Knowledge

talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Archive 2 - Knowledge

Source 📝

31: 1230: 3546:? It's not showing up in the transclusion, so I may have done something wrong or missed one of the "admin-only" steps. Unfortunately I don't have the patience to parse the "don't do this, do this!" old/new instructions on this page, but I do feel looking into this case is pretty important. I hope this process can be made more user-friendly at some point. Unless you've made it difficult to discourage frivolous requests? 3968: 3405: 3120: 1220: 533: 4142:(Note that had those "undoing" what I had done so far been as careful, all the cries of confusion and brokenness below on this page would not have happened. I even noted that all they need to have done is go through my contribution history. - It's easy to call names and make presumptions about someone and the "care" they put into something, it's perhaps a bit more difficult to actually 707:(Note that had those "undoing" what I had done so far been as careful, all the cries of confusion and brokenness below on this page would not have happened. I even noted that all they need to have done is go through my contribution history. - It's easy to call names and make presumptions about someone and the "care" they put into something, it's perhaps a bit more difficult to actually 4452:(checking that a range block won't block out a bunch of legit editors) and vote checks, checking that there was not ballot stuffing. There are probably other reasons, but listing the reasons and making everything else go as a case is probably best as making a case is not really that hard, and it gives us a chance to track the history of a particular problem user/puppet master. —— 1370:(checking that a range block won't block out a bunch of legit editors) and vote checks, checking that there was not ballot stuffing. There are probably other reasons, but listing the reasons and making everything else go as a case is probably best as making a case is not really that hard, and it gives us a chance to track the history of a particular problem user/puppet master. —— 3212:
simply to make the archives a subpage of each case. This lowers our transclude size significently, so as long as we don't have over 50 or 60 open cases at one time on the page we will be fine. If we have more issues I'll look into alternate ways to reduce our load further, but I don't think this will be needed. ——
4451:
Right now what I see, the directions for quick check are not being followed... people are putting requests there that really should be a case. I suggest coming up with some specific criteria for quick check and rejecting/making a case out of all else. Generally what I see that useful for is IP checks
4167:
because things may change "during", and we should minimise the changes that they may need to make.) But with so many bots acting "immediately" constantly (compared to, let's say a daily archive bot, or something), letting them know in advance to at least "pause" the bots, might have been a good idea.
3777:
for 2 days. People miss phone calls, emails, and sometimes Knowledge Talk page threads too. I have no opinion on the name -yet- but I am deeply concerned by the trend on Knowledge that makes people want to have decisions made in a split second without second guessing (that's not only directed towards
3748:
Anyway, if this is your own little Esperanza-like heirarchy corner of Knowledge (clerks, trainee clerks, what?), then please don't let me stop you. I merely thought that with the uproar not so long ago about admin "investigations" that perhaps we should go with a more tried and true name. <shrugs:
2995:
My second concern is... how much is this data being used? Just because the bot reports something does not mean that action is always taken. Have we used the data from the bot reports yet to actually do something with it? If this is not the case, I'd suggest leaving things as is, and allowing users to
1369:
Right now what I see, the directions for quick check are not being followed... people are putting requests there that really should be a case. I suggest coming up with some specific criteria for quick check and rejecting/making a case out of all else. Generally what I see that useful for is IP checks
732:
because things may change "during", and we should minimise the changes that they may need to make.) But with so many bots acting "immediately" constantly (compared to, let's say a daily archive bot, or something), letting them know in advance to at least "pause" the bots, might have been a good idea.
342:
for 2 days. People miss phone calls, emails, and sometimes Knowledge Talk page threads too. I have no opinion on the name -yet- but I am deeply concerned by the trend on Knowledge that makes people want to have decisions made in a split second without second guessing (that's not only directed towards
313:
Anyway, if this is your own little Esperanza-like heirarchy corner of Knowledge (clerks, trainee clerks, what?), then please don't let me stop you. I merely thought that with the uproar not so long ago about admin "investigations" that perhaps we should go with a more tried and true name. <shrugs:
5129:
Most likely you created the case while the bot was down earlier today (due to wikipedia's servers acting odd) or yesterday (when toolserver went down). Doing a "null edit", which is basically adding a new line to the case and clicking save, causes the bot to look at the case and do the correct stuff
4540:
We *can* think about doing that, but as the bot runs 24/7 in most cases the down time we speak of is usually less then 15 minutes. The time for the bot to parse all the subpages and actually check that everything is in order will grow as this process is in use longer. To see if a case is new, it has
4482:
Right, so we need to make a section not called "quick check" and list in that section the *specific* reasons to use that section and all else becomes a case, as most of the requests there right now seem to be from folks that think that section is "faster" then the normal process... which seems to be
2838:
If the bot is to do this, I need some instructions as to when and where to notify the users. All users on a new case should be notified (those that are in the checkuser and checkip templates)? Lets work this out before I get the bot posting out of WP:SPI space. Also to do this, I will need to make a
2293:
Most likely you created the case while the bot was down earlier today (due to wikipedia's servers acting odd) or yesterday (when toolserver went down). Doing a "null edit", which is basically adding a new line to the case and clicking save, causes the bot to look at the case and do the correct stuff
1899:
a subpage that contains identical content to this page minus all the collapsible boxes, and additionally another subpage that contains all requests requiring checkuser attention minus boxes. As silly as it sounds, right now the boxes really are putting me off working on this page. I understand that,
1458:
We *can* think about doing that, but as the bot runs 24/7 in most cases the down time we speak of is usually less then 15 minutes. The time for the bot to parse all the subpages and actually check that everything is in order will grow as this process is in use longer. To see if a case is new, it has
1400:
Right, so we need to make a section not called "quick check" and list in that section the *specific* reasons to use that section and all else becomes a case, as most of the requests there right now seem to be from folks that think that section is "faster" then the normal process... which seems to be
4240:
Jc37, the way most changes get done is when somebody has sufficient clue to realize what needs to be done, and that the change will not be opposed. If there is a chance of opposition, major changes should be discussed. Moving an active noticeboard with scores of subpages and robot dependencies is
4223:
So anyway, I'm done with the discussion and concern. I personally think that the name of this page is more than bitey, and has connotative suggestiveness that I think we should probably avoid, but I guess I just don't care enough to continue to worry about it. Probably better to allow the potential
4054:
The name already became more long-winded when it went from 'Suspected sock puppets' to 'Sockpuppet investigations' (six syllables went to eight). No need to go up to eleven syllables ('Requests for sockpuppet investigation'). It's already ambiguous whether the submitter has already investigated, or
3789:
This should have gained proper consensus beforehand, and I agree Jc37's actions were very careless and disruptive, but Lucasbfr's personal attacks were unnecessary to say the least. In so many words Lucas called Jc37 stupid, insane, etc. which is very uncivil, and not really something you expect to
3584:
Oh, I get it now. It was not obvious to me that the things above the buttons are editable fields. I just clicked the button and saw the admin-only thing. I was looking at this in Chrome, BTW, but it looks the same in Firefox (can't get iE to work right now). Maybe I'm being especially thick lately,
3306:
It's a thought, though I think general practice from AfD and similar areas should work fine. Every so often a case can use a talk page, and where it can't people seem to take a hint from the vast number of subpages. If it's a problem, though, it's definitely worth trying to figure out how to direct
805:
Jc37, the way most changes get done is when somebody has sufficient clue to realize what needs to be done, and that the change will not be opposed. If there is a chance of opposition, major changes should be discussed. Moving an active noticeboard with scores of subpages and robot dependencies is
788:
So anyway, I'm done with the discussion and concern. I personally think that the name of this page is more than bitey, and has connotative suggestiveness that I think we should probably avoid, but I guess I just don't care enough to continue to worry about it. Probably better to allow the potential
619:
The name already became more long-winded when it went from 'Suspected sock puppets' to 'Sockpuppet investigations' (six syllables went to eight). No need to go up to eleven syllables ('Requests for sockpuppet investigation'). It's already ambiguous whether the submitter has already investigated, or
354:
This should have gained proper consensus beforehand, and I agree Jc37's actions were very careless and disruptive, but Lucasbfr's personal attacks were unnecessary to say the least. In so many words Lucas called Jc37 stupid, insane, etc. which is very uncivil, and not really something you expect to
119:
Quick summary for users unfamiliar (based on chat) - this would be for blatant obvious vandalism, that doesn't have any question about it, but needs checkuser to resolve, where it's not even necessary to know who the sockmaster is but just to deal with it. Also for suspected proxy-using vandals to
4916:
I understand the original name is preferred instead these days. However, as Lucasbfr indicated, this is a meme not a user. The community has previously rejected listing all the sockpuppets participating in the meme, since such lists serve no useful purpose, nay are detrimental, to this project. --
1973:
We *can* have the bot maintain two versions, but before doing so I want to see if its possible to get someone to code some js or css that will prevent the show/hide boxes from showing for those that don't want them. If this is not possible or is not done by friday, I will have the bot maintain two
1654:
I understand the original name is preferred instead these days. However, as Lucasbfr indicated, this is a meme not a user. The community has previously rejected listing all the sockpuppets participating in the meme, since such lists serve no useful purpose, nay are detrimental, to this project. --
3211:
We were hitting transclude limits pretty bad early on. The page was transcluding over 2MB of data, which wikipedia won't permit. Our problem was we were transcluding the active cases *and* all prior cases that were archived as we had them in those show/hide boxes. My solution to this problem was
2508:
Ok, we can change the behavior, though I noticed that you guys came up with a clever solution, just letting the archive notice template contain the header. I think at this point, we should just continue in the same fashion. EG, no changes to the bot as I think the notice template is clearer, and
3260:
A possibility we can do is redirect all case page talk pages to this page. This prevents any issues with folks posting to those case talk pages and nobody noticing. Hardly anyone ever posts to the case talk pages anyway, and more attention to issues on a case would be gained if they posted here
3026:
The point about clogging up is very pertinent, and it is the fact that these cases are clogging up the main SPI page, with nobody really looking at them that first drew my attention to the fact that improvements were needed. 90% of the cases that the bot reports don't actually edit, and without
2474:
Do we want the bot to leave the L4 header? I was under the impression that was added as part of the "new case" thing that happens when someone clicks the buttons to create a case. Right now the bot simply "blanks" the page and replaces whatever is left with the archive notice. Do we want the L4
2056:
or something), we could have the template take care of formatting issues, rather than needing to modify bot code every time we want a formatting change. If the template then grabbed style information using a relative path, in some circumstances, I don't think it'd be too much trouble to get
3493:
I need to do a sockpuppet request, but I cannot figure out how to actually fill out your request form. It's so convoluted that I get lost, and I don't want to do it wrong and have the whole thing removed because it wasn't performed correctly. Could someone provide some assistance. :D
4138:
care, and I had been working on adjusting the various things for well over an hour before others' "panic" struck. Note that it's fairly simple to adjust a process, especially at it's early stages. merely check for page transclusions, whatlinkshere, and FT2's contribution history.
703:
care, and I had been working on adjusting the various things for well over an hour before others' "panic" struck. Note that it's fairly simple to adjust a process, especially at it's early stages. merely check for page transclusions, whatlinkshere, and FT2's contribution history.
