826:. I put "citation" tags on several of the things you wrote because they are opinions without a source. Rather than simply deleting those tags, you need to provide the source for that information. I think this could be done in a couple of ways... one would be to say: "According to XXXXX," and give us the name of the documentary that made these assertions. Another would be to add a note or reference for the section and name the source. As it currently stands, these entries don't meet the wikipedia policies for
1361:
407:
1294:
1249:
1857:, if you feel strongly about it, you should initiate discussion on the talk page, rather than engaging in an edit war. My own suspicion is that this kind of content needs to be more developed than its current form for inclusion. BUT you cannot apply the results of a decision amongst the editors at Frank Oz, to the rest of wikipedia. If you do feel that those sections in other articles have copyright implications please do bring it up at the
1950:. As you point out, there are a fair number of these categories, and their numbers are increasing. That, in itself isn't a justification for creating more of them. I suspect a fair number, if not most of the awards categories should be deleted, and perhaps they will over time. You can choose to follow the guidelines or work counter to them. A better tact if you think the guideline is wrong, is to discuss changing it at
2127:
1087:
2033:. That policy page states that "Primary sources" includes "television programs", and that "Knowledge articles should rely mainly on published reliable secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources", and to the extent that any primary sources are used, the article must "make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source".
2045:'"Colleen was very upset, but was pleased when Sally pulled through. She now knows that Cassie is pregnant after telling Cassie that she's put on a little bit of weight and Cassie then went up to Colleen and said "Actually Mrs Smart I am pregnant." ... She was apprehensive about Cassie because she is HIV Positive at first, not being fully aware about it. Though at the same time sympathised with her.'
1637:
1478:
1142:
1050:
885:
280:
1410:
think that it had many problems, as does your recreation, but the problems are fixable. The main problem is that the things cited for each actor are not directly on point. If you are going to use quantity of awards, you should also cite an authority that makes the assertion that winning the most awards is significant. (
378:
326:
221:. I'm removing your entry because just receiving nominations does not make any film "the greatest". I suggest that you look over the history of the page, and the talk page to get a sense of what belongs and what doesn't. And if you happen to be that former user, I hope you are returning with a better attitude. --
648:
the remainder going into the main Dave the
Barbarian page. The page is short enough, with few enough items that it could easily be moved over; having a separate list of items is less helpful than integrating the information with individual pages as there is no information to link the separate sections together.
325:'s article Fan Reaction, if you're going to add fan-pairings around, you must be sure that those pairings are popular around the fandom as the one known as Kigo (Kim/Shego) is. The main reason for which Kigo is mentioned is because of it's notability, something you can easily prove by searching around
2106:
I have removed your category addition to the article regarding
Connolly being a naturalised citizen of Australia. There is nothing in the article to indicate this and I cannot find anything to back that up elsewhere. This information will not be accepted unless you can provide a reputable third-party
2049:
Please let me know which portion of
Knowledge policy you believe backs up your restoration of this unreferenced synthesis/original research to an article. Also, I will ignore your accusation of vandalism in your edit summary, but if you continue such disruptive and uncivil behaviour in the future you
2036:
The show sure can be used as a reliable source for descriptive claims (though preferably with specific inline citations to episode numbers, rather than just general reference to a show with thousands of episodes). However, most of the stuff I removed engaged in some ways in synthesis and speculation.
1615:
Hi, in this artticle, you recently said "would you all please stop deleting these" in the caption to a recent edit, referring to a number of mentions of Amblin that were "uncredited" on the films. On that basis, can you cite the sources from which you derive the information that they were actually
2167:
There was an IP – whose number is always changing, but always starts with '92.12 or 92.13' – who insists on including it even if he/she acknowledges it is a rumour. Maybe they'll edit irregularly and someone can swat them whenever they pop up (similarly, I'll never be able to block the person adding
632:
Also, it's not even linked to the main page, it's an orphan. There is no way to get to the page except by typing in exactly the correct page title. There's no redirects or links to other pages. It may not be a good choice for a page. How many items are there in the game? Is there really so many
1696:
I suggest that you stay away from the Amblin page for a while. Nobody seems to support your changes, and they have posted reasonable reasons for reverting you on the discussion page. You comments about being called a sockpuppet have no reason to be in an edit summary for an article. If anything,
647:
Please leave the orphan tag until more links are established to List of things in Dave the
Barbarian. It currently links to exactly one page, Dave the Barbarian, and is still considered orphaned. Also, consider merging the contents of the page into the individual episode pages if they exist, with
260:
on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in
Knowledge, please note that inserting spam into Knowledge is against policy. For more information about me, see
2239:
is, as two other editors have already stated there, faulty and makes a leap of original research/synthesis on your part. The fact that you believe what your surmise from a documentary indicates something is nowhere near the level of proof demanded of challenged claims on
Knowledge. If you add back
1409:
I've restored the history of the page and moved it to a shared user-space that I've created for lists such as this one. I believe that the page could be improved enough so that it might survive in the main-space. You might recall, that I argued to keep the page when it was on AFD. However, I do
