138:
245:
187:
169:
1286:
809:
Because a computer can only understand machine language and humans wish to write in high level languages high level languages have to be re-written (translated) into machine language at some point. This is done by special programs called compilers, interpreters, or assemblers that are built into the
335:
which provides implementation instructions. Numerous code samples -- the entire standard library article series is written like this. Is this good for
Knowledge, to be partial, second-class documentation? A third-rate tutorial site? I don't understand the motive for including all this information in
920:
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you?
813:
C++ is designed to be a compiled language, meaning that it is generally translated into machine language that can be understood directly by the system, making the generated program highly efficient. For that, a set of tools are needed, known as the development tool chain, whose core are a compiler
434:
Hello all! I’m working with the Saylor foundation to create a series of original, crowd-sourced textbooks that will be openly licensed and freely available on the web and within Saylor’s free, self-paced courses at Saylor.org. We are using
Wikibooks as a platform to host this project and hope to
785:
As you can imagine, programming a computer directly in machine language using only ones and zeros is very tedious and error prone. To make programming easier, high level languages have been developed. High level programs also make it easier for programmers to inspect and understand each other's
362:
You guys are probably aware of this already, but I have noticed that many C++ and general computer programming articles still refer to C++0x as an upcoming standard, rather than to C++11 adopted in August of this year. Is there any organized effort to fix that or do we just let it trickle in?
781:
A particular computer's machine language program that allows a user to input two numbers, adds the two numbers together and displays the total could include these machine code instructions: 00000 10011110 00001 11110100 00010 10011110 00011 11010100 00100 10111111 00101 00000000
777:
Computers understand only one language and that language consists of sets of instructions made of ones and zeros. This computer language is appropriately called machine language. A single instruction in computer might look like this: 0000 0001 (Binary
Numbers)
724:
At some point, a few plain text names were included in the list of participants. I tried searching the names but cannot connect them to any existing
Knowledge accounts. As far as I can tell, they may be the names of three unregistered people.
490:
template to
Knowledge with the goal to establish one standard for version history tables (or lists). It simplifies creation of release histories, standardizes release stages and makes the content more accessible. Please comment on the
478:
435:
garner the interest of existing members of the
Wikibooks and Knowledge community, as well as bring in new members! We thought that some of your members may be interested in contributing to our book Saylor.Org's C++ Programming
1277:
1210:
Quality assessments are used by
Knowledge editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at
834:
I'm not sure why the above was added to the talk page, but it is nice tutorial that probably belongs in an article (with a bit or rewording and some minor editing, such as my change of "is" to "might").
1114:
and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
504:
975:
1263:
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.
1216:
913:! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the
1302:
1003:
806:
Even if you cannot really understand the code above, you should be able to appreciate how much easier it will be to program in the C++ language as opposed to machine language.
1249:
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass
1169:
848:
It is unclear to me whether there has been any recent activity on this project. If there is some work to do, I'm willing to help out, but don't know how to participate.
352:
378:
I think that renaming effort is needed. C++0x is a history now. It should be explained what is that in the main C++ article. Everywhere else the C++11 should be used.
879:
822:
326:
865:
348:
970:
387:
473:
443:
49:
934:
857:
295:
256:
939:
898:
843:
456:
611:
C++ is an extremely close relative of C, not its successor. Referring to both under either name is incorrect and misleading to perspective participants.
677:
904:
1008:
691:
922:
372:
1272:
755:
451:
948:
464:
457:
1314:
668:
though perhaps it would be better to cover cshell, tcsh, C# and Java and ECMAscript (JS) as well, in a unified C/C++/C#/Java/JS project? --
1028:
336:
an encyclopedia. I know people are passionate about the language, but these articles are clearly beyond casual encyclopedic interest. See:
108:
1293:
1279:
1236:
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to
527:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1246:, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
1205:
917:
that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
84:
411:
826:
558:
1199:
1335:
290:
264:
1233:, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
659:
1340:
90:
738:
1165:
767:
343:
I propose to eliminate or merge a large number of these library pages, without the code samples they're nothing but stubs.
818:
669:
285:
1330:
344:
1240:
1227:
582:
991:(to which I had contributed many years ago) and it doesn't seem to lack anything important. I'd rate it as at least
914:
1186:
357:
1161:
1142:
416:
275:
If you are not currently a project participant and wish to help you may still participate in the project. This
30:
1126:
568:
194:
174:
79:
34:
1212:
992:
402:. Is it bad image ? ( increment should be done also after last check of condition ) Am I right ? Regards --
149:
17:
642:
621:
590:
564:
276:
206:
topics on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
1179:
I'd like to adopt this WikiProject. If there are no objections, I'll adopt this WikiProject in a week.