2991:
The question here is do we want the bot generated reports to be clogging up our SPI system? What I mean is the SPI reports have no clue as to what the master account would be which is what our case titles are. Eg, hagger socks go into hagger, etc. If this is possible, that is a
4509:
FYI, toolserver went down for a few minutes, the bot has restarted, but its possible that a case or two got missed.. if so just make a "null edit" (do a null edit by adding a line by hitting enter somewhere on the case and save it) This causes the bot to re-evaluate. Thanks——
1427:
FYI, toolserver went down for a few minutes, the bot has restarted, but its possible that a case or two got missed.. if so just make a "null edit" (do a null edit by adding a line by hitting enter somewhere on the case and save it) This causes the bot to re-evaluate. Thanks——
4623:
This is fixed... the bot will remove level 2 and 3 headers. The instructions should be modified accordingly. (Don't tell people *not* to leave a summary). Note that the bot simply removes them, does not do any formatting with them as most of the time they are garbage... ——
1065:
This is fixed... the bot will remove level 2 and 3 headers. The instructions should be modified accordingly. (Don't tell people *not* to leave a summary). Note that the bot simply removes them, does not do any formatting with them as most of the time they are garbage... ——
4245:. Your first strike was making the change without consensus. Your second strike is defending your original action in the face of thoughtful objections from multiple clueful users. If you pull a stunt like this again, that will be strike three, and you'll be heading to 810:. Your first strike was making the change without consensus. Your second strike is defending your original action in the face of thoughtful objections from multiple clueful users. If you pull a stunt like this again, that will be strike three, and you'll be heading to 5178: 2342: 5130:
with it. In future cases, I advise folks if they don't see their case in 30 minutes or so, to simply do a null edit, most likely the bot did not see due to technical issues on toolserver or wikipedia itself. I did the null edit this time so all should be well. ——
2294:
with it. In future cases, I advise folks if they don't see their case in 30 minutes or so, to simply do a null edit, most likely the bot did not see due to technical issues on toolserver or wikipedia itself. I did the null edit this time so all should be well. ——
3100: 3074: 4391:
hope that you treat other, less experienced, editors better than this. Agressiveness, eagerness to attack (or to intentionally "set up" a scenario so that you can feel justfied to block someone), and so on, would seem to be less-than-collegiate, at the very
956:
hope that you treat other, less experienced, editors better than this. Agressiveness, eagerness to attack (or to intentionally "set up" a scenario so that you can feel justfied to block someone), and so on, would seem to be less-than-collegiate, at the very
102:
for sample functionality). I think this section served a useful purpose; I hope we can have it and resist this tendency to complicate everything. For reference, this is a long-standing part of the RFCU process, arising out of a discussion from August 2006:
4360:
name. (I merely think that a discussion should be had considering the name, in particular considering some events in the not-so-distant past concerning "investigations" and "sleuthing". But I suppose I'll leave that to be someone else's concern for
925:
name. (I merely think that a discussion should be had considering the name, in particular considering some events in the not-so-distant past concerning "investigations" and "sleuthing". But I suppose I'll leave that to be someone else's concern for
1247:
Do to the recent page move, the clerk bot is officially broken. I am not sure how we are going to do this, but clerks (or anyone who wants to help for that matter) are going to have to do everything by hand until I can get Nixeagle to fix the bot.
3565:
and look for the two buttons halfway down the instruction page. You will probably want the second one which asks for checkuser attention. Just change CASENAME to the name of the master account and push the button and follow the directions. ——
3041:
Yes start with that change, but don't actually make subpages with it yet. We don't want to clog up the "Open cases" either. First this feed needs to show itself useful before we start making individual cases out of it. There is a reason
5204: 3944: 2184: 509: 4648: 2607: 2444:
broke horribly on the archive pages, because it used {{SUBPAGENAME}}, i.e. the last part of the page name, which is always "Archive" I've changed it to use {{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}}, which will always pick up the second
1488: 3022:
know what the master account is, and already adds that to the text of the report. It would be a pretty trivial change to the bot blacklist to have it direct every report to the correct SPI case page, rather than the main SPI
3769:-like reaction. Moving a page is bold (why not), but moving an entire subspace without checking first that will not break things is reckless. If you want, this is like discovering in the morning that someone moved all of 334:-like reaction. Moving a page is bold (why not), but moving an entire subspace without checking first that will not break things is reckless. If you want, this is like discovering in the morning that someone moved all of 4928:
It would be best if there were a particular username we could file all this under. I have seen behavior patterns in this user that may be useful in preemptively banning accounts created, if we can get a CU orchestrated.
4483:
slow to me both ways right now as we need more people understanding how the new system works and actually going through the deluge of "SSP" style cases where admins can deal with them without the help of a checkuser. ——
1666:
It would be best if there were a particular username we could file all this under. I have seen behavior patterns in this user that may be useful in preemptively banning accounts created, if we can get a CU orchestrated.
1401:
slow to me both ways right now as we need more people understanding how the new system works and actually going through the deluge of "SSP" style cases where admins can deal with them without the help of a checkuser. ——
4007:. As such, you are not "requesting" a sockpuppet investigation (when you click submit you have already filed one, so there is nothing left to request) you are more requesting conversation about the case you have filed. 572:. As such, you are not "requesting" a sockpuppet investigation (when you click submit you have already filed one, so there is nothing left to request) you are more requesting conversation about the case you have filed. 2893: 4178:
As for the name "Sockpuppet investigations" and the so-called "consensus". I'll have to find it again, but it was more like someone proposed the name, someone else suggested it be plural, and that was it. Entrenched
743:
As for the name "Sockpuppet investigations" and the so-called "consensus". I'll have to find it again, but it was more like someone proposed the name, someone else suggested it be plural, and that was it. Entrenched
5176:
This is something I've known as an issue for a while now, there are several implementation problems I need to work through as well as solve some other bugs before I get to this one though. I've put it on a list at
3843:
On it atm. X is working from the bottom, I'm working from the top, but also, there are pages that require a sysop to move them because of their protection, so X or you or whoever will have to take care of those.—
2340:
This is something I've known as an issue for a while now, there are several implementation problems I need to work through as well as solve some other bugs before I get to this one though. I've put it on a list at
408:
On it atm. X is working from the bottom, I'm working from the top, but also, there are pages that require a sysop to move them because of their protection, so X or you or whoever will have to take care of those.—
3755:
I was going to finish the rest of the "whatlinkshere", but since there now seems a "cloud" over this, I'll just stop editing for now so that someone who wishes to revert, can just use my contributions history. -
2843:
on the bot. I have avoided doing so before now because the bot is very localized and only in this space. However for me to have it edit talk pages will require that I get broader consensus for its operations. ——
2107:
This is something that we could quite easily achieve with a conditional template, and it should make the bot's job easier, because it would only have to deal with single lines per case, rather than the 3 it does
320:
I was going to finish the rest of the "whatlinkshere", but since there now seems a "cloud" over this, I'll just stop editing for now so that someone who wishes to revert, can just use my contributions history. -
3585:
but I don't register boxes with text already in them as editable fields. I don't see clear instructions about how to link to investigations in the older style. I'll leave a note on the new case report. Thanks!
2088:
If this is something that can work without the bot having to keep two versions, one with the show/hide boxes and one without, then please give it a shot. I can easily change which template the bot looks at. ——
5111: 2275: 4696:
These are almost always caused by people ignoring the "don't add a heading" instruction. When Nixeagle gets a minute, the bot will be set up to clean up such things. I've removed a superfluous header to fix.
1536:
These are almost always caused by people ignoring the "don't add a heading" instruction. When Nixeagle gets a minute, the bot will be set up to clean up such things. I've removed a superfluous header to fix.
3996:
has proposed this page be renamed to either Requests for sockpuppet investigation, or Sockpuppet investigation requests. Let me state a few reasons why a rename is not needed, and should not be carried out:
3073: 2152: 561:
has proposed this page be renamed to either Requests for sockpuppet investigation, or Sockpuppet investigation requests. Let me state a few reasons why a rename is not needed, and should not be carried out:
4742:
The SPI Bot is currently down as a result of Wikimedia's page load issues. The RC feed is working as Wikimedia's IRC feed is not dependant on the web servers - however the bot is down until further notice.
1796:
The SPI Bot is currently down as a result of Wikimedia's page load issues. The RC feed is working as Wikimedia's IRC feed is not dependant on the web servers - however the bot is down until further notice.
2493:
We want to leave the L4 header, and the User5 template. These are only added by the preload if the page doesn't exist. If adding to a page that already exists, the preload only adds th L5 header onwards.
3093: 2967:
Create ordinary case pages for all the HBC blacklist cases, and target the HBC bot at the case pages rather than at bots section, and let the clerkbot relist these pages as required. (fairly easy)
155:
There was actually a discussion (a small one though) which determined it best to handle all IP block requests via cases, like anything else. I think we need to discuss this before adding it back.
3943: 4163:. (I had intended on doing that after the move was completed - something which is the normal SOP with such things - action occurs which affects bots, let them know after the action is resolved. 728:. (I had intended on doing that after the move was completed - something which is the normal SOP with such things - action occurs which affects bots, let them know after the action is resolved. 1992:
If we opt for the dual display, I'd suggest leaving the boxed versions on the main page and offering a link to the unboxed version, since it seems that the majority of people like the boxes. --
3652:
This could have just created a huge problem. You needed to have spoken with Nixeagle who runs the clerk bot before making this move, as now the bot does not read any of the case pages........
2807: 217:
This could have just created a huge problem. You needed to have spoken with Nixeagle who runs the clerk bot before making this move, as now the bot does not read any of the case pages........
5148:
This kind of thing is happening often enough that I think you should modify the bot to search for these stray reports. People don't want to have to shepherd their report through the process.—
2312:
This kind of thing is happening often enough that I think you should modify the bot to search for these stray reports. People don't want to have to shepherd their report through the process.—
2192: 3426:, it won't categorise it. The current cases that are affected will stay affected until they are edited, or the job queue catches up with them, but no new archive cases will be categorised. 508: 5415:
When a case already has an archive page, archiving a further report overwrote the existing archive, rather than appending the further report, and copied the whole of the active page over.
2695:
When a case already has an archive page, archiving a further report overwrote the existing archive, rather than appending the further report, and copied the whole of the active page over.
1909: 3959: 3610:
I was going to suggest that it merely be moved to the singular form, but the more I think about it, the more I think that perhaps we should restore the word "request" in the page name.
175:
I was going to suggest that it merely be moved to the singular form, but the more I think about it, the more I think that perhaps we should restore the word "request" in the page name.
4667: 3804:
I never called him stupid. I said this action was stupid. I still think harsh words were needed here, the page is completely broken for 24 hours now, and we have no way to fix it. --
2779: 1890: 524: 369:
I never called him stupid. I said this action was stupid. I still think harsh words were needed here, the page is completely broken for 24 hours now, and we have no way to fix it. --
5326:
Yes, the page will break as it adds a level two heading where one is not supposed to be. I was thinking of having the bot remove the heading if it was accidentally added by someone.
5258:
Case pages are in whatever order the bot adds them. I'm not really sure which order it is in though. Bot reported cases is done by a different bot, which is not under my control. ——
2661:
Case pages are in whatever order the bot adds them. I'm not really sure which order it is in though. Bot reported cases is done by a different bot, which is not under my control. ——
1138:
Yes, the page will break as it adds a level two heading where one is not supposed to be. I was thinking of having the bot remove the heading if it was accidentally added by someone.
3291:
That is not needed. I generally check talk pages of cases I work on, and find that uses often leave links to other cases, AN/ANI threads there in reference to the user in question.
1507: 4647: 2188: 2393:
for archiving. This is done for technical reasons as there were some transclusion issues. Anyone who sees a wording change needing to be made to the new archive template, please
5300:
in big red letters. Why is this the case; will something break if there is an edit summary left with the report creation? Is there any chance this will change in the future?
4227:
If there is still some confusion about something I changed, and help is wanted to return it to the previous state, please drop me a note on my talk page, I'll be happy to help.
3261:
rather then on a case page. Therefor a solution to this is to have the bot simply check new cases and if the case talk pages are a redlink, add a redirect to here. Thoughts? ——
2412:
The archive process robs the active page of its L4 ==== ] ==== header, so I've amended the archive notice to add the header back in (and keep the TOC clean). I also added the
2196: 1112:
in big red letters. Why is this the case; will something break if there is an edit summary left with the report creation? Is there any chance this will change in the future?
