Knowledge

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed: Difference between revisions

Source 📝

871:
out of the nation’s laboratories and classrooms.<ref name=nyt/><ref name=pressrelease/> It also discusses the consequences of the '']'' trial.<ref name=Timonen/> ''Kitzmiller'' was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of "Intelligent Design" as an alternative to evolution. The court ruling noted that intelligent design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents"<ref>At the 2005 '']'' trial it was decided on the basis of expert testimony and the testimony of leading intelligent design proponents that ]. The judgement concluded that intelligent design is not science and "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents." {{cite court |litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District |vol=04 |reporter= cv |opinion= 2688 |pinpoint= |court= |date=] ] }}, ].</ref> and that it was not science.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District |vol=04 |reporter= cv |opinion= 2688 |pinpoint= |court= |date=] ] }} ]</ref><ref>In about the film for the '']'', environmental journalist describes ] as "an ideological cousin of ]" and later as a "creationist idea".</ref><ref name=ForrestMayPaper>{{citation | url= http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf| title = Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy| first = Barbara| last = Forrest| author-link = Barbara Forrest | date= May, 2007| month = May| year = 2007| publisher = ], Inc.| place = ]|accessdate = 2007-08-06}}.</ref> The court rejected the Discovery Institute's claims that intelligent design was not religiously motivated,<ref name=oreilly/><ref>"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory." ]</ref> and rebuffed the attempt to introduce it into public school science classes as a constitutional violation.<ref name="sciam-rennie"/><ref>) and "our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom." ]</ref>
827:|doi=10.1038/nmeth1207-983}}</ref><ref name="doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131">{{cite journal |author= Mark Greener |title=Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience? |journal=EMBO Reports |volume=8 |issue=12 |pages=1107–1109 |year=2007 |doi=10.1038/sj.embor.7401131}}</ref> The ] has stated that "intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life" are not science because they cannot be tested by ], do not generate any predictions, and propose no new ] of their own.<ref>National Academy of Sciences, 1999 </ref> The US ] and the ] have termed it pseudoscience.<ref>National Science Teachers Association, a professional association of 55,000 science teachers and administrators in a 2005 press release: "We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science.... It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom." {{Dead link|date=December 2007}} National Science Teachers Association Press Release ] ].<br/> "for most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience." David Mu. Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005.<br /> "Creationists are repackaging their message as the pseudoscience of intelligent design theory." American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2001.</ref> Evolution is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community with one source stating "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution."<ref> , ], quoting ] Professor ] (]). Retrieved ].</ref> 815:
opposing ID. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and . More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism. According to '']'' "There is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth."{{cite news |first=Cordelia |last=Dean |title=Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life's Origin |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin |work= |publisher=]|date=September 27, 2007 |accessdate=2007-09-28 }}</ref><ref name=teachernet>{{cite web |url=http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890 |title=Teachernet, Document bank |accessdate=2007-10-01 |coauthors= |date=], ] |work= |publisher=] |quote=The ] claims there are aspects of the natural world that are so intricate and fit for purpose that they cannot have evolved but must have been created by an '].' Furthermore they assert that this claim is scientifically ] and should therefore be taught in science lessons. Intelligent design lies wholly outside of science. Sometimes examples are quoted that are said to require an 'intelligent designer'. However, many of these have subsequently been shown to have a scientific explanation, for example, the ] and ]s.<br> Attempts to establish an idea of the ']' needed for intelligent design are surrounded by complex ]. Despite this, the idea seems to be essentially a modern version of the old idea of the "]". Lack of a satisfactory scientific explanation of some phenomena (a 'gap' in scientific
863:<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District |vol=04 |reporter= cv |opinion= 2688 |pinpoint= |court= |date=] ] }} ]</ref><ref>In about the film for the '']'', environmental journalist describes ] as "an ideological cousin of ]" and later as a "creationist idea".</ref><ref name=ForrestMayPaper>{{citation | url= http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf| title = Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy| first = Barbara| last = Forrest| author-link = Barbara Forrest | date= May, 2007| month = May| year = 2007| publisher = ], Inc.| place = ]|accessdate = 2007-08-06}}.</ref> The court rejected the Discovery Institute's claims that intelligent design was not religiously motivated,<ref name=oreilly/><ref>"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory." ]</ref> and rebuffed the attempt to introduce it into public school science classes as a constitutional violation.<ref name="sciam-rennie"/><ref>) and "our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom." ]</ref> 851:
out of the nation’s laboratories and classrooms.<ref name=nyt/><ref name=pressrelease/> It also discusses the consequences of the '']'' trial.<ref name=Timonen/> ''Kitzmiller'' was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of "Intelligent Design" as an alternative to evolution. The court ruling noted that intelligent design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents"<ref>At the 2005 '']'' trial it was decided on the basis of expert testimony and the testimony of leading intelligent design proponents that ]. The judgement concluded that intelligent design is not science and "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents." {{cite court |litigants=Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District |vol=04 |reporter= cv |opinion= 2688 |pinpoint= |court= |date=] ] }}, ].</ref> and that it was
1901:. The movie's use of Holocaust imagery (and other techniques) to demonize evolution and those working in the field was a particular cause of concern and was considered distasteful and manipulative of the audience, with many critics surprised that Stein, being a Jew, was involved in a movie which exploited it in a "dishonest" way. Some wondered whether Stein was involved for purely mercenary reasons, or expressed concern for his career direction. The film's evasiveness with regards to actual information about intelligent design or evolution was criticized , in particular that the movie failed to define either, or adequately explain the nature of the scientific debate pictured, in particular omitting pertinent facts regarding the "expelled" scientists. The movie was derided for a lack of historical accuracy with regards to Stalinism and the Holocaust, regardless of evolution's involvement in either. 4343:"Under normal circumstances, Mr. Gonzalez's publication record would be stellar and would warrant his earning tenure at most universities, according to Mr. Hirsch. But Mr. Gonzalez completed the best scholarship, as judged by his peers, while doing postdoctoral work at the University of Texas at Austin and at the University of Washington, where he received his Ph.D. His record has trailed off since then. 'It looks like it slowed down considerably,' said Mr. Hirsch, stressing that he has not studied Mr. Gonzalez's work in detail and is not an expert on his tenure case. 'It's not clear that he started new things, or anything on his own, in the period he was an assistant professor at Iowa State.' That pattern may have hurt his case. 'Tenure review only deals with his work since he came to Iowa State,' said John McCarroll, a spokesman for the university." 1688:, which was about Darwinism and why it has such a lock on the academic establishment when the theory has so many holes. And why freedom of speech has been lost at so many colleges to the point where you can’t question even the slightest bit of Darwinism or your colleagues will spurn you, you’ll lose your job, and you’ll be publicly humiliated. As they sent me books and talked to me about these things I became more enthusiastic about participating. Plus I was never a big fan of Darwinism because it played such a large part in the Nazis’ Final Solution to their so-called “Jewish problem” and was so clearly instrumental in their rationalizing of the Holocaust. So I was primed to want to do a project on how Darwinism relates to fascism and to outline the flaws in Darwinism generally. 1815:
was copied by computer-generated means from a video entitled "The Inner Life of a Cell." XVIVO holds the copyright to all the models, processes, and depictions in this video, and has not authorized Premise Media or Rampant Films to make any use of this material. We have obtained promotional material for the "Expelled" film, presented on a DVD, which clearly shows in the "cell segment" the virtually identical depiction of material from the "Inner Life" video. Among the infringed scenes, we particularly refer to the segment of the "Expelled" film purporting to show the "walking" models of kinesic activities in cellular mechanisms. The segments depicting these models in your film are clearly based upon, and copied from, material in the "Inner Life" video.
2807:
that Myers is "distraught" and that he had been calling upon others to sneak into screenings for "many weeks". Myers responded that he only felt "a little guilty that I'd escaped a bad movie while my friends and family were stuck with watching it" and that he has never requested that people sneak into screenings or "even asked them to sign up for them, as I did". He observed that Dawkins was registered only as an anonymous guest — the press release claim that he "oddly used his formal surname 'Clinton' instead of Richard to sign up" was erroneous. Dawkins did offer his passport as identification when he arrived at the screening. It shows both of his forenames, giving his full name as "Clinton Richard Dawkins."
2283:
sakes Darwin worked within the framework of believing there was a God. And yet, somehow, today you're not allowed to believe it. Why can't we have as much freedom as Darwin had?" The Discovery Institute quickly issued a statement that when Bill O'Reilly conflated intelligent design with creationism he was mistakenly defining it as an attempt to find a divine designer, and regretting that "Ben referred to the 'gaps' in Darwin's theory, as if those are the only issues that intelligent design theory addresses." It went on to assert that "intelligent design also provides a robust positive case, and a serious scientific research approach", a claim that had been explicitly refuted in the
2386:-style," and that it is "hilarious" to watch the scientists trying to answer, according to Mathis. Mathis stated that it was unreasonable for the scientists to claim that they were misled, since he personally contacted them and conducted the interviews and was quite open with them, and the scientists cashed the paychecks he gave them for their interviews. Mathis expressed surprise that the scientists answered his questions in a manner that was consistent with their publications, and supported evolution in the interviews and disparaged intelligent design. He was particularly dismissive of the complaints of Richard Dawkins since Dawkins was in the movie 2070:
some other celebrities, finally has shown his true colors and they aren't so pretty." Friedman criticizes the film's exploitation of the Holocaust, "hoping someone will latch onto an anti-Semitism theme here" but that it is "such a warped premise that no one's biting," and Stein's involvement, as a Jew, is "so distasteful you wonder what in — sorry — God's name — he was thinking when he got into this". Ultimately he concludes that "It will come and go without much fanfare" and that were the film to be shown in his area he'd "boycott the filmmakers for thinking of me as this gullible and unsophisticated."
2086:
film and was not invited to a screening, he explained that when producers do this it usually means the films are targeted to "teenagers and morons." In his article the author noted "I can't help but be struck by the irony of Stein's own words in the movie's introduction (which is also on YouTube): 'In my experience, people who are confident in their ideas are not afraid of criticism. So that tells me the Darwinists are afraid. They're hiding something'." Means then asked, "What, pray tell, are Stein and the "Expelled" producers hiding? And what are they afraid of?"
2382:
show that popular support for some form of theistic influence in the origin of species is below 45% as of 2007). Mathis said that at one time the Church had very strong control over science, and this was reasonable since the Church "advanced" science, and that now there is a backlash with the pendulum swinging the other way. Instead, Mathis said that now the Church of Atheism and Secularism excludes all ideas that are contrary to atheistic beliefs in climatology, biology and politics. Stein asks questions of scientists who subscribe to evolution "
1581:"For my part, the moment I sat down with Stein (with Mathis there) and he asked me that question about firing people for expressing dissenting views a dozen times, I realized that I was being manipulated to give certain answers they were looking for me to give. I asked them both, several times, if they had anything else to ask me about evolutionary theory or Intelligent Design. In frustration I finally said something like "Do you have any other questions to ask me or do you keep asking me this question in hopes that I'll give a different answer?" 795:
G-O-D." They also claim that the scientific community has "conveniently dismissed as religious 'creationism,'" and assert that those who oppose intelligent design "are simply wrong."<ref name="titleEXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed">{{cite web |url=http://www.expelledthemovie.com/chronicle.php?article=1 |title=EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed |accessdate=2008-04-03 |format= |work=}}{{Verify credibility|date=April 2008}}<!-- Keeps changing (and not in Wayback), so unreliable unless archived (using WebCite or similar) --></ref>
2192:"scientists" but "darwinists," indicating that "Ben Stein wants you to stop thinking of evolution as an actual science supported by verifiable facts and logical arguments and to start thinking of it as a dogmatic, atheistic ideology akin to Marxism." He echoes Shermer's comments regarding the omission of facts, and in particular the way that the movie depicts Robert Sternberg is "shoddy investigation or deliberate propagandizing," but more generally its depictions of the other scientist and the histories of Stalinism and the Holocaust. 2816:
to attend had been canceled. One of the other individuals to receive this email phoned the theater, which revealed that the screening was set to go ahead anyway. He attended, and found that his name was no longer on the guest list, but after some negotiation (presenting his confirmation email and stating he was not representing any organization) he was allowed to view the movie. Lynch proposes a guest pre-screening process was set up in response to the Myers and Dawkins incident, and uses this as evidence.
1133:. The producers claim that those opposing intelligent design "don't like the very idea of an intelligent cause because they don't like the idea of allowing even the possibility of the existence of an intelligent 'designer.' That might lead to scientific evidence in support of the unthinkable, i.e. G-O-D." They also claim that the scientific community has "conveniently dismissed as religious 'creationism,'" and assert that those who oppose intelligent design "are simply wrong." 2803:
all very ham-handed. The audience apparently ate it up, though. Figures. Christians have a growing reputation for their appreciation of dishonesty." The student who had e-mailed described the film as "subtly clever and occasionally funny", and reported that the movie they had seen was a rough Director's Cut with occasional things out of sync or appearing to jump. The soundtrack included well known music, but Mathis indicated that music cues might change before the final cut.
2680:. It was stated that the event had been approved by House General Counsel and was not paid for by a lobbyist/principal. The legislation has been criticized as trying to allow biblical creationists to bring religious teachings into classrooms, but Hays states that the bill is simply drafted to allow teachers and students to discuss "the full range" of problems and ideas surrounding Darwin's theory, without fear of punishment. He and his co-sponsor Senator 514:<cite>"Biologists aren't alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they're alarmed because intelligent design is junk science."</cite> H. Allen Orr. Annals of Science. New Yorker May 2005.<br/>Also, ] Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism.<br />• Mark Bergin. World Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 8 February 25 2006.</ref> 71: 2184:
proponents. He explains that according to the university, only "two or three" students appear in the scene, and the remainder are hired extras. He discusses how he was misled about the subject of the movie and how his interview was edited, and various omissions of pertinent fact in the movie. He describes the movie's exploitation of Holocaust imagery as a "propaganda production would make Joseph Goebbels proud."
1225:) stated that the portrayal of intelligent design proponents as martyrs and victims of discrimination is a common tactic of the intelligent design movement: "The persecuted scientist against the establishment hoax. Another plea often articulated by ID proponents is the idea that there is a community of ID scientists undergoing persecution by the science establishment for their revolutionary scientific ideas." 1667:
contributed a vast amount of research and data in support of Darwin’s idea. And yet, millions of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and other people of faith believe in a literal interpretation that humans were crafted by the hand of God. The conflict between science and religion has unleashed passions in school board meetings, courtrooms, and town halls across America and beyond.
2001:
as a "security breech " and claims that Moore gained entry by impersonating a minister. In the alert, Ben Stein responds to Moore's charge that the film's manipulation of Holocaust imagery is "despicable", by stating that "The only thing I find despicable is when reporters sneak into screenings by pretending to be ministers. This is a new low even for liberal reporters."
3465: 2196:
reward faculty who fritter away their careers on ill-conceived theories". In summation he considers that it is "a film for ID creationism's religious base," "a rallying point to revive their morale." His closing remarks express concern for Stein, who "might have lost relatives in the Holocaust but is now appropriating it for an intellectually dishonest purpose".
1330:, as victims of persecution by "Big Science" for their promotion of intelligent design. What one reviewer describes as four or five examples of "ordinary academic backbiting" are presented. And it alleges that they are evidence of widespread persecution of educators and scientists who promote intelligent design. Other intelligent design supporters such as 2781:, cited an e-mail from a college student who was at the screening. The student assumed that Dawkins and Myers had not been invited, and suggested that Myers had been "hustling and bothering" invited guests. The student subsequently stated that Myers "didn't cause a disruption per se; he was kindly escorted out." However, the producer later wrote: 2770:, but shortly before the film started a security guard told him that the assistant producer Mark Mathis had instructed that Myers be removed from the premises. Myers described being expelled in this way as showing off "the hypocrisy of these people, as well as their outright incompetence." His guests were allowed in, including fellow interviewee 2143:, described the movie as "pure propaganda" in the style of a "sub-standard Michael Moore flick" with "problematic references to the Holocaust". Echoing Roger Moore's concerns that the movie demonizes evolutionary biologists, she notes that dark lighting, foreboding music and sinister camera angles are used during an interview with 1949:, and then attacks evolution for misrepresenting the origin of life. Scientists with hypotheses for abiogenesis are ridiculed for stating that this is still not understood. Overall, Whipple found it to be fairly boring and uncompelling. Whipple subsequently reported that after his review the producers began asking people to sign 260:
allegiance to atheistic materialism; they're alarmed because intelligent design is junk science."</cite> H. Allen Orr. Annals of Science. New Yorker May 2005.<br/>Also, ] Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism.<br />• Mark Bergin. World Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 8 February 25 2006.</ref>
1552:
Lab (EIL) at Baylor, and posted their work on the subject on a website hosted by the university. The university removed the website after receiving complaints. Baylor officials later allowed the website back on their server but required changes be made to the website so that it did not appear to be endorsed by the University.
