3466:
Knowledge should be reflective of, and reactive to, the names used in the real world. Not proactive in making up names for things itself. But that's the case here. Your argument that no one is calling them "self balancing two-wheel boards" is just as accurate as the fact that no one on the street is calling them "self-balancing scooters" either. For better or worse, as the article itself points out, people are uniformly calling them "hoverboards" now. That's an undeniable fact. And any folks who are wringing their hands unnecessarily to find an alternative moniker right now, are just in denial over this fact. I happen to hate that word for them myself, because it's really not what they are, or what they do. But just like you, I don't control that. So you can leave this closure in place, as you're clearly determined to do. But we'll just be right back here in a few months (if not sooner) doing this all over again. You also did not address my concern that you closed the discussion while people were still weighing in. The last comment being less than 24 hours before your closure.
3346:, since no real consensus has been established. The current !vote count of 4-2 is closer to 4-3 if you include the final comment, which notes that any new change, if there was going to be one, should incorporate the word "hoverboard" and not the word "scooter." That certainly is not in support of this move. Even without it, 4-2, with two agreeing without comment, is not consensus. More importantly, this has been debated for months now. Once it was even admin closed as no consensus. But it was reopened on request, for a question. After being left stagnant for a month. Since being reopened, there needs to be adequate time for people to respond to these newest comments. But in no way is the current vote conclusive. So please re-open it and leave it to an admin to close: when it appears everyone has had a chance to weigh in and no further comments can reasonably be expected. Thanks.
589:) and a consensus was formed against that behavior. So, while it was not a specific individual edit that caused the topic ban, it was the consensus of editors who have interacted with your editing style that accommodating your methodology was counterproductive. No one will be able to provide you with specific diffs, nor do they need to. I would recommend that you read their comments on the ANI noticeboards, and take them to heart. Edit in other areas of the Encyclopedia for six months to show that you have learned from the experience, and appeal the ban at that time. Otherwise, wait the year and request then. It is unfortunate when this happens; I wish you well in the upcoming months, and much success in contributing to other areas!
3362:(previously having been rejected), as well as the current title being obtusely awful, the logical choice is to move the article. If a new, better, term surfaces that refers to the topic, another RM can be opened to consider it. So far however, no such term has been suggested, and as "Self-balancing scooter" is better than the current title the logical choice is again, to move it. This is a case of the proposed title being better than the current one, and a perfect title perhaps not having surfaced yet. Edit: also, of the two 'oppose' !votes, one was objecting to the caps error in the move request, and the other gave no reason for objection.
3592:§ Proposed edits above, the vast majority of the reliable sources in this article do use the term "hoverboard", that would be an argument for Hoverboard (scooter), per WP:COMMONNAME. I see that the term "Scooter" is very ambiguous, and there are several different types of "ground scooters." It's pretty clear that comment had nothing to do with "cap issues." You also misunderstood my point. I'm not interested in changing the name to "Hoverboard." I'm simply stating the obvious, which that editor also noted: is if any name change had to occur at this time (which it doesn't), "Hoverboard" is the only name that could be justified.
386:
stepping on a nail. I think its better you throw in the towel and don't do anymore interrogatory things because they are not going to listen or care at this point. I have no interest in the article and have no dog in the show except connected with one over bearing person and knowing their way of operating. Cut your loss's I would say. If you are innocent then grin and bear it, but if you continue the argument after this it might be used against you somehow. Sound weird? Well it read weird also.
2186:
a member for The
Recording Academy, you can't even do that unless you have been directly verified as a large contribution to the recording industry. There are multiply topics address Michael and his company, so thus, it provides everything needed. If you read through them, you will see nearly every sentence in the article has a source backing it up. I've been working on this article for months. What other information do you need? (frankly, it meets the standards. There's plenty of coverage. )
31:
3621:, once again you failed to accurately assess either my comments, or their context. I objected there as the RM was only reopened because someone decided they wanted to ask a question after the closure - when they had failed to ask that question in the OVER A MONTH prior when no new comments were made. But I object to your closure - in part - because it came JUST ONE DAY after the last comment. So try as you might, there is zero basis for comparison. Or conflating the two.
3588:
3509:
these things are called? The tenor of your responses in our discussion seem to suggest you really might be better suited expressing your opinions at the RM, rather than doing a supposedly impartial, non-admin close of it. You obviously have strong opinions and want to weigh in with them yourself. No harm in that. But given everything, I just don't see a compelling and/or objective rationale for this early close; and I believe policy and practices recommend against it.
1064:
2796:
1231:
1094:
216:
3142:
etc) are put into perspective. To me, 14/8 is not consensus, it isn't even two thirds, and in the absence of a clear policy reason for a move, or clear evidence of primary topic, this RM is going nowhere toward convincing people from either side. Disambiguation is not a bad thing and the status quo is just fine. The page view statistics themselves indicate that readers are getting to their desired destination just fine (the dabs page views are
885:
812:
665:
636:
ARB (which is also not appropriate for a novice like me) nor to write with a fixed account because my assumption was that he has friends if he acts that way. Just to clarify(because I have seen Arthur Rubins comment) - I work for a hydropower company and not for the
Military-Industrial-Complex as Arthur - and are not associated with Rossi. Just a privat physics geek interested in CF and other interesting banned disciplines. rgds.
607:, and for the clarity it provides me. While I have read and considered the comments on the ANI, I do feel that I was unfairly misrepresented by Andy's friends on the ANI noticeboard, if I had known how much influence he had on there, or how many times that even more serious offences of his had been overlooked, I never would have made the complaint, as in hindsight, its no surprise that I got
1009:
3532:
and I don't see a good rationale for changing the verdict to "no consensus" (which is the only other option I would consider at this time). You can easily argue for your real point (the hoverboard name) with a new RM that isn't down at the bottom of the backlog (where editors are unlikely to find it). I would suggest opening a new RM if you are unsatisfied with the current title.
3194:. Consensus is about being able to persuade people to shift their viewpoint and/or compromise. As far as I'm seeing with this RM, no one is willing to change sides on this, they are either familiar with the city, or familiar with the grape/wine and aren't willing to consider that the other one is primary, the compromise is to leave it at the dab page. When both
3389:
2647:. Perhaps I should have left a message clarifying why I rejected the article for "not having enough reliable sources", although I thought that the automatic notice is rather clear about it. Am I missing something? I feel like my rejection was totally justified. The only other news sources I can find on him are a mention here:
3527:, like pretty much the definition of it. However, to get to the real point, I accepted the RM on the basis that all editors were in agreement (except you) that A: the move request had a caps issue that should be fixed, and B: that the new title was better than the old one. If you want to argue for changing the name to
1194:
443:
5016:
You don't seem very willing to listen to the most basic of criticism or suggestion. Despite the high level of technical knowledge present in your articles, they currently don't even attempt to make themselves understandable to non-programmers (as a non-programmer myself I am actually highly qualified
4143:
Hi before you nominate an article for speedy deletion again and without checking is it just one off please allow editors time to accumulate associated data and sources in order to connect all the articles together as I said all these events were connected and included both mens and womens tournaments
3881:
event and have been uncontactable. The two sources you have provided are useful for saying that Ian Page is performing Mozart 250, and would be considered high quality sources for a "Mozart 250" article. However, as they only give passing mentions of Ian Page, they are not "significant coverage", and
3508:
Given all this, are you really sure you can justify a non-admin closure less than a day after the last comment? On an RM that is as non-clear cut as this one is? Especially when the proposed new name, is one that everyone agrees, unanimously, isn't going to be either the best or final answer for what
3141:
I respectfully have to disagree, while I don't have a stake in this, little evidence listed in the move request enticed me either way. the page view statistics are a bit higher for the city, but the google statistics are not very clear, especially when additional searches (adding together wine+grapes
2757:
I agree with you that articles like this are unlikely to be deleted if taken to AfD, but as an AfD reviewer myself, it is IMO way better if articles have a few good sources before accepted at AfC, as they are then far less likely be nominated for deletion and end up wasting a bunch of peoples time at
2714:
Perhaps it is a matter of personal preference, but even if something demonstrably satisfies one of the notability criterion, I feel like having at least 2 (better 3) significant independent reliable sources is necessary before I will accept an article at AfC. The AfC notability message clearly states
2185:
It directly mentions his company, many of them are about his shows events, which provide evidence for
Michael. There are passing of Michael's name, yes, such as in line-up listing or such, but in conjunction with the numerous other sources that were already there, it provides adequate information. He
3689:
is transparent nonsense. We clearly disagree. But only because you have been unable to offer any objectively defensible reasons or explanations for this closure. Likely because you seem more invested in being an advocate in this discussion, rather than being an objective and disinterested party. But
1938:
You are correct. Much of that material was copy-pasted, but that's because it was the material my office wrote for the adjutant general position. I'm the State
Historian for the Nevada National Guard and I work out of the Public Affairs Office in the Office of the Adjutant General in Carson City. If
565:
I agreed to abide by Admin decision on this matter and I stand by that, however, I also requested that I be told why, specifically: what edits, are construed as misconduct so that I can improve my actions. since you did not cite any reason for the above topic ban except 'as per discussion' (where no
319:
But I suggest you stand down now. Just let them do what they want to do. Stop editing the article in question for a while. I think the AnI scene can be partisan according to people throwing in for their favorites like the comments indicate. You don't have to respond to the what I would call annoying
4944:
With regards to my editing style, and what a do here on wikipedia; yes, I do a lot of bureaucratic/organisational work along side quite a few others that help to insure that wikipedia does not descend into anarchy. I contribute to articles quite often, and have on occasion written a few articles as
4840:
The time limit generally refers to A1 and A3 criteria as stated above. In the first case, it was for G11 (advertisement), for the second it was not a speedy tag, but a BIO PROD on a biography with no refs, as is required, and for the third I waited longer than 10 minutes. Next time add some content
4066:
The notice was not meant to imply that the given citations were not useful. Just to suggest that additional sources are needed to expand the article, apologies if the article is still being written, many articles are abandoned by their creators shortly after moving to the article space, and I can't
2304:
It is a source for one off
Michael's clients, providing a citation for him and his company and his client. What exactly do you need to satisfy the request for article creation? Michael literally attends the Grammy award shows. Like I'm not sure how you don't see nobility. He was over 300k followers
2213:
Well first, i see no mention to the New York Times in any of the references, please point it out to me as I must be missing it. Secondly, you repeatedly say things like "in conjunction with the numerous other sources that were already there" when this statement is useless. None of the other sources
635:
Otherwise - your contribution and the topic ban put some focus on this article - and the attempt to get rid of the unpleasent talk page ended up in merging e-cat into Andrea Rossi - which somewhat triggered the
Streisand effect. So I would summarize it as heroic casualty. I did not dare to call for
4761:
The notifications are sent as a courtesy, to notify you that the articles in question have been proposed for deletion (as you started the articles). Each is for a separate article, so I'm not spamming (also the messages are automated when I use the twinkle tool to PROD an article) You have up to a
4461:
Yes, sorry, that was me, I should have removed the message at your talk page (I forgot that it was automated). I accidentally used the wrong criteria when declining the submission the first time. I reverted and corrected the review shortly afterward. I meant to say that it is improperly referenced
3531:
or something similar, simply open up a new RM and ping all the commenters from the previous RM, this will be far cleaner than reopening the current RM when it has caps issues and most of the comments are not about the hoverboard name at all. In summary, nothing is accomplished by reopening the RM,
3361:
This RM has been open for two months now, as you may or may not know, there is a significant backlog over at the RM page. The closure of an RM is not based on vote counts, but on the strength of the arguments, as there does not seem to be a very strong argument for "hoverboard" or some derivation
2568:
Hi, I'm just overwhelmed by all the things necessary to creat a simple album page here on
Knowledge. I merely want to make a page for this most recent album that is comparable and similar to the previous album's Knowledge pages. Although I made a few very brief Knowledge pages last year, it seems
1404:
Because of the length of my sig i couldn't fit the ( ) formatting, and copy pasting an nbsp in that location (or a normal space for that matter) results in one not being displayed as a weird quirk of HTML. The space you removed was actually a special character that has a nonstandard space
4936:
Because I am not an expert or very knowledgeable in the subject? I'm not entirely sure what the subject is, and that is the main problem. A wikipedia article should, at the very least, explain to the reader what the article is about (and any reader should be able to understand the context of the
3443:
be another name worth considering, eventually. In fact consensus seems to be that the current name of the article was very bad. Your argument seems to be that we shouldn't change the name because the proposed one is not good enough. However, everyone else (that wasn't objecting based on the caps
1517:
My sig hits the character limite as well :p Look at the code for mine, in your "span style" opening tag you can add a parameter "padding:0 3px;" that will add a few pixels of padding between the text and inside border (and tweak the numbers to see what works best for you). I'm far from an expert
3591:
But you also misstated and misinterpreted the actual discussion. Contrary to your characterization that "all editors were in agreement (except you) that A: the move request had a caps issue that should be fixed," the very last comment posted the day before your closure was: " If, as asserted in
3465:
The eBay link is simply evidence of a new and emerging product which will be competing for this same name. It's a warning that this name will not be unique and using it will only add even more confusion to an already muddled situation. A name which, by the way, even you agree is not definitive.
