Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

10494:

living people terrorists and murderers, he refuses to accept the result, announces he has won, forks the discussion to re-propose the exact same thing again and again edit wars BLP vios on the affected articles in the middle of the RfC discussion to the point where one is protected and another currently in a state of edit warring. This continues a months-long campaign of BLP vios, edit warring, game playing to the point of bad faith, personal attacks, incivilities, fabricated complaints against other editors, and dozens and dozens of rejected proposals all on a single POV point. It may not be too late to simply close the RfC as no consensus, revert the edits he has warred into place, and start an RfC or other behavioral process from there if he does not comply. But he obviously is not complying with consensus or our behavioral policies, and he is demonstrating a propensity for messing up RfCs, so that time is probably now. There are 2-3 other editors of dubious legitimacy and an equal number of new SPAs making the same point who will probably show up here or anywhere else we try to deal with them, and who themselves probably should be dealt with as well.

5674:

striking. Another possibility (though it takes a few estra edits) is to include a link to the diff of the comment being removed or replaced (that raises the same concerns as leaving stuff visible, though it places stuff a click away, though it does reassure those who want to make sure that you didn't remove more than you needed to). Finally, to ensure that the subthread doesn't end up not being replied to, leave Raul a talk page message explaining what you did and repeating your apologies and your offer for him to remove the whole subthread. You can even add a link back in the subthread saying "Raul notified of this offer". That way, if Raul doesn't follow up, but choses to leave the subthread in open view, people know that is his choice, not just yours. Yet another alternative (I saw SandyGeorgia do this recently) is to put off-topic or distracting parts of a thread in a collapse box, though sometimes this backfires and draws

2805:

question but, rather, a series of accusations against Catherineyronwode disguised as a question. By calling it a POV push in the heading, Zero1328 set the tone right at the beginning. Then, to continue with this 'question', Zero1328 wrote that Catherineyronwode and her husband (user Self-ref who also edits Knowledge) have: "written several, long essays all over the place, disruptively edited, and have generally had a disregard for policies." That does not sound like a question, does it? Then user Dave Souza wrote a series of answers to this question, the answers amounting to little more than slinging mud in the direction of Catherineyronwode. For instance, Dave Souza's first answer to Zero1328 said "A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing Knowledge, it would seem." No content, just accusation, which is what I would call mud slinging. With this analysis, I have am trying to wipe off the mud.

3160:) abused so as to support quick reduction to stubs of that with which a hostile editor-shooter does not agree. I would like to emphasize that "editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references" and i think hostile cite-tagging and hostile category-tagging are not supporting a helpful reference source for Knowledge readers based on its policy support of effacement of esoteric topics under assault by critical POVs seeking intrusive showcasing where they do not belong." mean this to you? I can tell you that the practice to which i refer has me writing elsewhere than Knowledge. I know others for whom this is true, and some who seem to be about to transit to that activity also. I don't think driving away writers is what is best for Knowledge, do you? 3234:

silent, does this mean that there is a consensus, or that the category has been abandoned, or what? I hear your direction to "persuade a lot of people" before i start implementing my ideas of it. I thought the best course was to have a conversation about the implementation, and then implement what was hammered out in the Talk page. How long should i wait in silence unopposed to my arguments for these subcategories' exclusion before i begin implementing that? Should i wait 3 weeks and then begin implementing those which aren't covered by the policy arbitration first, referring to those who object to my edits to engage discussion on the category page instead of engaging in an edit war with me? You're an admin here, dave, surely you know the best procedure. Thank you for your assistance.

10680:

like Flatterworld, a 2-year editor with 10,000+ mainspace contributions to 3,800+ articles. We are growing tired of discussion and citations, which have been provided again and again in response to Noroton's many dozen attempts to upset consensus to avoid calling Bill Ayers or Bernadine Dohrn terrorists or murderers, and to avoid linking them and terrorism to Obama. Chronicling his behavior problems would involve several megabytes of differences, something best done should there be a need to explain this to the uninitiated in a serious discussion of a topic ban. Noroton is also a prolific editor who makes uncontroversial contributions in other parts of the encyclopedia. In the meanwhile, a pause in the game playing, edit warring, incivilities, etc., would be most welcome.

4649:. We have a user who was once blocked inappropriately (no warnings, no prior blocks, no attempts to explain why his edits were a problem) well over a year ago, who reappears and makes a few edits to a different article. Again, he has received no warnings and nobody has attempted to explain what problem apparently exists with his edits, but now we're not just trying to block him, but to all out ban him. If there's evidence of abusive sockpuppetry, it would need to be presented before I could support a block (we've seen how well blocks based on speculation of sockpuppetry work). The reason a years absence didn't "fix this" is because nobody has attempted to "fix this". Based on what's been presented, I just don't get why exactly we are banning him. - 7429:)I tagged the articles because, in the course of the AfD, I became confused with Dreadstar's interpretation of notability - that pilot articles aren't notable, and that their content should be merged back to the series article. I decided that to better understand his point of view on the subject, I should see what articles he had worked on (all noting edits within the last few months, and not years, ago) and created where notability was on point. I found a surprising number of articles that would likely not survive an AfD themselves. After pointing this contradictory position in the AfD, I tried to figure out what to do with articles that were even less notable than the one Dreadstar wanted to have merged as non-notable on its own merits. 3181:, with which you appear to be associating notability. I thought ANIs were supposed to be more thorough and specific than that. Since i'm just now learning about the details of administration and negotiations in Knowledge i'll watch for what standards should be engaged in an ANI. So far it appears to me a distraction from conversations better had elsewhere about the actual categories and their use and abuse. Making it personal seems to me the wrong way to handle such discussions, because it assumes bad faith rather than addressing the issues proper in a polite and clear way in the context of the topic, category, and page of the dispute. 10430:) and Flatterworld, on the Bill Ayers talk page, is immediately trying to turn a civil discussion into a mudwrestling match. I've certainly let Flatterworld get under my skin in the past, but I'm really trying to avoid responding in kind to impolite comments. Please help me to do so. Please remind Flatterworld that working with others in a civil way, discussing new facts and how they may be helpful in developing articles is what talk pages are supposed to do, and working together to reach consensus is what we're supposed to be doing to build the encyclopedia. And please tell him that if he can't work that way, he will be banned from 2936:, i like it very much, and i would prefer not to see it abused so as to support quick reduction to stubs of that with which a hostile editor-shooter does not agree. I would like to emphasize that "editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references" and i think hostile cite-tagging and hostile category-tagging are not supporting a helpful reference source for Knowledge readers based on its policy support of effacement of esoteric topics under assault by critical POVs seeking intrusive showcasing where they do not belong. 8642:. That's just a small sample of stuff, of course. Bambifan101 has the longest history because of actual attempts to talk some sense into him. At this point, I can almost spot this guy on site, report to AIV, and usually he's blocked quick. However, when his in IP mode, its a band-aid at best. He seems determined to keep this stuff up despite knowing its not appreciated and he's falsely claiming that he just wants to "help" in the various communications with him. I suspect he finds it funny watching folks run around behind him having to clean up after him. 9559:

news, filmed by multiple sources.. anything remotely negative is being deleted by obvious fans/non nuetral parties. please see now the page is protected for blp issues and a whole section that has been worked on for weeks (and all ready widdled down to the bare minimum) has been totally removed. something needs to be done or this whole page should be deleted as it is 100% biased and BLP is being way over used.. not to mention they are using alex jones own network of websites as sources on half the items on the article. thanks for looking into it.. -

6594:

mentoring would be the best resolve from this and that I would try my hardest to gain as much as possible from it. I am willing to burry the hatchet, get over that which has plagued (what some have described as) an otherwise promising editor for the past 3 months. I still have alot more to give and do. Again I stress that this particuler discussion has been a wake up call that going around feuding with other editors whom you have a brush with isnt acceptable. And I am most willing to consider anyones suggestions or requests.

7450:

encyclopedia. Dreadstar and others would be able to address the notability issues and expand/improve the articles. I think it would be a POINT edit if the concerns weren't valid, which isn't the case here. The proof of that can be found in the fact that in all but one of the examples LessheardVanU pointed out, some improvement was offered by either Less, Lifebaka or Dreadstar himself. The articles still have some pretty big notability issues, but at least, they are better than they were before I tagged them. -

4708:

before blocking him or her. Besides, i ran trough his recent edits and i fail to see any PoV pushing that bad it warrants an instant block. At the same time the diff above is unfriendly, but if it is the only misconduct i would say like to note that if that offense was a reason for an instant ban, we would have to do so for quite some people. Pure vandals must receive four warnings before being eligible for a block, so i fail to see why this case should warrant one without warning? So for now Oppose Ban.

2874:

Effacement, by those opposed to such coverage, and those whose interests extend to esoteric topics that want to work within a wiki are making their own wikis rather than attempt to negotiate for their existence and contributions. Predictably, the result will be an array of wikis focussed and covering a variety of topics, leaving for some future 'meta-wiki' the kind of edited inclusion which should be the ideal and aim of Knowledge. ... -- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

6035:

That may or may not be the case in any given situation... hence communal discussion. RFC is useful when there's a wish to explore in more depth, for example if there are concerns but unsure how widespread, or if it's not completely clear what the real problem is. If it's fairly straightforward, then a debate like this at ANI often covers the same ground more quickly and with less wasted bureaucracy. If there is a clear and visible serious problem, with strong evidence, then there's no "rule" saying RFC

6228:

apart from the fact that they distract from the incidents that need dealing with and take longer, community ban discussions should be treated with respect, not suddenly produced in the heat of the moment as part of an ongoing ANI thread. That is a knee-jerk reaction. Any community ban proposal should have careful presentation of evidence, and clearly delineate the point at which the discussion will end. Otherwise you get discussions closed as a ban after only a day, and others that drag on for weeks.

2135:, or rather, the opposition of it. The two users are spouses. They have written several, long essays all over the place, disruptively edited, and have generally had a disregard for policies. They do not supply diffs or citations or anything, and seem to ignore attempts at other editor's explanations. Cath seems to have conflict of interest issues regarding WP:AUTO. The events regarding Hrafn may have been an intelligent attack on him. Hrafn appears to have done edits regarding Pseudoscience. 12601:

native English speakers), and is also the form of English officially used by the EU, there is no good reason to be using US English in an article which primarily concerns African and European nations, and so there could be no reasonable objection to the change, except from those from a third continent, apparently unaware of local usage, and intent on imposing US English where it simply does not belong, even thought it is jarring and culturally intrusive to the parties directly concerned.

5390:, where I referred to his hostility and bitterness (his words) towards administrators a "trainwreck" waiting to happen. He has had his rollback and account creator privileges revoked, and has been banned from IRC for trolling. It's clear from his prior incidents, battling various administrators and his actions at IRC, that he no longer is a constructive contributor and is only picking and choosing his battles, to which I was warned of earlier that I'd be invoking a witchhunt. 12141: 12136: 9426:. This is just some of the most recent ones, it would appear Prophaniti has a long history of doing this. He calls the other editors edits "vandalism" in content disputes often as well. Basically I just want help explaining that it isn't ok to edit war just because you are "right" and the other editor is "wrong". I'm not asking for a block or anything, just think Prophanity should stop edit warring so often. I also want to make it clear that I'm aware my behavior on 1992:(ec) Yes. My browser was slowing down, too, which is why I also did the same to several other threads. We have an entire encyclopedia to run. If one action's discussion that affects only one user, however perceivably unjust the action may be, is preventing people from reporting/responding to problems here, it needs to be fixed so that the other 99% of the encyclopedia can be covered. I'm sorry if you feel this action is unjust, but it is firmly grounded in our 2521:

variety, of articles because she has an idealistic belief in the good WP does. Truthfully, I would not recognize her from your very negative descriptions of her. I have edited with her, and even when we were in disagreement I never had any difficulty with her, and I always found her open to reason. I think that despite the effort she puts into Wikipedi, she often gets rather shabby treatment here....such as the disrespectful statement you just made about her.

324:

3RR (specifically, that "edits against consensus... are not exempt"), but not its spirit. This wasn't really an edit war — it was vandal fighting that went on a few reverts too long. There's a difference, and I know it. I should have just put {{tl|uw-3rr}} on Thingg's user talk page, instead of blocking him. And a 3-hour block of Redrumracer wasn't sufficient. (Fortunately, {{user|Barneca}} was wiser, and subsequently blocked redrumracer indefinitely.)

2437:

resisted then i stopped that method of correction and sought another method, engaging more people. This indicates to the contrary regarding 'disruptive' editing style, which is "persistently editing a page with information which is not verifiable through reliable sources or insisting on giving undue weight to a minority view." In the case of the former, i wasn't persistently editing a single page. The latter (undue weight) was what i was attempting to

1701: 1665: 5684:

deserving of a community ban, IMO, but as I haven't looked in enough detail, some of it might be of more concern. Still, padding the charge list with non-serious concerns not only wastes people's time, but does actually, IMO, weaken the overall case (which is not to say that a re-presentation of the ban proposal concentrating on the possibly serious stuff wouldn't be more deserving of consideration). ie. I agree with those who say an RfC (with

81: 6791: 3017:, i very strongly agree that "Pseudoscience is a social phenomenon and therefore may be significant, but it should not obfuscate the description of the main views, and any mention should be proportionate; and, moreover, should explain how scientists have received pseudoscientific ideas and concepts. This is all in the purview of the task of describing a dispute fairly." I also like the rest of the page very much except the presented 2953:

removal). I have explained why it ought remain, as comparable to Category:Hoaxes or Category:Fallacies, which are helpfully explained as to how and why these are conventionally so regarded. In general, the error that is being committed is in consideration of a topic and where its borders extend. To the extent that "where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly" topic

3577:(ec)Heh, definitely not familiar with that case because I make it a point to stay away from Arb stuff. It's so much easier to just use common sense and do what you think is right. But looking at that case, the party had a deliberately confusing sig. Simply not having a link is not disruptive in the least bit, nor does it really relate back to that Arb case in terms of what the ArbCom stated in its decision. 2088:- erase all the contributions made while the sub-thread was on the main noticeboard, start with the actual sub-thread itself. The inevitable consequence of sub-threading is a dropoff in comments, which inevitably gives the volume of main-thread comments weight of numbers. Sub-threading offloads the main board, but emasculates the thread. Alternatively per Carcharoth, make the active sub-threads visible. 10510:

arbitration case over editing abuse. I note that some of the parties seem to be planning (another) arbitration case against me(!). Hmmm. Anyway, for the sake of Knowledge tranquility and so that this board can concentrate on easier problems it's probably best to withdraw or conclude this one unless any administrator is ready to deal with Noroton and some of the other editors at this time.

11955: 11702: 10711: 10533: 10290: 9521: 3442: 12544:) of the ENGVAR to the British variant, I weakly agreed to because the article name was Industrialisation, but in no way can you state that Industrialisation is dependant on the ENGVAR for strong national ties. Industrialisation effects the entire world and should have stood with the first ENGVAR it was written in and moved to Industrilization if your statements above hold validity.-- 4167: 9610:(and through the next several sections there), and the admins involved are (from my view, at least) enforcing BLP because the sources being used for the section in question are not very good. (YouTube videos, blogs, et al, from the looks of things.) Due to repeated BLP concerns from the sources being suspect, the page has been protected. Seems reasonable enough to me. 2076:- these are not the most important issues to discuss, admins come to AN/I looking to find out what is happening and of late the size of AN/I has been manifestly ridiculous. Slow user connections are not the only problem - sometimes WP itself has been extremely slow too. This gives people a factor of choice re the more dramatic topics attracting a lot of discussion. 4244:

these details but also that someone, especially an administrator, would not actually explain the reason behind their decision. If Docu can't provide a good explanation then this can be described as him being disruptive, plain and simple, and some kind of action should be taken to stop this disruption, what form this action should take is the big question however.

5772:

personally block someone for insulting you, is it acceptable to support a community ban (which would end up being a block by a more circuitous route) for the same reason? I think what I'm trying to say here is that if you were involved in the precipitating or recent incident, you should be a "witness" if you like, rather than part of jury. Does that make sense?

6505:

heaps etc. His age made it quite clear that he was making all this up, I and several others told him to stop, he didnt so I !op for trolling and an op re-centered the conversation. I find it ammusing how he said my morals are lacking, when on IRC I said I had morals in regards to his cheating confession. I dont think I need to say anything more about that

3357:

divination, folklore, et al. I write in many categories (e.g dog breeds, collectibles, celebrities, music, science, religion, folklore, etc.), but only in religious and magical categories have i seem articles targeted for stubbing and deletion by editors who show great disrespect for the writers who created and/or upgraded the articles in the past.

3081:. Apologies for the extent to which my quick attempt at translation fell short, however you still don't seem to like "The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." The 2432:, to which i replied with cites of previous complaints about the abuse of the . I could also have made mention of the 2 previous CfD for the entire category itself. I have already explained my support for the category's restrained usage primarily in its non-pejorative significance. The characterization of "tendentious" is false, because i was 3229:, allowing me to make the first (possibly unpracticed and misguided) attempt to do what was already agreed: discuss each of the subcategories and consider them for inclusion or exclusion. If anything, i offer an intermediary position between those who demand the category's deletion and those who seem to be abusing it. I don't accept the 6437:

resources from issues with the actual encyclopedia (disputes, trolling, pov-pushers). There is no need to community-ban this user. He's been given a couple of blocks of a few hours' lengths. Well, if he keeps prancing around, just double the block length in every future block and the problem will go away one way or the other. Thanks. --

3102:– an article supported only by self-published sources, and so another article needing improvement to meet the threshold of WP:V. The other core content policies all have a bearing on how "esoteric topics" are presented, if at all, and have to apply. If you wish to dispute the legitimacy and wisdom of the arbitration's specification at 6699:

should always, first and foremost, be building its content and providing the means for content to be built, and anything else (drama, social networking, who's saying what at Jimbo's talk page, adminship etc) comes a distant second. He is an intelligent and capable user who is in the top classes at school, and I feel he

5791:

all out of AGF'. Support statements can be more carefully examined for vindictiveness or actual 'run of of patience' feelings. Sometimes we have seen insulted users come here and say 'no, not yet, I'm willing to accept him getting one more chance', so reading the opinions of those offended is worthwhile to the group.

12774:

determination, whether these were within Knowledge policy/guideline or was an attempt by an editor to press a POV ENGVAR over established article ENGVAR, and perhaps prevent edit warring on these article over the change. It was a good faith attempt and in no way meant to press any personal ENGVAR POV of my own.--

2974:, and have explained why in the Pseudoscience category's Talk page as seems appropriate (there are several sections challenging it). I am still waiting for rational arguments against me in any of those sections. Perhaps it is a convention that cites are necessary for Category Talk pages? I haven't noticed this. 10391:

anti-Obama attack mode, no matter how fringe (or second- or third- or fourth-hand 'quotes') they may be. He completely ignores the spirit of Knowledge and instead looks for 'loopholes' to justify his POV edits. This simply can't continue. We're getting to the end of September and he's diverting editors who

9350:, is about a book that takes a strong POV, so it's not a complete surprise that extremely partisan editors are working on the article. Due to the edit warring, the article has been full-protected twice in the last few weeks. I suggest that the article subject might not meet the notability requirements of 12927:-ise is hardly a "minority spelling" - due to the proliferation of British usage as well as those who have learned English in French or other Romance language countries, it's actually probably in the majority. That being said, I'm not arguing for or against either use, as we have ENGVAR to decide that. 10679:

I don't know why we're using a resolved section on an edit war for complaining about other editors. Flatterworld has been just fine. Noroton's calling Flatterworld a troll, above, is par for the course. Noroton is getting worse, and is vexing quite a few long-term, serious, legitimate contributors

10395:

be doing work elsewhere into constantly reverting his edits and discussing with him (for the umpteenth time) variations on the theme of what 'encyclopedic' means. Other editors have simply given up in disgust and left. If he's blocked until mid-November, it's possible he will come to his senses after

9815:

I'm tending to the belief that this account is on a mission to see how much and for how long they can get away with. I only skimmed the contrib history, so perhaps someone can point to any constructive edits - I certainly missed them. I also have the suspicion that they are GHawPgger wannabe (without

9558:

can someone nuetral please take a look at alex jones (radio). There are a few administrators on there that are using there powers to turn the article into the alex jones fan club page. Info on current events, no matter how well sourced are being removed for BLP reasons. even thought they are on the

7633:

Well, it wasn't an emergency, was it? You're an experienced user. If it wasn't POINT, you could have waited a couple days till any conflict was over. However, I will not assume bad faith, since I don't know what was in your mind. You might at least have known that this would increase the conflict

6736:

article without consensus. He replaces the summarized text in the Italian Fascism section with nearly whole Italian Fascism article. He also deletes chunks of cited text (I suspect because he just doesn't argee with) and changes Nazism to National Socialism when Nazism is the peferred title since may

6564:

It is of upmost concern and hurtfullness that I have ended up here, being discussed. If you had asked me four months ago the possility of me being here or having a block I would have laughed the suggestion off becuase Community bans were are thing that happened to other people. Now the scenario seems

6508:

In regards to the very short removal of rollback and ACC which was initiated by MBisanz, it was restored within an hour later with the following sumamry's "after review, the user hasn't abused rollback, but doesn't need the account creator flag" and "Further review - this editor had a clean record up

6414:

per Anthony as well as my own earlier comment. Having discussed it with him, he's noted he's ready for mentorship or anything the community will throw at him, and appears to be genuinely regretful of his actions. I considered this a very serious matter and did let him know of how this could've turned

5096:

to be at fault rather than the article. In this case, you're (s/he says) an anti-semite, so the AfD should be withdrawn etc and you banned for good measure blah blah blah. I know it's tiresome and offensive, but such ludicrous attacks are best ignored. Nevertheless, I'll give the editor in question a

4398:

What good would an RfC do besides foster drama and ill-will? There is absolutely NO chance that ArbCom or any admin will block or otherwise sanction a longtime user for having an incomplete (as opposed to disruptive or misleading) signature. I wish I lived in the sort of sunny, happy-go-lucky would

3387:

Hi Cat, glad you could join in. Unfortunately your confidence in your mind-reading powers seems undiminished, and again your argument is based on your presumption that an editor acting properly in accordance with policies, working through related articles in a normal way, had an "agenda". Your belief

3348:

I've been away for a few days and came back to find this. I've seen ANI discussions before, and this one is certainly atypical. Normally the complaining party supplies diffs, examples, a desired outcome, and such, but this is just a lot of opinionating and fake mind-reading. The complaining party has

2990:

seems completely common-sense to me. I don't think that i have ever edited an article in Knowledge and failed to support it with proper sources. If you know of an instance, please point it out. I don't think that this applies to User_pages, Talk_pages, or Village_pump_pages which have been my primary

2962:

continually taking cues from my elder editors (and especially writers). It is my aim "to present each of the significant views fairly and not assert any one of them as correct." I think that until a topic is generally evaluated as a hoax, or as a fallacy, or as a pseudoscience, it is POV-pushing to

2859:

and request for "some help on understanding what the heck is going on". Rather than answer the question, you attack the messenger and instead of giving your own explanation, attack my attempt at giving a concise answer. You object to my description of "A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing

2825:

Anekāntavāda (Devanagari: अनेकान्तवाद) is one of the most important and basic doctrines of Jainism. It refers to the principles of pluralism and multiplicity of viewpoints, the notion that truth and reality are perceived differently from diverse points of view, and that no single point of view is the

2785:

No where on wikipedia is it stated that editors must refrain from critisting or proposing changes to existing policies. What Catherine and her husband is doing is stating their opinion that certain policies should be changed and they are completely within their right to do so. Just like the community

2487:

The CfD ruling was that this (correcting the Pseudoscience category) was my apparent point, and some of those who contributed seemed to agree that the pejorative tag was problematic. Where better to address the problem than on the Talk page of that category? So i began engaging conversation there and

2311:

Dave souza, when does an ANI complaint become "hounding"? I had an ANI also; but, although I thought the complaint was misdirected, I would not have resorted to whining complaints, like accusations of hounding. I have the impression that Hrafn was a pretty tough editor, and probably understands that

12819:

My understanding is that -ise is the correct primary spelling in British English and related variants (except Canadian English, where only -ize is correct), but -ize is an acceptable, allowable and correct alternative spelling. I personally always use -ise except on articles where either American or

12697:

However other dictionaries list both forms as acceptable so there seems little reason to change the article from one acceptable form to another. Stop edit warring, or you will likely be blocked for disrupting Knowledge. This really is one of the more petty squabbles I have come across on Knowledge -

11517:

Haha so you admit rudeness! Not even gonna fight that one eh? Seriously though you are misrepresenting an old discussion that I had never even seen before today. That userbox has been on my userpage for... months on end. If you were editing in good faith the least you could have done was bring it up

7618:

that I noticed the articles while trying to glean Dreadstar's philosophy on notability, and decided to tag them because they weren't especially notable or cited. POINT would have been to nom them at AfD. The diffs you provided are not new links, but recreations of the ones that initiated the report.

6484:

group, I could have put it on the project page but I it to seem a bit more personal considering the barnstar’s I gave them all (which is funnily not mentioned) for the effort and enthusiasm they have put in. They are all new users and I thought that those two tips would help them fit in. I gave them

5969:

I am on the wall on this one, I have seen some rather questionable contributions on and off wiki that make me want to support here but at the same time I am not sure that all other resources have been exhausted (RfC ect..). I think I would support a ban if I was to see a few more attempts to educate

5790:

Proposal and support of a community ban by an involved editor are two different things. The first is more improper, as it can been seen as vindictive or vengeful, and can be, and often is, dismissed easily. The second is more important, as it says ' I can't try to work with this user anymore, and am

5704:

Im afraid I was not aware of the other methods of removing ones own comments without changing the context of anothers. Its not everyday that situation pops up so I hadnt put much thought into it. Given your detailed summery of alternative ways of doing so, I agree I could have handled it better, but

5309:

we should assume him to be a user worth redeeming. But my question was just to learn if there was one, because if so, we'd have something to work with, some disputes already lined out, some opinions already expressed. As for Wisdom89's comment, well, we don't know if they have. I think a RFC/U might

5042:

PS, jc37, not sure how going "inactive" for periods of time can be used as part of the justification to ban anybody. Is having a life a bad thing, in your books? Also, can anybody tell me what "using socks" is? Again, my life outside of computers and this website limits me to only knowing one use

3820:

Meh, he's been using it since 2003. I honestly cannot believe it's been dragged to AIV. It's not the first time it's happened. If he was acting in a disruptive matter, I could see it. He's not, he never has, and I'm not particularly happy with the constant instruction creep flowing into WP:SIG being

2873:

The current policies and atmosphere in Knowledge are not conducive to fostering coverage of esoteric subjects in any depth. Instead, it facilitates effacement of substantative articles, using such mechanisms as hostile cite-tagging, hostile category tagging to categories and pages, and the Weapon of

2537:

It was not my intention to imply that it's been fully proven and whatnot. I haven't even given diffs. I've stated twice that I am not fully sure on Cath and I was seeking clarification. It's more about Self-ref. The two users are related, which is why I thought it was common sense to mention Cath as

2520:

I see Catherineyronwode (who I have met only on WP) rather differently than you do. She is one of the very few Wikipedie editors I know of who has her own article, and she is considered notable. She is a professional writer, and the most talented WP writer I know of. She works on a large number, and

12535:

was established in 2002 when the first editor wrote the article. It has stood many revisions and additions since that time without a change in ENGVAR. No discussion or consensus was made/reached on the articles talk for a change. You posted today on the article talk page about moving the article

10979:

Ok, I am one of the IPs who is not yet involved in a proper edit war. A semi protect would be improper here as I am not vandalizing the page. I am simple removing factually inaccurate, misleading information sourced from one Opinion piece that does not claim where its information comes from. Just

10615:

While I myself support Obama and try to check this personal political inclinations at the door while I edit Knowledge, still, in this totally whacked out and silly political environment, I think it would be great if Knowledge could somehow await until the first Tuesday of November has come and gone

10493:

where we conclude conclude once and for all in an orderly way whether his content position has consensus (it obviously does not), reach a result, and stick with it. But he is gumming up the process with procedural game-playing on the RfC. After utterly failing to get consensus for calling various

10488:

Yes, if no administrator is willing to do so on their own it is time for a community topic ban. For my part, after trying for months I am more or less giving up on interacting with this tendentious editor. At the same time he is mangling some important articles, and I do not want to let him bully

9409:

he/she goes to the same article and reverts the same user literally minutes into the next 24 hour period. He/she is doing this on multiple articles and has recieved several recent warnings regarding edit warring. Is gaming the 3RR rule like this acceptable? I myself was involved in an edit war with

9311:

is choking other editors and not letting any discussion to take place on article talkpage. Additionally he is using tags and wikipedia policy keywords against other editors unwarranted. He seems adamant on pursuing his own POV and deleting everything else on the article talkpage. All my attempts to

7800:

There is a guy, who claims to be a 13 year old kid, who is causing a lot of problems with various Disney film articles, some Teletubbies articles, and some Barney articles. He has been indef blocked numerous times, but keeps changing IP addresses so the blocks only last a few hours, or a day at the

7666:

cognizant that making too many edits to the articles would seem vindictive (and excessive cn tagging or AfD nom was out of the question), and truly felt that simply placing a notability tag on the articles needing serious expansion and citation was the least intrusive way to draw attention to them.

6190:

the drama boards but plenty of users don't read them or don't feel comfortable commenting. I'm not saying an RFC reaches a wider audience, per se, but it gives him a chance to have people with defend him and weigh in. Absent some serious incident, I don't think we should be debating a ban in this

6034:

Roughly speaking, what you're really after for a community ban is a consensus that the patience of the community is pretty much done, it's not visibly changing, general net detriment (repeating problem, unhelpfulness), and time to say "the problems mean this isn't really working out for all of us".

