User talk:Red-tailed hawk/Archive 3

4193:! I really appreciate the time you took to review my Australian Journal of Labour Law draft. Seriously, I know there is a huge backlog. Thank you so much! So, I know that creating a new article is a big deal, and actually I wanted to wait a while before I did this! However, in the list of journal articles on Knowledge, there is a note saying it is incomplete. This is one of the articles listed, but without a bluelink to click on. This journal is referenced in dozens of court cases, in books, etc/ I can easily provide a reference list to those, but they are not really relevant to Knowledge. I only created this article because it was a redlink listed in a Knowledge list, and thought that it would be a good place to start. Most journal articles do not get any press coverage or anything, their notability comes from being cited in other academic papers. The only thing I could do is add a list to the article showing where it has been cited previously? Happy to do that. Most people never talk about a journal article unless they are citing it? If you feel there is no way this article will get published, I will just let this go. There are only two journals in the Knowledge list which do not have entries, this is one of those two, I just wanted to complete that list. Most of the other journals are all stubs, because there is not much to say about them. I guess I could look up some famous cases or other scholars that have cited the journal? Anyway, thanks so much. Cheers, 2701:. While I understand your concern about WikiEd (and I did not realize this at the time I nominated the page for redirection), I really am confused by your decision to unilaterally close the discussion as a speedy keep. I'd ask that you reverse your speedy closure; an argument is provided for redirection in the AfD, which is enough to avoid the speedy closure criterion that you cited. I did not support a merger myself; I supported a redirect while keeping the history in order to make the redundancy eliminated and so the article subject could be covered in one place. While this does not explicitly prohibit editors from taking text from one to the other, I'm not advocating for a merge of the article content, so this doesn't meet 1734:) but was reverted by the closer and told to take my objections to the administrator’s noticeboard. Should you be dissatisfied with the outcome of your current discussion with the closer, will you take your objections to the admin noticeboard as advised by the closer? Or will you leave it as us? If you do decide to take it to the noticeboard would you mind if I deferred to you to take the lead in writing the challenge? Your contributions on the subject article’s talk page and your aggregate contributions to the encyclopedia would appear to indicate that your commitment to this rsn closure issue and overall experience far exceeds mine 1319:

to the article (IP editor) also positively added something about another magician (COI?), as well as the person who wrote on the talk page about the conviction was another SPA account -- sounds like someone is very intent on making his crimes more public knowledge. Perhaps a victim, but also possibly an adversary in the field. Which even while the information is accurate it is a tiny but concerning. But to be clear motives do not detract from truth. And if Oliver is free to promote himself, others are equally free to factually detract from his public image.

2815: 31: 4310: 183: 2850: 5064: 4041: 3124: 268: 977: 2349: 4412: 3701: 2952: 3179:, which is excessively lengthy, but if you have, you will see that I am trying to arrange a set of RFCs, and that we aren't there yet, largely because I am having a difficult time in getting the participants to keep focused on what I see as the objective of putting together a set of RFCs, and also because there was a discussion of whether to AFD the article, which seemed to be decided as not taking the article to AFD, until it was taken to AFD. 1964:. However, due to your, ahem, humorous username, it is unlikely that your request will be considered. Since you will be regularly interacting with new editors, many of whom will be justifiably upset at being accused of abusing multiple accounts, you'll need to have a more appropriate username. I'd also recommend getting a username change if you intend on ever running for adminship, since that alone will get it shot down. Cheers! 2478: 4970: 4881: 3822: 3239:. I don't see any way that the current deletion discussion ends in a consensus to delete, though a "no consensus" outcome is honestly probably the most destructive thing that could happen because this will lead to everyone pressing the same deletion arguments and keep arguments again with the almost certain possibility that canvassing will occur because this is obviously a topic that a lot of people online seem to care about. 1036: 1636:. Except when community consensus is clearly established in discussions, such as from the result of an RfC or as from the result of substantial discussions with high participation, the RSP listing isn't necessarily reflecting community consensus. Discussion on RSN might actually help to flush this out a bit and to improve the extent to which the RSP listing can be seen as proceeding from a community consensus. 895: 323: 2256:, Love your detailed explanation as always! When we list a source like a video and it has the name of the cast members, is it considered a valid link? I understand you can't use the IMDB entry as a valid source. But how about a real video of the content? For instance, if I say the subject has done voices for X,Y and Z and then link to the actual voice mimic audio file, is that considered valid? 4361: 4454: 4243: 112: 3923: 1682: 2680:. The WikiEd dashboard seems to be down right now, but I'd hazard a guess that the latter was the article they were assigned, but that since their instructions directed them to make a userspace draft, they then didn't know how to reconcile the two versions. I'm just going to merge them and explain what I did to the editor; AfDs can be extremely alienating to new editors. – 2618:. You can easily unmask it if you disagree. I left the gallery section at the end of the article because they are photos of alumni mentioned in the text. In some places you'll see I masked irrelevant information. If you disagree with any of the masking you can simply remove the arrow dash characters before and after it and the sentence will be reinstated. 574:. That seemed to be the frame in which the community was discussing the issue. And, it did not seem like there was a general consensus to purge Olympics participation from a presumption of notability outside of that scope. The discussion focused on the general notion of participation in the Olympics, rather than participation in any 1752:. I think that the most proper way to move forward, for now, is to discuss the close with the closer on their talk page. It is generally improper for a closed discussion to be re-opened by a user other than the uninvolved closer unilaterally. I find substantial issues with the top line summary of the close in light of 579:

for a presumption of notability) would presumably grant enough significant coverage (or plain notability by some other measure) for a competitor in that particular sport. Or editors could apply a similar analysis and find that, for a particular sport, the top X people are presumed notable where X is not three.

4506:

Thank you for leaving this message. I left a detailed description of how I evaluated the sources atop the submitted draft. Many of the sources were plainly not independent due to their author also being involved in running the organization, though for other sources I've made notes on the page itself.

4481:

Comments regarding the review say references "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". I was wondering if you could expound on these comments? Is an article in a newspaper considered

680:

Thank you for reaching out on this. I think Twinkle may be running into an issue with automatically notifying people of CSDs when they select a redirect-specific deletion criteria, even with the box checked. I also have the page curation script running; could that lead to a conflict? In any case, how

649:

so please be sure that in your Preferences, you have the "Notify page creator" box checked and that you have every CSD criteria checked. I think the Twinkle default is to only have a few speedy deletion criteria checked but it really doesn't matter whether the page has been tagged as a G11, C1 or R3,

213:

Removed proposed deletion. I encourage anyone proposing deletion to do more research before doing so. The Universities Research Association Inc is a consortium of 89 research universities around the world and is a partnership to manage one of the premier research laboratories in the world (Fermilab).

4550:

The one article that predates the founding of the organization talks about the network’s Executive Director’s grandfather. In another article is a reference to how the Executive Director’s grandfather influenced her. I see the background and influences on the outlook and formation of the Executive

4531:

If I might digress a little, I remember when I was at a recruiting fair at college where companies were looking to hire recent graduates. At the Proctor and Gamble table sat three of their products, right at the front of the table. One of the products was Tide. This really stood out to me, seeing

3314:

Zeroth, I realize that, in asking if you had any suggestions, I was not clear as to what I was asking. I was asking sincerely for suggestions about the dispute resolution process in general and the mediation process in particular. I was also asking about what to do about MKUCR, but my question was

3211:

I think honestly that if there is at least one editor party to the dispute resolution process that is totally unwilling to accept anything other than their current point of view that the dispute resolution process will fail; the point of DR is to get editors to agree to some mutual solution and move

1686:

article in question because it was written by a news editor that has been highly used across Knowledge, so I thought it may be appropriate. In case you did not see my note on the Talk page, you can read it in full on the Frontiers Media Talk page. Thanks for helping me better understand what sources

1623:

to cover claims involving individuals other than Stavast; there aren't exceptions made for claims about the identity of her spouse, fiancé, child, parents, or close relatives in the BLP policy. If anyone were to come by and contest the material (I don't see why anybody would, but you never know), it

1318:

I think this will ultimately result in what I predicted over at COIN but it is best to go through the established processes when it is contentious and we have both COI and other involved editors dealing with this issue. As an aside I find it very interesting that the person who first added the crime

1291:

No bone to pick here with the article subject. My reading of the sources is that he's a public figure and a well-known now-retired magician, and that these sorts of widely reported criminal charges would belong in his article given their relative level of coverage. However I've self-reverted to make

582:

The sorts of questions of how to create SNGs for particular sports are not resolved by the RfC that I closed. The close itself was intended to reflect a consensus that participating in the Olympics, in and of itself, does not merit a presumption of notability. This is should not be read to supersede

578:

sport’s competition at the Olympics. For example, some might expect it to be more likely that there exists in-depth coverage of Olympic figure skaters than, say, 1900s tug-of-war contestants—they might find it reasonable that Olympic participation (with or without a restriction on the earliest date

4582:

is because you see the network as being inseparably connected to the practice of enthronements. I'm going to push back a little on that—there are certainly some products that are notable even if the company that produces them is not itself notable. The reason for this is how Knowledge intentionally

3234:

The first problem is the reason that I think any sort of non-binding mediation here is going to fail. It most significantly highlights the extreme gap between editors party to the DR IMO, and it's a bit hard to get editors who argue that a subject is inherently OR/SYNTH that anything in the article

3171:

You wrote: "This seems to be a feasible outline, and I see a path forward that involves a bunch of RfCs to determine how to weight content of the first two sections, but this seems like it would reasonably summarize the topic area. If the issue is the current content in some sections, then that is

2224:

on how to proceed. Alternatively, rather than reverting wholesale, you can manually revert the portions of edits made that you think were detrimental to the article, though be sure to explain why you are doing so in both the edit summary when making your edits and on the talk page after making them

1224:

I can see your passionate about this article, but your passion seems misplaced. You are not dealing with some POV or involved editor here. I plainly explained the reason for the removal both in the edit summary and on the AfD, but instead of discussing an item you know is contentious, you POV push,

2531:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2169:

Thanks for your feedback and review of my article Jonathan Roumie. After the acceptance I noticed couple of edits and comments about how it’s not supported with enough documentation. And I also noticed something that is substantiated by references was removed by a user calling it promotional fluff

1827:

this sounds good. My only concern is if other editors put the rsn decision about aspi on the rsp list before you get the chance to issue the close challenge. If timing is an issue and you can’t do it then let me know and I’ll see what I can do to help out. If it isn’t then I look forward to seeing

1643:

explicitly notes that it doesn't necessarily reflect community consensus. I don't think that there's a reasonable reading that the source assessment table reflects a community consensus of sorts, and pointing to a nicely-formatted table that you created in a previous discussion doesn't actually do

548:

mentions "Olympics" in many other places on the page, essentially duplicating (before) that Olympic participants in the respective sport were notable. Based on this RfC, should those sport-specific guidelines also be updated? Or are they considered exceptions, not within the scope of the RfC. A

4602:

If there is reliable, independent sourcing that connects the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network to the practice of enthronement in some particularly unique and substantial way—such as being the only organization within the Church that has come up with this idea and engages in its promotion—I'd be

3285:

Once these are done, the scope of the article should be much more clear. Once the scope of the article is clear, then we can actually move on to evaluating particular content to see how it lines up with relevant scholarship. Until the scope of the article is clear, these sorts of discussions are

