2873:— and fair enough. But I am confused about the use of the letter L. I understand that it means inductance, but on circuit diagrams I regularly see the letter L next to the symbol for an inductor (in the same way I see the letter C next to capacitors and R next to resistors) and that if there are multiple inductors (or capacitors or resistors) that these get numbered (L1, L2, C1, Q1 for a transistor, etc.). The number has nothing to do with the inductance, it is a way of distinguishing inductors from each other— because the letter L is signifying "here is an inductor." Am I not understanding that correctly? (I do not have an electrical engineering background, though I have built a few simple circuits in my time). Please clarify for me if you would. Thanks!
466:. However, they band together to quote WP:BLP, WP:UNDUE and WP:CONSENSUS. Unfortunately, even for this controversial article, almost nobody apparently cares enough about the subject to comment about these issues; I posted queries on three message boards and only one editor responded. The few regular editors of the article, are often against me. In that case, I'll never achieve their idea of consensus. I'm really not sure how to proceed. I'm sure you'll be able to find out which article I'm talking about, but I'm not sure if you should intervene on that talk page yet. I was hoping to discuss my actions with you here, if possible, instead of you contacting the other editors. Thank you very much for your time.
2389:. I have seen the preview of the book in Amazon. It is not written in the style of a factual account. Baxter puts a lot of emotions into the characters that are her own insinuation. You might be right that I am being unfair to describe it as a fictionalized account, but it is not a straight historical factual account either. Anyway, the bibliography section is for a bibliography of sources that have been used in writing the article and this book clearly has not been so used. If you were to expand the article using the book as a source that would be a different matter. We could compromise and have it in a "Further reading" section though.
615:
my opinion, your insertion of the sentence "this charge was dropped on
September 8 when evidence could not prove Bieber was the assailant" was the cause of the latest round of reversions. That is massively POV, implying as it does that Knowledge thinks Bieber really did carry out the assault, just that it couldn't be proved in court. That is completely unacceptable and was quite rightly reverted. Other minor issues may have got caught up in that but removing negative POV in BLP articles must be a priority for us and the article did finally settle down to a version with the same information in a more neutral form.
2084:
some of the best engineers in the industry. These articles are not scrapped. Each one of them takes over a week to write. Hours go into diligently researching and writing every single piece of content. Additionally, there are no "buy now buttons" or "get a quote" buttons. Nor are there any external links or advertisement. If anything, the only thing you will find is a link to a detailed guide on Liquid
Silicone Rubber (LSR), the material, the applications, and the process. Something that I can assure you, Knowledge readers will find extremely useful.
2311:
462:. This is related but not entirely the same issue, but it is regarding the same article. I can't help but feel that certain experienced editors are being very combative as to my edits regarding a controversial article. My edits, which I feel are legitimate, are being reverted multiple times. I feel that some parts of my edits are definitely positive instead of controversial, but the whole edits are being reverted. When I discuss my edits at the talk page, I can't help but feel that these editors are
4574:
31:
3458:
2924:. Of course, the silkscreen of a pcb is commonly marked with component references and in that context they are to be seen as part numbers rather than values. But my basic problem with your edit is that it unnecessarily complicated the first sentence of the lead. We should try and make leads as clear and simple as possible. I don't have any fundamental objection to the symbol being mentioned in the article, but it really doesn't have to be in the first sentence.
703:
1959:#5. The second one is a bit more borderline, but still probably does not belong, the site is a directory rather than selling something themselves, but nevertheless, the information is placed there to attract customers to companies in their directory. It still fails ELNO #1 if the same information could be written in the article. The default position is not to have external links. They should only be inserted if there is a positive reason for having them.
4501:
2590:
2207:
3691:
1699:
1618:
1261:
1202:
1890:
add external links, another sign of a spammer. Secondly, many of the links I removed were placed in the references section or the see also section. Both of those are inappropriate; they are not referencing any fact in the article and see also is not supposed to be used for external links. The most appropriate place for such links is the external links section but even there I would probably still remove them. See our
3793:
4494:
1785:. The name in the ref ids is really of no consequence, it is just there to let the software know which ref is being reused. It is never visible to the encyclopaedia user. You can change it if you want, but please note that spaces are not allowed in ref ids unless the id is enclosed in quotes. If you do change it, please use the preview button before saving your edit to make sure you have the result you intended.
4140:
1364:
3312:
1567:
1061:
988:
887:
3586:
longer supported on new platforms. The research paper related to this new tool is under review process in some research journal and, as in most cases, will take around 1-2 year to come in print. I have included this article to provide a resource for the students and teaching community who come to wiki for this purpose and found outdated software links on this prestigious site. Regards majid
3416:
4046:, I only get 3 hits, none of them ever cited. I thought that using the full first names was somehow limiting me, so I changed to "JW Diesel" and got the same result. Right now, I get 39 results for "John W." and 86 for "J W", which are the same results you get, I think... I have no clue what happened there, why I got different results for the same search yesterday and today. Do you?
1442:. I'm not really sure why, at a quick look I can't find the line you are triggering in the regex. However, I would question the suitability of the video in any case. It is clearly a prototype (no stickers) and probably the manufacturer's video. There is no indication that the uploader has permission and it is probably a copyright violation. As such, we shouldn't link to it.
1838:
of AFC reviewers to get the article perfect. The purpose of AFC is only to check that the material is not a copyvio, POV, advertising, non-notable or otherwise a heap of crap. I have removed the duplicate posting which was your other objection and fixed some other cosmetic stuff, so you should have no problem passing the article now, should you?
4069:. I thought it might be country specific, but I get the same result after trying all the likely country codes. I can only conclude you entered it wrong. The best search term (for Scholar) is "John Diesel" which finds the maximum number of relevant hits with the minimum number of false positives. It returns all the J Diesels and JW Diesels.
4096:
the median... But I cannot impose my standards, of course, so I go with the current consensus. There have been previous discussions about this on the talk page of ACADEMIC and in different AfDs, without ever coming to a clear conclusions on what is an acceptable citation rate. As for GS: I just ran the searches again and 39 results
4065:"John Wallace Diesel" is definitely a poor choice of search term, it will only return results that have "Wallace" actually written in the source (you can check what the source has by clicking on the "cite" link). I get the same result as you for that. I don't understand why you do not get more results for "JW Diesel", I get
2563:
single reference to find it, which makes it very difficult for them. Is there something they missed? If there is, please link to it and I can advise you further from there how to proceed. If not, you will have to wait for the subject to gain some actual notabiity before he can have an article on
Knowledge.
1955:
look at them, I was only looking at your links. You came to my attention because you posted links in an article on my watchlist. The first link I would definitely remove (and probably will now you have brought it to my attention), any page that has a big "request a quote" button is a big no-no. It fails
2947:
4019:
Sorry, I'm not going to revert my close because you DONTLIKEIT. There were arguments from the sources, and potential sources, in the keep camp, as well as them being in the majority, so yes, I did give due weight to policy based argument. Possibly not the way I would have voted personally, but that
3947:
deletion has nothing to do with copyright, it is deletion of an article that gives no indication of the importance of the subject. But I tell you what I'll do with this one, I'll restore it and send it for a deletion debate where the community can decide. As it stands, it will probably end up being
3060:
Regarding the deletion of Blanca Gómez's blp. Why did you discount my vote on the grounds of failing to "present some kind of rationale why the subject should be kept"? My rationale was, as I stated, that the only thing wrong with the blp was the link rot. If you don't agree with my rationale, or you
2708:
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine
2552:
The debate was held open for ten days, substantially longer than the required seven days. Nobody in the debate except you, the creator of the aricle, called for it to be kept. No evidence of notability of the subject was presented in the debate. Thus, the deletion process was properly followed and
1837:
You are not supposed to fail articles for a lack of inline citations. To quote the reviewing instructions "Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material". The article has a ton of good quality scholarly references. It is not the role
614:
As I say, I am not going to get involved in this, and looking at those edits I don't think there is any need for outside help, only rational editor discussion is needed. There is certainly no call for administrator action; I don't see any evidence that you are being bullied. If you insist on having
535:
before. Many people weighed in and a majority of them did not object to a majority of content I added. The RfC was closed as "no consensus to not include", but I found that some content was removed anyway after the RfC due to no "consensus to include". Another editor virtually declined to participate
4565:
Hi
Spinningspark. The page Hard Rain SoloistEnsemble was deleted. As a new user I'm a little confused about what went wrong and find it hard to cut through all the wiki jargon. I'd like to attempt to improve the article and get it to a point where it can be acceptable to Knowledge. Perhaps you could
4095:
scientists with these citation rates, probably not even an obituary when they pass away. In life sciences, an h about equal to the number of years a scientist has been active after their PhD is about the median. Someone who has been active for 30 years and has an h of 19 is therefore decidedly below
3649:
I'd like to say I am not that person. Basically I was in the process of creating short articles wherever a template had a red link and this was in the hope of seeing them flourish over time from other editors. I am presuming their original outlook was very different, if not then I assure you this is
3106:
Just let you know that we would like to remove the page of Blanca Gomez, since 'the community' already decided to delete it with out enough evidence. We can mention a lot of examples in wikipidia that don't have any relevance as a 'notable' journalists. We don't want 'public debates' under her name.
