User talk:Steven Walling/Archive 10

2978:"By the 20's and 30's, when the breed really hit its stride in this country the breed had pretty well become the "sorrels and roans." Now there are a few roans and even the odd bay now and then, but for all practical purposes, it is a chestnut-sorrel breed today." "This has long been the preferred color by Americans . . . the Cadillac of colors being a chestnut or sorrel team with snow-white manes and tails, with a white strip in the face and four white socks. This is the ultimate in draft horse style." "The fact that Belgians are by far the most numerous of all draft breeds in this country, plus the fact that they are pretty much a one-color breed, makes it easier to mate a horse when you need to and offers you a much bigger market when you wish to sell." 2831:. He seems to really be pushing an agenda with his edits. He makes assertations about working dogs living miserable lives in cages when they aren't in the back of a patrol car which is not very accurate. I know lots of police and military dog handlers whose dogs reside with them and their families when they aren't at work. A well trained GSD can switch from a work environment to a non-work environment. And the part about them being euthanized at the end of their working careers is blatantly erroneous. I have two 12 year old GSD's retired search and rescue dogs living out their old age in my house as proof. Anyway thanks again and sorry to vent-- 1762:

mean to, but that is how people get judged here. Think of it this way, a failed RFA wipes the slate clean. When you go up for RFA again, which I hope you do, the comments that you made previously will be discounted. Your slate is clean and now you know what people are looking for. Prove everybody wrong and when go for for Admin again let me know. I would love to support you! I do think you'll be a hell of an admin---the transgressions were just too recent. I know you think 3 months is a long enough time, but most people believe 6 months to a year is more appropriate.

31: 2056:

dumped a fair bit of effort into this. In particular I'd highlight Giano's input to you... if he thought you were irredeemable he would have acerbicly cut you off at the knees and been on his way to write more featured articles instead of returning here afterwards. But he did not, he has invested considerable time in counseling you, even though he opposed you. Take all of this on board. You have the potential to be a remarkable editor and admin here and I wish you all the best.

2953:

heavy feathering on their lower legs. The photo you used does appear to have something to do with Belgium, based on the caption, but the horse doesn't look like a purebred Belgian. (For one thing, I've never seen a Bay Belgian, and compare leg feather on the two horses. Photographer captions aren't always accurate) By the way, though, I DO appreciate the eye you cast on these articles and much of what you have to offer is very helpful.

2972:

the American Belgian, but bred in a different direction; I honestly don't know. The Belgian association site in the US says, "Along with these changes in conformation has come a color change. The original imports came in many color coats with a predominance of bay. About half of the first imports were bay and bay-brown, followed by roan, chestnut sorrel, black, and even a few greys. There was no particular Belgian color at the outset."

1585:

secret with you, you can get away (just) with being rude about another editor but never insult their work. It is their baby - their creation - there is always something positive to say before the "but" and even them temper it. Never criticise work unless you are able to effect and/or advise on the solution yourself. You've probably learnt one of the most valuable lessons of your life today. So move on, it can only get better.

2355: 1989:. You might take that as an insult, but it isn't intended as one. I know from personal experience that there are a number of extremely contentious issues out there, and that it sometimes helps to have a helping hand give one an idea how to handle them. I know that the backlog right now is pretty big, but you might be able to find someone listed as a coach who might be willing to offer a hand. It couldn't hurt, anyway. 1125: 3582: 3331: 2888:

refs you have identified as not academic enough (12, 13, 22, 23), I should be able to find alternatives like BWP for the first three - pity about the airspeed calc though, that won't be in an academic journal - What can I do about the swallow tattoo bit, it's clearly true and oft-repeated on the web, but is never going to be in an academic journal - do I just take it out?

3463: 2369:...for your participation, criticism, and support in my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final count of 90/1/1. I appreciate all of your kind words, criticism, and suggestions. I extend a special thanks to Acalamari for his nomination, and Dihydrogen Monoxide and Husond for their coaching and nominations. If you need help in any administrative matters, please contact me. 2710:. The trust bestowed upon me by the community is one of the most touching honours that I have ever received, and I vow not to let you down. Whether you have suggestions for ways in which I could improve, a request for assistance or just need someone to listen, my talk page and my email are always open. I pledge to do what I can to help this project, in the words of 1965:

haven't been through an RfA, but I had a conflict a while ago where an editor chose to go through my life with a fine-toothed comb and draw all kinds of outlandish conclusions, and I remember the sick feeling in the pit of my gut that followed me around for a few days. So I can relate, but I can also tell you that if you have that, it will pass. All the best, -

694: 1623:" then you probably are a dick. Writing an encyclopedia is about content and knowledge the information and the facts are the important things that must be encouraged - putting them into acceptable English is also a talent - but trust me, the editors that can do both are few are far between. So wise up and get real and you may be an Admin yet. 2039:

if you do take it on board, you will do fine in your next RfA. It takes a very deft touch to be a good admin here, for reasons that are complicated, and I think that's where you need most to focus. The advice you get sometimes will come from people who themselves could benefit from it, to be sure. But it is valid advice just the same.

326:

alone. I think it would be best if the entire domestication of the dog section was merged over to the domestication of the dog article, and in the process purged of hopeful speculation. In fact, what would be good is a Speculation section where each myth about the domestication events was labeled a speculation. What do you think?

2483: 3179:

Hi VanTucky. Apart from the general stuff about my dour writing style, I think I've addressed the other points. Per what I said on Scartol's page, I tend to write with the book open, so my info normally is a subset of the book page I was using, so often, there is only a need for one or two book cites

3070:

I'd say that it needs to wrap things up better. Right now that section is very fragmented and needs to be combined into coherent paragraphs. One thing that might help would be cutting some of the longer quotes short. Also, quotes under four lines long are often best combined with the text rather than

2971:

Without being able to read Dutch, or Flemish, or whatever language those commons photos are in, I don't know what they really are, but none of them could be considered a registered Belgian in the USA, they may be a different breed native to Belgium, or horses derived from the same foundation stock as

2865:

Do you have any suggestions on what I can do? I liked your review because I felt you were holding the article to a high standard, which is what I aspire to. Just so you know, I'm not asking for a GA review, or comments on the writing/formatting (it's under construction once again), just suggestions

2295:

Thank you for the card about your RfA. I know that you're probably feeling discouraged right now, but please keep in mind that this RfA isn't meant as a condemnation of you as a person, although it probably feels that way right now. It's merely the opinion of interested editors about your suitability

2016:

as our admin coaches and would recommend him... But in all honesty, I think what you need most isn't coaching but time... you have the skills/knowledge. I think you have the trust of everybody (including those who opposed you this time) their concern was that you recently had a major transgression.

1894:

This RfA shows one of the major problems with the process: those who keep their heads down, and avoid controversial articles have a simple time at RfA, while those who dive into the deep end of the pool, editing articles many won't touch get brutalized. Unfair? Probably. But perhaps for a few months,

1536:

It's also easier for non-qualified editors who have edited for a few months and who have stayed under the radar become administrators than it is for highly qualified editors who have rustled a few feathers in the process of editing highly controversial articles. I get kind of weary seeing editors who

1460:

I trust you. You seem to be running into the same problems that I did at my RFA. People opposing you either based on comments made months ago or opposing based on other peoples oppositions. Some of the supposedly "rude" or "incivil" comments that are cited are nothing compared to some of the comments

131:

Welcome and thanks for signing up at WikiProject Agriculture. Please take a look around our project page and talk page for things you can do and add ideas of your own. I notice you have an interest in livestock, please let me know if you think a Work Group or Task Force for livestock makes sense at

3095:

The majority of birds are not as well studied, and do not have the wealth of literary associations of Barn Swallow - is there a minimum recommended length for GA? I'd like to work up some of the other bird articles to GA, and it would be helpful to know whether I should stick to species where I know

2911:

OK, I've dumped the gallery (kept images though, I hope that's OK), replaced ref 12, used the UMich suggested citation for 13, fixed 14 and 18. I've moved the predators and brood parasites to a more sensible place, and tightened the text. I don't know what to do about Estonia or tattoos. If they are