1310:, demonizing "Big Science" and claiming nonexistent scientific credibility for intelligent design to lend plausibility to the argument that evolution is a matter of faith, rather than a large set of observations and data showing that beneficial mutation and selection occurs, and a scientific theory explaining why this occurs. 2774:, who asked in a question and answer session at the end of the film why Myers had been excluded. Dawkins later said that "if anyone had a right to see the film, it was . The incompetence, on a public relations level, is beyond belief." Dawkins described the event as "a gift" and that "we could not ask for anything better." 1987:"'s attempts to spread doubt about the health effects of smoking. The review described the movie's restricted pre-release screenings as "a stealth campaign, out of the public eye, preaching to the choir to get the word out about the movie without anyone who isn't a true believer passing a discouraging judgment on it." 2527:"reveals the stark truth: Darwinists have been conspiring to keep design out of classrooms, out of journals, and out of public discourse." The Discovery Institute has published more than twenty articles featuring on its evolutionnews.org website and blog, tying its promotion of Expelled in with its effort to pass the " 6429: 785:
parts of cells—they're still deciding and will get back to you on that."<ref name="sciam-rennie"/> The ], which is at the center of promoting intelligent design, claims that it is a serious scientific research approach and not creationism.<ref name=oreilly/><ref name=idnotCreationism/>
2815:
The Seed science blogger John M. Lynch (of "Stranger Fruit") has reported receiving an email (to himself and several others) stating that the screening he was to attend had been moved one hour earlier. He later received an email (to himself and five others) stating that the RSVP screening he was set
2701:
he stated that it was technically legal as long as they just watched the film without discussing the issue or arranging any future votes. Commenting on this, and the controversy over Roger Moore of the Orlando Sentinel managing to view the film against the wishes of the film company, House Democratic
2333:
personality in the United States." Ruloff said that the dominant "Darwinist orthodoxy" was unfairly discriminating against religious scientists, discouraging any of the "future great minds" coming from the 85% of the American public that are religious. He felt Darwinism was preventing scientists from
2110:
discussing the film featuring Mario Diaz, CWA's Policy Director for Legal Issues, and Matt Barber, CWA's Policy Director for Cultural Issues, who went to a prescreening. Diaz and Barber thought the movie was entertaining, funny and shocking. They looked forward to it being profound and controversial.
2000:
Though executive producer Logan Craft and Paul Lauer, head of the movie's PR agency Motive Marketing, have denied any involvement an "online media alert" was apparently issued by Motive Marketing lambasting the professional film critic for criticizing the movie. The alert characterizes Moore's review
1535:
in Nazi Germany had been based on Darwin's ideas and on science. A university spokesman said her contract was not renewed for reasons unrelated to her views on intelligent design, and that though they wholeheartedly supported academic freedom, "teachers also have a responsibility to stick to subjects
1142:
editor John Rennie summarises intelligent design as "a notion which firmly states that at one or more unspecified times in the past, an unidentified designer who might or might not be God somehow created whole organisms, or maybe just cells, or maybe just certain parts of cells—they're still deciding
2806:
In a press release dated March 25, 2008, Mathis claimed that the decision to expel Myers was made well in advance, as soon as it was noted that Myers, Dawkins, and "a group of other atheists" had signed up to view the movie, and was a deliberate PR move to capitalize on the irony. The release claims
2381:
Mark Mathis, was interviewed on a Victory Broadcast Service Radio program, whose mission is to "spread the Good News of Jesus Christ". Mathis stated that it was unfair that "90% of the American public" believes that there is design in nature but in Academia, the opposite is true (independent surveys
1904:
The movie's promotional campaign also raised eyebrows, with many reviewers characterizing it as an attempt to drum up support from those who already agreed with its viewpoint while shielding the film from outside appraisal. Many were of the opinion that the movie is "preaching to the converted", and
1814:
It has come to our intention that Premise Media and Rampant Films has produced a film entitled "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," which is scheduled for commercial release and distribution on April 18, 2008. To our knowledge, this film includes a segment depicting biological cellular activity that
1701:
On learning of the pro-intelligent design stance of the real film, Myers said "not telling one of the sides in a debate about what the subject might be and then leading him around randomly to various topics, with the intent of later editing it down to the parts that just make the points you want, is
1551:
and author of numerous technical books and articles. The Baylor administration asked Marks to return an intelligent design research grant. Marks' collaborator in this project was Discovery Institute fellow William Dembski. In July and August 2007, they formed the short-lived Evolutionary Informatics
6238:
A: In speaking with Christian Schools, we've found that hosting a school-wide “mandatory” field trip is the best way to maximize your school's earning potential. Send a field trip home with your middle school and high school students, have each child pay for their own ticket, then collect the stubs
2738:
of the Discovery Institute said that "scientific information" would be determined by science teachers themselves in consultation with their science curriculum staff and their school boards. This would bypass the Florida education standards identified by science domain experts and education experts.
2684:
were both unable to name any teachers in Florida who have been disciplined for being critical of evolution in the science classroom. Hays said "I want a balanced policy. I want students taught how to think, not what to think. There are problems with evolution. Have you ever seen a half-monkey, half
2453:
reported that journalists had to submit their questions by email in advance for screening, and at the conference "softball" questions were posed by Paul Lauer, a representative of the film's public relations firm. Only four outside questions were used, all from Christian organizations with only two
2010:
writes that due to Stein's involvement, "you'd expect a dishonest documentary, and apparently, we've got one". From his brief exposure "it seems to deploy all the loaded-dice arguments, the overdog's deep-seated sense of victimhood and conventional rightwing hysteria", "nd yes - you get all that in
1990:
As a whole, Moore judged that the movie "makes good points about academic freedom and the ways unpopular ideas are shouted down in academia, the press and the culture", but "not offering evidence to back your side, where the burden of proof lies, makes the movie every bit as meaningful and silly as
1200:
Under a new anti-religious dogmatism, scientists and educators are not allowed to even think thoughts that involve an intelligent creator. Do you realize that some of the leading lights of "anti-intelligent design" would not allow a scientist who merely believed in the possibility of an intelligent
814:
This is in contrast with the ] of the ] that intelligent design is not science but ].<ref name="unscientific">See: 1) ] 2) ]. 3) The Discovery Institute's ] petition begun in 2001 has been signed by "over 700 scientists" as of ] ]. A four day ] petition gained 7733 signatories from scientists
2802:
ChristianityToday liveblog cited Myers as saying that he'd heard that the film is "not only boring and poorly made, but is ludicrous in its dishonesty. Apparently, a standard tactic is to do lots of fast cuts between biologists like me or Dawkins or Eugenie Scott and shots of Nazi atrocities. It's
2721:, one of the drafters of the bill, said that intelligent design could not be taught, though "criticisms" of evolution could, and the teacher would have to follow the curriculum. Stein said it was the teacher who would decide what was "scientific information", and Casey Luskin, an attorney with the 2498:
On March 28th, 2008, Many members of the staff at Scientific American were invited to view the film. After which, they began an interview with Mark Mathis which was recorded and is hosted on their website. In the interview, Mathis claims the overt use of Nazi imagery and quote-mining of scientists
2358:
for most questions is "no you can't do that" because the ideas violated Darwinism, so Darwinism is a "science-stopper." Ruloff described the team he had assembled to make the film, and said he was glad that for the director, he had managed to hire Nathan Frankowski, who had previously been second
2282:
as the idea that "a deity created life", and Stein stated that "There's no doubt about it. We have lots and lots of evidence of it in the movie. And you know Einstein worked within the framework of believing there was a God. Newton worked within the framework of believing there was a God. For gosh
2191:
is "a movie not quite harmless enough to be ignored" and although its points are "all recycled from previous pro-ID works", "its heavy-handed linkage of modern biology to the Holocaust demands a response for the sake of simple human decency". He criticizes the rhetorical device of referring not to
2183:
feature so prominently as supporters of Stein in the opening of the movie, as "their mostly Christian students fully accept the theory of evolution" and it was during his studies there that Shermer himself learned about evolutionary biology and realized that he had been "hoodwinked" by creationism
2069:
is a sloppy, all-over-the-place, poorly made (and not just a little boring) 'expose' of the scientific community" and echoes Patterson's concerns about Stein's career direction, stating that he "is either completely nuts or so avaricious that he's abandoned all good sense to make a buck" and "like
1585:
After a break and small talk the interview resumed and Shermer again expressed a sense that he was being manipulated, "they showed asking me about my books, and that's where I told him I thought ID was much closer to pseudoscience than science. Then he asked me AGAIN if I thought people should be
870:
The film presents evidence claimed to show that scientists do not have the freedom to work within the framework of believing there is a God,<ref name=oreilly/> alleging that there is widespread persecution of educators and scientists who promote intelligent design, and a conspiracy to keep ]
850:
The film presents evidence claimed to show that scientists do not have the freedom to work within the framework of believing there is a God,<ref name=oreilly/> alleging that there is widespread persecution of educators and scientists who promote intelligent design, and a conspiracy to keep ]
2785:
Yes, I turned Mr. Myers away. He was not an invited guest of Premise Media. This was a private screening of an unfinished film. I could have let him in, just as I invited Michael Shermer to a screening in Nashville. Shermer is in the film as well. But, in light of Myers' untruthful blogging about
2399:
Mathis said the reason that Darwinists oppose intelligent design is that this will mean they have to share grant money with intelligent design and cut into their book sales. Mathis predicted that this movie will have a big impact on the debate about evolution and government policy. Mathis stated
2313:
A similar program called the "Adopt-A-Theatre Campaign" was announced in March, 2008. The goal is to produce a competition among church groups and other organizations to see which can generate the largest group sale of movie theatre tickets to see the film. The five largest groups to register and
2085:
wrote that the producers of Expelled are "hiding" the film from movie critics and "Every semi-knowledgeable moviegoer and reader of movie criticism knows what the words 'not screened for critics' means: The movie is a dog." Though Means withholds judgement on the content since he has not seen the
1182:
In the film, Stein claims that scientists do not have the freedom to work within the framework of believing there is a God. The film also claims "that freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry have been expelled from publicly-funded high schools, universities and research institutions." It states
1165:
was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of "Intelligent Design" as an alternative to evolution. The court ruling noted that intelligent design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus
784:
In his review of the movie, '']'' editor John Rennie summarises intelligent design as "a notion which firmly states that at one or more unspecified times in the past, an unidentified designer who might or might not be God somehow created whole organisms, or maybe just cells, or maybe just certain
2195:
He observes that "the omission of science from Expelled was a deliberate choice", that "Ben Stein doesn't want you to recognize evolution versus ID as a conflict between valid scientific ideas and invalid ones" because then "it suddenly begins to look much more just when, say, universities don't
1932:
during the second week of December, 2007. Whipple was somewhat surprised that neither intelligent design nor evolution were defined in the film. According to Whipple, the film charges that intellectual freedom of intelligent design supporters is being restricted, but he was not able to find much
1836:
It was a nice touch on the producer’s part to use the same music as the XVIVO video. Presumably they got permission from the artist — or is that another possible oversight to explore? But then again, one of the producers was for years in the music business. So most likely they’re covered here as
1828:
I’ve gotten to know the producers quite well. As far as I can tell, they made sure to budget for lawsuits. Also, I know for a fact that they have one of the best intellectual property attorneys in the business. I expect that the producers made their video close enough to the Harvard video to get
1205:
The producers allege that atheist beliefs are in part to blame for the persecution, "But they simultaneously want you to believe that their belief in atheism has nothing to do with their persecution of scientists and educators, many of whom see scientific evidence for design or a designer." The
794:
The producers claim that those opposing intelligent design "don't like the very idea of an intelligent cause because they don't like the idea of allowing even the possibility of the existence of an intelligent 'designer.' That might lead to scientific evidence in support of the unthinkable, i.e.
256:
a form of ],<ref>In her article about the film for the ], environmental journalist describes ] as "an ideological cousin of ]" and later as a "creationist idea".<br>At the the 2005 '']'' trial it was concluded on the basis of expert testimony and the testimony of leading intelligent
2798:
Myers described this as an admission by Mathis that Myers had not been "unruly" or "gatecrashing", but had been thrown out "on a petty, arbitrary, vindictive whim" without legitimate cause. In an email to another blog, Mathis stated that "I banned pz because I want him to pay to see it. Nothing
2478:
as appearing to be anti-rational, and cited Stein describing problems with Darwin's Theory of Evolution as being the unanswered questions "Where did life come from?... How did the cell get so complex? ... Assuming it all did happen by Random Mutation and Natural Selection, where did the laws of
259:
which has been described as ].<ref name=FOX/><ref> Journal of Clinical Investigation 116:1134–1138 American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006.<br /> <cite>"Biologists aren't alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn
2587:
system page was publicized, offering free private movie screenings. Persons filling out an online entry form were sent a reservation confirmation via email which stated that no ticket was needed and that IDs would be checked against a list of names. The producers have also held invitation only
2486:
Another telephone press conference was held March 28, 2008. PZ Myers listened in on the initial part of this press conference, and then (having heard the password to talk into the call during pre-conference chatter) challenged the producers for "lying". The producers were flustered when Myers
2124:
featuring "Today's News, Christian Views", writes that this is a "seriously funny documentary" that should be rated R for being " reasonable, radical, risible, and right." Olasky agrees wholeheartedly with the premise of the movie that evolution produced the Holocaust, and asserts that in the
1853:
Questions have been raised about the origination of some of the animation used in our movie EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed. Claims that we have used any animation in an unauthorized manner are simply false. Premise Media created the animation that illustrates cellular activity used in our
1494:
as part of his tenure review file. Dr. Gregory Tinkler of Iowa Citizens for Science stated that "Being a religious scientist is perfectly normal and acceptable, but scientists are supposed to be able to separate science from non-science, and good research from bad. Academic freedom protects a
2716:
The screening was attended by about 100 people, but few were legislators, and the majority of legislators stayed away. In a press conference afterwards Stein said the documentary showed that the academic freedom bill was needed. The legislation tells instructors to teach the "full range" of
2482:
Producer Walt Ruloff claimed that they had interviewed "hundreds and hundreds of scientists who wouldn't even talk" because of their fears for their career prospects if they strayed from the current orthodoxy or from a "Darwinian position." Whipple contrasted this with his own experience of
1953:
before seeing the film, which he thought ironic in relation to producer Walt Ruloff's statement that "What we're really asking for is freedom of speech, and allowing science, and students, people in applied or theoretical research to have the freedom to go where they need to go and ask the
1666:
It has been the central question of humanity through the ages: How in the world did we get here? In 1859 Charles Darwin provided the answer in his landmark book, “The Origin of Species.” In the century and a half since, geologists, biologists, physicists, astronomers, and philosophers have
2685:
human?" The bill is seen as an attempt to undermine recently adopted education standards, which have been opposed by supporters of intelligent design but which, according to a majority of the education board, already support the right to teach students how to question evidence and analyze
2050:
states that this film is "fabulous" and "powerful." Limbaugh asserts that Darwinism does not allow for a belief in God, and that it has taken hold at every major intellectual institution. Limbaugh conflates liberty and creationism and freedom, and uses this as a segue into an attack on
1178:"Highly credentialed "dissenters" from today's prevailing "materialist" theories of life's progression who wish to pursue science on the basis of a presupposition of intelligent design are being persecuted, vilified, denied tenure and even fired from their jobs for their beliefs today." 2309:
The program also recommends a "school-wide mandatory field trip" as "the best way to maximize your school's earning potential" Elsberry criticizes this as a call to "take children away from classrooms, fill their heads with obnoxiously delivered misinformation, and profit off of it."
1522:
was not established (such as "No one has ever seen a dog turn into a cat in a laboratory"), that many scientists believe that complex life reveals the hand of an intelligent designer, that experiments that she said were supposed to prove evolution had been found to be false, and that
513:
The film promotes ] &mdash; the idea that there is evidence of a ] intelligence in biological processes, which has been described as ].<ref name=FOX/><ref> Journal of Clinical Investigation 116:1134–1138 American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006.<br />
1710:
Mathis called Myers, Dawkins and Scott a "bunch of hypocrites", and said that he "went over all of the questions with these folks before the interviews and I e-mailed the questions to many of them days in advance". The film's proponents point out that Dawkins participated in the
1481:
and promotion on the grounds that he "simply did not show the trajectory of excellence that we expect in a candidate seeking tenure in physics and astronomy." In the previous decade, four of the 12 candidates who came up for review in the department were not granted tenure. The
928: 826:
knowledge) is claimed to be evidence of an intelligent designer.}}</ref><ref name="doi:10.1038/nmeth1207-983">{{cite journal |author= Nature Methods Editorial |title=An intelligently designed response|journal=Nat. Methods |volume=4 |issue=12 |pages=983 |year=2007
156: 2499:
was not his decision, but instead blames unnamed superiors. He concedes that the cases of the scientists shown in the film are inflated (again, not his decision) and makes erroneous claims regarding the Dover vs. Kitzmiller case which the editors factcheck on the same page.
1317:
which translates as "Principles for the Cleansing of Public Libraries" gives the works of evolution its own section; "6. Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel)."
1150:
The film presents evidence claimed to show that scientists do not have the freedom to work within the framework of believing there is a God, alleging that there is widespread persecution of educators and scientists who promote intelligent design, and a conspiracy to keep
1166:
religious, antecedents" and that it was not science. The court rejected the Discovery Institute's claims that intelligent design was not religiously motivated, and rebuffed the attempt to introduce it into public school science classes as a constitutional violation.
1744:, complaining about the deception. Speckhardt wrote, "If one needs to believe in a god to be moral, why are we seeing yet another case of dishonesty by the devout? Why were leading scientists deceived as to the intentions of a religious group of filmmakers?" 1840:
BOTTOM LINE: Before you think the producers of EXPELLED are idiots, you might think that they are chess players who have seen several moves ahead. For instance, have you ever thought who stood to gain the most from the Machine Video featured at UD a week
63: 1536:
they were hired to teach, and intelligent design belonged in a religion class, not biology. Does academic freedom 'literally give you the right to talk about anything, whether it has anything to do with the subject matter or not? The answer is no.'"
2570:
also wrote about the upcoming film on the Probe Ministries website. Bohlin claims that the persecution of scientists who question Darwinism has led to the dismissal of tenured faculty. He also states that it was possible to doubt Darwin in biology
1751:
keep their religion and science separate only because they are "toeing the party line". Collins, who was not asked to be interviewed for the film in any of its incarnations, said that Ruloff's claims were "ludicrous". When the editorial staff of
2495:." At this, the producers claimed that Myers was dishonestly listening to the telephone conference, and Myers was asked to leave the conference call. He did so, after first providing the press with an email address where he could be contacted. 2151:
have argued is not the case. Reporting in the magazine's blog on a screening and subsequent question and answer session, she expressed concern that several of those asking questions appeared to be members of staff who arranged the screening.