1261:

I don't intend to discuss or debate this issue on your talk page. But rather point these out to point that this is a contentious issue, that should not be summarily dismissed with a simple click of UNDO. My ask is that you revert your own edit in the interest of privacy and process -- or -- talk

653:

If you expect doing a lot of this type of work, you might find it handy to check off the box to maintain a deletion log, for CSDs, PRODs and XfDs. It can be useful to look it over later and see if your taggings led to deletions and, if not, you can see why. I have been around 8 years and I still

3258:

Second, it's becoming increasingly apparent to me that the term "mass killings" doesn't have community consensus on what it actually means. What sources agree on is that the big three mass killing regimes (Soviet, PRC, Cambodia) were mass killings. After the RfC on whether this whole concept is

2146:

Tulu script is an olden script . This page will help for research people who is doing research regarding tulu script and tulu tradition. Presently there are so many people learning script from various places. So many people are working to teach tulu script. Karnataka Tulu sahithya academy and

1296:

policy and its application to this specific case via edit summaries wouldn't be productive nor beneficial to the project if it becomes a back-and-forth thing. I think that the extent to which he's a public figure could be pertinent to some potential arguments relating to deletion as an outcome

4554:

As for “The EWTN source that clearly is a talk show”, I see it as giving insights into the network. This is what the network does: promote Enthronements. It is one thing to write about what the network does. It is another to give a concrete example of the type of promotion that the network

1985:

While my username has not been disruptive to any of the work I have done over my thousands of edits on Knowledge, and I have already posted a reason for why I chose this name above, I am ok to change it if this is going to be disruptive for clerking SPI and interacting with new users. I have

4136:

at 21:17, 3 November 2021? I don't remember seeing any actual evidence that real people feel "confined" by their mobility devices. I only remember seeing one editor speculating that it might happen. If that's what you've based that comment on, you might want to remove it from the closing

1904:

I am so sorry about that. I talked to some of the people in the house and one of them was playing a chess game with a friend, and in order to not lose, edited the wiki page so that the made up rule appeared. Thank you for telling me and I will try to make sure it won't happn again. Cheers!

1232:

on the issue. I think there is not enough consideration of the policies, precedents and facts when evaluating how this issue has been handled in the past. (The COI/POV editors do not help any!). THANK YOU for contributing to the AfD and the information you provided was definitely helpful!

4634:. The video amounts more or less to an interview with the founders of the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network on a daytime Catholic talk show. This sort of thing might be helpful in understanding the purpose and goals of the organization, but it would be a very hard sell for that to be 3254:

and any attempts to write a summary style article article are probably not going to gain community consensus. If the consensus is that it is not fringe (or if it's indeed the majority view), then the article is best as a summary style article that branches off into the other mass

2301:

another picture you have seen of him. Likewise, if you'd link to the voice mimic audio file, it would probably not be OK inasmuch as we'd need the primary source (the audio file) to explicitly affirm that it's the article subject saying it (it would probably be a violation of

2651:

I'll trust your judgement on the masking; it's not my area of expertise and your judgements seem reasonable. I'll take a look at the sections that you've indicated to need work, and I'll try to have this peer-reviewed for a content check before it gets submitted for GA. —

2705:'s criteria for a speedy keep. If you believe that the text should be merged, rather than redirected, you should be willing to make that case at the AfD instead of prematurely closing it as a speedy keep and shortly thereafter merging the content of the two articles. — 1729:

Greetings MikeHawk10. I see that you are currently in communication with the closer of the discussion thread about the Australian strategic policy institute on the reliable sources noticeboard and appear to be challenging to the close. I have also challenged the close

1756:

and how we generally characterize biased sources on RSP that are reliable in their area of expertise, but I would like to hear more from the closer on their intended meaning of the close (and to give them a chance to tweak the close) before I would take it to AN. —

1585:

There is zero precedent found in guidelines or community consensus for summarily banning the use of all references that happen to contain content that's under RfC, when those references are used to support uncontroversial content unrelated to the topic of the RfC

3337:

misses the point of my role. As the mediator, my job is to stay in a role of attempting to develop the RFCs as long as I can, in spite of conduct allegations and conduct violations. If I have to abandon that role by failing the DRN, I will make a statement to

1001:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1884:

Hi Milehawk10 it’s been a couple of days since your last comment concerning this issue and I see you may have forgotten about this as your edit history shows you’ve been preoccupied with other articles and topics, but can follow up on this? Thanks in advance

2228:

In general, pages are not protected due to disputes over content, unless there's really bad edit warring (which often results in some users being blocked by admins who are trying to keep the peace). If you'd like to request page protection, you can head to

1772:

this sounds good. But just to clarify will you take your objections to the admin noticeboard if the closer doesn’t change the decision? Or will you leave it as is? It sounds like you will take it to the administrator’s noticeboard but I’m not 100% sure

4152:

Did you miss Psiĥedelisto, who themselves identified as a "wheelchair-bound person" on 01:14, 21 November 2021? It was more than one user that I based that comment on. I agree that the phrasing was not optimal, and I've tweaked it to be more clear. —

3263:

isn't plainly described by the term of "mass killing", but the notion of "50K deaths over 5 years" that I'm seeing some editors advocate for goes against my native understanding of what a mass killing is and also would apparently draw a line between

4542:

On a different note, the company I work for was recently bought. The CEO of the company that brought us said the reason they bought the company was because of the people. The people are the company. Take away the people and there is no company.

4212:

right here is the list, and Labour Law and Law & History are the only two in the list. Please could you look at the other entries? the James Cook University Law Review is only one sentence, as many of them are. I intend on expanding those :)

3315:

partly sarcastic, partly the result of frustration, and partly wondering if anyone had any new ideas after reading 27,000 words. I apologize if I wasted your time in asking a question that would partly agree with what I am already trying to do.

1251:& "Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures." 4618:

I agree that the quality of a company's labor contracts-in-force is a factor to consider when undertaking a corporate acquisition, but having a notable set of employees doesn't really have a bearing on the corporation's notability itself since

4289: 1193: 396:. To be honest, I've never experienced a "the guideline is bad thus keep" discussion before, though I guess this is how guidelines can change over time. My hope is that it doesn't turn out to be a big waste of time for all those involved. — 1935:: I deleted the GA review transclusion because editors can access the review from the template at the top of the Talk page. This is fairly common, but you can keep the GA review transcluded on the Talk page if you prefer. Happy editing! --- 162: 2170:

when there is clearly a reference cited. Is locking the article something I can look at? The last thing I want is for the article to be vandalised, since this is a BLOP. And how do I go about applying a protection level on my article?

4102:), we are currently engaging in a discussion around the WSJ lede statement concerning the Journal’s editorial board. You made a change to this statement in the past. If you’d like to contribute to this conversation, please join us at 2212:), then you want to explain in the discussion why each of the sources is reliable for the claim that is being made (many appear to be primary source videos; do they show the names of the people cast at any point?). Be careful not to 3764:

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please

3318:

First, I said that you were not required to have read the 27,000 words of DRN. Since I don't know whether you have read that lengthy exchange, I don't know whether you are mostly agreeing with me or mostly disagreeing with me.

1521:"When Heavy.com cites another source for their own article, it is preferable to read and cite the original source instead." This Heavy.com article clearly relies on Stavast's Instagram for her engagement announcement, and per the 3913: 4228: 598:

Just a suggestion to improve legibility of closing statements: perhaps in cases where you are making a long statement, you could consider just placing it at the top of the discussion, rather than in a sidebar box? Thanks.

4546:

One of the comments I see is that the references do not talk about the network. However, I would say that they talk about the significant people that make up the network, so in that way, they talk about the network.

1102:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

2357: 3675: 4577:

What I'm reading is that there is a (relatively) longstanding practice of enthronements to the Sacred Heart that predates the formal establishment of the network, and the reason that you've created the page on the

3322:

Second, I have already taken issue with one editor saying that "mass killing" is straightforward. In particular, there isn't agreement about the two famines, about whether they should be counted as mass killings.

4013:

You're very welcome! I've now added it. It will most probably run within the next 24 hours, and I'll be monitoring that it worked as intended. Remember to dust it off regularly and change the oil once in a while.

2152: 1005:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

766: 2233:

and file a request there, following the instructions on the page. It seems unlikely to me that protection would be granted here; there doesn't appear to be edit warring and the BLP issues seem to have been dealt

2289:

The reason I say the videos is because if there are (for example) movie/TV show credits, then those credits could be considered reliable for the purposes of saying that he was in the movie/TV show. However, you

4538:

For the Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, the product is the practice of Enthroning the Sacred Heart of Jesus. So, in the sources, I am saying if you want to know about the organization, look at the product.

97: 3249:

is itself a fringe theory. If the consensus is that it is fringe, the article probably needs to be rewritten as an article detailing the specific relationship between communism and mass killings in line with

1207: 1174: 370:. The relevant guideline is very clear, and you put a lot of effort into complying with that guideline, after I urged you to do so. There's now a multi-venue discussion going on about the appropriateness of 5058: 4035: 3118: 1624:

would have to be removed unless we have a non self-published source; Heavy.com is such a source and I believe that its inclusion as a reference improves the article's sourcing. I would gladly take this to

4615:

sufficient to establish the notability of Tide as a company or brand?" I think the answer is no (unless we want to presume notability for all laundry detergent brands, which is a bad idea in my opinion).

262: 3259:

fringe is concluded as "it is not", I'd fire off an RfC to try to determine what constitutes a "mass killing" for the purpose of a summary style article. I personally find it hard to imagine that the

2208:(read that bluelink first though, since it describes the "insert a bold edit, revert the bold edit, discuss how to move forward" process fairly well). If you object to edits challenging the sourcing ( 3728:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2979:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1088: 3766: 3272:—the definition doesn't seem like an obviously correct one. An RfC would help to resolve the criteria for what gets listed as a child article, so that this way we can get rid of the potential for 2787: 1849:

Ultimately, any editor has the prerogative to issue a close challenge if they'd like. I'm reading everything over again today and I'll let you know over the next 24 hours what I'm going to do. —

2197:

To answer the last question first, that's probably a caching issue with Google. I'm able to get to the correct page when clicking on the link with both Google and Bing, so I think it's resolved.

4329: 1060:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 3959: 3245:

First, fire off an RfC (probably on the fringe theories noticeboard and also post on CENT, since this will affect a whole host of Eastern European history articles) on whether the idea that

200: 4535:

But, here I was evaluating companies and one company says “our company is our products. Without our products, we don’t exist. If you want to know about our company, look at our products.“

4528:

You wrote: “The practice of enthroning the Sacred Heart of Jesus itself seems to be given significant coverage by the sources present. However, the same cannot be said about the network.”

924: 3797: 3189:

Do you have a suggestion for how to go forward in this dispute? Do you have a suggestion for how to handle protracted content disputes where editors have strong incompatible opinions?

4389: 3744: 2995: 1545:

Editing after others have raised objections may be viewed as disruptive editing or edit warring. Be patient; make your improvements in accord with consensus after the RfC is resolved.

3280:" do and, while lists are different than prose articles, I do think that this sort of thing would help to regulate what gets lumped into the article in order to keep it maintainable. 3186:

is difficult is that a protracted dispute is typically one in which there are different editors with strong and incompatible ideas, and that it is not easy to get to the RFC stage.