792:
If there is still some confusion about something I changed, and help is wanted to return it to the previous state, please drop me a note on my talk page, I'll be happy to help.
2006:
Yep, thats about what I'm thinking... however I want to see if we can't avoid having to do two versions mainly because it will make the bot twice as slow in updating cases. ——
1487: 142:
For the moment we'll try running this out of "other requests." I've expanded the wording in the header accordingly. If this becomes an issue we'll kick it to its own section.
5066: 1749: 1335:
For future notice: If you wish to change the page that this operates out of, someone needs to change a config variable on the bot, so please let folks know before you do it!
4826: 4808: 4789: 4970:
As a result of the changes to archiving, this wasn't working correctly. This has now been fixed, but there is still an issue with the template, which I am working on!!
2572:
As a result of the changes to archiving, this wasn't working correctly. This has now been fixed, but there is still an issue with the template, which I am working on!!
1880: 1862: 4096: 3922:
Filing new cases is barfing because the boilerplate for a new case is a redirect, and if you preload a redirect, you get the redirect content, not the target content.
3887: 3857: 3462:
now add "checked" to the RFCU template. I have not tested that this is the case, but if I did everything right, it will work. If its not working, let me know here. ——
3081: 2857: 2833: 2819: 1947:
I share in the appreciation for those who are trying to improve this page, but also in Deskana's dislike of the collapse boxes. Only backward and primitive areas like
1843: 487:
Filing new cases is barfing because the boilerplate for a new case is a redirect, and if you preload a redirect, you get the redirect content, not the target content.
4938: 4911: 4862: 4706: 4073: 4064: 3810: 3799: 4687: 4175:
that, I don't believe that I did anything wrong or untoward in this. And honestly, feel I've been treated rather poorly, and with a tremendous amount of poor faith.
3340: 3322: 3245: 3160: 2083: 1329: 1311: 740:
that, I don't believe that I did anything wrong or untoward in this. And honestly, feel I've been treated rather poorly, and with a tremendous amount of poor faith.
661: 452: 422: 5320: 5143: 5093: 5082: 5060: 4921: 4891: 4880: 4637: 4618: 4561: 4535: 4496: 4477: 4113: 3669: 3397: 3194: 2072: 1987: 1676: 1649: 1600: 1546: 1301:
story on centralizing both SSP and RFCU into SPI, going through briefly on the procedure to reduce the learning curve. But now I'll hold on until the bot is fixed.
1292: 1273: 638: 629: 375: 364: 5487: 5473: 5455: 5441: 5038: 4724: 4607: 3931: 3917: 3903: 3760: 1968: 1527: 161: 5271: 4997: 3981: 3475: 3297: 3286: 3225: 2488: 2307: 2247: 2234: 2102: 1776: 1765: 1743: 1659: 1629: 1618: 1479: 1453: 1414: 1395: 1350: 1132: 1079: 1060: 678: 234: 5390: 5372: 5343: 5332: 4770: 4414: 4257: 3543: 3453: 3206: 3063: 3036: 3013: 2938: 2875: 2767: 2753: 2735: 2721: 2536: 2522: 2503: 2469: 2458: 2212: 2120: 2033: 2019: 2001: 1942: 1928: 1721: 1564: 1049: 496: 482: 468: 325: 4436: 3784: 3699: 3658: 3594: 3579: 3531: 3435: 3133: 2674: 2599: 2174: 546: 94:
Well this combined business is all news to me, and I like to think I'm in the loop (apparently not). Anyway, we seem to have lost the old IP check section from
5418:
When archiving a subsequent case, it ought to append and it ought to take ONLY the L5 heading onwards (the L4 heading should be copied on first archive only).
5194: 5171: 5157: 4523: 2866:
to report will already have templated all the suspects, so the bot will need to parse the user talk to determine whether a notification has been left already.
2698:
When archiving a subsequent case, it ought to append and it ought to take ONLY the L5 heading onwards (the L4 heading should be copied on first archive only).
1824: 1202: 1184: 1155: 1144: 979: 822: 4979: 4711:
This is fixed... the bot will remove level 2 and 3 headers. The instructions should be modified accordingly. (Don't tell people *not* to leave a summary). ——
3112: 1551:
This is fixed... the bot will remove level 2 and 3 headers. The instructions should be modified accordingly. (Don't tell people *not* to leave a summary). ——
1001: 349: 264: 223: 124: 2358: 2335: 2321: 1441: 3837: 3647: 2581: 5409: 4964: 4867:
Or... just make a case named "HAGGER" or whatever the original dude's name was. (He is a prolific vandal/abuser that we ought to be archiving info on). ——
2689: 1605:
Or... just make a case named "HAGGER" or whatever the original dude's name was. (He is a prolific vandal/abuser that we ought to be archiving info on). ——
4841:
I want to make a CU request for an editor whom I suspect as being the HAGGER dude. But I do not know what username to use to refer to him. Please advise.
4776:
wow... that was fast... I think the technical problems are done with (wikipedia wide issues look to be working...) Bot should work now as it can edit. ——
4465: 3828: 1830:
wow... that was fast... I think the technical problems are done with (wikipedia wide issues look to be working...) Bot should work now as it can edit. ——
1579:
I want to make a CU request for an editor whom I suspect as being the HAGGER dude. But I do not know what username to use to refer to him. Please advise.
402: 393: 212: 3382: 2566: 4577:
Would it be a good idea for the bot, when listing a page, to delete any lines containing L2 or L3 headings (case pages should have L4/l5 headings only)
1383: 1019:
Would it be a good idea for the bot, when listing a page, to delete any lines containing L2 or L3 headings (case pages should have L4/l5 headings only)
3561:
I won't say the instructions here are the best, but you made your request on the wrong process page. Requests for checkuser is no longer active. Go to
1915:
Thanks for posting here, its on my todo list. I'll definately see about making a subpage without the boxes that contains *only* checkuser requests. ——
81: 76: 71: 59: 4253:
with your sysop bit in jeopardy. Forgive me for being blunt, but those are the facts, like them or not. Hopefully a word to the wise is sufficient.
3280:
I'm not sure that's needed, on RFCU we used to move extensive off topic discussions there, some users might still feel the need to do it. Dunno... --
818:
with your sysop bit in jeopardy. Forgive me for being blunt, but those are the facts, like them or not. Hopefully a word to the wise is sufficient.
4795: 3555: 1849: 99: 4046: 3274: 1316:
The bot is fixed afaik. Its editing properly. I did not do anything, moving the pages back to where they are supposed to go fixed it on its own. ——
5429: 4069:
My main objection to adding "requests for..." is that it adds nothing to the meaning of the title, while making it substantially more cumbersome.
634:
My main objection to adding "requests for..." is that it adds nothing to the meaning of the title, while making it substantially more cumbersome.
4674: 4156:
And if I was intending "great disruption" or some such nonsense, I wonder if I would have stopped to discuss as I did, when concerns were raised.
4104:
I wouldn't consider this as much a request page as a "please look into this (investigate)" page. The above reasons sum everything up pretty well.
3185:
The fact that recidivist cases don't now transclude loads of old stuff should help, but clearly we could check on whether we have any redundancy.
2985: 1514: 721:
And if I was intending "great disruption" or some such nonsense, I wonder if I would have stopped to discuss as I did, when concerns were raised.
669:
I wouldn't consider this as much a request page as a "please look into this (investigate)" page. The above reasons sum everything up pretty well.
611: 5436: 5327: 5242: 4041: 3653: 3292: 3201: 2970:
Get the HBC bot to create its reports in an SPI-like format (requires co-operation from bot owner, but I could actually provide him with a patch)
2814: 2716: 2709: 2645: 2464: 2398: 2242: 1287: 1249: 1236: 1139: 606: 218: 156: 5233:
Newest at bottom as the Oldest ones as the older ones should take priority over the newer ones as a backlog will start building fast otherwise.
2636:
Newest at bottom as the Oldest ones as the older ones should take priority over the newer ones as a backlog will start building fast otherwise.
5478:
Thanks for fixing, in fact, a general thank you for all the work that you've been doing to tweak the bot as SPI beds in is very much in order!
5277: 5123: 4885:
Not so sure, that's a lot of unrelated copycats that are better left alone in their basement instead of helping them count their numbers :) --
4427: 3724: 2883: 2758:
Thanks for fixing, in fact, a general thank you for all the work that you've been doing to tweak the bot as SPI beds in is very much in order!
2162:
Thus, all the lazy CheckUser needs to do is transclude the endorsed CU queue into his own user space, and he gets it formatted how he likes it.
2129: 1900:
in general, people like the boxes, but it'd be awesome if the bot could also maintain a non-box version for the awkward ones like myself :-) --
1623:
Not so sure, that's a lot of unrelated copycats that are better left alone in their basement instead of helping them count their numbers :) --
1279: 992: 5019: 4529:
Would it be feasible to have the bot check the whole subspace, or parse the categories, to check everything looks in order when it starts? --
2798:
procedure, or does some automated process now do this? I didn't see a mention of this in the SPI instructions, unless I missed it. Thanks.
1447:
Would it be feasible to have the bot check the whole subspace, or parse the categories, to check everything looks in order when it starts? --
4588: 2898: 2287: 1254: 1241: 289: 5224: 2627: 1702: 5069:. Notice the "reporting user" is a red link and that the username there does not exist... that I can tell... the bot also barfed there. —— 4850: 3738:, and moved the page, and was working on fixing all redirects and links thereof. (The bot owners know what to fix on their end, of course.) 3141: 1752:. Notice the "reporting user" is a red link and that the username there does not exist... that I can tell... the bot also barfed there. —— 1261: 1089: 1030: 303:, and moved the page, and was working on fixing all redirects and links thereof. (The bot owners know what to fix on their end, of course.) 149: 137: 113: 3774: 3509: 1588: 339: 5010:
As of this morning, the bot keeps blanking the /closed page. I've reverted it twice, but it looks like something is causing it to barf.
4471:
Vandalism that does not require a follow up (eg open proxy blocking after pagemove) and archiving could go there too, in my opinion. --
3631: 2403: 1693:
As of this morning, the bot keeps blanking the /closed page. I've reverted it twice, but it looks like something is causing it to barf.
1389:
Vandalism that does not require a follow up (eg open proxy blocking after pagemove) and archiving could go there too, in my opinion. --
4234: 3367:. Could be that I'm missing a step, here, but is it worth having the bot update closed cases to a "checked" status, during archival? – 2888: 4422:
is an essay, not a guideline. When the boldness takes more than 24 hours to be fixed, that means the change is bolder than necessary.
4018:; while the threads there are generally requests, are not called Requests for administrative assistance. Why should this be different? 3151: 987:
is an essay, not a guideline. When the boldness takes more than 24 hours to be fixed, that means the change is bolder than necessary.
583:; while the threads there are generally requests, are not called Requests for administrative assistance. Why should this be different? 196: 4897: 3822: 2165:
I'm going to be tied up in meetings for much of the day, but feel free to suggest improvements, and I'll have a look a bit later on.
1635: 799: 4055:
hopes that others will investigate for him. We don't need to immortalize one interpretation of that in the name of the noticeboard.
2135:, which could be used direct onto the various queues, replacing the two collapse templates, and the direct transclusion of the case. 620:
hopes that others will investigate for him. We don't need to immortalize one interpretation of that in the name of the noticeboard.
4544:
What I may do is rig a system up that checks the RC history for the last... say 1 hour (or period that the bot was down) and check
2880:
Right... so, lets take a few examples, and tell me who should be notified in each. (Assume the bot won't leave duplicate notices).
