Knowledge talk:STiki/Archive 10

2597:

after STiki placed the warning. In the first case, at least, STiki did the right thing. Another editor had recently placed a "vandalism-4im" template on the user's talk page. You reverted another edit by the same user, STiki saw this template, and STiki took the next logical step in requesting a block. Someone at AIV used their discretion to decline the block; it happens. I don't have time to fully vet the case, but if this is indeed "edit warring", then STiki's confusion lies at the fact that humans were using anti-vandal templates to curb the issue. Was there another problem in the diff you presented? Thanks,

3377:

feedback is still being recorded for retraining purposes, but no changes will be made. Regardless of how you classify, no one else will ever see the edit again, because it is no longer the most recent on the article by virtue of your edit. (2) The "don't pass" dialogue should occur less and less over time, I think it is set for something like a user's 10th, 50th, 100th, 250th, 500th, 1000th, 5000th pass action. However, your "number of passes" is stored in a client-side settings file. If you are using different computers, this could indeed get annoying (but shouldn't in the general case).

31: 2707:

addition to just a blank (and dull) form field, I'd like to have a drop-down box with some common default messages (maybe things like "unacceptable grammar", "Knowledge is not a fan site", etc. etc.). I'd appreciate if you guys could split off a page and collaborate on what (a) types there should be, and (b) what they should say -- while I concentrate on the technical bits. We can of course have placeholders for things like "username", "article edited", etc. Thanks,

3814: 1624:(2) I assume there would be a link or button a user could use to trigger this action, and it could be a potential vehicle for DOS attacks. (3) You should see someone about that nasty case of edit-count-itis. Other than personal pleasure, this serves no real purpos, does it? There is a "recent usage stats" function in the queue menu and the most I'd probably be willing to do is update that with a "personal classification" counter. Thoughts? Thanks, 3563: 2416: 2289: 2170: 2000: 705: 2642:) created an article with just an infobox. He then expanded the article and was reverted "Revert non-encyclopedic addition - content needs to be factual and neutral in nature". Unfortunately we can't tell what the edit was because it has been deleted. MrDilly kept adding stuff and has been reverted multiple times, including by Titodutta. I don't think any of the reverts used STiki. Titodutta 2080: 1073: 3703: 3446: 2991: 2852: 2052: 1973: 1579: 1288: 817: 3782: 2143:

better candidates for reversion. That's why if you think that the vast majority of STiki users wouldn't know you should just press innocent, and leave the edit to article watchlisters. Of course, this requires you to guess at what other STiki users will do, which is easier said than done... so, especially as someone new to STiki, it is understandable that you pass a lot.

3333:

intentionally performed, I don't think we should be too subtle in parsing out its motivations. However, if you classify an edit as a "good faith revert", a dialogue should pop that provides more subtle, descriptive, and customized options. Similarly, as Gareth mentioned, Twinkle actions fired from STiki hyperlinks can always cover the corner cases... Thanks,

3047:

good and no one used it. I turned off the link spam queue to coincide with the new release (i.e., probably within the last 24 hours). These queue's will still be "accessible" for those with older versions of the tool, but they will not be getting populated with new revisions (although this could be trivially restarted at any moment). Thanks,

869:, would it not be prudent if the STiki permissions and the rollback rights were frozen until the user undergoes a mandatory CVU training? He is definitely very enthusiastic about this project, but we might benefit a lot more (than be on our toes) if that enthusiasm was mixed with the proper kind of advice and training. 885:

permission to use STiki). Rather than blocking him and creating some ill-feelings towards us, I am going to try the diplomatic approach of asking him to stop using STiki until he goes through CVU training or otherwise demonstrates some better judgement. I'll notify him/her on the user talk page. Thanks,

2973:

I previously asked for permission to use STiki here, but my application was politely rejected due to my lack of experience. I have since done what I feel is a lot of constructive contributing in a short time, and I feel confident in my own abilities to use STiki responsibly. As such, I'm asking again

1943:

You'll get the hang of it eventually -- or just classify enough edits that your name makes it near the headers! You can't see the changes yet because while they have been made "in source", I wait until a few changes accumulate before pushing a new download version (it would be annoying to do this for

1698:

Andrew; Thank you for considering the idea! I understand your concern about the sheer vulnerability of an open link operating the refresh operation and using the write API for every user (if that's how it works, my sysadmin career never got off the ground!). The "local" idea is great! It's everything

1623:

System resources aren't really of concern here, I have plenty of CPU that can re-generate the leader-board as needed. However, extending this functionality to end-users brings social and security concerns. (1) People watchlist the leader-board; do we really want to bombard them with frequent updates?

1612:

This is so simple it must be a perrenial request, but I do not see it in an archive so I will ask; It would be crazy to update the leaderboard in real time, but could a system be developed similar to a manual purge link that an actual editor can use to refresh the stats? Not sure how much impact that

1332:

method of watching the Recent changes and clicking (diff) links for changes with no summary. I have a sneaking feeling that it's not having much effect. I've reverted some things, some obviously vandalism, some probably a new user experimenting, some obviously good faith edits that happened not to be

987:

Well what is your preference for how this is handled? I'm fishing for ideas here. He's not operating in bad-faith so some type of pre-block warning/ultimatum would have to be issued. It seems he's been aggressive in doing other "tagging" tasks across the encyclopedia (e.g., good/featured articles). I

584:

This is a fine idea but sounds little outside of STiki's scope, which tends to be very vandalism/damage focused (plus, why should we only welcome the users who are good-faith reverted in STiki? wouldn't innocent new users be even more deserving of a welcome? And STiki probably only encounters a small

3920:(Dissertation writing, so I can't dig too deep at current). I would look at trying to force a Java update, as Java 7 has been around since mid-2011. This might also be a generally good idea, given some of the security issues that Java's browser plug-in environment has been having as of late. Thanks, 3585:

cough*cough. If this were only being used to build a tutorial for STiki, there would be some pretty significant conflict-of-interest such that I should probably avoid. However, if your willing to make a larger commitment to multiple tools/processes, then I think this is appropriate and within scope.

3046:

I cannot speak specifically to the WikiTrust queue. When I contacted them, they seemed to indicate they knew there was a problem, but it wasn't one they were terribly eager to fix. I would expect any periods of operation to be intermittent, and the larger point remains that its accuracy was not very

2340:

On 2, this should not be related to Knowledge norms since in web interface edit diffs, editor identity and timestamp comes first and below that the edit diff, and it increases chances that you notice the edit summary (BTW, after spending 2 hours with STiki, I don't see an urgent need for this. those

2122:

Technically speaking, one should not receive this warning message during each session. If you are using a recent version and the same login/computer, STiki counts uses of the "pass" button to a local configuration file (which persists across STiki sessions). The warnings should be exponentially less

201:"edit-count-itis" - where people just want a high edit count. People may feel that the edit count impresses more people. This is a risk with STiki and other tools like Huggle, but the balance of risk is generally seen to be in favour of having the tools. Having the leaderboard doesn't change that. 166:

There is an innate problem with rewarding people with attention for their number of edits and revisions. There are people who will defacto vandalize good edits when they think they can get away with it just to move up such boards. The most likely people this will happen to is people who don't bother

3600:

Very interesting, didn't know that this existed (sorry, missed the reply until now). This is something that I would be interested in. If we can come up with a list of projects that would benefit from this work and what tutorials would need to be made, this could develop into something very good.

3376:

I believe it may be somewhere deep within the documentation page, but: (1) If an edit displays in STiki, and you use a web browser to make a change, then when you return to the STiki window, classifying as "vandalism" or "AGF" will NOT revert your changes. Classify the diff as appropriate, as your

3355:

Hello! I really appreciate the hard work that has gone into making STiki such a wonderful tool, but, even as I continue to use it, I find it very annoying that I am getting messages asking me to not "pass" as often. I think that users should not feel pressured to find something innocent that they

3280:

After going through recent changes old school with the help of twinkle, this is a great improvement. But more warning templates would be great, because we can't choose a level of warning, nor most of templates for specific kinds of disruptive editing. If I'm wrong, could you tell me how to get more

3137:

I'll be the first to admit the imperfection of these pre-formatted options. I am hopeful now that they are in live versions that suggestions like these will roll in, and I have no issue pushing the changes in the next release (and in the mean-time, the "user custom" options can be used to store the

2142:

Hi Tito. You asked if any harm would be done by passing a lot. Well.. yes and no. No direct harm is done. The concern is that if some edits are passed by a lot of people then they all waste a small amount time on those edits, which adds up to a lot of time, which would otherwise be spent looking at

1669:

I agree that game-ification is a powerful tool we should be harnessing. Towards that, I wonder if the "personal counter" inside the STiki tool might be sufficient to meet this user's desires? Better yet, I could probably also produce a "local leader-board" that displays inside the tool, but doesn't

1472:

Because AGF edits cannot use native rollback (as they must not be marked "minor"), software rollback uses the "edit full text" API call when 2+ edits must be reverted in this fashion. Unlike every other edit path, this operation does not have an integrity checks that would cause the edit to fail if

1180:

