161:
143:
348:
287:
171:
277:
259:
228:
432:. Of the two of them, the Architecture has what I would offer is a good template to reorganize the CE project. The project scope as currently written talks about topics but not buildings or structures. This is a tough constraint to put on Civil Engineers. In fact, the current categorization has a number of categories that structures. The Electrical engineering project has a good scope statement:
633:
An arch-gravity dam or arched dam is a dam with the characteristics of both an arch dam and a gravity dam. It is a dam that curves upstream in a narrowing curve that directs most of the water pressure against the canyon rock walls, providing the force to compress the dam. It combines the strengths of
742:
article on flood control has been tagged since March 2019 as needing attention from an expert in civil engineering, but I'm not sure this was called out on the civil engineering
Wikiproject pages. Inviting your attention to it now. It may just be a matter of verifying the unsourced material already
659:
The design of an arch-gravity dam is an amalgam of the arch dam and gravity dam designs. It is a dam that curves upstream in a narrowing curve that directs most of the water pressure against the canyon rock walls, providing the force to compress the dam. This maximizes the strength of the dam while
809:
I think this particular route may count as a pass, as from either side it is the uppermost section of a long ascent to a high mountain crossing (it would be different if it was a lower-level tunnel under a mountain range). Tunnelled or partially covered sections are common on high mountain routes,
838:
can be redirected here. Being a subject of paramount importance and related to this wikiproject I would like to bring it to your kind notice. I would love to assist in the mean process as and when needed but being a civil engineering student I might not be able to accomplish this on my own having
766:
page as part of a WikiEdu course. It's an article that was flagged as needing help to improve it from a stub by this WikiProject, so I wanted to update y'all on the progress made. I think it is much improved and the quality scale could be reassessed. I'm still very new to
Knowledge editing, but
423:
I am new to the CE project although I have been writing on
Knowledge for over a decade about Civil Engineering. I saw that the project has been inactive for some time and want to work with others on reviving it. I started looking around for best practices in organizing and found the
810:
often being excavated to avoid extensive, exposed, dangerous, costly or unfeasible alternative routes. In Europe, I have also walked high level routes where 'passes' have included short tunnels that avoid narrow and exposed high ridges. Interesting question though....
645:
of the arch & gravity dam designs. Meaning that it combines the best qualities of both and eliminates the disadvantages. Calling it a compromise suggests that it still gives up some good qualities and keeps some of the bad. I could edit it as
546:
as well as collaborating with other
European and American organizations. The page could be organized a little better and more third party references added rather than ESIS material used. I would recommend the following:
418:
882:
Example would be HS2, as such will break many records for longest high speed railway bridge in the world. Most employment opportunities for single project in 21st century. A few
Guinness W records too
688:
508:
854:
There was a separate article at one time. A merge was proposed and rejected in 2010, then apparently proposed again in 2013 although I can't find the discussion, and it was finally merged in 2016.
710:. There are 22,000 transclusions, so there's plenty of work for any of you who want to start using it; feel free to pick your favorite buildings and add the information for them. Cheers,
728:
669:
I don't know the reference, but the horizontal curved slice really does translate the compression-force of the water along the shape of the curve, which would buckle any other shape.
39:
781:
803:
609:
593:
575:
532:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
666:
However, curving a gravity dam may make it look stronger, but some of this effect may be psychological factors in operation in making a choice of dam style.
776:
920:
908:
413:
944:
863:
795:
406:
Is there anyone watching here who has knowledge or experience in underwater concrete formwork, mixes and placement? Please ping with reply.· · ·
682:
907:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
896:
513:
871:
429:
752:
954:
949:
519:
556:
696:
After years and years of people proposing it basically uncontested on the talk page but it never getting actioned, we've finally added
74:
819:
959:
891:
848:
518:
Hello. Does anyone know if ESIS are a notable organisation please? And does this draft article have any glaring errors/omissions:
184:
148:
24:
309:
80:
757:
791:
939:
475:"The WikiProject generally considers any article related to Civil engineering to be within its scope. It also aims to:
425:
300:
264:
911:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
493:
Develop essays, standards and templates for civil engineering, civil engineers and their projects related articles.
401:
743:
present and adding citations of reliable sources, but perhaps new material is also needed for proper coverage. --
543:
860:
has very few sources. I suggest working on that first, and doing the split when that section is in better shape.
484:
Provide a place to discuss common issues on civil engineering, civil engineers and their projects related pages.
20:
934:
490:
Ensure all pages meet the standards of
Knowledge:Cite sources. See also WikiProject Fact and Reference Check.
459:
Ensure all pages meet the standards of
Knowledge:Cite sources. See also WikiProject Fact and Reference Check.
