Knowledge

Lie detection

Source 📝

248:
specific techniques to try and trick the test. Although the issues with the CQT false-positive and false-negative rates are discussed above, there are also methodological issues with how proponents of the CQT determine the accuracy of the test. Due to the fact that the accuracy of the CQT is often determined through whether an individual who is given the test provides the police a confession to a crime after the test is administered, this means that cases where someone was cleared of charges after taking a polygraph or, in a worse-case scenario, gives a false confession when they are actually innocent are not taken into account when it comes to determining the accuracy of the test. Another issue is that, due to how the CQT is administered and how the lie-detection process works, only people who are determined to be deceptive are further interrogated for a confession. This means that the polygraph outcome and the confession are not independent of one another, making it very difficult to use confessions as the sole determiner of the accuracy of the test. These methodological problems provide false evidence that supports the continued use of this test, despite the many flaws that the test possesses. While it could be said that including this test as a police tool is useful because it might sometimes provide accurate information, the probability of it causing undue hardship to people who are actually innocent, and wasting time in the process, makes this a very unreliable method for law enforcement officers to use.
201:, to conduct an analysis of written content. He claims it has accuracy in predicting lying. Pennebaker cites his method as "significantly more effective than human judges in correctly identifying deceptive or truthful writing samples"; there is a 67% accuracy rate with his method, while trained people have 52% accuracy. There were five experimental procedures used in this study. Study 1–3 asked participants to speak, hand write or type a true or false statement about abortion. The participants were randomly assigned to tell a true or false statement. Study 4 focused on feelings about friends and study 5 had the students involved in a mock crime and asked to lie. Human judges were asked to rate the truthfulness of the 400 communications dealing with abortion. The judges read or watched the statement and gave it a yes or no answer about if this statement was false or not. LIWC correctly classified 67% of the abortion communications and the judges correctly classified 52%. His studies have identified that deception carries three primary written markers. The first is fewer first-person pronouns such as 'I', 'me', 'my', 'mine', and 'myself' (singular), as well as 'we', 'us', 'our', and 'ourselves' (plural). Those lying "avoid statements of ownership, distance themselves from their stories and avoid taking responsibility for their behavior" while also using more 291:, capillary dilation, and muscular movement. While taking a polygraph test the subject wears a blood pressure device to measure blood pressure fluctuations. Respiration is measured by wearing pneumographs around the chest, and finally electrodes are placed on the subject's fingers to measure skin conductivity. To determine truth it is assumed the subject will show more signs of fear when answering the control questions, known to the examiner, compared with the relevant questions, where the answers are not known. Polygraphs focus more on the exams predictive value of guilt by comparing the responses of the participant to control questions, irrelevant questions, and relevant questions to gauge arousal, which is then interpreted as a display of fear and deception is assumed. If a person is showing a deception there will be changes in the autonomic arousal responses to the relevant questions. Results are considered inconclusive if there is no fluctuation in any of the questions. 187:(FACS) and "when combined with voice and speech measures, reaches detection accuracy rates of up to 90 percent." However, there is currently no evidence to support such a claim. It is currently being automated for use in law enforcement and is still being improved to increase accuracy. His studies use micro-expressions, which last less than one-fifth of a second, and "may leak emotions someone wants to conceal, such as anger or guilt." However, "signs of emotion aren't necessarily signs of guilt. An innocent person may be apprehensive and appear guilty," Ekman reminds us. With regard to his studies, lies about emotions at the moment have the biggest payoff from face and voice cues while lies about beliefs and actions, such as crimes use cues from gestures and words are added. Ekman and his associates have validated many signs of deception, but do not publish all of them so as not to educate criminals 352:, intensity and micro tremors. In this way voice analysis "detect minute variations in the voice thought to signal lying." It can even be used covertly over the phone, and has been used by banking and insurance companies as well as the government of the United Kingdom. Customers are assessed for truth in certain situations by banks and insurance companies where computers are used to record responses. Software then compares control questions to relevant questions assessed for deception. However, its reliability has been debated by peer-reviewed journals. "When a person lies, an involuntary interference of the nerves causes the vocal cords to produce a distorted sound wave, namely a frequency level which is different from the one produced by the same person when telling the truth." 356:
making the deception the most likely ground truth. With 48% accurate classification, VSA performed at chance level. Several other studies showed similar results (Damphousse, 2008; Harnsberger, Hollien, Martin, & Hollien, 2009). In 2003, the National Research Council concluded "Overall, this research and the few controlled tests conducted over the past decade offer little or no scientific basis for the use of the computer voice stress analyser or similar voice measurement instruments."
541:
component allows researchers to see activation in the brain over time and assess efficiency and connectivity by comparing blood use in the brain, which allows for the identification of which portions of the brain are using more oxygen, and thus being used during a specific task. FMRI data have been examined through the lens of machine learning algorithms to decode whether subjects believed or disbelieved statements, ranging from mathematical, semantic to religious belief statements.
459:. A pattern of blood-flow-velocity changes is obtained in response to questions that include correct and incorrect answers. The wrong answer will elicit bi-hemispheric activation, from correct answer that activates unilateral response. Cognitive polygraphy based on this system is devoid of any subjective control of mental processes and, hence, high reliability and specificity; however, this is yet to be tested in forensic practice. See also cognitive 574:(historically speaking) are used for the purposes of obtaining accurate information from an unwilling subject. Information obtained by publicly disclosed truth drugs has been shown to be highly unreliable, with subjects apparently freely mixing fact and fantasy. Much of the claimed effect relies on the belief of the subjects that they cannot tell a lie while under the influence of the drug. 25: 329:
constant physiological response. As technology and research have developed many have moved away from polygraphing because of the drawbacks of this style of detection. Supporters of polygraphing claim it has a 70% accuracy rate, 16% better than lie detection in the general population. Someone who has failed the test is more likely to confess than someone who has passed, contributing to
244:(GKT) is a multiple-choice format in which answer choices or one correct answer and additional incorrect answers are read and the physiological response is recorded. The controls are the incorrect alternative answers. The greater physiological response should be to the correct answer. Its point is to determine if the subject has knowledge about a particular event. 453:
suggests that the DKS model may have a correlate in mnemonic operations. In other words, the DKS model may have a discrete knowledge base (DKB) of essential components needed for task resolution, while for nDKS, DKB is absent and, hence, a "global" or bi-hemispheric search occurs. Based on the latter premise, a 'lie detector' system was designed as described in
119:"...there is at present only limited scientific evidence for establishing the validity of polygraph testing. Even where the evidence seems to indicate that polygraph testing detects deceptive subjects better than chance, significant error rates are possible, and examiner and examinee differences and the use of countermeasures may further affect validity." 545:
deception. While fMRI studies on deception have claimed detection accuracy as high as 90% many have problems with implementing this style of detection. Only yes or no answers can be used which allows for flexibility in the truth and style of lying. Some people are unable to take one such as those with medical conditions, claustrophobia, or implants.