Hi Kevin, as you have 1000+ article namespace edits, you don't require the "special permission" to use the tool. I could go the extra step to *block* you from using STiki, but this does not appear to be a necessary step. Enjoy your wiki-break, and if/when you return make sure to take your criticism

884:

Ugh. Not good. This user classified about 150 edits yesterday with a 94% revert rate. I can't do anything about the rollback right which he has acquired (you could post about that elsewhere if you see fit; but he can freely use Huggle et al.; and with the rollback right he doesn't even need special

3875:

Pretty sure the syntax is correct. Tried it on a different Windows machine a few days ago and got the same response as double clicking on the icon (as it happens this was a message box saying there was trouble connecting to the STiki back end, but I assume that was a temporary glitch, it normally

3175:

I would love for these to be developed in a community fashion, if you can find others willing to participate. I tried to poke at this during the development stage (where only you responded), but perhaps having the feature live will generate some more traffic. I like to concentrate on the technical

2596:

I'm having a hard time parsing what is going on there (or which reports you are talking about if there are multiple), plus I have a flight to catch so I am a bit rushed. Many of those reports have custom authored messages, whereas STiki leaves a static/default message. I'll assume you changed them

1483:

Backend: Functionality added for "unification" of accounts. Imagine someone has a "public terminal" account and a primary account. It is now possible for all actions of either account to map to the primary one (primarily for leaderboard purposes). An edit "pass/ignored" in one account is similarly

425:

Based on my understanding of the two systems, I don't think there should be any real incompatibility between PC and STiki. In some situations, if you revert an edit on a PC-protected page your edit will await approval by a reviewer before it "goes live". But unless someone has already approved a

342:

You've been around a little while and I've noticed your adopt-a-user progress with respect to vandalism. For this reason, I've approved your account. HOWEVER, I encourage you to see my approval of "Greatuser" above and the subsequent traffic on his/her talk page. These powers can be abused. People

129:

I see that you have enrolled in an "Adopt a User" program, read some essays on vandalism, and generally demonstrated a good-faith attitude towards the project. For these reasons, I have decided to enable your account. Proceed cautiously and realize that any edit you mark as "Pass" will be given to

113:

I am currently trying to learn and get hands on with fighting vandalism on wiki, only that I do not know how to find vandals easily. I would like to use STiki to make correct choices and fight vandalism appropriately. Can I get the permission to use it? (Sadly I do not possess enough experience to

3413:

Hi! I've recently been doing a fair bit of vandalism reverting so I was wondering whether I could be granted special permission to use the Stiki tool. If you are concerned whether I am a trusted user or not, I have the reviewer permission and a clean block log. I also have an understanding of the

3332:

Well, if you press the "vandalism" button the level of warning will automatically increment based on the recent vandalism warnings on the user talk page. This is a practical necessity -- via this progression is how the blocking process usually proceeds. Vandalism is "vandalism" and when damage is

2901:

Somewhere in the archives we discussed the possibility of saving passwords or cookies (similar as we already do with the user name field). This seems like the moral equivalent. To summarize, its probably not the best idea and regardless its not a burden I'm looking to take on if things go awry. I

1201:

It appears someone at Knowledge has changed the way diffs are rendered (without notification, it would seem). This does not play nice with my code, thus STiki is seeing every edit as a "null revision" and showing nothing in the diff browser. I am investigating the problem. In the meantime, please

943:

I'm in holiday transit right now and cannot give this the attention it deserves. Just dropping him from our "specially accepted users" list achieves nothing, as this user has 1000+ NS0 edits and rollback rights. How bad is it? You point out many instances, but what percentage of his overall STiki

3503:

It has mentioned in the recent archives and fixed in source; such a minor bug is no reason to push a new release, though. There are also some discussions about more/alternative customized messages in that archived thread. Those that currently exist are just my attempt to hack some basic ones out

1476:

Minor update to a "revert panel" message: The "beaten to revert" case only displays when an identity revert has taken place as a conflicting edit. Thus, if a non-identity change/conflict took place while an edit was in the diff browser, the "last revert panel" would say "Undid 0 edits / unknown

1376:

First off, what computer limits browser access but lets people run Java programs? And how do you know STiki will work? Regardless, I am going to side with StrikeEagle on this one, as you have a very limited revert history. Its easy to catch obvious vandalism, but whether to revert/AGF/ignore the

3849:

and post or privately submit if you need to? This is often an error seen with Java version mis-alignment, but that seems unlikely given your recent update. I don't use MS-DOS very much, so can you also confirm that the command-line syntax is correct and normal? On Linux, it would look more like

200:

enables people to be ranked on a number of things, but the default is number of classifications, not the number of edits. Obviously it is possible for people to make a stream of reckless classifications to try to edge up the leaderboard. However, I think a bigger incitement to recklessness is

2834:

Thanks for the listing, Yaris. My initial thought was that we wouldn't "subst" templates like these directly, but maybe upon selection from a drop-down box the raw wikitext (presumably of the templates, or something similar) would appear in a textbox and be ripe for immediate customization and

2706:

Greetings team. I am going through some feature-requests and bug-fixes today. Towards that, I have begun to look at T#019. The idea is that after pressing "AGF revert", a dialogue will pop-up (if the option is enabled) that will allow you to author a custom message for the user's talk page. In

1032:

Hi Andrew. I'm just letting you know that I have revoked Greatuser's use of rollback. I have also asked him to stop using STiki immediately. Perhaps you could review the situation, but I'm sure you'll come to the same conclusion. I think the sooner this is done, it will avoid anyone

1403:

I'm limited to using older versions of IE that can't use Twinkle, and many links to download programs were blocked; STiki happened to be one I was able to download and run. The program runs, but doesn't let me log in, which is expected. As far as the other stuff goes, roger that. I completely

958:

Upon closer investigation, this is a muddy case. The questionable judgements are not usually completely off-base, but perhaps should have been "AGF" instead of "vandalism" classifications. He admits to his inexperience, yet refuses to participate in any adoption program. The edits are broadly

2323:

and the "interface tips" subhead in particular. (2) I prefer the "edit properties" at GUI bottom. The most important component of a Knowledge edit is not *who* or *when*, but the *what* has been changed. Thus the diff takes prominence. In borderline cases I will look at an edit summary and

1561:

That's correct. If he/she can indeed produce a history of anti-vandal work on Wikia then I would be satisfied enough to grant access. Consider that he/she downloaded a copy of STiki many months ago in order to study more about it and possible applicability to Wikia properties. Moreover, the

3094:] Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because it did not meet one or more of our ]. Feel free to read more there, or contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ~~~~ 1646:

have the features to make it as enjoyable as possible to edit. Of course, I don't want anyone to be addicted to Knowledge, but we should always be willing to increase personal pleasure for personal pleasure's sake, as long as it encourages productive editing, because that helps Knowledge.

3360:

annoying, though, is that I often find an error, go to the actual page on Knowledge to fix it, then pass so that I'm not reverting my own changes. The original edit isn't necessarily innocent (or "guilty"), but my changes are fine, so I want to leave it untouched. Andrew, what is your

224:

Yaris stated things quite eloquently. The default "leaderboard" sort and basis for barnstar dissemination is "classifications" not "vandalisms labelled." Besides, marking good edits as vandalism is sure to eventually cause one troubles in the form of talk-page complaints. See also this

3740:

Connection issues are notoriously hard to troubleshoot. It could be on (a) your end, (b) my end, (c) Knowledge's end. So long as it is not recurring and others are not experiencing it, then I am not going to fret it. Regardless, all seems to be running smoothly currently. Thanks,

1613:

system would have on resources. I... Um, have a bad case of editcountitis and it kills me everyday to wait for the 12AM refresh. :$ Thank you for all your hard work and great product Andrew! I'm using it religiously now, from Huggle. I'm climbing that leaderboard! Cheers; -

2859:

I included a quite minimal subset in the new STiki version pushed tonight. I am sure once people familiarize themselves with the functionality, that these requests will generate a little more traffic. I was trying to concentrate on cases I had actually seen before. Thanks

2209:

The tool already shows the edit summary of the editor in the Edit Properties section(the one mentioned above).I do agree that the summary section is often ignored(by me), due to its small size and as you said, we dont tend to read anything that lies in the extremes of the

1884:

And one needs to scroll back to top to see what does 43.47% etc mean! Surely, it'll not an issue for me after few days, but not easy for first/rare time visitor. If the table is split into multiple sub tables (ranking 1-250, 251-500 etc) it'll be to easy to to follow the

3789:-- Absolutely not. Many of your edits show negligence and perhaps abuse of automated tools -- and you have a minimal amount of anti-vandalism work. If this remains something you are interested in, you need to familiarize yourself with policy, and at minimum complete the 2472:

I think I used "pass" precisely because the edit is "passed" to another STiki user -- although I see some possibility for this conclusion. This would create some issues with power-users who have the keyboard shortcuts hard-wired into their fingers. I'll think about it.

