User talk:Steven Walling/Archive 8

160:

be brushed once or twice a week (it is helpful to spray-mist with water when brushing). Mats can be commonly found behind the ears, under the elbow on each front leg, and in the fluffy fur on the hind legs (the "skirts"). Although its coat might appear to be a time-consuming task, a once-weekly, but thorough, brushing is all that is needed, though more frequent groomings will contribute to a beautiful and tidy coat. Shelties 'blow' coat usually twice a year, often at spring and fall, and should be groomed more often at those times. A good brushing with an undercoat rake, which removes the dead and loose hair from its coat daily should reduce the amount of hair that is shed. It is easiest to teach a dog to tolerate, or even enjoy, grooming if they are shown that it is a pleasurable thing from a young age. Breeders usually teach the dogs to lie on their side, be brushed, and then flip over to the other side. Toenails and hair between the pads need to be trimmed every couple of weeks. Show dogs may require more frequent brushing to keep their coats in top condition. Regular brushing encourages undercoat growth, distributes healthful oils produced by the skin, and prevents sores known as "hotspots" which can occur when dead undercoat is allowed to accumulate close to the skin. Most Shelties learn to love the attention that grooming provides, if the routine is started when the dog is still young.

108:

to 1/4 of the ear tipped. If a dog's ears are not bent (referred to as prick ears) it is acceptable to help the ears along to the desired position by bracing them into the correct position and leaving them on for several weeks to several months. Wideset ears can also be a problem, often breaking too low down (referred to as 'hound' ears). These are often harder to correct than prick ears, and must be braced early and consistently throughout the first year. It is easiest to train a dog's ears when the dog is a puppy. Beginning at 6 to 8 weeks, the puppy's ears may be taped. Many popular household items used to "fix" ears are things such as moleskin (used on the inside of the ears to incite the ears to stand up and have the tips fold in the proper position), masking tape, fabric glue (used to glue the tips of the ears to the moleskin, or used to create a hair bridge to bring the ears together), and string (also used to make a bridge). There are many other items an owner can buy that are promoted to fix the earset of a puppy. Once that cartilege in the ears is hard (usually by the time the puppy is 6 months old), it's impossible to fix the earset with veterinary procedures.

118:, there is this part of the home site: "Shelties' ears are required to bend slightly or "tip" at the top to be qualified to show in Canadian Kennel Club (CKC) www.ckc.ca/en shows. The proper earset is to have the top 1/3 of the ear tipped. If a dog's ears are not bent (referred to as prick ears) it is acceptable to help the ears along to the desired position by bracing them into the correct position and leaving them on for several weeks. Wideset ears can also be a problem, often breaking too low down (referred to as 'hound' ears). These are often harder to correct than prick ears, and must be braced early and consistently throughout the first year. It is easiest to train a dog's ears when the dog is a puppy. Beginning at 6 to 8 weeks, the puppy's ears may be taped and glued to help induce a proper earset. There are also veterinary procedures to "fix" improper earsets, although any reputable breeder will not go to those extremes." 442:

to convince me of that, rather than flying off the handle with a rant about us bad oppose folks. My oppose is based on the candidate's comments. When they start off their third attempt by whining about the RFA process rather than pointing out how they've seriously improved, then it shows a lack of maturity and the proper attitude to adminship. Someone who can't acknowledge that failing multiple previous RFAs actually might have something to do with their previous inadequacy as a candidate (i.e. show a little humility) is not someone who I trust with the tools. Playing the game of criticizing the process, rather than simply demonstrating the improvements that make you a candidate I should trust, is not something I am going to support.

2527: 1689: 581: 1186: 31: 230:, both threads started by Jimbo himself, so I'd guess it was his concerns that prompted the tag's placement. I don't know if the issues in the talk page were resolved, but I thought I'd just let you know when it was placed there. (I just happen to remember because I was doing RC patrol when it was placed, lol) You're probably more familiar with the issues than I am, but I thought I'd try to help, if possible. Perhaps you already knew all this, in which case, feel free to ignore me! 773:

Thankfully, each time, s/he gets reverted very quickly; so I didn't have to go through each and every one. Strangely, it seems like it's one person (maybe two) making the same types of jokes and doing them repeadetly. Is there any way to nix his/her editing power here? If you check it out yourself, you'll see that this goes way beyond warnings -- it's totally flagrant. I've never dealt with something like this before so I'm clueless! Many thanks. Cheers!

2678: 347:'s work, then state it on the article talk page. Precisely one of your tags has not been removed, the one from a sentence I added after reading about eight difference sources so I couldn't tell you which it came from, but it's such an obvious statement I rather doubt anyone who has the slightest familiarity with the subject would contest it as a contributing influence, though one could obviously make a list of further reasons for U.S. involvement. - 1412: 822: 476: 839: 233: 2129:

deleted.We can prove our statements with pedigrees showing we did in fact develop the F1b strain of Labradoodle. It would seem that Wiki,either knowingly or not descriminates in some cases as to what content will be displayed. I have edited the "type" catagory again in the hopes we will not be discriminated against. Sincerely, Paul L. Buccilli St. Clair Labradoodle Kennels

2341: 2303: 2743:. Some of the stuff on popular culture information at the end also looks a bit like a trivia section as well, so that could be a minor issue (although some of it is cited, so it's not a major issue). I can't see any major issues with edit-warring, though I wonder if we should consider the "review-warring' as going against the stability criterion of 856:, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on 2236:(brace yourself, I warn!). The discrimination in this section is so strong it's hard to believe that Sze_cavalry01 doesn't see it. In any event, I don't know how to proceed from here or who to go to. The arguing has gone on long enough. It's in one ear and out the other with this guy/gal... Many thanks for your help. Cheers, 1964:: I'm a bit lost over how to fix the article now if wiki doesn't like me editing it myself. Cheers for giving the article an independent look over, though: just to check - should the redlinks be kept even if they're trying to link to articles that probably won't be written? I doubt anybody but me would write about 2362:

changes since they first came to GA/R; please judge the article only on its merits as of its current version. If you reviewed an earlier version of any of these articles, please also consider re-reading them and either revise or endorse any earluer comments you have made. Thanks for your help with this! --

2361:

is experiencing a considerable backlog problem. There are several articles dating from August that still have not generated enough discussion to close. Could you please take a look at the oldest article and make some fresh comments on them? Please note that some of these have undergone signigicant

2049:

My change was not vandalism and was justified, so I wonder why you did that. Could you explain why you undid my change? And could you list atheistic beliefs? Because I'm an atheist and I can't think a single one of them - except maybe that there is no god, but that is only one belief (and not beliefs

