116:, but it is easier with a railbanked line than one that has undergone a "total abandonment," as the federal government guarantees the railroad the full rights to reactivate it. A railbanked line can be reopened within a year's time while an abandoned corridor could take years to be reactivated, if it was even possible. In railbanking, the government helps fund the line's rebuild. In the 25-year period from 1983 to 2008, 14,184 miles (22,827 km) of railroad have been abandoned. Of that, 8,056.5 miles (12,965.7 km), representing 56.8% of the lines abandoned in the past 25 years, were originally negotiated for railbanking agreements.
36:
194:
120:
period. The remaining 43.2% of the lines, representing 6,127.5 miles (9,861.3 km), were lines that railroads never considered trying to have railbanked, and were abandoned in their entirety. In total, 9,105 miles (14,653 km) of the 14,184 miles (22,827 km) abandoned during the 25-year period were not railbanked (64.2%). Some railroads refuse to railbank lines, and instead sell the land in parcels to the surrounding landowners.
213:
railway's route with many different owners, the reopening costs could be considerable. In 2017 the STB ruled that Neosho County in Kansas violated the Trails Act when it foreclosed on and sold three parcels of railbanked land where each spanned the full width of the right-of-way. The county's sales of the parcels were preempted by federal law and were vacated to keep the rail line available for reactivation.
190:, a law was made to remove all unused railroad overpasses. Another example is a natural disaster. If a flood washes away a railbanked railroad bridge, that is beyond the owner's control. The local, state, and Federal governments could give some financial help for the railroad to rebuild any infrastructure that may have been damaged or destroyed during the time that it was unused.
104:
on their condition or any planned interim use of the railbed. Often the rail corridor is put in custody of a state transportation agency, which then seeks a new operator for possible rehabilitation or reactivation. This helps ensure the possibility of future restored rail service when new economic conditions may warrant resuming operation.
130:
The land over which railways pass may have many owners—private, rail operator, or governmental—and, depending on the terms under which it was originally acquired, the type of operating rights may also vary. Without railbanking, on closure, some parts of a railway's route might otherwise revert to the
103:
for possible future use. Railbanking leaves the railroad, railbed, bridges or bridge corridor, and other infrastructure intact. This relieves the railroad's operator from the responsibility of maintenance, and from taxation. Existing rails may or may not be maintained intact on the railbed, depending
216:
By designating the route as railbanked, these complications are avoided and the costs of maintaining a right-of-way are removed from the railway operator. In the United States, land transferred to rail banks is held by local, state or federal governments and many railbanked rail corridors have been
134:
Approximately 85% of the railroad rights-of-way in the United States were acquired by easement from the then-abutting property owners. Normally, when the use for an easement is abandoned, the easement is extinguished and the land is not burdened by this adverse use. In 1983, Congress passed what is
119:
Twenty-one percent of those railbanking agreements failed; that is, they were ultimately abandoned. Of those 8,056.5 miles (12,965.7 km) originally negotiated, 5,079 miles (8,174 km) actually reached a railbanking agreement, representing 35.8% of the lines abandoned during the 25-year
233:
cuts in the 1960s and while several of these routes have subsequently been reopened, none were formally treated as land banks in the US manner. The
Beeching closures were driven by the government's desire to reduce expenditure on railways, and so most lines were offered for sale to the highest
127:(STB). Some of these reactivated corridors had only short sections reactivated, while others had the entire corridor reactivated. Railbanked corridors are usually utilized as multi-use recreational trails for cyclists, walkers, joggers, snowmobiling, cross country skiing, and horseback riding.
212:
A single section of a route changed in this way could have serious consequences for the viability of a restoration of a service, with the costs of repurchasing the land or right-of-way or of restoring the site to its former condition outweighing the economic benefit. Over the full length of a
135:
now known as the federal Rails-To-Trails law codified as 16 U.S.C. 1247(d). The federal law took the property rights of property owners throughout the United States for rail trails. Several property owners sued the government as the law took property without compensation. In 1990, the
182:
is one of the only states where railbanked corridors have a reasonable chance of reactivation (should there be a need to), where elsewhere local opposition from trail users and property abutters would be able to directly influence a municipally-owned right-of-way.
131:
former owner. The owner could reuse them for any purpose, or modify the ground conditions, potentially prejudicing the line's future reuse if required. However, the landowner must agree to keep the infrastructure such as bridges and tunnels intact.