498:, or EEG, measures brain activity through electrodes attached to the scalp of a subject. The object is to identify the recognition of meaningful data through this activity. Images or objects are shown to the subject while questioning techniques are implemented to determine recognition. This can include crime scene images, for example. 514:
Machine learning algorithms applied to EEG data have also been used to decode whether a subject believed or disbelieved a statement reaching ~90% accuracy. This work was an extension to work by Sam Harris and colleagues and further demonstrated that belief preceded disbelief in time, suggesting that
251:
Both are considered to be biased against those that are innocent, because the guilty who fear the consequences of being found out can be more motivated to cheat on the test. Various techniques (which can be found online) can teach individuals how to change the results of the tests, including curling
480:
assess recognition, and therefore may or may not be effective in assessing deception. In ERP studies P3 amplitude waves are assessed, with these waves being large when an item is recognized. However, P100 amplitudes have been observed to have significant correlation to trustworthiness ratings, the
355:
Several studies published in peer reviewed journals showed VSA to perform at chance level when it comes to detecting deception. Horvath, McCloughan, Weatherman, and Slowik, (2013), for example, tested VSA on the recordings of interrogation of 74 suspects. Eighteen of these suspects later confessed,
123:
In the 2007 peer-reviewed academic article "Charlatanry in forensic speech science", the authors reviewed 50 years of lie detector research and came to the conclusion that there is no scientific evidence supporting that voice analysis lie detectors actually work. Lie detector manufacturer Nemesysco
452:
technique showed that successful problem-solving employs a discrete knowledge strategy (DKS) that selects neural pathways represented in one hemisphere, while unsuccessful outcome implicates a non-discrete knowledge strategy (nDKS). A polygraphic test could be viewed as a working memory task. This
247:
In addition to the test skewing towards not finding people innocent, there are also issues where some offenders might have a greater physiological response to the control question than to the specific question, making it difficult to determine guilt using this method even when people are not using
167:
to give a continuous blood pressure and pulse curve and used it to study 4,000 criminals. In the 1990s, a team of scientists, Stanley Abrams, Jean M. Verdier and Oleg Maltsev developed a new methodology contributing six coefficients that positively affect the accuracy of the lie detector analysis
501:
Perceived trustworthiness is interpreted by the individual from looking at a face, and this decreases when someone is lying. Such observations are "too subtle to be explicitly processed by observers, but affect implicit cognitive and affective processes." These results, in a study by Heussen,
176:
Two meta-analyses conducted by 2004 found an association between lying and increased pupil size and compressed lips. Liars may stay still more, use fewer hand gestures, and make less eye contact. Liars may take more time to answer questions but on the other hand, if they have had time to prepare,
83:
is an assessment of a verbal statement with the goal to reveal a possible intentional deceit. Lie detection may refer to a cognitive process of detecting deception by evaluating message content as well as non-verbal cues. It also may refer to questioning techniques used along with technology that
393:
that they consider a polygraph alternative. This is not an emotional reaction like the polygraph and other methods but rather a cognitive reaction. This technology measures pupil dilation, response time, reading and rereading time, and errors. Data is recorded while subjects answer true or false
376:
Dr. Alan Hirsch, from the department of Neurology and Psychiatry at the Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago, explained the "Pinocchio syndrome" or "Pinocchio effect" as: blood rushes to the nose when people lie. This extra blood may make the nose itchy. As a result, people who
240:(CQT) uses control questions, with known answers, to serve as a physiological baseline in order to compare them with questions relevant to a particular incident. The control question should have a greater physiological response if truth was told and a lesser physiological response for lying. The 540:
fMRIs use electromagnets to create pulse sequences in the cells of the brain. The fMRI scanner then detects the different pulses and fields that are used to distinguish tissue structures and the distinction between layers of the brain, matter type, and the ability to see growths. The functional
111:
The cumulative research evidence suggests that machines do detect deception better than chance, but with significant error rates and that strategies used to "beat" polygraph examinations, so-called countermeasures, may be effective. Despite unreliability, results are admissible in court in some
328:
has no scientific validity because it is not a scientific procedure. People have found ways to try and cheat the system, such as taking sedatives to reduce anxiety; using antiperspirant to prevent sweating; and positioning pins or biting parts of the mouth after each question to demonstrate a
208:
More recently evidence has been provided by the work of CA Morgan III and GA Hazlett that a computer analysis of cognitive interview derived speech content (i.e. response length and unique word count) provides a method for detecting deception that is both demonstrably better than professional
132:
can cause problems with data as certain disorders can lead a person to make a statement they believe to be truth but is actually a fabrication. As well as with all testing, the examiner can cause biases within the test with their interaction with the subject and interpretation of the data.
544:
Historically, fMRI lie detector tests have not been allowed into evidence in legal proceedings, the most famous attempt being Harvey Nathan's insurance fraud case in 2007. The lack of legal support has not stopped companies like No Lie MRI and CEPHOS from offering private fMRI scans to test
515:
the brain may initially accept statements as valid descriptions of the world (belief) prior to rejecting this notion (disbelief). Understanding how the brain assesses the veracity of a descriptive statement may be an important step in building neuroimaging based lie detection methods.
159:, with which he reported 90–100% accuracy. His studies used students and actual court cases. Then in 1913 W.M. Marston determined systolic blood-pressure by oscillatory methods and his findings cite definite changes in blood pressure during the deception of criminal suspects. In 1921, 401:
Eye-tracking claims to offer several benefits over the polygraph: lower cost, 1/5th of the time to conduct, subjects do not need to be "hooked up" to anything, and it does not require qualified polygraph examiners to give the test. The technology has not been subject to peer review.
209:
judgments of professionals and useful at distinguishing between genuine and false adult claims of exposure to highly stressful, potentially traumatic events. This method shows particular promise as it is non confrontational as well as scientifically and cross culturally valid.