107:

I have a question about plagiarism. I wrote part of this article (from the Shetland Sheepdog page): "Shelties' ears should bend slightly or "tip" at the top to be shown in American Kennel Club (AKC) shows because they contribute to the proper Sheltie expression. The proper ear is to have the top 1/3

2762:

anyway. So if we pose it as a simple quick-fail per that, and keep the debate over the review as a side issue, then I think it would be fair. The article has a devoted following of editors, so it will easily be re-nominated once this has been worked out, and then a proper, uncontroversial review can

2215:

from the ye-old days of imperialism. Some people on the talk page have even said that the content is copied from it's source. Funny thing, is the source is so old it's in the public domain! (The source is Sir George Scott Robertson's Book titled "The Kafirs of Hindukush" from 1895.) I'm not invested

441:

I will ignore your philosophizing about RFA, except to say that little hints about being superficial border on personal attacks, and that arrogant admonishments to "reconsider my approach to RFA" do not help to make me change my mind. If you really think this is such a great candidate, you might try

419:

I'm sorry, there's really not much left to add to that. Unfortunately, there are some folks who oppose far too often, maybe because they know that because of the required 70+ per cent support ratio for a success, any oppose weighs more than a support and it somehow makes their opinion more important

366:

Thanks for the proposal. I´ll investigate; however I don´t remember any peer-review paper on the subject. Nevertheles if you know any you can add a brief paragraph to the alternative treatments section. It will be welcome. You can also help reviewing the whole article since it has been nominated for

159:

Grooming Shelties have a double coat. The topcoat consists of long, straight, water-repellent hair, which provides some protection from cold and the elements. The undercoat is short, furry, and very dense in order to help keep the dog warm. The Sheltie is usually a clean dog and should only need to

1950:

Did you have anything particular in mind when you decided to add the warning about conflict of interest to my talk? I've never made any secret about who I am, and I don't think I've been particularly self-agrandising: I'm just not a big enough celebrity that somebody else would write the page about

1160:

Thanks for taking the time for writing a helpful GA review. The points reflecting the concerns clearly point out what needs to be done in order to improve the quality of the article. My response in form of editing the article to address those concerns would have been swift but I have been down with

423:

As far as I can see, there's no reason not to grant EM the tools. Going neutral I could understand because he is the kind of guy who simply wouldn't give the community shit by inflating his edit count or by clever political manoeuvring, and some people simply can't look past superficial things like

249:

I wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look at the above article for me. A new user has been removing sourced content about a controversy surrounding the group and adding a lot of apparently unsourced (but new) info. I have reverted twice, wholesale, but I'd like a 3rd opinion on whether any of the

2265:

Thanks for your help! Will definitely contact AIV and also request full protection. I tried to explain to Sze_cavalry01 that there was no way he could possibly defend his position, given the policies/guidelines of Knowledge and the flagrantly discriminatory content. But he was really passionate in

2159:

they cannot be included, and including them as "references" is inappropriate considering you have no editorial review or reliable fact checking. I cannot speak for all of the present refs, but I will check them out and remove any inappropriate ones. The presence of other inadmissible links is not

1639:

page. I must admit I did not realise just how much I was getting myself into, but I believe that the result has been well worth it, and the page has now been assessed as GA which is very satisfying. So give yourself a big pat on the back for giving me the idea, I have learnt a great deal through

1535:

At first I was put back by your question. Why wouldn't you welcome everyone? But, then I thought, perhaps you do not always assume good faith - that perhaps the user in question can be brought out of the depths of spamming and be an editor. Well, to me, there is always hope. So, to answer your

1388:

as soon as you can to read my comments regarding both changes I've made because of your comments but also how your observations were partially inaccurate. It seems like you may have only read the lead section of the article and assumed that the rest of the article was done the same way, since it's

503:, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to 121:

I wrote most of that article-altered it from the beginning to the end (case in point: the last sentence about the veterinary prodecures-they are almost identical. Case in point: all of the words in the parenthesis and quotation marks-I wrote those, in both articles. All the Sherwood Shelties did

2128:

Van, Every organization listed under your references in "Labradoodle" is in the business of selling memberships. Why is it we cannot add useful links to our business? Also,under Types of Labradoodle,we added useful content describing the origin of the F1b Labradoodle which we developed and it was

1302:

have always been in the best interest, and you are to be applauded for your efforts to the article. Unfortunately, you've hit upon one of the least block-happy admins, but, should Frikkers resort to personal attacks against you when he returns (such as calling you a vandal) despite already being

275:

Ha, i came to your user page fascinated by your name, because i thought it reflected me, and wondered if there was a similarity between us. Alas, no. I spent much of my childhood in Vancouver (the big one), and moved to KY when i got married, hence i, too, could be Vantucky; it's interesting to

1012:

An RfC is a very good idea. I'm happy to go through things paragraph by paragraph on the talk page. What I've done with other articles of contention is to go through the article paragraph-by-paragraph with everyone over a couple of weeks on the talk page and reach consensus on each issue of

2697:

I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5). Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Knowledge.

772:

Got a wee vandal problem. It's coming from IP: 64.90.250.32. It appears to be a school library computer in Orange County, NY -- very easy to trace. But, that aside, almost every edit by this IP is blatant vandalism, and there are dozens upon dozens of instances recorded in the IP's history.

342:

template, to be disingenuous, to put it charitably. Each of those paragraphs had a citation and picking sentences out from the paragraph and demanding that the citation from the end of the paragraph be repeated for each of those sentences is the sort of mindless sourcing cruft I detest on

2276:

I've left two notices on the Administrators noticeboard/Indicents page but, unfortunately, haven't gotten any responses. Meanwhile, Sze_cavalry01 has gotten more aggressive. Is there any better way to get administrator attention? Post on their talk pages perhaps? Thanks. Cheers,

1258: 311:

Van Tucky, please explain your immediate reversal of my addition to the Dahn Yoga article. The quote cited in the article is clearly from an article by a single author, not a group of former members. My change was meant to rectify that misrepresentation of the quote.

1297:

as very much a consensus version. Should Frikkers revert against what we are doing, he will have to answer why his edits are improving the article against consensus, and should he fail to do so, he can be reverted on sight. We all realize that your contributions to

2431:

I reverted your edits to The Chatopug.JPG Image.. I feel an old aged pug has nothing to do the text Appearance section of the article. A front facing young fawn pug however, can show the distinct features on a Pug's face as described by the text in a more in depth

400:

Being bitter and negative about the RFA process, rather than taking criticism constructively and having the humility to admit that failed attempts may have actually been due to the candidates attributes (rather than the failings of the process) is not desirable. —

798:

Thank you for participating in my RfA. I appreciate your taking the time to comment, and plan on learning from the experience and keeping the criticism in mind. If, in the future, you see me doing something that still concerns you, please let me know about it.