2562:
As pointed out in the debate, many of the references are unacceptable on
Knowledge, like about.com and facebook. Most, if not all, of the rest do not even mention the subject so evidence of notability is lacking within the article. If there is something in there, reviewers would have to read every
2520:
The Gregg L Greer article was hastily deleted outside of meeting the established criteria and I believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide on the overturn of the original decision and restore the page. I'm requesting a secondary review of the AFD information relevant prior
2083:
Thank you
Spinningspark for taking the time to teach me the ropes. I will try not to make anymore mistakes, but please go easy on me while I learn. I will carefully read the content and post the articles as a reference if they make sense. For your edification, the articles I added were written by
1922:
I would really appreciate the feedback since my intent is not to spam
Knowledge in anyway. As a matter of fact, I am one of the most loyal followers, reason I make sure I financially support it year after year. I am a true believer of what you do here. and that is the reason I take the time to add
1889:
Well first of all they are to the site of a commercial company. That is always a bad sign. There are also multiple instances of them across multiple articles all to the same company. That is usually an indication that someone is trying to spam us. Your account has done pretty much nothing except
1860:
Hi there. I just received a message that you had removed one or more external links I added to the page
Elastomer, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. These are great technical articles that go in great detail about elastomers, so I am a bit puzzled. For future reference,
939:
It is not for me to unpick your edits a piece at a time either. Your edits amount to a change to your personal preference for formatting. They are adding nothing substantive to the article. Knowledge is not losing anything by reverting them. Instead of starting a war, go to the article talk page
4326:
Thanks for message. I wasn't aware that the same content was at AFD, but I'm not clear what remedial action you are proposing I take. The main user page isn't the appropriate place for a draft article anyway, and you say it exists already in article space. Do you want me to restore the content in a
2736:
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly
4370:
I was servicing a routine G6 request by Roman
Spinner asserted to be uncontroversial. I did not look into it too closely, I thought maybe it was a WP:COMMONNAME issue, and it seemed fairly harmless, not requiring a big investigation. It was not "obviously" controversial until you undid Spinner's
2724:
decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose
Knowledge to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the
2693:
Hello Spinningspark. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the
2003:
of such sources, depending on exactly what information was being verified by the source. In any case book sources and published scholarly papers are much to be preferred for technical information if at all possible. Advertising does not entirely rule out a site for the purpose of either external
3013:
The article was proposed for deletion with the concern that it "doesn't meet Knowledge notability guidelines". Articles can only be deleted under this process if the deletion is not challenged. Since you are challenging, I have restored the article. However, please be aware that any editor can
2347:
I had added Carol Baxter's account of the "Salt Hill" Murder of Sarah Hart by John Tawell, "The Electric Constable", to the bibliography, but apparently you saw fit to remove it (or to have it removed) suggesting it was a fictional account. Ms Baxter, a criminal historian from Australia, wrote a
1977:
That makes sense. Thank you for taking the time to explain. In that case, let me ask you another question before I make another mistake. I noticed in the Injection Molding section, there is a reference by Thomasnet.com It says (1) Liquid Injection Molding and it takes you to a commercial page
1954:
Jackie, learn to sign your posts. I could make a career out of sifting through Knowledge removing all inappropriate links. It would be a full time job. I don't do it because I have better things to do here. I guess you are asking why I didn't remove those other links – simple answer, I didn't
1757:
I revised "Creg Robinson" to "Greg Robinson" in the citations to Japanese in New York City entry. The author's name for the articles cited in this entry is Greg Robinson. It is easy to check this. However, you undid my revisions so that it reads "Creg Robinson." I think it would be helpful to
3585:
DLD - Digital Logic Design is a new educational tool to provide assistance in teaching those subject areas mentioned in the article. The references given in the article are related to those subjects which are using some old tools for teaching those subjects. Those tools are either outdated or no
1466:
I am not questioning the blacklisting at all. I am just wondering what to do if other people can no longer add to the talk page because the existing blacklisting blocks page saves. Perhaps the blacklisted link from that other post can simply be removed, or stored in a way that does not block the
666:
I looked at the specific edits you explicitly brought to my attention and asked me to comment on. As I have said, I am not going to get involved in the dispute so it is useless to keep coming back at me. You asked for a comment, you got it, sorry if you don't like it but this discussion is now
4090:
I agree it's on the margin, given that he published mainly in the 60s. Personally, I actually think that our standards for including academics are too low, the figures I gave above are what is common practice in AfDs for academics. An h of 19 is, in many fields, actually quite mediocre (not in
1894:, especially the first point of links normally to be avoided - "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." In other words, we want Knowledge articles to be expanded in preference to pointing readers to other sites.
3212:
As I said in my closing remarks, you need to e-mail me first. Attachments cannot be sent through Knowledge e-mail, so you need to let me know your e-mail address before anything can be sent. Sending me a message is the easiest way to do this and avoids revealing your e-mail address online.
3259:
There is no need to ping me on my own talk page (and I watchlist any page I write to so usually it is not necessary to ping me at all). To e-mail me: while you are on my talk page or user page, go to the tools menu in the sidebar and click "email this user" then follow the instructions.
353:
Thank you for the answer. For the moment, I changed again the definition at the top because to say that a material is a single substance is wrong. For example the steel is a material formed mainly by two substances (carbon and iron). I will create the page "Material" as soon as possible.
494:
It is not really possible to give an opinion without seeing the discussion in question, but in general, if nobody agrees with you, then you might want to consider the possibility that you are wrong. As an aside, posting "queries on three message boards" will probably be viewed as
320:. They should never contain encyclopaedic information and thus never require references. Their only purpose is to direct the reader to the article they are looking for. As such, only the bare minimum of text necessary to distinguish the required article is needed on the page.
2487:
I'm not inclined to help save an article where the debate is being overrun with people canvassed from the outside who are completely clueless about Knowledge requirments. Maybe the article should be saved, but I'm not going to help. There is plenty of manpower in the army of
1736:
Thanks for indulging my comments on that review. :) I had one remaining question (really a clarification of a comment), but that can be answered at your leisure. the article certainly meets the GA criteria and I have no issue passing it with that question outstanding. Thanks.
2110:
and nominated it for DYK. Several articles about the topic just came through my RSS reader today. As the topic includes the word Zombie, it would be perfect for tomorrow, but I realize this is exceptionally late notice, so may not be possible. Anything to be done you think?
2406:
Thank you for your response. If you would add it to "Further reading" that would be fine. I know what you mean by Ms Baxter's style - all her books are written like that, but I can vouch for the fact that she researches them and they are meant as factual accounts.
252:
I'd be happy to help, are you working on something somewhere? My work on nothing was a kind of penance for a bad mistake I made early on involving that article (it nearly derailed my RFA). It was really a one-off, but I guess I could do something useful with
3337:
1998:
I'm not sure which article you are talking about there. Perhaps you can give a link to it. Yes, references do have different rules. If that is where the information genuinely came from that is what should be cited. However, I might question the
3448:
1305:
Can you review my pending changes on the "Carl Freer" Knowledge page? I am a clear, concise writer. I am well educated. And this page, and several other pages, have issues related to grammar, word choice, editorializing, and misrepresentations.
4288:
FYI, your reverting of a linked citation to remove an erroneous credit killed the very citation link to support the edit. Therefore, I reverted the deletion and corrected the citation. BTW, I am the one wearing the capote in the article.
3992:
comment, with which I would concur. Your close seems to have counted votes rather than giving due weight to policy-based argument. The keep !votes are mostly endorsing a couple of earlier "keeps" which themselves amount to little more than
3928:
Hi, you removed Oxygine again with reason "A7" but it is not true right now. Article was fixed. It is not article about blog or something else. It is article about free open source technology. And it doesn't have any copy pasted text from
1439:
159:
It's probably ok, but I'm inclined to let it run till tomorrow at least to give him a chance to calm down and take it all in. I really don't want to have to block him and leaving the article protected removes the temptation.
4091:
mathematics or humanities, but in high citation fields like physics or life sciences) and by accepting such a large bar we get stuck with a large number of stubs that are difficult to expand, because nobody will ever write
3937:
My fault that I didn't wait review and moved it from draft directly to articles because I saw warning that review could take very long time. I didn't know that it is forbidden. What I could do now to unlock it? Thank you.
3942:
It's not a requirement that you wait for a review, and you haven't broken any rules by posting the article yourself, but you were unwise to do so because a reviewer could have told you what problems the article had. The
3401:
3080:
which is an argument routinely ignored by closing admins in AFD debates, which I did in this case. I was only doing you a favour by letting you know that for future reference. Use the information however you like.
3621:
I get the impression from previous deletions of yours that any new editor creating pages like this are Tobias Conradi. But I don't know anything about the history of that user so I'm not sure. Can you glance at
4072:
It's a pity this was closed before the issue could be bottomed out. It's also a pity that there is not more guidance in WP:PROF on this. As it stands, there is huge room for disagreement and your target of h:
2800:
but two of the articles submitted in joint AFD were not deleted nor any mention of their being judged notable on their individual merits (Jeff Rosenthal, Pete Gross and redirects: Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Peter R.
4183:
The first sentence in this page says "In the context of vectors and phasors, the term phase angle refers to the angular component of the polar coordinate representation." I don't understand the reason for your
536:
in the RfC, yet was displeased with the results and went ahead after the RfC to remove even more content. Therefore I've lost quite a bit of faith in (not the actual RfC process) but the "post-RfC" follow-up.
2821:
I've fixed the link. There was no mistake, all of the articles are deleted. I moved two unrelated articles back to their original titles as suggested in the debate, which is why they are now showing blue.
2004:
links or references, but it is often a bad sign. The plastics industry is well established and there is a huge body of material written about it. It should not be difficult to find a book source for any
1654:
4352:(Deletion log); 20:19:40 . . Spinningspark (talk | contribs) deleted page The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man's Changing Vision of the Universe (G6: Deleted to make room for an uncontroversial page move)
3135:(see the page at the bottom, under the discussion, for more) and has blanked the page several times. I don't have the policy on-hand saying why that can't happen but figured you'd be able to sort it out.
2348:
fully well-researched factual account in this book, and if you have doubts I would suggest you get a copy and read it. I would respectfully request to put the citation I had back in the bibliography.
3388:
I would have preferred that you had added a note explaining your analysis of the close, but the case being made for keep was compelling and sets a good precedent for future discussions. Thank you, --
2949:. Now, that having been said, it may still be resolvable with normal editing, I'll leave that to your best judgment, of course, but that's what I was looking at. No worries either way. Cheers, --
2087:
Thank you for your patience and for taking the time out of your personal life to keep Knowledge a reliable source of information. Now I know that my financial support is going to the right cause!
3478:
1978:
where it has a button "Find Suppliers" and also an advertisement banner on the right (It says advertisement on top). Is that ok because it is a reference inside the article posted in wikipedia?