103:
941:
518:
368:
331:
I see a number of articles related to C/C++ that are tutorials. For example, there is an article on
1122:
1019:
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to
1014:
988:
977:
754:, but it was speedily deleted as advertisement. I hope some one would be able to help. Here is the
447:
439:
199:
1001:
673:
617:
586:
500:
407:
399:
383:
894:
509:
393:
1253:
1083:
875:
772:
710:
635:
576:
528:
492:
480:
313:
252:
155:
1194:
1181:
1103:
964:
952:
364:
8:
1111:
853:
839:
719:
60:
1268:
1138:
996:
930:
885:
Just for the historical record: the answer is literally a few sections above this one:
743:
496:
403:
379:
305:
269:
121:
75:
995:. Is there any particular reason why it is marked as a Start-Class article, instead? —
1297:
1073:
1024:
890:
541:
56:
1150:
871:
789:
This is a portion of code written in C++ that accomplishes the exact same purpose:
763:
572:
487:
1107:
956:
910:
1146:
849:
835:
687:
469:
436:
418:
709:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
117:
1324:
1264:
1134:
1020:
926:
728:
Before simply removing them, I'm wondering if anyone knows who they might be.
1192:
Seeing as this topic received no responses, I'll adopt the project anyway.
1093:
750:
700:
1174:
1027:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the
759:
733:
654:
122:
1121:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at
595:
Move the inactive project to a better location and get a fresh restart
1057:
1036:
614:"C/C++" is the commonly used term for referring both simultaneously.
481:
Establish standards for version history tables in software articles
332:
244:
119:
947:
Watchers of this page may be interested in the move discussion at
495:(there already is some discussion). Thanks for your contribution.
604:
If this WikiProject is truly supposed to cover both C and C++,
1285:
186:
168:
123:
949:
Talk:C18_(C_standard_revision)#Requested_move_26_October_2020
337:
203:
1294:
Talk:Associative containers#Requested move 26 September 2023
1280:
Talk:Associative containers#Requested move 26 September 2023
1215:, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent
631:
C and C++ articles then can be easily differentiated with
1158:
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.
1069:
It will work on a variety of links, including those from
1296:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
517:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1045:
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
699:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
955:
of the current C standard revision is C17 or C18. -
198:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
25:
531:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1125:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at
870:Why are C and C++ placed within a single project?
713:. No further edits should be made to this section.
327:Articles as manual pages, or miniature tutorials?
1322:
909:Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the
866:Why are C and C++ placed within a single project
1219:was approved and has been implemented to add a
887:Knowledge talk:WikiProject C/C++#Requested_move
600:I disagree that "...C++" is a better location.
37:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
802:sum = a + b; cout << sum << endl;
921:We have collected all of these questions at
1031:. The idea is that it takes something like
465:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/C++ grammar
458:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/C++ grammar
338:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NOT#GUIDE
905:Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
536:The result of the move request was: page
148:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1292:There is a requested move discussion at
1009:User script to detect unreliable sources
1206:Project-independent quality assessments
14:
1323:
1029:39th most imported script on Knowledge
748:I wrote an article about a C++ book
239:
137:
135:
131:
925:where you can leave your response.
886:
154:It is of interest to the following
23:
1284:
1119:not a script to be mindlessly used
810:various programming applications.
296:Dealing with inactive WikiProjects
279:if collaborative activity resumes.
24:
1352:
1051:and turns it into something like
192:This page is within the scope of
243:
185:
167:
136:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
645:categorizations (one for each).
1308:
1102:The script is mostly based on
398:Hi. I have found this image :
13:
1:
1127:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable
692:00:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
678:23:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
660:13:48, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
505:07:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
373:15:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
210:and see a list of open tasks.
47:Put new text under old text.
1336:NA-importance C/C++ articles
1213:Knowledge:Content assessment
971:21:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
935:04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
880:16:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
827:18:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
474:22:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
388:12:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
353:18:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject C
7:
1303:19:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
1004:09:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
626:Knowledge:WikiProject C/C++
606:Knowledge:WikiProject C/C++
569:Knowledge:WikiProject C/C++
452:17:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
216:Knowledge:WikiProject C/C++
55:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1357:
1341:WikiProject C/C++ articles
1200:21:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
1187:23:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
1170:16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
1162:MediaWiki message delivery
1012:
899:23:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
858:16:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
844:16:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
486:I'd like to introduce the
412:09:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
303:
219:Template:WikiProject C/C++
1273:20:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
942:C18 (C standard revision)
739:11:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
622:Knowledge:WikiProject C++
591:Knowledge:WikiProject C++
565:Knowledge:WikiProject C++
559:02:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
291:Directory of WikiProjects
180:
162:
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
1261:|QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
1241:WikiProject banner shell
1228:WikiProject banner shell
1123:User:Headbomb/unreliable
1043:. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
1015:User:Headbomb/unreliable
980:marked as "Start-Class"?