1508:

I would like to note that this account was created yesterday, and doesn't even have 50 edits. (Thus, they are not autoconfirmed) I don't think this user has quite enough experience from one day of editing to be granted this tool. This revert is a bit troubling as well:

300:(not of *terrible* concern, given that it seemingly took forever to notice this; no one really uses that queue). I'll ping my contacts who run the tool and see if they are interested in doing anything about it, and if not I will disable it in the next release. Thanks, 1068:

Hello guys I was thinking if we could arrange a separate section for new requests(like AWB or something similar) to use STiki here.Every user planning to use the tool adds a new section unnecessarily increasing the length of the page. Cheers and Season's greetings!

1351:

user's recent reverts seem fine.But the overall edits is just ~180 and the reverts in them make no more than 10-15 of them.I suggest they work for sometime on manual reverts and Twinkle before they request access to the tool.However, the decision lies with Andrew.

3763:

I would like to have permission to use STiki. I have been doing quite a bit of vandalism reverting and would like to be able to use STiki to be able to spot more vandalism. I think I will be able to help make Knowledge stay a safe learning enviroment more using

3118:] Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but I decided to revert your edit(s) to #a#. If you would like to discuss this change, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or #at#. Thank you! ~~~~ 3241:? They deleted whole article, so my revet was correct there! But, the way they are criticizing us for giving wrong/false information and demanding an apology from Knowledge, should we do something or leave as it is? (I know almost nothing about the subject) -- 1896:

We've touched on this somewhere in the archives, I think. Splitting the tables is bad, as it breaks global sorting functions, and that is how I use it! To see who is "winning", how the newest users are faring, and who is doing the densest amount of labor.

3540:

There could be... with screen capture software and a nice voice-over it could probably be done reasonably quickly, as well. I would support any community member who wants to attempt this. However, I am currently loaded with technical tasks. Thanks,

2378:

On a related note, I notice that sometimes the edit summary is truncated. It appears that the GUI doesn't give it much space. I suggest that the box in the GUI be expanded so that the whole edit summary can be read without clicking through to the

1450:

In this release you'll find a couple of minor front-end changes and bug fixes. These had been accumulating for a good while, so I decided to go ahead and release without any real "centerpiece" feature. As always, thanks for your continued support.

3361:

recommendation - should I hit "innocent" instead (thus avoiding someone reverting my changes unintentionally), should a new option be added ("fix manually"), or should the warning be reduced, or some alternative? Please advise. Thanks again! --

3022:

In the case of WikiTrust, the surprising thing is that all the diffs were only a few days old. Does this mean that the WikiTrust server worked for a period? Or does it mean that the STiki server is just serving me a different queue (STiki or or

2059:

Bang, within 3 minutes of starting using STiki, I have got an an alert "potential overuse of pass button"! Manual says "Pass" means "Skip". Of course, I'll skip until I'm 100% sure of an edit. Any harm of overusing "pass" button? Any suggestion?

2374:

box. I agreed with that suggestion. It might also help to do something else to make it stand out - the edit summary is a lot more useful than the other info. I would be against putting it in bold... but maybe make the font one point bigger.

1231:. Per that link (and its response), this is a recently known bug introduced with a new version deployment. STiki itself is not broken and there is nothing I can do until that bug is resolved. Everything will be fine again once fixed. Thanks, 275:

Andrew, can you investigate why WikiTrust is showing such consistently old diffs? My first guess would be that the WikiTrust server may have been down for the last 205 days and so no new scores have been gathered for that queue since then.

2489:

Totally agree with you Andrew on this. I always mark similar instances as vandalism, although I invariably then check the User's Talk to get an idea of the history. For instance, is he/she a rookie editor or an established, problem vandal,

1336:

I would use Twinkle or some similar tool, but unfortunately I'm using a public computer that limits my access to updated browsers and some software. STiki works, and I'd love to have permission to use it to make Knowledge better. Thanks!

403:

Therefore, it may be a good time to discuss the relationship between PC and STiki. I think this comes under a number of categories. I have put them below in different sub sections, in case people want to discuss any of them further.

1417:

As Andrew mentioned above, identifying obvious vandalism is entirely different from good-faith edits.As I already mentioned, work for some more time on manual reverts(say atleast 50) and return.You would be granted access for sure.

1132:

WikiTyson, I'm afraid you don't yet have the experience to gain STiki permissions. At this time, you have only 16 main namespace edits in several months on the encyclopedia. If this is something you are serious about, you can join

589:, which will do things like this and many more. It actually consumes STiki scores via API to make judgements about how to welcome new users (based on edit quality) with the ultimate goal of editor retention. Check it out! Thanks, 3524:

The project page is potentially daunting to newcomers, by merit of being so prose-dense and well-documented. Might there be a YouTube video the curious could watch to get an entertaining, quick, and visual how-to demo of STiki?

799:

Actually... it's 1,000 article edits required for automatic qualification and Greatuser is not quite there. I would be inclined to give you the access but the decision lies with Andrew because he has access to the database.

2656:

In summary, MrDilly appears to have been doing adding non-encyclopedic and copyright-infringing information. This was reverted a number of times and deleted from the record, presumably because of the copyright infringement.

2324:

registration status, but those are a secondary contextualization of what has been done. (3) Annotating feature groups in some way is an interesting idea, and one I will consider a feature request for future versions. Thanks,

3473:

There appears to be a spelling error in the pre-made good faith revert messages. The one for unencyclopedic details says something like "we maycollaborate" without a space between the two words. Is anyone else getting this?

2457:

Excellent! Thank you. Last one.. can we rename "pass" simply as "skip"! "Pass" might mean "promote" too (and if you are a DYK, GA, FA reviewer then you "pass" an article means completely the opposite thing of STiki's Pass.)

746:

Hello, Please give me the permission of using STiki so that i can revert Vandalism I have read essays, pages related to Vandalism I have completely come to know what is Vandalism and What is not Vandalism? I also tried in

369:

And yes, asking someone is a good idea. That is how you learn how to handle a similar situation next time. Asking the user who adopted you may be the best port of call. But if that gives no joy, try asking on this talk

3356:

do not know the details of. Yes, I feel that editors should do their due diligence is screening out potential information on their own, but sometimes things just aren't in our area of expertise. The reason that it is

365:

in doubt you still have the issue of whether to press "Pass" or "Innocent". A good rule of thumb is that if you think it is possible that someone with more experience would decide that it is vandalism you should press

2075:

hehe...I get the alert almost everytime I use it.It suggests that we should rather use innocent rather than the skip everytime.However, if you feel that you are not 100% sure, better go for pass and bear the alert

3825:, I thought I would try to get STiki working on my girlfriend's computer. It didn't work from double clicking on the icon so I had a go through the command line. The screen dump here shows the text I got back. 2367: 2660:

Tito, for future reference, I wouldn't have used the term edit-warring in this situation. I would say "repeatedly adding copyright-infringing material" or something like that. I would also post the message at

1980:

35,000+ edits, OS: Windows 7, BitZipper, after extracting files when I am double clicking on the JAR file, the file list is opening in BitZipper. I am certainly missing a very easy thing. Can someone point out?

1466:

Zero difference edits (i.e., null diffs) where no changes are made will no longer be presented to users. These appeared in the earlier transition to the diff browser displaying "rollback"-derived differences.

161: 3414:

relevant wiki policies regarding vandalism. My contributions are mainly in the area of GA reviews, of which I have conducted about 30. If you have any questions regarding my application please ask. Thanks!

3672:

My STiKi client was working fine up until about an hour ago, it now appears that it cannot connect to the STiKi server(or whatever it logs into) when i enter my account username and password. Any ideas?

1469:

The location of the STiki server is no longer hard-coded. Instead, an independently controlled DNS routing is used, useful in migrating STiki to a new location (likely to happen with my PhD completion).

373:

When asking an opinion, provide a diff. The best way to do this is click on "Wiki-DIFF" in the STiki interface and then copy and paste the web address of the diff into your message asking for help.

2420:

Is there any option to have a simple "revert" option as "catch-all" (typo, Wikicreole error, MoS error, edit test etc). I generally use the word "vandalism" very carefully. For example, please see

1141:

to find a mentor who will issue advice, lesson plans, etc. about doing this kind of work. If you make good progress there, your application for STiki rights will be viewed more favorably. Thanks,

1097:

No objection, but I'd prefer to keep it on this page (one less to watchlist). Then, of course, there is the matter of whether or not people will actually use it or start a new section. Thanks,

2439:

I think we might mention this in the section I linked above, but .... I would certainly label that case as "vandalism" -- it is blatantly unconstructive and not in good-faith. Notice that the

2341:

IP editors generally don't write edit summary, still having an option to take the "Edit property" box at top will make it similar to Knowledge web interface). and thanks for answer 1 and 3. --

3567:(This is actually semi-serious, so if anyone from WMF is watching and thinks they could get a donation or someone from Adobe can make this happen, I could do this for a LOT of tutorials.) -- 1562:

particular edit you highlighted isn't one I'd consider constructive. While I'd probably give it an AGF revert, I don't think we should over analyze minor deviations of subjectivity. Thanks,

499:

violations or copyright infringements. So if you come across an article with a lot of vandalism in its history that isn't getting a lot of attention then I suggest requesting protection at

585:

percentage of all users...). Regardless, there a number of projects around here that are focused on welcoming new users. However, the most exciting and dynamic is one in development called

988:

don't think a STiki-specific block would address the issue here, he'd move onto a different tool. If action is needed, I think it should be at the permissions level. Thoughts? Thanks,

2177:

Show the edit summary of the editor (if any) in bold? (eg. An edit summary like "Removed 3 paragraphs, completely biased information, see talk page for information" makes good sense)?