3168:
creating promotional pages for them) we can courtesy blank the debate. I have now done this, but you should note that editors can still access the debate online through the page history.
1595:
1341:
579:
Ok. Let's not talk about the RfC stuff, there's clearly too much history. Would you be willing to instead focus on the most recent edits to the article instead? From the "stable" state of
4074:=19 amounts to no more than just opinion. Anyway, with an h-index of around 12, Diesel is not so far off that target so I trust we can at least agree he is on the margins of notability.
3333:
3664:
I'm not seeing any obvious intersection with either this user or the previously deleted articles. I can't really remember how I got involved with this. You might be better off asking
961:
3076:
Saying that there is not anything wrong with an article is not a a policy based rationale, nor does it counter the claim that the subject is not notable. It is merely an example of
4566:
send me the original article I posted so that I can amend as necessary and I would welcome any advice you can give as to what I might do, specifically, to make it fit for purpose.
4260:
I added the GA icon, and Legobot promptly added the oldid to the template on the talk page. Not sure what's going on there, but I think it's fixed now; please let me know if not.
1671:
4471:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
1521:
Thanks! No time now, but there is that recent result on the optimal 26 quarter-turn solution, and I think it might be nice to have a couple of comments about beginner solutions.
3981:
715:
275:
article). We also need to watch out that Russell's sometimes idiosyncratic views do not poke through unattributed. But ff that's the kind of help you want, just let me know.
4541:
3131:
I've directed Blanquska here as you seem to be the final authority here by closing the AfD. User(s) (seems to be a shared account) is/are adamantly requesting deletion of the
2768:
2946:
I know DupeDet has been flaky recently, but I'm seeing a fair number of 10+ word sequence matches, more if you look carefully at the contexts of the ones DupeDet does find:
2701:
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when
4050:
100 citations, h-index of about 19 or more; lower for low citation fields such as mathematics or humanities, for the latter we often rely more on book reviews and such). --
1676:
563:
I'm really not very inclined to get involved in this, but a 15-point RfC and you expected it to come to a firm conclusion? Try something a little more specific next time.
3698:
3489:
3786:
3826:
1540:
3738:
3164:, but you will be wasting your time going there, the page won't get deleted. However, to save the embarassment of the subject (something that should be thought about
1649:
1395:
1238:
723:
4432:
1011:
740:
4049:
As an aside, it wouldn't have changed my !vote, as those citation data are way below the level that is normally judged to meet ACADEMIC (several articles with : -->
2753:
2472:
still has a couple of issues, one of which is that this page was nominated for deletion. You may help improving the page further and rescue it if your time permits.
4400:
4382:
3092:
2019:
1905:
1034:
4147:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
2854:
2833:
1730:
1371:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
4408:
780:
1590:
4304:
I already replied to you on the article talk page. Congratulations on getting into a Knowledge article, but I don't think that really helps your position :-)
3906:
2547:
2531:
2530:{{TempUndelete}} Is my request for article while under review for restore. If consensus can not be meet for any reason, on any of the request please advise.--
1292:
379:
363:
348:
3029:
2574:
2096:
2056:
1946:
637:
On September 8, Toronto dropped an assault charge against Bieber originally brought up in January 29 for an incident with a limousine driver in December 2013.
4449:
3778:
3764:
3659:
3509:
2503:
1855:
1849:
1781:
introduced multiple citation errors (follow the link and scroll down to the article to see what I mean). After reverting you I corrected the author name in
1084:
678:
661:
626:
609:
574:
558:
514:
4277:
4255:
4031:
2037:
1824:
1335:
955:
528:
I posted on 3 message boards almost simultaneously linking and directing them to contribute the Bieber talk page discussion, so I don't think that's guilty?
3989:
2688:
4482:
4315:
3679:
2896:
True enough, but the symbol on a circuit diagram will (usually) be an algebraic variable standing in for an actual number. For instance, one might write
2659:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2400:
2272:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
1516:
1500:
1476:
1453:
4109:
4085:
3797:
2972:
2249:
1309:
I will be glad to contribute to Knowledge. In return, I ask only that you review my edits fairly as your time permits. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.
447:
3179:
1530:
2636:
2076:
1970:
1796:
1767:
1432:
4532:
4171:
2935:
1233:
3884:
3866:
3271:
3224:
3050:
3000:
2793:-- link broken, needs opening bracket -- I would have fixed it but I know regular editors are not supposed to touch the closed out AFD work products.
1179:
1139:
801:
427:
411:
286:
228:
183:
171:
154:
138:
2741:; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
1706:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1625:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1268:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1209:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
910:
3155:
2702:
2433:
2374:
1169:
1153:
940:
and make your case for the changes. If you can get anyone to agree that the article ought to be changed then we can make the changes. Until then
854:
707:
2191:
2170:
2150:
4418:
3594:
2991:
wiki page and would like to make necessary modifications so that the page meets needed guidelines. The page is linked in multiple Wiki articles.
2539:
2088:
2048:
1986:
1934:
1872:
860:
3132:
1746:
1752:
4562:
3712:
3299:
3247:
1400:
797:
4364:
3291:
3254:
3239:
3207:
3191:
2296:
1802:
2955:
1861:
I'd appreciate if you can let me know what was inappropriate about them so I am more careful when adding references or information sources.
432:
Hi Dan, you need to be aware that it is a breach of etiquette on this site to ask editors to reveal their real-life identities. Please see
121:
4244:
It also hasn't put the GA template on the article or added the reviewed version link to the talk page. Perhaps you should do it manually.
3606:
3561:
819:
532:
419:
246:
2709:
in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied
2259:
1134:
1028:
213:
4455:
3070:
2683:
2646:
2008:
fact that needs citing. Google books is a good place to search for sources, many publishers allow google to show a preview of the book.
1109:
719:
4238:
3580:
3122:
2705:
in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
2481:
2062:
That's ok as a reference, but as I said, a better (more reliable) source could easily be found. The very first result on google books
1811:
Hello, saw your good work on the equivalent pig article, thought you might have advice/interest in this AFC draft that just popped up:
722:. Because it's ANI, I think I'm required to give you a formal notice that I mentioned you, in case you wish to comment. The thread is
3160:
User Deadbeef is correct, deletion debates are never deleted. To answer your question, the correct venue to request a deletion is at
2334:
4391:
Well, not quite, as I'd already undone one of his moves, and this was noted on the talk page at that point. But, its not a big thing
3963:
3750:
3396:
760:
4298:
3769:
Oh, sorry, I didn't know - I thought you were responsible for reassessment:) Still thanks for directing me to the appropriate place)
4117:
1656:
1622:
1372:
920:
Reverting is not your tool to stop my edits until you approve of them. If you believe one specific part of the edits is wrong then
3061:
think that it is insufficient then that is fine, but I would be grateful if you would not state that that I didn't present any. --
4217:
I've passed Henry Nock as a GA. For some reason Legobot did not post the usual notification, but as far as I can tell I updated
2527:
Please: Endorse the original closing decision; or Reverse the deletion, or submit to the appropriate forum for reconsideration.
2342:
933:
4339:
4097:
3918:
3849:
3749:
What has that got to do with me? I don't have an interest in football articles and don't usually assess them. Take it up with
3375:
2908:
of the component. This can be seen to be so by the fact that the symbols can subsequently be used in an equation, for instance
1570:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1318:
1064:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
991:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
890:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
403:
I will understand if you don't wish to do this and I wanted to first ask before simply using the article name as the reference.
4013:
3742:
2815:
814:
310:
2805:
Only mentioning it as I checked my watchlist and in case you may have inadvertently overlooked something. Yours respectfully,
1707:
1626:
1269:
1210:
1017:
Placed this one as GA on Hold. Quite minor issues really, shouldn't be too hard to address. Great work overall!! Good luck, —
735:
499:
and asking me as well just makes that worse. One way of getting more editors involved to help reach a consensus is to open a
4487:
4066:
3238:
I could not find a way to send you message which would be private as I do not want to reveal my email address. Please guide.
2978:
756:
753:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
102:
3643:
1758:
readers of this entry if the author's name is listed correctly. I would appreciate it if you could correct this. Thanks.
488:
4478:
4428:
4273:
4234:
4207:
4193:
3734:
2764:
2473:
1089:
647:
595:
544:
474:
218:
2941:
2890:
1778:
4269:
4230:
4059:
2458:
1608:
1601:
1354:
1347:
1310:
1116:
974:
967:
925:
2596:
1417:
and I cannot save the page. This is not a link in my edit, but seems to be contained in one of the comments under talk,
4637:
4629:
4624:
4612:
4607:
4602:
4134:
3566:
2213:
1693:
1612:
1358:
1255:
1196:
808:
and haven't gotten anyone yet. Is there anyplace else I can go to get physics-knowledgeable outside editors? Thanks,
805:
195:
144:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
4464:
3800:. I am inviting you to try the improved script! It makes relisting and closing debates much easier and now works in
4549:
3161:
2656:
2509:
2429:
2370:
2269:
2197:
1782:
1405:
Hi Spinningspark, sorry to bother you, not sure whether you are the person to ask. When trying to add to the talk on
2120:
397:
I have completed a short assignment and have used your information on Stethoscopes as research material. Thank you.
3541:
3483:
3199:
2580:
1703:
389:
227:, and (perhaps despite this), I was wondering if you could help build an article on the rather abstract concept of
1462:
Ok, so it seems that somebody else added a link to the talk page which is now blacklisted. It's the link under 3.
146:
3438:
3403:
2760:
2694:
issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to
1421:. Never had this before (but I have limited Wiki experience). Any suggestion what to do about this? Many thanks.
1265:
400:
May I have your surname and first initial for correct APA v6.0 referencing style? I wish to credit you properly.
267:
2729:}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=
839:
None of these ISBNs seem to resolve and I'm in general not qualified to determine if this is a hoax or other bs.