2156: 5101: 4078: 3161: 2112:

I reverted. Both of these were disruptive. If you cease editing disruptively, but instead choose to edit productively, then I see no need to make a formal report. Happy editing! —

4334: 3714: 2965: 1109:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the 1030: 305: 3432: 822:

Not intentional at all; the conflict system tangled my comment with yours and somehow removed yours (I double-checked too, which is doubly frustrating!). Very sorry about that.

1807:. I'm mulling over it; I'm seeing a good bit of opposition on the RSN thread itself, and I've discussed it with the user on their talkpage. I'm going to be writing a piece for 3781: 2161: 1510: 4603:

interested to read it. It seems like what you're saying, however, is that the practice of enthronements predates the founding of the organization by quite a number of years.

4641:

Again, I'm fairly convinced that the practice of enthronement (in the context of devotion to the Sacred Heart) is notable based upon the sources you've provided (and also a

4439: 1164: 4607:

also indicates that there have been a number of groups that have promoted Sacred Heart enthronements. Based off of my understanding, an appropriate analogous question with

4384: 3671: 232: 2772: 4476: 2466: 2275: 2184: 2173:

Also I noticed that when I click on the Knowledge page Jonathan Roumie on Google search the page automatically redirects to “The Chosen”. How do I remove the redirect?

2148: 1126: 316: 205: 4685: 3656: 4789: 4564: 4493: 4269: 3464: 3440: 3022: 1445: 965: 257: 142: 4661:

might be helpful in establishing notability, but I can't find sources that cover the network itself in a way that would indicate notability after an extensive search.

2220:, there's no exception here and there's no real way to assert that. If you open discussions on the talk page and explain your analysis, then that would be helpful in 3456: 3448: 2754: 1419: 1387: 1213: 1025: 983: 967: 5106: 2545: 2317:. In other words, it would have to be hosted on some reliable service so that we can trust that it hasn't been tampered with by a random person prior to its upload. 1961: 1315:

No bone here either... I think there is good discussion taking place at AfD and your research has been helpful. And your insights on other AfD are also insightful!

480:

This does not seem to meet the criteria for a G10. Content is sourced and not entirely negative. It may still warrant deletion per BLP, you may want to take it to

4867: 3538: 1278: 374:

with that/those AFDs as a test-case, and the first of those articles has been nominated again. So maybe something will come of it. *sigh*. Keep up the good work.

5209: 5153: 5128: 4805: 4781: 4749: 3500: 3424: 2528: 2485: 2471: 1640: 1483: 1395: 1355: 1212: 998: 907: 794:

you are totally correct; that’s rather embarrassing on my behalf. I've apologized to the editor on their talk page. Thank you for letting me know about this. —

4821: 4797: 4757: 3488: 3480: 3416: 2661: 1528:

Regardless of whether Heavy.com can be considered a reliable source here, I tried to be more clear in my next removal of your addition of the Heavy.com source

1411: 1403: 1363: 1188: 410:

Oh, its the intersection of gender equality and professional (or not) sports, it will absolutely be a colossal waste of time. But none of that is your fault.

5219:, if you are busy no worries, I understand, I can always request someone else finish it off. Either way thanks for your help in reviewing it so far. Regards 4920: 4222: 3598: 3584: 2121: 4773: 4107: 3408: 2444: 2324:. If you think that it's not absolutely clear that the source backs up that he's in something, it's probably not an appropriate use of a primary source. — 1371: 936: 319:

that you were interested in becoming a SPI clerk. Could you please ensure your entry is up to date, and confirm that you are still interested. Many thanks

3685: 4765: 4482:

significant coverage and not just a passing mention? Is a Catholic newspaper a secondary source independent of the subject? Could you be more specific?

3691: 3472: 3390: 3303: 3089: 1435: 1427: 355: 3172:

something that the request for comment process is made for; protracted WP:DR seems to be running into the same shortcomings of the WP:Mediation Cabal."

3110: 2460: 422: 405: 4268:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the 2434: 1262:

about it on the article page. I am presuming an enormous amount of good faith in you at the moment and hoping that you don't have a bone to pick here.

467: 4176: 4162: 2333: 2246: 2058: 2044: 1788:

Hi Mikehawk10. I am not sure if my request for clarification escaped your notice but is it possible that can you follow up on this? Thanks in advance

1335: 1310: 868: 5229: 4829: 3943:

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 209 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (

3871: 2760: 1719: 1696: 1661: 1168: 690: 531: 516: 367: 4673: 4516: 2838: 2746: 2714: 2635: 2417:

I heavily believe that Juan Mata is one of the best midfielders in the last decade and his period at Chelsea proves so. Why did you change my edit?

1152: 5191: 5172: 5032:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4935:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4604: 3886:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3829: 2353: 1872: 1858: 1837: 1822: 1782: 811: 781: 629: 608: 4468: 3562: 1628:

to discuss the reliability of the Heavy.com source. Its current listing doesn't really have more weight than an essay; keep in mind that RSP is a

5017: 4977: 4930: 4813: 4027: 4008: 2141: 1973: 1379: 4888: 336: 4851: 4837: 4146: 3522: 3508: 2735:(all 3 lines) should not be in that article, then go ahead and remove it, though it is relevant and referenced so I don't see why you would. – 2013:

I reset up the move, using the process you described, could you let me know if I have done everything correctly? Thanks so much for the help.

1467: 1453: 668: 3881: 2406: 2003: 1506: 615: 600: 5163:! Really sorry that his had slipped my mind. I'll take a look through the changes and let you know any response over the next hour or so. — 4957: 4419:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

3060: 5027: 3349:

Fifth, it is true that protracted dispute resolution very seldom results in compromise. Protracted disputes have to be resolved by RFC.

956: 4459:

Hi Mhawk10, Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thank you for your support and great work on Knowledge. Happy Holidays.

3630: 3326:

Third, it is true that there isn't going to be a compromise, and I have been and am trying to direct the process toward a set of RFCs.

2942: 1766: 1731: 739: 474: 275: 3908: 5053: 4691:

Please note that one of the !voters for Option 2—3Kingdoms, mentioning of fringe/extreme views—has been indefinitely blocked for being

4444: 2035:

You've moved it to the new title within the Draft namespace, so you've done that correctly if your intent was to keep it as a draft. —

4710: 2136: 2090: 1950: 3657:

https://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/areas-between-gairsain-bhararisain-to-be-developed-as-smart-114110401051_1.html

2691: 1894: 1813:

as my primary editing task until that article is complete, but it's likely that I could write a challenge to the close after that. —

1797: 1743: 1096: 1071: 988: 637: 217:

Happy to discuss further but I do encourage you to do research first. If you have suggestions for improving the page, please do so.

3381:

a signpost article, so I'm going to take that on right now, but please ping me if I don't get back to you over the next 36 hours. —

2937: 1920: 1536: 4115: 3861: 2426: 2022: 1667: 4256:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3364: 2799: 125:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4416: 720: 654:

maintain deletion logs. It can also alert you if a page that was deleted has been recreated as it might need to be tagged again.

346:. Thank you for your message. I'm still interested in becoming an SPI clerk and I will update my entry to bring it up-to-date. — 5036:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4939:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3890:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3611:

Hi, MHawk10 I'm working on a school project I appreciate the help but if you could just leave alone for a month that be great.

3247:

mass killings committed by communist regimes were unique in some way from mass killings committed by regimes of other ideologies

846: 592: 4855: 4737: 4732: 4595:, but they don't necessarily inherit notability from their mission itself (the fact that a religious building is listed on the 4364:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4202: 3526: 3396: 2901:. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to 2467: 1556: 1532: 1471: 3198: 2380: 444: 4704: 4626:

I agree that the EWTN talk show can be usable to give insights into the network, but that particular show isn't one in which

3986: 2086: 1343: 1095:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

765:

BLPvios. Since they're a brand-new user, might be a good idea to apologize. (I noticed this while reviewing Spicy's close at

558: 2905:. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status 2858: 4863: 4642: 4596: 3777: 3534: 3018: 2147:

government approved to teach tulu script. This page will help people who are willing to learn tulu script .. Thank you..

1479: 494: 89: 935:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

734: 4873: 3809: 1301:), so I think that would be the proper forum to have the discussion around that point rather than at the article talk. — 1140: 1114: 1110: 1065: 1053: 1044: 874: 81: 76: 64: 59: 2109: 386: 4406: 4402: 4395: 4347: 4340: 3277: 758: 645:

Please remember to leave a talk page notification any time you tag a page for speedy deletion, CSD. I see that you use

310: 4599:

does not necessarily mean that the religious organization that owns or meets in the building is notable, for example).

3212:

forward. In this case, the fundamental issues that editors don't seem to be agreeing on, in order of importance, are:

2886: 2310:

to link a voice file and say that it's 100% the person based on the sound of the voice alone). Do these examples help?

5033: 4936: 4120: 3887: 3626: 3286:

going to go in endless circles. And, if you believe and have evidence that people are acting in bad faith by being a

3083: 3054: 2928:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing!

2418: 1955: 1912: 1105: 206: 4129:, you wrote that "Others still noted that there were indeed people who do feel confined/bound to their wheelchair". 1606:

that an argument that the addition of that reference in the way that I did is somehow precluded by text found on an

1254:. Therefore, it might be a really good idea to remove this contentious information, and wait out the AfD -- this is 4688:. To me, this looks like a supervote or over-verbosity failing to convey the very obvious consensus for Option 2. 2906: 2890: 2550: 1203: 745: 2209: 2105: 1580:

he grew up in Colorado and moved to Las Vegas where her then-fiancé Gavin was living when she got engaged in 2016.

916:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

708: 583:

all other established subject notability guidelines listed within NSPORT that involve the Olympics in some way. —

4859: 4301: 4280: 4230: 3814: 3773: 3530: 3032: 3014: 2902: 2866:" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and 2271: 1475: 1249: 174: 153: 99: 3650: 3038: 1578:

source (which is fine for things like engagements and the like), and the reference is used to support the text,

1567: 3544: 1607: 220:

Furthermore, if you wish to delete a page, please open the discussion on the Talk page first where it belongs.

4551:

Director as significant factors influencing the network and important information to share about the network.

2648:

Thank you so much! This is really helpful and I really appreciate the time you put in to copyedit the article.

4962: 4099: 3606: 2049:

Fantastic, and the non draft page will be deleted at some point before any other steps can be made, correct?

1724: 138: 5020:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4923:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4591:). Religious nonprofits (which this appears to be) has a slightly lower bar for being presumed notable, per 4507:

Are there specific questions you have about that long comment that I left to explain the source analysis? —

4296:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3874:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1676:, I hope to touch base with you regarding the Frontiers Media COVID-19 hub request edit that was posted at 169:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

4846: 4297: 4276: 4103: 3948: 3737: 3594: 3558: 3517: 2988: 2788:

Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(television)#Request_for_comment_to_establish_this_notability_guideline_as_an_SNG

2667: 2631: 2602:

section and I have masked material in a number of sections that is out of date including the introduction,

1710:

19_hubs]]. If you still have time to review, I would appreciate your feedback. If not, I understand. Best,

1462: 1258:

so there is no rush, and we should error on the side of privacy. I believe this is a reasonable approach.

1163:

If this fact is not included then all his dead link to people he supposedly photographed should be erased.