364:
People often evaluate lies based on non-verbal behavior, but are quick to place too much merit in misleading indicators, such as: avoidance of eye contact, increased pauses between statements, and excessive movements originating from the hands or feet. Devices such as the
150:
was the first to work on practical deception tests based on physiological changes. He detected changes in inspiration-expiration ratio—findings confirmed by N.E. Burtt. Burtt conducted studies that emphasized the changes in quantitative systolic blood-pressure.
124:
threatened to sue the academic publisher for libel resulting in removal of the article from online databases. In a letter to the publisher, Nemesysco's lawyers wrote that the authors of the article could be sued for defamation if they wrote on the subject again.
440:. It is isolated and easier to generate because it lacks cross-checking into the larger picture. This style contrasts memorized lies that aren't as rich in detail but are retrieved from memory. They often fit into an actual scenario to make recall easier. 397:
They have found that more effort is required by lying than giving the truth and thus their aim is to find indications of hard work. Individuals not telling the truth might, for instance, have dilated pupils while also taking longer to answer the question.
127:
Nevertheless, extraneous "noise" on the polygraph can come from embarrassment or anxiety and not be specific to lying. When subjects are aware of the assessment their resulting emotional response, especially anxiety, can impact the data. Additionally,
283:. Micro-expressions are the brief and incomplete nonverbal changes in expression while the rest show an activation of the nervous system. These changes in body functions are not easily controlled by the conscious mind. They also may consider 506:
paradigm including two conditions within the experiment: truthful faces and lying faces. Faces flashed for 100ms and then the participants rated them. However, the limitations of this study would be that it only had 15 participants and the
256:
was found to be ineffective by at least one study, especially in students counting backward by seven. A study has found that in the guilty knowledge test subjects can focusing on the alternative answers and make themselves look innocent.
433:(fNIRS) also detects oxygen and activity in the brain like the fMRI, but instead it looks at blood oxygen levels. It is advantageous to the fMRI because it is portable, however its image resolution is of lower quality than the fMRI. 481:
importance of which will be discussed in the EEG section. This, along with other studies leads some to purport that because ERP studies rely on quick perceptual processes they "are integral to the detection of deception."
232:
Relevant questions are compared against comparison questions (which should represent false answers) and irrelevant questions (which should represent true answers). They are about whatever is particularly in question.
1211:
DePaulo, Bella M.; Morris, Wendy L. (2004). "Chapter 2: Discerning lies from truth: behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition". In Granhag, Pär Anders; Strömwall, Leif A. (eds.).
1577:
Horvath, F., McCloughan, J., Weatherman, D., & Slowik, S. (2013). "The Accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) Operators' Judgments of Truth and Deception During Police Questioning".
84:
record physiological functions to ascertain truth and falsehood in response. The latter is commonly used by law enforcement in the United States, but rarely in other countries because it is based on
413:, or the measurement of the time taken to perform mental operations, can be used to distinguish lying from truth-telling. One recent instrument using cognitive chronometry for this purpose is the 177:
they may answer more quickly than people telling the truth would, and talk less, and repeat phrases more. They do not appear to be more fidgety, blink more, or have a less-relaxed posture.
721: 99:
of existing research concluded that there was "little basis for the expectation that a polygraph test could have extremely high accuracy." There is no evidence to substantiate that
373:
over time slots and encodes them into large vectors which are classified as showing truthful or deceptive behavior by artificial intelligence or statistical classifiers.
205:
words such as "hate, worthless and sad." Second, they use "few exclusionary words such as except, but or nor" when "distinguish what they did from what they did not do."
1241:
Morgan CA 3rd; et al. (2011). "Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events".
1909:
Douglas, Pamela K; Edward Lau; Ariana Anderson; Wesley Kerr; Austin Head; Margalit Wollner; Daniel Moyer; Michael Durnhofer; Wei Li; Jen Bramen; Mark S Cohen (2013).
943: 2614: 163:
criticized Marston's intermittent blood pressure method because emotional changes were so brief they could be lost. To adjust for this he modified the Erlanger
436:
As there are different styles of lying, a spontaneous or artificial deception is constructed based on a mixture of information already stored in semantic and
1452: 2123: 1284: 991: 427:
and the multiple voxels activated in the brain evoked by a stimulus to determine what the brain has detected, and so whether it is familiar.
310: 1615:
Harnsberger, J. D.; Hollien, H.; Martin, C. A.; Hollien, K. A. (2009). "Stress and Deception in Speech: Evaluating Layered Voice Analysis".
1989:"Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs. disbelief" 1761:
Rothwell, J. McLean; Bandar, J.; O'Shea, Z. (2006). "Charting the behavioural state of a person using a Backpropagation Neural Network".
229:
Comparison questions have an indirect relationship to the event or circumstance, and they are designed to encourage the subject to lie.
2064: 1714: 155:
studied blood-pressure and noted increase in systolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or over indicated guilt through using the tycos
103:
lie detection, such as by looking at body language, is an effective way to detect lies, even if it is widely used by law enforcement.
2641: 2509: 414: 449: 298:
which can be from lying or significance to the subject. The problem becomes that they are also associated with mental effort and
226:
Irrelevant questions establish a baseline to compare other answers by asking simple questions with clear true and false answers.
1826:
Njemanze, P. C. (2005). "Cerebral lateralization and general intelligence: Gender differences in a transcranial Doppler study".
533:
to compare time and topography of activity in the brain for lie detection. While a polygraph detects changes in activity in the
49: 33: 2371: 2116: 704: 430: 2720: 1104: 2735: 2725: 940: 306: 302:, so they can be influenced by fear, anger, and surprise for example. This technique may also be used with CQT and GKT. 625:
Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches (Wiley Series in Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law)
1225: 1039: 848: 632: 318: 314: 1407: 2619: 67: 1882:
Heussen, Yana; Ferdinand Binkofski; Jacob Jolij (September 2010). "The semantics of the lying face – An EEG Study".
1797: 817:"Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation – A Technical Memorandum" 2109: 966: 146:
The study of physiological methods for deception tests measuring emotional disturbances began in the early 1900s.
91:
There are a wide variety of technologies available for this purpose. The most common and long used measure is the
888: 1911:"Single trial decoding of belief decision making from EEG and fMRI data using independent components features" 2472: 588: 96: 911: 115:
In 1983 the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment published a review of the technology and found:
2811: 2636: 2214: 2187: 2036:
Langleben, D. D.; Dattilio, F. M. (2008). "Commentary: The future of forensic functional brain imaging".