666:
has recorded a voice over part for Dave the
Barbarian, and for the second time it has been removed. IMDb is not a reliable source, as anyone can add information there, be it true or not. If you can find any (reliable) cite that says this happened, or that this episode he supposedly recorded aired,
2243:
I also notice from your contributions that you have again been accusing people of "vandalism" when you disagree with their editorial actions. Let me refresh your memory about what I wrote earlier in the month: "if you continue such disruptive and uncivil behaviour in the future you may be blocked
1218:
Any way I interpret "Save it for your retarded ku klux klan meetings" it reads as a personal attack. If the editor is a KKK supporter the comment calls him retarded for his beliefs. If the editor is not a KKK supporter the comment calls him a retard and adds the possible insult that he is a KKK
856:
to use an oscar nomination or win to be a citation for a film being the "best" of a genre. I don't think this is a "retarded" idea, rather, I think it is keeping with the policies that make
Knowledge successful. If you think it is a bad idea, the appropriate response is a note on the discussion
800:
Hello. You re-added Steve Martin to the
Casting section of the above article, with the explanation that he "revealed in his book that he also auditioned for the role and he desperately wanted it". Which book is this supposed to be in? Martin doesn't appear to be mentioned in executive producer
387:
You can't base your contributions on
Knowledge acording to just what some little kids says, information in Knowledge must be sourced from either another website or some other media, like a book or a novel (In case we're talking about facts of fictional characters). Considering this, I can't allow
2028:
Hello. In your recent restorations of unreferenced material to the character articles, you mentioned in some edit summaries that the material is allowed by the "Knowledge rulebook". Could you please point to the specific parts of the policy to which you're referring? For reference, the part of
1678:. Next time you would like assistance from and admin, please leave links to the history diffs that are examples of the problem you want dealt with, and check that your links work. It took me some time to find the User you wanted me to look at, because you had misspelled the link. --
1209:
There is an implication that the editor is a member of the Klu Klux Klan, which to many people would be very insulting. If you had knowledge that the editor was a member of the KKK, it would not be wrong to mention that, but in that case point #3 would have been more of an
1418:. I suggest that you be more careful with your edit comments, especially when you are doing something that is bound to be controversial (like recreating a deleted page). Implying that people are hypocrites will not help you make friends and influence people. --
251:
from Knowledge. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. Please read
2247:
Finally, have you found the policy which backs you up in relation to the Home and Away character articles yet? Last chance to find me some specific references, otherwise I'll go through and revert them back down to the stub versions in the next day or two. -
1564:. This is because it is seemingly a completely arbitrary selection with no apparent basis. You seem to have a habit of doing this and I advise you to read our policy on what is a reliable source otherwise you will be blocked for your disruptive editing. --
1697:
the comments make you look more guilty of the accusation. Your edits are becoming disruptive. If you revert the Amblin page again, without first having built a strong consensus for your change on the discussion page, you will be asking for a block. --
1415:
1436:
Yes I do remember you arguing it for it to be kept, you were one of the few, and I agree it does need to be improved and trust me I promise to keep a very closeful eye on the page to make it as less POV as films considered the greatest ever.
1309:
2234:
article, and restored movies to the article which are disputed by another editor and for which specific, reliable and verifiable sources have been requested. The rationale for their inclusion which you previously provided on the article's
365:
Well that's what the kids in the pre-school class I teach keep telling me (Dave The Barbarian is married to Kim Possible), and I believe another user has tried to put Dave as one of the love interests. So would that count as fan-fic?
999:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
355:'s article. I'm not going to give you all the time of the world 'cause I can't allow irrelevant and probably fake information to be shown like that. Either you prove that that paragraph is worth mentioning or I'll remove it soon. --
2240:
this material again without providing any new justification or source supporting your claim, then I will consider your behaviour disruptive to the encyclopedia and either protect the article from editing or block you from editing.
1530:
Edge's claim is not that notable. When he was feuding with Cena for the WWE Championship in summer/fall 2006, he claimed that he was undefeated in TLC matches (even though that was false, he and Christian lost TLC III).
381:
and you'll find what Kigo (Kim/Shego) Fics are. Other than that, I haven't found any Kim/Junior or Kim/Dave material, specially because Kim and Dave are from differents series! (And, as far as I know, differents in much
622:
for what wikipedia is not - it's not an indiscriminate collection of information, so lists of things in video games usually aren't considered particularly encyclopedic; they're better embedded in the main page's text.
2008:
and in edit summaries. Also neither of you have ever responded to my attempts at discussion on the articles talk page, is there a reason for that? Perhaps if you explain why your edits don't need any sources, i might
1368:
1256:
1242:
428:
I hate to do this, but you're acting against what's been decided and without giving any valid policy, and opinions only count in the Talk Pages. So please start acting like a good wikipedian or I'll have to report.
1903:
Whoops, sorry about that, it was an honest mistake as my first revert came at the same time as the one reverting vandalisim, I thought you were being a smart arse who was reverting the page back to its vandalisim.