2853:

Hello again. I'm still thinking about getting the CJ article up to GA. The main hurdle in the last review was the "Hippies" section, because you thought it wasn't NPOV, or possbily offensive. I understand what you're saying, so I renamed the section, but I haven't found a word to replace the word

2735:

Sorry about that – I speedy-deleted GAList3 after making GAList2 the exact same thing. If anyone else was likely to use GAL3, I would have done a redir, but I think you're the only person who even knew about it (and GeoGuy, but I doubt it). Sorry for the confusion! I fixed the page of your review by

2047:

bad news you are delivering, such that your colleagues here are glad that you took the time to write them, glad that you and they have interacted. That is a touch I myself do not always have, I am quick to take offense and speak harshly sometimes, but I know that touch when I see it. Our best admins

2038:

VanTucky: I am sorry you did not succeed on the first try. You have received some very sage advice during this process, and here on this page... as I said during the process itself, I sincerely believe that you will take it on board. You are clearly an intelligent and competent contributor here, and

1964:

Heya Van, just want to echo what's said above. It got kinda brutal over there, but it looks like you may have been gaining some insight even through all the negativity, into what the community wants. Hopefully it ends up being a net positive for you, even though it probably really sucks right now. I

1604:

I see your point Giano, and it might be a good one. But in practicum, the line between constructive criticism of work and an insult is often non-existent when it comes to the feelings and subsequent reaction of editors. Playing politics with bad writing isn't something I care to do, and I'd honestly

1103:

time, but I've tended to try to help bird articles in particular to GA/FAC status, not review them - basically on this occasion it was a case of fools rush in. I see now that what I should have done was add the lifespan stuff and the tweaks (int units first, sex not gender, bird species capped etc)

3272:

really only refers to outright reversion wars and impending future events (like elections). Personally I wouldn't quick-fail it just yet, I'd wait and see what happens. It doesn't seem to contentious at the moment. Do you really want it? You can have it if you want, I just barely started my review.

2887:

Thanks for taking on the review, especially after my transgressions! I did think of double columning refs, wasn't sure if there were enough to justify. The predators were listed, but in a silly place (status) now moved to breeding. I've fixed refs 18 (and 14, which pointed to the wrong source). The

2861:

You mentioned removing the section, but I've lived in CJ off and on the past 34 years, and the hippie influence is really important to the town. More important than even the refs I found indicate, though I only included what can be reliably refed. Basically, it's more important to me that it be a

2042:

You have an opportunity in your work at GA to interact with lots of editors, far more than most editors do. Some are poor writers, and some are great writers, but all are participating in GA because they really want to make better articles and make this remarkable project better. Never forget that.

1975:

Damn. I had stopped watching your RfA while I was on holiday since I thought it was sure to be successful. To be honest I'm a little flabbergasted that it was not. I still have 100% confidence in your good judgement and must apologise for persuading you to attempt such an disheartening exercise. If

1584:

is partly correct it is "all too easy for teenagers are more easily able to become admins than adults, as if the whole process has been designed for them" but that is not the reason your FA failed. One of the interesting things I have learnt here (actually it is a fact of life) and I will share the

415:

Okay, I know for sure there are things people could quibble about that I've done. Sometimes I get hot headed, and three months ago I was blocked for violation of 3RR on Mike Godwin. I honestly think this (other than me not being smart enough to not revert) was a simple confusion over the difference

325:

I've been poking around in the dog domestication section of the Dog article, and have come to the conclusion that it is has collected a lot of pure speculation and breed-hyping. People are referencing sources that say the opposite of what they are claiming. Fixing all of it is too much for me to do

3287:

I think you should stick with it, and I'll sorta watch from the sidelines, and maybe chime in if I see the opportunity. It will be good to see one that I'm not too involved with. I have probably edited Hillsboro too much to take that one on, but I'll keep my eye out. Thanks! Will I see you Friday?

2991:

My take on the existing photo is that while the horse is not stood up and the background is less than ideal, it is at least an animal which is representative of the breed standard, prepped and conditioned for show and has reasonably decent conformation. Better might be out there, the Flickr photos

2967:

Yeah, there IS a difference between the official "Belgian" breed of horse found in North America, and a draft horse that happens to be in Belguim! (grin) As for the Flickr shots, yes, those ARE "real" American-style Belgians, though the last one, labeled "Nephron's profile" might be a crossbred,

2325:

Even though we did not always see eye to eye I thought you should be trusted with greater responsibility. There is a paradox here: people young enough to be willing to take on more work are likely to be more fiery than we might like, but those mature enough to be more level-headed are likely to be

1761:

Hey there Van Tucky, I just wanted to wish you good luck on your next RFA. I think you are a great contributor and asset to this community and hope that this one doesn't prevent you from coming back stronger in a few months. I know that it is easy to loose your cool and say things that you don't

1579:

Van Tucky, just a moment before this wallowing in self pity and talk of water becomes a mass drowning in tears. Amongst the opposition were some very long standing editors and Admins all held in high repute on the encyclopedia. I think the conversation here could be a little more introspective.

1772:

VT...next time you are up for RfA, please drop me a note. I've given up looking over the applicants because they're mostly not worthy of the admin tools. You are. Your transgressions were minor and irrelevant. You are a credit to this project. Semper fidelis. (No, not a Marine, but it's apt

2952:

Wanted to let you know that the photo you swaped out doesn't show the breed characteristics of a Belgian horse so I reverted it. Not that the other photo is perfect, if we did find a better one, I wouldn't complain, but in this case, nearly all Belgians are chestnut or roan, and they don't have

2055:

very good advice, those telling you that the system is flawed, that you were robbed, that you need not change... they are doing you a disservice, I am afraid by glossing over the things that need attention. They are correct when they say you have many virtues, though. That is why some of us have

1829:

Remember, being an admin isn't the be-all and end-all of being a valuable contributor. You have certainly been the latter, and I and I think everybody else hope that you don't let this example of criticism, which is known to get rather brutal toward several people, influence your future actions.

1520:

This shows all the worst traits of Rfa and shows the clear need to reform it. It seems like teenagers are more easily able to become admins than adults, as if the whole process has been designed for them, and that concerns me, as indeed do certain implications of the whole 2-tier system. Thanks,

432:

I've had a look through that discussion and I think people are generally sympathetic towards editors who try to insist that bio articles are carefully referenced. With an otherwise clean block log in over a year of editing I think if you note this specifically and discuss it in the nomination in

390:

First off, you flatter me! Actually, I removed it not long ago. I've tempered in my attitudes towards adminship, and understand that it really is no big deal. Keeping that in mind, I'd totally let you nominate me. Though I'm not sure if I really need admin tools for what I do. What do you think?

3252:

Well, yer too durn quick, I was going to do my first GA. Actually, I was going to quick-fail, because of the multiple questions about bias and neutrality that have surfaced on the talk page. It's not technically an edit war -- way too polite for that -- but it's clear that there are significant

818:

was a proud homosexual (have you even bothered to study his writings and letters?) and the homosexual movement is likewise proud of him as an icon. But by deliberately keeping this truth out of the spotlight in Knowledge you are depriving future readers from knowing the truth! "Neoconservative"

405:

I agree completely that people get too worked up about it, with partly that in mind I'm in the middle of a modest recruitment drive to expand the pool of admins a bit - I think any reliable editor should have the tools, even if they will only use them occasionally. I do think you would be an

1085:

OK, first time I've done a GA, better make it the last too, since I seem to have trodden on too many toes. I misinterpreted your comment and thought you were just waiting for survival data to pass. Please delist it if you're not happy with the GA status, I won't interfere again. Thanks,

2258:

Thanks to both of you. Alison, I just went to your navbar page and stole the click template format. Seems to work. Thanks again for the tips! You're now both my a party to my aesthetic anal retentiveness (ala the completely ridiculous userpage I forced Phaedriel into slaving over).

