Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

10446:

living people terrorists and murderers, he refuses to accept the result, announces he has won, forks the discussion to re-propose the exact same thing again and again edit wars BLP vios on the affected articles in the middle of the RfC discussion to the point where one is protected and another currently in a state of edit warring. This continues a months-long campaign of BLP vios, edit warring, game playing to the point of bad faith, personal attacks, incivilities, fabricated complaints against other editors, and dozens and dozens of rejected proposals all on a single POV point. It may not be too late to simply close the RfC as no consensus, revert the edits he has warred into place, and start an RfC or other behavioral process from there if he does not comply. But he obviously is not complying with consensus or our behavioral policies, and he is demonstrating a propensity for messing up RfCs, so that time is probably now. There are 2-3 other editors of dubious legitimacy and an equal number of new SPAs making the same point who will probably show up here or anywhere else we try to deal with them, and who themselves probably should be dealt with as well.

5626:

striking. Another possibility (though it takes a few estra edits) is to include a link to the diff of the comment being removed or replaced (that raises the same concerns as leaving stuff visible, though it places stuff a click away, though it does reassure those who want to make sure that you didn't remove more than you needed to). Finally, to ensure that the subthread doesn't end up not being replied to, leave Raul a talk page message explaining what you did and repeating your apologies and your offer for him to remove the whole subthread. You can even add a link back in the subthread saying "Raul notified of this offer". That way, if Raul doesn't follow up, but choses to leave the subthread in open view, people know that is his choice, not just yours. Yet another alternative (I saw SandyGeorgia do this recently) is to put off-topic or distracting parts of a thread in a collapse box, though sometimes this backfires and draws

2757:

question but, rather, a series of accusations against Catherineyronwode disguised as a question. By calling it a POV push in the heading, Zero1328 set the tone right at the beginning. Then, to continue with this 'question', Zero1328 wrote that Catherineyronwode and her husband (user Self-ref who also edits Knowledge) have: "written several, long essays all over the place, disruptively edited, and have generally had a disregard for policies." That does not sound like a question, does it? Then user Dave Souza wrote a series of answers to this question, the answers amounting to little more than slinging mud in the direction of Catherineyronwode. For instance, Dave Souza's first answer to Zero1328 said "A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing Knowledge, it would seem." No content, just accusation, which is what I would call mud slinging. With this analysis, I have am trying to wipe off the mud.

3112:) abused so as to support quick reduction to stubs of that with which a hostile editor-shooter does not agree. I would like to emphasize that "editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references" and i think hostile cite-tagging and hostile category-tagging are not supporting a helpful reference source for Knowledge readers based on its policy support of effacement of esoteric topics under assault by critical POVs seeking intrusive showcasing where they do not belong." mean this to you? I can tell you that the practice to which i refer has me writing elsewhere than Knowledge. I know others for whom this is true, and some who seem to be about to transit to that activity also. I don't think driving away writers is what is best for Knowledge, do you? 3186:

silent, does this mean that there is a consensus, or that the category has been abandoned, or what? I hear your direction to "persuade a lot of people" before i start implementing my ideas of it. I thought the best course was to have a conversation about the implementation, and then implement what was hammered out in the Talk page. How long should i wait in silence unopposed to my arguments for these subcategories' exclusion before i begin implementing that? Should i wait 3 weeks and then begin implementing those which aren't covered by the policy arbitration first, referring to those who object to my edits to engage discussion on the category page instead of engaging in an edit war with me? You're an admin here, dave, surely you know the best procedure. Thank you for your assistance.

10632:

like Flatterworld, a 2-year editor with 10,000+ mainspace contributions to 3,800+ articles. We are growing tired of discussion and citations, which have been provided again and again in response to Noroton's many dozen attempts to upset consensus to avoid calling Bill Ayers or Bernadine Dohrn terrorists or murderers, and to avoid linking them and terrorism to Obama. Chronicling his behavior problems would involve several megabytes of differences, something best done should there be a need to explain this to the uninitiated in a serious discussion of a topic ban. Noroton is also a prolific editor who makes uncontroversial contributions in other parts of the encyclopedia. In the meanwhile, a pause in the game playing, edit warring, incivilities, etc., would be most welcome.

4601:. We have a user who was once blocked inappropriately (no warnings, no prior blocks, no attempts to explain why his edits were a problem) well over a year ago, who reappears and makes a few edits to a different article. Again, he has received no warnings and nobody has attempted to explain what problem apparently exists with his edits, but now we're not just trying to block him, but to all out ban him. If there's evidence of abusive sockpuppetry, it would need to be presented before I could support a block (we've seen how well blocks based on speculation of sockpuppetry work). The reason a years absence didn't "fix this" is because nobody has attempted to "fix this". Based on what's been presented, I just don't get why exactly we are banning him. - 7381:)I tagged the articles because, in the course of the AfD, I became confused with Dreadstar's interpretation of notability - that pilot articles aren't notable, and that their content should be merged back to the series article. I decided that to better understand his point of view on the subject, I should see what articles he had worked on (all noting edits within the last few months, and not years, ago) and created where notability was on point. I found a surprising number of articles that would likely not survive an AfD themselves. After pointing this contradictory position in the AfD, I tried to figure out what to do with articles that were even less notable than the one Dreadstar wanted to have merged as non-notable on its own merits. 3133:, with which you appear to be associating notability. I thought ANIs were supposed to be more thorough and specific than that. Since i'm just now learning about the details of administration and negotiations in Knowledge i'll watch for what standards should be engaged in an ANI. So far it appears to me a distraction from conversations better had elsewhere about the actual categories and their use and abuse. Making it personal seems to me the wrong way to handle such discussions, because it assumes bad faith rather than addressing the issues proper in a polite and clear way in the context of the topic, category, and page of the dispute. 10382:) and Flatterworld, on the Bill Ayers talk page, is immediately trying to turn a civil discussion into a mudwrestling match. I've certainly let Flatterworld get under my skin in the past, but I'm really trying to avoid responding in kind to impolite comments. Please help me to do so. Please remind Flatterworld that working with others in a civil way, discussing new facts and how they may be helpful in developing articles is what talk pages are supposed to do, and working together to reach consensus is what we're supposed to be doing to build the encyclopedia. And please tell him that if he can't work that way, he will be banned from 2888:, i like it very much, and i would prefer not to see it abused so as to support quick reduction to stubs of that with which a hostile editor-shooter does not agree. I would like to emphasize that "editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references" and i think hostile cite-tagging and hostile category-tagging are not supporting a helpful reference source for Knowledge readers based on its policy support of effacement of esoteric topics under assault by critical POVs seeking intrusive showcasing where they do not belong. 8594:. That's just a small sample of stuff, of course. Bambifan101 has the longest history because of actual attempts to talk some sense into him. At this point, I can almost spot this guy on site, report to AIV, and usually he's blocked quick. However, when his in IP mode, its a band-aid at best. He seems determined to keep this stuff up despite knowing its not appreciated and he's falsely claiming that he just wants to "help" in the various communications with him. I suspect he finds it funny watching folks run around behind him having to clean up after him. 9511:

news, filmed by multiple sources.. anything remotely negative is being deleted by obvious fans/non nuetral parties. please see now the page is protected for blp issues and a whole section that has been worked on for weeks (and all ready widdled down to the bare minimum) has been totally removed. something needs to be done or this whole page should be deleted as it is 100% biased and BLP is being way over used.. not to mention they are using alex jones own network of websites as sources on half the items on the article. thanks for looking into it.. -

6546:

mentoring would be the best resolve from this and that I would try my hardest to gain as much as possible from it. I am willing to burry the hatchet, get over that which has plagued (what some have described as) an otherwise promising editor for the past 3 months. I still have alot more to give and do. Again I stress that this particuler discussion has been a wake up call that going around feuding with other editors whom you have a brush with isnt acceptable. And I am most willing to consider anyones suggestions or requests.

7402:

encyclopedia. Dreadstar and others would be able to address the notability issues and expand/improve the articles. I think it would be a POINT edit if the concerns weren't valid, which isn't the case here. The proof of that can be found in the fact that in all but one of the examples LessheardVanU pointed out, some improvement was offered by either Less, Lifebaka or Dreadstar himself. The articles still have some pretty big notability issues, but at least, they are better than they were before I tagged them. -

4660:

before blocking him or her. Besides, i ran trough his recent edits and i fail to see any PoV pushing that bad it warrants an instant block. At the same time the diff above is unfriendly, but if it is the only misconduct i would say like to note that if that offense was a reason for an instant ban, we would have to do so for quite some people. Pure vandals must receive four warnings before being eligible for a block, so i fail to see why this case should warrant one without warning? So for now Oppose Ban.

2826:

Effacement, by those opposed to such coverage, and those whose interests extend to esoteric topics that want to work within a wiki are making their own wikis rather than attempt to negotiate for their existence and contributions. Predictably, the result will be an array of wikis focussed and covering a variety of topics, leaving for some future 'meta-wiki' the kind of edited inclusion which should be the ideal and aim of Knowledge. ... -- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

5987:

That may or may not be the case in any given situation... hence communal discussion. RFC is useful when there's a wish to explore in more depth, for example if there are concerns but unsure how widespread, or if it's not completely clear what the real problem is. If it's fairly straightforward, then a debate like this at ANI often covers the same ground more quickly and with less wasted bureaucracy. If there is a clear and visible serious problem, with strong evidence, then there's no "rule" saying RFC

6180:

apart from the fact that they distract from the incidents that need dealing with and take longer, community ban discussions should be treated with respect, not suddenly produced in the heat of the moment as part of an ongoing ANI thread. That is a knee-jerk reaction. Any community ban proposal should have careful presentation of evidence, and clearly delineate the point at which the discussion will end. Otherwise you get discussions closed as a ban after only a day, and others that drag on for weeks.

2087:, or rather, the opposition of it. The two users are spouses. They have written several, long essays all over the place, disruptively edited, and have generally had a disregard for policies. They do not supply diffs or citations or anything, and seem to ignore attempts at other editor's explanations. Cath seems to have conflict of interest issues regarding WP:AUTO. The events regarding Hrafn may have been an intelligent attack on him. Hrafn appears to have done edits regarding Pseudoscience. 12553:

native English speakers), and is also the form of English officially used by the EU, there is no good reason to be using US English in an article which primarily concerns African and European nations, and so there could be no reasonable objection to the change, except from those from a third continent, apparently unaware of local usage, and intent on imposing US English where it simply does not belong, even thought it is jarring and culturally intrusive to the parties directly concerned.

5342:, where I referred to his hostility and bitterness (his words) towards administrators a "trainwreck" waiting to happen. He has had his rollback and account creator privileges revoked, and has been banned from IRC for trolling. It's clear from his prior incidents, battling various administrators and his actions at IRC, that he no longer is a constructive contributor and is only picking and choosing his battles, to which I was warned of earlier that I'd be invoking a witchhunt. 12093: 12088: 9378:. This is just some of the most recent ones, it would appear Prophaniti has a long history of doing this. He calls the other editors edits "vandalism" in content disputes often as well. Basically I just want help explaining that it isn't ok to edit war just because you are "right" and the other editor is "wrong". I'm not asking for a block or anything, just think Prophanity should stop edit warring so often. I also want to make it clear that I'm aware my behavior on 1944:(ec) Yes. My browser was slowing down, too, which is why I also did the same to several other threads. We have an entire encyclopedia to run. If one action's discussion that affects only one user, however perceivably unjust the action may be, is preventing people from reporting/responding to problems here, it needs to be fixed so that the other 99% of the encyclopedia can be covered. I'm sorry if you feel this action is unjust, but it is firmly grounded in our 2473:

variety, of articles because she has an idealistic belief in the good WP does. Truthfully, I would not recognize her from your very negative descriptions of her. I have edited with her, and even when we were in disagreement I never had any difficulty with her, and I always found her open to reason. I think that despite the effort she puts into Wikipedi, she often gets rather shabby treatment here....such as the disrespectful statement you just made about her.

2389:

resisted then i stopped that method of correction and sought another method, engaging more people. This indicates to the contrary regarding 'disruptive' editing style, which is "persistently editing a page with information which is not verifiable through reliable sources or insisting on giving undue weight to a minority view." In the case of the former, i wasn't persistently editing a single page. The latter (undue weight) was what i was attempting to

1653: 1617: 5636:

deserving of a community ban, IMO, but as I haven't looked in enough detail, some of it might be of more concern. Still, padding the charge list with non-serious concerns not only wastes people's time, but does actually, IMO, weaken the overall case (which is not to say that a re-presentation of the ban proposal concentrating on the possibly serious stuff wouldn't be more deserving of consideration). ie. I agree with those who say an RfC (with

81: 6743: 2969:, i very strongly agree that "Pseudoscience is a social phenomenon and therefore may be significant, but it should not obfuscate the description of the main views, and any mention should be proportionate; and, moreover, should explain how scientists have received pseudoscientific ideas and concepts. This is all in the purview of the task of describing a dispute fairly." I also like the rest of the page very much except the presented 2905:

removal). I have explained why it ought remain, as comparable to Category:Hoaxes or Category:Fallacies, which are helpfully explained as to how and why these are conventionally so regarded. In general, the error that is being committed is in consideration of a topic and where its borders extend. To the extent that "where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly" topic

3529:(ec)Heh, definitely not familiar with that case because I make it a point to stay away from Arb stuff. It's so much easier to just use common sense and do what you think is right. But looking at that case, the party had a deliberately confusing sig. Simply not having a link is not disruptive in the least bit, nor does it really relate back to that Arb case in terms of what the ArbCom stated in its decision. 2040:- erase all the contributions made while the sub-thread was on the main noticeboard, start with the actual sub-thread itself. The inevitable consequence of sub-threading is a dropoff in comments, which inevitably gives the volume of main-thread comments weight of numbers. Sub-threading offloads the main board, but emasculates the thread. Alternatively per Carcharoth, make the active sub-threads visible. 10462:

arbitration case over editing abuse. I note that some of the parties seem to be planning (another) arbitration case against me(!). Hmmm. Anyway, for the sake of Knowledge tranquility and so that this board can concentrate on easier problems it's probably best to withdraw or conclude this one unless any administrator is ready to deal with Noroton and some of the other editors at this time.

11907: 11654: 10663: 10485: 10242: 9473: 3394: 12496:) of the ENGVAR to the British variant, I weakly agreed to because the article name was Industrialisation, but in no way can you state that Industrialisation is dependant on the ENGVAR for strong national ties. Industrialisation effects the entire world and should have stood with the first ENGVAR it was written in and moved to Industrilization if your statements above hold validity.-- 4119: 9562:(and through the next several sections there), and the admins involved are (from my view, at least) enforcing BLP because the sources being used for the section in question are not very good. (YouTube videos, blogs, et al, from the looks of things.) Due to repeated BLP concerns from the sources being suspect, the page has been protected. Seems reasonable enough to me. 2028:- these are not the most important issues to discuss, admins come to AN/I looking to find out what is happening and of late the size of AN/I has been manifestly ridiculous. Slow user connections are not the only problem - sometimes WP itself has been extremely slow too. This gives people a factor of choice re the more dramatic topics attracting a lot of discussion. 4196:

these details but also that someone, especially an administrator, would not actually explain the reason behind their decision. If Docu can't provide a good explanation then this can be described as him being disruptive, plain and simple, and some kind of action should be taken to stop this disruption, what form this action should take is the big question however.

5724:

personally block someone for insulting you, is it acceptable to support a community ban (which would end up being a block by a more circuitous route) for the same reason? I think what I'm trying to say here is that if you were involved in the precipitating or recent incident, you should be a "witness" if you like, rather than part of jury. Does that make sense?

6457:

heaps etc. His age made it quite clear that he was making all this up, I and several others told him to stop, he didnt so I !op for trolling and an op re-centered the conversation. I find it ammusing how he said my morals are lacking, when on IRC I said I had morals in regards to his cheating confession. I dont think I need to say anything more about that

3309:

divination, folklore, et al. I write in many categories (e.g dog breeds, collectibles, celebrities, music, science, religion, folklore, etc.), but only in religious and magical categories have i seem articles targeted for stubbing and deletion by editors who show great disrespect for the writers who created and/or upgraded the articles in the past.

3033:. Apologies for the extent to which my quick attempt at translation fell short, however you still don't seem to like "The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true." The 2384:, to which i replied with cites of previous complaints about the abuse of the . I could also have made mention of the 2 previous CfD for the entire category itself. I have already explained my support for the category's restrained usage primarily in its non-pejorative significance. The characterization of "tendentious" is false, because i was 3181:, allowing me to make the first (possibly unpracticed and misguided) attempt to do what was already agreed: discuss each of the subcategories and consider them for inclusion or exclusion. If anything, i offer an intermediary position between those who demand the category's deletion and those who seem to be abusing it. I don't accept the 6389:

resources from issues with the actual encyclopedia (disputes, trolling, pov-pushers). There is no need to community-ban this user. He's been given a couple of blocks of a few hours' lengths. Well, if he keeps prancing around, just double the block length in every future block and the problem will go away one way or the other. Thanks. --

3054:– an article supported only by self-published sources, and so another article needing improvement to meet the threshold of WP:V. The other core content policies all have a bearing on how "esoteric topics" are presented, if at all, and have to apply. If you wish to dispute the legitimacy and wisdom of the arbitration's specification at 6651:

should always, first and foremost, be building its content and providing the means for content to be built, and anything else (drama, social networking, who's saying what at Jimbo's talk page, adminship etc) comes a distant second. He is an intelligent and capable user who is in the top classes at school, and I feel he

5743:

all out of AGF'. Support statements can be more carefully examined for vindictiveness or actual 'run of of patience' feelings. Sometimes we have seen insulted users come here and say 'no, not yet, I'm willing to accept him getting one more chance', so reading the opinions of those offended is worthwhile to the group.

12726:

determination, whether these were within Knowledge policy/guideline or was an attempt by an editor to press a POV ENGVAR over established article ENGVAR, and perhaps prevent edit warring on these article over the change. It was a good faith attempt and in no way meant to press any personal ENGVAR POV of my own.--

2926:, and have explained why in the Pseudoscience category's Talk page as seems appropriate (there are several sections challenging it). I am still waiting for rational arguments against me in any of those sections. Perhaps it is a convention that cites are necessary for Category Talk pages? I haven't noticed this. 10343:

anti-Obama attack mode, no matter how fringe (or second- or third- or fourth-hand 'quotes') they may be. He completely ignores the spirit of Knowledge and instead looks for 'loopholes' to justify his POV edits. This simply can't continue. We're getting to the end of September and he's diverting editors who

9302:, is about a book that takes a strong POV, so it's not a complete surprise that extremely partisan editors are working on the article. Due to the edit warring, the article has been full-protected twice in the last few weeks. I suggest that the article subject might not meet the notability requirements of 12879:-ise is hardly a "minority spelling" - due to the proliferation of British usage as well as those who have learned English in French or other Romance language countries, it's actually probably in the majority. That being said, I'm not arguing for or against either use, as we have ENGVAR to decide that. 10631:

I don't know why we're using a resolved section on an edit war for complaining about other editors. Flatterworld has been just fine. Noroton's calling Flatterworld a troll, above, is par for the course. Noroton is getting worse, and is vexing quite a few long-term, serious, legitimate contributors

10347:

be doing work elsewhere into constantly reverting his edits and discussing with him (for the umpteenth time) variations on the theme of what 'encyclopedic' means. Other editors have simply given up in disgust and left. If he's blocked until mid-November, it's possible he will come to his senses after

9767:

I'm tending to the belief that this account is on a mission to see how much and for how long they can get away with. I only skimmed the contrib history, so perhaps someone can point to any constructive edits - I certainly missed them. I also have the suspicion that they are GHawPgger wannabe (without

9510:

can someone nuetral please take a look at alex jones (radio). There are a few administrators on there that are using there powers to turn the article into the alex jones fan club page. Info on current events, no matter how well sourced are being removed for BLP reasons. even thought they are on the

7585:

Well, it wasn't an emergency, was it? You're an experienced user. If it wasn't POINT, you could have waited a couple days till any conflict was over. However, I will not assume bad faith, since I don't know what was in your mind. You might at least have known that this would increase the conflict

6688:

article without consensus. He replaces the summarized text in the Italian Fascism section with nearly whole Italian Fascism article. He also deletes chunks of cited text (I suspect because he just doesn't argee with) and changes Nazism to National Socialism when Nazism is the peferred title since may

6516:

It is of upmost concern and hurtfullness that I have ended up here, being discussed. If you had asked me four months ago the possility of me being here or having a block I would have laughed the suggestion off becuase Community bans were are thing that happened to other people. Now the scenario seems

6460:

In regards to the very short removal of rollback and ACC which was initiated by MBisanz, it was restored within an hour later with the following sumamry's "after review, the user hasn't abused rollback, but doesn't need the account creator flag" and "Further review - this editor had a clean record up

6366:

per Anthony as well as my own earlier comment. Having discussed it with him, he's noted he's ready for mentorship or anything the community will throw at him, and appears to be genuinely regretful of his actions. I considered this a very serious matter and did let him know of how this could've turned

5048:

to be at fault rather than the article. In this case, you're (s/he says) an anti-semite, so the AfD should be withdrawn etc and you banned for good measure blah blah blah. I know it's tiresome and offensive, but such ludicrous attacks are best ignored. Nevertheless, I'll give the editor in question a

4350:

What good would an RfC do besides foster drama and ill-will? There is absolutely NO chance that ArbCom or any admin will block or otherwise sanction a longtime user for having an incomplete (as opposed to disruptive or misleading) signature. I wish I lived in the sort of sunny, happy-go-lucky would

3339:

Hi Cat, glad you could join in. Unfortunately your confidence in your mind-reading powers seems undiminished, and again your argument is based on your presumption that an editor acting properly in accordance with policies, working through related articles in a normal way, had an "agenda". Your belief

3300:

I've been away for a few days and came back to find this. I've seen ANI discussions before, and this one is certainly atypical. Normally the complaining party supplies diffs, examples, a desired outcome, and such, but this is just a lot of opinionating and fake mind-reading. The complaining party has

2942:

seems completely common-sense to me. I don't think that i have ever edited an article in Knowledge and failed to support it with proper sources. If you know of an instance, please point it out. I don't think that this applies to User_pages, Talk_pages, or Village_pump_pages which have been my primary

2914:

continually taking cues from my elder editors (and especially writers). It is my aim "to present each of the significant views fairly and not assert any one of them as correct." I think that until a topic is generally evaluated as a hoax, or as a fallacy, or as a pseudoscience, it is POV-pushing to

2811:

and request for "some help on understanding what the heck is going on". Rather than answer the question, you attack the messenger and instead of giving your own explanation, attack my attempt at giving a concise answer. You object to my description of "A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing

2777:

Anekāntavāda (Devanagari: अनेकान्तवाद) is one of the most important and basic doctrines of Jainism. It refers to the principles of pluralism and multiplicity of viewpoints, the notion that truth and reality are perceived differently from diverse points of view, and that no single point of view is the

2737:

No where on wikipedia is it stated that editors must refrain from critisting or proposing changes to existing policies. What Catherine and her husband is doing is stating their opinion that certain policies should be changed and they are completely within their right to do so. Just like the community

2439:

The CfD ruling was that this (correcting the Pseudoscience category) was my apparent point, and some of those who contributed seemed to agree that the pejorative tag was problematic. Where better to address the problem than on the Talk page of that category? So i began engaging conversation there and

2263:

Dave souza, when does an ANI complaint become "hounding"? I had an ANI also; but, although I thought the complaint was misdirected, I would not have resorted to whining complaints, like accusations of hounding. I have the impression that Hrafn was a pretty tough editor, and probably understands that

12771:

My understanding is that -ise is the correct primary spelling in British English and related variants (except Canadian English, where only -ize is correct), but -ize is an acceptable, allowable and correct alternative spelling. I personally always use -ise except on articles where either American or

12649:

However other dictionaries list both forms as acceptable so there seems little reason to change the article from one acceptable form to another. Stop edit warring, or you will likely be blocked for disrupting Knowledge. This really is one of the more petty squabbles I have come across on Knowledge -

11469:

Haha so you admit rudeness! Not even gonna fight that one eh? Seriously though you are misrepresenting an old discussion that I had never even seen before today. That userbox has been on my userpage for... months on end. If you were editing in good faith the least you could have done was bring it up

7570:

that I noticed the articles while trying to glean Dreadstar's philosophy on notability, and decided to tag them because they weren't especially notable or cited. POINT would have been to nom them at AfD. The diffs you provided are not new links, but recreations of the ones that initiated the report.

6436:

group, I could have put it on the project page but I it to seem a bit more personal considering the barnstar’s I gave them all (which is funnily not mentioned) for the effort and enthusiasm they have put in. They are all new users and I thought that those two tips would help them fit in. I gave them

5921:

I am on the wall on this one, I have seen some rather questionable contributions on and off wiki that make me want to support here but at the same time I am not sure that all other resources have been exhausted (RfC ect..). I think I would support a ban if I was to see a few more attempts to educate

5742:

Proposal and support of a community ban by an involved editor are two different things. The first is more improper, as it can been seen as vindictive or vengeful, and can be, and often is, dismissed easily. The second is more important, as it says ' I can't try to work with this user anymore, and am

5656:

Im afraid I was not aware of the other methods of removing ones own comments without changing the context of anothers. Its not everyday that situation pops up so I hadnt put much thought into it. Given your detailed summery of alternative ways of doing so, I agree I could have handled it better, but

5261:

we should assume him to be a user worth redeeming. But my question was just to learn if there was one, because if so, we'd have something to work with, some disputes already lined out, some opinions already expressed. As for Wisdom89's comment, well, we don't know if they have. I think a RFC/U might

4994:

PS, jc37, not sure how going "inactive" for periods of time can be used as part of the justification to ban anybody. Is having a life a bad thing, in your books? Also, can anybody tell me what "using socks" is? Again, my life outside of computers and this website limits me to only knowing one use

3772:

Meh, he's been using it since 2003. I honestly cannot believe it's been dragged to AIV. It's not the first time it's happened. If he was acting in a disruptive matter, I could see it. He's not, he never has, and I'm not particularly happy with the constant instruction creep flowing into WP:SIG being

2825:

The current policies and atmosphere in Knowledge are not conducive to fostering coverage of esoteric subjects in any depth. Instead, it facilitates effacement of substantative articles, using such mechanisms as hostile cite-tagging, hostile category tagging to categories and pages, and the Weapon of

2489:

It was not my intention to imply that it's been fully proven and whatnot. I haven't even given diffs. I've stated twice that I am not fully sure on Cath and I was seeking clarification. It's more about Self-ref. The two users are related, which is why I thought it was common sense to mention Cath as

2472:

I see Catherineyronwode (who I have met only on WP) rather differently than you do. She is one of the very few Wikipedie editors I know of who has her own article, and she is considered notable. She is a professional writer, and the most talented WP writer I know of. She works on a large number, and

12487:

was established in 2002 when the first editor wrote the article. It has stood many revisions and additions since that time without a change in ENGVAR. No discussion or consensus was made/reached on the articles talk for a change. You posted today on the article talk page about moving the article

10931:

Ok, I am one of the IPs who is not yet involved in a proper edit war. A semi protect would be improper here as I am not vandalizing the page. I am simple removing factually inaccurate, misleading information sourced from one Opinion piece that does not claim where its information comes from. Just

10567:

While I myself support Obama and try to check this personal political inclinations at the door while I edit Knowledge, still, in this totally whacked out and silly political environment, I think it would be great if Knowledge could somehow await until the first Tuesday of November has come and gone

10445:

where we conclude conclude once and for all in an orderly way whether his content position has consensus (it obviously does not), reach a result, and stick with it. But he is gumming up the process with procedural game-playing on the RfC. After utterly failing to get consensus for calling various

10440:

Yes, if no administrator is willing to do so on their own it is time for a community topic ban. For my part, after trying for months I am more or less giving up on interacting with this tendentious editor. At the same time he is mangling some important articles, and I do not want to let him bully

9361:

he/she goes to the same article and reverts the same user literally minutes into the next 24 hour period. He/she is doing this on multiple articles and has recieved several recent warnings regarding edit warring. Is gaming the 3RR rule like this acceptable? I myself was involved in an edit war with

9263:

is choking other editors and not letting any discussion to take place on article talkpage. Additionally he is using tags and wikipedia policy keywords against other editors unwarranted. He seems adamant on pursuing his own POV and deleting everything else on the article talkpage. All my attempts to

7752:

There is a guy, who claims to be a 13 year old kid, who is causing a lot of problems with various Disney film articles, some Teletubbies articles, and some Barney articles. He has been indef blocked numerous times, but keeps changing IP addresses so the blocks only last a few hours, or a day at the

7618:

cognizant that making too many edits to the articles would seem vindictive (and excessive cn tagging or AfD nom was out of the question), and truly felt that simply placing a notability tag on the articles needing serious expansion and citation was the least intrusive way to draw attention to them.

6142:

the drama boards but plenty of users don't read them or don't feel comfortable commenting. I'm not saying an RFC reaches a wider audience, per se, but it gives him a chance to have people with defend him and weigh in. Absent some serious incident, I don't think we should be debating a ban in this

5986:

Roughly speaking, what you're really after for a community ban is a consensus that the patience of the community is pretty much done, it's not visibly changing, general net detriment (repeating problem, unhelpfulness), and time to say "the problems mean this isn't really working out for all of us".