1520:

Thanks VanTucky, that's what I needed to hear. I have twice seen my edit deleted by an anonymous user without explanation and was beginning to get quite annoyed. I was not aware that blog links were not appropriate but now that I do I will cease and desist.

1110:

I noticed the picture at the top of the article and of course removed it. Since the practice is democratically spread across populations with different orientations, the homosexualization of the article is gratuitously provocative and possibly worse.

2738:

template on it. Has there been any conclusion regarding the controversial reviewer status? From what I can tell content wise, the biggest problems with the article appear to be references (cleanup tag on the references section) and possibly some

413:

That has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with what RfA is about. RfA is about trust. Now it's of course easy for you to just say that because of his "bad attitude" et cetera you can't trust him. But then I call bullshit unless you present some

2824:

Hello VanTucky, Could you please inform me the reason that the Bassenthwaite picture link was removed? Is it because of the Google Ads? No offence or "Spamming" was intended, just a useful link to some nice photos. Regards, David AKA Dscottag

2757:

The debate seems to be not be on-going, at least on the GAN talk. But I would agree that an experienced reviewer, if you don't want to I will, should close the nomination forthwith until the article is stable. A cleanup tag is technically a

2318:, which passed today with a unanimous 79/0/0 tally. It feels great to be appreciated, and I will try my best to meet everyone's expectations. If you have any advice or tips, feel free to pass them along, as I am sure that I will need them! 172:

Absolutely nothing. If you read the basic intro to Knowledge - and look just below the edit window on the right - you'll notice that all contributions you make to Knowledge are not copyrighted to yourself, but they are licensed under the

196:

Interesting. I still think it's rude that they used all of the information and didn't even give a nod to Knowledge. I'm not offended because I wrote that-I only noticed it because I wrote it. Thanks for the quick answer, VanTucky.

150:(Edited to add this:) I've compared most of the information on their home page, and it's from Knowledge, without being acknowledged-they plagiarized so much information. Including all of the following: 1043:

I keep a current list of all basset hound rescues in the USA. I am assuming it is because I sell books on my website, but there are other commercial links in the basset hound Knowledge listing.

1389:

hard to call an article with nearly 100 inline-citations egregiously lacking in verifiability. There is a reason there were few citations in the lead, and it has to do with a disputed section of

250:

new user's contrbutions should be kept. This group also claims to teach "internal martial arts" for health, but seem to be a green card factory from Korea to the United States (IMHO). Thanks! --

1393:. I have now swung the article's citation style to the other side of the dispute because of your objections. Please see the FAC page for a more full explanation of all the issues. Thank you. -- 1465:

the fila brasileiro message board is not a board for advertising. it is for discussing fila. if you are going to continue deleting my link then delete the other message / forum boards also.

2246:

In consideration of the blatantly racist POV this carries, I would suggest taking this to AIV. An admin would definitely be more able to mediate things. Making a full protection request at

2463:

Just a question about the takedown of the Folsom Last Supper ad, is this picture not current news? Various news organizations have posted the picture. Would this not constitue a fair use?

260:

Hi, I've been away for a few days, there has been a lot of extra work with my new fall schedule. Thanks for your notes. I will muck in as soon as I have some time, Sunday at the latest. --

290:

Thanks for your support and kind words at my recent successful RfA. I'm sure we'll continue running into each other at RFCN. Let me know if I can help you out with anything. Cheers! --

1920:

I was trying to look at the images when you reverted me. Please give me a little while when in a major edit. I guess I'm not very good with images without seeing them on the screen.

1002:

Hi VanTucky and thanks for your note. That is indeed unfortunate. I am just heading to the hospital for a case but will try to intervene on the talk page as soon as I get back. --

420:

or so. At any rate, you might want to reconsider your general way of participating at RfA. So should I, probably, but I haven't given up the inconvenient hope that people can learn.

153:

Sizing The size of a sheltie (at the withers) can range from being undersize (under 13 inches) to being oversize (over 16 inches.) The average height of a sheltie is 14-15 inches.

2228:, over certain, particurly bad sections. However, Sze_cavalry01 refuses to accept the consensus. Here is a link to the version of the article that Sze_cavalry01 keeps reverting to: 650: 156:

There have been reports of a brindle Sheltie but many Sheltie enthusiasts agree that a cross sometime in the ancestry of that specific Sheltie could have produced a brindle coat.

783:

Thanks for the help! I didn't realize that random IPs were afforded user pages. But now I can see (via the user page) that this IP's vandalism has been dealt with. Thanks again!

1583:

for the welcome note and for correcting my emphasis style. For what it's worth, I inherited it from the previous editor, questioned it, and decided to let it me. I know now.

1960:

Fairy nuff - I've read your reasons for the GA rejection and can't really argue - like I say though, nobody else is particularly interested in editing the page because I'm no

2221: 1937: 1161:

Influenza recently and have been slow at recovering. Will edit to address the concerns in a couple of days and hope to ask for your opinion if you can still spare the time.

432:

opposing without providing any diffs of serious misconduct, or any kind of really bad long-term pattern in the candidate's contribs — that just gives me a mild headache. —

2854:

The link is defined as link spam by Knowledge's standards because it contains more commerical content than information (that the article does not provide). Secondarily,

2593: 1880:

What did you have in mind for adding the DYK to the F&A page? Personally, It really doesn't belong because it focuses mostly on Featured items, new admins and bots.

1768: 1170: 674: 313: 2605: 1780: 1145:

Hi VanTucky, I just wanted to say thank you for helping someone very green to Knowledge. I made some huge mistakes. You tolerated me for months and I appreciate it. (

686: 2083:: I'm sorry to hear of this. The context rather suggests that I was the perp. I've reread the comment of mine in which I mentioned Useight, and can't see any attack, 2600: 2191: 1944: 1775: 1322: 679: 2420: 2160:

leeway for more. Knowledge is not a free web host or advertising service, it is a reference work. If you truly are the first to breed F1b labradoodles, then this

1844: 1739: 1155: 642: 2288: 2270: 2240: 2581: 1759: 662: 351: 2266:

his stance, although he didn't really make any empirical arguments in his favor. Crazy, crazy, crazy. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks again! Cheers,

394:

In his opening comments, the candidate shows a very poor attitude that is undesirable in a position that requires one to be an exemplar in the community. —

1385: 1318: 1397: 2588: 758: 667: 1629: 2772: 1747: 1679: 568: 494: 1572: 1439:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 396:

In my and others' opinions, he has a really great attitude. Maybe you and the other more or less regular opposers are just not ready to appreciate it.

