User talk:AKR619/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

282:

is, as two other editors have already stated there, faulty and makes a leap of original research/synthesis on your part. The fact that you believe what your surmise from a documentary indicates something is nowhere near the level of proof demanded of challenged claims on Knowledge. If you add back this material again without providing any new justification or source supporting your claim, then I will consider your behaviour disruptive to the encyclopedia and either protect the article from editing or block you from editing.

1013:. I put "citation" tags on several of the things you wrote because they are opinions without a source. Rather than simply deleting those tags, you need to provide the source for that information. I think this could be done in a couple of ways... one would be to say: "According to XXXXX," and give us the name of the documentary that made these assertions. Another would be to add a note or reference for the section and name the source. As it currently stands, these entries don't meet the wikipedia policies for 1548: 594: 1481: 1436: 2044:, if you feel strongly about it, you should initiate discussion on the talk page, rather than engaging in an edit war. My own suspicion is that this kind of content needs to be more developed than its current form for inclusion. BUT you cannot apply the results of a decision amongst the editors at Frank Oz, to the rest of wikipedia. If you do feel that those sections in other articles have copyright implications please do bring it up at the 81: 2137:. As you point out, there are a fair number of these categories, and their numbers are increasing. That, in itself isn't a justification for creating more of them. I suspect a fair number, if not most of the awards categories should be deleted, and perhaps they will over time. You can choose to follow the guidelines or work counter to them. A better tact if you think the guideline is wrong, is to discuss changing it at 2314: 1274: 2220:. That policy page states that "Primary sources" includes "television programs", and that "Knowledge articles should rely mainly on published reliable secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources", and to the extent that any primary sources are used, the article must "make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source". 2232:'"Colleen was very upset, but was pleased when Sally pulled through. She now knows that Cassie is pregnant after telling Cassie that she's put on a little bit of weight and Cassie then went up to Colleen and said "Actually Mrs Smart I am pregnant." ... She was apprehensive about Cassie because she is HIV Positive at first, not being fully aware about it. Though at the same time sympathised with her.' 1824: 1665: 1329: 1237: 1072: 467: 1597:

think that it had many problems, as does your recreation, but the problems are fixable. The main problem is that the things cited for each actor are not directly on point. If you are going to use quantity of awards, you should also cite an authority that makes the assertion that winning the most awards is significant. (

565: 513: 408:. I'm removing your entry because just receiving nominations does not make any film "the greatest". I suggest that you look over the history of the page, and the talk page to get a sense of what belongs and what doesn't. And if you happen to be that former user, I hope you are returning with a better attitude. -- 835:

the remainder going into the main Dave the Barbarian page. The page is short enough, with few enough items that it could easily be moved over; having a separate list of items is less helpful than integrating the information with individual pages as there is no information to link the separate sections together.

512:'s article Fan Reaction, if you're going to add fan-pairings around, you must be sure that those pairings are popular around the fandom as the one known as Kigo (Kim/Shego) is. The main reason for which Kigo is mentioned is because of it's notability, something you can easily prove by searching around 2293:

I have removed your category addition to the article regarding Connolly being a naturalised citizen of Australia. There is nothing in the article to indicate this and I cannot find anything to back that up elsewhere. This information will not be accepted unless you can provide a reputable third-party

2236:

Please let me know which portion of Knowledge policy you believe backs up your restoration of this unreferenced synthesis/original research to an article. Also, I will ignore your accusation of vandalism in your edit summary, but if you continue such disruptive and uncivil behaviour in the future you

2223:

The show sure can be used as a reliable source for descriptive claims (though preferably with specific inline citations to episode numbers, rather than just general reference to a show with thousands of episodes). However, most of the stuff I removed engaged in some ways in synthesis and speculation.

1802:

Hi, in this artticle, you recently said "would you all please stop deleting these" in the caption to a recent edit, referring to a number of mentions of Amblin that were "uncredited" on the films. On that basis, can you cite the sources from which you derive the information that they were actually

2354:

There was an IP – whose number is always changing, but always starts with '92.12 or 92.13' – who insists on including it even if he/she acknowledges it is a rumour. Maybe they'll edit irregularly and someone can swat them whenever they pop up (similarly, I'll never be able to block the person adding

819:

Also, it's not even linked to the main page, it's an orphan. There is no way to get to the page except by typing in exactly the correct page title. There's no redirects or links to other pages. It may not be a good choice for a page. How many items are there in the game? Is there really so many

1883:

I suggest that you stay away from the Amblin page for a while. Nobody seems to support your changes, and they have posted reasonable reasons for reverting you on the discussion page. You comments about being called a sockpuppet have no reason to be in an edit summary for an article. If anything,

834:

Please leave the orphan tag until more links are established to List of things in Dave the Barbarian. It currently links to exactly one page, Dave the Barbarian, and is still considered orphaned. Also, consider merging the contents of the page into the individual episode pages if they exist, with

447:

on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Knowledge, please note that inserting spam into Knowledge is against policy. For more information about me, see

281:

In you removed a factual accuracy dispute tag from the ] article, and restored movies to the article which are disputed by another editor and for which specific, reliable and verifiable sources have been requested. The rationale for their inclusion which you previously provided on the article's ]

2426:

1596:

I've restored the history of the page and moved it to a shared user-space that I've created for lists such as this one. I believe that the page could be improved enough so that it might survive in the main-space. You might recall, that I argued to keep the page when it was on AFD. However, I do

853:

has recorded a voice over part for Dave the Barbarian, and for the second time it has been removed. IMDb is not a reliable source, as anyone can add information there, be it true or not. If you can find any (reliable) cite that says this happened, or that this episode he supposedly recorded aired,

2430:

I also notice from your contributions that you have again been accusing people of "vandalism" when you disagree with their editorial actions. Let me refresh your memory about what I wrote earlier in the month: "if you continue such disruptive and uncivil behaviour in the future you may be blocked

1405:

Any way I interpret "Save it for your retarded ku klux klan meetings" it reads as a personal attack. If the editor is a KKK supporter the comment calls him retarded for his beliefs. If the editor is not a KKK supporter the comment calls him a retard and adds the possible insult that he is a KKK

1043:

to use an oscar nomination or win to be a citation for a film being the "best" of a genre. I don't think this is a "retarded" idea, rather, I think it is keeping with the policies that make Knowledge successful. If you think it is a bad idea, the appropriate response is a note on the discussion

987:

Hello. You re-added Steve Martin to the Casting section of the above article, with the explanation that he "revealed in his book that he also auditioned for the role and he desperately wanted it". Which book is this supposed to be in? Martin doesn't appear to be mentioned in executive producer

574:

You can't base your contributions on Knowledge acording to just what some little kids says, information in Knowledge must be sourced from either another website or some other media, like a book or a novel (In case we're talking about facts of fictional characters). Considering this, I can't allow

302:

2215:

Hello. In your recent restorations of unreferenced material to the character articles, you mentioned in some edit summaries that the material is allowed by the "Knowledge rulebook". Could you please point to the specific parts of the policy to which you're referring? For reference, the part of

1865:. Next time you would like assistance from and admin, please leave links to the history diffs that are examples of the problem you want dealt with, and check that your links work. It took me some time to find the User you wanted me to look at, because you had misspelled the link. -- 323:

Finally, have you found the policy which backs you up in relation to the Home and Away character articles yet? Last chance to find me some specific references, otherwise I'll go through and revert them back down to the stub versions in the next day or two. - ] 11:13, 26 October 2008

1396:

There is an implication that the editor is a member of the Klu Klux Klan, which to many people would be very insulting. If you had knowledge that the editor was a member of the KKK, it would not be wrong to mention that, but in that case point #3 would have been more of an

152: 1605:. I suggest that you be more careful with your edit comments, especially when you are doing something that is bound to be controversial (like recreating a deleted page). Implying that people are hypocrites will not help you make friends and influence people. -- 438:

from Knowledge. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. Please read

2434:

1751:. This is because it is seemingly a completely arbitrary selection with no apparent basis. You seem to have a habit of doing this and I advise you to read our policy on what is a reliable source otherwise you will be blocked for your disruptive editing. -- 1884:

the comments make you look more guilty of the accusation. Your edits are becoming disruptive. If you revert the Amblin page again, without first having built a strong consensus for your change on the discussion page, you will be asking for a block. --

73: 1602: 1623:

Yes I do remember you arguing it for it to be kept, you were one of the few, and I agree it does need to be improved and trust me I promise to keep a very closeful eye on the page to make it as less POV as films considered the greatest ever.

1496: 2421:

article, and restored movies to the article which are disputed by another editor and for which specific, reliable and verifiable sources have been requested. The rationale for their inclusion which you previously provided on the article's

552:

Well that's what the kids in the pre-school class I teach keep telling me (Dave The Barbarian is married to Kim Possible), and I believe another user has tried to put Dave as one of the love interests. So would that count as fan-fic?

1186:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

542:'s article. I'm not going to give you all the time of the world 'cause I can't allow irrelevant and probably fake information to be shown like that. Either you prove that that paragraph is worth mentioning or I'll remove it soon. -- 2427:

this material again without providing any new justification or source supporting your claim, then I will consider your behaviour disruptive to the encyclopedia and either protect the article from editing or block you from editing.

1717:

Edge's claim is not that notable. When he was feuding with Cena for the WWE Championship in summer/fall 2006, he claimed that he was undefeated in TLC matches (even though that was false, he and Christian lost TLC III).

568:

and you'll find what Kigo (Kim/Shego) Fics are. Other than that, I haven't found any Kim/Junior or Kim/Dave material, specially because Kim and Dave are from differents series! (And, as far as I know, differents in much

809:

for what wikipedia is not - it's not an indiscriminate collection of information, so lists of things in video games usually aren't considered particularly encyclopedic; they're better embedded in the main page's text.

2195:

and in edit summaries. Also neither of you have ever responded to my attempts at discussion on the articles talk page, is there a reason for that? Perhaps if you explain why your edits don't need any sources, i might

1555: 1443: 1429: 615:

I hate to do this, but you're acting against what's been decided and without giving any valid policy, and opinions only count in the Talk Pages. So please start acting like a good wikipedian or I'll have to report.

2090:

Whoops, sorry about that, it was an honest mistake as my first revert came at the same time as the one reverting vandalisim, I thought you were being a smart arse who was reverting the page back to its vandalisim.

1451: 1488: 1474: 761:

episode articles pretty much fit the guidelines mentioned above). Therefore, I have reverted those articles back to redirects. Please do not restore them unless you can make them fit Knowledge's policies.