5635:

time to repair. Having said that, I personally think your explanations and contriteness here should give you a chance to show you can reform and improve (though I say that without looking in detail at what has happenned). Some of things things that you have done to irritate and annoy people are not

4836:

may be a useful example.) However, on the proposal to ban this user, I do not believe this to be a move that facilitates the improvement of the encyclopedia; and, if the worst comes to the worst and Boondocks37 disrupts in the future, an administrator can simply issue a preventive block. Now, let's

4252:

Why doesn't someone open an RFC about this? Going around and around in circles about it here is only going to stir up drama- but taking it to arbcom would be ridiculuous. If the user has been asked to change it for some five odd years and has not yet responded, chances are good they aren't going to

3791:

I strongly disagree that this was something that should have been brought to AN/I OR AIV, but since it's here. I don't think it's inappropriate to ask for him at least to have a timestamp. We have quite a bit of leeway with signatures (which might be hypocritical coming from someone who essentially

2544:

removal of any information as bad deletion, apparently failing to realise that the information is readily accessible from the article history even when the page has been made into a redirect. These views are, in my understanding, simply against policy. I have no knowledge about her contributions to

1695:

as one thing (a discussion about a previous AN thread and Kurt's contribution there) and then segued into the predictable ban discussion. The ban discussion should have been at AN, where the size wouldn't have been a problem. Now someone can try and work out what to do with my comment when they put

13192:

Subsequently, Thingg's record of useful vandal fighting was pointed out to me, and I thought more about the incident. Upon further reflection, I decided that Redrumracer's edits were close enough to simple vandalism that I shouldn't have blocked Thingg. I was thinking of the letter of the law at

9728:

His editing from thereon(and I mean for the amount of time starting around the time of the above edits, and the most recent stream of edits) appeared to be normal, however his most recent edits have vastly deviated from any kind of constructive editing. Even though he was warned in the past about

6473:

I felt that alot of the points people has raised needed addressing as I felt it was Mis-construed or skewed by leaving out alot of the points such as my apology to Raul or the tips were not actually talkpage spamming or the rollback removal was actually an admin's mistake and was quickly reverted.

6456:

In Re: To Tyler Puetz's claims, He was ranting and trolling on IRC, saying how he cheated on a history exam and how he has been through courts (careful to mention for civil and criminal) for hacking and causing massive damges and how the CEO was pissed etc, How He has called the FBI and the police

6388:

attention. Knowledge isn't a social network, people. You don't need to psychoanalyse problem editors. If they cause problems, slap blocks on them, escalating lengths in case of repeated offense. Some will get it, others will keep going until blocked for good. All this social drama draws away admin

6220:

Oppose ban proposal: a ban is not yet warranted by Prom's behaviour. I reiterate the suggestions that an RFC be filed, and note that the proposal to put Prom. into Mentorship would indeed be wise; I think he simply needs a stronger editor to guide him on the right track (eg., with his small heated

5972:

No, a ban doesn't need arbitration committee sanction these days, and hasn't for a long time. We do still (as a committee) handle appeals because some bans have been poorly judged, but the majority are fair. A ban isn't usually a step the community goes to without some good reason, so it's more to

5765:

That's a useful distinction to make, between proposal and support. I agree with what you are saying here. Especially the "the opinions of those offended is worthwhile to the group" bit - I should have said that in my initial comment. I'd still be more comfortable if people stated in commmunity ban

5723:

Raul, that's the second time recently I've seen you propose or support a community ban based on someone attacking or insulting you. If a community ban is needed in such cases, surely it will happen without you weighing in on it? To put it another way, if (according to some) it is not acceptable to

5625:

When you want to remove one of your comments that someone has already replied to, one approach is to replace your comments with something like "Comments removed. Raul (or whoever), please accept my apologies and feel free to remove this part of the thread and your reply". That is an alternative to

4727:

The diff posted is only one example of the trolling and POV pushing exhibited by this user. The fact that he came back right after an extended block to wave an edit in Raul's face is simply childish. We don't need editors like this here, who are not only unwilling to learn from their mistakes, but

4379:

early on in this discussion already, ArbCom have intervened in a variety of types of disputes on-wiki. Should an RFC fail, unless there's an intention on proposing a community ban discussion (which will almost definitely not go anywhere), this isn't the place and that's the only other avenue left.

4233:

I find his signature (along with the lack of willingness to talk about it in a meaningful way) disruptive. I guess the question would be, no snarkiness intended, is it selfish and lazy of me or any other user for wanting to see the time stamp or being able to click through to the user page of this

4210:

An editor deliberately makes it hard for other editors to communicate with him. He signs in a way which can disrupt archiving. He repeatedly fails to respond to other editors concerns about this. Maybe a short block would attract his attention (and before anyone claims that that is not what blocks

3712:

I'd rather not see this become a teapot tempest. I would hope, now that the matter has been brought to Docu's attention a couple of times, that he would just add a link to his user or talk page to his sig, and sign with a datestamp (just like everyone else does). While we allow all our editors a

3225:

Interesting, but probably not relevant. What would seem to me to be relevant would be Cat and Self-ref's flouting of WP's policies regarding verifiable, reliable content, vis-a-vis the persistent use of the word "hostile", to paint said policies as "evil". Let's try to stick with that point, and

2988:

Dave, you maintain that i have a "tactic of posting huge screeds at the Village Pump", and yet i don't think i've contributed more than a single extended essay there and, when asked to provide an 'executive summary' did so without complaint, answering all questions put to me for clarification. You

2330:

I had some hope that someone would give a hand in understanding, as it's alot of information and it's a bit confusing to me. This seemed to be an issue greater than just Hrafn, so I guess it was partially an attempt at separating the discussion. Like I said, I wasn't fully sure about Cath; most of

13078:

As above... this is also merely a bump thread. Some people were crying foul that the page wasn't visible enough, so I'm creating another section for the purposes of promoting this subpage to further community attention. All kinds of input are requested and appreciated, but piling on at this point

7220:

relisted after he previously closed it as a redirect and merge. In the current afd, Hexhand has responded to every participant that wasn't supporting a "keep". Hexhand and Dreadstar have discussed several points related to this afd. Today Hexhand placed notability tags on 5 articles Dreadstar had

6650:

I talked to the user at length last night on IRC and I think it's a reasonable conclusion he is good faith and means well, that the eruptions are more stemming from a lack of control/forethought than any genuine ill will, and that an area of concern is priorities. The priority of an encyclopaedia

6581:

Information (for what it's worth) -- I had not heard of Prom3th3an until the Steve Crossin incident (~Aug 23). In that incident, the Arbitration Committee were emailed with anonymous emails of what we felt to be a game-y and uncertain faith nature ("Have you figured out who it is yet?"), and then

6452:

The so called "Grawp-style vandalism off-wiki" on a test wiki that has nothing to do with Knowledge, has nothing to do with Knowledge or its projects. However if you want an explanation email me. Note that Manticore is actually a key staff member on the test wiki and has not interfaced with me on

6409:

I've just spotted this, and I must admit I am absolutely flabbergasted at the amount of people who think I am deserving of a community ban or other type of restriction. However, I heed your concerns and this has been a wake up call. I think that a RFC/U would have come notice to me as to how much

5698:

Personally, i find blanking of comments disruptive, as it interrupts the flow of a thread, and (especially when those comments have been replied to or commented on) may alter the meaning of a thread as a whole. I much prefer striking, though I do agree that this should be done with an appropriate

5171:

I'm wondering whether I'm the only one who has had enough of this individual. As far as I can see from their contributions they add nothing whatsoever of value to the project and their childish disruption soaks up far too much time and energy by editors who are actually here to be useful. Recent

4968:

I appreciate all the attention. Just so we're clear, I am not getting banned. This jc37 character has something against me, and can't stand losing. Which he did, when he tried, unsuccessfuly, to remove an edit of mine, which I provided with a valid reference, for no other reason than it didn't

4162:

The thing I'm baffled by, is Docu's apparent refusal to answer the simple question of "why not?". There must be a reason he doesn't like timestamps and a linked signature (I can guess at possibilities), but despite all these people asking, he seems to keep ignoring that specific question. I think

3210:

Dave souza wrote: "Ah, Malcolm Schosha, you're failing to assume good faith in Zero1328's question..." Ah, Dave souza, since when do users bring complaints to AN/I because they assume good faith? I would have thought that, by now, you would have figured out that this is where users come when they

2302:

You do realise that according to your gifted colleague, describing another editor as "whining" is gross incivility? Dissonance should be resolved by dispute resolution and policy, not by wikistalking and attacks on editor's motives. While I'm sure Cat's motives are of the finest, her methods were

2157:

Knowledge is in an ongoing process of change, which is what characterizes life. But your implication is that there is something evil about Catherine wanting to move Knowledge toward certain changes. It hardly seems a danger to Knowledge; and, in any case, no editor has the clout to force unwanted

12797:

I don't think we should be incorporating minority spellings into articles just because there's a partial overlap with another regional variety with next to no relevance to the subject matter, simply in order to appease a linguistic bully from a third country with no knowledge of the local usage.

12552:

talk page where another user had complained about the topically inappropriate US spellings, he was advised to go ahead and make the changes: “Be bold, especially on such matters”. Since Commonwealth English is the form of English used by almost all African nations (which include many millions of

6646:

Given a community ban appears to have been rejected, what should take place? I think for Prom3th3an's sake, there needs to be clarity, so that he can move on in the appropriate manner without this hanging over him in an unresolved fashion. My own idea of a solution would be some form of enforced

6179:

was the venue for community ban discussions? ANI is for urgent incidents. AN is for the longer, more careful discussions, such as community ban discussions. I'm annoyed I didn't notice this before. ANI and subpages (in the case of another discussion) are not the places for ban discussions. Quite

5421:

I'd support a ban of limited duration. His recent exchange with Raul on his talk, coupled with previous blocks and warnings et al, are all enough to earn himself a break from the Wiki. Either a block for a while, or, at least, a stab at mentoring him. But, alas, I fear, it is "too late" for some

4195:

If he doesn't have the courtesy to answer the simple question as to why he won't include these details then why should the community be prepared to tolerate the nuisance of this? Quiddity sums up the situation very well. It surprises me not only that someone would consider it appropriate to omit

3747:

and haven't jumped in because I've hoped that Docu would simply consent to using a more standard signature that at least provides users with a link to the user page or talk page, and please try signing talk pages with the datestamp. The signature confuses bots, makes it difficult to tell when a

2388:

the neutral point of view. I was correcting tendentious use of a misused category tag. That i did so a single time with numerous tags also contradicts this characterization, which could mean "repetitive attempts to insert or delete content which is resisted by multiple other editors." Once i was

1874:

receive less attention, and the minimum standards for a ban discussion require it to be conducted openly. And as I've said several times now, ANI is more active than AN, so ban discussions should, for that reasons if nothing else, be held at AN where there is a less pressing need to split off to

12543:

had a strong national tie to British English, so once again your complaint is unfounded. I said it was the title of the original page. Systematic and improper changes in the text to US English had made the text inconsistent with the page name, so I corrected these to harmonise the text with the

12428:

page, and yet instead of examining the history of the article to establish the correctness of my action, you rushed in and reverted me, and have been posting patently inappropriate warnings on my talk page, when all I did was correct those earlier, improper alterations to the original language.

10815:

Something's happening on there which is not yet a proper edit war, but at least two IPs are constantly removing well-referenced material with controversial views of Facebook, despite of reverts by registered users. I've reverted two such deletions including citations of The Guardian (which were

10461:

Having said that, I don't think an AN/I report at this time could lead to a lot of argument but is unlikely to lead to any administrative action. We should probably conclude the RfC and if the results aren't respected, file a new AN/I report, behavioral RfC, and if all other recourse fails, an

7336:

If every time anyone who challenged someone who disagreed with them became the subject of an ANI, we would have a never-ending tide of ANIs resulting from nearly every contested RfA, as well as most XfDs. While I can't say that Dreadstar will have enjoyed Hexhand's responses and actions, he has

4659:

i ran trough the history of his talk page, and i noticed the absence of both warning templates or even an explanation before he was blocked the first time. Unless discussion took place somewhere else or there has been some form of grave misconduct i am unaware of, it is customary to warn a user

2913:

topical matter into the main article. This is disruptive of encyclopedic content, and should be curtailed as a form of POV-pushing. I am taking both specific steps and broad-ranging explanatory means of correcting this. I am open myself to correction, and since i am a new editor at Knowledge am

2904:

informs my motivation for correcting the POV-intrusion of pejorative category tagging. By its very characterization it is obvious that this type of category is easily abused. There have been adequate explanations for this in the Pseudoscience category Talk page (arguably justifying its complete

13220:

My question is whether there's any way for the block to be removed from Thingg's record. I'm not aware of such a thing, but perhaps people with bureaucrat or oversight privileges can remove the history of the block? I just don't want an ill-considered block to stand in the way of a promising

10342:

for a start). This has gone on for months, and instead of improving with experience and coaching, his work has deteriorated. He has shown no interest in encyclopedic facts, structure, style or wording. Instead, he has a clear personal agenda and searches for 'sources' that support his virulent

5181:

nasty exchange they just removed from their talk page really sums up the way they drain oxygen and energy from the project. I'd personally like to see them indefinitly blocked but, if there is not consensus for that, I'd like to see a topic ban from wikipedia space. I'd appreciate thoughts and

3312:

We all know that Knowledge standards are changing, and that old articles with no citations as well as last year's articles with end-of-article footnotes are getting tagged. It would not be difficult for the taggers to play fair and notify the writers who have worked on the articles that inline

3308:

against topics that fall into their pet peeve categories. I gave stated (and supported with diffs and examples) my belief that at least one editor deleted rather than upgraded older and less-well-sourced articles on spirituality, self-help, New Thought, Creationism, Christianity, Spiritualism,

3185:

of that policy's implementation, and so of course i proceed from that basis, explaining what i think is logical and rational (and most conservative). Others may argue to the contrary regarding each of the subcategories' inclusion/exclusion in response. If they do not, and if people just remain

2951:

Knowledge i have of course constructed many pages with variable citation, since they weren't all encyclopedias. Surely i have much to learn as regards this principle of Knowledge, but i am neither opposed to its application on non-notable subjects (examples?) nor do i think that the notability

2343:

fashion, and now more of a civil POV push, but still ignoring some rules. I'm not really sure on how one would handle this. I do not know much about Cath's editing but there's a fair possibility that their editing styles are connected. They seem to have assisted each other in one of their long

256:

248:

12272:

This is merely a bump thread. Some people were crying foul that the page wasn't visible enough, so I'm creating another section for the purposes of promoting this subpage to further community attention. All kinds of input are requested and appreciated, but piling on at this point isn't really

6545:

Some people have brought it to my attention that my statement implies I may be trying to defend my actions as completly innocent. This could not be further from the truth, I admit I have done many wrongs over the past 2-3 months however I am willing to change. If its any constellation I think

4474:

edit seems odd based on the reference provided (and because it replaced other text), and have reverted. I did this both because I disagree with how the article is being construed in the article, but also because (in this case, anyway), I won't be the one to block the individual. (I wish to be

2756:

Dave souza wrote to me (above): "My goal was to summarise the situation concisely as repeatedly requested by Zero1328, and you are of course welcome to comment on any aspects you perceive differently..." This seems a complete misrepresentation of Zero1328 'question', which in my view is not a

11850:) has come in and is making the exact same edits as the IPs. The editor has no other substantial edits except to this article, and although he is commenting on the talk page, seems intent on reverting to his preferred version regardless of the discussion. Thanks in advance for the attention. 9086:

If it's related to a particular school, maybe someone - preferably local to the area - should contact the school. We had a problem here in Western Australia with what turned out to be a trio of vandals who were wreaking unholy havoc in a range of areas and had gotten well and truly ahead of

7619:

It wasn't a POINT edit (and doesn't seem to fit the criteria of that anyway). That Dreadstar and others have addressed the tagging by improving the articles is proof somewhat of the validity of the tagging. I had actually planned on seeking out sources this weekend for some of the articles (

3887:

hardware. The point of having a timestamp attached is that you know immediately who said what when without having to dig through the page history. This is random, but you do not have to mark your comments as being made by a non-admin. Many of the contributors here are not admins, it's not a

3006:

Therefore, in brief, dave, your contentions about my positions are extreme, unfounded (you don't provide pointers to where i dispute these principles), and for all but one exception in the last, which i answer to above, are 180 degrees off-base. Can you explain how you got such an incorrect

171: 12725:

WJBscribe, I apologize if this appears to be a squabble. During, vandalization patrol of recently changed articles, I noticed the first change, then subsequent changes and did not see an overwhelming need based on ENGVAR for these changes. I brought it here so administrators could make a

11340:

Not exactly. I do believe the prior discussion is relevant, but I'm not entirely sure applying a small handful of comments about one specific userbox to some other situation -- a year after the fact, and without any assurance that the users commenting previously had any idea their words be

7401:

I must confess that though I think Dreadstar seems to be a good person, I still don't understand his views on notability, and in fact find them contradictory. However, I don't think that tagging articles that I discover having notability issues to be stalking, as the goal is to improve the

12046:

Both sides have violated 3RR; both sides are POV pushing, removing cited materials the other seeks to include. Both sources are questionable, one's to a pro ulster site, the other to an apparent anti-ulster author. I say give both liberal 3RR blocks, neitther seems inclined to stop this.

9356:

This user is edit warring on multiple articles with multiple users. He has a consistent pattern of making 3 reverts, then sitting and waiting till a few minutes into the next 24 hour period and resumes. Shortly after a 3RR report with a result of (no violation no action) that can be seen

9104:

Comparing the ranges here with the ones on Simple English, there is one stand out entry but the rest fall under the same ISP/location. 72.28.33.218 does not geolocate near the known location and would likely not match if checked. The ranges needed to shut this down are 70.146.192.0/18,

12423:

without explanation, despite strong national ties to the Commonwealth and the EU, and almost no connection to the USA, whose language was being arbitrarily and improperly imposed. You didn't open a discussion on the user who did that. Something similar had previously happened to the

10946:

I have declined the protection for now. I am going to keep an eye on the article. Further edit warring is going to result in blocks and full protection of the article. Take your dispute to the talk page and try and work towards some consensus. Let me know if you have any questions.

3340:

in his "agenda" is unfounded and irrelevant, and again you don't seem to realise that the editor was never in a position to delete any articles – that's an admin decision. You do seem to have learnt the idea of requesting references, though an unreferenced tag with the edit summary

2694:

We can discuss, yet again, the patterns that she finds detrimental, although it has been hashed out in several forums including this one (see section above). I do not want to summarise them, lest it re-open what has been a rancorous discussion, and so I would urge you to read them

2997:, and have made this penatrably clear both on Category talk:Pseudoscience and in the couple of essays that i wrote explaining why the category's misuse is a problem and why i think that it is being misused (an extension of cultural struggles into Knowledge, sullying its content). 2184:

There's nothing evil about such desires, the question is whether the method of hounding an editor working in full accordance with policies will benefit the encyclopedia, and whether changes should be implemented in contradiction of present policies without community sanction. .

3916:

IAR is typically only invoked when trying to improve the encyclopedia. I fail to see how ignoring community norms (and a guideline; which I believe is more like a policy given how widely respected it is) and making it more difficult to interact with you helps the encyclopedia.

10975:

edits. This editor appeared a few days ago, is making hundred of edits with no references/citations/any other apparent factual basis, many of which are immediately reverted by other editors who cannot keep up with this ongoing activity, which may simply be vandalism. Thanks

11341:

interpreted as enduring precedent to cover all cases -- is prudent without at least some discussion of whether doing so is appropriate. If the box is as obviously and totally problematic as you seem to say, then I don't see what you have to fear from reasonable discussion. –

2628:

It's really not difficult to be cynical about her editing patterns, I assure you. This is after all a collaborative encyclopedia, and editors who have their own concepts of long standing Knowledge policies such as notability and sourcing tend to run into problems eventually.

4466:

I am looking for a community ban rather than just a block (indefinite or otherwise) due to the long time "missing", combined with the concern about the autoblock. I think that this user may have been (and be) using IPs and possibly other socks to continue more of the same.

4070:

do that, I'm not because it involves modifying my URL bar, doing a query in the search bar, or doing an action that only impedes communication. That's not difficult for me, but it can be for many new users or users who just don't want to communicate with a user who is

2714:"As I do, Cat feels that some patterns by particular editors, while not outside policy, are nonetheless determinental to Knowledge as a whole." To me, that sounds like "we don't like some Knowledge policies, and will ignore them wherever we can get away with it." We 2422:) and, during observation of certain cultural struggles in the topical areas of my interest, provided my observations on the whole as a basis for attempting to redress the problem from another tack: the restraint on the abuse of the pejorative Pseudoscience category. 4576:– If this dispute is about a single word in a single article I think this is being blown way out of proportion. Are there other instances of unconstructive editing? Has this user engaged in abusive socking? Also I am wondering if the administrator who originally 4105:

You can just put it in the "search" and wait for it to pop up. User:Docu is being kind of a jerk on this, but it's a crime akin to tearing a tag off a mattress. I'd like to see this trivial matter go to ArbCom and see how long it takes for the laughter to die down.

5596:

I did not want to change the context of Raul's reply, as it would have seemed out of place if I removed the remarks (Like he was attacking me for no reason) so i did the next best thing, struck them out per WP:CIVIL. I also gave a sincere apology on his talk page.

7609:

In retrospect, I can now see how it could be misinterpreted. I guess I should have - as you said - waited until the AfD was complete. It never occurred to me that the worst would be presumed of my behavior. When we (as editors) see something wrong in an article -

3150:

I will now no longer respond to your accusations without substantiation referring to my writing. I have adequately refuted your contentions about what principles you think i "seem to dislike". I will now proceed to address only what i regard as substance in your

2989:

also state that i made "proposals at Category talk:Pseudoscience where he appears to be objecting to WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy." I think i clarified that above. I agree with the policy, and agree that the arbitration produced that result, but i dispute the

3830:

I have a question...why is a timestamp on the page necessary, when all of our posts are timestamped regardless if we add one or not. It is on the diffs and our contrib pages, I am just curious as to why that it is necessary for it to beside our sigs as well. -

9961:

edit war. Once a day since the beginning of September is not the action of someone who is interested in community editing practices. However, if anyone feels the block is wrong in fact or duration please feel free to change it without further reference to me.

6444:

The joke block page is in good humour, its a preload that comes up when you click "To vandalise my user page click here instead." on my message portal. It was going to be used for April fools day (see history) but until such a time I changed it to its current

7388:

be retaliatory (or at the very least mean-spirited), I thought noting that they needed to be improved/expanded so as to improve their notability, so that someone else wouldn't come by and nom them on their own. The tagging was to mark the articles as needing

5827:

and let me add that they were for very minor disruption. Oppose community ban or topic ban. Take it to RfC. I suspect mentorship could work well here and I'll happily take him under my wing. He's got a lot to give, he just needs to change his attitude a bit.

3882:

Well, there's many reasons. Mainly, if you're looking at a heavily edited talk page or archives, the edit in question may be buried hundreds of diffs ago. This can be especially difficult for users utilizing assistive technology, text browsers, or just plain

10297:

Oh bum; I didn't even think to look here (not having super dooper admin powers these pages slip my mind) before I reported it myself. I am suitably embarrassed. David, I have a URN number if you want to know it to help them merge it please drop me an email.

9737:, even when told not to several times by the user who's userspace the page was under. This happened several times. The user in question has also created several POV categories, which of course have been deleted. Last but not least, the recent edit found 9721:. He even claims that the user in question(for the last edit) has said it was okay. When searching through, I found no such thing(you can check if you don't believe me). He made this claim to me, and an admin I believe, as can be seen here as the admin 4922:- Would solve the "perceived" problem sure..but I just don't see it. Inappropriately dealt with in the past..no warnings..just a strange (possibly immature attitude) with a few troublesome diffs. I'm just not seeing the appropriateness of issuing the ban. 11545:

So what? The userbox isn't offensive. All the wikipedia issues with N Ireland have been ironed out, is it necessary for you to find people you don't like to argue with, and post your own self-created drama on the admin notice board? Kind of reminds me of

10760:

This user seems to be a pain in the ass without sense of humour. It's a minor incident in a specific case, no other problem in here, I've seen - and done - much worse!... I'm the one who needs some assistance not to be unjustifiedly adverted or worse!...

6264:. This user, who is fairly young, needs serious help and probably mentorship to get them on track, there is too much drama and too many incidents to ignore. However a community ban at this stage when other means have not been tried first are ridiculous. 5630:

attention to the off-topic stuff. This might all seem complicated, but then that is a consequence of people opening their mouths and talking before they think. Stuffing the genie back in the bottle takes some diplomacy sometimes, and some damage takes a

4048:

Not everyone is as competent enough about URLs and using computers that such a thing is obvious. Including (mandating) a user or user talk link makes the site more accessible to new editors/computer users. Using plaintext signatures does the opposite..

12688:

respecting national varieties of English, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Better advice would be for people to actually familiarise themselves with the varieties of English used in different nations before they start disrupting legitimate

10020:

The articles look OK at the moment. It's not breaking news where I am. I guess you are saying to watch the article for insertion of rumours on their current conditions, and not to allow updates in their conditions without a news source to back it up.

9693:

Frogger had joined awhile back, he's been here for at least a few months to my knowledge, and while I have, in the beginning at least, tried to help him learn what not to do here, per his recent edits, it still seems that he doesn't quite understand.

73: 5766:

discussions whether they had any previous involvement with the user (and to be fair, most people do make that clear if asked). The difficult thing to see, when looking at a community ban discussion, is to see who the genuinely uninvolved people are.

3574:

Docu's still around? Do you realize he's been using that sig since, hell, at least 2003? I remember people grumbling about that before. It's not that big a deal. Try spending more time on the writing and less on pointing out issues like signatures.

3468:

about the guideline now appears to becoming distracted by Docu's signature, or lack of it, and as such I am looking to see how this can be resolved. If this isn't the appropriate venue then I would welcome and advise as to where may be more suited.

3172:

seems very sound, and i like it very much. Can you give me some advice here? If nobody discusses the implementation of that policy on the Talk page of the Pseudoscience category, then where will it be discussed? I don't see anyone arguing that i am

2952:

guideline has as much weight as do the editing principles (in fact i think notability guidelines are too heavily emphasized and should be moderated against an unlimited data holdings so as not to treat Knowledge as if it were a paper encyclopedia).

13193:

3RR (specifically, that "edits against consensus... are not exempt"), but not its spirit. This wasn't really an edit war — it was vandal fighting that went on a few reverts too long. There's a difference, and I know it. I should have just put

5489:"Your probably jealous of Jimbo that's all. «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)" A response to me on Jimbo's talk page. It is worth pointing out that dis uzas spelin and gramaz r wurs dan most peepils. Support indef. Erik the 10584:? As most proper on an article's Talk page, so here. With the sole exception of open-and-shut cases, I think the best protocol to take with regard to alleged problematic behavior is to provide diffs that would be thought to plainly back them up. 11144:'Yes, well, that's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage. You sit there on your loathsome, spotty behinds squeezing blackheads, not caring a tinker's cuss for the struggling artist.' 3409:

seems to be currently signing all his comments simply with the text "User:Docu". The lack of a timestamp or links to his userpage/talkpage make it more difficult for other users and I, and others, have asked him why he doesn't include these.

2212:

Malcolm, please do not make bad faith accusations towards other editors. No user is accusing any other user of "evil". Quite honestly, if any user views any portion of wikiprocess as "evil", then they need to step outside for some fresh air.

12062:

With all due respect don't you think that's a little unfair as I've been tag teamed all day by two editors including this one? I am the one who has brought this to your attention and I'm not the editor who's being abusive. If you consult

10069:

were on the plane, and that several IPs had posted the fact of their deaths before confirming that fact, I semi-protected the articles for 48 hours. Did that before seeing this thread, though - so if I jumped the gun, please revert me.

9090:

I've blocked the account indef for block evasion per the above but I'm happy for any subsequent resolution of this matter to unblock the account - it's more a case of "this account should not be editing so we'll stop it from doing so".

7397:

them. I took no action beyond that, have not followed Dreadstar's edits (beyind noting when he last worked upon the articles in question). At least one of the articles in question were worked on by Dreadstar as recently as June of this

11198: 2977:, 2 of which are not even unanimous. I am not out of line to dispute it, especially as i am helping to clarify the referents of its application -- something which is barely touched on in the arbitration because its focus is elsewhere. 4698:, all that is visible to me is small amounts of POV-pushing followed by an excessive block, and no attempts to discuss the issue with the user. There is nothing here yet that supports a formal ban. If there is more, please show it. 1696:

the subpage back here. Taking it off people's watchlists and putting a ban discussion on a subpage is not acceptable. I will note that the last three comments were opposes, so yanking it off ANI and onto a subpage looks even worse.

10266:. This is just a note to say that I did the checkuser and am following this one up with the relevant authorities - and to ask please don't delete the edit, I've referred to it in emails so they can see what I'm talking about :-) - 3720:

to stick to best practices on Knowledge and set a good example; those include signing with four tildes and not doing things that inconvenience others. Please, Docu? While I doubt you'll face any sanctions over this, is there any

10363:

I welcome this thread, although I don't have much time today, I'll be back either late tonight or early tomorrow morning (that is, about 8 hours or 18 hours from now). I'd like administrators to look at Flatterworld's comments at

6165:

the venue to propose and decide on a community ban. RFC rarely result in blocks or bans and they would need to be endorsed here if they did. Based on the statement below do you see any evidence that they will change their ways?

11509:

lying. And from what I can makeout from skimming through that discussion, my modified one actually bypasses any of the claimed "offensiveness". And this has nothing to do with stress, it has to do with basic wikipedia policies.

10548:

A misleading non-sequitur attack from one of the problem editors I refer to above. I'm fully expecting plenty of tit-for-tat counterattacks - I've been subjected to them as long as I've been trying to keep peace on Knowledge.