945: 170: 149: 1932: 1529: 1503: 3749: 3067: 3000: 2509: 2493: 2082: 1677: 1199: 716: 435:

They were not exact recreations, namely, the pages now show that the players have an ongoing pro career.

2564:

Checking the article's edit history will give you a clear idea of any changes. I updated details in the

1680:. I found another source that mentions Frontiers Media Covid-19 knowledge hub. Also, I had proposed the 5037: 5023: 4940: 4926: 3891: 3877: 2844: 2533: 1943: 1298: 1179:

Not all dead links (archives are fine), but the list of exhibitions should be significantly trimmed. —

1049: 38: 4994:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4905:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2451:. In other words, if you're going to add that statement, you need to find a reliable source for it. — 1594:, even though the use of the source in the article doesn't then I'd point you towards the notion that 3360: 3194: 2916: 2777: 2768: 2132: 992: 883: 47: 17: 2386:

For clarification, you are not the main subject of the thread, but I did briefly mention you in it.

650:

page creators should receive a notification when a page they created has been tagged for deletion.

248:

from? And, I think the PROD rationale explained my views on the state of the article pretty well. —

5011: 4723: 4265: 3352:

Sixth, do you have any general recommendations about how to deal with protracted content disputes?

3131: 2921: 2008: 1969: 1494:

Hi Mikehawk10, I am writing to follow up on my removal of your addition of the Heavy.com article, "

1252: 1198:

Please help to perfect and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you.

228: 5084:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

4061:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

3144:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

1194:

Please help to perfect and publish a draft of the article entitled (J. Mario Belougi). Thank you.

288:

subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

5003: 4391: 4336: 4218: 4198: 4111: 3622: 3590: 3589:

Thank you once again Mikehawk. You gave me my first GA! It's been a pleasure working with you :)

3570: 3554: 3221: 3220:(Is the article about the relationship between a communist ideology and mass killing, or is it a 2867: 2643: 2627: 2342: 1916: 1899: 1099:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 450:

They were almost identical to the versions of the Knowledge page archived at Everybody Wiki. See

196: 137:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 5118:. I was not sure if the ping went through as I did not recieve a notification that it was sent. 4522:

Thanks for the detailed descriptions. I did not see those initially. Here are some responses:

4700: 4172: 4142: 3856: 3805: 2412: 1629: 753: 712: 332: 3346:

if someone takes it there instead). I am trying to minimize conduct issues as long as I can.

2614:

section is masked because it does not really add to reader's understanding of the article per

2610:

sections. Some of this may be worth updating, some perhaps not. The gallery that followed the

5227: 5207: 5189: 5151: 5141: 5126: 4982: 4893: 3834: 3725: 3175:

Yes. Do you have a suggestion? You are not expected to have read the dispute resolution at

3077: 3048: 2976: 2898: 2422: 2267: 2066: 1936: 1715: 1692: 1595: 1566:

and thank you for your message. I disagree strongly with your assertion any implication that

1489: 1158: 817: 246:

you wish to delete a page, please open the discussion on the Talk page first where it belongs

5133:

Hi again, just wanted check you’re still planning on finishing /responding to the Zuby GAN?

3229:

The way that sources should be weighted in the text of the article once scope is determined.

4620: 4560: 4489: 4083: 3964: 3736:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3681: 3614: 3372: 3356: 3309: 3206: 3190: 3106: 2987:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2882: 2834: 2826: 2764: 2710: 2673: 2657: 2456: 2329: 2321: 2259: 2242: 2128: 2117: 2099: 2078: 2074: 2040: 1999: 1991: 1926: 1908: 1854: 1818: 1762: 1657: 1513:

and stated "and per pending RfC". In both AfDs, it is noted that this Heavy.com article is

1306: 1184: 1148: 864: 807: 799: 730: 686: 625: 588: 539: 512: 463: 440: 401: 351: 253: 3973:, would you like me to set up a nice archival bot for your talk page, as a Hanukkah gift? 8: 4909: 4900: 4715: 4435: 4380: 4249: 4234: 2814: 2497: 2180: 2054: 2018: 1980: 1965: 1616: 1330: 1273: 1097:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1020: 837: 239: 224: 4106:

under the heading “Should editorial opinions be posted in the lede summary.” Take care.

707:

Thank you for your contributions, but please be careful with reverts because edits like

5049: 4325: 4214: 4194: 4126: 4048: 3970: 3636: 3273: 3176: 2933: 2875: 2871: 2782:

Not that it's likely to cause confusion, but I assume you meant to write "Consensus is

1552: 1217: 523: 486: 430: 192: 1706:, a friendly reminder that I replied to your question at [[Talk:Frontiers_Media#COVID- 1228:

In case you missed it, in the AfD which I notified you about, I made clear that I am '

5168: 5007: 4953: 4696: 4669: 4631: 4621:

notability of an organization is not inherited from the people involved in running it

4612: 4592: 4512: 4168: 4158: 4138: 4093: 4022: 4004: 3981: 3904: 3801: 3708: 3580: 3386: 3330: 3299: 3287: 2959: 2795: 2741: 2724: 2686: 2541: 2517: 2399: 2373: 1591: 1571: 1255: 1122: 859:

Not a problem! Just wanted to check; this sort of thing happens from time to time. —

646: 554: 545: 473: 343: 328: 2615: 1590:

If your objection is that the referenced article contains content that's related to

5097: 4635: 4588: 4464: 4184: 4074: 3944: 3756: 3721: 3618: 3549:

Hey Mikehawk. Just letting you know that added a few comments to your GA review of

3251: 3157: 3096: 3071: 3042: 3007: 2972: 2702: 2440: 1890: 1868: 1833: 1793: 1778: 1753: 1739: 1711: 1688: 1620: 941: 604: 412: 393: 376: 371: 301: 134: 3796:

Although I did not mention your name, and had not requested any actions, it seems

2893:

and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when

761:) for BLP violations. But it looks to me like the five edits in question were all 455: 4679: 4587:

at a very high bar (multiple reliable sources covering the company with in-depth

4584: 4572: 4556: 4501: 4485: 4355: 4309: 3914:

Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

3865: 3850: 3841: 3378: 3102: 2830: 2822: 2706: 2653: 2452: 2391: 2365: 2325: 2294: 2253: 2238: 2113: 2036: 1995: 1987: 1850: 1814: 1758: 1703: 1673: 1653: 1302: 1248:. And when we are talking about a BLP, we need to "(presume) in favor of privacy" 1180: 1144: 860: 803: 795: 726: 702: 682: 621: 584: 508: 459: 451: 436: 397: 347: 249: 182: 2532:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2489: 2488:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5220: 5200: 5182: 5160: 5144: 5134: 5119: 5093: 5071: 4431: 4426: 4376: 4371: 4070: 3733: 3260: 3242:

In any case, back to your original question on whether I have any suggestions:

3153: 2984: 2558:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors has been completed.

2505: 2448: 2284: 2263: 2230: 2192: 2176: 2050: 2030: 2014: 1575: 1320: 1286: 1263: 1010: 854: 825: 695: 571: 297: 3224:

article that serves as a hub for mass killings committed by communist regimes)

3101:

Thank you for alerting me to this! I'll keep this in mind in the future. :) —

3041:

elsewhere? I'm trying something myself and I'll get back to you if it works.—

5216: 5215:

Hi again Mhawk10, I just wanted to check if you were going to finish off the

5115: 5108: 5085: 5081: 5045: 4998: 4989: 4319: 4062: 4058: 3729: 3651:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Bhararisain#map=12/30.0955/79.2648

3550: 3343: 3236: 3166: 3145: 3141: 2980: 2929: 2501: 2303: 2221: 2217: 2216:

by continuously undoing edits on the page; since even article creators don't

2213: 2205: 1649: 1625: 1600:

links which are relevant to the topic but that some people find objectionable

1563: 1548: 1540: 1522: 1518: 1499: 1293: 1241: 502: 481: 289: 285: 4782:

STEM articles judged unsuitable for undergraduates below the first paragraph

4275:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1388:

Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process

148:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

5164: 4949: 4665: 4508: 4422: 4367: 4351: 4190: 4154: 4133: 4089: 4015: 4000: 3994: 3974: 3900: 3576: 3382: 3339: 3334: 3295: 3291: 3265: 3183: 2807: 2791: 2736: 2731:, which is what you wanted to happen. If you really feel strongly that the 2728: 2720: 2698: 2681: 2677: 2537: 2201: 1809: 1633: 1531:, which is intended to keep the page stable while the RfC on the Talk page 1134: 1118: 565: 550: 4346:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1091:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 1056:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 4460: 3953: 3791: 3269: 2307: 1886: 1864: 1844: 1829: 1804: 1789: 1774: 1749: 1735: 1237: 950: 789: 773: 361: 118: 103: 4279:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3854:, who plays the character of Jesus Christ in American television series 3740:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2991:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2439:

Statements of opinion are fine, provided that they reflect are properly

2356:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

1495: 152:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

5080:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

4057:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

3718:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3140:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

2969:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2849: 2387: 2361: 1514: 1502:. I had two reasons for removing this source. In my first edit summary 284:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of

2523:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3700: 2951: 2513: 2358:

Banana Republic casting ASPERSIONS and overall not assuming good fait

4969: 4880: 4686:

Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Jacobin_(magazine)

3821: 3481:

Content translation tool helps create one million Knowledge articles

1292:

this procedurally more kosher; sparring over interpretations of the

913:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

5059:

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

4308:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4036:

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

3664: 3660: 3119:

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

2616:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Image_galleries

1525:

related to Heavy.com, the original source should be used instead.

1035: 675: 659: 263:

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

181:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4453: 3999:

Sure! That would be nice; thank you so much for the kind offer. —

3473:"Did You Know ..." featured a photo of the wrong female WWII pilot 4252:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 769:. You should take a look there, if you haven't already.) Thanks. 121:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3753:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3465:

Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers

3004:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2812:

OOPS! I’ve fixed it in the statement—thank you for alerting me.

1648:

reference that I added by itself. That being said, that is what

1236:

However, this should underscore that the question on IF he is a

4914: 3743:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3182:

I personally have found that one of the reasons why protracted

2994:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2763:, and there are two unreferenced sections awaiting references. 1533:

about whether to include content related to "Let's Go Brandon!"

1517:, and in the second AfD, the source assessment table includes " 894: 4209: 3712:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2963:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2676:. It was created by a student editor under the original title 2313:

On top of that, you'd have to show that the primary source is

2297:

that he's in a movie/TV show because you see a character that

1986:

submitted a request for usurpation at the appropriate page. —

1511:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast (2nd nomination)

1420:

Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more

544:

Thanks for your time to assess close the RfC. I noticed that

4649:. Independent coverage of the organization in something like 3641:

It is a place as you can see in OpenStreetMap wich is named

2870:. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a 1084:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

507:

Per your advice, I've nominated the article for deletion. —

4758:

Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements

4627: 4608: 4242: 3922: 2204:. If you'd prefer to challenge particular edits, you could 1052:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 749: 111: 3649:

because it it translated from Hindi language to English.-

3215:

Whether any article along these lines should exist at all;

2561:

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

1048:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 4709:

MHawk10, since you asked to be notified, I've unarchived

4286:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

2878:

when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

2598:

sections. Another update that needs working on is in the

1372:

China bans, and is there intelligent life on this planet?