1264:
1301:
1287:
574:
episode articles pretty much fit the guidelines mentioned above). Therefore, I have reverted those articles back to redirects. Please do not restore them unless you can make them fit Knowledge's policies.
237:
336:
I'm not going to remove that just yet, but rather give you time to either prove it's notability or remove it yourself. At any rate, if you have something to say, I'd rather you discuss it in the article's
1205:
Perhaps the ambiguously posted "Racist!" could have been meant to be a comment about the edit and not the editor, but considering the rest of the comments, it reads as an attack -- calling the editor a
1240:
582:
back to the main article. I note that you say you are going to expand it, and feel free to restore it when you do that, but until then it is only duplicating the information in the main article.
1285:
235:
566:
for guidelines on when individual TV episode articles may be notable, and what those articles should contain. The fact that individual articles exist for other TV programs isn't a factor (see
1792:
your stock you puted on the page is way too political and not enough science fiction, I would say and I suspect. We all know politics has many allure but does it make it science fiction?
1124:
Well if that's the way you want to put it, what you did to my talk page is considered vandalisim. If you've seen the way Carl treats Johnny in the show you'll see he's obsessed with him --
1414:
also has this problem in the Academy Award section.) If the article improves enough, I would be willing to be an advocate for its return to the main-space. For now, you can find it at
1926:
1942:
as the result of discussions. They are created, and then if objected to, a discussion decides if they should be deleted. If you object to the decision to delete you can bring it to
919:
1722:
and the Indiana Jones series, please stop adding them to the article. Also, your recent blind revert removed some valid info and formatting. Please be more careful in the future.
1775:
is because ILM had some involvement with the special effects. Amblin still didn't produce those movies, nor did they produce Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.
996:
333:, and as far as I'm concerned, those pairings are nowhere as popular as Kigo. Including minor notable fan-pairings like that is what could turn the article into a fan-site.
1280:
1325:
755:
Hehe, funny though, I never saw this in any other reliable source. Still, you struck gold! Next time though, always refer to people by their surname, not "Ted and Terry".
495:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
269:
1998:, and until sources exist i must revert their addition. These common themes you are claiming don't appear in sources i checked, like the Encylopedia of Science fiction.
1146:
1134:
2134:
2004:, the core policy i was referring too. And consensus with that particular user does nothing to convince me, after the offensive and incoherent msges he leaves on my
961:
914:
2142:
1026:. It is alright to discuss why you disagree with an edit. It is not alright to call someone a "retard". If you continue you will be blocked from editing. --
538:
1861:
for central discussion, blatting those articles without discussion is trying to create a wheel war - and I doubt if continuation of it will be tolerated. It's
2060:
Are you planning at all on answering me? If you can't provide a specific reference to policy to back up your claims, I'll go through and revert your edits. -
1834:
in a film is not in itself an infringement of intellectual property. Such large scale deletions should be discussed beforehand. If necessary take up it up at
132:
120:
2198:
Second, please stop re-creating the category. Just because a character may decide to call themself a lord or lady, doesn't mean we should categorise by it.
1865:
and disruptive. Take a break, think about some substance and referenced content for that Oz article - and discuss the matter with the other editors. Thanks
1826:, amongst others, claiming 'a breach of trademark'. I think a single question would be apposite - where is this 'registered as a trademark'? To comment on
957:
262:
905:
458:. This allows readers to seek out and verify the information on their own. Claiming it was said in some documentary in an edit summary causes it to fail
136:
116:
2121:
128:
1759:
1502:
526:
511:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
768:
718:
Please stop with the edit war you are currently engaged in on the Hall of Fame page. If this matter persist you may be blocked from editing wikipedia.
2038:
1651:. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
899:. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
1335:
He is still a SmackDown superstar, he just appears on RAW occasionally. It's the same with Ric Flair, he is still technically a SmackDown wrestler.
1954:. You might first read the discussions that led to the creation of the guideline in the first place, to help you understand why we created it. --
1162:
266:
1602:
2157:
809:
393:
Please, next time you decide to contribute in some article, make sure to talk in said article's Talk Page before attemting some major changes. --
903:
please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --
330:
157:
to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1874:
1222:
I appreciate the motivation of not wanting racist comments made. However, even the worst, most offensive actions require a civil response. --
244:
1731:
1664:
359:
1778:
838:
759:
736:
413:
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Knowledge, as you did to
351:
I've been looking around ff.net, DeviantART and other sites, but yet I haven't found ANY mention about fanfics likes the one you stated in
1847:
792:
2079:
1946:. Looking at the previous discussion to delete, I would concur with the decision to delete. The overcategorization guideline clearly
1933:
1187:
741:
Austereo doesn't give out transcripts of the interviews, they're not even able for purchase, don't why but it's their strange policy.
2054:
817:
2089:
2023:
1234:
849:
696:
Guild has nothing to do with casting. If it was real it wouldn't be so hard to find even one other cite for the episode existing.«»
2064:
1430:
1169:
707:
1817:
197:
1709:
1655:
please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.
1213:
The use of the word "retarded" implies that the editor is a retard. This is exactly the word I had concerns about twice before.