3387:
just a couple weeks ago. And as we're judging arguments, you yourself just made the case for not adopting this proposal. The proposed title is not definitive. That's exactly the opposition view. So in a few months, we'll just be looking to change this title again. Which only adds more confusion
1974:
Thanks for the review of the page. We will make a correction of the text by english native speaker, you have been right about translating from German language, so we will work again on the text. Third party references will be available within the next weeks when the movie world premiere will be
4883:
doesn't have a speedy banner, it has a BLP prod. This is very different, as editors have up to a week to add sources to the article in question, whereas speedy tagged articles are generally deleted very quickly. Much like the PRODs I just placed on several of the articles you created that give
2079:
I was told by the help desk to add 1 more source. I added several. I'm not sure what the problem is. The refrences clearly show notibility based on the guidelines of Wiki. Every source added was a new, reliable, verifiable, independent news sources, such as The New York Times. Did you read the
1641:
Hi, Insertcleverphrasehere. A helpee came to the IRC help channel today asking about that draft. Were you saying the page was all good except for the disambiguation? If so, you could have just accepted it and disambiguated it yourself, rather than expecting the article creator to fix such a
584:
Forgive the intrusion, but I hope to offer some clarity here. I have had no involvement in this, but I have learned a bit of the way that this works. Basically, it appears that your fellow editors have pointed out a pattern of behavior that they believe interferes with the maintenance of the
385:
But therein you are hooked. As Kafka once said something like, there is no worse thing than implying guilt where one can not defend oneself,,, or something like that. In other words I would say remove you plea from below and consider what happened a arbitrary act of nature or like accidentally
4456:
I submitted an article that had eight citations. They were reliable sources including magazines and books. The topic of the article is a deceased political figure in Israel. There is already a Hebrew wikipedia page published about this person, and it uses many of the same sources as the one I
3885:
As for the print article in Opera, it is perfectly acceptable to create a ref for a print only article, if you have a scan. Interview articles are generally considered sources only for direct quotes of the artist, and I am pretty sure they are otherwise considered a primary source (unless the
5042:, (in the category you linked above). The structure of this article, particularly the lede's layman explanations, are exactly what are lacking from the articles listed above. Without this information it simply becomes tables of technical information that is indecipherable to any non-expert.
611:
as a result (also I'll note that Andy warned me about the possibility of the boomerang in question, so this result rests on my shoulders not his). Anyway, thanks for your clarity on the subject, much appreciated. I withdraw any request for further information regarding my topic ban from
2569:
that the process is now more complicated/convuluted in comparison. I'm hoping there is just a simplified walkthrough or tutorial that I can use in order to creat a page for this individual album, of which there are plenty of valid online sources to choose from. Thank you for your time.
2449:
I am
Ethanjkagan and you reviewed one of my articles, SpreadsheetWEB. I wanted to ask you a few questions about this article, whereas i'm rather new here. I've been looking at similar pages and to be honest, all other pages look A LOT worse than what I wrote in that article (e.g.
1495:
Not sure what that means... perhaps you know more than me after all. But in all seriousness, I've got like a couple extra characters available for my sig, thats why I couldn't use formatting. my damn name is just too long and I wanted links to contributions, talk, and user pages.
3557:
when the move request was previously reopened, you objected based on the fact that there had been plenty of discussion (now you argue that the discussion should continue based on one new comment?). The only difference is that I didn't make the same decision he did, and you
2162:"We need significant coverage. This helps show that a topic meets the notability guidelines. We need multiple sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail. Not: passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the topic's name in it."
272:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
2857:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
1295:. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
3102:, and given how long it has been open it doesn't seem that one is likely to develop. Given that the search numbers are not clear (especially when adding in 'muscat+wine'), I don't see how there is a strong policy argument that was put forth to support a move either.
906:
833:
714:
351:
I would edit out your comment below about asking for more information about 'what you did wrong'. Going plaintively as a supplicant is a nonstarter because,,,,,, not sure why, but obviously you made some good arguments and no one cared. Edit other articles.
4194:
with A1 seven minutes after creation. There is a broad consensus to wait at least 10-15 minutes before tagging with A1 and A3. Another thing in this case is, that the article was in
Serbian, and the text makes sense if you translate it, it's just a copy of
2822:
to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The
Committee's decision is
1054:
2222:
Yup this isn't a RS or an independent source, nor does it mention the subject). I don't feel like wasting my day running through them all and explaining why but almost all of the references would not be accepted in an article. What more do I say? Refer to
3202:
are present this becomes rather apparent. The statistics are not clearcut enough to have merit alone, so in the absence of any evidence that consensus is likely to form (this RM was open for 17 days), I have to say that one is not likely to ever develop.
3491:- and your responses. Especially, since this individual was the admin who originally closed this RM, with no consensus - then reopened it only upon request. There you argued that 13-8 was not consensus. But here you're arguing that 4-2 (actually 4-3) is?
1166:, a German insider joke should be of interest for you. Its a scientific joke used as well on hot fusion. It goes like that: Oil will and always has been on the verge of being depleted in the upcoming 30 years, since modern oil drilling started 1858 in
2454:). This product doesn't have publicity all over the news, therefore I can't find too many sources. Most of what I wrote here, I wrote from personal experience from using this product for 3 years and my interactions with the developers. Please advise.
4242:
Hi. Just a quick heads up that I'm contesting this PROD since the school includes a high school division. These are routinely more or less automatically kept at AfD. You are welcome to bring the piece to AfD if you disagree with this analysis of
518:
If Insertcleverphrasehere edits appropriately for the next year, but continues the same disruptive behavior after the expiration of the topic ban, a formal request will be filed for an indefinite community ban against Insertcleverphrasehere at
2127:
Did you actually view the sources? How does the New York Times not quality? All the references are independent, and moreover, all are reputable. I can edit wording, I'm not worried about that. But it most definitely is significant coverage.
4457:
submitted. Yet, somebody declined my submission by claiming it did not have reliable sources. I feel the editor was discriminating against the subject of the article, since the stated reason of "lacking reliable sources" could not be true.
1223:
1146:
I just wanted to thank you for your input in the Peak Oil article GA review; and for the Barnstar! You had some very useful comments. I also want you to know that I will be updating the page as developments arise. Best of luck with your
3039:
Good work! I have accepted the article. One thing I would like to see though is a Ref to an obituary in the death section if you can find it, rather than relying on the guardian for this information. Other than that, top notch work!
91:, it would be wise for you to disclose any commonality of interest between you and Rossi, or any connection between you and other editors. Furthermore, if, by chance, you are working for someone paying you to edit Knowledge, you are
2305:(which, accordingly to wiki bypasses the need for extra sources as an "active fanbase" proves nobility. There are several articles that mention Michael, his company, and his accomplishments, and all the ones cited are independent.
2009:
2890:
article should also be listed with the Gamergate discretionary sanctions (they currently are not tagged as such but perhaps they should be). Gender-dispute related vandals and trolls show up all the time at both articles anyway.
2376:
722:
3865:
Would either of those be suitable as secondary sources? Another possibility is Opera magazine, who did an article in January 2015 on Ian Page and Mozart 250. Again, I have scans of the print but there is no online version.
2952:
914:
841:
3872:
And of course there are endless newspaper and maagzine reviews of the concerts Ian has conducted but reading the guidelines I understand these are not suitable. I would really appreciate any guidance you could give on this.
3143:
1689:
3123:
Well, I know I participated, but I'd regard 14-8 as a consensus to move, given the strength of the evidence. At least, it's not clear to me that there's a lack of consensus here. Respectfully, I ask that you reopen the
4884:
insufficient context to the reader. You have up to a week to fix the issues, or else remove the prod, though I recommend fixing the issues before removing the prod, or else it will be taken to Articles for Deletion.
4762:
week to fix the issues, or else remove the prod notifications, however, if you remove a prod without fixing the issue then the article will likely be taken to Articles for Deletion, so its not something I recommend.
4067:
be reasonably expected to know when an article is still being worked on, vs being considered complete enough by the content creator. I'll keep your suggestions in mind if I see other new SSSIs. No offence was meant.
4786:
4347:
and I have deleted it as such. It's important to choose the right tag, to help newbie authors understand what they are doing wrong, so that maybe they do better next time. There is good advice for speedy taggers at
2371:
4488:
3990:
Well AFD is often a last resort-don't ever put it up if the article is new either-just keep that in mind. (Unless if its a removed prod). Also the BLP prod was good enough for the article. Don't bite the newbies.