1226:

As I said in my last (which will be my final) note to him, I'd never interacted with you before this RfA. I just never like to let good editors like yourself get smeared with unfair criticism at RfA. There are definitley some RfAs worth opposing--mostly those that are

1605:

rather never be an admin if it means I have to be falsely complimentary of poor work. That said, I'm usually harsher than most people (maybe it's because I write and copyedit for a living, or maybe I'm just a dick), so making an effort to be extra nice couldn't hurt.

361:

No, no, not for each theory. What I would like is your input on the changes I make. How about I make a few changes at a time, paring down the domestication section, and then wait for dissent? For example, what did you think of my adjustments to the DNA evidence bit?

2425:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1320:

K. Scott Bailey, a clarification: I was actually on your user talk page having followed your signature links from an RfA, and saw the bottom thread. I linked it to Alison because it was about her, who has since replied here. She isn't stalking you, I don't think.

3047:

Interesting. Yeah, I can't think of a much better animal for silvopasture than goats. They'd love it. Apparently pigs free-ranging in fallow orchards used to be quite popular, but I can't particularly see them being as useful as goats in naturally forested land.

2984:

So, given that this IS English Knowledge, and that the Belgian horse, as understood by English speakers (at least in North America) is the slick, no-feather sorrel (chestnut), I think we'd best stick with that standard. Check out these URLs for more info:

2862:

good article than a "Good Article," but I would like to make it both. It's kind of like writing the New York City article; you may have many things you can add based on refs, but a knowledgable editor needs to make decisions about what to include.

542:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 3359:

I feel honored to be trusted by so many of you. Knowledge is such a large community, that my acceptance in the face of such large numbers truly is humbling. I will use my new tools to continue the tasks for which you entrusted them to

1634:

Maybe you misunderstood what I said. I'm not suggesting that the line between them actually is thin, but that people sometimes react badly whether it's constructive criticsm or an outright insult. Do some GA reviewing and find out.

554:

VanTucky, thanks for your vigilance on go articles, especially, go shape. With this years experience you have blossomed into a fine editor. Perhaps we can play go some day. I am variable in fighting strength, between 3Q and 1D.

1475:

I completely agree. It's difficult to keep from jumping back in as I see some of the opposition, but I think it's better to simply let it ride, and if it becomes clear that it will not result in promotion, gracefully withdraw.

472:

Sure. One other point to: my total edit count is like 17,000, but at least a 1,000 of those are to my own userspace (before I learned to use the preview button). It may be better just to give counts for mainspace, xfd, etc.

2539:

to be there, if it actually had ANY helpful information at all, it would have every right to stay there. But it doesn't. All it says is that Banksy's British and likes to stencil. Big deal. It shouldn't be there at all.

188:

Thank you so much for suppporting my RfA. I was promoted with a total of (44/1/0) - a vote of confidence from the community that I find humbling and motivating. I will not abuse your trust. Look forward to working with

2736:

changing the 3 to a 2. (Also, it's a good idea to sign inside the template, at the end of the 7com line. Otherwise, if you leave a space after the final }} symbols, it will show up as pre-formatted text.) Cheers. –

1150:, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of strong support are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to 3030:, if you prefer), small-time, just a few does right now on a very small parcel (the good thing about dairy goats is they don't take a lot of space since they aren't grazers. Hoping to expand, very interested in 1364:

VT is not my wikifriend (though he may be after this mini-ordeal). I had never met him on WP before this RfA. I have simply judged him to be a GREAT editor, and a superb RfA candidate, and defended him as such.

1413:, but basically it's impossible to get photos of even the common species of these small, fast-flying swifts. Is there any point trying to upgrade the article without more images? Secondly, I've been working on 379:

Do I remember correctly that you used to have a note saying that you never intent to accept a nomination for administrator on your userpage? If that is not true, would you consider allowing me to nominate you?

462:

Excellent. I'll write up your recommendation. A point people are sure to make is the proportion of your edits without an edit summary, could you turn on the "Remind me if I forget" option in your preferences?

2466:

Yes, it is a shame you had to withdraw:-( Big deal, you were uncivil to someone back in July! That was a isolated case. We all make misstakes. All that matters is if you learned from it. Have a nice day:)--

1649:

Perhaps you ought to cut your teeth writing and commenting on FAs before becoming a one man GA reviewer. FAC can be a pretty tough and hostile place, but generally the criticism is constructive and helpful

1311:(a line which I completely and totally deny that I've crossed). In other words, leave me alone. I've already stated I'm withdrawing, and you come here to do a bit of a "victory dance"? Irony much, Alison? 805: 346:

link, and leave it at that. At the most, a sentence or two about "a proliferation of various minority scientific and popular theories on the domestication of the dog and breed development" would suffice.

2992:

are worth uploading to commons, maybe plop the two conformation shots onto the talk page for the article along with the existing photo and we can compare them side by side. Lighting is better, anyway...

3220:

Hi there, I have enhanced the general idea you had by finding more anecdotal type evidence about his life that would dilute the emphasis on statistics and the bottom line . Please take a look. Thanks,

2421:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1931:

I don't criticise this comment but the use of "win" kinda makes it clear that it's a contest (a beauty contest?). As I see it, that's not what consensus should be about. But you dealt with some heavy

1254:

Good call, sir. And please refrain from attacking other editors re. their opposes off the RfA. That's not a good thing at all & I'll pretend I didn't see you calling me a dick just now, okies? -

132:

this point. I tend to think the earlier we start such sub-project areas the better organized the entire project could eventually be. I look forward to editing with you in the area of Agriculture.--

2675: 2497:

Keep up the excellent work; my first RFA didn't pan out either. The fact that you haven't let up on your diligence immediately after your RFA withdrawal demonstrates your dedication to Knowledge.

1537:

have been here 4 months and made a few edits become administrators but editors who have been here for over a year or two but have said a few things that upset people here and there never make it.

741:

Hey man can you please remove that banner you put on my page? I don't think it is neccessary as people just forget to remember things. I do know how to sign my posts and fill in the edit summary.

2854:

hippie within the section. I looked for synonyms, but only found "beatnik, Bohemian, drop-out, flower child, freak, free spirit, freethinker, and yippie," which don't really work. I looked at

1231:-closed--without having people taking one mistake made during the heat of an argument an opposing on that alone. Again, I will retire from the discussion, per your wishes though. Best regards, 3086:

Many thanks for all your help, I'm particularly impressed that you took the trouble to find better images! With most bird species, other than ducks and birds of prey, the problem is to find

834: 3407:

I wanted to thankyou for your review of Batwoman. Despite my best efforts, there are certain resources I simply do not have or cannot find for the article at this time. Thankyou again.

999: 754:

RE. Alright man, I thought you were having a go at me. I just guess I like to learn things myself! But thanks for your help, I had a quick read of the links you provided me. Peace.

1343:

Accepted. Please understand that I'm not stalking you. Please also, in the interests of your friend, back away from this nonsense. I'm done commenting, suggest you do likewise -

2122:

Yours was the best counsel he received during the RfA (some were simply "oppose because he was mean/incivil/cursed/whatever"), and this post continues your great advice for VT.

3011:

Hey, I didn't know you were a breeder. Not to pry, but I'm interested in it myself somewhat. I recently devoured all the literature on it I could find. What breed do you keep?

2447:

You're very welcome. It's a shame you had to withdraw. I'm sure that, if you take note of all the pointers left down by other voters, you'll be more successful next time. :-)

181: 3108:, where I have good biological sources, but there won't be as much behavioural research, and virtually no cultural significance. Thanks again for your much appreciated help. 2382:

This RfA thanks inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.

1701:

I certainly think our journeys through wikipedia are full of life lessons, really that is what has kept me here through the dark times (of my own experiences here). Thanks,

2131:(my one comment, okay?) I also agree with Lar here. From this point, the reset button gets pushed & next time around, I'm looking forward to supporting your next nom - 2574:

I remember reading about the environmental_issues/trade_routes subject, especially the oil slicks in maritime routes and such, so I'll try to and get to that soon as well.