1157:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
2213:
1889:
1630:
1466:
1197:
952:
until you provide a source and justify why this information belongs on the page. You may wish to familiarize yourself with our
516:
1980:
1773:
I'm guessing the reason why there were clips for Splash, Forrest Gump and the first two Terminator movies in that documentary
433:
397:
345:
2018:
1446:
1625:
1403:
200:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
2252:
1966:
727:
722:
286:
Welcome to Knowledge. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without
1994:
that the themes you are adding the the page are common and well-known, but i simply disagree. Hence the onus is on you to
857:
page explaining your reasons. It does not help to call people retards. Please familiarize yourself with our policies on
1751:
1004:
604:
1898:
967:
926:
548:
2186:
2116:
1811:
1616:
involved - I find it surprising that Amblin should do such work and NOT be acknowledged on the film credits. regards,
1520:
1411:
1119:
1081:
218:
2181:
1575:
1481:
Thanks for experimenting with Knowledge. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been
311:
211:
Also, you should know that there is a history of a former user being blocked because of his behavior regarding adding
2227:
2224:
1913:
1595:
678:
1355:
1350:
1128:
873:
1133:
2005:
1038:
1918:
1387:
520:
496:
2218:
1985:
1648:
1494:
586:
1744:
Stay away from the Amblin page! If you continue to change the page again, I will suggest to get you blocked!
652:
473:
1807:
1546:
1150:
338:
230:
181:
1608:
637:
627:
316:
166:
154:
2148:
1886:
1690:
2206:
492:
1727:
831:
702:
673:
567:
468:
291:
274:
124:
94:
43:
1675:
1015:
2236:
2138:
1391:
1382:
1305:
1260:
1158:
1112:
972:
500:
422:
186:
2177:
2141:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
1652:
1641:
1490:
1376:
1308:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
1263:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
1193:
And what exactly did I do wrong, I didn't do any personal attacks on any person just ku klux klan--
1104:
900:
889:
843:
827:
732:
I'd like to review that statement. Could you give me a proper transcript of that interview please?
657:
579:
452:
414:
352:
322:
287:
585:
Another idea might be to expand the list of episodes with a quick summary of each one, a bit like
507:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
1919:
1787:
1755:
1660:
1644:
1570:
1486:
892:
459:
226:
2095:
1880:
1471:
1310:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Television series considered the greatest ever (2nd nomination)
1009:
794:
719:
599:
161:
83:
32:
1489:
in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
1723:
1589:
1043:
295:
193:
993:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
989:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
2231:
1870:
1843:
1795:
1747:
1609:
1320:
982:
782:
747:
553:
478:
1581:
Equally, Outpost Gallifrey isn't a reliable source. You must list where THEy got it from.
558:
I redirected the episode articles because they are not notable on their own. Please read
8:
2173:
1951:
1930:
1893:
1330:
1100:
1058:
978:
878:
823:
765:
756:
733:
213:
201:
69:
2112:
2075:
1976:
1909:
1656:
1565:
1539:
1513:
1462:
1442:
1343:
1274:
1014:
Less than two weeks after calling me "retarded", you call another editor "a retard" in
931:
806:
642:
448:
176:
2172:'s article, but whenever they surface every few weeks or so I immediately undo them).
2030:
1995:
1803:
1621:
1498:
1074:
713:
591:
559:
508:
438:
299:
27:
2014:
2001:
1823:
1585:
1551:
1505:
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.
956:
for fiction-related articles, as well, as many of your edits violate it. Thanks, —
17:
563:
2169:
2162:
1947:
1866:
1862:
1839:
1451:
Please don't add links to your userspace re-creation in the article namespace to
1399:
1314:
1265:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever
1054:
1023:
858:
609:
257:
1175:
I've warned you twice about this very thing. I'm blocking you for 24 hours. --
2192:
2096:
1718:
Unless you can provide sources for your claims that Amblin produced films like
1669:
1482:
1166:
1116:
1078:
1070:
1066:
1062:
835:
615:
571:
512:
430:
394:
373:
No, it doesn't. Fanfics means a writting history about the shown. Check around
356:
342:
248:
90:
39:
2154:
2108:
2103:
1943:
1858:
1835:
1534:
1508:
1457:
1452:
1338:
1269:
1019:
953:
667:
please share it, but until then it won't be allowed to stay in the article.«»
619:
484:
307:
171:
1955:
1799:
1698:
1679:
1617:
1561:
1525:
1419:
1372:
1223:
1176:
1053:
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
1027:
1001:
945:
862:
853:
488:
253:
2071:
2010:
1972:
1905:
1438:
1194:
1125:
941:
777:
742:
367:
1390:. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent
1360:
406:
341:
or reply here, I'll keep track of you so I'll know when you'll reply. --
1557:
1395:
1293:
1248:
949:
937:
374:
2070:
Yeah I am, calm down, I'm still looking for the specific references --
2249:
2210:
2086:
2061:
2051:
990:
896:
697:
668:
663:
662:
For the second time in as many weeks you have added information that
463:
444:
1073:
before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
773:
According one of the hosts, Camilla, all of them, but I heard it on
243:
Thank you for contributing to Knowledge, AKR619! However, your edit
74:
2126:
1959:
1854:
1702:
1683:
1423:
1227:
1180:
1086:
1031:
866:
649:
634:
624:
303:
302:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--
222:
1375:. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an
1416:
User:Wikilists/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever
1065:. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
618:
to format your posts for readability. You may also want to see
256:
for more information. If the link was to an image, please read
1636:
1477:
1141:
1049:
995:
884:
279:
204:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
986:
523:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
1371:
which previously was deleted in accordance with Knowledge's
977:
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
852:. I happen to be one of the people who decided that it was
515:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
774:
685:
2209:(where the rest of the "lords and ladies" are already). -
981:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
503:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
72:
to this revision, which may differ significantly from the
1485:
or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be
247:
was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
2029:
Knowledge policy which I believe supports my actions is
1501:
for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the
948:
sources. I will continue to remove the information from
822:
Thanks for your comments on Aladdin in the entry on the
1929:, which is why it's being deleted after you create it.
