2749:
2439:
226:
205:
174:
143:
2516:
sought to upscale or return the template's importance. Each WikiProject would feel that they wish to draw readers' attention to their project - the question here is why is this WikiProject regarded as more special than all the others that their endeavours get singled out? I'm wondering if a general discussion on the importance and value of the Vital articles project is appropriate for this venue, and if the discussion should be at
1142:) and the template should go with other WikiProject templates. The decision as to which articles are listed as vital is done by consensus of those participating in the project. As such it has no more significance than any WikiProject deciding that a topic is important or not. We shouldn't be misleading readers into thinking there is any kind of authority in the decision to list certain articles as vital and not others.
579:
2413:, high importance articles. It needs some way to identify those articles that isn't just pageviews (which are skewed by both recentism and systemic bias). That's the niche that Vital Articles fills. On vetting, the example you gave is for level-5, which is still under construction and indeed is not subject to significant scrutiny. But the higher levels do receive substantial scrutiny.
1496:, thanks for your comment. In the grouping above, I tried to retain some semblance of the original order on the project page, despite my own preferences. If I understand your objection from your sandbox, it's because it's a small, right-aligned box, and if that's the case, then I would agree with you. But two points here: there is no reason to use the
1223:
kept, and would like them to be displayed. Perhaps we have got to the point where all talkpage templates should be reviewed to see if there is consensus to continue using them (though I suspect the default on that would be to keep all). An example of what I feel is a misplaced talkpage template is stuff like
2538:
to abolish the project at VPR in 2020 which got snow-closed. But I do think it might be time to revisit it there, since some sort of reform is needed. The reason I stopped participating is that, sorta opposite SandyGeorgia's concerns, in my experience the project became consumed by debates over which
2497:
If I'm understanding you right, I think the presence of a small notification that "this is a vital topic" would be better placed on the article itself (like it is for featured articles and good articles). I agree that the consensus-building process for which articles are "vital" is very flawed at the
2250:
inside the banner shell. Without knowing about this discussion, earlier today, I filed a bug report to get it to stop doing that. I'll keep an eye on this discussion and amend my bug report if needed. Whatever is decided here, I think it's important that this page (WP:TALKORDER) contain the canonical
1222:
I like what you are doing as regards sorting out talkpage templates, and I like your idea of grouping templates by theme. Ideally what we need to do is reduce some of the clutter that appears on talkpages. However, people who create and use some of these templates would understandably like them to be
1067:
is a misnomer; it's not the article that is vital, but the topic.) Hence, the grouping of the two, and the separation from WikiProjects, which seems to me more to do with collaboration and management within a subject area. You could, I suppose, say that WikiProjects are there to "improve the quality"
372:
directly above. The wording you quote: "However, this is not an absolute rule, and editors should use common sense when deciding its placement", comes after " By convention, this template goes at the very top of the talk page, above WikiProject templates and other talk-page banners", and is referring
3161:
To your point of "where they should go" I think the point of the Rfc (which I opposed, so I hope I'm fairly stating this) is that after conversion to "regular page sections" they would eventually get archived according to the archiving config on each page where they appeared; whereas as a template,
2723:
of vital articles is useful overall. I also agree that talk pages are often far too cluttered with banners (BTW, when are we going to make them mobile-friendly?). I'd support putting it in WPBannerShell and adding collapsibility; and also support adding a topicon on the article talk page. Most these
2693:
It seems you're pursuing an impossible standard — there is no WikiProject that actively monitors with oversight everything within its scope. That said, I agree that level-5 has issues and was a questionable creation in the first place — I would very much consider a proposal to display only level-4+.
2575:
Elevating Vital to the level of FA ?? That is exactly the opposite of the direction I advocate. It has even less scrutiny than GA, which is a one-person review; I don't know why we feature one-person anything in mainspace. The Vital
Project acts with no more scrutiny or authority than any group of
1515:. (If it were up to me, I'd force that template to default to wide/thin, but that's a different topic.) As far as the fat/squat Archives box in your sandbox example, I'm opposed to that one, too, especially since it no longer has any function on pages that contain a Talk header. The main issue with
1506:
template as a "small" template: it makes an ugly, fat squat box that takes up a lot of vertical space and pushes the page content down; it's much better to use the wide, horizontal version. Furthermore, they should be collapsed just like WikiProjects and some other banners. For examples, please see:
994:
Note that this gives five sections about the article and four about the Talk page. These are tagged '(A)' and '(T)', suggesting a further possible axis of abstraction. That's nine total sections, and somewhere I read that seven is the magic number for what most humans can hold in memory, so I'd love
616:
Looking at the current layout, 16 items is a lot to take in at once, and the mind looks for order and it's hard to find. Trying to take a 40,000-foot view, it seems to me like there were some commonalities there, that I couldn't quite see with the current ordering. I attempted to analyze the list to
1218:
I don't see Vital as being essentially any different to a standard WikiProject banner in regards to giving a topic "importance", so it could sit inside {{WPB}}, where it is sometimes found, though I have also found it inside BannerHolder. Be interesting to see the thinking behind why folks feel it
2634:
be put on the article page, I think I just misunderstood the comment you were making as saying something should be reader-facing not editor-facing and was trying to understand that. If anything I was trying to emphasise that the lower levels don't provide anything useful to the readers. That's my
2450:
Given all this, I think what we should be discussing is where to move the condensed version of the information. To throw out some ideas, turning it into a topicon (an image at upper right near any protection icon, probably consisting of the level number superimposed on the VA logo), putting it in
2965:
I agree that the fewer templates on the talkpage the better, and if several templates can be merged into one, that would be better than organising them into groups that would still appear as a distracting cluster on the talkpage. If templates can be identified which could be merged, then a merge
2515:
I have no objection to further talk, and drawing in more people. However, the current consensus is in favour of downscaling the importance of the Vital articles template in order to reduce talkpage clutter, therefore, until consensus is changed, the template is downscaled. Consensus must now be
2432:
tag, they're alerted to the fact that Musa is a very important historical figure, and that the article on him ought to be prioritized for improvement beyond its current C-class status. This is also what differentiates the vital article designations from the information in project banners, which
2942:
It's fine to consolidate the advice on this page into fewer groupings based on the responses above but I think the most impactful action would be to reduce the number of discrete "attention" templates into one that will actually be read and heeded. Having the relevant "attention" templates put
1219:
should take precedence over other WikiProjects, and be placed alone in a prominent location. It may be useful to readers to provide some information in the template - something like "Some
Knowledge editors feel this topic/article ranks as Level 3 on Knowledge's Vital articles importance scale".