3536: 1445:

I hope my support did not act as a Jonah to your RfA. It seems to have gone downhill since I participated. Oh well, I've seen people promoted with worse !vote counts. -

3446: 1303:). Also, I'd recommend that you not threaten me with "I'll pretend I didn't see" type statements. A bit unbecoming, don't you think? Also, there's a difference between 1334:

My apologies, then. It felt like stalking to me, but that was probably a bit of an emotional reaction. I apologize to Alison for that part of my post, and retract it.

1299:. I'd also recommend you reread my post. I was referring to my reply to as falling under that essay, not to you. In other words, I was saying I was being a jerk (per 782: 814:? How and why do you think it was "not constructive"? The intolerance and animosity of people like you towards homosexuality is simply wrong and very disappointing. 1063: 1990: 1831: 1177: 797: 2657: 2640: 2234: 2437: 1976:

you want to forget about the whole idea that would be understandable, but if not, I would still be willing to nominate you again early next year. All the best,

2547: 2392: 1993: 2525: 1855: 2007: 845: 574: 3230: 3200: 1834: 1744: 1504: 1249: 1017: 793: 672: 634: 597: 336:

I don't think an entire speculation section for each theory is necessary. What it should do is give an overview of the whole Domestication article, give a

123: 2202:

I noticed that the toolbar images at the talk of your talk and user page link to the images, not to the relevant pages in userspace. Is that intentional?

1803: 1480: 136: 3311: 3133: 2123: 1899: 1896: 1788: 1477: 1366: 1335: 1312: 1246: 1232: 312: 303: 3302:

Yikes -- hope she's OK. Strangely, that makes you the second person who will miss the party on account of eye surgery. I'm hoping we keep that to two! -

1980: 1954: 1245:

reply to Alison's patent nonsense when I received your note at my talk. I will completely retire from the discussion, if that's what you wish. Regards,

2840: 1926: 1566: 1545: 1525: 1401: 963: 945: 928: 914: 893: 876: 3297: 3282: 1589: 859: 508: 494: 2998: 2939: 2921: 2516: 2021: 1824: 1439: 1369: 1359: 1338: 1329: 1315: 1287: 1270: 1108: 1090: 1047: 764: 482: 467: 455: 441: 425: 410: 400: 3136:

I'm the only one opposing, and I trust your judgment. I know you're busy, but having your initial impressions would help me considerably. Cheers. –

2191: 1716: 1705: 3237: 1672: 1654: 1644: 1627: 1614: 1513: 1485:

It seems that water, having flowed under the bridge, seems here to end in some sort of never-draining reservoir. Let me know when you run again. --

679: 655: 641: 619: 366: 356: 3253:

disagreements about content that will take some time to resolve. Curious what you think of this reasoning, as I'd like to do GA's in the future. -

3207: 2340: 2126: 3222: 3192: 3170: 2896:) 07:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Also the Estonia national symbol - I've sourced to the Embassy, which should know, but it's not an academic ref. 2770: 2434: 2422: 2281:

Yes, sorry your request for adminship didn't pass. I plan to support you next time. Don't worry, I didn't pass my first RfA either. Best wishes.

2268: 1877: 1736: 664: 626: 589: 538: 3117: 2095: 3057: 3038: 2875: 2699: 2622: 2326:

too busy. I thought you were a good bet, but I guess this was not the moment. Well, the real work is in the writing anyway, isn't it? Regards,

2253: 2228: 1969: 1868: 2470: 2426: 2086: 1895:

you can "keep your head down" (similar to what Giano was talking about) and just get through the next one. The project needs admins like you.

1766: 800: 3388:

If the second paragraph was phrased in a more NPOV and a section was added on the deniers would the article be ready for Class A nomination?

3338: 2722: 2147: 2117: 280:

At any rate, it is my understanding that Officers Row has little to do with the McLoughlin House. Let me know if you think I'm in error. --

758: 701: 3372: 3616: 3550:, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support, and I'm looking forward to your next RfA as well. All the best, ~ 2968:

the head is chisled like a lighter horse, so I wouldn't use that one, though I notice they do promote that "look" in artwork of Belgians.

1042: 3416: 2821: 2559: 2415: 2300:. If you continue your hard work, and address various issues raised in this RfA, I'm sure that your next attempt will be successful. -- 2071: 166: 730: 284: 1734:

Best of luck next time. I think the ungainly comments that you made were magnified far far more than is the norm. Keep your chin up!

1143: 765: 196: 2796: 1079: 114:, the discussion of the characters is lifted almost completely from the text on the webcomic's site. What can be done about this? 3150: 330: 2750: 1235: 290:

I reverted myself and explained on the FVNS talk. It was a simple confusion, I failed to notice that it was a McLoughlin House in

3441: 2930:

Thanks for explanation - I thought I must have misunderstood because otherwise non-scientific articles would be in real trouble!

2410:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

604: 559: 1469: 3020: 2905: 2330: 1449: 1429: 3397: 3262: 3529: 2582: 2555: 2508: 1751: 819:(read: intolerant and fanatic) people like you are causing great harm to Knowledge's reputation, I am sorry to say. Thanks. 252: 3080: 416:

between adequate references and adequate citations. I haven't been in a good-faith edit war since, just warning you though.

118: 2808:

Hi, When you get a chance could you take a look at the subject article, specifically regarding a series of recent edits by

2285: 1189: 826: 713: 3567: 2959: 2315: 2210: 549: 384: 2812:. You've made some very nice edits to the GSD page and I'm interested in your opinion regarding these edits. Thanks! -- 2458: 2430: 1950: 1500: 97: 89: 84: 2176: 1005:

Haha. I didn't come up with the 'fuckpooling' centers - the other cabalist did! As an admin, you learn to dodge things.

3429: 2033: 1756: 72: 67: 59: 3509: 3494: 2043:

If you are tempted to merely point out the flaws in their articles, remember that. Try to make your words, no matter

125: 3572: 841:

I knew there was something funny about you! You're a damn neocon and a bigot -- how did I not see this before? ;) -

529: 2100:

Well said Lar! I hope to support you in a future RfA, VanTucky. Hopefully the constructive ideas will be useful. ~

3412: 2170: 1850: 748: 1388:

Blanket notice: talk pages have transparent histories for a reason. This page isn't a private conversation, and

2587: 1915: 2846: 2665: 1023: 777: 1799:

Hey, many of the best admins had to go through RfA twice. You'll join their ranks next time around. Cheers.

3565: 3321: 2776: 2115: 1418: 687: 2801: 2158:

That RFA thanks really has class, and is extremely funny. Sorry I had to vote against you this time. ——

1919: 787: 161: 3180:

at the end of the para, since the info matches up well (being a subset). In any case, just feel free to

406:

excellent candidate, particularly since you have no strong desire to become and admin for its own sake!

3408: 3123: 2871: 1422: 171: 38: 933:

It's what makes me the good administrator that you soon shall be. I'll come up and well get some ink.

2784: 2730: 2551: 2068: 1414: 1207: 1068: 320: 565:

Thanks Larry. I'd love to play sometime, though I fear you're much stronger than I (10kyu at best).

1986: 1904:

Sorry you didn't win your RFA. If you ever run again, drop me a line and I'll be happy to support.

830: 772: 47: 17: 3190:

anything and everything and I will move the ref up from the bottom of the para as needed. Thanks,

150:. Since this is a huge subject could you suggest more specifics in order to improve and expand it? 2320: 1946: 1496: 580: 3428:

Since you passed this for GA, a map has been added along with some more detail. I've sent it to

3100:

of info (eg Winter Wren, Nightingale, Blackbird, Skylark]] or if I could work up something like

3421: 3368: 3065: 2809: 2602: 2596: 2588: 2577: 2530: 2505: 2411: 2402: 2394: 1281: 1199: 1058: 1011: 993: 939: 908: 899: 870: 556: 205: 155: 3547: 3381: 3307: 3293: 3258: 3006: 2867: 2847: 2683: 1407:

Hi, as an experienced reviewer, I wonder if you would comment on these. I’ve been working on

726: 256: 3432:

with a view to FAC next. Since you know the article, I'd be grateful for any further input.