424: 523:

I'm not going to remove that just yet, but rather give you time to either prove it's notability or remove it yourself. At any rate, if you have something to say, I'd rather you discuss it in the article's

1392:

Perhaps the ambiguously posted "Racist!" could have been meant to be a comment about the edit and not the editor, but considering the rest of the comments, it reads as an attack -- calling the editor a

1427: 769:

back to the main article. I note that you say you are going to expand it, and feel free to restore it when you do that, but until then it is only duplicating the information in the main article.

1472: 422: 753:

for guidelines on when individual TV episode articles may be notable, and what those articles should contain. The fact that individual articles exist for other TV programs isn't a factor (see

25: 1979:

your stock you puted on the page is way too political and not enough science fiction, I would say and I suspect. We all know politics has many allure but does it make it science fiction?

1311:

Well if that's the way you want to put it, what you did to my talk page is considered vandalisim. If you've seen the way Carl treats Johnny in the show you'll see he's obsessed with him --

1601:

also has this problem in the Academy Award section.) If the article improves enough, I would be willing to be an advocate for its return to the main-space. For now, you can find it at

2113: 2129:

as the result of discussions. They are created, and then if objected to, a discussion decides if they should be deleted. If you object to the decision to delete you can bring it to

1106: 1909:

and the Indiana Jones series, please stop adding them to the article. Also, your recent blind revert removed some valid info and formatting. Please be more careful in the future.

203: 135: 1962:

is because ILM had some involvement with the special effects. Amblin still didn't produce those movies, nor did they produce Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

1183: 520:, and as far as I'm concerned, those pairings are nowhere as popular as Kigo. Including minor notable fan-pairings like that is what could turn the article into a fan-site. 1467: 1512: 942:

Hehe, funny though, I never saw this in any other reliable source. Still, you struck gold! Next time though, always refer to people by their surname, not "Ted and Terry".

682:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

456: 2185:, and until sources exist i must revert their addition. These common themes you are claiming don't appear in sources i checked, like the Encylopedia of Science fiction. 1333: 1321: 2321: 2191:, the core policy i was referring too. And consensus with that particular user does nothing to convince me, after the offensive and incoherent msges he leaves on my 1148: 1101: 2329: 1213:. It is alright to discuss why you disagree with an edit. It is not alright to call someone a "retard". If you continue you will be blocked from editing. -- 725: 2048:

for central discussion, blatting those articles without discussion is trying to create a wheel war - and I doubt if continuation of it will be tolerated. It's

2247:

Are you planning at all on answering me? If you can't provide a specific reference to policy to back up your claims, I'll go through and revert your edits. -

2021:

in a film is not in itself an infringement of intellectual property. Such large scale deletions should be discussed beforehand. If necessary take up it up at

2385:

Second, please stop re-creating the category. Just because a character may decide to call themself a lord or lady, doesn't mean we should categorise by it.

2052:

and disruptive. Take a break, think about some substance and referenced content for that Oz article - and discuss the matter with the other editors. Thanks

2013:, amongst others, claiming 'a breach of trademark'. I think a single question would be apposite - where is this 'registered as a trademark'? To comment on 1144: 449: 147: 103: 1092: 645:. This allows readers to seek out and verify the information on their own. Claiming it was said in some documentary in an edit summary causes it to fail 241:

If they ''are'' nobility, then they should be categoried under ] (where the rest of the "lords and ladies" are already). - ] 12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

234:

If they ''are'' nobility, then they should be categoried under ] (where the rest of the "lords and ladies" are already). - ] 12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

41: 38: 2308: 1946: 1689: 713: 698:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 955: 905:

Please stop with the edit war you are currently engaged in on the Hall of Fame page. If this matter persist you may be blocked from editing wikipedia.

2225: 1838:. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with 1086:. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with 1522:

He is still a SmackDown superstar, he just appears on RAW occasionally. It's the same with Ric Flair, he is still technically a SmackDown wrestler.

2141:. You might first read the discussions that led to the creation of the guideline in the first place, to help you understand why we created it. -- 1349: 453: 110: 1789: 2344: 996: 580:

Please, next time you decide to contribute in some article, make sure to talk in said article's Talk Page before attemting some major changes. --

82: 1090:

please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --

517: 344:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

2061: 1409:

I appreciate the motivation of not wanting racist comments made. However, even the worst, most offensive actions require a civil response. --

431: 1918: 1851: 546: 1965: 1025: 946: 923: 600:

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Knowledge, as you did to

538:

I've been looking around ff.net, DeviantART and other sites, but yet I haven't found ANY mention about fanfics likes the one you stated in

143: 99: 2034: 979: 2266: 2133:. Looking at the previous discussion to delete, I would concur with the decision to delete. The overcategorization guideline clearly 2120: 1374: 928:

Austereo doesn't give out transcripts of the interviews, they're not even able for purchase, don't why but it's their strange policy.

2241: 1004: 2276: 2210: 1421: 1036: 883:

Guild has nothing to do with casting. If it was real it wouldn't be so hard to find even one other cite for the episode existing.«»

2251: 1617: 1356: 894: 2004: 384: 1896: 1842:

please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.

1400:

The use of the word "retarded" implies that the editor is a retard. This is exactly the word I had concerns about twice before.