1179:
it suggests another kind of possible grouping, namely, the level of consensus or authority: we have banners with everything from Arbcom D/s notices and BLP notices, to policy/guideline-based, to purely informational, and they all have the same look-and-feel. I wonder if different shades of the
427:
Yes, that would be fine. Given the functionality that is being added to the template, I can see that it would eventually end up on most talkpages, though historically we have encountered problems with people blindly adding templates en-masse, so a notice saying that doing such a thing would be
373:
to where on the talkpage it should be placed, not that it "should only be used where it is needed", ie, that it should only be placed on talkpages in certain circumstances. The RfC concluded that it could be placed on any talkpage, but that nobody should now go round mass placing the template.
3166:
adds them near the top, i.e., right under the end of the header template section where they used to be, but I could be wrong. To the extent that the whole goal is to get them off the page, I don't know if the location on the page even matters that much, but others may disagree.
2178:
YES. Let's solve one of the (many) problems with talk page clutter. The idea of 17 different things at talk before you get to talk is beyond absurd, as is the placement of one less-than-even-a-WikiProject (Vital articles) above so many other items or more relevance.
2813:
Agree that it's not helpful that {{Vital article}} currently appears above even contentious topic warning. Even if not collapsed into general project banner, it should at least go down right above projects. But not almost at the very top of banners.
2391:
was not notified of it. They deserve to have the opportunity to comment on a proposal that would significantly affect them, and the wider community deserves the chance to weigh in as well given the large-scale impact on talk pages. Also, there was
3288:
Is there any advice anywhere concerning the use of multiple banners for the same project on the same talk page? WikiProject Women in Red places a new banner for every editathon that they organise and these are starting to build up on pages like
2550:, and have essentially no worth to anyone outside of it (and dubious worth within it — if you think the VA list lacks oversight, I have bad news about project importance ratings...). The VA ratings, by contrast, are for the entire encyclopedia.
2408:
SandyGeorgia, from your comments, I gather that have a dim view of the Vital
Articles endeavor overall. I agree that the project has some significant issues, but I don't think it's useless. Knowledge overall struggles to direct attention to
2400:
overrules this. Therefore, I'm going to send out invites and keep the status quo until the invited folks have had a chance to comment. Sorry to delay the resolution, but it'll be worthwhile to achieve something that sticks as a non-local
2206:
which is intended to enclose banners that are not WikiProject banners, but it doesn't cause the enclosed banners to reduce to a single line - they are either fully visible or entirely hidden, unless they are self-collapsing, as with
2498:
moment. There's just too many articles at levels 4 and 5 for a high level of scrutiny on all of them, so imo something like this should be restricted to levels 1 to 3 (if it was done, which would require its own separate consensus).
1625:
that the Vital tags should be placed with WikiProjects. The Vital designation is no more than a WikiProject finding and we should not be cluttering the talk page unnecessarily with similar tags that can be added to a WP banner.
2334:
That's it; this has even less significance than one-person reviewer processes-- these designations can be added by anyone and are subject to no independent scrutiny. William
Utermohlen is still listed as a vital article.
2539:
articles to raise/lower to which level, which were already make-work tasks and became even moreso as participants failed to agree on precisely what constituted vitality and therefore went in circles. Since then, I know
1590:
I'm seeing the germ of a topic worthy of a separate discussion here, namely, the issue of the fugly boxes. I'm mulling over starting one, as it seems like a sub-topic of the ongoing discussions about TP banner clutter.
3061:
Ah, thanks. So is there now a ruling which needs to be made about whether such sections go in a particular place (like just under the header templates) or get mixed in with general conversations? There's no mention at
2416:
So do vital article designations have utility to talk page viewers? I would say yes, since they can serve as signals to help direct attention. For instance, let's say an editor is gnoming and comes to an article like
2404:
Moving on to the substance of the discussion, I think we need to zoom out a bit. The operating questions here are: What information will be helpful to talk page visitors, and how do we best concisely communicate
3032:, I would've definitely included these, however they are no longer header templates since an Rfc decided to convert them all to individual talk sections instead, and Primebot has been doing the conversions.
2421:
and its talk page. Not knowing much about West
African history, they haven't heard of Musa, don't bother to read the lead section, and aren't inclined to stick around very long. But on seeing the level-3
2393:
2373:
2904:
2638:
I agree with SilkTork and SandyGeorgia that the vital articles project shouldn't be treated any differently from any other project. It should have (at most) a wikiproject box on the talk page.
2985:
2535:
2781:
2501:
Given that, I think this is separate to the talk page issue. I agree with above that the vital article template used on talk pages should be part of the condensed wikiproject grouping.
1068:
of articles within their purview, but then again, so is the entire project and everything we do here, so that seems kind of meaningless. Anyway, that's why I tried grouping those two.
1176:
doesn't belong in a "quality" grouping, but rather in a "local consensus" grouping. I'm trying to think if there are other TP banner templates like that, or if this is a unique case.
3405:
should be fixed. But in practice, me and other editors just throw this temporary tmbox at the very bottom, just like how XFDcloser incorrectly puts 9. Article history above 4.
1539:
advice; after that, whether they are placed near the top or near the bottom is less of an issue afaic. But if I could eliminate those fat, ugly banners in a stroke, I would.
2743:
255:
134:
1612:
2728:
vital, despite scrutiny concerns; and most of them are severely neglected, so a topicon would be much appreciated to raise attention in a minimal and unobtrusive way.
2321:
617:
see if imposing an additional level of abstraction above the current list of sixteen might reduce the seeming arbitrariness of the list. Here is what I came up with:
336:
discuss. This page has attracted too much drama in the past to have two prolific editors engage in a slow-burning edit war on a minor instruction on template usage.
2426:
2244:
2125:
2090:
2079:
1984:
1920:
1279:
1104:
658:
2885:. That's where it is most useful, and will be seen when the page is opened for editing. An editing guideline on the talkpage is less useful, and adds to clutter.
3091:
2546:
Regarding the "special treatment" argument you and SandyGeorgia are making, most project importance ratings are very narrowly scoped: they're the importance
3020:
391:, that was my read on the RFC and believe that the current reading on this Info page does not reflect that. Maybe there is a middle ground where we state
2674:
Even they acknowledge it is a WikiProject (so why aren't we adding it to talk pages like any other), and they don't monitor Level 5 as they say they do.
1353:, which is an oddity, as I doubt anyone would consider that a vital article. Indeed, some might consider that article has no notability. It was added by
2358:
We have a consensus of five in favour of downscaling Vital article and one against in this rather slow moving discussion. I shall update the guideline.
1646:
There's been no opposition to that suggestion, and we now have at least three in favour. If there are no objections in the next seven days I will amend
332:, please stop reverting each other and come to the talk page to discuss the changes. SilkTork, you made a bold change, Headbomb reverted you, now let's
1063:, because even if the article is a plagiarized, unattributed, one-line stub, it's possible that the topic is a top-level vital one. (In fact, the term
39:
3130:
2327:
2352:
1640:
437:
422:
382:
3290:
2338:
Vital should be either in the WikiProject Banner Shell, or in the regular Banner holder, and they do not warrant any other ranking on talk pages.