5683:

time to repair. Having said that, I personally think your explanations and contriteness here should give you a chance to show you can reform and improve (though I say that without looking in detail at what has happenned). Some of things things that you have done to irritate and annoy people are not

4884:

may be a useful example.) However, on the proposal to ban this user, I do not believe this to be a move that facilitates the improvement of the encyclopedia; and, if the worst comes to the worst and Boondocks37 disrupts in the future, an administrator can simply issue a preventive block. Now, let's

4300:

Why doesn't someone open an RFC about this? Going around and around in circles about it here is only going to stir up drama- but taking it to arbcom would be ridiculuous. If the user has been asked to change it for some five odd years and has not yet responded, chances are good they aren't going to

3839:

I strongly disagree that this was something that should have been brought to AN/I OR AIV, but since it's here. I don't think it's inappropriate to ask for him at least to have a timestamp. We have quite a bit of leeway with signatures (which might be hypocritical coming from someone who essentially

2592:

removal of any information as bad deletion, apparently failing to realise that the information is readily accessible from the article history even when the page has been made into a redirect. These views are, in my understanding, simply against policy. I have no knowledge about her contributions to

1743:

as one thing (a discussion about a previous AN thread and Kurt's contribution there) and then segued into the predictable ban discussion. The ban discussion should have been at AN, where the size wouldn't have been a problem. Now someone can try and work out what to do with my comment when they put

13240:

Subsequently, Thingg's record of useful vandal fighting was pointed out to me, and I thought more about the incident. Upon further reflection, I decided that Redrumracer's edits were close enough to simple vandalism that I shouldn't have blocked Thingg. I was thinking of the letter of the law at

9776:

His editing from thereon(and I mean for the amount of time starting around the time of the above edits, and the most recent stream of edits) appeared to be normal, however his most recent edits have vastly deviated from any kind of constructive editing. Even though he was warned in the past about

6521:

I felt that alot of the points people has raised needed addressing as I felt it was Mis-construed or skewed by leaving out alot of the points such as my apology to Raul or the tips were not actually talkpage spamming or the rollback removal was actually an admin's mistake and was quickly reverted.

6504:

In Re: To Tyler Puetz's claims, He was ranting and trolling on IRC, saying how he cheated on a history exam and how he has been through courts (careful to mention for civil and criminal) for hacking and causing massive damges and how the CEO was pissed etc, How He has called the FBI and the police

6436:

attention. Knowledge isn't a social network, people. You don't need to psychoanalyse problem editors. If they cause problems, slap blocks on them, escalating lengths in case of repeated offense. Some will get it, others will keep going until blocked for good. All this social drama draws away admin

6268:

Oppose ban proposal: a ban is not yet warranted by Prom's behaviour. I reiterate the suggestions that an RFC be filed, and note that the proposal to put Prom. into Mentorship would indeed be wise; I think he simply needs a stronger editor to guide him on the right track (eg., with his small heated

6020:

No, a ban doesn't need arbitration committee sanction these days, and hasn't for a long time. We do still (as a committee) handle appeals because some bans have been poorly judged, but the majority are fair. A ban isn't usually a step the community goes to without some good reason, so it's more to

5813:

That's a useful distinction to make, between proposal and support. I agree with what you are saying here. Especially the "the opinions of those offended is worthwhile to the group" bit - I should have said that in my initial comment. I'd still be more comfortable if people stated in commmunity ban

5771:

Raul, that's the second time recently I've seen you propose or support a community ban based on someone attacking or insulting you. If a community ban is needed in such cases, surely it will happen without you weighing in on it? To put it another way, if (according to some) it is not acceptable to

5673:

When you want to remove one of your comments that someone has already replied to, one approach is to replace your comments with something like "Comments removed. Raul (or whoever), please accept my apologies and feel free to remove this part of the thread and your reply". That is an alternative to

4775:

The diff posted is only one example of the trolling and POV pushing exhibited by this user. The fact that he came back right after an extended block to wave an edit in Raul's face is simply childish. We don't need editors like this here, who are not only unwilling to learn from their mistakes, but

4427:

early on in this discussion already, ArbCom have intervened in a variety of types of disputes on-wiki. Should an RFC fail, unless there's an intention on proposing a community ban discussion (which will almost definitely not go anywhere), this isn't the place and that's the only other avenue left.

4281:

I find his signature (along with the lack of willingness to talk about it in a meaningful way) disruptive. I guess the question would be, no snarkiness intended, is it selfish and lazy of me or any other user for wanting to see the time stamp or being able to click through to the user page of this

4258:

An editor deliberately makes it hard for other editors to communicate with him. He signs in a way which can disrupt archiving. He repeatedly fails to respond to other editors concerns about this. Maybe a short block would attract his attention (and before anyone claims that that is not what blocks

3760:

I'd rather not see this become a teapot tempest. I would hope, now that the matter has been brought to Docu's attention a couple of times, that he would just add a link to his user or talk page to his sig, and sign with a datestamp (just like everyone else does). While we allow all our editors a

3273:

Interesting, but probably not relevant. What would seem to me to be relevant would be Cat and Self-ref's flouting of WP's policies regarding verifiable, reliable content, vis-a-vis the persistent use of the word "hostile", to paint said policies as "evil". Let's try to stick with that point, and

3036:

Dave, you maintain that i have a "tactic of posting huge screeds at the Village Pump", and yet i don't think i've contributed more than a single extended essay there and, when asked to provide an 'executive summary' did so without complaint, answering all questions put to me for clarification. You

2378:

I had some hope that someone would give a hand in understanding, as it's alot of information and it's a bit confusing to me. This seemed to be an issue greater than just Hrafn, so I guess it was partially an attempt at separating the discussion. Like I said, I wasn't fully sure about Cath; most of

323:

13126:

As above... this is also merely a bump thread. Some people were crying foul that the page wasn't visible enough, so I'm creating another section for the purposes of promoting this subpage to further community attention. All kinds of input are requested and appreciated, but piling on at this point

7268:

relisted after he previously closed it as a redirect and merge. In the current afd, Hexhand has responded to every participant that wasn't supporting a "keep". Hexhand and Dreadstar have discussed several points related to this afd. Today Hexhand placed notability tags on 5 articles Dreadstar had

6698:

I talked to the user at length last night on IRC and I think it's a reasonable conclusion he is good faith and means well, that the eruptions are more stemming from a lack of control/forethought than any genuine ill will, and that an area of concern is priorities. The priority of an encyclopaedia

6629:

Information (for what it's worth) -- I had not heard of Prom3th3an until the Steve Crossin incident (~Aug 23). In that incident, the Arbitration Committee were emailed with anonymous emails of what we felt to be a game-y and uncertain faith nature ("Have you figured out who it is yet?"), and then

6500:

The so called "Grawp-style vandalism off-wiki" on a test wiki that has nothing to do with Knowledge, has nothing to do with Knowledge or its projects. However if you want an explanation email me. Note that Manticore is actually a key staff member on the test wiki and has not interfaced with me on

6457:

I've just spotted this, and I must admit I am absolutely flabbergasted at the amount of people who think I am deserving of a community ban or other type of restriction. However, I heed your concerns and this has been a wake up call. I think that a RFC/U would have come notice to me as to how much

5746:

Personally, i find blanking of comments disruptive, as it interrupts the flow of a thread, and (especially when those comments have been replied to or commented on) may alter the meaning of a thread as a whole. I much prefer striking, though I do agree that this should be done with an appropriate

5219:

I'm wondering whether I'm the only one who has had enough of this individual. As far as I can see from their contributions they add nothing whatsoever of value to the project and their childish disruption soaks up far too much time and energy by editors who are actually here to be useful. Recent

5016:

I appreciate all the attention. Just so we're clear, I am not getting banned. This jc37 character has something against me, and can't stand losing. Which he did, when he tried, unsuccessfuly, to remove an edit of mine, which I provided with a valid reference, for no other reason than it didn't

4210:

The thing I'm baffled by, is Docu's apparent refusal to answer the simple question of "why not?". There must be a reason he doesn't like timestamps and a linked signature (I can guess at possibilities), but despite all these people asking, he seems to keep ignoring that specific question. I think

3258:

Dave souza wrote: "Ah, Malcolm Schosha, you're failing to assume good faith in Zero1328's question..." Ah, Dave souza, since when do users bring complaints to AN/I because they assume good faith? I would have thought that, by now, you would have figured out that this is where users come when they

2350:

You do realise that according to your gifted colleague, describing another editor as "whining" is gross incivility? Dissonance should be resolved by dispute resolution and policy, not by wikistalking and attacks on editor's motives. While I'm sure Cat's motives are of the finest, her methods were

2205:

Knowledge is in an ongoing process of change, which is what characterizes life. But your implication is that there is something evil about Catherine wanting to move Knowledge toward certain changes. It hardly seems a danger to Knowledge; and, in any case, no editor has the clout to force unwanted

261:

253:

12845:

I don't think we should be incorporating minority spellings into articles just because there's a partial overlap with another regional variety with next to no relevance to the subject matter, simply in order to appease a linguistic bully from a third country with no knowledge of the local usage.

12600:

talk page where another user had complained about the topically inappropriate US spellings, he was advised to go ahead and make the changes: “Be bold, especially on such matters”. Since Commonwealth English is the form of English used by almost all African nations (which include many millions of

6694:

Given a community ban appears to have been rejected, what should take place? I think for Prom3th3an's sake, there needs to be clarity, so that he can move on in the appropriate manner without this hanging over him in an unresolved fashion. My own idea of a solution would be some form of enforced

6227:

was the venue for community ban discussions? ANI is for urgent incidents. AN is for the longer, more careful discussions, such as community ban discussions. I'm annoyed I didn't notice this before. ANI and subpages (in the case of another discussion) are not the places for ban discussions. Quite

5469:

I'd support a ban of limited duration. His recent exchange with Raul on his talk, coupled with previous blocks and warnings et al, are all enough to earn himself a break from the Wiki. Either a block for a while, or, at least, a stab at mentoring him. But, alas, I fear, it is "too late" for some

4243:

If he doesn't have the courtesy to answer the simple question as to why he won't include these details then why should the community be prepared to tolerate the nuisance of this? Quiddity sums up the situation very well. It surprises me not only that someone would consider it appropriate to omit

3795:

and haven't jumped in because I've hoped that Docu would simply consent to using a more standard signature that at least provides users with a link to the user page or talk page, and please try signing talk pages with the datestamp. The signature confuses bots, makes it difficult to tell when a

2436:

the neutral point of view. I was correcting tendentious use of a misused category tag. That i did so a single time with numerous tags also contradicts this characterization, which could mean "repetitive attempts to insert or delete content which is resisted by multiple other editors." Once i was

1922:

receive less attention, and the minimum standards for a ban discussion require it to be conducted openly. And as I've said several times now, ANI is more active than AN, so ban discussions should, for that reasons if nothing else, be held at AN where there is a less pressing need to split off to

12591:

had a strong national tie to British English, so once again your complaint is unfounded. I said it was the title of the original page. Systematic and improper changes in the text to US English had made the text inconsistent with the page name, so I corrected these to harmonise the text with the

12476:

page, and yet instead of examining the history of the article to establish the correctness of my action, you rushed in and reverted me, and have been posting patently inappropriate warnings on my talk page, when all I did was correct those earlier, improper alterations to the original language.

10863:

Something's happening on there which is not yet a proper edit war, but at least two IPs are constantly removing well-referenced material with controversial views of Facebook, despite of reverts by registered users. I've reverted two such deletions including citations of The Guardian (which were

10509:

Having said that, I don't think an AN/I report at this time could lead to a lot of argument but is unlikely to lead to any administrative action. We should probably conclude the RfC and if the results aren't respected, file a new AN/I report, behavioral RfC, and if all other recourse fails, an

7384:

If every time anyone who challenged someone who disagreed with them became the subject of an ANI, we would have a never-ending tide of ANIs resulting from nearly every contested RfA, as well as most XfDs. While I can't say that Dreadstar will have enjoyed Hexhand's responses and actions, he has

4707:

i ran trough the history of his talk page, and i noticed the absence of both warning templates or even an explanation before he was blocked the first time. Unless discussion took place somewhere else or there has been some form of grave misconduct i am unaware of, it is customary to warn a user

2961:

topical matter into the main article. This is disruptive of encyclopedic content, and should be curtailed as a form of POV-pushing. I am taking both specific steps and broad-ranging explanatory means of correcting this. I am open myself to correction, and since i am a new editor at Knowledge am

2952:

informs my motivation for correcting the POV-intrusion of pejorative category tagging. By its very characterization it is obvious that this type of category is easily abused. There have been adequate explanations for this in the Pseudoscience category Talk page (arguably justifying its complete

13268:

My question is whether there's any way for the block to be removed from Thingg's record. I'm not aware of such a thing, but perhaps people with bureaucrat or oversight privileges can remove the history of the block? I just don't want an ill-considered block to stand in the way of a promising

10390:

for a start). This has gone on for months, and instead of improving with experience and coaching, his work has deteriorated. He has shown no interest in encyclopedic facts, structure, style or wording. Instead, he has a clear personal agenda and searches for 'sources' that support his virulent

5229:

nasty exchange they just removed from their talk page really sums up the way they drain oxygen and energy from the project. I'd personally like to see them indefinitly blocked but, if there is not consensus for that, I'd like to see a topic ban from wikipedia space. I'd appreciate thoughts and

3360:

We all know that Knowledge standards are changing, and that old articles with no citations as well as last year's articles with end-of-article footnotes are getting tagged. It would not be difficult for the taggers to play fair and notify the writers who have worked on the articles that inline

3356:

against topics that fall into their pet peeve categories. I gave stated (and supported with diffs and examples) my belief that at least one editor deleted rather than upgraded older and less-well-sourced articles on spirituality, self-help, New Thought, Creationism, Christianity, Spiritualism,

3233:

of that policy's implementation, and so of course i proceed from that basis, explaining what i think is logical and rational (and most conservative). Others may argue to the contrary regarding each of the subcategories' inclusion/exclusion in response. If they do not, and if people just remain

2999:

Knowledge i have of course constructed many pages with variable citation, since they weren't all encyclopedias. Surely i have much to learn as regards this principle of Knowledge, but i am neither opposed to its application on non-notable subjects (examples?) nor do i think that the notability

2391:

fashion, and now more of a civil POV push, but still ignoring some rules. I'm not really sure on how one would handle this. I do not know much about Cath's editing but there's a fair possibility that their editing styles are connected. They seem to have assisted each other in one of their long

344:

12320:

This is merely a bump thread. Some people were crying foul that the page wasn't visible enough, so I'm creating another section for the purposes of promoting this subpage to further community attention. All kinds of input are requested and appreciated, but piling on at this point isn't really

6593:

Some people have brought it to my attention that my statement implies I may be trying to defend my actions as completly innocent. This could not be further from the truth, I admit I have done many wrongs over the past 2-3 months however I am willing to change. If its any constellation I think

4522:

edit seems odd based on the reference provided (and because it replaced other text), and have reverted. I did this both because I disagree with how the article is being construed in the article, but also because (in this case, anyway), I won't be the one to block the individual. (I wish to be

2804:

Dave souza wrote to me (above): "My goal was to summarise the situation concisely as repeatedly requested by Zero1328, and you are of course welcome to comment on any aspects you perceive differently..." This seems a complete misrepresentation of Zero1328 'question', which in my view is not a

302:

A few days back, I spotted an edit war on ]. {{user5|Redrumracer}} was inserting clearly non-consensus text, and {{user5|Thingg}} was reverting it. Although Redrumracer was acting against clear page consensus, I thought that it was still inappropriate of Thingg to break the 3RR, so I blocked

11898:) has come in and is making the exact same edits as the IPs. The editor has no other substantial edits except to this article, and although he is commenting on the talk page, seems intent on reverting to his preferred version regardless of the discussion. Thanks in advance for the attention. 9134:

If it's related to a particular school, maybe someone - preferably local to the area - should contact the school. We had a problem here in Western Australia with what turned out to be a trio of vandals who were wreaking unholy havoc in a range of areas and had gotten well and truly ahead of

7667:

It wasn't a POINT edit (and doesn't seem to fit the criteria of that anyway). That Dreadstar and others have addressed the tagging by improving the articles is proof somewhat of the validity of the tagging. I had actually planned on seeking out sources this weekend for some of the articles (

3935:

hardware. The point of having a timestamp attached is that you know immediately who said what when without having to dig through the page history. This is random, but you do not have to mark your comments as being made by a non-admin. Many of the contributors here are not admins, it's not a

3054:

Therefore, in brief, dave, your contentions about my positions are extreme, unfounded (you don't provide pointers to where i dispute these principles), and for all but one exception in the last, which i answer to above, are 180 degrees off-base. Can you explain how you got such an incorrect

171: 12773:

WJBscribe, I apologize if this appears to be a squabble. During, vandalization patrol of recently changed articles, I noticed the first change, then subsequent changes and did not see an overwhelming need based on ENGVAR for these changes. I brought it here so administrators could make a

11388:

Not exactly. I do believe the prior discussion is relevant, but I'm not entirely sure applying a small handful of comments about one specific userbox to some other situation -- a year after the fact, and without any assurance that the users commenting previously had any idea their words be

7449:

I must confess that though I think Dreadstar seems to be a good person, I still don't understand his views on notability, and in fact find them contradictory. However, I don't think that tagging articles that I discover having notability issues to be stalking, as the goal is to improve the

12094:

Both sides have violated 3RR; both sides are POV pushing, removing cited materials the other seeks to include. Both sources are questionable, one's to a pro ulster site, the other to an apparent anti-ulster author. I say give both liberal 3RR blocks, neitther seems inclined to stop this.

9404:

This user is edit warring on multiple articles with multiple users. He has a consistent pattern of making 3 reverts, then sitting and waiting till a few minutes into the next 24 hour period and resumes. Shortly after a 3RR report with a result of (no violation no action) that can be seen

9152:

Comparing the ranges here with the ones on Simple English, there is one stand out entry but the rest fall under the same ISP/location. 72.28.33.218 does not geolocate near the known location and would likely not match if checked. The ranges needed to shut this down are 70.146.192.0/18,

12471:

without explanation, despite strong national ties to the Commonwealth and the EU, and almost no connection to the USA, whose language was being arbitrarily and improperly imposed. You didn't open a discussion on the user who did that. Something similar had previously happened to the

10994:

I have declined the protection for now. I am going to keep an eye on the article. Further edit warring is going to result in blocks and full protection of the article. Take your dispute to the talk page and try and work towards some consensus. Let me know if you have any questions.

3388:

in his "agenda" is unfounded and irrelevant, and again you don't seem to realise that the editor was never in a position to delete any articles – that's an admin decision. You do seem to have learnt the idea of requesting references, though an unreferenced tag with the edit summary

2742:

We can discuss, yet again, the patterns that she finds detrimental, although it has been hashed out in several forums including this one (see section above). I do not want to summarise them, lest it re-open what has been a rancorous discussion, and so I would urge you to read them

3045:, and have made this penatrably clear both on Category talk:Pseudoscience and in the couple of essays that i wrote explaining why the category's misuse is a problem and why i think that it is being misused (an extension of cultural struggles into Knowledge, sullying its content). 2232:

There's nothing evil about such desires, the question is whether the method of hounding an editor working in full accordance with policies will benefit the encyclopedia, and whether changes should be implemented in contradiction of present policies without community sanction. .

3964:

IAR is typically only invoked when trying to improve the encyclopedia. I fail to see how ignoring community norms (and a guideline; which I believe is more like a policy given how widely respected it is) and making it more difficult to interact with you helps the encyclopedia.

11023:

edits. This editor appeared a few days ago, is making hundred of edits with no references/citations/any other apparent factual basis, many of which are immediately reverted by other editors who cannot keep up with this ongoing activity, which may simply be vandalism. Thanks

11389:

interpreted as enduring precedent to cover all cases -- is prudent without at least some discussion of whether doing so is appropriate. If the box is as obviously and totally problematic as you seem to say, then I don't see what you have to fear from reasonable discussion. –

2676:

It's really not difficult to be cynical about her editing patterns, I assure you. This is after all a collaborative encyclopedia, and editors who have their own concepts of long standing Knowledge policies such as notability and sourcing tend to run into problems eventually.

4514:

I am looking for a community ban rather than just a block (indefinite or otherwise) due to the long time "missing", combined with the concern about the autoblock. I think that this user may have been (and be) using IPs and possibly other socks to continue more of the same.

4118:

do that, I'm not because it involves modifying my URL bar, doing a query in the search bar, or doing an action that only impedes communication. That's not difficult for me, but it can be for many new users or users who just don't want to communicate with a user who is

2762:"As I do, Cat feels that some patterns by particular editors, while not outside policy, are nonetheless determinental to Knowledge as a whole." To me, that sounds like "we don't like some Knowledge policies, and will ignore them wherever we can get away with it." We 2470:) and, during observation of certain cultural struggles in the topical areas of my interest, provided my observations on the whole as a basis for attempting to redress the problem from another tack: the restraint on the abuse of the pejorative Pseudoscience category. 4624:– If this dispute is about a single word in a single article I think this is being blown way out of proportion. Are there other instances of unconstructive editing? Has this user engaged in abusive socking? Also I am wondering if the administrator who originally 4153:

You can just put it in the "search" and wait for it to pop up. User:Docu is being kind of a jerk on this, but it's a crime akin to tearing a tag off a mattress. I'd like to see this trivial matter go to ArbCom and see how long it takes for the laughter to die down.

5644:

I did not want to change the context of Raul's reply, as it would have seemed out of place if I removed the remarks (Like he was attacking me for no reason) so i did the next best thing, struck them out per WP:CIVIL. I also gave a sincere apology on his talk page.

7657:

In retrospect, I can now see how it could be misinterpreted. I guess I should have - as you said - waited until the AfD was complete. It never occurred to me that the worst would be presumed of my behavior. When we (as editors) see something wrong in an article -

3198:

I will now no longer respond to your accusations without substantiation referring to my writing. I have adequately refuted your contentions about what principles you think i "seem to dislike". I will now proceed to address only what i regard as substance in your

3037:

also state that i made "proposals at Category talk:Pseudoscience where he appears to be objecting to WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy." I think i clarified that above. I agree with the policy, and agree that the arbitration produced that result, but i dispute the

3878:

I have a question...why is a timestamp on the page necessary, when all of our posts are timestamped regardless if we add one or not. It is on the diffs and our contrib pages, I am just curious as to why that it is necessary for it to beside our sigs as well. -

10009:

edit war. Once a day since the beginning of September is not the action of someone who is interested in community editing practices. However, if anyone feels the block is wrong in fact or duration please feel free to change it without further reference to me.

6492:

The joke block page is in good humour, its a preload that comes up when you click "To vandalise my user page click here instead." on my message portal. It was going to be used for April fools day (see history) but until such a time I changed it to its current

7436:

be retaliatory (or at the very least mean-spirited), I thought noting that they needed to be improved/expanded so as to improve their notability, so that someone else wouldn't come by and nom them on their own. The tagging was to mark the articles as needing

5875:

and let me add that they were for very minor disruption. Oppose community ban or topic ban. Take it to RfC. I suspect mentorship could work well here and I'll happily take him under my wing. He's got a lot to give, he just needs to change his attitude a bit.

3930:

Well, there's many reasons. Mainly, if you're looking at a heavily edited talk page or archives, the edit in question may be buried hundreds of diffs ago. This can be especially difficult for users utilizing assistive technology, text browsers, or just plain

10345:

Oh bum; I didn't even think to look here (not having super dooper admin powers these pages slip my mind) before I reported it myself. I am suitably embarrassed. David, I have a URN number if you want to know it to help them merge it please drop me an email.

9785:, even when told not to several times by the user who's userspace the page was under. This happened several times. The user in question has also created several POV categories, which of course have been deleted. Last but not least, the recent edit found 9769:. He even claims that the user in question(for the last edit) has said it was okay. When searching through, I found no such thing(you can check if you don't believe me). He made this claim to me, and an admin I believe, as can be seen here as the admin 4970:- Would solve the "perceived" problem sure..but I just don't see it. Inappropriately dealt with in the past..no warnings..just a strange (possibly immature attitude) with a few troublesome diffs. I'm just not seeing the appropriateness of issuing the ban. 11593:

So what? The userbox isn't offensive. All the wikipedia issues with N Ireland have been ironed out, is it necessary for you to find people you don't like to argue with, and post your own self-created drama on the admin notice board? Kind of reminds me of

10808:

This user seems to be a pain in the ass without sense of humour. It's a minor incident in a specific case, no other problem in here, I've seen - and done - much worse!... I'm the one who needs some assistance not to be unjustifiedly adverted or worse!...

6312:. This user, who is fairly young, needs serious help and probably mentorship to get them on track, there is too much drama and too many incidents to ignore. However a community ban at this stage when other means have not been tried first are ridiculous. 5678:

attention to the off-topic stuff. This might all seem complicated, but then that is a consequence of people opening their mouths and talking before they think. Stuffing the genie back in the bottle takes some diplomacy sometimes, and some damage takes a

4096:

Not everyone is as competent enough about URLs and using computers that such a thing is obvious. Including (mandating) a user or user talk link makes the site more accessible to new editors/computer users. Using plaintext signatures does the opposite..

12736:

respecting national varieties of English, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Better advice would be for people to actually familiarise themselves with the varieties of English used in different nations before they start disrupting legitimate

10068:

The articles look OK at the moment. It's not breaking news where I am. I guess you are saying to watch the article for insertion of rumours on their current conditions, and not to allow updates in their conditions without a news source to back it up.

9741:

Frogger had joined awhile back, he's been here for at least a few months to my knowledge, and while I have, in the beginning at least, tried to help him learn what not to do here, per his recent edits, it still seems that he doesn't quite understand.

73: 5814:

discussions whether they had any previous involvement with the user (and to be fair, most people do make that clear if asked). The difficult thing to see, when looking at a community ban discussion, is to see who the genuinely uninvolved people are.

3622:

Docu's still around? Do you realize he's been using that sig since, hell, at least 2003? I remember people grumbling about that before. It's not that big a deal. Try spending more time on the writing and less on pointing out issues like signatures.

3516:

about the guideline now appears to becoming distracted by Docu's signature, or lack of it, and as such I am looking to see how this can be resolved. If this isn't the appropriate venue then I would welcome and advise as to where may be more suited.

3220:

seems very sound, and i like it very much. Can you give me some advice here? If nobody discusses the implementation of that policy on the Talk page of the Pseudoscience category, then where will it be discussed? I don't see anyone arguing that i am

3000:

guideline has as much weight as do the editing principles (in fact i think notability guidelines are too heavily emphasized and should be moderated against an unlimited data holdings so as not to treat Knowledge as if it were a paper encyclopedia).

13241:

5537:"Your probably jealous of Jimbo that's all. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)" A response to me on Jimbo's talk page. It is worth pointing out that dis uzas spelin and gramaz r wurs dan most peepils. Support indef. Erik the 10632:? As most proper on an article's Talk page, so here. With the sole exception of open-and-shut cases, I think the best protocol to take with regard to alleged problematic behavior is to provide diffs that would be thought to plainly back them up. 11192:'Yes, well, that's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage. You sit there on your loathsome, spotty behinds squeezing blackheads, not caring a tinker's cuss for the struggling artist.' 3457:

seems to be currently signing all his comments simply with the text "User:Docu". The lack of a timestamp or links to his userpage/talkpage make it more difficult for other users and I, and others, have asked him why he doesn't include these.

2260:

Malcolm, please do not make bad faith accusations towards other editors. No user is accusing any other user of "evil". Quite honestly, if any user views any portion of wikiprocess as "evil", then they need to step outside for some fresh air.

12110:

With all due respect don't you think that's a little unfair as I've been tag teamed all day by two editors including this one? I am the one who has brought this to your attention and I'm not the editor who's being abusive. If you consult

10117:

were on the plane, and that several IPs had posted the fact of their deaths before confirming that fact, I semi-protected the articles for 48 hours. Did that before seeing this thread, though - so if I jumped the gun, please revert me.

9138:

I've blocked the account indef for block evasion per the above but I'm happy for any subsequent resolution of this matter to unblock the account - it's more a case of "this account should not be editing so we'll stop it from doing so".

7445:

them. I took no action beyond that, have not followed Dreadstar's edits (beyind noting when he last worked upon the articles in question). At least one of the articles in question were worked on by Dreadstar as recently as June of this

11246: 3025:, 2 of which are not even unanimous. I am not out of line to dispute it, especially as i am helping to clarify the referents of its application -- something which is barely touched on in the arbitration because its focus is elsewhere. 4746:, all that is visible to me is small amounts of POV-pushing followed by an excessive block, and no attempts to discuss the issue with the user. There is nothing here yet that supports a formal ban. If there is more, please show it. 1744:

the subpage back here. Taking it off people's watchlists and putting a ban discussion on a subpage is not acceptable. I will note that the last three comments were opposes, so yanking it off ANI and onto a subpage looks even worse.

10314:. This is just a note to say that I did the checkuser and am following this one up with the relevant authorities - and to ask please don't delete the edit, I've referred to it in emails so they can see what I'm talking about :-) - 3768:

to stick to best practices on Knowledge and set a good example; those include signing with four tildes and not doing things that inconvenience others. Please, Docu? While I doubt you'll face any sanctions over this, is there any

10411:

I welcome this thread, although I don't have much time today, I'll be back either late tonight or early tomorrow morning (that is, about 8 hours or 18 hours from now). I'd like administrators to look at Flatterworld's comments at

6213:

the venue to propose and decide on a community ban. RFC rarely result in blocks or bans and they would need to be endorsed here if they did. Based on the statement below do you see any evidence that they will change their ways?