223:
There are typically three types of questions used in polygraph testing or voice stress analysis testing:
184: 2376: 2177: 1002: 778: 366: 1658:
Hollien, H.; Harnsberger, J. D.; Martin, C. A.; Hollien, K. A. (2008). "Evaluation of the NITV CVSA".
112:
countries, such as Japan. Lie detector results are very rarely admitted in evidence in the US courts.
2428: 1701:
Akehurst; Koehnken (1996). "Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behavior".
534: 1840: 1593: 686: 2791: 2301: 477: 472: 276: 2828: 2704: 2132: 152: 129: 100: 2231: 2918: 2519: 2258: 1835: 879: 593: 530: 495: 490: 2818: 2477: 2311: 1278: 661: 410: 341: 2086:
Rowell, Jr (1952). "Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Scientific Devices and Analyses".
1473: 861: 2786: 2321: 2286: 2263: 2221: 2145: 1312: 951: 160: 8: 2730: 2467: 2418: 2366: 1730:"Silent talker: a new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception" 598: 503: 321:
currently use polygraphs. They are regularly used by these agencies to screen employees.
738: 2823: 2740: 2609: 2441: 2343: 2326: 2251: 2013: 1988: 1937: 1910: 1861: 1778: 1683: 1640: 1546: 1519: 1340: 1266: 1214: 1193: 1086: 759: 583: 524: 390: 330: 253: 218: 194: 45: 1594:"Voice stress analysis: Only 15 percent of lies about drug use detected in field test" 2599: 2549: 2356: 2291: 2197: 2182: 2045: 2018: 2004: 1969: 1942: 1853: 1687: 1675: 1671: 1644: 1632: 1628: 1551: 1390: 1344: 1332: 1258: 1254: 1221: 1185: 1138: 751: 743: 700: 628: 563: 1865: 1420: 1367:
Ganis, G.; Kosslyn, S. M.; Stose, S.; Thompson, W. L.; Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003).
1270: 1197: 763: 2756: 2209: 2008: 2000: 1932: 1922: 1895: 1891: 1845: 1782: 1770: 1741: 1710: 1667: 1624: 1541: 1531: 1380: 1324: 1250: 1177: 1078: 923: 844: 786: 733: 692: 284: 202: 198: 190: 156: 147: 2880: 2854: 2539: 2436: 2406: 2192: 1220:(Transferred to digital print. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 970: 947: 437: 370: 299: 295: 1849: 1181: 927: 385:
John Kircher, Doug Hacker, Anne Cook, Dan Woltz and David Raskin have developed
2761: 2457: 1568:
S. Manes. "Lie Detector. (Lie Detector Software Truster)." Forbes, Oct. 5, 1998
288: 1774: 1385: 1368: 791: 455: 2912: 2849: 2801: 2694: 2668: 2659: 2624: 2554: 2529: 2514: 2361: 2168: 1927: 1536: 1336: 1328: 747: 420: 345: 279:
reactions, such as micro-expressions, breathing rate, skin conductivity, and
85: 377:
stretch the truth tend to either scratch their nose or touch it more often.
2699: 2684: 2651: 2296: 2049: 2022: 1973: 1946: 1908: 1857: 1801: 1679: 1636: 1555: 1474:
The Lie Behind the Lie Detector by George W. Maschke and Gino J. Scalabrini
1394: 1262: 1189: 941:
All lies? Scientists threatened with legal action over lie detector article
755: 386: 164: 2101: 1715:
10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199612)10:6<461::aid-acp413>3.3.co;2-u
1369:"Neural Correlates of Different Types of Deception: An fMRI Investigation" 2875: 2833: 2663: 2411: 2381: 2246: 1960:
Simpson JR (2008). "Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?".
1812: 1313:"Effective Policing: Understanding How Polygraph Tests Work and Are Used" 992:"Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously" 963: 554: 41:
there is a mismatch between the article body and the lead about accuracy.
912:"Charlantry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously" 2796: 2766: 2544: 2351: 1090: 559: 460: 325: 280: 180: 1485: 816: 2806: 2594: 2534: 2462: 2331: 2268: 2241: 2226: 1881: 1746: 1729: 1069:
Keeler, Leonarde (January 1930). "A Method for Detecting Deception".
975: 883: 603: 349: 272: 266: 92: 1520:"Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector" 1453:"Education psychologists use eye0tracking method for detecting lies" 1168:
Bond CF, Jr; DePaulo, BM (2006). "Accuracy of deception judgments".
1082: 2631: 2397: 2306: 2236: 2172: 2163: 696: 571: 681: 679: 2885: 2204: 567: 106: 2069:
International Journal of Medical Toxicology & Legal Medicine
989: 2859: 2604: 2559: 2524: 2401: 2316: 2278: 1657: 1614: 676: 518: 333:
not learning about mistakes they have made and thus improving.
1727: 824:
Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment
448:
Recent developments that permit non-invasive monitoring using
2038:
The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
623:
Granhag, Pär Anders; Vrij, Aldert; Verschuere, Bruno (2015).
502:
Binkofski, and Jolij, were obtained through a study with an
344:(also called voice risk analysis) uses computers to compare 2063:
Kapoor, P.; Chugh, Y.; Kapoor, A. K.; Sinha, U. S. (2008).
537:, fMRI has the potential to catch the lie at the 'source'. 508: 424: 275:, and is used to test both styles of deception. It detects 720:
Vrij, Aldert; Hartwig, Maria; Granhag, Pär Anders (2019).
1795: 1728:
Rothwell, J.; Bandar, Z.; O'Shea, J.; McLean, D. (2006).
1366: 443: 2615:
Pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified
1760: 1517: 990:
Anders Eriksson; Francisco Lacerda (14 February 2007).