69:
239:
60:
93:
436:"The project generally considers any article related to Electrical engineering to be within its scope.
704:
689:
617:
478:
Thoroughly explore civil engineering practice and history, globally and primarily in North
America.
390:
127:
308:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
192:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
748:
678:
605:
571:
504:
453:
Provide a place to discuss common issues on architecture, buildings, construction related pages.
877:
772:
844:
831:
794:
tunnel and border crossing is described. There is a pass nearby, but it has its own article.
410:
245:
462:
Develop standards and templates for architecture, buildings, construction related articles.
8:
887:
825:
589:
528:
50:
867:
835:
799:
762:
Hello Civil Engineering WikiProject! I have just completed a major contribution to the
744:
733:
674:
601:
581:
567:
500:
292:
176:
65:
656:
but this doesn't read so well, since it implies a subjective opinion. How about this?
768:
189:
46:
160:
142:
840:
815:
447:
Thoroughly explore architecture, buildings, construction globally and historically.
407:
763:
916:
883:
585:
539:
524:
386:
123:
928:
787:
481:
Improve articles about civil engineering, civil engineers and their projects.
347:
555:
Rework the presidents into an infobox at the bottom of the page such as the
450:
Improve articles about architecture, architects, buildings and construction.
904:
898:
830:
Hello fellow editors, greetings! I see a need of forming a new article for
641:
I think this last sentence would be better to state that the design is an
811:
305:
392:
286:
170:
128:
912:
739:
649:
It combines the strengths of two common dam forms and is considered an
834:
whose scope is increasing and article is yet to be made on wiki. Even
767:
please feel free to edit or change anything you'd like there. Thanks!
419:
Greetings and a new goal for the new year! Change in Scope? Suggestion
857:
716:
471:
Taking the best of both projects, this is proposed as a new scope.
388:
276:
258:
125:
393:
129:
660:
minimizing the amount of material necessary to construct it.
625:
786:
If you dig a tunnel under a mountain, does it become a
584:, I really appreciate all your help with this. Cheers,
542:. I did a reference check and they have published over
862:
Never mind, I see the decision has already been made.
341:
304:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
282:
188:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
166:
15:
487:Organise and categorise Category:Civil Engineering
782:Is a tunnel under a mountain considered a "pass"?
926:
600:Best to you, let me know if you need more help.
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
465:Manage editing of the Architecture WikiPortal
456:Organise and categorise Category:Architecture
520:Draft:European Structural Integrity Society
428:article which is impressive. Then there is
790:? I wouldn't think so, but that's how the
663:This sentence here doesn't look accurate:
692:now has a public transit access parameter
634:two common dam forms and is considered a
626:https://en.wikipedia.org/Arch-gravity_dam
238:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
552:Remove the technical committee material
202:Knowledge:WikiProject Civil engineering
945:WikiProject Civil engineering articles
927:
499:Thanks, in advance for your comments.
440:The Architecture project scope is ...
205:Template:WikiProject Civil engineering
673:Does this editor sign their work?...
514:European Structural Integrity Society
839:been unknown of various terms used.
227:
225:
221:
792:Paso Internacional Los Libertadores
13:
955:NA-importance Engineering articles
950:Project-Class Engineering articles
14:
971:
318:Knowledge:WikiProject Engineering
298:This page is within the scope of
182:This page is within the scope of
960:WikiProject Engineering articles
346:
321:Template:WikiProject Engineering
285:
275:
257:
226:
169:
159:
141:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
897:Good article reassessment for
729:06:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
683:13:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
244:It is of interest to multiple
1:
872:20:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
849:19:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
509:20:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
312:and see a list of open tasks.
196:and see a list of open tasks.
185:WikiProject Civil engineering
37:Put new text under old text.
25:WikiProject Civil engineering
892:13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
758:Chézy formula article update
414:16:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
7:
444:"This WikiProject aims to:
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
976:
921:01:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
820:18:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
804:15:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
610:13:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
594:00:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
576:15:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
533:09:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
940:NA-importance CE articles
753:14:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
690:Template:Infobox building
270:
252:
154:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
777:20:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
402:Underwater concrete work
856:The current section at
630:contains the sentences
544:thirty books since 1978
301:WikiProject Engineering
430:Electrical Engineering
70:avoid personal attacks
832:Geomatics engineering
935:NA-Class CE articles
426:Project Architecture
324:Engineering articles
878:Major Rail Projects
738:The section of the
836:Survey engineering
638:between the two.