11557:

lying. And from what I can makeout from skimming through that discussion, my modified one actually bypasses any of the claimed "offensiveness". And this has nothing to do with stress, it has to do with basic wikipedia policies.

10596:

A misleading non-sequitur attack from one of the problem editors I refer to above. I'm fully expecting plenty of tit-for-tat counterattacks - I've been subjected to them as long as I've been trying to keep peace on Knowledge.

222: 154: 3796:

comment was made (in some cases making it difficult to realise that Docu commented at all), and adds an unnecessary step for users who are trying to access the user/talk/contributions/etc. I really can't see any good reason

2735:

As I do, Cat feels that some patterns by particular editors, while not outside policy, are nonetheless determinental to Knowledge as a whole. This is not unusual. Dave Souza, for example, frets (and with good reason) about

4903:

If you would like to be that person, please feel free. (Though after using this account to POV push, they seem to have gone "inactive" again, so I'm not sure you'll get through, but please, feel free to make the attempt.) -

3663:) requires a link to either his user talk or user page in his signature. As he's an admin, it seems even more important that he follow community standards (which also includes adding a date/time to all talk page comments). — 3055:

impression of me? Is there something i can do to help you penetrate my prose, see my support of Wiki editing principles, and allow me to object to the Weapon of Effacement in pursuit of a healthier Knowledge? In Good Faith,

13046:

Yes, and I politely asked you to write-up your proposal in the sandbox I created, but you have insisted on copy/pasting the same text off the web onto my talk page 5 times, even though I erase it and ask you not to do so.

8758:

You might try suggesting to him that you will contact administrators at Lincoln Middle School if this continues. It might be a spurious connection, but if not, I bet mentioning the possibility will end this problem quick.

3303:

Not relevant? It is a comment exactly on the accusation (disguised as a question) originally made by Zero1328. If you can't remember, take a look at Dave souza's edit just above, and at the top of this section on the page.

4428:

I'll emphasise: nobody is compelled to use any of those processes, but these are merely the options available - the appropriateness of each option is something for each individual to consider themselves. We're done here.

10333:

song. He said he had received a letter that read, "Darling, I love you. Please marry me or I will kill myself." He was rather disturbed at that, until he looked closer and noticed the letter was addressed to "Occupant".

7773:

No, no discussion necessary, I was just letting people know. Disabling email is a fairly unusual step, but WordBomb knows how to contact the foundation should the need arise so there should be no issues arising from it.

7482:

Reply to JzG re "Quite how one can say that the pilot is notable independent of the series..." Your response belongs at AfD, not here, and I think you may find that consensus appears to disagree with you on the matter.

3761:

fair bit of leeway with their sigs, having a link and a datestamp is simple courtesy to other editors. (Links make communication easier, while datestamps are helpful in long, threaded discussions on busy noticeboards.)

2466:. I accepted this ruling and decided that i was not likely to produce a change in the overall trends and dynamics in Knowledge (as i set about exploring other Wikis and began to notice how they looked and behaved like 12115:

you'll discover that I've been the subject of contstant harrassment by two particular editors since registering this account. The evidence of continually being called a sock is indicative of what I've had to endure.

11777:. I can accept I was edit-warring as indicated on my talk page, but edit-warring to get your POV across. I don't think so. How can I get an editor to support their accusations when all they do is refuse to answer? -- 6516:

silence for "trolling on IRC" was because I was discussing my 3 hour block intesivly, I have since then not been silenced. I was not aware that IRC was offically related to wikipedia, so I dont know why it was raised

4536:

Also, at what point should we consider that there is consensus concerning this? And once that's determined, someone else will please need to enact the block/ban, since I have intentionally recused myself from that. -

3368:

report, i shall now take my leave, thanking those kind souls who supported me, and leaving what remains of this gossipy thread to the mind-readers and mentalists who prefer Wikidrama to writing encyclopedia entries.

2903:

much either. I've also commented there on Cat's objectives. By the way, you will note that today's featured article, Anekantavada, is fully supported by citations to reliable third party sources. Think about it. . .

6273:

and to give due thought to the consequences of each edit he makes; if he fails to remedy the currently poor conduct he is practising, I do fear a second ban proposal would not result in such a sympathetic consensus.

4851:- a "long time missing" is surely not grounds for any administrative action at all, let alone a ban. I'll just add that I have informed the editor in question of this thread, as no-one else appears to have bothered. 3903:

Two reasons, one so that people reading a discussion can see the order in which it was made, particularly on deletion discussion, RFAs, etc. Second, it lets the bot know how old a thread is and when to archive it.

2157:

Zero1328, at the top of this page it says: "This page is for reporting and discussing incidents on the English Knowledge that require the intervention of administrators", but I don't see what intervention you want.

12536:

from Decolonization of Africa to Decolonisation of Africa and also said that a change in ENGVAR should follow. Then you go ahead and change the ENGVAR of the article prior to any move. Another change you made to

12175:

Actually - what Thunderer says here is largely correct in that he's been repeatedly tag-teamed by two other editors over a period of months now. He's also been repeatedly accused of being an abusive sockpuppeteer,

10426:) and see if Flatterworld is not acting more like a troll than a constructive contributor. I'm trying to have a civil discussion about information previously not considered (which is what I'm also trying to do at 9123:

and it needs to be indef blocked. I reported to AIV, but reviewing admin said it should be handled here. A ban throughout wikiworld since he's causing problems on at least two wikis already? More range blocks? --

6415:

out. He knows that he has a fair amount of work ahead of him, and this might require a frustrating amount of time and effort, and is willing to do what it takes. I see no reason not to afford him another chance.

13236:

was reverting it. Although Redrumracer was acting against clear page consensus, I thought that it was still inappropriate of Thingg to break the 3RR, so I blocked Redrumracer for 3 hours and Thingg for 1 hour.

9235:

We have this over on Simple English Knowledge... obviously, being smaller we can see articles as they come up. He'll often copy and paste stuff from here, along with all the templates. We block/delete on sight.

5339:

I also be thinkin' a RFC be the way to go. It be crazy to make editors walk the plank without parlay first. I be inclined to think there be a way to bring the scalawag back to our side. Cheers, me hearties.

11656:

It doesn't look like admin intervention is necessary at this time, although you two could probably stand to be a little more civil to each other. Traditional Unionist: if you don't like the userbox, take it to

7619:

My tagging articles with little or no notability or citations is disruptive how, exactly? Are you suggesting that the notability of the articles tagged were in fact splendid articles chock full of citations? -

4214:

It's all very trivial/minor (no link, no timestamp, no explanation), but still frustrating. Mostly the lack of timestamp is the real concern. It makes it very hard to comprehend the flow of certain threads. --

13079:

Thank you for logging in Yasis. Please don't post that stuff a 7th time. Please write up your proposed edit in the sandbox so I can see what you plan on saying and what exact sources you would like to use.

4211:

this refusal to communicate (along with his admin status) is what is making this into a bigger deal than it otherwise would be. (I think this is what Adambro was trying to explain with his initial post here).

2121: 5091:

Quite often when an article is nominated for AfD, the author of the article detonates. It's understandable, I suppose. And when they detonate, they grab at the first thing they can think of that "proves" the

12207: 8685:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Lincoln Middle School (Gainesville, Florida)" rcid="244126532" pageid="3704564" revid="238376379" old_revid="237806485" user="68.220.150.90" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T15:33:44Z"

4296:

I'm back! Locke- your comment has long passed, but to call me silly for asking you to reread IAR is also silly- and the "I've been here longer than you" argument is both condescending and irrelevant. Moving

2038:

FFS. It's linked from AN/I. This page is already absurdly long and it is nice to get a permanent link to it. It isn't some nefarious plot to hide the secret admin goings on from the regular drama boards.

1079: 4032:

and IAR does not mean you can go on blindly ignoring something if people call you on it. If people call you on it you have to discuss it and get consensus for the change which doesn't seem to have happened

3532:

Um no offense, but seriously, is this issue really that important in the scheme of things? His sig isn't misleading, and it isn't disruptive. Let's just leave it at that and go work on the encyclopedia...

6496:

My block log has two blocks, one 3 hour block for civility issues and one 12 hour block for WP:TE. There are far more colourful block logs out there who belong to users who did mend, I would like the same

1044:

Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are

10396:

the election is over. Right now, he seems to believe he's on some mission to save the world from encyclopedic editing. I think we're at the end of the road right now, and blocking is the only thing left.

3085:

gives a basis for working, subject to common sense and consensus on any particular article, and there's rightly no exemption clause for "esoteric topics" unsupported by third party reliable sources. Some

166: 103: 10083:

Yes, I'm saying given that they're relatively popular celebrities, and Barker has had numerous publicized death "hoaxes" in the past, eyeballs are needed to ensure that references are properly followed.

1110: 1105: 4872:, very few of which highlight behaviour arising from anything other than a poor understanding of how the encyclopedia works and how editors are expected to conduct themselves, does not deserve a formal 41: 38: 5981:

I'll echo Tip - if other avenues are exhausted to no avail, I'd reconsider, until then, I think talk of a community ban is premature. Besides, aren't bans invoked after an issue is brought to Arbcomm?

3364:

My record of writing, copy editing, and cite-tagging for veriifiability is clear. I am not interested in low gossip, name-calling, or baiting. Since no "incidents" have been mentioned in this supposed

6191:

venue. As for the up/down on the ban in general, I'm neutral. I've seen that user here and there and usually not liked what I have seen, but that could be said about me in plenty of cases, so: meh.

1013: 10620:), let me say that I am familiar with the diffs that Noroton provides in the section above and understand his frustration with Flatterworld, feeling the same myself. As it is, doesn't Flatterworld's 9379:

crap, but he is wrong in prolongued rants about it. It is enough to cite the issues raised in the reviews cited. As EdJohnston states, it may be worth an AfD to look into whether the book satisfies

9332:

FYI, I blocked Roadahead and Goingoveredge both for edit warring, but beyond their accusations and bad blood there may be some actual shenanigans that could use sorting out, or at least extra eyes.--

2593:

writing articles, but expect that these contributions are excellent and are to be praised. I've consistenely encouraged her to work cooperatively and to continue with her valuable contributions. . .

4876:. I would suggest instead an experienced and uninvolved administrator sit down with this editor and give some serious tuition about how we behave on a collaborative encyclopedia, and make clear the 2861: 8688:

type="edit" ns="0" title="2008 Auburn Tigers football team" rcid="244027244" pageid="14268766" revid="238280748" old_revid="238273637" user="68.220.163.129" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T03:10:57Z"

2538:

well. I did not mean disrespect, but I'm also not very concerned about who she is or whatever. I'm just looking at the editing methods, and I think I'm seeing something wierd in the recent area. -

11854:

might not be seeing your posts on your talk page, since she's usually pretty busy and may not have watchlisted your talk page (and thus didn't check for your responses/inquiries). Try posting to

11694: 8727:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997105" pageid="4196336" revid="238251733" old_revid="238229539" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:03:02Z"

8724:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997175" pageid="4196336" revid="238251800" old_revid="238251733" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:03:41Z"

8721:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997340" pageid="4196336" revid="238251963" old_revid="238251800" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:04:37Z"

8718:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997573" pageid="4196336" revid="238252191" old_revid="238251963" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:05:52Z"

8715:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997699" pageid="4196336" revid="238252312" old_revid="238252191" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:06:38Z"

8712:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997817" pageid="4196336" revid="238252423" old_revid="238252312" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:07:23Z"

8709:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997912" pageid="4196336" revid="238252501" old_revid="238252423" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:07:53Z"

1918:

before, and I disagreed with automatic use of subpages due to size then, and I object now. Ban discussions are a clear example of a case where exceptions need to be made. Discussions on subpages

1693: 3361:

citations are being sought -- because getting the refs will be easiest for the writers who wrote the pages, since they were working from material they have in print or know how to find online.

2655:

I regret that my brief summary style led to this misunderstanding, and assure you that I have no supernatural powers. My goal was to summarise the situation concisely as repeatedly requested by

13128: 12322: 2463: 1839:

bits of the thread out here, leave the inactive bits there (mark with archive tabs and links to here), and also provide links here, back to there. Then archive as a whole when finished. See, a

1709: 11735: 8899:

Sounds like that would at least impede him some, maybe? Anyway to trace these IPs to see if any go back to that school? The earlier SSP noted that most come from Bellsouth, I believe. -- ] (]

5274:

Well, that really is only an opinion. If multiple editors have attempted to resolve conflict/issues with him/her, then a RfC would be perfectly applicable and would gain wide community input.

2138:

I'm quite afraid that I could be making an extremely bad misjudgement on this, but I don't think I can dig deeper for an understanding. I have an interest in these types of problems, but even

25: 2694:

Exactly.:) Someone who considers themselves to 'know better' than most others, doesn't tend to do so well in a collaborative enterprise. Most of us I imagine can think of examples on wiki.

9266:

Wtf is up with Knowledge's servers today? Anyways, I thought somewhat interesting to note that I used to teach in the elementary school adjacent to Lincoln Middle. Still live in the area. --

11717: 2056:- I have a very slow internet connection and it's hard to load AN/I, plus edit conflicts crash firefox. So I'd really like to see this kept on a subpage. It's easier to watchlist anyway... 1728: 12880:

While I agree with you (this is not a North American topic; it has close links to the Commonwealth; the original spelling used appears to be Commonwealth/British English) I'd ask that you

9171:

Is someone working on this idea? It would really help if he was at least slowed down. Dealing with this almost every day, including new registered accounts, is getting really old. -- ] (]

6186:- Just file an RFC and we can get a ban from that consensus. I know we aren't a bureaucracy, but I really don't want AN/I to get the image as a good venue to community ban a user. These 162: 99: 10489:

me into letting him have his way with the encyclopedia. I took a bad faith report he had filed against me here as an occasion to file the content-oriented Obama/Weathermen/terrorism RfC

4686:, this editor's contributions don't even seem particularly problematic to me. If there are allegations of socking, where are the diffs please, where is the related SSP or checkuser case? 4370:

As I originally commented, I wasn't sure where best to raise this. The suggestions to start an RFC have been noted and I'll investigate doing so. Clearly this isn't something for ArbCom.

13284: 9354:, and an AfD of the article might be a reasonable solution. (We have no article on the book's author, G. B. Singh, and it's not common for a book to be notable while its author is not). 6660:

To be honest I think we should give the "devil" his due, After your requests for me to effectivly "butt out" of the whole steve-crossin thing, i did exactly that (butt out) from memory.

4760:

Agree with Kusma and auburnpilot. No to a ban on the basis of the "evidence" presented here. I don't see what the diff jc37 posted is supposed to prove. And where's the checkuser case?

2627:

Dave souza wrote: "She thinks it unfair..." You know what she thinks? This seems to imply you have a good level of mind reading ability. Or, could it be that you are making use of what

2441:

from perturbing the topics i observed as under contention. I saw the opportunity to improve Knowledge, and so may have ignored some rules, as charged. Which ones? I'm not actually sure.

4794:

This is a fair part of the concern. That and the edit history (and gaps thereof) suggest that they are using socks to achieve this (on the articles noted, and presumably elsewhere). -

12972:

Now (not having gotten enough of a rise from me???) he has resorted to wikistalking me to pages he has never edited to revert my recent edits with the summary "new information added":

8730:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Intensive care unit" rcid="243994536" pageid="6332859" revid="238249200" old_revid="237664594" user="68.220.132.129" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T23:47:13Z"

10364:

That's OK, it's all good :-) You should forward details to Mike Godwin, the WMF lawyer - mgodwin at wikimedia.org. I mean, it's probably not a serious threat, but just in case ... -

8733:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Heaven's Gate (film)" rcid="243962951" pageid="92706" revid="238218287" old_revid="238159037" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T20:59:25Z"

7142:

so that his old edits can be transferred to the new name. I am sure one of the admins there will be able to sort it out. At least of his new account has few edits worth keeping. :-)

1923:

subpages. Even if a ban discussion results from an ANI thread, the time, space and decorum needed for a ban discussion are better suited to AN than ANI. But certainly not a subpage.

12900: 4011:

does. So I again ask you, how is Docu in the right to ignore community norms? BTW, nobody is going straight to "let's block". As I understand it, he's been talked to about this for

11279:

The userbox is a modifed version that was added after(and without knowledge of) the discussion that is being used as an excuse to edit war by the above user. By the way what gives

4015:. At some point you need to escalate things if you expect conformance. Otherwise, all the rules/guidelines/policies in the world won't mean a thing if you refuse to enforce them. — 8697:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Thumper (Bambi)" rcid="244001024" pageid="8400506" revid="238255500" old_revid="236754961" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:25:37Z"

8694:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Thumper (Bambi)" rcid="244001417" pageid="8400506" revid="238255883" old_revid="238255500" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:28:32Z"

5004:- We don't use the nuclear option on people out of pique. Sorry. I guess you'll just have to deal with the consequences of controversial actions the same way as us lesser beings. 11539:

Haha! So you can't stand over your claim of lies! I did bring it to your attention, and you have chosen to ignore it. You cannot bypass consensus by claiming emotional stress.

8736:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Caligula (film)" rcid="243956202" pageid="243204" revid="238211649" old_revid="236819207" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T20:26:30Z"

6164:

just how do you intend to prove that he has harrassed you in IRC when you have already admitted to me that you do not keep a log? That's gonna be kind of tough, don't you think?

3135:

to be a hostile means of addressing communication problems that would be better and more faithfully resolved by clear, thoughtful questions. Thank you for your apology, accepted.

3041:

of the arbitration's specification, thinking that it extended a ridiculous expansion to the support for applying this pejorative category tag. I support its restriction to nouns

13145: 11941: 9153:

68.220.160.0/19 and 65.0.160.0/19. I would suggest having a CheckUser look at the ranges for collateral damage as this is taking out a major ISP in a fairly good sized US city.

8739:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Fantasy Ride" rcid="243578053" pageid="16855379" revid="237843196" old_revid="237829341" user="68.220.131.151" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-12T01:43:50Z"

5387: 2467: 11688: 11404: 11383: 11369: 8618:

Sometimes, he does acceptable edits, but mostly he drives myself and a bunch of other editors to distraction by his attempts to return improved articles to bad earlier versions

2567:

that some little known subjects should be exempt from that policy, and articles about them should not be deleted just because there is no evidence to show that they are at all

3840:

opposed an rfa because of a signature, but oh wellsies) but the whole point of a signature is to know who said something and when. We have the who, now we just need the when.

2459: 2125: 1054: 10019: 11628: 11612: 11588: 11572: 11548: 11532: 11512: 11349: 10459:

with information previously not considered by editors on that page. Some editors interested in shutting down discussion now while their own POV is reflected on the pages of

6565:

so more real. I was, up untill now organising measures in place to help me get back on track, I can but hope that I have the chance to finish them, and to see if they work.

5887: 5843: 11913:(Non-admin comment): as a result of the previous thread here, the page was semi-protected. This prompted a series of responses from an anonymous IP: accusing an editor of 10616:

before we tackle the complaints and counter-complaints represented in this report. However (if it's decided to go ahead with this examination of Noroton's editing behavior

10137: 8706:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243998270" pageid="2877925" revid="238252833" old_revid="238010885" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:10:02Z"

8703:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243998959" pageid="2877925" revid="238253510" old_revid="238252833" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:13:58Z"

8700:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243999762" pageid="2877925" revid="238254303" old_revid="238253510" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:18:42Z"

8691:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="244001802" pageid="2877925" revid="238256257" old_revid="238254551" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:30:30Z"

5152: 3636: 3491:

On September 16, 2008, I ask Docu to explain why he doesn't include a link to his pages and a timestamp to which Docu replied that the issue was being discussed elsewhere,

3425: 12931: 12855: 12824: 12084: 10221: 6269:

exchange with Raul yesterday, he apologised upon my suggestion -- obviously willing to listen and learn). I would caution him in the strongest possible words, however, to

4341: 4180: 3852: 3654: 2966:

to it, and especially to ambiguous referents which these pseudosciences may study. With that in mind, i do dispute that a proper treatment has been given to Pseudoscience

10338: 9847: 9825: 9375:

subtracting all the vitriol, this is about a crappy book that is pushed by one ideological group and vilified by another. Goingoveredge is right in stating that the book

3675: 3617: 3268: 2912: 2685: 2667: 2359: 2325: 2269: 2241: 2215: 2192: 2131:

I am not fully sure with Cath, but my current understanding is that it appears to be a crusade about deletionism and POVs with hard-to-find citations. Very specifically,

12526: 12504: 11849: 9996: 9966: 7525:

I became confused with Dreadstar's interpretation of notability - that pilot articles aren't notable, and that their content should be merged back to the series article.

6401: 6381: 4322: 3349:

failed to bring forth (dare i say it?) verifiable evidence that i don't support verifiability, NPOV or other Knowledge policies -- because i DO support those policies.

3309: 3264: 3022: 2833: 2810: 2643: 2526: 2321: 2211: 2163: 1987: 1973: 12746: 12707: 12678: 10194: 10183: 7671:

had some interest), but then this came along. I am pretty hesitant to make any contribution at this point, as it might be misinterpreted in the worst possible light. -

6424: 5668: 5639: 3745: 3313: 3286: 2709: 2547: 2401: 2167: 1885:. Please discuss the current splitting/archiving consensus there if you feel it should change. Otherwise, please continue the discussion on the subpage and update the 13065:

Now that is very strange NJGW, why you delete my post on questions on sources without commenting? You also like to make false alleagtions against me. Why is that NJGW?

12610: 12566: 12486: 10689: 10674: 10128: 9677: 9587: 7587:

In case an explanation is needed: somehow, Hexhand got around to putting notability tags on all these articles Dreadstar started or edits a lot??? By chance, no doubt

7350: 6368: 5737: 5141: 4291: 4052:

Good, now I know who I can ignore if I run into a conflict or discussion with. People who make their pages inaccessible or difficult to reach get no dealings from me.

3895: 3834: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 10652: 7401:

Quite how one can say that the pilot is notable independent of the series, when coverage of the series thus far consists only of coverage of the pilot, is beyond me.

6446: 4238: 4027: 3994: 3977: 3873: 3815: 3782: 12309: 12125: 12070: 12056: 12026: 11004: 10373: 10355: 10104: 10078: 9505: 7328: 6617: 5756: 5728: 5697: 5559: 5114: 4437: 4313: 4253: 3999:

You need to reread it yourself (on a side note, telling someone who's been here longer than you to read something they've edited repeatedly themselves is borderline

3698: 3599: 3572: 3554: 2774: 2617: 1869: 12596:, perhaps I misunderstood the meaning of the line in the edit history: “(moved Decolonisation of Africa to Decolonization of Africa over redirect)”. However On the 10450: 6695:

mentorship, with recourse to blocks (not indefinite - enough to stop the behaviour without being punitive) if we see repeats of the personal commentary incidents.

5919: 5587: 5421: 4699: 3912: 1955: 13056: 13037: 12457: 12167: 11907: 11726:

is deleting mentions of Iraq in various articles and replacing it with Kurdistan and is adding a flag to each article. This happened in the Shanidar cave article.

11479: 10989: 10519: 10323: 9392: 4920:

Also theres something wrong with the diff you provided and that is he said it against Raul.......seriously its Raul so im not to fussed about him trolling a troll.

4839: 4379: 4234:

And since the penalty for not signing properly is roughly the same as that for driving without a seat belt in your own driveway, he can't be compelled to testify.

4042: 3340: 3243: 3114: 3064: 2601: 2116:. It could be significant, but I do not have the energy to go through all the page histories. It could be the majority of their contribs. You may be familiar with 1852: 555: 13140: 12796: 12477:

Churchill takes precedence because his government had executive responsibility for the colonies and more direct influence over their legal and political position.

11208: 9244: 9143: 6783: 6588: 6559: 6316: 6237: 6173: 5823: 5800: 5781: 5617: 5368: 4960: 4767: 4682:

I've looked at the diffs, and I must say I'm afraid I can't see what this thread is about. Unless there are deleted contribs that only admins can see, other than

4393: 4268: 3725: 2080: 82: 12656: 12335: 12235: 11498: 11333: 10936: 9363: 8890: 8876: 7680: 7652: 7628: 6091: 6007: 5377: 5085: 4418: 4188:

Cripes. I surely did not intend to open such a can o' worms. I didn't realize Docu had been using the unlinked sig for years, nor that others had asked before.

4143: 4109: 3712: 2794: 2505: 2068: 1253: 12642: 12272: 11997: 10606: 10591: 10149: 9619: 9601: 9341: 9162: 9014: 7561: 7531:

pilots may have sufficient notability for a stand-alone article. I asked what criteria should be used to denote a notable pilot separate from its series, or if

6710:, and seeing just two more in the eight days hence (both of which could be classed as technical or minor), I really hope to see an improvement in that as well. 6341: 6304: 6151: 5870: 5855: 5353: 5300: 4675: 4663: 4355:

Either make an RFC, or take it to ArbCom, or do both (one after the other) - the community can't do much, and I see no benefit in keeping this discussion open.

2022: 2008: 1932: 1830: 1799: 1753: 11442: 11238: 10480: 8580: 7518: 7492: 7394: 6470:

to Raul without any sort of request, I understand if he would still want me community banned, but never the less its the intention and the thought that counts.

6466:

In regards to Raul I was totally out of line, I should not have acted upon what one hears on IRC, after realising this I removed or struck out my comments and

6218: 6074: 5931: 5532: 5479: 5132: 4944: 4860: 4817: 4602: 3488:

suggests Docu adds a link to his signature who doesn't do so and lightly rebuffs the suggestion saying that "User page can be accessed quite easily anyways".

3305: 3260: 2844: 2829: 2806: 2639: 2522: 2317: 2207: 2159: 1673: 743: 11762: 11165: 10972: 10958: 10266: 7375: 7158: 7133: 7107: 7082: 7060: 6683: 5976: 5964: 5326: 2766:

seen this a few times before, you know? Still, at least this thread will ensure a lot of eyes on the edits of certain users, which can only be a good thing.

2097: 1909: 1786: 12350: 11866: 11265:. I have pointed to the president and reverted, he has ignored this. Can an administrator please enforce consensus with this user as happened with Setanta. 11091: 9327: 9299: 9275: 7787: 7768: 7247: 6200: 6131: 5499: 5462: 5269: 5260: 5010: 4996: 4798: 4789: 4716: 4616: 4091: 2048: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1536: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1379: 1257: 1135: 1066: 814: 11074: 10873: 10731: 10305: 8768: 6801: 6263: 6043: 5062: 5036: 4584: 4566: 4557: 4496:

This user, after asserting a removal of an autoblock (apparently blocked for POV pushing), disappears for a over a year, then returns for more of the same.

1760:

Full agreement - This discussion really shouldn't be shuffled back and forth between an unwatched subpage and ANI. It should stay put, and preferably here.

11184: 10252: 9861: 8816: 7473: 7459: 7319:

I have reverted all the above articles to the pre tagged version. I shall notify Hexhand of my actions, and this discussion, and comment upon his tagging.

6714: 6555:

Does it not worry you that so many people have had enough of you? Please can you explain how you will change your behaviour if you are not blocked/banned?

5733:

It wouldn't have taken much foresight to see that the comments should never have been made at all, let alone the issue of what to do about them once made.

4336: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1433: 1428: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1388: 13113: 13089: 13074: 12104: 8753: 7414: 4755: 4158: 3381: 12252:

archived? The issue is still live, the user continues with the same abusive edits, and the matter has not been resolved, or even apparently looked into?

12196: 11340:

Because the last XFD still stands. There is no need to have the same discussion twice, a decision was arrived at my consensus and it should be enforced.

11274: 9948: 9745:

His first few edits are mainly to userpages, which could be said are mistakes, where he adds a cabal template to various users' userpages, as seen here:

8910: 6746: 6287: 5833: 4641: 4628:

this user has any opinion on whether there should be a ban or not. If that administrator supports a ban, or if there is abusive socking as confirmed by

4541: 3982:

Reread IAR- it can be applied wherever it needs to be. I'm not suggesting that we do nothing, but going straight to "let's block" is not helpful either.

3495:. This discussion is quickly removed from his talk page in line which his practice which appears to be removal, rather than archiving, of old comments. 1370: 701: 500: 11970: 9568: 6114: 4908: 4898: 4738: 4364: 3958: 2837: 2814: 2647: 2530: 2458:

I thought my strategies for addressing the error was inventive, creative, and gradually focussed. First it followed after a specific user suggestion by

13155: 10750: 5050: 5024: 4453: 1497: 1375: 11773:

An editor on a number of occasions has made accusations against me, however, when I ask for diff's to support this they ignore me. This is the latest

8800: 4808:

I would not characterize a 1 week block (and unblocked the next day) as an "extended block", and have difficulty understanding how anyone else could.

9762: 9642: 4530: 4224: 4098: 4016: 3966: 3862: 3664: 2963: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 262:

isn't really constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is ]. Thanks, ] (]) 03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

254:

isn't really constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is ]. Thanks, ] (]) 03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

13007: 12984: 9792:

In the past I have suggested this user apply for mentoring. I don't know if they have, but it doesn't appear they have, according to his history.—

8856:? If I have time, I may partake the calling of the school if it is verified that all of the accounts involved are related (user accounts, that is). 3526: 11885: 9809: 9406: 8441: 4625: 4072: 3018: 2756: 592: 459: 12216: 11918: 11673: 10005:

edit; I don't think such comments should be tolerated, and the tariff was determined with regard to Whotheman2006's disregard to consensus in the

8673: 8619: 7034: 6252: 6058: 11454: 11354:

Instead of citing a year-old discussion in the most inflammatory way possible, I suggest you (a) start a new MfD or (b) let sleeping dogs lie. –

11308: 10062: 9439: 7802: 5982: 5971: 5939: 5507: 5275: 4971: 4611: 2151: 1805: 1761: 1131: 1062: 733: 11231: 10405: 7764:

You unblocked and immediately reblocked with email disabled. Now I understand what you are saying. I don't think there is anything to discuss.

