Knowledge

Buck v. Bell

Source đź“ť

1041:
academic subjects but mathematics (which was always difficult for her, and where she scored a D) during her first term in Grade 1A, from September 1930 to January 1931. She improved during her second term in 1B, meriting an A in deportment, C in mathematics, and B in all other academic subjects; she was placed on the honor roll in April 1931. Promoted to 2A, she had trouble during the fall term of 1931, failing mathematics and spelling but receiving A in deportment, B in reading, and C in writing and English. She was "retained in 2A" for the next term â€“ or "left back" as we used to say, and scarcely a sign of imbecility as I remember all my buddies who suffered a similar fate. In any case, she again did well in her final term, with B in deportment, reading, and spelling, and C in writing, English, and mathematics during her last month in school. This daughter of "lewd and immoral" women excelled in deportment and performed adequately, although not brilliantly, in her academic subjects.
2863: 2001) ("It is true that involuntary sterilization is not always unconstitutional if it is a narrowly tailored means to achieve a compelling government interest. See Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 207–08, 47 S.Ct. 584, 71 L.Ed. 1000 (rejecting due process and equal protection challenges to compelled sterilization of mentally handicapped woman). It is also true that the mentally handicapped, depending on their circumstances, may be subjected to various degrees of government intrusion that would be unjustified if directed at other segments of society. See Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 442–47, 105 S.Ct. 3249; Buck, 274 U.S. at 207–08, 47 S.Ct. 584. It does not follow, however, that the State can dispense with procedural protections, coerce an individual into sterilization, and then after the fact argue that it was justified. If it did, it would invite conduct, like that alleged in this case, that is ripe for abuse and error."). 936:, could fairly be described as a zealot of eugenics. Prior to 1924, Priddy had performed hundreds of forced sterilizations by creatively interpreting laws which allowed surgery to benefit the "physical, mental or moral" condition of the inmates at the Colony. He would operate to relieve "chronic pelvic disorder" and, in the process, sterilize the women. According to Priddy, the women he chose were "immoral" because of their "fondness for men," their reputations for "promiscuity," and their "over-sexed" and "man-crazy" tendencies. One sixteen-year-old girl was sterilized for her habit of "talking to the little boys." 1139:
documented evidence, that Carrie had been an average student, including one teacher who wrote that Carrie was “very good” at “deportment and lessons.” Instead, it seemed that Whitehead was often testifying against his own client, taking it for granted that she was of “low caliber.” He did not challenge the claim that Carrie was illegitimate, which was false as a matter of Virginia state law because Carrie’s parents were married at the time of her birth. Nor did he argue that Carrie’s supposed “immorality” and Vivian’s illegitimacy were due to a rape by the Dobbs’ nephew, Clarence Garland.
34: 1127: 273: 1220: 940: 1393:. Laughlin had, a few years previously, conducted studies on the enforcement of sterilization legislation throughout the country and had concluded that the reason for their lack of use was primarily that the physicians who would order the sterilizations were afraid of prosecution by patients upon whom they operated. Laughlin saw the need to create a "Model Law" that could withstand constitutional scrutiny, clearing the way for future sterilization operations. The Nazi jurists designing the German 768: 2935: 2915: 998: 1135:
anecdotes surrounding her and her family. One of the few witnesses to testify with first-hand knowledge of Carrie, a nurse from Charlottesville who had intermittent contact with Carrie over the years, recalled that in grammar school Carrie had been caught writing notes to boys. Priddy, of course, had once sterilized a girl for that transgression. For his testimony, Priddy felt the need to point out that Carrie had a “rather badly formed face.”
1096: 2812: (1973) ("The privacy right involved, therefore, cannot be said to be absolute. In fact, it is not clear to us that the claim asserted by some amici that one has an unlimited right to do with one's body as one pleases bears a close relationship to the right of privacy previously articulated in the Court's decisions. The Court has refused to recognize an unlimited right of this kind in the past.") 970:", feeling they were no longer capable of caring for her. It was later claimed that Buck's pregnancy was not caused by any "immorality" on her own part. In the summer of 1923, while her adoptive mother was away "on account of some illness," her adoptive mother's nephew allegedly raped Buck, and her later commitment has been described as an attempt by the family to save their reputation. 966:, and had three children without good knowledge of their paternity. Carrie Buck, one of those children, had been adopted and attended school for five years, reaching the level of sixth grade. However, according to Priddy, Buck eventually proved to be "incorrigible" and gave birth to an illegitimate child. Her adoptive family had her committed to the State Colony as " 1347: 1442:, it created enough of a legal quandary to discourage many sterilizations. By 1963, sterilization laws were almost wholly out of use, though some remained officially on the books for many years. Language referring to eugenics was removed from Virginia's sterilization law, and the current law, passed in 1988 and amended in 2013, authorizes only the voluntary 1244:, since it is not intended to be punitive. Citing the best interests of the state, Justice Holmes affirmed the value of a law like Virginia's in order to prevent the nation from being "swamped with incompetence." The Court accepted without evidence that Carrie and her mother were promiscuous, and that the three generations of Bucks shared the 1236:, since sterilization could not occur until a proper hearing had occurred, at which the patient and a guardian could be present, and the patient had the right to appeal the decision. They also found that, since the procedure was limited to people housed in state institutions, it did not deny the patient 1208:
Some of the brethren are troubled about the case, especially Butler. May I suggest that you make a little full the care Virginia has taken in guarding against undue or hasty action, proven absence of danger to the patient, and other circumstances tending to lessen the shock that many feel over the
1309:
According to famed eugenicist Harry H. Laughlin, whose written testimony was presented during the trial in his absence, Buck's legal defeat signaled the end of "eugenical sterilization's 'experimental period.'" Following the Supreme Court ruling, over two dozen states enacted similar laws, including
1158:
of Virginia, where Whitehead offered a 5‑page compared to the state’s 40-page brief. Buck lost there too. Her only recourse was to the U.S. Supreme Court, but that was merely an illusion: even if Whitehead had put forth an effort, Carrie’s case was put before a Supreme Court with at least two avowed
1138:
Whitehead failed to adequately defend Buck and counteract the prosecutors. Not only did he call no witnesses, but he did not challenge the prosecution’s witnesses’ lack of firsthand knowledge or their dodgy scientific claims. Whitehead did not even call Carrie’s teachers, who could have proven, with
1252:
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being
1182:
The legal challenge was consciously collusive, brought on behalf of the state to test the legality of the statute. The cross examination and witnesses produced by Whitehead were ineffectual and allegedly a result of his alliance with Strode during the trial. There was no real litigation between the
1134:
Throughout Carrie's trial, a succession of witnesses offered testimony that was hearsay, contentious, speculative, and simply absurd. Because Priddy and Strode felt it crucial to establish that Carrie's entire family "stock" was defective, witnesses who had never met Carrie testified to rumors and
1103:
Carrie Buck found herself in the Colony in June 1924, shortly before her 18th birthday. Priddy quickly made the connection between Emma and Carrie, and he knew about the recently born Vivian: the board of directors issued an order for the sterilization of Buck and her guardian appealed the case to
1040:
She was a perfectly normal, quite average student, neither particularly outstanding nor much troubled. In those days before grade inflation, when C meant "good, 81–87" (as defined on her report card) rather than barely scraping by, Vivian Dobbs received A's and B's for deportment and C's for all
1111:
In order to fully validate the law to Priddy’s satisfaction, the Board’s determination had to be defended in court. Thus, Irving P. Whitehead was appointed to “defend” Carrie from the Board’s ruling. Whitehead was not only a close friend of Priddy, a former member of the Colony Board and,
2435:
The court's majority opinion states that the court accepted the diagnoses of the Virginia medical personnel, not looking into whether they were correct: "Carrie Buck is a feeble-minded white woman who was committed to the State Colony above mentioned in due form. She is the daughter of a
4679: 1484:
quoted it to justify that the constitutional right to abortion is not unlimited. Blackmun claimed that the right to privacy was strong enough to prevent the state from protecting unborn life in the womb, but not strong enough to prevent a woman being sterilized against her will.
1087:
in 1924. According to American historian Paul A. Lombardo, politicians wrote the law to benefit a malpracticing doctor avoiding lawsuits from patients who had been the victims of forced sterilization. Eugenicists used Buck to legitimize this law in the 1927 Supreme Court case
982:, the first of three children born to Emma Buck; she also had a half-sister, Doris Buck, and a half-brother, Roy Smith. Little is known about Emma Buck except that she was poor and married to Frederick Buck, who abandoned her early in their marriage. Emma was committed to the 1253:
swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains
1178:
was being violated since not all similarly situated people were being treated the same. The sterilization law was only for the "feeble-minded" at certain state institutions and made no mention of other state institutions or those who were not in an institution.
1203:
Taft assigned the opinion to Holmes, who went at his task with a zealotry that bordered on bloodlust. His first draft was apparently even more brutal and was criticized by colleagues for substituting rhetorical flourishes about eugenics for legal analysis.
1310:
Oregon and the Carolinas, doubling American sterilizations from 6,000 to more than 12,000 by 1947. Buck was sterilized on October 19, 1927, roughly five months after the Supreme Court trial verdict. She became the first Virginian sterilized since the 1924
1171:, which contained a sizable portion devoted to eugenics. As for Holmes, in 1921, he told future justice Felix Frankfurter that he had no problem “restricting propagation by the undesirables and putting to death infants that didn’t pass the examination.” 958:. She was an 18-year-old patient at his institution who he claimed had a mental age of 9. Priddy maintained that Buck represented a genetic threat to society. According to him, Buck's 52-year-old mother possessed a mental age of 8, had a record of 1334:. According to his report, Vivian "showed backwardness", thus the "three generations" of the majority opinion. It is worth noting that the child did very well in school for the two years that she attended (she died of complications from 1195:
accepted that Buck, her mother and her daughter were "feeble-minded" and "promiscuous," and that it was in the state's interest to have her sterilized. The ruling found that the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924 did not violate the
1035:
the baby and named her "Vivian Alice Elaine Dobbs". She attended Venable Public Elementary School of Charlottesville for four terms, from September 1930 until May 1932. By all accounts, Vivian was of average intelligence, far above
1520:
to protect the constitutional rights of a woman coerced into sterilization without procedural due process. The court stated that error and abuse will result if the state does not follow the procedural requirements, established by
1231:
made clear that the challenge was not upon the medical procedure involved, but on the process of the substantive law. The court was satisfied that the Virginia Sterilization Act complied with the requirements of
896:
and had found proponents in Europe by the start of the 20th century; 42 of the 58 research papers presented at the First International Congress of Eugenics, held in London in 1912, were from American scientists.