633:
that it couldn't be a bulleted list in the main page?
208:
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
2143:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lula's First Barbarian
1022:. Knowledge only functions if everyone behaves with
2230:
you removed a factual accuracy dispute tag from the
1367:
You have recently recreated or reposted material at
936:
Please stop adding unsourced, nonsense edits to the
2133:An article that you have been involved in editing,
1300:An article that you have been involved in editing,
1255:An article that you have been involved in editing,
2037:Here is an example from the stuff you restored to
785:comment was added at 10:10, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
750:comment was added at 10:00, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
1369:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever
1257:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever
1243:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever
801:Phil Segal's own book on the making of the film,
491:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
1165:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
940:page. All edits to Knowledge must be sourced to
2205:nobility, then they should be categoried under
1302:Television series considered the greatest ever
1288:Television series considered the greatest ever
238:Television Shows Considered The Greatest Ever
1599:
1592:
1582:
192:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
103:
82:Revision as of 11:13, 26 October 2008 by
58:
2122:AfD nomination of Lula's First Barbarian
2000:Incidentally, consensus doesn't overide
1556:Your addition of the "icons" website to
1493:or discuss the changes on the article's
1069:or discuss the changes on the article's
53:
2195:before accusing others of "vandalism".
1925:This category was deleted by consensus
81:
14:
1386:from editing. We ask that you respect
294:is not consistent with our policy on
50:
31:
1948:tries to limit categories for awards
1560:has been reverted, as this is not a
23:
2191:First of all, You may wish to read
524:
388:that paragraph to be there anymore.
219:Films considered the greatest ever
145:
114:
2125:
1885:Um, look at the diff of your edit
1640:Please do not add content without
1412:Films considered the greatest ever
1359:
1292:
1247:
1085:
888:Please do not add content without
570:). Also, you will notice that the
532:
405:
278:
146:
2263:
1781:(talk) 11:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
818:Aladdin & 1992 Academy Awards
540:
527:
254:Knowledge's external links policy
68:. The present address (URL) is a
2024:Home and Away character articles
1635:
1497:before making them. Please use
1476:
1145:With regard to your comments on
1140:
1048:
994:
883:
447:is/was going to be the voice of
2050:may be blocked from editing. -
1963:
1818:Themes, plot devices and motifs
1706:
1687:
1427:
1275:
1270:
1231:
1184:
1035:
870:
600:
595:
592:
2019:11:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1981:09:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1967:09:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1934:08:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1890:WP:Don't template the regulars
1649:The Little Mermaid (1989 film)
1631:The Little Mermaid (1989 film)
1540:
1535:
1514:
1509:
1344:
1339:
1198:23:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
1188:18:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
1170:01:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
1129:03:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
1120:01:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
1082:01:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
1039:06:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
1005:05:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
968:11:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
927:01:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
13:
1:
1888:, and you might want to skim
1521:08:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
1467:11:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1461:
1447:08:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1431:08:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
1404:08:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
874:23:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
839:12:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
810:08:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
684:Stop it. As it states on the
578:Similarly, I have redirected
296:attribution and verifiability
162:The five pillars of Knowledge
2253:11:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
2214:12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
2182:09:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
2158:08:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1822:You deleted this section in
1760:22:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
1326:18:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
728:The Curse of the Black Pearl
487:}}" template to the article
182:How to write a great article
7:
2207:Category:Fictional nobility
2117:12:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
2090:02:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
2080:02:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
2065:02:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
2055:12:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1938:Categories are not usually
1914:06:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1899:06:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
1875:09:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
1848:09:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
1732:00:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
1351:06:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
1281:03:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1235:07:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
1057:. Your edits appear to be
769:10:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
760:10:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
737:09:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
723:17:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
708:01:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
692:credits. Nothing more. The
679:01:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
501:Knowledge's deletion policy
30:of this page, as edited by
10:
2268:
2187:Fictional lords and ladies
1491:cite references or sources
1067:cite references or sources
653:13:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
638:13:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
628:13:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
451:without putting an actual
434:16:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
398:12:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
360:03:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
346:11:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
312:15:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
270:08:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
258:Knowledge's image tutorial
231:07:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
101:
56:
2151:of receiving this notice?