217: 154: 3748:

comment was made (in some cases making it difficult to realise that Docu commented at all), and adds an unnecessary step for users who are trying to access the user/talk/contributions/etc. I really can't see any good reason

2687:

As I do, Cat feels that some patterns by particular editors, while not outside policy, are nonetheless determinental to Knowledge as a whole. This is not unusual. Dave Souza, for example, frets (and with good reason) about

4855:

If you would like to be that person, please feel free. (Though after using this account to POV push, they seem to have gone "inactive" again, so I'm not sure you'll get through, but please, feel free to make the attempt.) -

3615:) requires a link to either his user talk or user page in his signature. As he's an admin, it seems even more important that he follow community standards (which also includes adding a date/time to all talk page comments). — 3007:

impression of me? Is there something i can do to help you penetrate my prose, see my support of Wiki editing principles, and allow me to object to the Weapon of Effacement in pursuit of a healthier Knowledge? In Good Faith,

12998:

Yes, and I politely asked you to write-up your proposal in the sandbox I created, but you have insisted on copy/pasting the same text off the web onto my talk page 5 times, even though I erase it and ask you not to do so.

8710:

You might try suggesting to him that you will contact administrators at Lincoln Middle School if this continues. It might be a spurious connection, but if not, I bet mentioning the possibility will end this problem quick.

3255:

Not relevant? It is a comment exactly on the accusation (disguised as a question) originally made by Zero1328. If you can't remember, take a look at Dave souza's edit just above, and at the top of this section on the page.

4380:

I'll emphasise: nobody is compelled to use any of those processes, but these are merely the options available - the appropriateness of each option is something for each individual to consider themselves. We're done here.

10285:

song. He said he had received a letter that read, "Darling, I love you. Please marry me or I will kill myself." He was rather disturbed at that, until he looked closer and noticed the letter was addressed to "Occupant".

7725:

No, no discussion necessary, I was just letting people know. Disabling email is a fairly unusual step, but WordBomb knows how to contact the foundation should the need arise so there should be no issues arising from it.

7434:

Reply to JzG re "Quite how one can say that the pilot is notable independent of the series..." Your response belongs at AfD, not here, and I think you may find that consensus appears to disagree with you on the matter.

3713:

fair bit of leeway with their sigs, having a link and a datestamp is simple courtesy to other editors. (Links make communication easier, while datestamps are helpful in long, threaded discussions on busy noticeboards.)

2418:. I accepted this ruling and decided that i was not likely to produce a change in the overall trends and dynamics in Knowledge (as i set about exploring other Wikis and began to notice how they looked and behaved like 12067:

you'll discover that I've been the subject of contstant harrassment by two particular editors since registering this account. The evidence of continually being called a sock is indicative of what I've had to endure.

11729:. I can accept I was edit-warring as indicated on my talk page, but edit-warring to get your POV across. I don't think so. How can I get an editor to support their accusations when all they do is refuse to answer? -- 6468:

silence for "trolling on IRC" was because I was discussing my 3 hour block intesivly, I have since then not been silenced. I was not aware that IRC was offically related to wikipedia, so I dont know why it was raised

4488:

Also, at what point should we consider that there is consensus concerning this? And once that's determined, someone else will please need to enact the block/ban, since I have intentionally recused myself from that. -

3320:

report, i shall now take my leave, thanking those kind souls who supported me, and leaving what remains of this gossipy thread to the mind-readers and mentalists who prefer Wikidrama to writing encyclopedia entries.

2855:

much either. I've also commented there on Cat's objectives. By the way, you will note that today's featured article, Anekantavada, is fully supported by citations to reliable third party sources. Think about it. . .

6225:

and to give due thought to the consequences of each edit he makes; if he fails to remedy the currently poor conduct he is practising, I do fear a second ban proposal would not result in such a sympathetic consensus.

4803:- a "long time missing" is surely not grounds for any administrative action at all, let alone a ban. I'll just add that I have informed the editor in question of this thread, as no-one else appears to have bothered. 3855:

Two reasons, one so that people reading a discussion can see the order in which it was made, particularly on deletion discussion, RFAs, etc. Second, it lets the bot know how old a thread is and when to archive it.

2109:

Zero1328, at the top of this page it says: "This page is for reporting and discussing incidents on the English Knowledge that require the intervention of administrators", but I don't see what intervention you want.

12488:

from Decolonization of Africa to Decolonisation of Africa and also said that a change in ENGVAR should follow. Then you go ahead and change the ENGVAR of the article prior to any move. Another change you made to

12127:

Actually - what Thunderer says here is largely correct in that he's been repeatedly tag-teamed by two other editors over a period of months now. He's also been repeatedly accused of being an abusive sockpuppeteer,

10378:) and see if Flatterworld is not acting more like a troll than a constructive contributor. I'm trying to have a civil discussion about information previously not considered (which is what I'm also trying to do at 9075:

and it needs to be indef blocked. I reported to AIV, but reviewing admin said it should be handled here. A ban throughout wikiworld since he's causing problems on at least two wikis already? More range blocks? --

6367:

out. He knows that he has a fair amount of work ahead of him, and this might require a frustrating amount of time and effort, and is willing to do what it takes. I see no reason not to afford him another chance.

13188:

was reverting it. Although Redrumracer was acting against clear page consensus, I thought that it was still inappropriate of Thingg to break the 3RR, so I blocked Redrumracer for 3 hours and Thingg for 1 hour.

9187:

We have this over on Simple English Knowledge... obviously, being smaller we can see articles as they come up. He'll often copy and paste stuff from here, along with all the templates. We block/delete on sight.

5291:

I also be thinkin' a RFC be the way to go. It be crazy to make editors walk the plank without parlay first. I be inclined to think there be a way to bring the scalawag back to our side. Cheers, me hearties.

11608:

It doesn't look like admin intervention is necessary at this time, although you two could probably stand to be a little more civil to each other. Traditional Unionist: if you don't like the userbox, take it to

7571:

My tagging articles with little or no notability or citations is disruptive how, exactly? Are you suggesting that the notability of the articles tagged were in fact splendid articles chock full of citations? -

4166:

It's all very trivial/minor (no link, no timestamp, no explanation), but still frustrating. Mostly the lack of timestamp is the real concern. It makes it very hard to comprehend the flow of certain threads. --

13031:

Thank you for logging in Yasis. Please don't post that stuff a 7th time. Please write up your proposed edit in the sandbox so I can see what you plan on saying and what exact sources you would like to use.

4163:

this refusal to communicate (along with his admin status) is what is making this into a bigger deal than it otherwise would be. (I think this is what Adambro was trying to explain with his initial post here).

2073: 5043:

Quite often when an article is nominated for AfD, the author of the article detonates. It's understandable, I suppose. And when they detonate, they grab at the first thing they can think of that "proves" the

12159: 8637:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Lincoln Middle School (Gainesville, Florida)" rcid="244126532" pageid="3704564" revid="238376379" old_revid="237806485" user="68.220.150.90" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T15:33:44Z"

4248:

I'm back! Locke- your comment has long passed, but to call me silly for asking you to reread IAR is also silly- and the "I've been here longer than you" argument is both condescending and irrelevant. Moving

1990:

FFS. It's linked from AN/I. This page is already absurdly long and it is nice to get a permanent link to it. It isn't some nefarious plot to hide the secret admin goings on from the regular drama boards.

1031: 3984:

and IAR does not mean you can go on blindly ignoring something if people call you on it. If people call you on it you have to discuss it and get consensus for the change which doesn't seem to have happened

3484:

Um no offense, but seriously, is this issue really that important in the scheme of things? His sig isn't misleading, and it isn't disruptive. Let's just leave it at that and go work on the encyclopedia...

6448:

My block log has two blocks, one 3 hour block for civility issues and one 12 hour block for WP:TE. There are far more colourful block logs out there who belong to users who did mend, I would like the same

996:

Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are

10348:

the election is over. Right now, he seems to believe he's on some mission to save the world from encyclopedic editing. I think we're at the end of the road right now, and blocking is the only thing left.

3037:

gives a basis for working, subject to common sense and consensus on any particular article, and there's rightly no exemption clause for "esoteric topics" unsupported by third party reliable sources. Some

166: 103: 10035:

Yes, I'm saying given that they're relatively popular celebrities, and Barker has had numerous publicized death "hoaxes" in the past, eyeballs are needed to ensure that references are properly followed.

1062: 1057: 4824:, very few of which highlight behaviour arising from anything other than a poor understanding of how the encyclopedia works and how editors are expected to conduct themselves, does not deserve a formal 41: 38: 5933:

I'll echo Tip - if other avenues are exhausted to no avail, I'd reconsider, until then, I think talk of a community ban is premature. Besides, aren't bans invoked after an issue is brought to Arbcomm?

3316:

My record of writing, copy editing, and cite-tagging for veriifiability is clear. I am not interested in low gossip, name-calling, or baiting. Since no "incidents" have been mentioned in this supposed

6143:

venue. As for the up/down on the ban in general, I'm neutral. I've seen that user here and there and usually not liked what I have seen, but that could be said about me in plenty of cases, so: meh.

965: 10572:), let me say that I am familiar with the diffs that Noroton provides in the section above and understand his frustration with Flatterworld, feeling the same myself. As it is, doesn't Flatterworld's 9331:

crap, but he is wrong in prolongued rants about it. It is enough to cite the issues raised in the reviews cited. As EdJohnston states, it may be worth an AfD to look into whether the book satisfies

9284:

FYI, I blocked Roadahead and Goingoveredge both for edit warring, but beyond their accusations and bad blood there may be some actual shenanigans that could use sorting out, or at least extra eyes.--

2545:

writing articles, but expect that these contributions are excellent and are to be praised. I've consistenely encouraged her to work cooperatively and to continue with her valuable contributions. . .

4828:. I would suggest instead an experienced and uninvolved administrator sit down with this editor and give some serious tuition about how we behave on a collaborative encyclopedia, and make clear the 2813: 8640:

type="edit" ns="0" title="2008 Auburn Tigers football team" rcid="244027244" pageid="14268766" revid="238280748" old_revid="238273637" user="68.220.163.129" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T03:10:57Z"

2490:

well. I did not mean disrespect, but I'm also not very concerned about who she is or whatever. I'm just looking at the editing methods, and I think I'm seeing something wierd in the recent area. -

11806:

might not be seeing your posts on your talk page, since she's usually pretty busy and may not have watchlisted your talk page (and thus didn't check for your responses/inquiries). Try posting to

11646: 8679:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997105" pageid="4196336" revid="238251733" old_revid="238229539" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:03:02Z"

8676:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997175" pageid="4196336" revid="238251800" old_revid="238251733" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:03:41Z"

8673:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997340" pageid="4196336" revid="238251963" old_revid="238251800" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:04:37Z"

8670:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997573" pageid="4196336" revid="238252191" old_revid="238251963" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:05:52Z"

8667:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997699" pageid="4196336" revid="238252312" old_revid="238252191" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:06:38Z"

8664:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997817" pageid="4196336" revid="238252423" old_revid="238252312" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:07:23Z"

8661:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Cinderella II: Dreams Come True" rcid="243997912" pageid="4196336" revid="238252501" old_revid="238252423" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:07:53Z"

1870:

before, and I disagreed with automatic use of subpages due to size then, and I object now. Ban discussions are a clear example of a case where exceptions need to be made. Discussions on subpages

1645: 3313:

citations are being sought -- because getting the refs will be easiest for the writers who wrote the pages, since they were working from material they have in print or know how to find online.

2607:

I regret that my brief summary style led to this misunderstanding, and assure you that I have no supernatural powers. My goal was to summarise the situation concisely as repeatedly requested by

13080: 12274: 2415: 1791:

bits of the thread out here, leave the inactive bits there (mark with archive tabs and links to here), and also provide links here, back to there. Then archive as a whole when finished. See, a

1661: 11687: 8851:

Sounds like that would at least impede him some, maybe? Anyway to trace these IPs to see if any go back to that school? The earlier SSP noted that most come from Bellsouth, I believe. -- ] (]

5226:

Well, that really is only an opinion. If multiple editors have attempted to resolve conflict/issues with him/her, then a RfC would be perfectly applicable and would gain wide community input.

2090:

I'm quite afraid that I could be making an extremely bad misjudgement on this, but I don't think I can dig deeper for an understanding. I have an interest in these types of problems, but even

25: 2646:

Exactly.:) Someone who considers themselves to 'know better' than most others, doesn't tend to do so well in a collaborative enterprise. Most of us I imagine can think of examples on wiki.

9218:

Wtf is up with Knowledge's servers today? Anyways, I thought somewhat interesting to note that I used to teach in the elementary school adjacent to Lincoln Middle. Still live in the area. --

11669: 2008:- I have a very slow internet connection and it's hard to load AN/I, plus edit conflicts crash firefox. So I'd really like to see this kept on a subpage. It's easier to watchlist anyway... 1680: 12832:

While I agree with you (this is not a North American topic; it has close links to the Commonwealth; the original spelling used appears to be Commonwealth/British English) I'd ask that you

9123:

Is someone working on this idea? It would really help if he was at least slowed down. Dealing with this almost every day, including new registered accounts, is getting really old. -- ] (]

6138:- Just file an RFC and we can get a ban from that consensus. I know we aren't a bureaucracy, but I really don't want AN/I to get the image as a good venue to community ban a user. These 162: 99: 10441:

me into letting him have his way with the encyclopedia. I took a bad faith report he had filed against me here as an occasion to file the content-oriented Obama/Weathermen/terrorism RfC

4638:, this editor's contributions don't even seem particularly problematic to me. If there are allegations of socking, where are the diffs please, where is the related SSP or checkuser case? 4322:

As I originally commented, I wasn't sure where best to raise this. The suggestions to start an RFC have been noted and I'll investigate doing so. Clearly this isn't something for ArbCom.

13236: 9306:, and an AfD of the article might be a reasonable solution. (We have no article on the book's author, G. B. Singh, and it's not common for a book to be notable while its author is not). 6612:

To be honest I think we should give the "devil" his due, After your requests for me to effectivly "butt out" of the whole steve-crossin thing, i did exactly that (butt out) from memory.

297:

Can one of you please remove the speedy delete on ]. It is about a song, not a person and it has received coverage in a reliable source. ](]) 03:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

4712:

Agree with Kusma and auburnpilot. No to a ban on the basis of the "evidence" presented here. I don't see what the diff jc37 posted is supposed to prove. And where's the checkuser case?

2579:

Dave souza wrote: "She thinks it unfair..." You know what she thinks? This seems to imply you have a good level of mind reading ability. Or, could it be that you are making use of what

2393:

from perturbing the topics i observed as under contention. I saw the opportunity to improve Knowledge, and so may have ignored some rules, as charged. Which ones? I'm not actually sure.

4746:

This is a fair part of the concern. That and the edit history (and gaps thereof) suggest that they are using socks to achieve this (on the articles noted, and presumably elsewhere). -

12924:

Now (not having gotten enough of a rise from me???) he has resorted to wikistalking me to pages he has never edited to revert my recent edits with the summary "new information added":

8682:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Intensive care unit" rcid="243994536" pageid="6332859" revid="238249200" old_revid="237664594" user="68.220.132.129" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T23:47:13Z"

10316:

That's OK, it's all good :-) You should forward details to Mike Godwin, the WMF lawyer - mgodwin at wikimedia.org. I mean, it's probably not a serious threat, but just in case ... -

8685:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Heaven's Gate (film)" rcid="243962951" pageid="92706" revid="238218287" old_revid="238159037" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T20:59:25Z"

7094:

so that his old edits can be transferred to the new name. I am sure one of the admins there will be able to sort it out. At least of his new account has few edits worth keeping. :-)

1875:

subpages. Even if a ban discussion results from an ANI thread, the time, space and decorum needed for a ban discussion are better suited to AN than ANI. But certainly not a subpage.

12852: 3963:

does. So I again ask you, how is Docu in the right to ignore community norms? BTW, nobody is going straight to "let's block". As I understand it, he's been talked to about this for

11231:

The userbox is a modifed version that was added after(and without knowledge of) the discussion that is being used as an excuse to edit war by the above user. By the way what gives

3967:. At some point you need to escalate things if you expect conformance. Otherwise, all the rules/guidelines/policies in the world won't mean a thing if you refuse to enforce them. — 8649:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Thumper (Bambi)" rcid="244001024" pageid="8400506" revid="238255500" old_revid="236754961" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:25:37Z"

8646:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Thumper (Bambi)" rcid="244001417" pageid="8400506" revid="238255883" old_revid="238255500" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:28:32Z"

4956:- We don't use the nuclear option on people out of pique. Sorry. I guess you'll just have to deal with the consequences of controversial actions the same way as us lesser beings. 11491:

Haha! So you can't stand over your claim of lies! I did bring it to your attention, and you have chosen to ignore it. You cannot bypass consensus by claiming emotional stress.

8688:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Caligula (film)" rcid="243956202" pageid="243204" revid="238211649" old_revid="236819207" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-13T20:26:30Z"

6116:

just how do you intend to prove that he has harrassed you in IRC when you have already admitted to me that you do not keep a log? That's gonna be kind of tough, don't you think?

3087:

to be a hostile means of addressing communication problems that would be better and more faithfully resolved by clear, thoughtful questions. Thank you for your apology, accepted.

2993:

of the arbitration's specification, thinking that it extended a ridiculous expansion to the support for applying this pejorative category tag. I support its restriction to nouns

13097: 11893: 9105:

68.220.160.0/19 and 65.0.160.0/19. I would suggest having a CheckUser look at the ranges for collateral damage as this is taking out a major ISP in a fairly good sized US city.

8691:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Fantasy Ride" rcid="243578053" pageid="16855379" revid="237843196" old_revid="237829341" user="68.220.131.151" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-12T01:43:50Z"

5339: 2419: 11640: 11356: 11335: 11321: 8570:

Sometimes, he does acceptable edits, but mostly he drives myself and a bunch of other editors to distraction by his attempts to return improved articles to bad earlier versions

2519:

that some little known subjects should be exempt from that policy, and articles about them should not be deleted just because there is no evidence to show that they are at all

3792:

opposed an rfa because of a signature, but oh wellsies) but the whole point of a signature is to know who said something and when. We have the who, now we just need the when.

2411: 2077: 1006: 9971: 11580: 11564: 11540: 11524: 11500: 11484: 11464: 11301: 10411:

with information previously not considered by editors on that page. Some editors interested in shutting down discussion now while their own POV is reflected on the pages of

6517:

so more real. I was, up untill now organising measures in place to help me get back on track, I can but hope that I have the chance to finish them, and to see if they work.

5839: 5795: 11865:(Non-admin comment): as a result of the previous thread here, the page was semi-protected. This prompted a series of responses from an anonymous IP: accusing an editor of 10568:

before we tackle the complaints and counter-complaints represented in this report. However (if it's decided to go ahead with this examination of Noroton's editing behavior

10089: 8658:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243998270" pageid="2877925" revid="238252833" old_revid="238010885" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:10:02Z"

8655:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243998959" pageid="2877925" revid="238253510" old_revid="238252833" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:13:58Z"

8652:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="243999762" pageid="2877925" revid="238254303" old_revid="238253510" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:18:42Z"

8643:

type="edit" ns="0" title="Bambi II" rcid="244001802" pageid="2877925" revid="238256257" old_revid="238254551" user="68.220.173.143" anon="" timestamp="2008-09-14T00:30:30Z"

5104: 3588: 3443:

On September 16, 2008, I ask Docu to explain why he doesn't include a link to his pages and a timestamp to which Docu replied that the issue was being discussed elsewhere,

3377: 12883: 12807: 12776: 12036: 10173: 6221:

exchange with Raul yesterday, he apologised upon my suggestion -- obviously willing to listen and learn). I would caution him in the strongest possible words, however, to

4293: 4132: 3804: 3606: 2918:

to it, and especially to ambiguous referents which these pseudosciences may study. With that in mind, i do dispute that a proper treatment has been given to Pseudoscience

10290: 9799: 9777: 9327:

subtracting all the vitriol, this is about a crappy book that is pushed by one ideological group and vilified by another. Goingoveredge is right in stating that the book

3627: 3569: 3220: 2864: 2637: 2619: 2311: 2277: 2221: 2193: 2167: 2144: 2083:

I am not fully sure with Cath, but my current understanding is that it appears to be a crusade about deletionism and POVs with hard-to-find citations. Very specifically,

12478: 12456: 11801: 9948: 9918: 7477:

I became confused with Dreadstar's interpretation of notability - that pilot articles aren't notable, and that their content should be merged back to the series article.

6353: 6333: 4274: 3301:

failed to bring forth (dare i say it?) verifiable evidence that i don't support verifiability, NPOV or other Knowledge policies -- because i DO support those policies.

3261: 3216: 2974: 2785: 2762: 2595: 2478: 2273: 2163: 2115: 1939: 1925: 178: 12698: 12659: 12630: 10146: 10135: 7623:

had some interest), but then this came along. I am pretty hesitant to make any contribution at this point, as it might be misinterpreted in the worst possible light. -

6376: 5620: 5591: 3697: 3265: 3238: 2661: 2499: 2353: 2119: 1837:. Please discuss the current splitting/archiving consensus there if you feel it should change. Otherwise, please continue the discussion on the subpage and update the 13017:

Now that is very strange NJGW, why you delete my post on questions on sources without commenting? You also like to make false alleagtions against me. Why is that NJGW?

12562: 12518: 12438: 10641: 10626: 10080: 9629: 9539: 7539:

In case an explanation is needed: somehow, Hexhand got around to putting notability tags on all these articles Dreadstar started or edits a lot??? By chance, no doubt

7302: 6320: 5689: 5093: 4243: 4004:

Good, now I know who I can ignore if I run into a conflict or discussion with. People who make their pages inaccessible or difficult to reach get no dealings from me.

3847: 3786: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1263: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1243: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1218: 10604: 7353:

Quite how one can say that the pilot is notable independent of the series, when coverage of the series thus far consists only of coverage of the pilot, is beyond me.

6398: 4190: 3979: 3946: 3929: 3825: 3767: 3734: 12261: 12077: 12022: 12008: 11978: 10956: 10325: 10307: 10056: 10030: 9457: 7280: 6569: 5708: 5680: 5649: 5511: 5066: 4389: 4265: 4205: 3951:

You need to reread it yourself (on a side note, telling someone who's been here longer than you to read something they've edited repeatedly themselves is borderline

3650: 3551: 3524: 3506: 2726: 2569: 1821: 12548:, perhaps I misunderstood the meaning of the line in the edit history: “(moved Decolonisation of Africa to Decolonization of Africa over redirect)”. However On the 10402: 6647:

mentorship, with recourse to blocks (not indefinite - enough to stop the behaviour without being punitive) if we see repeats of the personal commentary incidents.

5871: 5539: 5373: 4651: 3864: 1907: 13008: 12989: 12409: 12119: 11859: 11678:

is deleting mentions of Iraq in various articles and replacing it with Kurdistan and is adding a flag to each article. This happened in the Shanidar cave article.

11431: 10941: 10471: 10275: 9344: 4872:

Also theres something wrong with the diff you provided and that is he said it against Raul.......seriously its Raul so im not to fussed about him trolling a troll.

4791: 4331: 4186:

And since the penalty for not signing properly is roughly the same as that for driving without a seat belt in your own driveway, he can't be compelled to testify.

3994: 3292: 3195: 3066: 3016: 2553: 2068:. It could be significant, but I do not have the energy to go through all the page histories. It could be the majority of their contribs. You may be familiar with 1804: 507: 13092: 12748: 12429:

Churchill takes precedence because his government had executive responsibility for the colonies and more direct influence over their legal and political position.

11160: 9196: 9095: 6735: 6540: 6511: 6268: 6189: 6125: 5775: 5752: 5733: 5569: 5320: 4912: 4719: 4634:

I've looked at the diffs, and I must say I'm afraid I can't see what this thread is about. Unless there are deleted contribs that only admins can see, other than

4345: 4220: 3677: 2032: 82: 12608: 12287: 12187: 11450: 11285: 10888: 9315: 8842: 8828: 7632: 7604: 7580: 6043: 5959: 5329: 5037: 4370: 4140:

Cripes. I surely did not intend to open such a can o' worms. I didn't realize Docu had been using the unlinked sig for years, nor that others had asked before.

4095: 4061: 3664: 2746: 2457: 2020: 1205: 12594: 12224: 11949: 10558: 10543: 10101: 9571: 9553: 9293: 9114: 8966: 7513: 7483:

pilots may have sufficient notability for a stand-alone article. I asked what criteria should be used to denote a notable pilot separate from its series, or if

6662:, and seeing just two more in the eight days hence (both of which could be classed as technical or minor), I really hope to see an improvement in that as well. 6293: 6256: 6103: 5822: 5807: 5305: 5252: 4627: 4615: 4307:

Either make an RFC, or take it to ArbCom, or do both (one after the other) - the community can't do much, and I see no benefit in keeping this discussion open.

1974: 1960: 1884: 1782: 1751: 1705: 11394: 11190: 10432: 8532: 7470: 7444: 7346: 6422:

to Raul without any sort of request, I understand if he would still want me community banned, but never the less its the intention and the thought that counts.

6418:

In regards to Raul I was totally out of line, I should not have acted upon what one hears on IRC, after realising this I removed or struck out my comments and

6170: 6026: 5883: 5484: 5431: 5084: 4896: 4812: 4769: 4554: 3440:

suggests Docu adds a link to his signature who doesn't do so and lightly rebuffs the suggestion saying that "User page can be accessed quite easily anyways".

3257: 3212: 2796: 2781: 2758: 2591: 2474: 2269: 2159: 2111: 1625: 695: 11714: 11117: 10924: 10910: 10218: 7327: 7110: 7085: 7059: 7034: 7012: 6635: 5928: 5916: 5278: 2718:

seen this a few times before, you know? Still, at least this thread will ensure a lot of eyes on the edits of certain users, which can only be a good thing.

2049: 1861: 1738: 12302: 11818: 11217:. I have pointed to the president and reverted, he has ignored this. Can an administrator please enforce consensus with this user as happened with Setanta. 11043: 9279: 9251: 9227: 7739: 7720: 7199: 6152: 6083: 5451: 5414: 5221: 5212: 4962: 4948: 4750: 4741: 4668: 4568: 4043: 2000: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1510: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1331: 1209: 1087: 1018: 766: 11026: 10825: 10683: 10257: 8720: 6753: 6215: 5995: 5014: 4988: 4536: 4518: 4509: 4448:

This user, after asserting a removal of an autoblock (apparently blocked for POV pushing), disappears for a over a year, then returns for more of the same.

1712:

Full agreement - This discussion really shouldn't be shuffled back and forth between an unwatched subpage and ANI. It should stay put, and preferably here.

11136: 10204: 9813: 8768: 7425: 7411: 7271:

I have reverted all the above articles to the pre tagged version. I shall notify Hexhand of my actions, and this discussion, and comment upon his tagging.

6666: 6507:

Does it not worry you that so many people have had enough of you? Please can you explain how you will change your behaviour if you are not blocked/banned?

5685:

It wouldn't have taken much foresight to see that the comments should never have been made at all, let alone the issue of what to do about them once made.

4288: 1437: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 13065: 13041: 13026: 12056: 8705: 7366: 4707: 4110: 3333: 12204:

archived? The issue is still live, the user continues with the same abusive edits, and the matter has not been resolved, or even apparently looked into?

12148: 11292:

Because the last XFD still stands. There is no need to have the same discussion twice, a decision was arrived at my consensus and it should be enforced.

11226: 9900: 9697:

His first few edits are mainly to userpages, which could be said are mistakes, where he adds a cabal template to various users' userpages, as seen here:

8862: 6698: 6239: 5785: 4593: 4580:

this user has any opinion on whether there should be a ban or not. If that administrator supports a ban, or if there is abusive socking as confirmed by

4493: 3934:

Reread IAR- it can be applied wherever it needs to be. I'm not suggesting that we do nothing, but going straight to "let's block" is not helpful either.

3447:. This discussion is quickly removed from his talk page in line which his practice which appears to be removal, rather than archiving, of old comments. 1322: 653: 452: 11922: 9520: 6066: 4860: 4850: 4690: 4316: 3910: 2789: 2766: 2599: 2482: 2410:

I thought my strategies for addressing the error was inventive, creative, and gradually focussed. First it followed after a specific user suggestion by

13107: 10702: 5002: 4976: 4405: 1449: 1327: 11725:

An editor on a number of occasions has made accusations against me, however, when I ask for diff's to support this they ignore me. This is the latest

8752: 4760:

I would not characterize a 1 week block (and unblocked the next day) as an "extended block", and have difficulty understanding how anyone else could.

9714: 9594: 4482: 4176: 4050: 3968: 3918: 3814: 3616: 2915: 1193: 1188: 1183: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1096: 12959: 12936: 9744:

In the past I have suggested this user apply for mentoring. I don't know if they have, but it doesn't appear they have, according to his history.—

8808:? If I have time, I may partake the calling of the school if it is verified that all of the accounts involved are related (user accounts, that is). 3478: 11837: 9761: 9358: 8393: 4577: 4024: 2970: 2708: 544: 411: 12168: 11870: 11625: 9957:

edit; I don't think such comments should be tolerated, and the tariff was determined with regard to Whotheman2006's disregard to consensus in the

8625: 8571: 6986: 6204: 6010: 11406: 11306:

Instead of citing a year-old discussion in the most inflammatory way possible, I suggest you (a) start a new MfD or (b) let sleeping dogs lie. –

11260: 10014: 9391: 7754: 5934: 5923: 5891: 5459: 5227: 4923: 4563: 2103: 1757: 1713: 1083: 1014: 685: 11183: 10357: 7716:

You unblocked and immediately reblocked with email disabled. Now I understand what you are saying. I don't think there is anything to discuss.