782: 1370:, dozens of states added new sterilization statutes, or updated their constitutionally non-functional ones already enacted, with statutes which more closely mirrored the Virginia statute upheld by the Court. 3669: 5515: 1314:
passed. The Virginia sterilization law is said to have inspired Nazi Germany's 400,000 sterilizations, including those sanctioned under the 1933 Law for Protection Against Genetically Defective Offspring.
4615: 4607: 1174:
Buck and her guardian contended that the due process clause guarantees all adults the right to procreate which was being violated. They also made the argument that the Equal Protection Clause in the
5318: 4759: 4727: 4583: 808: 5406: 5222: 458: 1362:
laws in the United States as a whole. While many states already had sterilization laws on their books, their use was erratic and effects practically non-existent in every state except for
4882: 3645: 5056: 4591: 3851: 1446:
of those 18 and older, after the patient has given written consent and the doctor has informed the patient of the consequences as well as alternative methods of contraception.
4719: 3905: 5667: 2838:
that remains unrepudiated, a claim of a violation of the Equal Protection Clause based upon selective enforcement 'is the usual last resort of constitutional arguments.").
3443: 801: 5539: 1394: 5438: 4336: 5672: 4312: 3749: 5717: 4551: 4431: 3253: 1175: 864:, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), which involved compulsory sterilization of male habitual criminals (and came to a contrary result). Legal scholar and Holmes biographer 851: 565: 229: 1330:. She was an avid reader until her death in 1983. Her daughter Vivian had been pronounced "feeble minded" after a cursory examination by ERO field worker Dr. 5382: 5032: 4519: 4495: 3693: 3637: 3098: 2834: 1996) ("This claim of selective prosecution really amounts to a weak equal protection claim. And, as Justice Holmes pointed out in the only part of 2802: 1621: 1582: 1513: 983: 954:
Looking to determine if the new law would survive a legal challenge, on September 10, 1924, Priddy filed a petition with his board of directors to sterilize
947: 933: 794: 81: 61: 2363: 5647: 5326: 4391: 3717: 3685: 1493: 5682: 5358: 5270: 5214: 5128: 5120: 5016: 4914: 1248:
of feeblemindedness. Thus, it was in the state's best interest to have Carrie Buck sterilized. The decision was seen as a major victory for eugenicists.
5499: 4874: 4743: 4663: 3597: 1790: 1241: 5096: 4695: 4511: 4487: 4188: 2691: 5677: 5398: 5390: 5008: 4810: 4599: 496: 5048: 4471: 3765: 3552: 2526: 2578: 3996: 2080: 365: 5547: 4898: 4655: 4503: 4296: 2297: 1570: 1183:
prosecution and the defense, and thus the Supreme Court did not receive sufficient evidence to make a fair decision on the "friendly suit."
1577: 438: 2250: 1016:
At 17, Buck became pregnant as a result of being raped by Alice Dobbs' nephew, Clarence Garland. On January 23, 1924, the Dobbses had her
5350: 5262: 3889: 379: 2045: 5662: 5657: 4148: 3179: 1123:
While the litigation was making its way through the court system, Priddy died and his successor, John Hendren Bell, took up the case.
1013:, where she was noted to be an average student. When she was in sixth grade, the Dobbses removed her to have her help with housework. 5374: 4906: 3921: 3244: 2986: 3118: 2666: 2513:. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25 S. Ct. 358, 49 L. Ed. 643, 3 Ann. Cas. 765. Three generations of imbeciles are enough. 2219: 2714: 2537: 1240:
of the law. And finally, since the Virginia Sterilization Act was not a penal statute, the Court held that it did not violate the
854:. Despite the changing attitudes in the coming decades regarding sterilization, the Supreme Court has never expressly overturned 5692: 5187: 4052: 3653: 3520: 2874: 1587: 873: 868:, in fact, wrote, "the Supreme Court has distinguished the case out of existence". In addition, federal statutes, including the 5637: 4559: 3733: 3544: 777: 747: 3913: 3071: 3041: 3019: 2968: 2756: 2404: 2339: 2458: 5064: 4751: 4735: 4639: 4647: 3757: 1950: 5712: 5463: 5179: 5104: 4368: 2827: 2005: 1551: 1470:
Although this opinion and eugenics remain widely condemned, the decision in the case has not been formally overturned.
835: 827: 503: 481: 38: 1020:
to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded on the grounds of feeblemindedness, incorrigible behavior, and
5702: 5697: 5652: 5523: 3463: 2120: 987: 1820: 1024:. Her commitment is said to have been due to the family's embarrassment at Buck's pregnancy from the rape incident. 5642: 5342: 4212: 306: 5707: 4092: 3937: 3451: 2355: 1533: 1463: 4922: 3780: 1906: 901:
passed the first eugenics sterilization statute in 1907, but it was legally flawed. To remedy that situation,
3564: 3303: 3237: 1546: 1032: 910: 558: 413: 262: 4320: 4172: 4124: 3865: 3480: 3145: 2776: 2699: 2688: 1798: 1697: 1556: 1390: 3008:
Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity
2745:
Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity
2332:
Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity
1970:"Buck v. Bell: Inside the SCOTUS Case That Led to Forced Sterilization of 70,000 & Inspired the Nazis" 5206: 4376: 3677: 3528: 2938: 2503: 2469: 1406: 1258: 433: 1942:
Buck v. Bell: Inside the SCOTUS Case That Led to Forced Sterilization of 70,000 & Inspired the Nazis
4328: 1382: 1214:
Chief Justice William Howard Taft, Liva Baker, The Justice from Beacon Hill (1991), ISBN 978-0060166298
1050: 869: 715: 644: 428: 2570: 2541: 2436:
feeble-minded mother in the same institution, and the mother of an illegitimate feeble-minded child."
1969: 1872: 1449:
The story of Carrie Buck's sterilization and the court case was made into a television drama in 1994,
5531: 4938: 4930: 4543: 3964: 3897: 3154: 1281: 1228: 1164: 979: 876:, provide protections for people with disabilities, defined as both physical and mental impairments. 831: 649: 418: 150: 124: 5687: 5563: 5507: 4671: 4228: 4196: 3827: 3621: 3605: 3230: 3127: 2076: 1443: 1401:
held Laughlin in such high regard that they arranged for him to receive an honorary doctorate from
1155: 918: 839: 742: 585: 120: 2305: 2272: 1397:
based it largely on Laughlin's "Model Law", although development of that law preceded Laughlin's.
1099:
Dr. Albert Priddy, superintendent of the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and the Feebleminded
5571: 5136: 4992: 4253: 4180: 3573: 3488: 3211: 2990: 2956: 1932: 1766: 1722: 1505: 1294: 922: 913:, designed a model eugenic law that was reviewed by legal experts. In 1924, the Commonwealth of 843: 634: 448: 182: 2242: 1350:
John H. Bell was the superintendent at the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded
4802: 3187: 3162: 2388:
Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution
2301: 1457: 1386: 1254: 1017: 906: 720: 682: 423: 296: 162: 106: 3222: 3063: 3056: 2918: 2112: 2103: 5491: 5334: 5302: 4890: 4439: 3387: 3279: 3201: 3102: 2806: 2034: 1625: 1402: 1359: 358: 301: 73: 3176: 3109: 5483: 5230: 5080: 4973: 4778: 4711: 4220: 4156: 4036: 3873: 3701: 3661: 3613: 3029: 2809: 1209:
remedy? The strength of the facts in three generations of course is the strongest argument.
1112:
unsurprisingly, a staunch believer in forced sterilization, but also a childhood friend of
772: 491: 186: 1643: 8: 5414: 5366: 5310: 5246: 5238: 5171: 5088: 5024: 4687: 4631: 4575: 4567: 4204: 4084: 4068: 3945: 3725: 3709: 3403: 3287: 2658: 2211: 1430: 1160: 860: 537: 453: 351: 244: 158: 142: 2720: 2509:
The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the
2498: 5475: 5294: 5286: 5112: 5072: 5040: 4957: 4826: 4818: 4786: 4703: 4527: 4479: 4455: 4423: 4344: 4288: 4280: 4132: 4028: 3843: 3512: 3427: 3356: 3267: 3197: 2632: 2418: 2410: 2178: 1847: 1628: 1298: 1192: 847: 730: 629: 544: 311: 1508:
based upon selective enforcement 'is the usual last resort of constitutional arguments
211:
Holmes, joined by Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Sanford, Stone
5610: 5602: 5555: 5278: 5152: 4866: 4623: 4463: 4447: 4398: 4384: 4360: 4116: 4100: 4060: 3988: 3929: 3629: 3536: 3472: 3419: 3311: 3067: 3037: 3015: 2964: 2961:
Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck
2752: 2640: 2624: 2485: 2437: 2422: 2400: 2335: 2186: 2170: 2126: 2116: 2030: 2001: 1994:
Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck
1915: 1648: 1562: 1378: 1197: 1143: 1126: 1046: 710: 624: 619: 372: 174: 3193:"Buck v. Bell (1927)" by N. Antonios and C. Raup at the Embryo Project Encyclopedia 1428:
Sterilization rates under eugenic laws in the United States climbed from 1927 until
4858: 4834: 4415: 4164: 4140: 4004: 3411: 3379: 3327: 3051: 2616: 2392: 2162: 1671: 1481: 1331: 1237: 1113: 1092:
through which they sought to gain legal permission for Virginia to sterilize Buck.
1028: 654: 486: 1326:). She was later paroled from the institution as a domestic worker to a family in 272: 76: 4680:
Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville
4272: 4012: 3881: 3435: 3395: 3319: 3183: 3136: 2772: 2695: 2510: 2473: 2462: 2451: 1693: 1327: 865: 194: 2663:
Eugenics: Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Virginia, Eugenics & Buck v. Bell
2216:
Eugenics: Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Virginia, Eugenics & Buck v. Bell
1223:
Justice Holmes in the year of his appointment to the United States Supreme Court
5422: 5254: 5000: 4965: 4842: 4352: 4108: 4020: 3789: 3295: 3192: 3058:
Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell.
3034:
The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt
2713:
Harrry Hamilton Laughlin (December 1922). "Model Eugenical Sterilization Law".
1946: 1323: 1200:
and legitimized the sterilization procedures until they were repealed in 1974.