951:, regarding whether the
768:02:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
706:Please do not modify it.
624:should both redirect to
524:Please do not modify it.
358:C++0x still cited widely
277:status should be changed
1331:NA-Class C/C++ articles
987:I've carefully re-read
618:Knowledge:WikiProject C
587:Knowledge:WikiProject C
400:File:C language for.png
267:for help or ask at the
1289:
1065:. Accessed 2020-02-14.
571:– On 11 March 2006,‎
479:Request for comments:
417:Help with C++ Wikibook
80:avoid personal attacks
1288:
1217:Village pump proposal
1117:Do note that this is
286:Guide to WikiProjects
263:Consider looking for
1195:elijahpepe@wikipedia
1182:elijahpepe@wikipedia
989:Barton–Nackman trick
978:Barton–Nackman trick
608:is more appropriate.
940:Move discussion at
1290:
1278:Requested move at
1025:predatory journals
1021:unreliable sources
493:template talk page
255:is believed to be
150:content assessment
91:dispute resolution
52:
1058:Article of things
1037:Article of things
786:programs easier.
737:
658:
324:
323:
238:
237:
234:
233:
230:
229:
195:WikiProject C/C++
130:
129:
71:Assume good faith
48:
35:WikiProject C/C++
1348:
1316:
1312:
1300:
1262:
1258:
1252:
1245:
1239:
1232:
1226:
1222:
1198:
1185:
1159:
1154:
1098:
1092:
1088:
1082:
1078:
1072:
1060:
1046:
999:
961:
923:this Google form
814:and its linker.
731:
708:
652:
640:
634:
556:
526:
488:Template:Version
431:
430:
426:
316:
265:related projects
247:
240:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
189:
182:
181:
171:
164:
163:
141:
140:
139:
132:
124:
26:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1313:
1309:
1298:
1283:
1260:
1256:
1250:
1243:
1237:
1230:
1224:
1220:
1208:
1193:
1180:
1177:
1157:
1133:
1096:
1090:
1086:
1080:
1076:
1070:
1056:
1044:
1017:
1011:
997:
982:
957:
945:
907:
868:
792:int a, b, sum;
775:
756:deletion review
746:
722:
717:
704:
638:
632:
552:
548:
542:
522:
512:
484:
461:
432:
428:
424:
422:
421:
396:
360:
329:
320:
319:
312:
308:
300:
280:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
126:
125:
120:
97:
96:
66:
33:for discussing
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1354:
1344:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1318:
1317:
1306:
1282:
1276:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1176:
1173:
1160:Delivered by:
1067:
1066:
1063:Deprecated.com
1049:
1048:
1041:Deprecated.com
1010:
1007:
981:
974:
944:
938:
906:
903:
902:
901:
867:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
846:
817:
805:
774:
771:
745:
742:
729:
721:
718:
716:
715:
701:requested move
695:
694:
685:Makes sense. —
680:
649:
648:
647:
646:
615:
612:
609:
562:
550:
546:
534:
533:
519:requested move
513:
511:
510:Requested move
508:
483:
477:
460:
455:
444:Thomas Simpson
420:
415:
395:
394:for loop image
392:
391:
390:
359:
356:
328:
325:
322:
321:
318:
317:
309:
304:
301:
299:
298:
293:
288:
282:
281:
274:
262:
261:
248:
236:
235:
232:
231:
228:
227:
225:
222:C/C++ articles
208:the discussion
190:
178:
177:
172:
160:
159:
153:
142:
128:
127:
118:
116:
115:
112:
111:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
38:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1353:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1295:
1287:
1281:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1255:
1247:
1242:
1234:
1229:
1223:parameter to
1218:
1214:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1183:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1130:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:WP:RSPSOURCES
1100:
1095:
1085:
1075:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1016:
1006:
1005:
1002:
1000:
998:Gennaro Prota
994:
990:
985:
979:
973:
972:
968:
967:
962:
960:
954:
953:WP:COMMONNAME
950:
943:
937:
936:
932:
928:
924:
918:
916:
912:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
881:
877:
873:
859:
855:
851:
847:
845:
841:
837:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
819:14.96.222.110
815:
811:
807:
803:
800:
793:
790:
787:
783:
779:
773:C++ Compilers
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
741:
740:
736:
735:
726:
714:
712:
707:
702:
697:
696:
693:
690:
689:
684:
681:
679:
675:
671:
670:65.92.180.137
667:
664:
663:
662:
661:
657:
656:
644:
637:
630:
629:
627:
623:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
603:
602:
601:
598:
596:
593:. His reason
592:
588:
584:
581:
578:
574:
570:
566:
561:
560:
557:
555:
554:
553:
539:
532:
530:
525:
520:
515:
514:
507:
506:
502:
498:
497:Jesus Presley
494:
489:
482:
476:
475:
472:
471:
466:
459:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
427:
419:
414:
413:
409:
405:
404:Adam majewski
401:
389:
385:
381:
380:Code-Analysis
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
355:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:-- thoughts?