2572:

My PC has been giving me a hard time and those calls to the helpline are really not helping.

3516: 3481: 2880: 2836: 2817: 2777: 2649: 2632: 2614: 2543: 1221: 822: 533: 340: 141: 8: 3437: 3113: 2935: 2917: 2901: 2893: 2802: 2290: 2166: 1845: 1509:

FWIW, I think you've gotten a bum rap as well, but best of luck on your next attempt! —

1455: 309: 281: 708:

which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in

3541: 2719: 2687: 2454: 2407: 2197: 2017:

I think in 3-4 months, if you keep you nose clean, you should fly through the process.

1937: 1912: 1487: 1183: 815: 811: 236: 105: 228:

Vancouver National Historic Reserve--the whole area around Fort Vancouver. Includes:

3612: 3393: 3364: 3247: 3163: 3143: 3105: 2986: 2858:, but I think using "youths" is OR, and "counterculture youths" is OR and unwieldly. 2763: 2743: 2499: 1774: 1276: 1159: 1151: 1116: 1069: 1006: 988: 984: 934: 903: 865: 1621:

the line between constructive criticism of work and an insult is often non-existent'

536:

to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at

3595: 3558: 3402: 3303: 3289: 3254: 2792: 2674: 2276: 2226: 2208: 2108: 1966: 1800: 1538: 1462: 842: 721: 491: 214: 1275:

Alison - he referred to his reply as dickish, not you kiddo. You're not a dick ;)

2947: 2832: 2813: 2715: 2522: 2442: 2308: 2092: 2018: 1977: 1763: 1712:

I think that too, all the time. That is what is so rewarding about editing here.

1295: 709: 581: 546: 523: 464: 438: 407: 381: 716:

to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3433: 3109: 3101: 3076: 2993: 2954: 2931: 2913: 2897: 2889: 2337: 2282: 2217: 2160: 1840: 1702: 1581: 1563: 1522: 1446: 1436: 1426: 1304: 1300: 1242: 1228: 1105: 1087: 1076: 1037: 374: 262: 241: 193: 147: 111: 3604: 3546:

Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card

3480:~ This user hasn't included a message so thank you for what ever it was from 3382: 3274: 3269: 3129: 3049: 3012: 2449: 2260: 2183: 2153: 2078: 2064: 2013: 1999: 1909: 1713: 1664: 1651: 1636: 1624: 1606: 1586: 1393: 1308: 1171: 1033: 955: 920: 885: 851: 647: 611: 566: 500: 474: 447: 434: 417: 392: 363: 348: 327: 295: 115: 3353: 1075:

I saw your comment, added the age data and passed it as GA - hope that's OK

224:

As I understand how things are, the "hierarchy" of Fort Vancouver includes:

3608: 3591: 3422: 3389: 3157: 3137: 3031: 3027: 2881: 2757: 2737: 2607: 1821: 1417:. What do I need to do to get it to a higher grade (the featured lists for 1028:

Firstly, best of luck with your Rfa, and thank you very much for reviewing

717: 610:

No, but thanks for the reminder. I'll get right to it if you're anxious :)

231: 218: 1663:

done extensive collaboration on a couple FA candidates. I just prefer GA.

3551: 3184: 2788: 2711: 2327: 2238: 2221: 2203: 2132: 2101: 2048:

never have to raise their virtual voices. It is something to strive for.

1344: 1323: 1255: 736: 274:

include other parts of the Reserve, such as Officers Row, the air museum.

2912:

unacceptable because paras too short/non-academic refs, just chop them.

2482: 2237:

to get images clickable, if you like. I stole it from someone else :) -

2182:

yes, I thought the image was particularly applicable in its irony here.

2565: 2406:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 2301: 1874: 1510: 1409: 1294:

I'd recommend you not follow me around to other user's talk pages, per

587:

Howdy VT. I was wondering if you forgot that you claimed this article?

446:

Okay, sounds good then. Thanks for the offer Tim, and I humbly accept!

2220:- all but one of her buttom images are links to the appropriate page. 3072: 3035: 2691: 755: 745: 133: 2467: 2060: 1873:

Agreed. I'll keep my eye open to see you on RFA next time round. —

1861: 1029: 806:

Your deplorable attempt to hide Lawrence of Arabia's homosexuality

2686:

was voted by the community to serve a land that he loved. Today,

2354: 712:

during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in

2714:, "make the internet not suck." A special thank you goes out to 2855: 2059:

If I can ever be of service, you know where my talk page is. ++

2989: 1461:

that some administrators make and no one says anything about.

3607:

Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 24rd November 2007.

1124: 1052:

The article has been nominated for WP:FA. Kindly take a look

213:

I think that your recent move of the material concerning the

3090:

usable pics. I note the comment from Wrad above, good point.

2346: 693: 180: 3581: 1932: 1166:

for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.

1053: 3462: 3352:

As a token of my appreciation, please accept this bowl of

3330: 1032:. I've left some comments in response to your concerns at 490:

What, I'm too early? Open the damn door and lemme in! =) -

1241:

Again, my apologies. I had already posted my ... umm ...

1104:

and refer it back to you - I feel like a real newbie (:

2091:

Excellent comment Lar... couldn't agree with you more!

1839:

Ditto all the above. I'm disappointed on your behalf,

526:

would like to nominate you to become an administrator.

3515:

I hope you don't mind! Please get back to me, Cheers

3268:

Hmm. Well, technically the instability criterion of

794:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mammals/Pocket pets work group