1364:

The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded

159:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

5075:

on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment

4052:

on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment

3135:

on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment

2202:

Knowledge is an Encyclopedia that anyone can freely edit

1496:

Kelli Stavast: NBC Reporter Behind Let’s Go Brandon Meme

1031:

Replaceable fair use File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg

549:

statement, one way or the other, seems needed. Cheers.—

279:

on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment

3724:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2975:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

999:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/David Oliver (magician)

981:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4525:

I wanted to give responses to some of your comments:

3937:

For reviewing at least 200 articles during the drive.

2887:

the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect

2162:

Applying Protection level an article vs allowing edits

1615:

On another note, if you really want to get technical,

1080:

the original replaceable fair use template, replacing

5199:

Not sure you saw the ping but have responded again.

4921:

Template:Did you know nominations/Glen Rock (boulder)

3409:

Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography

3276:

by having firm guidance. This is what articles like "

1113:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 458:. I don't see a substantial difference in content. — 5016:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

4919:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

3870:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

3449:

On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent

2885:

for more information on this user right, especially

987:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

4477:

Review of Sacred Heart Enthronement Network article

3489:Reporting ticket sales on the edge of the Wiki, if 1574:" content into the article. The reference is to an 4645:). But, I don't think the organization is notable 3659:Also, it is part of sub adminstrative division of 2206:revert them and open a discussion on the talk page 620:Noted. I will keep this in mind for the future. — 4806:We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus" 3872:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie 2761:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie 2755:Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Roumie 1610:is unfounded. Please strike your reference to it. 1396:Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention 570:my reading of the RfC is that it was specific to 4132:Did this get claimed in any comments other than 2924:, for article renaming requests awaiting action. 1960:Hello Mike, I noticed you have applied to be an 5018:Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Binger 3329:Fourth, your final comment about reporting any 2354:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2322:primary sources in biographies of living people 767:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/LaserSharkz 4693:too incompetent to edit in controversial areas 3655:Or you can see here with same problem in name 2621:Best of luck with the article moving forward. 2490:section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2225:if you need room to give a fuller explanation. 1143:. Please let me know if you have any reply. — 141:over time. You may like to take a look at the 4585:notability for organizations and corporations 4210:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_law_journals 3846:, which you recently nominated. The fact was 3377:Thank you for the follow-up. I currently owe 1639:Regarding the "source assessment table" that 1507:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast 919:Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. 4713:at WP:AN where you may comment if you wish. 5114:Hi, there I've responded to your review at 3692:Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 1437:Knowledge and the Representation of Reality 1428:How Knowledge helped create a Serbian stamp 3501:Vandalizing Knowledge as rational behavior 1598:, which governs both content and external 4986:was updated with a fact from the article 4897:was updated with a fact from the article 3838:was updated with a fact from the article 2856:Hello, Mikehawk10. Your account has been 4272:to see how you can improve the article. 3862:extraordinary minister of Holy Communion 3670:Please remove deleting request. Thanks. 1608:information page on Requests for comment 145:to see how you can improve the article. 4417:Talk:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions 2786:determined by a vote" in your close at 2142:Tulu script information is more needed. 1380:A photo on Knowledge can ruin your life 1175:2600:1700:3520:3CE0:2C5E:4748:8132:205F 1165:2600:1700:3520:3CE0:2C5E:4748:8132:205F 14: 5092:Message delivered to you with love by 4830:Another Wiki crossword for one and all 4611:would be: "Is significant coverage of 4069:Message delivered to you with love by 3672:2409:4063:431F:BEC0:E3EA:DBFE:401:F5E0 3152:Message delivered to you with love by 1644:anything to add to an analysis of the 296:Message delivered to you with love by 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4822:Spider-Man, football and the departed 4766:Born three months before her brother? 4167:Thanks for clarifying the statement. 2566:Administration and academic buildings 2149:2402:8100:282C:77:EFE3:B0C3:3C81:29B5 1687:are appropriate for Knowledge. Best, 277:Talk:Republican Party (United States) 4798:Four billion words and a few numbers 4597:National Register of Historic Places 4532:as I remember it from 40 years ago. 3709:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 2960:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 2492:, because it is a redirect from the 1404:Reflections on the Chinese Knowledge 320: 25: 3457:What does it take to upload a file? 2943:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 2534:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 2352:There is currently a discussion at 1602:. From a policy perspective, it is 1535:continues. Please note that in the 1412:James Bond and the Giant Squid Game 1141:File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg 1045:File:Katyn Memorial Jersey City.jpg 989:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 740:Think you read those diffs backward 23: 5062: 4744: 4445:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 4403:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions 4396:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions 4348:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions 4341:Pseudo-reorganization acquisitions 4241: 4039: 3931:The New Page Patrol Medal of Merit 3403: 3278:list of ethnic cleansing campaigns 3122: 2848: 2829:) 03:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC) — 2476: 1828:the next steps that you will take 1678:Talk:Frontiers_Media#COVID-19_hubs 1350: 1034: 893: 521:I have voted deleted in this AfD. 266: 110: 24: 5241: 5181:Great thank you responded again. 5107:I've responded to your review at 4317:Thanks again, and happy editing! 4260:The article has been assessed as 3767:contact the election coordinators 2723:. What would reversing the close 2320:In short, use heavy caution with 1994:) 20:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC) — 1505:, I pointed to the discussion at 997:The article will be discussed at 802:) 17:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC) — 638:Tagging pages for speedy deletion 207:Universities Research Association 190:Thanks again, and happy editing! 129:The article has been assessed as 4968: 4879: 4452: 4410: 4359: 3921: 3820: 3699: 3218:The proper scope of the article 2950: 2897:is used. This can be done using 2813: 2347: 2200:Regarding the earlier questions 1668:re: Frontier Media COVID-19 hubs 1072:Di-replaceable fair use disputed 1054:first non-free content criterion 975: 321: 29: 5070:Your feedback is requested at 4638:for the purposes of notability. 4630:is acting in its capacity as a 4047:Your feedback is requested at 3747:and submit your choices on the 3235:is consistent with Knowledge's 3130:Your feedback is requested at 2998:and submit your choices on the 2881:Please take a moment to review 2576:Organization and administration 1621:self-published sources in a BLP 1225:instead of opting to discuss. 1171:) 00:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 910:for New Page Patrol will begin. 274:Your feedback is requested at 3509:A very new very Wiki crossword 1115:Media copyright questions page 13: 1: 5210:17:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 5192:14:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC) 5173:04:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC) 5143:17:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC) 5129:11:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 5002:, the lead prosecutor in the 4868:21:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 4733:15:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 4705:16:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC) 4684:Please express your views at 4674:20:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 4565:18:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 4517:19:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 4494:19:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 4469:15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 4440:18:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC) 4385:21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC) 4330:21:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 4300:without posting a request to 4223:07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 4203:07:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 4177:02:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 4163:02:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC) 4147:21:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC) 3726:Knowledge arbitration process 3686:19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 3631:19:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 3599:12:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 3585:03:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 3563:12:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC) 3539:00:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 3391:03:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC) 3365:02:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC) 3304:23:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 3199:22:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 3162:19:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 3111:01:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC) 3090:20:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 3061:17:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 3023:00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2977:Knowledge arbitration process 2938:17:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 2839:03:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 2800:03:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 2773:08:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC) 2747:06:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC) 2715:19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2692:07:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2662:22:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2636:21:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2572:Environmental sustainability' 2546:20:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2461:17:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2427:17:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2407:21:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 2381:21:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 2334:07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 2276:07:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 2247:05:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 