2062: 1421:"The Truth About Lie Detectors (aka Polygraph Tests)" 999:
International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
916:
International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
722:"Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception" 664:. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (UK) 622: 294:
These measures are supposed to indicate a short-term
212: 1798:"Can 'Pinocchio Syndrome' solve the niqab dilemma?" 1306: 1304: 1302: 1300: 1298: 1296: 1294: 1105:"Historical Perspective: Some Polygraph Techniques" 529:Functional magnetic resonance imaging looks to the 1518:Rusconi, Elena; Mitchener-Nissen, Timothy (2013). 1213: 719: 2035: 466: 2910: 1700: 1291: 1447: 1445: 1443: 1441: 1216:The detection of deception in forensic contexts 909: 484: 305:United States government agencies, such as the 1167: 107:General accuracy and limitations of assessment 2117: 1240: 1210: 627:. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 205. 324:Critics claim that "lie detection" by use of 1763:Journal of Neural Computing and Applications 1438: 811: 809: 656: 654: 652: 650: 648: 646: 644: 519:Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) 2131: 1980: 1953: 1283:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 2124: 2110: 1877: 1875: 1796:Dr. Game W. Gifford Jones (26 July 2010). 1591: 1132: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1033: 1031: 1029: 1027: 1025: 1023: 964:Threats over Swedish lie detector research 2642:Social (pragmatic) communication disorder 2012: 1936: 1926: 1884:International Journal of Psychophysiology 1839: 1745: 1545: 1535: 1384: 806: 790: 737: 641: 68:Learn how and when to remove this message 16:Assessment of statements to reveal deceit 2510:Basic interpersonal communicative skills 1825: 1170:Personality and Social Psychology Review 415:timed antagonistic response alethiometer 336: 2577: 1986: 1959: 1902: 1872: 1734:Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology 1492:. Electronic Privacy Information Center 1136: 1123: 1037: 1020: 878: 862:"Telling the truth about lie detectors" 2911: 2085: 1310: 1068: 1062: 776: 450:functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) 444:Functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) 359: 2576: 2498: 2372:High-context and low-context cultures 2143: 2105: 1513: 1511: 1509: 1507: 1455:. psychologialscience.org. 2010-07-12 1362: 1360: 1358: 1356: 1354: 770: 431:Functional near-infrared spectroscopy 405: 95:. A comprehensive 2003 review by the 2721:Computer processing of body language 2499: 2065:"Torture, terrorist and truth serum" 271:Lie detection commonly involves the 197:and Word Count (LIWC), published by 18: 2736:List of facial expression databases 2726:Emotion recognition in conversation 1311:Iacono, William G. (October 2008). 739:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135 691:. National Research Council. 2003. 13: 2029: 1504: 1351: 1071:American Journal of Police Science 910:Eriksson, A.; Lacerda, F. (2007). 849:American Psychological Association 456:United States Patent No. 6,390,979 219:Polygraph § Testing procedure 213:Questioning and testing techniques 14: 2930: 2620:Childhood disintegrative disorder 777:Seigel, Jessica (25 March 2021). 252:the toes, and biting the tongue. 2005:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.002 1672:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00596.x 1629:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01026.x 1255:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01896.x 1038:Preston, Elizabeth (July 2002). 1001:. 14.2 2007: 169. Archived from 23: 2079: 2056: 1915:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 1819: 1789: 1754: 1721: 1694: 1651: 1608: 1585: 1571: 1562: 1524:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 1478: 1467: 1413: 1401: 1234: 1204: 1161: 1097: 982: 957: 934: 903: 688:The Polygraph and Lie Detection 380: 171: 141: 2144: 1896:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.06.006 884:"Skeptoid #422: Lie Detection" 872: 854: 838: 713: 616: 467:Event-related potentials (ERP) 1: 1317:Criminal Justice and Behavior 1137:Adelson, Rachel (July 2004). 845:The Truth About Lie Detectors 609: 315:Customs and Border Protection 1703:Applied Cognitive Psychology 1660:Journal of Forensic Sciences 1617:Journal of Forensic Sciences 1580:Journal of Forensic Sciences 1243:Journal of Forensic Sciences 826:(OTA-TM-H-15). November 1983 485:Electroencephalography (EEG) 260: 97:National Academy of Sciences 7: 2637:Nonverbal learning disorder 2215:Speech-independent gestures 2188:Facial Action Coding System 1962:J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 1850:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.104 1410:. BBC Science & Nature. 1182:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 928:10.1558/ijsll.2007.14.2.169 726:Annual Review of Psychology 577: 185:Facial Action Coding System 10: 2935: 2377:Interpersonal relationship 2178:Body-to-body communication 552: 522: 488: 470: 367:Silent Talker Lie Detector 264: 216: 136: 2868: 2842: 2782: 2775: 2749: 2713: 2677: 2650: 2587: 2583: 2572: 2505: 2494: 2450: 2427: 2390: 2342: 2277: 2156: 2152: 2139: 1775:10.1007/s00521-006-0055-9 792:10.1146/knowable-032421-1 535:peripheral nervous system 394:questions on a computer. 369:monitor large numbers of 2792:Behavioral communication 1928:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00392 1537:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594 1329:10.1177/0093854808321529 548: 478:Event-related potentials 473:Event-related potentials 37:may need to be rewritten 2232:Interpersonal synchrony 2133:Nonverbal communication 1386:10.1093/cercor/13.8.830 779:"The truth about lying" 387:eye-tracking technology 153:William Moulton Marston 130:psychological disorders 39:. The reason given is: 2829:Monastic sign lexicons 2520:Emotional intelligence 594:Thought identification 589:Forensics in antiquity 531:central nervous system 496:Electroencephalography 491:Electroencephalography 2819:Impression management 1143:Monitor on Psychology 1139:"Detecting Deception" 1040:"Detecting Deception" 662:"Detecting Deception" 411:Cognitive chronometry 342:Voice stress analysis 337:Voice stress analysis 307:Department of Defense 242:guilty knowledge test 238:control question test 2834:Verbal communication 2787:Animal communication 2705:Targeted advertising 2222:Haptic communication 1987:Douglas, PK (2011). 