2429:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2756:Duh! thanks for fixing the docs. I owe you one. – 1985:One last possibility. There is the last option of 3451:Hello, I recently adapted this code to produce a 2783:Hi, VanTucky. Responded to your GA review at the 2690:humbly accepts the charge and support of serving 1998:Not an insult at all. I'll give it some thought. 3447:Hello! Your RfA thanks (inspired by Phaedriel's) 3128:VT, would you have any time for a quick look at 2645:Hi, did you get round to reviewing it? Thanks -- 792:The proposed pocket pets group is now active at 2606:, another article which i've been working to a 539:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Steven Walling 2694:that he loves. Hopefully, he won't disappoint. 881:You morally degenerate Southern Californians! 850:Lord, I better get used to this (per my RFA). 3491:From Someone who hasn't signed their name... 3156:Thanks for giving it another set of eyes. – 532:to see what this process entails, and then 175: 146:I've begun working on the article and have 902:last week in case I forget where I live. 178: 3603:Congratulations, I have chosen you as my 3579: 2517:RE your new question on your user page... 2480: 766:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/VanTucky 2400:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 14: 3455:, I hope you don't mind, For example: 704:. Unfortunately, the result stands at 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2077:Thank you for your heartfelt advice. 1307:(which I candidly I admit I did) and 864:Just stop hiding the truth, dood. ;) 253:Fort Vancouver National Historic Site 1142:Thank you for your participation in 186: 162: 25: 3472:Click there to open your mini card! 2610:. Please get back to me. Thanks! -- 1392:are welcome to comment on my talk. 706:51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral 23: 3337:Thank you for participating in my 2866:on the single section. Thanks. - 2698:Thank you for participating in my 2628:Thanks, I really appreciate it. -- 2373:Thank you again and, best regards, 692: 267:The McLoughlin House/Barclay House 24: 3630: 810:Why have you reverted my edit to 545:Good luck mate, AfD transcluded. 126:Knowledge:WikiProject Agriculture 3580: 3512:, including a christmas version 3461: 3329: 2673: 2481: 2353: 1935:with dignity. Next time, hey? -- 1197:This RFA thanks was inspired by 1123: 898:You are right about that. I got 530:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 179: 29: 2712:a man who needs no introduction 2521:My guess is the one in green... 2368: 2242: 2136: 1452:Insert non-formatted text here 1348: 1259: 1048:"Trade routes" WP:FA nomination 2431:Media copyright questions page 2336:Yup, well put Haiduc. Thanks, 2296:for becoming an administrator 1841: 1134:Click there to open your card! 662:I've made a follow-up. Thanks 646:No worries, I'm doing it now. 13: 1: 3617:16:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3568:23:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3537:22:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3496:Send someone else a mini card 3442:08:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3417:21:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3398:03:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3373:18:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3312:19:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3298:08:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3283:00:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3263:00:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3238:04:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3208:01:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3171:00:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3151:12:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 3118:06:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 3081:21:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 3071:separated into block quotes. 3058:20:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 3039:20:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 3021:06:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2999:23:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2960:17:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2940:19:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2922:10:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2906:08:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2876:05:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2841:23:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2822:01:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2797:07:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2771:00:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2751:23:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2723:22:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2658:19:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2641:20:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2623:19:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2583:06:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2560:20:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 2526:05:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 2509:21:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2471:11:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2459:11:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2438:03:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2341:03:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2331:01:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2316:01:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2286:23:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2269:01:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2254:01:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2229:01:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2211:22:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2192:00:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2177:22:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2148:00:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2127:00:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2118:00:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2096:00:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2087:23:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2072:23:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2022:05:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 2008:23:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1994:23:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1981:22:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1970:22:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1955:22:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1927:22:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1900:21:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1878:21:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1869:21:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1856:21:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1835:21:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1825:21:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1804:21:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1789:20:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1767:20:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1752:00:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1717:21:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1706:20:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1673:23:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1655:22:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1645:21:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1628:21:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1615:20:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1590:20:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1567:19:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1546:19:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1526:19:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1514:19:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1505:19:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1481:14:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1470:13:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1450:20:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1440:18:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1430:11:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1402:02:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1370:02:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1360:02:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1339:02:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1330:02:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1316:02:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1288:02:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1271:02:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1250:02:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1236:00:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1190:20:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1109:20:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1091:20:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1080:16:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1018:05:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1000:07:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 919:hardcore undertow. congrats. 437:it won't be a major problem. 2600:but could you please review 2427:criteria for speedy deletion 2051:You have also received some 1064:19:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1043:17:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 964:03:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 954:the secret! I'll be damned. 