2733:
considered that this would enable the Discovery Institute to recruit sympathetic teachers to introduce religiously-motivated antievolution arguments, and lawsuits would depend on someone with standing being willing to become a plaintiff.
2268:
The film's website asks for submissions of personal stories of discrimination against students for suggesting design or questioning Darwinian theory, with the enticement that a winning story, or stories, will be featured in the film.
1441:. The review procedure was questioned and the journal subsequently declared that the paper "does not meet the scientific standards of the Proceedings" and would not have been published had usual editorial practices been followed. 2542:
organization, discussed the film and the promotional campaign in an article that appeared December 17, 2007 on the AiG website. Purdom is glad that the film will highlight the discrimination against scientists who rely on the
1195:
biology teacher whose temporary contract was not renewed, and explains this as being due to a scientific conspiracy to keep God out of the nation's laboratories and classrooms. Additionally, on the Expelled blog, Stein wrote:
2039:, and by many religious figures, that evolution and belief in God are compatible. However, he believes that the film exposes the persecution of those who hold this position by people like Richard Dawkins and William Provine. 1367:
In addition, the motion picture includes interviews with scientists and others who advocate the teaching of evolution and criticize intelligent design as an attempt to bring religion into the science classroom. These include
1823:
had been compelled to discontinue using the same video after XVIVO accused him of copyright violation for using it in his lectures in 2007. Commenting on the cease-and-desist letter to Expelled's producers, Dembski wrote:
2077:
also pans the film, although he clearly is amenable to assorted anti-evolution arguments. Chang writes, "If evolution is worth debating, it's worth debating well, and by a more intelligently designed film than this one".
2790:
I decided it was better to have him wait until April 18 and pay to see the film. Others, notable others, were permitted to see the film. At a private screening it's my call. Unlike the Darwinist establishment, we expell
6157: 1971:. Moore criticized the film's use of out of date research ("Citing scientific research as recent as 1953"), lack of factual evidence, the ineffectiveness of the movie's attempts at humor, and the use of imagery of the 1706:
and is fundamentally dishonest." Dawkins said, "At no time was I given the slightest clue that these people were a creationist front"; and Scott said, "I just expect people to be honest with me, and they weren't."
2632:. It requested supporters to ask local movie theater managers to show the film, and to encourage their church leadership to buy out a local theater to show the film to as many people from that church as possible. 1905:
at least one reviewer was concerned that those asking questions at screenings were planted. There were also fears that the film was another step towards "sneaking" the teaching of intelligent design into schools.
1278:, and a frequently-used and oft-discredited creationist charge. Stein has repeatedly claimed that evolution is responsible for the Holocaust in interviews promoting the film and on his blog on the film's website. 3484: 3511: 3207:"Biologists aren't alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they're alarmed because intelligent design is junk science." 2696:
The invitation was restricted to legislators, their spouses, and their legislative aides. The press and public were excluded, and when the House general counsel was asked if that was legal under the Florida
2400:
that the movie will appear in the first or second week of April, 2008, but that the release date is not yet firm. Mathis was also interviewed by the Discovery Institute's Rob Crowther in February of 2008.
2342:. He said he was surprised how widespread and entrenched the suppression of intelligent design is. Ruloff said that the emphasis on Darwinism was also preventing scientific advances with implications for 1762:
in the movie, Mathis stated that his inclusion "would have confused the film unnecessarily" and went on to question Miller's intellectual honesty and orthodoxy as a Catholic because he accepts evolution.
1869:
Response to the movie from Christian groups and the Discovery Institute has been largely positive, praising the movie for its humor and for highlighting a serious issue. Conservative radio commentator
1945:
hypothesis, which is one of the alternatives to evolution sometimes suggested by intelligent design supporters. He also notes that the film acknowledges that evolution does not concern itself with
7595: 7600: 207: 139: 6601: 15: 2483:
interviewing many scientists holding very unorthodox ideas who were "forthright, diligent and feverishly eager to promote their ideas," and not finding any refusing to defend their research.
3466:
An Objective Observer Would Know that ID and Teaching About "Gaps" and "Problems" in Evolutionary Theory are Creationist, Religious Strategies that Evolved from Earlier Forms of Creationism
3644: 2023:
says that the film brought tears to his eyes and that the film is the "best thing that has been done on this issue, in any medium". Bethell asserts that the film promotes the position of
3632: 1933:
substance in these claims when he investigated further. After the first half hour, Whipple reports that the film launches into a condemnation of evolution, blaming it for "Communism, the
1724:, whose producers, they allege, presented themselves to the Discovery Institute as objective filmmakers and then portrayed the organization as religiously-motivated and anti-scientific. 2302:
10,000 to send students to see the movie. The program offers between $ 5 and $ 10 for every ticket stub submitted by the school within the first two weeks of the release of the film.
2265:
based their work and discoveries on creationist assumptions, and that they would not be allowed to pursue their science in the anti-religious scientific atmosphere that exists today.
2516: 1883:(a critic of evolutionary biology and other scientific issues) also praised the film. One otherwise critical review praised the movie for highlighting the idea of academic freedom. 5028: 1787:
identifies Tom Whaley as the animator. However, PZ Myers found that there were similarities between the animations of cellular internal operations from the film and a video from
6171:, a website "specifically designed for students, teachers, pastors, youth leaders and organizations to provide useful tools and resources to promote the ideas surrounding ". 2528: 1465: 1426: 1174:
The producers state that intelligent design advocates are victimized for rejecting natural selection as a basis for explaining life's biological diversity. They claim,
151: 93: 6239:
at the door once you get to the movie theater. With this model, you also will be able to benefit from the ticket stubs purchased by parents who choose to come as well.
31: 28: 1490:
campaign asserts that his intelligent design writings should not have been considered in the review, a view that was contradicted by Gonzalez himself, when he listed
1662:
which described the strong support that had been accumulated for evolution, and contrasted this with the religious who rejected it, and the controversy this caused:
1573:, which is largely devoted to investigating and debunking pseudoscientific and supernatural claims. He was interviewed for the movie by Stein and assistant producer 2403:
Executive Producer Logan Craft, chairman of the board of Premise Media, was interviewed by Jerry Pierce for the Southern Baptist Texan, official publication of the
5057: 1201:
designer/creator to work for him… EVEN IF HE NEVER MENTIONED the possibility of intelligent design in the universe? EVEN FOR HIS VERY THOUGHTS… HE WOULD BE BANNED.
910: 1437:
and submitting his resignation in the previous year, he arranged for his last issue to include publication of a paper by leading intelligent design proponent
7002: 4896: 1477:
After the normal review of aspects such as his record of scientific publications (which had dropped sharply after he joined the faculty), he was not granted
2346:, since scientists told him off-camera that as much as 30% of their scientific results had to be suppressed and were essentially "shelved" (particularly in 7376: 3560:
Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy
3048: 2011:
the first 10 minutes." He expresses regret that Stein has moved from comedy, where he is talented, to "political apologias, where his talents simply die".
6581: 147: 89: 1210:
shows Ben Stein stating that his intention is to unmask "people out there who want to keep science in a little box where it can't possibly touch God."
6867: 2567: 1503: 4126:
The evolution of creationism: After their notorious legal defeat, intelligent design proponents are resurfacing with insidious new assaults on science
2729:
saw this as acknowledgement that the bill would make it easier to bring up religiously tinged intelligent design in public-school science classrooms.
3468:. The judgement concluded that intelligent design is not science and "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents." 1507: 7471:"Intelligent design film: Volunteer's account of what really happened when Darwinist was kicked out of the screening"; post-darwinist.blogspot.com; 2147:. She also observed that the movie makes explicit connections between Intelligent Design and religion, something which proponents of ID such as the 6988: 2825: 2653: 2249:
and the beliefs of historically prominent scientists. He also accuses the modern American scientific establishment as being "a new anti-religious
1327: 1275: 72: 5784: 5532: 3767: 3420: 3041: 7485: 7380: 3631:"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory." 7406: 3643:) and "our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom." 2665: 2156: 1574: 1422: 6738: 6686: 6512: 5837: 4966: 4838: 4775: 4284: 4280: 3072: 2555:" approach of intelligent design and this film, since it does not look like it will promote the Bible as a better source of truth than the 2404: 1833:
Against Ben Stein and EXPELLED" — you think that might generate interest in the movie?), but different enough so that they are unexposed.
1350: 1983:
to "in a not-quite-subliminal seduction way demonize the people who might hold a contrary view". The rhetorical approach is compared to "
6271: 2903:
Detailed analysis of the claims made in the film, and what really happened to the people the film claims were persecuted for their views.
2717:"scientific information" about biological and chemical evolution. During the press conference John Stemberger of the evangelical Florida 2698: 1893:
The rhetorical approach was subject to much criticism, widely considered to be misleading and dishonest and was compared to that used by
1147:, which is at the center of promoting intelligent design, claims that it is a serious scientific research approach and not creationism. 7251: 4100: 2830: 2851:, a documentary contrasting the debate between intelligent design proponents and the scientific establishment that supports evolution. 7570: 2725:, said that intelligent design constituted "scientific information", but that the bill was not intended to settle that question. The 1967:, although the organizers attempted to belatedly rescind his invitation, as it had been mistakenly offered, and he refused to sign a 1890:-style devices was commented upon, but the film was widely considered unamusing and unsubtle, boring, poorly made, and unconvincing. 5488: 3498: 3471: 3460: 2534:
Many others in the Christian and Creationist communities are anxiously anticipating this movie. For example, Dr. Georgia Purdom of
2036: 7348: 7202: 7182: 4094: 3523: 2989: 2459: 2407:, in January of 2008. Craft said that the reason intelligent design is so controversial is that it is a scientific challenge to " 5262: 2298:
In order to promote the film, the website "GetExpelled.com" launched "The Expelled Challenge" which offers to pay schools up to
7580: 6213: 4093:, an idea common among creationist thinkers. If it were up to him, he said, the film would be called 'From Darwin to Hitler'" ( 3674:
116:1134-1138 (2006), doi:10.1172/JCI28449, A publication of the American Society for Clinical Investigation; 10226K PDF file)
2215: 3356: 5268: 4935: 2884: 1647: 857:
science" and, indeed, "fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is
1586:
fired...." Shermer has stated that he believes that the film is effective in delivering its message to its target audience.
5381: 2547:, instead of human reason, for their work. She complains that the only scientists featured appear to be connected with the 1925: 1187:
intelligence in biological processes have been unfairly treated, presents examples such as an unsuccessful application for
118: 5456: 5082: 4491: 2479:
gravity come from. Where did the laws of thermodynamics come from? Where did the laws of motion and, of heat come from?"
7575: 7143:"Orlando Sentinel - Academic freedom, evolution and Ben Stein's Expelled movie --the Florida House may consider them all" 6411: 5283: 4577: 4559: 3151: 181: 7162: 6365: 7470: 7142: 3464:
trial it was decided on the basis of expert testimony and the testimony of leading intelligent design proponents that
2129:
he has seen many shelves of racist and antisemitic journals full of articles frequently "citing and applying Darwin".
7410: 5300: 4910: 4348: 3671: 3617: 2360: 1886:
Response from other critics was less favorable, particularly those in the science media. The film's extensive use of
1798:
produced in 2006 by XVIVO. Myers also noted that the same errors and omissions were present in both. On April 9th, a
1430: 1413: 133: 5115: 4150: 2754:
followed the online procedure to reserve seats for himself and guests under his own name to attend a showing at the
2306:
noted that at the upper end of the range, the value of the reward is probably greater than the actual ticket price.
7539: 7514: 6678: 2588:
screenings for religious organizations and government officials. Some of the screenings have been controversial.
2350:
synthesis, and Ruloff claimed this percentage is growing). He alleges that he learnt that the standard response in
2052: 1234: 2596:
In advance of release, the film was shown at private screenings to various Christian conservative leaders such as
2447:
A 50 minute telephone press conference with Stein and the producers was held in late January 2008. Dan Whipple of
7183:"Lawmakers attend Tallahassee screening of movie by Ben Stein : tallahassee.com : Tallahassee Democrat" 5986: 5649: 5410: 4676: 2613: 1628: 1449: 6603:
Ben Stein exposes the frightening agenda of the Darwinian Machine in new movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
5225: 3308: 2199:
In a podcast, Mirsky talks with Expelled interviewee Eugenie Scott and how she was "bamboozled" into appearing.
7451: 6798: 4842: 2629: 2279: 1461: 174: 6417: 5820: 4583: 4565: 2329:. Ruloff said that "Ben Stein obviously a great intellect, considered one of the smartest people as far as a 1845:
On April 11th, two days after the cease-and-desist letter was sent, the following statement was posted on the
4599: 4268: 3558: 3275: 2435:
of the 19th century." Craft's main complaint about Darwin was that his theory was too simple to describe the
1731: 111: 6094: 4613:
Skepticality #074 - No Intelligence Allowed! - Interviews: Professor Richard Dawkins and Dr. Michael Shermer
254:
The film promotes ] &mdash; the idea that there is evidence of a ] intelligence in biological processes,
6504: 6447: 5169: 5165: 4471:"Iowa Citizens for Science - Gonzalez, Discovery Institute seek to replace science with politics, religion" 4240: 3368: 2032: 1748: 6379: 4779: 6824: 6331: 6299: 6100: 5188: 4450: 3369:"Evolution News & Views: Intelligent Design is Not Creationism (No Matter What Bill O'Reilly Thinks)" 2689:. The film and the bill have been described by critics as going hand in hand with the intelligent design 2548: 2463: 2103: 1993: 7497: 7278: 6926: 6857: 6730: 5312: 4931: 3976: 3438: 7590: 7022: 6968: 6882: 1793: 1684:
I was approached a couple of years ago by the producers, and they described to me the central issue of
163: 6563:
Ben Stein to battle Darwin in major film: Actor-commentator stars in Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
6493: 5153: 4446: 3821:
New book by Discovery Institute Fellow shows influence of Darwinian principles on Hitler's Nazi regime
1771:
There are segments of animation in the movie that purport to show the internal functioning of cells.
1294:
Germany is the thread that ties everything in the movie together. Evolution leads to atheism leads to
1243:
for the film alleges that Stein discovers "an elitist scientific establishment that has traded in its
7087: 7049: 5943: 5619: 4546: 2209: 1354: 100: 6779: 6628: 6553: 5777: 5015: 4428: 4330: 4253: 3894: 3760: 3413: 3128: 3034: 2419:
basis of science must be discarded and the supernatural admitted into science. Craft stated that as
2241:
from Ben Stein which explains his personal premise for the movie. Stein utilizes arguments based on
2207:
The promotion of the film is being managed by Motive Marketing, which was responsible for promoting
7163:"Legislature invited to movie about creationism debate : news-press.com : The News-Press" 5955: 5896: 5631: 5572: 4705: 4515: 4124: 4006:
Talkorigins Claim CA006.1: Adolf Hitler exploited the racist ideas of Darwinism to justify genocide
3610: 2335: 2221: 1968: 1950: 1307: 1032: 4373: 3204:
Journal of Clinical Investigation 116:1134–1138 American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006.
2575:
in the 1980s, but it is no longer possible because of increasing restriction of academic freedom.
6682: 6634: 6561: 5387: 4902: 3136: 3076: 3047:
Cite error: The named reference "nyt" was defined multiple times with different content (see the
2617: 2539: 1715: 1511: 1495:
scientist's ability to do science, not to pass off a political or religious crusade as science.”
7099: 6583:
Ben Stein Confronts Dominance of Darwinian Thought in New Film: Intelligent Design vs. Darwinism
6116: 5802: 5732: 5250: 4672: 3934: 3797: 3715: 3655: 2924: 1654:, who say they were misled into participating by being asked to be interviewed for a film named 7585: 7303: 6946: 5996: 5974: 5420: 3967: 3920: 3863: 3210: 2777:
One blog claimed that Myers had gatecrashed the showing. Jeffrey Overstreet, a film critic for
2649: 2388: 2274: 2019: 1879: 1747:
Defending the movie, the producer, Walt Ruloff, said that scientists like prominent geneticist
6830: 1941:, the Holocaust, atheism and Planned Parenthood." Whipple remarks that the film ridicules the 1646:
The movie has been criticized by several of the interviewees, including Myers and Dawkins and
6104: 5841: 5736: 5674: 5670: 4383: 3719: 2718: 2449: 2180: 2166: 1920: 1470: 1457: 1384: 1073: 66: 5462: 4611: 4264: 4180: 2928: 2669: 2299: 1959: 1758:
asked Mathis why they did not include anybody like devout Catholic and prominent biologist
1735: 1609: 1601: 1564: 1518:
was not renewed because her lecture promoted intelligent design, including statements that
1155:
out of the nation’s laboratories and classrooms. It also discusses the consequences of the
1050: 7330: 6765: 6713: 6539: 5931: 5882: 5763: 5701: 5607: 5555: 5001: 4883: 4820: 4732: 4410: 3876: 3746: 3598: 3399: 3339: 3239: 3114: 3020: 2491:
long before Charles Darwin's theory. Myers asked them if they had ever heard of the word "
2322:
Walt Ruloff, executive director of the film, was interviewed on the Discovery Institute's
8: 7565: 6802: 5161: 4193:(note: quoted text is in the "spoiler" at the bottom and must be highlighted to be seen). 3824: 3372: 2722: 2512: 2488: 2455: 2161: 2148: 2126: 1754: 1487: 1157: 1144: 1138: 5968: 5329: 1313:
In fact the works of Darwin were burned by the Nazi Party, in 1935 in a document called
7247: 6922: 6834: 6567: 6277: 6209: 6011: 5194: 4710: 4442: 4104: 4082: 3986: 3571: 3537: 3183: 3155: 3007: 2993: 2842: 2838: 2778: 2730: 2621: 2535: 2303: 2106:(CWA), a conservative Christian political action group, reviewed the film and posted a 2074: 1788: 1772: 1568: 1544: 1391: 1279: 1122: 1097: 170: 6902: 5733:"Colorado Confidential: The Search for Truth, God and Braver Scientists in 'Expelled'" 2648:
who had filed House 1483: Relating to Teaching Chemical and Biological Evolution, an "
2628:
met Ben Stein beforehand to discuss ways that the film can have a major impact on the
1608:
writer, and holds a professorship dedicated to Public Understanding of Science at the
7438: 7317: 7074: 7036: 6982: 6752: 6700: 6526: 6457: 6039: 5918: 5869: 5846: 5750: 5688: 5594: 5542: 5235: 4988: 4970: 4870: 4847: 4807: 4784: 4719: 4595: 4533: 4519: 4397: 4344: 4315: 4272: 4223: 4004: 3924: 3914: 3733: 3585: 3386: 3326: 3312: 3215: 3101: 2947: 2891: 2875: 2551:, rather than creationists like herself. Purdom also expresses uneasiness about the " 2355: 2082: 2024: 1964: 1759: 1635: 1548: 1418: 1263: 1222: 107: 6651: 6079: 4898:
Scientists Say Intelligent-Design Movie's Producers Deceived Them Into Participating
4651: 3944: 3201: 2155:
Following an unexpected private preview of the movie provided by associate producer
7223: 7117: 6251: 4345:
Advocate of Intelligent Design Who Was Denied Tenure Has Strong Publications Record
4130: 3963: 3940: 3791: 3567: 2367: 2363: 2258: 2242: 2226: 2028: 1929: 1799: 1720: 1577:
and described feeling awkward about their motives soon after the interview began.