902: 889: 639: 551: 170: 3207: 1963: 1940: 1219: 1027:
On March 28, 1924, she gave birth to a daughter. Since Buck had been declared
5631: 5516:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
5144: 4535: 4407: 4076: 4044: 3972: 3835: 3741: 3589: 3504: 3011: 2748: 2628: 2174: 2130: 1997: 1319: 1105: 1070: 1006: 967: 939: 893: 725: 677: 659: 5430: 4794: 3335: 3167: 2856: 2719:. Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago. Archived from 2644: 2499:"BUCK v. BELL, Superintendent of State Colony Epileptics and Feeble Minded" 2414: 2386: 2190: 1919: 1418: 1410: 1398: 1010: 997: 959: 929: 736: 476: 443: 925:
for the purpose of eugenics, a statute closely based on Laughlin's model.
4304: 3581: 3496: 3368: 2797: 1936: 1900:
Lombardo, Paul A. (1985), "Three Generations, No Imbeciles: New Light on
1824: 1476: 1233: 1021: 955: 943: 57: 4760:
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
2396: 2212:"Buck v. Bell: The Test Case for Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act" 1450: 4850: 2875:"Ex Tenebris Lux: Buck v. Bell and the Americans with Disabilities Act" 2636: 2604: 2182: 2150: 1674:. Lutz Kaelber, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Vermont 1363: 963: 4728:
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
4584:
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
1338:
in 1932), even being listed on her school's honor roll in April 1931.
1672:"Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States - Virginia" 1290: 1286: 1262: 1245: 2620: 2166: 1474:
was cited as a precedent by the opinion of the court (part VIII) in
3646:
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
2860: 2831: 991: 914: 885: 846:, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the 2105:
Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, The Supreme Court, and
3215: 3032:(1995), "Mr. Justice Holmes and Three Generations of Imbeciles", 1335: 1066: 898: 892:, who also coined the name. The idea first became popular in the 1095: 3852:
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
3252: 2946: 2926: 1500:
by writing, "as Justice Holmes pointed out in the only part of
1346: 1130:
Irving Whitehead, Carrie Buck's Lawyer in the Buck v. Bell case
88: 33: 3906:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
2773:"Sexual Sterilization, Virginia Code §§ 54.1-2974 - 54.1-2980" 1694:"Sexual Sterilization, Virginia Code §§ 54.1-2974 - 54.1-2980" 1142:
Buck lost in the trial court, where noted Virginia eugenicist
2557:"Silent Protest: A Catholic Justice Dissents in Buck v. Bell" 2466: 1159:
believers in eugenics: Chief Justice (and former president)
123:
of the unfit "for the protection and health of the state."
1480:, but not in support of abortion rights. To the contrary, 1060:, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985, pp. 316-317. 5540:
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
3444:
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
3163:
An account of the case from the Dolan DNA Learning Center
1504:
that remains unrepudiated, a claim of a violation of the
1395:
Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring
1167:. In 1915, Taft had written the introduction to the book 4337:
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
2712: 3750:
Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
4432:
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
2243:"Re-examining Supreme Court support for sterilization" 2111:. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp.  1895: 1893: 1791:"Chapter 46B of the Code of Virginia § 1095h–m (1924)" 1318:
Carrie Buck was operated upon, receiving a compulsory
1293:
are enough". The sole dissenter in the court, Justice
852:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
4496:
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education
3638:
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
2659:"Influence of Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act" 2391:. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. p. 124. 1837:
Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded
1719:
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self
1583:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 274
1514:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1455:. It was also referred to in 1934's sensational film 984:
Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded
948:
Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded
934:
Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded
826:, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a landmark decision of the 5327:
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
4392:
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
3718:
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
2987:"Eugenics victim, son fighting together for justice" 1494:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1058:
The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History
5668:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
5215:
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
3214:from the original on December 21, 2021 – via 1890: 4875:Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney 4744:Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action 3598:Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth 3055: 1931: 1823:. Central Virginia Training Center. Archived from 1749:Pandora's Lab: Seven stories of Science gone wrong 1069:. She died from a secondary intestinal infection, 858:. It is widely believed to have been weakened by 4512:Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 4189:Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 3210:. Mahindra Humanities Center. February 13, 2014. 2360:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory DNA Learning Center 2101: 5629: 5391:City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. 4600:Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 2527:"Silent Protest: A Catholic Justice Dissents in 2524: 1737:Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development 1289:for the decision, stating "Three generations of 4472:Green v. County School Board of New Kent County 3997:Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. 1665: 1663: 1525:, for performing an involuntary sterilization. 366:Poe v. Lynchburg Training School & Hospital 5673:United States substantive due process case law 1377:upheld was designed in part by the eugenicist 5718:Compulsory sterilization in the United States 5548:Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs 4899:Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County 4656:Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 4504:Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education 4297:Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education 3238: 1571:Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital 1005:After her birth, Carrie Buck was placed with 950:along with her birth mother Emma Buck in 1924 802: 62:State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded 3766:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 3670:Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 3553:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 3028: 2716:Eugenical Sterilization in the United States 1660: 1578:Sex-related court cases in the United States 1149: 1056:(1984), as reprinted in Gould, Stephen Jay, 439:Society for Biodemography and Social Biology 5648:Mental health case law in the United States 5351:Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia 5263:Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections 4252: 3890:Will v. Michigan Department of State Police 2325: 2323: 1925: 1528:Derek Warden has shown how the decision in 380:Doe ex. rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia 5683:United States reproductive rights case law 4616:Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education 4149:Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill 3245: 3231: 3062:, Johns Hopkins University Press, p.  2979:Encyclopedia of Women's History in America 2356:"Irving Whitehead, still image with audio" 1939:; Shaikh, Nermeen, eds. (March 17, 2016). 809: 795: 5375:New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer 4907:Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan 3922:Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee 2846: 2844: 2240: 1761: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1669: 4608:Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1 3050: 3005: 2742: 2602: 2385:Fisher, Louis (2019). "Privacy Rights". 2329: 2320: 2300:. Claude Moore Health Sciences Library, 2148: 2025: 2023: 2021: 2019: 2017: 1987: 1985: 1899: 1345: 1279:Holmes concluded his argument by citing 1218: 1191:On May 2, 1927, in an 8–1 decision, the 1125: 1094: 996: 938: 60:v. John Hendren Bell, Superintendent of 16:1927 US Supreme Court sterilization case 5678:United States equal protection case law 5319:Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. 5188:Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward 4053:Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur 3654:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 3521:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 2479: 2447: 2445: 2070: 2068: 2066: 1588:Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 1452:Against Her Will: The Carrie Buck Story 1083:Virginia's General Assembly passed the 874:Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 119:The Court upheld a statute instituting 5630: 5462: 4560:Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver 3355: 3266: 3186:Claude Moore Health Sciences Library, 2872: 2841: 2669:from the original on November 27, 2020 2565: 2563: 2525:Phillip Thompson (February 23, 2005). 