1462:
What I may do is rig a system up that checks the RC history for the last... say 1 hour (or period that the bot was down) and check
47: 17: 4950: 3364: 1283: 4504: 4352:
Incidentally, note above that I suggested that I'm not incredibly interested in further discussion because I didn't/don't care
917:
Incidentally, note above that I suggested that I'm not incredibly interested in further discussion because I didn't/don't care
387: 5047:, screwed it up. I went ahead and removed it. I'm looking into why this caused the bot to barf and blank the pages though. —— 1730:, screwed it up. I went ahead and removed it. I'm looking into why this caused the bot to barf and blank the pages though. —— 5162:
It was created on the 30th, 4 days ago. Maybe there should be anotice somewhere? Would probably save you guys a lot of time.
2552: 2326:
It was created on the 30th, 4 days ago. Maybe there should be anotice somewhere? Would probably save you guys a lot of time.
4159:
In my opinion, the one thing that I didn't do, which I should have (in hindsight) was drop a note on each bot-owner's page
2964:
Set all bot reporting to SPI to "wait till edit" in the HBC blacklist. Reports of users with no edits are pointless. (easy)
1422: 724:
In my opinion, the one thing that I didn't do, which I should have (in hindsight) was drop a note on each bot-owner's page
3027:
edits, we can't even consider a SPI case. Hence the first bit of my proposal, to only add reports when the account edits.
1959:
have got rid of them. Helpful hint: if you turn off Javascript in your browser, you will not see the evil collapse boxes.
4763: 4734: 2218: 2180: 1817: 120:
be tested or blocked in cases of likely proxy use (as opposed to cases where comparisons of user behavior are involved).
4594:
This is not a bad idea... Any ideas on when you think the bot should do the removals? On case creation only or what? ——
1036:
This is not a bad idea... Any ideas on when you think the bot should do the removals? On case creation only or what? ——
5446:
Cheers. I was about to fix it myself but a certain 2 year old said that I had to put his Bob the Builder DVD on first!
5352:
was giving me a hard time about not having an edit summary for that one particular edit. I'll let him know. Thanks!
5286: 3624:
I personally like the first better. (For one thing, it matches other pages, including one which this page replaced...)
2726:
Cheers. I was about to fix it myself but a certain 2 year old said that I had to put his Bob the Builder DVD on first!
1164:
was giving me a hard time about not having an edit summary for that one particular edit. I'll let him know. Thanks!
1098: 189:
I personally like the first better. (For one thing, it matches other pages, including one which this page replaced...)
4574:
A couple of times every day, we get a case where a case is added, with a L2 heading that screws up the main SPI page.
1016:
A couple of times every day, we get a case where a case is added, with a L2 heading that screws up the main SPI page.
4446: 4093: 3987: 3884: 3874:, as in the pages left after I've moved them to the correct name. That way the list above can actually be emptied.— 3854: 3721: 2957:
As things stand, these are neither use nor ornament, because they don't really fit in with the way we process stuff!
1788: 658: 449: 439:, as in the pages left after I've moved them to the correct name. That way the list above can actually be emptied.— 419: 286: 4401:
Anyway, As I said above, I really don't intend to get much further embroiled in this. I'll leave that up to others.
1278:
Yep, for the time being the clerks and CheckUser are going to need to use the categories to know what needs doing.
966:
Anyway, As I said above, I really don't intend to get much further embroiled in this. I'll leave that up to others.
104: 3230:
Interesting! Also explains the shift in archive styles... this new method might be easier to work out, anyway. –
1364: 4128:
Not looking for a debate (or even a discussion) at this point, just thought I'd merely clarify a couple things.
693:
Not looking for a debate (or even a discussion) at this point, just thought I'd merely clarify a couple things.
4216:
talk page such as this one has been. (There are literally thousands of examples. Check out the number of times
3537: 2199:
and similar pages do not. I do like your solution though, I'll wait for Deskana and others to opine though. ——
781:
talk page such as this one has been. (There are literally thousands of examples. Check out the number of times
552: 3663:
Reverting. Nobody saw your message, the bot is broken and I imagine the automatic reporting is broken too. --
2925:
templates should have talk page notices for each case. Once we have that hammered down, I can do the rest. ——
228:
Reverting. Nobody saw your message, the bot is broken and I imagine the automatic reporting is broken too. --
3348: 2159:
does nothing more than transclude this test queue, but the page name causes the collapse boxes to be omitted.
5400: 5361: 5309: 3255: 2527:
Actually, come to think of it, letting the archive box supply the L4 works just fine. Let's leave it be!
1173: 1121: 4021:
The former SSP page did not have the word "request" in the name, and in practice this page is the same.
2952: 2387: 586:
The former SSP page did not have the word "request" in the name, and in practice this page is the same.
38: 4896:
This user is usually referred to as GRAWP - his HAGGER and HERMIE moves are related to a character in
1634:
This user is usually referred to as GRAWP - his HAGGER and HERMIE moves are related to a character in
3147: 2680: 1951:
still retain the collapse boxes around entire cases. Enlightened, forward-thinking noticeboards like
4426:
applies to the whole project too (On the bright side, you're not the first one, you surely remember
991:
applies to the whole project too (On the bright side, you're not the first one, you surely remember
5296:"LEAVE THE EDIT SUMMARY AND TITLE BOX BLANK EVEN IF ASKED TO FILL THEM, WHEN YOU SAVE THE REQUEST." 4801: 4335:(Interesting to note that simple reversion seems to have "fixed" the bot issues, as well. Though I 4183:
is something that I thought we're supposed to avoid? (Which is, I believe, one of the reasons that
4123: 3127:(don't look at the logs or you'll see what happens when the Move and Delete tabs are too close) -- 1855: 1108:"LEAVE THE EDIT SUMMARY AND TITLE BOX BLANK EVEN IF ASKED TO FILL THEM, WHEN YOU SAVE THE REQUEST." 900:(Interesting to note that simple reversion seems to have "fixed" the bot issues, as well. Though I 748:
is something that I thought we're supposed to avoid? (Which is, I believe, one of the reasons that
4612:
I'd say all the time, I see no reason why they would be used :). Replace them by a ";" header. --
4370:
At this stage, I'm more concerned about the lack of good faith, and the biteyness that's resulted.
3363:
template still listing them as "endorsed", which has the result of listing their archive pages in
3050:
reports, the accuracy of the bot is not high enough. The same conditions should apply to this. ——
1054:
I'd say all the time, I see no reason why they would be used :). Replace them by a ";" header. --
935:
At this stage, I'm more concerned about the lack of good faith, and the biteyness that's resulted.
4756: 3868: 2829: 2803: 2788: 1810: 433: 2179:
Can we get it so that only the main page has the collapse boxes and all the subpages don't? Eg,
5219: 5105: 5005: 3607:
The plural form of this page just seems "wrong" to me. (And on different levels of semantics.)
2622: 172:
The plural form of this page just seems "wrong" to me. (And on different levels of semantics.)
3894:
noticed that the purge links aren't working, so I'm going to start on a bit of fixing myself.
2784:
After filing an SPI entry, are we still supposed to notify the suspected sockpuppets with the
2138:
The template is designed to exhibit different behaviour, depending on where it is viewed from.
459:
noticed that the purge links aren't working, so I'm going to start on a bit of fixing myself.
4683: 4569: 4343:- I had not intended on giving you a headache, but hoping to save you one, as I noted above.) 4090: 3992:
Alight, let's all try and get back on track here and turn this to a productive conversation.
3881: 3851: 3718: 3643:
It moved 100 subpages automatically, but it looks like I may have to do the rest manually. -
3377: 3317: 3240: 2067: 1523: 1307: 908:- I had not intended on giving you a headache, but hoping to save you one, as I noted above.) 688: 655: 557:
Alight, let's all try and get back on track here and turn this to a productive conversation.
446: 416: 283: 208:
It moved 100 subpages automatically, but it looks like I may have to do the rest manually. -
5435:
I fixed that specific case, but we are going to need to get Nixeagle to fix it permanently.
2715:
I fixed that specific case, but we are going to need to get Nixeagle to fix it permanently.
4934: 4908: 4846: 4060: 3795: 2813:
You should notify parties. We are currently working on getting the bot to do this. Cheers,
2269: 1964: 1688: 1672: 1646: 1584: 1269: 1212: 625: 360: 2217:
What we can do also is provided the above is possible, provide links to the subpages from
2185:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Subpage - Open suspected sockpuppet investigations
8: 4423: 4288:
Even better, because the user in question (me) left a note on the talk page several days
3743:
But the messages I just received from lucas was, well, surprising. (See their talk page.)
3602: 1011: 988: 853:
Even better, because the user in question (me) left a note on the talk page several days
308:
But the messages I just received from lucas was, well, surprising. (See their talk page.)
146: 134: 110: 4003:
This page is effectively a noticeboard, where users can discuss potential violations of
568:
This page is effectively a noticeboard, where users can discuss potential violations of
5467: 5384: 5265: 5251: 5188: 5169: 5137: 5121: 5076: 5054: 5032: 4874: 4820: 4783: 4749: 4718: 4631: 4601: 4555: 4517: 4490: 4459: 4311:
So what's the next step if the person cares to see their bold action still implemented?
4111: 3573: 3469: 3447: 3334: 3268: 3219: 3057: 3007: 2932: 2919: 2905:
Each of the listed cases has slightly different conditions, tell me which users in the
2851: 2825: 2799: 2747: 2668: 2654: 2516: 2482: 2352: 2333: 2301: 2285: 2228: 2206: 2096: 2013: 1981: 1922: 1874: 1837: 1803: 1759: 1737: 1715: 1612: 1558: 1473: 1435: 1408: 1377: 1344: 1323: 1298: 1196: 1073: 1043: 876:
So what's the next step if the person cares to see their bold action still implemented?
676: 4798:
and another Jarl sock/jobber should be enlightening. By the by, SPI templates down. -
1852:
and another Jarl sock/jobber should be enlightening. By the by, SPI templates down. -
130:
Eh, I'm being bold and adding it back. If I break something I'm sure it can be fixed.
5483: 5451: 5425: 5247: 5015: 4993: 4975: 4702: 4584: 4191: 3927: 3899: 3526: 3504: 3487: 3431: 3393: 3190: 3032: 2981: 2871: 2763: 2731: 2705: 2650: 2595: 2577: 2532: 2499: 2454: 2170: 2116: 2029: 1997: 1938: 1905: 1698: 1542: 1026: 756: 492: 464: 167: 2960:
I have a few suggestions to make. Some are easy to implement, some are more tricky.
2057:
alternative display styles. Of course, that's a fair number of meta-templates. :p –
5367: 5315: 5238: 5110:
On Jan. 30 I filed another SS report against Sleepydre. The page is transcluded at
4836: 4678: 4663: 4085: 3955: 3950:
Can someone delete this? (Can't add db-maintenance tag as page is full protected).
3911:
Which pages? I'll try to double check later. I fixed the purge links meanwhile. --
3876: 3846: 3713: 3590: 3551: 3369: 3309: 3232: 3108: 3089: 2909: 2862:
We also need to consider whether the user has already been notified. Those who use
2641: 2274:
On Jan. 30 I filed another SS report against Sleepydre. The page is transcluded at
2156: 2059: 1518: 1503: 1302: 1179: 1127: 650: 520: 515:
Can someone delete this? (Can't add db-maintenance tag as page is full protected).
476:
Which pages? I'll try to double check later. I fixed the purge links meanwhile. --
441: 411: 278: 89: 4387:
say that you really seem a bit too eager to attack, and not so much to discuss. I
4149:
And for those concerned about the "immediacy", I dunno, but somehow I don't see 2
952:
say that you really seem a bit too eager to attack, and not so much to discuss. I
714:
And for those concerned about the "immediacy", I dunno, but somehow I don't see 2
5358: 5306: 4930: 4905: 4842: 4056: 3791: 2438: 2426: 2368: 1960: 1952: 1668: 1643: 1580: 1265: 1170: 1118: 621: 356: 3440:
I'll just change the bot when I get to fixing the unicode issue later today. ——
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4813:
The bot is up, if you have a potential sock master... create a case please. ——
4292: 4254: 4250: 4217: 4180: 4131:
Somewhat disruptive in that some bots would need to be adjusted? No arguement.