2629: 2576: 1804: 1752: 903: 718: 655: 348: 264: 2662: 2399: 1509: 1477: 1069: 261: 251: 2867: 2788: 2498:

I know things can be tough at the beginning, but the rules about fair use images are strict for a good reason: so we don't get sued. Try reading:

2452: 1927: 459: 451: 316: 190: 2832: 2511: 2492: 2482: 2467: 2433: 2334: 2185: 2005: 1375: 1367: 1354: 371: 2844: 2751: 2259: 1870: 977: 2787:

evaluations, but do not recall if you have done any. I have never requested an expedited review. Do you have any advice on my request for an

2489: 2464: 2136: 2115: 2106: 1972: 1955: 1900:. I wikified it some but I need someone knowledgable about dog articles to take a look at it. Since you are, among other things, a member of 1489: 1211:

for nominating me. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA. Please do not hesitate to point out any errors I

1100: 2203:

that violates a million and one policies (NPOV, Reliable Sources, Weasel Words, Discriminatory Content). It also uses an outdate source (from

2078: 787: 2814: 2517: 1149: 237: 1115: 1023: 2065: 1619:

Thanks for your input on the page. I believe I have addressed your concerns, let me know if you think I need to do some wmore work on it.

2411:

even after it passed GA and would rather like to write 5 or 6 good articles for WP readers then to just push POV across a dozen articles.

2405:

Oh, I just saw that the article made it ! I thought that was a remark of encouragement on my userpage and did not know about the review !

1834: 849: 748: 403:

Not every criticism is equally constructive. Besides, the main reason people opposed his 2nd RfA was because of his refusal to answer the

2293: 813: 407:

questions, which he did now. Did you bother to look through the other RfA at all? Your comment reads a bit like you didn't investigate.

1884: 1559:

Thank you for your last comment as turse it may be. But, I respectfully disagree with your assesment. Thank you for stopping by. --

2633: 2458: 2315: 1808: 722: 1215:

make (unintentionally of course), so I won't make them again. Please contact me if you need anything done, that's what I'm here for!

1553: 1204: 1081: 359: 354: 2378: 2097:

Call it whatever you want, but criticizing Useight isn't a method that's going to convince me that a candidate merits my support.

2819: 1923:

I had refrained from making reversions to the text for several days because of the discussion on the talk page that you can see.

1273: 1131:

Even though you didn't positively support my self-nomination, I thank you for raising valid concerns. I learn from everything. --

1075: 2091: 1674: 808: 2858:

usually serves as a sufficient gallery, and external picture gallery links do not provide encyclopedic content for the reader.

1924: 1908: 1650: 1613: 2625: 2621: 2057: 1800: 1796: 1460: 1339: 1105: 1065: 777: 714: 710: 280: 2250:

might be a good idea until the conflict is over as well. I'll stop by though, and thanks for bringing this to my attention!

1307: 1536:

question, that's why I placed the welcome template on the user's talk page. Oh, BTW, I also reformatted the talk page per

1455: 1238: 1140: 992: 254: 201: 166: 144: 2233: 1525: 1013:

contention. I think it would work on Boerboel provided Frikkers is willing to participate in good faith. Let me know --

111:

There are also veterinary procedures to "fix" improper earsets, although no reputable breeder will go to those extremes."

1328: 1031: 206: 94: 86: 2015: 1990: 1135: 435: 301: 2801: 2721: 2559: 2041:

Although people who self-identify as atheists are usually assumed to be irreligious, some sects within major religions

2029:

Although people who self-identify as atheists are usually assumed to be irreligious, some sects within major religions

1721: 1589: 962: 624: 81: 69: 64: 59: 2712: 1280: 1006: 411:

Your edit history is completely irrelevant if you can't demonstrate a positive, constructive attitude to adminship. —

2383: 2148: 1360: 2436: 949:

Wow, thank you for fixing that typo. How could I have not noticed that earlier? Haha, thank you again very much! =)

2805: 2778: 2087:

or other -- but perhaps my stylistic cilia are a bit numb today. Please tell me where the problem lies. Thanks! --

1090:

Its closing time is near, so I would be glad if you could review my reply and possibly change your recommendation.

360: 2809: 1943: 1485: 329: 296: 1540:

Lastly, I am ingoring your last statement per your instructions. Thank you for stopping by. Happy editing! --

2840: 2373: 1850: 1345:

Considering that the talk addition is their only contrib, I don't think a fourth-level warning is appropriate.

1276:, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified. 140: 2144: 869: 306: 215: 2208: 705: 1363:

is to navigate to, it seemed unlikely they are actually a novice. If I'm wrong, I owe them an apology. —

2050:

as stated in article) and that doesn't apply to atheism in general, but applies only to strong atheism.

2020: 2722: 2526: 2071: 1901: 1688: 1440: 580: 181:

is allowed to freely use, alter and distribute Knowledge content. That's a part of why we're "the 💕".

38: 2407:

Even after the review I'll keep trying my level best to improve the article further. I keep trying on

2390:

I'll keep trying to improve the article and your message encourages me to work more dilligently on it.

2349: 2061: 1889: 1061: 925: 550: 2229: 1655: 1530: 866: 793: 390:

Any strong oppose should be thoroughly backed up by diffs, not just some half-informed assumptions.

321: 47: 17: 2473:

You have to add a fair use rationale for it to be fair use. Without one it's copyright violation.

2199:

I've got a small problem I was hoping you could help with. There is an article I've come across,

2176:

sources to be included. Verification, not truth, is the sole threshold for inclusion of content.

1881: 2797: 2415: 2394: 2200: 1865: 1856: 1288: 1165: 919: 908: 764: 537: 1411: 1207:, which ended succesfully with 26 supports, 3 opposes and 1 neutral. A special thanks goes to 227: 1648: 1627: 1611: 1427: 1312: 2828: 2132: 2053: 1969: 1952: 1473: 1402: 1057: 1053: 1047: 892: 857: 270: 128: 1036:

Hi VanTucky: I was wondering why the link that I submitted to you was deleted recently.

8: 1875: 1860: 1841: 1660:

Thanks very much for the 'star. I'm glad to know the template will be helpful. Cheers! –

1481: 1175: 983: 294: 2111:

Oh, I see -- though I thought I'd criticized Useight's argument rather than Useight. --

1840:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 754:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 223: 2836: 2748: 2668: 2639: 2367: 2225: 1814: 1594: 1515: 728: 136: 102: 2855: 2792: 2732: 2212: 2140: 1904:

could you take a look at it and tell me if it is in the approved format? Thank you.

