User talk:Madchester/Archive05

1130: 472: 211: 1571:. Now I have read both these project pages and am no closer to understanding why it's there. Overcrowding? It's the only block element in the article besides the infobox. Just because the average song article shouldn't have album artwork on it just by dint of it being on the album, doesn't mean when there is a connection to be discussed that it shouldn't be there. Taking away the image make the article no better, no more legal and in fact harder to follow. So why? 2191: 1528:. I don't want to waste a bunch of time edit warring with him again, so I'm instead going to try a new tactic. I'd like to get as many NBA editors as possible together on this, so that we can make a single unified push to the appropriate admins. I am at a loss for other tactics we can use to avoid his continued attempts to push his agenda and his unwillingness to compromise. Please contact me at 1778:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 141:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 863:

different from pre-screenings. I have no idea how accurate that is, but his actions were clearly based on reason rather than a deliberate attempt to damage the encyclopedia (i.e. 'vandalism'). Further, you violated 3RR in your edit war with him. That is itself a blockable offense... and blocking someone while engaged in a content dispute with them is one of the

1100:. People are continually taking spoilers out of it to be newbie-friendly, or for whatever reason, but that's not how it should be done. You get your point across much better than I do, you've had to argue a similar point before, and you're a VM fan, so I think you can sort it out better than I can. Leave me a message either way. -- 1986:

appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.". I know if you hit edit you can see the markup, but I'm pretty sure no one does this. I couldn't find any template, nor could I find it on the AFD page. So what's the template?

1845:

What I referred to was that if events such as the winners of the NBA are to be included should say Chelsea winning the Premiership or Liverpool winning the FA Cup be included to? Show me the edition where that happened. World and inter-continental champions fine but not national, it simple not world news.

1400:. Last I checked, there's never been a precedent of posting indvidual scores of games in Best-of-7 championship series, whether it was the World Series, NBA Finals, or Stanley Cups. I can see that you're from Edmonton, but you shouldn't let your personal biases get in the way of editing on Knowledge. -- 1487:

protect the image in the version it is right now. As I have pointed out on it's talk page, the copyright for the current image - peach suit and "busy background" - is not licensed correctly (you should have read that on the discussion page). Please unlock and revert yourself or let me know once it is

1159:

status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to

835:

Nice trying to accuse me of vandalism when I have already stated the reason for removing the statement. I didn't remove a section, I removed a statement, so you can atleast get that straight. Also, try providing the direct link to Rotten's verifiability, because the page you listed doesn't talk about

501:

240:

47:

for someone to know that the text was taken from wikipedia, as you didn't leave your note on the talk page until you recreated the article . . . I am always as careful as possible not to delete pages unnecessarily; following up on notes on the talk page, deleting and then restoring a version without

1844:

Well I knew that the Champions League Final had been included and did research. The Cricket World Cup as I said should be included as it a World Championship. The Heiniken Cup and the Champions League I didn't actually mention and they should have been included being inter-continental Championships.

2109:

I hope we don't need to see this go wrong. I don't want lies and incorrect information on the Zelda pages. That's just a thing of me, and I don't want to see that being rediculously vandalized by people who don't know what they're talking about and do nothing but annoy, vandalize and delete, rather

1825:

page? Most of the info comes from the pages of the referenced artists. I agree the "notable piano rockers..." section is a little bit subjective and has expanded from its original list - the beauty of wikip I guess. Originally I got the notable artists from allmusic.com - would this be enough of a

836:

Juggernaut. Also, pay attention to the Talk Page, but you were out voted when it comes to waiting until Friday to post the bit of trivia. By adding the continuously, after it has been agreed upon that it should wait till it can be verified by the movie itself, you are in fact vandalizing the page.

31:

the page had been marked as a copyvio for three weeks, and as coldplaying.com states nowhere that they took the text from wikipedia but instead says that the site is copyrighted by them, what else should i have done in that situation? after almost a month, nobody had done a thing to make it clear

2106:

Besides the fact that not everything, like media, can be added to the articles, WikiPedia wants it's sources cited, thus should they be. And most certainly when links like IGN are all over the place, there needs to be sources that correct them. On both Tingle RPG and Twilight Princess, two of the

862:

Madchester, I'm going to unblock Bignole. I understand that you feel this information is sufficiently verified for inclusion, but that does not make its removal by those who feel otherwise 'vandalism'. Bignole was clearly operating based on his belief that the official theatrical release could be

568:

could you please explain to me what your reasons are for deleting my report on the aaron donahue article. the greatest concern about the aaron article in the first place was that he wasnt sourched and not notable enough. so i took the time to write why i believe he is. this has nothing to do with

1985:

Hey Madchester. Knowing the your an admin and the you probably close debates sometimes, what is the code the makes a gray box and says "The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the

867:

few things admins are specifically precluded from doing. Please, let's all take a step back and find some way to resolve this peacefully. Waiting three days seemed like a reasonable compromise, but failing that... it ought to be possible to say something like, 'While the movie has not officially

2034:

Hi there. I'm a user with an interest in Transformers and was wondering why many articles had been cited as unsourced. I can't see anything that would be classed as needing a source (apart from the odd tech spec). Maybe I just can't see it but if you could post what it is occuring across these

1459:

These daily reversions for and against the World Cup scores are getting rather ridiculous. The fact is both sides have valid arguments, and you can't really say that one side is more "correct" than one another. Personally I don't like how editors are taking sides when these edit wars are not