293:Engineering portal
240:content assessment
177:Engineering portal
81:dispute resolution
42:
909:reassessment page
726:
714:
399:
398:
340:
339:
336:
335:
332:
331:
220:
219:
216:
215:
199:Civil engineering
190:Civil engineering
149:Civil engineering
136:
135:
61:Assume good faith
38:
967:
826:Article creation
727:
724:
723:
721:
712:
709:
705:Infobox building
703:
699:
698:|public_transit=
653:between the two
618:Arch-gravity dam
394:
350:
342:
326:
325:
322:
319:
316:
295:
290:
289:
279:
272:
271:
261:
254:
253:
231:
230:
229:
222:
210:
209:
206:
203:
200:
179:
174:
173:
163:
156:
155:
145:
138:
137:
130:
16:
975:
974:
970:
969:
968:
966:
965:
964:
925:
924:
902:
880:
828:
784:
760:
736:
717:
715:
711:
707:
701:
697:
694:
667:
661:
654:
639:
620:
516:
421:
408:Peter Southwood
404:
395:
389:
355:
323:
320:
317:
314:
313:
291:
284:
207:
204:
201:
198:
197:
175:
168:
132:
131:
126:
87:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
973:
963:
962:
957:
952:
947:
942:
937:
901:
895:
879:
876:
875:
874:
827:
824:
823:
822:
783:
780:
759:
756:
735:
732:
693:
687:
686:
685:
665:
658:
648:
632:
619:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
597:
596:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
553:
522:
515:
512:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
438:
437:
420:
417:
403:
400:
397:
396:
391:
387:
385:
382:
381:
357:
356:
351:
345:
338:
337:
334:
333:
330:
329:
327:
310:the discussion
297:
296:
280:
268:
267:
262:
250:
249:
243:
232:
218:
217:
214:
213:
211:
194:the discussion
181:
180:
164:
152:
151:
146:
134:
133:
124:
122:
121:
118:
117:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
972:
961:
958:
956:
953:
951:
948:
946:
943:
941:
938:
936:
933:
932:
930:
923:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
900:
894:
893:
889:
885:
873:
869:
865:
861:
859:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
837:
833:
821:
817:
813:
808:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
788:mountain pass
779:
778:
774:
770:
765:
764:Chézy formula
755:
754:
750:
746:
745:Kent G. Budge
741:
731:
730:
722:
720:
706:
691:
684:
680:
676:
675:Risk Engineer
672:
671:
670:
664:
657:
652:
647:
644:
637:
631:
628:
627:
623:
611:
607:
603:
602:Risk Engineer
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:Risk Engineer
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
568:Risk Engineer
565:
558:
554:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
523:Many thanks,
521:
511:
510:
506:
502:
501:Risk Engineer
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
474:
473:
472:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
435:
434:
433:
431:
427:
416:
415:
411:
409:
384:
383:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
354:
349:
344:
343:
328:
311:
307:
303:
302:
294:
288:
283:
281:
278:
274:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
255:
251:
247:
241:
237:
233:
224:
223:
212:
195:
191:
187:
186:
178:
172:
167:
165:
162:
158:
157:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
139:
120:
119:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
905:Buro Happold
903:
899:Buro Happold
881:
855:
829:
785:
769:Katiejill127
761:
737:
718:
695:
668:
662:
655:
650:
642:
640:
635:
629:
624:
621:
557:ASCE article
517:
498:
470:
439:
422:
405:
360:
352:
299:
246:WikiProjects
236:project page
235:
193:
183:
92:
19:This is the
841:Franked2004
315:Engineering
306:engineering
265:Engineering
208:CE articles
929:Categories
740:Floodplain
734:Floodplain
636:compromise
884:Ashattock
858:Geomatics
622:The page
586:1292simon
540:1292simon
525:1292simon
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
864:GA-RT-22
796:GA-RT-22
353:Archives
94:Archives
51:get help
651:amalgam
643:amalgam
580:Thanks
566:Cheers
538:Cheers
812:Paul W
242:scale.
913:Z1720
234:This
79:Seek
917:talk
888:talk
868:talk
845:talk
816:talk
800:talk
773:talk
749:talk
719:Sdkb
713:{{u|
679:talk
606:talk
590:talk
572:talk
529:talk
505:talk
68:and
700:to
931::
919:)
890:)
870:)
847:)
818:)
802:)
775:)
751:)
725:}}
708:}}
702:{{
681:)
608:)
592:)
574:)
531:)
507:)
412::
376:,
372:,
368:,
364:,
113:,
109:,
105:,
101:,
49:;
915:(
886:(
866:(
843:(
814:(
798:(
771:(
747:(
677:(
604:(
588:(
570:(
559:.
527:(
503:(
378:5
374:4
370:3
366:2
362:1
248:.
115:5
111:4
107:3
103:2
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.