139:
ruled that the property owners were entitled to compensation for the land taken for these rail trails. In 1996, the plaintiff was awarded $ 1.5 million as compensation for the land taken for a trail through his property (see
543:
304:
Testimony presented to the
Surface Transportation Board July 8, 2009, on the 25th anniversary of Section 8(d) of the National Trails Systems Act, which created the federal railbanking program
158:
policy has been to acquire abandoned rail lines for preservation. This has contributed to the majority of railroad mileage in
Connecticut being publicly owned, between the state and
391:"Railbanking is the essential legal tool for preserving abandoned railroad rights of way for Trails and Greenways, planning, railtrail corridor study, recreation path system, l"
287:
186:
Often, most of or all infrastructure is removed regardless to future use. Laws have been passed to remove infrastructure, in some cases. For example, in the
Commonwealth of
167:
607:
575:
328:
234:
bidder, a process which frequently led to great fragmentation in the ownership of former UK railway lines and reuse of the land for entirely different purposes. The
532:
504:
178:). A provision of this transfer is that CDOT is allowed to retake ownership of a right-of-way when needed for transportation purposes. Because of this,
166:
that shows future potential for transportation, when the property becomes available. CDOT has subsequently transferred 60 miles of right-of-way to the
390:
46:
291:
315:
155:
112:
In places with many environmental laws and other governmental regulations as the United States, it is very difficult to restore an
600:
568:
332:
365:
80:
493:
416:
123:
Since railbanking began in 1983, less than twenty railbanked corridors have been approved for reactivation by the
438:
163:
100:
175:
601:
Sunflower Rails-Trails
Conservancy, Inc. - Petition for Declaratory Order - Sale of Railbanked Right-of-Way
569:
Sunflower Rails-Trails
Conservancy, Inc. - Petition for Declaratory Order - Sale of Railbanked Right-of-Way
124:
136:
394:
141:
62:
17:
316:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=student-scholarship
638:
242:
is possibly the most extreme example, but commercial and residential developments are common.
174:, and CDEEP itself has independently obtained another 50 miles (22 of which are used for the
8:
329:"Surface Transportation Board hearing on rail banking abandoned railroad trail corridors"
154:
has taken a proactive approach to preserving railway rights-of-way. Since the 1970s,
113:
54:
198:
58:
574:(Report). Surface Transportation Board Decision Document 45420. 23 February 2017.
354:
606:(Report). Surface Transportation Board Decision Document 46055. 17 October 2017.
235:
226:
206:
97:
632:
288:"Review of federal railbanking: successes, statistics, and landowner impacts"
239:
230:
187:
417:"Rails-to-Trails Conservancy:: What We Do:: Trail Advocacy:: Railbanking"
179:
171:
151:
251:
467:
446:
193:
229:, thousands of miles (kilometers) of railway were closed under the
202:
159:
168:
Connecticut
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
494:"2013 Connecticut Rail Transportation Ownership and Service"
326:
162:. Today, this policy continues; the State will purchase any
439:"National Association of Reversionary Property Owners"
27:
Preserving railroad corridors for possible future use
393:. Americantrails.org. 17 March 2007. Archived from
630:
43:The examples and perspective in this article
542:. Connecticut Department of Transportation.
527:
525:
503:. Connecticut Department of Transportation.
522:
81:Learn how and when to remove this message
281:
279:
277:
275:
273:
271:
269:
267:
220:
192:
156:Connecticut Department of Transportation
533:"Connecticut State Rail Plan 2012-2016"
107:
14:
631:
285:
264:
331:. Americantrails.org. Archived from
29:
24:
347:
327:the Surface Transportation Board.
320:
25:
650:
290:. American trails. Archived from
286:Fowler, Marianne (July 8, 2009).
492:
34:
613:from the original on 2022-10-09
593:
581:from the original on 2022-10-09
561:
549:from the original on 2022-10-09
510:from the original on 2022-10-09
371:from the original on 2022-10-09
238:on the former Oxford–Cambridge
197:This causeway once carried the
531:
486:
460:
431:
409:
383:
309:
96:is the practice of preserving
13:
1:
257:
125:Surface Transportation Board
7:
245:
137:United States Supreme Court
57:, discuss the issue on the
10:
655:
145:, 100 F3d 1525, Fed. Cir.
355:"Story of Railbanking"
209:
221:In the United Kingdom
196:
474:. Supreme.justia.com
108:In the United States
63:create a new article
55:improve this article
45:may not represent a
419:. Railstotrails.org
397:on 24 December 2010
443:Home.earthlink.net
217:reused as trails.