4004: 3735: 3734:, is typically a "silent" endorsement of an action. As such, I proceeded to be 3695:
As for the bot issue, I would presume that this is something easily fixable? -
2996:
choose to "upgrade" a bot report into a full SPI case. (This is similar to how
2840: 2416: 2394: 1956: 1867:
The bot is up, if you have a potential sock master... create a case please. ——
1574: 857: 819: 815: 782: 745: 696:
Somewhat disruptive in that some bots would need to be adjusted? No arguement.
569: 300: 299:, is typically a "silent" endorsement of an action. As such, I proceeded to be 260:
As for the bot issue, I would presume that this is something easily fixable? -
143: 131: 107: 95: 5462: 5379: 5338: 5260: 5183: 5163: 5153: 5132: 5115: 5088: 5071: 5049: 5027: 4960: 4886: 4869: 4857: 4815: 4778: 4713: 4655: 4626: 4613: 4596: 4550: 4530: 4512: 4485: 4472: 4454: 4431: 4419: 4340: 4267: 4246: 4242: 4184: 4105: 4070: 4025: 4015: 3976: 3912: 3832: 3805: 3779: 3766: 3664: 3568: 3562: 3464: 3442: 3416: 3357: 3329: 3281: 3263: 3214: 3155: 3128: 3052: 3047: 3002: 2927: 2846: 2795: 2742: 2663: 2562: 2511: 2477: 2422:
line so that any subsequent cases still get the proper headers. I didn't add
2377: 2347: 2327: 2317: 2296: 2279: 2223: 2201: 2091: 2078: 2008: 1976: 1948: 1917: 1869: 1832: 1771: 1754: 1732: 1710: 1624: 1607: 1595: 1553: 1495: 1468: 1448: 1430: 1403: 1390: 1372: 1339: 1318: 1191: 1150: 1068: 1055: 1038: 996: 984: 905: 832: 811: 807: 749: 670: 635: 590: 580: 541: 477: 397: 370: 344: 331: 229: 5228:
Newest at bottom, while all the other sections have Oldest at bottom --: -->
4224:
issues to occur, than to try to be proactive. It's how most learn, I spose.
3730:
I'm more than slightly stunned. Anywhere else, a few days of no opposition,
3146:
I can't look into it right now, but we might have an issue where we hit the
2631:
Newest at bottom, while all the other sections have Oldest at bottom --: -->
1933:
On behalf of the Lazy CheckUser Association, thank you for the hard work. --
789:
issues to occur, than to try to be proactive. It's how most learn, I spose.
295:
I'm more than slightly stunned. Anywhere else, a few days of no opposition,
5479: 5447: 5421: 5364: 5349: 5312: 5179:
Knowledge talk:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/SPCUClerkbot bugs and features
5011: 4989: 4971: 4698: 4580: 4011: 3923: 3895: 3770: 3517: 3516:
I think I took care of it alright, so hopefully there won't be any issues.
3495: 3427: 3389: 3186: 3028: 2977: 2867: 2863: 2759: 2727: 2701: 2591: 2573: 2528: 2495: 2450: 2343:
Knowledge talk:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/SPCUClerkbot bugs and features
2166: 2112: 2025: 1993: 1934: 1901: 1694: 1538: 1176: 1161: 1124: 1022: 576: 488: 460: 335: 1974:
versions of the process... and you guys can pick which one to look at. ——
5234: 4918: 4659: 3951: 3586: 3547: 3104: 3085: 3043: 3000:
works. (3RRbot is a bot I programmed to detect violations of WP:3RR). ——
2997: 2637: 1656: 1499: 516: 3711:
I don't know if I can help, but I will try to help clean up this mess.—
1229: 276:
I don't know if I can help, but I will try to help clean up this mess.—
5353: 5301: 4856:
Don't worry about it, use the Quick CheckUser requests section IMO. --
1594:
Don't worry about it, use the Quick CheckUser requests section IMO. --
1165: 1113: 3101:
Knowledge talk:Requests for sockpuppet investigation/Archives/Archive2
3075:
Knowledge talk:Requests for sockpuppet investigation/Archives/Archive1
2193:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Subpage - Open CheckUser cases
5087:
I have commented the user's name since it's breaking this page :) --
4411: 4231: 3993: 3757: 3696: 3644: 3628: 3200:
We created a new archiving system that should have fixed that issue.
1770:
I have commented the user's name since it's breaking this page :) --
976: 796: 558: 322: 261: 209: 193: 4083:- The reasons above are reason enough why it shouldn't be changed.— 648:- The reasons above are reason enough why it shouldn't be changed.— 5149: 4956: 2558: 2313: 121: 4955:
This box is showing an identical enormous listing for every case.—
2557:
This box is showing an identical enormous listing for every case.—
2148:
If viewed from any other page, it will simply transclude the case.
4988:
OK, should be fixed! Drop me a note if it still causes problems.
2590:
OK, should be fixed! Drop me a note if it still causes problems.
2189:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Subpage - Declined cases
5205: 4285:
And what do you know, it worked here, just as it's supposed to.
4276:
on Knowledge. Not just where we might consider it "convenient".
2608: 2197:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Subpage - Pending close
2111:
I'll get my coding head on once I'm more awake, and get going.
850:
And what do you know, it worked here, just as it's supposed to.
841:
on Knowledge. Not just where we might consider it "convenient".
3773:
and all of its archives after a thread was left unanswered at
338:
and all of its archives after a thread was left unanswered at
5067:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise
4901: 3388:
I'll take a look at the template to get it to behave better!
1750:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise
1639: 2155:
is a dummy SPI queue page, showing the collapsed behaviour.
4654:
This case appears to be malforming the headers on the main
4190:
And finally, though I personally don't entirely agree with
1494:
This case appears to be malforming the headers on the main
755:
And finally, though I personally don't entirely agree with
3082:
Knowledge talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Archives/Archive1
2780:
Are we still supposed to notify the suspected sockpuppets?
2141:
If viewed from a page where the first part of the name is
2077:
Since when are you afraid to create meta templates? :P --
1891:
A subpage containing all requests minus collapsible boxes?
5405:
There appears to be a glitch in the new archive process!
5377:
This is now done by the bot (removal of that header). ——
2685:
There appears to be a glitch in the new archive process!
2432:
because that belongs with the archived cases in any case.
2125:
OK, coding head duly applied, and a new template is born
1189:
This is now done by the bot (removal of that header). ——
5337:
I even think FT2 filled a bugzilla request about it. --
3945:
Knowledge:Requests for sockpuppet investigation/Casename
2145:, it will display the current collapsed boxes behaviour. 1149:
I even think FT2 filled a bugzilla request about it. --
510:
Knowledge:Requests for sockpuppet investigation/Casename
5212: 3544:
Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pioneercourthouse
3353:
I notice a number of cases have been archived with the
2615: 4649:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Douglemeister
3765:
This is not a question of hierarchy and control freak-
1489:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Douglemeister
330:
This is not a question of hierarchy and control freak-
5181:
which we will use to track bugs/feature requests. ——
2345:
which we will use to track bugs/feature requests. ——
5410:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Runtshit/Archive
2690:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Runtshit/Archive
3422:so that where the third barrel of the page name is 4796:Special:Contributions/And I feel like Alan Minter 3152:Knowledge:Village_pump_(technical)#Templates_down 2894:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/192.91.171.36 1850:Special:Contributions/And I feel like Alan Minter 100:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive 5214:_Newest_at_top?_2-2009-02-03T15:28:00.000Z": --> 5207:_Newest_at_top?_2-2009-02-03T15:28:00.000Z": --> 5232:IMO, I think it should be Oldest at top --: --> 4541:to actually load that subpage, look at it, etc. 4134:But besides that, the move was being done with 3831:? I found a case but there's probably more. -- 3175:Post-expand include size: 1168101/2048000 bytes 2635:IMO, I think it should be Oldest at top --: --> 1459:to actually load that subpage, look at it, etc. 699:But besides that, the move was being done with 396:? I found a case but there's probably more. -- 5252:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 5248:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 5243:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 5229:Newest at top.... shouldn't it be consistent? 5220:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 5213:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 5206:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 4428:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Deletion of VFD 2884:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Roosterdem 2655:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2651:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2646:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2632:Newest at top.... shouldn't it be consistent? 2623:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2617:_Newest_at_top?-2009-02-03T15:28:00.000Z": --> 2616:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2610:_Newest_at_top?-2009-02-03T15:28:00.000Z": --> 2609:_Newest_at_bottom;_or_Oldest_at_bottom_--: --> 2052:If the bot listed cases with a template (say, 1280:Category:SPI requests for pre-CheckUser review 993:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Deletion of VFD 5210:Newest at bottom; or Oldest at bottom --: --> 5112:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/queue 2899:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Jvolkblum 2824:OK, will do, thanks for the quick response. 2613:Newest at bottom; or Oldest at bottom --: --> 2276:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/queue 4024:Finally, there was consensus for this name, 2153:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/test 1262:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/RabAllan 589:Finally, there was consensus for this name, 5045:(redacted, was breaking this page's layout) 3178:Template argument size: 55777/2048000 bytes 1728:(redacted, was breaking this page's layout) 4326:Looks to me like BRD is working just fine. 3908:or not, the pages are all move protected! 3775:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard 2889:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Fadulj 891:Looks to me like BRD is working just fine. 473:or not, the pages are all move protected! 340:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard 4898:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 4677:and probably screwed up the bot process. 4658:page. I've tried to fix it but failed... 1636:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 1517:and probably screwed up the bot process. 1498:page. I've tried to fix it but failed... 5460:Thanks for reporting, this is fixed. —— 2740:Thanks for reporting, this is fixed. —— 18:Knowledge talk:Sockpuppet investigations 3864:I am also tagging the empty pages with 3627:Thoughts/concerns obviously welcome. - 3365:Category:SPI cases awaiting a CheckUser 3181:Expensive parser function count: 61/500 2151:I've rigged up a demo of it in action. 1284:Category:SPI cases awaiting a CheckUser 429:I am also tagging the empty pages with 192:Thoughts/concerns obviously welcome. - 14: 4194:, a lack of opposition on a talk page 3637:Without opposition, the motion carries 3172:Preprocessor node count: 17040/1000000 759:, a lack of opposition on a talk page 202:Without opposition, the motion carries 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5348:Alright, the reason I ask is because 3617:Requests for sockpuppet investigation 1160:Alright, the reason I ask is because 182:Requests for sockpuppet investigation 5278:Blank edit sumary on report creation 4016:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents 3142:Too many templates in the main page? 1090:Blank edit sumary on report creation 581:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents 25: 5114:, but not on SPI itself. Thoughts? 4383:be the next course. I dunno. But I 4153:falling under that. <shrugs: --> 4146:that the namecalling is accurate.) 2409:OK, I've made a couple of changes! 2278:, but not on SPI itself. Thoughts? 2241:Sounds like a good solution to me. 2219:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations 2181:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations 948:be the next course. I dunno. But I 718:falling under that. <shrugs: --> 711:that the namecalling is accurate.) 23: 5065:This is the case that broke it... 4675:someone added contents to the page 3790:see coming from an administrator. 3165:At present, we are within limits; 1748:This is the case that broke it... 1515:someone added contents to the page 355:see coming from an administrator. 24: 5505: 5227:section has Oldest at top --: --> 4410:Hope everyone has better days. - 4266:Well, to "be blunt" in response, 4206:Knowledge page typically occurs. 3620:Sockpuppet investigation requests 3327:Ok, we won't do this for now. —— 2630:section has Oldest at top --: --> 975:Hope everyone has better days. - 831:Well, to "be blunt" in response, 771:Knowledge page typically occurs. 