2384: 2366:from the original on November 27, 2020 2206: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2144: 2142: 2140: 1752: 1734: 1657:, the Court has never overruled it."). 1461:, and was covered in the October 2018 748:Sterilization of Native American women 5590: 5461: 4251: 3914:City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams 3354: 3265: 3226: 2984: 2955: 2687:Quinn, Peter (February/March 2003). " 2598: 2596: 2222:from the original on November 8, 2020 2083:from the original on January 26, 2021 2029: 2014: 1991: 1982: 1640: 1421:explicitly cited Holmes's opinion in 1297:, a devout Catholic, did not write a 1009:, John and Alice Dobbs. She attended 986:after being accused of "immorality", 21:1927 United States Supreme Court case 4640:Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education 3781:Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes 2981:(Infobase Publishing, 2009) pp 37–38 2581:from the original on October 5, 2018 2467:Justia.com U.S. Supreme Court Center 2442: 2253:from the original on October 5, 2015 2063: 1467:documentary "The Eugenics Crusade". 5407:Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools 5223:Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth 4648:City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. 3758:June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo 3734:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 3545:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 3036:, New York: Oxford, pp. 3–25, 2985:Breed, Allen G. (August 13, 2011). 2560: 2197: 2137: 2051:from the original on April 21, 2015 1953:from the original on March 17, 2016 13: 5180:Arlington County Board v. Richards 5105:Examining Board v. Flores de Otero 4883:Wengler v. Druggists Mut. Ins. Co. 4369:McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents 3254:United States Fourteenth Amendment 2900: 2651: 2593: 2378: 2348: 1552:Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924 917:adopted a statute authorizing the 834:, in which the Court ruled that a 504:Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924 482:Average Young American Male (1921) 39:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 5729: 5663:United States Supreme Court cases 5658:United States disability case law 5524:Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 5065:Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n 3105:200 (1927) is available from: 3087: 5343:Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas 4752:Fisher v. University of Texas II 4213:Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 3208:"Noah Feldman on 'Buck v. Bell'" 3081:The Sterilization of Carrie Buck 2933: 2913: 2298:"Eugenics: Eugenics in Virginia" 2074: 1739:, London: Macmillan, p. 199 1186: 1065:In June 1932, Vivian contracted 1031:to raise her child, the Dobbses 766: 497:Selective Reproduction of Slaves 271: 32: 5057:Ohio ex rel. Clark v. Deckebach 4736:Fisher v. University of Texas I 4093:Moore v. City of East Cleveland 3938:Los Angeles County v. Humphries 3452:West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish 3168:Buck v. Bell (Case File #31681) 2879:University of Toledo Law Review 2866: 2815: 2790: 2765: 2736: 2706: 2681: 2518: 2491: 2429: 2290: 2265: 2241:USA Today (November 16, 2008). 2234: 2095: 1865: 1840: 1813: 1534:Americans with Disabilities Act 1496:both recognized and criticized 1270:Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, 105:Buck v. Bell, 143 Va. 310, 130 5693:1927 in United States case law 4923:J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. 2919:Presentation by Adam Cohen on 1907:New York University Law Review 1783: 1743: 1728: 1711: 1686: 1644:Disability Advocacy and Atkins 1634: 1611: 1438:did not specifically overturn 973: 1: 5638:Eugenics in the United States 4592:Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. Brinkman 3797:McNeese v. Board of Education 3304:United States v. Wong Kim Ark 1653:("In the eight decades since 1594: 1547:Eugenics in the United States 1434:, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). While 1078: 911:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 879: 559:The Passing of the Great Race 414:American Birth Control League 4321:Hirabayashi v. United States 4173:DeShaney v. Winnebago County 4125:Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. 3866:Owen v. City of Independence 3481:Pierce v. Society of Sisters 2777:General Assembly of Virginia 1698:General Assembly of Virginia 1604: 1557:Racial Integrity Act of 1924 1391:Cold Spring Harbor, New York 1304: 842:of the unfit, including the 7: 5207:United States v. Cruikshank 4377:Brown v. Board of Education 3678:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 3529:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 3155:Professor Thomas D. Russell 2504:Legal Information Institute 2334:. New York: Vintage Books. 2273:"Bell, John H. (1883–1934)" 1539: 1407:Subsequent Nuremberg trials 1312:Eugenical Sterilization Act 1259:cutting the Fallopian tubes 1154:The case then moved to the 1118:Eugenical Sterilization Act 1085:Eugenical Sterilization Act 828:United States Supreme Court 434:Human Betterment Foundation 10: 5734: 4329:Korematsu v. United States 2609:The Hastings Center Report 2603:Lombardo, Paul A. (2003). 2155:The Hastings Center Report 2149:Lombardo, Paul A. (2003). 2102:Lombardo, Paul A. (2008). 1873:"Buck, Carrie (1906–1983)" 1383:Charles Benedict Davenport 1373:The Virginia statute that 1341: 888:was propounded in 1883 by 870:Rehabilitation Act of 1973 716:Social degeneration theory 645:Charles Benedict Davenport 429:Race Betterment Foundation 5713:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. 5597: 5591: 5586: 5532:United States v. Morrison 5470: 5457: 5198: 5163: 4984: 4949: 4939:United States v. Skrmetti 4931:United States v. Virginia 4770: 4544:Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson 4264: 4260: 4247: 3965:Jacobson v. Massachusetts 3956: 3898:Gonzaga University v. Doe 3776: 3563: 3462: 3367: 3363: 3350: 3274: 3261: 3083:(New Horizon Press, 1989) 2932: 2912: 2907: 2694:February 6, 2009, at the 2689:Race Cleansing in America 1532:has been affected by the 1282:Jacobson v. Massachusetts 1257:is broad enough to cover 1150:Legal appeals and rulings 980:Charlottesville, Virginia 832:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. 650:Gertrude Crotty Davenport 419:American Eugenics Society 242: 235: 228: 223: 215: 207: 202: 136: 131: 125:Supreme Court of Virginia 118: 113: 101: 96: 68: 52: 45: 31: 26: 5703:Amherst County, Virginia 5698:Sterilization (medicine) 5653:Psychiatry controversies 5564:United States v. Georgia 5508:City of Boerne v. Flores 4672:United States v. Fordice 4229:Williams v. Pennsylvania 4197:Washington v. Glucksberg 3030:Leuchtenburg, William E. 3006:Bruinius, Harry (2007). 2977:Cullen-DuPont, Kathryn. 2939:Interview with Cohen on 2743:Bruinius, Harry (2007). 2330:Bruinius, Harry (2007). 2277:encyclopediavirginia.org 2035:"Carrie Buck's Daughter" 1877:encyclopediavirginia.org 1852:encyclopediavirginia.org 1795:encyclopediavirginia.org 1735:Galton, Francis (1883), 1642: 1599: 1261:. Three generations of 1165:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr 1156:Supreme Court of Appeals 1001:Blood kin of Carrie Buck 978:Carrie Buck was born in 932:, superintendent of the 919:compulsory sterilization 840:compulsory sterilization 773:United States portal 743:Sterilization of Latinas 566:The Rising Tide of Color 121:compulsory sterilization 5643:Intellectual disability 5572:Shelby County v. Holder 5137:Cabell v. Chavez-Salido 4993:Patsone v. Pennsylvania 4254:Equal Protection Clause 4181:Michael H. v. Gerald D. 3574:United States v. Vuitch 3489:Griswold v. Connecticut 2991:Winfall, North Carolina 2075:Dorr, Gregory Michael. 1723:Oxford University Press 1506:Equal Protection Clause 1146:testified against her. 1116:, who drafted the 1924 923:intellectually disabled 844:intellectually disabled 635:Edwin Katzen-Ellenbogen 449:Human Betterment League 5708:Healthcare in Virginia 5439:Armour v. Indianapolis 4803:Moritz v. Commissioner 3859:Procunier v. Navarette 3777:Civil rights liability 3565:Abortion jurisprudence 3188:University of Virginia 3182:April 5, 2013, at the 2873:Warden, Derek (2019). 2703:. Retrieved 7-27-2010. 2571:"The Eugenics Crusade" 2302:University of Virginia 1996:. New York, New York: 1387:Eugenics Record Office 1351: 1277: 1255:compulsory vaccination 1224: 1217: 1131: 1100: 1063: 1002: 951: 907:Eugenics Record Office 884:The modern concept of 721:Social purity movement 683:Wallace H. Kuralt. Sr. 424:Eugenics Record Office 230:U.S. Const. amend. XIV 5492:Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer 5335:Richardson v. Ramirez 5303:Boddie v. Connecticut 4891:Kirchberg v. Feenstra 4720:Johnson v. California 4440:McLaughlin v. Florida 3828:O'Connor v. Donaldson 3388:Allgeyer v. Louisiana 3280:Slaughter-House Cases 3202:Encyclopedia Virginia 2857:253 F.3d 1124 2538:St. John's University 2077:"Buck v. Bell (1927)" 1848:"Buck v. Bell (1927)" 1767:"Buck vs. Bell Trial" 1403:Heidelberg University 1360:eugenic sterilization 1349: 1274:, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) 1250: 1229:Oliver Wendell Holmes 1222: 1206: 1129: 1098: 1038: 1000: 942: 830:, written by Justice 359:Madrigal v. Quilligan 46:Argued April 22, 1927 5484:Katzenbach v. Morgan 5231:Breedlove v. Suttles 5081:Graham v. Richardson 4974:Obergefell v. Hodges 4779:Breedlove v. Suttles 4712:Grutter v. Bollinger 4552:Jefferson v. Hackney 4221:Obergefell v. Hodges 4157:Edwards v. Aguillard 4037:Epperson v. Arkansas 3874:Harlow v. Fitzgerald 3809:Jenkins v. McKeithen 3702:Mazurek v. Armstrong 3662:Hodgson v. Minnesota 3622:Bellotti v. Baird II 3614:Colautti v. Franklin 3369:Economic substantive 2605:"Facing Carrie Buck" 2151:"Facing Carrie Buck" 1992:Cohen, Adam (2016). 