4396:
4360:
3708:
3602:
3148:
3066:
2679:
2166:
1942:
1880:
459:
1489:
Are you trying to edit the whole page? If so, try editing just the relevant section, or start a new section.
3434:
3098:
2622:
1916:
745:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
523:, see the last two discussions (last is more important) and the corresponding edits leading to discussion at
500:
271:. Doing that again will, of course, weight the article to Western thinkers (something still apparent in the
3336:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
1912:
1463:
3994:
201:
2749:
2492:
at the AFD debate to do any necessary work. And if they don't do it or mess it up, I don't really care.
2301:
1689:
1682:
1553:
1546:
632:
583:'s edit to the present state? That's less than 10 edits. Then the only relevant talk page discussion is
301:. Please revert your revert and I will be happy to write a page about materials if necessary. Thanks. --
4581:
3655:
3380:
2660:
2642:
2273:
2255:
1251:
1244:
1047:
1040:
584:
433:
359:
306:
143:
Based on the latest comments by Petershatner do you think removing the protection would be appropriate?
38:
4100:. "John Diesel" gives 59 results. I never use a country-specific site, but always the .com version. --
800:
and if you are inclined, giving your opinion. I wouldn't ask, but I posted requests for opinions on
4392:
4356:
4212:
3872:
3831:
3704:
3685:
3668:
who was the blocking admin (although talk page claims he is retired, he is still very much editing).
3062:
3046:
2996:
2744:
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--
2554:
2535:
2468:
Thanks for detecting and removing this tag mentioning copy-paste yields false-positive. This page at
2047:
If you scroll all the way down to reference, you will see the and the link to the article. Thanks!
324:
3818:
to make that process easier. Please do check out the description page and give it a try! Thanks. —
3650:
a co-incidence. Once the deletion notices started coming (after just two), I stopped immediately. --
298:
4344:
4283:
3774:
3493:
2845:
2806:
2477:
2463:
1820:
655:
603:
552:
496:
482:
2557:
as this will only look at the process followed. It will not allow a renewed debate to take place.
4590:
4444:
4377:
4310:
4265:
4250:
4226:
4167:
4119:
4080:
4043:
4026:
4009:
3958:
3923:
3861:
3759:
3674:
3513:
3473:
3266:
3219:
3174:
3087:
3024:
2967:
2930:
2828:
2569:
2498:
2395:
2071:
2032:
2014:
1965:
1900:
1844:
1812:
1804:
1791:
1678:
1597:
1542:
1511:
1495:
1448:
1343:
1330:
1314:
1240:
1181:
1148:
1036:
963:
950:
929:
862:
673:
621:
569:
509:
442:
374:
343:
281:
166:
133:
47:
17:
1662:
You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic.
127:
Thanks, but I just realised that myself and fully protected the article while you were writing.
4558:
4321:
3525:
2063:
1206:
696:
2589:
2206:
796:
between another editor and I. If you have time, I wonder if you would mind taking a look at
323:
By all means write an article, but before doing so the disambiguation page should be moved to
4529:
4294:
3651:
3639:
3631:
3305:
2601:
2489:
2425:
2366:
2291:
2218:
2180:
1526:
1472:
1428:
785:
355:
302:
3804:. Support has been added to deal with some incompatibility it had with other gadgets (like
3363:
3014:
initiate a full deletion debate and the article may still end up deleted if not fixed. See
176:
Its OK either way, I am involved so it is up to you, just thought it might be a good idea.
4105:
4055:
3730:
3590:
3557:
3537:
3533:
3392:
3371:
3055:
3042:
3008:
2992:
2953:
2745:
2446:
2417:
2358:
2330:
1982:
1930:
1868:
850:
580:
415:
200:
Hi Spinningspark, the user actually did say what article it was, just above your comment -
8:
4473:
4423:
4334:
4221:
correctly, and Legobot has removed the nomination from GAN, so I think everything is OK.
4176:
3770:
3325:
3118:
1832:
1816:
915:
711:
640:
639:
I really doubt that there is POV here. In any case, thanks for your time, SpinningSpark.
588:
537:
467:
1413:
The following link has triggered a protection filter: google.com ... =bv.68911936,d.c2E
4439:
4372:
4305:
4261:
4245:
4222:
4163:
4158:
4075:
4021:
4005:
3953:
3856:
3754:
3669:
3598:
3468:
3285:
3261:
3233:
3214:
3169:
3143:
3082:
3036:
3019:
2962:
2925:
2864:
2823:
2673:
2626:
2564:
2493:
2440:
2390:
2187:
2160:
2146:
2127:
2116:
2092:
2066:
2052:
2027:
2009:
1990:
1960:
1938:
1915:
under Elastomer. It is a commercial site. What would the difference be? or this one
1895:
1876:
1839:
1786:
1777:. I don't dispute that you have the correct name, but that's not why I reverted you.
1763:
1506:
1490:
1443:
1325:
1297:
1143:
945:
668:
616:
564:
520:
504:
437:
369:
338:
276:
161:
128:
2639:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2310:
2252:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
4554:
4203:
4189:
3998:
3972:
3898:
3837:
3821:
3549:
3422:
3407:
3077:
2887:
2234:
2225:
2044:
1911:
Thank you for the detailed explanation. Let me ask you, I see for example this link
1742:
1726:
1586:
1192:
1185:
1120:
873:
866:
825:
776:
767:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
731:
209:
3753:, or else you can assess it yourself if you haven't been a major contributor to it.
2779:
4290:
3914:
3880:
3845:
3801:
3718:
3635:
3613:
3501:
3295:
3243:
3195:
2738:
2617:
2608:
2454:
2421:
2384:
2362:
2283:
2263:
1522:
1468:
1424:
844:
746:
331:
262:
241:
180:
151:
118:
2650:
4468:
4457:
4218:
4198:
I saw your most recent edits, which clarify the article significantly. Thank you!
4148:
4101:
4051:
3812:
3805:
3627:
3623:
3553:
3529:
3497:
3457:
3437:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
3389:
3367:
3316:
2950:
2326:
2239:
2026:
Jackie, the correct way to sign your posts is with four tildes (like this: ~~~~)
1667:
1561:
1055:
982:
881:
111:
104:
4589:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3944:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4328:
4144:
4037:
4001:. I would prefer that you self revert and allow another admin to deal with it.
3362:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
3114:
2177:
1956:
1891:
1645:
1391:
1368:
1288:
1229:
1165:
1130:
1105:
1080:
1024:
1007:
906:
809:
292:
114:
will not stop the user from readding the BLP material as he is autoconfirmed.
458:
Hello SpinningSpark, I'm writing to you because you originally responded to a
3545:
3517:
3138:
2669:
2183:
2156:
2142:
2135:
2131:
2112:
1774:
1759:
1406:
793:
786:
524:
453:
3855:
The image was created by me. I am hardly likely to object to my own image!
4199:
4185:
4154:
3949:
3521:
3381:
3185:
3015:
2988:
2980:
2875:
2139:
2000:
1738:
1722:
1717:
1713:
1632:
1582:
1577:
1573:
1557:
1378:
1275:
1216:
1067:
1051:
994:
978:
893:
877:
772:
768:
750:
727:
205:
3697:
Thanks for taking the time to write up a thorough and thoughtful close at
1917:
http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/plastics-rubber/liquid-injection-molding
1552:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1046:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
973:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
872:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
4177:
3910:
3876:
3841:
3505:
2773:
2630:
2450:
2107:
2101:
1913:
http://www.customadvanced.com/common-properties-of-rubber-elastomers.html
832:
232:
177:
148:
115:
4493:
4130:
4123:
3985:
3665:
3190:
Please share the copy of the article ButN which I had up on Knowledge.
1663:
4355:
The move is obviously not uncontroversial. Could you explain, please?
3429:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
1923:
good content (or for what at least I believe to be excellent content)
1698:
1617:
1260:
1201:
3902:
3894:
3893:
About vector images: can you produce a new one from (inspiration of)
3690:
3575:
3430:
2613:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
2243:
2230:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
1641:
1636:
1387:
1382:
1284:
1279:
1225:
1220:
1160:
1125:
1100:
1076:
1071:
1019:
1003:
998:
902:
897:
835:
has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
254:
4500:
2045:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Injection_molding_of_liquid_silicone_rubber
223:
I mean that literally - I noticed that you've done a lot of work on
4525:
4510:
3724:
3456:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
2870:
1919:
under Liquid Injection Molding. That is also a commercial site.
941:
631:
I acknowledge that the sentence you brought up might have had POV.
337:
on the page to get an admin to delete it so a move can take place.
3984:. I find the outcome of no consensus surprising, given that admin
3952:
which gives a simple overview of our requirements for an article.
3321:
2323:
50,000 edits deserves a hearty "Well done!" and a pat on the back.
3425:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
2900:
next to a resistor, or one might generalise that with the symbol
317:
258:
224:
2713:, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the
204:. Just thought you might want to re-word your reply. Regards,
3982:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Singapore
3358:
J. H. Gridley, ''Principles of Electrical Transmission Lines in
3329:
798:
Talk:Electromagnet#The term "ferromagnetic" in the introduction
4139:
3934:
1363:
3699:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kedar Joshi (2nd nomination)
1566:
1060:
987:
886:
3948:
deleted for lack of notability. I recommend that you read
3808:). It also makes use of the new relist count parameter in
3415:
2714:
2126:
Pinging a few other reviewers and admins for wider notice.
316:
I think you have misunderstood what dab pages are for, see
2469:
3871:
Ops, now I see... Good work!! Well, about Ashby's image,
3445:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
3041:. Will improve the article as per notability guidelines.
327:. When you have an article ready you will need to place
2725:
page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=
2553:
in my opinion it would be a waste of time to request a
749:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
297:
If you need it, I can give billions of reference about
3433:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
2521:
to deletion. The context seemed to be misinterpreted.
3930:
2737:
informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with
3701:. That went above and beyond, and I appreciate it.
3492:, for deletion. Might I also suggest the following?