2185:08:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2157:14:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2137:00:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2122:00:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2091:00:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2059:00:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2045:00:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 2023:00:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 1356:Different stories, same place 681:do I report a Twinkle bug? — 173:without posting a request to 5230:21:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC) 5154:17:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC) 5102:01:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC) 5096::) | Is this wrong? Contact 5077:. Thank you for helping out! 5054:00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 4116:01:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 4104:Talk:The Wall Street Journal 4079:03:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 4073::) | Is this wrong? Contact 4054:. Thank you for helping out! 4028:20:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 4009:16:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 3987:06:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 3971:Knowledge police gets to you 3960:12:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 3909:00:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 3810:19:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 3782:02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 3769:for assistance. Thank you! 3425:What we lost, what we gained 3355:Seventh, mostly thank you. 3156::) | Is this wrong? Contact 3137:. Thank you for helping out! 2891:post-move cleanup procedures 2889:. Please remember to follow 2727:? The page now redirects to 2004:20:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC) 1974:19:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC) 1951:12:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC) 1921:11:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC) 1895:15:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC) 1873:02:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC) 1859:20:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 1838:16:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 1823:02:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC) 1798:18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 1783:10:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 1767:15:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 1744:14:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 1720:15:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC) 1662:22:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 1557:13:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 1484:20:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC) 1336:19:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 1311:05:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 1279:05:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 1208:12:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 1189:00:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 1153:06:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC) 1127:19:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 1026:23:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 957:01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC) 869:01:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 847:01:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 812:17:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 782:17:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 735:14:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 721:11:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC) 691:22:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 669:22:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 630:21:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 609:21:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 593:13:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 559:07:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 532:22:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 517:18:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 495:09:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 468:05:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 445:05:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 423:00:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 406:21:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC) 387:12:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC) 356:03:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC) 337:18:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 306:05:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 300::) | Is this wrong? Contact 281:. Thank you for helping out! 258:09:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 233:02:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 201:11:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 7: 4958:12:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 4874:DYK for Glen Rock (boulder) 4264:, which is recorded on its 3037:Did you find the answer to 1697:14:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 922:Interested in taking part? 889:November 2021 Backlog Drive 875:November 2021 backlog drive 133:, which is recorded on its 10: 5246: 4860:MediaWiki message delivery 4847:Read this Signpost in full 4814:Wikicommons presents: 2021 3774:MediaWiki message delivery 3531:MediaWiki message delivery 3518:Read this Signpost in full 3015:MediaWiki message delivery 2108:that the bot reverted and 1476:MediaWiki message delivery 1463:Read this Signpost in full 311:Trainee SPI clerk interest 5006:, unsuccessfully ran for 5004:trial of Kyle Rittenhouse 4774:The past is not even past 4451: 4354:-status according to the 4121:Quick clarifying question 3927: 3920: 3761:to your user talk page. 3431:From a Knowledge reader: 2917:Knowledge:Requested moves 2672:We don't need an AfD for 2484:A tag has been placed on 2447:and are compliant with a 1956:SPI clerk trainee request 1596:Knowledge is not censored 1066:the file description page 934: 892: 657:Thank you for your work! 366:I can only apologise for 18:User talk:Red-tailed hawk 5082:Feedback Request Service 5012:Racine County, Wisconsin 4311:leaving us some feedback 4298:create articles yourself 4277:create articles yourself 4059:Feedback Request Service 3294:is around the corner. — 3142:Feedback Request Service 3012:to your user talk page. 2922:Category:Requested moves 2551:University of Notre Dame 1139:I've left a response on 1089:the file discussion page 991:or whether it should be 286:Feedback Request Service 184:leaving us some feedback 171:create articles yourself 150:create articles yourself 3815:DYK for Jonathan Roumie 3335:Arbitration Enforcement 3237:policies and guidelines 3033:Your help desk question 1619:doesn't actually allow 1214:David Oliver (magician) 1111:non-free content policy 984:David Oliver (magician) 968:David Oliver (magician) 908:one-month backlog drive 5067: 5038:Did you know talk page 4941:Did you know talk page 4246: 4044: 3892:Did you know talk page 3575:I will take a look! — 3545:Talk:Jordan Geller/GA1 3127: 2853: 2525:contest the nomination 2481: 1200:Christiani E. Landjaro 1039: 898: 271: 115: 5066: 4963:DYK for Thomas Binger 4421:Message delivered by 4366:Message delivered by 4302:Articles for creation 4281:Articles for creation 4245: 4231:Articles for creation 4043: 3722:Arbitration Committee 3706:Hello! Voting in the 3607:RE: Minoan Snake Tube 3126: 2973:Arbitration Committee 2957:Hello! Voting in the 2899:Special:WhatLinksHere 2852: 2612:Community development 2486:Wat Khao Wong Prachan 2480: 2472:Wat Khao Wong Prachan 2449:neutral point of view 2222:obtaining a consensus 1931:Hello! Just FYI, re: 1725:Reliable source close 1454:A very Wiki crossword 1074:|<your reason: --> 1042:Thanks for uploading 1038: 897: 270: 175:Articles for creation 154:Articles for creation 114: 100:Articles for creation 42:of past discussions. 4788:Arbitration report: 4659:Catholic News Agency 3798:I have to notify you 3463:WikiProject report: 3439:Arbitration report: 2903:secure your password 2883:Knowledge:Page mover 2759:Hi, I have reviewed 2674:Ki the Earth Goddess 2668:Ki the Earth Goddess 2580:Colleges and schools 1537:Responding to an RfC 1444:WikiProject report: 1082:<your reason: --> 315:Hi - you previously 5034:the statistics page 4937:the statistics page 4931:Glen Rock (boulder) 4901:Glen Rock (boulder) 4636:independent content 4589:independent content 4405:you nominated as a 4250:Glen Rock (boulder) 4235:Glen Rock (boulder) 4229:Your submission at 3888:the statistics page 3455:Technology report: 3447:Discussion report: 3433:What's Matt Amodio? 1418:Technology report: 1386:Discussion report: 1299:WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE 642:Hello, Mikehawk10, 98:Your submission at 5086:removing your name 5068: 4790:A new crew for '22 4741:: 28 December 2021 4350:you nominated for 4247: 4063:removing your name 4045: 3738:arbitration policy 3663:not same place as 3571:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d 3400:: 29 November 2021 3184:dispute resolution 3146:removing your name 3133:Talk:Jack Posobiec 3128: 2989:arbitration policy 2854: 2845:Page mover granted 2644:Twofingered Typist 2628:Twofingered Typist 2482: 1058:no free equivalent 1040: 899: 290:removing your name 272: 244:Where did you get 116: 5089: 5031: 5008:district attorney 4934: 4804:Deletion report: 4780:Recent research: 4748:From the editor: 4695:and/or trolling. 4632:news organization 4613:laundry detergent 4474: 4473: 4429: 4374: 4237:has been accepted 4066: 3941: 3940: 3885: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3688: 3617:comment added by 3499:Recent research: 3423:Deletion report: 3225: 3149: 3030: 3029: 3025: 2778:Typo in RfC close 2745: 2719:See point 1.2 of 2690: 2529:visiting the page 2494:article namespace 2405: 2379: 2262:comment added by 2077:comment added by 2071:Don't report me 1923: 1911:comment added by 1394:Recent research: 1354:From the editor: 1347:: 31 October 2021 1068:and add the text 963: 962: 906:On November 1, a 844: 713:Wretchskull (alt) 530: 529: 493: 492: 293: 209:proposed deletion 106:has been accepted 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5237: 5225: 5205: 5187: 5149: 5139: 5124: 5079: 5065: 5021: 4972: 4924: 4883: 4838:Buying Knowledge 4820:Traffic report: 4796:By the numbers: 4756:News and notes: 4750:Here is the news 4731: 4728: 4720: 4711:the close review 4655:America Magazine 4576: 4505: 4456: 4449: 4448: 4420: 4414: 4413: 4365: 4363: 4362: 4322: 4313: 4305: 4292: 4056: 4042: 4025: 4020: 3998: 3984: 3979: 3956: 3925: 3918: 3917: 3875: 3824: 3772: 3760: 3703: 3696: 3695: 3679: 3633: 3574: 3487:Traffic report: 3479:News from Diff: 3417:The WikiCup 2021 3415:WikiCup report: 3376: 3219: 3210: 3139: 3125: 3100: 3086: 3080: 3074: 3057: 3051: 3045: 3013: 3011: 2954: 2947: 2946: 2896: 2895:suppressredirect 2865: 2861: 2817: 2811: 2739: 2684: 2647: 2600:Special programs 2596:Men's basketball 2479: 2438: 2403: 2395: 2377: 2369: 2351: 2350: 2288: 2278: 2196: 2103: 2093: 2034: 2009:Question on move 1984: 1946: 1939: 1938:Another Believer 1906: 1848: 1592:Let's Go Brandon 1572:Let's Go Brandon 1410:Traffic report: 1402:Community view: 1362:News and notes: 1333: 1325: 1290: 1276: 1268: 1178: 1138: 1108: 1083: 1076: 1023: 1015: 979: 978: 953: 890: 879: 878: 858: 845: 840: 834: 833: 828: 793: 780: 778: 776: 756: 706: 679: 667: 619: 569: 528: 522: 506: 491: 485: 419: 417: 383: 381: 326: 325: 324: 283: 269: 243: 186: 178: 165: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5245: 5244: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5221: 5201: 5183: 5145: 5135: 5120: 5112: 5098:my bot operator 5063: 5061: 5043: 5042: 4978:14 January 2022 4973: 4965: 4946: 4945: 4884: 4876: 4871: 4870: 4842: 4743: 4730: 4724: 4716: 4714: 4682: 4570: 4499: 4479: 4447: 4425:, on behalf of 4411: 4399: 4370:, on behalf of 4360: 4344: 4332: 4320: 4295: 4288: 4284: 4239: 4187: 4123: 4086: 4075:my bot operator 4040: 4038: 4023: 4016: 3992: 3982: 3975: 3967: 3954: 3916: 3897: 3896: 3882:Jonathan