 104:and 3977:GWP 3566:two 3288:All 3246:All 3117:}} 3072:Jay 2993:... 2875:not 2580:sdw 2122:FYI 1947:So 1936:can 1708:ITV 1565:not 1489:GWP 1461:GWP 1266:Tim 1238:Tim 1101:in 923:RfA 570:had 317:-- 135:-- 3843:. 3742:) 3738:• 3594:-- 3554:-- 3491:-- 3328:-- 3177:) 2978:) 2841:-- 2825:• 2821:• 2817:• 2813:• 2781:-- 2776:}} 2770:{{ 2686:Gl 2627:-- 2515:. 2425:-_ 2397:_- 2392::D 2379:-_ 2351:_- 2245:. 1898:) 1894:• 1835:}} 1829:{{ 1770:^ 1678:➨ 1610:) 1585:}} 1579:{{ 1272:) 1244:) 1215:. 1213:}} 1207:{{ 1117:. 991:}} 985:{{ 981:}} 975:{{ 760:) 743:) 522:-- 266:{{ 254:}} 248:{{ 158:| 3945:/ 3941:/ 3734:( 3707:l 3703:e 3173:( 3082:) 3078:( 3014:☀ 2974:( 2953:T 2951:/ 2949:L 2947:/ 2945:E 2829:) 2809:( 2789:e 2734:| 2702:C 2694:n 2690:e 2641:S 2553:/ 2549:/ 2423:P 2411:o 2399:M 2377:P 2365:o 2353:M 2268:e 1890:( 1743:❞ 1733:E 1728:R 1723:❝ 1700:❞ 1690:E 1685:R 1680:❝ 1352:? 1327:? 1268:( 1253:z 1240:( 955:❞ 945:E 940:R 935:❝ 753:( 736:( 658:] 648:] 534:-

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index