946:03:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 929:03:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 915:03:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 894:02:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 877:02:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 860:02:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 846:02:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 835:01:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 801:16:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 783:07:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 759:05:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 749:05:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 731:03:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 680:02:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 656:00:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 642:00:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 620:00:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 605:00:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 575:04:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 560:04:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 550:01:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 509:00:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 495:00:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 483:00:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 468:00:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 456:00:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 442:00:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 426:00:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 411:00:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 401:23:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 385:23:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 367:00:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 357:05:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 331:05:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 313:00:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 304:22:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 285:22:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 197:21:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 185: 167:20:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 137:20:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 119:04:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 7: 3336: 3034:possibilities with goats.-- 2718:for nominating me. Cheers, 2680: 2594:Hey, You recently reviewed 1425:might be helpful)?. Thanks 10: 3635: 2988:and the association site: 2412:the image description page 2034:For the second time around 1757:Good luck next time around 714:featured portal candidates 624:No, I'm not that anxious. 308:Thanks for fixing that. -- 294:that the passage covered. 3586: 2682:Four years ago this day, 2491:The Barnstar of Diligence 2487: 2414:and edit it to include a 1415:List of birds of Thailand 3573:GAN Reviewer of the Week 2012:My wife and I both used 1987:Knowledge:Admin coaching 18:User talk:Steven Walling 2603:Curtis (50 Cent album)‎ 2589:Curtis (50 Cent album)‎ 2403:Image:Cruciblecover.jpg 2395:Image:Cruciblecover.jpg 2393:Fair use rationale for 983:(undent) You'll need a 521: 148:addressed some concerns 2810:user:Piercetheorganist 2597:Straight Outta Compton 1619:If you believe that "' 1206:which was inspired by 697: 255:, administered by the 3409:Bookkeeperoftheoccult 2848:Cave Junction, Oregon 2829:although it continues 2827:Thanks for your help 2666:RfA for Canadian Paul 2235:User:Alison/Imagelink 1435:OK, thanks for that, 1099:I've been an admin a 1024:GA review of Dyer Lum 700:Thanks for voting at 696: 257:National Park Service 42:of past discussions. 3322:Thanks for your vote 2778:Oil shale extraction 720:. Have a great day. 217:into the article on 3510:some other versions 2803:German Shepherd Dog 2651:¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 2634:¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 2616:¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 788:Pocket pets project 3124:A quick FA review? 2416:fair use rationale 2377: 2359: 1562:Well put. Thanks, 1192: 1129: 987:. Inquire within. 816:Lawrence of Arabia 812:Lawrence of Arabia 698: 534:contact TimVickers 237:Pearson Air Museum 172:Thank you bunches! 3622: 3621: 3535: 3473: 3379: 3378: 3167: 3147: 3106:Great Grey Shrike 2767: 2747: 2731:All taken care of 2728: 2727: 2656: 2639: 2621: 2579:Havelock the Dane 2562: 2546:comment added by 2514: 2513: 2384: 2371: 2351: 1787: 1284: 1215: 1201:The Random Editor 1169: 1140:Dearest VanTucky, 1135: 1121: 1070:Northern Cardinal 1060:Havelock the Dane 1014: 996: 942: 911: 884: 873: 837: 825:comment added by 688:OhanaUnited's RfA 557:Larry R. Holmgren 321:Dog domestication 203: 202: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3626: 3584: 3577: 3576: 3563: 3556: 3532: 3524: 3521: 3500: 3497: 3486: 3475: 3471: 3465: 3333: 3326: 3325: 3279: 3233: 3225: 3203: 3195: 3189: 3183: 3168: 3165: 3160: 3148: 3145: 3140: 3054: 3017: 2996: 2957: 2868:Peregrine Fisher 2768: 2765: 2760: 2748: 2745: 2740: 2677: 2670: 2669: 2654: 2652: 2646: 2637: 2635: 2629: 2619: 2617: 2611: 2580: 2541: 2503: 2485: 2478: 2477: 2457: 2452: 2423:my contributions 2386: 2385: 2380: 2374: 2365: 2357: 2313: 2306: 2265: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2224: 2206: 2188: 2175: 2163: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2113: 2106: 2083: 2004: 1942: 1925: 1920:Report a mistake 1866: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1786: 1784: 1779: 1747: 1739: 1669: 1641: 1611: 1542: 1492: 1466: 1398: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1326: 1285: 1283: 1268: 1265: 1263: 1212: 1202: 1196: 1186: 1180: 1174: 1164: 1156: 1148: 1133: 1127: 1061: 1040: 1015: 1013: 997: 995: 960: 943: 941: 925: 912: 910: 890: 882: 874: 872: 856: 820: 780: 775: 710:featured portals 675: 667: 652: 637: 629: 616: 600: 592: 571: 505: 479: 452: 422: 397: 353: 345: 339: 300: 221:, is incorrect. 215:McLoughlin House 191: 183: 176: 164: 158: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3575: 3559: 3552: 3544: 3534: 3530: 3517: 3508:There are also 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3499: 3495: 3482: 3478: 3476: 3470: 3466: 3449: 3426: 3405: 3386: 3345:with a vote of 3324: 3277: 3250: 3231: 3223: 3201: 3193: 3187: 3181: 3164: 3158: 3144: 3138: 3126: 3068: 3052: 3015: 3009: 2994: 2955: 2950: 2885: 2851: 2806: 2781: 2764: 2758: 2744: 2738: 2733: 2706:with a vote of 2688:a new foreigner 2668: 2650: 2648: 2633: 2631: 2615: 2613: 2592: 2578: 2568: 2548:Gabriel Surette 2533: 2519: 2501: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2398: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2379: 2372: 2366: 2363: 2358: 2349: 2323: 2321:You are welcome 2309: 2302: 2293: 2279: 2263: 2244: 2239: 2222: 2204: 2200: 2186: 2173: 2161: 2156: 2138: 2133: 2124:K. Scott Bailey 2109: 2102: 2081: 2036: 2002: 1938: 1905: 1897:K. Scott Bailey 1862: 1851: 1846: 1780: 1775: 1759: 1745: 1737: 1667: 1639: 1609: 1540: 1488: 1478:K. Scott Bailey 1464: 1458: 1396: 1367:K. Scott Bailey 1350: 1345: 1336:K. Scott Bailey 1324: 1313:K. Scott Bailey 1282: 1261: 1256: 1247:K. Scott Bailey 1233:K. Scott Bailey 1224: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1208: 1200: 1184: 1178: 1172: 1160: 1152: 1144: 1137: 1128: 1119: 1073: 1059: 1050: 1038: 1026: 1012: 994: 958: 940: 923: 909: 888: 871: 854: 808: 790: 778: 773: 769: 739: 734: 690: 673: 665: 650: 635: 627: 614: 598: 590: 585: 582:Phan Dinh Phung 569: 543: 503: 499:Thanks pete :) 477: 450: 420: 395: 377: 351: 343: 337: 323: 298: 208: 190: 174: 156: 144: 129: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3632: 3620: 3619: 3600: 3599: 3587: 3585: 3574: 3571: 3543: 3540: 3528: 3493: 3492: 3490: 3489: 3479: 3477: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3460: 3459: 3448: 3445: 3425: 3420: 3404: 3401: 3385: 3380: 3377: 3376: 3334: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3249: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3174: 3173: 3125: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3102:Kentish Plover 3092: 3091: 3067: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3042: 3041: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2969: 2949: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2925: 2924: 2884: 2879: 2850: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2805: 2800: 2780: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2697: 2678: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2591: 2586: 2576:With Regards, 2575: 2573: 2571: 2567: 2564: 2532: 2531:Banksy infobox 2529: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2494: 2493: 2488: 2486: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2444: 2441: 2397: 2391: 2378: 2375: 2370: 2367: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2352: 2350: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2322: 2319: 2292: 2289: 2278: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2233:You can steal 2231: 2218:User:ArielGold 2199: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2155: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2129: 2120: 2098: 2089: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1871: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1792: 1791: 1758: 1755: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1631: 1630: 1593: 1592: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1529: 1528: 1517: 1516: 1507: 1483: 1457: 1454: 1443: 1442: 1405: 1404: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1290: 1223: 1220: 1214:'s RFA thanks. 1167: 1141: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1122: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1094: 1093: 1072: 1067: 1057: 1049: 1046: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1020: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 827:203.200.95.130 807: 804: 789: 786: 768: 763: 762: 761: 738: 735: 691: 689: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 660: 659: 658: 584: 579: 578: 577: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 460: 459: 458: 430: 429: 428: 376: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 322: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 310:EngineerScotty 282:EngineerScotty 278: 277: 276: 275: 268: 265: 263:Fort Vancouver 248: 247: 246: 245: 242:Fort Vancouver 239: 234: 207: 206:Fort Vancouver 204: 201: 200: 187: 184: 173: 170: 153: 151: 143: 140: 128: 122: 112:Queen of Wands 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3631: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3601: 3598: 3597: 3593: 3588: 3583: 3578: 3570: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3562: 3557: 3555: 3549: 3539: 3538: 3533: 3527: 3522: 3520: 3513: 3511: 3506: 3498: 3487: 3485: 3464: 3458: 3456: 3454: 3444: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3424: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3384: 3383:The Holocaust 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3361: 3357: 3355: 3350: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3335: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3281: 3280: 3271: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3239: 3235: 3234: 3227: 3226: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3209: 3205: 3204: 3197: 3196: 3186: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3169: 3161: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3149: 