1109:Western Morning News 952:Stockholm University 319:Department of Energy 161:John Augustus Larson 2843:Non-verbal language 2731:Gesture recognition 2578:Further information 2468:Emotion recognition 2419:Silent service code 1592:Damphousse (2008). 1486:"Polygraph Testing" 1408:Forensic Psychology 979:. January 27, 2009. 599:Voice risk analysis 360:Non-verbal behavior 331:polygraph examiners 193:uses the method of 2869:Art and literature 2824:Meta-communication 2812:Passive-aggressive 2741:Sentiment analysis 2442:Non-verbal leakage 2088:Florida Law Review 1828:Brain and Language 969:2010-12-07 at the 946:2009-04-13 at the 584:Ecological fallacy 525:fMRI lie detection 406:Brain observations 391:University of Utah 195:Linguistic Inquiry 2906: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2600:Asperger syndrome 2568: 2567: 2550:Social competence 2490: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2292:Emotional prosody 2198:Subtle expression 2183:Facial expression 1323:(10): 1295–1308. 783:Knowable Magazine 706:978-0-309-26392-4 564:sodium thiopental 311:Homeland Security 254:Mental arithmetic 78: 77: 70: 50:lead layout guide 2926: 2780: 2779: 2757:Ray Birdwhistell 2585: 2584: 2574: 2573: 2500:Broader concepts 2496: 2495: 2473:First impression 2154: 2153: 2141: 2140: 2126: 2119: 2112: 2103: 2102: 2096: 2095: 2083: 2077: 2076: 2060: 2054: 2053: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2016: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1957: 1951: 1950: 1940: 1930: 1906: 1900: 1899: 1879: 1870: 1869: 1843: 1823: 1817: 1816: 1810: 1808: 1793: 1787: 1786: 1769:(4–5): 327–339. 1758: 1752: 1751: 1749: 1747:10.1002/acp.1204 1725: 1719: 1718: 1698: 1692: 1691: 1655: 1649: 1648: 1612: 1606: 1605: 1589: 1583: 1575: 1569: 1566: 1560: 1559: 1549: 1539: 1515: 1502: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1482: 1476: 1471: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1449: 1436: 1435: 1433: 1431: 1417: 1411: 1405: 1399: 1398: 1388: 1364: 1349: 1348: 1308: 1289: 1288: 1282: 1274: 1249:(5): 1227–1234. 1238: 1232: 1231: 1219: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1156: 1154: 1134: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1116: 1111:. 3 October 2018 1101: 1095: 1094: 1066: 1060: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1035: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1013: 1008:on 2 August 2016 1007: 996: 986: 980: 961: 955: 938: 932: 931: 907: 901: 900: 898: 896: 876: 870: 869: 858: 852: 842: 836: 835: 833: 831: 821: 813: 804: 803: 801: 799: 794: 774: 768: 767: 741: 717: 711: 710: 683: 674: 673: 671: 669: 658: 639: 638: 620: 458: 371:microexpressions 285:respiration rate 203:negative emotion 199:Lawrence Erlbaum 191:James Pennebaker 157:sphygmomanometer 148:Vittorio Benussi 73: 66: 62: 59: 53: 46:improve the lead 27: 26: 19: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2890: 2881:Mimoplastic art 2864: 2855:Tactile signing 2838: 2771: 2745: 2709: 2673: 2646: 2579: 2564: 2540:Social behavior 2501: 2482: 2446: 2437:Microexpression 2423: 2407:One-bit message 2386: 2338: 2273: 2193:Microexpression 2148: 2135: 2130: 2100: 2099: 2084: 2080: 2061: 2057: 2034: 2030: 1985: 1981: 1958: 1954: 1907: 1903: 1880: 1873: 1841:10.1.1.532.5734 1824: 1820: 1806: 1804: 1794: 1790: 1759: 1755: 1726: 1722: 1699: 1695: 1656: 1652: 1613: 1609: 1590: 1586: 1576: 1572: 1567: 1563: 1516: 1505: 1495: 1493: 1484: 1483: 1479: 1472: 1468: 1458: 1456: 1451: 1450: 1439: 1429: 1427: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1406: 1402: 1373:Cerebral Cortex 1365: 1352: 1309: 1292: 1276: 1275: 1239: 1235: 1228: 1209: 1205: 1166: 1162: 1152: 1150: 1135: 1124: 1114: 1112: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1083:10.2307/1147254 1067: 1063: 1053: 1051: 1036: 1021: 1011: 1009: 1005: 994: 987: 983: 971:Wayback Machine 962: 958: 948:Wayback Machine 939: 935: 908: 904: 894: 892: 882:(8 July 2014). 877: 873: 860: 859: 855: 843: 839: 829: 827: 819: 815: 814: 807: 797: 795: 775: 771: 718: 714: 707: 685: 684: 677: 667: 665: 660: 659: 642: 635: 621: 617: 612: 580: 557: 551: 527: 521: 493: 487: 475: 469: 454: 446: 438:episodic memory 408: 383: 362: 339: 317:, and even the 300:emotional state 296:stress response 269: 263: 221: 215: 174: 144: 139: 109: 74: 63: 57: 54: 43: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2932: 2922: 2921: 2904: 2903: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2889: 2888: 2883: 2878: 2872: 2870: 2866: 2865: 2863: 2862: 2857: 2852: 2846: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2837: 2836: 2831: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2789: 2783: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2762:Charles Darwin 2759: 2753: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2723: 2717: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2697: 2692: 2687: 2681: 2679: 2675: 2674: 2672: 2671: 2666: 2656: 2654: 2648: 2647: 2645: 2644: 2639: 2634: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2607: 2602: 2591: 2589: 2581: 2580: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2565: 2563: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2527: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2492: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2484: 2483: 2481: 2480: 2475: 2470: 2465: 2460: 2458:Affect display 2454: 2452: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2444: 2439: 2433: 2431: 2425: 2424: 2422: 2421: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2404: 2394: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2385: 2384: 2379: 2374: 2369: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2348: 2346: 2344:Social context 2340: 2339: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2329: 2324: 2319: 2314: 2309: 2304: 2294: 2289: 2283: 2281: 2275: 2274: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2252:Pupil dilation 2249: 2239: 2234: 2229: 2224: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2212: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2180: 2175: 2166: 2160: 2158: 2150: 2149: 2137: 2136: 2129: 2128: 2121: 2114: 2106: 2098: 2097: 2078: 2055: 2028: 1999:(2): 544–553. 