7228: 7199: 3659:

Just because something has been done for five years doesn't make it right. And while I agree it's a minor issue, community norms (as defined at

12423:

and changing the English variant from one style to the British style when no strong tie to a specific English speaking country exists. In the

12261: 10213: 8550: 7540: 7538: 7261: 4371: 4259:

are for, I have seen plenty of examples of admins explicitly blocking just to get a response from an uncommunicative or unresponsive editor).

4245: 3518: 2462:

by removing the poorly-related subcategories. When this was opposed, i recommended a complement category tag which i agree was indeed making a

2142:

I discovered Hrafn, and the WP:AUTO problems, I realised that this is out of my league, and I can't figure it out alone in my current state. -

696: 12969:). Recently, he returned and has been posting repeatedly on my talk page from several different IPs (see my talk page for the discussion). 11619:

Can we take that as a withdrawal of your civility objections? If one userbox is unacceptable, its inverse is likewise. That is self evident.

11033: 10576: 10558: 5602: 5234: 11301: 10503: 9552: 9204: 7608: 5938:

Oppose community ban per Ryan. The block log is unconvincing..and the number of edits to the mainspace is pretty irrelevant. Take it to RfC.

5410: 5224: 5221: 3413:

and you are of course free to delete any completely unsupported text. As always, it's up to those wanting to keep the information to provide

2496:(abuse) discussion there clarifying rational examining of its employment. I think i have addressed the relevant portions of your commentary. 1880:(ec) As has been discussed multiple times before, threads are split when they become large. Consensus is that we usually split threads : --> 10490: 10456: 10427: 9414:

which ended by me self reverting my last edit just to put an end to the edit warring. Some other examples of the same behavior can be seen

9100: 8508: 6875: 6547: 4671:

But before trying to further to clarify, may I ask if you looked at the diffs (both, before and now), and to share your opinion of them. -

2865: 11796: 7536: 7313: 5450: 12367: 12340: 11108: 8330: 8288: 8162: 8120: 8036: 7994: 7826: 6990: 6891: 1882: 1618: 762: 535: 377: 11156:

has openly stated his intention to edit war on a number of articles. Assistance would be greatly appreciated to resolve the situation.

6974: 6647: 6643: 6639: 6635: 12431:). A review of all his edits is necessary to reverse possible vandalism. Some edits he has made appear constructive, but his changing 9987:- which has continued even after a uw-delete4 warning. The remark about being "a TOOL!!!" was Whotheman2006's, so he needs no apology. 9283: 8975: 8833: 8372: 8204: 7868: 6907: 6122:

Prom3th3an has never caused me any grief, and has seemed like a perfectly reasonable editor to me. I would like to see an RFC first.

3703:

And heeeeeereee we go with the random drop in of "Arbitrary Committee" attacks. Don't you have another windmill to tilt against, Kurt?

2971: 2560:

puts the onus on anyone adding or re-adding information to provide verification from a reliable source, while Catherine and associates

1684: 1492: 772: 691: 540: 10386:

Noroton's disruptive editing has made work on various presidential election-related articles just about impossible (see Talk pages of

7337:

here may be a good taggin'. The article thar do be a bit shy on th' notabil'ty and references. Avast mateys, thar be a reef ahead!

1100: 11872: 10897: 10892: 10853: 10697: 10312: 9041: 9006:

I went ahead and anon-only rangeblocked 68.220.160.0/19 for a week. That should hopefully cover a decent chunk of it temporarily. --

8927: 8785: 8414: 8246: 8078: 7952: 6883: 6763: 4869: 4826:

Sorry, I misread the block log for some reason. Either way, he hasn't improved any, and we don't need this level of immaturity here.

2725:

is a term used on Knowledge to describe the aggressive promotion of a particular point of view, particularly when used to denote the

2578:

that articles that have been tagged as lacking third party reliable sources for about nine months should be put up for deletion, and

737: 12820:

Canadian variants are in use (in both, -ise is considered a misspelling - Canadian follows the English on almost all other points).

7006: 6654: 6462:

I would seriously give anything a try to avoid a community ban, I must admit it looks ugly, but when you break it down I am trying.

3861:, specifically the section which mandates a user or user talk link in signatures. There doesn't seem to be much leeway there, IMO. — 17: 13172: 11882: 10901: 10212:'s edits, despite there being no obvious link to the previous issue of his userpage, I've moved this down to create a new section. 9707: 9592:

If there is concern about administrators misusing their tools to try and push a point of view that goes beyond a content dispute.--

8465: 7910: 7758: 6631: 5074: 4470: 4204: 3561: 3156:, just repeated your contention that i still "don't seem to like it". Where dave? Does some part of "i would prefer not to see it ( 520: 11914: 6982: 6021:

ensure fairness and a route for review if there's a genuine issue. RFC isn't needed either, many community bans happen without it.

3481:

Docu to "add a link to your user talk page at the very least in your signature". Docu doesn't do so, nor does he explain why not.

11262: 11080: 10945:, should take care of the problem, as we can expect that anyone trying to clean their slate will have countless IPs to try with. 10282: 9467: 8592: 8544: 6867: 6689: 5190: 3684:

Not to mention the fact that the Arbitrary Committee is not a legitimate authority anyway, and so what it says is irrelevant...

863: 633: 12996: 10864:

called "unreliable"). I'm not going to call that Facebook is trying to clean their slate here, but the whole affair smells bad.

8626: 12966: 10884: 9758: 9607: 9198: 7745:

I have just reblocked WordBomb with email disabled due to email abuse. Predictable enough, under the circumstances, I guess.

1791:

That's just brilliant for people with a slow internet connection. Also, brilliant for people who love multiple edit conflicts.

1126: 856: 628: 550: 422: 12990: 9253:. I usually spot him when he starts in on one of his usual articles, but by then he's often hit another 10-20. *sigh* -- ] (] 6966: 2429: 2425: 1881:= 50kb, especially if they look like they're gonna keep growing; this one was 131kb. The discussion page for AN* boards is at 10824: 9290:

Seems to be a long-standing and heated edit war both in the article and on its talk page. Really could use some sorting out.

9094: 8638: 8635: 8630: 8502: 7713: 7209: 7173: 6481: 4593:

case to refer to in this discussion. Even if no additional action is required, it helps to gather the evidence in one place.

2717:

I am at a loss to understand why someone would claim that Cat is engaged in POV pushing as the title suggests. I quote from

789: 530: 469: 12267:

He doesn't seem to have edited after a 3RR warning, and strictly hadn't hit 3RR anyway. If he reverts again, please take to

9782: 9778: 2517:

You are presenting your thoughts on Catherineyronwode with an implication that these accusations are proven. They are not.

13121: 13029: 12847: 12738: 12670: 12602: 12518: 12478: 12385: 12361: 11126: 11102: 10858: 10133:

It's been confirmed that neither Farrell nor DeGraw were on the plane; probably OK to unprotect their articles. Just FYI...

9770: 9560: 8781: 8324: 8282: 8156: 8114: 8030: 7988: 7820: 7575: 7366: 7290: 7149: 7098: 7051: 6473:

I closed the mediation case with best of intentions because it had principally moved on to RFAR and the mediation case was

5913: 5553: 5317: 5251: 5068: 4722: 868: 608: 525: 13251:

on Thingg's user talk page, instead of blocking him. And a 3-hour block of Redrumracer wasn't sufficient. (Fortunately,

12993: 12973: 10229: 10198: 7581: 5373:

Personally I see it only as more drama and a further waste of the communities time but I can see which way this is going.

13213: 11947: 9871: 8969: 8827: 8366: 8198: 7862: 6827: 5608:

He struck the comments - he shouldn't have made them in the first place, but at least he had the decency to strike them.

3591: 3546: 1623: 728: 653: 508: 439: 10737:

Dropped. Had not realized that dispute resolution was supposed to be the first avenue for dealing with people violating

9786: 2860:

Knowledge, it would seem", but that seems to me to be a fair description of the massive amount of impenetrable prose at

11484:

In the "Engaging in incivility" section alone I can count rudeness and Lies(deliberately asserting false information).

10124: 9985: 9347: 9284: 9035: 8921: 8556: 8408: 8240: 8072: 7946: 7583: 6707: 6393: 6360: 5431: 3613: 841: 836: 821: 658: 648: 613: 484: 121: 11086: 10435: 7281: 4399:

where someone's sig was something to start dispute-resolution processes over... or even think about, for that matter.

13279: 13166: 11050: 10831: 10722:

Dispute resolution is indeed the avenue for the underlying factual dispute, but not for the name calling and insults.

9701: 9210: 8459: 7904: 7187: 5593:

From my run-in with him earlier (aluded to by Corvus), I think it's clear that this user has earned a community ban.

5058: 5032: 4464: 4447: 846: 779: 675: 668: 618: 189: 12428: 10756: 4683: 4504: 3098:

bio is supported only by passing references in a couple of modern books, a 1919 history, and a history published by

2921:

Hi dave. Could you give specific quotes from me that indicate that i don't like those things? I would appreciate it.

2747:, in a better attempt to understand the issues involved. Certainly posting vague concerns is not helpful. Thanks, 12947: 11922: 10981: 10906: 9461: 9106: 8640: 8586: 8514: 7278: 6926: 6899: 6719: 6336: 6142:- He's harassed me and basically in IRC and Knowledge to stir up trouble with other users. His morals are lacking. 5184: 4106: 4024: 3974: 3870: 3672: 2634:?, with the goal of presenting Catherineyronwode in the worst way. I really would hate to think you are doing that 1092: 993: 479: 444: 12541: 12517:

And that preponderant influence is reflected in the form of English used in African nations as well as in the EU.

11774: 11242: 10424: 10417: 10239:

way, and the two of you can leave each other alone. First one to start on at the other again gets blocked. Fair?

9766: 8806:

When I saw him adding simple links to some of his ideas, I wondered if he was causing problems there too. -- ] (]

8645:

Is there anything else that can be done to stop this kid? An IP range block, a word to his ISP, anything? -- ] (]

8633: 6859: 6703:

become a highly useful contributor with appropriate guidance and direction as long as he is willing to cooperate.

5427: 3431: 2786:

is in its good right to dismiss those proposals when they don't agree with them. This is called forming consensus.

13298: 11895: 9959: 9750: 9574:

Have you discussed this on the article talk page? At a glance, it sounds like a content dispute, better taken to

8568: 8562: 8336: 8294: 8168: 8126: 8042: 8000: 7832: 7646: 7602: 5435: 5433: 4526:

Anyway, I welcome others' thoughts/opinion on all of this (including if you think I'm "way off base" on this). -

3021:, which i dispute is illogical, should not apply to an expansive use of the Pseudoscience category, and contains 1628: 880: 831: 784: 643: 565: 454: 370: 11254: 10002: 9937: 9222: 7577: 7334: 7287: 6998: 5227: 4918:

Nah ah, definetly premature for a community ban, a good way to the solve the issue is not always the right way.

4589:

I support a community ban on Boondocks37. If there is serious concern about socking, it would be good to have a

4192: 13103: 13101: 13099: 13097: 13095: 12315: 11684: 11624: 11584: 11544: 11508: 11473: 11379: 11345: 11327: 11270: 9971:

The incivility is an aside; the report was about the repetitive arbitrary deletion of solidly sourced material

9216: 9118: 8981: 8839: 8526: 8378: 8210: 7874: 7801:

most. I started tracking in August. This is a list of ones used so far, all confirmed to be from the same ISP (

7707: 7579: 7284: 6958: 6460:"RFCs are only useful when there is a chance to redeem a useful editor. This doesn't look like an option to me" 6001: 5958: 5526: 5294: 5265:

RFCs are only useful when there is a chance to reedem a useful editor. This doesn't look like an option to me.

5129: 5111: 4990: 4949: 1824: 1780: 951: 767: 711: 663: 582: 545: 110: 12965:) was blocked temporarily for edit warring on several articles and continuing the edit war using several IPs ( 12409: 11150: 10918: 10438: 10193:

As the previous thread was closed early, I'm opening new thread about the above and his recent edits, such as

8348: 8306: 8180: 8138: 8054: 8012: 7844: 7235: 6432:-- this looks like self-perpetuating wikidrama. You are giving attention to people who misbehave because they 5838:

Prom3th3an is clearly no there to do anything constructive, but simply to stir people up and crate drama. His

3352:

My concern has been that editors with an agenda (political and/or religious, primarily) are misusing deletion

13262: 12333: 12201: 9112: 9047: 8993: 8933: 8851: 8628: 8520: 8420: 8390: 8252: 8222: 8084: 7958: 7886: 7091:. You could tell him about that as well. Point is, you should ask the user first before posting it here. :-) 6757: 5839: 5441: 5429: 982: 587: 575: 570: 178: 12669:

Except hardly anybody uses Oxford spelling outside of the OUP and Clarendon Press, so that cuts no mustard.

12373: 11114: 9059: 8945: 8432: 8264: 8096: 7970: 13207: 13190: 13178: 12403: 11813: 11679:

There has already been a MFD on this and the community has decided. I was attempting to enforce consensus.

11144: 11039:

First off, you should use {{user|Historian19}} in such cases to automatically add links for the user (i.e.

10547: 9731: 9351: 9069: 8870: 8667: 8483: 8471: 8342: 8300: 8174: 8132: 8048: 8006: 7928: 7916: 7838: 7795: 5404: 4548:

A years absence shows that time isn't going to fix this. That doesn't exactly leave us with many choices.--

4488: 4476: 4137: 4066: 3641:

Sure, it's a minor issue when compared to say, world hunger, but basic etiquette would be nice. I'd rather

963: 851: 721: 513: 10525: 9491: 8610: 6835: 5214: 3411: 3392: 3217: 3103: 12962: 12892: 11977: 11933: 11258: 10820: 9924:

This generally uncivil user has reached final warning stage for repeatedly removing a sourced statement (

9754: 9746: 9719: 8987: 8881:

Well, normal admins can't block anything larger than a /16, although four of those will cover off a /14.

8845: 8788: 8623: 8621: 8598: 8538: 8384: 8216: 7880: 5506:

None of those diffs seem to warrant any kind of temp ban from project space - especially the "tips" spam

5119:

Sorry, it's not you they're attacking, it's the other person to comment. Nevertheless, I'll still tap. ➨

3377: 2737: 2316:

editors think principle is involved, and have differing ideas of what is good, there will be dissonance.

2113: 1050: 716: 396: 9479: 7737: 5202: 11878: 11825: 10888: 9855: 9511: 9192: 9053: 8939: 8426: 8258: 8090: 7964: 7464:(and I just realized what day it was, after seeing Lifebaka's and SoWhy's pirate-y mode of speech!). - 7013:. He redirected the Steelerfan-94 userpage and talk pages to the new account's pages. Is this allowed? 6934: 6851: 6809: 3106:

then you've got to persuade a lot of people before you start implementing your own ideas about it. . .

2417: 1046: 638: 464: 449: 434: 404: 363: 13231: 13127:

isn't really constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is

7725: 13184: 12733: 12427:

article, they even go so far as to edit Winston Churchill's name to precede Franklin D. Roosevelt's (

11843: 11831: 11680: 11620: 11580: 11540: 11504: 11375: 11341: 11280: 11266: 10794: 10460: 9992: 9944: 9725: 9088: 9072:. Interestingly, this one seems to actually be a repeat IP for him, from the previous edits. -- ] (] 8496: 8477: 7922: 7385:

explained the issue of consistency. Making claims of stalking in this regard is rather questionable.

6501:

Knowledge at any point, I question his motives as it would seem clear he would have a clear-cut bias.

6452: 4695: 4482: 4078:

It's hardly making it difficult to reach, User:Docu in the address bar and off you go. It's just not

3513: 3499: 3492: 2740:

also a pattern used by some editors that is by-and-large within policy, but is nonetheless unhelpful.

2103: 623: 474: 11984:

is engaging in an edit war which is threatening to spill into 3RR and is an extension of similar at

11881:

over the use of the song in a political context. There was a previous thread about this on ANI here

10914: 10413: 10034:

Breaking news this morning, a plane crash killed 4 unknown people, and injured Blink 182 ex-drummer

6950: 2585:

much more time to be given to those who haven't previously been bothering to find sources. She also

1964:

It won't load in your iPhone? I'm speechless. Is that really the most important consideration here?

13136: 13033: 12851: 12742: 12674: 12606: 12593: 12532: 12522: 12482: 12468: 12464: 12424: 12416: 12355: 12327: 12241: 11819: 11096: 11014: 10015: 9821: 9683: 9564: 9485: 9419: 8604: 8318: 8276: 8150: 8108: 8024: 7982: 7814: 7324: 7208:

abusive sock-puppetry going on here. Previous accounts have been declared, per policy, mateys, and

6753: 5907: 5547: 5208: 3778: 1983: 1951: 957: 809: 196: 128: 11518:

in a polite manner. But no you had to edit in an aggressive way. It's not on really, come on now.

10434:

and related topics. Because, really, he's being a pest and he seems to think it's proper behavior.

9449:

article. He made a fourth revert shortly after the 3RR case was closed in his favor. I've blocked

5017:

agree with his personal POV. It is sad really. But, once again, I do appreciate the attention.

3773:

why you'd want to make work for other contributors, or why you wouldn't want a link in your sig?

13219: 12304: 12293: 12121: 12080: 12066: 11993: 11985: 11837: 10665: 10420: 10029: 9904: 9895: 9890: 9865: 9830:

Also, as a side note, hoping that someone will clarify, I have no idea what gwa p means, or is.—

9713: 9397: 8963: 8886: 8821: 8360: 8192: 7856: 6821: 5878: 5631: 5579: 5166: 5081: 4764: 3738: 3587: 3542: 3094:

and wording completely unsupported by sources, but even a reasonably notable subject such as the

2702: 2290:

Smashville, what "bad faith"? My saying something you do not like is not automatically bad faith.

12379: 11120: 10910: 9648:

Well, if you have concerns that they are sockpuppets of a certain user, you should list them at

12928: 12821: 12223: 10401: 10369: 10319: 9982: 9980: 9978: 9976: 9974: 9972: 9899: 9660:

once they were warned enough. If the vandalism is too much, you can request semi-protection at

9639: 9473: 9140: 9029: 8915: 8784:

have been indef semied as a result of his edits and Chaorlette's Web 2 was deleted three times

8533: 8402: 8234: 8066: 7940: 7731: 7040:

Depends on what he is planning to do with it. You should ask him about that and tell him about

6711: 6397: 6378: 6364: 6313: 5734: 5196: 5149: 3888: 3609: 3373: 3099: 2077: 1641: 1023: 826: 386: 117: 9430:

was totally unacceptable, and that I did violate 3RR and self reverted when I realized I had.

9423: 8680:

Did a scan of the last 20000 anonymous edits, looking for 68.220.128/14. Here are the results:

7264:, I'd like others to look at this situation. The afd has been a bit heated at times and admin 7212:

is well and truly in the past, and was debated publicly by the community on ANI at the time -

7065:

It be fine, long as the two be the same user. Users be able to do what they want. A note on

4881: 2312:

such things happen when fighting for principle. It is also necessary to understand that, when

13275: 13160: 12231: 11399: 11364: 11214: 11044: 10980:

because someone chooses not to register an account does not mean they are not making GFE. --

10880: 9837: 9799: 9695: 9187: 8776:

This Disney Vandal has been causing major problems at the Simple English Knowledge as well.

8453: 7898: 7181: 6420: 6087: 5054: 5028: 4658: 4458: 4433: 4360: 3650: 3645:

delve through the history of talk pages to work out when someone has signed their comment. -

185: 76: 10801: 10329:"Do things my way or I will kill myself"??? That reminds me of this part of an intro from a 9916: 8787:. If this is blocked I suggest it be global. The relevant discussion would be over on the 6843: 6467: 3478: 3468: 13225: 12500: 11988:. The user is preventing the formatting of the article and deleting sourced information. 11903: 11201: 11000: 10985: 10816: 10812: 10782: 10757: 10698: 10381: 10262: 10134: 10090: 10074: 10048: 9988: 9940: 9882: 9629: 9501: 9455: 9435: 9427: 9411: 9359: 9250: 9083: 8909:

If we could do some of these partial blocks, it would be good. He just returned again with

8796: 8625:, removing plot points and other major bits of content while adding their own made up stuff 8491: 7719: 7253: 7066: 6920: 6680: 6614: 6585: 6544: 6389: 6356: 6300: 6233: 6147: 5866: 5819: 5777: 5752: 5725: 5693: 5665: 5613: 5178: 5138: 5046: 5020: 4941: 4880:

if s/he does not conform to the communal standards of conduct we hold here. (My message at

4856: 4813: 4691: 4598: 4389: 4264: 4102: 4020: 3970: 3866: 3829: 3719: 3668: 3631: 3422: 3111: 2909: 2768: 2752: 2679: 2664: 2614: 2598: 2356: 2267: 2238: 2189: 2018: 1969: 1928: 1865: 1848: 1749: 1643: 10637: 9738:

Hello, I'm coming here because I don't really know what to think in regards to this user.

5842:

is demonstrative of this, as are his ridiculous comments. His mainspace contributions are

4873: 8: 13132: 12703: 12652: 12597: 12321:

constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is

11889: 11768: 10685: 10602: 10572: 10554: 10515: 10499: 10468: 10011: 9955: 9842: 9817: 9804: 9388: 9323: 8313: 8271: 8145: 8103: 8019: 7977: 7809: 7642: 7598: 7555: 7320: 6942: 6742: 6724:

I am here to report on User:Tigris the Majestic, whom I suspect of being a sockpuppet of

6442: 6069: 5928: 5899: 5539: 4287: 3774: 3708: 3095: 1979: 1947: 1888: 1027: 799: 706: 400: 345:

Wikipedian's future. —] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

12391: 11132: 3800:

to link, and I do believe it's a wholly reasonable request that people are making here.

3177:

You have still not quoted me substantiating your repeated assertion about my dislike of

3152:

You have still not quoted me substantiating your repeated assertion about my dislike of

2659:, and you are of course welcome to comment on any aspects you perceive differently. . . 919: 12788: 12558: 12449: 12299: 12288: 12117: 12076: 12062: 12003:

I suggest Troubles ArbCom, is the best way to deal with this. Because I've had it with

11989: 11731: 11606: 11566: 11526: 11492: 11463: 11317: 11295: 11284: 10968: 10869: 10633: 10626:

actual discussion of precise citations from sources and exact language of WP guidelines

10351: 10335: 10209: 10150: 9615: 9583: 9512: 9308: 8958: 8764: 8355: 8187: 7851: 7701: 7488: 7390: 7345: 7127: 7077: 7028: 6876: 6817: 6810: 6778: 5991: 5948: 5897:. Make him walk the plank for his disruption, incivility and drama-mongering. Erik the 5624: 5572: 5516: 5475: 5358:

Well, since RfCs are finally becoming quasi-useful, it wouldn't hurt to go that route.

5348: 5284: 5077: 4980: 4761: 4319: 4235: 4220: 4177: 4155: 3792: 3731: 3580: 3535: 3239: 3060: 3014: 2900: 2695: 2632: 2543: 2501: 2397: 2147: 2109: 2093: 1814: 1770: 1657: 912: 904: 804: 560: 9314: 3730:

I voted for Kurt for the board, if he stands for Arbcom I will vote for him for sure.

2013:

And my suggestions to bring the ban part out here and leave the other stuff in there?

1946:

split. It won't load in my iPhone. Also, it is slagging my Firefox implementation.

13256: 12638: 12588: 12537: 12473: 12257: 12180:

and contrary to the findings of Checkuser. I'm getting rather tired of it all, too -

12100: 12048: 12018: 11884:. The article was being edit warred upon by anon IPs, so it was semi-protected. Now 11788: 11662: 11220: 11161: 10476: 10446: 10397: 10365: 10315: 10217: 10119: 9597: 9024: 8397: 8229: 8061: 7935: 7676: 7624: 7469: 7455: 6908: 6196: 6169: 6127: 5796: 5598: 4956: 4580: 4553: 4500: 4375: 4302: 4249: 4200: 4038: 4007:" Exactly as I said, "improving or maintaining Knowledge", neither of which ignoring 3983: 3947: 3882: 3841: 3810: 3606: 3522: 3509:

There could be other instance where this issue has been raised which I am not aware.

3091: 2421: 2388: 2057: 2044: 1915: 1896: 12151:; both are aware of it, as evidenced by prior history. In the future, please report 11374:

SO you believe that consensus expires and must be renewed? That is a new one on me.

7527:" I have never said that pilot articles aren't notable, what I did say was that not 6975: 6884: 4333:

with too much time on their hands? Doesn't anybody write and edit articles anymore?

13270: 13201: 12432: 12420: 12342: 12242: 12227: 12211: 11926: 11855: 11807: 11435: 11391: 11356: 11040: 11029: 11020: 10587: 9832: 9794: 9690: 9684: 9415: 9337: 9065: 8864: 8661: 8448: 7893: 7690: 7511: 7306: 7243: 7195: 7177: 6725: 6458:

trouble I was causing and I wish people would AGF instead of making s summery like

6416: 6349:

Prom said he is sorry on IRC, I have the log :) Give him more time 2 weeks perhaps.

6259: 6083: 5495: 5458: 5398: 4650: 4429: 4384:{{unsigned}} can be used to add link and timestamp where an editor fails to do so. 4356: 4131: 4087: 4060: 3646: 3564:, different circumstances, but apparently sigs are a BID DEAL, why I have no idea. 2730: 1993: 1717: 26: 13018:

I asked you politely on your talkpage for discussion of articles and sources NJGW.

12004: 10441:, but he seems to be away from the keyboard. This kind of abuse is depressing. -- 9912: 7007: 6868: 3398:

on an article with two inline cites to BBC articles, and external links including

13245: 13070: 12956: 12885: 12626: 12496: 12268: 12214: 11921:

report against an apparently good faith editor, and again accusing the editor of

11899: 11756: 11595: 11450: 11194: 11068: 10996: 10952: 10847: 10790: 10258: 10085: 10070: 10043: 9671: 9528: 9497: 9450: 9431: 9398: 9355: 9271: 9158: 8792: 8575: 7547: 7369: 7356: 7274: 7270: 7152: 7101: 7054: 6983: 6916: 6661: 6595: 6566: 6525: 6474: 6326: 6296: 6229: 6143: 5862: 5851: 5815: 5773: 5748: 5706: 5689: 5646: 5609: 5320: 5254: 5241: 5173: 5167: 4922: 4877: 4852: 4809: 4751: 4594: 4385: 4260: 3418: 3395: 3107: 2905: 2748: 2726: 2660: 2610: 2594: 2352: 2262: 2234: 2185: 2184:. A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing Knowledge, it would seem. . . 2014: 1965: 1924: 1861: 1844: 1745: 11053:)). Then, if you are correct and those edits are vandalism, you should use some 6892: 5861:

His block log shews effectively only two blocks - all the rest are adjustments.

13109: 13085: 13052: 13003: 12980: 12700: 12649: 12283:

are for; long-term behaviour isn't an "incident", although it might come under

12249: 11742: 11661:

and let the community decide, but don't edit war on someone else's userpage...

11054: 10942: 10681: 10598: 10568: 10550: 10511: 10495: 10464: 10179: 9963: 9933: 9929: 9661: 9653: 9384: 9319: 8744:

Doesn't look like collateral damage would be high from blocking 68.220.128/14.

7765: 7636: 7592: 7551: 7542:. If one is trying to "better understand" an editor's position, it's better to 7265: 6967: 6738: 6729: 6438: 6295:

per AGK (Anthony) and my comments further above. Premature - RFC needed first.

6062: 5925: 5359: 4637: 4629: 4400: 4283: 3704: 3475: 3465: 3132: 3082: 3078: 2949: 2892: 2884: 2718: 2568: 2384: 1997: 1713: 1009: 11723:

I'm in a hurry so couldn't look at this too closely but it appears that an IP

11579:

It is an inverted version of the same info box. It is even of the same style.

9954:

I decline to block for this single incident. The user needs to be told about

9908: 7269:

created-4 of them in 2006 and one in 2007. IHMO this is disruption to prove a

1639: 13292: 12881: 12777: 12547: 12438: 12284: 12280: 12276: 12156: 12152: 12148: 11746: 11727: 11658: 11600: 11560: 11520: 11486: 11424: 11289: 11250: 11179: 11173: 11058: 10964: 10924: 10865: 10764: 10746: 10738: 10727: 10347: 10247: 10241: 10110: 10035: 9657: 9649: 9611: 9579: 9547: 9541: 9536: 9532: 9295: 8777: 8760: 8749: 8653:

Indef'ed Bambirocks, page protecting some of the heaviest-hit pages for now.

7782: 7776: 7753: 7747: 7696: 7662:

article - our first instinct is to attempt to fix it. that's just natural. I

7484: 7409: 7403: 7386: 7339: 7277:

violation also. These articles were all tagged today within a 3-minute span:

7139: 7115: 7088: 7071: 7041: 7016: 6991: 6772: 6282: 5846:. I do not believe Prom3th3an is a net positive and propose a community ban. 5471: 5342: 5306: 5098: 4893: 4827: 4777: 4733: 4727: 4709: 4590: 4216: 4195:

the sentence to the guideline, in July 2007, primarily (at the time) because

4008: 3943: 3939: 3858: 3660: 3503: 3485: 3329: 3275: 3235: 3178: 3056: 2987: 2888: 2862:

Cultural Struggle, the Weapon of Effacement, and a Theory of Hierarchic Wikis

2852: 2848: 2744: 2656: 2628: 2539: 2497: 2393: 2380: 2143: 2132: 2089: 12495:

America had remarkably few colonies in Africa, Britain had remarkable many.