7180: 7151: 3611:

Just because something has been done for five years doesn't make it right. And while I agree it's a minor issue, community norms (as defined at

13251: 12375:

and changing the English variant from one style to the British style when no strong tie to a specific English speaking country exists. In the

12213: 10165: 8502: 7492: 7490: 7213: 4323: 4211:

are for, I have seen plenty of examples of admins explicitly blocking just to get a response from an uncommunicative or unresponsive editor).

4197: 3470: 2414:

by removing the poorly-related subcategories. When this was opposed, i recommended a complement category tag which i agree was indeed making a

2094:

I discovered Hrafn, and the WP:AUTO problems, I realised that this is out of my league, and I can't figure it out alone in my current state. -

648: 12921:). Recently, he returned and has been posting repeatedly on my talk page from several different IPs (see my talk page for the discussion). 11571:

Can we take that as a withdrawal of your civility objections? If one userbox is unacceptable, its inverse is likewise. That is self evident.

10985: 10528: 10510: 5554: 5186: 11253: 10455: 9504: 9156: 7560: 5890:

Oppose community ban per Ryan. The block log is unconvincing..and the number of edits to the mainspace is pretty irrelevant. Take it to RfC.

5362: 5176: 5173: 3365:

and you are of course free to delete any completely unsupported text. As always, it's up to those wanting to keep the information to provide

2448:(abuse) discussion there clarifying rational examining of its employment. I think i have addressed the relevant portions of your commentary. 1832:(ec) As has been discussed multiple times before, threads are split when they become large. Consensus is that we usually split threads : --> 10442: 10408: 10379: 9366:

which ended by me self reverting my last edit just to put an end to the edit warring. Some other examples of the same behavior can be seen

9052: 8460: 6827: 6499: 4623:

But before trying to further to clarify, may I ask if you looked at the diffs (both, before and now), and to share your opinion of them. -

2817: 11748: 7488: 7265: 5402: 12319: 12292: 11060: 8282: 8240: 8114: 8072: 7988: 7946: 7778: 6942: 6843: 1834: 1570: 714: 487: 329: 11108:

has openly stated his intention to edit war on a number of articles. Assistance would be greatly appreciated to resolve the situation.

6926: 6599: 6595: 6591: 6587: 12383:). A review of all his edits is necessary to reverse possible vandalism. Some edits he has made appear constructive, but his changing 9939:- which has continued even after a uw-delete4 warning. The remark about being "a TOOL!!!" was Whotheman2006's, so he needs no apology. 9235: 8927: 8785: 8324: 8156: 7820: 6859: 6074:

Prom3th3an has never caused me any grief, and has seemed like a perfectly reasonable editor to me. I would like to see an RFC first.

3655:

And heeeeeereee we go with the random drop in of "Arbitrary Committee" attacks. Don't you have another windmill to tilt against, Kurt?

2923: 2512:

puts the onus on anyone adding or re-adding information to provide verification from a reliable source, while Catherine and associates

1636: 1444: 724: 643: 492: 10338:

Noroton's disruptive editing has made work on various presidential election-related articles just about impossible (see Talk pages of

7289:

here may be a good taggin'. The article thar do be a bit shy on th' notabil'ty and references. Avast mateys, thar be a reef ahead!

1052: 13273: 11824: 10849: 10844: 10805: 10649: 10264: 8993: 8958:

I went ahead and anon-only rangeblocked 68.220.160.0/19 for a week. That should hopefully cover a decent chunk of it temporarily. --

8879: 8737: 8366: 8198: 8030: 7904: 6835: 6715: 4821: 4778:

Sorry, I misread the block log for some reason. Either way, he hasn't improved any, and we don't need this level of immaturity here.

2677:

is a term used on Knowledge to describe the aggressive promotion of a particular point of view, particularly when used to denote the

2530:

that articles that have been tagged as lacking third party reliable sources for about nine months should be put up for deletion, and

689: 12772:

Canadian variants are in use (in both, -ise is considered a misspelling - Canadian follows the English on almost all other points).

6958: 6606: 6414:

I would seriously give anything a try to avoid a community ban, I must admit it looks ugly, but when you break it down I am trying.

3813:, specifically the section which mandates a user or user talk link in signatures. There doesn't seem to be much leeway there, IMO. — 17: 13124: 11834: 10853: 10164:'s edits, despite there being no obvious link to the previous issue of his userpage, I've moved this down to create a new section. 9659: 9544:

If there is concern about administrators misusing their tools to try and push a point of view that goes beyond a content dispute.--

8417: 7862: 7710: 6583: 5026: 4422: 4156: 3513: 3108:, just repeated your contention that i still "don't seem to like it". Where dave? Does some part of "i would prefer not to see it ( 472: 11866: 6934: 5973:

ensure fairness and a route for review if there's a genuine issue. RFC isn't needed either, many community bans happen without it.

3433:

Docu to "add a link to your user talk page at the very least in your signature". Docu doesn't do so, nor does he explain why not.

11214: 11032: 10897:, should take care of the problem, as we can expect that anyone trying to clean their slate will have countless IPs to try with. 10234: 9419: 8544: 8496: 6819: 6641: 5142: 3636:

Not to mention the fact that the Arbitrary Committee is not a legitimate authority anyway, and so what it says is irrelevant...

815: 585: 12948: 10816:

called "unreliable"). I'm not going to call that Facebook is trying to clean their slate here, but the whole affair smells bad.

8578: 12918: 10836: 9710: 9559: 9150: 7697:

I have just reblocked WordBomb with email disabled due to email abuse. Predictable enough, under the circumstances, I guess.

1743:

That's just brilliant for people with a slow internet connection. Also, brilliant for people who love multiple edit conflicts.

1078: 808: 580: 502: 374: 12942: 9205:. I usually spot him when he starts in on one of his usual articles, but by then he's often hit another 10-20. *sigh* -- ] (] 6918: 2381: 2377: 1833:= 50kb, especially if they look like they're gonna keep growing; this one was 131kb. The discussion page for AN* boards is at 10776: 9242:

Seems to be a long-standing and heated edit war both in the article and on its talk page. Really could use some sorting out.

9046: 8590: 8587: 8582: 8454: 7665: 7161: 7125: 6433: 4545:

case to refer to in this discussion. Even if no additional action is required, it helps to gather the evidence in one place.

2669:

I am at a loss to understand why someone would claim that Cat is engaged in POV pushing as the title suggests. I quote from

741: 482: 421: 12219:

He doesn't seem to have edited after a 3RR warning, and strictly hadn't hit 3RR anyway. If he reverts again, please take to

9734: 9730: 2469:

You are presenting your thoughts on Catherineyronwode with an implication that these accusations are proven. They are not.

13073: 12981: 12799: 12690: 12622: 12554: 12470: 12430: 12337: 12313: 11078: 11054: 10810: 10085:

It's been confirmed that neither Farrell nor DeGraw were on the plane; probably OK to unprotect their articles. Just FYI...

9722: 9512: 8733: 8276: 8234: 8108: 8066: 7982: 7940: 7772: 7527: 7318: 7242: 7101: 7050: 7003: 6425:

I closed the mediation case with best of intentions because it had principally moved on to RFAR and the mediation case was

5865: 5505: 5269: 5203: 5020: 4674: 820: 560: 477: 13203:

on Thingg's user talk page, instead of blocking him. And a 3-hour block of Redrumracer wasn't sufficient. (Fortunately,

12945: 12925: 10181: 10150: 7533: 5325:

Personally I see it only as more drama and a further waste of the communities time but I can see which way this is going.

13165: 11899: 9823: 8921: 8779: 8318: 8150: 7814: 6779: 5560:

He struck the comments - he shouldn't have made them in the first place, but at least he had the decency to strike them.

3543: 3498: 1575: 680: 605: 460: 391: 10689:

Dropped. Had not realized that dispute resolution was supposed to be the first avenue for dealing with people violating

9738: 2812:

Knowledge, it would seem", but that seems to me to be a fair description of the massive amount of impenetrable prose at

11436:

In the "Engaging in incivility" section alone I can count rudeness and Lies(deliberately asserting false information).

10076: 9937: 9299: 9236: 8987: 8873: 8508: 8360: 8192: 8024: 7898: 7535: 6659: 6345: 6312: 5383: 3565: 793: 788: 773: 610: 600: 565: 436: 11038: 10387: 7233: 4351:

where someone's sig was something to start dispute-resolution processes over... or even think about, for that matter.

13231: 13118: 11002: 10783: 10674:

Dispute resolution is indeed the avenue for the underlying factual dispute, but not for the name calling and insults.

9653: 9162: 8411: 7856: 7139: 5545:

From my run-in with him earlier (aluded to by Corvus), I think it's clear that this user has earned a community ban.

5010: 4984: 4416: 4399: 798: 731: 627: 620: 570: 121: 12380: 10708: 4635: 4456: 3050:

bio is supported only by passing references in a couple of modern books, a 1919 history, and a history published by

2873:

Hi dave. Could you give specific quotes from me that indicate that i don't like those things? I would appreciate it.

2699:, in a better attempt to understand the issues involved. Certainly posting vague concerns is not helpful. Thanks, 12899: 11874: 10933: 10858: 9413: 9058: 8592: 8538: 8466: 7230: 6878: 6851: 6671: 6288: 6094:- He's harassed me and basically in IRC and Knowledge to stir up trouble with other users. His morals are lacking. 5136: 4058: 3976: 3926: 3822: 3624: 2586:?, with the goal of presenting Catherineyronwode in the worst way. I really would hate to think you are doing that 1044: 945: 431: 396: 12493: 12469:

And that preponderant influence is reflected in the form of English used in African nations as well as in the EU.

11726: 11194: 10376: 10369: 10191:

way, and the two of you can leave each other alone. First one to start on at the other again gets blocked. Fair?

9718: 8758:

When I saw him adding simple links to some of his ideas, I wondered if he was causing problems there too. -- ] (]

8597:

Is there anything else that can be done to stop this kid? An IP range block, a word to his ISP, anything? -- ] (]

8585: 6811: 6655:

become a highly useful contributor with appropriate guidance and direction as long as he is willing to cooperate.

5379: 3383: 2738:

is in its good right to dismiss those proposals when they don't agree with them. This is called forming consensus.

13287: 11847: 9911: 9702: 9526:

Have you discussed this on the article talk page? At a glance, it sounds like a content dispute, better taken to

8520: 8514: 8288: 8246: 8120: 8078: 7994: 7952: 7784: 7598: 7554: 5387: 5385: 4478:

Anyway, I welcome others' thoughts/opinion on all of this (including if you think I'm "way off base" on this). -

2973:, which i dispute is illogical, should not apply to an expansive use of the Pseudoscience category, and contains 1580: 832: 783: 736: 595: 517: 406: 322: 11206: 9954: 9889: 9174: 7529: 7286: 7239: 6950: 5179: 4870:

Nah ah, definetly premature for a community ban, a good way to the solve the issue is not always the right way.

4541:

I support a community ban on Boondocks37. If there is serious concern about socking, it would be good to have a

4144: 13055: 13053: 13051: 13049: 13047: 12267: 11636: 11576: 11536: 11496: 11460: 11425: 11331: 11297: 11279: 11222: 9923:

The incivility is an aside; the report was about the repetitive arbitrary deletion of solidly sourced material

9168: 9070: 8933: 8791: 8478: 8330: 8162: 7826: 7753:

most. I started tracking in August. This is a list of ones used so far, all confirmed to be from the same ISP (

7659: 7531: 7236: 6910: 6412:"RFCs are only useful when there is a chance to redeem a useful editor. This doesn't look like an option to me" 5953: 5910: 5478: 5246: 5217:

RFCs are only useful when there is a chance to reedem a useful editor. This doesn't look like an option to me.

5081: 5063: 4942: 4901: 1776: 1732: 903: 719: 663: 615: 534: 497: 12917:) was blocked temporarily for edit warring on several articles and continuing the edit war using several IPs ( 12361: 11102: 10870: 10390: 10145:

As the previous thread was closed early, I'm opening new thread about the above and his recent edits, such as

8300: 8258: 8132: 8090: 8006: 7964: 7796: 7187: 6384:-- this looks like self-perpetuating wikidrama. You are giving attention to people who misbehave because they 5790:

Prom3th3an is clearly no there to do anything constructive, but simply to stir people up and crate drama. His

3304:

My concern has been that editors with an agenda (political and/or religious, primarily) are misusing deletion

13214: 12285: 12153: 9064: 8999: 8945: 8885: 8803: 8580: 8472: 8372: 8342: 8204: 8174: 8036: 7910: 7838: 7043:. You could tell him about that as well. Point is, you should ask the user first before posting it here. :-) 6709: 5791: 5393: 5381: 934: 539: 527: 522: 189: 110: 12621:

Except hardly anybody uses Oxford spelling outside of the OUP and Clarendon Press, so that cuts no mustard.

12325: 11066: 9011: 8897: 8384: 8216: 8048: 7922: 13159: 13142: 13130: 12355: 11765: 11631:

There has already been a MFD on this and the community has decided. I was attempting to enforce consensus.

11096: 10991:

First off, you should use {{user|Historian19}} in such cases to automatically add links for the user (i.e.

10499: 9683: 9303: 9021: 8822: 8619: 8435: 8423: 8294: 8252: 8126: 8084: 8000: 7958: 7880: 7868: 7790: 7747: 5356: 4500:

A years absence shows that time isn't going to fix this. That doesn't exactly leave us with many choices.--

4440: 4428: 4089: 4018: 3593:

Sure, it's a minor issue when compared to say, world hunger, but basic etiquette would be nice. I'd rather

915: 803: 673: 465: 10477: 9443: 8562: 6787: 5166: 3363: 3344: 3169: 3055: 12914: 12844: 11929: 11885: 11210: 10772: 9876:

This generally uncivil user has reached final warning stage for repeatedly removing a sourced statement (

9706: 9698: 9671: 8939: 8833:

Well, normal admins can't block anything larger than a /16, although four of those will cover off a /14.

8797: 8740: 8575: 8573: 8550: 8490: 8336: 8168: 7832: 5458:

None of those diffs seem to warrant any kind of temp ban from project space - especially the "tips" spam

5071:

Sorry, it's not you they're attacking, it's the other person to comment. Nevertheless, I'll still tap. ➨

3329: 2689: 2268:

editors think principle is involved, and have differing ideas of what is good, there will be dissonance.

2065: 1002: 668: 348: 9431: 7689: 5154: 11830: 11777: 10840: 9807: 9463: 9144: 9005: 8891: 8378: 8210: 8042: 7916: 7416:(and I just realized what day it was, after seeing Lifebaka's and SoWhy's pirate-y mode of speech!). - 6965:. He redirected the Steelerfan-94 userpage and talk pages to the new account's pages. Is this allowed? 6886: 6803: 6761: 3058:

then you've got to persuade a lot of people before you start implementing your own ideas about it. . .

2369: 998: 590: 416: 401: 386: 356: 315: 13183: 13079:

isn't really constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is

7677: 13136: 12685: 12379:

article, they even go so far as to edit Winston Churchill's name to precede Franklin D. Roosevelt's (

11795: 11783: 11632: 11572: 11532: 11492: 11456: 11327: 11293: 11232: 11218: 10746: 10412: 9944: 9896: 9677: 9040: 9024:. Interestingly, this one seems to actually be a repeat IP for him, from the previous edits. -- ] (] 8448: 8429: 7874: 7337:

explained the issue of consistency. Making claims of stalking in this regard is rather questionable.

6453:

Knowledge at any point, I question his motives as it would seem clear he would have a clear-cut bias.

6404: 4647: 4434: 4030:

It's hardly making it difficult to reach, User:Docu in the address bar and off you go. It's just not

3465: 3451: 3444: 2692:

also a pattern used by some editors that is by-and-large within policy, but is nonetheless unhelpful.

2055: 575: 426: 11936:

is engaging in an edit war which is threatening to spill into 3RR and is an extension of similar at

11833:

over the use of the song in a political context. There was a previous thread about this on ANI here

10866: 10365: 9986:

Breaking news this morning, a plane crash killed 4 unknown people, and injured Blink 182 ex-drummer

6902: 2537:

much more time to be given to those who haven't previously been bothering to find sources. She also

1916:

It won't load in your iPhone? I'm speechless. Is that really the most important consideration here?

13088: 12985: 12803: 12694: 12626: 12558: 12545: 12484: 12474: 12434: 12420: 12416: 12376: 12368: 12307: 12279: 12193: 11771: 11048: 10966: 9967: 9773: 9635: 9516: 9437: 9371: 8556: 8270: 8228: 8102: 8060: 7976: 7934: 7766: 7276: 7160:

abusive sock-puppetry going on here. Previous accounts have been declared, per policy, mateys, and

6705: 5859: 5499: 5160: 3730: 1935: 1903: 909: 761: 128: 11470:

in a polite manner. But no you had to edit in an aggressive way. It's not on really, come on now.

10386:

and related topics. Because, really, he's being a pest and he seems to think it's proper behavior.

9401:

article. He made a fourth revert shortly after the 3RR case was closed in his favor. I've blocked

4969:

agree with his personal POV. It is sad really. But, once again, I do appreciate the attention.

3725:

why you'd want to make work for other contributors, or why you wouldn't want a link in your sig?

13171: 12256: 12245: 12073: 12032: 12018: 11945: 11937: 11789: 10617: 10372: 9981: 9856: 9847: 9842: 9817: 9782:

Also, as a side note, hoping that someone will clarify, I have no idea what gwa p means, or is.—

9665: 9349: 8915: 8838: 8773: 8312: 8144: 7808: 6773: 5830: 5583: 5531: 5118: 5033: 4716: 3690: 3539: 3494: 3046:

and wording completely unsupported by sources, but even a reasonably notable subject such as the

2654: 2242:

Smashville, what "bad faith"? My saying something you do not like is not automatically bad faith.

12331: 11072: 10862: 9600:

Well, if you have concerns that they are sockpuppets of a certain user, you should list them at

12880: 12773: 12175: 10353: 10321: 10271: 9934: 9932: 9930: 9928: 9926: 9924: 9851: 9612:

once they were warned enough. If the vandalism is too much, you can request semi-protection at

9591: 9425: 9092: 8981: 8867: 8736:

have been indef semied as a result of his edits and Chaorlette's Web 2 was deleted three times

8485: 8354: 8186: 8018: 7892: 7683: 6992:

Depends on what he is planning to do with it. You should ask him about that and tell him about

6663: 6349: 6330: 6316: 6265: 5686: 5148: 5101: 3840: 3561: 3325: 3051: 2029: 1593: 975: 778: 338: 9382:

was totally unacceptable, and that I did violate 3RR and self reverted when I realized I had.

9375: 8632:

Did a scan of the last 20000 anonymous edits, looking for 68.220.128/14. Here are the results:

7216:, I'd like others to look at this situation. The afd has been a bit heated at times and admin 7164:

is well and truly in the past, and was debated publicly by the community on ANI at the time -

7017:

It be fine, long as the two be the same user. Users be able to do what they want. A note on

4833: 2264:

such things happen when fighting for principle. It is also necessary to understand that, when

13227: 13112: 12183: 11351: 11316: 11166: 10996: 10932:

because someone chooses not to register an account does not mean they are not making GFE. --

10832: 9789: 9751: 9647: 9139: 8728:

This Disney Vandal has been causing major problems at the Simple English Knowledge as well.

8405: 7850: 7133: 6372: 6039: 5006: 4980: 4610: 4410: 4385: 4312: 3602: 3597:

delve through the history of talk pages to work out when someone has signed their comment. -

117: 76: 10753: 10281:"Do things my way or I will kill myself"??? That reminds me of this part of an intro from a 9868: 8739:. If this is blocked I suggest it be global. The relevant discussion would be over on the 6795: 6419: 3430: 3420: 13177: 12452: 11940:. The user is preventing the formatting of the article and deleting sourced information. 11855: 11153: 10952: 10937: 10768: 10764: 10734: 10709: 10650: 10333: 10214: 10086: 10042: 10026: 10000: 9940: 9892: 9834: 9581: 9453: 9407: 9387: 9379: 9363: 9311: 9202: 9035: 8861:

If we could do some of these partial blocks, it would be good. He just returned again with

8748: 8577:, removing plot points and other major bits of content while adding their own made up stuff 8443: 7671: 7205: 7018: 6872: 6632: 6566: 6537: 6496: 6341: 6308: 6252: 6185: 6099: 5818: 5771: 5729: 5704: 5677: 5645: 5617: 5565: 5130: 5090: 4998: 4972: 4893: 4832:

if s/he does not conform to the communal standards of conduct we hold here. (My message at

4808: 4765: 4643: 4550: 4341: 4216: 4054: 3972: 3922: 3818: 3781: 3671: 3620: 3583: 3374: 3063: 2861: 2720: 2704: 2631: 2616: 2566: 2550: 2308: 2219: 2190: 2141: 1970: 1921: 1880: 1817: 1800: 1701: 1595: 10589: 9690:

Hello, I'm coming here because I don't really know what to think in regards to this user.

5794:

is demonstrative of this, as are his ridiculous comments. His mainspace contributions are

4825: 8: 13247: 13084: 12655: 12604: 12549: 12273:

constructive, in my personal opinion. Anyhow, the subpage discussing Kmweber's future is

11841: 11720: 10637: 10554: 10524: 10506: 10467: 10451: 10420: 9963: 9907: 9794: 9769: 9756: 9340: 9275: 8265: 8223: 8097: 8055: 7971: 7929: 7761: 7594: 7550: 7507: 7272: 6894: 6694: 6676:

I am here to report on User:Tigris the Majestic, whom I suspect of being a sockpuppet of

6394: 6021: 5880: 5851: 5491: 4239: 3726: 3660: 3047: 1931: 1899: 1840: 979: 751: 658: 352: 257:

Wikipedian's future. —] (] • ]) 03:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

249:

Wikipedian's future. —] (] • ]) 03:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

12343: 11084: 3752:

to link, and I do believe it's a wholly reasonable request that people are making here.

3129:

You have still not quoted me substantiating your repeated assertion about my dislike of

3104:

You have still not quoted me substantiating your repeated assertion about my dislike of

2611:, and you are of course welcome to comment on any aspects you perceive differently. . . 871: 12740: 12510: 12401: 12251: 12240: 12069: 12028: 12014: 11955:

I suggest Troubles ArbCom, is the best way to deal with this. Because I've had it with

11941: 11683: 11558: 11518: 11478: 11444: 11415: 11269: 11247: 11236: 10920: 10821: 10585: 10578:

actual discussion of precise citations from sources and exact language of WP guidelines

10303: 10287: 10161: 10102: 9567: 9535: 9464: 9260: 8910: 8716: 8307: 8139: 7803: 7653: 7440: 7342: 7297: 7079: 7029: 6980: 6828: 6769: 6762: 6730: 5943: 5900: 5849:. Make him walk the plank for his disruption, incivility and drama-mongering. Erik the 5576: 5524: 5468: 5427: 5310:

Well, since RfCs are finally becoming quasi-useful, it wouldn't hurt to go that route.

5300: 5236: 5029: 4932: 4713: 4271: 4187: 4172: 4129: 4107: 3744: 3683: 3532: 3487: 3191: 3012: 2966: 2852: 2647: 2584: 2495: 2453: 2349: 2099: 2061: 2045: 1766: 1722: 1609: 864: 856: 756: 512: 13250:. It is about a song, not a person and it has received coverage in a reliable source. 9266: 3682:

I voted for Kurt for the board, if he stands for Arbcom I will vote for him for sure.

1965:

And my suggestions to bring the ban part out here and leave the other stuff in there?

1898:

split. It won't load in my iPhone. Also, it is slagging my Firefox implementation.

13266: 13208: 12590: 12540: 12489: 12425: 12209: 12132:

and contrary to the findings of Checkuser. I'm getting rather tired of it all, too -

12052: 12000: 11970: 11836:. The article was being edit warred upon by anon IPs, so it was semi-protected. Now 11740: 11614: 11172: 11113: 10428: 10398: 10349: 10317: 10267: 10169: 10071: 9549: 8976: 8349: 8181: 8013: 7887: 7628: 7576: 7421: 7407: 6860: 6148: 6121: 6079: 5748: 5550: 4908: 4532: 4505: 4452: 4327: 4254: 4201: 4152: 3990: 3959:" Exactly as I said, "improving or maintaining Knowledge", neither of which ignoring 3935: 3899: 3834: 3793: 3762: 3558: 3474: 3461:

There could be other instance where this issue has been raised which I am not aware.

3043: 2373: 2340: 2009: 1996: 1867: 1848: 185: 12103:; both are aware of it, as evidenced by prior history. In the future, please report 11326:

SO you believe that consensus expires and must be renewed? That is a new one on me.

7479:" I have never said that pilot articles aren't notable, what I did say was that not 6927: 6836: 4285:

with too much time on their hands? Doesn't anybody write and edit articles anymore?

13222: 13153: 12384: 12372: 12294: 12194: 12179: 12163: 11878: 11807: 11759: 11387: 11343: 11308: 10992: 10981: 10972: 10539: 9784: 9746: 9642: 9636: 9367: 9289: 9017: 8816: 8613: 8400: 7845: 7642: 7463: 7258: 7195: 7147: 7129: 6677: 6410:

trouble I was causing and I wish people would AGF instead of making s summery like

6368: 6301:

Prom said he is sorry on IRC, I have the log :) Give him more time 2 weeks perhaps.

6211: 6035: 5447: 5410: 5350: 4602: 4381: 4336:{{unsigned}} can be used to add link and timestamp where an editor fails to do so. 4308: 4083: 4039: 4012: 3598: 3516:, different circumstances, but apparently sigs are a BID DEAL, why I have no idea. 2682: 1945: 1669: 26: 12970:

I asked you politely on your talkpage for discussion of articles and sources NJGW.

11956: 10393:, but he seems to be away from the keyboard. This kind of abuse is depressing. -- 9864: 6959: 6820: 3350:

on an article with two inline cites to BBC articles, and external links including

13197: 13022: 12908: 12837: 12578: 12448: 12220: 12166: 11873:

report against an apparently good faith editor, and again accusing the editor of

11851: 11708: 11547: 11402: 11146: 11020: 10948: 10904: 10799: 10742: 10210: 10037: 10022: 9995: 9623: 9480: 9449: 9402: 9383: 9350: 9307: 9223: 9110: 8744: 8527: 7499: 7321: 7308: 7226: 7222: 7104: 7053: 7006: 6935: 6868: 6613: 6547: 6518: 6477: 6426: 6278: 6248: 6181: 6095: 5814: 5803: 5767: 5725: 5700: 5658: 5641: 5598: 5561: 5272: 5206: 5193: 5125: 5119: 4874: 4829: 4804: 4761: 4703: 4546: 4337: 4212: 3370: 3347: 3059: 2857: 2700: 2678: 2612: 2562: 2546: 2304: 2214: 2186: 2137: 2136:. A huge mass of verbiage with the aim of changing Knowledge, it would seem. . . 1966: 1917: 1876: 1813: 1796: 1697: 11005:)). Then, if you are correct and those edits are vandalism, you should use some 6844: 5813:

His block log shews effectively only two blocks - all the rest are adjustments.

13241: 13061: 13037: 13004: 12955: 12932: 12652: 12601: 12235:

are for; long-term behaviour isn't an "incident", although it might come under

12201: 11694: 11613:

and let the community decide, but don't edit war on someone else's userpage...

11006: 10894: 10633: 10550: 10520: 10502: 10463: 10447: 10416: 10131: 9915: 9885: 9881: 9613: 9605: 9336: 9271: 8696:

Doesn't look like collateral damage would be high from blocking 68.220.128/14.

7717: 7588: 7544: 7503: 7494:. If one is trying to "better understand" an editor's position, it's better to 7217: 6919: 6690: 6681: 6390: 6247:

per AGK (Anthony) and my comments further above. Premature - RFC needed first.

6014: 5877: 5311: 4589: 4581: 4352: 4235: 3656: 3427: 3417: 3084: 3034: 3030: 2901: 2844: 2836: 2670: 2520: 2336: 1949: 1665: 961: 11675:

I'm in a hurry so couldn't look at this too closely but it appears that an IP

11531:

It is an inverted version of the same info box. It is even of the same style.

9906:

I decline to block for this single incident. The user needs to be told about

9860: 7221:

created-4 of them in 2006 and one in 2007. IHMO this is disruption to prove a

1591: 13281: 12833: 12729: 12499: 12390: 12236: 12232: 12228: 12108: 12104: 12100: 11698: 11679: 11610: 11552: 11512: 11472: 11438: 11376: 11241: 11202: 11131: 11125: 11010: 10916: 10876: 10817: 10716: 10698: 10690: 10679: 10299: 10199: 10193: 10062: 9987: 9609: 9601: 9563: 9531: 9499: 9493: 9488: 9484: 9247: 8729: 8712: 8701: 8605:

Indef'ed Bambirocks, page protecting some of the heaviest-hit pages for now.

7734: 7728: 7705: 7699: 7648: 7614:

article - our first instinct is to attempt to fix it. that's just natural. I

7436: 7361: 7355: 7338: 7291: 7229:

violation also. These articles were all tagged today within a 3-minute span:

7091: 7067: 7040: 7023: 6993: 6968: 6943: 6724: 6234: 5798:. I do not believe Prom3th3an is a net positive and propose a community ban. 5423: 5294: 5258: 5050: 4845: 4779: 4729: 4685: 4679: 4661: 4542: 4168: 4147:

the sentence to the guideline, in July 2007, primarily (at the time) because

3960: 3895: 3891: 3810: 3612: 3455: 3437: 3281: 3227: 3187: 3130: 3008: 2939: 2840: 2814:

Cultural Struggle, the Weapon of Effacement, and a Theory of Hierarchic Wikis

2804: 2800: 2696: 2608: 2580: 2491: 2449: 2345: 2332: 2095: 2084: 2041: 12447:

America had remarkably few colonies in Africa, Britain had remarkable many.