2084:.No, it doesnt cause any harm.Its a single issue notice for one login.It would alert you only after you use it again the next time.So feel free to ignore it if you feel you are right. 1377:

subtle cases is where we most often run into problems. You seem quite capable, so (1) you can demonstrate some more manual ability (say, ~100 reverts), or preferably (2) pass through

1328:

Greetings! I've been an editor for a while now (although only a really active editor for about a week), and the past few days I've started doing manual vandalism patrolling using the

1048:

Per a thread above on the topic, I agree with this and believe that the rollback permission was the proper level to deal with the issue (rather than anything STiki specific). Thanks,

180: 2220:

Customization:You can opt for warnings to be sent to the offender's talk.You can opt it out if you feel it unnecessarily increases the no. of your user talk space edits.(left bottom)

1996:

I feel you dont have Java runtime environment installed in your PC.Google it and install it.It hardly takes any time.I faced the same problem, but in my case it opened using WinRAR

167:

to log in before tweaking some small item. They likely won't notice such a reversion has taken place until and unless they happen to go back to the page, which might never happen.

3828:

I'm using Windows 7 and Java updated itself yesterday. I don't think its anything specific to the Java update; I've tried and failed to get it to run on this machine before.

3156: 3652:

Looks reasonable to me... Integrate it into the template and update documentation accordingly. Who knows how long it will be until we actually need this one, though! Thanks!

1228: 2701: 2443:

does not mention the word "vandalism" at all. only "unconstructive". For this reason, I think we have consensus that such instances should get a vandalism label. Thanks,

2044: 2213:

Yes, when you try to revert the edits of any autoconfirmed user who has above 150(or 50.I dont remember) edits to the mainspace, the tool warns you once and asks you to

251:

I have just had a go with the WikiTrust queue for the first time in ages and absolutely every diff I saw was over 200 days old. I think the range was about 205 to 275.

2716: 229:. The threat of gamification is constant, but it is also one the entire project faces. If anything, STiki reduces this concern with its admission requirements. Thanks, 3215:

You have implicit permission, as you have 1000+ article namespace edits! Download the tool, and once you enter your username/password, you'll be let right in. Thanks,

2180:

More importantly, is there any way to differentiate (bg color, edit tag, editor tag, highlight) editor groups (I mainly want to see these IP, Auto-confirmed, Admins)?

1161:

Hi Andrew, please remove my STiki rights until I request them again, because I will not be using this account for a while until probably February 2013 or so. Cheers!

343:

will notice. It will not end well. When in doubt, do not revert. There are lots of helpful people around here who can give you advice in "sticky" situations. Thanks,

2646:

the case to AIV manually. Tito submitted other cases using STiki at around the same time, which may have lead to some confusion. Mr Dilly has not edited recently.

3370: 3018:

Because I'm the sort of person I am, I decided to use the old version of STiki (2012_12_04) and see if the WikiTrust and LinkSpam queues still work. And they do!

3102:

The list is so massive that it could just confuse new users. If a STiki user can't direct the user to a specific policy they mean they probably shouldn't bother.

190:

encourage people to make reckless edits. However, I think you may have got the wrong end of the stick about what STiki is and how the leaderboard is constructed.

3342: 3288: 2520: 279:

If this is so and if there is no immediate prospect of the WikiTrust server coming back on line, it may be a good idea to remove this queue from the STiki GUI.

3350: 3323: 2393:

I do remember this coming up before. I will now add explicitly to the bug-tracking/feature-request table so it doesn't escape my memory in the future. Thanks,

973:

I had my rollback removed a while ago due to three incorrect edit summaries (should've been blanking, not vandalism), I recall, so this is not a "muddy case."

934: 2749:

I guess it would be helpful to get the opinion of several STiki users on which templates should be on the shortlist... but here are some suggestions from me:

2407: 1011: 997: 982: 953: 711: 655: 155: 878: 809: 3610: 3595: 3576: 3400: 3386: 2835:

modification. This should be a very good starting point. I don't think STiki users should be too intimated by a little bit of template formatting. Thanks,

1703: 1633: 894: 794: 139: 1126: 2956: 2869: 2643: 2578: 2566: 1906: 1693: 1595: 1254: 1117:

Please grant me access to STiki. I want to help reduce vandalism, but I'm struggling to find articles to edit. This tool would be a great help. Thanks. -

1112: 968: 1571: 1390: 1106: 3661: 3283: 3238: 2226:

You can use any of the four rev Queue mechanisms.(top left in the title bar). Cluebot NG and STiki are the most used ones.You get CluebotNG as default.

1729: 1460: 172: 123: 3802: 3550: 3007: 2069: 1679: 1656: 1412: 760: 290: 3750: 3513: 3462: 3269: 2911: 2731: 2620: 2606: 2499:...if appropriate I would edit the warning on the page. Perhaps this has something to do with my percentage which hangs always just under the 50% – 2482: 2467: 2452: 2350: 2333: 2152: 2132: 1953: 1747: 1433: 1367: 1315: 1304: 1240: 1223: 1190: 1150: 1091: 916: 847: 733: 696: 598: 352: 3912: 3863: 3185: 3170: 3147: 3070: 3056: 2844: 2302: 2246: 2117: 2103: 2036: 2022: 1556: 833: 616: 384: 309: 238: 3224: 2942: 2928: 2662: 1057: 246: 226: 3631:. I believe that this could potentially be used for an editor's 100,00th classification. I am open to any suggestions any of you make. Thank you. 492: 215: 2814: 2740: 2366:

WRT Tito's second bullet point at the top of this thread... I agree that it would help to make the edit summary more prominent. It was suggested

1738:

I've already coded this up in my local source. (a) Done. (b) Difficult. Certainly not worth the time investment for something like this. Thanks,

1532: 741: 3026:

In the case of the Link Spam queue. I got up to date diffs of some spammy links. Does this mean that you just haven't disabled this queue yet?

2829: 2695: 2433: 320:

Please grant me permission to use STiki. I do a lot of vandal reverting, new page patrolling etc. so this tool would help me out a lot. Cheers!

2629: 1381:

which should concentrate on these cases. When either of those are met (assuming no interim issues), I will happy to grant permissions. Thanks,

775: 634: 535: 2166:

Bring the "Edit property" box at the top of the page (by default human eyes read left to right and top to bottom (unless you are reading Urdu

622: 1752:

a) thanks, but, can not see changes, b) The reason to ask for a sticky header is when I scroll down to see my ranking, it is something like:

1445: 463: 429:

The one situation when a STiki user's revert will be automatically be approved will be fairly common but it requires a number of things to

259: 2253:

I know these too, but sincere thanks for your help! It seems STiki does not have these customizing options (or think of keyboard shortcut

959:

constructive and not generating much talk page controversy. I plan to continue monitoring the situation before taking any action. Thanks,

481: 336: 3555:

If Wikimedia (or someone else - there's an academic license, which I'm eligible for, but it's still $ 299) wants to give me a license to

2590: 2512: 1202:

close your STiki instances, because my database is getting smashed as all clients are continually requesting fresh reservations. Thanks,

1063: 523: 255: 2746:

Depending on how clever you can be with interface design, I reckon you want a smallish subset of these, plus a "more" link to that page.

2680: 3646: 1990: 1345: 105: 2547: 3773: 2982: 2497:

There is no point in carrying out this undertaking if you wish to avoid the retroaction of the odd, unpleasant post on your Talk page

1617: 2424:, there was nothing "good faith" in that edit, but not a serious vandal attack too. A simple revert option might be helpful here! -- 2402: 2123:

frequent over time, i.e., after {1, 10, 100, 500, 1000, 5000} passes. Those aren't the exact numbers, but you get the idea. Thanks,

1211: 3628: 3534: 1771: 458: 3437: 3294: 3038: 1493:

I did some vandalism removal job here and West said he can allow me to get permission for using this super, awesome tool. Thanks!

1174: 3929: 512: 3732: 3696: 2193: 577: 3085:

Hi Andrew, I just did a good-faith revert. I like the new message feature, although I decided not to use it on this occasion.

2933:

If persons using the tool want to take the responsibility upon themselves, an AutoIT script would be trivially easy to create.

2388: 1931: 1502: 677: 2895: 2157: 1720:

so that one can easily learn his ranking! b) (I don't know, but,) is there anyway to lock the header row of the table only? --

944:

contributions are unacceptable? Does this warrant a STiki block? Stripping of rollback? Should these go hand in hand? Thanks,

204:

Is there a specific case that has raised your concern? I think it would be better deal with concerns on a case-by-case basis.