620:

In regards to your sockpuppet warning, I also believe 67.101.128.103, 67.100.49.172, 67.101.128.6, and just about every IP in the 67.*.*.* range in the edit history of the Da Vinci Code is the same guy. But not in 66.*.*.* range, those are likely User:Rodgerbales, who I have talked to and has

1685:

If I were uncivil, I'd be saying much worse things about you. I'm not really sure why you're so insistent about removing things like noting that the models cited their modeling career for not going through with the head shaving, or why you're wanting to draw your little line in the sand over

1942:

What part of copyright is violated by mentioning a tech spoec number? I can understand it's not good to mention the whole text of the Tech Spec, but the 8 numbers? If I say starscream has 77979877 or somesuch, is that a violation? I didn't think anyone could copyright an 8 digit number - so

1552:

twice. Can I assume you just didn't read the rest of the article? It discusses the album, in particular the artwork, and its connection to the single. This makes it fair use, for the purpose of illustrating the discussed record. It's an essential illustration for the article to make sense.

846:

Again I would suggest reviewing the sources provided; which have in turn also been referenced by RottenTomatoes, more or less the internet standard in film reviews. It is a poor-faith deletion to remove information independently verified by multiple reviewers on separate websites.

1888:

The user's been removing multiple tags raning from PROD warnings to {{unsourced}} ones on multiple TF pages. Just before your series of comments on his talk page, he had also removed a series of image licensing warnings as well as my earlier tag removal warnings on his talk page.

817:

it's very difficult to remove a block, if I don't know your friend's IP address. I've been working on a rash of vandalism patrols lately and I don't want to release an IP used by a blocked vandal editor.... I don't want to release the IP addresses of such editors prematurely.

2373:

Yes, I just looked at this. I was not aware of this policy, although it does seem rather petty, particularly as words can be wikified. As an alternative, however, I shall find external links that display the lyrics in full, without any complaints from the copyright holder.

2340:), the site was non-notable (low Google search relevance) and there was votespamming from anonymous users to keep the site up. When regular editors vote for deletion and a host of anonymous first-timers vote to keep it, the notability of the site is seriously in doubt. -- 1410:

It wasn't a point. And what does that have to do with you using rollback? To answer your question: the round robins of the World Cup games surely cannot be that much more important than the games of a Stanley Cup final. And I don't even see how adding scores to a template

362:, I also believe that this deserves to stay on Knowledge. Everything here (aside from the 'made up one day in school' type articles, which I can't remember the accurate name of), in my mind, deserves to stay, as, if it happened, it should be in an encyclopedia. 328:

yielded a near unanminous decision to delete the article. I didn't vote in the poll, I simply reviewed the votes and opinions to close the poll and delete the article. Once again, if you believe that the article is worthy of un-deletion, then submit it to

1204:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 546:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 285:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1689:

One thing you might want to keep in mind, when deleting people's material because they're unable to offer you things like episode numbers when I've yet to see a similar demand for episode numbers in response to any other edit, is that just because

1740:

I've already indicated my intent not to engage with you and I have no interest in seeing your messages on my talk page or anywhere else. I am attempting to "agree to disagree" here, so, with all due respect and all possible civility, step off.

669:

Well, this doesn't matter now. Hganesan decided to personally attack another contributor, so I have restarted the 48 hour block from scratch. The block probably should have been longer, but it probably won't matter. Thanks anyway.

1580:

The guidelines indicate that (song) articles should not be crowded with excessive photos. The Knights of Cydonia article only contains one written section with less than 500 words. It's impractical per the guidelines above (and

32:

that the page wasn't a copyvio, and the deletion was done according to policy. the other "complaint" was not a complaint, but a question, as the user leaving the comment had no familiarity with wikipedia copyright policy and was

653:

for an extra 48 hours. The way I understand the blocking mechanism, since you blocked for a longer length while the previous block was active, it won't take effect. You have to unblock and then reblock for the desired length.

572:

in other words i am trying to sourch him, and provide a list of his accomplishments. if i cant get this through the wiki board, i will have to wait for aarons book to come out before i start another page on him.

1610:

despite having no relevance to the song except that it appeared on that album. Its only real value is to add a little instant context in the huge mass of text. To me it puts the discussed image in perspective.

1659:" for appropriate usage of additional photos in music-related articles. These articles are over 1500 words in length and the images provide appropriate breaks to the text and provide complimentary information. 1923:

has just modified some of your cleanup templates. I just figured I would tell you... {{Cleanup|MONTH YEAR}} is not a valid template. Use {{Cleanup-date|MONTH YEAR}}. Just figured that I would tell you.

1297: 2262: 1317: 886:

Yes, I saw that you had edited the text to use 'early reports indicate' wording similar to what I suggested above. I think that makes sense. Hopefully it will be good enough for everyone until Friday. --

708:

mentioned above. The pages and selections edited, comments and styles are essentially the same. The username and a number of IPs were blocked on May 19 and he seems to have found a new IP. I have added

1686:

including the "Frankenberry" nickname but if it makes you feel better to leave it out then by all means I hope you're satisfied, since I have no intention of getting into an edit war with you over it.

1874:, it is not a fix this article or it gets deleted process. In my understanding if someone removes the tag and it is still felt that the article should be deleted then it should go through the normal 581:

Why do you keep following ed dames, i know your one of his lackies. i keep sending messages to the varies parties involved in the deletions, but they dont answer me. i wonder if they feel guilty.