3690:
no need to respond further, as there's clearly no point in continuing here. I was required to bring my concerns to your attention on your talk page. I have explained them at length. So that has been accomplished.
2642:
He might very well meet the criteria for the reasons that you have put forward. However, note that the article only has one independent source (BBC), generally to be accepted for submission articles need multiple
1680:
994:
335:
I suspect what you did doesn't seem to matter, its all who you know... Andy really DOES seem to be immune from prosecution for personal attacks. This incident will only make him more bold, I've made things worse.
1911:
2252:, and that source you just listed is independent, and it DIRECTLY mentions Michael's debut event and provides a verified source for his show in Nashville. Are you reading the sources, or simply dismissing it?
1307:
1102:
3438:
In any case, as I said above, opposition seems to be only because of the caps issue, and no one in the entire discussion suggested that the current name was better than the proposed name, rather that there
2092:
797:
650:
2468:
1405:
width (the only way i could get it to display the space without the   formatting). Unfortunately, as you pointed out this space was not a non-breaking space. I have now replaced the space with a (
961:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
951:
767:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
757:
2617:
566:
one referenced a single diffs related to article edits against me), I am left confused as to what actions of mine resulted in my topic ban and unable to review my actions and improve them in the future.
4045:
The references are adaquate for the job being asked of them. I presume you have not followed any of the two refs or the two external links, nor explored the very comprehensive information they provide.
3252:
4681:
on the team's article. The info box is possibly out of date for the team's article, as it seems to indicate that they play in a much lower tier. apologies, I'll remove the prod from the two articles.
3031:
870:
4372:
Ok thanks, I remember being confused if i should G11 it or not, but it seemed like someone had accidentally published it as a section of something else, but i see where you are coming from, thanks.
2593:
1961:
4970:
4834:
4816:
3847:
Would an interview article be more appropriate as a secondary resource? Ian was interviewed for Limelight magazine last year. There is no online link to that article, though I have scans of it.
1162:
I just went here from the creation move request, a very enWP specific discussion, I like your remarks. We haven't met at Peakoil, but I introduced a variety of content there and in the deWP. The
4100:" (my emphasis). Beyond some contextual information on the Whin Sill, all of the information in the article is supported by its refs. It follows that the use of the template is inappropriate. --
3902:
3413:
But the presence of these new, identically named devices, also represents significant additional information not discussed in the RM, and that warrants, if anything, a reopen to relist. Thanks.
3188:
Due to your very polite request, I thought very seriously of reopening the RM, to the point of having the edit ready to go, but really the thing that changed my mind at the last minute is this:
1739:
Hi There! Thanks for the message on the Fable page - I've added a couple of new high profile references - Rolling Stone and Popjustice. Hopefully it can be approved now. Thanks for helping out!
1082:
785:
4513:
2685:
2504:
4482:
744:
512:
If Insertcleverphrasehere violates the topic ban, he will be given escalating blocks, starting with 2 week blocks, with the one year topic ban being reset to the beginning of each such block.
865:
3392:
and it's nothing like these devices. Again, just adding more confusion. And with no consensus. Regardless of the RM backlog, there's no rush to close now - surely no more than there was on
1877:
982:
3704:
Ok, I've had enough aspersions against my personal integrity and judgement for one day, I'd appreciate it if you leave my talk page and keep the discussion on the move review page please.
1939:
you would like me to re-word the description of the adjutant general position, I can. However, it's the description that has been written by my office and approved by he adjutant general.
938:
3273:
3780:
367:
I have no problem with going elsewhere, however i would like to know what the admin who banned me thinks i did wrong, as, like you, I am unsure. and it hasn't been clearly pointed out.
4199:. Now, the question is more, is this a hoax or is there some other reason for why I can't find sources on this algorithm? :) Anyway, author blanked, so I'm going to G7 tag it. Cheers,
4655:
1987:
I'm not sure how long drafts are kept around, but I think a draft is only deleted if it hasn't been edited in 6 months or something, so for your purposes don't worry, take your time.
4726:
2476:
LaMona's comments were quite accurate, this submission reads like a brochure or advertisement meant to promote or advertise the product. Moreover it does not seem to be supported by
1787:
Yea sorry, forgot to untick the blank and speedy boxes... first copyright violation review, so I didn't realise that it did that, I do now. Anything I need to do to fix the mistake?
4498:
4394:
1767:
4922:
Do you think that deletions are priority than content expansion at Knowledge? Because based on your 2 year edit history I would assume you spread this bullshit just everywhere.
1717:
Please let me know how can I fix the page. All the content was supported by external articles published in various magazines of blogs. All these links are external to website.
3587:. That same name already exists currently. Not in the future. You would be incorrect if assuming that was the only place where the name is used to refer to this new device -
1824:
1803:
515:
If Insertcleverphrasehere socks to get around the topic ban (including clearly editing as an IP), he will be given escalating blocks, and the topic ban will become permanent.
2325:
2299:
2272:
2243:
2206:
2180:
2148:
2122:
413:
395:
376:
345:
4697:
4128:
4107:
4083:
2496:
625:
598:
4931:
4229:
4157:
3236:
3219:
3183:
3162:
3136:
3118:
2774:
2752:
2738:
2709:
2667:
1363:
532:
to obtain a mentor, ideally while the ban is still in place, so that Insertcleverphrasehere may be guided to editing that conforms with Knowledge policies and guidelines.
4098:
the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, even if all the material is supported by a single citation.
3171:
are best reserved for cases where the consensus, or lack thereof, is clear. I think most of your closures have been spot on, but I don't think this one's as clear cut.--
2416:
2003:
1559:
1538:
1512:
1465:
1440:
1135:
5058:
5033:
5011:
4961:
4917:
4900:
4875:
4857:
4778:
4179:
3774:
3056:
1945:
It depends on whether you hold the copyright on the material or not, if you do you can release it to creative commons and its fine, if not it will need to be reworded.
1625:
1611:
4535:
4428:
4278:
4191:
2049:
1030:
4388:
3752:
3295:
2942:
2921:
2907:
575:
4633:
4138:
4021:
3983:
3948:
1872:
1375:
3720:
3699:
3578:
3548:
3518:
3460:
3422:
3378:
4992:
4324:
2992:
698:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
2155:
Yes these publications are reliable sources, but they do not provide significant coverage of Michael Weist, but rather only trivial passing mentions. Again, See:
1121:
4671:
2882:
I get you, I didn't realise that the Gamergate decision was so far broadened to include 'any gender related dispute or controversy'. I guess that means that the
2819:
1250:
226:
3444:
issue) seems to agree that it is a better descriptive term for the article to sit at until the market makes its mind up about a generic term for these devices.
5039:
2407:
1975:
announced - so far we can not provide any third party references. How long will the draft be safted for rework? Thank you very much for your patience and help
300:. Usernames cannot be merged; that would be too complicated. They can only be changed. In your case, I think that you should just leave well enough alone.
3646:
You were also incorrect when you said "now you argue that the discussion should continue based on one new comment?" Since reopening, there have actually been
3814:
3738:
3355:
2040:
1832:
963:
769:
5017:
to offer this critique). I have clearly stated what is needed to bring the articles to acceptable levels, if you would rather insult me, well thats on you.
1490:
4980:
3326:
2102:. None of the references qualify all of these criteria, therefore the article has no references that prove notability. Moreover, the draft shows pervasive
1883:
1178:
4284:
1661:
471:
4989:
4986:
4983:
1727:
1649:
4400:
2460:
2388:
1170:. The Fusionskonstante tells us, that making money with hot fusion always has been feasible the upcoming 30 years, for any given present since 1950 ;)
4974:
1325:
4977:
4547:
3317:. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review.
1779:
537:
Please note that these sanctions may be lifted only by formal community proposal, or by emailing ArbCom. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
4612:
4576:
4000:
3962:
2912:
Glad you get what I was saying. :) It would be great if you would note your understanding at the AfD and consider striking the "crowbar" comment.
4938:
4905:
Yes, thank you for reminding all of us what deletion normative and how quickly we should work while you placing labels just every 1/3 of your edit.
3331:
3088:
1262:
1098:
447:
238:
4256:
2629:
4825:
you seem to ignore common sense about interrupting other people edits with deletion requests. This may and will distract people from Knowledge.
4753:
3914:
3023:
2964:
286:
4059:
3758:
If you look above you'll see that this has been discussed already on this page. Please see the discussion above and my reasons for the close.
3301:
1742:
1341:
4365:
432:
361:
329:
4052:
major references for SSSIs are their citation and their designation of Defra's map. To suggest these are insufficient is incomprehensible. --
3261:
2824:
1148:
3967:
Ok sorry, I'm new to new page patrolling, but really it should go straight to AfD, I did a search and this guy doesn't seem notable at all.
1750:
1156:
5049:
5024:
4952:
4891:
4848:
4769:
4717:
4688:
4641:
4624:
4585:
4526:
4473:
4379:
4269:
4220:
4170:
4119:
4074:
4012:
3974:
3939:
3893:
3765:
3711:
3569:
3539:
3451:
3369:
3286:
3210:
3153:
3109:
3047:
2933:
2898:
2765:
2729:
2658:
2584:
2487:
2362:
2290:
2234:
2171:
2113:
1994:
1952:
1815:
1794:
1602:
1550:
1503:
1431:
1354:
645:
465:
117:
4207:
4163:
I am pretty sure that all I did was PROD it. Fairly certain I didn't speedy it. I was fine with your explanation over on your talk page.
309:
3745:
Um, I don't think 13:7 in favour of the move, with both reasonable and unreasonable arguments from both sides, count as "no consensus".
200:
3860:
3854:
3618:
3554:
1969:
79:
71:
66:
4112:
Fair enough mate, I am new to new page patrolling, so I'm bound to make some errors here and there, I'll take a look at the template.
3882:
so would not qualify as a high quality source on Ian Page. They can still be used in the article when talking about mozart 250 though.
4996:
4466:. The references are notable enough, the citations just are in an improper format. Fix this up and the article should be good to go.
4304:
4148:
that has 8 known tournaments and possibly more I have also added newspaper sources kindly don't just jump the gun next time thanks.--
3844:
Hi, many thanks for your feedback on my article about Ian Page. I wondered if you could give me some guidance on secondary sources.
2846:
1902:
1852:
1284:
261:
4597:
4559:
1589:
1114:
898:, which is not permitted on Knowledge. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
825:, which is not permitted on Knowledge. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
3926:
2218:
either. Most of the sources in this article wouldn't even be accepted as sources AT ALL, (for example ill just pick one at random:
1633:
559:
1398:
1215:
2573:
Indeed, there are probably enough sources to establish notability, but these need to be provided before it can be accepted. See
1705:
2869:
2829:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
2280:
1267:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
244:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
4617:
No worries mate, probably doesn't satisfy GNG. but ill wait a few days before taking to to AfD to see if some sources appear.