1438: 1361: 1065: 197: 16: 5251:
Letter from David Bolinsky, Partner and Medical Director, XVIVO LLC to Logan Craft
4054: 3846: 7224:"Intelligent Design could slip into science class - 03/13/2008 - MiamiHerald.com" 6607: 5855: 5287: 5088: 4856: 4793: 4495: 3982: 3554: 2861: 2771: 2755: 2572: 2411:," not a religious challenge. Craft said that it was clear with the discovery of 2262: 2170: 2144: 1820: 1605: 1594: 1560: 1429:(ISCID), an intelligent design advocacy group. He is the prominent figure in the 1394: 1380: 1376: 1358: 1342: 1334: 1116: 4064: 992: 7444: 7353: 6653:
New documentary to expose academic punishment for those against Big Bang Theory
6587: 6281: 6066: 5808: 5367: 5125: 5121: 5063: 4950: 4297: 4010: 3528: 2848: 2690: 2428: 2230: 2119: 1740: 1727: 1694: 1598: 1519: 1453: 1398: 1267: 1252: 1207: 7252:"The Austringer Âť Florida: John West Spins Wildly to Cover Luskin's Back" 6240: 6194: 5650:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ben-steins-expelled-review-michael-shermer
4447:"Iowa Citizens for Science Press Release on Gonzalez Case - The Panda's Thumb" 3716:"Colorado Confidential: Science Sunday: Intelligent Design Goes to the Movies" 1084:, it claims that what the film calls "Big Science" allows no dissent from the 7559: 6863: 6146: 6061:
Seriously funny: Ben Stein takes on the debate-phobic Darwinian establishment
5992: 5493: 5416: 5362:
Seriously funny: Ben Stein takes on the debate-phobic Darwinian establishment
4596:
Baylor U. Removes a Web Page Associated With Intelligent Design From Its Site
4051: 3851: 3533: 3152:"New mutation in Darwin debate - Entertainment News, Weekly, Media - Variety" 2977: 2420: 2139: 2114: 2047: 1887: 1870: 1651: 1506:
is a trained biologist and currently serves as the Executive Director of the
1401: 1346: 1240: 1218: 6333:
Nothing Up His Sleeve: Executive Producer Walt Ruloff and Expelled (Part II)
6236:
Q: What's the best way to get our school families to come out to the movies?
5173: 3780: 3667: 2431:
must be cast aside as well, calling the trio the "the three bearded men, or
1680:
However, the movie was actually pitched to Stein as an anti-Darwin picture:
47: 7227: 7121: 6618: 6591: 6571: 6142: 6083: 5851: 5720: 5129: 5099: 4914: 4852: 4789: 4697: 4276: 4108: 3978:
From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany
3959:
Darwin's Deadly Legacy: The Chilling Impact of Darwin's Theory of Evolution
3805: 3703: 2981: 2726: 2712:
It's kind of an irony: The public is expelled from a movie called Expelled.
2681: 2597: 2394: 2056: 2043: 2006: 1703: 1524: 1515: 1486:
roadshow portrays Gonzalez as a victim of religious discrimination and the
1387: 1299: 1184: 1130: 1126: 132:
Revert to revision 205880614 dated 2008-04-15 21:28:24 by Dave souza using
4630: 3276:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ben-steins-expelled-review-john-rennie
1169: 6838: 6641: 6180: 6059: 5724: 5360: 5345: 5038: 5034: 4946: 4134: 4014: 3908: 3837: 3707: 3541: 3504: 3477: 3221: 2707: 2560: 2454:
of them from "the press". Questions came from the policy/lobbying groups
2436: 2416: 2343: 2238: 2095: 2014: 1984: 1946: 1934: 1894: 1874: 1532: 1331: 1069: 7015: 6035: 5206: 4204: 3911:
claim is repeated over and over in creationist literature. For example:
3668:
Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action
3234: 3232: 3230: 3202:
Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action
2869: 2517:
Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns claiming discrimination
7299: 7118:"Ben Stein weighs in on evolution fight - 03/10/2008 - MiamiHerald.com" 6392: 6168: 5394: 5092: 5067: 4164: 3360: 3300: 2703: 2371: 2339: 2287: 2272:
To publicize the film, Ben Stein appeared on the cable television show
1942: 1898: 1830: 1612:. Dawkins is portrayed as one of the leading members of "Big Science". 1456:, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at 1244: 1192: 6731:"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed the new film on the ID controversy" 5804:
Disinvited to a Screening, a Critic Ends Up in a Faith-Based Crossfire
2742: 2250: 1228: 7300:"Biology prof expelled from screening of 'Expelled' - TwinCities.com" 6806: 6794:
What Happened to Freedom of Speech? Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
6661: 6657: 6611: 6344: 6312: 6301:
Expelling Dogma: Executive Producer Walt Ruloff and Expelled (Part I)
6126: 6122: 5137: 5042: 4378: 4156: 4060: 4037: 3227: 2759: 2735: 2645: 2609: 2508: 2424: 2408: 2330: 2246: 1972: 1807: 1369: 1271: 1089: 1081: 972: 233:===Promotion of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution === 226:===Promotion of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution === 6472: 4843:"Expelled producer seems to be embarrassed about his sneaky tactics" 4706:"Dawkins rails at 'creationist front' for duping him into film role" 4361: 3957: 2925:"Politics: State: New legislation to keep debate on evolution alive" 2176:
Across five pages, Shermer relates that he was surprised to see his
1433:
which arose when, having served as editor of the scientific journal
7501: 7473: 7422: 7391: 7274: 7203:"Eyes wide open : tallahassee.com : Tallahassee Democrat" 6995: 6453: 6257: 6017: 5900: 5833: 5576: 5525: 5498: 5231: 4834: 4771: 4470: 4186: 4090: 4020: 3948: 3296: 3189: 2763: 2751: 2673: 2601: 2552: 2351: 2062: 1766: 1620: 1528: 1372: 1338: 1295: 1259: 1101: 7056: 6792: 2880: 2004:
Based on the movie's ten-minute online preview, John Patterson of
1991:
that transcendental metaphysical hooey of a couple of years back,
1129:
intelligence in biological processes, which has been described as
6870: 6614: 6508: 6388: 6367:
Interview with Mark Mathis, producer of "Expelled" with Ben Stein
6340: 6308: 6260: 5999: 5423: 5333: 5271: 5213: 4617: 4374:"Statement from Iowa State University President Gregory Geoffroy" 4254:
http://www.library.arizona.edu/exhibits/burnedbooks/documents.htm
3820: 2641: 2625: 2383: 2326: 2254: 2107: 1938: 1641: 1624: 2374:, February 12th, 2008, though the movie would later be delayed. 927: 198:→‎Promotion of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution 6284: 5662: 5341: 4365: 4086: 4028: 3087: 2922: 2686: 2583:
As part of the pre-release marketing for the film, a web-based
2492: 2432: 1980: 1976: 1478: 1306:
The film has been criticized for adding fuel to a media-driven
1256: 1188: 1093: 1085: 1077: 6734: 6431:
Ben Stein's Controversial Film “Expelled” Tops the Blogosphere
6385: 6337: 6305: 5059:
Expelled Producers Deny Deceiving Scientists to Appear in Film
4301: 4182:
Richard Dawkins crashes the party at a screening of "Expelled"
2887:
site collating critical reviews and news coverage of the movie
1117:
Promotion of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution
7488:, Premise Media press release, Business Wire, March 25, 2008. 7349:"No Admission for Evolutionary Biologist at Creationist Film" 6478: 4906: 4085:, "He said he also believed the theory of evolution leads to 4070: 3656:
http://expelledthemovie.com/blog/2007/08/21/bens-blog/#more-4
3224:
Mark Bergin. World Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 8 February 25 2006.
2556: 2544: 2167:
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed--Scientific American's Take
1659: 1248: 899:===Claims that intelligent design advocates are persecuted=== 892:===Claims that intelligent design advocates are persecuted=== 7134: 6947:"Expelled gone missing from Santa Clara - The Panda's Thumb" 2370:. Ruloff said he was looking forward to the film opening on 1638:. In the film he is portrayed as a member of "Big Science". 1466:
International Society for Complexity, Information and Design
1427:
International Society for Complexity, Information and Design
1092:, and blames evolution for a range of modern movements from 686:|url=http://www.expelledthemovie.com/chronicle.php?article=1 7426: 7395: 6842: 6810: 6665: 6645: 6637: 6622: 6595: 6575: 6481: 6460: 6396: 6348: 6316: 6273:
Flunked, Not Expelled: Can't Get Buzz? Offer More Kickbacks
6130: 5904: 5728: 5666: 5580: 5528: 5502: 5461:, Roger Moore, Frankly My Dear... Movies with Roger Moore, 5398: 5390: 5349: 5337: 5238: 5210: 5141: 5133: 5103: 5095: 5071: 5046: 4974: 4918: 4746: 4701: 4369: 4190: 4168: 4160: 4138: 4112: 4040: 4032: 4024: 3990: 3971: 3951: 3928: 3841: 3808: 3711: 3507: 3480: 3364: 3304: 2985: 2834: 2767: 2677: 2661: 2605: 2584: 2234: 2111:
They felt this movie presented an extremely credible case.
2099: 1784: 1632: 1291: 1105: 7533: 7531: 6036:"Hiding 'Expelled' from critics a not-so-intelligent move" 3801: 2559:
or human reason. She equates the use of human reason with
1270:'s theory of evolution as having been responsible for the 7111: 7109: 6435: 6181:
Take the Expelled Challenge: Raise money for your school!
3855: 3218:
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism.
2487:
confronted them with the information that there had been
2412: 2347: 1712: 1152: 572:
idea of allowing even the possibility of the existence of
4435: 2656:, invited Florida legislators to a private screening of 2317: 1315:"Prinzipelles zur Säuberung der Üffentlichen Bßcherein," 7528: 6966: 1326:
The film portrays several people, who have featured in
1170:
Claims that intelligent design advocates are persecuted
7215: 7106: 6474:
Audio of PZ Myers Crashing the Expelled Teleconference
5489:
Short Sharp Science: Are ID proponents being silenced?
5197:, posted April 11, 2008, date in print April 14, 2008. 4205:"Is the Theory of Evolution Really a Matter of Faith?" 2810: 1829:
tongues awagging (Headline: "Harvard University Seeks
1658:
on the "intersection of science and religion", with a
54: 7269: 7267: 4185:, Jeffrey Overstreet, News on Film official website, 3309:"Pharyngula: Official denial, unofficial endorsement" 3209:
H. Allen Orr. Annals of Science. New Yorker May 2005.
2293: 1282:
film critic Jeffrey Overstreet wrote on the official
1068:
which claims that educators and scientists are being
672:
those who oppose intelligent design "are simply wrong
7240: 5798: 5796: 5794: 5264:
Expelled producers accused of copyright infringement
4602:-Daily ed., September 4, 2007. subscription required 2892:"Expelled Exposed > The Truth behind the Fiction" 1859:
The Producers of "EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed"
1819:
This was after leading intelligent design proponent
1510:. She claims that her part-time faculty contract at 1183:
that educators and scientists who see evidence of a
7381:"Richard Dawkins crashes the party at screening of 6915: 5715: 5713: 5711: 4758:, under "Properties" menu, select "Crossroads" icon 3351: 3349: 2743:
PZ Myers and Richard Dawkins at Minnesota screening
2229:firms have been hired. The film's website includes 1435:
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
1229:
Claims that acceptance of evolution leads to Nazism
7264: 7246: 6921: 6381:Behind the Scenes with Expelled Associate Producer 4441: 3070: 2990:"Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life's Origin" 2923:Shannon Colavecchio-Van Sickler (March 13, 2008). 6679:"In the News - Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" 6434:, posted by News LI Editor, edited by C. Cuizon, 6214:"Flunked, Not Expelled: Gaming the Movie Ratings" 5791: 5030:Atheist Scientists in Uproar over Movie: EXPELLED 4202: 2826:Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns‎ 2314:attend a screening will be awarded 1000 dollars. 2173:, and Steve Mirsky review and discuss the movie. 2169:, in which editor John Rennie, movie interviewee 1783:and lists the lead animator as Joseph Condeelis. 1508:Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center 1460:and a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's 7557: 6927:"The Austringer Âť Expelled from "Expelled"" 5708: 5645: 5643: 5641: 4932:Expelled Exposed: Questionable Interview Tactics 4489: 4096:Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life's Origin 3346: 2918: 2916: 2591: 2502: 1767:Alleged plagiarism of The Inner Life of the Cell 1328:Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns 6190: 6188: 3547: 2654:Discovery Institute intelligent design campaign 2511:media and by organizations affiliated with the 1563:is an author, historian of science, founder of 1321: 7372: 7370: 6630:"Expelled" Live Lecture Webcast at 11:00AM EST 6253:Adopt-A-Theater for the chance to win $ 1000!! 5383:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed - Four Stars 3793:Ben Stein to battle `anti-religious dogmatism` 3271: 3269: 3267: 3265: 3263: 3261: 3259: 3257: 3255: 3149: 3066: 3064: 3062: 3060: 3058: 2612:for attendees at the annual convention of the 1963:previewed the film at the Northland Church in 1642:Claims that film producers misled interviewees 7486:EXPELLED Controversy Top Issue in Blogosphere 6883:"One Great City ~ CH!CAGO: Private Screening" 6204: 6202: 5638: 2913: 2894:. National Center for Science Education. 2008 2233:, additional material, press articles, and a 1423:National Center for Biotechnology Information 1125:— the idea that there is evidence of a 7140: 6987:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 6487: 6185: 6158:Kitzmiller v. Dover:4. Whether ID is Science 5519: 5517: 5515: 5513: 5511: 4964: 4673:"Paul Myers, Associate Professor of Biology" 4360: 3436: 2165:is publishing a series of articles entitled 1924:, saw an early screening of the film at the 1547:is an engineering professor and director at 1251:" and allows no dissent from what it calls " 7452:"Pharyngula: An admission from Mark Mathis" 7367: 7342: 7340: 7221: 7115: 6939: 6895: 6096:Is film's marketing intelligently designed? 6030: 6028: 6026: 5567: 5565: 5315:, 'Editor's Note' to a post, April 11 2008. 5184: 5182: 4960: 4958: 4695: 3355: 3252: 3055: 1775:attributes the film animation sequences to 7537: 7512: 6967:Mark Looy, CCO, AiG–U.S (March 13, 2008). 6853: 6851: 6820: 6818: 6725: 6723: 6361: 6359: 6357: 6199: 3432: 3430: 3291: 3289: 3287: 3285: 3283: 2831:Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial 926: 202:A better section, please consider at least 6969:"A Meeting of Minds - Answers in Genesis" 6407: 6405: 5508: 5458:Is Ben Stein the new face of Creationism? 5452: 5290:, Uncommon Descent blog, 27 November 2007 4589: 3830: 2976: 2377:In January 2008, one of the producers of 7540:"Expelled in Tempe: The Final Countdown" 7337: 7297: 7273: 6875: 6413:Q&A: ‘Expelled' producer Logan Craft 6327: 6325: 6208: 6151: 6136: 6023: 5783:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 5562: 5450: 5448: 5446: 5444: 5442: 5440: 5438: 5436: 5434: 5432: 5179: 4955: 3766:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 3499:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 3472:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 3419:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 3040:CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 2285:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 2037:National Human Genome Research Institute 1806:, alleging that it infringed on XVIVO's 6848: 6815: 6720: 6423: 6354: 6295: 6293: 5719: 5325: 5323: 5321: 4766: 4764: 4561:Baptist professors featured in new film 4553: 4203:Leonard Steinhorn (December 31, 2007). 