339:
334:
315:
311:
310:
307:
302:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
283:
278:
272:
271:
266:
260:
258:
254:
249:
246:
242:
241:
226:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
166:
165:
161:
157:
151:
147:
143:
134:
133:
114:
113:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
1310:
1291:
1254:WPBannerMeta
1248:
1235:
1209:
1178:
1156:
1131:
1118:
1116:
1112:WP:CITEWATCH
1101:
1084:cite journal
1068:
1062:
1055:John Smith "
1050:
1040:
1035:John Smith "
1018:
986:
983:
965:
958:
946:
919:
908:
891:DanielPharos
869:
816:
812:
808:
804:
801:
797:a; cin : -->
794:
791:
788:
784:
780:
776:
749:
747:
732:
727:
723:
705:
698:
686:
682:
665:
653:
650:
636:WPBannerMeta
625:
605:
599:
594:
579:
563:
545:
544:
543:
537:
535:
523:
516:
485:
468:
462:
433:
397:
361:
345:75.119.90.35
342:
330:
268:
250:
207:
193:
156:WikiProjects
146:project page
145:
102:
29:This is the
1013:Main page:
872:Martinkunev
720:Member list
711:move review
573:Deryck Chan
529:move review
253:WikiProject
1325:Categories
959:Astrophobe
911:WP 1.0 Bot
751:C++ Primer
744:Needs help
643:task force
549:rbitrarily
850:Tripodics
836:Tripodics
795:cin : -->
93:if needed
76:Be polite
31:talk page
1265:Aymatth2
1197:(he/him)
1184:(he/him)
1175:Adoption
1135:Headbomb
1108:WP:NPPSG
1074:cite web
927:Walkerma
915:web tool
585:) moved
583:contribs
467:. FYI, —
333:stdarg.h
314:WP:C/C++
306:Shortcut
270:Teahouse
257:inactive
104:Archives
61:get help
1299:ASUKITE
1221:|class=
993:B-Class
976:Why is
683:Support
666:Support
1259:a new
760:HNAKXR
734:Sowlos
655:Sowlos
423:": -->
251:This
152:scale.
798:: -->
796:: -->
538:moved
213:C/C++
175:C/C++
144:This
89:Seek
16:<
1269:talk
1166:talk
1110:and
1089:and
1023:and
984:Hi,
966:talk
931:talk
895:talk
876:talk
854:talk
840:talk
823:talk
764:talk
758:. --
688:Ruud
674:talk
620:and
577:talk
501:talk
470:Ruud
463:See
448:talk
442:) --
440:talk
425:edit
408:talk
384:talk
369:talk
349:talk
202:and
78:and
1132:-
1094:doi
799:b;
703:.
641:'s
589:to
365:TiC
204:C++
1327::
1271:)
1257:}}
1251:{{
1244:}}
1238:{{
1231:}}
1225:{{
1168:)
1149:·
1145:·
1141:·
1129:.
1106:,
1099:.
1097:}}
1091:{{
1087:}}
1081:{{
1079:,
1077:}}
1071:{{
1061:"
1039:"
969:)
933:)
897:)
889:--
878:)
856:)
842:)
825:)
766:)
676:)
639:}}
633:{{
628:.
597:.
567:→
540:.
521:.
503:)
450:)
438:.(
410:)
386:)
371:)
351:)
59:;
1267:(
1164:(
1153:}
1151:b
1147:p
1143:c
1139:t
1137:{
1047:)
963:(
929:(
893:(
874:(
852:(
838:(
821:(
762:(
730:—
672:(
651:—
580:·
575:(
551:0
547:A
499:(
446:(
429:]
406:(
382:(
367:(
347:(
273:.
259:.
200:C
158::
109:1
106::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