1897: 1890: 1667: 1231: 804: 242: 2328: 2283: 1977: 1913: 1641: 1620: 1604: 1434: 1293:

Hi VanTucky, yes, I suppose you are correct. I consider what we are working on at

1120: 997: 956: 944: 322: 424:

that, mainly because they are superficial themselves. Opposing EM makes me wonder

276:

hear your explanation, though ~ i've never run across the phrase before. Cheers,

2744: 1566: 1561: 1547: 1542: 1394: 1248: 884: 861: 376: 2443:

Um, in case you didn't notice, there are already facial portraits of fawn pugs.

2357:

I have noticed that you are a frequent reviewer at that Good Articles project.

1331:), but maybe it's the right combination for balance. Thanks for fixing that in 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2677: 2643: 2247: 1934: 1818: 1578: 1468: 1390: 1381: 732: 514: 504: 291: 285: 219: 1185: 2859: 2784: 2764: 2759: 2503: 2499: 2474: 2444: 2408: 2363: 2358: 2351: 2251: 2177: 2123: 2098: 1997: 1859:

and have renominated the article after extensive editing. Kindly take a look

1586: 1501: 1496:

There are no other message board links, and all such links are prohibited by

1346: 1332: 1294: 1146: 969: 443: 368: 344: 336: 277: 198: 182: 163: 132: 2851:

Please remember to sign all your talk posts with four tildes like this: ~~~~

1635:

Hi VanTucky, thank you for prompting me to proceed down the GA path for the

214:

Just thought I'd show you when and why the tag was placed, it was placed on

177:. This means that not only do you not own your own writing in articles, but 2740: 2169: 2156: 2012: 1987: 1961: 1711: 1661: 1537: 1522: 1497: 1418: 1364: 1336: 1220: 1132: 1097: 989: 800: 614: 2426: 2323: 2278: 2267: 2237: 2232:. Also, here is a link to the most flagrant section in that old version: 2165: 1983: 1451: 1277: 1208: 1112: 951: 784: 774: 755: 524: 208: 2659: 2112: 2088: 1905: 1636: 1600: 1304: 1020: 1014: 1003: 663:

News and notes: Template standardization, editing patterns, milestones

533:, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day. 428:

superficial people can be, but it's still their own business. However,

1933:

Don't forget you can use the preview button to see how images appear,

2549: 243: 988:

Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--

2707: 2582:

News and notes: Commons uploaders, Wikimania 2008/2009, milestones

1914: 1855:

I have tried to address the concerns expressed in the GA-review of

1299: 544: 1833:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

747:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

115: 1982:

Just a short note to say thanks for your help and support on the

821: 2216:

in the article but was thoroughly disgusted by it and had to do

475: 1046:

Thanks for your help VanTucky! Cathy Rudert, from Kentucky! (

838: 467: 2045:, and even reject the existence of a personal, creator deity. 2033:, and even reject the existence of a personal, creator deity. 367:

good article and nobody reviews it due to its specificity. --

122:

was to modify it a bit by deleting some words and sentences.

2572: 2340: 2302: 2025:

So you undid my change on article about Atheism. I changed:

1734: 1257: 637: 232: 2612: 2552: 2534: 1787: 1714: 1696: 1422: 695: 617: 599: 575: 174: 2502:

to get an idea of how to upload with a proper rationale.

1748:

Wikimedia announces plans to move office to San Francisco

1359:

That thought crossed my mind. But considering how hard

456:

Sorry that you didn't like the enquired explanation. —

559:. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design. 1303:

warned, I will view it as a very serious offense --

1093:If you have any more concerns, please let me know. 2192:Policy violating article / conensus not respected 2155:Links to St. Clair kennels are spam, period. Per 1317:Well, between us we delivered a mixed message to 1156:RE:Your GA nomination of Roman trade with India 2234:Sze_cavalry01's Kafir Characteristics Section 1180: 1080:Thanks for expressing your opinion on my RFA ( 924:'s RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by 2601:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 2224:has many people arguing with one lone user, 1776:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 1469:http://members.boardhost.com/filabrasileiro/ 1384:, I respectfully request that you return to 680:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 651:Wikimedia treasurer expected to depart soon 2307: 1431:was updated with a fact from the article 1255: 2728:This article still has a somewhat stale 2566: 1737: 1728: 1082:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Amire80 640: 631: 2747:and just fail this for the time being? 2577:WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox" 1376:Cillian Murphy FAC issues now addressed 343:Knowledge. If you have a problem with 14: 2314:Thank you for voicing your opinion in 222:, with direction to the discussion at 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2810:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 2284: 848:Thank you for your participation in 493:Thank you for your participation in 25: 1380:Since you have opposed the FAC for 1128:I have been given the sysop tools. 883: 23: 2525: 2294:Knowledge has a new administrator! 1687: 814:The now-traditional RFA thank-spam 579: 24: 2879: 2459:Takedown of Folsom Last Supper ad 1925:The way, the truth, and the light 1764:archives, conferences, milestones 1683:updated for September 24th, 2007. 1361:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Oregon 572:updated for September 17th, 2007. 2676: 2606:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 2339: 2301: 1781:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 1410: 1256: 1184: 1050:22:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)) 837: 820: 687:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 549:This RFA thanks was inspired by 474: 361:Therapies for multiple sclerosis 231: 29: 2820:Bassenthwaite lake link removal 2687:Thanks Steven Walling/Archive 8 2416: 2395: 2079:An ad hominem attack on Useight 1866: 1740:From the editor: Survey results 1166: 1076:RfA - Amire80 (Amir E. Aharoni) 894: 888: 885: 656:WikiWorld comic: "Sarah Vowell" 116:http://www.sherwoodshelties.ca/ 2186:16:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2149:12:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2116:03:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2107:03:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2092:02:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2066:23:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 2016:02:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2011:Ditto. Very much appreciated! 2006:23:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1991:23:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1973:07:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1956:07:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1938:18:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1928:18:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1909:15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1885:18:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1871:12:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1845:02:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1675:01:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1614:22:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1590:21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1573:22:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1554:20:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1526:08:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1510:00:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1490:00:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1456:18:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1398:07:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1368:01:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1355:00:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1340:00:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1308:00:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1281:19:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1239:12:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1171:11:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1150:00:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1136:23:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 1116:23:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 1101:13:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 1070:21:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 1024:04:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 1007:01:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 993:23:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 978:22:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 963:22:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 904:20:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 831:Click there to open your card! 809:13:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 788:21:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 778:20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 759:03:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 643:From the editor: Reader survey 485:Click there to open your card! 460:22:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 452:18:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 436:06:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 381:Ok, so let me try to clarify. 372:07:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 355:04:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 317:04:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 302:04:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 281:18:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 265:03:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 255:14:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 238:08:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 202:23:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 191:23:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 167:23:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 145:23:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 13: 1: 1461:Fila Brasileiro Message Board 1203:for your participation in my 1106:Your contribution to anal sex 926: 551: 525: 515: 505: 495: 2656: 2547: 2521:updated for October 03, 2007 2488:Man, this is too complcated. 2300: 2209:obsolete scientific theories 1709: 1599:Thanks for your help on the 1141:Thanks for helping a newbie! 1087:I replied to your concerns. 1019:I know, give me a second -- 612: 125:What can be done about it? 7: 2868:22:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 2845:22:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 2815:18:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 2773:19:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2752:17:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2713:04:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2663:03:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2658:Automatically delivered by 2637: 2557: 2512:01:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2493:01:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2483:01:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2468:01:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2453:21:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2437:21:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2421:21:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2400:21:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2379:02:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2338: 2335:21:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2289:17:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 2271:03:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2260:20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2241:16:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2043:don't have theistic beliefs 1896:Someone created a stub for 1812: 1753:WikiWorld comic: "Ambigram" 1719: 1651:11:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1630:01:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1272:Thanks for your support in 1032:Basset Hound Rescues in USA 726: 622: 10: 2884: 2723:Electronic voice phenomena 2620: 2615: 2542: 1902:Knowledge:WikiProject Dogs 1863:for details. With regards, 1795: 1790: 1704: 703: 607: 2783:I have had 30 successful 2675: 2650: 2604: 2599: 2592: 2587: 2580: 2575: 2537: 2384:RE:Roman trade with India 2359:good article reassessment 2222:talk page for the article 1986:page. Much appreciated! 