3497: 3131: 3105:

There is the possibility that the good-faith revert was done for a reason not mentioned in policy (or even guidelines). e.g.

420: 415: 400:

protection started being applied to some articles on the 1st of December and it seems to be rolling out smoothly and slowly.

3839: 3250: 1042: 726: 670: 1279: 297: 2934: 1538: 486: 315: 3822: 2572: 1851: 1480:

Backend: IRC reporting of STiki scores now outputs a URL by which the diff for an RID can simply be opened in browser.

3209: 3155:

You could facilitate people collaborting on improvements by posting the contents of the messages to a subpage. e.g.

2650: 650: 1965: 684: 522:

through STiki. Investigating the history of the article showed a lot of vandalism. I logged a request, which was

495:

says PC-protection can be applied to pages that are not frequently edited but do suffer from persistent vandalism,

468:

There will be many STiki users who would make good reviewers. If you think you may be in this category, check out

3504:

quickly (since I couldn't get the community to care much about them prior to the feature being included). Thanks,

2005: 1516:, which any autoconfirmed user can use, before using STiki. But, of course, the decision is up to the developers. 3582: 3318: 2611:

Alright, I'll carefully watch the STiki AIV reports and write back in details if it happens in future! Thanks! --

2507: 1811: 1527: 1323: 1170: 790: 570: 329: 97: 89: 84: 3622: 2666: 519: 72: 67: 59: 3106: 1510: 3758: 2968: 2639: 1586:

Based on information this user has privately submitted to me, I have approved his/her STiki account. Thanks,

2902:

can't imagine the burden of typing in a password every now and then is one that is too troublesome. Thanks,

862: 3013: 1767: 2223:

You also have the option to customize the edit summary of warnings, in case you opt for them.(Left bottom)

907:

and have completely come to know further i will take care about this and will not disrupt Wiki, Thank You

3519: 3408: 2528: 2412:

Thanks a lot for answering my questions on the first day of my STiki use. The answers are really helpful.

1919: 1295:

Should be good to go. I've done the mapping and given the public account explicit access rights. Thanks,

1273:

to use STiki and have it map to my account? I heard this is possible now due to backend changes. Thanks,

1156: 1007: 978: 930: 574: 333: 197: 3845:

Apologies, this got pushed to my back burner given some other wiki work. Can you confirm the output of

3312: 2554: 2502: 2421: 784: 38: 3667: 3606: 3572: 3396: 3366: 3275: 2782: 1196: 874: 541: 426:

vandalised version of the page, the vandalised version will never "go live" so no harm will be done.

397: 151: 119: 546:

Hi Andrew, I think it would help if you introduced a function that...well, let me just roleplay it:

3817:

A screen grab of a Java exception that was thrown when trying to run STiki. (User name blanked out)

2974:

if I may be permitted to use what looks like a great tool for monitoring vandalism on wikipedia. --

2752: 1607: 1488: 720: 664: 196:

is a tool which directs people to possible vandalism and makes it easy for them to revert it. The

3925: 3859: 3798: 3746: 3657: 3591: 3546: 3509: 3458: 3382: 3338: 3265: 3220: 3181: 3143: 3080: 3052: 3003: 2952: 2938: 2907: 2881: 2865: 2840: 2712: 2602: 2562: 2478: 2448: 2398: 2329: 2128: 1949: 1902: 1763: 1743: 1689: 1675: 1629: 1591: 1567: 1456: 1386: 1300: 1250: 1236: 1207: 1186: 1146: 1102: 1053: 993: 964: 949: 890: 866: 829: 594: 392: 348: 305: 234: 135: 580:

By the way, STiki is working out really well for me and I appreciate your creation of the tool.

3808: 3468: 2440: 2239: 2096: 2015: 1847: 1549: 1426: 1360: 1084: 1027: 1003: 974: 926: 649:

In the message that you send to new STiki users, the link to userboxes needs to be changed to

3639: 3230: 2320: 1700: 1614: 1270: 1122: 265: 176: 3769: 3602: 3568: 3530: 3392: 3362: 2767: 1652: 870: 491:

STiki users will come across many pages that are suitable for pending-changes protection.

147: 115: 47: 17: 2231:

That's all the customization I know in the tool. Hope you make the best out of it. Cheers

8: 3722: 3686: 3487: 3427: 3246: 2891: 2800: 2796: 2777: 2772: 2762: 2727: 2722:

That sounds excellent! Few Twinkle warning/notice/alert type messages will be helpful. --

2691: 2616: 2586: 2463: 2429: 2346: 2298: 2189: 2113: 2065: 2032: 1986: 1927: 1807: 1725: 1522: 1498: 1477:

error / check page hist". This message has now been corrected to say "conflict or error".

1264: 1229:

Knowledge:Village_pump_(technical)#Urgent:_API_returning_.22textmissing.22_breaking_tools

1166: 912: 843: 756: 644: 566: 469: 325: 3921: 3908: 3855: 3835: 3794: 3742: 3653: 3587: 3542: 3505: 3454: 3378: 3334: 3261: 3216: 3177: 3166: 3139: 3127: 3066: 3048: 3034: 2999: 2948: 2903: 2861: 2836: 2825: 2708: 2676: 2598: 2558: 2535: 2474: 2444: 2394: 2384: 2325: 2203: 2148: 2124: 1945: 1898: 1739: 1685: 1671: 1625: 1587: 1563: 1452: 1382: 1296: 1246: 1232: 1203: 1182: 1142: 1098: 1049: 989: 960: 945: 899:

Oh! Oh! I really apologize, I am so sorry, sorry and really sorry I have read the page

886: 825: 805: 692: 630: 612: 590: 531: 508: 477: 454: 411: 380: 344: 301: 286: 230: 211: 131: 2206:, the developer.I didn't find any option for the customization of this section though. 3305: 3205: 2924: 2809: 2805: 2791: 2787: 2633: 2234: 2091: 2010: 1843: 1544: 1512:. I would suggest that after you are autoconfirmed you do a bit more patrolling with 1421: 1355: 1079: 1038: 771: 586: 3634: 3195: 900: 748: 2174:), so, if the box is at top of the page, there are more chances you'll notice it)? 3765: 3556: 3526: 2977: 2757: 1717: 1648: 1537:

You are right Vacation9.But Wiki4blog requested the permission only after Andrew

1407: 1340: 1134: 193: 3200:

How does one get permission to use this program? Seems like it's a great tool.--

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3846: 3790: 3725: 3719: 3713: 3689: 3683: 3677: 3490: 3484: 3478: 3430: 3424: 3418: 3242: 2887: 2723: 2687: 2612: 2582: 2459: 2425: 2342: 2294: 2185: 2109: 2061: 2028: 1982: 1923: 1803: 1721: 1642:

Here are my 2 cents. People stay on the internet because it's entertaining. We

1517: 1494: 1378: 1310: 1274: 1218: 1181:

in stride, take your time, and always assume good faith. Best of luck. Thanks,

1162: 1138: 1118: 908: 839: 752: 562: 500: 321: 3260:

would also be a reasonable place to get some feedback, in the future, thanks,

2947:

Would you care to expand on that, for those that might be interested? Thanks,

1473:

intermediate/conflicting edits had occurred. An explicit check has been added.

3904: 3831: 3257: 3231: 3162: 3123: 3062: 3030: 2821: 2672: 2380: 2144: 801: 688: 626: 608: 527: 504: 496: 473: 450: 407: 376: 282: 207: 2649:

Although the edits were deleted, we can get some idea of their content from

3201: 2919: 1404:

understand, I'm happy to keep working with (diff) links for now. Thanks! --

1034: 767: 550:

Newb makes a good faith but unconstructive edit-this was his/her FIRST edit

3088:

One slight quibble. I notice that there is a general message, which says

3813: 3627:

I have created a new version of the STiki Barnstar of Merit, available

2686:

Good observation. Next part (unrelated to STiki) at your talk page.. --

2086:

never mind,I messed up my language above and I'm too lame to correct it

1329: 766:

You have made over 1000 edits, so you don't need permission to use it.

3098:

I don't think a general message should mention policies. Two reasons:

904: 169:

I suggest to you that making a "leaderboard" is a very very bad idea.

2557:

where you should note we have several templates at the top. Thanks,

653:. I would change it myself, but I'm not sure where the template is. 493:

Knowledge:Protection policy#When to apply pending changes protection

114:

get the rollback permission which I would have preffered.). Thanks,

2217:.You may go ahead with the revert if you wish so the second time. 1513: 621:

Cool. Looking at the research of Snuggle's author has led me to

254:

Needless to say all the diffs were innocent. A lot of them were

2553:

Your free to do as you wish! I will, however, also point you to

556:

STiki automatically posts a "Welcome" banner on the user's page.

3176:

bits and let the practitioners tell me what they need. Thanks,

2184:

In short, please tell me about STiki customization options! --

751:

but i was denied Please enable STiki in my account, Thank You

1918:

CC SA attribution: Some portion of this post is copied from

162:

Problems with vandalism by people "climbing" the leaderboard

3879:

Still getting the same message on my girlfriend's computer.