Roumie 3866:Catholic Church 3851:Jonathan Roumie 3848:... that actor 3842:Jonathan Roumie 3830:3 December 2021 3825: 3817: 3794: 3754: 3694: 3639: 3612: 3609: 3568: 3547: 3542: 3541: 3513: 3402: 3373:Robert McClenon 3370: 3357:Robert McClenon 3312: 3207:Robert McClenon 3204: 3191:Robert McClenon 3169: 3158:my bot operator 3123: 3121: 3094: 3084: 3078: 3072: 3055: 3049: 3043: 3035: 3005: 2945: 2894: 2863: 2857: 2847: 2805: 2780: 2765:Graeme Bartlett 2757: 2670: 2641: 2553: 2496:to a different 2477: 2475: 2468:Speedy deletion 2445:reliable source 2432: 2415: 2397: 2371: 2348: 2345: 2282: 2257: 2190: 2164: 2144: 2129:NewsChannel fan 2100:NewsChannel fan 2097: 2079:NewsChannel fan 2072: 2069: 2028: 2011: 1978: 1958: 1949: 1944: 1937: 1929: 1902: 1900:Chess Promotion 1842: 1727: 1670: 1630:WP:SUPPLEMENTAL 1604:extremely clear 1492: 1487: 1486: 1458: 1349: 1331: 1321: 1284: 1274: 1264: 1222: 1196: 1172: 1161: 1132: 1104: 1081: 1069: 1033: 1021: 1011: 1008: 980: 976: 972: 951: 888: 884:New Page Patrol 877: 852: 838: 831: 826: 823: 820: 787: 774: 771: 770: 748: 742: 700: 698: 673: 658: 640: 613: 563: 542: 500: 478: 433: 415: 413: 379: 377: 364: 322: 313: 302:my bot operator 267: 265: 237: 225:Bryan MacKinnon 211: 203: 168: 161: 157: 108: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5243: 5233: 5232: 5217:Zuby GA review 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5176: 5175: 5111: 5105: 5078: 5060: 5057: 4974: 4967: 4966: 4964: 4961: 4889:3 January 2022 4885: 4878: 4877: 4875: 4872: 4843: 4841: 4840: 4833: 4832: 4825: 4824: 4817: 4816: 4809: 4808: 4801: 4800: 4793: 4792: 4785: 4784: 4777: 4776: 4772:In the media: 4769: 4768: 4761: 4760: 4753: 4752: 4745: 4742: 4736: 4722: 4718:Tayi Arajakate 4681: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4662: 4639: 4624: 4616: 4600: 4520: 4519: 4478: 4475: 4472: 4471: 4457: 4446: 4443: 4398: 4394:nomination of 4388: 4343: 4339:nomination of 4333: 4283:if you prefer. 4274: 4270:grading scheme 4257: 4254: 4240: 4238: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4122: 4119: 4085: 4082: 4055: 4037: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 3966: 3963: 3939: 3938: 3934: 3933: 3928: 3926: 3915: 3912: 3826: 3819: 3818: 3816: 3813: 3793: 3790: 3787: 3786: 3745:the candidates 3715:eligible users 3704: 3693: 3690: 3684:comment added 3638: 3635: 3608: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3553:. Thank you!! 3546: 3543: 3514: 3512: 3511: 3504: 3503: 3496: 3495: 3484: 3483: 3476: 3475: 3468: 3467: 3460: 3459: 3452: 3451: 3444: 3443: 3441:ArbCom in 2021 3436: 3435: 3428: 3427: 3420: 3419: 3412: 3411: 3407:In the media: 3404: 3401: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3311: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3261:Katyn massacre 3256: 3240: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3227: 3216: 3168: 3165: 3138: 3120: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3034: 3031: 3028: 3027: 2996:the candidates 2966:eligible users 2955: 2944: 2941: 2926: 2925: 2919: 2912:Useful links: 2907:can be revoked 2846: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2779: 2776: 2756: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2649: 2608:Student Events 2588:Student events 2552: 2549: 2474: 2470:nomination of 2465: 2464: 2463: 2414: 2413:Juan Mata edit 2411: 2410: 2409: 2344: 2341: 2339: 2337: 2336: 2318: 2311: 2250: 2249: 2235: 2226: 2198: 2163: 2160: 2143: 2140: 2125: 2124: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2010: 2007: 1981:Reaper Eternal 1966:Reaper Eternal 1957: 1954: 1941: 1928: 1925: 1901: 1898: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1786: 1785: 1726: 1723: 1708: 1707: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1637: 1612: 1611: 1491: 1488: 1459: 1457: 1456: 1449: 1448: 1441: 1440: 1431: 1430: 1423: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1399: 1398: 1391: 1390: 1383: 1382: 1375: 1374: 1370:In the media: 1367: 1366: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1348: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1316: 1221: 1211: 1195: 1192: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1117:. Thank you. 1093: 1092: 1085: 1032: 1029: 974: 973: 971: 966:Nomination of 964: 961: 960: 932: 931: 930: 929: 920: 917: 914: 911: 901: 900: 891: 876: 873: 872: 871: 819: 816: 815: 814: 741: 738: 697: 694: 639: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 541: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 477: 472: 471: 470: 432: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 363: 360: 359: 358: 312: 309: 282: 264: 261: 240:Bryanmackinnon 223: 210: 204: 156:if you prefer. 147: 143:grading scheme 126: 123: 109: 107: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5242: 5231: 5228: 5226: 5224: 5218: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5208: 5206: 5204: 5193: 5190: 5188: 5186: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5152: 5150: 5148: 5142: 5140: 5138: 5131: 5130: 5127: 5125: 5123: 5117: 5116:Talk:Zuby/GA2 5110: 5109:Talk:Zuby/GA2 5104: 5103: 5100:. | Sent at 5099: 5095: 5090: 5087: 5083: 5076: 5074: 5056: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5041: 5039: 5035: 5029: 5028:Thomas Binger 5025: 5019: 5015: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4999:Thomas Binger 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990:Thomas Binger 4985: 4984: 4979: 4971: 4960: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4944: 4942: 4938: 4932: 4928: 4922: 4918: 4916: 4912: 4911: 4907:... that the 4904: 4903: 4902: 4896: 4895: 4890: 4882: 4869: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4848: 4839: 4835: 4834: 4831: 4827: 4826: 4823: 4819: 4818: 4815: 4811: 4810: 4807: 4803: 4802: 4799: 4795: 4794: 4791: 4787: 4786: 4783: 4779: 4778: 4775: 4771: 4770: 4767: 4764:Serendipity: 4763: 4762: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4751: 4747: 4746: 4740: 4735: 4734: 4729: 4727: 4721: 4719: 4712: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4689: 4687: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4643:google search 4640: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4622: 4617: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4601: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4581: 4574: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4533: 4529: 4526: 4523: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4503: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4470: 4466: 4462: 4458: 4455: 4450: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4428: 4424: 4418: 4408: 4404: 4397: 4393: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4373: 4369: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4342: 4338: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4318: 4315: 4312: 4306: 4303: 4299: 4293: 4291: 4282: 4278: 4273: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4258: 4253: 4251: 4244: 4236: 4232: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4215:Such-change47 4211: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4195:Such-change47 4192: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4160: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4135: 4130: 4128: 4118: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4108:Stallion55347 4105: 4101: 4098: 4095: 4091: 4081: 4080: 4077:. | Sent at 4076: 4072: 4067: 4064: 4060: 4053: 4051: 4029: 4026: 4021: 4019: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3996: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3985: 3980: 3978: 3972: 3962: 3961: 3958: 3957: 3950: 3946: 3936: 3935: 3932: 3929: 3924: 3919: 3911: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3895: 3893: 3889: 3883: 3879: 3873: 3869: 3867: 3863: 3860:, is also an 3858: 3855: 3853: 3852: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3837: 3836: 3831: 3823: 3812: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3785: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3770: 3768: 3762: 3758: 3752: 3751: 3746: 3741: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3717: 3716: 3711: 3710: 3705: 3702: 3698: 3697: 3689: 3687: 3683: 3677: 3673: 3668: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3634: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3591:Dr. Swag Lord 3588: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3572: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555:Dr. Swag Lord 3552: 3551:Jordan Geller 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3510: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3492: 3486: 3485: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3474: 3471:Serendipity: 3470: 3469: 3466: 3462: 3461: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3446: 3445: 3442: 3438: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3414: 3413: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3399: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3374: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3353: 3350: 3347: 3345: 3341: 3336: 3332: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3253: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3233: 3228: 3223: 3222:summary style 3217: 3214: 3213: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3187: 3185: 3180: 3178: 3173: 3164: 3163: 3160:. | Sent at 3159: 3155: 3150: 3147: 3143: 3136: 3134: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3098: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3085:contributions 3081: 3075: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3056:contributions 3052: 3046: 3040: 3039:this question 3026: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3009: 3003: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2968: 2967: 2962: 2961: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2923: 2920: 2918: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2864:extendedmover 2860: 2851: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2809: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2748: 2743: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2688: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2622: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2562: 2559: 2556: 2548: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2530: 2526: 2521: 2520:namespaces. 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2473: 2469: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2436: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2408: 2401: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2375: 2367: 2363: 2360:. Thank you. 2359: 2355: 2343:November 2021 2340: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2309: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2293: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2255: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210:like this one 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2101: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2067:I did nothing 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2032: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1982: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1953: 1952: 1947: 1940: 1934: 1924: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1846: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1638: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1543:, it states, 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1500:Kelli Stavast 1497: 1490:November 2021 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1434:Book review: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1426:Serendipity: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1346: 1337: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1259: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1242:public figure 1239: 1234: 1231: 1226: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1176: 1170: 1166: 1159:Kiino Villand 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1107: 1100: 1098: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1073: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1037: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1007: 1003: 1000: 994: 990: 986: 985: 969: 959: 958: 955: 954: 947: 943: 938: 933: 927: 926: 921: 918: 915: 912: 909: 905: 904: 903: 902: 896: 887: 885: 881: 880: 870: 866: 862: 856: 851: 850: 849: 848: 843: 841: 830: 829: 818:Kelli Stavast 