1344:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 2400: 2076: 1817: 1653: 1384: 1139:

until you provide a source and justify why this information belongs on the page. You may wish to familiarize yourself with our

703: 2167: 1960:

I'm guessing the reason why there were clips for Splash, Forrest Gump and the first two Terminator movies in that documentary

620: 584: 532: 2205: 1633: 1812: 1590: 387:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

2439: 2153: 914: 909: 473:

Welcome to Knowledge. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without

177: 2181:

that the themes you are adding the the page are common and well-known, but i simply disagree. Hence the onus is on you to

1044:

page explaining your reasons. It does not help to call people retards. Please familiarize yourself with our policies on

1938: 1191: 791: 2085: 1154: 1113: 735: 2373: 2303: 1998: 1803:

involved - I find it surprising that Amblin should do such work and NOT be acknowledged on the film credits. regards,

1707: 1598: 1306: 1268: 405: 2368: 1762: 1668:

Thanks for experimenting with Knowledge. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been

498: 398:

Also, you should know that there is a history of a former user being blocked because of his behavior regarding adding

2414: 2411: 2100: 1782: 865: 1542: 1537: 1315: 1060: 1320: 2192: 1225: 2105: 1574: 707: 683: 2405: 2172: 1835: 1681: 773: 1931:

Stay away from the Amblin page! If you continue to change the page again, I will suggest to get you blocked!

839: 660: 1994: 1733: 1337: 525: 417: 368: 1795: 824: 814: 503: 353: 341: 2335: 2073: 1877: 2393: 679: 1914: 1018: 889: 860: 754: 655: 478: 461: 170: 1862: 1202: 2423: 2325: 1578: 1569: 1492: 1447: 1345: 1299: 1159: 687: 609: 373: 2364: 2328:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1839: 1828: 1677: 1563: 1495:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1450:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1380:

And what exactly did I do wrong, I didn't do any personal attacks on any person just ku klux klan--

1291: 1087: 1076: 1030: 1014: 919:

I'd like to review that statement. Could you give me a proper transcript of that interview please?

844: 766: 639: 601: 539: 509: 474: 772:

Another idea might be to expand the list of episodes with a quick summary of each one, a bit like

694:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2106: 1974: 1942: 1847: 1831: 1757: 1673: 1079: 646: 413: 117: 2282: 2067: 1658: 1497:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Television series considered the greatest ever (2nd nomination)

1196: 981: 906: 786: 348: 159: 1676:

in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please

1910: 1776: 1230: 482: 380: 76: 1180:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 1176:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the 2418: 2057: 2030: 1982: 1934: 1796: 1507: 1169: 969: 934: 740: 665: 1768:

Equally, Outpost Gallifrey isn't a reliable source. You must list where THEy got it from.

745:

I redirected the episode articles because they are not notable on their own. Please read

8: 2360: 2138: 2117: 2080: 1517: 1287: 1245: 1165: 1065: 1010: 952: 943: 920: 400: 388: 2299: 2262: 2163: 2096: 1843: 1752: 1726: 1700: 1649: 1629: 1530: 1461: 1201:

Less than two weeks after calling me "retarded", you call another editor "a retard" in

1118: 993: 829: 635: 363: 2359:'s article, but whenever they surface every few weeks or so I immediately undo them). 2217: 2182: 1990: 1808: 1685: 1261: 900: 778: 746: 695: 625: 486: 2201: 2188: 2010: 1772: 1738: 1692:

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

1143:

for fiction-related articles, as well, as many of your edits violate it. Thanks, —

26: 17: 750: 2356: 2349: 2134: 2053: 2049: 2026: 1638:

Please don't add links to your userspace re-creation in the article namespace to

1586: 1501: 1452:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever

1241: 1210: 1045: 796: 444: 1362:

I've warned you twice about this very thing. I'm blocking you for 24 hours. --

2379: 2283: 1905:

Unless you can provide sources for your claims that Amblin produced films like

1856: 1669: 1353: 1303: 1265: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1022: 802: 758: 699: 617: 581: 560:

No, it doesn't. Fanfics means a writting history about the shown. Check around

543: 529: 435: 166: 2341: 2295: 2290: 2130: 2045: 2022: 1721: 1695: 1644: 1639: 1525: 1456: 1206: 1140: 854:

please share it, but until then it won't be allowed to stay in the article.«»

806: 671: 494: 358: 57: 2142: 1986: 1885: 1866: 1804: 1748: 1712: 1606: 1559: 1410: 1363: 1240:

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to

1214: 1188: 1132: 1049: 1040: 675: 440: 2258: 2197: 2159: 2092: 1625: 1381: 1312: 1128: 964: 929: 554: 1577:. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent 1547: 593: 528:

or reply here, I'll keep track of you so I'll know when you'll reply. --

1744: 1582: 1480: 1435: 1136: 1124: 561: 2257:

Yeah I am, calm down, I'm still looking for the specific references --

2436: 2397: 2273: 2248: 2238: 1177: 1083: 884: 855: 850: 849:

For the second time in as many weeks you have added information that

650: 631: 1260:

before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the

960:

According one of the hosts, Camilla, all of them, but I heard it on

430:

Thank you for contributing to Knowledge, AKR619! However, your edit

2313: 2146: 2041: 1889: 1870: 1610: 1414: 1367: 1273: 1218: 1053: 836: 821: 811: 490: 489:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--

409: 1562:. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an 1603:

User:Wikilists/Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever

1252:. If you believe the information you added was correct, please 805:

to format your posts for readability. You may also want to see

443:

for more information. If the link was to an image, please read

1823: 1664: 1328: 1236: 1182: 1071: 466: 391:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 1173: 710:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1558:

which previously was deleted in accordance with Knowledge's

1164:

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

1039:. I happen to be one of the people who decided that it was 702:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 961: 872: 2396:(where the rest of the "lords and ladies" are already). - 1168:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

690:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the 1672:

or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be

434:

was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove

2216:

Knowledge policy which I believe supports my actions is

1688:

for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the

1135:

sources. I will continue to remove the information from

1009:

Thanks for your comments on Aladdin in the entry on the

2116:, which is why it's being deleted after you create it. 820:

that it couldn't be a bulleted list in the main page?

395:

after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

2330:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lula's First Barbarian

64: 1209:. Knowledge only functions if everyone behaves with 2417:

you removed a factual accuracy dispute tag from the

1554:

You have recently recreated or reposted material at

1123:

Please stop adding unsourced, nonsense edits to the

2320:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1487:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1442:An article that you have been involved in editing, 2224:Here is an example from the stuff you restored to 972:comment was added at 10:10, August 22, 2007 (UTC). 937:comment was added at 10:00, August 22, 2007 (UTC). 1556:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever 1444:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever 1430:Actors and actresses considered the greatest ever 988:Phil Segal's own book on the making of the film, 678:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 1352:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 1127:page. All edits to Knowledge must be sourced to 2392:nobility, then they should be categoried under 1489:Television series considered the greatest ever 1475:Television series considered the greatest ever 425:Television Shows Considered The Greatest Ever 1786: 1779: 1769: 379:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 193: 2309:AfD nomination of Lula's First Barbarian 2187:Incidentally, consensus doesn't overide 1743:Your addition of the "icons" website to 1680:or discuss the changes on the article's 1256:or discuss the changes on the article's 2382:before accusing others of "vandalism". 2112:This category was deleted by consensus 14: 1573:from editing. We ask that you respect 481:is not consistent with our policy on 331:Revision as of 11:13, 26 October 2008 144:Revision as of 11:13, 26 October 2008 100:Revision as of 00:11, 25 October 2008 2135:tries to limit categories for awards 1747:has been reverted, as this is not a 90: 56: 2378:First of all, You may wish to read 711: 575:that paragraph to be there anymore. 406:Films considered the greatest ever 202: 189: 158: 141: 134: 123: 109: 97: 23: 2312: 2072:Um, look at the diff of your edit 1827:Please do not add content without 1599:Films considered the greatest ever 1546: 1479: 1434: 1272: 1075:Please do not add content without 757:). Also, you will notice that the 719: 592: 465: 333: 45: 2450: 1968:(talk) 11:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1005:Aladdin & 1992 Academy Awards 727: 714: 441:Knowledge's external links policy 2211:Home and Away character articles 1822: 1684:before making them. Please use 1663: 1332:With regard to your comments on 1327: 1235: 1181: 1070: 634:is/was going to be the voice of 2237:may be blocked from editing. - 2150: 2005:Themes, plot devices and motifs 1893: 1874: 1614: 1462: 1457: 1418: 1371: 1222: 1057: 787: 782: 779: 2206:11:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2168:09:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2154:09:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2121:08:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2077:WP:Don't template the regulars 1836:The Little Mermaid (1989 film) 1818:The Little Mermaid (1989 film) 1727: 1722: 1701: 1696: 1531: 1526: 1385:23:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1375:18:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1357:01:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1316:03:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1307:01:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1269:01:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 1226:06:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 1192:05:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1155:11:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 1114:01:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 13: 1: 2075:, and you might want to skim 1708:08:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 1654:11:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1648: 1634:08:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1618:08:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1591:08:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1061:23:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1026:12:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 997:08:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 871:Stop it. As it states on the 765:Similarly, I have redirected 483:attribution and verifiability 349:The five pillars of Knowledge 329: 319: 310: 298: 289: 277: 268: 257: 248: 2440:11:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 2401:12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2369:09:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 2345:08:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 2009:You deleted this section in 1947:22:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 1513:18:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 915:The Curse of the Black Pearl 674:}}" template to the article 369:How to write a great article 28:Browse history interactively 7: 2394:Category:Fictional nobility 2304:12:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 2277:02:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 2267:02:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 2252:02:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 2242:12:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 2125:Categories are not usually 2101:06:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2086:06:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2062:09:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2035:09:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1919:00:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1538:06:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1468:03:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 1422:07:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 1244:. Your edits appear to be 956:10:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 947:10:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 924:09:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 910:17:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 895:01:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 879:credits. Nothing more. The 866:01:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 688:Knowledge's deletion policy 127: 10: 2455: 2374:Fictional lords and ladies 1678:cite references or sources 1254:cite references or sources 840:13:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 825:13:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 815:13:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 638:without putting an actual 621:16:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 585:12:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 547:03:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 533:11:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 499:15:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 457:08:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 445:Knowledge's image tutorial 418:07:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 261:== Amblin Entertainment == 191: 125: 2338:of receiving this notice? 