2635:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2248:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3798:
Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD
3787:
Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CloseAFD
3332:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just
2250:
Template:Did you know nominations/Impedance analogy
1657:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) Media Viewer RfC
635:Instead, in my last edit, the sentence I added was
633:
I had already stopped advocating for its insertion.
4528:, and thanks for your contributions to Knowledge.
3110:Please let me know if its a procedure to follow .
2869:Hi, I saw you undid my revision to the article on
2637:Template:Did you know nominations/Mobility analogy
436:for the correct forms to cite Knowledge articles.
3901:(or updating it!)? There are more work to do at
802:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electrical engineering
741:Disambiguation link notification for September 12
3488:Hi Spinningspark - you've suggested my article,
3345:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
2987:I would like to know the reason for deletion of
2445:Thank you for your really thorough GA review on
1419:Semi-protected edit request (II) on 15 June 2014
1140:User:Spinningspark/Why I don't upload to Commons
4409:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jeung Lai Chuen
3727:be reassessed as it does not look like a stub
2625:being proposed as a new theoretical element of
708:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
4042:There's something weird here. If I just click
2789:a) In the closing adjudication lede sentence:
1505:I've moved the problem thread to the archive.
368:So steel is not a substance by your thinking?
3935:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_game_engines
3571:No, I don't have access to the book sources.
2720:If you do find a copyright violation, please
1856:Spinningspark left you a message on Knowledge
944:says we should stick to the status quo ante.
464:ignoring a significant amount of my arguments
4524:Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
2791:"The result was delete. Delete all except ]"
2689:Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
2629:and later fabricated as a real component in
4020:is not how AFDs are supposed to be closed.
3723:Hello, Spinningspark. I suggest an article
531:As an aside I've previously contributed to
3933:You could see hundred similar acticles on
3796:You are invited to join the discussion at
718:. I briefly mentioned your close of the
3751:Knowledge:WikiProject Football/Assessment
3466:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
3018:for a brief summary of the requirements.
2605:was updated with a fact from the article
2222:was updated with a fact from the article
4438:Try reading my closing rationale again.
4151:for things which need to be addressed.
2470:http://en.wikipedia.org/B._S._Daya_Sagar
1375:for things which need to be addressed.
792:There is an edit conflict developing on
1623:Talk:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
1373:Talk:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
14:
4587:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4143:. The article is close to meeting the
3290:sent you email. Please check. Thanks.
2615:... that a theoretical problem in the
1753:Your edit of Japanese in New York City
1367:. The article is close to meeting the
843:To reply, leave a comment on Talain's
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3319:. I have automatically detected that
2717:is very useful for sussing that out.)
1115:For example, how come you don't want
4568:
3357:In the words of Gridley <ref: -->
2584:
2201:
820:I have unreviewed a page you curated
25:
1401:Problem adding to Rubik's Cube page
1117:File:Impedance analogy resistor.svg
1098:thingies on the images you made? —
1094:Just curious, how come you put the
706:There is currently a discussion at
23:
4499:
4492:
4417:!vote out of five participants in
3689:
3414:
2065:gives a similar list of machines.
1609:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
1602:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
1355:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
1348:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
975:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
968:Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle
806:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Physics
585:Talk:Justin Bieber#Toronto assault
24:
4651:
3162:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
2844:Oh, I see. Thanks. My apologies.
2317:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
4572:
4540:Send New Year cheer by adding {{
4138:
3791:
3542:Donnchadh Mac an Caoilfhiaclaigh
3310:
3035:Appreciate your speedy response
2588:
2309:
2205:
1697:
1616:
1565:
1362:
1324:Sorry, not my area of interest.
1259:
1200:
1059:
986:
885:
701:
29:
2343:John Tawell - Carol Baxter book
1704:Talk:Foster's reactance theorem
1266:Talk:Indoor-outdoor thermometer
268:A History of Western Philosophy
4327:user sandbox? Happy New Year,
2961:Ok, that's convincing enough.
2242:is analogous to an electrical
1234:20:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
1110:20:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
1085:18:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
1012:18:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
956:00:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
934:23:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
911:23:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
855:22:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
815:21:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
781:09:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
736:22:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
679:15:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
662:14:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
627:07:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
610:04:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
257:. Most of my contribution to
110:The protection you applied to
13:
1:
4488:Happy New Year Spinningspark!
4340:17:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
4316:12:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
4299:12:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
4278:13:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
4256:18:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
4239:11:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
4208:16:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
4194:16:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
4172:04:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
4110:09:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
4086:08:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
4060:07:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
4032:18:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
4014:18:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
3964:18:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
3919:16:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
3885:16:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
3867:14:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
3850:10:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
3827:16:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
3779:20:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
3765:14:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
3743:14:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
3713:03:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
3680:22:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
3660:15:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
3644:15:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
3607:05:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
3581:01:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
2973:20:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
2956:19:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
2936:09:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
2891:02:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
2855:15:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
2834:15:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
2816:13:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
2785:and happened to notice that:
2769:02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
2754:02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
2684:12:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
2575:18:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
2540:16:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
2504:12:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
2482:11:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
2459:10:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
2043:Here is the link to the page
1440:triggering the spam blacklist
575:23:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
559:23:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
515:15:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
489:14:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
460:help desk query I had earlier
448:08:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
420:05:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
380:08:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
364:03:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
4421:makes a consensus to keep.--
3562:20:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
3479:20:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
3397:19:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
3376:17:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
3300:17:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3272:17:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3248:17:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3225:15:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3200:05:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3180:15:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3156:04:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3123:04:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3093:01:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3071:23:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3051:10:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3030:10:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3001:10:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
2434:07:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
2401:22:22, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
2375:20:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
2335:20:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
2297:00:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
2192:19:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
2171:19:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
2151:19:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
2121:19:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
2097:15:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2077:15:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2057:14:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2038:14:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2020:14:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
1971:23:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1947:22:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1906:22:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1850:19:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1825:19:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1797:12:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
1768:14:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
1467:page. Thanks for your help!
1090:Images for Impedance analogy
219:Can you help with something?
202:Psychopathy in the workplace
7:
4563:13:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
4533:14:17, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4483:14:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4450:13:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4433:13:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4401:18:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4383:11:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4365:10:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
4004:Have a good festive season.
3897:, converting to a SVG like
3133:Blanca Gómez AfD discussion
1747:02:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
1731:02:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
1710:to appear in Did you know.
1672:19:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
1650:18:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
1629:to appear in Did you know.
1591:17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1531:18:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
1517:20:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1501:18:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1477:17:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1454:12:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1433:06:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
1396:03:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
1336:21:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1319:21:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1293:03:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1272:to appear in Did you know.
1213:to appear in Did you know.
1170:18:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1154:16:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1135:14:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1029:02:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
527:. RE: Forum shopping -: -->
349:14:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
311:12:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
287:09:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
247:03:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
214:14:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
184:19:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
172:17:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
155:17:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
139:15:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
122:15:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
10:
4656:
4463:An editor has asked for a
4044:the link on top of the AfD
3840:illustration now is ok. --
3567:DLD - Digital Logic Design
3364:these opt-out instructions
2761:MediaWiki message delivery
2232:... that according to the
1690:Foster's reactance theorem
1683:Foster's reactance theorem
1554:Foster's reactance theorem
1547:Foster's reactance theorem
1252:Indoor-outdoor thermometer
1245:Indoor-outdoor thermometer
1158:Understood, no worries! —
1048:Indoor-outdoor thermometer
1041:Indoor-outdoor thermometer
196:Help Desk - Youtube Thread
4550:Hard Rain SoloistEnsemble
4542:subst:Happy New Year 2015
2942:Here's what I was seeing:
2655:, and it may be added to
2510:Deletion of Gregg L Greer
2308:
2293:Penny for your thoughts?
2268:, and it may be added to
2198:DYK for Impedance analogy
1560:-status according to the
1054:-status according to the
981:-status according to the
880:-status according to the
325:material (disambiguation)
4137:has been placed on hold
3980:Regarding your close of
3494:Laurentius of Echternach
3484:Suggestions for deletion
3459:leaving us some feedback
3435:create articles yourself
2581:DYK for Mobility analogy
2449:. It was very helpful.
1926:Awaiting your response
1892:external links guideline
1361:has been placed on hold
716:Barney the barney barney
390:Regarding referencing...
3875:, I need some help. --
3836:Hello, please check if
3514:Laisren of Cloonkerrill
3490:Aed mac Brian Ó hUiginn
3338:my operator's talk page
1813:Draft:Jeju_black_cattle
1805:Draft:Jeju_black_cattle
1409:, I get an error about
519:Okay, here's the link.
18:User talk:Spinningspark
4544:}} to user talk pages.
4504:
4497:
3907:Talk:Analogical_models
3895:my File:Blackbox3D.png
3694:
3419:
2904:. That is, the resist
2661:Did you know talk page
2274:Did you know talk page
1207:Talk:Impedance analogy
841:
4585:of past discussions.
4503:
4496:
4153:Message delivered by
4145:good article criteria
3995:WP:Other stuff exists
3693:
3632:User:Marcus Az-Absent
3526:Tom O'Connor (priest)
3439:Articles for Creation
3418:
3404:Articles for creation
3099:Blanca Gomez deletion
2703:hallmarks of copyvios
1712:Message delivered by
1631:Message delivered by
1572:Message delivered by
1377:Message delivered by
1369:good article criteria
1274:Message delivered by
1215:Message delivered by
1066:Message delivered by
993:Message delivered by
892:Message delivered by
837:
824:Thanks for reviewing
42:of past discussions.
4456:Deletion review for
4413:I don't see how one
4393:William M. Connolley
4357:William M. Connolley
3705:Lesser Cartographies
3538:Mo Lua of Kilmoluagh
3328:may have broken the
3063:The Vintage Feminist
2447:Oil shale in Estonia
769:opt-out instructions
4133:you nominated as a
3510:Adrian James Martyn
3402:Your submission at
3326:Standing wave ratio
2657:the statistics page
2627:mechanical networks
2302:A barnstar for you!