185:Sockpuppet investigation requests 4230:Hope you all have a good day. - 4032:be overturned through community 3966: 3403: 3118: 1297:Well, I was thinking of doing a 1228: 1218: 795:Hope you all have a good day. - 597:be overturned through community 531: 29: 4005:Knowledge's sockpuppetry policy 3080:That needs to be moved back to 2509:fewer lines in the editbox. —— 570:Knowledge's sockpuppetry policy 5292:, the last bullet point reads 4379:So perhaps dispute resolution 3732:on an active talk page no less 2383:and whatnot, we are now using 2054:{{SPICaseListing|FooPageName}} 1104:, the last bullet point reads 944:So perhaps dispute resolution 297:on an active talk page no less 13: 1: 4951:Prior SSP cases for this user 2553:Prior SSP cases for this user 2183:has the boxes as before, but 1264:is in limbo because of that. 5488:09:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 5474:14:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 5456:20:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5442:20:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5430:20:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5391:19:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 5373:17:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 5344:07:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 5333:00:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 5321:19:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 5272:14:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 5245:15:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5195:14:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 5172:00:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 5158:12:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5144:23:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 5124:22:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 5094:20:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 5083:16:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 5061:15:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 5039:15:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 5020:13:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4998:16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4980:13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4965:12:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4939:10:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4922:10:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4912:07:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 4892:19:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4881:15:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4863:14:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4851:13:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4827:21:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4809:19:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4790:19:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4771:19:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4725:22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4707:13:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4688:14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4668:08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4638:22:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4619:07:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4608:19:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 4589:13:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 4562:15:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4536:10:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4524:20:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 4505:toolserver down and back up. 4497:15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4478:10:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4466:21:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 4437:11:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 4415:19:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4258:18:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 4235:21:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4220:itself has been renamed : ) 4114:01:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 4097:22:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4074:21:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4065:19:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 4047:18:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3982:15:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3960:14:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3932:15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3918:13:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3904:11:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3888:08:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3858:08:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3838:08:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3827:Could someone move back the 3811:07:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3800:18:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3785:07:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3761:07:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3725:07:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3700:07:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3670:06:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3659:06:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3648:05:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3632:10:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 3595:01:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 3580:23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3556:22:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3532:19:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3510:19:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 3476:20:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3454:15:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3436:13:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3398:11:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3383:11:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3341:15:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3323:11:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3298:21:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3287:18:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3275:18:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3246:11:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3226:18:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3207:18:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3195:16:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3161:16:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3134:16:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3113:16:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3094:16:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 3064:15:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3037:08:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 3014:18:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2986:09:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2939:15:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2876:13:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2858:18:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2834:03:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2820:03:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2808:03:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2768:09:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2754:14:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2736:20:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2722:20:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2710:20:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2675:14:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2648:15:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2600:16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2582:13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2567:12:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2537:18:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2523:18:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2504:16:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2489:14:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2470:15:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2459:08:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2404:04:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2359:14:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2336:00:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2322:12:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2308:23:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 2288:22:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 2248:21:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2235:20:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2213:20:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2175:08:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2121:06:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2103:14:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 2084:20:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2073:11:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2034:00:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2020:00:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 2002:00:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1988:00:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1969:22:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1943:22:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1929:21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1910:21:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1881:21:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1863:19:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1844:19:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1825:19:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1777:20:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1766:16:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1744:15:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1722:15:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1703:13:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1677:10:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1660:10:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1650:07:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1630:19:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1619:15:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1601:14:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1589:13:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1565:22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1547:13:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1528:14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1508:08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1480:15:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1454:10:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1442:20:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1423:toolserver down and back up. 1415:15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1396:10:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1384:21:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1351:21:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1330:21:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1312:20:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1293:23:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1274:22:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1255:19:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1242:22:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 1203:19:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 1185:17:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1156:07:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1145:00:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1133:19:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 1080:22:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 1061:07:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1050:19:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 1031:13:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 1002:11:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 980:19:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 823:18:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 800:21:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 785:itself has been renamed : ) 679:01:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 662:22:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 639:21:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 630:19:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 612:18:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 547:15:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 525:14:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 497:15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 483:13:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 469:11:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 453:08:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 423:08:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 403:08:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 392:Could someone move back the 376:07:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 365:18:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 350:07:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 326:07:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 290:07:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 265:07:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 235:06:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 224:06:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 213:05:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 197:10:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 162:06:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 150:03:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 138:03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 125:03:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 114:02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 7: 5025:Mmm... looking into it. —— 1708:Mmm... looking into it. —— 10: 5510: 4012:Administrators noticeboard 3829:pages that are still there 1216: 577:Administrators noticeboard 394:pages that are still there 5287:SPI inputbox instructions 4735:SPI Bot is currently down 3823:Fixing pending discussion 2143:Sockpuppet investigations 1789:SPI Bot is currently down 1099:SPI inputbox instructions 388:Fixing pending discussion 4339:express my apologies to 3640:(Aka, I moved the page.) 904:express my apologies to 205:(Aka, I moved the page.) 5253:_Newest_at_top?_2": --> 5249:_Newest_at_top?_2": --> 5244:_Newest_at_top?_2": --> 5221:_Newest_at_top?_2": --> 3538:Need help with listing 2475:headers to remain? —— 5209:Oldest at top --: --> 5043:By the looks of it, 4548:pages on startup. —— 3349:Completed CU requests 2656:_Newest_at_top?": --> 2652:_Newest_at_top?": --> 2647:_Newest_at_top?": --> 2624:_Newest_at_top?": --> 2612:Oldest at top --: --> 1726:By the looks of it, 1466:pages on startup. —— 42:of past discussions. 