1859:media copyright questions
1812:06:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
1691:06:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1665:12:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1626:13:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1547:03:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
1149:: Please see Knowledge's
1103:Knowledge, as you did to
605:15:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
513:proposed deletion process
2168:copyright violations to
1710:19:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
1653:Knowledge:Citing sources
1603:10:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1576:05:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1147:User talk:121.221.92.148
1135:User talk:121.221.92.148
1105:Johnny Bravo (character)
901:Knowledge:Citing sources
803:Doctor Who: Regeneration
764:Hang on, which station?
580:Johnny Bravo (character)
549:22:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
517:speedy deletion criteria
443:Please stop adding that
415:Kim Possible (character)
1920:Category:Disney Legends
1161:for disruption. Please
795:Doctor Who (1996 film)
474:01:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
460:Knowledge:Verifiability
2137:, has been listed for
2135:Lula's First Barbarian
2130:
1990:I understand that you
1986:science fiction themes
1364:
1356:Recreating AfD'd pages
1304:, has been listed for
1297:
1259:, has been listed for
1252:
1090:
1018:. Please stop making
410:
377:. If you check around
283:
104:→Amblin Entertainment
59:→Amblin Entertainment
51:11:13, 26 October 2008
2129:
1453:avoid self-references
1388:what Knowledge is not
1363:
1296:
1251:
1089:
850:this comment you made
521:Articles for Deletion
519:or it can be sent to
497:What Knowledge is not
409:
298:. Take a look at the
282:
2232:Amblin Entertainment
2219:Amblin Entertainment
2031:No original research
1610:Amblin Entertainment
688:, the WGA furnishes
616:talk page guidelines
317:Kim Possible article
1153:policy. Comment on
1151:no personal attacks
848:I don't appreciate
824:65th Academy Awards
568:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
236:Regarding edits to
214:Aladdin (1992 film)
202:Knowledge:Questions
153:Hello, AKR619, and
121:← Previous revision
2131:
1853:You are on 3RR on
1365:
1298:
1286:AfD nomination of
1253:
1241:AfD nomination of
1099:The next time you
1091:
783:signed but undated
748:signed but undated
483:I have added a "{{
449:Dave the Barbarian
411:
284:
275:John Candy article
167:How to edit a page
2152:
2085:Still looking? -
1814:
1798:comment added by
1784:Please remember!
1750:comment added by
1373:deletion policies
1324:
1016:this edit comment
973:Your recent edits
964:
854:original research
786:
751:
720:Wrestlinglover420
545:
493:proposed deletion
2259:
2146:
1965:
1824:Alfred Hitchcock
1793:
1762:
1724:TheRealFennShysa
1708:
1689:
1647:, as you did to
1645:reliable sources
1639:
1601:
1594:
1584:
1573:
1568:
1544:
1542:
1537:
1518:
1516:
1511:
1480:
1465:
1429:
1348:
1346:
1341:
1318:
1277:
1272:
1267:. Thank you. --
1233:
1186:
1144:
1052:
1037:
1020:personal attacks
998:
962:
925:
917:
912:
909:
895:, as you did to
893:reliable sources
887:
872:
844:Your comments...
807:Mark H Wilkinson
781:—The preceding
780:
746:—The preceding
745:
686:WGA page of IMDb
658:John Cena, again
614:Please read the
601:
597:
594:
547:
544:
539:
536:
531:
506:
207:
133:Newer revision →
111:
109:
107:
98:
77:
75:current revision
67:
66:
64:
62:
52:
48:
47:
18:User talk:AKR619
2267:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2244:from editing".
2221:
2189:
2170:Peter Sanderson
2165:
2147:Do you want to
2124:
2100:
2039:Colleen Stewart
2026:
1988:
1944:Deletion Review
1931:Good Ol’factory
1923:
1883:
1820:
1790:
1788:science fiction
1770:Remember this?
1745:
1672:
1633:
1613:
1571:
1566:
1562:reliable source
1554:
1533:
1528:
1507:
1474:
1392:deletion review
1358:
1337:
1333:
1291:
1246:
1138:
1115:from editing.
1055:Anthony Carelli
1046:
1012:
985:by typing four
983:sign your posts
975:
954:manual of style
934:
918:
913:
907:
904:
881:
846:
832:reliable source
820:
798:
730:
716:
705:
676:
660:
645:
612:
556:
504:
481:
471:
441:
425:from editing.
319:
292:reliable source
277:
241:
205:
187:Manual of Style
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
125:Latest revision
113:
112:
102:
99:
88:
86:
73:
57:
54:
37:
35:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2265:
2220:
2217:
2188:
2185:
2174:Alientraveller
2164:
2161:
2145:. Thank you.