2046:media copyright questions 1999:06:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 1878:06:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 1852:12:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1813:13:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 1734:03:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1336:: Please see Knowledge's 1290:Knowledge, as you did to 792:15:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 700:proposed deletion process 317: 308: 296: 287: 275: 266: 255: 246: 213: 210: 140: 96: 2355:copyright violations to 1897:19:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1840:Knowledge:Citing sources 1790:10:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 1763:05:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 1334:User talk:121.221.92.148 1322:User talk:121.221.92.148 1292:Johnny Bravo (character) 1088:Knowledge:Citing sources 990:Doctor Who: Regeneration 951:Hang on, which station? 767:Johnny Bravo (character) 736:22:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 704:speedy deletion criteria 630:Please stop adding that 602:Kim Possible (character) 178:Extended confirmed users 2107:Category:Disney Legends 1348:for disruption. Please 982:Doctor Who (1996 film)‎ 661:01:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 647:Knowledge:Verifiability 95: 2324:, has been listed for 2322:Lula's First Barbarian 2317: 2177:I understand that you 2173:science fiction themes 1551: 1543:Recreating AfD'd pages 1491:, has been listed for 1484: 1446:, has been listed for 1439: 1277: 1205:. Please stop making 597: 564:. If you check around 470: 194:→‎Amblin Entertainment 2316: 1640:avoid self-references 1575:what Knowledge is not 1550: 1483: 1438: 1276: 1037:this comment you made 708:Articles for Deletion 706:or it can be sent to 684:What Knowledge is not 596: 485:. Take a look at the 469: 2419:Amblin Entertainment 2406:Amblin Entertainment 2218:No original research 1797:Amblin Entertainment 875:, the WGA furnishes 803:talk page guidelines 504:Kim Possible article 1340:policy. Comment on 1338:no personal attacks 1035:I don't appreciate 1011:65th Academy Awards 755:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 423:Regarding edits to 401:Aladdin (1992 film) 389:Knowledge:Questions 340:Hello, AKR619, and 2318: 2040:You are on 3RR on 1552: 1485: 1473:AfD nomination of 1440: 1428:AfD nomination of 1286:The next time you 1278: 970:signed but undated 935:signed but undated 670:I have added a "{{ 636:Dave the Barbarian 598: 471: 462:John Candy article 354:How to edit a page 156: 107: 2339: 2272:Still looking? - 2001: 1985:comment added by 1971:Please remember! 1937:comment added by 1560:deletion policies 1511: 1203:this edit comment 1160:Your recent edits 1151: 1041:original research 973: 938: 907:Wrestlinglover420 732: 680:proposed deletion 328: 142: 98: 78: 2446: 2333: 2152: 2011:Alfred Hitchcock 1980: 1949: 1911:TheRealFennShysa 1895: 1876: 1834:, as you did to 1832:reliable sources 1826: 1788: 1781: 1771: 1760: 1755: 1731: 1729: 1724: 1705: 1703: 1698: 1667: 1652: 1616: 1535: 1533: 1528: 1505: 1464: 1459: 1454:. Thank you. -- 1420: 1373: 1331: 1239: 1224: 1207:personal attacks 1185: 1149: 1112: 1104: 1099: 1096: 1082:, as you did to 1080:reliable sources 1074: 1059: 1031:Your comments... 994:Mark H Wilkinson 968:—The preceding 967: 933:—The preceding 932: 873:WGA page of IMDb 845:John Cena, again 801:Please read the 788: 784: 781: 734: 731: 726: 723: 718: 693: 394: 200: 199: 197: 184: 174: 155: 150: 132: 131: 130: 121: 106: 79: 70: 69: 67: 62: 60: 52: 49: 31: 29: 18:User talk:AKR619 2454: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2431:from editing". 2408: 2376: 2357:Peter Sanderson 2352: 2334:Do you want to 2311: 2287: 2226:Colleen Stewart 2213: 2175: 2131:Deletion Review 2118:Good Ol’factory 2110: 2070: 2007: 1977: 1975:science fiction 1957:Remember this? 1932: 1859: 1820: 1800: 1758: 1753: 1749:reliable source 1741: 1720: 1715: 1694: 1661: 1579:deletion review 1545: 1524: 1520: 1478: 1433: 1325: 1302:from editing. 1242:Anthony Carelli 1233: 1199: 1172:by typing four 1170:sign your posts 1162: 1141:manual of style 1121: 1105: 1100: 1094: 1091: 1068: 1033: 1019:reliable source 1007: 985: 917: 903: 892: 863: 847: 832: 799: 743: 691: 668: 658: 628: 612:from editing. 506: 479:reliable source 464: 428: 392: 374:Manual of Style 325: 313: 304: 292: 283: 271: 262: 251: 242: 235: 226: 221: 206: 201: 192: 190: 188: 187: 186: 182: 180: 164: 162: 157: 151: 146: 138: 136:← Previous edit 133: 126: 124: 122: 115: 113: 108: 102: 94: 93: 92: 91: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 75: 71: 65: 63: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48:Content deleted 47: 44: 39:← Previous edit 36: 35: 34: 27: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2452: 2407: 2404: 2375: 2372: 2361:Alientraveller 2351: 2348: 2332:. Thank you. 2310: 2307: 2286: 2284:Billy Connolly 2281: 2280: 2279: 2255: 2254: 2234: 2233: 2212: 2209: 2186: 2174: 2171: 2109: 2104: 2069: 2068:Robin Williams 2066: 2065: 2064: 2006: 2003: 1976: 1973: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1907:The Terminator 1900: 1899: 1858: 1855: 1819: 1816: 1799: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1740: 1737: 1714: 1711: 1660: 1659:WWE Armageddon 1657: 1621: 1620: 1544: 1541: 1519: 1516: 1499:. Thank you. 1477: 1471: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1378: 1377: 1324: 1319: 1285: 1248:and have been 1232: 1229: 1198: 1197:Second warning 1195: 1161: 1158: 1120: 1117: 1067: 1064: 1032: 1029: 1006: 1003: 1001: 984: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 958: 953:Alientraveller 944:Alientraveller 921:Alientraveller 916: 913: 902: 899: 898: 897: 888: 859: 846: 843: 831: 828: 798: 795: 759:Drawn Together 742: 739: 692:{{dated prod}} 667: 664: 654: 627: 624: 590: 588: 587: 577: 576: 571: 570: 550: 549: 514:Fanfiction.net 508:Regarding the 505: 502: 463: 460: 427: 421: 385:sign your name 377: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 351: 332: 327: 326: 322: 320: 318: 315: 314: 311: 309: 306: 305: 303:from editing". 301: 299: 297: 294: 293: 290: 288: 285: 284: 280: 278: 276: 273: 272: 269: 267: 264: 263: 260: 258: 256: 253: 252: 249: 247: 244: 243: 240: 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 227: 224: 222: 219: 216: 215: 212: 208: 207: 181: 176: 175: 160: 139: 111: 80: 74: 72: 54: 46: 37: 33: 32: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2451: 2442: 2441: 2438: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2413: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2337: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2315: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2292: 2285: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2253: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2227: 2221: 2219: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2190: 2184: 2180: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2115: 2108: 2103: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2078: 2074: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2025:. Thank you. 