11724: 9936:) because he doesn't want the singer "compared to that skank with the baby" 6039:

to be undertaken. It's useful as a clarifier though, in some circumstances.

5924:

Looks like it's time to help this obvious troll find the door--endorse ban.

2733:." I have not run across any article edits by Cat fitting this description. 2428:. I was informed that were i to continue in my correction of errors i would 972: 212: 57: 13252: 13151: 12634: 12253: 12140: 12135: 12096: 12039: 12009: 11981: 11779: 11191: 11157: 10837: 10472: 10442: 10114: 10100: 10058: 9593: 9575: 9380: 9238: 7672: 7620: 7465: 7451: 7254: 6900: 6556: 6224: 6215: 6192: 6165: 6123: 6107: 5792: 5594: 5374: 5266: 5231: 5123: 5105: 4952: 4576: 4549: 4196: 4034: 3906: 3801: 3685: 3566: 3400: 2820: 2040: 1793: 12419:;. Editor is systematically going from article to article in violation of 4005:

If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge, ignore it.

1090: 13196: 12181: 12112: 11802: 11428: 11025: 10779:. Not the worst of personal attacks, but I'd appreciate some assistance. 10583: 9333: 8882: 8858: 8655: 7500: 7295: 7239: 7213: 7191: 6706:

The level of mainspace contributions in recent weeks is something I have

6255: 5688:

presentation of evidence, as opposed to a chaotic ANI thread) is needed.

5491: 5454: 5392: 4125: 4083: 4054: 3414: 3157: 3153: 3087: 2933: 2880: 2870:

Helpfully, Self-ref has given an "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY" of the former post –

2787: 2557: 2351:

unacceptable and my hopes for her reform are dim. Still, live in hope. .

9777:

editing userpages that are not in his his one userspace, he has done so

6999: 5073:

I have concerns about an unsupported accusation of anti-semitic bias on

2108:

I'd like some help on understanding what the heck is going on regarding

403:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see 13066: 12952: 12160: 11963: 11859: 11751: 11710: 11063: 10947: 10842: 10564: 10541: 10431: 10387: 10330: 10298: 9666: 9267: 9154: 9007: 7588: 7361: 7144: 7093: 7046: 5847: 5312: 5246: 4747: 4518:

As an aside, when looking over their contributions, I noted that their

2001: 1902: 1721: 1677: 7523:

Thanks Rlevse, you're right, I'm being misquoted where Hexhand says, "

7432:

Rather than nominate the article examples for deletion, which I think

7044:. It is most likely that the user just did not know about it. Regards 4230:

If a guy won't answer a question, there's usually a very good reason:

1710:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Kmweber ban discussion

956:

If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on

13105: 13081: 13048: 12999: 12976: 10582:

An edit war that you and Scjessey have provoked and participated in.

10202: 10175: 7292:. Notices posted at the afd, and talk pages of Hexhand and Dreadstar. 6486: 4905: 4795: 4776:

persist in acts of seeming "revenge" against those who opposed them.

4672: 4633: 4563: 4538: 4527: 3506:

raised the same issue. Docu has yet to really answer our questions.

3454: 3432: 3406: 399:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the 10768: 8440:

He's also been confirmed to have at least registered sock accounts (

5453:

in total, only 1,957 are in the Mainspace, only 31% of his edits...

3090:

related articles have been improved a bit by being stripped of some

2176:

Thanks for the heads-up, the issue is currently under discussion at

12275:

and looks too detailed for here; that's what specialist pages like

11307:

Why not start another MfD considering the outcome of the last one?

10802: 10786: 10742: 10723: 10702: 9886: 9291: 8745: 7668: 6798: 6651: 6275: 6099:- I've personally had enough, and Manticore brings up a god point. 6040: 4886: 2866:

Should this category be purged of its poorly related subcategories?

6324:

If you give him time (and intense mentorship), he'll come around.

3942:

is a guideline and by it's very definition has leeway. Please see

13265:) was wiser, and subsequently blocked redrumracer indefinitely.) 12226:. You have to ask there. Anyone knows the correct noticeboard? -- 9135:

themselves, and after the school intervened, all problems ceased.

6733: 6100: 5894: 3791:

Meh. I agree with the above. I've been watching this unfold on

11695:

IP is adding inappropriate nationalist material to many articles

10763:

This user seems to be having difficulty grasping the concept of

10741:. Seems a strange path to go down for obvious policy violations. 9312:

have civil discussion with him have failed. Please also see the

6509:

until now & removing these bits smacks of punitive measures"

1835:

You forgot the sarcasm link. All joking aside, why not move the

1694:

User:Kmweber on WP:AN & Kmweber blocked & ban discussion

10836:

You should, if you have any problems with each other, consider

10257:

I agree. Docu's refusal to let things go is becoming tiresome.

9446: 7112:

Actually, I came here to answer a question of his, "Is it ok?"

5622:

Right, struck them but left them there for everybody to read.

1644: 355: 10567:

article, in view of calming an edit war over there? Thanks,

5570:

above? I notice that nobody has commented about them there.

5437:*Spamming* a lot of user talkpages with what look like "tips". 2879:

If my translation is correct, that means that he doesn't like

1645: 12698:

and trust me, I've seen my fair share of petty squabbles....

11925:

while requesting a 3rd opinion. All of this was directed at

10039: 9928:

official website saying that her favourite musicians include

9635: 7190:) account. I class that he has used five different accounts. 1978:

Sometimes I wish a sucky internet connection on some of you.

1720:

and consensus clearly established for long AN/ANI threads. --

282:== I made a block I now regret — is its history indelible? == 12647:

Indeed, both forms are correct in British English anyway...

10563:

While we are here, could an admin please take a look at the

9761:. In later edits, he continues to edit others' userspaces: 7359:

indeed! I be thinkin that tis be still yer primary concern!

7172:

Please note this user has created sockpuppet accounts - see

4166: 9307:

I would request to please look into this issue. The editor

7138:

Ah, okay. I think you should tell him to file a request at

3077:

That's a bit clearer, hopefully you're getting the hang of

2899:

above, the latter discussion suggests that he doesn't like

10624:

in this very report mimics hi/r talkpage style: to eschew

9816:

the suss). I would not missed them if they were indeff'd.

9082:*screams* Now he is back with another registered account: 4507:), really would seem to make it clear that this user does 4423:(Replying to both Adambro and Starblind) As was suggested 3717:

Go on Kurt, stand for ArbCom this year. I'd vote for you.

11917:

while requesting that the page be unprotected, filing an

10006: 9925: 9878: 9182:

Removed from archive since new suggestions had been added

6836: 6767: 3857:

It's disruptive, albeit minor. As for leeway, please see

2819:

I think it is interesting that today's featured article,

213:→‎I made a block I now regret — is its history indelible? 12397: 11138: 9318:

for some more information on his activities. Regards, --

7087:

Or, after reviewing, I think he just did not know about

4668:

I had thought it was self-evident by by post at the top.

144: 13146:

I made a block I now regret — is its history indelible?

7355:

Tis may be correct, me hearty, but tis be lookin' very

6737:

non fascist groups used the title "National Socialism.

3605:

I don't think this requires administrative attention. –

3328:

But, how does it address the real issue? It doesn't.

11249:. The polar opposite of this userbox still exists on 10630:

simple pronouncements in the tone of "Trust My Words!"

6935: 5310:

be a way to see if multiple users have such opinions.

2000:

guidelines due to technical and readability issues. --

64: 10840:. This does not need any administrator intervention. 10640: 6377:

He said sorry the last time too. Then this happened.

6134:(not an admin- delete if this is not a valid comment) 5747:

edit summary, and in some cases a talk page apology.

5440:

On a similar note, I'm struggling to know why he has

3498:

Failing to find an answer to my original question at

3336: 3333: 3330: 3282: 3279: 3276: 2823:, does apply in interesting ways to this discussion. 1674:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Hrafn

11929:, apparently in retaliation for daring to post here. 10208:

Since you persist in wanting to continue to discuss

10167:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

7497:

Hex-Dreadstar never said ALL pilots aren't notable.

6828: 6732:. He pops up every once and a while and changes the 5566:

Has anyone noted this user's struck-out comments at

3449:

No admin action required. Recommended to pursue RFC.

3274:leave the digressions on user talk pages. Thanks. 1804:

You're right..let's just keep going back and forth.

12732:If people would only observe the guidelines in the 12061:I am not a sock. I have asked you not to edit war. 11741:Sounds like vandalism to me. Warn him/her with the 10455:Incidentally, I'll be making new proposals soon at 10311:Some of you may have noticed the suicide threat at 10297:

authorities contacted; no further action needed. --

10278:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

10174:I think JzG's note on his user page resolved this. 7614:Martinphi, I didn't say it happened by accident; I 11171:must... stop... thinking... "architect sketch"... 10646: 9634:A number of IPs have vandalized the same thing on 9608:It appears to be under discussion on the talk page 13023:You are making false allegations against me NJGW. 11061:once he received a fourth level warning. Regards 10463:-related articles might find it useful to review 9984:with the promise to "do this to the end of time" 7069:'bout it be good, though. Cheers, me hearties. 6927: 3938:Locke: at risk of sounding like a broken record, 13290: 8998:. Any ideas on how to block him at all? -- ] (] 8442:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Iluvteletubbies 5416:Evidence of what could be classed as disruptive: 4164:That's it. I'm just replacing my signature with 3899:(the previous statement was made by a non-admin) 2964:apply such a blatantly pejorative categorization 1091: 1004:When starting a discussion about an editor, you 13094:So at what point does this become harassment? 9578:, not an issue for administrator intervention. 9445:Hmm, you have a point about Prophaniti and the 7803:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/70.146.241.244 6860: 6852: 13195:was inserting clearly non-consensus text, and 11962:Both editors blocked due to 3RR violations. -- 10963:Ok, I requested semi-protection for that one. 10109:Based on the speculation in the articles that 7262:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pilot (Fringe) 5567: 5137:Redvers, am I missing Talk Like a Pirate Day? 1053:. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the 990:Do not report breaches of personal information 303:Redrumracer for 3 hours and Thingg for 1 hour. 12208:Image:Rachel Stevens holding right boobie.jpg 10170:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8632:, and doing massive refactoring of talk pages 7572:Looks like a major violation of POINT to me 7204:Arrr! Checkuser be determining that there is 4610:- Looks like a good way to solve this issue. 4205:Knowledge talk:Signatures/Archive 5#Recourses 371: 10941:Well, I think semi-protection, requested at 10457:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC 10428:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC 6959: 6951: 5240:That looks pretty serious. Has there been a 4318:I sense another admin food-fight coming on. 992:on this highly visible page – instead go to 12435:rampantly is the substance of my complaint. 11877:There is an edit war once again brewing at 6914:Today, this user created a second account, 6844: 2383:initially editing in what appeared to be a 13150:A few days back, I spotted an edit war on 10001:Ah, I did block - for a week - when I saw 9789:, of which the user has yet to explain. 9023:Alas, not even 24 hours...he came back on 6480:The tip "spamming" was to members of this 4511:have Knowledge's best interests at heart. 3579: 3534: 3502:, I then asked again on his talk page and 3023:four decisions by 8 people on the category 2638:, although you are certainly doing that. 1883:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard 378: 364: 18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 9068:but apparently decided to also play with 6634:by Deskana and these comments by myself: 3225:on that page, only (at least recently) a 12210:to a title that is a bit more tasteful? 9249:That would probably explain his creating 7535:pilots should have a standalone article 6943: 6630:made posts on-wiki about it that led to 6386:Give him 2 weeks only.... iDangerMouse 5075:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Eli Tene 3562:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2607:Non-clairvoyant corrections as requested 2180:above, with the latest subsection being 1106:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 12178:in the complete absence of any evidence 9606:I see now what this is about, I think. 3581: 3536: 352:Revision as of 03:13, 21 September 2008 163:Revision as of 03:13, 21 September 2008 100:Revision as of 03:10, 21 September 2008 14: 13291: 12967:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Yasis 9962:, and asked to refactor their remark. 6644:Prom3th3an's 2nd post (later modified) 6082:I too would like to see an RFC first. 4199:was linking his signature directly to 3936:requirement for posting on this board. 3764:As admins, we're supposed to at least 1901:or similar when things are settled. -- 952:these tips for dealing with incivility 896:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 12271:. Meanwhile, your previous thread is 12033:Okay, checkuser shows no evidence of 11858:requesting clarification. Cheers. -- 10091: 10049: 6482:Knowledge:WikiProject_AP_Biology_2008 5388:I predicted this earlier in the month 2430:"very likely be accused of vandalism" 1914:I was there for those discussions at 359: 145:→‎IP 89.240.197.164 WP:ENGVAR Changes 10775:, and his response was to switch to 10161:The following discussion is closed. 9638:. I wonder if they are sockpuppets. 8782:simple:The Fox and the Hound (movie) 7236:he's going back to his Steelerfan-94 4327:Ever get the feeling there might be 1739:the thread is so long is because it 397:discussion, request, and help venues 90: 56: 11219:No admin help needed at this time. 5834:Prom3th3an - Proposed community ban 4301:respond. So do something about it. 1008:leave a notice on their talk page; 221: 208: 177: 160: 153: 140: 109: 97: 23: 12037:sock-puppetry. I beg to differ. -- 11553:Misrepresenting an old discussion 10540:article indefinitely protected by 10414:Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and Violence 10201:. -- 14:41, 2008 September 20. -- 9348:Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity 9285:Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity 9231:]) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9128:]) 01:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 9002:]) 21:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8954:]) 00:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8649:]) 00:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7260:Since I participated in this afd: 6816: 4885:get back to some article writing. 3821:hauled up as if it were policy. -- 3471:about Docu's signing of comments. 3410:. However, your next edit is fine, 354: 45: 13310: 13013:What's this with me stalking you? 12633:variants are correct in BrEng. – 11873:Right here, Right Now...Yet Again 11257:per consensus and president. He 10095: 10053: 9257:]) 01:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9175:]) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9076:]) 02:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8903:]) 14:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8810:]) 03:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 5705:that is the beauty of hindsight. 5242:request for comments on this user 5097:quick tap of the cluestick about 12463:The title of one of these pages 12298:23:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)-- 12139: 12134: 11953: 11700: 10709: 10531: 10288: 10274:The discussion above is closed. 10038:and Nicole Ritchie's ex-husband 9519: 6789: 6325: 4523:"just-another-editor" in this.) 4165: 3440: 2181: 1699: 1663: 385: 12187: 12185: 11671: 11664: 11607: 11601: 11567: 11561: 11527: 11521: 11493: 11487: 11466: 11456: 11392: 11357: 11320: 11310: 11296: 11290: 11283:the right to completley ignore 11229: 11222: 11081:Blatant POV/soapboxing by an IP 10421:Talk:Bill Ayers#First paragraph 10283:Suicide threat being dealt with 9960:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 8871: 8865: 8859: 8668: 8662: 8656: 7219: 7217: 6915: 6283: 6276: 5994: 5984: 5951: 5941: 5519: 5509: 5405: 5399: 5393: 5287: 5277: 4983: 4973: 4894: 4887: 4654: 4651: 4575:I concur with a community ban. 4414: 4411: 4408: 4405: 4311: 4304: 4138: 4132: 4126: 4082:as if there was a sig there. -- 4067: 4061: 4055: 3992: 3985: 3956: 3949: 3850: 3843: 3809: 3803: 3740: 3733: 3461:Looking through his talk page: 3236:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 3218:WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy 3104:WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy 3057:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 2896: 2828:Certainly, an important point. 2704: 2697: 2498:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 2177: 2117: 2066: 2059: 1817: 1807: 1773: 1763: 881:Category:Knowledge noticeboards 13285:03:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13141:03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13114:03:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13090:02:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13075:02:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13057:02:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13038:02:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13008:02:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12985:02:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12932:03:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12901:03:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12856:02:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12825:02:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12797:02:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12747:03:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12708:02:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12679:02:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12657:01:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12643:01:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12611:02:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12567:01:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12527:01:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12505:01:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12487:01:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12458:00:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12336:23:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12310:23:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12262:23:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12236:00:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12217:23:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12197:01:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12168:23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12126:22:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12105:22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12085:22:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12071:22:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12057:22:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12027:22:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11998:22:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11971:23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11942:23:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11908:22:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11867:22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11797:22:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11763:21:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11736:21:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11718:21:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11689:00:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11674:23:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11663: 11629:20:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11613:20:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11589:20:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11573:20:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11549:20:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11533:20:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11513:20:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11499:20:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11480:20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11443:20:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11405:00:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11384:21:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11370:20:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11350:20:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11334:20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11302:20:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11275:19:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11232:23:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11221: 11209:00:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11185:19:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11166:19:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11075:18:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11034:18:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11005:22:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10990:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10973:18:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10959:18:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10937:18:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10874:17:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10854:18:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10751:18:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10732:18:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10690:23:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10675:21:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10607:18:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10592:18:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10577:17:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10559:18:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10520:20:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10504:17:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10481:16:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10451:16:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10406:16:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10374:22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10356:20:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10339:16:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10324:15:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10306:22:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10267:15:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10253:15:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10222:14:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10184:18:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10138:19:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10129:14:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10105:13:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10079:13:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10063:13:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10020:15:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9997:14:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9967:13:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9949:12:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9848:23:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9826:14:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9810:09:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9678:17:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9643:08:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9620:08:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9602:08:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9588:06:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9569:06:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9553:10:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9506:05:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9440:04:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9393:15:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9364:05:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9342:04:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9328:04:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9300:03:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9276:14:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9245:01:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9163:11:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 9144:10:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 9015:21:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8891:10:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8877:03:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8801:03:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8769:03:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8754:02:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8674:00:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7788:22:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7769:00:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7759:23:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7681:02:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7653:02:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7629:01:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7609:00:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7562:01:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7519:00:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7493:22:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7474:22:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7460:22:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7415:21:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7395:21:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7376:21:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7351:21:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7329:20:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7314:20:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7248:17:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7229:20:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7200:19:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7159:19:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7134:19:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7108:19:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7083:19:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7061:18:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7035:18:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6802:02:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6784:18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6747:18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6715:03:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 6684:07:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6655:07:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6618:09:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6589:07:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6560:06:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6548:06:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6489:the co-ordinator for the idea. 6447:15:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6425:14:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6402:11:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6382:11:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6369:11:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6342:11:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6335: 6317:11:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6305:10:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6288:10:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6264:07:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6238:15:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6219:06:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6201:05:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6174:18:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6152:03:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6132:03:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6115:03:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6092:00:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6075:00:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6059:Grawp-style vandalism off-wiki 6044:02:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6008:00:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5977:23:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5965:23:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5932:22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5920:22:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5912: 5906: 5888:22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5882: 5871:22:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5856:22:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5824:12:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5801:12:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5782:10:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5757:13:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5738:11:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5729:10:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5698:10:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5669:10:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5640:23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5618:22:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5603:22:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5588:22:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5560:22:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5552: 5546: 5533:20:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5500:19:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5480:19:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5463:19:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5411:18:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5378:18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5369:18:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5354:18:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5327:18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5301:18:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5270:18:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5261:18:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5235:18:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5153:11:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5142:18:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5133:12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5115:12:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5086:12:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5063:02:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 5037:02:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 5011:22:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4997:18:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4961:16:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4945:16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4909:23:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4899:16:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4861:15:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4840:16:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4818:15:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4799:23:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4790:15:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4768:10:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4756:09:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4739:09:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4717:09:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4710: 4700:09:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4676:08:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4664:01:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 4642:00:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 4632:, I would have no objection. 4617:02:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 4603:22:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 4585:02:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 4567:08:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 4558:09:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 4542:22:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 4531:08:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 4438:14:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4419:14:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4394:14:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4380:12:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4365:01:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4342:21:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4323:20:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4314:20:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4303: 4292:19:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4269:19:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4254:18:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4239:18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4225:18:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4207:for other links and context). 4181:17:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4159:14:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4144:13:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4110:13:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4092:12:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4073:12:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4043:09:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4028:04:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3995:04:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3984: 3978:03:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3959:03:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3948: 3913:02:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3896:02:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3874:02:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3853:00:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3842: 3835:00:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3816:21:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3783:21:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3746:01:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3726:00:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3713:21:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3699:21:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3676:02:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3655:12:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3637:21:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3618:21:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3614: 3610: 3600:21:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3573:21:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3560:You must not be familiar with 3555:21:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3527:20:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3426:08:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3382:06:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3341:18:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3314:14:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3287:22:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3269:18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3244:15:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3115:09:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3065:08:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2913:17:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2838:13:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2815:12:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2795:13:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2775:06:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2757:02:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2710:02:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2686:00:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2668:00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2648:00:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2618:00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2602:23:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2548:22:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2531:22:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2506:06:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2402:22:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2360:21:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2326:21:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2270:20:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2242:20:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2216:18:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2193:18:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2168:15:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2152:14:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2098:02:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2081:02:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2069:23:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2058: 2049:22:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2023:22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2009:22:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1988:22:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1974:22:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1956:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1933:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1910:21:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1870:21:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1853:21:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1831:21:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1800:21:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1787:21:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1754:21:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1729:21:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1685:21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 13: 1: 13028:That is unfair and childish. 12778: 12548: 12439: 12038: 12008: 11976:Can someone please assist at 11778: 11449:Also, where is the breach of 11202: 10771:. I asked him not to call me 10092: 10050: 9833: 9795: 7338: 7070: 6771: 5879: 5341: 3720: 2769: 2680: 501:Biographies of living persons 350: 340: 331: 319: 310: 298: 289: 278: 269: 13122:Kmweber block/ban bump redux 12989:Hmmm, not just one article: 12153:three revert rule violations 11427:be the place for that? ;-) — 11195: 10859:Article:Critisms of Facebook 10718:No admin intervention needed 9070:Knowledge:Avoid weasel words 5130:Yo Ho Ho And A Bottle Of Rum 5112:Yo Ho Ho And A Bottle Of Rum 5069:accusation anti-semitic bias 4882:User talk:Dpmuk#Skin Hunters 3259:have run out of good faith. 2957:inserts hyper-skeptical and 28:Browse history interactively 7: 12884:of your fellow editors and 12075:3RR has now been breached. 11978:Ulster Special Constabulary 11948:Ulster Special Constabulary 10228:I left a note on his talk, 10086: 10044: 10042:. Eyeballs will be needed. 8789:administrators' noticeboard 6766:) of this thread, maytey. 5898: 5538: 5120: 5102: 3390:(entirely void of sourcing) 2114:User talk:Catherineyronwode 1735:Emergency split? The whole 1708:emergency split (131kb) to 10: 13315: 12467:was recently changed from 12224:this image is from commons 12222:boobie..... :-/ anyways, 11951: 11879:Right Now (Van Halen song) 11745:and then report the IP to 11698: 10707: 10529: 10437:I asked MastCell for help 10286: 10153:'s edit warring continuing 9517: 5568:#Request for community ban 3512:The ongoing discussion at 3438: 2379:what I've seen so far was 1697: 1661: 1637: 1614: 1609: 1491: 1369: 1247: 1125: 902: 869:Discussions for discussion 210: 142: 12734:Knowledge Manual of Style 11749:if it continues. Regards 11281:User:Traditional unionist 11237:Last year Setanta747 was 10628:and to replace this with 10461:Weatherman (organization) 9939:. Could we have a block? 9773:, telling him he cannot. 4868:. An editor who has made 4448:Request for community ban 3514:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3500:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3493:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3131:Thanks, dave. I consider 3019:Pseudoscience arbitration 2576:asserts that it is unfair 1624:Sockpuppet investigations 986:demonstrating the problem 877: 752: 684: 601: 493: 412: 393: 338: 329: 317: 308: 296: 287: 276: 267: 232: 229: 159: 96: 12948:Yasis is wikistalking me 12594:Decolonization of Africa 12533:Decolonization of Africa 12469:Decolonisation of Africa 12465:Decolonization of Africa 12425:Decolonization of Africa 12417:Decolonization of Africa 12147:– both editors violated 11709:blockified. cheers =) -- 10769:comments on my talk page 10276:Please do not modify it. 10164:Please do not modify it. 9656:them and report them to 6720:User:Tigris the Majestic 6057:per reasoning above and 5488:support indefinite block 5486:Based on the above, I'd 2120:. I'll point you to the 1111:ArbCom election RFC 2024 1055:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 561:Scalable vector graphics 395:Knowledge's centralized 12625:Well, if you adhere to 12206:Is it possible to move 11986:Ulster Defence Regiment 11057:and report the user to 9652:. Otherwise you should 7042:the user account policy 6708:already raised with him 6690:So, where to from here? 5424:a Mediation Cabal case. 4950:Pot, meet kettle. Black 1493:Arbitration enforcement 405:formal review processes 95: 13299:Knowledge noticeboards 13269:Wikipedian's future. — 12316:Kmweber block/ban bump 10648: 9383:in the first place. -- 7176:. He has also had the 5970:and solve this issue. 3484:On September 6, 2008, 3100:Optimist International 1672:large thread split to 1093:Centralized discussion 1081:Start a new discussion 1051:Lowercase sigmabot III 994:Requests for oversight 445:Centralized discussion 12202:Tasteless image title 10923:<- For reference. 10881:Criticism of Facebook 10649: 10647:{\displaystyle \sim } 9352:WP:Notability (books) 8957:He's back again with 6636:Prom3th3an's comment 3039:legitimacy and wisdom 2991:contribution thusfar 2731:minor or fringe views 1121:Noticeboard archives 980:Be brief and include 973:recently active admin 864:WikiProject proposals 763:Committee noticeboard 712:Personal restrictions 697:Contributor copyright 536:Neutral point of view 12145:Both editors blocked 11681:Traditional unionist 11621:Traditional unionist 11581:Traditional unionist 11541:Traditional unionist 11505:Traditional unionist 11376:Traditional unionist 11342:Traditional unionist 11267:Traditional unionist 10758:user:G.-M._Cupertino 10699:user:G.-M._Cupertino 10638: 10231:. Now, Docu you go 9428:Thousand Foot Krutch 9412:Thousand Foot Krutch 9315:RFC on Goingoveredge 7796:Disney Vandal issues 7067:User talk:RKO 4 Life 6752:Arr, I be notifyin' 6271:think before he acts 6120:Oppose community ban 4874:slamming-of-the-door 4282:admin straight off? 3231:legitimacy or wisdom 3083:notability guideline 2893:non-notable subjects 2847:, you're failing to 1101:Administrator recall 938:behavioral problems. 936:chronic, intractable 822:Requests for comment 738:Requests for comment 702:Edit warring and 3RR 692:Conflict of interest 494:Articles and content 12894:This flag once was 12888:terms like "bully". 12598:Talk:Decolonization 12329:Anonymous Dissident 12269:the 3rr noticeboard 12157:the 3RR noticeboard 11935:This flag once was 11263:told me where to go 10767:, judging from his 9956:Knowledge:Etiquette 9531:abusively applying 7546:rather than making 6754:Tigris the Majestic 6310:Oppose as premature 5444:in his userspace... 