2270:the statistics page
1692:you nominated as a
1611:you nominated as a
1357:you nominated as a
1254:you nominated as a
1195:you nominated as a
724:What started it all
501:Request for comment
4505:
4498:
3977:Hi Spinningspark.
3931:http://oxygine.org
3695:
3420:
3350:, radartutorial.eu
2514:Hi SpinningSpark,
1655:Please comment on
1556:you nominated for
1302:Hi SpinningSpark,
1050:you nominated for
977:you nominated for
876:you nominated for
828:, Spinningspark.
759:• Join us at the
521:Talk:Justin Bieber
4643:
4642:
4597:
4596:
4591:current talk page
4545:
4476:
4426:
4213:Passed Henry Nock
4161:
3903:black box article
3899:File:Blackbox.svg
3873:see are my answer
3838:Analogical models
3832:Analogical models
3745:
3733:comment added by
3686:A kitten for you!
3610:
3593:comment added by
3423:Brahim Darghouthi
3410:has been accepted
3408:Brahim Darghouthi
2667:
2666:
2654:
2437:
2420:comment added by
2378:
2361:comment added by
2340:
2339:
2280:
2279:
2267:
2235:impedance analogy
2226:Impedance analogy
1994:
1985:comment added by
1950:
1933:comment added by
1885:
1871:comment added by
1720:
1639:
1580:
1385:
1282:
1223:
1193:Impedance analogy
1186:Impedance analogy
1121:Wikimedia Commons
1074:
1001:
900:
874:Impedance analogy
867:Impedance analogy
826:Impedance analogy
764:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4647:
4621:
4599:
4598:
4576:
4575:
4569:
4539:
4516:
4472:
4422:
4349:I'm puzzled by:
4345:The Sleepwalkers
4337:
4284:Capote (garment)
4152:
4142:
3825:
3817:
3811:
3795:
3794:
3728:
3652:Marcus Az-Absent
3609:
3587:
3552:. Thanking you,
3502:Simon of Ireland
3461:
3451:
3355:
3341:
3314:
3313:
3289:
3258:
3237:
3211:
3154:
3153:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3012:
2899:
2889:
2885:
2880:
2852:
2813:
2640:
2618:mobility analogy
2609:Mobility analogy
2597:17 November 2014
2592:
2585:
2551:
2464:B. S. Daya Sagar
2436:
2414:
2410:Than you again.
2388:
2377:
2355:
2313:
2306:
2305:
2294:
2288:
2253:
2209:
2202:
2181:7%266%3Dthirteen
1993:
1979:
1949:
1927:
1884:
1865:
1836:
1711:
1701:
1630:
1620:
1571:
1569:
1376:
1366:
1273:
1263:
1214:
1204:
1065:
1063:
992:
990:
891:
889:
857:
812:
754:
747:Oppenheimer pole
705:
704:
658:
652:
645:
606:
600:
593:
555:
549:
542:
533:an RfC on Bieber
485:
479:
472:
434:Citing Knowledge
431:
356:Daniele Pugliesi
336:
330:
303:Daniele Pugliesi
263:Bertrand Russell
239:
112:William Shatner
105:William Shatner
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4655:
4654:
4650:
4649:
4648:
4646:
4645:
4644:
4617:
4573:
4552:
4547:
4546:
4517:
4507:
4490:
4481:
4469:Jeung Lai Chuen
4465:deletion review
4461:
4458:Jeung Lai Chuen
4431:
4411:
4353:
4347:
4335:
4324:
4286:
4219:Talk:Henry Nock
4215:
4181:
4157:, on behalf of
4149:Talk:Henry Nock
4127:
4040:
3975:
3926:
3924:Oxygine deleted
3834:
3819:
3815:
3809:
3792:
3789:
3721:
3688:
3634:and confirm? --
3628:Time in Austria
3624:Time in Albania
3616:
3588:
3569:
3534:Néide mac Onchú
3530:Frances Moffett
3498:Miles de Angulo
3486:
3481:
3447:
3441:if you prefer.
3412:
3386:
3351:
3320:
3311:
3308:
3283:
3252:
3231:
3205:
3188:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3137:
3136:
3101:
3058:
3043:Girishgullapudi
3009:Girishgullapudi
3006:
2993:Girishgullapudi
2985:
2944:
2897:
2881:
2876:
2874:
2867:
2849:Quis separabit?
2846:
2810:Quis separabit?
2807:
2776:
2746:Fuhghettaboutit
2715:Wayback Machine
2691:
2583:
2555:deletion review
2548:Greeralivetoday
2545:
2532:Greeralivetoday
2512:
2466:
2443:
2415:
2382:
2356:
2345:
2304:
2292:
2284:
2214:2 November 2014
2200:
2155:Interesting....
2106:I just created
2104:
1980:
1928:
1866:
1858:
1830:
1809:
1755:
1716:, on behalf of
1686:
1660:
1635:, on behalf of
1605:
1576:, on behalf of
1550:
1403:
1381:, on behalf of
1351:
1300:
1278:, on behalf of
1248:
1219:, on behalf of
1189:
1092:
1070:, on behalf of
1044:
997:, on behalf of
971:
924:edit those out.
918:
896:, on behalf of
870:
848:
822:
810:
790:
761:DPL WikiProject
743:
726:. Thank you.
720:John Mutton AfD
702:
699:
656:
648:
641:
604:
596:
589:
553:
545:
538:
483:
475:
468:
456:
425:
392:
334:
328:
295:
233:
221:
198:
108:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4653:
4641:
4640:
4635:
4632:
4627:
4622:
4615:
4610:
4605:
4595:
4594:
4577:
4551:
4548:
4538:
4536:
4535:
4523:
4511:Happy New Year
4506:
4491:
4489:
4486:
4477:
4474:JohnBlackburne
4460:
4454:
4453:
4452:
4427:
4424:JohnBlackburne
4410:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4386:
4385:
4351:
4346:
4343:
4323:
4322:User:Wasif0909
4320:
4319:
4318:
4285:
4282:
4281:
4280:
4258:
4214:
4211:
4180:
4175:
4126:
4122:nomination of
4116:
4115:
4114:
4113:
4112:
4070:
4039:
4036:
4035:
4034:
3974:
3971:
3967:
3966:
3925:
3922:
3892:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3887:
3833:
3830:
3788:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3771:Oldstone James
3735:86.174.186.110
3720:
3717:
3715:
3687:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3662:
3615:
3612:
3568:
3565:
3485:
3482:
3464:
3463:
3454:
3427:
3413:
3411:
3400:
3385:
3379:
3360:
3359:
3347:
3346:
3307:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3279:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3228:
3227:
3187:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3158:
3129:
3100:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3057:
3054:
3033:
3032:
2984:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2943:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2866:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2837:
2836:
2803:
2802:
2796:b) Result was
2794:
2775:
2772:
2732:
2728:
2711:from the draft
2698:in particular.
2690:
2687:
2665:
2664:
2593:
2582:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2559:
2558:
2511:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2474:14.139.157.211
2465:
2462:
2442:
2439:
2404:
2403:
2344:
2341:
2338:
2337:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2314:
2303:
2300:
2278:
2277:
2210:
2199:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2103:
2100:
2082:
2080:
2079:
2041:
2040:
2023:
2022:
1976:
1974:
1973:
1909:
1908:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1833:MatthewVanitas
1817:MatthewVanitas
1808:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1685:
1681:nomination of
1675:
1659:
1653:
1604:
1600:nomination of
1594:
1549:
1545:nomination of
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1519:
1503:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1457:
1456:
1402:
1399:
1350:
1346:nomination of
1340:
1339:
1338:
1299:
1296:
1247:
1243:nomination of
1237:
1188:
1184:nomination of
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1091:
1088:
1043:
1039:nomination of
1033:
1032:
1031:
970:
966:nomination of
960:
959:
958:
917:
914:
869:
865:nomination of
859:
853:comment added
831:Unfortunately
821:
818:
789:
784:
742:
739:
712:DangerousPanda
698:
697:ANI discussion
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
529:
497:forum shopping
455:
452:
451:
450:
409:
406:Kind regards,
391:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
321:
294:
291:
290:
289:
220:
217:
197:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
107:
103:Protection of
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4652:
4639:
4636:
4633:
4631:
4628:
4626:
4623:
4620:
4616:
4614:
4611:
4609:
4606:
4604:
4601:
4600:
4592:
4588:
4584:
4583:
4578:
4571:
4570:
4567:
4564:
4560:
4556:
4543:
4537:
4534:
4531:
4527:
4521:
4520:Spinningspark
4515:
4514:
4512:
4502:
4495:
4485:
4484:
4480:
4475:
4470:
4466:
4459:
4451:
4448:
4447:
4443:
4442:
4437:
4436:
4435:
4434:
4430:
4425:
4420:
4416:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4389:
4388:
4387:
4384:
4381:
4380:
4376:
4375:
4369:
4368:
4367:
4366:
4362:
4358:
4350:
4342:
4341:
4338:
4332:
4331:
4317:
4314:
4313:
4309:
4308:
4303:
4302:
4301:
4300:
4296:
4292:
4279:
4275:
4271:
4267:
4263:
4262:Mike Christie
4259:
4257:
4254:
4253:
4249:
4248:
4243:
4242:
4241:
4240:
4236:
4232:
4228:
4224:
4223:Mike Christie
4220:
4210:
4209:
4205:
4201:
4196:
4195:
4191:
4187:
4179:
4174:
4173:
4169:
4165:
4164:Mike Christie
4160:
4159:Mike Christie
4156:
4150:
4146:
4141:
4136:
4132:
4125:
4121:
4111:
4107:
4103:
4099:
4094:
4089:
4088:
4087:
4084:
4083:
4079:
4078:
4071:
4068:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4061:
4057:
4053:
4047:
4045:
4033:
4030:
4029:
4025:
4024:
4018:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4011:
4007:
4002:
4000:
3996:
3991:
3987:
3983:
3978:
3970:
3965:
3962:
3961:
3957:
3956:
3951:
3946:
3941:
3940:
3939:
3936:
3932:
3921:
3920:
3916:
3912:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3896:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3874:
3870:
3869:
3868:
3865:
3864:
3860:
3859:
3854:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3847:
3843:
3839:
3829:
3828:
3823:
3814:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3780:
3776:
3772:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3763:
3762:
3758:
3757:
3752:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3744:
3740:
3736:
3732:
3726:
3716:
3714:
3710:
3706:
3702:
3700:
3692:
3681:
3678:
3677:
3673:
3672:
3667:
3663:
3661:
3657:
3653:
3648:
3647:
3646:
3645:
3641:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3625:
3619:
3611:
3608:
3604:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3583:
3582:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3564:
3563:
3559:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3546:Margaret Athy
3543:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3518:Thomas Cawley
3515:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3491:
3480:
3477:
3476:
3472:
3471:
3467:
3460:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3440:
3436:
3432:
3426:
3424:
3417:
3409:
3405:
3399:
3398:
3394:
3391:
3383:
3378:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3356:</ref: -->
3354:
3349:
3348:
3344:
3343:
3342:
3339:
3335:
3334:edit the page
3331:
3327:
3323:
3318:
3306:December 2014
3301:
3297:
3293:
3287:
3286:Spinningspark
3282:
3281:
3280:
3273:
3270:
3269:
3265:
3264:
3256:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3235:
3234:Spinningspark
3230:
3229:
3226:
3223:
3222:
3218:
3217:
3209:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3181:
3178:
3177:
3173:
3172:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3157:
3152:
3147:
3142:
3134:
3130:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3111:
3108:
3104:
3094:
3091:
3090:
3086:
3085:
3079:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3068:
3064:
3053:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3039:
3031:
3028:
3027:
3023:
3022:
3017:
3010:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2982:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2966:
2965:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2948:
2937:
2934:
2933:
2929:
2928:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2888:
2886:
2884:
2879:
2872:
2856:
2853:
2851:
2850:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2838:
2835:
2832:
2831:
2827:
2826:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2811:
2799:
2795:
2792:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2784:
2783:
2771:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2757:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2742:
2740:
2734:
2731:URL of source
2730:
2727:URL of source
2726:
2723:
2718:
2716:
2712:
2706:
2704:
2699:
2697:
2686:
2685:
2681:
2678:
2675:
2671:
2662:
2658:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2638:
2634:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2619:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2604:
2603:
2598:
2594:
2591:
2587:
2586:
2576:
2573:
2572:
2568:
2567:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2549:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2526:
2522:
2519:
2515:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2461:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2438:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2411:
2408:
2402:
2399:
2398:
2394:
2393:
2386:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2352:
2349:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2322:
2321:
2318:
2315:
2312:
2307:
2299:
2298:
2295:
2289:
2287:
2275:
2271:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2251:
2247:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2221:
2220:
2215:
2211:
2208:
2204:
2203:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2165:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2128:Carlojoseph14
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2109:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2085:
2078:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2064:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2025:
2024:
2021:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2007:
2002:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1964:
1963:
1958:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1924:
1920:
1918:
1914:
1907:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1864:Best regards,
1862:
1851:
1848:
1847:
1843:
1842:
1834:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1815:. Take care,
1814:
1806:
1803:Guidance for
1798:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1715:
1709:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1684:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1658:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1634:
1628:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1603:
1599:
1593:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1548:
1544:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1408:
1398:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1345:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:24.242.94.114
1307:
1303:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1277:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1187:
1183:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1062:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1042:
1038:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
996:
989:
984:
980:
976:
969:
965:
957:
954:
953:
949:
948:
943:
938:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
926:87.254.66.250
923:
913:
912:
908:
904:
899:
895:
888:
883:
879:
875:
868:
864:
858:
856:
852:
846:
840:
836:
834:
829:
827:
817:
816:
813:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:Electromagnet
788:
787:Electromagnet
783:
782:
778:
774:
770:
765:
762:
758:
752:
748:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
680:
677:
676:
672:
671:
665:
664:
663:
660:
659:
653:
651:
646:
644:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
625:
624:
620:
619:
613:
612:
611:
608:
607:
601:
599:
594:
592:
587:. Thank you.
586:
582:
578:
577:
576:
573:
572:
568:
567:
562:
561:
560:
557:
556:
550:
548:
543:
541:
534:
530:
526:
525:Justin Bieber
522:
518:
517:
516:
513:
512:
508:
507:
502:
498:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
486:
480:
478:
473:
471:
465:
461:
449:
446:
445:
441:
440:
435:
429:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
381:
378:
377:
373:
372:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
347:
346:
342:
341:
333:
326:
322:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
288:
285:
284:
280:
279:
274:
270:
269:
264:
261:was based on
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
244:
240:
238:
237:
230:
226:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
185:
182:
179:
175:
174:
173:
170:
169:
165:
164:
158:
157:
156:
153:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
140:
137:
136:
132:
131:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
117:
113:
106:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4618:
4586:
4580:
4555:Greg caffrey
4553:
4530:NorthAmerica
4519:
4518:
4509:
4508:
4462:
4445:
4440:
4414:
4412:
4378:
4373:
4354:
4348:
4329:
4325:
4311:
4306:
4287:
4251:
4246:
4216:
4197:
4182:
4135:good article
4129:The article
4128:
4098:for "John W"
4092:
4081:
4076:
4048:
4041:
4027:
4022:
4003:
3979:
3976:
3968:
3959:
3954:
3927:
3891:
3862:
3857:
3835:
3822:Technical 13
3790:
3760:
3755:
3729:— Preceding
3722:
3703:
3696:
3675:
3670:
3620:
3617:
3589:— Preceding
3584:
3573:
3572:
3570:
3550:Scandlán Mór
3522:Markus Casey
3487:
3474:
3469:
3465:
3446:
3428:
3421:
3387:
3382:Jonah Falcon
3361:
3352:
3309:
3278:
3267:
3262:
3220:
3215:
3189:
3175:
3170:
3165:
3112:
3109:
3105:
3102:
3088:
3083:
3059:
3056:Blanca Gómez
3037:
3034:
3025:
3020:
2989:Aditya Music
2986:
2981:Aditya Music
2979:Deletion of
2968:
2963:
2945:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2882:
2877:
2868:
2848:
2847:
2829:
2824:
2809:
2808:
2804:
2797:
2790:
2781:
2780:watchlisted
2777:
2758:
2743:
2739:weasel words
2735:
2721:
2719:
2710:
2707:
2700:
2695:
2692:
2676:
2668:
2651:daily totals
2616:
2614:
2607:
2606:
2602:Did you know
2600:
2570:
2565:
2529:
2524:
2523:
2517:
2516:
2513:
2499:
2494:
2467:
2444:
2416:— Preceding
2412:
2409:
2405:
2396:
2391:
2357:— Preceding
2353:
2350:
2346:
2316:
2285:
2281:
2264:daily totals
2233:
2231:
2224:
2223:
2219:Did you know
2217:
2163:
2105:
2086:
2081:
2072:
2067:
2042:
2033:
2028:
2015:
2010:
2005:
1981:— Preceding
1975:
1966:
1961:
1929:— Preceding
1925:
1921:
1910:
1901:
1896:
1867:— Preceding
1863:
1859:
1845:
1840:
1810:
1792:
1787:
1756:
1694:good article
1688:The article
1687:
1661:
1613:good article
1607:The article
1606:
1551:
1512:
1507:
1496:
1491:
1449:
1444:
1423:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1407:Rubik's Cube
1404:
1359:good article
1353:The article
1352:
1331:
1326:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1256:good article
1250:The article
1249:
1197:good article
1191:The article
1190:
1159:
1149:
1144:
1124:
1099:
1096:local copies
1095:
1093:
1045:
1018:
972:
951:
946:
921:
919:
871:
849:— Preceding
842:
838:
830:
823:
791:
766:
751:Port Augusta
744:
714:'s block of
700:
674:
669:
654:
649:
642:
636:
622:
617:
602:
597:
590:
570:
565:
551:
546:
539:
510:
505:
481:
476:
469:
463:
457:
443:
438:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
375:
370:
344:
339:
296:
282:
277:
272:
266:
242:
235:
234:
222:
199:
167:
162:
134:
129:
109:
75:
43:
37:
4579:This is an
4336:talk to me?
4291:Steelbeard1
4178:Phase angle
3636:Floquenbeam
3506:Martin Coen
3315:Hello, I'm
2631:Formula One
2621:led to the
2490:meatpuppets
2422:JesseLeiman
2385:JesseLeiman
2363:JesseLeiman
2351:Thank you.
2286:HJ Mitchell
2108:Zombie star
2001:reliability
1708:nominate it
1696:has passed
1627:nominate it
1615:has passed
1523:Randinfogen
1469:Randinfogen
1464:found here.
1425:Randinfogen
1270:nominate it
1258:has passed
1211:nominate it
1199:has passed
916:RLC circuit
410:Dan Gamble
36:This is an
4638:Archive 25
4630:Archive 20
4625:Archive 19
4619:Archive 18
4613:Archive 17
4608:Archive 16
4603:Archive 15
4131:Henry Nock
4124:Henry Nock
4102:Randykitty
4067:86 results
4052:Randykitty
3999:WP:ILIKEIT
3986:User:slakr
3969:Thank you
3666:user:Dpmuk
3554:Fergananim
3390:Scalhotrod
3368:BracketBot
3366:. Thanks,
3317:BracketBot
3078:WP:ILIKEIT
2951:j⚛e decker
2865:Inductors?
2798:delete all
2759:Sent via--
2647:live views
2643:here's how
2441:Thank you!
2327:Tom Morris
2260:live views
2256:here's how
1298:Carl Freer
771:. Thanks,
710:regarding
428:Mambogambo
412:Mambogambo
231:. Cheers!