368:
has amended it in line with the RfC, so that the documentation no longer reads "should only be used where it is needed". This matter was raised by
3434:
3267:
3263:
3095:
1600:
1585:
1548:
1484:
1366:
1336:
237:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit
3389:
1387:
1252:
1213:
1151:
1133:
1077:
1035:
754:
485:
2907:
and it unfortunately didn't achieve consensus. Perhaps we'd have more success looking at the lessons learned there and trying again. Cheers,
442:
The RFC (which is also pretty close, 8-6 by my count, and it would be 8-7 had I known it was going on) is not a blanket approval on putting
3176:
3154:
3085:
3041:
591:
572:
541:
520:
2296:
462:
when it's needed. If it's not needed, don't add it. This is line with the existing documentation and the actual consensus on that page.
350:
3117:
74:
494:, what I gather here is that it was close enough that it should have a formal close from an uninvolved editor. I'll post a request at
292:
3310:
3305:
2388:
130:
126:
122:
118:
1004:
3283:
2590:
2471:
are all possibilities. If we can figure out something that looks good, I think it'll be a solution that satisfies both sides here.
1407:
3372:
2266:
2876:
2831:
2823:
3316:
2894:
2529:
2367:
2193:
2027:
3458:
3453:
3426:
3001:
fits? Perhaps within group 8, "article history and milestones", but it would be good to see it explicitly mentioned. Thanks.
2607:, but whether or not an individual article is considered vital is information that should provided for editors, not readers.
282:
80:
2231:
2173:
2142:
1349:. It simply says that the article is of interest to WikiProject Vital Articles, but gives no ranking. It has been placed on
2712:
2688:
2666:
2647:
2625:
2510:
2068:
1669:
1139:
142:
2937:
2311:
3141:) 19:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC) And here's a page which has a couple of converted templates (and an empty banner shell):
2044:
1994:
1964:
1287:
1237:
1094:
3278:
3214:
1560:
You're right, my objection is because it defaults as a small, right-aligned box. I agree with your proposal of keeping
2979:
2925:
2568:
2517:
2492:
2328:
inquire at the
Project about this obscure person being "vital", and listed by the person who wrote it, I get no answer
364:, the documentation has been updated following a discussion. If you look at the documentation today, you'll note that
3363:
2959:
2465:
2013:
1930:
1303:
838:
2775:
2737:
2317:
2119:
2802:
2659:
3246:
3448:
3098:
in 2020, as it's not a standard kind of WikiProject and its banners aren's usually included in the banner shell.
3063:
2995:
2576:
editors who come together as in a WikiProject, and should be treated as one. It's an internal, talk page matter.
1950:
532:
No problem; to avoid misunderstanding, can you link the revision you want removed? Or, just feel free to do it.
2160:
1120:
1022:
742:
611:
472:
20:
2436:
However, the information the talk page visitor actually needs is very small. It could be displayed as merely
1940:
1051:, Vital articles are at #4, and WikiProjects at #9. The abstraction I was going for in grouping the two, was
311:
69:
2115:, and won't collapse when used inside WPBS. The banner shall is not the place to put non-collapsing banners.
3210:
2603:
here. The vital article ranking lists themselves have some reader-facing value as they're a good link from
2292:
1442:
185:
3251:
242:
60:
2543:
has overhauled the project pages and tried to refocus it toward improving the articles within its scope.
3353:
3323:
2862:
at the end, as they are so often obvious, and are also most often templated at the top of the article.
2210:
2130:
earlier than the WikiProject banners has been in place since August 2014, more than eight years ago. --
1459:
943:
861:
113:
24:
3229:
And now if we could just move Vital in to the WikiProject shell, and language in to the banner, voila.
3430:
2846:
2057:, which is its redirect) will collapse because it is a true WikiProject banner template built around
1812:
1800:
1512:
821:
720:
415:
343:
3188:
2856:
2072:
1904:
1822:
1227:
902:
851:
730:
3206:
2819:
2540:
2288:
2261:
1728:
1718:
1709:
1508:
698:
688:
627:
578:
551:
3343:
3333:
3242:
3200:
2872:
2684:
2643:
2586:
2506:
2380:
2348:
2282:
2201:
2189:
1854:
1770:
1636:
1469:
1319:
953:
791:
238:
233:
210:
2782:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Vital
Articles#TfD follow-up: Fate of the vital article talk banner
2102:
2060:
1913:
1690:
1295:
637:
191:
98:
3409:
2946:
2882:
2455:
1884:
1780:
1702:
1679:
1581:
1480:
801:
672:
456:
446:
396:
315:
2753:
2443:
428:
regarded as unacceptable would both be useful, and in line with the consensus of the RfC.
8:
2881:
I would go further and say that language-related guideline banners should only go on the
2227:
2138:
1738:
1659:
1647:
1563:
1519:
1500:
1398:
Quite like this colour-differentiation proposal, and support the regrouping as proposed.
1332:
1048:
708:
50:
1357:; be interesting to know if they added it by accident; and, if not, why they added it.
3194:
3172:
3150:
3138:
3037:
2975:
2890:
2815:
2604:
2525:
2397:
2396:
in the not-too-distant past on this exact question; it came to no consensus, which per
2363:
2307:
2252:
2156:
2023:
1596:
1544:
1449:
1435:
1383:
1362:
1248:
1209:
1147:
1116:
1073:
1018:
1000:
884:
587:
537:
468:
433:
410:
378:
357:
338:
90:
65:
157:
3419:
3233:
2863:
2675:
2639:
2600:
2596:
2577:
2502:
2339:
2237:
2216:
2180:
1894:
1874:
1864:
1844:
1627:
982:
922:
46:
502:
if they might be willing to restore the status quo ante until that happens. Cheers,
490:
As someone who commented but didn't feel strongly enough to !vote in the discussion
3142:
2168:
1128:
1030:
480:
402:
may be placed on any talk page, but should not be placed en-masse on all talk pages
2433:
communicate only that the article falls within some (normally obvious) topic area.
2376:
and sees some potential for the vital articles system, I have a few thoughts here.