3774: 3702: 3553: 3427: 3280: 3211:Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't 2460:Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission 1143:and will get back to you on that." The 7558: 7291: 6402: 6110: 5950:Italic or bold markup not allowed in: 5626:Italic or bold markup not allowed in: 4152:Darwinism: The Imperialism of Biology? 3143: 2635: 2278:. Intelligent design was described by 2081:Sean P. Means, movie reviewer for the 676:titleEXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed 7195: 7175: 7023:"Pharyngula: It's a propaganda film!" 6373: 6322: 5483: 5481: 5479: 5477: 5475: 5473: 5471: 5429: 5269:National Center for Science Education 4936:National Centre for Science Education 4631:"The Simonyi Professorship Home Page" 4490:Shankar Vedantam (February 5, 2006). 3916:Darwinism and the Nazi race Holocaust 3698: 3696: 3694: 3692: 3690: 3688: 3686: 3684: 3682: 3680: 3179: 3177: 3175: 3173: 3171: 2972: 2970: 2968: 2966: 2964: 2962: 2960: 2958: 2956: 2885:National Center for Science Education 2405:Southern Baptists of Texas Convention 2359:unit director for the controversial 2318:Promotional interviews with producers 2137:Amanda Gefter, reviewing the film in 1648:National Center for Science Education 1539: 1444: 1274:, which is also a part of an ongoing 257:design proponents that ].</ref> 7346: 7279:"Pharyngula: A late night quick one" 7003:"Session :Bills : flsenate.gov" 6960: 6370:, Bill Greene Show, January 11, 2008 6290: 6169:http://www.getexpelled.com/index.php 6145:Premise Media Corporation, Accessed 5832: 5823:PZ Myers. Pharyngula, March 11, 2008 5660: 5318: 5084:EXPELLED makes front page of NYTimes 4833: 4770: 4761: 4652:"The Third Culture: Richard Dawkins" 4483: 4302:The Biological Society of Washington 3544:" and later as a "creationist idea". 3295: 3150:Tatania Siegel (February 15, 2008). 2442: 2338:, and therefore hurting science and 1864: 1802:letter was sent to the producers of 1407: 80: 46: 6505:"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" 5534:Warning! They've got designs on you 5342:Concerned Women for America website 5284:News Release: Harvard's XVIVO Video 4379:News Service: Iowa State University 4265:"Finding the Evolution in Medicine" 3240:"EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed" 3046: 1498: 906:Revision as of 22:49, 15 April 2008 206: 193: 162: 148:Revision as of 22:49, 15 April 2008 145: 138: 130: 99: 90:Revision as of 22:07, 15 April 2008 87: 13: 7082:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 7044:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 6438:, Society section, March 26, 2008. 6070:, Vol. 23, No. 7, April 05, 2008. 5938:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 5614:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 5523: 5468: 5227:About that cell video in Expelled… 4579:Q&A: ‘Expelled's' Robert Marks 4541:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 4066:Creationists, Hitler and Evolution 3677: 3168: 3081:[[Press Release]]" 2953: 2608:, a preview screening was held in 2089: 1589: 1555: 908: 35: 7612: 6859:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 6826:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 5330:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 5207:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 5190:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 4911:The Chronicle of Higher Education 4349:The Chronicle of Higher Education 3672:Journal of Clinical Investigation 2871:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 2855: 2519:one of the institute's websites, 1693:Ben Stein, Mocked and Belittled, 1431:Sternberg peer review controversy 1414:Sternberg peer review controversy 1215:Journal of Clinical Investigation 1061:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 921:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 7571:Intelligent design controversies 7515:"Even more on Expelled in Tempe" 7506: 7491: 7479: 7464: 7431: 7400: 7155: 6786: 6671: 6497: 6466: 6441: 6265: 6245: 6230: 4351:, May, 2007. Subscription needed 2237:. The blog's first entry was an 2132: 1913: 1631:, and the author of the science 1235:Creationism and Social Darwinism 7141:LesliePostal (March 10, 2008). 6174: 6162: 6088: 6073: 6053: 6005: 5988:Ben Stein's Film Blew Rush Away 5980: 5962: 5889: 5826: 5814: 5654: 5412:Ben Stein's Film Blew Rush Away 5404: 5375: 5372:Vol. 23, No. 7, April 05, 2008. 5354: 5306: 5303:Uncommon Descent April 10, 2008 5293: 5277: 5256: 5244: 5219: 5200: 5147: 5109: 5076: 5051: 5022: 4949:, an interview with Ben Stein, 4940: 4924: 4890: 4827: 4780:"I'm gonna be a ☆ MOVIE STAR ☆" 4739: 4689: 4677:University of Minnesota, Morris 4665: 4644: 4623: 4605: 4571: 4516:"Full Vita: Robert J. Marks II" 4508: 4463: 4354: 4337: 4290: 4258: 4247: 4196: 4174: 4144: 4118: 4075: 4045: 3998: 3901: 3814: 3785: 3660: 3649: 3645:Kitzmiller conclusion, page 137 3637: 3625: 3516: 3490: 3452: 3437:Josh Timonen (March 25, 2008). 2614:National Religious Broadcasters 2065:'s Roger Friedman writes that " 1672:Defunct Rampant Films site for 1629:University of Minnesota, Morris 1464:. He is also a fellow with the 1072:for their belief that there is 7222:Marc Caputo (March 15, 2008). 7116:Marc Caputo (March 10, 2008). 6799:Center for Science and Culture 5671:"Colorado Confidential: About" 5301:Expelled Plagiarizing Harvard? 5158:Associate Producer Mark Mathis 4971:"Atheist Scientists in Uproar" 4081:When Stein was interviewed by 3633:Kitzmiller conclusion, page 43 3503:, 04 cv 2688 ( 3476:, 04 cv 2688 ( 3195: 2941: 2507:The film is being promoted by 1462:Center for Science and Culture 1357:, reporter Pamela Winnick and 1100:. It is due to be released on 1: 7596:Documentaries about education 7581:Discovery Institute campaigns 7513:John Lynch (March 31, 2008). 7347:Dean, Cornelia (2008-03-21). 6118:Ben Stein's Introductory Blog 4600:Chronicle of Higher Education 4269:National Institutes of Health 3540:as "an ideological cousin of 2907: 2592:Conservative Christian groups 2578: 2521:Intelligent Design the Future 2503:Promotional efforts by others 1732:American Humanist Association 1623:is an Associate Professor of 1567:, and editor of its magazine 1421:is a Staff Scientist for the 904: 866: 846: 822: 810: 802: 790: 780: 509: 250: 7601:Documentaries about religion 7538:John Lynch (April 2, 2008). 5821:Expelled gets more bad press 2660:. The screening held in the 2202: 1730:, executive director of the 1322:People presented in the film 1276:Discovery Institute campaign 1136:In his review of the movie, 18:Browse history interactively 7: 7298:Chris Hewitt (03/21/2008). 6241:Expelled Challenge FAQ page 6195:Expelled Challenge FAQ page 5537:, New Scientist, p. 46 4011:Index to Creationist Claims 3936:The Holocaust and evolution 3856:Creation Science Evangelism 3532:, environmental journalist 2819: 2549:intelligent design movement 2464:Southern Baptist Convention 2104:Concerned Women for America 1615: 1111: 10: 7617: 7576:American documentary films 7388:The Looking Closer Journal 5216:, retrieved April 12, 2008 5117:Humanists vs. Evangelicals 4633:. The University of Oxford 4163:on Film official website, 3616:CS1 maint: date and year ( 2666:Challenger Learning Center 2253:". The letter claims that 1994:What the Bleep Do We Know? 1908: 1794:The Inner Life of the Cell 1411: 1232: 195: 7094:replacement character in 6449:I always aim to misbehave 6013:Ben Stein: Win His Career 5338:Culture and Family Issues 4211:. George Mason University 4056:Creationists for Genocide 3185:Ben Stein: Win His Career 2811:Screening "cancellations" 2630:creation/evolution debate 2624:reported that its leader 2210:The Passion of the Christ 1951:non-disclosure agreements 1364:also appear in the film. 1046: 1038: 1028: 1018: 1008: 1000: 988: 980: 968: 954: 942: 934: 925: 920: 830: 818: 806: 798: 778: 504:ref name=idnotCreationism 217: 214: 182:Pending changes reviewers 144: 86: 6903:"Expelled - RSVP System" 6084:Motive Marketing website 5970:No Intelligence Allowed! 5313:Expelled from 'Expelled' 3847:The Dangers of Evolution 3071:Lesley Burbridge-Bates ( 2472:Colorado Catholic Herald 2466:, the Christian program 2336:thinking outside the box 2294:The "Expelled Challenge" 2216:The Chronicles of Narnia 1969:non-disclosure agreement 1308:manufactured controversy 1217:(whose authors included 1191:by an astronomer, and a 1033:United States of America 119:Extended confirmed users 7419:Christianity Today Blog 6683:Access Research Network 6635:Family Research Council 5897:""A step to the right"" 5573:""A step to the right"" 5388:Access Research Network 4747:""Crossroads" synopsis" 4598:, Elizabeth F. Farrell, 3781:Expelled Movie trailers 3526:about the film for the 3135:URL–wikilink conflict ( 2618:young Earth creationist 2540:young earth creationist 2523:, makes the claim that 1781:Out of Our Mind Studios 1512:George Mason University 1298:leads to Holocaust and 1004:Rocky Mountain Pictures 85: 7498:Lying by press release 7325:Check date values in: 6760:Check date values in: 6708:Check date values in: 6534:Check date values in: 6418:Southern Baptist Texan 5997:The Rush Limbaugh Show 5975:The American Spectator 5926:Check date values in: 5877:Check date values in: 5758:Check date values in: 5696:Check date values in: 5602:Check date values in: 5550:Check date values in: 5421:The Rush Limbaugh Show 4996:Check date values in: 4878:Check date values in: 4815:Check date values in: 4727:Check date values in: 4584:Southern Baptist Texan 4566:Southern Baptist Texan 4405:Check date values in: 3968:Coral Ridge Ministries 3871:Check date values in: 3802:Scoop Independent News 3741:Check date values in: 3593:Check date values in: 3394:Check date values in: 3334:Check date values in: 3109:Check date values in: 3015:Check date values in: 2796: 2020:The American Spectator 1880:The American Spectator 1862: 1843: 1817: 1699: 1678: 1602:evolutionary biologist 1583: 1385:philosopher of science 1304: 1203: 1180: 710:credibility|date=April 701:|accessdate=2008-04-03 7439:See Ben Stein's Movie 6586:, Katherine T. Phan, 6105:American Public Media 5737:Colorado Confidential 5675:Colorado Confidential 5062:, Katherine T. Phan, 4445:(December 12, 2007). 4384:Iowa State University 4347:Richard Monastersky. 3925:CEN Technical Journal 3720:Colorado Confidential 2783: 2719:Family Policy Council 2650:Academic Freedom bill 2529:Academic Freedom Bill 2450:Colorado Confidential 2389:The Root of All Evil? 2187:Rennie believes that 2181:Pepperdine University 2055:presidential hopeful 1926:Archdiocese of Denver 1921:Colorado Confidential 1851: 1826: 1812: 1702:the video version of 1682: 1664: 1579: 1492:The Privileged Planet 1471:The Privileged Planet 1458:Iowa State University 1288: 1266:." The film portrays 1233:Further information: 1198: 1176: 6658:Catholic News Agency 5977:, February 19, 2008. 5463:The Orlando Sentinel 5154:A Conversation with 4947:Mocked and Belittled 4492:"Eden and Evolution" 4209:History News Network 3485:Conclusion of Ruling 3441:. RichardDawkins.net 2929:St. Petersburg Times 2670:Tallahassee, Florida 2474:. Whipple described 1960:The Orlando Sentinel 1736:letter to the editor 1610:University of Oxford 1565:The Skeptics Society 1425:and a fellow of the 1392:historian of science 911:Template:Future film 530:intelligent design " 421:that."<ref name=" 7437:Inside Higher Ed, " 6803:Discovery Institute 6509:ChristianCinema.com 6212:(16 January 2008). 6210:Elsberry, Wesley R. 5164:. Audio recording: 5162:Scientific American 4903:Richard Monastersky 4298:"Council Statement" 4069:Accessed 2008 from 3825:Discovery Institute 3439:"Expelled Overview" 3373:Discovery Institute 2950:, retrieved 4/10/08 2723:Discovery Institute 2687:scientific theories 2636:Florida legislators 2513:Discovery Institute 2489:persecution of Jews 2456:Focus on the Family 2427:had been rejected, 2392:and wrote the book 2275:The O'Reilly Factor 2162:Scientific American 2149:Discovery Institute 2127:Library of Congress 1755:Scientific American 1488:Discovery Institute 1158:Kitzmiller v. Dover 1145:Discovery Institute 1139:Scientific American 1064:is a controversial 964:Premise Media Corp. 497:creationism.<ref 7377:Jeffery Overstreet 7277:(March 21, 2008). 7248:Wesley R. Elsberry 6923:Wesley R. Elsberry 6835:Answers in Genesis 6797:, Premise Media, 6484:, March 28th, 2008 6477:, Rebecca Watson, 6463:, March 28, 2008 6420:, January 28, 2008 6278:Wesley R. Elsberry 6016:, Roger Friedman, 5465:, February 1, 2008 5426:, March 18, 2008. 5174:Partial transcript 4965:LifeSiteNews.com ( 4711:Guardian Unlimited 4586:, January 28, 2008 4568:, January 28, 2008 4443:Wesley R. Elsberry 4231:Unknown parameter 4105:The New York Times 4083:The New York Times 4071:Talkreason website 3987:Palgrave MacMillan 3605:Unknown parameter 3572:Center for Inquiry 3538:intelligent design 3188:, Roger Friedman, 3156:Variety (magazine) 2994:The New York Times 2843:Kitzmiller v Dover 2839:intelligent design 2837:documentary about 2779:Christianity Today 2731:Wesley R. Elsberry 2622:Answers in Genesis 2536:Answers in Genesis 2515:. As part of the 2304:Wesley R. Elsberry 2243:freedom of inquiry 2225:. A total of four 2046:radio commentator 1789:Harvard University 1621:Paul Zachary Myers 1540:Robert J. Marks II 1450:Guillermo Gonzalez 1445:Guillermo Gonzalez 1280:Christianity Today 1213:An article in the 1123:intelligent design 1121:The film promotes 1098:Planned Parenthood 1074:evidence of design 915:2008 American film 276:intelligent design 160: 97: 7591:Independent films 7441:", March 24, 2008 7411:"Dawkins crashes 7304:The Pioneer Press 7250:(14 March 2008). 6772:External link in 6546:External link in 6287:, March 29, 2008. 6064:, Marvin Olasky, 6040:Salt Lake Tribune 6002:, March 18, 2008. 5811:, March 10, 2008. 5807:, John Metcalfe, 5770:External link in 5365:, Marvin Olasky, 5299:William Dembski, 5241:, March 23, 2008. 