11676: 9888:) because he doesn't want the singer "compared to that skank with the baby" 5991:

to be undertaken. It's useful as a clarifier though, in some circumstances.

5876:

Looks like it's time to help this obvious troll find the door--endorse ban.

2685:." I have not run across any article edits by Cat fitting this description. 2380:. I was informed that were i to continue in my correction of errors i would 924: 144: 57: 13204: 13103: 12586: 12205: 12092: 12087: 12048: 11991: 11961: 11933: 11731: 11143: 11109: 10789: 10424: 10394: 10066: 10052: 10010: 9545: 9527: 9332: 9190: 7624: 7572: 7417: 7403: 7206: 6852: 6508: 6176: 6167: 6144: 6117: 6075: 6059: 5744: 5546: 5326: 5218: 5183: 5075: 5057: 4904: 4528: 4501: 4148: 3986: 3858: 3753: 3637: 3518: 3352: 2772: 1992: 1745: 12371:;. Editor is systematically going from article to article in violation of 3957:

If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge, ignore it.

1042: 13148: 12133: 12064: 11754: 11380: 10977: 10731:. Not the worst of personal attacks, but I'd appreciate some assistance. 10535: 9285: 8834: 8810: 8607: 7452: 7247: 7191: 7165: 7143: 6658:

The level of mainspace contributions in recent weeks is something I have

6207: 5640:

presentation of evidence, as opposed to a chaotic ANI thread) is needed.

5443: 5406: 5344: 4077: 4035: 4006: 3366: 3109: 3105: 3039: 2885: 2832: 2822:

Helpfully, Self-ref has given an "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY" of the former post –

2739: 2509: 2303:

unacceptable and my hopes for her reform are dim. Still, live in hope. .

9729:

editing userpages that are not in his his one userspace, he has done so

6951: 5025:

I have concerns about an unsupported accusation of anti-semitic bias on

2060:

I'd like some help on understanding what the heck is going on regarding

355:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see 13018: 12904: 12112: 11915: 11811: 11703: 11662: 11015: 10899: 10794: 10516: 10493: 10383: 10339: 10282: 10250: 9618: 9219: 9106: 8959: 7540: 7313: 7096: 7045: 6998: 5799: 5264: 5198: 4699: 4470:

As an aside, when looking over their contributions, I noted that their

1953: 1854: 1673: 1629: 7475:

Thanks Rlevse, you're right, I'm being misquoted where Hexhand says, "

7384:

Rather than nominate the article examples for deletion, which I think

6996:. It is most likely that the user just did not know about it. Regards 4182:

If a guy won't answer a question, there's usually a very good reason:

1662:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Kmweber ban discussion

908:

If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on

13057: 13033: 13000: 12951: 12928: 10534:

An edit war that you and Scjessey have provoked and participated in.

10154: 10127: 7244:. Notices posted at the afd, and talk pages of Hexhand and Dreadstar. 6438: 4857: 4747: 4728:

persist in acts of seeming "revenge" against those who opposed them.

4624: 4585: 4515: 4490: 4479: 3458:

raised the same issue. Docu has yet to really answer our questions.

3406: 3384: 3358: 351:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the 10720: 8392:

He's also been confirmed to have at least registered sock accounts (

5405:

in total, only 1,957 are in the Mainspace, only 31% of his edits...

3042:

related articles have been improved a bit by being stripped of some

2128:

Thanks for the heads-up, the issue is currently under discussion at

12227:

and looks too detailed for here; that's what specialist pages like

11259:

Why not start another MfD considering the outcome of the last one?

10754: 10738: 10694: 10675: 10654: 9838: 9243: 8697: 7620: 6750: 6603: 6227: 6051:- I've personally had enough, and Manticore brings up a god point. 5992: 4838: 2818:

Should this category be purged of its poorly related subcategories?

6276:

If you give him time (and intense mentorship), he'll come around.

3894:

is a guideline and by it's very definition has leeway. Please see

13217:) was wiser, and subsequently blocked redrumracer indefinitely.) 12178:. You have to ask there. Anyone knows the correct noticeboard? -- 9087:

themselves, and after the school intervened, all problems ceased.

6685: 6052: 5846: 3743:

Meh. I agree with the above. I've been watching this unfold on

11647:

IP is adding inappropriate nationalist material to many articles

10715:

This user seems to be having difficulty grasping the concept of

10693:. Seems a strange path to go down for obvious policy violations. 9264:

have civil discussion with him have failed. Please also see the

6461:

until now & removing these bits smacks of punitive measures"

1787:

You forgot the sarcasm link. All joking aside, why not move the

1646:

User:Kmweber on WP:AN & Kmweber blocked & ban discussion

10788:

You should, if you have any problems with each other, consider

10209:

I agree. Docu's refusal to let things go is becoming tiresome.

9398: 7064:

Actually, I came here to answer a question of his, "Is it ok?"

5574:

Right, struck them but left them there for everybody to read.

1596: 307: 10519:

article, in view of calming an edit war over there? Thanks,

5522:

above? I notice that nobody has commented about them there.

5389:*Spamming* a lot of user talkpages with what look like "tips". 2831:

If my translation is correct, that means that he doesn't like

1597: 12650:

and trust me, I've seen my fair share of petty squabbles....

11877:

while requesting a 3rd opinion. All of this was directed at

9991: 9880:

official website saying that her favourite musicians include

9587: 7142:) account. I class that he has used five different accounts. 1930:

Sometimes I wish a sucky internet connection on some of you.

1672:

and consensus clearly established for long AN/ANI threads. --

12599:

Indeed, both forms are correct in British English anyway...

10515:

While we are here, could an admin please take a look at the

9713:. In later edits, he continues to edit others' userspaces: 7311:

indeed! I be thinkin that tis be still yer primary concern!

7124:

Please note this user has created sockpuppet accounts - see

4118: 9259:

I would request to please look into this issue. The editor

7090:

Ah, okay. I think you should tell him to file a request at

3029:

That's a bit clearer, hopefully you're getting the hang of

2851:

above, the latter discussion suggests that he doesn't like

10576:

in this very report mimics hi/r talkpage style: to eschew

9768:

the suss). I would not missed them if they were indeff'd.

9034:*screams* Now he is back with another registered account: 4459:), really would seem to make it clear that this user does 4375:(Replying to both Adambro and Starblind) As was suggested 3669:

Go on Kurt, stand for ArbCom this year. I'd vote for you.

11869:

while requesting that the page be unprotected, filing an

9958: 9877: 9830: 9134:

Removed from archive since new suggestions had been added

6788: 6719: 3809:

It's disruptive, albeit minor. As for leeway, please see

2771:

I think it is interesting that today's featured article,

145:→‎I made a block I now regret — is its history indelible? 12349: 11090: 9270:

for some more information on his activities. Regards, --

7039:

Or, after reviewing, I think he just did not know about

4620:

I had thought it was self-evident by by post at the top.

13098:

I made a block I now regret — is its history indelible?

7307:

Tis may be correct, me hearty, but tis be lookin' very

6689:

non fascist groups used the title "National Socialism.

3557:

I don't think this requires administrative attention. –

3280:

But, how does it address the real issue? It doesn't.

11201:. The polar opposite of this userbox still exists on 10582:

simple pronouncements in the tone of "Trust My Words!"

6887: 5262:

be a way to see if multiple users have such opinions.

1952:

guidelines due to technical and readability issues. --

64: 10792:. This does not need any administrator intervention. 10592: 6329:

He said sorry the last time too. Then this happened.

6086:(not an admin- delete if this is not a valid comment) 5699:

edit summary, and in some cases a talk page apology.

5392:

On a similar note, I'm struggling to know why he has

3450:

Failing to find an answer to my original question at

3288: 3285: 3282: 3234: 3231: 3228: 2775:, does apply in interesting ways to this discussion. 1626:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Hrafn

11881:, apparently in retaliation for daring to post here. 10160:

Since you persist in wanting to continue to discuss

10119:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

7449:

Hex-Dreadstar never said ALL pilots aren't notable.

6780: 6684:. He pops up every once and a while and changes the 5518:

Has anyone noted this user's struck-out comments at

3401:

No admin action required. Recommended to pursue RFC.

3226:leave the digressions on user talk pages. Thanks. 1756:

You're right..let's just keep going back and forth.

12684:If people would only observe the guidelines in the 12013:I am not a sock. I have asked you not to edit war. 11693:Sounds like vandalism to me. Warn him/her with the 10407:Incidentally, I'll be making new proposals soon at 10263:Some of you may have noticed the suicide threat at 10249:

authorities contacted; no further action needed. --

10230:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

10126:I think JzG's note on his user page resolved this. 7566:Martinphi, I didn't say it happened by accident; I 13246:Can one of you please remove the speedy delete on 11123:must... stop... thinking... "architect sketch"... 10598: 9586:A number of IPs have vandalized the same thing on 9560:It appears to be under discussion on the talk page 12975:You are making false allegations against me NJGW. 11013:once he received a fourth level warning. Regards 10415:-related articles might find it useful to review 9936:with the promise to "do this to the end of time" 7021:'bout it be good, though. Cheers, me hearties. 6879: 3890:Locke: at risk of sounding like a broken record, 13279: 8950:. Any ideas on how to block him at all? -- ] (] 8394:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Iluvteletubbies 5368:Evidence of what could be classed as disruptive: 4116:That's it. I'm just replacing my signature with 3851:(the previous statement was made by a non-admin) 2916:apply such a blatantly pejorative categorization 1043: 956:When starting a discussion about an editor, you 13046:So at what point does this become harassment? 9530:, not an issue for administrator intervention. 9397:Hmm, you have a point about Prophaniti and the 7755:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/70.146.241.244 6812: 6804: 13147:was inserting clearly non-consensus text, and 11914:Both editors blocked due to 3RR violations. -- 10915:Ok, I requested semi-protection for that one. 10061:Based on the speculation in the articles that 7214:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pilot (Fringe) 5519: 5089:Redvers, am I missing Talk Like a Pirate Day? 1005:. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the 942:Do not report breaches of personal information 12160:Image:Rachel Stevens holding right boobie.jpg 10122:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8584:, and doing massive refactoring of talk pages 7524:Looks like a major violation of POINT to me 7156:Arrr! Checkuser be determining that there is 4562:- Looks like a good way to solve this issue. 4157:Knowledge talk:Signatures/Archive 5#Recourses 323: 10893:Well, I think semi-protection, requested at 10409:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC 10380:Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC 6911: 6903: 5192:That looks pretty serious. Has there been a 4270:I sense another admin food-fight coming on. 944:on this highly visible page – instead go to 12387:rampantly is the substance of my complaint. 11829:There is an edit war once again brewing at 6866:Today, this user created a second account, 6796: 2335:initially editing in what appeared to be a 13102:A few days back, I spotted an edit war on 9953:Ah, I did block - for a week - when I saw 9741:, of which the user has yet to explain. 8975:Alas, not even 24 hours...he came back on 6432:The tip "spamming" was to members of this 4463:have Knowledge's best interests at heart. 3531: 3486: 3454:, I then asked again on his talk page and 2975:four decisions by 8 people on the category 2590:, although you are certainly doing that. 1835:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard 330: 316: 18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 9020:but apparently decided to also play with 6586:by Deskana and these comments by myself: 3177:on that page, only (at least recently) a 12162:to a title that is a bit more tasteful? 9201:That would probably explain his creating 7487:pilots should have a standalone article 6895: 6582:made posts on-wiki about it that led to 6338:Give him 2 weeks only.... iDangerMouse 5027:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Eli Tene 3514:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2559:Non-clairvoyant corrections as requested 2132:above, with the latest subsection being 1058:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 12130:in the complete absence of any evidence 9558:I see now what this is about, I think. 3533: 3488: 304:Revision as of 03:14, 21 September 2008 163:Revision as of 03:14, 21 September 2008 100:Revision as of 03:13, 21 September 2008 14: 13280: 12919:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Yasis 9914:, and asked to refactor their remark. 6596:Prom3th3an's 2nd post (later modified) 6034:I too would like to see an RFC first. 4151:was linking his signature directly to 3888:requirement for posting on this board. 3716:As admins, we're supposed to at least 1853:or similar when things are settled. -- 904:these tips for dealing with incivility 848:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 12223:. Meanwhile, your previous thread is 11985:Okay, checkuser shows no evidence of 11810:requesting clarification. Cheers. -- 10043: 10001: 6434:Knowledge:WikiProject_AP_Biology_2008 5340:I predicted this earlier in the month 2382:"very likely be accused of vandalism" 1866:I was there for those discussions at 311: 10727:, and his response was to switch to 10113:The following discussion is closed. 9590:. I wonder if they are sockpuppets. 8734:simple:The Fox and the Hound (movie) 7188:he's going back to his Steelerfan-94 4279:Ever get the feeling there might be 1691:the thread is so long is because it 349:discussion, request, and help venues 90: 56: 11171:No admin help needed at this time. 5786:Prom3th3an - Proposed community ban 4253:respond. So do something about it. 960:leave a notice on their talk page; 216: 203: 177: 160: 153: 140: 109: 97: 23: 11989:sock-puppetry. I beg to differ. -- 11505:Misrepresenting an old discussion 10492:article indefinitely protected by 10366:Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and Violence 10153:. -- 14:41, 2008 September 20. -- 9300:Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity 9237:Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity 9183:]) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9080:]) 01:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 8954:]) 21:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8906:]) 00:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8601:]) 00:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7212:Since I participated in this afd: 6768: 4837:get back to some article writing. 3773:hauled up as if it were policy. -- 3423:about Docu's signing of comments. 3362:. However, your next edit is fine, 306: 45: 13299: 12965:What's this with me stalking you? 12585:variants are correct in BrEng. – 11825:Right here, Right Now...Yet Again 11209:per consensus and president. He 10047: 10005: 9209:]) 01:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9127:]) 00:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9028:]) 02:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8855:]) 14:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8762:]) 03:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 5657:that is the beauty of hindsight. 5194:request for comments on this user 5049:quick tap of the cluestick about 12415:The title of one of these pages 12250:23:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)-- 12091: 12086: 11905: 11652: 10661: 10483: 10240: 10226:The discussion above is closed. 9990:and Nicole Ritchie's ex-husband 9471: 6741: 6277: 4475:"just-another-editor" in this.) 4117: 3392: 2133: 1651: 1615: 337: 12139: 12137: 11623: 11616: 11559: 11553: 11519: 11513: 11479: 11473: 11445: 11439: 11418: 11408: 11344: 11309: 11272: 11262: 11248: 11242: 11235:the right to completley ignore 11181: 11174: 11033:Blatant POV/soapboxing by an IP 10373:Talk:Bill Ayers#First paragraph 10235:Suicide threat being dealt with 9912:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 8823: 8817: 8811: 8620: 8614: 8608: 7171: 7169: 6867: 6235: 6228: 5946: 5936: 5903: 5893: 5471: 5461: 5357: 5351: 5345: 5239: 5229: 4935: 4925: 4846: 4839: 4606: 4603: 4527:I concur with a community ban. 4366: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4263: 4256: 4090: 4084: 4078: 4034:as if there was a sig there. -- 4019: 4013: 4007: 3944: 3937: 3908: 3901: 3802: 3795: 3761: 3755: 3692: 3685: 3413:Looking through his talk page: 3188:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 3170:WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy 3056:WP:NPOVFAQ#Pseudoscience policy 3009:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 2848: 2780:Certainly, an important point. 2656: 2649: 2450:-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) 2129: 2069: 2018: 2011: 1769: 1759: 1725: 1715: 833:Category:Knowledge noticeboards 13274:03:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13237:03:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13093:03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13066:03:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13042:02:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13027:02:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 13009:02:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12990:02:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12960:02:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12937:02:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12884:03:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12853:03:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12808:02:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12777:02:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12749:02:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12699:03:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12660:02:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12631:02:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12609:01:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12595:01:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12563:02:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12519:01:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12479:01:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12457:01:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12439:01:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12410:00:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12288:23:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12262:23:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12214:23:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12188:00:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12169:23:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12149:01:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 12120:23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12078:22:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12057:22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12037:22:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12023:22:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 12009:22:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11979:22:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11950:22:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11923:23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11894:23:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11860:22:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11819:22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11749:22:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11715:21:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11688:21:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11670:21:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11641:00:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11626:23:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11615: 11581:20:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11565:20:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11541:20:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11525:20:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11501:20:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11485:20:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11465:20:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11451:20:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11432:20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11395:20:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11357:00:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11336:21:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11322:20:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11302:20:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11286:20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11254:20:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11227:19:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11184:23:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11173: 11161:00:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 11137:19:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11118:19:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 11027:18:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10986:18:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10957:22:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10942:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10925:18:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10911:18:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10889:18:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10826:17:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10806:18:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10703:18:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10684:18:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10642:23:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10627:21:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10559:18:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10544:18:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10529:17:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10511:18:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10472:20:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10456:17:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10433:16:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10403:16:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10358:16:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10326:22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10308:20:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10291:16:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10276:15:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10258:22:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10219:15:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10205:15:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10174:14:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10136:18:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10090:19:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10081:14:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10057:13:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10031:13:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 10015:13:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9972:15:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9949:14:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9919:13:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9901:12:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9800:23:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9778:14:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9762:09:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9630:17:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9595:08:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9572:08:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9554:08:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9540:06:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9521:06:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9505:10:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9458:05:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9392:04:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9345:15:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9316:05:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9294:04:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9280:04:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9252:03:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9228:14:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9197:01:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 9115:11:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 9096:10:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 8967:21:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8843:10:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8829:03:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8753:03:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8721:03:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8706:02:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 8626:00:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7740:22:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7721:00:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7711:23:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7633:02:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7605:02:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7581:01:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7561:00:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7514:01:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7471:00:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7445:22:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7426:22:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7412:22:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7367:21:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7347:21:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7328:21:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7303:21:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7281:20:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7266:20:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7200:17:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 7181:20:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7152:19:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7111:19:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7086:19:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7060:19:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7035:19:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 7013:18:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6987:18:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6754:02:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6736:18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6699:18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6667:03:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 6636:07:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6607:07:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6570:09:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6541:07:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6512:06:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6500:06:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6441:the co-ordinator for the idea. 6399:15:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6377:14:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6354:11:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6334:11:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6321:11:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6294:11:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6287: 6269:11:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6257:10:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6240:10:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6216:07:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6190:15:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6171:06:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6153:05:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6126:18:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6104:03:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6084:03:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6067:03:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6044:00:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6027:00:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 6011:Grawp-style vandalism off-wiki 5996:02:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5960:00:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5929:23:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5917:23:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5884:22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5872:22:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5864: 5858: 5840:22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5834: 5823:22:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5808:22:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5776:12:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5753:12:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5734:10:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5709:13:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5690:11:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5681:10:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5650:10:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5621:10:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5592:23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5570:22:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5555:22:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5540:22:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5512:22:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5504: 5498: 5485:20:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5452:19:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5432:19:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5415:19:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5363:18:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5330:18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5321:18:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5306:18:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5279:18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5253:18:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5222:18:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5213:18:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5187:18:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5105:11:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 5094:18:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5085:12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5067:12:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5038:12:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5015:02:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4989:02:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 4963:22:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4949:18:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4913:16:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4897:16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4861:23:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4851:16:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4813:15:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4792:16:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4770:15:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4751:23:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4742:15:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4720:10:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4708:09:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4691:09:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4669:09:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4662: 4652:09:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4628:08:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4616:01:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 4594:00:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 4584:, I would have no objection. 4569:02:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 4555:22:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 4537:02:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 4519:08:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 4510:09:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 4494:22:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 4483:08:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 4390:14:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4371:14:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4346:14:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4332:12:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4317:01:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 4294:21:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4275:20:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4266:20:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4255: 4244:19:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4221:19:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4206:18:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4191:18:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4177:18:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4159:for other links and context). 4133:17:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4111:14:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4096:13:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4062:13:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4044:12:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 4025:12:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3995:09:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3980:04:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3947:04:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3936: 3930:03:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3911:03:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3900: 3865:02:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3848:02:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3826:02:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3805:00:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3794: 3787:00:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3768:21:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3735:21:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3698:01:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3678:00:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3665:21:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3651:21:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3628:02:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3607:12:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3589:21:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3570:21:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3566: 3562: 3552:21:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3525:21:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3512:You must not be familiar with 3507:21:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3479:20:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 3378:08:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3334:06:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3293:18:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3266:14:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3239:22:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3221:18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3196:15:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3067:09:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 3017:08:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2865:17:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2790:13:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2767:12:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2747:13:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2727:06:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2709:02:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2662:02:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2638:00:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2620:00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2600:00:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2570:00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2554:23:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2500:22:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2483:22:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2458:06:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2354:22:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2312:21:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2278:21:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2222:20:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2194:20:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2168:18:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2145:18:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2120:15:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2104:14:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2050:02:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2033:02:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2021:23:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2010: 2001:22:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1975:22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1961:22:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1940:22:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1926:22:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1908:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1885:22:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1862:21:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1822:21:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1805:21:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1783:21:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1752:21:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1739:21:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1706:21:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1681:21:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 1637:21:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 13: 1: 12980:That is unfair and childish. 12730: 12500: 12391: 11990: 11960: 11928:Can someone please assist at 11730: 11401:Also, where is the breach of 11154: 10723:. I asked him not to call me 10044: 10002: 9785: 9747: 7290: 7022: 6723: 5831: 5293: 3672: 2721: 2632: 453:Biographies of living persons 302: 293: 284: 273: 264: 13074:Kmweber block/ban bump redux 12941:Hmmm, not just one article: 12105:three revert rule violations 11379:be the place for that? ;-) — 11147: 10811:Article:Critisms of Facebook 10670:No admin intervention needed 9022:Knowledge:Avoid weasel words 5082:Yo Ho Ho And A Bottle Of Rum 5064:Yo Ho Ho And A Bottle Of Rum 5021:accusation anti-semitic bias 4834:User talk:Dpmuk#Skin Hunters 3211:have run out of good faith. 2909:inserts hyper-skeptical and 28:Browse history interactively 7: 12836:of your fellow editors and 12027:3RR has now been breached. 11930:Ulster Special Constabulary 11900:Ulster Special Constabulary 10180:I left a note on his talk, 10038: 9996: 9994:. Eyeballs will be needed. 8741:administrators' noticeboard 6718:) of this thread, maytey. 5850: 5490: 5072: 5054: 3342:(entirely void of sourcing) 2066:User talk:Catherineyronwode 1687:Emergency split? The whole 1660:emergency split (131kb) to 207: 10: 13304: 12419:was recently changed from 12176:this image is from commons 12174:boobie..... :-/ anyways, 11903: 11831:Right Now (Van Halen song) 11697:and then report the IP to 11650: 10659: 10481: 10389:I asked MastCell for help 10238: 10105:'s edit warring continuing 9469: 5520:#Request for community ban 3464:The ongoing discussion at 3390: 2331:what I've seen so far was 1649: 1613: 1589: 1566: 1561: 1443: 1321: 1199: 1077: 854: 821:Discussions for discussion 205: 142: 12686:Knowledge Manual of Style 11701:if it continues. Regards 11233:User:Traditional unionist 11189:Last year Setanta747 was 10580:and to replace this with 10413:Weatherman (organization) 9891:. Could we have a block? 9725:, telling him he cannot. 4820:. An editor who has made 4400:Request for community ban 3466:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3452:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3445:Knowledge talk:Signatures 3083:Thanks, dave. I consider 2971:Pseudoscience arbitration 2528:asserts that it is unfair 1576:Sockpuppet investigations 938:demonstrating the problem 829: 704: 636: 553: 445: 364: 345: 291: 282: 271: 262: 227: 224: 159: 96: 12900:Yasis is wikistalking me 12546:Decolonization of Africa 12485:Decolonization of Africa 12421:Decolonisation of Africa 12417:Decolonization of Africa 12377:Decolonization of Africa 12369:Decolonization of Africa 12099:– both editors violated 11661:blockified. cheers =) -- 10721:comments on my talk page 10228:Please do not modify it. 10116:Please do not modify it. 9608:them and report them to 6672:User:Tigris the Majestic 6009:per reasoning above and 5440:support indefinite block 5438:Based on the above, I'd 2072:. I'll point you to the 1063:ArbCom election RFC 2024 1007:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 513:Scalable vector graphics 347:Knowledge's centralized 12577:Well, if you adhere to 12158:Is it possible to move 11938:Ulster Defence Regiment 11009:and report the user to 9604:. Otherwise you should 6994:the user account policy 6660:already raised with him 6642:So, where to from here? 5376:a Mediation Cabal case. 4902:Pot, meet kettle. Black 1445:Arbitration enforcement 357:formal review processes 95: 13288:Knowledge noticeboards 13221:Wikipedian's future. — 12268:Kmweber block/ban bump 10600: 9335:in the first place. -- 7128:. He has also had the 5922:and solve this issue. 3436:On September 6, 2008, 3052:Optimist International 1624:large thread split to 1045:Centralized discussion 1033:Start a new discussion 1003:Lowercase sigmabot III 946:Requests for oversight 397:Centralized discussion 12154:Tasteless image title 10875:<- For reference. 10833:Criticism of Facebook 10601: 10599:{\displaystyle \sim } 9304:WP:Notability (books) 8909:He's back again with 6588:Prom3th3an's comment 2991:legitimacy and wisdom 2943:contribution thusfar 2683:minor or fringe views 1073:Noticeboard archives 932:Be brief and include 925:recently active admin 816:WikiProject proposals 715:Committee noticeboard 664:Personal restrictions 649:Contributor copyright 488:Neutral point of view 12097:Both editors blocked 11633:Traditional unionist 11573:Traditional unionist 11533:Traditional unionist 11493:Traditional unionist 11457:Traditional unionist 11328:Traditional unionist 11294:Traditional unionist 11219:Traditional unionist 10710:user:G.-M._Cupertino 10651:user:G.-M._Cupertino 10590: 10183:. Now, Docu you go 9380:Thousand Foot Krutch 9364:Thousand Foot Krutch 9267:RFC on Goingoveredge 7748:Disney Vandal issues 7019:User talk:RKO 4 Life 6704:Arr, I be notifyin' 6223:think before he acts 6072:Oppose community ban 4826:slamming-of-the-door 4234:admin straight off? 3183:legitimacy or wisdom 3035:notability guideline 2845:non-notable subjects 2799:, you're failing to 1053:Administrator recall 890:behavioral problems. 888:chronic, intractable 774:Requests for comment 690:Requests for comment 654:Edit warring and 3RR 644:Conflict of interest 446:Articles and content 13248:The Mean Kitty Song 12846:This flag once was 12840:terms like "bully". 12550:Talk:Decolonization 12281:Anonymous Dissident 12221:the 3rr noticeboard 12109:the 3RR noticeboard 11887:This flag once was 11215:told me where to go 10719:, judging from his 9908:Knowledge:Etiquette 9483:abusively applying 7498:rather than making 6706:Tigris the Majestic 6262:Oppose as premature 5396:in his userspace... 