2733:
2410:
1760:
1577:
1571:
1529:
1491:
1476:
1403:
781:
2630:
Oh sorry for the poorly-worded comment, I wasn't trying to argue that something
3399:
3379:
3300:
3272:
3258:
3108:
3094:
in June 2020. I see the placement of the Women in Red project banners was also
3076:
3011:
2953:
2842:
I would prefer to see 6. Language-related talk page guideline banners, such as
2220:
2164:
2131:
2110:
2052:
2004:
1974:
1344:
1325:
1311:
1271:
1170:
1124:
1026:
965:
874:
476:
1431:
While I agree with your concept in general, I disagree with your placement of
1308:
which will collapse it); the second is a non-WikiProject banner, built around
153:
3442:
3168:
3163:
3146:
3134:
3056:
3033:
2971:
2967:
2900:
2886:
2839:
2752:
2521:
2442:
2359:
2152:
2019:
1750:
1622:
1618:
1592:
1555:
1540:
1426:
1379:
1373:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1263:
1259:
1244:
1205:
1158:
1143:
1112:
1069:
1042:
1014:
996:
771:
583:
547:
533:
499:
464:
429:
405:
388:
374:
365:
361:
329:
325:
250:
1790:
811:
495:
2719:
As a (semi-active) member of WikiProject Vital articles, I agree that the
1834:
912:
225:
204:
2744:
Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 4#Template:Vital article
2251:
rules, and user scripts should be modified to follow it when possible. –
158:
2729:
2447:. They certainly don't need an entire banner composed mostly of filler.
2418:
1399:
245:
and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the
3296:
3124:
3099:
3067:
3027:
3002:
2913:
2790:
2763:
2700:
2613:
2556:
2480:
1012:
Vital articles should be with
Wikiprojects, not active nominations.
643:, but that takes up vertical space, whereas this floats and does not)
560:
527:
508:
369:
246:
2943:
succinctly in the same box would be more effective than any generic
2279:
Sounds good. I generally put anything not covered by the above into
1378:
It was definitely a mistake and I removed it. Thanks for the ping!
155:
2147:"The banner shll is not the place to put non-collapsing banners."
3193:
Here's a case study for you all—what's the best way to organise
159:
1696:– should only be necessary on talk pages with several banners
3266:
about the edit you reverted? I've been reminded that it has
2099:
a true WikiProject banner template - it is not built around
931:
14. Attribution history: Copy, split, merge, translate, etc.
1445:
for an example of the problem created by placing the small
3319:, most transclusions are below 16. Page metadata, such as
3223:
Removed calm and controversial from a very quiet talk page
2018:, though cannot be adjusted to show importance or rating.
681:
Article editing restrictions, warnings, and guidance (A)
1243:- ie, place the template where people are going to edit.
716:
7. Language-related talk page guideline banners, such as
3270:, so the talk page is the best place to make your case.
1300:, is a true WikiProject banner and may be placed inside
2383:
on a process point, which is that this conversation is
1163:, that's a really good point, and I have two thoughts:
3066:
or its talk page: Where was the RfC, out of interest?
2302:
Here's an example of how useful the Vital
Project is:
1960:
I am unclear on if there is actually a preference for
1808:
Language-related talk page guideline banners, such as
1055:. Clearly, "active nominations" are about recognizing
3220:
Merged OTD to AH (have a bot almost ready to do that)
2991:
While we're looking at this, could we specify where
2665:
The level 5 Vital
Articles list is monitored by the
831:
Article issues, collaboration, and improvement: (A)
15:
3369:. Is there consensus to consistently move it down?
2658:Sdkb, doubly reinforcing my view is this text from
1059:, and it seems to me that Vital articles are about
2986:sidebar on former educational assignment templates
767:6. Specific talk page guideline banners, such as
3440:
2746:, where I have proposed displaying as just e.g.
1090:, and really this is more or less equivalent to
452:on every page, and this page reflects that. Add
3226:Moved old moves, merges, etc in to banner shell
492:(it was CENT-listed but not technically an RfC)
2742:You all are invited to join the discussion at
2120:User talk:Kanashimi#Placement of Vital article
1746:Specific talk page guideline banners, such as
1708:– should only be used where it is needed; see
3133:which followed the Rfc and has a link to it.
2071:. It should not be used on the talk pages of
2033:There's been no opposition to that suggestion
1613:Vital tags should be placed with WikiProjects
1284:are not the same: the first is a redirect to
3162:they tended to stay around forever. I think
2150:So let's convert it and make it collapse.
2095:template, as I have pointed out before, is
995:to abstract it down to seven, if possible.
254:
1138:For me, vital articles is a WikiProject (
684:5. High-importance attention templates –
184:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
2520:where more people are likely to see it.
1316:, so is not collapsible - not even with
1047:, thanks for your comment. Currently at
3395:. I think the transclusion I saw above
3373:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Refideas
2780:There is now a follow-up discussion at
2374:vehemently opposed to talk page clutter
2236:Just a quick note that the user script
1525:for me, is that it should be kept with
1455:template above large templates such as
1100:which is basically unused in favour of
3441:
3317:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Central
3311:Template:central and Template:refideas
1936:template when 3+ are present, such as
1714:High-importance attention templates –
1655:Active nominations, when applicable –
3390:Reliable sources for medical articles
3284:Multiple banners for the same project
755:Reliable sources for medical articles
261:and a volunteer will visit you there.
231:This page is within the scope of the
2069:Knowledge:WikiProject Vital Articles
1140:Knowledge:WikiProject Vital Articles
936:Stats, Metadata, and externals: (A)
173:
171:
167:
898:8. Article history and milestones:
764:Talk page advice and warnings: (T)
190:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
3131:Educational noticeboard discussion
2518:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)
14:
3470:
2461:, or putting it in the header of
2747:
2660:Knowledge:Vital articles/Level/5
2437:
1870:) or "article milestone" (e.g.,
1086:isn't about quality, it's about
577:
224:
203:
172:
141:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
3064:Template:Educational assignment
1900:) banner, preferably within an
270:Template:Knowledge Help Project
2065:. However, its doc does state
648:Topic and article quality (A)
257:ask for help on your talk page
1:
3247:23:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
3215:23:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
3197:? As above, and then one big
3177:21:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
3155:19:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
3118:18:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
3086:18:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
3042:18:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
3021:08:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
2926:16:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2738:14:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2713:16:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2689:12:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2648:03:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
2626:16:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2591:11:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2569:16:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2530:08:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2511:07:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2493:05:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
2389:WT:WikiProject Vital Articles
2368:21:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2353:17:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2297:17:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2267:02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1830:Any "article history" (e.g.,
1601:21:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1586:20:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1549:19:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1485:04:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1408:14:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
1388:19:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1367:13:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1337:12:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1253:10:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1214:22:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1152:05:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1134:03:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1078:03:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1036:21:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
1005:21:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
834:9. WikiProject banners, in a
592:20:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
573:20:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
542:19:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
521:19:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
486:19:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
438:18:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
423:17:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
383:16:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
351:14:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
37:Put new text under old text.