2098:
The references are not "Significant Coverage" nor mostly are they "reliable sources", and most are also not "independent" see
4300:
4297:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3254:
2520:
1848:
1845:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3657:
3653:
3650:
3647:
3397:
3384:
1693:
106:
779:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
637:
489:
157:
1927:
1701:
1378:) in your signature, or replace it with a nbsp, otherwise your little border thingy can be word wrapped across two lines.
4866:
should be probably removed, nerveless, this page was edited for next 50 minutes after you placed speedy deletion banner.
2838:
2321:
2268:
2202:
2144:
2031:
1893:
1685:
1543:
Yeah figured it was something like that... no room for it though, and my 2 character solution works well enough i think.
1276:
253:
133:
1724:
973:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
4235:
3401:
3393:
1671:
621:
571:
477:
409:
372:
341:
2554:
1915:
495:
4410:
3796:
3388:
unnecessarily. In fact, as I pointed out (perhaps you missed it) the industry has already created something called a
2398:
1728:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-05-23/news/50054952_1_venture-capitalists-ispirt-baby-care-products
4706:
article. Edit: I've fixed this by changing it form the 2015 list of clubs and stadiums to the 2016 version from the
3310:
1923:
1595:
Yes i realised this shortly afterward, but I can't revert until after the AfD ends, supposing the result is 'keep'.
483:
5052:
5027:
4955:
4894:
4851:
4772:
4734:
4720:
4691:
4627:
4529:
4476:
4382:
4272:
4223:
4173:
4122:
4077:
4015:
3977:
3942:
3896:
3768:
3714:
3572:
3542:
3454:
3372:
3343:
3332:
3289:
3231:
3213:
3178:
3156:
3131:
3112:
3083:
3064:
3050:
2936:
2901:
2830:
2768:
2732:
2661:
2587:
2538:
2490:
2365:
2293:
2237:
2174:
2116:
1997:
1955:
1907:
1818:
1797:
1605:
1553:
1506:
1434:
1357:
1132:
459:
400:
That which is made cannot be unmade. I have made no accusation, just a request for more information. I'll see what
47:
17:
3435:
Your link is to an eBay listing, hardly convincing evidence of a competing primary topic for the new article name.
4329:
3739:
2954:
2850:
2815:
2605:
2599:
2378:
2011:
1288:
1044:
996:
872:
799:
652:
265:
2347:
As I've said repeatedly, to satisfy the request for article creation we need multiple sources that each satisfy
900:
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Knowledge.
827:
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Knowledge.
2974:
2219:
1755:
1697:
924:
851:
732:
4289:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1837:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1141:
1040:
674:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
147:
4973:. It takes decades for FULL TIME PAYED PROFESSIONALS to describe what you recently nominated for "deletion"
4802:
1718:
2574:
2355:, that is: Significant coverage, in reliable sources, that are independent. If you have them present them.
1732:
1312:
552:
152:
2542:
1374:
You should remove the space between the opening of the span class and the start of your username (as I've
5046:
5021:
4966:
Yes Knowledge was created so that non-experts can requests everyone to follow WP: guidelines. Keep going!
4949:
4888:
4845:
4766:
4714:
4685:
4621:
4523:
4470:
4376:
4266:
4217:
4196:
4167:
4116:
4071:
4029:
4009:
3971:
3936:
3890:
3762:
3708:
3566:
3536:
3448:
3366:
3283:
3207:
3150:
3106:
3044:
2930:
2895:
2762:
2726:
2655:
2581:
2529:
2484:
2359:
2287:
2231:
2168:
2110:
1991:
1949:
1919:
1812:
1791:
1599:
1547:
1500:
1428:
1351:
1125:
617:
567:
454:
405:
368:
337:
297:
2550:
314:
4236:
4145:
2842:
2534:
1280:
257:
38:
274:
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
120:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
4290:
2854:
2802:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
2514:
2432:
1292:
1237:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
305:
282:
269:
205:
196:
180:
4541:
4444:
3877:
Apologies for the very late reply, I have been in the wilderness taking part in running a week long
3861:
http://www.classicfm.com/composers/mozart/news/fancy-sponsoring-few-bars-mozart/#8JE1bf6H9sEwd4uB.97
3855:
http://www.classicfm.com/composers/mozart/news/250-project-anniversary-concerts/#MuXRXqlZD3RXB8bu.97
2065:
4744:
Basically, I'm ignoring notifications because you decided to spam my user page with notifications.
4603:
I had to remove the prod as that it cannot be prodded in that wording. Take it to AFD if you must.
4088:
No offence taken, or, at least, it passed quickly. You need to recheck the usage of the template: "
4042:
The article is clearly still being written. You need to leave a decent interval before defacing it.
3953:
Also-don't put up AFD's for articles that are only 14 minutes old, it also already had a BLP prod.
3869:
Stephen Roe, 'Mozart year by year', Opera: The Worlds leading opera magazine, January 2015, p31-35
3686:
3559:
2693:
2249:
1775:
1303:
693:
641:
3008:
1721:
2420:
2317:
2264:
2198:
2140:
2088:
2025:
1980:
1887:
428:
391:
357:
325:
4647:
4432:
4338:
was not the right tag there - that is for pages that were obviously not intended as articles. ("
2053:
4739:
4667:
4247:, but I hope that this was just an oversight by you and that you won't. Best regards, —Tim ///
4185:
3830:
3314:
3303:
2887:
2834:
2681:
2428:
1665:
1272:
423:
Ah saw the comment below and see you modified your stance. The other person summed it up well.
249:
175:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
138:
124:
103:
4440:
2996:
2833:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
2412:
2061:
1271:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
967:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
773:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
248:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
4424:
4404:
4104:
4056:
3908:
3790:
3524:
2546:
2464:
2392:
2045:
1175:
594:
168:
88:
3383:
It actually hasn't been opened for two months. As I said, it was originally admin closed as
3004:
2279:
Well, yeah that new york magazine ref doesn't mention Weist either. Note that notability is
1762:
4204:
3818:
3528:
3228:
3175:
3128:
3080:
2988:
2748:
2705:
2625:
2510:
2309:
2256:
2190:
2132:
1733:
1339:
1224:
Reminder - Energy Catalyzer and cold fusion articles are covered by discretionary sanctions
783:
742:
437:
301:
278:
192:
164:
128:
8:
4803:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Succinct_Data_Structure_Library&action=history
4797:
4707:
4651:
4419:
4294:
4035:
3826:
3224:
Well, I certainly appreciate your well reasoned and articulated responses here. Cheers,--
3190:
1771:
1575:
1532:
1484:
1459:
1392:
1299:
1110:
876:
803:
706:
656:
608:
586:
176:
4493:
Hello, I would like to know if a category grouping articles related to the secessionist
3810:
1580:
Please revert the page move. There was a recent RM that kept the current title. Thanks.
5007:
4927:
4913:
4871:
4830:
4812:
4749:
4244:
4153:
3746:
3660:
which the reopen was based up - and the RM was closed before the question was answered.
3027:
2968:
2313:
2260:
2194:
2136:
2084:
2021:
1976:
1621:
1585:
1268:
1087:
1078:
1026:
978:
969:
934:
861:
775:
424:
387:
353:
321:
245:
3076:? It seems to me like there's a consensus to move the article, be it a little rough.--
4792:
4663:
4509:
4320:
4311:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4252:
3584:
2983:
2080:
sources? There are SEVERAL additions, bringing the article up to standards of wiki.
1868:
1859:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1746:
1725:
http://therodinhoods.com/forum/topics/meet-mridula-arora-the-nurturer-for-mompreneurs
1646:
1470:
However, why do you even need a space there? Why not add padding to your span style?
1211:
1184:
450:
Arbitration Committee decision, you are hereby sanctioned by the community as below:
291:
100:
2424:
4519:
Quite possibly, but it definitely needs to be expanded before it will be accepted.
4494:
4463:
4436:
4361:
4101:
4053:
3850:
Gavin Dixon, 'Mozart (The other masterpieces)', Limelight, September 2015, p50-53.
3786:
3269:
2917:
2865:
2788:
2057:
1635:
1369:
1152:
604:
590:
546:
111:
3279:
Thanks, looks like this will all get sorted out by JzG when he gets on next time.
4608:
4593:
4572:
4555:
4349:
4341:
4201:
3996:
3958:
3922:
3878:
3484:
3225:
3172:
3168:
3125:
3077:
3000:
2744:
2701:
2637:
2621:
2613:
1524:
1476:
1451:
1445:
You obviously know more about this that I do. I just saw weird word wrapping. :p
1384:
1333:
1063:
1043:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
780:
739:
500:
is topic-banned from making edits anywhere on Knowledge relating to cold fusion,
4462:
because the inline citations need to be linked using the guidelines laid out at
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4703:
4678:
3805:
3695:
3514:
3418:
3351:
3322:
2224:
2103:
1838:
1258:
1106:
689:
234:
3822:
5003:
4923:
4909:
4867:
4826:
4808:
4745:
4659:
4353:
4149:
2716:
2697:
2689:
2677:
2644:
2477:
2352:
2215:
2156:
2099:
1617:
1581:
1321:
1254:
1074:
1015:
1000:
974:
930:
894:
has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included
891:
857:
821:
has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included
818:
671:
520:
230:
96:
4740:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ushkin_N&action=history
2686:
Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions#Main task
2220:
https://www.wannadolocal.com/nashville/events/party-with-the-viners-2-rgkBAA
1206:
Thank you for contributing to the discussion. Your voice is well received.
4880:
4863:
4505:
4316:
4312:
4248:
3886:
interviewer also comments on the subject outside the interview questions).
3488:
3073:
3066:
2673:
2651:] which are merely passing mentions and not really 'significant coverage'.
1864:
1860:
1643:
1421:
1412:
1207:
1193:
1163:
895:
822:
677:
143:
4787:
If you stop requesting deletions faster than 6-10 minutes it would be nice
3400:. In this case, I'm asking for a reopen because the last comment was just
585:
encyclopedia. What happened at ANI is that your complaint backfired (See
4489:
Project of new nategory grouping articles related to the State of Katanga
4357:
3265:
2913:
2877:
2861:
1808:
Indeed sorry for missing the ticket. I'll keep my eye out in the future.
1719:
http://therodinhoods.com/forum/topics/mybabycart-com-inviting-mompreneurs
685:
613:
540:
401:
206:
3859:
And this one talks about the start of the Mozart opera recording cycle:
3853:
This Classic FM articles talk about Ian Page and the Mozart250 project:
2795:
1347:
Apologies my friend, editing on an Iphone can make weird things happen.