5257:Well, I think with 4184:He doesn't want to. 3324:catherine yronwode 3048:Christian D. Larson 2690:"Civil POV pushing" 2440:following out both 2074:Village pump (misc) 1074: 921:Just want an admin? 12658: 12607: 12293:IP 89.240.197.164 12284: 11995: 11965: 11735: 10790:dispute resolution 10596: 10162:User:Pigsonthewing 10103:User:Pigsonthewing 9808:User:Whotheman2006 9528:dispute resolution 9465:Alex Jones (radio) 9138:Have another one: 7041:changing usernames 6763:user:Steelerfan-94 2062:User talk:Self-ref 1072: 916:dispute resolution 674:Contentious topics 473:Dispute resolution 461:Questions on media 175: 107: 13272: 13262: 13235: 12747: 12737: 12651: 12600: 12541:Industrialisation 12517: 12507: 12490:Industrialisation 12426:Industrialisation 12408: 12398: 12278: 12118: 11993: 11963: 11921: 11817: 11733: 11695:warning templates 11668: 11427: 11422: 11393: 11281: 11276: 11135: 10780: 10767:comment added by 10750: 10737:comment added by 10624: 10256: 10203: 10079: 10054: 10012: 9592:Narutolovehinata5 9570: 9538: 9503: 9343: 9016:and not only hit 8965: 8827: 8624: 8486:Nowthatwasawesome 8440:- first known one 7738: 7709: 7512: 7365: 6397: 6344:comment added by 6311:comment added by 6063: 5955: 5950: 5912: 5907: 5870: 5510: 5480: 5475: 5361: 5248: 5243: 5182:comments on this 5001:comment added by 4975:comment added by 4961: 4944: 4939: 4689: 4636:this uncivil post 4613: 4453:User talk:Raul654 4153:Special:Emailuser 4094: 4066:Exactly. While I 4023: 3852: 3846: 3326:Catherineyronwode 3168:Your point about 2843:being applied to 2809:Massive POV push? 2801:assume good faith 2386:correcting toward 2056:Massive POV push? 1959: 1860: 1812:with Carcharoth. 1778: 1773: 1734: 1729: 1679: 1635: 1603: 1602: 1041: 1040: 1010: 1001:automatically by 882:This page is for 840: 839: 669:General sanctions 508:Resource requests 493:Original research 301: 161: 98: 78: 13295: 13269: 13264: 13261: 13260: 13257: 13254: 13225: 13202: 13196: 13187: 13166:deleted contribs 13146: 13125:deleted contribs 12850: 12849: 12745: 12739: 12736: 12734: 12727: 12515: 12509: 12506: 12504: 12497: 12406: 12400: 12397: 12395: 12388: 12366: 12365: 12320:deleted contribs 12282: 12259: 12254: 12248: 12243: 12195:User:Depaulicize 12146: 12143: 12141: 12117: 12115: 12095: 12090: 12007: 12003: 11996: 11977: 11973: 11966: 11925: 11920: 11918: 11909: 11908: 11891: 11890: 11879:User:Tbsdy lives 11816: 11814: 11805: 11747: 11743: 11736: 11711: 11706: 11672: 11667: 11665: 11656: 11655: 11624: 11621: 11620: 11561: 11555: 11521: 11515: 11481: 11475: 11447: 11441: 11426: 11420: 11416: 11410: 11385: 11355: 11348: 11320: 11313: 11280: 11274: 11270: 11264: 11250: 11244: 11205:'s userpage. I 11182: 11179: 11178: 11158: 11151: 11129: 11107: 11106: 11061:deleted contribs 11023: 11018: 11007:warning messages 10973:User:Historian19 10967:User:Historian19 10907: 10902: 10874: 10856: 10802: 10797: 10762: 10732: 10671: 10665: 10664: 10618: 10615: 10605: 10603: 10602: 10597: 10496: 10487: 10486: 10260: 10255: 10253: 10244: 10243: 10197: 10118: 10075: 10053: 10050: 10049: 10046: 10040: 10011: 10008: 10007: 10004: 9998: 9872: 9854: 9787: 9749: 9687: 9660:deleted contribs 9637:User:Frogger3140 9626: 9621: 9566: 9534: 9507: 9497: 9475: 9474: 9447: 9420:deleted contribs 9339: 9193: 9178: 9157:deleted contribs 9140:Bambiisadinosaur 9074: 9053:deleted contribs 9018:Talk:Teletubbies 9015: 8994:deleted contribs 8964: 8962: 8949: 8928:deleted contribs 8901: 8880:deleted contribs 8825: 8819: 8813: 8809: 8807: 8786:deleted contribs 8622: 8616: 8610: 8606: 8566: 8545:deleted contribs 8524: 8503:deleted contribs 8482: 8461:deleted contribs 8439: 8418:deleted contribs 8388: 8367:deleted contribs 8346: 8325:deleted contribs 8304: 8283:deleted contribs 8262: 8241:deleted contribs 8220: 8199:deleted contribs 8178: 8157:deleted contribs 8136: 8115:deleted contribs 8094: 8073:deleted contribs 8052: 8031:deleted contribs 8010: 7989:deleted contribs 7968: 7947:deleted contribs 7926: 7905:deleted contribs 7884: 7863:deleted contribs 7842: 7821:deleted contribs 7800: 7779:deleted contribs 7732: 7703: 7693: 7666:deleted contribs 7603: 7591: 7559: 7547: 7510: 7506: 7469: 7466: 7460: 7359: 7324: 7316: 7296: 7264: 7261: 7255: 7178: 7175: 7173: 7107: 7099: 7084: 7076: 7075: 7074: 7056: 7048: 7028: 7009: 7001: 6985: 6977: 6976: 6975: 6964: 6961: 6953: 6945: 6937: 6929: 6921: 6913: 6905: 6897: 6889: 6881: 6865: 6862: 6854: 6846: 6838: 6830: 6822: 6814: 6806: 6798: 6790: 6782: 6745: 6744: 6729: 6722:, me hearties. 6678:User:Yorkshirian 6629: 6627: 6625: 6623: 6563: 6561: 6559: 6557: 6534: 6532: 6530: 6528: 6493: 6491: 6489: 6487: 6393: 6356: 6323: 6291: 6281: 6237: 6232: 6175:I always though 6118:Thor Malmjursson 6076:Thor Malmjursson 6064: 6061: 6057: 6024: 6019: 5954: 5948: 5944: 5938: 5926: 5911: 5905: 5901: 5895: 5868: 5862: 5856: 5854: 5836: 5833: 5674: 5672: 5670: 5668: 5614: 5612: 5610: 5608: 5590: 5586: 5579: 5538: 5534: 5527: 5508: 5502: 5496: 5494: 5479: 5473: 5469: 5463: 5359: 5353: 5347: 5343: 5318: 5299: 5275: 5267: 5247: 5241: 5237: 5231: 5209: 5201: 5172:"contributions" 5170: 5143:deleted contribs 5080: 5062: 5017: 4991: 4960: 4959: 4943: 4937: 4933: 4927: 4890: 4888: 4886: 4884: 4848: 4843: 4683: 4666: 4611: 4608: 4605: 4566: 4444: 4423:deleted contribs 4368: 4365: 4362: 4359: 4264: 4261: 4260: 4128:Most excellent. 4121: 4092: 4086: 4080: 4076: 4021: 4015: 4009: 4005: 3945: 3942: 3941: 3909: 3906: 3905: 3861: 3850: 3845: 3843: 3837: 3832: 3803: 3800: 3799: 3785: 3778: 3765: 3757: 3694: 3687: 3674: 3647: 3644: 3587: 3580: 3567: 3563: 3549: 3548: 3535: 3521: 3504: 3503: 3490: 3421:raised a concern 3402: 3396: 3395: 3290: 3287: 3284: 3236: 3233: 3230: 3044:peacock language 2924:this arbitration 2743: 2723: 2658: 2651: 2634: 2583:calls "framing" 2525:thinks it unfair 2019: 2016: 2015: 1958: 1956: 1859: 1857: 1852: 1844: 1777: 1771: 1767: 1761: 1748: 1733: 1727: 1723: 1717: 1683: 1678: 1676: 1655: 1654: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1619: 1618: 1598: 1453: 1335: 1323:Edit-warring/3RR 1213: 1091: 1075: 1071: 1034: 1023: 1022: 995: 983: 874: 867: 845: 844: 503:Reliable sources 437:User permissions 417:Main Page errors 412:Interface admins 402:Closure requests 332: 325: 318: 309: 308: 214: 213: 211: 198: 193: 174: 169: 151: 150: 148: 135: 125: 106: 79: 70: 69: 67: 62: 60: 52: 49: 31: 29: 13303: 13302: 13298: 13297: 13296: 13294: 13293: 13292: 13278: 13277: 13267: 13258: 13255: 13252: 13244: 13200: 13194: 13151: 13110: 13100: 13076: 12902: 12847: 12845: 12834:assume the best 12741: 12728: 12579:Oxford spelling 12511: 12498: 12402: 12389: 12305: 12301: 12299: 12280: 12270: 12257: 12252: 12246: 12241: 12237:long-term abuse 12198: 12156: 12134: 12113: 12006: 12001: 11992: 11976: 11971: 11962: 11926: 11916: 11913: 11911: 11906: 11902: 11888: 11886: 11827: 11812: 11757: 11746: 11741: 11732: 11723: 11709: 11704: 11673: 11663: 11660: 11658: 11653: 11649: 11430: 11421: 11342: 11307: 11284: 11275: 11199:deleted userbox 11169: 11046: 11042: 11035: 11021: 11016: 10971:Please look at 10969: 10905: 10900: 10847: 10831: 10813: 10800: 10795: 10786: 10769:G.-M. Cupertino 10758: 10713: 10672: 10669: 10667: 10662: 10658: 10591: 10588: 10587: 10586: 10497: 10491: 10489: 10484: 10480: 10336: 10261: 10251: 10248: 10246: 10241: 10237: 10232: 10231: 10187:way, he can go 10143: 10114: 10107: 10087:Gladys J Cortez 9984: 9982:Eyeballs needed 9941:Gordonofcartoon 9893:Gordonofcartoon 9845: 9829: 9810: 9797: 9759: 9645: 9640: 9624: 9619: 9584: 9508: 9489:brand new users 9487:in defiance of 9479: 9477: 9472: 9468: 9405: 9354: 9351:User:Prophaniti 9240: 9191: 9142: 9038: 9036:Ohnothesimpsons 8979: 8960: 8913: 8865: 8771: 8530: 8488: 8446: 8444:Iluvteletubbies 8403: 8352: 8310: 8268: 8226: 8184: 8142: 8100: 8058: 8016: 7974: 7932: 7890: 7848: 7806: 7764: 7750: 7651: 7645: 7601: 7589: 7557: 7545: 7508: 7464: 7453: 7450: 7322: 7314: 7285:I be thinking, 7259: 7248: 7245: 7225:and possibly a 7210: 7166: 7105: 7097: 7072: 7070: 7068: 7065: 7054: 7046: 7007: 6999: 6973: 6971: 6969: 6966: 6766: 6749:per checkuser. 6742: 6674: 6644: 6621: 6619: 6617: 6615: 6555: 6553: 6551: 6549: 6526: 6524: 6522: 6520: 6485: 6483: 6481: 6479: 6437:the tips after 6407: 6339: 6306: 6305:iDangerMouse. 6292: 6062:clamation point 6060: 6053: 6022: 6015: 5958: 5949: 5924: 5915: 5906: 5788: 5666: 5664: 5662: 5660: 5606: 5604: 5602: 5600: 5589: 5584: 5577: 5575: 5537: 5532: 5525: 5523: 5483: 5474: 5312: 5273: 5265: 5251: 5242: 5207: 5199: 5128: 5123: 5120:User:Prom3th3an 5091:KillerChihuahua 5023: 4996: 4970: 4957: 4947: 4938: 4882: 4880: 4878: 4876: 4801:Further comment 4644:AlasdairGreen27 4564: 4451:The posting to 4408: 4402: 4282:too many admins 4075:to be ignored. 3859: 3841: 3835: 3833: 3779: 3774: 3645: 3642: 3581: 3576: 3534:« Gonzo fan2007 3530: 3519: 3489:« Gonzo fan2007 3485: 3416:In March 2008, 3403: 3400: 3398: 3393: 3389: 3258:Malcolm Schosha 3213:Malcolm Schosha 2965:With regard to 2797:Malcolm Schosha 2782:Malcolm Schosha 2778:complete truth. 2759:Malcolm Schosha 2741: 2592:Malcolm Schosha 2498: 2475:Malcolm Schosha 2352: 2270:Malcolm Schosha 2160:Malcolm Schosha 2112:Malcolm Schosha 2102: 2058: 1954: 1855: 1846: 1838: 1781: 1772: 1746: 1737: 1728: 1684: 1674: 1659: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1640: 1630: 1623: 1621: 1616: 1612: 1604: 1599: 1594: 1585: 1447: 1325: 1203: 1081: 1079:Administrators' 1069: 1068: 1067: 1047: 1032: 1012: 1011: 992: 991: 990: 986: 973: 970: 951: 910:their talk page 891: 879: 878: 877: 870: 863: 859: 841: 836: 825: 742:False positives 700: 632: 549: 498:Pending changes 483:Fringe theories 441: 371:Administrators 360: 341: 336: 298: 287: 278: 267: 258: 250: 240: 235: 220: 215: 206: 204: 202: 201: 200: 196: 183: 181: 176: 170: 165: 157: 155:← Previous edit 152: 143: 141: 139: 138: 137: 133: 131: 115: 113: 108: 102: 94: 93: 92: 91: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 75: 71: 65: 63: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48:Content deleted 47: 44: 39:← Previous edit 36: 35: 34: 27: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 13301: 13291: 13290: 13243: 13240: 13099: 13096: 13085:NonvocalScream 13075: 13072: 13071: 13070: 13069: 13068: 13044: 13014: 13013: 13012: 13011: 12993: 12992: 12982:218.186.68.211 12977: 12976: 12972: 12971: 12967: 12966: 12901: 12898: 12897: 12896: 12895: 12894: 12893: 12892: 12891: 12890: 12889: 12888: 12887: 12886: 12866: 12865: 12864: 12863: 12862: 12861: 12860: 12859: 12858: 12857: 12856: 12855: 12841: 12819: 12818: 12817: 12816: 12815: 12814: 12813: 12812: 12811: 12810: 12800:89.240.197.164 12786: 12785: 12784: 12783: 12782: 12781: 12780: 12779: 12762: 12761: 12760: 12759: 12758: 12757: 12756: 12755: 12754: 12753: 12752: 12751: 12712: 12711: 12710: 12709: 12708: 12707: 12706: 12705: 12704: 12703: 12702: 12701: 12691:89.240.197.164 12671: 12670: 12669: 12668: 12667: 12666: 12665: 12664: 12663: 12662: 12638: 12637: 12636: 12635: 12634: 12633: 12623:89.240.197.164 12614: 12613: 12612: 12611: 12574: 12573: 12572: 12571: 12570: 12569: 12568: 12567: 12566: 12565: 12555:89.240.197.164 12544:title. As for 12528: 12527: 12526: 12525: 12524: 12523: 12522: 12521: 12483:The ENGVAR of 12471:89.240.197.164 12462: 12461: 12460: 12459: 12442: 12441: 12431:89.240.197.164 12303:89.240.197.164 12298: 12291: 12269: 12266: 12265: 12264: 12197: 12192: 12191: 12190: 12155: 12152: 12125: 12124: 12123: 12122: 12081: 12080: 12044: 12043: 12042: 12041: 12040: 12039: 11998: 11982: 11981: 11968: 11904: 11901: 11898: 11897: 11896: 11882: 11826: 11823: 11822: 11821: 11738: 11722: 11719: 11718: 11717: 11651: 11648: 11645: 11644: 11643: 11606: 11605: 11604: 11603: 11602: 11601: 11600: 11599: 11598: 11597: 11596: 11595: 11594: 11593: 11592: 11591: 11590: 11589: 11588: 11587: 11586: 11585: 11584: 11583: 11563: 11523: 11483: 11449: 11417: 11413: 11399: 11398: 11397: 11370: 11369: 11368: 11367: 11366: 11365: 11364: 11363: 11362: 11361: 11360: 11359: 11271: 11267: 11252: 11197:surrounding a 11188: 11168: 11165: 11164: 11163: 11140: 11139: 11044:86.154.221.122 11034: 11031: 11030: 11029: 10968: 10965: 10964: 10963: 10962: 10961: 10960: 10959: 10929: 10928: 10927: 10884: 10881: 10812: 10809: 10785: 10782: 10757: 10752: 10712: 10707: 10706: 10705: 10660: 10657: 10648: 10647: 10646: 10645: 10644: 10595: 10564: 10563: 10562: 10561: 10482: 10479: 10476: 10475: 10474: 10438: 10437: 10436: 10435: 10335: 10332: 10331: 10330: 10329: 10328: 10311: 10310: 10294: 10293: 10239: 10236: 10233: 10225: 10224: 10223: 10222: 10221: 10177: 10176: 10142: 10141: 10140: 10139: 10138: 10109: 10108: 10106: 10100: 10099: 10098: 10097: 10096: 10095: 10094: 10093: 10092: 9983: 9980: 9979: 9978: 9977: 9976: 9975: 9974: 9964:LessHeard vanU 9886:Brian McKnight 9882:Britney Spears 9874: 9873: 9827: 9809: 9806: 9805: 9804: 9803: 9802: 9793: 9770:LessHeard vanU 9755: 9639: 9634: 9633: 9632: 9583: 9580: 9579: 9578: 9577: 9576: 9575: 9574: 9513:71.232.179.236 9470: 9467: 9462: 9461: 9460: 9448:for 24 hours. 9353: 9348: 9325: 9324: 9323: 9322: 9321: 9320: 9319: 9318: 9298:This article, 9239: 9234: 9233: 9232: 9231: 9230: 9213: 9212: 9211: 9210: 9131: 9130: 9129: 9128: 9118: 9117: 9101: 9100: 9099: 9098: 9088: 9032: 9031: 9030: 9029: 8970: 8969: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8846: 8845: 8831: 8764: 8763: 8726: 8725: 8724: 8723: 8693: 8692: 8689: 8686: 8683: 8680: 8677: 8674: 8671: 8668: 8665: 8662: 8659: 8656: 8653: 8650: 8647: 8644: 8641: 8638: 8634: 8633: 8629: 8628: 8568: 8567: 8525: 8483: 8441: 8390: 8389: 8347: 8305: 8266:68.220.173.251 8263: 8224:68.220.174.184 8221: 8179: 8137: 8098:68.220.174.133 8095: 8056:70.146.242.139 8053: 8011: 7972:70.146.241.244 7969: 7930:68.220.162.165 7927: 7885: 7843: 7801: 7762:68.220.180.163 7749: 7746: 7745: 7744: 7743: 7742: 7695: 7694: 7644: 7641: 7640: 7639: 7638: 7637: 7636: 7635: 7523: 7521: 7520: 7519: 7518: 7517: 7516: 7432: 7431: 7430: 7429: 7428: 7414: 7399: 7382: 7370: 7369: 7350: 7349: 7334: 7333: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7273:LessHeard vanU 7218:User:Dreadstar 7209: 7204: 7203: 7202: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7118: 7117: 7116: 7115: 7114: 7113: 6765: 6760: 6759: 6758: 6757: 6756: 6720:Down the hatch 6682:User:Gennarous 6673: 6670: 6643: 6640: 6639: 6638: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6471: 6470: 6462: 6458: 6454: 6450: 6446: 6442: 6439:congratulating 6430: 6423: 6406: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6379: 6360: 6359: 6358: 6357: 6336: 6303: 6302: 6296: 6286: 6271: 6259: 6242: 6218: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6156: 6155: 6132: 6131: 6130: 6129: 6107: 6106: 6088: 6087: 6069: 6046: 6029: 6003: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5962: 5945: 5941: 5919: 5902: 5898: 5887: 5886: 5874: 5844: 5843: 5842: 5787: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5737: 5736: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5581: 5543: 5542: 5529: 5515: 5514: 5487: 5470: 5466: 5455: 5454: 5435: 5434: 5418: 5417: 5398: 5397: 5390: 5377: 5370: 5369: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5238: 5234: 5122: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5022: 5019: 4966: 4965: 4951: 4934: 4930: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4815: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4794: 4787: 4784: 4773: 4772: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4737: 4734: 4722: 4714:Angus McLellan 4710: 4693: 4675:walk the plank 4671: 4654: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4621: 4596: 4571: 4557: 4539: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4497: 4496: 4446: 4445: 4401: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4353:Andrew Lenahan 4348: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4250: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4143:To clarify: I 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4123: 4122: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3982: 3889: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3738: 3737: 3727:TenOfAllTrades 3714: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3667: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3609: 3426:In July 2008, 3418:User:Rarelibra 3405:Administrator 3391: 3388: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3289:sch 3283:Jim 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3235:sch 3229:Jim 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2920:categorization 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2868: 2867: 2847:. As shown at 2828: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2730: 2729: 2693: 2686: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2641: 2640: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2503: 2502: 2494: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2348: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2123: 2122: 2098: 2057: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2038:Possible split 2035: 2023: 2003: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1942: 1932:NonvocalScream 1911: 1910: 1900:NonvocalScream 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1768: 1764: 1724: 1720: 1709: 1708: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1584: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1455: 1454: 1441: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1337: 1336: 1319: 1318: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1197: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1145: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1093: 1092: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1049: 1048: 1039: 1038: 1026: 1025: 993: 989: 988: 987: 971: 954: 952: 950: 949: 939: 930: 929: 928: 918: 912: 906: 897:Before posting 893: 881: 876: 875: 868: 860: 855: 853: 850: 849: 843: 838: 837: 830: 827: 826: 824: 823: 818: 813: 812: 811: 806: 801: 796: 791: 786: 776: 771: 770: 769: 764: 762:Reference desk 759: 754: 746: 745: 744: 739: 729: 728: 727: 722: 717: 708: 706: 702: 701: 699: 698: 693: 683: 678: 677: 676: 671: 666: 656: 651: 646: 640: 638: 634: 633: 631: 630: 625: 624: 623: 618: 613: 608: 603: 598: 588: 583: 578: 573: 568: 563: 561:History merges 557: 555: 551: 550: 548: 547: 542: 540:Titleblacklist 537: 532: 531: 530: 525: 515: 510: 505: 500: 495: 490: 485: 480: 478:External links 475: 470: 469: 468: 463: 455: 449: 447: 443: 442: 440: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 383: 382: 377: 368: 366: 362: 361: 346: 343: 342: 335: 334: 327: 320: 312: 305: 300: 299: 296: 294: 292: 289: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 276: 274: 272: 269: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 255: 253: 251: 247: 245: 242: 241: 238: 236: 233: 230: 229: 226: 222: 221: 195: 194: 179: 158: 132: 129:Administrators 127: 126: 111: 80: 74: 72: 54: 46: 37: 33: 32: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 13300: 13289: 13286: 13285: 13283: 13276: 13275: 13270: 13263: 13249: 13239: 13238: 13233: 13229: 13224: 13218: 13216: 13213: 13210: 13206: 13199: 13190: 13185: 13182: 13179: 13176: 13173: 13170: 13167: 13164: 13161: 13158: 13155: 13150: 13144: 13141: 13138: 13135: 13132: 13129: 13126: 13123: 13120: 13117: 13114: 13109: 13105: 13095: 13094: 13090: 13086: 13082: 13067: 13063: 13059: 13056: 13054: 13052: 13050: 13048: 13045: 13043: 13039: 13035: 13030: 13029: 13028: 13024: 13020: 13016: 13015: 13010: 13006: 13002: 12997: 12996: 12995: 12994: 12991: 12987: 12983: 12979: 12978: 12974: 12973: 12969: 12968: 12964: 12963: 12962: 12961: 12957: 12953: 12949: 12946: 12943: 12939: 12938: 12934: 12930: 12926: 12922: 12920: 12916: 12913: 12910: 12906: 12885: 12882: 12878: 12877: 12876: 12875: 12874: 12873: 12872: 12871: 12870: 12869: 12868: 12867: 12854: 12851: 12842: 12839: 12835: 12831: 12830: 12829: 12828: 12827: 12826: 12825: 12824: 12823: 12822: 12821: 12820: 12809: 12805: 12801: 12796: 12795: 12794: 12793: 12792: 12791: 12790: 12789: 12788: 12787: 12778: 12775: 12770: 12769: 12768: 12767: 12766: 12765: 12764: 12763: 12750: 12746: 12744: 12735: 12733: 12724: 12723: 12722: 12721: 12720: 12719: 12718: 12717: 12716: 12715: 12714: 12713: 12700: 12696: 12692: 12687: 12683: 12682: 12681: 12680: 12679: 12678: 12677: 12676: 12675: 12674: 12673: 12672: 12661: 12657: 12654: 12648: 12647: 12646: 12645: 12644: 12643: 12642: 12641: 12640: 12639: 12632: 12628: 12624: 12620: 12619: 12618: 12617: 12616: 12615: 12610: 12606: 12603: 12598: 12597: 12596: 12592: 12588: 12584: 12580: 12576: 12575: 12564: 12560: 12556: 12551: 12547: 12542: 12539:I never said 12538: 12537: 12536: 12535: 12534: 12533: 12532: 12531: 12530: 12529: 12520: 12516: 12514: 12505: 12503: 12495: 12491: 12486: 12482: 12481: 12480: 12476: 12472: 12468: 12467: 12466: 12465: 12464: 12463: 12458: 12454: 12450: 12446: 12445: 12444: 12443: 12440: 12436: 12432: 12427: 12422: 12418: 12414: 12413: 12412: 12411: 12407: 12405: 12396: 12394: 12386: 12382: 12378: 12374: 12370: 12363: 12360: 12357: 12354: 12351: 12348: 12345: 12342: 12339: 12336: 12333: 12330: 12327: 12324: 12321: 12318: 12315: 12312: 12309: 12304: 12296: 12290: 12289: 12286: 12283: 12276: 12263: 12260: 12255: 12249: 12244: 12238: 12234: 12230: 12226: 12222: 12218: 12217: 12216: 12215: 12211: 12207: 12203: 12196: 12189: 12185: 12181: 12177: 12173: 12172: 12171: 12170: 12167: 12165: 12161: 12151: 12150: 12147: 12145: 12131: 12121: 12116: 12110: 12106: 12102: 12098: 12094: 12089: 12085: 12084: 12083: 12082: 12079: 12075: 12071: 12070:The Thunderer 12066: 12061: 12060: 12059: 12058: 12054: 12050: 12038: 12034: 12030: 12029:The Thunderer 12026: 12025: 12024: 12020: 12016: 12015:The Thunderer 12012: 12011: 12010: 12005: 12004: 11997: 11988: 11984: 11983: 11980: 11975: 11974: 11967: 11958: 11954: 11953: 11952: 11951: 11947: 11943: 11942:The Thunderer 11939: 11935: 11931: 11924: 11919: 11895: 11892: 11883: 11880: 11876: 11872: 11868: 11864: 11863: 11862: 11861: 11857: 11853: 11849: 11846: 11843: 11839: 11835: 11832: 11820: 11815: 11809: 11808:her talk page 11803: 11800: 11797: 11794: 11791: 11788: 11785: 11782: 11779: 11776: 11773: 11770: 11767: 11764: 11761: 11756: 11753: 11752: 11751: 11750: 11745: 11744: 11737: 11728: 11716: 11713: 11712: 11707: 11700: 11696: 11692: 11691: 11690: 11689: 11685: 11681: 11677: 11671: 11666: 11642: 11638: 11634: 11630: 11629: 11628: 11627: 11622: 11619: 11612: 11582: 11578: 11574: 11570: 11569: 11568: 11567: 11566: 11562: 11556: 11551: 11549: 11544: 11543: 11542: 11538: 11534: 11530: 11529: 11528: 11527: 11526: 11522: 11516: 11511: 11508: 11504: 11503: 11502: 11498: 11494: 11490: 11489: 11488: 11487: 11486: 11482: 11476: 11471: 11468: 11467: 11466: 11462: 11458: 11455:Lies? Where? 11454: 11453: 11452: 11448: 11442: 11437: 11435: 11434: 11433: 11428: 11423: 11412: 11411: 11404: 11400: 11396: 11391: 11390: 11384: 11383: 11378: 11374: 11373: 11372: 11371: 11358: 11353: 11349: 11347: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11333: 11329: 11325: 11324: 11323: 11318: 11314: 11312: 11305: 11304: 11303: 11299: 11295: 11291: 11290: 11289: 11288: 11287: 11282: 11277: 11266: 11265: 11258: 11257: 11256: 11255: 11251: 11245: 11240: 11238: 11234: 11229: 11228: 11224: 11220: 11216: 11212: 11208: 11204: 11203:User:Fennessy 11200: 11196: 11192: 11186: 11185: 11180: 11177: 11167:User:Fennessy 11162: 11159: 11157: 11152: 11150: 11145: 11142: 11141: 11138: 11133: 11128: 11127: 11122: 11121: 11120: 11119: 11115: 11111: 11104: 11101: 11098: 11095: 11092: 11089: 11086: 11083: 11080: 11077: 11074: 11071: 11068: 11065: 11062: 11059: 11056: 11053: 11050: 11045: 11040: 11028: 11025: 11024: 11019: 11012: 11008: 11004: 11001: 10998: 10994: 10990: 10989: 10988: 10987: 10983: 10979: 10974: 10958: 10954: 10950: 10945: 10944: 10943: 10939: 10935: 10930: 10926: 10922: 10918: 10914: 10913: 10912: 10909: 10908: 10903: 10896: 10892: 10891: 10890: 10887: 10886: 10885: 10882: 10879: 10872: 10868: 10864: 10860: 10855: 10851: 10846: 10842: 10838: 10834: 10830: 10829: 10828: 10827: 10823: 10819: 10808: 10807: 10804: 10803: 10798: 10791: 10781: 10778: 10774: 10770: 10766: 10756: 10751: 10748: 10744: 10740: 10736: 10730: 10726: 10722: 10718: 10711: 10704: 10700: 10696: 10692: 10688: 10687: 10686: 10685: 10681: 10677: 10656: 10652: 10643: 10639: 10635: 10630: 10629: 10628: 10625: 10623: 10622: 10616: 10613: 10609: 10593: 10583: 10579: 10575: 10571: 10566: 10565: 10560: 10556: 10552: 10547: 10546: 10545: 10541: 10537: 10533: 10532: 10531: 10530: 10526: 10522: 10518: 10513: 10512: 10508: 10504: 10500: 10495: 10478:Ayers article 10473: 10469: 10465: 10460: 10459: 10458: 10457: 10453: 10449: 10444: 10434: 10430: 10426: 10422: 10418: 10414: 10410: 10406: 10405: 10404: 10400: 10396: 10392: 10388: 10385: 10381: 10377: 10374: 10370: 10367: 10362: 10361: 10360: 10359: 10355: 10351: 10346: 10341: 10327: 10323: 10319: 10315: 10314: 10313: 10312: 10309: 10306: 10305: 10301: 10296: 10295: 10292: 10289: 10288:Baseball Bugs 10284: 10280: 10279: 10278: 10277: 10273: 10269: 10265: 10259: 10254: 10229: 10220: 10216: 10212: 10208: 10207: 10206: 10201: 10196: 10195: 10190: 10186: 10182: 10179: 10178: 10175: 10171: 10167: 10163: 10159: 10158: 10157: 10156: 10152: 10148: 10137: 10133: 10129: 10125: 10124: 10123: 10120: 10117: 10111: 10110: 10104: 10091: 10088: 10084: 10083: 10082: 10078: 10073: 10068: 10064: 10063:Perry Farrell 10060: 10059: 10058: 10055: 10051: 10041: 10034: 10033: 10032: 10028: 10024: 10019: 10018: 10017: 10016: 10013: 10009: 9999: 9993: 9989: 9988:Travis Barker 9973: 9969: 9965: 9960: 9956: 9952: 9951: 9950: 9946: 9942: 9938: 9935: 9933: 9931: 9929: 9927: 9925: 9922: 9921: 9920: 9917: 9913: 9909: 9905: 9904: 9903: 9902: 9898: 9894: 9890: 9887: 9883: 9879: 9870: 9866: 9862: 9858: 9853: 9849: 9844: 9840: 9836: 9832: 9828: 9825: 9822: 9819: 9815: 9814:Whotheman2006 9812: 9811: 9801: 9798: 9796: 9791: 9788: 9781: 9780: 9779: 9775: 9771: 9766: 9765: 9764: 9763: 9760: 9758: 9753: 9750: 9742: 9740: 9736: 9732: 9726: 9724: 9720: 9716: 9712: 9708: 9704: 9700: 9695: 9691: 9688: 9685: 9682: 9679: 9676: 9673: 9670: 9667: 9664: 9661: 9658: 9655: 9652: 9649: 9644: 9638: 9631: 9628: 9627: 9622: 9615: 9611: 9607: 9603: 9599: 9598: 9597: 9596: 9593: 9589: 9573: 9569: 9565: 9561: 9557: 9556: 9555: 9551: 9547: 9543: 9542: 9541: 9537: 9533: 9529: 9525: 9524: 9523: 9522: 9518: 9514: 9506: 9501: 9496: 9495: 9490: 9486: 9482: 9466: 9459: 9455: 9451: 9445: 9442: 9439: 9436: 9433: 9430: 9427: 9424: 9421: 9418: 9415: 9412: 9409: 9404: 9400: 9396: 9395: 9394: 9393: 9389: 9385: 9381: 9377: 9373: 9369: 9365: 9362:this user on 9360: 9352: 9347: 9346: 9342: 9338: 9334: 9330: 9317: 9313: 9309: 9305: 9301: 9297: 9296: 9295: 9291: 9287: 9283: 9282: 9281: 9277: 9273: 9269: 9268: 9262: 9261:Goingoveredge 9258: 9257: 9256: 9255: 9254: 9253: 9249: 9245: 9238: 9229: 9225: 9221: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9214: 9208: 9204: 9200: 9199: 9198: 9195: 9194: 9186: 9185: 9184: 9182: 9176: 9173: 9170: 9167: 9164: 9161: 9158: 9155: 9152: 9149: 9146: 9141: 9136: 9135: 9126: 9122: 9121: 9120: 9119: 9116: 9112: 9108: 9103: 9102: 9097: 9094: 9089: 9085: 9084: 9083: 9082: 9081: 9079: 9072: 9069: 9066: 9063: 9060: 9057: 9054: 9051: 9048: 9045: 9042: 9037: 9027: 9023: 9019: 9013: 9010: 9007: 9004: 9001: 8998: 8995: 8992: 8989: 8986: 8983: 8978: 8974: 8973: 8972: 8971: 8968: 8963: 8957: 8956: 8955: 8953: 8947: 8944: 8941: 8938: 8935: 8932: 8929: 8926: 8923: 8920: 8917: 8912: 8911:68.220.177.16 8907: 8905: 8899: 8896: 8893: 8890: 8887: 8884: 8881: 8878: 8875: 8872: 8869: 8864: 8854: 8850: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8844: 8840: 8836: 8832: 8830: 8826: 8820: 8814: 8805: 8802: 8799: 8796: 8793: 8790: 8787: 8784: 8781: 8778: 8775: 8770: 8769:85.127.170.86 8766: 8765: 8761: 8757: 8756: 8755: 8754: 8750: 8746: 8742: 8738: 8735: 8731: 8730:simple:WALL-E 8722: 8718: 8714: 8709: 8708: 8707: 8703: 8699: 8695: 8694: 8690: 8687: 8684: 8681: 8678: 8675: 8672: 8669: 8666: 8663: 8660: 8657: 8654: 8651: 8648: 8645: 8642: 8639: 8636: 8635: 8631: 8630: 8627: 8623: 8617: 8611: 8604: 8603: 8602: 8600: 8595: 8593: 8591: 8589: 8588: 8586: 8583: 8581: 8579: 8576: 8574: 8572: 8564: 8561: 8558: 8555: 8552: 8549: 8546: 8543: 8540: 8537: 8534: 8529: 8526: 8522: 8519: 8516: 8513: 8510: 8507: 8504: 8501: 8498: 8495: 8492: 8487: 8484: 8480: 8477: 8474: 8471: 8468: 8465: 8462: 8459: 8456: 8453: 8450: 8445: 8442: 8437: 8434: 8431: 8428: 8425: 8422: 8419: 8416: 8413: 8410: 8407: 8402: 8399: 8398: 8397: 8395: 8386: 8383: 8380: 8377: 8374: 8371: 8368: 8365: 8362: 8359: 8356: 8351: 8348: 8344: 8341: 8338: 8335: 8332: 8329: 8326: 8323: 8320: 8317: 8314: 8309: 8308:68.220.177.43 8306: 8302: 8299: 8296: 8293: 8290: 8287: 8284: 8281: 8278: 8275: 8272: 8267: 8264: 8260: 8257: 8254: 8251: 8248: 8245: 8242: 8239: 8236: 8233: 8230: 8225: 8222: 8218: 8215: 8212: 8209: 8206: 8203: 8200: 8197: 8194: 8191: 8188: 8183: 8180: 8176: 8173: 8170: 8167: 8164: 8161: 8158: 8155: 8152: 8149: 8146: 8141: 8140:68.220.175.46 8138: 8134: 8131: 8128: 8125: 8122: 8119: 8116: 8113: 8110: 8107: 8104: 8099: 8096: 8092: 8089: 8086: 8083: 8080: 8077: 8074: 8071: 8068: 8065: 8062: 8057: 8054: 8050: 8047: 8044: 8041: 8038: 8035: 8032: 8029: 8026: 8023: 8020: 8015: 8012: 8008: 8005: 8002: 7999: 7996: 7993: 7990: 7987: 7984: 7981: 7978: 7973: 7970: 7966: 7963: 7960: 7957: 7954: 7951: 7948: 7945: 7942: 7939: 7936: 7931: 7928: 7924: 7921: 7918: 7915: 7912: 7909: 7906: 7903: 7900: 7897: 7894: 7889: 7886: 7882: 7879: 7876: 7873: 7870: 7867: 7864: 7861: 7858: 7855: 7852: 7847: 7844: 7840: 7837: 7834: 7831: 7828: 7825: 7822: 7819: 7816: 7813: 7810: 7805: 7804:68.220.184.91 7802: 7798: 7795: 7792: 7789: 7786: 7783: 7780: 7777: 7774: 7771: 7768: 7763: 7760: 7759: 7758: 7756: 7741: 7736: 7731: 7730: 7724: 7723: 7722: 7719: 7715: 7714: 7713: 7712: 7707: 7702: 7701: 7691: 7688: 7685: 7682: 7679: 7676: 7673: 7670: 7667: 7664: 7661: 7658: 7655: 7650: 7647: 7646: 7634: 7630: 7626: 7622: 7617: 7613: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7600: 7596: 7593: 7592: 7584: 7583: 7582: 7578: 7574: 7569: 7565: 7564: 7563: 7562: 7556: 7552: 7549: 7548: 7541: 7537: 7536: 7534: 7532: 7530: 7528: 7525: 7515: 7511: 7505: 7501: 7497: 7493: 7491: 7489: 7486: 7482: 7478: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7467: 7461: 7459: 7457: 7448: 7447: 7446: 7442: 7438: 7433: 7427: 7423: 7419: 7415: 7413: 7409: 7405: 7400: 7396: 7392: 7387: 7383: 7380: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7368: 7363: 7358: 7357: 7352: 7351: 7348: 7344: 7340: 7335: 7329: 7326: 7325: 7320: 7317: 7310: 7306: 7305: 7304: 7301: 7300: 7295: 7294: 7288: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7278: 7274: 7270: 7269: 7268: 7267: 7262: 7256: 7254: 7252: 7243: 7240: 7237: 7234: 7231: 7228: 7224: 7219: 7215: 7208: 7201: 7197: 7193: 7189: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7179: 7177: 7163: 7162:this incident 7159: 7154: 7153: 7149: 7145: 7141: 7138: 7135: 7131: 7127: 7112: 7109: 7108: 7103: 7100: 7093: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7083: 7081: 7077: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7058: 7057: 7052: 7049: 7042: 7038: 7037: 7036: 7033: 7032: 7027: 7026: 7020: 7016: 7015: 7014: 7011: 7010: 7005: 7002: 6995: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6988: 6984: 6982: 6978: 6962: 6957: 6954: 6949: 6946: 6941: 6938: 6933: 6930: 6925: 6922: 6917: 6914: 6909: 6906: 6901: 6898: 6893: 6890: 6885: 6882: 6877: 6874: 6870: 6863: 6858: 6855: 6850: 6847: 6842: 6839: 6834: 6831: 6826: 6823: 6818: 6815: 6810: 6807: 6802: 6799: 6794: 6791: 6786: 6783: 6778: 6775: 6771: 6770:Steelerfan-94 6764: 6755: 6752: 6748: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6734: 6733: 6728: 6727: 6721: 6717: 6714: 6711: 6707: 6703: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6696: 6692: 6687: 6683: 6679: 6669: 6668: 6665: 6661: 6656: 6654: 6648: 6637: 6634: 6631: 6630: 6611: 6610: 6609: 6608: 6605: 6601: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6585: 6571: 6568: 6565: 6564: 6544: 6543: 6542: 6539: 6536: 6535: 6515: 6514: 6513: 6510: 6506: 6505: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6501: 6498: 6495: 6494: 6475: 6467: 6463: 6459: 6455: 6451: 6447: 6443: 6440: 6435: 6431: 6428: 6424: 6421: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6413: 6400: 6396: 6392: 6387: 6383: 6380: 6378: 6374: 6370: 6365: 6362: 6361: 6355: 6351: 6347: 6343: 6337: 6335: 6332: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6322: 6318: 6314: 6310: 6300: 6297: 6295: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6280: 6275: 6272: 6270: 6267: 6263: 6260: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6246: 6243: 6241: 6238: 6233: 6231: 6224: 6219: 6217: 6213: 6209: 6206: 6202: 6199: 6198: 6191: 6187: 6183: 6178: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6169: 6164: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6154: 6150: 6146: 6141: 6137: 6134: 6133: 6128: 6127: 6123: 6119: 6114: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6096:- Tyler Puetz 6093: 6090: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6070: 6068: 6065: 6058: 6056: 6050: 6047: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6030: 6028: 6025: 6020: 6018: 6012: 6008: 6005: 6004: 5997: 5994: 5990: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5980: 5971: 5970: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5966: 5961: 5956: 5951: 5940: 5939: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5927: 5920: 5918: 5913: 5908: 5897: 5896: 5889: 5888: 5885: 5882: 5879: 5875: 5873: 5867: 5861: 5853: 5848: 5845: 5841: 5838: 5837: 5835:Postlethwaite 5826: 5825: 5824: 5820: 5816: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5805: 5801: 5797: 5793: 5777: 5773: 5769: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5722: 5721: 5710: 5706: 5702: 5697: 5691: 5688: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5679: 5676: 5675: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5647: 5643: 5639: 5634: 5629: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5619: 5616: 5615: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5588: 5587: 5580: 5578:Corvus cornix 5573: 5572: 5571: 5567: 5563: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5541: 5536: 5535: 5528: 5526:Corvus cornix 5521: 5517: 5516: 5513: 5507: 5501: 5493: 5488: 5486: 5481: 5476: 5465: 5464: 5457: 5456: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5436: 5433: 5429: 5425: 5420: 5419: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5401:Also, he has 5400: 5399: 5395: 5391: 5388: 5386: 5384: 5382: 5380: 5378: 5375: 5372: 5371: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5360: 5354: 5348: 5341: 5331: 5328: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5319: 5317: 5316: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5304: 5303: 5298: 5297: 5290: 5289: 5280: 5277: 5276: 5271: 5268: 5260: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5249: 5244: 5233: 5232: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5220: 5216: 5215: 5214: 5211: 5210: 5205: 5202: 5195: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5185: 5180: 5177: 5174: 5168: 5165: 5162: 5159: 5156: 5153: 5150: 5147: 5144: 5141: 5138: 5135: 5132: 5127: 5121: 5106: 5103: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5092: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5083: 5078: 5077: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5065: 5060: 5059: 5052: 5047: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5030:Duffbeerforme 5028: 5018: 5016: 5012: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4992: 4990: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4964: 4955: 4952: 4950: 4945: 4940: 4929: 4928: 4921: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4903: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4895: 4892: 4891: 4873: 4869: 4866: 4862: 4859: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4849: 4844: 4842: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4816: 4814: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4799: 4798: 4793: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4785: 4782: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4771: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4756: 4752: 4749: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4735: 4732: 4726: 4723: 4721: 4718: 4715: 4711: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4697: 4694: 4692: 4687: 4682: 4681: 4676: 4673:Arrr, he can 4672: 4670: 4667: 4665: 4658: 4655: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4626: 4622: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4614: 4609: 4600: 4597: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4572: 4570: 4567: 4561: 4558: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4525: 4520: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4498: 4495: 4492: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4481: 4476: 4473: 4468: 4464: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4449: 4442: 4439: 4436: 4433: 4430: 4427: 4424: 4421: 4418: 4415: 4412: 4407: 4404: 4403: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4378: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4369: 4354: 4349: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4295: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289:Ed Fitzgerald 4284: 4283: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4273: 4272:Baseball Bugs 4269: 4268: 4267: 4262: 4259: 4251: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4189: 4188:Baseball Bugs 4185: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4164: 4160: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4141: 4134: 4131: 4130:Baseball Bugs 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4120: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4109: 4108:Baseball Bugs 4097: 4093: 4087: 4081: 4074: 4069: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4022: 4016: 4010: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3983: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3943: 3940: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3907: 3904: 3897: 3893: 3886: 3866: 3863: 3862: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3844: 3838: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3801: 3798: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3783: 3777: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3759: 3758: 3751: 3746: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3689: 3688: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3675: 3668: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3648: 3639: 3635: 3629: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3586: 3585: 3579: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3547: 3545: 3541: 3536: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3523: 3522: 3515: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3502: 3500: 3496: 3491: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3467: 3462: 3459: 3457: 3456:User:RFBailey 3453: 3448: 3446: 3441: 3439: 3438:User:Quiddity 3434: 3432: 3429: 3424: 3422: 3419: 3414: 3411: 3408: 3386: 3379: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3361: 3360: 3355: 3354: 3349: 3345: 3343: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3322: 3319: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3302: 3294: 3291: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3240: 3237: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3171: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3086: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3068: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2996: 2992: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2950: 2946: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2908: 2903: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2887: 2884:In regard to 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2859: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2824: 2821: 2819: 2815: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2774: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2748: 2745: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2691: 2684: 2681:promotion of 2680: 2676: 2672: 2663: 2660: 2659: 2653: 2652: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2635: 2627: 2626: 2621: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2588:intentionally 2585: 2582: 2581:George Lakoff 2571: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2470: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2376:corrected an 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2333:User:Self-ref 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2223: 2220: 2218: 2217: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2195: 2192: 2188: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2158:change here. 