2123:
2120:
2099:
2097:Billy Connolly
2094:
2093:
2092:
2068:
2067:
2047:
2046:
2025:
2022:
1999:
1987:
1984:
1922:
1917:
1882:
1881:Robin Williams
1879:
1878:
1877:
1819:
1816:
1789:
1786:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1720:The Terminator
1713:
1712:
1671:
1668:
1632:
1629:
1612:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1553:
1550:
1527:
1524:
1473:
1472:WWE Armageddon
1470:
1434:
1433:
1357:
1354:
1332:
1329:
1312:. Thank you.
1290:
1284:
1245:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1207:
1191:
1190:
1137:
1132:
1098:
1061:and have been
1045:
1042:
1011:
1010:Second warning
1008:
974:
971:
933:
930:
880:
877:
845:
842:
819:
816:
814:
797:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
771:
766:Alientraveller
757:Alientraveller
734:Alientraveller
729:
726:
715:
712:
711:
710:
701:
672:
659:
656:
644:
641:
611:
608:
572:Drawn Together
555:
552:
505:{{dated prod}}
480:
477:
467:
440:
437:
403:
401:
400:
390:
389:
384:
383:
363:
362:
327:Fanfiction.net
321:Regarding the
318:
315:
276:
273:
240:
234:
198:sign your name
190:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
84:
70:permanent link
33:
22:
21:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2264:
2255:
2254:
2251:
2245:
2241:
2238:
2233:
2229:
2226:
2216:
2215:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2150:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2128:
2119:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2105:
2098:
2091:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2066:
2063:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2053:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2040:
2034:
2032:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2007:
2003:
1997:
1993:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1969:
1968:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1936:
1935:
1932:
1928:
1921:
1916:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1901:
1900:
1897:
1896:
1891:
1887:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1838:. Thank you.
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1815:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1752:67.149.21.173
1749:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1711:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:I've replied
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1643:
1638:
1628:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1611:
1604:
1597:
1591:
1587:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1563:
1559:
1549:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1538:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1512:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1432:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1378:
1377:administrator
1374:
1370:
1362:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1342:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1295:
1289:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1273:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1250:
1244:
1236:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1189:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1143:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1096:
1093:This is your
1088:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1077:. Thank you.
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1044:More warnings
1041:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1007:
1006:
1003:
997:
992:
988:
984:
980:
970:
969:
965:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
929:
928:
924:
922:
916:
911:
910:
902:
898:
894:
891:
886:
876:
875:
869:
868:
864:
860:
855:
851:
841:
840:
837:
833:
829:
825:
815:
812:
811:
808:
804:
796:
793:Steve Martin/
784:
779:
776:
772:
770:
767:
763:
762:
761:
758:
754:
753:
752:
749:
744:
739:
738:
735:
725:
724:
721:
709:
704:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
655:
654:
651:
640:
639:
636:
630:
629:
626:
621:
617:
607:
606:
603:
602:
598:
588:
583:
581:
576:
573:
569:
565:
561:
551:
550:
546:
543:
542:(talk to me!)
537:
535:
530:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:its talk page
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
476:
475:
470:
465:
461:
457:
454:
450:
446:
436:
435:
432:
426:
424:
420:
416:
408:
404:
399:
396:
392:
391:
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
361:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
334:
332:
328:
324:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
281:
272:
271:
268:
264:
259:
255:
250:
246:
239:
233:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
209:
203:
199:
195:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
159:
158:
156:
151:
150:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
105:
96:
92:
87:
80:
79:
76:
71:
60:
45:
41:
36:
29:
19:
2246:
2242:
2222:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2190:
2166:
2132:
2101:
2069:
2048:
2035:
2027:
1991:
1989:
1971:Thank you --
1970:
1958:
1939:
1937:
1924:
1902:
1894:
1884:
1831:
1827:
1821:
1791:
1783:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1719:
1701:
1682:
1673:
1634:
1614:
1555:
1532:
1529:
1506:
1503:welcome page
1475:
1456:
1450:
1435:
1422:
1380:
1366:
1336:
1334:
1319:
1313:
1299:
1268:
1254:
1226:
1192:
1179:
1154:
1139:
1123:
1108:
1095:last warning
1094:
1092:
1047:
1030:
1013:
976:
935:
920:
906:
882:
865:
847:
821:
813:
802:
799:
740:
731:
717:
693:
689:
661:
646:
631:
613:
590:
584:
577:
557:
554:Johnny Bravo
541:
533:
528:
489:Howy Parkins
482:
479:Howy Parkins
455:
442:
427:
418:
412:
402:
364:
353:Kim Possible
335:
323:Kim Possible
320:
300:welcome page
285:
242:
212:
210:
191:
152:
148:
147:
28:old revision
25:
24:
1794:—Preceding
1746:—Preceding
1586:TreasuryTag
1499:the sandbox
1381:you may be
1331:Hornswoggle
778:User:AKR619
743:User:AKR619
564:WP:NOT#PLOT
456:on the page
368:User:AKR619
263:my FAQ page
108:new section
63:new section
26:This is an
1996:WP:proveit
1964:uelWantman
1867:Kbthompson
1840:Kbthompson
1779:Gabrielkat
1707:uelWantman
1688:uelWantman
1558:Doctor Who
1487:verifiable
1428:uelWantman
1232:uelWantman
1185:uelWantman
1036:uelWantman
979:talk pages
950:Daffy Duck
942:verifiable
938:Daffy Duck
932:Daffy Duck
908:ThinkBlue
871:uelWantman
643:Orphan tag
593:Eliminator
589:. Thanks,
560:WP:EPISODE
331:DeviantART
265:. Thanks!