1979: 1968:(4): 491–498. 1952: 1901: 1871: 1834:(3): 234–239. 1818: 1788: 1753: 1740:(6): 757–777. 1720: 1709:(6): 461–471. 1693: 1666:(1): 183–193. 1650: 1623:(3): 642–650. 1607: 1584: 1582:, 58, 385–392. 1570: 1561: 1503: 1477: 1466: 1437: 1412: 1400: 1379:(8): 830–836. 1350: 1290: 1233: 1227:978-0521541572 1226: 1203: 1176:(3): 214–234. 1160: 1122: 1096: 1061: 1019: 981: 956: 933: 902: 880:Dunning, Brian 871: 853: 837: 805: 769: 732:(1): 295–317. 712: 705: 697:10.17226/10420 675: 640: 634:978-1118509661 633: 614: 613: 611: 608: 607: 606: 601: 596: 591: 586: 579: 576: 553:Main article: 550: 547: 523:Main article: 520: 517: 489:Main article: 486: 483: 471:Main article: 468: 465: 445: 442: 407: 404: 382: 379: 361: 358: 338: 335: 289:blood pressure 265:Main article: 262: 259: 214: 211: 173: 170: 143: 140: 138: 135: 121: 120: 108: 105: 76: 75: 32:The article's 31: 29: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2931: 2920: 2919:Lie detection 2917: 2916: 2914: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2873: 2871: 2867: 2861: 2858: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2850:Sign language 2848: 2847: 2845: 2841: 2835: 2832: 2830: 2827: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2774: 2768: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2718: 2716: 2712: 2706: 2703: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2695:Freudian slip 2693: 2691: 2690:Lie detection 2688: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2680: 2676: 2670: 2669:Mirror neuron 2667: 2665: 2661: 2660:Limbic system 2658: 2657: 2655: 2653: 2649: 2643: 2640: 2638: 2635: 2633: 2630: 2626: 2625:Rett syndrome 2623: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2575: 2571: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2555:Social skills 2553: 2551: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2530:People skills 2528: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2515:Communication 2513: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2504: 2497: 2493: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2456: 2455: 2453: 2451:Multi-faceted 2449: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2435: 2434: 2432: 2430: 2426: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2403: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2393: 2389: 2383: 2380: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2368: 2365: 2363: 2362:Display rules 2360: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2347: 2345: 2341: 2333: 2332:Voice quality 2330: 2328: 2325: 2323: 2320: 2318: 2315: 2313: 2310: 2308: 2305: 2303: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2284: 2282: 2280: 2276: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2253: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2235: 2233: 2230: 2228: 2225: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2191: 2189: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2170: 2169:Body language 2167: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2127: 2122: 2120: 2115: 2113: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2093: 2089: 2082: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2059: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2032: 2024: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1983: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1956: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1929: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1905: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1878: 1876: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1822: 1814: 1803: 1799: 1792: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1757: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1724: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1697: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1654: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1611: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1588: 1581: 1574: 1565: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1514: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1491: 1487: 1481: 1475: 1470: 1454: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1442: 1426: 1422: 1416: 1409: 1404: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1363: 1361: 1359: 1357: 1355: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1307: 1305: 1303: 1301: 1299: 1297: 1295: 1286: 1280: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1237: 1229: 1223: 1218: 1217: 1207: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1133: 1131: 1129: 1127: 1110: 1106: 1100: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1034: 1032: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1024: 1004: 1000: 993: 985: 978: 977: 972: 968: 965: 960: 953: 949: 945: 942: 937: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 906: 891: 890: 885: 881: 875: 867: 863: 857: 850: 846: 841: 825: 818: 812: 810: 793: 788: 784: 780: 773: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 740: 735: 731: 727: 723: 716: 708: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689: 682: 680: 663: 657: 655: 653: 651: 649: 647: 645: 636: 630: 626: 619: 615: 605: 602: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 587: 585: 582: 581: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 556: 546: 542: 538: 536: 532: 526: 516: 512: 510: 505: 499: 497: 492: 482: 479: 474: 464: 462: 457: 451: 441: 439: 434: 432: 428: 426: 422: 421:Brain-reading 418: 416: 412: 403: 399: 395: 392: 388: 378: 374: 372: 368: 357: 353: 351: 347: 343: 334: 332: 327: 322: 320: 316: 312: 308: 303: 301: 297: 292: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 268: 258: 255: 249: 245: 243: 239: 234: 230: 227: 224: 220: 210: 206: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 186: 183:has used the 182: 178: 169: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 134: 131: 125: 118: 117: 116: 113: 104: 102: 98: 94: 89: 87: 86:pseudoscience 82: 81:Lie detection 72: 69: 61: 58:February 2022 51: 48:and read the 47: 42: 38: 35: 30: 21: 20: 2689: 2685:Cold reading 2678:Applications 2652:Neuroanatomy 2297:Paralanguage 2091: 2087: 2081: 2072: 2068: 2058: 2044:(4): 502–4. 