1230:
1171:
1101:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
215:
4604:
4589:
4568:
4551:
3992:
3954:
3918:
3404:. So it shouldn't be closed while people are still discussing it again.
116:
Hello, Insertcleverphrasehere, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for
4798:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fauzia_Ilyas&action=history
3487:'s comments in the section above, regarding your non-admin closure on
1035:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
4090:
This template should be used only for articles where there are some,
3691:
3510:
3414:
3347:
3318:
1036:
950:
756:
4908:
Why don't you expand this article instead of suggesting deletions?
2883:
2688:, articles should be accepted if you think they'd probably pass an
2609:
1657:== 04:25:19, 15 March 2016 review of submission by Mridulaarora ==
1062:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
884:
811:
664:
4793:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Phytorid&action=history
4646:
Hi, the bunch of articles I created was about players playing for
3260:
For your information, I started a sockpuppet investigation here -
3932:
Yeah sorry mate, that was an automated message sent via twinkle.
1018:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
3619:
User_talk:Cuchullain#RM_at_Talk:Self-balancing_two-wheeled_board
3555:
User_talk:Cuchullain#RM_at_Talk:Self-balancing_two-wheeled_board
2250:
http://nymag.com/news/media/internet-fame/dem-white-boyz-2014-4/
2505:
01:09:09, 20 March 2016 review of submission by Matthewcasebier
1842:
1722:
http://www.theweek.in/features/startersbloc/Mommys-day-out.html
1167:
705:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
4937:
article, regardless of their level of expertise). Please read
4584:
Although interesting enough there seems to be a link to it on
2806:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
1241:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
1878:
15:25:37, 15 March 2016 review of submission by Emersonmarcus
1261:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
237:, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
172:
2608:, an article that you rejected at AfC. Adams has played for
1424:
space. Let me know if the problem persists. Also... thanks.
3781:
11:56:03, 26 April 2016 review of submission by EstherMusic
1103:
Interference with DRN case, possible violation of topic ban
1008:
4677:
I see that I missed the notice that they were promoted to
320:
stuff there. There is a lot of baiting going on. Thanks.
4395:
05:12:34, 15 May 2016 review of submission by Rayarainbow
2676:, and in general they shouldn't be accepted, as he fails
1120:
Link to archive (as above link was broken by archiving):
1051:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
4995:(for some reason you stopped here, but there more such "
904:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
831:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
712:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
4702:
The team also isn't listed in the list of clubs on the
4293:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1841:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
5040:
Comparison_of_programming_languages_(string_functions)
2451:
1039:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
5002:
I don't think you are really adequate at this point.
4941:
as this should shed some light on this issue for you.
3146:). This is a good sign that nothing needs to change.
2953:
Request on 09:13:51, 29 March 2016 for assistance on
2758:
AfD (which always has a pretty big workload anyway).
2377:
Request on 15:07:33, 18 March 2016 for assistance on
2010:
Request on 12:42:50, 16 March 2016 for assistance on
709:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
4567:
Looking it up-it seems to be indeed a Youtube show.
3685:
So your accusation that my objections are because I
3583:
A current eBay ad has nothing whatsoever to do with
2106:. Sorry, not everyone deserves a wikipedia article.
3255:
Talk:Setting boundaries#Requested move 4 April 2016
2620:. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.
183:, or ask your question on this page and then place
4139:Dewar Cup circuit and associated Dewar Cup events
87:As an apparently new editor, so far only editing
4939:Knowledge:Make technical articles understandable
1420:)), which is another type of non-standard-width
688:. If you need help with referencing, please see
684:sources are required so that information can be
4501:and I wanted to know if it could be published.
1681:Draft:MyBabyCart - Mompreneurs Selling Platform
1099:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
676:This submission is not adequately supported by
616:, and I'll get on with editing in other areas.
4038:was misguided for at least two/three reasons:
3191:Consensus is not the result of a majority vote
2845:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
2692:, and I think if someone started an AfD about
1283:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
260:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
4144:I have created a navigational template here:
3740:Talk:Muscat,_Oman#Requested_move_3_March_2016
3262:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki-psyc
2618:notability guidelines for rugby union players
1833:Disambiguation link notification for March 15
508:. The following conditions are also applied:
4586:List of programs broadcast by ABC Television
4190:Hi Insertcleverphrasehere. I saw you tagged
925:real-time chat help from experienced editors
852:real-time chat help from experienced editors
733:real-time chat help from experienced editors
4340:Is this right?" etc.) That one was a clear
4285:Disambiguation link notification for May 12
3483:Finally, it was really interesting to read
4550:is real, but it might be a youtube short.
3523:"will be competing for this same name" is
3396:- when it was reopened upon request after
2684:still says they are presumed notable. Per
4048:Although there will be other references,
3072:Hey, might I ask you to reopen the RM at
1903:Draft:List of Adjutants General of Nevada
1249:The Arbitration Committee has authorised
1072:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
225:The Arbitration Committee has authorised
4334:Thanks for patrolling new pages, but G2
1033:to see how you can improve the article.
2810:Please carefully read this information:
1245:Please carefully read this information:
222:Please carefully read this information:
14:
4971:Make technical articles understandable
4034:Your insertion of a refimprove tag on
3342:I object to your non-admin closure of
3094:13-8 is not consensus especially with
191:before the question. Again, welcome!
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4504:Thanks in advance for your advice. --
3553:Moreover, regarding your comments at
3167:Something I'm dancing around is that
2452:https://en.wikipedia.org/Resolver_One
1029:. You may like to take a look at the
1025:, which is recorded on the article's
95:by a recently-added provision in the
4841:to your article before creating it?
4642:Recently created soccer bio articles
3020:Done / resubmitted - please review?
2722:have multiple high quality sources.
2604:Just to let you know, I've accepted
2577:for a walkthrough. Hope this helps!
1766:, had you missed the OTRS ticket at
25:
4822:
2696:, it'd probably be kept because of
1097:There is currently a discussion at
23:
4005:I'll keep that in mind... thanks.
1970:Draft:The Promise Documentary 2016
1007:
890:Your recent article submission to
883:
817:Your recent article submission to
810:
670:Your recent article submission to
663:
24:
5082:
3344:Self-balancing two-wheeled board
3333:Self-balancing two-wheeled board
2214:satisfy all of the criteria of a
1021:The article has been assessed as
4213:I'll keep that in mind, thanks.
2794:
2715:that topics should both satisfy
2616:. As such, he meets Knowledge's
1229:
1192:
1092:
949:
755:
214:
153:How to create your first article
99:, to identify your employer. —
29:
18:User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere
4499:Draft:Category:State of Katanga
2792:
2606:Draft:Josh Adams (rugby player)
2248:New York Magazine, my mistake:
1768:Draft talk:Translation Pedagogy
1253:to be used for pages regarding
1227:
964:Articles for creation help desk
908:Articles for creation help desk
835:Articles for creation help desk
770:Articles for creation help desk
716:Articles for creation help desk
229:to be used for pages regarding
212:
1200:You dope, I sent a POTSTICKER!
1115:00:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
13:
1:
2743:Fair enough, seems sensible.
1983:) 10:45, 16 March 2016 (CET)
1157:22:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
1136:18:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
1123:(this is a note for myself)
866:05:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
786:01:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
745:01:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
626:00:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
599:19:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
576:01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
560:19:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
433:09:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
414:11:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
396:11:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
377:03:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
362:03:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
346:11:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
330:11:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
139:The five pillars of Knowledge
4648:Kvarnsvedens IK Women's team
3398:a month with no new comments
2575:Knowledge:Your_first_article
1216:05:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
1179:21:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
700:when they have been resolved
7:
4497:could be viable. I created
4197:sr:Stoer-Vagnerov algoritam
2014:submission by Weist.michael
1642:comparatively minor issue.
1317:Hi Insertcleverphrasehere,
526:Insertcleverphrasehere is,
404:says and leave it at that.
10:
5087:
4658:. They are notable as per
4237:Government School, Bidhwan
4146:Template:Dewar Cup circuit
3721:12:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
3700:08:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
3589:as a simple search proves.
3579:01:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
3549:00:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
3519:20:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3461:09:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3423:09:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3379:08:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3356:08:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3327:08:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
3309:An editor has asked for a
3296:09:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3274:09:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
3237:20:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3220:19:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3184:14:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3163:08:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3137:03:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3119:02:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3089:02:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
3057:20:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
3032:09:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
2943:21:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2922:18:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2908:12:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2870:21:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
2775:12:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2753:12:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2739:12:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2710:09:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2668:02:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2630:00:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2594:01:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
2497:19:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
2469:15:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
2372:13:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2326:13:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2300:13:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2273:13:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2244:13:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2207:13:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2181:12:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2149:12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2123:12:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2093:12:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
2004:10:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
1962:21:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1873:10:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1825:10:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1804:10:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1780:09:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1751:10:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1650:23:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
1626:19:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
1612:22:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
1590:21:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
1560:00:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1539:21:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1513:21:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1491:21:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1466:21:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1441:20:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1399:15:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
1083:03:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
983:13:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
939:13:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
446:community discussion, and
158:Simplified Manual of Style
4656:fully professional league
4291:Life Flight (New Zealand)
3617:Regarding my comments at
2530:Draft:Emily's D+Evolution
2381:submission by Ethanjkagan
1364:11:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
1342:11:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
1308:17:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
1191:
690:Referencing for beginners
646:10:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
603:Thanks for your response
310:11:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
287:21:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
201:20:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
134:Contributing to Knowledge
107:00:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
5059:15:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
5034:15:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
5012:14:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4962:13:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4932:13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4918:13:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4901:12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4876:12:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4858:12:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4835:12:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4817:12:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4779:12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4754:12:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
4735:Distracting notification
4727:23:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4698:23:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4672:23:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4634:03:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4613:02:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4598:02:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4577:02:49, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4560:02:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
4536:08:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
4514:20:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
4483:11:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
4389:20:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
4366:11:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
4325:10:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
4279:21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4257:10:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4230:21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4208:10:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4192:Stoer Vagnerov algoritam
4180:11:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4158:10:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4129:09:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4108:09:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4084:09:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4060:09:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4022:05:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
4001:05:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
3984:04:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
3963:01:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
3949:01:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
3927:00:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
3390:"self-balancing scooter"
2694:Josh Adams (rugby union)
1065:leaving us some feedback
1041:create articles yourself
4330:Radical mastectomy etc.