1825: 1779: 1774: 1767: 1758: 1751: 1746: 1699: 1603:page, it is appreciated. 1262: 1183: 739: 698: 690: 685: 678: 673: 666: 661: 654: 649: 602: 2779:GAC expedited evaluation 2207:100 years ago) that use 1274:my request for adminship 882: 879: 842: 18:User talk:Steven Walling 2230:Sze_cavalry01's Version 1945:Dale Smith (Playwright) 1441:Did you know? talk page 2531: 2530:The Knowledge Signpost 2201:Hindukush Kafir people 2031:have atheistic beliefs 1857:Roman trade with India 1851:Roman trade with India 1693: 1692:The Knowledge Signpost 929:Phaedriel's RFA thanks 585: 584:The Knowledge Signpost 554:Phaedriel's RFA thanks 2589:Wikimedia in the News 2529: 1996:You're most welcome. 1691: 1205:Request for Adminship 1096:Thanks in advance. -- 968:You're most welcome. 668:Knowledge in the news 583: 307:Please explain change 42:of past discussions. 2789:expedited GAC review 916:brazenly stolen from 860:. Special thanks to 845:Dear Steven Walling, 314:Rhetorician magician 2760:quick-fail criteria 2594:Features and admins 2211:that are, frankly, 2021:Atheistic beliefs!? 1769:Features and admins 675:Features and admins 2560:About the Signpost 2544:Volume 3, Issue 40 2532: 2310:Thanks, Archive 8! 2072:Ad hominem attack? 1882:The Placebo Effect 1722:About the Signpost 1706:Volume 3, Issue 39 1694: 938: 937: 875:for nominating me. 826: 625:About the Signpost 609:Volume 3, Issue 38 586: 562: 561: 480: 2856:Wikimedia Commons 2847: 2831:comment added by 2813: 2719: 2718: 2665: 2655: 2654: 2646: 2611: 2610: 2571: 2570: 2376: 2370: 2347: 2346: 2213:scientific racism 2151: 2135:comment added by 2068: 2056:comment added by 1898:Comfort retriever 1891:Comfort retriever 1847: 1830: 1829: 1821: 1786: 1785: 1760:News and notes: 1733: 1732: 1671: 1492: 1476:comment added by 1447: 1446: 1435:Baduanjin qigong 1286: 1285: 1245: 1244: 1072: 1056:comment added by 935: 921:Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 906: 899: 881: 832: 818: 761: 744: 743: 735: 694: 693: 636: 635: 595: 594: 542: 539:Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 536: 491:Dearest VanTucky, 486: 472: 147: 131:comment added by 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2875: 2864: 2826: 2795: 2769: 2737: 2731: 2680: 2673: 2672: 2657: 2638: 2634:Single-Page View 2613: 2573: 2535: 2508: 2479: 2449: 2418: 2397: 2374: 2368: 2343: 2333: 2331: 2326: 2305: 2298: 2297: 2286: 2281: 2256: 2182: 2130: 2103: 2051: 2002: 1868: 1832: 1813: 1809:Single-Page View 1788: 1735: 1697: 1672: 1669: 1664: 1656:Thank you kindly 1646: 1625: 1609: 1569: 1564: 1550: 1545: 1531:Welcome template 1506: 1471: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1351: 1260: 1253: 1252: 1237: 1234: 1228: 1216: 1197: 1188: 1181: 1168: 1051: 974: 961: 959: 954: 932: 922: 914:This design was 913: 902: 901: 898: 893: 890: 887: 880: 877: 841: 830: 824: 794:Barneca RfA spam 746: 727: 723:Single-Page View 696: 638: 600: 591: 576: 557: 540: 531: 521: 511: 501: 484: 478: 448: 341: 335: 330:these challenges 323:Mobutu Sese Seko 235: 207:Re: NPOV tag on 187: 126: 114:On this website 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2883: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2862: 2822: 2781: 2767: 2735: 2729: 2726: 2715: 2699: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2671: 2666: 2533: 2523: 2506: 2477: 2461: 2447: 2429: 2386: 2355: 2329: 2324: 2322: 2312: 2296: 2279: 2254: 2194: 2180: 2126: 2101: 2074: 2058:193.198.138.114 2023: 2000: 1980: 1970:Sheriff Bernard 1966:The Fire Dragon 1953:Sheriff Bernard 1948: 1918: 1894: 1878: 1853: 1695: 1685: 1668: 1662: 1658: 1642: 1621: 1605: 1597: 1581: 1567: 1562: 1548: 1543: 1533: 1518: 1504: 1463: 1405: 1378: 1349: 1315: 1291: 1251: 1246: 1232: 1221: 1218: 1199: 1191: 1178: 1158: 1143: 1133:Amir E. Aharoni 1123: 1108: 1098:Amir E. Aharoni 1078: 1058:Bassethoundtown 1048:Bassethoundtown 1034: 1000: 986: 972: 957: 952: 950: 947: 942: 941: 940: 939: 920: 911: 834: 825: 816: 796: 767: 589:Weekly Delivery 587: 574: 566: 565: 564: 563: 547: 538: 488: 479: 470: 446: 379: 364: 339: 333: 326: 309: 299: 288: 273: 247: 212: 185: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2881: 2871: 2870: 2852: 2821: 2818: 2780: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2725: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2705: 2704: 2701: 2700: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2681: 2670: 2667: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2636: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2609: 2608: 2603: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2585: 2584: 2579: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2556: 2546: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2524: 2522: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2486: 2485: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2414: 2412: 2406: 2393: 2391: 2389: 2385: 2382: 2354: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2337: 2313: 2308: 2306: 2295: 2292: 2275: 2263: 2262: 2196:Hey Vantucky! 2193: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2073: 2070: 2022: 2019: 2009: 2008: 1979: 1976: 1947: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1917: 1912: 1893: 1888: 1877: 1874: 1864: 1852: 1849: 1842:R Delivery Bot 1828: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1811: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1784: 1783: 1778: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1756: 1755: 1750: 1744: 1743: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1718: 1708: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1686: 1684: 1678: 1657: 1654: 1633: 1632: 1596: 1593: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1532: 1529: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1462: 1459: 1445: 1444: 1415: 1404: 1401: 1382:Cillian Murphy 1377: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1314: 1311: 1290: 1289:Boerboel redux 1287: 1284: 1283: 1269: 1268: 1263: 1261: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1217: 1194:Dear VanTucky, 1189: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1164: 1162: 1157: 1154: 1142: 1139: 1122: 1119: 1107: 1104: 1077: 1074: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 999: 996: 985: 982: 981: 980: 946: 943: 910: 907: 876: 847: 846: 844: 843: 835: 829: 828: 827: 819: 817: 815: 812: 795: 792: 791: 790: 769:Hey VanTucky! 766: 765:Vandal Problem 763: 742: 741: 740: 737: 736: 725: 701: 700: 699: 692: 691: 689: 683: 682: 677: 671: 670: 665: 659: 658: 653: 647: 646: 634: 633: 632: 629: 628: 621: 611: 605: 604: 603: 597: 593: 592: 573: 567: 546: 543: 534: 492: 489: 483: 482: 481: 473: 471: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 417: 416: 409: 398: 392: 378: 375: 363: 358: 325: 320: 308: 305: 297: 287: 284: 272: 269: 268: 267: 246: 241: 211: 205: 194: 193: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2880: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2857: 2853: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2817: 2816: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2774: 2771: 2770: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2734: 2724: 2714: 2711: 2710: 2703: 2702: 2695: 2694: 2688: 2682: 2679: 2674: 2664: 2661: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2614: 2607: 2602: 2598: 2595: 2590: 2586: 2583: 2578: 2574: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2545: 2541: 2536: 2528: 2520: 2513: 2510: 2509: 2501: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2454: 2451: 2450: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2438: 2435: 2422: 2419: 2413:With Regards, 2410: 2409:Incense Route 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2392:With Regards, 2381: 2380: 2377: 2371: 2365: 2360: 2353: 2342: 2336: 2332: 2327: 2321: 2317: 2311: 2304: 2299: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2282: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2226:Sze_cavalry01 2223: 2219: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2197: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2080: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2047: 2046: 2044: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2032: 2026: 2018: 2017: 2014: 2007: 2004: 2003: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1946: 1939: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1892: 1887: 1886: 1883: 1873: 1872: 1869: 1862: 1858: 1848: 1846: 1843: 1839: 1837: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1789: 1782: 1777: 1773: 1770: 1765: 1763: 1757: 1754: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1736: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1707: 1703: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1665: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1645: 1640:the process! 