1200:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

542:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

281:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

740:

Duhon all that hganesan and I are doing are posting articles and putting on relevant facts that you are deleting, and you are loving steve nash like no other. Something should be done to you.

759:

I am apparently caught in an AOL "wide net" block for the last 3 hours. I am trying to edit one of the pages I created. It says you are looking for a vandal with IP address 152.163.100.68--

1598:

The photo would be the only non-meta image in the article. 108 of the 255 words in the article are written about it. How does this not only not support the text, but overcrowd the article?

1810:

The Ransack page was not only considered and given a disparaging comment. That's why I reverted it. If you want to consider it for deletion, don't print insults, or you'll get one back.

1755:

Basically it was a 1 goal game, the empty net was well, an empty net when the game was basically over. It was a pretty close game, don't you think we should leave the narrowly in --

1750: 2235:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 2326:

It seems as if the general consensus on both the discussion and deletion page of the article is to bring it back. There was never a good reason to delete it in the first place. --

2181: 1151: 1119: 2212: 1451: 2231:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1368: 1467:

to decide whether the scores stay or not. It's a rather standard procedure for dispute resolution. This is probably the best way to resolve the matter once and for all. --

999:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 1870:

etc. For the removal of the PROD tag, I'm a bit confused by your action. PROD is uncontested deletion if the user wants to contest it (for any reason) they can do so,

569:

starting the article on another page, if you read through the text on the talkpage you will clearly see that i am trying to verivy aaron by providing legimite links.

137: 129: 1471: 442:'d it. Unsurprisingly, it's been vandalised repeatedly. Seems simpler to draw your attention to it than to try to work out how to get it protected elsewhere... — 2312: 1998: 1759: 704:

Thanks for blocking him. I notice that you blocked the IP for 24 hours which I fear will be insufficient. I believe this user is almost certainly a sockpuppet of

48:

any copyvio in the history, etc. but there was no note on the talk page, no possibility of cleaning the history, no reference at coldplaying.com, and ultimately

794:

I need to know his IP address to be able to unblock it. Your friend is probably using a shared IP address and another vandal was probably using it yesterday. --

81:

Can you look up the history and revert to a version good enough, even if it's old? I gues you can choose a better than me. Aslo, find a better image, please. --

2247: 992: 337: 1774: 1766: 2104:

As an administrator, I hope you know better then get fedged up by a bunch of deleters. That's all they do. They don't contribute, they annoy and vandalise.

2070: 1866:

Looks like there is a bit of history with this, so if the user understands the problems of removing the tags I cannot easily tell, so I've pointed them to

1348: 1117: 493: 461: 389: 316: 2224:, meaning that is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 636: 198: 168: 127: 2327: 2166: 1216: 297: 986: 392: 377: 359: 345: 181:

I'd like a response on your opinion, since you removed the link I added, if you don't mind... just want to alert you that I made a note about it. --

1805: 1575: 1006: 890: 2344: 1674: 1615: 1593: 679: 1428: 822: 798: 325: 307:

I do not like being ignored, especially as you seemed so quick to disagree with my article, now you can't even be bothered to muster up a reply.

2378: 1729: 1589:" featured article: multiple sections and a word count of over 1800 words. Suffce to say, additional photos to support the text are welcome. -- 812: 2301: 1987: 1764: 1502: 876:...'. Gets the desired info into the article, but preserves the disclaimer that the final release version has not yet been seen. Acceptable? -- 851: 808:

tells me he is on AOL. Does that help to explain what has happened? If so what advice can we give him? He is not an overly 'technical' user. -

435: 428: 2240: 2141: 2132: 1205: 732: 547: 286: 190: 2147: 2138: 2114: 2111: 1247: 1226: 439: 693:. He's back to editing wars and posting pov. Reverting back to his old edits. Basically, destroying Steve Nash/Kobe Bryant pages again. 607: 558: 2337: 1893: 1822: 1109: 745: 2150: 788: 1285: 1264: 121: 2232: 2095: 1536: 1201: 1078: 543: 282: 173: 2173: 1745: 625: 2065: 459: 1404: 2048: 2039: 1718: 1703: 1492: 1391: 1163:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

505:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

403:

It+s my article, i wrote most of it. and you have no right to delete a article because you dont agree with the ideology behind it.

244:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1882: 1557: 1060: 921:

is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-

1083: 996: 319: 981: 719: 2367: 1932: 1038: 1020:, but didn't upload it. Doing so leaves the image open for vandalism on Commons; any changes would then be reflected here. See 880: 663: 352: 2137:

Please answer my issues rather then contributing to this violation. You are an administrator, you have your resposibilities.

1647:

Given the word count for the song is less than 500 words, there is no need to overcrowd the article with excess images. See

763: 639: 2330: 1852: 597: 2002: 1443: 1415:

can possibly be interpreted as disruptive. Just watch the use or rollback, do it manually and add an edit summary. Cheers.

960: 2316: 1801: 1209: 768: 551: 290: 164: 2281:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on 1336:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on 1190: 532: 451: 271: 2300:, to 13 a number of times. As I saw on his talk page, you already blocked him once for it. Please do it again. Thanks- 2023: 1858: 1508: 2062: 1830: 2160: 1735: 419: 2090: 1908:

than most other articles on television shows including at least a dozen other Alias articles. Hope you're appeased.