2285:

for vandalism, Good faith, Pass and Innocent respectively!

1684:

Added as T#023 in the feature request table up to. Thanks,

838:

Thank You So Much for approving my account for using STiki

2202:

I'm not sure of moving the column to above.Better contact

472:. That explains more, including how to get the "right". 1033:

creating unnecessary drama by opening an ANI case.

607:

Snuggle looks awesome. I have signed up for updates.

2916:

Agree with this feature request to save the password.

2702:

Suggestions for default AGF user messages (for T#019)

1002:

The rollback permission has been removed by Kudpung.

443:

The user pressed "Vandalism" not "Good-faith revert"

361:I concur with what Andrew said. Obviously, if you 3872:I have also had delays, hence the de-archiving! 1670:actually make an edit on the wiki site. Thanks, 2741:Knowledge:Template messages/User talk namespace 2665:, rather than AIV. That's what it suggests at 2663:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2533:Do you mind if I create a barnstar for STiki?-- 1217:That's wierd... I hope nothing else is broken. 553:Kevin12xd marks it as good-faith and reverts it 526:and the page is now PC protected until March. 446:The edit reverted to has already been approved. 3351:Low Priority Feature Change for Pass Reminders 701:Thanks! (now I know where the template is too 130:another, more experienced STiki user. Thanks, 1716:a) It will be great to number 1, 2, 3.. like 1699:I asked for. :) Thanks again. All the best, - 3882:The Java version thingy reports as follows: 3122:Note that #at# means the article talk page. 1541:to do so.So lets leave it to Andrew. Cheers 1113:Please grant me permissions to use the tool 651:WP:STiki#Userboxes, awards, and miscellania 2998:. Your access has been approved. Thanks, 3812: 2370:that it should be put at the top of the 780:Polite to ask first though. Thank you – 247:WikiTrust server down for over 200 days? 2739:There are loads of templates listed at 2045:Pass (potential overuse of pass button) 925:I have raised some more recent issues. 742:Requesting for permission to user STiki 14: 3237:Can anyone suggest me what to do with 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1269:Hello! Would it be possible to allow 1070: 3560: 3112:Maybe the general message should be 2413: 2286: 2167: 2077: 1997: 1446:CHANGELOG for the 2012-12-04 release 702: 25: 3709:-- It appears to be fixed. Thanks! 3304:revisions with STiki, I always use 1064:A separate section for new requests 23: 3581:Let me just leave this link here: 683:Well spotted. The template is at 106:Requesting permission to use STiki 24: 3940: 2408:Simple revert option as catch-all 3780: 3701: 3561: 3444: 2989: 2850: 2414: 2287: 2168: 2078: 2050: 2006:from here, a trusted site(by me) 1998: 1971: 1577: 1286: 1071: 815: 703: 685:Knowledge:STiki/welcome template 29: 3891:Operating system: Windows 7 6.1 3583:User:West.andrew.g/Flow_funding 3107:a pointless addition to a list 2667:Knowledge:Copyright violations 520:Sublimation (phase transition) 13: 1: 3864:17:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 3840:10:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 3535:20:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 3061:Cool. Thanks for the info. 1191:16:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 1175:03:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 1151:15:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC) 1127:06:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 1107:01:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 1092:13:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC) 1058:01:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 1043:13:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 1012:14:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 998:12:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 983:11:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 969:04:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 954:07:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 935:17:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 917:14:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 895:16:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC) 879:10:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC) 848:13:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 834:16:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 824:-- Account approved. Thanks, 810:11:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 795:11:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 776:11:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 761:10:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 734:18:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 697:10:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 678:05:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 635:13:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 617:11:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 599:03:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 578:00:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 536:11:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 513:19:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 482:19:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 459:19:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 416:19:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 385:11:43, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 353:00:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 337:22:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 310:22:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 291:20:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC) 239:15:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 216:10:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 181:08:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 156:19:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 140:19:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 124:18:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 3888:Version: Java SE 6 update 39 3885:Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc 3876:works fine on that machine). 3343:04:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 3324:23:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 3295:23:54, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 3281:warning templates? Thanks! ― 3270:19:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 3251:18:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 3225:04:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 3210:04:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 3186:22:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3171:22:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3148:21:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3138:improved versions). Thanks, 3132:21:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3071:21:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3057:20:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3039:20:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3008:16:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2983:15:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2957:23:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2943:20:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2929:19:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 2912:03:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 2896:18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 2886:Stay signed in! Possible? -- 2870:03:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 2845:05:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 2830:21:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 2732:18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 2717:18:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 2696:13:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 2681:13:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 2621:15:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2607:15:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2591:07:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2567:15:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 2548:13:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 2521:04:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 2483:17:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2468:17:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2453:16:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2434:15:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2403:05:42, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 2389:22:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 2351:15:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2334:13:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2319:(1) There are hot keys. See 2303:12:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2247:12:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2194:11:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2153:22:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 2133:13:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2118:11:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2104:11:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2070:11:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2037:11:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2023:11:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 2004:cheers You may download it 1991:10:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1954:16:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1944:every tiny change). Thanks, 1932:16:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1907:17:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1865: 1825: 1785: 1748:16:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1730:15:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1704:20:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1694:19:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1680:19:52, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1657:19:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1634:18:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1618:15:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1596:04:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1572:07:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC) 1557:03:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC) 1533:17:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 1503:15:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 1461:17:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 1434:17:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1413:17:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1391:17:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1368:14:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1346:14:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1316:00:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 1305:21:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 1280:12:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 1255:01:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 1241:21:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1224:20:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1212:20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 687:. I have made the change. 