1638: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1565: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1546: 1539: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1470: 1466: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1430: 1429: 1428:Did you know? 1424: 1420: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1400: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1383: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1319:Bollingersuks 1313:Bollingersuks 1310: 1309: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1295:Talk:Boerboel 1282: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1182: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1163:With Regards, 1153: 1151: 1148: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1073: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1037: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1005: 995: 994: 991: 979: 976: 975: 967: 966: 965: 964: 960: 955: 936: 933: 931: 930: 923: 917: 905: 900: 897: 896:(talk to me!) 891: 878: 874: 873: 872: 868: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 840: 823: 811: 810: 806: 802: 789: 786: 782: 781: 780: 779: 776: 770: 762: 760: 757: 753: 751: 738: 734: 730: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 702: 697: 688: 684: 681: 676: 672: 669: 664: 660: 657: 652: 648: 645: 644: 639: 630: 627: 626: 620: 619: 616: 610: 606: 601: 598: 590: 582: 578: 577: 571: 560: 558: 556: 555: 541: 535: 532: 530: 529: 522: 520: 519: 512: 510: 509: 502: 500: 499: 477: 461: 458: 455: 454: 453: 450: 449: 440: 439: 438: 437: 434: 431: 427: 421: 415: 410: 408: 404: 399: 397: 393: 391: 387: 386:Strong Oppose 384: 383: 382: 374: 373: 370: 362: 357: 356: 353: 350: 346: 345:Michela Wrong 338: 331: 324: 319: 318: 315: 304: 303: 300: 295: 293: 283: 282: 279: 266: 263: 259: 258: 257: 256: 253: 245: 240: 239: 234: 229: 225: 221: 217: 210: 204: 203: 200: 192: 189: 188: 180: 176: 171: 170: 169: 168: 165: 161: 157: 154: 151: 148: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 123: 119: 117: 112: 109: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2860: 2823: 2793:TonyTheTiger 2782: 2765: 2763:take place. 2727: 2708: 2686: 2558: 2548: 2543: 2518: 2504: 2487: 2475: 2462: 2445: 2430: 2387: 2356: 2319: 2309: 2274: 2264: 2252: 2217: 2204: 2198: 2195: 2178: 2173: 2161: 2127: 2099: 2084: 2076: 2075: 2048: 2042: 2040: 2039: 2036: 2030: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2010: 1998: 1981: 1965: 1962:Stephen King 1959: 1949: 1922: 1919: 1895: 1879: 1854: 1835: 1831: 1761: 1738: 1720: 1712:24 September 1710: 1705: 1680: 1659: 1643: 1634: 1622: 1606: 1598: 1585: 1582: 1560: 1541: 1534: 1523:User:Bnewsom 1519: 1502: 1467: 1464: 1450: 1448: 1433: 1432: 1426: 1419:25 September 1403:Did you know 1386:the FAC page 1379: 1347: 1325: 1316: 1292: 1265: 1223: 1222: 1212: 1200: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1159: 1144: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1109: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1079: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1001: 987: 970: 948: 928: 927: 918:inspired by 915: 912: 895: 870: 865: 858:my talk page 851: 850: 836: 797: 771: 768: 749: 745: 704: 641: 623: 615:17 September 613: 608: 596: 588: 569: 553: 552: 548: 527: 526: 517: 516: 507: 506: 497: 496: 490: 457: 444: 433: 429: 425: 422: 418: 412: 406: 402: 395: 389: 385: 380: 365: 327: 310: 289: 274: 271:Curious Name 262:Fire Star 火星 252:Fire Star 火星 248: 213: 195: 183: 178: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 124: 120: 113: 110: 106: 75: 43: 37: 2827:—Preceding 2350:Backlog at 2174:independent 2131:—Preceding 2052:—Preceding 1984:Solar power 1876:RE: F&A 1644:Nick Thorne 1623:Nick Thorne 1607:Nick Thorne 1472:—Preceding 1176:Edokter RfA 1052:—Preceding 984:RFA Thanks! 209:Jimmy Wales 127:—Preceding 36:This is an 2669:Thanks! :D 2388:Thank you, 2085:ad hominem 1637:Murray cod 1601:Murray cod 1595:Murray cod 1516:Crocs Blog 1395:Melty girl 867:Dihydrogen 468:RFA Thanks 332:using the 228:NPOV again 103:Plagiarism 95:Archive 15 87:Archive 10 2706:Regards, 2550:1 October 2439:Josewiki 2432:manner... 2218:something 1935:SqueakBox 1478:Robinfila 1201:Thank you 518:Wizardman 508:Hirohisat 405:optional 292:Flyguy649 244:Dahn yoga 220:SqueakBox 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 2841:contribs 2833:Dscottag 2829:unsigned 2749:Dr. Cash 2745:WP:WIAGA 2733:GAReview 2640:Shortcut 2630:Tip Line 2626:Newsroom 2622:Archives 2519:Signpost 2434:Josewiki 2375:contribs 2364:Jayron32 2280:₪ask123 2170:reliable 2166:verified 2145:contribs 2133:unsigned 2054:unsigned 1915:Anal sex 1838:spamlist 1836:Signpost 1815:Shortcut 1805:Tip Line 1801:Newsroom 1797:Archives 1681:Signpost 1587:PhGustaf 1486:contribs 1474:unsigned 1329:contribs 1300:Boerboel 1147:Chaps333 1066:contribs 1054:unsigned 998:Boerboel 945:Typo fix 871:Monoxide 752:spamlist 750:Signpost 729:Shortcut 719:Tip Line 715:Newsroom 711:Archives 570:Signpost 430:strongly 369:Garrondo 298:contribs 199:Narmowen 164:Narmowen 141:contribs 133:Narmowen 129:unsigned 2644:WP:POST 2490:Billyca 2465:Billyca 2417:Havelok 2396:Havelok 2320:Cheers, 2248:WP:RFPP 2137:Bootss1 2013:Mrshaba 1988:Johnfos 1867:Havelok 1819:WP:POST 1663:Scartol 1391:WP:LEAD 1365:EncMstr 1337:EncMstr 1249:Thanks! 1167:Havelok 990:JForget 953:hmwith 909:Credits 801:barneca 733:WP:POST 545:Credits 377:Re: RFA 328:I find 278:Lindsay 39:archive 2785:WP:GAC 2500:WP:NFC 2352:WP:GAR 2325:hmwith 2316:my RfA 2268:ask123 2238:ask123 2220:. The 1978:Thanks 1579:Thanks 1452:Allen3 1333:WP:ORE 1278:Addhoc 1266:My RFA 1226:dokter 1209:Rlevse 1121:My RfA 1113:Haiduc 862:Walton 852:my RFA 785:ask123 775:ask123 756:Ralbot 528:Husond 523:, and 498:my RFA 414:diffs. 349:Banyan 286:My RfA 226:, and 216:Aug 29 179:anyone 2863:Tucky 2768:Tucky 2741:WP:OR 2660:COBot 2507:Tucky 2478:Tucky 2448:Tucky 2255:Tucky 2181:Tucky 2157:WP:EL 2124:Edits 2113:Hoary 2102:Tucky 2089:Hoary 2001:Tucky 1906:RJFJR 1762:Times 1568:Eagle 1563:Blind 1549:Eagle 1544:Blind 1538:WP:UW 1505:Tucky 1498:WP:EL 1350:Tucky 1305:Samir 1021:Samir 1015:Samir 1004:Samir 973:Tucky 889:scent 886:iride 833:→ → → 487:→ → → 447:Tucky 218:, by 186:Tucky 16:< 2837:talk 2553:2007 2369:talk 2330:talk 2205:over 2172:and 2162:must 2141:talk 2062:talk 1951:me! 1861:here 1715:2007 1670:Talk 1482:talk 1423:2007 1323:talk 1233:Talk 1213:will 1125:Hi, 1062:talk 958:talk 864:and 805:talk 706:Home 618:2007 352:Tree 337:fact 224:NPOV 175:GFDL 137:talk 2861:Van 2806:bio 2791:?-- 2766:Van 2709:nat 2632:| 2628:| 2624:| 2505:Van 2476:Van 2446:Van 2427:Pug 2285:{t} 2253:Van 2179:Van 2168:by 2164:be 2100:Van 2037:to 1999:Van 1968::) 1807:| 1803:| 1799:| 1503:Van 1417:On 1348:Van 1335:. — 1084:). 971:Van 721:| 717:| 713:| 709:| 445:Van 426:how 236:. 184:Van 2843:) 2839:• 2812:) 2736:}} 2730:{{ 2642:: 2147:) 2143:• 2064:) 1817:: 1666:· 1500:. 1488:) 1484:• 1449:-- 1443:. 1425:, 1421:, 1236:• 1230:• 1219:— 1152:) 1068:) 1064:• 1040:] 807:) 799:-- 731:: 513:, 388:— 340:}} 334:{{ 143:) 139:• 91:→ 2835:( 2808:/ 2804:/ 2802:c 2800:/ 2798:t 2796:( 2372:| 2366:| 2139:( 2081:" 2077:" 2060:( 1480:( 1326:· 1321:( 1224:E 1060:( 934:. 803:( 135:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index