1331: 1300: 1260:

It's kind of a pain, give me a shout if you are confused as to what's going on and why I'm bitching about this. --

953: 917:, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. 690:

I saw you banned him previously. He's supposed to be banned for a week. He got his IP unbanned from another admin

1373: 98: 1645:

Once there is enough text to support the image, any contributor is free to shift the image back into the article.

1476: 1464: 1453: 1425: 1388: 946: 932: 840: 784:

is apparently being blocked by you. Maybes an IP mix-up? Can you please let me know what is happening? Thanks. -

691: 348:

article is non-notable, then you can bring up a 2nd AfD, if you please. Attack the content, not other users. --

1937: 742:; I'm not saying thats a threat but its pretty close, funny thing is i never even edited any of his Nash stuff. 384:

example of sarcasm directed at the method in which articles on Knowledge are moderated, not specifically to you.

1949: 1790: 1680: 1194: 536: 275: 153: 69: 1871: 2307: 2029: 1993: 1184: 526: 265: 726: 232: 200: 970:

All in place I think. It's not often I get to create an ITN article so I'm a bit shaky on the procedure!--

1666: 1043: 918: 777: 710: 699: 694: 644: 2282: 2107:

games that are vandalised by the others, they are giving incorrect information. Talk about reliability.

1785: 1710: 1635: 1541: 1337: 1017: 148: 43:

Sorry if this sounds snippy, but i did nothing against policy in this situation. There was absolutely

1954:

Just how much talk was there about deleting the Ransack page? DId anyone besides you want it deleted?

2350: 2087: 1365: 754: 613: 330: 1914: 1434: 1011: 584: 1980: 965: 857: 302: 175: 1664:

Please adhere to official policy as outlined by Knowledge. There are already two wiki-links to

1477: 976: 2261: 1316: 2291: 2269: 2075: 1713:, edits with no reliable references can be removed by any editor. Note that another editor ( 1353: 1324: 1240: 1129: 635:

Thank you very much for your help with the KNHC_(FM) article. Your work is much appreciated.

622: 471: 415: 210: 1970: 1960: 1021: 2321: 2053: 1839: 1075: 1030: 896: 675: 659: 630: 621:

complied with my requests and DOES NOT start edit wars that violate the 20 reverts rule. --

427: 407: 17: 1235:

Thanks, but you still haven't provided the detailed fair-use rationale for its use in the

380:

talk page were in no way an attempt to belittle you, because the criticism was a somewhat

8: 2276: 1966: 1421: 1384: 2296:

Madchester-Please block/warn 208.187.86.74 , the person that has changed 12 episodes in

104:

Nevermind abotu the image, it was a vandalized one, I reverted it to a good version. --

2297: 1974: 1920: 1816: 1549: 1542: 1529: 1178: 1167: 1067: 590: 520: 509: 340:), despite the obvious AfD results of your Adam and Andrew article can be considered a 259: 248: 55:

So sorry it got deleted, but again, i'm really not sure what else i could have done.

2015:

Wow...what a small world. Perhaps all Canadians really DO meet each other eventually

1160:

the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1155:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 502:

the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

497:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 241:

the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

236:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2356: 2010: 1955: 1944: 1860: 1811: 1607: 1105: 1071: 971: 805: 781: 769: 614: 447: 186: 1670:

which is more than sufficient for users wishing to view the album cover. Thanks. --

2216:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a 1849: 1721:

While the nickname is used within the fan community, fancruft is not permitted per

1612: 1599: 1572: 1554: 1093: 887: 877: 411: 74: 1899: 2341: 2129: 1925: 1905: 1890: 1726: 1671: 1631: 1603: 1590: 1586: 1564: 1499: 1468: 1401: 1397: 1223: 1066:

Hey, I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the interesting development at

1057: 1025: 950: 848: 819: 795: 671: 655: 367:

Adam and Andrew in particular had a significant effect on the description of the

349: 112: 89: 1585:) to place so many photos within such a short article. Contrast this with the " 1092:

Having battled on and off with you over spoilers in various articles related to

336:

Otherwise, belittling administrators for deleting your article (per comments on

2375: 2364: 2225: 2190: 2146:

Must I contact another administrator? Or could you have the decency to answer?

2125: 2064:

probably could have been mentioned somewhere if there was an issue, perhaps on

2045: 2036: 2020: 1797: 1714: 1627: 1568: 1417: 1380: 1051: 809: 785: 160: 66: 26: 2360: 2170: 2121: 2083: 2016: 1875: 1867: 1742: 1722: 1700: 1652: 1582: 1533: 1517: 1509: 1439:

I didn't re-add it after said explaination, no need to make block threats --

1361: 1305: 1236: 1097: 1085: 939: 925: 907: 830: 729: 716: 705: 650: 341: 713: 2217: 1827: 1648: 1489: 1101: 914: 897: 837: 760: 604: 594: 443: 182: 2221: 1969:, it will start to Far East and will end in the West. Here's the source: 1756: 1548:

Hi there. You've now removed the album artwork thumbnail from the single

1525: 1440: 1003: 935:. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the 931:

ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on

738:

Yeah this guy is really going overboard he just posted this on my page :'

555: 381: 368: 294: 1821:

Hey Madchester What sort of sources would you like to see quoted on the

1521: 1282: 1261: 1244: 1213: 107: 84: 1694:

don't happen to remember something doesn't mean that it's unverified.