2041: 2037: 2031: 1996: 1992: 1982: 1965: 1961: 1955: 1918: 1914: 1904: 1887: 1883: 1831: 1827: 1821: 1811:– via 1805:. Retrieved 1802:The Telegram 1791: 1766: 1762: 1756: 1737: 1733: 1723: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1663: 1659: 1653: 1620: 1616: 1610: 1601: 1597: 1587: 1579: 1573: 1564: 1527: 1523: 1496:23 September 1494:. Retrieved 1489: 1480: 1469: 1457:. Retrieved 1428:. Retrieved 1424: 1415: 1403: 1376: 1372: 1320: 1316: 1279:cite journal 1246: 1242: 1236: 1215: 1206: 1173: 1169: 1163: 1151:. Retrieved 1146: 1142: 1113:. Retrieved 1108: 1099: 1077:(1): 38–51. 1074: 1070: 1064: 1052:. Retrieved 1047: 1043: 1010:. Retrieved 1003:the original 998: 984: 974: 959: 936: 919: 915: 905: 893:. Retrieved 887: 874: 866:usatoday.com 865: 856: 840: 828:. Retrieved 823: 796:. Retrieved 782: 772: 729: 725: 715: 687: 666:. Retrieved 624: 618: 558: 543: 539: 528: 513: 511:age was 24. 500: 494: 476: 447: 435: 429: 419: 409: 400: 396: 384: 381:Eye-tracking 375: 363: 354: 340: 323: 304: 293: 270: 250: 246: 241: 237: 235: 231: 228: 225: 222: 207: 189: 179: 175: 172:21st century 165:sphygmograph 145: 142:20th century 126: 122: 114: 110: 90: 80: 79: 64: 55: 44:Please help 40: 36: 34:lead section 2664:Limbic lobe 2429:Unconscious 2412:Missed call 2382:Social norm 2357:Conventions 2247:Eye contact 1813:pressreader 1598:NIJ Journal 1430:4 September 1012:3 September 988:Online at: 830:3 September 560:Truth drugs 555:Truth serum 417:, or TARA. 2797:Aggressive 2767:Paul Ekman 2750:Key people 2714:Technology 2700:Poker tell 2545:Social cue 2352:Chronemics 2302:Intonation 2146:Modalities 1993:NeuroImage 1890:(3): 206. 798:8 December 610:References 461:biometrics 326:polygraphy 281:heart rate 217:See also: 181:Paul Ekman 101:non-verbal 2802:Assertive 2610:Fragile X 2595:Aprosodia 2588:Disorders 2535:Semiotics 2463:Deception 2269:Proxemics 2259:Olfaction 2242:Oculesics 2227:Imitation 1836:CiteSeerX 1807:12 August 1688:205767046 1645:205767994 1345:143302792 1337:0093-8548 1115:26 August 976:The Local 748:0066-4308 604:Deception 350:frequency 277:autonomic 273:polygraph 267:Polygraph 261:Polygraph 168:results. 93:polygraph 2913:Category 2632:Dyssemia 2478:Intimacy 2398:Emoticon 2307:Loudness 2237:Laughter 2173:Kinesics 2164:Blushing 2157:Physical 2050:19092068 2023:21073969 1974:19092066 1947:23914164 1866:12440401 1858:15721956 1680:18279255 1637:19432740 1556:24065912 1490:epic.org 1459:26 April 1395:12853369 1271:25246267 1263:21854383 1198:15248114 1190:16859438 1153:26 April 1054:26 April 1044:Observer 967:Archived 944:Archived 889:Skeptoid 764:58562467 756:30609913 668:26 April 578:See also 572:cannabis 562:such as 2886:Subtext 2807:Passive 2776:Related 2367:Habitus 2312:Prosody 2264:Posture 2205:Gesture 2014:3099263 1938:3728485 1921:: 392. 1783:8968052 1604:: 8–12. 1547:3781577 1530:: 594. 1425:apa.org 1149:(7): 70 1091:1147254 895:22 June 568:ethanol 389:at the 137:History 2860:Tadoma 2605:Autism 2560:Unsaid 2525:Nunchi 2402:Smiley 2322:Stress 2317:Rhythm 2287:Affect 2279:Speech 2048:  2021:  2011:  1972:  1945:  1935:  1864:  1856:  1838:  1781:  1686:  1678:  1643:  1635:  1554:  1544:  1393:  1343:  1335:  1269:  1261:  1224:  1196:  1188:  1089:  762:  754:  746:  703:  631:  570:, and 2391:Other 1862:S2CID 1779:S2CID 1684:S2CID 1641:S2CID 1341:S2CID 1267:S2CID 1194:S2CID 1087:JSTOR 1006:(PDF) 995:(PDF) 922:(2). 820:(PDF) 760:S2CID 549:Drugs 423:uses 346:pitch 2876:Mime 2327:Tone 2210:List 2094:(5). 2075:(2). 2046:PMID 2019:PMID 1970:PMID 1943:PMID 1854:PMID 1809:2021 1676:PMID 1633:PMID 1552:PMID 1498:2016 1461:2012 1432:2016 1391:PMID 1333:ISSN 1285:link 1259:PMID 1222:ISBN 1186:PMID 1155:2012 1117:2020 1056:2012 1014:2016 897:2017 832:2016 800:2021 752:PMID 744:ISSN 701:ISBN 670:2012 629:ISBN 509:mean 504:N400 425:fMRI 236:The 2009:PMC 2001:doi 1933:PMC 1923:doi 1892:doi 1846:doi 1771:doi 1742:doi 1711:doi 1668:doi 1625:doi 1602:259 1542:PMC 1532:doi 1381:doi 1325:doi 1251:doi 1178:doi 1079:doi 1050:(6) 924:doi 787:doi 734:doi 693:doi 313:, 2915:: 2662:/ 2400:/ 2171:/ 2090:. 2073:10 2071:. 2067:. 2042:36 2040:. 2017:. 2007:. 1997:56 1995:. 1991:. 1966:36 1964:. 1941:. 1931:. 1917:. 1913:. 1888:77 1886:. 1874:^ 1860:. 1852:. 1844:. 1832:92 1830:. 1800:. 1777:. 1767:16 1765:. 1738:20 1736:. 1732:. 1707:10 1705:. 1682:. 1674:. 1664:53 1662:. 1639:. 1631:. 1621:54 1619:. 1600:. 1596:. 1550:. 1540:. 1526:. 1522:. 1506:^ 1488:. 1440:^ 1423:. 1389:. 1377:13 1375:. 1371:. 1353:^ 1339:. 1331:. 1321:35 1319:. 1315:. 1293:^ 1281:}} 1277:{{ 1265:. 1257:. 1247:56 1245:. 1192:. 1184:. 1174:10 1172:. 1147:37 1145:. 1141:. 1125:^ 1107:. 1085:. 1073:. 1048:15 1046:. 1042:. 1022:^ 997:. 973:. 950:. 920:14 918:. 914:. 886:. 864:. 847:. 822:. 808:^ 785:. 781:. 758:. 750:. 742:. 730:70 728:. 724:. 699:. 678:^ 643:^ 566:, 463:. 348:, 309:, 287:, 88:. 2125:e 2118:t 2111:v 2092:5 2052:. 2025:. 2003:: 1976:. 1949:. 1925:: 1919:7 1898:. 1894:: 1868:. 1848:: 1815:. 1785:. 1773:: 1750:. 1744:: 1717:. 1713:: 1690:. 1670:: 1647:. 1627:: 1558:. 1534:: 1528:7 1500:. 1463:. 1434:. 1397:. 1383:: 1347:. 1327:: 1287:) 1273:. 1253:: 1230:. 1200:. 1180:: 1157:. 1119:. 1093:. 1081:: 1075:1 1058:. 1016:. 954:. 930:. 926:: 899:. 868:. 851:. 834:. 802:. 789:: 766:. 736:: 709:. 695:: 672:. 637:. 71:) 65:( 60:) 56:( 52:.

Index

lead section
improve the lead
lead layout guide
Learn how and when to remove this message
pseudoscience
polygraph
National Academy of Sciences
non-verbal
psychological disorders
Vittorio Benussi
William Moulton Marston
sphygmomanometer
John Augustus Larson
sphygmograph
Paul Ekman
Facial Action Coding System
James Pennebaker
Linguistic Inquiry
Lawrence Erlbaum
negative emotion
Polygraph § Testing procedure
Mental arithmetic
Polygraph
polygraph
autonomic
heart rate
respiration rate
blood pressure
stress response
emotional state

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.