4200:how most changes to 3678:someone comments : ) 2794:template like under 765:how most changes to 243:someone comments : ) 4028:that would need to 3256:Talk page redirects 593:that would need to 5225:Bot-reported cases 4052:Keep current name. 4010:Pages such as the 3542:Can someone check 3169:NewPP limit report 2953:Bot reported cases 2628:Bot-reported cases 2024:Absolutely. :-) -- 617:Keep current name. 575:Pages such as the 5401:Archiving glitch. 5371: 5319: 5046: 4102:Keep current name 4081:Keep current name 3988:Naming discussion 3674:2 days later and 3529: 3524: 3507: 3502: 2681:Archiving glitch. 2388:SPIarchive notice 2373:Instead of using 2032: 2000: 1941: 1908: 1729: 1183: 1131: 667:Keep current name 646:Keep current name 553:Naming discussion 239:2 days later and 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5501: 5470: 5465: 5439: 5387: 5382: 5356: 5341: 5330: 5304: 5291: 5285: 5268: 5263: 5254: 5250: 5222: 5215: 5208: 5191: 5186: 5166: 5140: 5135: 5118: 5091: 5079: 5074: 5057: 5052: 5044: 5035: 5030: 4889: 4877: 4872: 4860: 4823: 4818: 4807: 4804: 4786: 4781: 4768: 4761: 4754: 4721: 4716: 4634: 4629: 4616: 4604: 4599: 4558: 4553: 4533: 4520: 4515: 4493: 4488: 4475: 4462: 4457: 4434: 4241:not a place for 4108: 4088: 4044: 3979: 3974: 3970: 3969: 3915: 3879: 3873: 3867: 3849: 3835: 3808: 3782: 3716: 3667: 3656: 3576: 3571: 3527: 3522: 3518: 3505: 3500: 3496: 3472: 3467: 3450: 3445: 3421: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3406: 3381: 3374: 3362: 3356: 3337: 3332: 3321: 3314: 3295: 3284: 3271: 3266: 3244: 3237: 3222: 3217: 3204: 3158: 3131: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3060: 3055: 3046:does not create 3010: 3005: 2935: 2930: 2924: 2918: 2914: 2908: 2854: 2849: 2817: 2793: 2787: 2750: 2745: 2719: 2671: 2666: 2657: 2653: 2625: 2618: 2611: 2519: 2514: 2485: 2480: 2467: 2443: 2437: 2431: 2425: 2421: 2415: 2401: 2392: 2386: 2382: 2376: 2355: 2350: 2330: 2304: 2299: 2282: 2245: 2231: 2226: 2209: 2204: 2157:User:Mayalld/SPI 2134: 2128: 2099: 2094: 2081: 2071: 2064: 2055: 2028: 2016: 2011: 1996: 1984: 1979: 1937: 1925: 1920: 1904: 1877: 1872: 1861: 1858: 1840: 1835: 1822: 1815: 1808: 1774: 1762: 1757: 1740: 1735: 1727: 1718: 1713: 1627: 1615: 1610: 1598: 1561: 1556: 1476: 1471: 1451: 1438: 1433: 1411: 1406: 1393: 1380: 1375: 1347: 1342: 1326: 1321: 1290: 1260:that is why ... 1252: 1244: 1239: 1232: 1222: 1221: 1199: 1194: 1168: 1153: 1142: 1116: 1103: 1097: 1076: 1071: 1058: 1046: 1041: 999: 806:not a place for 673: 653: 609: 544: 539: 535: 534: 480: 444: 438: 432: 414: 400: 373: 347: 281: 232: 221: 159: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5509: 5508: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5500: 5499: 5498: 5468: 5463: 5437: 5403: 5385: 5380: 5339: 5328: 5289: 5283: 5280: 5266: 5261: 5223:I note how the 5217: 5189: 5184: 5164: 5138: 5133: 5116: 5108: 5089: 5077: 5072: 5055: 5050: 5033: 5028: 5008: 4953: 4887: 4875: 4870: 4858: 4839: 4821: 4816: 4802: 4799: 4784: 4779: 4764: 4757: 4750: 4737: 4719: 4714: 4673:What I saw was 4652: 4632: 4627: 4614: 4602: 4597: 4572: 4556: 4551: 4531: 4518: 4513: 4507: 4491: 4486: 4473: 4460: 4455: 4449: 4432: 4356:much about the 4298:So someone was 4171:So, other than 4126: 4106: 4086: 4042: 3990: 3977: 3967: 3965: 3948: 3913: 3877: 3871: 3865: 3847: 3833: 3825: 3806: 3780: 3714: 3665: 3654: 3605: 3574: 3569: 3540: 3520: 3498: 3490: 3470: 3465: 3448: 3443: 3419: 3413: 3404: 3402: 3370: 3368: 3360: 3354: 3351: 3335: 3330: 3310: 3308: 3307:people here. – 3293: 3282: 3269: 3264: 3258: 3233: 3231: 3220: 3215: 3202: 3156: 3148:Template limits 3144: 3129: 3119: 3117: 3078: 3058: 3053: 3008: 3003: 2955: 2933: 2928: 2922: 2916: 2912: 2906: 2852: 2847: 2815: 2791: 2785: 2782: 2748: 2743: 2717: 2683: 2669: 2664: 2626:I note how the 2620: 2555: 2517: 2512: 2483: 2478: 2465: 2441: 2435: 2429: 2423: 2419: 2413: 2399: 2397:and change it. 2390: 2384: 2380: 2374: 2371: 2353: 2348: 2328: 2302: 2297: 2280: 2272: 2243: 2229: 2224: 2207: 2202: 2132: 2126: 2097: 2092: 2079: 2060: 2058: 2053: 2014: 2009: 1982: 1977: 1923: 1918: 1893: 1875: 1870: 1856: 1853: 1838: 1833: 1818: 1811: 1804: 1791: 1772: 1760: 1755: 1738: 1733: 1716: 1711: 1691: 1625: 1613: 1608: 1596: 1577: 1559: 1554: 1513:What I saw was 1492: 1474: 1469: 1449: 1436: 1431: 1425: 1409: 1404: 1391: 1378: 1373: 1367: 1345: 1340: 1324: 1319: 1288: 1250: 1245: 1237: 1226: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1197: 1192: 1151: 1140: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1074: 1069: 1056: 1044: 1039: 1014: 997: 921:much about the 863:So someone was 736:So, other than 691: 671: 651: 607: 555: 542: 532: 530: 513: 478: 442: 436: 430: 412: 398: 390: 371: 345: 279: 230: 219: 170: 157: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5507: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5402: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5335: 5298: 5297: 5279: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5216: 5211:Newest at top? 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5174: 5107: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5007: 5004: 5003: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4983: 4982: 4952: 4949: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4838: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4746:For Nixeagle, 4736: 4733: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4691: 4690: 4651: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4542: 4506: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4448: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4312: 4309: 4303: 4296: 4286: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4261: 4260: 4125: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4099: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4038: 4037: 4022: 4019: 4008: 3989: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3947: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3891: 3890: 3869:db-maintenance 3861: 3860: 3824: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3752: 3751: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3739: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3641: 3638: 3622: 3621: 3618: 3604: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3489: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3350: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3257: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3183: 3182: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3170: 3143: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3024: 3018:The bot cases 2993: 2972: 2971: 2968: 2965: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2896: 2891: 2886: 2789:uw-socksuspect 2781: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2619: 2614:Newest at top? 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2585: 2584: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2433: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2338: 2271: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2163: 2160: 2149: 2146: 2139: 2136: 2109: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1800:For Nixeagle, 1790: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1531: 1530: 1491: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1460: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1147: 1110: 1109: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 970: 969: 968: 967: 961: 960: 959: 958: 939: 938: 937: 936: 930: 929: 928: 927: 912: 911: 910: 909: 895: 894: 893: 892: 886: 885: 884: 883: 877: 874: 868: 861: 851: 845: 844: 843: 842: 826: 825: 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 664: 643: 642: 641: 603: 602: 587: 584: 573: 554: 551: 550: 549: 512: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 456: 455: 434:db-maintenance 426: 425: 389: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 317: 316: 310: 309: 305: 304: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 206: 203: 187: 186: 183: 169: 166: 165: 164: 128: 127: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5506: 5489: 5485: 5481: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5472: 5471: 5466: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5440: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5416: 5413: 5411: 5406: 5392: 5389: 5388: 5383: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5369: 5366: 5363: 5360: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5346: 5345: 5342: 5336: 5334: 5331: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5317: 5314: 5311: 5308: 5303: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5288: 5273: 5270: 5269: 5264: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5246: 5240: 5236: 5230: 5226: 5196: 5193: 5192: 5187: 5180: 5175: 5173: 5170: 5167: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5142: 5141: 5136: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5122: 5119: 5113: 5095: 5092: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5081: 5080: 5075: 5068: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5059: 5058: 5053: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5037: 5036: 5031: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5017: 5013: 4999: 4995: 4991: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4981: 4977: 4973: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4927: 4923: 4920: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4910: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4890: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4879: 4878: 4873: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4861: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4848: 4844: 4828: 4825: 4824: 4819: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4806: 4805: 4797: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4788: 4787: 4782: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4769: 4767: 4762: 4760: 4755: 4753: 4747: 4744: 4740: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4717: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4704: 4700: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4689: 4686: 4685: 4682: 4681: 4676: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4650: 4639: 4636: 4635: 4630: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4617: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4606: 4605: 4600: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4575: 4563: 4560: 4559: 4554: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4534: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4522: 4521: 4516: 4498: 4495: 4494: 4489: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4476: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4464: 4463: 4458: 4447:"quick check" 4438: 4435: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4413: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4342: 4341:User:Nixeagle 4338: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4316: 4313: 4310: 4308: 4304: 4301: 4297: 4294: 4291: 4287: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4275: 4274: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4259: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4233: 4228: 4225: 4221: 4219: 4215: 4211: 4210: 4205: 4204: 4199: 4198: 4193: 4188: 4186: 4182: 4176: 4174: 4169: 4166: 4162: 4157: 4154: 4152: 4147: 4145: 4140: 4137: 4132: 4129: 4115: 4112: 4109: 4103: 4100: 4098: 4095: 4094: 4092: 4089: 4082: 4079: 4075: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4053: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4045: 4040: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4020: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4006: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3995: 3983: 3980: 3973: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3946: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3916: 3910: 3909: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3893: 3892: 3889: 3886: 3885: 3883: 3880: 3870: 3863: 3862: 3859: 3856: 3855: 3853: 3850: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3830: 3812: 3809: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3783: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3750:c'est la vie. 3747: 3746: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3723: 3722: 3720: 3717: 3701: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3668: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3657: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3646: 3642: 3639: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3625: 3619: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3611: 3608: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3572: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3533: 3530: 3525: 3523: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3508: 3503: 3501: 3477: 3474: 3473: 3468: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3452: 3451: 3446: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3418: 3412:I've changed 3410: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3379: 3375: 3373: 3366: 3359: 3342: 3339: 3338: 3333: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3319: 3315: 3313: 3305: 3304: 3299: 3296: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3285: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3272: 3267: 3247: 3242: 3238: 3236: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3224: 3223: 3218: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3205: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3153: 3149: 3135: 3132: 3125: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3076: 3065: 3062: 3061: 3056: 3049: 3045: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3012: 3011: 3006: 2999: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2969: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2958: 2940: 2937: 2936: 2931: 2921: 2911: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2890: 2887: 2885: 2882: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2855: 2850: 2842: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826:Wasted Time R 2823: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2800:Wasted Time R 2797: 