685: 2244: 1516:

After a succession of blocks by numerous admins over the last month,

1156: 1074:, the article in question being one you had shown an interest in. -- 498: 237: 62: 2252: 2079: 1879: 1357: 1177:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading 519:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading 258:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading 75: 2120:

Please stop introducing material from your personal websites per

2100:

Why are you adding to the vandalism on the Legend of Zelda pages?

1781:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

144:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

563: 2054: 1656: 36:

as to why that particular page had been deleted. (That page

344:, which is not allowed on Knowledge. If you belive that the 1174: 516: 255: 2068:]? I see it got reverted per current DYK policy. Thanks! 945:

template back to the article, but feel free to list it at

52:

to lead me to believe that the article was clean . . .

2182:

Orphaned fair use image (Image:IveBeenExpectingYou.gif)

2102:

What good is it to remove information from the article?

1751:

It was a 1 goal game, wouldn't you consider it narrowly

371:, which had been widely spread throughout the Internet. 1197:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

1096:, I'd like to enlist your help with similar issues in 539:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

278:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

2165:

Please discuss the current Twilight Princess reverts

1626:

Again, please do not re-insert the album cover, per

1016:

Hello, Madchester! I noticed that you had protected

1208:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 550:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 289:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2239:will be deleted after seven days, as described on 2035:articles that needs sourcing maybe we can fix it. 1719:noticed the lack of verifiability to the nickname. 1222:A music-promo screenshot, licensing tag updated.-- 1024:, where I've included some more details. Thanks! 1800:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 163:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 1973:, which teams have spotted in 5 continents. - 1281:Thanks, Madchester! Have a great weekend. -- 576: 1532:if you're interested in helping out. Thanks. 2363:have been displayed without any objection? 2338:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Thilo Savage 1052:http://www.mingpaonews.com/20060601/gma1.htm 398: 326:Adam and Andrew Article for Deletion process 2355:Could you please explain why the lyrics in 1460:conducive to Knowledge's daily operations. 1378:...to revert things that aren't vandalism. 358:I have nothing against the article for the 1563:So you removed it again, this time citing 991:An image or media file that you uploaded, 728:to document this time. Thanks in advance. 2273:was updated with a fact from the article 1643:Knowledge's Image use policy states that 1328:was updated with a fact from the article 987:Image:Julie delpy.jpg listed for deletion 2228:if you think that that will be useful. 2110:then contribute something for a change. 1977:- 06:08 pm, June 28, 2006 (Manila time) 1602:20:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Incidentally, 1173:tag can be used to release it under the 515:tag can be used to release it under the 254:tag can be used to release it under the 1191:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use 997:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 533:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use 272:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair_use 14: 1872:WP:PROD#Contesting_a_proposed_deletion 1398:making a dispruption to make a point 1243:on fair use rationales. Thanks. -- 1056:does that ineterest you? Kenny, aka 434:It looks like you forgot to protect 2359:are copyrighted, whereas those for 2169:before reverting again, thanks. -- 1965:I added the confirmed locations of 1938:Tech Specs and copyright violations 1802:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 1606:includes a copy of the artwork for 1396:I'm rather disappointed in editors 1189:or one of the other tags listed at 531:or one of the other tags listed at 270:or one of the other tags listed at 165:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 23: 2220:. However, the image is currently 2096:Vandalism on Legend of Zelda pages 313:I would appreciate your comments. 24: 2390: 1943:mentioning it isn't a violation. 2260: 2189: 1950:Ransack Page's untimely deletion 1332:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour 1315: 1301:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour 1128: 470: 209: 2185: 1796:This is an automated notice by 1346:Thanks for your contributions! 1124: 947:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 933:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 649:Hi, I noticed that you blocked 593:goes wrong. You had to fix it. 466: 324:Once again, the results of the 205: 159:This is an automated notice by 1791:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1210:Media copyright questions page 1195:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1152:Image:SomethingStupidVideo.jpg 1120:Image:SomethingStupidVideo.jpg 552:Media copyright questions page 537:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 291:Media copyright questions page 276:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 154:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 13: 1: 2283:the "Did you know?" talk page 2213:Image:IveBeenExpectingYou.gif 1338:the "Did you know?" talk page 1181:, and then use a tag such as 523:, and then use a tag such as 262:, and then use a tag such as 233:Image:BrushfireFairytales.jpg 201:Image:BrushfireFairytales.jpg 2241:criteria for speedy deletion 1488:unlocked so I can do so. -- 1454:Coin flip dispute resolution 1206:criteria for speedy deletion 872:that there is a scene where 548:criteria for speedy deletion 287:criteria for speedy deletion 7: 1667:Black Holes and Revelations 1018:Image:Flag of Indonesia.svg 603:I'm already fix it. Cheers 10: 2395: 2044:Could you answer, please? 