3459:Knowledge Help Project pages
3454:Top-importance Help articles
2980:16:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
2960:21:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2895:22:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2877:21:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2232:11:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
2194:21:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2174:21:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2143:11:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2122:, the present advice to put
2028:10:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1641:05:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1535:, since they are both about
1443:User talk:GoingBatty/Sandbox
1341:I'm not seeing any value in
975:Talk page nav (bottom): (T)
895:History and attribution (A)
287:This page has been rated as
7:
3349:clearly takes the place of
3279:02:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
2966:discussion could be had at
1670:Featured article candidates
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
3475:
3435:20:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3264:"dubious and prescriptive"
2667:WikiProject Vital Articles
2045:WikiProject Vital Articles
1995:WikiProject Vital Articles
1965:WikiProject Vital Articles
1288:WikiProject Vital Articles
1238:British English editnotice
1095:WikiProject Vital Articles
293:project's importance scale
88:
1513:Talk:Liberation of France
621:Talk page nav (top): (T)
286:
241:, where you can join the
219:
198:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
3385:but could also go below
3375:could be considered 13.
3364:WikiProject banner shell
3306:22:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
3268:been accepted for a year
3252:Article history template
2832:Language-related banners
2824:08:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
2803:19:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
2466:WikiProject banner shell
2014:WikiProject banner shell
1931:WikiProject banner shell
1304:WikiProject banner shell
1292:(and being built around
1182:#F8EABA background color
839:WikiProject banner shell
2776:15:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
2372:As someone who is both
2067:... pages that concern
1509:Talk:War guilt question
552:Special:Diff/1062162289
408:, any thoughts on that?
3449:NA-Class Help articles
2996:educational assignment
2899:Fully agreed, there, @
1951:WikiProject Television
612:Reducing arbitrariness
404:or something similar?
267:Knowledge:Help Project
234:Knowledge Help Project
70:avoid personal attacks
3207:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2938:Consolidate templates
2905:proposed that in 2021
2289:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2039:expressed opposition.
1990:, though I note that
1233:; far more useful is
743:Connected contributor
651:1. Active nominations
135:Auto-archiving period
3415:. Where do we think
2757:as mentioned above.
1941:WikiProject Elements
2306:An obscure artist,
1916:banners, including
1184:would help? Maybe,
3359:. A few are above
3262:, what exactly is
3195:Talk:Imelda Marcos
2541:CactiStaccingCrane
2385:rather slow moving
2308:William Utermohlen
2240:currently inserts
2215:. See for example
2118:As I mentioned at
1617:I agree with both
358:User:Gonzo_fan2007
186:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
3354:Annual readership
3324:Annual readership
3304:
2923:
2911:
2800:
2788:
2773:
2761:
2710:
2698:
2623:
2611:
2566:
2554:
2490:
2478:
2379:First, I have to
2265:
2238:User:Evad37/rater
2217:Talk:World War II
2211:Annual readership
2035:I thought that I
2010:will collapse in
1460:Annual readership
1268:Please note that
944:Annual readership
862:Infobox requested
570:
558:
518:
506:
493:
418:
346:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
166:
165:
61:Assume good faith
38:
3466:
3424:
3418:
3414:
3408:
3404:
3398:
3394:
3388:
3384:
3378:
3368:
3362:
3358:
3352:
3348:
3342:
3338:
3332:
3328:
3322:
3294:
3277:
3275:
3261:
3239:
3204:
3143:Talk:Transgender
3128:
3115:
3106:
3092:asked about this
3083:
3074:
3060:
3031:
3018:
3009:
3000:
2994:
2958:
2956:
2950:
2924:
2921:
2920:
2918:
2909:
2869:
2861:
2855:
2851:
2847:American English
2845:
2801:
2798:
2797:
2795:
2786:
2774:
2771:
2770:
2768:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2750:
2711:
2708:
2707:
2705:
2696:
2681:
2624:
2621:
2620:
2618:
2609:
2599:, I agree with @
2583:
2567:
2564:
2563:
2561:
2552:
2491:
2488:
2487:
2485:
2476:
2470:
2464:
2460:
2454:
2445:
2441:
2440:
2431:
2425:
2394:a VPR discussion
2345:
2322:adds it to Vital
2286:
2259:
2257:
2249:
2243:
2223:
2214:
2205:
2186:
2172:
2134:
2129:
2114:
2106:
2094:
2084:
2078:
2075:themselves; use
2064:
2056:
2048:
2017:
2009:
2003:
1999:
1993:
1989:
1983:
1979:
1973:
1969:
1963:
1955:
1949:
1945:
1939:
1935:
1929:
1925:
1919:
1909:
1903:
1899:
1893:
1889:
1883:
1879:
1873:
1869:
1863:
1859:
1853:
1849:
1843:
1839:
1833:
1827:
1821:
1817:
1813:American English
1811:
1805:
1801:Round in circles
1799:
1795:
1789:
1785:
1779:
1775:
1769:
1765:
1759:
1755:
1749:
1743:
1737:
1733:
1727:
1723:
1717:
1707:
1701:
1695:
1689:
1684:
1678:
1674:
1668:
1664:
1658:
1633:
1575:
1567:
1559:
1534:
1528:
1524:
1518:
1505:
1499:
1495:
1474:
1468:
1464:
1458:
1454:
1448:
1440:
1434:
1430:
1377:
1348:
1328:
1323:
1315:
1307:
1299:
1291:
1283:
1275:
1267:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1226:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:ArbCom & BLP
1183:
1175:
1169:
1162:
1132:
1109:
1103:
1099:
1093:
1046:
1034:
987:
981:
970:
964:
958:
952:
948:
942:
927:
921:
917:
911:
907:
901:
889:
883:
879:
873:
866:
860:
856:
850:
843:
837:
826:
822:Round in circles
820:
816:
810:
806:
800:
796:
790:
786:
780:
776:
770:
759:
753:
747:
741:
735:
729:
725:
721:American English
719:
713:
707:
703:
697:
693:
687:
677:
671:
663:
657:
642:
636:
632:
626:
581:
571:
568:
567:
565:
556:
531:
519:
516:
515:
513:
504:
491:
484:
461:
455:
451:
445:
421:
416:
413:
401:
395:
349:
344:
341:
320:
314:
275:
274:
271:
268:
265:
260:
239:the project page
228:
221:
220:
215:
207:
200:
199:
177:
176:
175:
168:
160:
146:
145:
136:
101:
25:Talk page layout
16:
3474:
3473:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3439:
3438:
3427:142.113.140.146
3422:
3416:
3412:
3406:
3402:
3396:
3392:
3386:
3382:
3376:
3366:
3360:
3356:
3350:
3346:
3340:
3336:
3330:
3326:
3320:
3313:
3286:
3273:
3271:
3256:
3254:
3237:
3198:
3191:
3122:
3109:
3100:
3077:
3068:
3054:
3025:
3012:
3003:
2998:
2992:
2988:
2954:
2952:
2944:
2940:
2914:
2912:
2908:
2867:
2859:
2857:British English
2853:
2849:
2843:
2834:
2791:
2789:
2785:
2764:
2762:
2758:
2748:
2701:
2699:
2695:
2679:
2614:
2612:
2608:
2581:
2557:
2555:
2551:
2548:to that project
2481:
2479:
2475:
2468:
2462:
2458:
2452:
2438:
2429:
2423:
2387:likely because
2343:
2280:
2253:
2247:
2241:
2221:
2208:
2199:
2184:
2151:
2132:
2123:
2108:
2100:
2088:
2082:
2076:
2058:
2050:
2042:
2011:
2007:
2001:
1997:
1991:
1987:
1981:
1977:
1971:
1967:
1961:
1953:
1947:
1943:
1937:
1933:
1927:
1923:
1917:
1907:
1905:Article history
1901:
1897:
1891:
1887:
1881:
1877:
1871:
1867:
1861:
1857:
1851:
1847:
1841:
1837:
1831:
1825:
1823:British English
1819:
1815:
1809:
1803:
1797:
1793:
1787:
1783:
1777:
1773:
1767:
1763:
1757:
1753:
1747:
1741:
1735:
1731:
1725:
1721:
1715:
1705:
1699:
1693:
1687:
1682:
1676:
1672:
1666:
1662:
1656:
1631:
1615:
1569:
1561:
1553:
1532:
1526:
1522:
1516:
1503:
1497:
1489:
1472:
1466:
1462:
1456:
1452:
1446:
1438:
1432:
1424:
1371:
1342:
1326:
1317:
1309:
1301:
1293:
1285:
1277:
1269:
1257:
1240:
1234:
1230:
1228:British English
1224:
1198:"informational"
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1173:
1167:
1156:
1111:
1107:
1101:
1097:
1091:
1057:article quality
1040:
1013:
985:
979:
968:
962:
956:
950:
946:
940:
925:
919:
915:
909:
905:
903:Article history
899:
887:
881:
877:
871:
864:
858:
854:
852:Image requested
848:
841:
835:
824:
818:
814:
808:
804:
798:
794:
788:
784:
778:
774:
768:
757:
751:
745:
739:
733:
731:British English
727:
723:
717:
711:
705:
701:
695:
691:
685:
675:
669:
661:
655:
640:
634:
630:
624:
614:
561:
559:
555:
525:
509:
507:
503:
463:
459:
453:
449:
443:
412:« Gonzo fan2007
411:
409:
399:
393:
340:« Gonzo fan2007
339:
337:
323:
318:
312:
272:
269:
266:
263:
262:
213:
162:
161:
156:
133:
107:
106:
105:
104:
97:
93:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
3472:
3462:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3312:
3309:
3291:Talk:Jana Amin
3285:
3282:
3253:
3250:
3231:
3230:
3227:
3224:
3221:
3190:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3044:
2987:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2939:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2833:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2636:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2544:
2499:
2472:
2448:
2434:
2414:
2406:
2402:
2377:
2332:
2331:
2324:
2314:
2300:
2299:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2196:
2148:
2116:
2073:vital articles
2040:
1957:
1956:
1911:
1828:
1806:
1744:
1729:Gs/talk notice
1719:Ds/talk notice
1712:
1697:
1685:
1652:
1651:
1614:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1220:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1190:"medium"-level
1177:
992:
991:
990:
989:
973:
972:
971:
959:
939:15. metadata:
934:
933:
932:
929:
893:
892:
891:
868:
845:
829:
828:
827:
762:
761:
760:
748:
736:
714:
699:Gs/talk notice
689:Ds/talk notice
679:
666:
665:
664:
652:
646:
645:
644:
633:(note: was 2.
628:Skip to bottom
613:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
322:
310:
305:
304:
301:
300:
297:
296:
289:Top-importance
285:
279:
278:
276:
264:Knowledge Help
251:Help Directory
229:
217:
216:
214:Top‑importance
211:Knowledge Help
208:
196:
195:
189:
178:
164:
163:
154:
152:
151:
148:
147:
109:
108:
103:
102:
94:
89:
87:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3471:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3446:
3444:
3437:
3436:
3432:
3428:
3421:
3411:
3401:
3391:
3381:
3374:
3370:
3365:
3355:
3345:
3344:Top 25 report
3335:
3334:Section sizes
3325:
3318:
3308:
3307:
3302:
3298:
3292:
3281:
3280:
3276:
3269:
3265:
3260:
3249:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3228:
3225:
3222:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3202:
3201:Banner holder
3196:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3165:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3126:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3116:
3114:
3113:
3107:
3105:
3104:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3081:
3075:
3073:
3072:
3065:
3058:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3029:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3016:
3010:
3008:
3007:
2997:
2990:
2989:
2981:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2957:
2948:
2927:
2919:
2917:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2874:
2870:
2866:
2858:
2848:
2841:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2816:AncientWalrus
2812:
2804:
2796:
2794:
2783:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2769:
2767:
2756:
2745:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2706:
2704:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2664:
2663:
2661:
2657:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2619:
2617:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2574:
2570:
2562:
2560:
2549:
2545:
2542:
2537:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2486:
2484:
2473:
2467:
2457:
2449:
2446:
2435:
2428:
2427:Vital article
2420:
2415:
2412:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2375:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2336:
2329:
2325:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2284:
2283:Banner holder
2278:
2268:
2263:
2258:
2256:
2255:Novem Linguae
2246:
2245:Vital article
2239:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2218:
2212:
2203:
2202:Banner holder
2197:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2149:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2127:
2126:Vital article
2121:
2117:
2112:
2104:
2098:
2092:
2091:Vital article
2086:
2081:
2080:Vital article
2074:
2070:
2062:
2054:
2046:
2041:
2038:
2034:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2015:
2006:
1996:
1986:
1985:Vital article
1976:
1966:
1959:
1958:
1952:
1942:
1932:
1922:
1921:Vital article
1915:
1912:
1906:
1896:
1886:
1876:
1866:
1856:
1855:Old XfD multi
1846:
1836:
1829:
1824:
1814:
1807:
1802:
1792:
1782:
1772:
1771:Controversial
1762:
1752:
1745:
1740:
1730:
1720:
1713:
1711:
1710:documentation
1704:
1698:
1692:
1686:
1681:
1671:
1661:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1624:
1620:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1573:
1565:
1557:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1531:
1521:
1514:
1510:
1502:
1493:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1471:
1470:Section sizes
1461:
1451:
1444:
1437:
1428:
1423:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1355:User:Mcampany
1352:
1351:Tetsuya Umeda
1346:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1321:
1320:Banner holder
1313:
1305:
1297:
1289:
1281:
1280:Vital article
1273:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1239:
1229:
1221:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1204:
1178:
1172:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1106:
1105:Vital article
1096:
1089:
1085:
1082:The thing is
1081:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1066:
1065:vital article
1062:
1061:topic quality
1058:
1054:
1050:
1044:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1002:
998:
984:
977:
976:
974:
967:
960:
955:
954:Section sizes
945:
938:
937:
935:
930:
924:
914:
904:
897:
896:
894:
886:
876:
869:
863:
853:
846:
840:
833:
832:
830:
823:
813:
803:
793:
792:Controversial
783:
773:
766:
765:
763:
756:
749:
744:
737:
732:
722:
715:
710:
700:
690:
683:
682:
680:
674:
667:
660:
659:Vital article
653:
650:
649:
647:
639:
629:
623:
622:
620:
619:
618:
593:
589:
585:
580:
576:
575:
574:
566:
564:
554:, I believe.