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2002: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939:67.149.21.173 1936: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1861:I've replied 1854: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1798: 1791: 1784: 1778: 1774: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1756: 1750: 1746: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1725: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1699: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1641: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1619: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1565: 1564:administrator 1561: 1557: 1549: 1540: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1529: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1482: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1437: 1431: 1423: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1323: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1283: 1280:This is your 1275: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1264:. Thank you. 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1238: 1231:More warnings 1228: 1227: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1184: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1109: 1103: 1098: 1097: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1073: 1063: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1038: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1002: 999: 998: 995: 991: 983: 980:Steve Martin/ 971: 966: 963: 959: 957: 954: 950: 949: 948: 945: 941: 940: 939: 936: 931: 926: 925: 922: 912: 911: 908: 896: 891: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 867: 862: 857: 852: 842: 841: 838: 827: 826: 823: 817: 816: 813: 808: 804: 794: 793: 790: 789: 785: 775: 770: 768: 763: 760: 756: 752: 748: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729:(talk to me!) 724: 722: 717: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696:its talk page 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 663: 662: 657: 652: 648: 644: 641: 637: 633: 623: 622: 619: 613: 611: 607: 603: 595: 591: 586: 583: 579: 578: 573: 572: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 556: 548: 545: 541: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 527: 521: 519: 515: 511: 501: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 468: 459: 458: 455: 451: 446: 442: 437: 433: 426: 420: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 402: 396: 390: 386: 382: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 346: 345: 343: 338: 337: 330: 321: 316: 312: 307: 300: 295: 291: 286: 279: 274: 270: 265: 259: 254: 250: 245: 239: 237: 232: 230: 229: 225: 223: 220: 218: 217: 209: 205: 195: 179: 172: 168: 163: 154: 149: 145: 137: 129: 119: 114: 112:67.149.21.173 105: 101: 83: 68: 61: 51:Content added 43: 40: 30: 19: 2433: 2429: 2409: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2377: 2353: 2319: 2288: 2256: 2235: 2222: 2214: 2178: 2176: 2158:Thank you -- 2157: 2145: 2126: 2124: 2111: 2089: 2081: 2071: 2018: 2014: 2008: 1978: 1970: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1906: 1888: 1869: 1860: 1821: 1801: 1742: 1719: 1716: 1693: 1690:welcome page 1662: 1643: 1637: 1622: 1609: 1567: 1553: 1523: 1521: 1506: 1500: 1486: 1455: 1441: 1413: 1379: 1366: 1341: 1326: 1310: 1295: 1282:last warning 1281: 1279: 1234: 1217: 1200: 1163: 1122: 1107: 1093: 1069: 1052: 1034: 1008: 1000: 989: 986: 927: 918: 904: 880: 876: 848: 833: 818: 800: 777: 771: 764: 744: 741:Johnny Bravo 728: 720: 715: 676:Howy Parkins 669: 666:Howy Parkins 642: 629: 614: 605: 599: 589: 551: 540:Kim Possible 522: 510:Kim Possible 507: 487:welcome page 472: 429: 399: 397: 378: 339: 335: 334: 1981:—Preceding 1933:—Preceding 1773:TreasuryTag 1686:the sandbox 1568:you may be 1518:Hornswoggle 965:User:AKR619 930:User:AKR619 751:WP:NOT#PLOT 643:on the page 555:User:AKR619 450:my FAQ page 204:Next edit → 198:new section 42:Next edit → 2183:WP:proveit 2151:uelWantman 2054:Kbthompson 2027:Kbthompson 1966:Gabrielkat 1894:uelWantman 1875:uelWantman 1745:Doctor Who 1674:verifiable 1615:uelWantman 1419:uelWantman 1372:uelWantman 1223:uelWantman 1166:talk pages 1137:Daffy Duck 1129:verifiable 1125:Daffy Duck 1119:Daffy Duck 1095:ThinkBlue 1058:uelWantman 830:Orphan tag 780:Eliminator 776:. Thanks, 747:WP:EPISODE 518:DeviantART 452:. Thanks! 393:{{helpme}} 381:Wikipedian 359:Help pages 2424:talk page 2193:talk page 2189:WP:verify 2082:Gimmetrow 2019:signature 1682:talk page 1354:Tiggerjay 1350:stay cool 1304:Tiggerjay 1288:vandalize 1266:Tiggerjay 1258:talk page 1246:vandalism 1178:Shift key 1084:John Cena 1066:John Cena 1023:Anson2995 901:Vandalism 851:John Cena 774:this page 632:John Cena 626:John Cena 618:Alexlayer 582:Alexlayer 544:Alexlayer 530:Alexlayer 526:Talk Page 454:Shadowbot 383:! Please 214:Line 243: 211:Line 243: 2388:If they 2342:sgeureka 2326:deletion 2296:23skidoo 2294:source. 2050:WP:POINT 2042:Frank Oz 1995:contribs 1983:unsigned 1935:unsigned 1783:contribs 1739:May 2008 1670:reverted 1493:deletion 1448:deletion 1250:reverted 1211:civility 1133:reliable 1046:civility 364:Tutorial 336:Welcome! 171:contribs 128:→‎Amblin 66:Wikitext 2380:WP:VAND 2350:Pirates 2336:opt out 2179:believe 2139:WT:OCAT 2127:created 1987:Despres 1844:Annie D 1805:Lynbarn 1754:Rodhull 1570:blocked 1406:member. 1397:attack. 1393:racist. 1342:content 1300:blocked 1262:sandbox 1189:SineBot 881:Writers 877:writing 797:WP:TALK 610:blocked 412:uel Wan 342:welcome 2291:WP:BLP 2259:AKR619 2198:Yobmod 2196:agree? 2160:AKR619 2093:AKR619 2023:WP:MCQ 1857:Amblin 1829:citing 1759:andemu 1645:Graham 1626:AKR619 1458:Reaper 1382:AKR619 1346:blocks 1313:AKR619 1294:, you 1174:tildes 1077:citing 1048:. -- 1015:citing 807:WP:NOT 716:irides 686:" and 604:, you 569:ways). 475:citing 183:10,068 77:Inline 59:Visual 2415:edits 2412:these 2015:motif 1728:Spyke 1702:Spyke 1583:tgies 1532:Spyke 1145:Brian 890:stalk 861:stalk 721:centi 656:stalk 324:(UTC) 185:edits 16:< 2437:Mark 2398:jc37 2365:talk 2300:talk 2289:Per 2274:Mark 2263:talk 2249:Mark 2239:Mark 2202:talk 2164:talk 2114:here 2097:talk 2058:talk 2031:talk 2017:and 1991:talk 1943:talk 1915:talk 1863:here 1848:talk 1809:talk 1777:talk 1713:WM23 1630:talk 1587:talk 1508:talk 1296:will 1150:talk 1108:BLUE 1102:(Hit 992:. -- 962:b105 749:and 672:prod 640:cite 606:will 566:here 562:here 495:talk 436:spam 432:here 416:man 167:talk 161:Mark 153:undo 148:edit 118:talk 104:edit 2410:In 2390:are 2147:Sam 1890:Sam 1871:Sam 1611:Sam 1581:. 1566:or 1502:Bob 1415:Sam 1368:Sam 1298:be 1219:Sam 1054:Sam 837:WLU 822:WLU 812:WLU 712:— 649:.«» 608:be 516:or 491:Vbd 410:Sam 404:to 2367:) 2340:– 2302:) 2265:) 2228:: 2204:) 2166:) 2143:☑ 2099:) 2091:-- 2079:. 2060:) 2033:) 1997:) 1993:• 1945:) 1917:) 1886:☑ 1867:☑ 1850:) 1811:) 1787:─╢ 1770:╟─ 1723:TJ 1697:TJ 1650:87 1642:. 1632:) 1624:-- 1607:☑ 1589:) 1527:TJ 1411:☑ 1364:☑ 1284:. 1215:☑ 1187:-- 1153:) 1131:, 1050:☑ 1021:. 1017:a 893:) 887:( 885:bd 864:) 858:( 856:bd 783:JR 659:) 653:( 651:bd 616:-- 497:) 477:a 196:: 169:| 2363:( 2298:( 2261:( 2200:( 2162:( 2095:( 2056:( 2029:( 1989:( 1964:- 1941:( 1913:( 1846:( 1807:( 1785:) 1780:╬ 1775:( 1628:( 1585:( 1463:X 1147:( 1110:) 493:( 414:t 173:) 165:( 120:) 116:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index