1786:Knowledge:Image use policy 1711:Knowledge:Reliable sources 1636:Knowledge:Image use policy 1634:guidelines and especially 1520:has returned yet again to 1452:World Cup status on ITN - 725:yup, he's returned. Added 191:06:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 169:03:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 149:Knowledge:Image use policy 122:00:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 99:00:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 70:19:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 2379:04:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 2368:04:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 2345:15:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2336:At the time of it's AFD ( 2331:14:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 2317:03:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 2161:Twilight Princess reverts 2040:16:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 2024:20:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 2003:14:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 1971:Amazing Race 10 locations 1961:Amazing Race 10 locations 1933:16:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 1894:21:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1883:16:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1853:13:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1831:09:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1806:10:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1760:03:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1746:07:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1736:Please stop talking to me 1730:07:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1704:06:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1675:21:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1616:21:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1594:21:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1576:12:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1558:14:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1537:23:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 1503:19:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 1493:19:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 1472:00:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 1463:I would suggest a simple 1444:04:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1429:03:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1413:with scores already on it 1405:03:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1392:03:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1369:02:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 331:Knowledge:Deletion review 138:Image:ColdplayAROBTTH.jpg 130:Image:ColdplayAROBTTH.jpg 2248:17:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 2174:20:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2151:21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2142:19:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2133:19:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2115:19:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 2091:01:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 2049:20:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1286:17:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1265:16:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1248:16:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1227:16:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1217:13:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1110:02:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1079:22:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1061:03:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1039:21:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 1007:13:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 982:08:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 961:19:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 891:01:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 881:00:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 852:23:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 841:23:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 823:00:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 813:09:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 799:17:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 789:16:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 764:13:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 733:23:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 720:07:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 680:05:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 664:03:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 640:06:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 626:00:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 608:05:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 598:04:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 1638:'s official guidelines. 1478:Image:Angela Merkel.jpg 868:opened yet it has been 559:22:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 452:19:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 393:15:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 353:14:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 320:11:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 310:Archive 04, Number 21. 298:13:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 176:Talk:The Amazing Race 9 1681:Civility My Aunt Fanny 1651:for examples such as " 1022:WP:AN#Image protection 40:have been deleted.) 2210:Thanks for uploading 2030:Transformers sources. 1772:Thanks for uploading 1498:Wrong person, non? -- 1374:Don't use rollback... 1149:Thanks for uploading 995:, has been listed at 993:Image:Julie delpy.jpg 491:Thanks for uploading 230:Thanks for uploading 135:Thanks for uploading 1900:Oh look! References! 