1651:653, 657 (2008). 1488:In the 1996 case of 1381:, superintendent of 1029:mentally incompetent 930:Albert Sidney Priddy 492:Oneida stirpiculture 151:Oliver W. Holmes Jr. 5415:Gregory v. Ashcroft 5383:Mills v. Habluetzel 5367:Zablocki v. Redhail 5311:Eisenstadt v. Baird 5247:Oyama v. California 5239:Skinner v. Oklahoma 5172:Shapiro v. Thompson 5089:Sugarman v. Dougall 5033:Porterfield v. Webb 5025:Terrace v. Thompson 4688:Missouri v. Jenkins 4632:Hunter v. Underwood 4576:Milliken v. Bradley 4568:Norwood v. Harrison 4520:McDaniel v. Barresi 4205:Troxel v. Granville 4085:Mathews v. Eldridge 4069:Taylor v. Louisiana 3946:Connick v. Thompson 3726:Gonzales v. Carhart 3710:Stenberg v. Carhart 3694:Lambert v. Wicklund 3606:Bellotti v. Baird I 3404:Lochner v. New York 3288:Minor v. Happersett 3146:Library of Congress 2828:74 F.3d 740 2575:American Experience 2547:on January 13, 2013 2397:10.2307/j.ctvqmp2sk 1801:on February 4, 2021 1464:American Experience 1458:Tomorrow's Children 1436:Skinner v. Oklahoma 1431:Skinner v. Oklahoma 1161:William Howard Taft 1108:of Amherst County. 1073:, at the age of 8. 861:Skinner v. Oklahoma 538:The Kallikak Family 454:Heredity Commission 352:Skinner v. Oklahoma 257:Part of a series on 245:Skinner v. Oklahoma 163:James C. McReynolds 159:Willis Van Devanter 48:Decided May 2, 1927 5476:Civil Rights Cases 5464:Enforcement Clause 5295:Oregon v. Mitchell 5287:Williams v. Rhodes 5113:Nyquist v. Mauclet 5073:Hernandez v. Texas 4958:Bowers v. Hardwick 4950:Sexual orientation 4827:Stanton v. Stanton 4819:Geduldig v. Aiello 4787:Goesaert v. Cleary 4704:Gratz v. Bollinger 4528:Palmer v. Thompson 4480:Hunter v. Erickson 4456:Loving v. Virginia 4424:Anderson v. Martin 4345:Shelley v. Kraemer 4289:Plessy v. Ferguson 4281:Yick Wo v. Hopkins 4133:Kolender v. Lawson 4029:Loving v. Virginia 3844:Imbler v. Pachtman 3821:Wood v. Strickland 3686:Leavitt v. Jane L. 3513:Bowers v. Hardwick 3428:Buchanan v. Warley 3357:Due Process Clause 3268:Citizenship Clause 2993:. Associated Press 2647:– via JSTOR. 2472:2021-05-06 at the 2461:2011-10-09 at the 2308:on August 10, 2011 2193:– via JSTOR. 2031:Gould, Stephen Jay 1717:White, G. Edward, 1358:was to legitimize 1352: 1299:dissenting opinion 1225: 1193:U.S. Supreme Court 1132: 1101: 1003: 952: 848:Due Process Clause 731:Racial nationalism 630:David Starr Jordan 586:Annals of Eugenics 545:Eugenics manifesto 147:Associate Justices 87:47 S. Ct. 584; 71 5625: 5624: 5621: 5620: 5611:Trump v. Anderson 5603:Gold Clause Cases 5582: 5581: 5556:Tennessee v. Lane 5453: 5452: 5449: 5448: 5359:Trimble v. Gordon 5279:Levy v. Louisiana 5271:Rinaldi v. Yeager 5153:Bernal v. Fainter 5129:Ambach v. Norwick 5121:Foley v. Connelie 5017:Crane v. New York 4915:Lehr v. Robertson 4867:Caban v. Mohammed 4624:Palmore v. Sidoti 4464:Lee v. Washington 4448:Reitman v. Mulkey 4399:Gebhart v. Belton 4385:Briggs v. Elliott 4361:Sweatt v. Painter 4243: 4242: 4239: 4238: 4117:Parratt v. Taylor 4101:Duren v. Missouri 4061:Arnett v. Kennedy 3989:Powell v. Alabama 3930:Ashcroft v. Iqbal 3815:Scheuer v. Rhodes 3630:H. L. v. Matheson 3537:Lawrence v. Texas 3473:Meyer v. Nebraska 3420:Coppage v. Kansas 3346: 3345: 3312:Perez v. Brownell 3079:Smith, J. David. 3073:978-0-8018-9010-9 3043:978-0-19-511131-6 3021:978-0-375-71305-7 2970:978-1-59420-418-0 2952: 2951: 2758:978-0-375-71305-7 2700:American Heritage 2406:978-0-7006-2810-0 2341:978-0-375-71305-7 1976:. March 17, 2016. 1821:"Online Services" 1649:DePaul Law Review 1563:Stump v. Sparkman 1379:Harry H. Laughlin 1198:U.S. Constitution 1144:Joseph DeJarnette 1047:Stephen Jay Gould 1036:feeblemindedness. 819: 818: 756: 755: 711:Scientific racism 691: 690: 625:Joseph DeJarnette 620:Harry H. Laughlin 595: 594: 512: 511: 389: 388: 373:Stump v. Sparkman 319: 318: 265:the United States 252: 251: 248:(partially, 1942) 187:Edward T. Sanford 175:George Sutherland 5725: 5588: 5587: 5500:Dellmuth v. Muth 5459: 5458: 4859:Parham v. Hughes 4835:Edwards v. Healy 4664:Freeman v. Pitts 4419:(M.D. Ala. 1956) 4416:Browder v. Gayle 4262: 4261: 4249: 4248: 4165:Turner v. Safley 4141:Hudson v. Palmer 4005:NAACP v. Alabama 3464:Right to privacy 3412:Muller v. Oregon 3380:Mugler v. Kansas 3365: 3364: 3352: 3351: 3328:Rogers v. Bellei 3263: 3262: 3247: 3240: 3233: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3159: 3153: 3150: 3144: 3141: 3135: 3132: 3126: 3123: 3117: 3114: 3108: 3076: 3061: 3046: 3025: 3002: 3000: 2998: 2973: 2937: 2936: 2917: 2916: 2905: 2904: 2894: 2893: 2891: 2889: 2870: 2864: 2854: 2848: 2839: 2825: 2823:Fieger v. Thomas 2819: 2813: 2794: 2788: 2787: 2785: 2783: 2769: 2763: 2762: 2740: 2734: 2732: 2730: 2728: 2710: 2704: 2685: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2674: 2655: 2649: 2648: 2600: 2591: 2590: 2588: 2586: 2567: 2558: 2556: 2554: 2552: 2546: 2540:. Archived from 2535: 2522: 2516: 2515: 2495: 2489: 2483: 2477: 2449: 2440: 2433: 2427: 2426: 2382: 2376: 2375: 2373: 2371: 2352: 2346: 2345: 2327: 2318: 2317: 2315: 2313: 2304:. Archived from 2294: 2288: 2287: 2285: 2283: 2269: 2263: 2262: 2260: 2258: 2238: 2232: 2231: 2229: 2227: 2208: 2195: 2194: 2146: 2135: 2134: 2099: 2093: 2092: 2090: 2088: 2072: 2061: 2060: 2058: 2056: 2050: 2039: 2027: 2012: 2011: 1989: 1980: 1977: 1962: 1960: 1958: 1929: 1923: 1922: 1897: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1883: 1869: 1863: 1862: 1860: 1858: 1844: 1838: 1836: 1834: 1832: 1827:on June 18, 2009 1817: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1806: 1797:. Archived from 1787: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1777: 1771:Eugenics Archive 1763: 1750: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1732: 1726: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1706: 1704: 1690: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1679: 1667: 1658: 1652: 1646: 1641:James W. Ellis, 1638: 1632: 1615: 1512:". In 2001, the 1511: 1490:Fieger v. Thomas 1482:Justice Blackmun 1425:in his defense. 1405:in 1936. At the 1332:Arthur Estabrook 1275: 1242:Eighth Amendment 1238:equal protection 1215: 1114:Aubrey E. Strode 1061: 811: 804: 797: 771: 770: 769: 704: 703: 655:Frederick Osborn 608: 607: 525: 524: 487:The Relf Sisters 402: 401: 332: 331: 286: 285: 275: 254: 253: 132:Court membership 36: 35: 24: 23: 5733: 5732: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5688:Science and law 5628: 5627: 5626: 5617: 5593: 5578: 5466: 5445: 5194: 5159: 5097:In re Griffiths 5041:Webb v. O'Brien 4980: 4945: 4766: 4696:Texas v. Lesage 4488:Hadnott v. Amos 4273:Pace v. Alabama 4256: 4235: 4013:Hoyt v. Florida 3952: 3882:Felder v. Casey 3778: 3772: 3559: 3458: 3436:Adams v. Tanner 3396:Holden v. Hardy 3370: 3359: 3342: 3320:Afroyim v. Rusk 3270: 3257: 3251: 3206: 3184:Wayback Machine 3157: 3151: 3148: 3142: 3139: 3133: 3130: 3124: 3121: 3115: 3112: 3106: 3090: 3074: 3044: 3022: 2996: 2994: 2971: 2943:, June 11, 2016 2934: 2923:, March 8, 2016 2914: 2908:External videos 2903: 2901:Further reading 2898: 2897: 2887: 2885: 2871: 2867: 2852:Vaughn v. Ruoff 2850: 2849: 2842: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2795: 2791: 2781: 2779: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2759: 2751:. p. 316. 2741: 2737: 2733:Harvard website 2726: 2724: 2723:on July 9, 2011 2711: 2707: 2696:Wayback Machine 2686: 2682: 2672: 2670: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2621:10.2307/3528148 2601: 2594: 2584: 2582: 2569: 2568: 2561: 2550: 2548: 2544: 2533: 2523: 2519: 2511:Fallopian tubes 2497: 2496: 2492: 2486:274 U.S. at 207 2484: 2480: 2474:Wayback Machine 2463:Wayback Machine 2450: 2443: 2438:274 U.S. at 205 2434: 2430: 2407: 2383: 2379: 2369: 2367: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2342: 2328: 2321: 2311: 2309: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2281: 2279: 2271: 2270: 2266: 2256: 2254: 2239: 2235: 2225: 2223: 2210: 2209: 2198: 2167:10.2307/3528148 2147: 2138: 2123: 2100: 2096: 2086: 2084: 2073: 2064: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2042:Natural History 2037: 2028: 2015: 2008: 1990: 1983: 1968: 1956: 1954: 1930: 1926: 1898: 1891: 1881: 1879: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1856: 1854: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1830: 1828: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1804: 1802: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1775: 1773: 1765: 1764: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1733: 1729: 1725:, 1993, p. 407. 