5305:Well, I think with 4232:He doesn't want to. 3372:catherine yronwode 3096:Christian D. Larson 2738:"Civil POV pushing" 2488:following out both 2122:Village pump (misc) 1122: 969:Just want an admin? 12706: 12655: 12341:IP 89.240.197.164 12332: 12043: 12013: 11783: 10838:dispute resolution 10644: 10210:User:Pigsonthewing 10151:User:Pigsonthewing 9856:User:Whotheman2006 9576:dispute resolution 9513:Alex Jones (radio) 9186:Have another one: 7089:changing usernames 6811:user:Steelerfan-94 2110:User talk:Self-ref 1120: 964:dispute resolution 722:Contentious topics 521:Dispute resolution 509:Questions on media 175: 107: 13283: 12795: 12785: 12699: 12648: 12589:Industrialisation 12565: 12555: 12538:Industrialisation 12474:Industrialisation 12456: 12446: 12326: 12166: 12041: 12011: 11969: 11865: 11781: 11743:warning templates 11716: 11475: 11470: 11441: 11329: 11324: 11183: 10828: 10815:comment added by 10798: 10785:comment added by 10672: 10304: 10251: 10127: 10102: 10060: 9640:Narutolovehinata5 9618: 9586: 9551: 9391: 9064:and not only hit 9013: 8875: 8672: 8534:Nowthatwasawesome 8488:- first known one 7786: 7757: 7560: 7413: 6445: 6392:comment added by 6359:comment added by 6111: 6003: 5998: 5960: 5955: 5918: 5558: 5528: 5523: 5409: 5296: 5291: 5230:comments on this 5049:comment added by 5023:comment added by 5009: 4992: 4987: 4737: 4684:this uncivil post 4661: 4501:User talk:Raul654 4201:Special:Emailuser 4142: 4114:Exactly. While I 4071: 3900: 3894: 3374:Catherineyronwode 3216:Your point about 2891:being applied to 2857:Massive POV push? 2849:assume good faith 2434:correcting toward 2104:Massive POV push? 2007: 1908: 1860:with Carcharoth. 1826: 1821: 1782: 1777: 1727: 1683: 1651: 1650: 1089: 1088: 1058: 1049:automatically by 930:This page is for 888: 887: 717:General sanctions 556:Resource requests 541:Original research 349: 161: 98: 78: 13306: 13273: 13250: 13244: 13235: 13214:deleted contribs 13194: 13173:deleted contribs 12898: 12897: 12793: 12787: 12784: 12782: 12775: 12563: 12557: 12554: 12552: 12545: 12454: 12448: 12445: 12443: 12436: 12414: 12413: 12368:deleted contribs 12330: 12307: 12302: 12296: 12291: 12243:User:Depaulicize 12194: 12191: 12189: 12165: 12163: 12143: 12138: 12055: 12051: 12044: 12025: 12021: 12014: 11973: 11968: 11966: 11957: 11956: 11939: 11938: 11927:User:Tbsdy lives 11864: 11862: 11853: 11795: 11791: 11784: 11759: 11754: 11720: 11715: 11713: 11704: 11703: 11672: 11669: 11668: 11609: 11603: 11569: 11563: 11529: 11523: 11495: 11489: 11474: 11468: 11464: 11458: 11433: 11403: 11396: 11368: 11361: 11328: 11322: 11318: 11312: 11298: 11292: 11253:'s userpage. I 11230: 11227: 11226: 11206: 11199: 11177: 11155: 11154: 11109:deleted contribs 11071: 11066: 11055:warning messages 11021:User:Historian19 11015:User:Historian19 10955: 10950: 10922: 10904: 10850: 10845: 10810: 10780: 10719: 10713: 10712: 10666: 10663: 10653: 10651: 10650: 10645: 10544: 10535: 10534: 10308: 10303: 10301: 10292: 10291: 10245: 10166: 10123: 10101: 10098: 10097: 10094: 10088: 10059: 10056: 10055: 10052: 10046: 9920: 9902: 9835: 9797: 9735: 9708:deleted contribs 9685:User:Frogger3140 9674: 9669: 9614: 9582: 9555: 9545: 9523: 9522: 9495: 9468:deleted contribs 9387: 9241: 9226: 9205:deleted contribs 9188:Bambiisadinosaur 9122: 9101:deleted contribs 9066:Talk:Teletubbies 9063: 9042:deleted contribs 9012: 9010: 8997: 8976:deleted contribs 8949: 8928:deleted contribs 8873: 8867: 8861: 8857: 8855: 8834:deleted contribs 8670: 8664: 8658: 8654: 8614: 8593:deleted contribs 8572: 8551:deleted contribs 8530: 8509:deleted contribs 8487: 8466:deleted contribs 8436: 8415:deleted contribs 8394: 8373:deleted contribs 8352: 8331:deleted contribs 8310: 8289:deleted contribs 8268: 8247:deleted contribs 8226: 8205:deleted contribs 8184: 8163:deleted contribs 8142: 8121:deleted contribs 8100: 8079:deleted contribs 8058: 8037:deleted contribs 8016: 7995:deleted contribs 7974: 7953:deleted contribs 7932: 7911:deleted contribs 7890: 7869:deleted contribs 7848: 7827:deleted contribs 7780: 7751: 7741: 7714:deleted contribs 7651: 7639: 7607: 7595: 7558: 7554: 7517: 7514: 7508: 7407: 7372: 7364: 7344: 7312: 7309: 7303: 7226: 7223: 7221: 7155: 7147: 7132: 7124: 7123: 7122: 7104: 7096: 7076: 7057: 7049: 7033: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7012: 7009: 7001: 6993: 6985: 6977: 6969: 6961: 6953: 6945: 6937: 6929: 6913: 6910: 6902: 6894: 6886: 6878: 6870: 6862: 6854: 6846: 6838: 6830: 6793: 6792: 6777: 6770:, me hearties. 6726:User:Yorkshirian 6677: 6675: 6673: 6671: 6611: 6609: 6607: 6605: 6582: 6580: 6578: 6576: 6541: 6539: 6537: 6535: 6441: 6404: 6371: 6339: 6329: 6285: 6280: 6223:I always though 6166:Thor Malmjursson 6124:Thor Malmjursson 6112: 6109: 6105: 6072: 6067: 6002: 5996: 5992: 5986: 5974: 5959: 5953: 5949: 5943: 5916: 5910: 5904: 5902: 5884: 5881: 5722: 5720: 5718: 5716: 5662: 5660: 5658: 5656: 5638: 5634: 5627: 5586: 5582: 5575: 5556: 5550: 5544: 5542: 5527: 5521: 5517: 5511: 5407: 5401: 5395: 5391: 5366: 5347: 5323: 5315: 5295: 5289: 5285: 5279: 5257: 5249: 5220:"contributions" 5218: 5191:deleted contribs 5128: 5110: 5065: 5039: 5008: 5007: 4991: 4985: 4981: 4975: 4938: 4936: 4934: 4932: 4896: 4891: 4731: 4714: 4659: 4656: 4653: 4614: 4492: 4471:deleted contribs 4416: 4413: 4410: 4407: 4312: 4309: 4308: 4176:Most excellent. 4169: 4140: 4134: 4128: 4124: 4069: 4063: 4057: 4053: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3957: 3954: 3953: 3909: 3898: 3893: 3891: 3885: 3880: 3851: 3848: 3847: 3833: 3826: 3813: 3805: 3742: 3735: 3722: 3695: 3692: 3635: 3628: 3615: 3611: 3597: 3596: 3583: 3569: 3552: 3551: 3538: 3469:raised a concern 3450: 3444: 3443: 3338: 3335: 3332: 3284: 3281: 3278: 3092:peacock language 2972:this arbitration 2791: 2771: 2706: 2699: 2682: 2631:calls "framing" 2573:thinks it unfair 2067: 2064: 2063: 2006: 2004: 1907: 1905: 1900: 1892: 1825: 1819: 1815: 1809: 1796: 1781: 1775: 1771: 1765: 1731: 1726: 1724: 1703: 1702: 1687: 1682: 1680: 1667: 1666: 1646: 1501: 1383: 1371:Edit-warring/3RR 1261: 1139: 1123: 1119: 1082: 1071: 1070: 1043: 1031: 922: 915: 893: 892: 551:Reliable sources 485:User permissions 465:Main Page errors 460:Interface admins 450:Closure requests 380: 373: 366: 357: 356: 219: 218: 216: 203: 193: 174: 169: 151: 150: 148: 135: 125: 106: 79: 70: 69: 67: 62: 60: 52: 49: 31: 29: 13314: 13313: 13309: 13308: 13307: 13305: 13304: 13303: 13289: 13288: 13248: 13242: 13199: 13158: 13148: 13124: 12950: 12895: 12893: 12882:assume the best 12789: 12776: 12627:Oxford spelling 12559: 12546: 12450: 12437: 12353: 12349: 12347: 12328: 12318: 12305: 12300: 12294: 12289: 12285:long-term abuse 12246: 12204: 12182: 12161: 12054: 12049: 12040: 12024: 12019: 12010: 11974: 11964: 11961: 11959: 11954: 11950: 11936: 11934: 11875: 11860: 11805: 11794: 11789: 11780: 11771: 11757: 11752: 11721: 11711: 11708: 11706: 11701: 11697: 11478: 11469: 11390: 11355: 11332: 11323: 11247:deleted userbox 11217: 11094: 11090: 11083: 11069: 11064: 11019:Please look at 11017: 10953: 10948: 10895: 10879: 10861: 10848: 10843: 10834: 10817:G.-M. Cupertino 10806: 10761: 10720: 10717: 10715: 10710: 10706: 10639: 10636: 10635: 10634: 10545: 10539: 10537: 10532: 10528: 10384: 10309: 10299: 10296: 10294: 10289: 10285: 10280: 10279: 10235:way, he can go 10191: 10162: 10155: 10135:Gladys J Cortez 10032: 10030:Eyeballs needed 9989:Gordonofcartoon 9941:Gordonofcartoon 9893: 9877: 9858: 9845: 9807: 9693: 9688: 9672: 9667: 9632: 9556: 9537:brand new users 9535:in defiance of 9527: 9525: 9520: 9516: 9453: 9402: 9399:User:Prophaniti 9288: 9239: 9190: 9086: 9084:Ohnothesimpsons 9027: 9008: 8961: 8913: 8819: 8578: 8536: 8494: 8492:Iluvteletubbies 8451: 8400: 8358: 8316: 8274: 8232: 8190: 8148: 8106: 8064: 8022: 7980: 7938: 7896: 7854: 7812: 7798: 7699: 7693: 7649: 7637: 7605: 7593: 7556: 7512: 7501: 7498: 7370: 7362: 7333:I be thinking, 7307: 7296: 7293: 7273:and possibly a 7258: 7214: 7153: 7145: 7120: 7118: 7116: 7113: 7102: 7094: 7055: 7047: 7021: 7019: 7017: 7014: 6814: 6797:per checkuser. 6790: 6722: 6692: 6669: 6667: 6665: 6663: 6603: 6601: 6599: 6597: 6574: 6572: 6570: 6568: 6533: 6531: 6529: 6527: 6485:the tips after 6455: 6387: 6354: 6353:iDangerMouse. 6340: 6110:clamation point 6108: 6101: 6070: 6063: 6006: 5997: 5972: 5963: 5954: 5836: 5714: 5712: 5710: 5708: 5654: 5652: 5650: 5648: 5637: 5632: 5625: 5623: 5585: 5580: 5573: 5571: 5531: 5522: 5360: 5321: 5313: 5299: 5290: 5255: 5247: 5176: 5171: 5168:User:Prom3th3an 5139:KillerChihuahua 5071: 5044: 5018: 5005: 4995: 4986: 4930: 4928: 4926: 4924: 4849:Further comment 4692:AlasdairGreen27 4612: 4499:The posting to 4456: 4450: 4330:too many admins 4123:to be ignored. 3907: 3889: 3883: 3881: 3827: 3822: 3693: 3690: 3629: 3624: 3582:« Gonzo fan2007 3578: 3567: 3537:« Gonzo fan2007 3533: 3464:In March 2008, 3451: 3448: 3446: 3441: 3437: 3306:Malcolm Schosha 3261:Malcolm Schosha 3013:With regard to 2845:Malcolm Schosha 2830:Malcolm Schosha 2826:complete truth. 2807:Malcolm Schosha 2789: 2640:Malcolm Schosha 2546: 2523:Malcolm Schosha 2400: 2318:Malcolm Schosha 2208:Malcolm Schosha 2160:Malcolm Schosha 2150: 2106: 2002: 1903: 1894: 1886: 1829: 1820: 1794: 1785: 1776: 1732: 1722: 1707: 1705: 1700: 1696: 1688: 1678: 1671: 1669: 1664: 1660: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1633: 1495: 1373: 1251: 1129: 1127:Administrators' 1117: 1116: 1115: 1095: 1080: 1060: 1059: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1021: 1018: 999: 958:their talk page 939: 927: 926: 925: 918: 911: 907: 889: 884: 873: 790:False positives 748: 680: 597: 546:Pending changes 531:Fringe theories 489: 419:Administrators 408: 389: 384: 346: 334: 325: 313: 304: 292: 283: 272: 263: 255: 245: 240: 225: 220: 211: 209: 207: 206: 205: 201: 199: 183: 181: 176: 170: 165: 157: 155:← Previous edit 152: 143: 141: 139: 138: 137: 133: 131: 115: 113: 108: 102: 94: 93: 92: 91: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 75: 71: 65: 63: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48:Content deleted 47: 44: 39:← Previous edit 36: 35: 34: 27: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 13312: 13302: 13301: 13147: 13144: 13133:NonvocalScream 13123: 13120: 13119: 13118: 13117: 13116: 13092: 13062: 13061: 13060: 13059: 13041: 13040: 13030:218.186.68.211 13025: 13024: 13020: 13019: 13015: 13014: 12949: 12946: 12945: 12944: 12943: 12942: 12941: 12940: 12939: 12938: 12937: 12936: 12935: 12934: 12914: 12913: 12912: 12911: 12910: 12909: 12908: 12907: 12906: 12905: 12904: 12903: 12889: 12867: 12866: 12865: 12864: 12863: 12862: 12861: 12860: 12859: 12858: 12848:89.240.197.164 12834: 12833: 12832: 12831: 12830: 12829: 12828: 12827: 12810: 12809: 12808: 12807: 12806: 12805: 12804: 12803: 12802: 12801: 12800: 12799: 12760: 12759: 12758: 12757: 12756: 12755: 12754: 12753: 12752: 12751: 12750: 12749: 12739:89.240.197.164 12719: 12718: 12717: 12716: 12715: 12714: 12713: 12712: 12711: 12710: 12686: 12685: 12684: 12683: 12682: 12681: 12671:89.240.197.164 12662: 12661: 12660: 12659: 12622: 12621: 12620: 12619: 12618: 12617: 12616: 12615: 12614: 12613: 12603:89.240.197.164 12592:title. As for 12576: 12575: 12574: 12573: 12572: 12571: 12570: 12569: 12531:The ENGVAR of 12519:89.240.197.164 12510: 12509: 12508: 12507: 12490: 12489: 12479:89.240.197.164 12351:89.240.197.164 12346: 12339: 12317: 12314: 12313: 12312: 12245: 12240: 12239: 12238: 12203: 12200: 12173: 12172: 12171: 12170: 12129: 12128: 12092: 12091: 12090: 12089: 12088: 12087: 12046: 12030: 12029: 12016: 11952: 11949: 11946: 11945: 11944: 11930: 11874: 11871: 11870: 11869: 11786: 11770: 11767: 11766: 11765: 11699: 11696: 11693: 11692: 11691: 11654: 11653: 11652: 11651: 11650: 11649: 11648: 11647: 11646: 11645: 11644: 11643: 11642: 11641: 11640: 11639: 11638: 11637: 11636: 11635: 11634: 11633: 11632: 11631: 11611: 11571: 11531: 11497: 11465: 11461: 11447: 11446: 11445: 11418: 11417: 11416: 11415: 11414: 11413: 11412: 11411: 11410: 11409: 11408: 11407: 11319: 11315: 11300: 11245:surrounding a 11236: 11216: 11213: 11212: 11211: 11188: 11187: 11092:86.154.221.122 11082: 11079: 11078: 11077: 11016: 11013: 11012: 11011: 11010: 11009: 11008: 11007: 10977: 10976: 10975: 10932: 10929: 10860: 10857: 10833: 10830: 10805: 10800: 10760: 10755: 10754: 10753: 10708: 10705: 10696: 10695: 10694: 10693: 10692: 10643: 10612: 10611: 10610: 10609: 10530: 10527: 10524: 10523: 10522: 10486: 10485: 10484: 10483: 10383: 10380: 10379: 10378: 10377: 10376: 10359: 10358: 10342: 10341: 10287: 10284: 10281: 10273: 10272: 10271: 10270: 10269: 10225: 10224: 10190: 10189: 10188: 10187: 10186: 10157: 10156: 10154: 10148: 10147: 10146: 10145: 10144: 10143: 10142: 10141: 10140: 10031: 10028: 10027: 10026: 10025: 10024: 10023: 10022: 10012:LessHeard vanU 9934:Brian McKnight 9930:Britney Spears 9922: 9921: 9875: 9857: 9854: 9853: 9852: 9851: 9850: 9841: 9818:LessHeard vanU 9803: 9687: 9682: 9681: 9680: 9631: 9628: 9627: 9626: 9625: 9624: 9623: 9622: 9561:71.232.179.236 9518: 9515: 9510: 9509: 9508: 9496:for 24 hours. 9401: 9396: 9373: 9372: 9371: 9370: 9369: 9368: 9367: 9366: 9346:This article, 9287: 9282: 9281: 9280: 9279: 9278: 9261: 9260: 9259: 9258: 9179: 9178: 9177: 9176: 9166: 9165: 9149: 9148: 9147: 9146: 9136: 9080: 9079: 9078: 9077: 9018: 9017: 8907: 8906: 8905: 8904: 8894: 8893: 8879: 8812: 8811: 8774: 8773: 8772: 8771: 8741: 8740: 8737: 8734: 8731: 8728: 8725: 8722: 8719: 8716: 8713: 8710: 8707: 8704: 8701: 8698: 8695: 8692: 8689: 8686: 8682: 8681: 8677: 8676: 8616: 8615: 8573: 8531: 8489: 8438: 8437: 8395: 8353: 8314:68.220.173.251 8311: 8272:68.220.174.184 8269: 8227: 8185: 8146:68.220.174.133 8143: 8104:70.146.242.139 8101: 8059: 8020:70.146.241.244 8017: 7978:68.220.162.165 7975: 7933: 7891: 7849: 7810:68.220.180.163 7797: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7791: 7790: 7743: 7742: 7692: 7689: 7688: 7687: 7686: 7685: 7684: 7683: 7571: 7569: 7568: 7567: 7566: 7565: 7564: 7480: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7462: 7447: 7430: 7418: 7417: 7398: 7397: 7382: 7381: 7380: 7379: 7378: 7321:LessHeard vanU 7266:User:Dreadstar 7257: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7161: 6813: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6768:Down the hatch 6730:User:Gennarous 6721: 6718: 6691: 6688: 6687: 6686: 6627: 6626: 6625: 6624: 6623: 6622: 6621: 6620: 6519: 6518: 6510: 6506: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6487:congratulating 6478: 6471: 6454: 6451: 6450: 6449: 6427: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6384: 6351: 6350: 6344: 6334: 6319: 6307: 6290: 6266: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6204: 6203: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6177: 6155: 6154: 6136: 6135: 6117: 6094: 6077: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 5993: 5989: 5967: 5950: 5946: 5935: 5934: 5922: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5835: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5785: 5784: 5768: 5767: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5740: 5629: 5591: 5590: 5577: 5563: 5562: 5535: 5518: 5514: 5503: 5502: 5483: 5482: 5466: 5465: 5446: 5445: 5438: 5425: 5418: 5417: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5286: 5282: 5170: 5165: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5070: 5067: 5014: 5013: 4999: 4982: 4978: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4863: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4835: 4832: 4821: 4820: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4785: 4782: 4770: 4762:Angus McLellan 4758: 4741: 4723:walk the plank 4719: 4702: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4669: 4644: 4619: 4605: 4587: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4545: 4544: 4494: 4493: 4449: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4401:Andrew Lenahan 4396: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4298: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4191:To clarify: I 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4171: 4170: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4030: 3937: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3786: 3785: 3775:TenOfAllTrades 3762: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3715: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3657: 3474:In July 2008, 3466:User:Rarelibra 3453:Administrator 3439: 3436: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3337:sch 3331:Jim 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3283:sch 3277:Jim 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2968:categorization 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2916: 2915: 2895:. As shown at 2876: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2778: 2777: 2741: 2734: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2689: 2688: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2551: 2550: 2542: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2396: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2171: 2170: 2146: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2086:Possible split 2083: 2071: 2051: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1990: 1980:NonvocalScream 1959: 1958: 1948:NonvocalScream 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1816: 1812: 1772: 1768: 1757: 1756: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1626: 1621: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1539: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1509: 1503: 1502: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1385: 1384: 1367: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1315: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1263: 1262: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1141: 1140: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1087: 1086: 1074: 1073: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1019: 1002: 1000: 998: 997: 987: 978: 977: 976: 966: 960: 954: 945:Before posting 941: 929: 924: 923: 916: 908: 903: 901: 898: 897: 891: 886: 885: 878: 875: 874: 872: 871: 866: 861: 860: 859: 854: 849: 844: 839: 834: 824: 819: 818: 817: 812: 810:Reference desk 807: 802: 794: 793: 792: 787: 777: 776: 775: 770: 765: 756: 754: 750: 749: 747: 746: 741: 731: 726: 725: 724: 719: 714: 704: 699: 694: 688: 686: 682: 681: 679: 678: 673: 672: 671: 666: 661: 656: 651: 646: 636: 631: 626: 621: 616: 611: 609:History merges 605: 603: 599: 598: 596: 595: 590: 588:Titleblacklist 585: 580: 579: 578: 573: 563: 558: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 526:External links 523: 518: 517: 516: 511: 503: 497: 495: 491: 490: 488: 487: 482: 477: 472: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 431: 430: 425: 416: 414: 410: 409: 394: 391: 390: 383: 382: 375: 368: 360: 353: 348: 347: 343: 341: 339: 336: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 322: 320: 318: 315: 314: 311: 309: 306: 305: 301: 299: 297: 294: 293: 290: 288: 285: 284: 281: 279: 277: 274: 273: 270: 268: 265: 264: 260: 258: 256: 252: 250: 247: 246: 243: 241: 238: 235: 234: 231: 227: 226: 200: 197:Administrators 195: 194: 179: 158: 132: 129:Administrators 127: 126: 111: 80: 74: 72: 54: 46: 37: 33: 32: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 13311: 13300: 13297: 13296: 13294: 13287: 13286: 13281: 13277: 13272: 13266: 13264: 13261: 13258: 13254: 13247: 13238: 13233: 13230: 13227: 13224: 13221: 13218: 13215: 13212: 13209: 13206: 13203: 13198: 13192: 13189: 13186: 13183: 13180: 13177: 13174: 13171: 13168: 13165: 13162: 13157: 13153: 13143: 13142: 13138: 13134: 13130: 13115: 13111: 13107: 13104: 13102: 13100: 13098: 13096: 13093: 13091: 13087: 13083: 13078: 13077: 13076: 13072: 13068: 13064: 13063: 13058: 13054: 13050: 13045: 13044: 13043: 13042: 13039: 13035: 13031: 13027: 13026: 13022: 13021: 13017: 13016: 13012: 13011: 13010: 13009: 13005: 13001: 12997: 12994: 12991: 12987: 12986: 12982: 12978: 12974: 12970: 12968: 12964: 12961: 12958: 12954: 12933: 12930: 12926: 12925: 12924: 12923: 12922: 12921: 12920: 12919: 12918: 12917: 12916: 12915: 12902: 12899: 12890: 12887: 12883: 12879: 12878: 12877: 12876: 12875: 12874: 12873: 12872: 12871: 12870: 12869: 12868: 12857: 12853: 12849: 12844: 12843: 12842: 12841: 12840: 12839: 12838: 12837: 12836: 12835: 12826: 12823: 12818: 12817: 12816: 12815: 12814: 12813: 12812: 12811: 12798: 12794: 12792: 12783: 12781: 12772: 12771: 12770: 12769: 12768: 12767: 12766: 12765: 12764: 12763: 12762: 12761: 12748: 12744: 12740: 12735: 12731: 12730: 12729: 12728: 12727: 12726: 12725: 12724: 12723: 12722: 12721: 12720: 12709: 12705: 12702: 12696: 12695: 12694: 12693: 12692: 12691: 12690: 12689: 12688: 12687: 12680: 12676: 12672: 12668: 12667: 12666: 12665: 12664: 12663: 12658: 12654: 12651: 12646: 12645: 12644: 12640: 12636: 12632: 12628: 12624: 12623: 12612: 12608: 12604: 12599: 12595: 12590: 12587:I never said 12586: 12585: 12584: 12583: 12582: 12581: 12580: 12579: 12578: 12577: 12568: 12564: 12562: 12553: 12551: 12543: 12539: 12534: 12530: 12529: 12528: 12524: 12520: 12516: 12515: 12514: 12513: 12512: 12511: 12506: 12502: 12498: 12494: 12493: 12492: 12491: 12488: 12484: 12480: 12475: 12470: 12466: 12462: 12461: 12460: 12459: 12455: 12453: 12444: 12442: 12434: 12430: 12426: 12422: 12418: 12411: 12408: 12405: 12402: 12399: 12396: 12393: 12390: 12387: 12384: 12381: 12378: 12375: 12372: 12369: 12366: 12363: 12360: 12357: 12352: 12344: 12338: 12337: 12334: 12331: 12324: 12311: 12308: 12303: 12297: 12292: 12286: 12282: 12278: 12274: 12270: 12266: 12265: 12264: 12263: 12259: 12255: 12251: 12244: 12237: 12233: 12229: 12225: 12221: 12220: 12219: 12218: 12215: 12213: 12209: 12199: 12198: 12195: 12193: 12179: 12169: 12164: 12158: 12154: 12150: 12146: 12142: 12137: 12133: 12132: 12131: 12130: 12127: 12123: 12119: 12118:The Thunderer 12114: 12109: 12108: 12107: 12106: 12102: 12098: 12086: 12082: 12078: 12077:The Thunderer 12074: 12073: 12072: 12068: 12064: 12063:The Thunderer 12060: 12059: 12058: 12053: 12052: 12045: 12036: 12032: 12031: 12028: 12023: 12022: 12015: 12006: 12002: 12001: 12000: 11999: 11995: 11991: 11990:The Thunderer 11987: 11983: 11979: 11972: 11967: 11943: 11940: 11931: 11928: 11924: 11920: 11916: 11912: 11911: 11910: 11909: 11905: 11901: 11897: 11894: 11891: 11887: 11883: 11880: 11868: 11863: 11857: 11856:her talk page 11851: 11848: 11845: 11842: 11839: 11836: 11833: 11830: 11827: 11824: 11821: 11818: 11815: 11812: 11809: 11804: 11801: 11800: 11799: 11798: 11793: 11792: 11785: 11776: 11764: 11761: 11760: 11755: 11748: 11744: 11740: 11739: 11738: 11737: 11733: 11729: 11725: 11719: 11714: 11690: 11686: 11682: 11678: 11677: 11676: 11675: 11670: 11667: 11660: 11630: 11626: 11622: 11618: 11617: 11616: 11615: 11614: 11610: 11604: 11599: 11597: 11592: 11591: 11590: 11586: 11582: 11578: 11577: 11576: 11575: 11574: 11570: 11564: 11559: 11556: 11552: 11551: 11550: 11546: 11542: 11538: 11537: 11536: 11535: 11534: 11530: 11524: 11519: 11516: 11515: 11514: 11510: 11506: 11503:Lies? Where? 11502: 11501: 11500: 11496: 11490: 11485: 11483: 11482: 11481: 11476: 11471: 11460: 11459: 11452: 11448: 11444: 11439: 11438: 11432: 11431: 11426: 11422: 11421: 11420: 11419: 11406: 11401: 11397: 11395: 11387: 11386: 11385: 11381: 11377: 11373: 11372: 11371: 11366: 11362: 11360: 11353: 11352: 11351: 11347: 11343: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11336: 11335: 11330: 11325: 11314: 11313: 11306: 11305: 11304: 11303: 11299: 11293: 11288: 11286: 11282: 11277: 11276: 11272: 11268: 11264: 11260: 11256: 11252: 11251:User:Fennessy 11248: 11244: 11240: 11234: 11233: 11228: 11225: 11215:User:Fennessy 11210: 11207: 11205: 11200: 11198: 11193: 11190: 11189: 11186: 11181: 11176: 11175: 11170: 11169: 11168: 11167: 11163: 11159: 11152: 11149: 11146: 11143: 11140: 11137: 11134: 11131: 11128: 11125: 11122: 11119: 11116: 11113: 11110: 11107: 11104: 11101: 11098: 11093: 11088: 11076: 11073: 11072: 11067: 11060: 11056: 11052: 11049: 11046: 11042: 11038: 11037: 11036: 11035: 11031: 11027: 11022: 11006: 11002: 10998: 10993: 10992: 10991: 10987: 10983: 10978: 10974: 10970: 10966: 10962: 10961: 10960: 10957: 10956: 10951: 10944: 10940: 10939: 10938: 10935: 10934: 10933: 10930: 10927: 10920: 10916: 10912: 10908: 10903: 10899: 10894: 10890: 10886: 10882: 10878: 10877: 10876: 10875: 10871: 10867: 10856: 10855: 10852: 10851: 10846: 10839: 10829: 10826: 10822: 10818: 10814: 10804: 10799: 10796: 10792: 10788: 10784: 10778: 10774: 10770: 10766: 10759: 10752: 10748: 10744: 10740: 10736: 10735: 10734: 10733: 10729: 10725: 10704: 10700: 10691: 10687: 10683: 10678: 10677: 10676: 10673: 10671: 10670: 10664: 10661: 10657: 10641: 10631: 10627: 10623: 10619: 10614: 10613: 10608: 10604: 10600: 10595: 10594: 10593: 10589: 10585: 10581: 10580: 10579: 10578: 10574: 10570: 10566: 10561: 10560: 10556: 10552: 10548: 10543: 10526:Ayers article 10521: 10517: 10513: 10508: 10507: 10506: 10505: 10501: 10497: 10492: 10482: 10478: 10474: 10470: 10466: 10462: 10458: 10454: 10453: 10452: 10448: 10444: 10440: 10436: 10433: 10429: 10425: 10422: 10418: 10415: 10410: 10409: 10408: 10407: 10403: 10399: 10394: 10389: 10375: 10371: 10367: 10363: 10362: 10361: 10360: 10357: 10354: 10353: 10349: 10344: 10343: 10340: 10337: 10336:Baseball Bugs 10332: 10328: 10327: 10326: 10325: 10321: 10317: 10313: 10307: 10302: 10277: 10268: 10264: 10260: 10256: 10255: 10254: 10249: 10244: 10243: 10238: 10234: 10230: 10227: 10226: 10223: 10219: 10215: 10211: 10207: 10206: 10205: 10204: 10200: 10196: 10185: 10181: 10177: 10173: 10172: 10171: 10168: 10165: 10159: 10158: 10152: 10139: 10136: 10132: 10131: 10130: 10126: 10121: 10116: 10112: 10111:Perry Farrell 10108: 10107: 10106: 10103: 10099: 10089: 10082: 10081: 10080: 10076: 10072: 10067: 10066: 10065: 10064: 10061: 10057: 10047: 10041: 10037: 10036:Travis Barker 10021: 10017: 10013: 10008: 10004: 10000: 9999: 9998: 9994: 9990: 9986: 9983: 9981: 9979: 9977: 9975: 9973: 9970: 9969: 9968: 9965: 9961: 9957: 9953: 9952: 9951: 9950: 9946: 9942: 9938: 9935: 9931: 9927: 9918: 9914: 9910: 9906: 9901: 9897: 9892: 9888: 9884: 9880: 9876: 9873: 9870: 9867: 9863: 9862:Whotheman2006 9860: 9859: 9849: 9846: 9844: 9839: 9836: 9829: 9828: 9827: 9823: 9819: 9814: 9813: 9812: 9811: 9808: 9806: 9801: 9798: 9790: 9788: 9784: 9780: 9774: 9772: 9768: 9764: 9760: 9756: 9752: 9748: 9743: 9739: 9736: 9733: 9730: 9727: 9724: 9721: 9718: 9715: 9712: 9709: 9706: 9703: 9700: 9697: 9692: 9686: 9679: 9676: 9675: 9670: 9663: 9659: 9655: 9651: 9647: 9646: 9645: 9644: 9641: 9637: 9621: 9617: 9613: 9609: 9605: 9604: 9603: 9599: 9595: 9591: 9590: 9589: 9585: 9581: 9577: 9573: 9572: 9571: 9570: 9566: 9562: 9554: 9549: 9544: 9543: 9538: 9534: 9530: 9514: 9507: 9503: 9499: 9493: 9490: 9487: 9484: 9481: 9478: 9475: 9472: 9469: 9466: 9463: 9460: 9457: 9452: 9448: 9444: 9443: 9442: 9441: 9437: 9433: 9429: 9425: 9421: 9417: 9413: 9410:this user on 9408: 9400: 9395: 9394: 9390: 9386: 9382: 9378: 9365: 9361: 9357: 9353: 9349: 9345: 9344: 9343: 9339: 9335: 9331: 9330: 9329: 9325: 9321: 9317: 9316: 9310: 9309:Goingoveredge 9306: 9305: 9304: 9303: 9302: 9301: 9297: 9293: 9286: 9277: 9273: 9269: 9265: 9264: 9263: 9262: 9256: 9252: 9248: 9247: 9246: 9243: 9242: 9234: 9233: 9232: 9230: 9224: 9221: 9218: 9215: 9212: 9209: 9206: 9203: 9200: 9197: 9194: 9189: 9184: 9183: 9174: 9170: 9169: 9168: 9167: 9164: 9160: 9156: 9151: 9150: 9145: 9142: 9137: 9133: 9132: 9131: 9130: 9129: 9127: 9120: 9117: 9114: 9111: 9108: 9105: 9102: 9099: 9096: 9093: 9090: 9085: 9075: 9071: 9067: 9061: 9058: 9055: 9052: 9049: 9046: 9043: 9040: 9037: 9034: 9031: 9026: 9022: 9021: 9020: 9019: 9016: 9011: 9005: 9004: 9003: 9001: 8995: 8992: 8989: 8986: 8983: 8980: 8977: 8974: 8971: 8968: 8965: 8960: 8959:68.220.177.16 8955: 8953: 8947: 8944: 8941: 8938: 8935: 8932: 8929: 8926: 8923: 8920: 8917: 8912: 8902: 8898: 8897: 8896: 8895: 8892: 8888: 8884: 8880: 8878: 8874: 8868: 8862: 8853: 8850: 8847: 8844: 8841: 8838: 8835: 8832: 8829: 8826: 8823: 8818: 8817:85.127.170.86 8814: 8813: 8809: 8805: 8804: 8803: 8802: 8798: 8794: 8790: 8786: 8783: 8779: 8778:simple:WALL-E 8770: 8766: 8762: 8757: 8756: 8755: 8751: 8747: 8743: 8742: 8738: 8735: 8732: 8729: 8726: 8723: 8720: 8717: 8714: 8711: 8708: 8705: 8702: 8699: 8696: 8693: 8690: 8687: 8684: 8683: 8679: 8678: 8675: 8671: 8665: 8659: 8652: 8651: 8650: 8648: 8643: 8641: 8639: 8637: 8636: 8634: 8631: 8629: 8627: 8624: 8622: 8620: 8612: 8609: 8606: 8603: 8600: 8597: 8594: 8591: 8588: 8585: 8582: 8577: 8574: 8570: 8567: 8564: 8561: 8558: 8555: 8552: 8549: 8546: 8543: 8540: 8535: 8532: 8528: 8525: 8522: 8519: 8516: 8513: 8510: 8507: 8504: 8501: 8498: 8493: 8490: 8485: 8482: 8479: 8476: 8473: 8470: 8467: 8464: 8461: 8458: 8455: 8450: 8447: 8446: 8445: 8443: 8434: 8431: 8428: 8425: 8422: 8419: 8416: 8413: 8410: 8407: 8404: 8399: 8396: 8392: 8389: 8386: 8383: 8380: 8377: 8374: 8371: 8368: 8365: 8362: 8357: 8356:68.220.177.43 8354: 8350: 8347: 8344: 8341: 8338: 8335: 8332: 8329: 8326: 8323: 8320: 8315: 8312: 8308: 8305: 8302: 8299: 8296: 8293: 8290: 8287: 8284: 8281: 8278: 8273: 8270: 8266: 8263: 8260: 8257: 8254: 8251: 8248: 8245: 8242: 8239: 8236: 8231: 8228: 8224: 8221: 8218: 8215: 8212: 8209: 8206: 8203: 8200: 8197: 8194: 8189: 8188:68.220.175.46 8186: 8182: 8179: 8176: 8173: 8170: 8167: 8164: 8161: 8158: 8155: 8152: 8147: 8144: 8140: 8137: 8134: 8131: 8128: 8125: 8122: 8119: 8116: 8113: 8110: 8105: 8102: 8098: 8095: 8092: 8089: 8086: 8083: 8080: 8077: 8074: 8071: 8068: 8063: 8060: 8056: 8053: 8050: 8047: 8044: 8041: 8038: 8035: 8032: 8029: 8026: 8021: 8018: 8014: 8011: 8008: 8005: 8002: 7999: 7996: 7993: 7990: 7987: 7984: 7979: 7976: 7972: 7969: 7966: 7963: 7960: 7957: 7954: 7951: 7948: 7945: 7942: 7937: 7934: 7930: 7927: 7924: 7921: 7918: 7915: 7912: 7909: 7906: 7903: 7900: 7895: 7892: 7888: 7885: 7882: 7879: 7876: 7873: 7870: 7867: 7864: 7861: 7858: 7853: 7852:68.220.184.91 7850: 7846: 7843: 7840: 7837: 7834: 7831: 7828: 7825: 7822: 7819: 7816: 7811: 7808: 7807: 7806: 7804: 7789: 7784: 7779: 7778: 7772: 7771: 7770: 7767: 7763: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7755: 7750: 7749: 7739: 7736: 7733: 7730: 7727: 7724: 7721: 7718: 7715: 7712: 7709: 7706: 7703: 7698: 7695: 7694: 7682: 7678: 7674: 7670: 7665: 7661: 7656: 7655: 7654: 7648: 7644: 7641: 7640: 7632: 7631: 7630: 7626: 7622: 7617: 7613: 7612: 7611: 7610: 7604: 7600: 7597: 7596: 7589: 7585: 7584: 7582: 7580: 7578: 7576: 7573: 7563: 7559: 7553: 7549: 7545: 7541: 7539: 7537: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7522: 7521: 7520: 7515: 7509: 7507: 7505: 7496: 7495: 7494: 7490: 7486: 7481: 7475: 7471: 7467: 7463: 7461: 7457: 7453: 7448: 7444: 7440: 7435: 7431: 7428: 7424: 7423: 7422: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7416: 7411: 7406: 7405: 7400: 7399: 7396: 7392: 7388: 7383: 7377: 7374: 7373: 7368: 7365: 7358: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7349: 7348: 7343: 7342: 7336: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7326: 7322: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7315: 7310: 7304: 7302: 7300: 7291: 7288: 7285: 7282: 7279: 7276: 7272: 7267: 7263: 7256: 7249: 7245: 7241: 7237: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7227: 7225: 7211: 7210:this incident 7207: 7202: 7201: 7197: 7193: 7189: 7186: 7183: 7179: 7175: 7160: 7157: 7156: 7151: 7148: 7141: 7137: 7136: 7135: 7131: 7129: 7125: 7111: 7110: 7109: 7106: 7105: 7100: 7097: 7090: 7086: 7085: 7084: 7081: 7080: 7075: 7074: 7068: 7064: 7063: 7062: 7059: 7058: 7053: 7050: 7043: 7039: 7038: 7037: 7036: 7032: 7030: 7026: 7010: 7005: 7002: 6997: 6994: 6989: 6986: 6981: 6978: 6973: 6970: 6965: 6962: 6957: 6954: 6949: 6946: 6941: 6938: 6933: 6930: 6925: 6922: 6918: 6911: 6906: 6903: 6898: 6895: 6890: 6887: 6882: 6879: 6874: 6871: 6866: 6863: 6858: 6855: 6850: 6847: 6842: 6839: 6834: 6831: 6826: 6823: 6819: 6818:Steelerfan-94 6812: 6803: 6800: 6796: 6787: 6786: 6785: 6782: 6781: 6776: 6775: 6769: 6765: 6762: 6759: 6755: 6751: 6750: 6749: 6748: 6744: 6740: 6735: 6731: 6727: 6717: 6716: 6713: 6709: 6704: 6702: 6696: 6685: 6682: 6679: 6678: 6659: 6658: 6657: 6656: 6653: 6649: 6645: 6641: 6637: 6633: 6619: 6616: 6613: 6612: 6592: 6591: 6590: 6587: 6584: 6583: 6563: 6562: 6561: 6558: 6554: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6549: 6546: 6543: 6542: 6523: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6503: 6499: 6495: 6491: 6488: 6483: 6479: 6476: 6472: 6469: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6461: 6448: 6444: 6440: 6435: 6431: 6428: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6413: 6410: 6409: 6403: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6385: 6383: 6380: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6358: 6348: 6345: 6343: 6338: 6333: 6332: 6328: 6323: 6320: 6318: 6315: 6311: 6308: 6306: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6291: 6289: 6286: 6281: 6279: 6272: 6267: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6254: 6250: 6247: 6246: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6226: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6217: 6212: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6189: 6185: 6182: 6181: 6176: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6162: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6153: 6149: 6145: 6144:- Tyler Puetz 6141: 6138: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6125: 6121: 6118: 6116: 6113: 6106: 6104: 6098: 6095: 6093: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6078: 6076: 6073: 6068: 6066: 6060: 6056: 6053: 6052: 6045: 6042: 6038: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6028: 6019: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6015: 6014: 6009: 6004: 5999: 5988: 5987: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5975: 5968: 5966: 5961: 5956: 5945: 5944: 5937: 5936: 5933: 5930: 5927: 5923: 5921: 5915: 5909: 5901: 5896: 5893: 5889: 5886: 5885: 5883:Postlethwaite 5874: 5873: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5825: 5821: 5817: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5807: 5802: 5798: 5794: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5783: 5779: 5775: 5770: 5769: 5758: 5754: 5750: 5745: 5739: 5736: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5727: 5724: 5723: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5695: 5691: 5687: 5682: 5677: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5667: 5664: 5663: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5636: 5635: 5628: 5626:Corvus cornix 5621: 5620: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5600: 5596: 5589: 5584: 5583: 5576: 5574:Corvus cornix 5569: 5565: 5564: 5561: 5555: 5549: 5541: 5536: 5534: 5529: 5524: 5513: 5512: 5505: 5504: 5501: 5497: 5493: 5489: 5485: 5484: 5481: 5477: 5473: 5468: 5467: 5464: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5449:Also, he has 5448: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5436: 5434: 5432: 5430: 5428: 5426: 5423: 5420: 5419: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5408: 5402: 5396: 5389: 5379: 5376: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5367: 5365: 5364: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5352: 5351: 5346: 5345: 5338: 5337: 5328: 5325: 5324: 5319: 5316: 5308: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5297: 5292: 5281: 5280: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5268: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5259: 5258: 5253: 5250: 5243: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5233: 5228: 5225: 5222: 5216: 5213: 5210: 5207: 5204: 5201: 5198: 5195: 5192: 5189: 5186: 5183: 5180: 5175: 5169: 5154: 5151: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5140: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5131: 5126: 5125: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5113: 5108: 5107: 5100: 5095: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5078:Duffbeerforme 5076: 5066: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5048: 5040: 5038: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5022: 5012: 5003: 5000: 4998: 4993: 4988: 4977: 4976: 4969: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4951: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4940: 4939: 4921: 4917: 4914: 4910: 4907: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4897: 4892: 4890: 4883: 4879: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4864: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4847: 4846: 4841: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4833: 4830: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4804: 4800: 4797: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4783: 4780: 4774: 4771: 4769: 4766: 4763: 4759: 4757: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4742: 4740: 4735: 4730: 4729: 4724: 4721:Arrr, he can 4720: 4718: 4715: 4713: 4706: 4703: 4701: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4674: 4670: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4662: 4657: 4648: 4645: 4643: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4620: 4618: 4615: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4574: 4573: 4568: 4565: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4546: 4543: 4540: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4529: 4524: 4521: 4516: 4512: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4497: 4490: 4487: 4484: 4481: 4478: 4475: 4472: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4460: 4455: 4452: 4451: 4439: 4435: 4431: 4426: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4417: 4402: 4397: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4343: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337:Ed Fitzgerald 4332: 4331: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4321: 4320:Baseball Bugs 4317: 4316: 4315: 4310: 4307: 4299: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4236:Baseball Bugs 4233: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4212: 4208: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4189: 4182: 4179: 4178:Baseball Bugs 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4168: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4157: 4156:Baseball Bugs 4145: 4141: 4135: 4129: 4122: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4070: 4064: 4058: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4031: 4029: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3991: 3988: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3955: 3952: 3945: 3941: 3934: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3892: 3886: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3849: 3846: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3831: 3825: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3812: 3807: 3806: 3799: 3794: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3747: 3744: 3743: 3737: 3736: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3724: 3723: 3716: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3696: 3687: 3683: 3677: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3627: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3595: 3593: 3589: 3584: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3571: 3570: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3550: 3548: 3544: 3539: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3515: 3510: 3507: 3505: 3504:User:RFBailey 3501: 3496: 3494: 3489: 3487: 3486:User:Quiddity 3482: 3480: 3477: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3434: 3427: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3409: 3408: 3403: 3402: 3397: 3393: 3391: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3370: 3367: 3362: 3358: 3355: 3350: 3342: 3339: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3288: 3285: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3219: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3180: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3116: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3044: 3040: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2998: 2994: 2989: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2960: 2956: 2951: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2935: 2932:In regard to 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2911: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2872: 2869: 2867: 2863: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2796: 2793: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2739: 2732: 2729:promotion of 2728: 2724: 2720: 2711: 2708: 2707: 2701: 2700: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2675: 2674: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2636:intentionally 2633: 2630: 2629:George Lakoff 2619: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2596: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2518: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2424:corrected an 2423: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381:User:Self-ref 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2271: 2268: 2266: 2265: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2243: 2240: 2236: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2206:change here. 