5008:External link in 4696:MacAskill, Ewen ( 4520:Baylor University 4451:The Panda's Thumb 4417:External link in 4323:External link in 4273:McGill University 4059:, and Flank, L ( 3927:, 13(2):101–111, 3883:External link in 3753:External link in 3406:External link in 3216:Robert T. Pennock 3121:External link in 3027:External link in 2644:, representative 2443:Press conferences 2356:molecular biology 2222:The Polar Express 2083:Salt Lake Tribune 1965:Longwood, Florida 1865:Critical reaction 1777:Light Productions 1760:Kenneth R. Miller 1549:Baylor University 1514:where she taught 1419:Richard Sternberg 1408:Richard Sternberg 1359:nuclear physicist 1264:natural selection 1223:Ronald L. Numbers 1086:scientific theory 1057: 1056: 996:Robbie Bronnimann 938:Nathan Frankowski 903: 146: 88: 68: 7608: 7551: 7550: 7548: 7547: 7542:. Stranger Fruit 7535: 7526: 7525: 7523: 7522: 7517:. Stranger Fruit 7510: 7504: 7495: 7489: 7483: 7477: 7468: 7462: 7461: 7459: 7458: 7448: 7442: 7435: 7429: 7404: 7398: 7374: 7365: 7364: 7362: 7361: 7344: 7335: 7334: 7328: 7323: 7321: 7313: 7311: 7310: 7295: 7289: 7288: 7286: 7285: 7271: 7262: 7261: 7259: 7258: 7244: 7238: 7237: 7235: 7234: 7219: 7213: 7212: 7210: 7209: 7199: 7193: 7192: 7190: 7189: 7179: 7173: 7172: 7170: 7169: 7159: 7153: 7152: 7150: 7149: 7138: 7132: 7131: 7129: 7128: 7113: 7104: 7103: 7098:at position 30 ( 7097: 7091: 7085: 7084:|coauthors= 7080: 7078: 7070: 7068: 7067: 7060: 7054: 7053: 7047: 7046:|coauthors= 7042: 7040: 7032: 7030: 7029: 7019: 7013: 7012: 7010: 7009: 6999: 6993: 6992: 6986: 6978: 6976: 6975: 6964: 6958: 6957: 6955: 6954: 6949:. March 21, 2008 6943: 6937: 6936: 6934: 6933: 6919: 6913: 6912: 6910: 6909: 6899: 6893: 6892: 6890: 6889: 6879: 6873: 6868:Probe Ministries 6855: 6846: 6822: 6813: 6790: 6784: 6783: 6777: 6776: 6775:|publisher= 6769: 6763: 6758: 6756: 6748: 6746: 6745: 6727: 6718: 6717: 6711: 6706: 6704: 6696: 6694: 6693: 6675: 6669: 6557: 6551: 6550: 6549:|publisher= 6543: 6537: 6532: 6530: 6522: 6520: 6519: 6501: 6495: 6491: 6485: 6470: 6464: 6445: 6439: 6427: 6421: 6416:, Jerry Pierce, 6409: 6400: 6377: 6371: 6363: 6352: 6329: 6320: 6297: 6288: 6269: 6263: 6249: 6243: 6234: 6228: 6227: 6225: 6224: 6206: 6197: 6192: 6183: 6178: 6172: 6166: 6160: 6155: 6149: 6140: 6134: 6114: 6108: 6107:, April 4, 2008. 6092: 6086: 6077: 6071: 6057: 6051: 6050: 6048: 6047: 6042:. April 12, 2008 6032: 6021: 6020:, April 9, 2008. 6009: 6003: 5984: 5978: 5966: 5960: 5959: 5953: 5952:|publisher= 5947: 5941: 5940:|coauthors= 5935: 5929: 5924: 5922: 5914: 5912: 5911: 5899:. The Guardian. 5893: 5887: 5886: 5880: 5875: 5873: 5865: 5863: 5862: 5856:Seed Media Group 5830: 5824: 5818: 5812: 5800: 5789: 5788: 5781: 5775: 5774: 5767: 5761: 5756: 5754: 5746: 5744: 5743: 5717: 5706: 5705: 5699: 5694: 5692: 5684: 5682: 5681: 5658: 5652: 5647: 5636: 5635: 5629: 5628:|publisher= 5623: 5617: 5616:|coauthors= 5611: 5605: 5600: 5598: 5590: 5588: 5587: 5575:. The Guardian. 5569: 5560: 5559: 5553: 5548: 5546: 5538: 5524:Gefter, Amanda ( 5521: 5506: 5487:Gefter, Amanda: 5485: 5466: 5454: 5427: 5408: 5402: 5386:, Tom Magnuson, 5379: 5373: 5358: 5352: 5327: 5316: 5310: 5304: 5297: 5291: 5281: 5275: 5274:, April 9, 2008. 5260: 5254: 5248: 5242: 5223: 5217: 5204: 5198: 5193:, Justin Chang, 5186: 5177: 5151: 5145: 5113: 5107: 5080: 5074: 5055: 5049: 5026: 5020: 5019: 5013: 5012: 5011:|publisher= 5005: 4999: 4994: 4992: 4984: 4982: 4981: 4975:LifeSiteNews.com 4962: 4953: 4944: 4938: 4928: 4922: 4894: 4888: 4887: 4881: 4876: 4874: 4866: 4864: 4863: 4857:Seed Media Group 4831: 4825: 4824: 4818: 4813: 4811: 4803: 4801: 4800: 4794:Seed Media Group 4768: 4759: 4757: 4755: 4754: 4743: 4737: 4736: 4730: 4725: 4723: 4715: 4693: 4687: 4686: 4684: 4683: 4669: 4663: 4662: 4660: 4659: 4648: 4642: 4641: 4639: 4638: 4627: 4621: 4620:, April 1, 2008. 4609: 4603: 4593: 4587: 4582:, Jerry Pierce, 4575: 4569: 4564:, Jerry Pierce, 4557: 4551: 4550: 4544: 4539: 4537: 4529: 4527: 4526: 4512: 4506: 4505: 4503: 4502: 4487: 4481: 4480: 4478: 4477: 4467: 4461: 4460: 4458: 4457: 4439: 4433: 4432: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4414: 4408: 4403: 4401: 4393: 4391: 4390: 4362:Gregory Geoffrey 4358: 4352: 4341: 4335: 4334: 4328: 4327: 4326:|publisher= 4321: 4319: 4311: 4309: 4308: 4294: 4288: 4262: 4256: 4251: 4245: 4244: 4238: 4234: 4233:|coauthors= 4229: 4227: 4219: 4217: 4216: 4200: 4194: 4178: 4172: 4148: 4142: 4122: 4116: 4079: 4073: 4049: 4043: 4002: 3996: 3964:D. James Kennedy 3941:Jonathan Sarfati 3905: 3899: 3898: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3886:|publisher= 3880: 3874: 3869: 3867: 3859: 3834: 3828: 3818: 3812: 3789: 3783: 3778: 3772: 3771: 3764: 3758: 3757: 3750: 3744: 3739: 3737: 3729: 3727: 3726: 3700: 3675: 3664: 3658: 3653: 3647: 3641: 3635: 3629: 3623: 3621: 3614: 3608: 3602: 3596: 3591: 3589: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3568:Washington, D.C. 3565: 3555:Forrest, Barbara 3551: 3545: 3520: 3514: 3502: 3494: 3488: 3475: 3456: 3450: 3449: 3447: 3446: 3434: 3425: 3424: 3417: 3411: 3410: 3403: 3397: 3392: 3390: 3382: 3380: 3379: 3353: 3344: 3343: 3337: 3332: 3330: 3322: 3320: 3319: 3293: 3278: 3273: 3250: 3249: 3247: 3246: 3236: 3225: 3208: 3199: 3193: 3181: 3166: 3165: 3163: 3162: 3147: 3141: 3140: 3132: 3126: 3125: 3124:|publisher= 3118: 3112: 3107: 3105: 3097: 3095: 3094: 3085: 3068: 3053: 3052: 3045: 3038: 3032: 3031: 3024: 3018: 3013: 3011: 3003: 3001: 3000: 2974: 2951: 2945: 2939: 2938: 2936: 2935: 2920: 2902: 2900: 2899: 2881:Expelled Exposed 2568:Probe Ministries 2368:The Path to 9/11 2364:television movie 2259:Sir Isaac Newton 2227:public relations 2073:Justin Chang of 2053:Democratic Party 2029:Brown University 1930:Denver, Colorado 1860: 1800:cease-and-desist 1721:A War on Science 1697: 1676: 1504:Caroline Crocker 1499:Caroline Crocker 1468:and co-authored 1439:Stephen C. Meyer 1362:Gerald Schroeder 1066:documentary film 930: 918: 917: 707:|work=}}{{Verify 689:|title=EXPELLED: 674:."<ref name=" 204: 203: 201: 188: 178: 159: 154: 136: 125: 115: 96: 69: 60: 59: 57: 52: 50: 42: 39: 21: 19: 7616: 7615: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7556: 7555: 7554: 7545: 7543: 7536: 7529: 7520: 7518: 7511: 7507: 7496: 7492: 7484: 7480: 7469: 7465: 7456: 7454: 7450: 7449: 7445: 7436: 7432: 7405: 7401: 7375: 7368: 7359: 7357: 7345: 7338: 7326: 7324: 7315: 7314: 7308: 7306: 7296: 7292: 7283: 7281: 7272: 7265: 7256: 7254: 7245: 7241: 7232: 7230: 7220: 7216: 7207: 7205: 7201: 7200: 7196: 7187: 7185: 7181: 7180: 7176: 7167: 7165: 7161: 7160: 7156: 7147: 7145: 7139: 7135: 7126: 7124: 7114: 7107: 7095: 7093: 7083: 7081: 7072: 7071: 7065: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7057: 7045: 7043: 7034: 7033: 7027: 7025: 7021: 7020: 7016: 7007: 7005: 7001: 7000: 6996: 6980: 6979: 6973: 6971: 6965: 6961: 6952: 6950: 6945: 6944: 6940: 6931: 6929: 6925:(21 Mar 2008). 6920: 6916: 6907: 6905: 6901: 6900: 6896: 6887: 6885: 6881: 6880: 6876: 6856: 6849: 6823: 6816: 6791: 6787: 6774: 6773: 6771: 6761: 6759: 6750: 6749: 6743: 6741: 6729: 6728: 6721: 6709: 6707: 6698: 6697: 6691: 6689: 6677: 6676: 6672: 6649: 6626: 6608:Christian Today 6599: 6579: 6559: 6548: 6547: 6545: 6535: 6533: 6524: 6523: 6517: 6515: 6503: 6502: 6498: 6492: 6488: 6471: 6467: 6446: 6442: 6428: 6424: 6410: 6403: 6378: 6374: 6364: 6355: 6330: 6323: 6298: 6291: 6270: 6266: 6250: 6246: 6237: 6235: 6231: 6222: 6220: 6207: 6200: 6193: 6186: 6179: 6175: 6167: 6163: 6156: 6152: 6141: 6137: 6115: 6111: 6093: 6089: 6080:Recent Projects 6078: 6074: 6058: 6054: 6045: 6043: 6034: 6033: 6024: 6010: 6006: 5985: 5981: 5973:, Tom Bethell, 5967: 5963: 5951: 5949: 5939: 5937: 5927: 5925: 5916: 5915: 5909: 5907: 5895: 5894: 5890: 5878: 5876: 5867: 5866: 5860: 5858: 5831: 5827: 5819: 5815: 5801: 5792: 5782: 5772: 5771: 5769: 5759: 5757: 5748: 5747: 5741: 5739: 5718: 5709: 5697: 5695: 5686: 5685: 5679: 5677: 5659: 5655: 5648: 5639: 5627: 5625: 5615: 5613: 5603: 5601: 5592: 5591: 5585: 5583: 5571: 5570: 5563: 5551: 5549: 5540: 5539: 5522: 5509: 5486: 5469: 5455: 5430: 5409: 5405: 5380: 5376: 5359: 5355: 5328: 5319: 5311: 5307: 5298: 5294: 5288:William Dembski 5282: 5278: 5261: 5257: 5249: 5245: 5224: 5220: 5205: 5201: 5187: 5180: 5152: 5148: 5114: 5110: 5093:Uncommondescent 5089:William Dembski 5081: 5077: 5056: 5052: 5027: 5023: 5010: 5009: 5007: 4997: 4995: 4986: 4985: 4979: 4977: 4963: 4956: 4945: 4941: 4929: 4925: 4895: 4891: 4879: 4877: 4868: 4867: 4861: 4859: 4832: 4828: 4816: 4814: 4805: 4804: 4798: 4796: 4769: 4762: 4752: 4750: 4749:. Rampant Films 4745: 4744: 4740: 4728: 4726: 4717: 4716: 4694: 4690: 4681: 4679: 4671: 4670: 4666: 4657: 4655: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4636: 4634: 4629: 4628: 4624: 4616:, Skepticality 4610: 4606: 4594: 4590: 4576: 4572: 4558: 4554: 4542: 4540: 4531: 4530: 4524: 4522: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4500: 4498: 4496:Washington Post 4488: 4484: 4475: 4473: 4469: 4468: 4464: 4455: 4453: 4440: 4436: 4423: 4419: 4418: 4416: 4406: 4404: 4395: 4394: 4388: 4386: 4359: 4355: 4342: 4338: 4325: 4324: 4322: 4313: 4312: 4306: 4304: 4296: 4295: 4291: 4263: 4259: 4252: 4248: 4236: 4232: 4230: 4221: 4220: 4214: 4212: 4201: 4197: 4179: 4175: 4149: 4145: 4129:, Gordy Slack, 4123: 4119: 4089:and ultimately 4080: 4076: 4050: 4046: 4003: 3999: 3983:Richard Weikart 3906: 3902: 3889: 3885: 3884: 3882: 3872: 3870: 3861: 3860: 3836: 3835: 3831: 3819: 3815: 3790: 3786: 3779: 3775: 3765: 3755: 3754: 3752: 3742: 3740: 3731: 3730: 3724: 3722: 3701: 3678: 3665: 3661: 3654: 3650: 3642: 3638: 3630: 3626: 3615: 3606: 3604: 3594: 3592: 3583: 3582: 3577: 3575: 3563: 3552: 3548: 3521: 3517: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3469: 3457: 3453: 3444: 3442: 3435: 3428: 3418: 3408: 3407: 3405: 3395: 3393: 3384: 3383: 3377: 3375: 3357:Robert Crowther 3354: 3347: 3335: 3333: 3324: 3323: 3317: 3315: 3294: 3281: 3274: 3253: 3244: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3228: 3219: 3213: 3206: 3205: 3200: 3196: 3192:, April 9, 2008 3182: 3169: 3160: 3158: 3148: 3144: 3134: 3123: 3122: 3120: 3110: 3108: 3099: 3098: 3092: 3090: 3083: 3069: 3056: 3039: 3029: 3028: 3026: 3016: 3014: 3005: 3004: 2998: 2996: 2975: 2954: 2946: 2942: 2933: 2931: 2921: 2914: 2910: 2897: 2895: 2890: 2858: 2822: 2813: 2772:Richard Dawkins 2756:Mall of America 2745: 2664:Theater of the 2652:" reflecting a 2638: 2594: 2581: 2573:graduate school 2505: 2445: 2320: 2296: 2263:Albert Einstein 2205: 2171:Michael Shermer 2145:Richard Dawkins 2135: 2092: 2090:Christian media 2033:Francis Collins 1957:Roger Moore of 1918:Dan Whipple of 1916: 1911: 1867: 1861: 1858: 1821:William Dembski 1769: 1749:Francis Collins 1698: 1692: 1677: 1671: 1644: 1618: 1606:popular science 1595:Richard Dawkins 1592: 1590:Richard Dawkins 1561:Michael Shermer 1558: 1556:Michael Shermer 1542: 1501: 1447: 1416: 1410: 1395:Michael Shermer 1381:Richard Dawkins 1377:William Provine 1343:William Dembski 1341:faculty member 1335:David Berlinski 1324: 1237: 1231: 1172: 1119: 1114: 1021: 1011: 995: 975: 963: 961: 959: 949: 947: 916: 900: 893: 884: 879: 872: 864: 862: 858: 854: 842: 837: 828: 816: 796: 786: 774: 769: 762: 760: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 726: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 677: 673: 669: 666: 663: 662:'creationism,'" 660: 657: 654: 652: 649: 646: 643: 640: 637: 634: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 600: 597: 594: 591: 587: 584: 580: 577: 573: 569: 566: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 533: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 507: 505: 501: 498: 495: 492: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 369: 366: 363: 359: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 341: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 295: 292: 289: 286: 283: 279: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 258: 246: 241: 234: 227: 210: 205: 196: 194: 192: 191: 190: 186: 184: 168: 166: 161: 155: 150: 142: 140:← Previous edit 137: 131: 129: 128: 127: 123: 121: 105: 103: 98: 92: 84: 83: 82: 81: 79: 78: 77: 76: 75: 74: 65: 61: 55: 53: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38:Content deleted 37: 34: 29:← Previous edit 26: 25: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 7614: 7604: 7603: 7598: 7593: 7588: 7583: 7578: 7573: 7568: 7553: 7552: 7527: 7505: 7490: 7478: 7463: 7443: 7430: 7399: 7366: 7354:New York Times 7336: 7290: 7263: 7239: 7214: 7194: 7174: 7154: 7133: 7105: 7055: 7014: 6994: 6959: 6938: 6914: 6894: 6874: 6847: 6831:Georgia Purdom 6814: 6785: 6719: 6670: 6588:Christian Post 6496: 6486: 6465: 6440: 6422: 6401: 6372: 6353: 6321: 6289: 6282:The Austringer 6264: 6244: 6229: 6218:The Austringer 6198: 6184: 6173: 6161: 6150: 6135: 6109: 6087: 6072: 6067:World Magazine 6052: 6022: 6004: 5979: 5961: 5888: 5842:"Media alert!" 5825: 5813: 5809:New York Times 5790: 5707: 5653: 5637: 5561: 5507: 5467: 5428: 5403: 5374: 5368:World Magazine 5353: 5317: 5305: 5292: 5276: 5255: 5253:, April 9 2008 5243: 5218: 5199: 5178: 5146: 5126:New York Times 5122:Roy Speckhardt 5108: 5075: 5064:Christian Post 5050: 5021: 4954: 4951:World Magazine 4939: 4923: 4889: 4826: 4760: 4738: 4688: 4664: 4643: 4622: 4604: 4588: 4570: 4552: 4507: 4482: 4462: 4434: 4353: 4336: 4289: 4257: 4246: 4195: 4173: 4143: 4117: 4074: 4044: 3997: 3995: 3994: 3974: 3955: 3932: 3921:Jerry Bergman 3900: 3829: 3813: 3800:, Top Scoops, 3798:Bill Berkowitz 3784: 3773: 3676: 3659: 3648: 3636: 3624: 3546: 3529:New York Times 3515: 3489: 3451: 3426: 3345: 3279: 3251: 3226: 3194: 3167: 3142: 3054: 2952: 2948:Movie overview 2940: 2911: 2909: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2888: 2878: 2867: 2857: 2856:External links 2854: 2853: 2852: 2849:Flock of Dodos 2846: 2828: 2821: 2818: 2812: 2809: 2744: 2741: 2691:wedge strategy 2637: 2634: 2593: 2590: 2580: 2577: 2566:Ray Bohlin of 2531:" in Florida. 