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
529:
524:
523:
522:
514:
512:
501:
498:and I'll ask
497:
489:
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
458:
448:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
424:
419:
414:
407:
403:
398:
390:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
371:
367:
366:User:Mathglot
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
347:
342:
335:
331:
327:
317:
309:
294:
290:
284:
281:
280:
277:
273:Help articles
259:
258:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
230:
227:
223:
222:
218:
212:
209:
206:
202:
201:
197:
193:
187:
183:
179:
170:
169:
150:
149:
144:
140:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
115:
111:
110:
100:
96:
95:
92:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3371:
3314:
3287:
3255:
3234:
3232:
3192:
3129:, Here's an
3111:
3110:
3102:
3101:
3079:
3078:
3070:
3069:
3014:
3013:
3005:
3004:
2941:
2915:
2864:
2792:
2765:
2725:
2720:
2702:
2676:
2640:OliveYouBean
2631:
2615:
2601:SandyGeorgia
2597:OliveYouBean
2578:
2558:
2547:
2503:OliveYouBean
2482:
2384:
2340:
2337:
2333:
2301:
2254:
2181:
2103:WPBannerMeta
2096:
2066:
2061:WPBannerMeta
2036:
2032:
1691:Skip to talk
1648:WP:TALKORDER
1628:
1616:
1536:
1296:WPBannerMeta
1087:
1083:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:WP:TALKORDER
993:
638:Skip to talk
615:
562:
510:
392:
333:
324:
308:
288:
256:
232:
192:WikiProjects
182:project page
181:
138:
112:
19:This is the
3425:should go?
3410:Talk header
3315:Looking at
3293:. — Martin
2947:talk header
2883:edit notice
2605:WP:Contents
2456:Talk header
2411:broad-topic
2398:WP:CONLEVEL
2326:and when I
2318:same editor
2107:but around
1914:WikiProject
1885:On this day
1781:Not a forum
1703:Talk header
1680:Peer review
1566:|small=no}}
1537:attribution
988:and similar
961:11 (part).
802:Not a forum
738:11 (part).
673:Talk header
457:talk header
447:talk header
397:Talk header
316:Talk header
3443:Categories
3189:Case study
3096:discussed
2536:a proposal
2534:There was
2419:Mansa Musa
2401:consensus.
2312:written by
1739:BLP others
1660:GA nominee
1578:GoingBatty
1564:translated
1520:translated
1501:translated
1492:GoingBatty
1477:GoingBatty
1088:importance
709:BLP others
243:discussion
3259:JayBeeEll
2724:articles
2198:There is
2085:for this.
1450:translate
1436:translate
1192:banners,
908:but also
885:Consensus
668:Header –
370:User:Sdkb
247:Help Menu
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
3420:refideas
3169:Mathglot
3164:PrimeBOT
3147:Mathglot
3135:Mathglot
3090:I see I
3057:Mathglot
3034:Mathglot
2972:SilkTork
2901:SilkTork
2887:SilkTork
2840:SilkTork
2522:SilkTork
2474:Cheers,
2360:SilkTork
2153:Headbomb
2020:SilkTork
1910:template
1895:ITN talk
1875:DYK talk
1865:Old prod
1845:FailedGA
1650:to read:
1623:SilkTork
1619:Headbomb
1593:Mathglot
1556:Mathglot
1541:Mathglot
1427:Mathglot
1380:Mcampany
1374:SilkTork
1359:SilkTork
1264:SilkTork
1260:Mathglot
1245:SilkTork
1206:Mathglot
1180:current
1159:SilkTork
1144:SilkTork
1113:Headbomb
1084:vitality
1070:Mathglot
1043:Headbomb
1015:Headbomb
997:Mathglot
983:Archives
923:FailedGA
844:template
584:Mathglot
548:Mathglot
534:Mathglot
500:Mathglot
465:Headbomb
430:SilkTork
406:Headbomb
389:SilkTork
375:SilkTork
362:Headbomb
330:SilkTork
326:Headbomb
139:180 days
114:Archives
91:Shortcut
51:get help
3238:Georgia
2868:Georgia
2721:concept
2680:Georgia
2582:Georgia
2344:Georgia
2185:Georgia
1926:, in a
1632:Georgia
1441:. See
1194:current
1053:Quality
550:, it's
387:Thanks
356:Thanks
291:on the
2968:WP:TFD
2632:should
2224:rose64
2135:rose64
1761:Censor
1572:copied
1530:copied
1329:rose64
1196:, and
1166:maybe
782:censor
582:Done.
417:(talk)
345:(talk)
188:scale.
99:WT:TPL
3400:Press
3380:To do
3235:Sandy
2865:Sandy
2730:DFlhb
2677:Sandy
2579:Sandy
2381:start
2341:Sandy
2310:, is
2182:Sandy
2111:tmbox
2053:Vital
2049:(and
2005:Vital
1980:over
1975:Vital
1796:, or
1675:, or
1629:Sandy
1568:with
1511:, or
1400:DFlhb
1345:Vital
1312:tmbox
1272:Vital
1171:Vital
966:Press
875:To do
817:, or
678:(A/T)
496:WP:CR
321:Usage
253:. Or
180:This
79:Seek
27:page.
3431:talk
3329:and
3301:talk
3297:MSGJ
3274:czar
3243:Talk
3211:talk
3173:talk
3151:talk
3139:talk
3125:PamD
3038:talk
3028:PamD
2976:talk
2955:czar
2916:Sdkb
2910:{{u|
2903:. I
2891:talk
2873:Talk
2820:talk
2793:Sdkb
2787:{{u|
2766:Sdkb
2760:{{u|
2754:VA-3
2734:talk
2703:Sdkb
2697:{{u|
2685:Talk
2644:talk
2635:bad.
2616:Sdkb
2610:{{u|
2587:Talk
2559:Sdkb
2553:{{u|
2526:talk
2507:talk
2483:Sdkb
2477:{{u|
2444:VA-3
2364:talk
2349:Talk
2320:who
2316:the
2293:talk
2262:talk
2228:talk
2226:🌹 (
2219:. --
2190:Talk
2139:talk
2137:🌹 (
2087:The
2024:talk
1946:and
1751:Calm
1637:Talk
1621:and
1597:talk
1582:talk
1545:talk
1481:talk
1465:and
1404:talk
1384:talk
1363:talk
1333:talk
1331:🌹 (
1324:. --
1276:and
1262:and
1249:talk
1210:talk
1148:talk
1074:talk
1001:talk
978:16.