1716: 1712: 1702: 1700: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1677: 1675: 1670:Kaelber, Lutz. 1668: 1661: 1639: 1635: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1542: 1509: 1344: 1328:Bland, Virginia 1307: 1276: 1269: 1216: 1213: 1189: 1152: 1081: 1071:enteric colitis 1062: 1052:Natural History 1045: 976: 882: 866:G. Edward White 815: 767: 765: 758: 757: 752: 701: 693: 692: 687: 664: 605: 597: 596: 591: 571: 522: 514: 513: 508: 463: 399: 391: 390: 385: 329: 321: 320: 283: 264: 238: 195:Harlan F. Stone 185: 173: 161: 143:William H. Taft 92: 47: 41: 22: 17: 12: 11: 5: 5731: 5721: 5720: 5715: 5710: 5705: 5700: 5695: 5690: 5685: 5680: 5675: 5670: 5665: 5660: 5655: 5650: 5645: 5640: 5623: 5622: 5619: 5618: 5616: 5615: 5607: 5598: 5595: 5594: 5584: 5583: 5580: 5579: 5577: 5576: 5568: 5560: 5552: 5544: 5536: 5528: 5520: 5512: 5504: 5496: 5488: 5480: 5471: 5468: 5467: 5455: 5454: 5451: 5450: 5447: 5446: 5444: 5443: 5435: 5427: 5423:Vacco v. Quill 5419: 5411: 5403: 5399:Clark v. Jeter 5395: 5387: 5379: 5371: 5363: 5355: 5347: 5339: 5331: 5323: 5315: 5307: 5299: 5291: 5283: 5275: 5267: 5259: 5255:Oyler v. Boles 5251: 5243: 5235: 5227: 5219: 5211: 5202: 5200: 5196: 5195: 5193: 5192: 5184: 5176: 5167: 5165: 5161: 5160: 5158: 5157: 5149: 5141: 5133: 5125: 5117: 5109: 5101: 5093: 5085: 5077: 5069: 5061: 5053: 5045: 5037: 5029: 5021: 5013: 5009:Heim v. McCall 5005: 5001:Truax v. Raich 4997: 4988: 4986: 4982: 4981: 4979: 4978: 4970: 4966:Romer v. Evans 4962: 4953: 4951: 4947: 4946: 4944: 4943: 4935: 4927: 4919: 4911: 4903: 4895: 4887: 4879: 4871: 4863: 4855: 4847: 4843:Craig v. Boren 4839: 4831: 4823: 4815: 4811:Kahn v. Shevin 4807: 4799: 4791: 4783: 4774: 4772: 4768: 4767: 4765: 4764: 4756: 4748: 4740: 4732: 4724: 4716: 4708: 4700: 4692: 4684: 4676: 4668: 4660: 4652: 4644: 4636: 4628: 4620: 4612: 4604: 4596: 4588: 4580: 4572: 4564: 4556: 4548: 4540: 4532: 4524: 4516: 4508: 4500: 4492: 4484: 4476: 4468: 4460: 4452: 4444: 4436: 4428: 4420: 4412: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4395: 4388: 4373: 4365: 4357: 4353:Perez v. Sharp 4349: 4341: 4333: 4325: 4317: 4313:Smith v. Texas 4309: 4301: 4293: 4285: 4277: 4268: 4266: 4258: 4257: 4245: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4236: 4234: 4233: 4225: 4217: 4209: 4201: 4193: 4185: 4177: 4169: 4161: 4153: 4145: 4137: 4129: 4121: 4113: 4109:Parham v. J.R. 4105: 4097: 4089: 4081: 4073: 4065: 4057: 4049: 4041: 4033: 4025: 4021:Oyler v. Boles 4017: 4009: 4001: 3993: 3985: 3977: 3969: 3960: 3958: 3954: 3953: 3951: 3950: 3942: 3934: 3926: 3918: 3910: 3902: 3894: 3886: 3878: 3870: 3862: 3856: 3848: 3840: 3832: 3824: 3818: 3812: 3806: 3803:Pierson v. Ray 3800: 3794: 3790:Monroe v. Pape 3785: 3783: 3774: 3773: 3771: 3770: 3762: 3754: 3746: 3738: 3730: 3722: 3714: 3706: 3698: 3690: 3682: 3674: 3666: 3658: 3650: 3642: 3634: 3626: 3618: 3610: 3602: 3594: 3586: 3578: 3569: 3567: 3561: 3560: 3558: 3557: 3549: 3541: 3533: 3525: 3517: 3509: 3501: 3493: 3485: 3477: 3468: 3466: 3460: 3459: 3457: 3456: 3448: 3440: 3432: 3424: 3416: 3408: 3400: 3392: 3384: 3375: 3373: 3361: 3360: 3348: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3340: 3332: 3324: 3316: 3308: 3300: 3296:Elk v. Wilkins 3292: 3284: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3259: 3258: 3250: 3249: 3242: 3235: 3227: 3221: 3220: 3204: 3195: 3190: 3174: 3165: 3160: 3128:Google Scholar 3089: 3088:External links 3086: 3085: 3084: 3077: 3072: 3052:Lombardo, Paul 3048: 3042: 3026: 3020: 3003: 2982: 2975: 2969: 2950: 2949: 2930: 2929: 2910: 2909: 2902: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2865: 2840: 2814: 2789: 2764: 2757: 2735: 2705: 2680: 2650: 2592: 2559: 2517: 2490: 2478: 2452:274 U.S. 200 ( 2441: 2428: 2405: 2377: 2347: 2340: 2319: 2289: 2264: 2233: 2196: 2136: 2121: 2094: 2062: 2013: 2007:978-1594204180 2006: 2000:. p. 24. 1981: 1979: 1978: 1974:Democracy Now! 1947:Democracy Now! 1924: 1889: 1864: 1839: 1812: 1782: 1751: 1742: 1727: 1710: 1685: 1659: 1633: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1567: 1559: 1554: 1549: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1413:, counsel for 1354:The effect of 1343: 1340: 1324:tubal ligation 1306: 1303: 1267: 1211: 1188: 1185: 1176:14th Amendment 1151: 1148: 1080: 1077: 1043: 1007:foster parents 975: 972: 946:(left) at the 903:Harry Laughlin 890:Francis Galton 881: 878: 817: 816: 814: 813: 806: 799: 791: 788: 787: 786: 785: 780: 775: 760: 759: 754: 753: 751: 750: 745: 740: 733: 728: 723: 718: 713: 707: 702: 699: 698: 695: 694: 689: 688: 686: 685: 680: 674: 671: 670: 666: 665: 663: 662: 657: 652: 647: 642: 640:Charles Goethe 637: 632: 627: 622: 616: 613: 612: 606: 603: 602: 599: 598: 593: 592: 590: 589: 581: 578: 577: 573: 572: 570: 569: 562: 555: 552:The Bell Curve 548: 541: 533: 530: 529: 523: 520: 519: 516: 515: 510: 509: 500: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 473: 470: 469: 465: 464: 462: 461: 456: 451: 446: 441: 436: 431: 426: 421: 416: 410: 407: 406: 400: 397: 396: 393: 392: 387: 386: 384: 383: 376: 369: 362: 355: 348: 340: 337: 336: 330: 327: 326: 323: 322: 317: 316: 315: 314: 309: 307:North Carolina 304: 299: 291: 290: 284: 281: 280: 277: 276: 268: 267: 259: 258: 250: 249: 240: 239: 236: 233: 232: 226: 225: 221: 220: 217: 213: 212: 209: 205: 204: 200: 199: 198: 197: 171:Louis Brandeis 148: 145: 140: 134: 133: 129: 128: 116: 115: 111: 110: 103: 99: 98: 94: 93: 86: 70: 66: 65: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 20: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5730: 5719: 5716: 5714: 5711: 5709: 5706: 5704: 5701: 5699: 5696: 5694: 5691: 5689: 5686: 5684: 5681: 5679: 5676: 5674: 5671: 5669: 5666: 5664: 5661: 5659: 5656: 5654: 5651: 5649: 5646: 5644: 5641: 5639: 5636: 5635: 5633: 5613: 5612: 5608: 5605: 5604: 5600: 5599: 5596: 5589: 5585: 5574: 5573: 5569: 5566: 5565: 5561: 5558: 5557: 5553: 5550: 5549: 5545: 5542: 5541: 5537: 5534: 5533: 5529: 5526: 5525: 5521: 5518: 5517: 5513: 5510: 5509: 5505: 5502: 5501: 5497: 5494: 5493: 5489: 5486: 5485: 5481: 5478: 5477: 5473: 5472: 5469: 5465: 5460: 5456: 5441: 5440: 5436: 5433: 5432: 5428: 5425: 5424: 5420: 5417: 5416: 5412: 5409: 5408: 5404: 5401: 5400: 5396: 5393: 5392: 5388: 5385: 5384: 5380: 5377: 5376: 5372: 5369: 5368: 5364: 5361: 5360: 5356: 5353: 5352: 5348: 5345: 5344: 5340: 5337: 5336: 5332: 5329: 5328: 5324: 5321: 5320: 5316: 5313: 5312: 5308: 5305: 5304: 5300: 5297: 5296: 5292: 5289: 5288: 5284: 5281: 5280: 5276: 5273: 5272: 5268: 5265: 5264: 5260: 5257: 5256: 5252: 5249: 5248: 5244: 5241: 5240: 5236: 5233: 5232: 5228: 5225: 5224: 5220: 5217: 5216: 5212: 5209: 5208: 5204: 5203: 5201: 5197: 5190: 5189: 5185: 5182: 5181: 5177: 5174: 5173: 5169: 5168: 5166: 5162: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5147: 5146: 5145:Plyler v. Doe 5142: 5139: 5138: 5134: 5131: 5130: 5126: 5123: 5122: 5118: 5115: 5114: 5110: 5107: 5106: 5102: 5099: 5098: 5094: 5091: 5090: 5086: 5083: 5082: 5078: 5075: 5074: 5070: 5067: 5066: 5062: 5059: 5058: 5054: 5051: 5050: 5049:Frick v. Webb 5046: 5043: 5042: 5038: 5035: 5034: 5030: 5027: 5026: 5022: 5019: 5018: 5014: 5011: 5010: 5006: 5003: 5002: 4998: 4995: 4994: 4990: 4989: 4987: 4983: 4976: 4975: 4971: 4968: 4967: 4963: 4960: 4959: 4955: 4954: 4952: 4948: 4941: 4940: 4936: 4933: 4932: 4928: 4925: 4924: 4920: 4917: 4916: 4912: 4909: 4908: 4904: 4901: 4900: 4896: 4893: 4892: 4888: 4885: 4884: 4880: 4877: 4876: 4872: 4869: 4868: 4864: 4861: 4860: 4856: 4853: 4852: 4848: 4845: 4844: 4840: 4837: 4836: 4832: 4829: 4828: 4824: 4821: 4820: 4816: 4813: 4812: 4808: 4805: 4804: 4800: 4797: 4796: 4792: 4789: 4788: 4784: 4781: 4780: 4776: 4775: 4773: 4769: 4762: 4761: 4757: 4754: 4753: 4749: 4746: 4745: 4741: 4738: 4737: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4725: 4722: 4721: 4717: 4714: 4713: 4709: 4706: 4705: 4701: 4698: 4697: 4693: 4690: 4689: 4685: 4682: 4681: 4677: 4674: 4673: 4669: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4658: 4657: 4653: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4637: 4634: 4633: 4629: 4626: 4625: 4621: 4618: 4617: 4613: 4610: 4609: 4605: 4602: 4601: 4597: 4594: 4593: 4589: 4586: 4585: 4581: 4578: 4577: 4573: 4570: 4569: 4565: 4562: 4561: 4557: 4554: 4553: 4549: 4546: 4545: 4541: 4538: 4537: 4536:Coit v. Green 4533: 4530: 4529: 4525: 4522: 4521: 4517: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4498: 4497: 4493: 4490: 4489: 4485: 4482: 4481: 4477: 4474: 4473: 4469: 4466: 4465: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4450: 4449: 4445: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4429: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4413: 4410: 4409: 4408:Lucy v. Adams 4405: 4401: 4400: 4396: 4394: 4393: 4389: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4381: 4379: 4378: 4374: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4363: 4362: 4358: 4355: 4354: 4350: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4339: 4338: 4334: 4331: 4330: 4326: 4323: 4322: 4318: 4315: 4314: 4310: 4307: 4306: 4302: 4299: 4298: 4294: 4291: 4290: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4278: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4269: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4250: 4246: 4231: 4230: 4226: 4223: 4222: 4218: 4215: 4214: 4210: 4207: 4206: 4202: 4199: 4198: 4194: 4191: 4190: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4178: 4175: 4174: 4170: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4126: 4122: 4119: 4118: 4114: 4111: 4110: 4106: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4086: 4082: 4079: 4078: 4077:Goss v. Lopez 4074: 4071: 4070: 4066: 4063: 4062: 4058: 4055: 4054: 4050: 4047: 4046: 4045:In re Winship 4042: 4039: 4038: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4023: 4022: 4018: 4015: 4014: 4010: 4007: 4006: 4002: 3999: 3998: 3994: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3983: 3982: 3978: 3975: 3974: 3973:Zucht v. King 3970: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3961: 3959: 