464:Applying for reviewer status 7: 3559:, I'd be happy to do this. 3256:Seems its been dealt with. 2321:Knowledge:STiki#Using_STiki 1920:Knowledge:STiki/leaderboard 1877: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1862: 1859: 1856: 1837: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1788: 1782: 1779: 1776: 316:Please grant me permissions 10: 3945: 2628:That is a very odd case. 2573:Need help or suggestion... 2441:level one warning template 2048: 1969: 1842: 1802: 1762: 256:category changes like this 3930:19:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 3913:16:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 3803:22:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 3774:22:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 3751:06:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 3733:08:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3697:07:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3662:03:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 3647:23:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3611:04:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 3596:19:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 3577:18:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 3551:08:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 3514:03:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3498:03:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3463:01:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3438:00:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3401:03:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 3387:19:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 3371:18:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 2783:Template:Uw-talkinarticle 2108:Excellent! Got it now! -- 1139:counter-vandalism academy 268:moves, so it didn't feel 264:I did manage to fine two 227:project scale leaderboard 2753:Template:Uw-badlistentry 1966:STiki installation help! 1135:the adopt-a-user program 440:The user is a rollbacker 298:nothing new is coming in 3116:==Recent edits to #a#== 3092:==Recent edits to #a#== 1484:reflected in the other. 1324:Permission to use STiki 518:Example: I came across 3818: 3623:Diamond Metal of Merit 749:Rollbacking Permission 437:The user is a reviewer 3816: 3313:Gareth Griffith-Jones 3157:WP:STiki/GFR messages 2969:A second supplication 2504:Gareth Griffith-Jones 2162:Is there any way to– 1271:User:Vacation9 Public 785:Gareth Griffith-Jones 421:Technical interaction 186:Having a leaderboard 42:of past discussions. 3894:Architecture: 32 bit 3014:Queues still working 2768:Template:Uw-deadlink 260:redirects like this. 18:Knowledge talk:STiki 3759:Permissions request 3520:Video instructions? 3409:Permissions request 3300:Hi! When reverting 2801:Template:Uw-advert4 2797:Template:Uw-advert1 2778:Template:Uw-spoiler 2773:Template:Uw-linking 2763:Template:Uw-crystal 2555:WP:STiki/milestones 2529:Creating a barnstar 1245:Now fixed! Thanks, 1157:STiki right removal 487:PC-protecting pages 3901:I hope this helps! 3819: 3315: 2653:on his talk page. 2204:User:West.andrew.g 1764:AutomaticStrikeout 1309:Much appreciated! 787: 623:another suggestion 3852:java -jar foo.jar 3668:Connection Issues 3321: 3319:The Welsh Buzzard 3311: 2810:Template:Uw-biog4 2806:Template:Uw-biog1 2792:Template:Uw-joke4 2788:Template:Uw-joke1 2158:Editor type/group 2087: 1882: 1881: 1197:STiki may be Down 1004:Thine Antique Pen 975:Thine Antique Pen 927:Thine Antique Pen 793: 791:The Welsh Buzzard 782: 542:Suggestion for ST 296:Yeah, it appears 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3936: 3788: 3784: 3783: 3730: 3718: 3716: 3708: 3705: 3704: 3694: 3682: 3680: 3642: 3637: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3495: 3483: 3481: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3435: 3423: 3421: 3317: 3291: 3286: 2997: 2993: 2992: 2927: 2922: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2517: 2510: 2505: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2244: 2242: 2237: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2101: 2099: 2094: 2085: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2054: 2053: 2020: 2018: 2013: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1975: 1974: 1760: 1759: 1608:Feature proposal 1585: 1581: 1580: 1554: 1552: 1547: 1530: 1525: 1520: 1489:Can I use STiki? 1431: 1429: 1424: 1365: 1363: 1358: 1313: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1277: 1221: 1089: 1087: 1082: 1076: 1075: 1074: 823: 819: 818: 789: 729: 723: 717: 714: 708: 707: 706: 673: 667: 661: 658: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3853: 3811: 3781: 3779: 3761: 3728: 3714: 3711: 3706: 3702: 3692: 3678: 3675: 3670: 3640: 3635: 3625: 3603:Jackson Peebles 3569:Jackson Peebles 3562: 3557:Adobe Captivate 3522: 3493: 3479: 3476: 3471: 3445: 3443: 3433: 3419: 3416: 3411: 3393:Jackson Peebles 3363:Jackson Peebles 3353: 3289: 3284: 3278: 3276:Feature Request 3235: 3198: 3120: 3096: 3083: 3081:General message 3016: 2990: 2988: 2971: 2918: 2917: 2884: 2882:Feature request 2851: 2849: 2758:Template:Uw-coi 2704: 2575: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2531: 2513: 2508: 2503: 2415: 2410: 2372:edit properties 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2240: 2235: 2233: 2169: 2160: 2097: 2092: 2090: 2079: 2057: 2056: 2051: 2047: 2016: 2011: 2009: 1999: 1978: 1977: 1972: 1968: 1610: 1578: 1576: 1550: 1545: 1543: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1491: 1448: 1427: 1422: 1420: 1361: 1356: 1354: 1326: 1311: 1287: 1285: 1275: 1267: 1219: 1199: 1159: 1115: 1085: 1080: 1078: 1072: 1066: 1035:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1030: 1028:Rights revoked 871:TheOriginalSoni 816: 814: 744: 727: 721: 715: 712: 704: 671: 665: 659: 656: 647: 544: 489: 466: 423: 398:Pending-changes 395: 393:Pending Changes 318: 249: 164: 148:TheOriginalSoni 116:TheOriginalSoni 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3942: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3902: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3892: 3889: 3886: 3880: 3877: 3867: 3866: 3851: 3810: 3809:Java exception 3807: 3806: 3805: 3760: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3669: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3624: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3470: 3469:Spelling error 3467: 3466: 3465: 3410: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3327: 3326: 3309: 3277: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3234: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3197: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3160: 3153: 3117: 3114: 3110: 3109: 3103: 3093: 3090: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3028: 3027: 3024: 3015: 3012: 3011: 3010: 2970: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2812: 2803: 2794: 2785: 2780: 2775: 2770: 2765: 2760: 2755: 2747: 2744: 2737: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2574: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2500: 2495: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2409: 2406: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2211: 2207: 2196:Answers by SE 2182: 2181: 2178: 2175: 2159: 2156: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 1970: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1886: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1855: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1733: 1732: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1696: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1637: 1636: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1467: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1371: 1370: 1333:constructive. 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 938: 937: 922: 921: 920: 919: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 781: 743: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 646: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 602: 601: 559: 558: 557: 554: 551: 543: 540: 539: 538: 488: 485: 465: 462: 448: 447: 444: 441: 438: 422: 419: 394: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 374: 371: 367: 356: 355: 317: 314: 313: 312: 272:unproductive. 266:WP:CUTANDPASTE 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 219: 218: 205: 202: 191: 170: 168: 163: 160: 159: 158: 143: 142: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3941: 3932: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3922:West.andrew.g 3914: 3910: 3906: 3903: 3900: 3893: 3890: 3887: 3884: 3883: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3856:West.andrew.g 3848: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3826: 3824: 3815: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3795:West.andrew.g 3792: 3787: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3743:West.andrew.g 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3731: 3727: 3724: 3721: 3717: 3699: 3698: 3695: 3691: 3688: 3685: 3681: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3654:West.andrew.g 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3630: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3588:West.andrew.g 3584: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3558: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3543:West.andrew.g 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3506:West.andrew.g 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3496: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3482: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3455:West.andrew.g 3451: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3429: 3426: 3422: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3379:West.andrew.g 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3359: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3335:West.andrew.g 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3325: 3320: 3314: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3293: 3292: 3287: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3262:West.andrew.g 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3233: 3232:Raymond Franz 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217:West.andrew.g 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3178:West.andrew.g 3174: 3173: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140:West.andrew.g 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3119: 3113: 3108: 3104: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3095: 3089: 3086: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3049:West.andrew.g 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3025: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000:West.andrew.g 2996: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2949:West.andrew.g 2946: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2935:118.92.203.57 2932: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2921: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2904:West.andrew.g 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2862:West.andrew.g 2857: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2837:West.andrew.g 2833: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2802: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2789: 2786: 2784: 2781: 2779: 2776: 2774: 2771: 2769: 2766: 2764: 2761: 2759: 2756: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709:West.andrew.g 