3903:19:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
3775:19:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
3753:11:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
2820:discretionary sanctions
2600:Accepted an AfC article
1322:think this was intended
1251:discretionary sanctions
896:copyrighted information
823:copyrighted information
227:discretionary sanctions
148:How to develop articles
4997:poorly explained pages
4650:, who competes in the
4546:From what I can tell,
3315:Self-balancing scooter
3304:Self-balancing scooter
2957:submission by Dsampele
2351:of the criteria for a
1756:Draft with OTRS ticket
1328:in my username in the
1128:InsertCleverPhraseHere
1012:
959:Insertcleverphrasehere
888:
815:
765:Insertcleverphrasehere
668:
618:Insertcleverphrasehere
568:Insertcleverphrasehere
535:
455:Insertcleverphrasehere
406:Insertcleverphrasehere
369:Insertcleverphrasehere
338:Insertcleverphrasehere
89:Talk:Energy Catalyzer
4345:blatant advertisement
3658:excludes the question
2888:Men's rights movement
2839:standards of behavior
2816:Arbitration Committee
2682:WP:NSPORT#Rugby union
1277:standards of behavior
1142:Thanks for your input
1045:Articles for Creation
1011:
997:Articles for creation
892:Articles for Creation
887:
873:Articles for creation
819:Articles for Creation
814:
800:Articles for creation
672:Articles for Creation
667:
653:Articles for creation
452:
254:standards of behavior
42:of past discussions.
4313:opt-out instructions
3529:Hoverboard (scooter)
2847:editing restrictions
2835:purpose of Knowledge
2672:Agree that it lacks
2408:Draft:SpreadsheetWEB
2353:very reliable source
2216:very reliable source
1861:opt-out instructions
1734:Draft:Fable (singer)
1313:Typo in my user name
1285:editing restrictions
1273:purpose of Knowledge
916:reviewer's talk page
843:reviewer's talk page
724:reviewer's talk page
298:WP:Changing Username
262:editing restrictions
250:purpose of Knowledge
4708:2016 Damallsvenskan
4652:2016 Damallsvenskan
4420:Draft:Gamliel Cohen
4295:Wellington Hospital
4094:, inline citations
4036:Allolee to Walltown
4030:Allolee to Walltown
2041:Draft:Michael Weist
995:Your submission at
871:Your submission at
798:Your submission at
707:Draft:Joseph Sledge
651:Your submission at
529:strongly encouraged
442:In accordance with
177:Knowledge:Questions
163:Please remember to
4303:• Join us at the
4262:Seems reasonable.
3169:non-admin closures
1851:• Join us at the
1324:, but you made an
1013:
889:
816:
669:
504:, for a period of
144:How to edit a page
118:your contributions
4821:As was stated in
4308:
3687:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
3560:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
3234:
3181:
3134:
3086:
2984:Draft:Tish Murtha
2329:
2312:comment added by
2276:
2259:comment added by
2210:
2193:comment added by
2152:
2135:comment added by
1856:
1332:move discussion.
1221:
1220:
1003:has been accepted
989:
988:
923:You can also get
850:You can also get
792:
791:
731:You can also get
558:
502:broadly construed
167:your messages on
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5078:
5057:
5032:
4960:
4899:
4856:
4777:
4725:
4696:
4632:
4534:
4495:State of Katanga
4481:
4449:
4448:
4387:
4298:
4277:
4228:
4178:
4127:
4092:but insufficient
4082:
4020:
3982:
3947:
3913:I didn't create
3901:
3835:
3834:
3773:
3750:
3719:
3656:. And that even
3577:
3547:
3459:
3377:
3302:Move review for
3294:
3253:Your comment on
3232:
3218:
3179:
3161:
3132:
3117:
3084:
3055:
3013:
3012:
2941:
2906:
2886:article and the
2881:
2798:
2773:
2737:
2674:reliable sources
2666:
2645:reliable sources
2641:
2592:
2559:
2558:
2495:
2478:reliable sources
2437:
2436:
2370:
2328:
2306:
2298:
2275:
2253:
2242:
2209:
2187:
2179:
2151:
2129:
2121:
2070:
2069:
2002:
1960:
1932:
1931:
1846:
1823:
1802:
1765:
1710:
1709:
1647:(Did I mess up?)
1636:Draft:Rob Fisher
1634:Your comment at
1610:
1558:
1537:
1535:
1529:
1528:
1511:
1489:
1487:
1481:
1480:
1464:
1462:
1456:
1455:
1439:
1419:
1415:
1410:
1409:
1397:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1362:
1336:
1233:
1196:
1189:
1188:
1134:
1096:
1095:
1067:
1057:
953:
946:
945:
919:
911:
846:
838:
759:
752:
751:
727:
719:
678:reliable sources
555:
549:
538:
499:
472:deleted contribs
315:I don't know you
218:
189:
188:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
5086:
5085:
5081:
5080:
5079:
5077:
5076:
5075:
5043:
5038:Have a look at
5018:
4946:
4885:
4842:
4823:#Speedy tagging
4789:
4763:
4737:
4711:
4682:
4644:
4618:
4544:
4520:
4491:
4467:
4422:
4418:
4397:
4373:
4332:
4305:DPL WikiProject
4287:
4263:
4240:
4214:
4188:
4164:
4141:
4113:
4068:
4032:
4006:
3968:
3933:
3911:
3887:
3879:rite of passage
3808:
3804:
3783:
3759:
3748:
3743:
3705:
3563:
3533:
3445:
3363:
3337:
3307:
3280:
3258:
3204:
3147:
3103:
3070:
3041:
2986:
2982:
2959:
2927:
2892:
2875:
2859:
2858:
2818:has authorised
2799:
2791:
2759:
2723:
2652:
2635:
2614:Anglo-Welsh Cup
2602:
2578:
2532:
2528:
2511:Matthewcasebier
2507:
2481:
2410:
2406:
2383:
2356:
2307:
2284:
2254:
2228:
2188:
2165:
2130:
2107:
2043:
2039:
2016:
1988:
1972:
1946:
1905:
1901:
1880:
1853:DPL WikiProject
1835:
1809:
1788:
1761:
1758:
1737:
1683:
1679:
1639:
1596:
1578:
1544:
1533:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1519:
1497:
1485:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1460:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1446:
1425:
1417:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1393:
1386:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1372:
1348:
1334:
1326:accidental typo
1315:
1297:
1296:
1234:
1226:
1187:
1144:
1124:
1105:. Thank you.
1093:
1090:
1085:
1053:
1047:if you prefer.
1005:
985:
941:
913:
905:
881:
868:
840:
832:
808:
788:
747:
721:
713:
697:
661:
553:
547:
543:
457:
440:
317:
302:Robert McClenon
294:
279:Robert McClenon
276:
275:
219:
211:
193:Robert McClenon
186:
185:
171:by typing four
129:Getting started
114:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5084:
5074:
5073:
5072:
5071:
5070:
5069:
5068:
5067:
5066:
5065:
5064:
5063:
5062:
5061:
5036:
5000:
4967:
4942:
4920:
4906:
4806:
4805:
4800:
4795:
4788:
4785:
4784:
4783:
4782:
4781:
4736:
4733:
4732:
4731:
4730:
4729:
4704:Damallsvenskan
4679:Damallsvenskan
4643:
4640:
4639:
4638:
4637:
4636:
4582:
4581:
4580:
4579:
4548:I'm a dinosaur
4543:
4542:I'm a dinosaur
4540:
4539:
4538:
4490:
4487:
4486:
4485:
4455:
4453:
4452:
4451:
4450:
4416:
4396:
4393:
4392:
4391:
4331:
4328:
4286:
4283:
4282:
4281:
4239:
4234:
4233:
4232:
4187:
4186:Speedy tagging
4184:
4183:
4182:
4140:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4063:
4062:
4046:
4043:
4031:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4025:
4024:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3951:
3910:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3883:
3841:
3839:
3838:
3837:
3836:
3806:Draft:Ian Page
3802:
3782:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3742:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3734:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3625:
3624:
3623:
3622:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3551:
3525:WP:Crystalball
3499:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3436:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3336:
3330:
3306:
3300:
3299:
3298:
3257:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3200:strong support
3100:Strong support
3069:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3019:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3014:
2980:
2958:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2841:, or relevant
2800:
2793:
2790:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2601:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2565:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2526:
2506:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2443:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2404:
2382:
2375:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2083:
2076:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2037:
2015:
2008:
2007:
2006:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1899:
1879:
1876:
1839:Evynne Hollens
1834:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1806:
1772:David Biddulph
1757:
1754:
1736:
1731:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1677:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1577:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1520:
1472:
1447:
1380:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1314:
1311:
1300:TenOfAllTrades
1279:, or relevant
1259:fringe science
1235:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1174:! Polentarion
1143:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1089:
1086:
1070:
1069:
1060:
1031:grading scheme
1020:
1006:
1004:
993:
991:
987:
986:
956:
954:
943:
929:
928:
921:
882:
880:
869:
856:
855:
848:
809:
807:
796:
794:
790:
789:
762:
760:
749:
737:
736:
729:
710:
694:Citing sources
675:
662:
660:
649:
638:143.161.248.25
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
579:
578:
541:
534:
533:
524:
516:
513:
439:
436:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
380:
379:
349:
348:
316:
313:
293:
290:
256:, or relevant
235:fringe science
220:
213:
210:
204:
161:
160:
155:
150:
141:
136:
131:
113:
110:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5083:
5060:
5056:
5055:
5054:
5051:
5048:
5041:
5037:
5035:
5031:
5030:
5029:
5026:
5023:
5015:
5014:
5013:
5009:
5005:
5001:
4998:
4994:
4991:
4988:
4985:
4982:
4979:
4976:
4972:
4968:
4965:
4964:
4963:
4959:
4958:
4957:
4954:
4951:
4943:
4940:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4929:
4925:
4921:
4919:
4915:
4911:
4907:
4904:
4903:
4902:
4898:
4897:
4896:
4893:
4890:
4882:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4873:
4869:
4865:
4861:
4860:
4859:
4855:
4854:
4853:
4850:
4847:
4839:
4838:
4837:
4836:
4832:
4828:
4824:
4819:
4818:
4814:
4810:
4804:
4801:
4799:
4796:
4794:
4791:
4790:
4780:
4776:
4775:
4774:
4771:
4768:
4760:
4759:
4758:
4757:
4756:
4755:
4751:
4747:
4742:
4741:
4728:
4724:
4723:
4722:
4719:
4716:
4709:
4705:
4701:
4700:
4699:
4695:
4694:
4693:
4690:
4687:
4680:
4676:
4675:
4674:
4673:
4669:
4665:
4661:
4657:
4654:, which is a
4653:
4649:
4635:
4631:
4630:
4629:
4626:
4623:
4616:
4615:
4614:
4610:
4606:
4602:
4601:
4600:
4599:
4595:
4591:
4587:
4578:
4574:
4570:
4566:
4565:
4564:
4563:
4562:
4561:
4557:
4553:
4549:
4537:
4533:
4532:
4531:
4528:
4525:
4518:
4517:
4516:
4515:
4511:
4507:
4502:
4500:
4496:
4484:
4480:
4479:
4478:
4475:
4472:
4465:
4460:
4459:
4458:
4446:
4442:
4438:
4434:
4430:
4426:
4421:
4417:
4415:
4414:
4412:
4409:
4406:
4402:
4399:
4398:
4390:
4386:
4385:
4384:
4381:
4378:
4371:
4370:
4369:
4368:
4367:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4344:
4343:
4337:
4327:
4326:
4322:
4318:
4314:
4309:
4306:
4302:
4296:
4292:
4280:
4276:
4275:
4274:
4271:
4268:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4258:
4254:
4250:
4246:
4238:
4231:
4227:
4226:
4225:
4222:
4219:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4209:
4206:
4205:
4203:
4198:
4193:
4181:
4177:
4176:
4175:
4172:
4169:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4155:
4151:
4147:
4130:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4121:
4118:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4106:
4103:
4099:
4097:
4093:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4081:
4080:
4079:
4076:
4073:
4065:
4064:
4061:
4058:
4055:
4051:
4047:
4044:
4041:
4040:
4039:
4037:
4023:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4014:
4011:
4004:
4003:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3980:
3979:
3976:
3973:
3966:
3965:
3964:
3960:
3956:
3952:
3950:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3941:
3938:
3931:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3916:
3915:Chakra khadka
3909:Chakra khadka
3904:
3900:
3899:
3898:
3895:
3892:
3884:
3880:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3870:
3867:
3863:
3862:
3857:
3856:
3851:
3848:
3845:
3842:
3832:
3828:
3824:
3820:
3816:
3812:
3807:
3803:
3801:
3800:
3798:
3795:
3792:
3788:
3785:
3784:
3776:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3767:
3764:
3757:
3756:
3755:
3754:
3751:
3741:
3722:
3718:
3717:
3716:
3713:
3710:
3703:
3702:
3701:
3697:
3693:
3688:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3659:
3655:
3652:
3649:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3620:
3616:
3615:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3606:
3605:
3590:
3586:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3576:
3575:
3574:
3571:
3568:
3561:
3556:
3552:
3550:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3541:
3538:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3516:
3512:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3490:
3486:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3453:
3450:
3442:
3437:
3434:
3433:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3424:
3420:
3416:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3386:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3371:
3368:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3357:
3353:
3349:
3345:
3340:
3334:
3329:
3328:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3305:
3297:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3288:
3285:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3256:
3238:
3235:
3229:
3227:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3212:
3209:
3201:
3197:
3196:strong oppose
3193:
3192:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3182:
3176:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3155:
3152:
3145:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3135:
3129:
3127:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3111:
3108:
3101:
3097:
3096:Strong oppose
3093:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3087:
3081:
3079:
3075:
3068:
3058:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3049:
3046:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3025:
3021:
3010:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2985:
2981:
2979:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2970:
2966:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2956:
2944:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2935:
2932:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2900:
2897:
2889:
2885:
2879:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2826:
2821:
2817:
2812:
2811:
2807:
2805:
2797:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2767:
2764:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2731:
2728:
2721:
2718:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2660:
2657:
2650:
2648:
2646:
2639:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2595:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2586:
2583:
2576:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2566:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2531:
2527:
2525:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2516:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2498:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2489:
2486:
2479:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2447:
2444:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2409:
2405:
2403:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2394:
2390:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2380:
2374:
2373:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2364:
2361:
2354:
2350:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2314:Weist.michael
2311:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2292:
2289:
2282:
2281:NOT INHERITED
2278:
2277:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2261:Weist.michael
2258:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2226:
2221:
2217:
2212:
2211:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:Weist.michael
2192:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2170:
2164:
2163:
2158:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2137:Weist.michael
2134:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:Weist.michael
2081:
2077:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2042:
2038:
2036:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2027:
2023:
2022:Weist.michael
2020:
2019:
2018:
2013:
2005:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1982:
1978:
1977:addictivefilm
1963:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1951:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1904:
1900:
1898:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1889:
1885:
1884:Emersonmarcus
1882:
1881:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1844:
1840:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1817:
1814:
1807:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1764:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1682:
1678:
1676:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1637:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1561:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1530:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1505:
1502:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1482:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1457:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1433:
1430:
1423:
1414:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1390:
1377:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1337:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:pseudoscience
1252:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1240:
1232:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1190:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1137:
1133:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1066:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1017:
1016:Joseph Sledge
1010:
1002:
1001:Joseph Sledge
998:
992:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
966:
965:
960:
955:
952:
948:
947:
944:
940:
936:
932:
926:
922:
918:
917:
910:
909:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
886:
878:
877:Joseph Sledge
874:
867:
863:
859:
853:
849:
845:
844:
837:
836:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
813:
806:(February 27)
805:
804:Joseph Sledge
801:
795:
787:
784:
782:
778:
777:
772:
771:
766:
761:
758:
754:
753:
750:
746:
743:
741:
734:
730:
726:
725:
718:
717:
711:
708:
704:
703:
701:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
673:
666:
659:(February 20)
658:
657:Joseph Sledge
654:
648:
647:
643:
639:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
606:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
583:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
564:
563:
562:
561:
556:
550:
544:
531:
530:
525:
522:
517:
514:
511:
510:
509:
507:
503:
497:
494:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
456:
451:
449:
445:
435:
434:
430:
426:
425:Earl King Jr.
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
388:Earl King Jr.
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
354:Earl King Jr.
347:
343:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
322:Earl King Jr.
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
289:
288:
284:
280:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
240:
236:
232:
231:pseudoscience
228:
223:
217:
208:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
126:
123:
122:
121:
119:
109:
108:
105:
102:
98:
94:
90:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5050:CleverPhrase
5045:
5044:
5025:CleverPhrase
5020:
5019:
4953:CleverPhrase
4948:
4947:
4892:CleverPhrase
4887:
4886:
4881:Fauzia Ilyas
4864:Fauzia Ilyas
4849:CleverPhrase
4844:
4843:
4820:
4807:
4770:CleverPhrase
4765:
4764:
4743:
4738:
4718:CleverPhrase
4713:
4712:
4689:CleverPhrase
4684:
4683:
4664:MbahGondrong
4645:
4625:CleverPhrase
4620:
4619:
4583:
4545:
4527:CleverPhrase
4522:
4521:
4503:
4492:
4474:CleverPhrase
4469:
4468:
4454:
4407:
4380:CleverPhrase
4375:
4374:
4346:
4339:
4335:
4333:
4310:
4288:
4270:CleverPhrase
4265:
4264:
4241:
4221:CleverPhrase
4216:
4215:
4200:
4189:
4171:CleverPhrase
4166:
4165:
4142:
4120:CleverPhrase
4115:
4114:
4095:
4091:
4089:
4075:CleverPhrase
4070:
4069:
4049:
4033:
4013:CleverPhrase
4008:
4007:
3975:CleverPhrase
3970:
3969:
3940:CleverPhrase
3935:
3934:
3912:
3894:CleverPhrase
3889:
3888:
3871:
3868:
3864:
3858:
3852:
3849:
3846:
3843:
3840:
3793:
3766:CleverPhrase
3761:
3760:
3744:
3712:CleverPhrase
3707:
3706:
3570:CleverPhrase
3565:
3564:
3540:CleverPhrase
3535:
3534:
3489:Muscat, Oman
3452:CleverPhrase
3447:
3446:
3440:
3385:no consensus
3370:CleverPhrase
3365:
3364:
3341:
3338:
3308:
3287:CleverPhrase
3282:
3281:
3259:
3211:CleverPhrase
3206:
3205:
3199:
3195:
3189:
3154:CleverPhrase
3149:
3148:
3110:CleverPhrase
3105:
3104:
3099:
3095:
3074:Muscat, Oman
3071:
3067:Muscat, Oman
3065:RM close at
3048:CleverPhrase
3043:
3042:
3022:
3018:
2971:
2960:
2934:CleverPhrase
2929:
2928:
2926:No problem.
2899:CleverPhrase
2894:
2893:
2860:
2813:
2809:
2808:
2803:
2801:
2766:CleverPhrase
2761:
2760:
2730:CleverPhrase
2725:
2724:
2719:
2659:CleverPhrase
2654:
2653:
2603:
2585:CleverPhrase
2580:
2579:
2567:
2564:
2517:
2488:CleverPhrase
2483:
2482:
2459:
2456:
2448:
2445:
2442:
2395:
2384:
2363:CleverPhrase
2358:
2357:
2348:
2346:
2308:— Preceding
2291:CleverPhrase
2286:
2285:
2255:— Preceding
2235:CleverPhrase
2230:
2229:
2189:— Preceding
2172:CleverPhrase
2167:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2131:— Preceding
2114:CleverPhrase
2109:
2108:
2082:
2078:
2075:
2028:
2017:
1995:CleverPhrase
1990:
1989:
1973:
1953:CleverPhrase
1948:
1947:
1937:
1890:
1858:
1836:
1816:CleverPhrase
1811:
1810:
1795:CleverPhrase
1790:
1789:
1759:
1741:
1738:
1715:
1668:
1662:Mridulaarora
1654:
1653:
1640:
1616:No worries!
1603:CleverPhrase
1598:
1597:
1579:
1551:CleverPhrase
1546:
1545:
1504:CleverPhrase
1499:
1498:
1432:CleverPhrase
1427:
1426:
1422:non-breaking
1413:FIGURE SPACE
1373:
1352:InsertClever
1350:
1349:
1329:
1319:
1316:
1298:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1236:
1199:
1164:Oil constant
1145:
1127:
1126:
1091:
1071:
1052:
1034:
1022:
1014:
990:
968:
962:
958:
942:
915:
907:
899:
842:
834:
826:
793:
774:
768:
764:
748:
723:
715:
699:
681:
634:
609:Boomerranged
587:WP:BOOMERANG
536:
528:
527:
505:
501:
492:
486:
480:
474:
468:
462:
453:
441:
438:Topic banned
422:
350:
318:
295:
277:
243:
224:
221:
184:
181:my talk page
179:, ask me on
162:
125:Introduction
115:
101:Arthur Rubin
92:
86:
60:
43:
37:
4401:Rayarainbow
4356:. Regards,
4245:WP:OUTCOMES
4102:Tagishsimon
4054:Tagishsimon
3787:EstherMusic
3311:Move review
3098:as well as
2680:. However,
2649:] and here:
2461:Ethanjkagan
2389:Ethanjkagan
1655:Italic text
1576:Misfortunes
1418: 
1023:Start-Class
605:ScrapIronIV
591:ScrapIronIV
207:Cold fusion
187:{{Help me}}
36:This is an
4969:Regarding
4342:WP:CSD#G11
4315:. Thanks,
4202:Sam Sailor
4096:to support
3585:WP:CRYSTAL
3485:Cúchullain
3226:Cúchullain
3173:Cúchullain
3126:Cúchullain
3078:Cúchullain
2831:uninvolved
2745:Joseph2302
2702:Joseph2302
2638:Joseph2302
2622:Joseph2302
2104:POV issues
1863:. Thanks,
1760:Regarding
1527:Salvidrim!