3955: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3940: 3939: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3900: 3899: 3895: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3876: 3875: 3871: 3868: 3867: 3863: 3860: 3857: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3838: 3837: 3836:Paul v. Davis 3833: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3822: 3819: 3816: 3813: 3810: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3791: 3787: 3786: 3784: 3782: 3775: 3768: 3767: 3763: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3752: 3751: 3747: 3744: 3743: 3742:Azar v. Garza 3739: 3736: 3735: 3731: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3720: 3719: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3707: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3688: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3672: 3671: 3667: 3664: 3663: 3659: 3656: 3655: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3632: 3631: 3627: 3624: 3623: 3619: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3592: 3591: 3590:Doe v. Bolton 3587: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3570: 3568: 3566: 3562: 3555: 3554: 3550: 3547: 3546: 3542: 3539: 3538: 3534: 3531: 3530: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3507: 3506: 3505:Doe v. Bolton 3502: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3469: 3467: 3465: 3461: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3438: 3437: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3406: 3405: 3401: 3398: 3397: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3374: 3372: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3353: 3349: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3314: 3313: 3309: 3306: 3305: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3269: 3264: 3260: 3255: 3248: 3243: 3241: 3236: 3234: 3229: 3228: 3225: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3203: 3199: 3196: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3164: 3161: 3156: 3147: 3138: 3129: 3120: 3111: 3110:CourtListener 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3082: 3078: 3075: 3069: 3065: 3060: 3059: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3017: 3013: 3012:Vintage Books 3009: 3004: 2992: 2988: 2983: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2953: 2948: 2944: 2942: 2931: 2928: 2924: 2922: 2911: 2906: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2869: 2862: 2858: 2853: 2847: 2845: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2824: 2818: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2793: 2778: 2774: 2768: 2760: 2754: 2750: 2749:Vintage Books 2746: 2739: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2709: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2684: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2654: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2599: 2597: 2580: 2577:. PBS. 2018. 2576: 2572: 2566: 2564: 2543: 2539: 2532: 2530: 2521: 2514: 2512: 2506: 2505: 2500: 2494: 2487: 2482: 2475: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2448: 2446: 2439: 2432: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2381: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2351: 2343: 2337: 2333: 2326: 2324: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2293: 2278: 2274: 2268: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2207: 2205: 2203: 2201: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2145: 2143: 2141: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2122:9780801890109 2118: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2098: 2082: 2078: 2071: 2069: 2067: 2047: 2043: 2036: 2033:(July 1984). 2032: 2026: 2024: 2022: 2020: 2018: 2009: 2003: 1999: 1998:Penguin Press 1995: 1988: 1986: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1928: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1896: 1894: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1853: 1849: 1843: 1826: 1822: 1816: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1786: 1772: 1768: 1762: 1760: 1758: 1756: 1746: 1738: 1731: 1724: 1720: 1714: 1699: 1695: 1689: 1673: 1666: 1664: 1656: 1650: 1645: 1637: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1610: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1537: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1524: 1519: 1515: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1447: 1445: 1444:sterilization 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1426: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1371: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1348: 1339: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320:salpingectomy 1316: 1313: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1295:Pierce Butler 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1273: 1266: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1249: 1247: 1246:genetic trait 1243: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1221: 1210: 1205: 1201: 1199: 1194: 1187:Supreme Court 1184: 1180: 1177: 1172: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1147: 1145: 1140: 1136: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1115: 1109: 1107: 1106:Circuit Court 1097: 1093: 1091: 1086: 1076: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1059: 1055: 1053: 1048: 1042: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1012: 1011:public school 1008: 999: 995: 993: 990:, and having 989: 985: 981: 971: 969: 968:feeble-minded 965: 961: 957: 949: 945: 941: 937: 935: 931: 926: 924: 920: 916: 912: 909:(ERO) at the 908: 904: 900: 895: 894:United States 891: 887: 877: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836:state statute 833: 829: 825: 824: 812: 807: 805: 800: 798: 793: 792: 790: 789: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 764: 763: 762: 761: 749: 746: 744: 741: 738: 734: 732: 729: 727: 726:Feeble-minded 724: 722: 719: 717: 714: 712: 709: 708: 706: 705: 697: 696: 684: 681: 679: 678:Guy W. Bailey 676: 675: 673: 672: 668: 667: 661: 660:Madison Grant 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 617: 615: 614: 610: 609: 601: 600: 588: 587: 583: 582: 580: 579: 575: 574: 568: 567: 563: 561: 560: 556: 554: 553: 549: 547: 546: 542: 540: 539: 535: 534: 532: 531: 527: 526: 518: 517: 507: 506: 505: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 474: 472: 471: 467: 466: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 409: 408: 404: 403: 395: 394: 382: 381: 377: 375: 374: 370: 368: 367: 363: 361: 360: 356: 354: 353: 349: 347: 346: 342: 341: 339: 338: 334: 333: 325: 324: 313: 310: 308: 305: 303: 300: 298: 295: 294: 293: 292: 288: 287: 279: 278: 274: 270: 269: 266: 261: 260: 256: 255: 247: 246: 241: 237:Superseded by 234: 231: 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203:Case opinions 201: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183:Pierce Butler 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139:Chief Justice 138: 137: 135: 130: 126: 122: 117: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 90: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 67: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 40: 30: 25: 19: 5609: 5601: 5570: 5562: 5554: 5546: 5538: 5530: 5522: 5514: 5506: 5498: 5490: 5482: 5474: 5437: 5431:Bush v. Gore 5429: 5421: 5413: 5405: 5397: 5389: 5381: 5373: 5365: 5357: 5349: 5341: 5333: 5325: 5317: 5309: 5301: 5293: 5285: 5277: 5269: 5261: 5253: 5245: 5237: 5229: 5221: 5213: 5205: 5186: 5178: 5170: 5151: 5143: 5135: 5127: 5119: 5111: 5103: 5095: 5087: 5079: 5071: 5063: 5055: 5047: 5039: 5031: 5023: 5015: 5007: 4999: 4991: 4972: 4964: 4956: 4937: 4929: 4921: 4913: 4905: 4897: 4889: 4881: 4873: 4865: 4857: 4849: 4841: 4833: 4825: 4817: 4809: 4801: 4795:Reed v. Reed 4793: 4785: 4777: 4758: 4750: 4742: 4734: 4726: 4718: 4710: 4702: 4694: 4686: 4678: 4670: 4662: 4654: 4646: 4638: 4630: 4622: 4614: 4606: 4598: 4590: 4582: 4574: 4566: 4558: 4550: 4542: 4534: 4526: 4518: 4510: 4502: 4494: 4486: 4478: 4470: 4462: 4454: 4446: 4438: 4430: 4422: 4414: 4406: 4397: 4390: 4383: 4375: 4367: 4359: 4351: 4343: 4335: 4327: 4319: 4311: 4303: 4295: 4287: 4279: 4271: 4227: 4219: 4211: 4203: 4195: 4187: 4179: 4171: 4163: 4155: 4147: 4139: 4131: 4123: 4115: 4107: 4099: 4091: 4083: 4075: 4067: 4059: 4051: 4043: 4035: 4027: 4019: 4011: 4003: 3995: 3987: 3981:Buck v. Bell 3980: 3979: 3971: 3963: 3944: 3936: 3928: 3920: 3912: 3904: 3896: 3888: 3880: 3872: 3864: 3858: 3850: 3842: 3834: 3826: 3820: 3814: 3808: 3802: 3796: 3788: 3764: 3756: 3748: 3740: 3732: 3724: 3716: 3708: 3700: 3692: 3684: 3676: 3668: 3660: 3652: 3644: 3636: 3628: 3620: 3612: 3604: 3596: 3588: 3580: 3572: 3551: 3543: 3535: 3527: 3519: 3511: 3503: 3495: 3487: 3479: 3471: 3450: 3442: 3434: 3426: 3418: 3410: 3402: 3394: 3386: 3378: 3336:Saenz v. Roe 3334: 3326: 3318: 3310: 3302: 3294: 3286: 3278: 3198:Buck v. Bell 3172:archives.gov 3171: 3095:Buck v. Bell 3094: 3080: 3057: 3033: 3010:. New York: 3007: 2995:. Retrieved 2978: 2960: 2940: 2920: 2886:. Retrieved 2882: 2878: 2868: 2859:, 1129 ( 2851: 2836:Buck v. Bell 2835: 2822: 2817: 2796: 2792: 2780:. Retrieved 2767: 2747:. New York: 2744: 2738: 2725:. Retrieved 2721:the original 2715: 2708: 2698: 2683: 2673:November 16, 2671:. Retrieved 2662: 2653: 2612: 2608: 2585:November 17, 2583:. Retrieved 2574: 2549:. Retrieved 2542:the original 2529:Buck V. Bell 2528: 2520: 2508: 2502: 2493: 2481: 2454:Buck v. Bell 2453: 2431: 2387: 2380: 2370:November 17, 2368:. Retrieved 2359: 2350: 2331: 2310:. Retrieved 2306:the original 2292: 2280:. Retrieved 2276: 2267: 2257:November 25, 2255:. Retrieved 2246: 2236: 2226:November 16, 2224:. Retrieved 2215: 2161:(2): 14–17. 