2504: 2501: 2444: 2441: 2437:origin of life 2319: 2316: 2295: 2292: 2204: 2201: 2134: 2131: 2120:World Magazine 2091: 2088: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1866: 1863: 1856: 1768: 1765: 1741:New York Times 1728:Roy Speckhardt 1695:World Magazine 1690: 1669: 1643: 1640: 1617: 1614: 1591: 1588: 1557: 1554: 1541: 1538: 1520:macroevolution 1500: 1497: 1454:astrophysicist 1446: 1443: 1412:Main article: 1409: 1406: 1399:anthropologist 1351:Jonathan Wells 1323: 1320: 1253:Charles Darwin 1230: 1227: 1171: 1168: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014:April 18, 2008 1012: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1002: 1001:Distributed by 998: 997: 990: 986: 985: 982: 978: 977: 970: 966: 965: 956: 952: 951: 944: 940: 939: 936: 932: 931: 923: 922: 914: 907: 902: 901: 898: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 885: 882: 880: 877: 874: 873: 869: 867: 865: 860: 856: 852: 849: 847: 844: 843: 840: 838: 835: 832: 831: 829: 825: 823: 820: 819: 817: 813: 811: 808: 807: 805: 803: 800: 799: 797: 793: 791: 788: 787: 783: 781: 779: 776: 775: 772: 770: 767: 764: 763: 758: 754: 751: 748: 745: 742: 739: 736: 733: 730: 727: 724: 721: 718: 715: 712: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 685: 682: 679: 675: 671: 667: 664: 661: 658: 655: 653: 650: 647: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 613: 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 585: 582: 578: 575: 571: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 543: 540: 537: 534: 531: 528:those opposing 527: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 510: 508: 503: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 478: 475: 472: 469: 466: 463: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 364: 361: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 277: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 255: 253: 251: 248: 247: 244: 242: 239: 236: 235: 232: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 219: 216: 212: 211: 185: 180: 179: 164: 143: 122: 117: 116: 101: 70: 64: 62: 44: 36: 27: 23: 22: 14: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7613: 7602: 7599: 7597: 7594: 7592: 7589: 7587: 7586:Future events 7584: 7582: 7579: 7577: 7574: 7572: 7569: 7567: 7564: 7563: 7561: 7541: 7534: 7532: 7516: 7509: 7503: 7499: 7494: 7487: 7482: 7475: 7472: 7467: 7453: 7447: 7440: 7434: 7428: 7424: 7420: 7416: 7414: 7408: 7403: 7397: 7393: 7389: 7385: 7384: 7378: 7373: 7371: 7356: 7355: 7350: 7343: 7341: 7332: 7319: 7305: 7301: 7294: 7280: 7276: 7270: 7268: 7253: 7249: 7243: 7229: 7225: 7218: 7204: 7198: 7184: 7178: 7164: 7158: 7144: 7137: 7123: 7119: 7112: 7110: 7101: 7089: 7076: 7059: 7051: 7038: 7024: 7018: 7004: 6998: 6990: 6984: 6970: 6963: 6948: 6942: 6928: 6924: 6918: 6904: 6898: 6884: 6878: 6872: 6869: 6865: 6861: 6860: 6854: 6852: 6844: 6840: 6836: 6832: 6828: 6827: 6821: 6819: 6812: 6808: 6804: 6800: 6796: 6795: 6789: 6781: 6767: 6754: 6740: 6736: 6735:ID the future 6732: 6726: 6724: 6715: 6702: 6688: 6684: 6680: 6674: 6667: 6663: 6659: 6655: 6654: 6647: 6643: 6639: 6636: 6632: 6631: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6613: 6609: 6605: 6604: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6585: 6584: 6577: 6573: 6569: 6568:WorldNetDaily 6565: 6564: 6555: 6541: 6528: 6514: 6510: 6506: 6500: 6494: 6490: 6483: 6480: 6476: 6475: 6469: 6462: 6459: 6455: 6451: 6450: 6444: 6437: 6433: 6432: 6426: 6419: 6415: 6414: 6408: 6406: 6398: 6394: 6390: 6387: 6386:ID the Future 6383: 6382: 6376: 6369: 6368: 6362: 6360: 6358: 6350: 6346: 6342: 6339: 6338:ID the Future 6335: 6334: 6328: 6326: 6318: 6314: 6310: 6307: 6306:ID the Future 6303: 6302: 6296: 6294: 6286: 6283: 6279: 6275: 6274: 6268: 6262: 6259: 6255: 6254: 6248: 6242: 6233: 6219: 6215: 6211: 6205: 6203: 6196: 6191: 6189: 6182: 6177: 6170: 6165: 6159: 6154: 6148: 6147:November 2007 6144: 6143:MOVIE CONTEST 6139: 6132: 6128: 6124: 6120: 6119: 6113: 6106: 6102: 6098: 6097: 6091: 6085: 6081: 6076: 6069: 6068: 6063: 6062: 6056: 6041: 6037: 6031: 6029: 6027: 6019: 6015: 6014: 6008: 6001: 5998: 5994: 5993:Rush Limbaugh 5990: 5989: 5983: 5976: 5972: 5971: 5965: 5957: 5945: 5933: 5920: 5906: 5902: 5898: 5892: 5884: 5871: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5848: 5843: 5839: 5835: 5829: 5822: 5817: 5810: 5806: 5805: 5799: 5797: 5795: 5786: 5779: 5773:|author= 5765: 5752: 5738: 5734: 5730: 5726: 5722: 5716: 5714: 5712: 5703: 5690: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5664: 5657: 5651: 5646: 5644: 5642: 5633: 5621: 5609: 5596: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5568: 5566: 5557: 5544: 5536: 5535: 5530: 5527: 5520: 5518: 5516: 5514: 5512: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5495: 5494:New Scientist 5490: 5484: 5482: 5480: 5478: 5476: 5474: 5472: 5464: 5460: 5459: 5453: 5451: 5449: 5447: 5445: 5443: 5441: 5439: 5437: 5435: 5433: 5425: 5422: 5418: 5417:Rush Limbaugh 5414: 5413: 5407: 5400: 5396: 5392: 5389: 5385: 5384: 5378: 5371: 5369: 5364: 5363: 5357: 5351: 5347: 5343: 5339: 5335: 5331: 5326: 5324: 5322: 5314: 5309: 5302: 5296: 5289: 5285: 5280: 5273: 5270: 5266: 5265: 5259: 5252: 5247: 5240: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5228: 5222: 5215: 5212: 5208: 5203: 5196: 5192: 5191: 5185: 5183: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5159: 5157: 5150: 5143: 5139: 5136:, Published: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5123: 5119: 5118: 5112: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5094: 5090: 5086: 5085: 5079: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5060: 5054: 5048: 5044: 5040: 5036: 5032: 5031: 5025: 5017: 5003: 4990: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4961: 4959: 4952: 4948: 4943: 4937: 4933: 4927: 4920: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4900: 4899: 4893: 4885: 4872: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4849: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4830: 4822: 4809: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4786: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4767: 4765: 4748: 4742: 4734: 4721: 4713: 4712: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4692: 4678: 4674: 4668: 4653: 4647: 4632: 4626: 4619: 4615: 4614: 4608: 4601: 4597: 4592: 4585: 4581: 4580: 4574: 4567: 4563: 4562: 4556: 4548: 4535: 4521: 4517: 4511: 4497: 4493: 4486: 4472: 4466: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4438: 4430: 4420:|author= 4412: 4399: 4385: 4381: 4380: 4375: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4357: 4350: 4346: 4340: 4332: 4317: 4303: 4299: 4293: 4286: 4283:). Retrieved 4282: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4261: 4255: 4250: 4242: 4237:|author= 4225: 4210: 4206: 4199: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4183: 4177: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4153: 4147: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4127: 4121: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4101:Cornelia Dean 4098: 4097: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4078: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4062: 4058: 4057: 4053: 4048: 4042: 4039: 4035: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4007: 4001: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3979: 3975: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3953: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3917: 3913: 3912: 3910: 3904: 3896: 3878: 3865: 3864:cite AV media 3857: 3853: 3849: 3848: 3843: 3839: 3833: 3826: 3822: 3817: 3810: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3794: 3788: 3782: 3777: 3769: 3762: 3756:|author= 3748: 3735: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3699: 3697: 3695: 3693: 3691: 3689: 3687: 3685: 3683: 3681: 3673: 3669: 3663: 3657: 3652: 3646: 3640: 3634: 3628: 3619: 3612: 3600: 3587: 3573: 3569: 3562: 3561: 3557:(May, 2007), 3556: 3550: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3534:Cornelia Dean 3531: 3530: 3525: 3519: 3513: 3509: 3506: 3501: 3500: 3493: 3486: 3482: 3479: 3474: 3473: 3467: 3463: 3462: 3455: 3440: 3433: 3431: 3422: 3415: 3409:|author= 3401: 3388: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3352: 3350: 3341: 3328: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3292: 3290: 3288: 3286: 3284: 3277: 3272: 3270: 3268: 3266: 3264: 3262: 3260: 3258: 3256: 3241: 3235: 3233: 3231: 3223: 3217: 3212: 3203: 3198: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3180: 3178: 3176: 3174: 3172: 3157: 3153: 3146: 3138: 3130: 3116: 3103: 3089: 3088:Premise Media 3082: 3080: 3074: 3067: 3065: 3063: 3061: 3059: 3050: 3043: 3036: 3030:|author= 3022: 3009: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978:Cornelia Dean 2973: 2971: 2969: 2967: 2965: 2963: 2961: 2959: 2957: 2949: 2944: 2930: 2926: 2919: 2917: 2912: 2893: 2889: 2886: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2866: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2824: 2823: 2817: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2795: 2793: 2789: 2782: 2780: 2775: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2740: 2737: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2700: 2694: 2692: 2688: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2620:organization 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2589: 2586: 2576: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2541: 2537: 2532: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2500: 2496: 2494: 2490: 2484: 2480: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2451: 2440: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2417:materialistic 2414: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2375: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2324:ID the Future 2315: 2311: 2307: 2305: 2301: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2281: 2280:Bill O'Reilly 2277: 2276: 2270: 2266: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2218: 2217: 2212: 2211: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2174: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2158: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2140:New Scientist 2133:Science media 2130: 2128: 2123: 2121: 2116: 2115:Marvin Olasky 2112: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2087: 2084: 2079: 2076: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2058: 2054: 2049: 2048:Rush Limbaugh 2045: 2040: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2002: 1998: 1996: 1995: 1988: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1955: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1914:General media 1906: 1902: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1889: 1888:Michael Moore 1884: 1882: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1871:Rush Limbaugh 1855: 1850: 1848: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1832: 1825: 1822: 1816: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1795: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1750: 1745: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1714: 1708: 1705: 1696: 1689: 1687: 1681: 1675: 1668: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652:Eugenie Scott 1649: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1613: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1596: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1566: 1562: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1537: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1496: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1472: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1442: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1415: 1405: 1403: 1402:Eugenie Scott 1400: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347:Stephen Meyer 1344: 1340: 1336: 1333: 1332:mathematician 1329: 1319: 1316: 1311: 1309: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1255:'s theory of 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241:press release 1236: 1226: 1224: 1220: 1219:Elliott Sober 1216: 1211: 1209: 1202: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1179: 1175: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1148: 1146: 1141: 1140: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1003: 999: 994: 991: 987: 984:Simon Tondeur 983: 979: 976:Jason Collett 974: 971: 967: 962:John Sullivan 957: 953: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 924: 919: 913: 912: 905: 897: 895: 890: 888: 887: 883: 881: 878: 876: 875: 868: 848: 845: 841: 839: 836: 834: 833: 824: 821: 812: 809: 804: 801: 792: 789: 782: 777: 773: 771: 768: 766: 765: 713:2008}}<!-- 648:"conveniently 511: 500:name=oreilly/ 392:cells—they're 252: 249: 245: 243: 240: 238: 237: 231: 229: 224: 222: 221: 213: 209: 199: 183: 176: 172: 167: 158: 153: 149: 141: 135: 120: 113: 109: 104: 95: 91: 73: 58: 51: 41:Content added 33: 30: 20: 7544:. Retrieved 7519:. Retrieved 7508: 7493: 7481: 7466: 7455:. Retrieved 7446: 7433: 7421:, Retrieved 7418: 7412: 7402: 7390:, Retrieved 7387: 7382: 7358:. Retrieved 7352: 7307:. Retrieved 7293: 7282:. Retrieved 7255:. Retrieved 7242: 7231:. Retrieved 7228:Miami Herald 7217: 7206:. Retrieved 7197: 7186:. Retrieved 7177: 7166:. Retrieved 7157: 7146:. Retrieved 7136: 7125:. Retrieved 7122:Miami Herald 7096:|title= 7064:. Retrieved 7058: 7026:. Retrieved 7017: 7006:. Retrieved 6997: 6972:. Retrieved 6962: 6951:. Retrieved 6941: 6930:. Retrieved 6917: 6906:. Retrieved 6897: 6886:. Retrieved 6877: 6858: 6833:, AiG–U.S., 6825: 6793: 6788: 6742:. Retrieved 6690:. Retrieved 6673: 6652: 6629: 6619:September 23 6602: 6592:September 28 6582: 6572:September 28 6562: 6516:. Retrieved 6499: 6489: 6473: 6468: 6448: 6443: 6430: 6425: 6412: 6380: 6375: 6366: 6332: 6300: 6272: 6267: 6258:Get Expelled 6252: 6247: 6232: 6221:. Retrieved 6217: 6176: 6164: 6153: 6138: 6117: 6112: 6095: 6090: 6075: 6065: 6060: 6055: 6044:. Retrieved 6012: 6007: 5987: 5982: 5969: 5964: 5908:. Retrieved 5891: 5859:. Retrieved 5852:Scienceblogs 5845: 5828: 5816: 5803: 5740:. Retrieved 5678:. Retrieved 5656: 5584:. Retrieved 5533: 5492: 5457: 5411: 5406: 5382: 5377: 5366: 5361: 5356: 5332:, including 5308: 5295: 5279: 5263: 5258: 5246: 5226: 5221: 5202: 5189: 5155: 5149: 5130:September 27 5116: 5111: 5100:September 27 5083: 5078: 5058: 5053: 5029: 5024: 4978:. Retrieved 4942: 4926: 4915:September 27 4897: 4892: 4860:. Retrieved 4853:Scienceblogs 4846: 4829: 4797:. Retrieved 4790:Scienceblogs 4783: 4751:. Retrieved 4741: 4709: 4698:September 28 4691: 4680:. Retrieved 4667: 4656:. Retrieved 4646: 4635:. Retrieved 4625: 4612: 4607: 4591: 4578: 4573: 4560: 4555: 4543:|month= 4523:. Retrieved 4510: 4499:. Retrieved 4485: 4474:. Retrieved 4465: 4454:. Retrieved 4437: 4387:. Retrieved 4377: 4356: 4339: 4305:. Retrieved 4292: 4277:Brian Alters 4260: 4249: 4239:suggested) ( 4213:. Retrieved 4208: 4198: 4181: 4176: 4151: 4146: 4125: 4120: 4109:September 27 4095: 4077: 4065: 4055: 4047: 4018: 4005: 4000: 3977: 3958: 3935: 3915: 3903: 3890:|title= 3845: 3832: 3816: 3806:11 September 3792: 3787: 3776: 3723:. Retrieved 3662: 3651: 3639: 3627: 3607:|month= 3576:, retrieved 3559: 3549: 3527: 3518: 3497: 3492: 3470: 3459: 3458:At the 2005 3454: 3443:. Retrieved 3376:. Retrieved 3316:. Retrieved 3243:. Retrieved 3222:Junk science 3197: 3184: 3159:. Retrieved 3145: 3091:. Retrieved 3078: 2997:. Retrieved 2982:September 27 2943: 2932:. Retrieved 2896:. Retrieved 2870: 2862: 2814: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2792: 2787: 2784: 2776: 2750:interviewee 2747: 2746: 2727:Miami Herald 2715: 2711: 2699:sunshine law 2695: 2682:Ronda Storms 2657: 2639: 2598:James Dobson 2595: 2582: 2565: 2533: 2524: 2520: 2506: 2497: 2485: 2481: 2475: 2471: 2468:Listen Up TV 2467: 2448: 2446: 2402: 2395:God Delusion 2393: 2387: 2378: 2376: 2323: 2321: 2312: 2308: 2297: 2284: 2273: 2271: 2267: 2220: 2214: 2208: 2206: 2198: 2194: 2188: 2186: 2177: 2175: 2160: 2154: 2138: 2136: 2118: 2113: 2093: 2080: 2072: 2066: 2061: 2057:Barack Obama 2044:conservative 2041: 2018: 2013: 2007:The Guardian 2005: 2003: 1999: 1992: 1989: 1958: 1956: 1954:questions." 