210:
205:'s largest lake,
201:over portions of
143:Preseault v. U.S.
91:
90:
83:
65:, as appropriate.
16:(Redirected from
646:
623:
622:
620:
618:
612:
605:
597:
591:
590:
588:
586:
580:
573:
565:
559:
558:
556:
554:
548:
537:
529:
520:
519:
517:
515:
509:
498:
490:
484:
483:
481:
479:
470:Preseault v. ICC
464:
458:
457:
455:
454:
445:. Archived from
435:
429:
428:
426:
424:
413:
407:
406:
404:
402:
387:
381:
380:
378:
376:
370:
359:
351:
345:
344:
342:
340:
335:on 26 April 2011
324:
318:
313:
307:
306:
301:
299:
283:
199:Rutland Railroad
86:
79:
75:
72:
66:
38:
37:
30:
21:
654:
653:
649:
648:
647:
645:
644:
643:
629:
628:
627:
626:
616:
614:
610:
603:
599:
598:
594:
584:
582:
578:
571:
567:
566:
562:
552:
550:
546:
535:
530:
523:
513:
511:
507:
496:
491:
487:
477:
475:
466:
465:
461:
452:
450:
437:
436:
432:
422:
420:
415:
414:
410:
400:
398:
389:
388:
384:
374:
372:
368:
357:
353:
352:
348:
338:
336:
325:
321:
314:
310:
297:
295:
284:
265:
260:
248:
223:
176:Valley Railroad
110:
87:
76:
70:
67:
52:
39:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
652:
642:
641:
625:
624:
592:
560:
521:
485:
459:
430:
408:
382:
346:
319:
308:
262:
261:
259:
256:
255:
254:
247:
244:
236:Ryle Telescope
227:United Kingdom
222:
219:
207:Lake Champlain
114:abandoned line
109:
106:
89:
88:
49:of the subject
47:worldwide view
42:
40:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
651:
640:
639:Railway Lands
637:
636:
634:
609:
602:
596:
577:
570:
564:
545:
541:
534:
528:
526:
506:
502:
495:
489:
473:
471:
463:
449:on 2016-07-05
448:
444:
440:
434:
418:
412:
396:
392:
386:
367:
363:
356:
350:
334:
330:
323:
317:
312:
305:
294:on 2011-12-24
293:
289:
282:
280:
278:
276:
274:
272:
270:
268:
263:
253:
250:
249:
243:
241:
237:
232:
228:
218:
214:
208:
204:
200:
195:
191:
189:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:The state of
148:
146:
144:
138:
132:
128:
126:
121:
117:
115:
105:
102:
99:
95:
85:
82:
74:
64:
60:
56:
50:
48:
41:
32:
31:
19:
615:. Retrieved
595:
583:. Retrieved
563:
553:30 September
551:. Retrieved
539:
514:30 September
512:. Retrieved
500:
488:
476:. Retrieved
469:
462:
451:. Retrieved
447:the original
442:
433:
421:. Retrieved
411:
399:. Retrieved
395:the original
385:
373:. Retrieved
361:
349:
337:. Retrieved
333:the original
322:
311:
303:
296:. Retrieved
292:the original
240:Varsity Line
231:Beeching Axe
224:
215:
211:
188:Pennsylvania
185:
164:right-of-way
149:
142:
133:
129:
122:
118:
111:
93:
92:
77:
68:
44:
362:Atfiles.org
180:Connecticut
172:rail trails
170:for use in
152:Connecticut
94:Railbanking
478:31 January
453:2016-08-18
423:31 January
401:31 January
375:31 January
339:31 January
298:31 January
258:References
252:Rail trail
71:April 2021
101:corridors
59:talk page
633:Category
608:Archived
576:Archived
544:Archived
505:Archived
366:Archived
246:See also
53:You may
18:Railbank
617:13 July
585:13 July
225:In the
203:Vermont
540:ct.gov
501:ct.gov
160:Amtrak
611:(PDF)
604:(PDF)
579:(PDF)
572:(PDF)
547:(PDF)
536:(PDF)
508:(PDF)
497:(PDF)
369:(PDF)
358:(PDF)
61:, or
619:2020
587:2020
555:2014
516:2014
480:2011
425:2011
403:2011
377:2011
341:2011
300:2011
98:rail
147:).
635::
538:.
524:^
499:.
441:.
364:.
360:.
302:.
266:^
621:.
589:.
557:.
518:.
482:.
472:"
468:"
456:.
427:.
405:.
379:.
343:.
84:)
78:(
73:)
69:(
51:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