1775:Image:Ian_Curtis.jpg 1767:Image:Ian_Curtis.jpg 1185:Non-free fair use in 527:Non-free fair use in 338:Talk:Icy_Hot_Stuntaz 266:Non-free fair use in 18:User talk:Madchester 2277:Polaris Music Prize 2226:You may add it back 2061:this change by you 1967:The Amazing Race 10 1304:, was selected for 1044:The Amazing Race :P 903:I have removed the 700:User:12.134.204.214 494:Image:Keaneband.JPG 462:Image:Keaneband.JPG 376:My comments on the 2298:The Amazing Race 9 2198:This media may be 1921:User:Alphachimpbot 1765:Image Tagging for 1550:Knights Of Cydonia 1543:Knights Of Cydonia 1530:User talk:Simishag 1137:This media may be 1068:User Talk:Hexadisc 748:21 May 2006 (UTC) 715:to document this. 591:The Amazing Race 9 479:This media may be 218:This media may be 128:Image Tagging for 2357:I Am Not Canadian 2351:I Am Not Canadian 2310: 2289: 2288: 2208: 2207: 1996: 1956:user:mathewignash 1945:user:mathewignash 1861:User:Mathewignash 1812:user:Mathewignash 1697:Have a nice day. 1649:featured articles 1608:Let It Be (album) 1344: 1343: 1147: 1146: 1072:Talk:B.J. Averell 1037: 980: 919:Proposed deletion 755:Please unblock me 615:The Da Vinci Code 589:Someone had make 489: 488: 450: 424: 410:comment added by 228: 227: 120: 97: 2386: 2306: 2264: 2257: 2256: 2233:my contributions 2218:fair use license 2203: 2193: 2186: 2073: 1992: 1930: 1915:Cleanup Template 1435:And if you noted 1351: 1319: 1312: 1311: 1202:my contributions 1188: 1172: 1166: 1142: 1132: 1125: 1094:The Amazing Race 1034: 1028: 1012:Image protection 974: 958: 944: 938: 930: 924: 912: 906: 645:Hganesan's block 623:M1ss1ontomars2k4 585:Goes Wrong...... 544:my contributions 530: 514: 508: 484: 474: 467: 446: 423: 404: 283:my contributions 269: 253: 247: 223: 213: 206: 116: 110: 105: 93: 87: 82: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2353: 2324: 2315: 2294: 2255: 2204: 2197: 2184: 2163: 2098: 2071: 2059: 2032: 2013: 2001: 1983: 1981:Archived Debate 1963: 1952: 1940: 1926: 1917: 1902: 1864: 1842: 1819: 1770: 1753: 1738: 1683: 1604:Get Back (song) 1546: 1514: 1481: 1457: 1437: 1376: 1349: 1310: 1298:Your article, 1187:|article name}} 1182: 1170: 1164: 1143: 1136: 1123: 1090: 1076:Maxamegalon2000 1046: 1032: 1014: 1000: 989: 968: 966:Java Earthquake 954: 942: 936: 928: 922: 910: 904: 901: 860: 858:Content dispute 833: 774: 757: 702: 688: 647: 633: 618: 587: 579: 566: 529:|article name}} 524: 512: 506: 485: 478: 465: 432: 405: 401: 378:Icy Hot Stuntaz 360:Icy Hot Stuntaz 346:Icy Hot Stuntaz 342:personal attack 305: 303:Adam and Andrew 268:|article name}} 263: 251: 245: 224: 217: 204: 179: 133: 117: 114: 108: 94: 91: 85: 79: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2392: 2382: 2381: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2323: 2320: 2311: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2265: 2254: 2251: 2206: 2205: 2196: 2194: 2183: 2180: 2178: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2058: 2052: 2031: 2028: 2012: 2009: 2007: 1997: 1982: 1979: 1962: 1959: 1951: 1948: 1939: 1936: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1863: 1857: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1818: 1815: 1794: 1793: 1788: 1769: 1763: 1752: 1749: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1715:User:KsprayDad 1682: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1661: 1660: 1640: 1639: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1545: 1540: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1480: 1475: 1456: 1450: 1448: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1375: 1372: 1342: 1341: 1320: 1309: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1230: 1229: 1145: 1144: 1135: 1133: 1122: 1118:Image Tagging 1116: 1114: 1089: 1082: 1065: 1045: 1042: 1013: 1010: 990: 988: 985: 967: 964: 900: 895: 894: 893: 874:blah blah blah 859: 856: 855: 854: 832: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 802: 801: 773: 772:being blocked? 767: 756: 753: 751: 736: 735: 701: 698: 687: 686:User: Hganesan 684: 683: 682: 646: 643: 632: 629: 617: 612: 611: 610: 586: 583: 578: 575: 565: 562: 487: 486: 477: 475: 464: 460:Image Tagging 458: 456: 431: 426: 400: 397: 396: 395: 386: 385: 373: 372: 364: 363: 304: 301: 226: 225: 216: 214: 203: 199:Image Tagging 197: 195: 178: 172: 157: 156: 151: 132: 126: 125: 124: 113: 90: 78: 73: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2391: 2380: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2361:I Am Canadian 2358: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2329: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2292:208.187.86.74 2284: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2272: 2271: 2270:Did you know? 2266: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2253:Did you know? 2250: 2249: 2246: 2243:. Thank you. 2242: 2238: 2234: 2229: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2201: 2195: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2093: 2092: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2067: 2063: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2017:I am Canadian 2008: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1978: 1976: 1975:ApprenticeFan 1972: 1968: 1958: 1957: 1947: 1946: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1922: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1895: 1892: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1862: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1846: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1829: 1824: 1814: 1813: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1777: 1776: 1768: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1709:According to 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1687: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1653:She Loves You 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1617: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1551: 1544: 1539: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518:User:Hganesan 1511: 1510:User:Hganesan 1504: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1486: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1455: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1327: 1326: 1325:Did you know? 1321: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237:Nicole Kidman 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1212:. Thank you. 