2790: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2686: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2667: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2649: 2643: 2639: 2633: 2629: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2520: 2515: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2487: 2486: 2481: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2440: 2434: 2428: 2418: 2411: 2410: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2402: 2396: 2389: 2379: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2351: 2344: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2300: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2277: 2249: 2246: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2227: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2205: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2137: 2131: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2095: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2063: 2051: 2050: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2012: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1980: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1926: 1921: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1882: 1879: 1878: 1873: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1836: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1816: 1814: 1809: 1807: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1778: 1775: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1758: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1736: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1714: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1611: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1557: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1490: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1472: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1376: 1365:"quick check" 1352: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1322: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1243: 1240: 1235: 1231: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1154: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1115: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1100: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1072: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1003: 1000: 994: 990: 986: 983: 982: 981: 978: 974: 973: 972: 971: 965: 964: 963: 962: 955: 951: 947: 943: 942: 941: 940: 934: 933: 932: 931: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 907: 906:User:Nixeagle 903: 899: 898: 897: 896: 890: 889: 888: 887: 881: 878: 875: 873: 869: 866: 862: 859: 856: 852: 849: 848: 847: 846: 840: 839: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 824: 821: 817: 813: 809: 804: 803: 802: 801: 798: 793: 790: 786: 784: 780: 776: 775: 770: 769: 764: 763: 758: 753: 751: 747: 741: 739: 734: 731: 727: 722: 719: 717: 712: 710: 705: 702: 697: 694: 680: 677: 674: 668: 665: 663: 660: 659: 657: 654: 647: 644: 640: 637: 633: 632: 631: 627: 623: 618: 615: 614: 613: 610: 605: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 585: 582: 578: 574: 571: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 560: 548: 545: 538: 529: 528: 527: 526: 522: 518: 511: 498: 494: 490: 486: 485: 484: 481: 475: 474: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457: 454: 451: 450: 448: 445: 435: 428: 427: 424: 421: 420: 418: 415: 407: 406: 405: 404: 401: 395: 377: 374: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 353: 352: 351: 348: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328: 327: 324: 319: 318: 315:c'est la vie. 312: 311: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 293: 292: 291: 288: 287: 285: 282: 266: 263: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 242: 238: 237: 236: 233: 227: 226: 225: 222: 216: 215: 214: 211: 207: 204: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 190: 184: 181: 180: 179: 176: 173: 163: 160: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 145: 140: 139: 136: 133: 126: 123: 118: 117: 116: 115: 112: 109: 105: 101: 97: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5461: 5420: 5417: 5414: 5407: 5404: 5378: 5299: 5281: 5259: 5231: 5218: 5182: 5131: 5109: 5106:Where is it? 5070: 5048: 5026: 5009: 5006:Closed cases 4954: 4868: 4840: 4814: 4800: 4777: 4765: 4758: 4751: 4748: 4745: 4741: 4738: 4712: 4684: 4679: 4653: 4625: 4595: 4579: 4576: 4573: 4549: 4545: 4511: 4508: 4484: 4453: 4450: 4424:WP:CLUESTICK 4388: 4384: 4380: 4357: 4353: 4336: 4314: 4306: 4299: 4289: 4272: 4271: 4229: 4226: 4222: 4213: 4208: 4207: 4202: 4201: 4196: 4195: 4189: 4177: 4172: 4170: 4164: 4160: 4158: 4155: 4150: 4148: 4143: 4141: 4135: 4133: 4130: 4127: 4101: 4084: 4080: 4051: 4033: 4029: 3991: 3971: 3949: 3875: 3845: 3826: 3731: 3712: 3710: 3675: 3626: 3623: 3612: 3609: 3606: 3567: 3541: 3528:(Contact me) 3519: 3506:(Contact me) 3497: 3492: 3491: 3463: 3459: 3441: 3423: 3408: 3371: 3352: 3328: 3311: 3262: 3259: 3234: 3213: 3184: 3164: 3145: 3123: 3079: 3051: 3019: 3001: 2976: 2973: 2959: 2956: 2926: 2845: 2783: 2741: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2687: 2684: 2662: 2634: 2621: 2556: 2510: 2476: 2372: 2346: 2295: 2273: 2270:Where is it? 2222: 2200: 2142: 2090: 2061: 2007: 1975: 1916: 1896: 1894: 1868: 1854: 1831: 1819: 1812: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1792: 1753: 1731: 1709: 1692: 1689:Closed cases 1606: 1578: 1552: 1524: 1519: 1493: 1467: 1463: 1429: 1426: 1402: 1371: 1368: 1338: 1334: 1317: 1308: 1303: 1246: 1233: 1213:Announcement 1190: 1111: 1093: 1067: 1037: 1021: 1018: 1015: 989:WP:CLUESTICK 953: 949: 945: 922: 918: 901: 879: 871: 864: 854: 837: 836: 794: 791: 787: 778: 773: 772: 767: 766: 761: 760: 754: 742: 737: 735: 729: 725: 723: 720: 715: 713: 708: 706: 700: 698: 695: 692: 666: 649: 645: 616: 598: 594: 556: 536: 514: 440: 410: 391: 296: 277: 275: 240: 191: 188: 177: 174: 171: 141: 129: 93: 65: 43: 37: 4680:OhanaUnited 4570:L2 headings 4181:bureaucracy 3372:Luna Santin 3312:Luna Santin 3235:Luna Santin 3084:(I think). 3044:User:3RRBot 2998:User:3RRBot 2463:Good work! 2062:Luna Santin 1520:OhanaUnited 1304:OhanaUnited 1012:L2 headings 746:bureaucracy 36:This is an 4931:Kingturtle 4909:Od Mishehu 4843:Kingturtle 4358:particular 4315:Discussion 4293:being bold 4273:everywhere 4209:Especially 4192:WP:SILENCE 4057:EdJohnston 4034:discussion 3792:Landon1980 3099:Same with 2974:Thoughts? 1961:EdJohnston 1669:Kingturtle 1647:Od Mishehu 1581:Kingturtle 1266:Agathoclea 923:particular 880:Discussion 858:being bold 838:everywhere 774:Especially 757:WP:SILENCE 622:EdJohnston 599:discussion 357:Landon1980 4906:עוד מישהו 4255:Jehochman 4187:exists?) 4026:consensus 3778:you). -- 3767:Esperanza 3603:Page name 3488:Need Help 2920:checkuser 1644:עוד מישהו 820:Jehochman 752:exists?) 591:consensus 343:you). -- 332:Esperanza 168:Page name 144:Mackensen 132:Mackensen 108:Mackensen 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5438:Tiptoety 5368:friendly 5362:contribs 5340:lucasbfr 5329:Tiptoety 5316:friendly 5310:contribs 5090:lucasbfr 4888:lucasbfr 4859:lucasbfr 4794:I think 4739:Hi all, 4615:lucasbfr 4532:lucasbfr 4474:lucasbfr 4433:lucasbfr 4307:reverted 4305:Someone 4270:applies 4173:possibly 4124:Response 4043:Tiptoety 3978:lucasbfr 3914:lucasbfr 3834:lucasbfr 3807:lucasbfr 3781:lucasbfr 3666:lucasbfr 3655:Tiptoety 3613:Either: 3521:BIGNOLE 3499:BIGNOLE 3458:The bot 3294:Tiptoety 3283:lucasbfr 3203:Tiptoety 3157:lucasbfr 3130:lucasbfr 2816:Tiptoety 2718:Tiptoety 2466:Tiptoety 2445:element. 2400:Tiptoety 2244:Tiptoety 2080:lucasbfr 1953:WP:BLP/N 1848:I think 1793:Hi all, 1773:lucasbfr 1626:lucasbfr 1597:lucasbfr 1450:lucasbfr 1392:lucasbfr 1299:Signpost 1289:Tiptoety 1251:Tiptoety 1238:Tiptoety 1223:Resolved 1180:friendly 1174:contribs 1152:lucasbfr 1141:Tiptoety 1128:friendly 1122:contribs 1057:lucasbfr 998:lucasbfr 872:reverted 870:Someone 835:applies 738:possibly 689:Response 608:Tiptoety 543:lucasbfr 479:lucasbfr 399:lucasbfr 372:lucasbfr 346:lucasbfr 231:lucasbfr 220:Tiptoety 178:Either: 158:Tiptoety 90:IP check 5480:Mayalld 5448:Mayalld 5422:Mayalld 5365:twinkle 5350:AzaToth 5313:twinkle 5012:Mayalld 4990:Mayalld 4972:Mayalld 4900:called 4759:Helpful 4699:Mayalld 4581:Mayalld 4251:WP:RFAR 4218:WP:BOLD 4030:clearly 3924:Mayalld 3896:Mayalld 3428:Mayalld 3424:Archive 3390:Mayalld 3187:Mayalld 3029:Mayalld 2978:Mayalld 2910:checkip 2868:Mayalld 2841:WP:BRFA 2760:Mayalld 2728:Mayalld 2702:Mayalld 2592:Mayalld 2574:Mayalld 2529:Mayalld 2496:Mayalld 2451:Mayalld 2395:be bold 2369:Archive 2167:Mayalld 2113:Mayalld 2026:Deskana 1994:Deskana 1957:WP:COIN 1935:Deskana 1902:Deskana 1813:Helpful 1695:Mayalld 1638:called 1539:Mayalld 1177:twinkle 1162:AzaToth 1125:twinkle 1023:Mayalld 816:WP:RFAR 783:WP:BOLD 595:clearly 489:Mayalld 461:Mayalld 96:WP:RFCU 39:archive 5235:D.M.N. 4919:zzuuzz 4837:HAGGER 4803:Jeremy 4660:D.M.N. 4656:WP:SPI 4430:). -- 4420:WP:BRD 4392:least. 4381:should 4290:before 4268:WP:BRD 4247:WP:RFC 4243:WP:BRD 4214:active 4185:WP:IAR 3952:D.M.N. 3587:Katr67 3563:WP:SPI 3548:Katr67 3460:should 3150:. See 3105:D.M.N. 3086:D.M.N. 3048:WP:AN3 2992:start. 2796:WP:SSP 2638:D.M.N. 2439:SPIold 2427:SPIold 2030:(talk) 1998:(talk) 1949:WP:DRV 1939:(talk) 1906:(talk) 1857:Jeremy 1657:zzuuzz 1575:HAGGER 1500:D.M.N. 1496:WP:SPI 995:). -- 985:WP:BRD 957:least. 946:should 855:before 833:WP:BRD 812:WP:RFC 808:WP:BRD 779:active 750:WP:IAR 517:D.M.N. 147:(talk) 135:(talk) 111:(talk) 5469:eagle 5386:eagle 5354:Ioeth 5302:Ioeth 5267:eagle 5190:eagle 5139:eagle 5078:eagle 5056:eagle 5034:eagle 4902:Grawp 4876:eagle 4822:eagle 4785:eagle 4720:eagle 4633:eagle 4603:eagle 4557:eagle 4546:those 4519:eagle 4492:eagle 4461:eagle 4361:now.) 4165:After 4161:first 4144:prove 4136:great 4091:dαlus 4014:, or 3882:dαlus 3852:dαlus 3771:WP:AN 3719:dαlus 3575:eagle 3471:eagle 3449:eagle 3336:eagle 3270:eagle 3221:eagle 3154:. -- 3059:eagle 3023:page. 3009:eagle 2934:eagle 2853:eagle 2749:eagle 2670:eagle 2518:eagle 2484:eagle 2417:user5 2354:eagle 2303:eagle 2230:eagle 2221:. —— 2208:eagle 2098:eagle 2015:eagle 1983:eagle 1924:eagle 1876:eagle 1839:eagle 1761:eagle 1739:eagle 1717:eagle 1640:Grawp 1614:eagle 1560:eagle 1475:eagle 1464:those 1437:eagle 1410:eagle 1379:eagle 1346:eagle 1337:. —— 1325:eagle 1234:Fixed 1198:eagle 1166:Ioeth 1114:Ioeth 1075:eagle 1045:eagle 926:now.) 730:After 726:first 709:prove 701:great 656:dαlus 579:, or 447:dαlus 417:dαlus 336:WP:AN 284:dαlus 98:(see 16:< 5484:talk 5452:talk 5426:talk 5408:See 5359:talk 5307:talk 5239:talk 5165:§hep 5154:talk 5117:§hep 5016:talk 4994:talk 4976:talk 4961:talk 4935:talk 4847:talk 4703:talk 4664:talk 4585:talk 4412:jc37 4385:will 4354:that 4337:will 4300:bold 4232:jc37 4151:days 4107:§hep 4061:talk 3994:jc37 3972:Done 3956:talk 3928:talk 3900:talk 3796:talk 3758:jc37 3736:bold 3697:jc37 3645:jc37 3629:jc37 3591:talk 3552:talk 3432:talk 3417:RFCU 3409:Done 3394:talk 3378:talk 3358:RFCU 3318:talk 3241:talk 3191:talk 3124:Done 3109:talk 3090:talk 3033:talk 2982:talk 2915:and 2872:talk 2830:talk 2804:talk 2764:talk 2732:talk 2706:talk 2688:See 2642:talk 2596:talk 2578:talk 2563:talk 2533:talk 2500:talk 2455:talk 2378:SPIa 2329:§hep 2318:talk 2281:§hep 2171:talk 2117:talk 2108:now. 2068:talk 1965:talk 1955:and 1897:love 1895:I'd 1699:talk 1673:talk 1585:talk 1543:talk 1504:talk 1282:and 1270:talk 1227:Bot 1171:talk 1119:talk 1027:talk 977:jc37 950:will 919:that 902:will 865:bold 797:jc37 716:days 672:§hep 626:talk 559:jc37 537:Done 521:talk 493:talk 465:talk 361:talk 323:jc37 301:bold 262:jc37 210:jc37 194:jc37 5464:nix 5381:nix 5282:In 5262:nix 5185:nix 5150:Kww 5134:nix 5073:nix 5051:nix 5029:nix 4957:Kww 4871:nix 4817:nix 4780:nix 4766:One 4752:The 4715:nix 4628:nix 4598:nix 4552:nix 4514:nix 4487:nix 4456:nix 4249:or 4212:an 4203:any 4110:• 3975:-- 3749:--> 3676:now 3570:nix 3466:nix 3444:nix 3331:nix 3265:nix 3216:nix 3054:nix 3004:nix 2929:nix 2848:nix 2744:nix 2665:nix 2559:Kww 2513:nix 2479:nix 2349:nix 2314:Kww 2298:nix 2225:nix 2203:nix 2130:SPI 2093:nix 2010:nix 1978:nix 1919:nix 1871:nix 1834:nix 1820:One 1806:The 1756:nix 1734:nix 1712:nix 1609:nix 1555:nix 1470:nix 1432:nix 1405:nix 1374:nix 1341:nix 1320:nix 1193:nix 1094:In 1070:nix 1040:nix 814:or 777:an 768:any 675:• 540:-- 314:--> 241:now 122:FT2 5486:) 5454:) 5428:) 5412:. 5290:}} 5284:{{ 5241:) 5168:• 5156:) 5120:• 5018:) 4996:) 4978:) 4963:) 4937:) 4904:. 4849:) 4705:) 4666:) 4587:) 4389:do 4197:is 4087:Dæ 4063:) 3958:) 3930:) 3902:) 3878:Dæ 3872:}} 3866:{{ 3848:Dæ 3798:) 3715:Dæ 3593:) 3554:) 3434:) 3420:}} 3414:{{ 3396:) 3361:}} 3355:{{ 3193:) 3111:) 3103:. 3092:) 3035:) 3020:do 2984:) 2923:}} 2917:{{ 2913:}} 2907:{{ 2874:) 2864:TW 2832:) 2806:) 2792:}} 2786:{{ 2766:) 2734:) 2708:) 2692:. 2644:) 2598:) 2580:) 2565:) 2535:) 2502:) 2457:) 2442:}} 2436:{{ 2430:}} 2424:{{ 2420:}} 2414:{{ 2391:}} 2385:{{ 2381:}} 2375:{{ 2332:• 2320:) 2284:• 2195:, 2191:, 2187:, 2173:) 2133:}} 2127:{{ 2119:) 1967:) 1701:) 1675:) 1642:. 1587:) 1545:) 1506:) 1286:. 1272:) 1225:– 1102:}} 1096:{{ 1029:) 954:do 762:is 652:Dæ 628:) 523:) 495:) 467:) 443:Dæ 437:}} 431:{{ 413:Dæ 363:) 280:Dæ 106:. 5482:( 5450:( 5424:( 5370:) 5357:( 5318:) 5305:( 5237:( 5152:( 5014:( 4992:( 4974:( 4959:( 4933:( 4845:( 4701:( 4662:( 4583:( 4317:. 4302:; 4295:. 4071:] 4059:( 4036:. 3954:( 3926:( 3898:( 3794:( 3589:( 3550:( 3430:( 3392:( 3380:) 3376:( 3320:) 3316:( 3243:) 3239:( 3189:( 3107:( 3088:( 3031:( 2980:( 2870:( 2828:( 2802:( 2762:( 2730:( 2704:( 2640:( 2594:( 2576:( 2561:( 2531:( 2498:( 2453:( 2316:( 2169:( 2115:( 2070:) 2066:( 1963:( 1697:( 1671:( 1583:( 1541:( 1502:( 1268:( 1182:) 1169:( 1130:) 1117:( 1025:( 882:. 867:; 860:. 636:] 624:( 601:. 519:( 491:( 463:( 359:( 50:.

Index

Knowledge talk:Sockpuppet investigations
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
WP:RFCU
Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive

Mackensen
(talk)
02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
FT2
03:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Mackensen
(talk)
03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Mackensen
(talk)
03:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Tiptoety
06:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
jc37
10:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
jc37
05:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Tiptoety
06:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.