95:Archive 25
87:Archive 20
82:Archive 19
76:Archive 18
70:Archive 17
65:Archive 16
60:Archive 15
4330:Jimfbleak
3988:had made
3973:AfD close
3449:help desk
3431:Knowledge
3322:your edit
3115:Blanquska
2670:Cas Liber
2244:capacitor
2178:Prioryman
2157:Cas Liber
2006:technical
1783:this edit
1779:Your edit
1119:moved to
845:talk page
811:Chetvorno
755:Read the
255:something
229:Something
4526:New Year
4441:Spinning
4419:this AfD
4374:Spinning
4307:Spinning
4270:contribs
4247:Spinning
4231:contribs
4077:Spinning
4023:Spinning
3955:Spinning
3909:)... --
3858:Spinning
3756:Spinning
3731:unsigned
3725:FC Tosno
3719:FC Tosno
3671:Spinning
3614:Time in
3603:contribs
3595:Drmajidn
3591:unsigned
3470:Spinning
3263:Spinning
3216:Spinning
3171:Spinning
3084:Spinning
3038:Spinning
3021:Spinning
2964:Spinning
2927:Spinning
2871:inductor
2825:Spinning
2782:this AFD
2680:contribs
2566:Spinning
2495:Spinning
2430:contribs
2418:unsigned
2392:Spinning
2371:contribs
2359:unsigned
2184:Gaijin42
2167:contribs
2143:Gaijin42
2136:Casliber
2132:Hawkeye7
2113:Gaijin42
2089:JackieBM
2068:Spinning
2049:JackieBM
2029:Spinning
2011:Spinning
1987:JackieBM
1983:JackieBM
1962:Spinning
1943:contribs
1935:JackieBM
1931:JackieBM
1897:Spinning
1881:contribs
1873:JackieBM
1869:unsigned
1841:Spinning
1788:Spinning
1775:Gordonap
1760:Gordonap
1562:criteria
1508:Spinning
1492:Spinning
1445:Spinning
1438:You are
1327:Spinning
1145:Spinning
1056:criteria
983:criteria
947:Spinning
942:MOS:MATH
882:criteria
670:Spinning
643:starship
618:Spinning
591:starship
566:Spinning
540:starship
506:Spinning
470:starship
439:Spinning
371:Spinning
340:Spinning
278:Spinning
163:Spinning
130:Spinning
4582:archive
4274:library
4235:library
4200:Brirush
4186:Brirush
4184:revert.
4155:Legobot
4006:Charles
3618:Hi SS,
2801:Gross).
2623:inerter
2525:Restore
2140:Smartse
1739:Protonk
1723:Protonk
1718:Protonk
1714:Legobot
1633:Legobot
1583:Protonk
1578:Protonk
1574:Legobot
1379:Legobot
1276:Legobot
1217:Legobot
1068:Legobot
995:Legobot
894:Legobot
851:undated
773:DPL bot
728:Msnicki
667:ended.
657:~ regal
605:~ regal
581:SNUGGUM
554:~ regal
484:~ regal
394:Hello,
332:Db-move
318:MOS:DAB
273:nothing
259:nothing
225:Nothing
206:CaptRik
39:archive
4371:move.
4038:Diesel
3911:Krauss
3877:Krauss
3842:Krauss
3813:Relist
3802:Vector
3393:(Talk)
3330:syntax
3292:Adsyvb
3255:Adsyvb
3240:Adsyvb
3208:Adsyvb
3192:Adsyvb
3166:before
3128:Spark,
3113:Thanks
2778:Hi, I
2722:do not
2451:Beagel
2413:Jeff
2354:Jeff
2240:spring
1702:; see
1621:; see
1264:; see
1205:; see
1123:??? —
833:Talain
650:.paint
598:.paint
547:.paint
477:.paint
293:Revert
236:bd2412
4479:deeds
4446:Spark
4429:deeds
4379:Spark
4312:Spark
4252:Spark
4118:Your
4093:about
4082:Spark
4028:Spark
3960:Spark
3950:WP:42
3905:(and
3863:Spark
3806:wikEd
3761:Spark
3676:Spark
3475:Spark
3384:- AfD
3268:Spark
3221:Spark
3176:Spark
3089:Spark
3026:Spark
3016:WP:42
2969:Spark
2932:Spark
2898:680 Ω
2830:Spark
2571:Spark
2500:Spark
2397:Spark
2073:Spark
2034:Spark
2016:Spark
1967:Spark
1902:Spark
1846:Spark
1793:Spark
1677:Your
1664:Alsee
1596:Your
1541:Your
1513:Spark
1497:Spark
1450:Spark
1342:Your
1332:Spark
1239:Your
1180:Your
1150:Spark
1035:Your
962:Your
952:Spark
861:Your
804:and
675:Spark
623:Spark
571:Spark
511:Spark
454:Hello
444:Spark
376:Spark
345:Spark
283:Spark
168:Spark
135:Spark
16:<
4559:talk
4415:keep
4397:talk
4361:talk
4295:talk
4266:talk
4227:talk
4204:talk
4190:talk
4168:talk
4106:talk
4056:talk
4010:talk
3997:and
3990:this
3915:talk
3881:talk
3846:talk
3820:{{U|
3775:talk
3739:talk
3709:talk
3656:talk
3640:talk
3630:and
3626:and
3599:talk
3576:Swpb
3558:talk
3395:☮ღ☺
3372:talk
3296:talk
3244:talk
3196:talk
3186:ButN
3119:talk
3103:Hi,
3067:talk
3047:talk
2997:talk
2983:page
2906:ance
2883:4444
2765:talk
2750:talk
2674:talk
2536:talk
2518:Note
2478:talk
2455:talk
2426:talk
2367:talk
2331:talk
2238:, a
2188:talk
2161:talk
2147:talk
2117:talk
2093:talk
2053:talk
1991:talk
1957:ELNO
1939:talk
1877:talk
1821:talk
1773:Hi,
1764:talk
1743:talk
1727:talk
1668:talk
1646:talk
1642:Cirt
1637:Cirt
1587:talk
1527:talk
1473:talk
1429:talk
1392:talk
1388:Cirt
1383:Cirt
1315:talk
1289:talk
1285:Cirt
1280:Cirt
1230:talk
1226:Cirt
1221:Cirt
1166:talk
1161:Cirt
1131:talk
1126:Cirt
1106:talk
1101:Cirt
1081:talk
1077:Cirt
1072:Cirt
1025:talk
1020:Cirt
1008:talk
1004:Cirt
999:Cirt
930:talk
907:talk
903:Cirt
898:Cirt
777:talk
732:talk
416:talk
360:talk
307:talk
299:this
210:talk
4467:of
4272:-
4233:-
4162:--
4073:-->
3824:}}
3324:to
3150:eef
3140:Dea
2878:KDS
2774:AFD
2733:}}.
2696:you
2595:On
2212:On
2102:dYK
1721:--
1640:--
1581:--
1386:--
1283:--
1224:--
1075:--
1002:--
922:you
901:--
847:.
757:FAQ
265:'s
181:fan
152:fan
119:fan
4634:→
4561:)
4399:)
4363:)
4333:-
4297:)
4276:)
4268:-
4237:)
4229:-
4206:)
4192:)
4170:)
4120:GA
4108:)
4058:)
4012:)
3945:A7
3917:)
3883:)
3848:)
3816:}}
3810:{{
3777:)
3741:)
3711:)
3658:)
3642:)
3605:)
3601:•
3560:)
3548:,
3544:,
3540:,
3536:,
3532:,
3528:,
3524:,
3520:,
3516:,
3512:,
3508:,
3504:,
3500:,
3496:,
3406::
3374:)
3298:)
3246:)
3198:)
3145:db
3121:)
3069:)
3049:)
2999:)
2767:)
2752:)
2682:)
2649:,
2645:,
2599:,
2538:)
2480:)
2457:)
2432:)
2428:•
2373:)
2369:•
2333:)
2290:|
2262:,
2258:,
2216:,
2190:)
2169:)
2149:)
2138:,
2134:,
2130:,
2119:)
2095:)
2055:)
1945:)
1941:•
1883:)
1879:•
1823:)
1766:)
1745:)
1729:)
1679:GA
1670:)
1648:)
1598:GA
1589:)
1564:.
1558:GA
1543:GA
1529:)
1475:)
1431:)
1394:)
1344:GA
1317:)
1291:)
1241:GA
1232:)
1182:GA
1168:)
1142:.
1133:)
1108:)
1083:)
1058:.
1052:GA
1037:GA
1027:)
1010:)
985:.
979:GA
964:GA
932:)
909:)
884:.
878:GA
863:GA
779:)
734:)
503:.
418:)
362:)
354:--
335:}}
329:{{
309:)
212:)
178:GB
149:GB
116:GB
91:→
4593:.
4557:(
4522:,
4513:!
4395:(
4359:(
4293:(
4264:(
4225:(
4202:(
4188:(
4166:(
4104:(
4054:(
4008:(
3913:(
3879:(
3844:(
3773:(
3737:(
3707:(
3654:(
3638:(
3597:(
3574:—
3556:(
3462:.
3453:.
3370:(
3353:]
3340:.
3294:(
3288::
3284:@
3257::
3253:@
3242:(
3236::
3232:@
3210::
3206:@
3194:(
3117:(
3065:(
3045:(
3011::
3007:@
2995:(
2922:L
2920:ω
2918:j
2916:+
2914:R
2912:=
2910:Z
2902:R
2763:(
2756:.
2748:(
2677:·
2672:(
2663:.
2653:)
2641:(
2633:?
2550::
2546:@
2534:(
2476:(
2453:(
2424:(
2387::
2383:@
2365:(
2329:(
2325:—
2282:—
2276:.
2266:)
2254:(
2246:?
2186:(
2164:·
2159:(
2145:(
2115:(
2091:(
2051:(
1989:(
1937:(
1875:(
1835::
1831:@
1819:(
1807:?
1762:(
1741:(
1725:(
1666:(
1644:(
1585:(
1525:(
1471:(
1427:(
1390:(
1313:(
1287:(
1228:(
1164:(
1129:(
1104:(
1079:(
1023:(
1006:(
928:(
905:(
775:(
763:.
730:(
430::
426:@
414:(
358:(
305:(
243:T
208:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.