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1140: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098:Veronica Mars 1095: 1087: 1086:Veronica Mars 1081: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1009: 1008: 1005: 998: 994: 984: 983: 978: 973: 963: 962: 959: 957: 952: 948: 941: 934: 927: 920: 916: 909: 899: 892: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 879: 875: 871: 866: 853: 850: 845: 844: 843: 842: 839: 824: 821: 816: 815: 814: 811: 807: 804: 803: 800: 797: 793: 792: 791: 790: 787: 783: 779: 778:Opera Project 776:My bona-fide 771: 766: 765: 762: 752: 749: 747: 743: 741: 734: 731: 727: 724: 723: 722: 721: 718: 714: 711: 707: 706:User:Hganesan 697: 695: 692: 681: 677: 673: 668: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 652: 651:User:Hganesan 642: 641: 638: 628: 627: 624: 616: 609: 606: 602: 601: 600: 599: 596: 592: 582: 574: 570: 561: 560: 557: 554:. Thank you. 553: 549: 545: 540: 538: 534: 528: 522: 518: 511: 503: 500: 496: 495: 482: 476: 473: 469: 468: 463: 457: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 430: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 394: 391: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374: 370: 366: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 351: 347: 343: 339: 334: 332: 327: 322: 321: 318: 314: 311: 308: 300: 299: 296: 293:. Thank you. 292: 288: 284: 279: 277: 273: 267: 261: 257: 250: 242: 239: 235: 234: 221: 215: 212: 208: 207: 202: 196: 193: 192: 188: 184: 177: 171: 170: 166: 162: 155: 152: 150: 147: 146: 145: 142: 140: 139: 131: 123: 118: 111: 103: 102: 101: 100: 95: 88: 77: 72: 71: 68: 64: 59: 56: 53: 51: 46: 41: 39: 35: 19: 2354: 2325: 2322:Thilo Savage 2302: 2295: 2275: 2274: 2268: 2236: 2230: 2211: 2209: 2199: 2177: 2164: 2128:. Thanks -- 2099: 2069: 2060: 2043: 2033: 2014: 2006: 1988: 1984: 1964: 1953: 1941: 1927: 1918: 1910: 1903: 1865: 1847: 1843: 1840:Sport on ITN 1835: 1826:reference? ( 1820: 1809: 1795: 1780: 1773: 1771: 1754: 1739: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1665: 1644: 1547: 1515: 1512:(yes, again) 1484: 1482: 1462: 1458: 1447: 1438: 1416: 1412: 1395: 1379: 1377: 1347: 1345: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1322:On June 11, 1299: 1199: 1162: 1150: 1148: 1138: 1113: 1091: 1064: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1015: 1001: 972:Keith Edkins 969: 955: 915:B.J. Averell 902: 898:B.J. Averell 873: 869: 864: 861: 834: 806:Buondelmonte 782:Buondelmonte 775: 770:Buondelmonte 758: 750: 744: 739: 737: 703: 689: 648: 637:66.165.21.53 634: 631:Thank you... 619: 588: 580: 571: 567: 541: 504: 492: 490: 480: 455: 436:Jagjeet Mann 433: 429:Jagjeet Mann 402: 335: 323: 315: 312: 309: 306: 280: 243: 231: 229: 219: 194: 180: 158: 143: 136: 134: 109:drini's page 86:drini's page 80: 60: 57: 54: 49: 44: 42: 37: 33: 30: 2328:4.89.184.26 2267:On July 8, 1878:process. -- 1850:Jimmmmmmmmm 1613:BigBlueFish 1600:BigBlueFish 1573:BigBlueFish 1555:BigBlueFish 1526:Kobe Bryant 1239:page. See 949:. Thanks! 888:CBDunkerson 878:CBDunkerson 440:Deletedpage 412:Cro..Scream 406:—Preceding 174:Please see 2342:Madchester 2130:Madchester 1928:Alphachimp 1906:references 1891:Madchester 1823:Piano Rock 1817:Piano Rock 1727:Madchester 1672:Madchester 1591:Madchester 1522:Steve Nash 1500:Madchester 1469:Madchester 1402:Madchester 1224:Madchester 1084:Help with 1058:SYSS Mouse 1026:Flcelloguy 849:Madchester 820:Madchester 796:Madchester 672:PS2pcGAMER 656:PS2pcGAMER 564:crowscream 350:Madchester 2376:Quiensabe 2365:Quiensabe 2313:Guestbook 2046:SMegatron 2037:SMegatron 2021:KsprayDad 2011:KsprayDad 1999:Guestbook 1859:block of 1798:OrphanBot 1465:coin flip 1418:Sasquatch 1381:Sasquatch 1168:GFDL-self 1157:copyright 913:tag from 810:Kleinzach 786:Kleinzach 510:GFDL-self 499:copyright 438:when you 249:GFDL-self 238:copyright 161:OrphanBot 2308:Contribs 2237:articles 2222:orphaned 2171:ReyBrujo 1994:Contribs 1919:My bot, 1743:Otto4711 1701:Otto4711 1632:WP:IMAGE 1587:Get Back 1565:WP:IMAGE 1534:Simishag 1241:this bit 1179:fair use 1088:, please 870:reported 730:Simishag 717:Simishag 521:fair use 420:contribs 408:unsigned 260:fair use 76:Coldplay 2303:TeckWiz 2200:deleted 2126:WP:SPAM 2066:WPT:DYK 1989:TeckWiz 1828:Westius 1717:) also 1655:", or " 1628:WP:SONG 1569:WP:SONG 1490:Boereck 1483:Please 1193:. See 1139:deleted 1102:SonicAD 1048:Colin, 838:Bignole 780:friend 761:Hokeman 605:Aleenf1 595:Aleenf1 535:. See 481:deleted 444:Haeleth 274:. See 220:deleted 183:SonicAD 58:cheers 50:nothing 34:curious 2148:Hyrule 2139:Hyrule 2122:WP:NOT 2112:Hyrule 2057:change 1876:WP:AFD 1868:WP:NOR 1757:Tawker 1723:WP:NOT 1583:WP:MoS 1485:do not 1441:Tawker 1004:Arniep 556:Jkelly 295:feydey 45:no way 38:should 27:clocks 2055:T:DYK 1904:More 1657:Layla 1283:Yamla 1262:Yamla 1245:Yamla 1214:Yamla 1033:note? 956:juice 951:Mango 831:Funny 746:Duhon 16:< 2245:meco 2167:here 2124:and 1725:. -- 1630:and 1567:and 1524:and 1175:GFDL 1106:talk 1070:and 977:Talk 940:prod 926:prod 908:prod 865:very 712:and 696:-EW 676:talk 660:talk 517:GFDL 448:Talk 416:talk 390:Will 333:. 317:Will 256:GFDL 187:talk 2080:Lar 1880:pgk 1692:you 1358:Lar 1306:DYK 382:emo 369:Emo 67:ah? 2285:. 2082:: 2026:T 2019:. 1924:-- 1889:-- 1855:) 1833:) 1804:. 1360:: 1340:. 1183:{{ 1171:}} 1165:{{ 1108:) 1031:A 975:( 943:}} 937:{{ 929:}} 923:{{ 911:}} 905:{{ 847:-- 818:-- 678:) 670:-- 662:) 654:-- 577:NN 525:{{ 513:}} 507:{{ 422:) 418:• 264:{{ 252:}} 246:{{ 189:) 167:. 106:( 83:( 63:He 61:-- 2202:. 2088:c 2086:/ 2084:t 2076:+ 2072:+ 1848:( 1426:c 1424:| 1422:t 1389:c 1387:| 1385:t 1366:c 1364:/ 1362:t 1354:+ 1350:+ 1308:! 1141:. 1104:( 1036:) 1029:( 1002:— 979:) 674:( 658:( 483:. 414:( 399:h 222:. 185:( 119:) 115:☎ 96:) 92:☎ 65::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index