206:{{helpme}}
194:Wikipedian
172:Help pages
2237:talk page
2006:talk page
2002:WP:verify
1895:Gimmetrow
1832:signature
1495:talk page
1167:Tiggerjay
1163:stay cool
1117:Tiggerjay
1101:vandalize
1079:Tiggerjay
1071:talk page
1059:vandalism
991:Shift key
897:John Cena
879:John Cena
836:Anson2995
714:Vandalism
664:John Cena
587:this page
445:John Cena
439:John Cena
431:Alexlayer
395:Alexlayer
357:Alexlayer
343:Alexlayer
339:Talk Page
267:Shadowbot
196:! Please
2201:If they
2155:sgeureka
2139:deletion
2109:23skidoo
2107:source.
1863:WP:POINT
1855:Frank Oz
1808:contribs
1796:unsigned
1748:unsigned
1596:contribs
1552:May 2008
1483:reverted
1306:deletion
1261:deletion
1063:reverted
1024:civility
946:reliable
859:civility
177:Tutorial
149:Welcome!
95:contribs
44:contribs
2193:WP:VAND
2163:Pirates
2149:opt out
1992:believe
1952:WT:OCAT
1940:created
1800:Despres
1657:Annie D
1618:Lynbarn
1567:Rodhull
1383:blocked
1219:member.
1210:attack.
1206:racist.
1155:content
1113:blocked
1075:sandbox
1002:SineBot
694:Writers
690:writing
610:WP:TALK
423:blocked
225:uel Wan
155:welcome
2104:WP:BLP
2072:AKR619
2011:Yobmod
2009:agree?
1973:AKR619
1906:AKR619
1836:WP:MCQ
1670:Amblin
1642:citing
1572:andemu
1458:Graham
1439:AKR619
1271:Reaper
1195:AKR619
1159:blocks
1126:AKR619
1107:, you
987:tildes
890:citing
861:. --
828:citing
620:WP:NOT
529:irides
499:" and
417:, you
382:ways).
288:citing
2228:edits
2225:these
1828:motif
1541:Spyke
1515:Spyke
1396:tgies
1345:Spyke
958:Brian
703:stalk
674:stalk
534:centi
469:stalk
16:<
2250:Mark
2211:jc37
2178:talk
2113:talk
2102:Per
2087:Mark
2076:talk
2062:Mark
2052:Mark
2015:talk
1977:talk
1927:here
1910:talk
1871:talk
1844:talk
1830:and
1804:talk
1756:talk
1728:talk
1676:here
1661:talk
1622:talk
1590:talk
1526:WM23
1443:talk
1400:talk
1321:talk
1109:will
963:talk
921:BLUE
915:(Hit
805:. --
775:b105
562:and
485:prod
453:cite
419:will
379:here
375:here
308:talk
249:spam
245:here
229:man
137:diff
131:) |
129:diff
117:diff
91:talk
85:Mark
40:talk
34:Mark
2223:In
2203:are
1960:Sam
1703:Sam
1684:Sam
1424:Sam
1394:.
1379:or
1315:Bob
1228:Sam
1181:Sam
1111:be
1032:Sam
867:Sam
650:WLU
635:WLU
625:WLU
525:—
462:.«»
421:be
329:or
304:Vbd
223:Sam
217:to
49:at
2180:)
2153:–
2115:)
2078:)
2041::
2017:)
1979:)
1956:☑
1912:)
1904:--
1892:.
1873:)
1846:)
1810:)
1806:•
1758:)
1730:)
1699:☑
1680:☑
1663:)
1624:)
1600:─╢
1583:╟─
1536:TJ
1510:TJ
1463:87
1455:.
1445:)
1437:--
1420:☑
1402:)
1340:TJ
1224:☑
1177:☑
1097:.
1028:☑
1000:--
966:)
944:,
863:☑
834:.
830:a
706:)
700:(
698:bd
677:)
671:(
669:bd
596:JR
472:)
466:(
464:bd
429:--
310:)
290:a
123:|
119:)
106::
93:|
61::
42:|
2176:(
2111:(
2074:(
2013:(
1975:(
1908:(
1869:(
1842:(
1802:(
1777:-
1754:(
1726:(
1659:(
1620:(
1598:)
1593:╬
1588:(
1441:(
1398:(
1276:X
960:(
923:)
306:(
227:t
139:)
135:(
127:(
115:(
110:)
100:(
97:)
89:(
78:.
65:)
55:(
46:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.