3141: 3135: 3131: 3130:Arthur Morris 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3094: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028:Anglo-Nubians 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3019: 3018: 3007:re:Dairy goat 3000: 2997: 2990: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2958: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2883: 2878: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2863: 2859: 2857: 2849: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2804: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2779: 2772: 2769: 2761: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2749: 2741: 2724: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2696: 2695: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2671: 2659: 2655: 2653: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2636: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2618: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2599: 2598: 2590: 2585: 2584: 2581: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2538: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2504: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2453: 2440: 2439: 2436: 2433:. Thank you. 2432: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2396: 2383: 2356: 2342: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2329: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2307: 2305: 2299: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2236: 2232: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2207: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2112: 2107: 2105: 2099: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2084: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2057: 2054: 2049: 2046: 2040: 2023: 2020: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2005: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1968: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1941: 1940:Rodhullandemu 1934: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1921: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1893: 1879: 1876: 1872: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1790: 1785: 1783: 1778: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1765: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1741: 1740: 1718: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1662: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1568: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1508: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1491: 1490:Rodhullandemu 1484: 1482: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1441: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419:North America 1416: 1412: 1411: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1371: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1280: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1213: 1211: 1205: 1204:'s RFA thanks 1203: 1195: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1157: 1155: 1149: 1147: 1126: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1056:for details. 1055: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1035: 1034:Talk:Dyer Lum 1031: 1019: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 992: 991: 986: 985:bathrobe soon 965: 962: 961: 953: 949: 948: 947: 944: 938: 937: 932: 931: 930: 927: 926: 918: 917: 916: 913: 907: 906: 901: 897: 896: 895: 892: 891: 880: 879: 878: 875: 869: 868: 863: 862: 861: 858: 857: 849: 848: 847: 844: 840: 839: 838: 836: 832: 828: 824: 817: 813: 803: 802: 799: 795: 785: 784: 781: 776: 767: 760: 757: 753: 752: 751: 750: 747: 742: 733: 732: 729: 728: 725: 724: 719: 718:Good articles 715: 711: 707: 703: 695: 681: 677: 676: 669: 668: 661: 657: 654: 653: 645: 644: 643: 639: 638: 631: 630: 623: 622: 621: 618: 617: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 601: 594: 593: 583: 576: 573: 572: 564: 563: 562: 561: 558: 552: 551: 548: 541: 540: 535: 531: 528:Please visit 527: 525: 510: 507: 506: 498: 497: 496: 493: 489: 486: 485: 484: 481: 480: 471: 470: 469: 466: 461: 457: 454: 453: 445: 444: 443: 440: 436: 431: 427: 424: 423: 414: 413: 412: 409: 404: 403: 402: 399: 398: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 368: 365: 360: 359: 358: 355: 354: 342: 335: 334: 333: 332: 329: 314: 311: 307: 306: 305: 302: 301: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 273: 269: 266: 264: 261: 260: 259:. Includes: 258: 254: 250: 249: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 229: 227: 226: 225: 222: 220: 216: 211: 198: 195: 182: 177: 169: 168: 165: 160: 159: 152:With Regards, 149: 139: 138: 135: 127: 121: 120: 117: 113: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3592:Good Article 3589: 3560: 3553: 3545: 3525: 3518: 3514: 3507: 3505: 3483: 3457: 3452: 3450: 3427: 3423:Barn Swallow 3406: 3387: 3365:EncycloPetey 3363:Gratefully, 3362: 3358: 3351: 3346: 3342: 3275: 3251: 3232:bananabucket 3229: 3221: 3202:bananabucket 3199: 3191: 3127: 3097: 3087: 3069: 3066:Barn swallow 3050: 3032:silvopasture 3026:Nubians (or 3013: 3010: 2977: 2951: 2886: 2882:Barn Swallow 2864: 2860: 2852: 2828: 2807: 2782: 2734: 2707: 2703: 2681: 2647: 2630: 2612: 2601: 2595: 2593: 2569: 2536: 2534: 2520: 2498: 2490: 2446: 2420: 2401: 2399: 2381: 2364:Thank you... 2324: 2310: 2303: 2298:at this time 2297: 2294: 2280: 2261: 2240: 2201: 2184: 2159: 2157: 2134: 2110: 2103: 2079: 2058: 2052: 2050: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2000: 1963: 1939: 1936: 1907: 1906: 1863: 1781: 1776: 1760: 1746:bananabucket 1743: 1735: 1733: 1665: 1660: 1637: 1620: 1607: 1539: 1489: 1486: 1463: 1459: 1444: 1408: 1406: 1394: 1389: 1346: 1322: 1293: 1278:the_undertow 1277: 1257: 1225: 1222:My apologies 1209: 1198: 1193: 1182: 1170: 1162:Phoenix-wiki 1161: 1154:The_undertow 1153: 1145: 1139: 1100: 1074: 1051: 1027: 1008:the_undertow 1007: 990:the_undertow 989: 982: 956: 951: 936:the_undertow 935: 921: 905:the_undertow 904: 886: 867:the_undertow 866: 852: 809: 791: 770: 743: 740: 727: 722: 705: 699: 674:bananabucket 671: 663: 648: 636:bananabucket 633: 625: 612: 599:bananabucket 596: 588: 586: 567: 553: 544: 537: 522: 501: 487: 475: 448: 418: 393: 378: 349: 324: 296: 291: 279: 271: 232:Officers Row 223: 219:Officers Row 212: 209: 154: 145: 142:Trade Routes 130: 110:On the page 109: 78: 43: 37: 3430:peer review 2716:Tim Vickers 2692:a community 2684:a foreigner 2542:—Preceding 2535:It doesn't 1991:John Carter 1978:Tim Vickers 1832:John Carter 1820:Excelsior! 1801:Majoreditor 1541:Wikidudeman 1465:Wikidudeman 1456:I Trust you 1036:. Regards, 821:—Preceding 798:John Carter 723:OhanaUnited 547:Tim Vickers 465:Tim Vickers 439:Tim Vickers 408:Tim Vickers 382:Tim Vickers 341:mainarticle 292:Oregon City 124:Welcome to 36:This is an 3542:RfA thanks 2570:Thank you, 2523:Balloonman 2216:Check out 2198:Image/Link 2093:Balloonman 2019:Balloonman 1860:Likewise. 1764:Balloonman 1410:Aerodramus 883:wink, wink 774:Dihydrogen 771:Q5 added. 524:TimVickers 106:Plagiarism 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 12 85:Archive 11 79:Archive 10 3594:Medal of 3453:mini card 3434:Jimfbleak 3248:Rajneeshi 3132:? At the 3110:Jimfbleak 3096:there is 2995:Montanabw 2956:Montanabw 2932:Jimfbleak 2914:Jimfbleak 2898:Jimfbleak 2890:Jimfbleak 2785:talk page 2347:Thankspam 2338:SqueakBox 2291:Thank you 2283:Acalamari 1703:SqueakBox 1582:SqueakBox 1564:SqueakBox 1523:SqueakBox 1447:Crockspot 1437:Jimfbleak 1427:Jimfbleak 1423:Nicaragua 1210:Phaedriel 1117:Thank you 1106:Jimfbleak 1088:Jimfbleak 1077:Jimfbleak 1039:Skomorokh 744:Thanks. 433:light of 194:Esprit15d 73:Archive 9 68:Archive 8 60:Archive 5 3403:Batwoman 3354:tzatziki 3347:(53/0/1) 3341:, which 3224:Blnguyen 3194:Blnguyen 2708:(47/0/1) 2702:, which 2556:contribs 2544:unsigned 2502:itsJamie 2435:Elseused 2408:fair use 2277:Your RfA 2014:Firsfron 1951:contribs 1773:here). 1738:Blnguyen 1501:contribs 1296:WP:STALK 1194:Credits: 1030:Dyer Lum 823:unsigned 779:Monoxide 666:Blnguyen 628:Blnguyen 591:Blnguyen 488:Support! 364:Speciate 328:Speciate 116:Narmowen 3609:Epbr123 3390:Alatari 3159:Scartol 3139:Scartol 2948:Belgian 2759:Scartol 2739:Scartol 2537:DESERVE 2443:Re: Rfa 2376:Neranei 1908:Cheers, 1864:Anthøny 1822:Bearian 1305:WP:DICK 1301:WP:DICK 950:Ha! So 157:Havelok 39:archive 3343:passed 3270:WP:QFC 3098:masses 2856:hippie 2789:Beagel 2704:passed 2328:Haiduc 2223:Avruch 2205:Avruch 2162:Martin 1842:пﮟოьεԻ 1782:Marlin 1777:Orange 1659:Uh, I 1325:Daniel 1309:WP:NPA 1146:my RFA 952:that's 702:my RfA 435:WP:BLP 375:Admin? 244:itself 3596:Merit 3519:PhilB 3484:PhilB 3474:→ → → 3278:Tucky 3053:Tucky 3036:Doug. 3016:Tucky 2608:WP:GA 2455:drama 2264:Tucky 2187:Tucky 2154:Class 2082:Tucky 2003:Tucky 1916:Lover 1875:BillC 1714:Giano 1668:Tucky 1652:Giano 1640:Tucky 1625:Giano 1610:Tucky 1587:Giano 1511:Coren 1397:Tucky 1243:terse 1136:→ → → 959:Tucky 924:Tucky 889:Tucky 855:Tucky 651:Tucky 615:Tucky 570:Tucky 504:Tucky 478:Tucky 451:Tucky 421:Tucky 396:Tucky 352:Tucky 299:Tucky 270:Does 210:Van, 134:Doug. 16:< 3613:talk 3590:The 3554:Eliz 3548:here 3438:talk 3413:talk 3394:talk 3369:talk 3308:talk 3304:Pete 3294:talk 3290:Pete 3259:talk 3255:Pete 3114:talk 3077:talk 3073:Wrad 2936:talk 2918:talk 2902:talk 2894:talk 2872:talk 2837:talk 2818:talk 2793:talk 2552:talk 2500:OhNo 2304:Kyok 2104:Eliz 2045:what 1967:Pete 1947:talk 1933:flak 1661:have 1497:talk 1421:and 1292:(ec) 1229:snow 1185:Love 1173:Lara 1158:and 1101:long 1054:here 900:this 843:Pete 831:talk 756:Jc4k 746:Jc4k 492:Pete 251:The 189:you! 3605:GAN 3360:me. 3339:RfA 3276:Van 3166:Tok 3146:Tok 3134:FAC 3104:or 3088:any 3051:Van 3014:Van 2833:Tom 2814:Tom 2766:Tok 2746:Tok 2700:RfA 2468:SJP 2451:Lra 2262:Van 2185:Van 2080:Van 2061:Lar 2053:not 2001:Van 1666:Van 1638:Van 1608:Van 1395:Van 1390:all 957:Van 922:Van 887:Van 853:Van 737:Hi? 649:Van 613:Van 568:Van 502:Van 476:Van 449:Van 419:Van 394:Van 350:Van 297:Van 272:not 3615:) 3561:81 3523:~ 3440:) 3415:) 3396:) 3371:) 3349:. 3310:) 3296:) 3261:) 3236:) 3206:) 3188:}} 3185:cn 3182:{{ 3162:• 3142:• 3116:) 3079:) 2938:) 2920:) 2904:) 2874:) 2839:) 2820:) 2795:) 2787:. 2762:• 2742:• 2720:CP 2566:Re 2558:) 2554:• 2418:. 2245:is 2174:—— 2169:Ψ 2139:is 2111:81 2063:: 1953:) 1949:- 1910:Je 1750:) 1503:) 1499:- 1351:is 1262:is 833:) 796:. 678:) 640:) 603:) 344:}} 338:{{ 199:) 94:→ 64:← 3611:( 3531:C 3526:/ 3488:~ 3436:( 3411:( 3392:( 3367:( 3356:. 3306:( 3292:( 3288:- 3257:( 3228:( 3198:( 3112:( 3075:( 2934:( 2916:( 2900:( 2892:( 2870:( 2835:( 2816:( 2791:( 2550:( 2311:o 2249:n 2247:o 2243:l 2241:A 2171:Φ 2167:☎ 2143:n 2141:o 2137:l 2135:A 2069:c 2067:/ 2065:t 1945:( 1922:) 1918:( 1913:t 1852:7 1847:5 1742:( 1495:( 1355:n 1353:o 1349:l 1347:A 1266:n 1264:o 1260:l 1258:A 1179:❤ 829:( 670:( 632:( 595:( 192:( 163:۞ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index