949:and
870:12.
847:10.
772:Calm
750:13.
588:talk
563:Sdkb
557:{{u|
538:talk
528:Sdkb
511:Sdkb
505:{{u|
434:talk
379:talk
328:and
68:and
3245:)
3103:Pam
3071:Pam
3006:Pam
2875:)
2852:or
2726:are
2687:)
2589:)
2405:it?
2351:)
2222:Red
2192:)
2133:Red
2097:not
2037:had
1818:or
1791:FAQ
1639:)
1576:.
1475:.
1327:Red
1110:.
928:etc
880:or
812:FAQ
726:or
654:4.
334:all
283:Top
249:or
3445::
3433:)
3423:}}
3417:{{
3413:}}
3407:{{
3403:}}
3397:{{
3393:}}
3387:{{
3383:}}
3377:{{
3367:}}
3361:{{
3357:}}
3351:{{
3347:}}
3341:{{
3339:.
3337:}}
3331:{{
3327:}}
3321:{{
3299:·
3213:)
3205:?
3203:}}
3199:{{
3175:)
3153:)
3145:.
3040:)
2999:}}
2993:{{
2978:)
2970:.
2951:.
2949:}}
2945:{{
2922:}}
2893:)
2860:}}
2854:{{
2850:}}
2844:{{
2822:)
2799:}}
2784:.
2772:}}
2736:)
2709:}}
2662::
2646:)
2622:}}
2565:}}
2528:)
2509:)
2489:}}
2469:}}
2463:{{
2459:}}
2453:{{
2430:}}
2424:{{
2366:)
2295:)
2287:.
2285:}}
2281:{{
2248:}}
2242:{{
2230:)
2213:}}
2209:{{
2204:}}
2200:{{
2167:·
2163:·
2159:·
2141:)
2128:}}
2124:{{
2113:}}
2109:{{
2105:}}
2101:{{
2093:}}
2089:{{
2083:}}
2077:{{
2063:}}
2059:{{
2055:}}
2051:{{
2047:}}
2043:{{
2026:)
2016:}}
2012:{{
2008:}}
2002:{{
1998:}}
1992:{{
1988:}}
1982:{{
1978:}}
1972:{{
1968:}}
1962:{{
1954:}}
1948:{{
1944:}}
1938:{{
1934:}}
1928:{{
1924:}}
1918:{{
1908:}}
1902:{{
1898:}}
1892:{{
1890:,
1888:}}
1882:{{
1880:,
1878:}}
1872:{{
1868:}}
1862:{{
1860:,
1858:}}
1852:{{
1850:,
1848:}}
1842:{{
1840:,
1838:}}
1835:GA
1832:{{
1826:}}
1820:{{
1816:}}
1810:{{
1804:}}
1798:{{
1794:}}
1788:{{
1786:,
1784:}}
1778:{{
1776:,
1774:}}
1768:{{
1766:,
1764:}}
1758:{{
1756:,
1754:}}
1748:{{
1742:}}
1736:{{
1734:,
1732:}}
1726:{{
1724:,
1722:}}
1716:{{
1706:}}
1700:{{
1694:}}
1688:{{
1683:}}
1677:{{
1673:}}
1667:{{
1665:,
1663:}}
1657:{{
1599:)
1584:)
1574:}}
1570:{{
1562:{{
1547:)
1533:}}
1527:{{
1523:}}
1517:{{
1504:}}
1498:{{
1483:)
1473:}}
1467:{{
1463:}}
1457:{{
1453:}}
1447:{{
1439:}}
1433:{{
1406:)
1386:)
1365:)
1347:}}
1343:{{
1335:)
1322:}}
1318:{{
1314:}}
1310:{{
1306:}}
1302:{{
1298:}}
1294:{{
1290:}}
1286:{{
1282:}}
1278:{{
1274:}}
1270:{{
1251:)
1241:}}
1235:{{
1231:}}
1225:{{
1212:)
1188:,
1174:}}
1168:{{
1150:)
1127:·
1123:·
1119:·
1108:}}
1102:{{
1098:}}
1092:{{
1076:)
1029:·
1025:·
1021:·
1003:)
986:}}
980:{{
969:}}
963:{{
957:}}
951:{{
947:}}
941:{{
926:}}
920:{{
918:,
916:}}
913:GA
910:{{
906:}}
900:{{
888:}}
882:{{
878:}}
872:{{
865:}}
859:{{
857:,
855:}}
849:{{
842:}}
836:{{
825:}}
819:{{
815:}}
809:{{
807:,
805:}}
799:{{
797:,
795:}}
789:{{
787:,
785:}}
779:{{
777:,
775:}}
769:{{
758:}}
752:{{
746:}}
740:{{
734:}}
728:{{
724:}}
718:{{
712:}}
706:{{
704:,
702:}}
696:{{
694:,
692:}}
686:{{
676:}}
670:{{
662:}}
656:{{
641:}}
635:{{
631:}}
625:{{
590:)
569:}}
540:)
517:}}
479:·
475:·
471:·
460:}}
454:{{
450:}}
444:{{
436:)
420:@
400:}}
394:{{
381:)
360:.
348:@
319:}}
313:{{
137::
129:,
125:,
121:,
49:;
3429:(
3303:)
3295:(
3257:@
3241:(
3209:(
3171:(
3149:(
3137:(
3127::
3123:@
3112:D
3080:D
3059::
3055:@
3036:(
3030::
3026:@
3015:D
2974:(
2889:(
2871:(
2818:(
2732:(
2683:(
2669:.
2642:(
2595:@
2585:(
2524:(
2505:(
2362:(
2347:(
2330:.
2291:(
2264:)
2260:(
2188:(
2171:}
2169:b
2165:p
2161:c
2157:t
2155:{
2022:(
2000:/
1970:/
1635:(
1595:(
1580:(
1558::
1554:@
1543:(
1494::
1490:@
1479:(
1429::
1425:@
1402:(
1382:(
1376::
1372:@
1361:(
1266::
1258:@
1247:(
1208:(
1200:?
1161::
1157:@
1146:(
1131:}
1129:b
1125:p
1121:c
1117:t
1115:{
1072:(
1045::
1041:@
1033:}
1031:b
1027:p
1023:c
1019:t
1017:{
999:(
890:,
867:,
586:(
546:@
536:(
530::
526:@
483:}
481:b
477:p
473:c
469:t
467:{
432:(
377:(
295:.
194::
131:4
127:3
123:2
119:1
116::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