1919: 1917: 1903: 1892: 1885: 1878: 1868: 1852: 1846: 1844: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1818: 1813: 1803: 1792: 1780: 1776: 1770: 1753: 1746: 1739: 1726: 1719: 1718:documentary 1709: 1704:quote-mining 1700: 1685: 1683: 1679: 1673: 1665: 1655: 1645: 1619: 1593: 1584: 1580: 1569: 1559: 1545:Robert Marks 1543: 1525:antisemitism 1516:Cell Biology 1502: 1491: 1483: 1476: 1469: 1448: 1434: 1417: 1388:Michael Ruse 1366: 1325: 1314: 1312: 1305: 1300:Nazi Germany 1289: 1283: 1238: 1214: 1212: 1204: 1199: 1185:supernatural 1181: 1177: 1173: 1162: 1156: 1149: 1137: 1135: 1131:junk science 1127:supernatural 1120: 1080:. Hosted by 1060: 1059: 1058: 1020:Running time 1010:Release date 993:Andy Hunter° 946:Kevin Miller 909: 695:Intelligence 423:sciam-rennie 326:unidentified 7407:Mark Moring 7327:|date= 6839:December 17 6762:|date= 6710:|date= 6642:November 28 6536:|date= 6101:Marketplace 5928:|date= 5879:|date= 5760:|date= 5725:February 15 5721:Dan Whipple 5698:|date= 5604:|date= 5552:|date= 5346:December 27 5039:Los Angeles 5035:PR Newswire 4998:|date= 4930:quatoed at 4880:|date= 4817:|date= 4729:|date= 4424:|work= 4407:|date= 4135:November 13 4027:, modified 4015:Talkorigins 3909:creationist 3873:|date= 3838:Kent Hovind 3743:|date= 3708:December 16 3704:Dan Whipple 3595:|date= 3542:creationism 3524:her article 3505:December 20 3478:December 20 3396:|date= 3336:|date= 3111:|date= 3017:|date= 2708:Miami Beach 2561:agnosticism 2344:health care 2239:open letter 2157:Mark Mathis 2096:December 27 2015:Tom Bethell 1985:Big Tobacco 1947:abiogenesis 1935:Berlin Wall 1895:Big Tobacco 1875:Tom Bethell 1575:Mark Mathis 1533:death camps 1355:Paul Nelson 1053:3.5 million 960:Walt Ruloff 958:Logan Craft 955:Produced by 950:Walt Ruloff 935:Directed by 755:similar) -- 614:unthinkable 576:intelligent 553:intelligent 458:intelligent 312:unspecified 208:Next edit → 32:Next edit → 7566:2008 films 7560:Categories 7546:2008-04-04 7521:2008-04-04 7457:2008-03-25 7360:2008-03-21 7309:2008-03-21 7284:2008-03-23 7257:2008-03-16 7233:2008-03-15 7208:2008-03-14 7188:2008-03-14 7168:2008-03-13 7148:2008-03-12 7127:2008-03-11 7066:2008-03-10 7028:2008-03-10 7008:2008-03-10 6974:2008-03-15 6953:2008-03-23 6932:2008-03-23 6908:2008-03-23 6888:2008-03-23 6864:Ray Bohlin 6744:2007-09-29 6739:2007-09-22 6692:2007-09-29 6687:2007-09-24 6612:Australian 6518:2007-09-29 6513:2007-09-23 6458:Pharyngula 6436:NewsLI.com 6393:February 4 6223:2008-01-16 6046:2008-08-18 5910:2008-04-04 5861:2008-03-11 5847:Pharyngula 5838:2008-02-27 5742:2008-02-16 5680:2008-02-16 5661:soapblox ( 5586:2008-04-04 5395:December 6 5236:Pharyngula 5156:Expelled's 5068:October 08 4980:2007-10-05 4967:2007-10-05 4862:2007-09-28 4848:Pharyngula 4839:2007-08-28 4799:2007-09-28 4785:Pharyngula 4776:2007-08-22 4753:2007-12-12 4682:2008-04-04 4658:2008-03-08 4654:. Edge.org 4637:2008-03-08 4525:2008-04-04 4501:2008-02-16 4476:2007-12-16 4456:2008-03-05 4389:2007-12-16 4307:2007-12-16 4285:2008-04-12 4281:2006-07-28 4275:Professor 4271:, quoting 4215:2008-01-11 4165:October 31 3725:2008-02-16 3578:2007-08-06 3536:describes 3445:2008-04-04 3378:2007-12-16 3361:October 24 3318:2007-12-16 3313:Pharyngula 3301:October 24 3245:2008-04-03 3161:2008-02-24 3093:2007-09-29 3073:2007-08-22 2999:2007-09-28 2934:2008-03-15 2908:References 2898:2008-04-15 2704:Dan Gelber 2579:Screenings 2470:, and the 2372:Darwin Day 2340:innovation 2288:court case 2178:alma mater 2025:Ken Miller 1943:panspermia 1899:propaganda 1831:Injunction 1674:Crossroads 1656:Crossroads 1636:Pharyngula 1370:biologists 1290:"In fact, 1245:skepticism 1193:university 1163:Kitzmiller 1070:persecuted 943:Written by 737:unreliable 639:scientific 596:scientific 482:scientific 274:summarises 6837:website, 6807:August 22 6662:August 29 6479:Skepchick 6345:August 27 6313:August 27 6127:August 21 6123:Ben Stein 5138:October 4 5043:October 4 4907:News Blog 4235:ignored ( 4157:Ben Stein 4052:Avalos, H 3947:22(1):4, 3609:ignored ( 3461:Kizmiller 3049:help page 3008:cite news 2760:Minnesota 2736:John West 2710:stated, 2646:Alan Hays 2610:Nashville 2509:Christian 2415:that the 2409:Darwinism 2379:Expelled, 2331:Hollywood 2251:dogmatism 2247:teleology 2203:Promotion 2042:American 1973:Holocaust 1808:copyright 1791:entitled 1286:website: 1272:Holocaust 1090:evolution 1082:Ben Stein 981:Edited by 973:Ben Stein 948:Ben Stein 757:></ 731:Wayback), 659:religious 651:dismissed 642:community 519:producers 455:promoting 358:organisms 328:designer 7502:PZ Myers 7474:March 23 7423:March 21 7413:Expelled 7392:March 21 7383:Expelled 7318:cite web 7275:PZ Myers 7075:cite web 7037:cite web 6983:cite web 6753:cite web 6701:cite web 6527:cite web 6454:PZ Myers 6018:Fox News 5919:cite web 5901:March 28 5870:cite web 5834:PZ Myers 5751:cite web 5689:cite web 5595:cite web 5577:March 28 5543:citation 5526:12 April 5499:March 24 5491:(blog), 5232:PZ Myers 4989:cite web 4871:cite web 4835:PZ Myers 4808:cite web 4772:PZ Myers 4720:cite web 4534:cite web 4398:cite web 4316:cite web 4224:cite web 4187:March 20 4091:genocide 4021:April 29 4019:created 3949:December 3945:Creation 3734:cite web 3586:citation 3387:cite web 3327:cite web 3297:PZ Myers 3190:Fox News 3102:cite web 3079:Expelled 2865:homepage 2863:Expelled 2841:and the 2820:See also 2788:Expelled 2764:March 20 2752:PZ Myers 2748:Expelled 2674:March 12 2658:Expelled 2602:March 11 2553:big tent 2525:Expelled 2476:Expelled 2458:and the 2352:genomics 2231:trailers 2189:Expelled 2067:Expelled 2063:Fox News 1857:—  1847:Expelled 1804:Expelled 1773:Variety 1734:wrote a 1691:—  1686:Expelled 1670:—  1616:PZ Myers 1529:eugenics 1484:Expelled 1373:PZ Myers 1339:theology 1296:eugenics 1284:Expelled 1260:mutation 1161:trial. 1112:Overview 1102:April 18 1039:Language 989:Music by 969:Starring 859:science. 743:archived 719:changing 704:|format= 599:evidence 581:designer 502:>< 488:approach 485:research 398:deciding 218:Line 27: 215:Line 27: 175:contribs 165:Mackan79 112:contribs 56:Wikitext 6871:website 6615:edition 6389:podcast 6341:podcast 6309:podcast 6261:website 6000:website 5424:website 5334:podcast 5272:website 5214:website 5195:Variety 4618:podcast 3850:(DVD). 2799:more." 2794:no one. 2702:leader 2642:Florida 2626:Ken Ham 2462:of the 2384:Columbo 2327:podcast 2255:Galileo 2108:podcast 2075:Variety 2035:of the 1939:Fascism 1909:Reviews 1837:well. 1738:of the 1716:Horizon 1625:biology 1599:British 1570:Skeptic 1208:trailer 1042:English 1029:Country 749:WebCite 698:Allowed 621:G-O-D." 605:support 559:because 479:serious 461:design, 383:certain 352:created 349:somehow 102:Archer3 7476:, 2008 7415:party" 6285:weblog 5663:July 3 5170:part 2 5166:part 1 4494:. The 4366:June 1 4087:racism 4063:1999) 4029:July 1 3574:, Inc. 3214:Also, 2845:trial. 2616:. The 2493:pogrom 2433:ZZ Top 2429:Darwin 2219:, and 1981:Hitler 1977:Stalin 1849:blog: 1479:tenure 1452:is an 1268:Darwin 1257:random 1189:tenure 1094:Nazism 1078:nature 1047:Budget 1024:97 min 746:(using 740:unless 680:{{cite 668:assert 588:might 464:claims 449:center 371:cells, 332:might 294:states 291:firmly 285:notion 271:Rennie 265:editor 134:popups 67:Inline 49:Visual 4131:Salon 3907:This 3564:(PDF) 3512:p. 64 3483:)., 3084:(PDF) 2672:, on 2600:. On 2557:Koran 2545:Bible 2421:Freud 2300:US $ 1873:and 1854:film. 1660:blurb 1650:head 1597:is a 1249:dogma 716:Keeps 678:"> 630:claim 565:don't 556:cause 532:don't 522:claim 506:/> 437:which 429:> 395:still 386:parts 377:maybe 365:maybe 355:whole 337:might 322:past, 315:times 288:which 262:'']'' 189:edits 187:7,363 126:edits 124:1,661 7427:2008 7396:2008 7331:help 7100:help 7088:help 7050:help 6989:link 6843:2007 6811:2007 6780:help 6766:help 6714:help 6666:2007 6646:2007 6638:blog 6623:2007 6596:2007 6576:2007 6554:help 6540:help 6482:blog 6461:blog 6397:2008 6349:2007 6317:2007 6131:2007 5956:help 5944:help 5932:help 5905:2008 5883:help 5785:link 5778:help 5764:help 5729:2008 5702:help 5667:2006 5632:help 5620:help 5608:help 5581:2008 5556:help 5529:2008 5503:2008 5399:2007 5391:blog 5350:2007 5239:blog 5211:IMDB 5168:and 5142:2007 5134:2007 5104:2007 5096:blog 5072:2007 5047:2007 5016:help 5002:help 4919:2007 4884:help 4821:help 4733:help 4702:2007 4547:help 4429:help 4422:and 4411:help 4370:2007 4331:help 4241:help 4191:2008 4169:2007 4161:Blog 4139:2007 4113:2007 4041:2006 4033:2005 4025:2001 3991:2004 3972:2007 3952:1999 3929:1999 3895:help 3888:and 3877:help 3842:2006 3809:2007 3796:, 3768:link 3761:help 3747:help 3712:2007 3618:link 3611:help 3599:help 3508:2005 3481:2005 3421:link 3414:help 3400:help 3365:2007 3340:help 3305:2007 3137:help 3129:help 3115:help 3042:link 3035:help 3021:help 2986:2007 2883:— A 2876:IMDb 2835:NOVA 2833:, a 2768:2008 2678:2008 2662:IMAX 2606:2008 2585:RSVP 2538:, a 2425:Marx 2423:and 2354:and 2261:and 2235:blog 2100:2007 2031:and 1979:and 1897:and 1841:ago? 1785:IMDB 1779:and 1633:blog 1531:and 1397:and 1379:and 1292:Nazi 1262:and 1247:for 1239:The 1221:and 1106:2008 761:> 722:(and 670:that 633:that 627:also 624:They 618:i.e. 590:lead 586:That 570:the 568:like 562:they 544:idea 541:very 535:like 525:that 467:that 410:back 404:will 380:just 368:just 320:the 309:more 297:that 268:John 171:talk 157:undo 152:edit 108:talk 94:edit 7379:, " 6862:, 5840:). 5731:). 5669:). 5531:), 4969:). 4841:). 4778:). 4704:). 4372:). 4036:, 3852:USA 3844:). 3823:, 3714:). 3522:In 3510:). 3367:). 3307:). 3075:). 2988:). 2874:at 2762:on 2758:in 2706:of 2693:. 2668:of 2640:In 2413:DNA 2361:ABC 2348:RNA 2117:of 2094:On 2027:of 2017:of 1997:". 1928:in 1877:of 1713:BBC 1627:at 1153:God 1096:to 1088:of 1076:in 855:not 759:ref 725:not 683:web 665:and 645:has 636:the 611:the 574:an 538:the 516:The 494:not 491:and 446:the 431:The 416:you 407:get 401:and 346:God 340:not 330:who 324:an 303:one 7562:: 7530:^ 7500:, 7425:, 7409:, 7394:, 7386:, 7369:^ 7351:. 7339:^ 7322:: 7320:}} 7316:{{ 7302:. 7266:^ 7226:. 7120:. 7108:^ 7092:; 7079:: 7077:}} 7073:{{ 7041:: 7039:}} 7035:{{ 6985:}} 6981:{{ 6866:, 6850:^ 6841:, 6829:, 6817:^ 6809:, 6805:, 6801:, 6770:; 6757:: 6755:}} 6751:{{ 6737:. 6733:. 6722:^ 6705:: 6703:}} 6699:{{ 6685:. 6681:. 6664:, 6660:, 6656:, 6650:• 6644:, 6640:, 6633:, 6627:• 6621:, 6617:, 6610:, 6606:, 6600:• 6594:, 6590:, 6580:• 6574:, 6570:, 6566:, 6560:• 6544:; 6531:: 6529:}} 6525:{{ 6511:. 6507:. 6456:, 6452:, 6404:^ 6395:, 6391:, 6384:, 6356:^ 6347:, 6343:, 6336:, 6324:^ 6315:, 6311:, 6304:, 6292:^ 6280:, 6276:, 6256:, 6216:. 6201:^ 6187:^ 6129:, 6125:, 6121:, 6103:, 6099:, 6082:, 6038:. 6025:^ 5995:, 5991:, 5948:; 5936:; 5923:: 5921:}} 5917:{{ 5903:, 5874:: 5872:}} 5868:{{ 5854:, 5850:. 5844:. 5793:^ 5768:; 5755:: 5753:}} 5749:{{ 5735:. 5727:, 5710:^ 5693:: 5691:}} 5687:{{ 5673:. 5665:, 5640:^ 5624:; 5612:; 5599:: 5597:}} 5593:{{ 5579:, 5564:^ 5547:: 5545:}} 5541:{{ 5510:^ 5501:, 5497:, 5470:^ 5431:^ 5419:, 5415:, 5397:, 5393:, 5348:, 5344:, 5340:, 5336:, 5320:^ 5286:, 5267:, 5234:, 5230:, 5209:, 5181:^ 5172:. 5160:, 5140:, 5132:, 5128:, 5124:, 5120:, 5102:, 5098:, 5091:, 5087:, 5070:, 5066:, 5045:, 5041:, 5037:, 5033:, 5006:; 4993:: 4991:}} 4987:{{ 4973:. 4957:^ 4934:, 4917:, 4913:, 4909:, 4905:, 4901:, 4875:: 4873:}} 4869:{{ 4855:, 4851:. 4845:. 4812:: 4810:}} 4806:{{ 4792:, 4788:. 4782:. 4763:^ 4724:: 4722:}} 4718:{{ 4708:. 4700:, 4675:. 4538:: 4536:}} 4532:{{ 4518:. 4449:. 4415:; 4402:: 4400:}} 4396:{{ 4382:. 4376:. 4368:, 4320:: 4318:}} 4314:{{ 4300:. 4267:, 4228:: 4226:}} 4222:{{ 4207:. 4189:, 4167:, 4159:, 4155:, 4137:, 4133:, 4115:). 4111:, 4107:, 4103:, 4099:, 4031:, 4023:, 4017:, 4013:, 4009:, 3989:, 3985:, 3981:, 3970:, 3966:, 3962:, 3943:, 3939:, 3923:, 3919:, 3881:; 3868:: 3866:}} 3862:{{ 3854:: 3804:, 3751:; 3738:: 3736:}} 3732:{{ 3718:. 3710:, 3679:^ 3670:, 3603:; 3590:: 3588:}} 3584:{{ 3570:: 3566:, 3429:^ 3404:; 3391:: 3389:}} 3385:{{ 3371:. 3363:, 3348:^ 3331:: 3329:}} 3325:{{ 3311:. 3303:, 3282:^ 3254:^ 3229:^ 3220:• 3170:^ 3154:. 3133:; 3119:; 3106:: 3104:}} 3100:{{ 3086:. 3057:^ 3051:). 3025:; 3012:: 3010:}} 3006:{{ 2992:. 2984:, 2955:^ 2927:. 2915:^ 2766:, 2676:, 2604:, 2563:. 2439:. 2366:, 2290:. 2257:, 2245:, 2213:, 2159:, 2102:, 2098:, 2059:. 1975:, 1937:, 1810:: 1604:, 1527:, 1404:. 1390:, 1383:, 1375:, 1353:, 1349:, 1345:, 1337:, 1302:." 1108:. 1104:, 1051:$ 752:or 734:so 728:in 692:No 656:as 616:, 608:of 602:in 593:to 583:.' 550:an 547:of 473:is 470:it 452:of 443:at 440:is 434:], 419:on 413:to 389:of 374:or 362:or 360:, 343:be 334:or 318:in 306:or 300:at 278:as 200:: 173:| 110:| 7549:. 7524:. 7460:. 7417:, 7363:. 7333:) 7329:( 7312:. 7287:. 7260:. 7236:. 7211:. 7191:. 7171:. 7151:. 7130:. 7102:) 7090:) 7086:( 7069:. 7052:) 7048:( 7031:. 7011:. 6991:) 6977:. 6956:. 6935:. 6911:. 6891:. 6845:. 6782:) 6778:( 6768:) 6764:( 6747:. 6716:) 6712:( 6695:. 6668:. 6648:. 6625:. 6598:. 6578:. 6558:. 6556:) 6552:( 6542:) 6538:( 6521:. 6399:. 6351:. 6319:. 6226:. 6133:. 6049:. 5958:) 5954:( 5946:) 5942:( 5934:) 5930:( 5913:. 5885:) 5881:( 5864:. 5836:( 5787:) 5780:) 5776:( 5766:) 5762:( 5745:. 5723:( 5704:) 5700:( 5683:. 5634:) 5630:( 5622:) 5618:( 5610:) 5606:( 5589:. 5558:) 5554:( 5505:. 5401:. 5370:, 5176:. 5144:. 5106:. 5018:) 5014:( 5004:) 5000:( 4983:. 4921:. 4886:) 4882:( 4865:. 4837:( 4823:) 4819:( 4802:. 4774:( 4756:. 4735:) 4731:( 4714:. 4685:. 4661:. 4640:. 4549:) 4545:( 4528:. 4504:. 4479:. 4459:. 4431:) 4427:( 4413:) 4409:( 4392:. 4364:( 4333:) 4329:( 4310:. 4287:. 4279:( 4243:) 4218:. 4171:. 4141:. 4061:Š 4038:Š 3993:. 3954:. 3931:. 3897:) 3893:( 3879:) 3875:( 3858:. 3840:( 3827:. 3811:. 3770:) 3763:) 3759:( 3749:) 3745:( 3728:. 3706:( 3666:( 3622:. 3620:) 3613:) 3601:) 3597:( 3487:. 3448:. 3423:) 3416:) 3412:( 3402:) 3398:( 3381:. 3359:( 3342:) 3338:( 3321:. 3299:( 3248:. 3164:. 3139:) 3131:) 3127:( 3117:) 3113:( 3096:. 3077:" 3044:) 3037:) 3033:( 3023:) 3019:( 3002:. 2980:( 2937:. 2901:. 2397:. 2122:, 1796:, 1473:. 861:" 853:" 579:' 476:a 427:/ 425:" 282:a 280:" 177:) 169:( 114:) 106:(

Index

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Next edit →
Visual
Wikitext

Revision as of 22:07, 15 April 2008
edit
Archer3
talk
contribs
Extended confirmed users
popups
← Previous edit
Revision as of 22:49, 15 April 2008
edit
undo
Mackan79
talk
contribs
Pending changes reviewers
→‎Promotion of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution
Next edit →
Template:Future film

Ben Stein
Andy Hunter°
United States of America
$
documentary film

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