1479:Salvidrim!
1454:Salvidrim!
1387:Salvidrim!
1335:soetermans
1269:uninvolved
1088:ANI Notice
912:or on the
879:(March 14)
839:or on the
720:or on the
548:have a cup
490:block user
484:filter log
246:uninvolved
169:talk pages
4710:article.
4464:WP:INCITE
4336:test page
4299:Read the
3402:yesterday
2349:all three
2159:. Quote:
1847:Read the
1763:this edit
1376:done here
1185:You dope!
1107:Guy Macon
1055:help desk
1037:Knowledge
1027:talk page
496:block log
292:User Name
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
5004:Ushkin N
4924:Ushkin N
4910:Ushkin N
4868:Ushkin N
4827:Ushkin N
4809:Ushkin N
4746:Ushkin N
4411:contribs
4350:WP:10CSD
4150:Navops47
3797:contribs
3654:comments
3144:very low
3024:Dsampele
2975:contribs
2965:Dsampele
2884:Feminism
2843:policies
2789:DS alert
2610:Scarlets
2521:contribs
2446:Hello,
2399:contribs
2322:contribs
2310:unsigned
2269:contribs
2257:unsigned
2203:contribs
2191:unsigned
2145:contribs
2133:unsigned
2032:contribs
1894:contribs
1672:contribs
1618:Dohn joe
1582:Dohn joe
1518:though.
1370:Your sig
1320:I don't
1281:policies
1172:Glückauf
1075:Onel5969
975:Onel5969
970:Teahouse
931:Onel5969
858:Onel5969
776:Teahouse
686:verified
682:Reliable
506:one year
466:contribs
258:policies
112:Welcome!
93:required
4506:Jean Po
4433:history
4317:DPL bot
4249:Carrite
3819:history
3394:April 5
3339:Hello,
3335:closure
2997:history
2612:in the
2543:history
2421:history
2225:WP:SNOW
2054:history
1916:history
1865:DPL bot
1743:74music
1694:history
1644:Howicus
1208:Potguru
957:Hello!
763:Hello!
39:archive
5047:Insert
5022:Insert
4950:Insert
4945:well.
4889:Insert
4846:Insert
4767:Insert
4715:Insert
4686:Insert
4660:WP:FPL
4622:Insert
4524:Insert
4471:Insert
4377:Insert
4358:JohnCD
4354:WP:A7M
4267:Insert
4218:Insert
4168:Insert
4117:Insert
4105:(talk)
4072:Insert
4057:(talk)
4010:Insert
3972:Insert
3937:Insert
3891:Insert
3763:Insert
3709:Insert
3567:Insert
3537:Insert
3449:Insert
3367:Insert
3284:Insert
3266:Penbat
3208:Insert
3151:Insert
3107:Insert
3045:Insert
2931:Insert
2914:Jytdog
2896:Insert
2878:Jytdog
2862:Jytdog
2855:blocks
2837:, our
2763:Insert
2727:Insert
2717:WP:GNG
2698:WP:NRU
2678:WP:GNG
2656:Insert
2582:Insert
2485:Insert
2360:Insert
2288:Insert
2232:Insert
2169:Insert
2157:WP:VRS
2111:Insert
2100:WP:VRS
1992:Insert
1950:Insert
1843:Wicked
1813:Insert
1792:Insert
1600:Insert
1548:Insert
1501:Insert
1429:Insert
1408:U+2007
1355:Phrase
1330:Hitman
1293:blocks
1275:, our
1168:Wietze
1149:Blandx
614:Coffee
542:Coffee
521:WP:ANI
402:Coffee
270:blocks
252:, our
173:tildes
104:(talk)
97:WP:TOS
4605:Wgolf
4590:Wgolf
4569:Wgolf
4552:Wgolf
4441:watch
4437:links
3993:Wgolf
3955:Wgolf
3919:Wgolf
3827:watch
3823:links
3749:flyer
3648:three
3441:might
3124:RM.--
3005:watch
3001:links
2853:, or
2551:watch
2547:links
2457:Best
2429:watch
2425:links
2062:watch
2058:links
1924:watch
1920:links
1702:watch
1698:links
1291:, or
1147:work.
554:beans
268:, or
209:alert
16:<
5053:Here
5028:Here
5008:talk
4956:Here
4928:talk
4914:talk
4895:Here
4872:talk
4862:Yes
4852:Here
4831:talk
4813:talk
4773:Here
4750:talk
4721:Here
4692:Here
4668:talk
4628:Here
4609:talk
4594:talk
4573:talk
4556:talk
4530:Here
4510:talk
4477:Here
4445:logs
4429:talk
4425:edit
4405:talk
4383:Here
4362:talk
4352:and
4321:talk
4273:Here
4253:talk
4224:Here
4174:Here
4154:talk
4123:Here
4078:Here
4016:Here
3997:talk
3978:Here
3959:talk
3943:Here
3923:talk
3897:Here
3831:logs
3815:talk
3811:edit
3791:talk
3769:Here
3715:Here
3696:talk
3692:X4n6
3573:Here
3543:Here
3515:talk
3511:X4n6
3455:Here
3419:talk
3415:X4n6
3373:Here
3352:talk
3348:X4n6
3323:talk
3319:X4n6
3290:Here
3270:talk
3214:Here
3198:and
3157:Here
3113:Here
3051:Here
3028:talk
3009:logs
2993:talk
2989:edit
2969:talk
2937:Here
2918:talk
2902:Here
2866:talk
2851:bans
2825:here
2814:The
2769:Here
2749:talk
2733:Here
2706:talk
2662:Here
2626:talk
2588:Here
2555:logs
2539:talk
2535:edit
2515:talk
2491:Here
2465:talk
2433:logs
2417:talk
2413:edit
2393:talk
2366:Here
2318:talk
2294:Here
2265:talk
2238:Here
2199:talk
2175:Here
2141:talk
2117:Here
2089:talk
2066:logs
2050:talk
2046:edit
2026:talk
1998:Here
1981:talk
1956:Here
1928:logs
1912:talk
1908:edit
1888:talk
1869:talk
1819:Here
1798:Here
1776:talk
1770:? --
1747:talk
1706:logs
1690:talk
1686:edit
1666:talk
1622:talk
1606:Here
1586:talk
1554:Here
1507:Here
1435:Here
1358:Here
1304:talk
1289:bans
1263:here
1257:and
1212:talk
1176:Talk
1153:talk
1111:talk
1079:talk
979:talk
935:talk
862:talk
692:and
642:talk
622:talk
595:talk
572:talk
478:logs
460:talk
448:this
444:this
429:talk
410:talk
392:talk
373:talk
358:talk
342:talk
326:talk
306:talk
296:See
283:talk
266:bans
239:here
233:and
197:talk
165:sign
146:and
127:and
4999:").
4301:FAQ
4050:the
3747:SST
3651:new
3313:of
2955:AfC
2804:not
2720:and
2690:AfD
2379:AfC
2012:AfC
1849:FAQ
1239:not
781:Sam
740:Sam
738:--
557://
551://
545://
5010:)
4930:)
4916:)
4874:)
4833:)
4815:)
4752:)
4670:)
4662:.
4611:)
4596:)
4588:.
4575:)
4558:)
4512:)
4443:|
4439:|
4435:|
4431:|
4427:|
4413:)
4364:)
4323:)
4255:)
4156:)
3999:)
3961:)
3925:)
3917:.
3829:|
3825:|
3821:|
3817:|
3813:|
3799:)
3698:)
3562:.
3517:)
3421:)
3354:)
3325:)
3272:)
3264:--
3030:)
3007:|
3003:|
2999:|
2995:|
2991:|
2977:)
2920:)
2868:)
2849:,
2827:.
2751:)
2708:)
2700:.
2628:)
2553:|
2549:|
2545:|
2541:|
2537:|
2523:)
2480:.
2467:)
2431:|
2427:|
2423:|
2419:|
2415:|
2401:)
2324:)
2320:•
2283:.
2271:)
2267:•
2227:.
2205:)
2201:•
2147:)
2143:•
2091:)
2064:|
2060:|
2056:|
2052:|
2048:|
2034:)
1926:|
1922:|
1918:|
1914:|
1910:|
1896:)
1871:)
1778:)
1749:)
1704:|
1700:|
1696:|
1692:|
1688:|
1674:)
1624:)
1588:)
1531:·
1523:·
1483:·
1475:·
1458:·
1450:·
1391:·
1383:·
1338:.
1306:)
1287:,
1265:.
1214:)
1155:)
1113:)
1081:)
999::
981:)
937:)
875::
864:)
802::
702:.
696:.
680:.
655::
644:)
624:)
597:)
574:)
539:—
431:)
412:)
394:)
375:)
360:)
344:)
328:)
308:)
285:)
264:,
241:.
199:)
76:→
5006:(
4993:7
4990:6
4987:5
4984:4
4981:3
4978:2
4975:1
4926:(
4912:(
4870:(
4829:(
4811:(
4748:(
4666:(
4607:(
4592:(
4571:(
4554:(
4508:(
4447:)
4423:(
4408:·
4403:(
4360:(
4319:(
4307:.
4251:(
4152:(
3995:(
3957:(
3921:(
3833:)
3809:(
3794:·
3789:(
3694:(
3513:(
3417:(
3350:(
3321:(
3268:(
3233:c
3230:/
3180:c
3177:/
3133:c
3130:/
3085:c
3082:/
3026:(
3011:)
2987:(
2972:·
2967:(
2916:(
2880::
2876:@
2864:(
2747:(
2704:(
2640::
2636:@
2624:(
2557:)
2533:(
2518:·
2513:(
2463:(
2435:)
2411:(
2396:·
2391:(
2316:(
2263:(
2197:(
2139:(
2087:(
2068:)
2044:(
2029:·
2024:(
1979:(
1930:)
1906:(
1891:·
1886:(
1867:(
1855:.
1774:(
1745:(
1708:)
1684:(
1669:·
1664:(
1620:(
1584:(
1534:✉
1521:☺
1486:✉
1473:☺
1461:✉
1448:☺
1416:(
1394:✉
1381:☺
1302:(
1210:(
1151:(
1109:(
1077:(
1068:.
1059:.
977:(
933:(
927:.
920:.
860:(
854:.
847:.
735:.
728:.
640:(
620:(
593:(
570:(
523:.
498:)
493:·
487:·
481:·
475:·
469:·
463:·
458:(
427:(
408:(
390:(
371:(
356:(
340:(
324:(
304:(
281:(
195:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.