2158: 2154: 2108: 2107:Buck v. Bell 2104: 2097: 2085:. Retrieved 2053:. Retrieved 2041: 1993: 1973: 1955:. Retrieved 1941: 1937:Goodman, Amy 1927: 1914:(1): 30–62, 1911: 1905: 1902:Buck v. Bell 1901: 1880:. Retrieved 1876: 1867: 1855:. Retrieved 1851: 1842: 1829:. Retrieved 1825:the original 1815: 1803:. Retrieved 1799:the original 1794: 1785: 1774:, retrieved 1770: 1745: 1736: 1730: 1721:, New York: 1718: 1713: 1701:. Retrieved 1688: 1676:. Retrieved 1654: 1636: 1631: (1927). 1618:Buck v. Bell 1617: 1613: 1569: 1561: 1530:Buck v. Bell 1529: 1527: 1523:Buck v. Bell 1522: 1518:Buck v. Bell 1517: 1502:Buck v. Bell 1501: 1498:Buck v. Bell 1497: 1489: 1487: 1475: 1472:Buck v. Bell 1471: 1469: 1462: 1456: 1451: 1448: 1440:Buck v. Bell 1439: 1435: 1429: 1427: 1423:Buck v. Bell 1422: 1419:Otto Hofmann 1417:functionary 1414: 1411:World War II 1399:Nazi Germany 1375:Buck v. Bell 1374: 1372: 1368:Buck v. Bell 1367: 1356:Buck v. Bell 1355: 1353: 1317: 1311: 1308: 1280: 1278: 1272:Buck v. Bell 1271: 1251: 1226: 1207: 1202: 1190: 1181: 1173: 1168: 1163:and Justice 1153: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1122: 1117: 1110: 1102: 1090:Buck v. Bell 1089: 1084: 1082: 1075: 1064: 1057: 1051: 1039: 1026: 1015: 1004: 988:prostitution 977: 960:prostitution 953: 927: 883: 859: 856:Buck v. Bell 855: 823:Buck v. Bell 822: 821: 820: 737:Race suicide 584: 564: 557: 550: 543: 536: 502: 501: 477:Jukes family 444:Pioneer Fund 405:Institutions 378: 371: 364: 357: 350: 345:Buck v. Bell 344: 343: 243: 224:Laws applied 190: 178: 166: 154: 97:Case history 80: 56: 27:Buck v. Bell 18: 4356:(Cal. 1948) 4305:Lum v. Rice 3582:Roe v. Wade 3497:Roe v. Wade 3371:due process 3177:"Eugenics." 2963:, Penguin, 2957:Cohen, Adam 2830:, 750 ( 2798:Roe v. Wade 2415:j.ctvqmp2sk 2282:November 4, 2087:October 23, 1933:Cohen, Adam 1882:November 4, 1857:November 4, 1805:November 4, 1776:October 16, 1477:Roe v. Wade 1322:(a form of 1265:are enough. 1234:due process 1169:How to Live 1022:promiscuity 974:Buck family 956:Carrie Buck 944:Carrie Buck 838:permitting 669:Politicians 335:Court cases 263:Eugenics in 58:Carrie Buck 5632:Categories 4851:Orr v. Orr 2997:August 13, 2888:January 4, 1595:References 1364:California 1079:Court case 964:immorality 880:Background 604:Proponents 521:Literature 297:California 109:516 (1925) 5164:Residency 2941:Imbeciles 2921:Imbeciles 2727:April 22, 2629:0093-0334 2615:(2): 16. 2423:241678748 2312:March 26, 2175:0093-0334 2131:195763255 1957:March 18, 1605:Citations 1305:Aftermath 1291:imbeciles 1287:precedent 1263:imbeciles 1018:committed 905:, of the 611:Academics 302:Minnesota 127:affirmed. 69:Citations 4985:Alienage 3256:case law 3212:Archived 3180:Archived 3093:Text of 3054:(2008), 2959:(2016), 2861:8th Cir. 2832:6th Cir. 2810:113, 154 2692:Archived 2667:Archived 2645:12760114 2579:Archived 2551:July 24, 2470:Archived 2459:Archived 2364:Archived 2251:Archived 2247:ABC News 2220:Archived 2191:12760114 2081:Archived 2055:June 10, 2046:Archived 1951:Archived 1920:11658945 1831:June 23, 1540:See also 1366:. After 1268:—  1227:Justice 1212:—  1054:magazine 1044:—  992:syphilis 915:Virginia 886:eugenics 872:and the 778:Category 576:Journals 208:Majority 4380:(1954) 3216:YouTube 3119:Findlaw 2782:May 30, 2637:3528148 2183:3528148 1964:Alt URL 1703:May 30, 1678:May 14, 1342:Effects 1336:measles 1067:measles 1033:adopted 921:of the 899:Indiana 850:of the 700:Related 468:General 398:History 216:Dissent 114:Holding 5614:(2024) 5606:(1935) 5575:(2013) 5567:(2006) 5559:(2004) 5551:(2003) 5543:(2001) 5535:(2000) 5527:(2000) 5519:(1999) 5511:(1997) 5503:(1989) 5495:(1976) 5487:(1966) 5479:(1883) 5442:(2012) 5434:(2000) 5426:(1997) 5418:(1991) 5410:(1988) 5402:(1988) 5394:(1985) 5386:(1982) 5378:(1979) 5370:(1978) 5362:(1977) 5354:(1976) 5346:(1974) 5338:(1974) 5330:(1973) 5322:(1973) 5314:(1972) 5306:(1971) 5298:(1970) 5290:(1968) 5282:(1968) 5274:(1966) 5266:(1966) 5258:(1962) 5250:(1948) 5242:(1942) 5234:(1937) 5226:(1928) 5218:(1886) 5210:(1876) 5191:(1985) 5183:(1977) 5175:(1969) 5156:(1984) 5148:(1982) 5140:(1982) 5132:(1979) 5124:(1978) 5116:(1977) 5108:(1976) 5100:(1973) 5092:(1973) 5084:(1971) 5076:(1954) 5068:(1948) 5060:(1927) 5052:(1923) 5044:(1923) 5036:(1923) 5028:(1923) 5020:(1915) 5012:(1915) 5004:(1915) 4996:(1914) 4977:(2015) 4969:(1996) 4961:(1986) 4942:(2024) 4934:(1996) 4926:(1994) 4918:(1983) 4910:(1982) 4902:(1981) 4894:(1981) 4886:(1980) 4878:(1979) 4870:(1979) 4862:(1979) 4854:(1979) 4846:(1976) 4838:(1975) 4830:(1975) 4822:(1974) 4814:(1974) 4806:(1972) 4798:(1971) 4790:(1948) 4782:(1937) 4763:(2023) 4755:(2016) 4747:(2014) 4739:(2013) 4731:(2007) 4723:(2005) 4715:(2003) 4707:(2003) 4699:(1999) 4691:(1995) 4683:(1993) 4675:(1992) 4667:(1992) 4659:(1991) 4651:(1989) 4643:(1986) 4635:(1985) 4627:(1984) 4619:(1982) 4611:(1982) 4603:(1978) 4595:(1977) 4587:(1977) 4579:(1974) 4571:(1973) 4563:(1973) 4555:(1972) 4547:(1971) 4539:(1971) 4531:(1971) 4523:(1971) 4515:(1971) 4507:(1969) 4499:(1969) 4491:(1969) 4483:(1969) 4475:(1968) 4467:(1968) 4459:(1967) 4451:(1967) 4443:(1964) 4435:(1964) 4427:(1964) 4411:(1955) 4372:(1950) 4364:(1950) 4348:(1948) 4340:(1948) 4332:(1944) 4324:(1943) 4316:(1940) 4308:(1927) 4300:(1899) 4292:(1896) 4284:(1886) 4276:(1883) 4232:(2016) 4224:(2015) 4216:(2009) 4208:(2000) 4200:(1997) 4192:(1990) 4184:(1989) 4176:(1989) 4168:(1987) 4160:(1987) 4152:(1985) 4144:(1984) 4136:(1983) 4128:(1982) 4120:(1981) 4112:(1979) 4104:(1979) 4096:(1977) 4088:(1976) 4080:(1975) 4072:(1975) 4064:(1974) 4056:(1974) 4048:(1971) 4040:(1968) 4032:(1967) 4024:(1962) 4016:(1961) 4008:(1958) 4000:(1950) 3992:(1932) 3984:(1927) 3976:(1922) 3968:(1905) 3949:(2011) 3941:(2010) 3933:(2009) 3925:(2009) 3917:(2005) 3909:(2003) 3901:(2002) 3893:(1989) 3885:(1988) 3877:(1982) 3869:(1980) 3861:(1978) 3855:(1978) 3847:(1976) 3839:(1976) 3831:(1975) 3823:(1975) 3817:(1974) 3811:(1969) 3805:(1967) 3799:(1963) 3793:(1961) 3779:under 3769:(2022) 3761:(2020) 3753:(2019) 3745:(2018) 3737:(2016) 3729:(2007) 3721:(2006) 3713:(2000) 3705:(1997) 3697:(1997) 3689:(1996) 3681:(1992) 3673:(1990) 3665:(1990) 3657:(1989) 3649:(1986) 3641:(1983) 3633:(1981) 3625:(1979) 3617:(1979) 3609:(1976) 3601:(1976) 3593:(1973) 3585:(1973) 3577:(1971) 3556:(2022) 3548:(2016) 3540:(2003) 3532:(1992) 3524:(1989) 3516:(1986) 3508:(1973) 3500:(1973) 3492:(1965) 3484:(1925) 3476:(1923) 3455:(1937) 3447:(1931) 3439:(1917) 3431:(1917) 3423:(1915) 3415:(1908) 3407:(1905) 3399:(1898) 3391:(1897) 3383:(1887) 3339:(1999) 3331:(1971) 3323:(1967) 3315:(1958) 3307:(1898) 3299:(1884) 3291:(1875) 3283:(1873) 3158:  3152:  3149:  3143:  3140:  3137:Justia 3134:  3131:  3125:  3122:  3116:  3113:  3107:  3070:  3040:  3018:  2967:  2947:C-SPAN 2927:C-SPAN 2855:, 2826:, 2801:, 2755:  2643:  2635:  2627:  2421:  2413:  2403:  2338:  2189:  2181:  2173:  2129:  2119:  2004:  1918:  1620:, 1574:(1981) 1566:(1978) 1516:cited 1492:, the 1409:after 459:AASPIM 312:Oregon 289:States 282:States 219:Butler 193: 191:· 189:  181: 179:· 177:  169: 167:· 165:  157: 155:· 153:  89:L. Ed. 5592:Other 5199:Other 3957:Other 3101: 2805: 2633:JSTOR 2545:(PDF) 2534:(PDF) 2419:S2CID 2411:JSTOR 2179:JSTOR 2049:(PDF) 2038:(PDF) 1647:, 57 1624: 1600:Notes 1285:as a 783:Index 528:Books 102:Prior 4265:Race 3103:U.S. 3068:ISBN 3038:ISBN 3016:ISBN 2999:2011 2965:ISBN 2890:2021 2807:U.S. 2784:2015 2753:ISBN 2729:2005 2675:2020 2641:PMID 2625:ISSN 2587:2020 2553:2012 2401:ISBN 2372:2020 2336:ISBN 2314:2013 2284:2015 2259:2020 2228:2020 2187:PMID 2171:ISSN 2127:OCLC 2117:ISBN 2089:2012 2057:2014 2002:ISBN 1959:2016 1916:PMID 1884:2015 1859:2015 1833:2009 1807:2015 1778:2009 1705:2015 1680:2013 1655:Buck 1626:U.S. 1104:the 962:and 928:Dr. 107:S.E. 91:1000 82:more 74:U.S. 72:274 4771:Sex 3200:at 3099:274 3064:365 2803:410 2617:doi 2393:doi 2163:doi 2113:190 1904:", 1629:200 1622:274 1389:in 1385:'s 328:Law 77:200 5634:: 3170:, 3097:, 3066:, 3014:. 2989:. 2945:, 2925:, 2883:51 2881:. 2877:. 2843:^ 2775:. 2665:. 2661:. 2639:. 2631:. 2623:. 2613:33 2611:. 2607:. 2595:^ 2573:. 2562:^ 2536:. 2507:. 2501:. 2465:, 2444:^ 2417:. 2409:. 2399:. 2362:. 2358:. 2322:^ 2275:. 2249:. 2245:. 2218:. 2214:. 2199:^ 2185:. 2177:. 2169:. 2159:33 2157:. 2153:. 2139:^ 2125:. 2115:. 2079:. 2065:^ 2044:. 2040:. 2016:^ 1984:^ 1972:. 1949:. 1945:. 1935:; 1912:60 1910:, 1892:^ 1875:. 1850:. 1793:. 1769:, 1754:^ 1696:. 1662:^ 1536:. 1415:SS 1301:. 1120:. 1049:, 994:. 3246:e 3239:t 3232:v 3218:. 3047:. 3024:. 3001:. 2974:. 2892:. 2786:. 2761:. 2731:. 2677:. 2619:: 2589:. 2555:. 2531:" 2488:. 2476:. 2456:) 2425:. 2395:: 2374:. 2344:. 2316:. 2286:. 2261:. 2230:. 2165:: 2133:. 2091:. 2059:. 2010:. 1961:. 1886:. 1861:. 1835:. 1809:. 1707:. 1682:. 1510:' 810:e 803:t 796:v 739:" 735:" 85:) 79:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
Carrie Buck
State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded
U.S.
200
more
L. Ed.
S.E.
compulsory sterilization
Supreme Court of Virginia
William H. Taft
Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
Willis Van Devanter
James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis
George Sutherland
Pierce Butler
Edward T. Sanford
Harlan F. Stone
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Eugenics in
the United States


California
Minnesota
North Carolina
Oregon
Buck v. Bell
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Madrigal v. Quilligan

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