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2136: 2134: 2133:Pseudoscience 2129: 2127: 2126:Pseudoscience 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2084: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2074:Support split 2072: 2070: 2065: 2062: 2055: 2054:Support Split 2052: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2037: 2036:Support split 2034: 2033: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2005: 1999: 1995: 1994:accessibility 1991: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1906: 1898: 1890: 1884: 1879: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1811: 1810: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1783: 1778: 1767: 1766: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1675: 1655: 1636: 1630: 1627: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1613: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1556: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 995: 991: 988: 985: 984: 979: 974: 970: 967: 965: 961: 959: 955: 953: 949: 948: 946: 943: 942: 940: 937: 934:incidents or 933: 921: 917: 914: 910: 909: 906: 900: 899: 895: 894: 890: 883: 882: 876: 870: 867: 865: 862: 858: 857:Miscellaneous 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 829: 828: 825: 823: 820: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 797: 795: 791: 788: 786: 783: 782: 781: 778: 774: 771: 769: 766: 764: 761: 760: 758: 757: 755: 751: 745: 742: 739: 735: 732: 730: 727: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 710: 709: 708: 705: 703: 700: 698: 695: 693: 690: 689: 687: 683: 677: 674: 670: 667: 665: 662: 660: 657: 655: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 641: 640: 637: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 610: 607: 606: 604: 602:Page handling 600: 594: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 577: 574: 572: 569: 568: 567: 564: 562: 559: 557: 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 515: 512: 510: 507: 506: 504: 502: 499: 498: 496: 492: 486: 483: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 429: 426: 424: 421: 420: 418: 417: 415: 411: 406: 402: 398: 392: 388: 381: 376: 374: 369: 367: 362: 361: 358: 351: 342: 337: 333: 328: 321: 316: 312: 307: 300: 295: 291: 286: 280: 275: 271: 266: 259: 257: 251: 249: 248: 244: 242: 239: 237: 236: 228: 224: 214: 198: 191: 187: 182: 173: 168: 164: 156: 146: 130: 123: 119: 114: 105: 101: 83: 68: 61: 51:Content added 43: 40: 30: 19: 13267: 13259: 13239: 13228: 13222: 13216: 13210: 13204: 13187: 13181: 13175: 13169: 13163: 13152:Barack Obama 13149: 13125: 12988: 12971: 12959: 12951: 12929:Orderinchaos 12822:Orderinchaos 12790: 12779: 12630: 12560: 12549: 12451: 12440: 12406: 12400: 12394: 12388: 12382: 12376: 12370: 12364: 12358: 12348: 12319: 12247: 12212:Aecis·(away) 12205: 12183: 12177: 12174: 12144: 12093: 12047: 12034: 12017: 11975: 11892: 11876: 11846: 11840: 11834: 11828: 11822: 11816: 11810: 11787: 11772: 11750: 11722: 11665: 11655: 11554: 11455: 11436: 11429: 11393: 11358: 11309: 11278: 11235: 11223: 11218: 11203: 11196: 11172: 11147: 11141: 11135: 11129: 11123: 11117: 11111: 11105: 11099: 11084: 11062: 11047: 11018: 10946: 10926: 10925: 10862: 10841: 10835: 10811:— Preceding 10807: 10781:— Preceding 10776: 10772: 10762: 10721: 10668: 10667: 10659: 10655: 10629: 10625: 10621: 10617: 10562: 10546: 10487: 10469:WP:CONSENSUS 10398:Flatterworld 10392: 10385: 10382:User:Noroton 10366:David Gerard 10352: 10316:David Gerard 10310: 10275: 10240: 10236: 10232: 10192: 10169: 10163: 10160: 10120:UltraExactZZ 10115:Gavin DeGraw 10033: 9923: 9868: 9831: 9793: 9791: 9781:, and again 9775: 9744: 9740: 9737: 9728: 9722: 9716: 9710: 9704: 9698: 9689: 9665: 9633: 9630:IPs on Shark 9557: 9540: 9529:rouge admins 9488: 9482: 9476: 9470: 9464: 9458: 9403: 9376: 9374: 9313: 9289: 9254: 9237: 9228: 9219: 9213: 9207: 9201: 9195: 9185: 9181: 9180: 9172: 9141:Orderinchaos 9125: 9115: 9109: 9103: 9097: 9091: 9081: 9073: 9056: 9050: 9044: 9038: 9032: 9025:65.0.160.105 8999: 8990: 8984: 8978: 8972: 8966: 8956: 8951: 8942: 8936: 8930: 8924: 8918: 8911:65.0.184.150 8908: 8900: 8848: 8842: 8836: 8830: 8824: 8807: 8775: 8646: 8644: 8617: 8607: 8601: 8595: 8589: 8583: 8565: 8559: 8553: 8547: 8541: 8523: 8517: 8511: 8505: 8499: 8480: 8474: 8468: 8462: 8456: 8439: 8429: 8423: 8417: 8411: 8405: 8398:65.0.184.123 8387: 8381: 8375: 8369: 8363: 8345: 8339: 8333: 8327: 8321: 8303: 8297: 8291: 8285: 8279: 8261: 8255: 8249: 8243: 8237: 8230:65.0.187.144 8219: 8213: 8207: 8201: 8195: 8177: 8171: 8165: 8159: 8153: 8135: 8129: 8123: 8117: 8111: 8093: 8087: 8081: 8075: 8069: 8062:65.0.163.131 8051: 8045: 8039: 8033: 8027: 8009: 8003: 7997: 7991: 7985: 7967: 7961: 7955: 7949: 7943: 7936:72.28.33.218 7925: 7919: 7913: 7907: 7901: 7883: 7877: 7871: 7865: 7859: 7841: 7835: 7829: 7823: 7817: 7799: 7775: 7746: 7744: 7734: 7728: 7722: 7716: 7710: 7704: 7663: 7659: 7635: 7615: 7591: 7586: 7574: 7570: 7543: 7532: 7528: 7524: 7503: 7502: 7442: 7438: 7433: 7426: 7402: 7360: 7346: 7340: 7298: 7297: 7259: 7255:User:Hexhand 7215: 7205: 7203: 7184: 7171: 7143: 7114: 7092: 7078: 7072: 7045: 7015: 7003: 6995: 6987: 6979: 6971: 6963: 6955: 6947: 6939: 6931: 6923: 6904: 6896: 6888: 6880: 6872: 6864: 6856: 6848: 6840: 6832: 6824: 6815: 6794: 6788:Very likely 6779: 6773: 6760: 6723: 6712:Orderinchaos 6705: 6700: 6697: 6693: 6670:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6662: 6628: 6604:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6596: 6575:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6567: 6534:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6526: 6524: 6520: 6513: 6497:opportunity. 6459: 6456: 6433: 6429: 6411: 6394:116.71.56.28 6379:Orderinchaos 6361:116.71.56.28 6352: 6346: 6331: 6330: 6321: 6314:Orderinchaos 6309: 6292: 6277: 6270: 6248: 6210: 6187: 6183: 6163: 6160: 6139: 6119: 6102: 6096: 6079: 6064: 6054: 6036: 5983: 5940: 5877: 5837: 5735:Orderinchaos 5715:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 5707: 5685: 5680: 5675: 5655:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 5647: 5630: 5592: 5578: 5508: 5487: 5386: 5362: 5361: 5349: 5343: 5311: 5276: 5245: 5211: 5205: 5199: 5193: 5187: 5181: 5172: 5150:Orderinchaos 5122: 5104: 5093: 5072: 5043:for socks. 5041: 5015: 5001: 4972: 4967: 4931:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 4923: 4919: 4915: 4888: 4878:consequences 4870:but 45 edits 4865: 4848: 4829: 4828: 4805: 4779: 4778: 4772: 4743: 4726: 4711: 4704: 4687: 4646: 4621: 4607: 4525: 4519: 4517: 4513: 4508: 4498: 4495: 4485: 4479: 4473: 4467: 4461: 4424: 4404: 4354: 4335: 4334: 4329: 4328: 4305: 4231: 4213: 4209: 4197:User:Anthony 4190: 4187: 4152: 4120: 4115: 4079: 4051: 4012: 4004: 4000: 3986: 3950: 3932: 3929: 3905: 3884:NeutralHomer 3844: 3828: 3823: 3808: 3802: 3797: 3770: 3765: 3739: 3732: 3718: 3689: 3642: 3630: 3625: 3607:Juliancolton 3598: 3585: 3565: 3553: 3540: 3511: 3508: 3497: 3490: 3483: 3473: 3463: 3460: 3452: 3435:'s signature 3415:verification 3405: 3401:the Guardian 3399: 3389: 3371: 3365: 3363: 3359: 3353: 3351: 3347: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3042: 3038: 2996: 2993:in Knowledge 2992: 2967: 2958: 2954: 2856: 2855:'s question 2824: 2821:Anekantavada 2818: 2803: 2767: 2763: 2722: 2716: 2703: 2696: 2678: 2635: 2626: 2606: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2564: 2561: 2556:In essense, 2519: 2516: 2493: 2492:(usage) and 2489: 2438: 2433: 2313: 2263: 2182:#Sad outcome 2139: 2137: 2130: 2107: 2085: 2078:Orderinchaos 2073: 2060: 2053: 2035: 1998:article size 1943: 1919: 1857: 1841:constructive 1840: 1836: 1806: 1792: 1762: 1740: 1736: 1689: 1653: 1610:Other links 1248: 1078: 1077: 1042: 1020:You may use 1005: 1003: 1001: 989: 981: 968: 944: 935: 931: 928: 879: 827:Village pump 815:New articles 780:Edit filters 759:Arbitration 685:User conduct 470:Open proxies 427: 387:Noticeboards 112:Orderinchaos 13271:Josiah Rowe 13156:Redrumracer 12325:. Thanks, — 12228:Enric Naval 11826:protections 11769:Accusations 11666:L'Aquatique 11394:Luna Santin 11359:Luna Santin 11285:WP:Civility 11224:L'Aquatique 11041:Historian19 10423:(this diff 10416:(this diff 9691:Frogger3140 8815:What about 8449:Bambifan101 7894:65.0.160.81 7439:improvement 7238:account... 7178:DH Michaels 6417:Ncmvocalist 6388:—Preceding 6355:—Preceding 6084:Ncmvocalist 5451:6,297 edits 5226:, and this 5051:Boondocks37 5045:—Preceding 5025:Boondocks37 5019:—Preceding 4773:Endorse ban 4454:Boondocks37 4430:Ncmvocalist 4357:Ncmvocalist 4306:L'Aquatique 3987:L'Aquatique 3951:L'Aquatique 3845:L'Aquatique 3647:Tbsdy lives 3354:selectively 3088:New Thought 3015:WP:NPOV/FAQ 2901:WP:NPOV/FAQ 2897:#Summing up 2723:POV pushing 2416:There were 2385:tendentious 2178:#User:Hrafn 2118:Hrafn's ANI 2061:L'Aquatique 773:Enforcement 729:Sockpuppets 634:Importation 593:Translation 505:Copyrights 440:Bureaucrats 223:Next edit → 217:new section 180:Josiah Rowe 42:Next edit → 13226:block user 13220:page moves 13185:block user 13179:page moves 13131:. Thanks, 12780:«JavierMC» 12550:«JavierMC» 12497:DuncanHill 12441:«JavierMC» 12404:block user 12374:filter log 11900:Dayewalker 11838:page moves 11255:removed it 11145:block user 11115:filter log 10997:KnightLago 10982:24.98.5.45 10565:Bill Ayers 10542:User:Slakr 10432:Bill Ayers 10388:Bill Ayers 10331:Tom Lehrer 10259:Carcharoth 10071:Carcharoth 9726:block user 9720:filter log 9664:. Regards 9498:EdJohnston 9486:block user 9480:filter log 9451:Prophaniti 9432:Landon1980 9356:EdJohnston 9217:block user 9211:page moves 9113:block user 9107:page moves 9054:block user 9048:page moves 8988:block user 8982:page moves 8950:. -- ] (] 8940:block user 8934:page moves 8846:block user 8840:page moves 8793:hbdragon88 8605:block user 8599:page moves 8576:Bambirocks 8563:block user 8557:page moves 8521:block user 8515:page moves 8478:block user 8472:page moves 8427:block user 8421:page moves 8385:block user 8379:page moves 8343:block user 8337:page moves 8301:block user 8295:page moves 8259:block user 8253:page moves 8217:block user 8211:page moves 8175:block user 8169:page moves 8133:block user 8127:page moves 8091:block user 8085:page moves 8049:block user 8043:page moves 8007:block user 8001:page moves 7965:block user 7959:page moves 7923:block user 7917:page moves 7881:block user 7875:page moves 7839:block user 7833:page moves 7732:block user 7726:filter log 7634:a lot. —— 6917:RKO 4 Life 6468:apologised 6327:Shapiros10 6297:Carcharoth 6230:Carcharoth 5863:DuncanHill 5816:Carcharoth 5774:Carcharoth 5749:DuncanHill 5690:Carcharoth 5610:DuncanHill 5209:block user 5203:filter log 5174:Prom3th3an 5002:Oppose ban 4968:Oppose ban 4866:Oppose ban 4853:DuncanHill 4810:DuncanHill 4688:Oppose ban 4595:EdJohnston 4562:Agreed. - 4483:block user 4477:page moves 4386:DuncanHill 4261:DuncanHill 4099:Locke Cole 4017:Locke Cole 3967:Locke Cole 3863:Locke Cole 3721:Black Kite 3686:Kurt Weber 3665:Locke Cole 3419:dave souza 3394:is rather 3108:dave souza 2906:dave souza 2770:Black Kite 2681:Black Kite 2661:dave souza 2611:dave souza 2595:dave souza 2392:essays. - 2389:disruptive 2353:dave souza 2264:Smashville 2235:dave souza 2186:dave souza 2015:Carcharoth 1966:Carcharoth 1925:Carcharoth 1889:Unresolved 1862:DuncanHill 1845:Carcharoth 1746:Carcharoth 1704:Unresolved 1668:Unresolved 1658:User:Hrafn 1032:to do so. 1028:ANI-notice 1014:not enough 971:Contact a 796:Questions 676:Undeletion 669:Miscellany 654:Categories 629:Protection 13232:block log 13191:block log 12701:WJBscribe 12650:WJBscribe 12433:WP:ENGVAR 12421:WP:ENGVAR 12410:block log 12343:WP:ENGVAR 12250:my report 12248:Why was 12005:this sock 11923:vandalism 11915:vandalism 11886:Coberloco 11832:deletions 11423:Wouldn't 11151:block log 11089:, the IP 11087:this diff 10777:army brat 10682:Wikidemon 10599:Wikidemon 10569:Wikidemon 10551:Wikidemon 10512:Wikidemon 10496:Wikidemon 10203:User:Docu 9964:Jehochman 9732:block log 9492:block log 9320:Roadahead 9223:block log 9119:block log 9060:block log 8994:block log 8946:block log 8852:block log 8611:block log 8569:block log 8527:block log 8484:block log 8433:block log 8391:block log 8349:block log 8307:block log 8265:block log 8223:block log 8181:block log 8139:block log 8097:block log 8055:block log 8013:block log 7971:block log 7929:block log 7887:block log 7845:block log 7766:Jehochman 7738:block log 7552:Dreadstar 6952:block log 6853:block log 6795:Confirmed 6739:Bobisbob2 6493:revision. 6453:Statement 6161:Errrrr... 6065:Manticore 5840:block log 5442:this page 5363:Wizardman 5215:block log 5148:Arrrrrr. 5094:nominator 4630:checkuser 4626:unblocked 4489:block log 4284:Gwen Gale 3705:SirFozzie 3476:Gary King 3455:User:Docu 3433:User:Docu 3407:The Times 3223:incorrect 3199:comments. 2955:intrusion 2590:describes 2460:MartinPhi 1843:comment. 1718:WP:ACCESS 1249:Incidents 975:directly. 905:Shortcuts 842:Proposals 837:Technical 800:Help desk 785:Requested 744:Vandalism 734:Usernames 707:Sanctions 659:Templates 649:Redirects 576:Whitelist 571:Blacklist 480:Oversight 455:Education 428:Incidents 401:dashboard 233:Line 829: 230:Line 829: 13293:Category 13280:contribs 13263:contribs 13208:contribs 13167:contribs 12963:contribs 12891:Cheers, 12362:contribs 12050:'fenian' 12020:'fenian' 11958:Resolved 11932:Cheers, 11896:contribs 11814:contribs 11790:'fenian' 11728:TimidGuy 11705:Resolved 11596:WP:POINT 11457:Wisdom89 11451:WP:CIVIL 11311:Wisdom89 11259:reverted 11103:contribs 11051:contribs 10965:De728631 10866:De728631 10832:Response 10825:contribs 10813:unsigned 10803:user:Kww 10795:contribs 10783:unsigned 10714:Resolved 10703:user:Kww 10536:Resolved 10348:Blowdart 10293:Resolved 10125:Evidence 9872:contribs 9771:responds 9702:contribs 9612:Tony Fox 9580:Tony Fox 9524:Resolved 9462:contribs 9227:-- ] (] 9199:contribs 9095:contribs 9036:contribs 8970:contribs 8922:contribs 8872:contribs 8828:contribs 8761:Looie496 8669:contribs 8587:contribs 8545:contribs 8503:contribs 8460:contribs 8409:contribs 8367:contribs 8325:contribs 8283:contribs 8241:contribs 8199:contribs 8157:contribs 8115:contribs 8073:contribs 8031:contribs 7989:contribs 7947:contribs 7905:contribs 7863:contribs 7821:contribs 7708:contribs 7697:WordBomb 7691:WordBomb 7669:Superpup 7550:edits. 7544:ask them 7485:Alansohn 7387:Alansohn 7341:lifebaka 7275:WP:STALK 7271:WP:POINT 7234:And now 7188:contribs 7073:lifebaka 6928:contribs 6829:contribs 6774:lifebaka 6764:contribs 6475:WP:STICK 6390:unsigned 6357:unsigned 5985:Wisdom89 5973:Tiptoety 5942:Wisdom89 5510:Wisdom89 5472:Utan Vax 5406:contribs 5344:lifebaka 5278:Wisdom89 5185:contribs 5059:contribs 5047:unsigned 5033:contribs 5021:unsigned 5006:Bullzeye 4974:Wisdom89 4712:Excirial 4705:Question 4647:Confused 4622:Question 4613:Tiptoety 4465:contribs 4217:Quiddity 4139:contribs 4121:choosing 4068:contribs 3592:contribs 3547:contribs 3445:Resolved 3366:incident 2959:opposing 2853:Zero1328 2788:·Maunus· 2745:Zero1328 2657:Zero1328 2540:Zero1328 2439:restrict 2418:no rules 2394:Zero1328 2144:Zero1328 2090:Franamax 1897:Resolved 1808:Wisdom89 1764:Wisdom89 1498:archives 1376:archives 1254:archives 1132:archives 1063:archives 1057:subpage. 1047:archived 847:Idea lab 805:Teahouse 768:Requests 644:Articles 514:Problems 190:contribs 122:contribs 66:Wikitext 13253:Barneca 12635:ukexpat 12345:Changes 12301:Rodhull 12290:Rodhull 12254:RolandR 12097:ThuranX 12042:Domer48 12035:abusive 12012:Domer48 11982:Domer48 11782:Domer48 11243:dispute 11241:over a 11239:blocked 11158:MSJapan 10943:WP:RFPP 10898:protect 10893:history 10473:Noroton 10465:WP:TALK 10443:Noroton 10214:Adambro 9896:protect 9891:history 9843:Improve 9805:Improve 9662:WP:RFPP 9594:Crossmr 9240:Majorly 7673:Hexhand 7621:Hexhand 7548:pointed 7466:Hexhand 7452:Hexhand 6734:Fascism 6557:Spartaz 6430:Comment 6337:My work 6278:Anthøny 6249:Support 6216:Spartaz 6193:Protonk 6140:Support 6097:Support 6080:Comment 6055:Support 5926:Blueboy 5844:minimal 5793:ThuranX 5595:Raul654 5470:users. 5422:Closing 5375:Spartaz 5267:Spartaz 5232:Spartaz 5124:ЯEDVERS 5106:ЯEDVERS 4953:Raul654 4889:Anthøny 4806:Comment 4608:Support 4577:Raul654 4550:Crossmr 4372:Adambro 4246:Adambro 4080:as easy 4035:Crossmr 4033:here.-- 3908:MBisanz 3830:Premise 3824:Logical 3632:Premise 3626:Logical 3568:MBisanz 3519:Adambro 3417:. . . 3227:silence 3133:WP:TLDR 3079:WP:TLDR 2997:Outside 2950:WP:NPOV 2885:WP:NPOV 2719:WP:NPOV 2583:demands 2569:notable 2041:Protonk 1944:Support 1893:tag to 1795:Majorly 1741:started 1714:WP:SIZE 1629:Backlog 1030:}} ~~~~ 1010:pinging 920:WP:AN/I 614:Mergers 413:General 13246:uw-3rr 13197:Thingg 12737:edits. 12704:(talk) 12653:(talk) 12629:, the 12306:andemu 12295:andemu 12281:WP:SSP 12277:WP:CHU 12149:WP:3RR 12113:Alison 11919:WP:AIV 11844:rights 11820:blocks 11803:Alison 11747:WP:AIV 11608:¿talk? 11568:¿talk? 11528:¿talk? 11494:¿talk? 11430:Animum 11297:¿talk? 11204:Shadow 11059:WP:AIV 11026:Hmains 10902:delete 10765:WP:NPA 10739:WP:NPA 10584:CENSEI 10419:) and 10096:Jester 10054:Jester 9900:delete 9765:, and 9658:WP:AIV 9650:WP:SSP 9616:(arf!) 9584:(arf!) 9533:WP:BLP 9447:Hed PE 9334:Tznkai 8883:Stifle 8860:seicer 8657:seicer 7638:Martin 7594:Martin 7443:remove 7441:, not 7357:pointy 7240:D.M.N. 7192:D.M.N. 7140:WP:CHU 6681:(talk) 6615:(talk) 6586:(talk) 6545:(talk) 6412:Oppose 6347:Oppose 6322:Oppose 6293:Oppose 6256:D.M.N. 6251:- Per 6184:Oppose 6071:(talk) 5914:CAESAR 5726:(talk) 5666:(talk) 5554:CAESAR 5492:D.M.N. 5455:D.M.N. 5394:seicer 5307:WP:AGF 5099:WP:NPA 4942:(talk) 4916:Oppose 4765:(Talk) 4744:Oppose 4652:auburn 4591:WP:SSP 4127:seicer 4084:Ged UK 4056:seicer 4009:WP:SIG 3944:WP:IAR 3940:WP:SIG 3859:WP:SIG 3793:WT:SIG 3771:reason 3741:Parkin 3734:Sticky 3694:Colts! 3661:WP:SIG 3396:POINTy 3179:WP:NOR 2988:WP:NOR 2889:WP:NOR 2749:Madman 2705:Parkin 2698:Sticky 2571:. She 2565:assert 2422:boldly 2140:before 1837:active 1737:reason 1380:search 1258:search 1136:search 1067:search 932:urgent 913:WP:ANI 832:Policy 619:Splits 202:31,668 134:70,076 77:Inline 59:Visual 13067:Yasis 12953:Yasis 12886:avoid 12415:- On 12380:WHOIS 12162:slakr 12159:. -- 11965:slakr 11861:slakr 11712:slakr 11180:Help! 11121:WHOIS 10919:views 10911:watch 10907:links 10622:modus 10471:. -- 10393:could 10300:slakr 10248:Help! 10040:DJ AM 9917:views 9909:watch 9905:links 9838:dαlus 9800:dαlus 9636:shark 9548:Help! 9381:WP:BK 9268:Moni3 9155:Creol 9124:] (] 9009:slakr 7783:Help! 7754:Help! 7506:levse 7446:year. 7434:would 7410:Help! 7367:Arrr! 7301:levse 7150:Arrr! 7099:Arrr! 7052:Arrr! 7008:socks 6936:count 6909:socks 6837:count 6701:could 6517:here. 6514:block 6225:WP:AN 6061:. -- 5895:Arghh 5848:Giggy 5686:clear 5318:Arrr! 5252:Arrr! 4748:Kusma 4734:Help! 4655:pilot 4520:other 4203:(see 4193:added 4116:could 4013:years 4001:silly 3479:asked 2864:and 2727:undue 2587:takes 2580:wants 2562:think 2544:Talk? 2464:POINT 2426:error 2398:Talk? 2148:Talk? 2003:slakr 1916:WT:AN 1904:slakr 1858:Agree 1723:slakr 1679:slakr 1024:subst 983:diffs 950:Read 753:Other 664:Files 624:Moves 583:Style 204:edits 136:edits 16:< 13276:talk 13257:talk 13202:talk 13161:talk 13137:talk 13129:here 13110:talk 13106:NJGW 13086:talk 13082:NJGW 13071:talk 13053:talk 13049:NJGW 13034:talk 13004:talk 13000:NJGW 12998:... 12981:talk 12977:NJGW 12957:talk 12852:talk 12791:Talk 12743:talk 12675:talk 12639:talk 12631:-ize 12607:talk 12561:Talk 12542:diff 12523:talk 12501:talk 12483:talk 12452:Talk 12429:diff 12398:http 12392:RBLs 12386:RDNS 12356:talk 12323:here 12287:. -- 12279:and 12273:here 12258:talk 12232:talk 12122:talk 12101:talk 12081:talk 12067:talk 12007:. -- 11994:talk 11904:talk 11890:talk 11808:talk 11775:here 11732:talk 11685:talk 11625:talk 11585:talk 11545:talk 11509:talk 11437:talk 11400:talk 11380:talk 11365:talk 11346:talk 11271:talk 11261:and 11197:Half 11162:talk 11139:http 11133:RBLs 11127:RDNS 11097:talk 11085:Per 11045:talk 11030:talk 11001:talk 10986:talk 10969:talk 10931:fold 10928:Hers 10915:logs 10889:talk 10885:edit 10870:talk 10821:talk 10791:talk 10773:lazy 10747:talk 10728:talk 10701:and 10686:talk 10669:( ) 10660:here 10603:talk 10588:talk 10573:talk 10555:talk 10516:talk 10500:talk 10491:here 10477:talk 10467:and 10447:talk 10439:here 10402:talk 10370:talk 10320:talk 10263:talk 10237:that 10233:this 10218:talk 10199:that 10197:and 10195:this 10180:talk 10176:Docu 10113:and 10093:SWAT 10075:talk 10051:SWAT 10016:talk 10003:that 9993:talk 9958:and 9945:talk 9932:and 9913:logs 9887:talk 9883:edit 9866:talk 9822:talk 9787:here 9783:here 9779:here 9714:logs 9696:talk 9654:warn 9598:talk 9565:talk 9502:talk 9474:logs 9456:talk 9436:talk 9424:here 9420:here 9416:here 9407:here 9389:(𒁳) 9360:talk 9338:talk 9324:talk 9296:talk 9272:talk 9251:this 9193:talk 9159:talk 9089:talk 9030:talk 8964:talk 8916:talk 8887:talk 8866:talk 8822:talk 8797:talk 8780:and 8765:talk 8750:talk 8663:talk 8581:talk 8539:talk 8497:talk 8454:talk 8403:talk 8361:talk 8319:talk 8277:talk 8235:talk 8193:talk 8151:talk 8109:talk 8067:talk 8025:talk 7983:talk 7941:talk 7899:talk 7857:talk 7815:talk 7720:logs 7702:talk 7677:talk 7625:talk 7616:said 7513:Talk 7489:talk 7470:talk 7456:talk 7427:exX2 7391:talk 7335:this 7325:talk 7308:Talk 7244:talk 7196:talk 7182:talk 7174:here 7128:talk 7029:talk 6944:logs 6921:talk 6845:logs 6822:talk 6758:talk 6743:talk 6648:mine 6640:mine 6632:this 6512:The 6443:(𒁳) 6434:want 6421:talk 6398:talk 6365:talk 6301:talk 6260:talk 6253:this 6234:talk 6209:ANI 6197:talk 6170:talk 6148:talk 6128:talk 6088:talk 5880:Ryan 5867:talk 5852:talk 5820:talk 5797:talk 5778:talk 5753:talk 5694:talk 5681:long 5676:more 5633:talk 5614:talk 5599:talk 5581:talk 5496:talk 5476:talk 5459:talk 5400:talk 5197:logs 5179:talk 5101:. ➨ 5082:talk 5055:talk 5029:talk 4957:talk 4906:jc37 4857:talk 4834:fold 4831:Hers 4814:talk 4796:jc37 4784:fold 4781:Hers 4752:talk 4696:talk 4673:jc37 4660:talk 4638:talk 4634:Bwrs 4599:talk 4581:talk 4564:jc37 4554:talk 4539:jc37 4528:jc37 4505:diff 4459:talk 4434:talk 4425:very 4390:talk 4376:talk 4361:talk 4288:talk 4265:talk 4250:talk 4221:talk 4133:talk 4088:talk 4062:talk 4039:talk 4003:)— " 3890:Talk 3804:Sher 3779:talk 3709:talk 3651:talk 3594:) @ 3588:talk 3549:) @ 3543:talk 3523:talk 3423:talk 3404:and 3378:talk 3310:talk 3265:talk 3240:talk 3158:WP:V 3154:WP:V 3112:talk 3061:talk 3043:only 2934:WP:V 2910:talk 2887:and 2881:WP:V 2843:Ah, 2834:talk 2811:talk 2764:have 2753:talk 2665:talk 2644:talk 2615:talk 2609:. . 2599:talk 2558:WP:V 2527:talk 2502:talk 2468:MUDs 2420:. I 2387:and 2357:talk 2322:talk 2239:talk 2212:talk 2190:talk 2164:talk 2124:and 2112:and 2094:talk 2045:talk 2019:talk 1996:and 1984:talk 1970:talk 1952:talk 1929:talk 1866:talk 1849:talk 1750:talk 1716:and 1712:per 1619:Talk 1364:1167 1359:1166 1354:1165 1349:1164 1344:1163 1339:1162 1334:1161 1329:1160 1324:1159 1319:1158 1312:1157 1307:1156 1302:1155 1297:1154 1292:1153 1287:1152 1282:1151 1277:1150 1272:1149 1267:1148 1006:must 962:Try 566:Spam 435:Bots 423:Main 186:talk 172:undo 167:edit 118:talk 104:edit 12975:. 12896:red 12155:to 11980:. 11937:red 11850:RfA 11758:Why 11659:MfD 11425:DRV 11174:Guy 11070:Why 10954:Why 10849:Why 10787:Kww 10743:Kww 10724:Kww 10662:now 10656:ust 10618:now 10242:Guy 10007:BoA 9926:BoA 9879:BoA 9673:Why 9542:Guy 9385:dab 9292:JNW 8746:Kww 8444:). 7805:): 7777:Guy 7748:Guy 7664:was 7660:any 7590:.—— 7533:all 7529:all 7404:Guy 7371:Why 7154:Why 7119:tth 7117:iMa 7103:Why 7056:Why 7020:tth 7018:iMa 7000:lta 6992:rfc 6984:arb 6976:rfb 6968:rfa 6901:lta 6893:rfc 6885:arb 6877:rfb 6869:rfa 6799:FT2 6652:FT2 6439:dab 6188:are 6041:FT2 6037:has 5908:AVE 5900:Red 5548:AVE 5540:Red 5322:Why 5256:Why 4728:Guy 4509:not 4412:bli 4297:on. 3933:old 3811:eth 3798:not 3766:try 3643:not 2970:in 2851:in 2721:: " 2494:con 2490:pro 2314:two 2128:. 1604:340 1599:339 1594:338 1589:337 1584:336 1579:335 1574:334 1569:333 1564:332 1559:331 1552:330 1547:329 1542:328 1537:327 1532:326 1527:325 1522:324 1517:323 1512:322 1507:321 1486:487 1481:486 1476:485 1471:484 1466:483 1461:482 1456:481 1451:480 1446:479 1441:478 1434:477 1429:476 1424:475 1419:474 1414:473 1409:472 1404:471 1399:470 1394:469 1389:468 1242:365 1237:364 1232:363 1227:362 1222:361 1217:360 1212:359 1207:358 1202:357 1197:356 1190:355 1185:354 1180:353 1175:352 1170:351 1165:350 1160:349 1155:348 1150:347 1145:346 1012:is 852:WMF 639:XfD 475:VRT 13295:: 13278:• 13249:}} 13243:{{ 13154:. 13139:) 13112:) 13088:) 13073:) 13055:) 13036:) 13006:) 12995:, 12992:, 12983:) 12854:) 12745:) 12677:) 12641:) 12609:) 12525:) 12503:) 12485:) 12260:) 12234:) 12188:is 12124:) 12103:) 12083:) 12069:) 11996:) 11960:– 11906:) 11753:So 11734:) 11707:– 11687:) 11627:) 11602:ʄ! 11598:. 11587:) 11562:ʄ! 11555:is 11547:) 11522:ʄ! 11511:) 11488:ʄ! 11472:/ 11453:? 11382:) 11348:) 11326:/ 11291:ʄ! 11287:? 11273:) 11164:) 11065:So 11032:) 11003:) 10988:) 10971:) 10949:So 10917:| 10913:| 10909:| 10905:| 10900:| 10896:| 10891:| 10887:| 10872:) 10844:So 10827:) 10823:• 10797:) 10793:• 10749:) 10730:) 10716:– 10688:) 10658:me 10642:∼ 10605:) 10590:) 10575:) 10557:) 10549:- 10538:– 10518:) 10502:) 10479:) 10449:) 10404:) 10372:) 10350:| 10346:-- 10322:) 10295:– 10265:) 10220:) 10182:) 10077:) 10018:) 9995:) 9947:) 9915:| 9911:| 9907:| 9903:| 9898:| 9894:| 9889:| 9885:| 9834:Dæ 9824:) 9796:Dæ 9757:, 9753:, 9749:, 9668:So 9600:) 9567:) 9539:. 9526:– 9504:) 9438:) 9422:, 9418:, 9377:is 9362:) 9340:) 9326:) 9298:) 9274:) 9161:) 8889:) 8869:| 8863:| 8799:) 8791:. 8767:) 8752:) 8666:| 8660:| 7679:) 7650:—— 7645:Ψ 7627:) 7606:—— 7601:Ψ 7516:• 7510:• 7499:— 7491:) 7472:) 7458:) 7393:) 7363:So 7347:++ 7327:) 7311:• 7305:• 7294:— 7289:, 7286:, 7283:, 7280:, 7246:) 7220:is 7206:no 7198:) 7146:So 7121:ew 7095:So 7079:++ 7048:So 7022:ew 6960:lu 6861:lu 6780:++ 6745:) 6676:» 6650:. 6646:, 6642:, 6638:, 6610:» 6581:» 6540:» 6423:) 6400:) 6367:) 6303:) 6262:) 6236:) 6211:is 6199:) 6172:) 6150:) 6130:) 6090:) 6000:/ 5957:/ 5929:96 5903:2 5869:) 5854:) 5822:) 5799:) 5780:) 5755:) 5721:» 5696:) 5661:» 5616:) 5601:) 5543:2 5525:/ 5498:) 5490:. 5478:) 5461:) 5403:| 5397:| 5350:++ 5314:So 5293:/ 5248:So 5244:? 5223:, 5084:) 5061:) 5057:• 5035:) 5031:• 4989:/ 4959:) 4937:» 4859:) 4816:) 4754:) 4725:. 4698:) 4690:. 4640:) 4601:) 4583:) 4556:) 4436:) 4415:nd 4409:ar 4406:St 4403:- 4392:) 4378:) 4363:) 4290:) 4267:) 4252:) 4223:) 4136:| 4130:| 4105:• 4101:• 4090:) 4065:| 4059:| 4041:) 4023:• 4019:• 3973:• 3969:• 3946:. 3887:• 3869:• 3865:• 3781:) 3711:) 3697:) 3691:Go 3671:• 3667:• 3653:) 3623:-- 3590:♦ 3545:♦ 3525:) 3447:– 3421:, 3380:) 3334:62 3312:) 3280:62 3267:) 3242:) 3110:, 3063:) 2995:. 2908:, 2883:, 2836:) 2813:) 2755:) 2663:, 2646:) 2613:, 2597:, 2533:‎ 2529:) 2504:) 2355:, 2324:) 2261:-- 2237:, 2214:) 2188:, 2166:) 2096:) 2047:) 2021:) 1986:) 1972:) 1954:) 1931:) 1920:do 1899:}} 1895:{{ 1891:}} 1887:{{ 1868:) 1851:) 1823:/ 1779:/ 1752:) 1706:– 1676:-- 1670:– 1378:, 1256:, 1134:, 1065:, 1022:{{ 947:: 215:: 188:| 147:: 120:| 13282:) 13274:( 13260:· 13255:( 13234:) 13229:· 13223:· 13217:· 13211:· 13205:· 13200:( 13193:) 13188:· 13182:· 13176:· 13170:· 13164:· 13159:( 13135:( 13108:( 13084:( 13069:( 13051:( 13032:( 13002:( 12979:( 12960:· 12955:( 12850:( 12786:| 12741:( 12673:( 12637:( 12605:( 12556:| 12540:( 12521:( 12499:( 12481:( 12447:| 12412:) 12407:· 12401:· 12395:· 12389:· 12383:· 12377:· 12371:· 12365:· 12359:· 12354:( 12256:( 12230:( 12192:n 12190:o 12186:l 12184:A 12120:( 12099:( 12079:( 12065:( 11992:( 11902:( 11893:· 11888:( 11852:) 11847:· 11841:· 11835:· 11829:· 11823:· 11817:· 11811:· 11806:( 11730:( 11683:( 11623:( 11605:• 11583:( 11565:• 11543:( 11525:• 11507:( 11491:• 11477:) 11467:T 11462:( 11440:) 11434:( 11402:) 11398:( 11378:( 11367:) 11363:( 11344:( 11331:) 11321:T 11316:( 11294:• 11269:( 11182:) 11178:( 11160:( 11153:) 11148:· 11142:· 11136:· 11130:· 11124:· 11118:· 11112:· 11106:· 11100:· 11095:( 11048:· 11043:( 11028:( 10999:( 10984:( 10967:( 10921:) 10883:( 10868:( 10819:( 10789:( 10745:( 10726:( 10684:( 10654:J 10601:( 10586:( 10571:( 10553:( 10514:( 10498:( 10475:( 10445:( 10400:( 10368:( 10318:( 10261:( 10250:) 10246:( 10216:( 10178:( 10122:~ 10087:⇒ 10073:( 10045:⇒ 10014:( 9991:( 9943:( 9919:) 9881:( 9874:) 9869:· 9864:( 9840:/ 9820:( 9802:/ 9767:2 9763:1 9759:4 9755:3 9751:2 9747:1 9734:) 9729:· 9723:· 9717:· 9711:· 9705:· 9699:· 9694:( 9596:( 9563:( 9550:) 9546:( 9500:( 9494:) 9489:· 9483:· 9477:· 9471:· 9465:· 9459:· 9454:( 9434:( 9358:( 9336:( 9322:( 9294:( 9270:( 9255:· 9229:· 9225:) 9220:· 9214:· 9208:· 9202:· 9196:· 9191:( 9173:· 9157:( 9126:· 9121:) 9116:· 9110:· 9104:· 9098:· 9092:· 9087:( 9074:· 9062:) 9057:· 9051:· 9045:· 9039:· 9033:· 9028:( 9000:· 8996:) 8991:· 8985:· 8979:· 8973:· 8967:· 8962:( 8952:· 8948:) 8943:· 8937:· 8931:· 8925:· 8919:· 8914:( 8901:· 8885:( 8854:) 8849:· 8843:· 8837:· 8831:· 8825:· 8820:( 8808:· 8795:( 8763:( 8748:( 8647:· 8613:) 8608:· 8602:· 8596:· 8590:· 8584:· 8579:( 8571:) 8566:· 8560:· 8554:· 8548:· 8542:· 8537:( 8529:) 8524:· 8518:· 8512:· 8506:· 8500:· 8495:( 8486:) 8481:· 8475:· 8469:· 8463:· 8457:· 8452:( 8435:) 8430:· 8424:· 8418:· 8412:· 8406:· 8401:( 8393:) 8388:· 8382:· 8376:· 8370:· 8364:· 8359:( 8351:) 8346:· 8340:· 8334:· 8328:· 8322:· 8317:( 8309:) 8304:· 8298:· 8292:· 8286:· 8280:· 8275:( 8267:) 8262:· 8256:· 8250:· 8244:· 8238:· 8233:( 8225:) 8220:· 8214:· 8208:· 8202:· 8196:· 8191:( 8183:) 8178:· 8172:· 8166:· 8160:· 8154:· 8149:( 8141:) 8136:· 8130:· 8124:· 8118:· 8112:· 8107:( 8099:) 8094:· 8088:· 8082:· 8076:· 8070:· 8065:( 8057:) 8052:· 8046:· 8040:· 8034:· 8028:· 8023:( 8015:) 8010:· 8004:· 7998:· 7992:· 7986:· 7981:( 7973:) 7968:· 7962:· 7956:· 7950:· 7944:· 7939:( 7931:) 7926:· 7920:· 7914:· 7908:· 7902:· 7897:( 7889:) 7884:· 7878:· 7872:· 7866:· 7860:· 7855:( 7847:) 7842:· 7836:· 7830:· 7824:· 7818:· 7813:( 7785:) 7781:( 7756:) 7752:( 7740:) 7735:· 7729:· 7723:· 7717:· 7711:· 7705:· 7700:( 7675:( 7647:Φ 7643:☎ 7623:( 7603:Φ 7599:☎ 7557:† 7504:R 7487:( 7468:( 7454:( 7425:( 7412:) 7408:( 7389:( 7323:( 7299:R 7242:( 7224:n 7222:o 7218:l 7216:A 7194:( 7185:· 7180:( 7130:) 7126:( 7031:) 7027:( 7011:) 7004:· 6996:· 6988:· 6980:· 6972:· 6964:· 6956:· 6948:· 6940:· 6932:· 6924:· 6919:( 6912:) 6905:· 6897:· 6889:· 6881:· 6873:· 6865:· 6857:· 6849:· 6841:· 6833:· 6825:· 6820:( 6761:· 6756:( 6741:( 6728:\ 6674:l 6672:| 6668:| 6666:l 6664:« 6608:l 6606:| 6602:| 6600:l 6598:« 6579:l 6577:| 6573:| 6571:l 6569:« 6538:l 6536:| 6532:| 6530:l 6528:« 6477:. 6419:( 6396:( 6363:( 6299:( 6284:✉ 6258:( 6232:( 6195:( 6168:( 6146:( 6126:( 6103:X 6086:( 6005:) 5995:T 5990:( 5962:) 5952:T 5947:( 5917:) 5911:· 5905:( 5865:( 5850:( 5818:( 5795:( 5776:( 5751:( 5719:l 5717:| 5713:| 5711:l 5709:« 5692:( 5659:l 5657:| 5653:| 5651:l 5649:« 5612:( 5597:( 5557:) 5551:· 5545:( 5530:) 5520:T 5515:( 5494:( 5474:( 5457:( 5298:) 5288:T 5283:( 5217:) 5212:· 5206:· 5200:· 5194:· 5188:· 5182:· 5177:( 5127:❞ 5121:❝ 5109:❞ 5103:❝ 5080:( 5053:( 5027:( 4994:) 4984:T 4979:( 4955:( 4935:l 4933:| 4929:| 4927:l 4925:« 4895:✉ 4855:( 4812:( 4750:( 4736:) 4732:( 4694:( 4636:( 4597:( 4579:( 4552:( 4503:( 4491:) 4486:· 4480:· 4474:· 4468:· 4462:· 4457:( 4432:( 4388:( 4374:( 4359:( 4286:( 4263:( 4248:( 4219:( 4107:c 4103:t 4097:— 4086:( 4037:( 4025:c 4021:t 3975:c 3971:t 3965:— 3871:c 3867:t 3777:( 3707:( 3688:( 3673:c 3669:t 3649:( 3586:( 3541:( 3521:( 3376:( 3308:( 3263:( 3238:( 3059:( 2832:( 2809:( 2792:· 2790:ƛ 2751:( 2642:( 2525:( 2500:( 2320:( 2210:( 2162:( 2092:( 2043:( 2017:( 1982:( 1968:( 1950:( 1927:( 1864:( 1847:( 1828:) 1818:T 1813:( 1784:) 1774:T 1769:( 1748:( 1500:) 1496:( 1382:) 1374:( 1260:) 1252:( 1138:) 1130:( 1069:) 1061:( 1026:: 1017:. 996:. 740:) 736:( 407:. 379:e 372:t 365:v 192:) 184:( 149:+ 124:) 116:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Knowledge

Index