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 791: 786: 785: 784: 783: 777: 768: 764: 760: 755: 751: 747: 737: 736: 732: 728: 723: 722: 718: 714: 710: 704: 693: 692: 688: 684: 677: 671: 670: 666: 664: 663: 655: 651: 648: 643: 631: 627: 623: 617: 612: 611: 610: 606: 602: 597: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 580: 577: 573: 567: 561: 560: 556: 552: 547: 533: 527: 526: 520: 519: 518: 514: 510: 504: 499: 498: 497: 496: 490: 489: 483: 476: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 447: 446: 442: 438: 424: 421: 420: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 388: 385: 384: 373: 369: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 318: 308: 307: 304:. | Sent at 303: 299: 294: 291: 287: 280: 278: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 241: 235: 234: 230: 226: 221: 218: 215: 208: 202: 198: 194: 193:Theroadislong 191: 188: 185: 179: 176: 172: 166: 164: 155: 151: 146: 144: 140: 136: 132: 127: 122: 120: 113: 105: 101: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5223:Spy-cicle💥 5222: 5203:Spy-cicle💥 5202: 5198: 5185:Spy-cicle💥 5184: 5147:Spy-cicle💥 5146: 5137:Spy-cicle💥 5136: 5132: 5122:Spy-cicle💥 5121: 5113: 5091: 5072: 5069: 5044: 4997: 4995: 4988: 4987: 4983:Did you know 4981: 4975: 4947: 4908: 4906: 4899: 4898: 4894:Did you know 4892: 4886: 4845: 4739:The Signpost 4738: 4725: 4717: 4708: 4697:TrangaBellam 4692: 4690: 4683: 4658: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4605:Content here 4579: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4527: 4524: 4521: 4484: 4480: 4407:good article 4401:The article 4400: 4345: 4316: 4307: 4287: 4285: 4261: 4259: 4255: 4248: 4188: 4169:WhatamIdoing 4139:WhatamIdoing 4131: 4124: 4096: 4087: 4084:WSJ Lede RfC 4068: 4050:Talk:PragerU 4049: 4046: 4017: 3976: 3968: 3965:Archive bot? 3952: 3942: 3930: 3898: 3859: 3849: 3847: 3840: 3839: 3835:Did you know 3833: 3827: 3802:Paul Siebert 3800:. Regards, 3795: 3771: 3763: 3748: 3742: 3719: 3713: 3707: 3680:— Preceding 3669: 3654: 3646: 3642: 3640: 3613:— Preceding 3610: 3548: 3516: 3490: 3398:The Signpost 3397: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3328: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3266:mass killing 3246: 3188: 3181: 3174: 3170: 3151: 3132: 3129: 3036: 2999: 2993: 2970: 2964: 2958: 2927: 2911: 2880: 2868:moving pages 2855: 2818: 2783: 2781: 2758: 2732: 2729:Ki (goddess) 2678:Ki (goddess) 2671: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2611: 2607: 2604:Student Life 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2524: 2522: 2483: 2416: 2396:(please use 2370:(please use 2346: 2338: 2314: 2298: 2291: 2258:— Preceding 2251: 2218:own the page 2175: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2145: 2126: 2104:You've made 2073:— Preceding 2070: 2012: 1977: 1959: 1930: 1927:Re: Rise Bar 1907:— Preceding 1903: 1883: 1863:sounds good! 1810:The Signpost 1808: 1787: 1747: 1728: 1709: 1681: 1671: 1645: 1617:WP:ABOUTSELF 1603: 1599: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1544: 1527: 1493: 1461: 1436: 1345:The Signpost 1344: 1326: 1322: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1245: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1197: 1162: 1101: 1094: 1077: 1057: 1043: 1041: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1004: 996: 982: 970:for deletion 949: 939: 925:Sign up here 923: 882: 835: 824: 821: 762: 750:Taylorthewho 743: 724: 711:can happen. 699: 672: 661: 660: 656: 652: 644: 641: 581: 575: 562: 543: 540:Olympics SNG 524: 487: 479: 434: 411: 375: 365: 344:TheresNoTime 314: 295: 276: 273: 245: 236: 222: 219: 216: 212: 189: 180: 160: 158: 130: 128: 124: 117: 70: 43: 37: 4856:Unsubscribe 4852:Single-page 4828:Crossword: 4583:designates 4409:has failed 4137:statement. 3969:Before the 3750:voting page 3645:instead of 3643:Bhararisain 3619:DrewDevine0 3527:Unsubscribe 3523:Single-page 3493:should fail 3274:WP:COATRACK 3270:mass murder 3177:WP:DRNMKUCR 3097:Vchimpanzee 3073:Vchimpanzee 3044:Vchimpanzee 3001:voting page 2500:except the 2435:2.26.184.57 2419:2.26.184.57 2127:Ok I will 1913:49.2.69.102 1712:JBFrontiers 1689:JBFrontiers 1641:you created 1547:Thank you, 1539:section of 1472:Unsubscribe 1468:Single-page 1446:Redirection 1246:contentious 1218:WP:BLPCRIME 394:Stalwart111 392:Thank you, 368:this result 331:(she/her • 131:Start-Class 119:Vito Trause 104:Vito Trause 36:This is an 5024:here's how 5014:, in 2016? 4927:here's how 4651:The Pillar 4593:WP:NCHURCH 4573:Shenaw2016 4557:Shenaw2016 4502:Shenaw2016 4486:Shenaw2016 3878:here's how 3857:The Chosen 3734:topic bans 3647:Bhararisen 3637:Bhararisen 3379:Smallbones 3331:sealioning 3288:WP:SEALION 3103:Mikehawk10 3068:a response 2985:topic bans 2831:Mikehawk10 2823:Mikehawk10 2819:Self-trout 2707:Mikehawk10 2654:Mikehawk10 2453:Mikehawk10 2441:attributed 2326:Mikehawk10 2315:legitimate 2299:looks like 2295:synthesize 2254:Mikehawk10 2239:Mikehawk10 2114:Mikehawk10 2037:Mikehawk10 1996:Mikehawk10 1988:Mikehawk10 1851:Mikehawk10 1815:Mikehawk10 1759:Mikehawk10 1704:Mikehawk10 1683:TechCrunch 1674:Mikehawk10 1654:Mikehawk10 1652:is for. — 1570:inserted " 1515:churnalism 1303:Mikehawk10 1256:WP:NOTNEWS 1181:Mikehawk10 1145:Mikehawk10 861:Mikehawk10 804:Mikehawk10 796:Mikehawk10 779:(she/they) 727:Mikehawk10 725:Noted. — 703:Mikehawk10 683:Mikehawk10 622:Mikehawk10 585:Mikehawk10 576:particular 546:WP:NSPORTS 509:Mikehawk10 460:Mikehawk10 437:Geschichte 431:Recreation 398:Mikehawk10 348:Mikehawk10 250:Mikehawk10 90:Archive 10 5161:Spy-cicle 5094:Yapperbot 4996:... that 4910:Glen Rock 4812:Gallery: 4432:Shushugah 4427:Shushugah 4377:Shushugah 4372:Shushugah 4290:help desk 4266:talk page 4189:Hi there 4071:Yapperbot 3730:site bans 3310:Follow-Up 3255:killings. 3252:WP:WEIGHT 3154:Yapperbot 3066:You have 2981:site bans 2703:WP:SCLOSE 2624:Regards, 2510:Knowledge 2498:namespace 2404:on reply) 2378:on reply) 2285:Elenatina 2264:Elenatina 2193:Elenatina 2177:Elenatina 2166:Hi Mike, 2110:this edit 2106:this edit 2051:Zune4ever 2031:Zune4ever 2015:Zune4ever 1962:SPI clerk 1933:this edit 1754:WP:BIASED 1568:this edit 1378:Opinion: 1287:Tiggerjay 1106:this link 855:Mrschimpf 475:Couch Guy 372:WP:NFOOTY 317:indicated 298:Yapperbot 163:help desk 135:talk page 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5073:Talk:God 5046:valereee 4913:is very 4836:Humour: 4356:criteria 4321:Rusalkii 4185:Addition 4100:contribs 3665:Gairsain 3661:Gairsain 3627:contribs 3615:unsigned 3507:Humour: 3491:Eternals 2930:Primefac 2876:subpages 2872:redirect 2592:Football 2584:Rankings 2506:Template 2502:Category 2402:|Chess}} 2400:reply to 2376:|Chess}} 2374:reply to 2272:contribs 2260:unsigned 2252:Thanks @ 2214:edit war 2087:contribs 2075:unsigned 1909:unsigned 1646:specific 1564:Beccaynr 1549:Beccaynr 1452:Humour: 1050:fair use 763:removing 759:contribs 525:HighInBC 503:HighInBC 488:HighInBC 5165:Mhawk10 4950:Amakuru 4680:Jacobin 4666:Mhawk10 4580:network 4509:Mhawk10 4423:Legobot 4368:Legobot 4262:C-Class 4191:Mhawk10 4155:Mhawk10 4134:Dhtwiki 4090:Mhawk10 4018:JBchrch 4001:Mhawk10 3995:JBchrch 3977:JBchrch 3901:Amakuru 3864:in the 3757:NoACEMM 3682:undated 3577:Mhawk10 3383:Mhawk10 3296:Mhawk10 3290:, then 3008:NoACEMM 2874:, move 2859:granted 2808:Colin M 2792:Colin M 2733:content 2725:achieve 2699:Joe Roe 2555:Hello: 2538:Stefan2 2306:and/or 2231:WP:RFPP 1586:itself. 1576:WP:MREL 1238:notable 1230:neutral 1216:& 1135:Stefan2 1119:Stefan2 993:deleted 839:chatter 647:Twinkle 572:WP:NOLY 566:Bagumba 551:Bagumba 139:develop 39:archive 4915:gneiss 4461:DMySon 4415:; see 4127:WT:MOS 4088:Hello 3955:buidhe 3344:WP:ANI 2518:Portal 2304:WP:NOR 1887:Estnot 1865:Estnot 1845:Estnot 1830:Estnot 1805:Estnot 1790:Estnot 1775:Estnot 1750:Estnot 1736:Estnot 1702:Hello 1672:Hello 1650:WP:RSN 1626:WP:RSN 1562:Hello 1541:WP:RFC 1523:WP:RSP 1519:WP:RSP 1332:(talk) 1323:Tigger 1297:(a-la- 1294:WP:BLP 1275:(talk) 1266:Tigger 1064:Go to 1022:(talk) 1013:Tigger 952:buidhe 790:Tamzin 775:Tamzin 746:warned 696:notice 616:Isaacl 601:isaacl 482:WP:AfD 4657:, or 4555:does. 4390:Your 4335:Your 3292:WP:AE 3226:; and 3167:MKUCR 2862:the " 2721:WP:SK 2516:, or 2443:to a 2388:Chess 2362:Chess 2292:can't 2234:with. 1634:WP:RS 1498:" to 1220:issue 1078:below 937:here. 709:these 418:lwart 382:lwart 16:< 5169:talk 5050:talk 4954:talk 4864:talk 4726:Talk 4701:talk 4670:talk 4628:EWTN 4609:Tide 4561:talk 4513:talk 4490:talk 4465:talk 4436:talk 4381:talk 4326:talk 4219:talk 4199:talk 4173:talk 4159:talk 4143:talk 4112:talk 4094:talk 4024:talk 4005:talk 3983:talk 3905:talk 3806:talk 3778:talk 3720:The 3676:talk 3623:talk 3595:talk 3581:talk 3559:talk 3535:talk 3387:talk 3361:talk 3342:(or 3300:talk 3268:and 3195:talk 3107:talk 3079:talk 3050:talk 3019:talk 2971:The 2934:talk 2835:talk 2827:talk 2796:talk 2769:talk 2742:talk 2711:talk 2687:talk 2658:talk 2632:talk 2606:and 2594:and 2542:talk 2536:. 2514:Help 2457:talk 2423:talk 2392:talk 2366:talk 2330:talk 2308:WP:V 2268:talk 2243:talk 2181:talk 2153:talk 2133:talk 2118:talk 2083:talk 2055:talk 2041:talk 2019:talk 2000:talk 1992:talk 1970:talk 1945:Talk 1917:talk 1891:talk 1869:talk 1855:talk 1834:talk 1819:talk 1794:talk 1779:talk 1763:talk 1740:talk 1732:this 1716:talk 1693:talk 1658:talk 1553:talk 1509:and 1480:talk 1307:talk 1204:talk 1185:talk 1169:talk 1149:talk 1123:talk 865:talk 827:Nate 808:talk 800:talk 754:talk 744:You 731:talk 717:talk 687:talk 626:talk 605:talk 589:talk 555:talk 513:talk 464:talk 454:and 441:talk 402:talk 352:talk 333:talk 254:talk 229:talk 197:talk 5159:Hi 5010:of 4976:On 4887:On 4647:yet 4430:-- 4375:-- 4125:At 3828:On 3792:ANI 3678:) 3333:to 3088:• 3070:.— 3059:• 2784:not 2737:Joe 2697:Hi 2682:Joe 2527:by 1803:Hi 1748:Hi 1632:to 1327:Jay 1270:Jay 1244:is 1087:On 1017:Jay 772:-- 676:Liz 362:AFD 342:Hi 329:TNT 5171:) 5052:) 5040:. 5026:, 4980:, 4956:) 4948:— 4943:. 4929:, 4891:, 4866:) 4858:* 4854:* 4850:* 4844:* 4703:) 4672:) 4664:— 4653:, 4563:) 4515:) 4492:) 4467:) 4438:) 4392:GA 4383:) 4358:. 4352:GA 4337:GA 4328:) 4314:. 4233:: 4221:) 4205:\ 4201:) 4175:) 4161:) 4145:) 4114:) 4007:) 3951:) 3947:· 3907:) 3899:— 3894:. 3880:, 3832:, 3808:) 3780:) 3759:}} 3755:{{ 3732:, 3667:. 3629:) 3625:• 3597:) 3583:) 3561:) 3537:) 3529:* 3525:* 3521:* 3515:* 3389:) 3363:) 3340:AE 3302:) 3197:) 3109:) 3082:• 3076:• 3053:• 3047:• 3021:) 3010:}} 3006:{{ 2983:, 2936:) 2909:. 2837:) 2821:— 2798:) 2790:. 2771:) 2713:) 2660:) 2634:) 2590:, 2586:, 2582:, 2578:, 2574:, 2568:, 2544:) 2512:, 2508:, 2504:, 2459:) 2425:) 2398:{{ 2394:) 2372:{{ 2368:) 2332:) 2274:) 2270:• 2245:) 2237:— 2183:) 2155:) 2135:) 2120:) 2089:) 2085:• 2057:) 2043:) 2021:) 2002:) 1972:) 1919:) 1893:) 1871:) 1857:) 1836:) 1821:) 1796:) 1781:) 1765:) 1742:) 1718:) 1695:) 1660:) 1555:) 1482:) 1474:* 1470:* 1466:* 1460:* 1309:) 1240:, 1206:) 1187:) 1151:) 1125:) 1075:}} 1070:{{ 995:. 948:) 944:· 867:) 810:) 757:· 733:) 719:) 689:) 665:iz 628:) 607:) 591:) 557:) 515:) 484:. 466:) 443:) 414:St 404:) 378:St 354:) 335:) 256:) 231:) 199:) 187:. 102:: 86:→ 5167:( 5088:. 5048:( 5030:) 5022:( 4952:( 4933:) 4925:( 4917:? 4862:( 4699:( 4668:( 4623:. 4575:: 4571:@ 4559:( 4511:( 4504:: 4500:@ 4488:( 4463:( 4434:( 4379:( 4324:( 4304:. 4294:. 4217:( 4197:( 4171:( 4157:( 4141:( 4110:( 4097:· 4092:( 4065:. 4003:( 3997:: 3993:@ 3949:c 3945:t 3903:( 3884:) 3876:( 3868:? 3804:( 3776:( 3674:( 3621:( 3593:( 3579:( 3573:: 3569:@ 3557:( 3533:( 3385:( 3375:: 3371:@ 3359:( 3298:( 3209:: 3205:@ 3193:( 3148:. 3105:( 3099:: 3095:@ 3017:( 2932:( 2833:( 2825:( 2810:: 2806:@ 2794:( 2767:( 2744:) 2740:( 2709:( 2689:) 2685:( 2656:( 2646:: 2642:@ 2630:( 2540:( 2455:( 2437:: 2433:@ 2421:( 2390:( 2364:( 2328:( 2287:: 2283:@ 2266:( 2241:( 2195:: 2191:@ 2179:( 2151:( 2131:( 2116:( 2102:: 2098:@ 2081:( 2053:( 2039:( 2033:: 2029:@ 2017:( 1998:( 1990:( 1983:: 1979:@ 1968:( 1948:) 1942:( 1915:( 1889:( 1867:( 1853:( 1847:: 1843:@ 1832:( 1817:( 1792:( 1777:( 1761:( 1738:( 1730:( 1714:( 1691:( 1656:( 1551:( 1478:( 1305:( 1289:: 1285:@ 1202:( 1183:( 1177:: 1173:@ 1167:( 1147:( 1137:: 1133:@ 1121:( 946:c 942:t 940:( 928:. 886:| 863:( 857:: 853:@ 842:) 836:( 832:• 806:( 798:( 792:: 788:@ 752:( 729:( 715:( 705:: 701:@ 685:( 678:: 674:@ 662:L 624:( 618:: 614:@ 603:( 587:( 568:: 564:@ 553:( 511:( 505:: 501:@ 462:( 456:2 452:1 439:( 416:★ 400:( 380:★ 350:( 327:~ 292:. 252:( 242:: 238:@ 227:( 195:( 177:. 167:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index