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2146: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2086: 2085:Pseudoscience 2081: 2079: 2078:Pseudoscience 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2027: 2026:Support split 2024: 2022: 2017: 2014: 2007: 2006:Support Split 2004: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1988:Support split 1986: 1985: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1957: 1951: 1947: 1946:accessibility 1943: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1858: 1850: 1842: 1836: 1831: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1763: 1762: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1719: 1718: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1677: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1627: 1607: 1588: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1560: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1008: 1004: 1000: 985: 981: 977: 968: 967: 963: 959: 947: 943: 940: 937: 936: 931: 926: 922: 919: 917: 913: 911: 907: 905: 901: 900: 898: 895: 894: 892: 889: 886:incidents or 885: 873: 869: 866: 862: 861: 858: 852: 851: 847: 846: 842: 835: 834: 828: 822: 819: 817: 814: 810: 809:Miscellaneous 807: 805: 802: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 781: 780: 777: 775: 772: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 749: 747: 743: 740: 738: 735: 734: 733: 730: 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 712: 710: 709: 707: 703: 697: 694: 691: 687: 684: 682: 679: 675: 672: 670: 667: 665: 662: 661: 660: 657: 655: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 641: 639: 635: 629: 626: 622: 619: 617: 614: 612: 609: 607: 604: 602: 599: 597: 594: 593: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 558: 556: 554:Page handling 552: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 529: 526: 524: 521: 520: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 467: 464: 462: 459: 458: 456: 454: 451: 450: 448: 444: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 381: 378: 376: 373: 372: 370: 369: 367: 363: 358: 354: 350: 344: 340: 333: 328: 326: 321: 319: 314: 313: 310: 303: 295: 290: 286: 281: 275: 270: 266: 261: 254: 252: 246: 244: 243: 239: 237: 234: 232: 231: 223: 219: 209: 191: 187: 182: 173: 168: 164: 156: 146: 130: 123: 119: 114: 105: 101: 83: 68: 61: 51:Content added 43: 40: 30: 19: 13245: 13219: 13211: 13191: 13180: 13174: 13168: 13162: 13156: 13139: 13133: 13127: 13121: 13115: 13104:Barack Obama 13101: 13077: 12940: 12923: 12911: 12903: 12881:Orderinchaos 12774:Orderinchaos 12742: 12731: 12582: 12512: 12501: 12403: 12392: 12358: 12352: 12346: 12340: 12334: 12328: 12322: 12316: 12310: 12300: 12271: 12199: 12164:Aecis·(away) 12157: 12135: 12129: 12126: 12096: 12045: 11999: 11986: 11969: 11927: 11844: 11828: 11798: 11792: 11786: 11780: 11774: 11768: 11762: 11739: 11724: 11702: 11674: 11617: 11607: 11506: 11407: 11388: 11381: 11345: 11310: 11261: 11230: 11187: 11175: 11170: 11155: 11148: 11124: 11099: 11093: 11087: 11081: 11075: 11069: 11063: 11057: 11051: 11036: 11014: 10999: 10970: 10898: 10878: 10877: 10814: 10793: 10787: 10763:— Preceding 10759: 10733:— Preceding 10728: 10724: 10714: 10673: 10620: 10619: 10611: 10607: 10581: 10577: 10573: 10569: 10514: 10498: 10439: 10421:WP:CONSENSUS 10350:Flatterworld 10344: 10337: 10334:User:Noroton 10318:David Gerard 10304: 10268:David Gerard 10262: 10227: 10192: 10188: 10184: 10144: 10121: 10115: 10112: 10072:UltraExactZZ 10067:Gavin DeGraw 9985: 9875: 9820: 9783: 9745: 9743: 9733:, and again 9727: 9696: 9692: 9689: 9680: 9674: 9668: 9662: 9656: 9650: 9641: 9617: 9585: 9582:IPs on Shark 9509: 9492: 9481:rouge admins 9440: 9434: 9428: 9422: 9416: 9410: 9355: 9328: 9326: 9265: 9241: 9206: 9189: 9180: 9171: 9165: 9159: 9153: 9147: 9137: 9133: 9132: 9124: 9093:Orderinchaos 9077: 9067: 9061: 9055: 9049: 9043: 9033: 9025: 9008: 9002: 8996: 8990: 8984: 8977:65.0.160.105 8951: 8942: 8936: 8930: 8924: 8918: 8908: 8903: 8894: 8888: 8882: 8876: 8870: 8863:65.0.184.150 8860: 8852: 8800: 8794: 8788: 8782: 8776: 8759: 8727: 8598: 8596: 8569: 8559: 8553: 8547: 8541: 8535: 8517: 8511: 8505: 8499: 8493: 8475: 8469: 8463: 8457: 8451: 8432: 8426: 8420: 8414: 8408: 8391: 8381: 8375: 8369: 8363: 8357: 8350:65.0.184.123 8339: 8333: 8327: 8321: 8315: 8297: 8291: 8285: 8279: 8273: 8255: 8249: 8243: 8237: 8231: 8213: 8207: 8201: 8195: 8189: 8182:65.0.187.144 8171: 8165: 8159: 8153: 8147: 8129: 8123: 8117: 8111: 8105: 8087: 8081: 8075: 8069: 8063: 8045: 8039: 8033: 8027: 8021: 8014:65.0.163.131 8003: 7997: 7991: 7985: 7979: 7961: 7955: 7949: 7943: 7937: 7919: 7913: 7907: 7901: 7895: 7888:72.28.33.218 7877: 7871: 7865: 7859: 7853: 7835: 7829: 7823: 7817: 7811: 7793: 7787: 7781: 7775: 7769: 7751: 7727: 7698: 7696: 7686: 7680: 7674: 7668: 7662: 7656: 7615: 7611: 7587: 7567: 7543: 7538: 7526: 7522: 7495: 7484: 7480: 7476: 7455: 7454: 7394: 7390: 7385: 7378: 7354: 7312: 7298: 7292: 7250: 7249: 7211: 7207:User:Hexhand 7167: 7157: 7155: 7136: 7123: 7095: 7066: 7044: 7030: 7024: 6997: 6967: 6955: 6947: 6939: 6931: 6923: 6915: 6907: 6899: 6891: 6883: 6875: 6856: 6848: 6840: 6832: 6824: 6816: 6808: 6800: 6792: 6784: 6776: 6767: 6746: 6740:Very likely 6731: 6725: 6712: 6675: 6664:Orderinchaos 6657: 6652: 6649: 6645: 6622:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6614: 6580: 6556:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6548: 6527:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6519: 6486:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 6478: 6476: 6472: 6465: 6449:opportunity. 6411: 6408: 6385: 6381: 6363: 6346:116.71.56.28 6331:Orderinchaos 6313:116.71.56.28 6304: 6298: 6283: 6282: 6273: 6266:Orderinchaos 6261: 6244: 6229: 6222: 6200: 6162: 6139: 6135: 6115: 6112: 6091: 6071: 6054: 6048: 6031: 6016: 6006: 5988: 5935: 5892: 5829: 5789: 5687:Orderinchaos 5667:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 5659: 5637: 5632: 5627: 5607:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 5599: 5582: 5544: 5530: 5460: 5439: 5338: 5314: 5313: 5301: 5295: 5263: 5228: 5197: 5163: 5157: 5151: 5145: 5139: 5133: 5124: 5102:Orderinchaos 5074: 5056: 5045: 5024: 4995:for socks. 4993: 4967: 4953: 4924: 4919: 4883:Ψrom3th3ăn ™ 4875: 4871: 4867: 4840: 4830:consequences 4822:but 45 edits 4817: 4800: 4781: 4780: 4757: 4731: 4730: 4724: 4695: 4678: 4663: 4656: 4639: 4598: 4573: 4559: 4477: 4471: 4469: 4465: 4460: 4450: 4447: 4437: 4431: 4425: 4419: 4413: 4376: 4356: 4306: 4287: 4286: 4281: 4280: 4257: 4183: 4165: 4161: 4149:User:Anthony 4142: 4139: 4104: 4072: 4067: 4031: 4003: 3964: 3956: 3952: 3938: 3902: 3884: 3881: 3857: 3836:NeutralHomer 3796: 3780: 3775: 3760: 3754: 3749: 3722: 3717: 3691: 3684: 3670: 3641: 3594: 3582: 3577: 3559:Juliancolton 3550: 3537: 3517: 3505: 3492: 3463: 3460: 3449: 3442: 3435: 3425: 3415: 3412: 3404: 3387:'s signature 3367:verification 3357: 3353:the Guardian 3351: 3341: 3323: 3317: 3315: 3311: 3305: 3303: 3299: 3182: 3178: 3174: 2994: 2990: 2948: 2945:in Knowledge 2944: 2919: 2910: 2906: 2808: 2807:'s question 2776: 2773:Anekantavada 2770: 2755: 2719: 2715: 2674: 2668: 2655: 2648: 2630: 2587: 2578: 2558: 2541: 2538: 2534: 2531: 2527: 2524: 2516: 2513: 2508:In essense, 2471: 2468: 2445: 2444:(usage) and 2441: 2390: 2385: 2265: 2215: 2134:#Sad outcome 2091: 2089: 2082: 2059: 2037: 2030:Orderinchaos 2025: 2012: 2005: 1987: 1950:article size 1895: 1871: 1809: 1793:constructive 1792: 1788: 1758: 1744: 1714: 1692: 1688: 1641: 1605: 1562:Other links 1200: 1030: 1029: 994: 972:You may use 957: 955: 953: 941: 933: 920: 896: 887: 883: 880: 831: 779:Village pump 767:New articles 732:Edit filters 711:Arbitration 637:User conduct 422:Open proxies 379: 339:Noticeboards 277:== Speedy == 13223:Josiah Rowe 13108:Redrumracer 12277:. Thanks, — 12180:Enric Naval 11778:protections 11721:Accusations 11618:L'Aquatique 11346:Luna Santin 11311:Luna Santin 11237:WP:Civility 11176:L'Aquatique 10993:Historian19 10375:(this diff 10368:(this diff 9643:Frogger3140 8767:What about 8401:Bambifan101 7846:65.0.160.81 7391:improvement 7190:account... 7130:DH Michaels 6369:Ncmvocalist 6340:—Preceding 6307:—Preceding 6036:Ncmvocalist 5403:6,297 edits 5178:, and this 5003:Boondocks37 4997:—Preceding 4977:Boondocks37 4971:—Preceding 4725:Endorse ban 4406:Boondocks37 4382:Ncmvocalist 4309:Ncmvocalist 4258:L'Aquatique 3939:L'Aquatique 3903:L'Aquatique 3797:L'Aquatique 3599:Tbsdy lives 3306:selectively 3040:New Thought 2967:WP:NPOV/FAQ 2853:WP:NPOV/FAQ 2849:#Summing up 2675:POV pushing 2368:There were 2337:tendentious 2130:#User:Hrafn 2070:Hrafn's ANI 2013:L'Aquatique 725:Enforcement 681:Sockpuppets 586:Importation 545:Translation 457:Copyrights 392:Bureaucrats 218:Next edit → 212:new section 149:new section 112:Josiah Rowe 42:Next edit → 13178:block user 13172:page moves 13137:block user 13131:page moves 13083:. Thanks, 12732:«JavierMC» 12502:«JavierMC» 12449:DuncanHill 12393:«JavierMC» 12356:block user 12326:filter log 11852:Dayewalker 11790:page moves 11207:removed it 11097:block user 11067:filter log 10949:KnightLago 10934:24.98.5.45 10517:Bill Ayers 10494:User:Slakr 10384:Bill Ayers 10340:Bill Ayers 10283:Tom Lehrer 10211:Carcharoth 10023:Carcharoth 9678:block user 9672:filter log 9616:. Regards 9450:EdJohnston 9438:block user 9432:filter log 9403:Prophaniti 9384:Landon1980 9308:EdJohnston 9169:block user 9163:page moves 9065:block user 9059:page moves 9006:block user 9000:page moves 8940:block user 8934:page moves 8902:. -- ] (] 8892:block user 8886:page moves 8798:block user 8792:page moves 8745:hbdragon88 8557:block user 8551:page moves 8528:Bambirocks 8515:block user 8509:page moves 8473:block user 8467:page moves 8430:block user 8424:page moves 8379:block user 8373:page moves 8337:block user 8331:page moves 8295:block user 8289:page moves 8253:block user 8247:page moves 8211:block user 8205:page moves 8169:block user 8163:page moves 8127:block user 8121:page moves 8085:block user 8079:page moves 8043:block user 8037:page moves 8001:block user 7995:page moves 7959:block user 7953:page moves 7917:block user 7911:page moves 7875:block user 7869:page moves 7833:block user 7827:page moves 7791:block user 7785:page moves 7684:block user 7678:filter log 7586:a lot. —— 6869:RKO 4 Life 6420:apologised 6279:Shapiros10 6249:Carcharoth 6182:Carcharoth 5815:DuncanHill 5768:Carcharoth 5726:Carcharoth 5701:DuncanHill 5642:Carcharoth 5562:DuncanHill 5161:block user 5155:filter log 5126:Prom3th3an 4954:Oppose ban 4920:Oppose ban 4818:Oppose ban 4805:DuncanHill 4762:DuncanHill 4640:Oppose ban 4547:EdJohnston 4514:Agreed. - 4435:block user 4429:page moves 4338:DuncanHill 4213:DuncanHill 4051:Locke Cole 3969:Locke Cole 3919:Locke Cole 3815:Locke Cole 3673:Black Kite 3638:Kurt Weber 3617:Locke Cole 3371:dave souza 3346:is rather 3060:dave souza 2858:dave souza 2722:Black Kite 2633:Black Kite 2613:dave souza 2563:dave souza 2547:dave souza 2344:essays. - 2341:disruptive 2305:dave souza 2216:Smashville 2187:dave souza 2138:dave souza 1967:Carcharoth 1918:Carcharoth 1877:Carcharoth 1841:Unresolved 1814:DuncanHill 1797:Carcharoth 1698:Carcharoth 1656:Unresolved 1620:Unresolved 1610:User:Hrafn 984:to do so. 980:ANI-notice 966:not enough 923:Contact a 748:Questions 628:Undeletion 621:Miscellany 606:Categories 581:Protection 13184:block log 13143:block log 12653:WJBscribe 12602:WJBscribe 12385:WP:ENGVAR 12373:WP:ENGVAR 12362:block log 12295:WP:ENGVAR 12202:my report 12200:Why was 11957:this sock 11875:vandalism 11867:vandalism 11838:Coberloco 11784:deletions 11375:Wouldn't 11103:block log 11041:, the IP 11039:this diff 10729:army brat 10634:Wikidemon 10551:Wikidemon 10521:Wikidemon 10503:Wikidemon 10464:Wikidemon 10448:Wikidemon 10155:User:Docu 9916:Jehochman 9684:block log 9444:block log 9272:Roadahead 9175:block log 9071:block log 9012:block log 8946:block log 8898:block log 8804:block log 8563:block log 8521:block log 8479:block log 8436:block log 8385:block log 8343:block log 8301:block log 8259:block log 8217:block log 8175:block log 8133:block log 8091:block log 8049:block log 8007:block log 7965:block log 7923:block log 7881:block log 7839:block log 7797:block log 7718:Jehochman 7690:block log 7504:Dreadstar 6904:block log 6805:block log 6747:Confirmed 6691:Bobisbob2 6445:revision. 6405:Statement 6113:Errrrr... 6017:Manticore 5792:block log 5394:this page 5315:Wizardman 5167:block log 5100:Arrrrrr. 5046:nominator 4582:checkuser 4578:unblocked 4441:block log 4236:Gwen Gale 3657:SirFozzie 3428:Gary King 3407:User:Docu 3385:User:Docu 3359:The Times 3175:incorrect 3151:comments. 2907:intrusion 2542:describes 2412:MartinPhi 1795:comment. 1670:WP:ACCESS 1201:Incidents 927:directly. 857:Shortcuts 794:Proposals 789:Technical 752:Help desk 737:Requested 696:Vandalism 686:Usernames 659:Sanctions 611:Templates 601:Redirects 528:Whitelist 523:Blacklist 432:Oversight 407:Education 380:Incidents 353:dashboard 228:Line 837: 225:Line 837: 13282:Category 13232:contribs 13215:contribs 13160:contribs 13119:contribs 12915:contribs 12843:Cheers, 12314:contribs 12002:'fenian' 11972:'fenian' 11910:Resolved 11884:Cheers, 11848:contribs 11766:contribs 11742:'fenian' 11680:TimidGuy 11657:Resolved 11548:WP:POINT 11409:Wisdom89 11403:WP:CIVIL 11263:Wisdom89 11211:reverted 11055:contribs 11003:contribs 10917:De728631 10818:De728631 10784:Response 10777:contribs 10765:unsigned 10755:user:Kww 10747:contribs 10735:unsigned 10666:Resolved 10655:user:Kww 10488:Resolved 10300:Blowdart 10245:Resolved 10077:Evidence 9824:contribs 9723:responds 9654:contribs 9564:Tony Fox 9532:Tony Fox 9476:Resolved 9414:contribs 9179:-- ] (] 9151:contribs 9047:contribs 8988:contribs 8922:contribs 8874:contribs 8824:contribs 8780:contribs 8713:Looie496 8621:contribs 8539:contribs 8497:contribs 8455:contribs 8412:contribs 8361:contribs 8319:contribs 8277:contribs 8235:contribs 8193:contribs 8151:contribs 8109:contribs 8067:contribs 8025:contribs 7983:contribs 7941:contribs 7899:contribs 7857:contribs 7815:contribs 7773:contribs 7660:contribs 7649:WordBomb 7643:WordBomb 7621:Superpup 7502:edits. 7496:ask them 7437:Alansohn 7339:Alansohn 7293:lifebaka 7227:WP:STALK 7223:WP:POINT 7186:And now 7140:contribs 7025:lifebaka 6880:contribs 6781:contribs 6726:lifebaka 6716:contribs 6427:WP:STICK 6342:unsigned 6309:unsigned 5937:Wisdom89 5925:Tiptoety 5894:Wisdom89 5462:Wisdom89 5424:Utan Vax 5358:contribs 5296:lifebaka 5230:Wisdom89 5137:contribs 5011:contribs 4999:unsigned 4985:contribs 4973:unsigned 4958:Bullzeye 4926:Wisdom89 4664:Excirial 4657:Question 4599:Confused 4574:Question 4565:Tiptoety 4417:contribs 4169:Quiddity 4091:contribs 4073:choosing 4020:contribs 3544:contribs 3499:contribs 3397:Resolved 3318:incident 2911:opposing 2805:Zero1328 2740:·Maunus· 2697:Zero1328 2609:Zero1328 2492:Zero1328 2391:restrict 2370:no rules 2346:Zero1328 2096:Zero1328 2042:Franamax 1849:Resolved 1760:Wisdom89 1716:Wisdom89 1450:archives 1328:archives 1206:archives 1084:archives 1015:archives 1009:subpage. 999:archived 799:Idea lab 757:Teahouse 720:Requests 596:Articles 466:Problems 208:→‎Speedy 190:contribs 122:contribs 66:Wikitext 13205:Barneca 12587:ukexpat 12297:Changes 12253:Rodhull 12242:Rodhull 12206:RolandR 12049:ThuranX 11994:Domer48 11987:abusive 11964:Domer48 11934:Domer48 11734:Domer48 11195:dispute 11193:over a 11191:blocked 11110:MSJapan 10895:WP:RFPP 10850:protect 10845:history 10425:Noroton 10417:WP:TALK 10395:Noroton 10166:Adambro 9848:protect 9843:history 9795:Improve 9757:Improve 9614:WP:RFPP 9546:Crossmr 9192:Majorly 7625:Hexhand 7573:Hexhand 7500:pointed 7418:Hexhand 7404:Hexhand 6686:Fascism 6509:Spartaz 6382:Comment 6289:My work 6230:Anthøny 6201:Support 6168:Spartaz 6145:Protonk 6092:Support 6049:Support 6032:Comment 6007:Support 5878:Blueboy 5796:minimal 5745:ThuranX 5547:Raul654 5422:users. 5374:Closing 5327:Spartaz 5219:Spartaz 5184:Spartaz 5076:ЯEDVERS 5058:ЯEDVERS 4905:Raul654 4841:Anthøny 4758:Comment 4560:Support 4529:Raul654 4502:Crossmr 4324:Adambro 4198:Adambro 4032:as easy 3987:Crossmr 3985:here.-- 3860:MBisanz 3782:Premise 3776:Logical 3584:Premise 3578:Logical 3520:MBisanz 3471:Adambro 3369:. . . 3179:silence 3085:WP:TLDR 3031:WP:TLDR 2949:Outside 2902:WP:NPOV 2837:WP:NPOV 2671:WP:NPOV 2535:demands 2521:notable 1993:Protonk 1896:Support 1845:tag to 1747:Majorly 1693:started 1666:WP:SIZE 1581:Backlog 982:}} ~~~~ 962:pinging 872:WP:AN/I 566:Mergers 365:General 180:Schuym1 13242:Speedy 13198:uw-3rr 13149:Thingg 12689:edits. 12656:(talk) 12605:(talk) 12581:, the 12258:andemu 12247:andemu 12233:WP:SSP 12229:WP:CHU 12101:WP:3RR 12065:Alison 11871:WP:AIV 11796:rights 11772:blocks 11755:Alison 11699:WP:AIV 11560:¿talk? 11520:¿talk? 11480:¿talk? 11446:¿talk? 11382:Animum 11249:¿talk? 11156:Shadow 11011:WP:AIV 10978:Hmains 10854:delete 10717:WP:NPA 10691:WP:NPA 10536:CENSEI 10371:) and 10048:Jester 10006:Jester 9852:delete 9717:, and 9610:WP:AIV 9602:WP:SSP 9568:(arf!) 9536:(arf!) 9485:WP:BLP 9399:Hed PE 9286:Tznkai 8835:Stifle 8812:seicer 8609:seicer 7590:Martin 7546:Martin 7395:remove 7393:, not 7309:pointy 7192:D.M.N. 7144:D.M.N. 7092:WP:CHU 6633:(talk) 6567:(talk) 6538:(talk) 6497:(talk) 6364:Oppose 6299:Oppose 6274:Oppose 6245:Oppose 6208:D.M.N. 6203:- Per 6136:Oppose 6023:(talk) 5866:CAESAR 5678:(talk) 5618:(talk) 5506:CAESAR 5444:D.M.N. 5407:D.M.N. 5346:seicer 5259:WP:AGF 5051:WP:NPA 4894:(talk) 4868:Oppose 4717:(Talk) 4696:Oppose 4604:auburn 4543:WP:SSP 4079:seicer 4036:Ged UK 4008:seicer 3961:WP:SIG 3896:WP:IAR 3892:WP:SIG 3811:WP:SIG 3745:WT:SIG 3723:reason 3693:Parkin 3686:Sticky 3646:Colts! 3613:WP:SIG 3348:POINTy 3131:WP:NOR 2940:WP:NOR 2841:WP:NOR 2701:Madman 2657:Parkin 2650:Sticky 2523:. She 2517:assert 2374:boldly 2092:before 1789:active 1689:reason 1332:search 1210:search 1088:search 1019:search 884:urgent 865:WP:ANI 784:Policy 571:Splits 197:10,393 134:31,668 77:Inline 59:Visual 13253:Schuy 13019:Yasis 12905:Yasis 12838:avoid 12367:- On 12332:WHOIS 12114:slakr 12111:. -- 11917:slakr 11813:slakr 11664:slakr 11132:Help! 11073:WHOIS 10871:views 10863:watch 10859:links 10574:modus 10423:. -- 10345:could 10252:slakr 10200:Help! 9992:DJ AM 9869:views 9861:watch 9857:links 9790:dαlus 9752:dαlus 9588:shark 9500:Help! 9333:WP:BK 9220:Moni3 9107:Creol 9076:] (] 8961:slakr 7735:Help! 7706:Help! 7458:levse 7398:year. 7386:would 7362:Help! 7319:Arrr! 7253:levse 7102:Arrr! 7051:Arrr! 7004:Arrr! 6960:socks 6888:count 6861:socks 6789:count 6653:could 6469:here. 6466:block 6177:WP:AN 6013:. -- 5847:Arghh 5800:Giggy 5638:clear 5270:Arrr! 5204:Arrr! 4700:Kusma 4686:Help! 4607:pilot 4472:other 4155:(see 4145:added 4068:could 3965:years 3953:silly 3431:asked 2816:and 2679:undue 2539:takes 2532:wants 2514:think 2496:Talk? 2416:POINT 2378:error 2350:Talk? 2100:Talk? 1955:slakr 1868:WT:AN 1856:slakr 1810:Agree 1675:slakr 1631:slakr 976:subst 935:diffs 902:Read 705:Other 616:Files 576:Moves 535:Style 199:edits 136:edits 16:< 13268:talk 13228:talk 13209:talk 13154:talk 13113:talk 13089:talk 13081:here 13062:talk 13058:NJGW 13038:talk 13034:NJGW 13023:talk 13005:talk 13001:NJGW 12986:talk 12956:talk 12952:NJGW 12950:... 12933:talk 12929:NJGW 12909:talk 12804:talk 12743:Talk 12695:talk 12627:talk 12591:talk 12583:-ize 12559:talk 12513:Talk 12494:diff 12475:talk 12453:talk 12435:talk 12404:Talk 12381:diff 12350:http 12344:RBLs 12338:RDNS 12308:talk 12275:here 12239:. -- 12231:and 12225:here 12210:talk 12184:talk 12074:talk 12053:talk 12033:talk 12019:talk 11959:. -- 11946:talk 11856:talk 11842:talk 11760:talk 11727:here 11684:talk 11637:talk 11577:talk 11537:talk 11497:talk 11461:talk 11389:talk 11352:talk 11332:talk 11317:talk 11298:talk 11223:talk 11213:and 11149:Half 11114:talk 11091:http 11085:RBLs 11079:RDNS 11049:talk 11037:Per 10997:talk 10982:talk 10953:talk 10938:talk 10921:talk 10883:fold 10880:Hers 10867:logs 10841:talk 10837:edit 10822:talk 10773:talk 10743:talk 10725:lazy 10699:talk 10680:talk 10653:and 10638:talk 10621:( ) 10612:here 10555:talk 10540:talk 10525:talk 10507:talk 10468:talk 10452:talk 10443:here 10429:talk 10419:and 10399:talk 10391:here 10354:talk 10322:talk 10272:talk 10215:talk 10189:that 10185:this 10170:talk 10151:that 10149:and 10147:this 10132:talk 10128:Docu 10065:and 10045:SWAT 10027:talk 10003:SWAT 9968:talk 9955:that 9945:talk 9910:and 9897:talk 9884:and 9865:logs 9839:talk 9835:edit 9818:talk 9774:talk 9739:here 9735:here 9731:here 9666:logs 9648:talk 9606:warn 9550:talk 9517:talk 9454:talk 9426:logs 9408:talk 9388:talk 9376:here 9372:here 9368:here 9359:here 9341:(𒁳) 9312:talk 9290:talk 9276:talk 9248:talk 9224:talk 9203:this 9145:talk 9111:talk 9041:talk 8982:talk 8916:talk 8868:talk 8839:talk 8818:talk 8774:talk 8749:talk 8732:and 8717:talk 8702:talk 8615:talk 8533:talk 8491:talk 8449:talk 8406:talk 8355:talk 8313:talk 8271:talk 8229:talk 8187:talk 8145:talk 8103:talk 8061:talk 8019:talk 7977:talk 7935:talk 7893:talk 7851:talk 7809:talk 7767:talk 7672:logs 7654:talk 7629:talk 7577:talk 7568:said 7465:Talk 7441:talk 7422:talk 7408:talk 7379:exX2 7343:talk 7287:this 7277:talk 7260:Talk 7196:talk 7148:talk 7134:talk 7126:here 7080:talk 6981:talk 6896:logs 6873:talk 6797:logs 6774:talk 6710:talk 6695:talk 6600:mine 6592:mine 6584:this 6464:The 6395:(𒁳) 6386:want 6373:talk 6350:talk 6317:talk 6253:talk 6212:talk 6205:this 6186:talk 6161:ANI 6149:talk 6122:talk 6100:talk 6080:talk 6040:talk 5832:Ryan 5819:talk 5804:talk 5772:talk 5749:talk 5730:talk 5705:talk 5646:talk 5633:long 5628:more 5585:talk 5566:talk 5551:talk 5533:talk 5448:talk 5428:talk 5411:talk 5352:talk 5149:logs 5131:talk 5053:. ➨ 5034:talk 5007:talk 4981:talk 4909:talk 4858:jc37 4809:talk 4786:fold 4783:Hers 4766:talk 4748:jc37 4736:fold 4733:Hers 4704:talk 4648:talk 4625:jc37 4612:talk 4590:talk 4586:Bwrs 4551:talk 4533:talk 4516:jc37 4506:talk 4491:jc37 4480:jc37 4457:diff 4411:talk 4386:talk 4377:very 4342:talk 4328:talk 4313:talk 4240:talk 4217:talk 4202:talk 4173:talk 4085:talk 4040:talk 4014:talk 3991:talk 3955:)— " 3842:Talk 3756:Sher 3731:talk 3661:talk 3603:talk 3546:) @ 3540:talk 3501:) @ 3495:talk 3475:talk 3375:talk 3356:and 3330:talk 3262:talk 3217:talk 3192:talk 3110:WP:V 3106:WP:V 3064:talk 3013:talk 2995:only 2886:WP:V 2862:talk 2839:and 2833:WP:V 2795:Ah, 2786:talk 2763:talk 2716:have 2705:talk 2617:talk 2596:talk 2567:talk 2561:. . 2551:talk 2510:WP:V 2479:talk 2454:talk 2420:MUDs 2372:. I 2339:and 2309:talk 2274:talk 2191:talk 2164:talk 2142:talk 2116:talk 2076:and 2064:and 2046:talk 1997:talk 1971:talk 1948:and 1936:talk 1922:talk 1904:talk 1881:talk 1818:talk 1801:talk 1702:talk 1668:and 1664:per 1571:Talk 1316:1167 1311:1166 1306:1165 1301:1164 1296:1163 1291:1162 1286:1161 1281:1160 1276:1159 1271:1158 1264:1157 1259:1156 1254:1155 1249:1154 1244:1153 1239:1152 1234:1151 1229:1150 1224:1149 1219:1148 958:must 914:Try 518:Spam 387:Bots 375:Main 186:talk 172:undo 167:edit 118:talk 104:edit 12927:. 12848:red 12107:to 11932:. 11889:red 11802:RfA 11710:Why 11611:MfD 11377:DRV 11126:Guy 11022:Why 10906:Why 10801:Why 10739:Kww 10695:Kww 10676:Kww 10614:now 10608:ust 10570:now 10194:Guy 9959:BoA 9878:BoA 9831:BoA 9625:Why 9494:Guy 9337:dab 9244:JNW 8698:Kww 8396:). 7757:): 7729:Guy 7700:Guy 7616:was 7612:any 7542:.—— 7485:all 7481:all 7356:Guy 7323:Why 7106:Why 7071:tth 7069:iMa 7055:Why 7008:Why 6972:tth 6970:iMa 6952:lta 6944:rfc 6936:arb 6928:rfb 6920:rfa 6853:lta 6845:rfc 6837:arb 6829:rfb 6821:rfa 6751:FT2 6604:FT2 6391:dab 6140:are 5993:FT2 5989:has 5860:AVE 5852:Red 5500:AVE 5492:Red 5274:Why 5208:Why 4680:Guy 4461:not 4364:bli 4249:on. 3885:old 3763:eth 3750:not 3718:try 3595:not 2922:in 2803:in 2673:: " 2446:con 2442:pro 2266:two 2080:. 1556:340 1551:339 1546:338 1541:337 1536:336 1531:335 1526:334 1521:333 1516:332 1511:331 1504:330 1499:329 1494:328 1489:327 1484:326 1479:325 1474:324 1469:323 1464:322 1459:321 1438:487 1433:486 1428:485 1423:484 1418:483 1413:482 1408:481 1403:480 1398:479 1393:478 1386:477 1381:476 1376:475 1371:474 1366:473 1361:472 1356:471 1351:470 1346:469 1341:468 1194:365 1189:364 1184:363 1179:362 1174:361 1169:360 1164:359 1159:358 1154:357 1149:356 1142:355 1137:354 1132:353 1127:352 1122:351 1117:350 1112:349 1107:348 1102:347 1097:346 964:is 804:WMF 591:XfD 427:VRT 13284:: 13230:• 13201:}} 13195:{{ 13106:. 13091:) 13064:) 13040:) 13025:) 13007:) 12988:) 12958:) 12947:, 12944:, 12935:) 12806:) 12697:) 12629:) 12593:) 12561:) 12477:) 12455:) 12437:) 12212:) 12186:) 12140:is 12076:) 12055:) 12035:) 12021:) 11948:) 11912:– 11858:) 11705:So 11686:) 11659:– 11639:) 11579:) 11554:ʄ! 11550:. 11539:) 11514:ʄ! 11507:is 11499:) 11474:ʄ! 11463:) 11440:ʄ! 11424:/ 11405:? 11334:) 11300:) 11278:/ 11243:ʄ! 11239:? 11225:) 11116:) 11017:So 10984:) 10955:) 10940:) 10923:) 10901:So 10869:| 10865:| 10861:| 10857:| 10852:| 10848:| 10843:| 10839:| 10824:) 10796:So 10779:) 10775:• 10749:) 10745:• 10701:) 10682:) 10668:– 10640:) 10610:me 10594:∼ 10557:) 10542:) 10527:) 10509:) 10501:- 10490:– 10470:) 10454:) 10431:) 10401:) 10356:) 10324:) 10302:| 10298:-- 10274:) 10247:– 10217:) 10172:) 10134:) 10029:) 9970:) 9947:) 9899:) 9867:| 9863:| 9859:| 9855:| 9850:| 9846:| 9841:| 9837:| 9786:Dæ 9776:) 9748:Dæ 9709:, 9705:, 9701:, 9620:So 9552:) 9519:) 9491:. 9478:– 9456:) 9390:) 9374:, 9370:, 9329:is 9314:) 9292:) 9278:) 9250:) 9226:) 9113:) 8841:) 8821:| 8815:| 8751:) 8743:. 8719:) 8704:) 8618:| 8612:| 7631:) 7602:—— 7597:Ψ 7579:) 7558:—— 7553:Ψ 7468:• 7462:• 7451:— 7443:) 7424:) 7410:) 7345:) 7315:So 7299:++ 7279:) 7263:• 7257:• 7246:— 7241:, 7238:, 7235:, 7232:, 7198:) 7172:is 7158:no 7150:) 7098:So 7073:ew 7047:So 7031:++ 7000:So 6974:ew 6912:lu 6813:lu 6732:++ 6697:) 6628:» 6602:. 6598:, 6594:, 6590:, 6562:» 6533:» 6492:» 6375:) 6352:) 6319:) 6255:) 6214:) 6188:) 6163:is 6151:) 6124:) 6102:) 6082:) 6042:) 5952:/ 5909:/ 5881:96 5855:2 5821:) 5806:) 5774:) 5751:) 5732:) 5707:) 5673:» 5648:) 5613:» 5568:) 5553:) 5495:2 5477:/ 5450:) 5442:. 5430:) 5413:) 5355:| 5349:| 5302:++ 5266:So 5245:/ 5200:So 5196:? 5175:, 5036:) 5013:) 5009:• 4987:) 4983:• 4941:/ 4911:) 4889:» 4811:) 4768:) 4706:) 4677:. 4650:) 4642:. 4592:) 4553:) 4535:) 4508:) 4388:) 4367:nd 4361:ar 4358:St 4355:- 4344:) 4330:) 4315:) 4242:) 4219:) 4204:) 4175:) 4088:| 4082:| 4057:• 4053:• 4042:) 4017:| 4011:| 3993:) 3975:• 3971:• 3925:• 3921:• 3898:. 3839:• 3821:• 3817:• 3733:) 3663:) 3649:) 3643:Go 3623:• 3619:• 3605:) 3575:-- 3542:♦ 3497:♦ 3477:) 3399:– 3373:, 3332:) 3286:62 3264:) 3232:62 3219:) 3194:) 3062:, 3015:) 2947:. 2860:, 2835:, 2788:) 2765:) 2707:) 2615:, 2598:) 2565:, 2549:, 2485:‎ 2481:) 2456:) 2307:, 2276:) 2213:-- 2189:, 2166:) 2140:, 2118:) 2048:) 1999:) 1973:) 1938:) 1924:) 1906:) 1883:) 1872:do 1851:}} 1847:{{ 1843:}} 1839:{{ 1820:) 1803:) 1775:/ 1731:/ 1704:) 1658:– 1628:-- 1622:– 1330:, 1208:, 1086:, 1017:, 974:{{ 899:: 210:: 188:| 147:: 120:| 13271:) 13265:( 13259:1 13256:m 13234:) 13226:( 13212:· 13207:( 13186:) 13181:· 13175:· 13169:· 13163:· 13157:· 13152:( 13145:) 13140:· 13134:· 13128:· 13122:· 13116:· 13111:( 13087:( 13060:( 13036:( 13021:( 13003:( 12984:( 12954:( 12931:( 12912:· 12907:( 12802:( 12738:| 12693:( 12625:( 12589:( 12557:( 12508:| 12492:( 12473:( 12451:( 12433:( 12399:| 12364:) 12359:· 12353:· 12347:· 12341:· 12335:· 12329:· 12323:· 12317:· 12311:· 12306:( 12208:( 12182:( 12144:n 12142:o 12138:l 12136:A 12072:( 12051:( 12031:( 12017:( 11944:( 11854:( 11845:· 11840:( 11804:) 11799:· 11793:· 11787:· 11781:· 11775:· 11769:· 11763:· 11758:( 11682:( 11635:( 11575:( 11557:• 11535:( 11517:• 11495:( 11477:• 11459:( 11443:• 11429:) 11419:T 11414:( 11392:) 11386:( 11354:) 11350:( 11330:( 11319:) 11315:( 11296:( 11283:) 11273:T 11268:( 11246:• 11221:( 11134:) 11130:( 11112:( 11105:) 11100:· 11094:· 11088:· 11082:· 11076:· 11070:· 11064:· 11058:· 11052:· 11047:( 11000:· 10995:( 10980:( 10951:( 10936:( 10919:( 10873:) 10835:( 10820:( 10771:( 10741:( 10697:( 10678:( 10636:( 10606:J 10553:( 10538:( 10523:( 10505:( 10466:( 10450:( 10427:( 10397:( 10352:( 10320:( 10270:( 10213:( 10202:) 10198:( 10168:( 10130:( 10074:~ 10039:⇒ 10025:( 9997:⇒ 9966:( 9943:( 9895:( 9871:) 9833:( 9826:) 9821:· 9816:( 9792:/ 9772:( 9754:/ 9719:2 9715:1 9711:4 9707:3 9703:2 9699:1 9686:) 9681:· 9675:· 9669:· 9663:· 9657:· 9651:· 9646:( 9548:( 9515:( 9502:) 9498:( 9452:( 9446:) 9441:· 9435:· 9429:· 9423:· 9417:· 9411:· 9406:( 9386:( 9310:( 9288:( 9274:( 9246:( 9222:( 9207:· 9181:· 9177:) 9172:· 9166:· 9160:· 9154:· 9148:· 9143:( 9125:· 9109:( 9078:· 9073:) 9068:· 9062:· 9056:· 9050:· 9044:· 9039:( 9026:· 9014:) 9009:· 9003:· 8997:· 8991:· 8985:· 8980:( 8952:· 8948:) 8943:· 8937:· 8931:· 8925:· 8919:· 8914:( 8904:· 8900:) 8895:· 8889:· 8883:· 8877:· 8871:· 8866:( 8853:· 8837:( 8806:) 8801:· 8795:· 8789:· 8783:· 8777:· 8772:( 8760:· 8747:( 8715:( 8700:( 8599:· 8565:) 8560:· 8554:· 8548:· 8542:· 8536:· 8531:( 8523:) 8518:· 8512:· 8506:· 8500:· 8494:· 8489:( 8481:) 8476:· 8470:· 8464:· 8458:· 8452:· 8447:( 8438:) 8433:· 8427:· 8421:· 8415:· 8409:· 8404:( 8387:) 8382:· 8376:· 8370:· 8364:· 8358:· 8353:( 8345:) 8340:· 8334:· 8328:· 8322:· 8316:· 8311:( 8303:) 8298:· 8292:· 8286:· 8280:· 8274:· 8269:( 8261:) 8256:· 8250:· 8244:· 8238:· 8232:· 8227:( 8219:) 8214:· 8208:· 8202:· 8196:· 8190:· 8185:( 8177:) 8172:· 8166:· 8160:· 8154:· 8148:· 8143:( 8135:) 8130:· 8124:· 8118:· 8112:· 8106:· 8101:( 8093:) 8088:· 8082:· 8076:· 8070:· 8064:· 8059:( 8051:) 8046:· 8040:· 8034:· 8028:· 8022:· 8017:( 8009:) 8004:· 7998:· 7992:· 7986:· 7980:· 7975:( 7967:) 7962:· 7956:· 7950:· 7944:· 7938:· 7933:( 7925:) 7920:· 7914:· 7908:· 7902:· 7896:· 7891:( 7883:) 7878:· 7872:· 7866:· 7860:· 7854:· 7849:( 7841:) 7836:· 7830:· 7824:· 7818:· 7812:· 7807:( 7799:) 7794:· 7788:· 7782:· 7776:· 7770:· 7765:( 7737:) 7733:( 7708:) 7704:( 7692:) 7687:· 7681:· 7675:· 7669:· 7663:· 7657:· 7652:( 7627:( 7599:Φ 7595:☎ 7575:( 7555:Φ 7551:☎ 7509:† 7456:R 7439:( 7420:( 7406:( 7377:( 7364:) 7360:( 7341:( 7275:( 7251:R 7194:( 7176:n 7174:o 7170:l 7168:A 7146:( 7137:· 7132:( 7082:) 7078:( 6983:) 6979:( 6963:) 6956:· 6948:· 6940:· 6932:· 6924:· 6916:· 6908:· 6900:· 6892:· 6884:· 6876:· 6871:( 6864:) 6857:· 6849:· 6841:· 6833:· 6825:· 6817:· 6809:· 6801:· 6793:· 6785:· 6777:· 6772:( 6713:· 6708:( 6693:( 6680:\ 6626:l 6624:| 6620:| 6618:l 6616:« 6560:l 6558:| 6554:| 6552:l 6550:« 6531:l 6529:| 6525:| 6523:l 6521:« 6490:l 6488:| 6484:| 6482:l 6480:« 6429:. 6371:( 6348:( 6315:( 6251:( 6236:✉ 6210:( 6184:( 6147:( 6120:( 6098:( 6078:( 6055:X 6038:( 5957:) 5947:T 5942:( 5914:) 5904:T 5899:( 5869:) 5863:· 5857:( 5817:( 5802:( 5770:( 5747:( 5728:( 5703:( 5671:l 5669:| 5665:| 5663:l 5661:« 5644:( 5611:l 5609:| 5605:| 5603:l 5601:« 5564:( 5549:( 5509:) 5503:· 5497:( 5482:) 5472:T 5467:( 5446:( 5426:( 5409:( 5250:) 5240:T 5235:( 5169:) 5164:· 5158:· 5152:· 5146:· 5140:· 5134:· 5129:( 5079:❞ 5073:❝ 5061:❞ 5055:❝ 5032:( 5005:( 4979:( 4946:) 4936:T 4931:( 4907:( 4887:l 4885:| 4881:| 4879:l 4877:« 4847:✉ 4807:( 4764:( 4702:( 4688:) 4684:( 4646:( 4588:( 4549:( 4531:( 4504:( 4455:( 4443:) 4438:· 4432:· 4426:· 4420:· 4414:· 4409:( 4384:( 4340:( 4326:( 4311:( 4238:( 4215:( 4200:( 4171:( 4059:c 4055:t 4049:— 4038:( 3989:( 3977:c 3973:t 3927:c 3923:t 3917:— 3823:c 3819:t 3729:( 3659:( 3640:( 3625:c 3621:t 3601:( 3538:( 3493:( 3473:( 3328:( 3260:( 3215:( 3190:( 3011:( 2784:( 2761:( 2744:· 2742:ƛ 2703:( 2594:( 2477:( 2452:( 2272:( 2162:( 2114:( 2044:( 1995:( 1969:( 1934:( 1920:( 1902:( 1879:( 1816:( 1799:( 1780:) 1770:T 1765:( 1736:) 1726:T 1721:( 1700:( 1452:) 1448:( 1334:) 1326:( 1212:) 1204:( 1090:) 1082:( 1021:) 1013:( 978:: 969:. 948:. 692:) 688:( 359:. 331:e 324:t 317:v 192:) 184:( 124:) 116:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Knowledge

Index