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2668: 2664: 2658: 2654: 2652: 2647: 2645: 2641: 2638: 2635: 2631: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2599:West.andrew.g 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2559:West.andrew.g 2556: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2522: 2518: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2498: 2493: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2475:West.andrew.g 2471: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2445:West.andrew.g 2442: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395:West.andrew.g 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2376: 2373: 2369: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326:West.andrew.g 2322: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2238: 2230: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2179: 2176: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125:West.andrew.g 2121: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2095: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027:Very good! -- 2026: 2025: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2014: 2007: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1946:West.andrew.g 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899:West.andrew.g 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740:West.andrew.g 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1705: 1702: 1697: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686:West.andrew.g 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672:West.andrew.g 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1626:West.andrew.g 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588:West.andrew.g 1584: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564:West.andrew.g 1560: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453:West.andrew.g 1435: 1432: 1430: 1425: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383:West.andrew.g 1380: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1359: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1334: 1331: 1317: 1314: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1297:West.andrew.g 1293: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1272: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247:West.andrew.g 1244: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233:West.andrew.g 1230: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204:West.andrew.g 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183:West.andrew.g 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1143:West.andrew.g 1140: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119:OneAwesomeGuy 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099:West.andrew.g 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1083: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050:West.andrew.g 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 990:West.andrew.g 986: 985: 984: 980: 976: 972: 971: 970: 966: 962: 961:West.andrew.g 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 946:West.andrew.g 942: 941: 940: 939: 936: 932: 928: 924: 923: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 887:West.andrew.g 883: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 826:West.andrew.g 822: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 798: 797: 796: 792: 786: 779: 778: 777: 773: 769: 765: 764: 763: 762: 758: 754: 750: 735: 732: 730: 724: 718: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681: 680: 679: 676: 674: 668: 662: 652: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 619: 618: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 603: 600: 596: 592: 591:West.andrew.g 588: 583: 582: 581: 579: 576: 572: 568: 564: 555: 552: 549: 548: 547: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 461: 460: 456: 452: 445: 442: 439: 436: 435: 434: 432: 427: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 399: 386: 382: 378: 375: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 345:West.andrew.g 341: 340: 339: 338: 335: 331: 327: 323: 311: 307: 303: 302:West.andrew.g 299: 295: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 280: 277: 273: 271: 267: 262: 261: 257: 252: 240: 236: 232: 231:West.andrew.g 228: 223: 222: 221: 220: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 157: 153: 149: 145: 144: 141: 137: 133: 132:West.andrew.g 128: 127: 126: 125: 121: 117: 111: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3919: 3830: 3827: 3823:my last post 3820: 3785: 3762: 3710: 3700: 3674: 3671: 3633: 3632: 3626: 3523: 3475: 3472: 3449: 3415: 3412: 3357: 3354: 3301: 3282: 3279: 3236: 3199: 3121: 3115: 3111: 3097: 3091: 3087: 3084: 3029: 3017: 2994: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2885: 2855: 2705: 2671: 2659: 2655: 2648: 2636: 2627: 2576: 2534: 2532: 2514: 2496: 2491: 2411: 2392: 2377: 2371: 2365: 2232: 2214: 2183: 2161: 2141: 2089: 2058: 2008: 1979: 1917: 1883: 1869:131 days ago 1844:braincricket 1789:265 days ago 1643: 1611: 1582: 1542: 1492: 1449: 1419: 1406: 1405: 1353: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1327: 1291: 1268: 1200: 1160: 1116: 1077: 1067: 1031: 860: 820: 745: 710: 654: 648: 563:Kevin12xd... 560: 545: 490: 470:WP:Reviewing 467: 449: 430: 428: 424: 406: 402: 396: 362: 322:Kevin12xd... 319: 281: 278: 274: 269: 263: 253: 250: 187: 165: 112: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3821:Related to 2509:– The Welsh 1872:99 days ago 1792:10 days ago 1265:Alt Account 645:Broken link 571:take a peek 330:take a peek 198:leaderboard 173:OBloodyHell 36:This is an 3854:. Thanks, 3793:training. 3766:Liberalufp 3527:Biosthmors 3391:Thanks! -- 3306:WP:TWINKLE 3243:Tito Dutta 3152:Good idea. 2978:Kierkkadon 2888:Tito Dutta 2736:Hi Andrew, 2724:Tito Dutta 2688:Tito Dutta 2613:Tito Dutta 2583:Tito Dutta 2460:Tito Dutta 2426:Tito Dutta 2343:Tito Dutta 2295:Tito Dutta 2186:Tito Dutta 2110:Tito Dutta 2062:Tito Dutta 2029:Tito Dutta 1983:Tito Dutta 1924:Tito Dutta 1875:9.85 edits 1866:Cluebot-NG 1835:1318 edits 1832:0 days ago 1829:1 days ago 1826:Cluebot-NG 1795:5.02 edits 1786:Cluebot-NG 1722:Tito Dutta 1649:Biosthmors 1408:Kierkkadon 1341:Kierkkadon 1330:Old school 716:Anonymouse 660:Anonymouse 587:WP:Snuggle 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 12 85:Archive 11 79:Archive 10 2651:this post 2644:submitted 2492:et cetera 2422:this edit 2236:TheStrike 2093:TheStrike 2012:TheStrike 1804:Titodutta 1546:TheStrike 1539:asked him 1495:Wiki4Blog 1423:TheStrike 1357:TheStrike 1163:Kevin12xd 1081:TheStrike 909:Greatuser 905:Vandalism 901:Vandalism 840:Greatuser 753:Greatuser 433:be true: 73:Archive 9 68:Archive 8 60:Archive 5 3905:Yaris678 3832:Yaris678 3786:Not done 3764:STiki.-- 3586:Thanks, 3196:Question 3163:Yaris678 3124:Yaris678 3063:Yaris678 3031:Yaris678 2822:Yaris678 2673:Yaris678 2640:contribs 2381:Yaris678 2145:Yaris678 2055:Resolved 1976:Resolved 1852:contribs 1812:contribs 1772:contribs 1718:WP:EDITS 1312:Vacation 1276:Vacation 1220:Vacation 1171:contribs 802:Yaris678 728:contribs 689:Yaris678 672:contribs 627:Yaris678 609:Yaris678 575:email me 567:speak up 561:Cheers, 528:Yaris678 524:accepted 505:Yaris678 474:Yaris678 451:Yaris678 408:Yaris678 377:Yaris678 334:email me 326:speak up 283:Yaris678 270:entirely 208:Yaris678 194:WP:STiki 3791:WP:CVUA 3290:coolguy 3202:YHoshua 2920:Widefox 2815:more... 2630:MrDilly 2515:Buzzard 2215:rethink 2210:page :) 2088:Cheers 1885:header! 1514:Twinkle 1379:WP:CVUA 861:Seeing 768:Mdann52 501:WP:RFPP 366:"Pass". 146:Thanks 110:Hello, 39:archive 3636:Frigid 3358:really 3258:WP:ANI 3023:CBNG)? 1863:30.47% 1860:30.78% 1823:43.47% 1820:22.38% 1783:18.66% 1780:36.19% 1644:should 3720:Retro 3684:Retro 3641:Ninja 3485:Retro 3425:Retro 2379:diff. 2241:Σagle 2098:Σagle 2017:Σagle 1838:1318 1701:T.I.M 1615:T.I.M 1551:Σagle 1428:Σagle 1362:Σagle 1086:Σagle 370:page. 188:could 16:< 3926:talk 3909:talk 3860:talk 3847:this 3836:talk 3799:talk 3770:talk 3747:talk 3723:Lord 3687:Lord 3658:talk 3629:here 3607:talk 3592:talk 3573:talk 3547:talk 3531:talk 3510:talk 3488:Lord 3459:talk 3450:Done 3428:Lord 3397:talk 3383:talk 3367:talk 3339:talk 3285:Ross 3266:talk 3247:talk 3239:this 3221:talk 3206:talk 3182:talk 3167:talk 3144:talk 3128:talk 3067:talk 3053:talk 3035:talk 3004:talk 2995:Done 2953:talk 2939:talk 2925:talk 2908:talk 2892:talk 2866:talk 2856:Done 2841:talk 2826:talk 2728:talk 2713:talk 2692:talk 2677:talk 2634:talk 2617:talk 2603:talk 2587:talk 2579:here 2563:talk 2479:talk 2464:talk 2449:talk 2430:talk 2399:talk 2385:talk 2368:here 2347:talk 2330:talk 2299:talk 2293:) -- 2190:talk 2149:talk 2129:talk 2114:talk 2066:talk 2033:talk 1987:talk 1950:talk 1928:talk 1903:talk 1857:1290 1848:talk 1817:1318 1808:talk 1777:1329 1768:talk 1744:talk 1726:talk 1690:talk 1676:talk 1653:talk 1630:talk 1592:talk 1583:Done 1568:talk 1524:tion 1519:Vaca 1499:talk 1457:talk 1387:talk 1301:talk 1292:Done 1251:talk 1237:talk 1208:talk 1187:talk 1167:talk 1147:talk 1125:) 1123:talk 1103:talk 1054:talk 1039:talk 1008:talk 994:talk 979:talk 965:talk 950:talk 931:talk 913:talk 903:and 891:talk 875:talk 867:this 865:and 863:this 844:talk 830:talk 821:Done 806:talk 772:talk 757:talk 722:talk 693:talk 666:talk 631:talk 613:talk 595:talk 532:talk 509:talk 478:talk 455:talk 412:talk 381:talk 349:talk 306:talk 287:talk 258:and 235:talk 212:talk 177:talk 152:talk 136:talk 120:talk 3453:-- 3302:AGF 2808:to 2799:to 2790:to 2577:... 2542:yya 2279:Alt 2271:Alt 2263:Alt 2255:Alt 1798:25 1169:) ( 1137:or 713:The 657:The 625:. 503:. 497:BLP 431:all 363:are 3928:) 3911:) 3862:) 3838:) 3801:) 3772:) 3749:) 3660:) 3609:) 3601:-- 3594:) 3575:) 3549:) 3533:) 3512:) 3461:) 3399:) 3385:) 3369:) 3341:) 3322:| 3310:– 3308:– 3268:) 3249:) 3223:) 3208:) 3184:) 3169:) 3146:) 3130:) 3069:) 3055:) 3037:) 3006:) 2955:) 2941:) 2923:; 2910:) 2894:) 2868:) 2843:) 2828:) 2730:) 2715:) 2694:) 2679:) 2669:. 2619:) 2605:) 2589:) 2581:-- 2565:) 2539:at 2537:Pr 2519:– 2501:– 2481:) 2466:) 2458:-- 2451:) 2432:) 2401:) 2387:) 2349:) 2332:) 2301:) 2277:, 2269:, 2261:, 2192:) 2151:) 2131:) 2116:) 2068:) 2060:-- 2035:) 1989:) 1981:-- 1952:) 1930:) 1922:-- 1905:) 1878:0 1850:| 1810:| 1770:| 1746:) 1728:) 1692:) 1678:) 1655:) 1632:) 1594:) 1570:) 1501:) 1459:) 1389:) 1337:-- 1303:) 1253:) 1239:) 1210:) 1189:) 1173:) 1149:) 1105:) 1056:) 1041:) 1010:) 996:) 981:) 967:) 952:) 933:) 915:) 893:) 877:) 846:) 832:) 808:) 783:– 774:) 759:) 731:) 725:• 709:) 695:) 675:) 669:• 633:) 615:) 597:) 573:| 569:| 565:| 534:) 511:) 480:) 457:) 414:) 383:) 351:) 332:| 328:| 324:| 308:) 289:) 237:) 214:) 179:) 171:-- 154:) 138:) 122:) 94:→ 64:← 3924:( 3907:( 3858:( 3834:( 3797:( 3768:( 3745:( 3729:★ 3726:★ 3715:★ 3712:★ 3707:Y 3693:★ 3690:★ 3679:★ 3676:★ 3656:( 3605:( 3590:( 3571:( 3545:( 3529:( 3508:( 3494:★ 3491:★ 3480:★ 3477:★ 3457:( 3434:★ 3431:★ 3420:★ 3417:★ 3395:( 3381:( 3365:( 3337:( 3316:| 3264:( 3245:( 3219:( 3204:( 3180:( 3165:( 3159:. 3142:( 3126:( 3065:( 3051:( 3033:( 3002:( 2951:( 2937:( 2906:( 2890:( 2864:( 2839:( 2824:( 2743:. 2726:( 2711:( 2690:( 2675:( 2637:· 2632:( 2615:( 2601:( 2585:( 2561:( 2494:. 2477:( 2462:( 2447:( 2428:( 2397:( 2383:( 2345:( 2328:( 2297:( 2283:I 2281:+ 2275:P 2273:+ 2267:G 2265:+ 2259:V 2257:+ 2188:( 2147:( 2127:( 2112:( 2064:( 2031:( 1985:( 1948:( 1926:( 1901:( 1854:) 1846:( 1814:) 1806:( 1774:) 1766:( 1742:( 1724:( 1688:( 1674:( 1651:( 1628:( 1590:( 1566:( 1529:9 1497:( 1455:( 1385:( 1299:( 1249:( 1235:( 1206:( 1185:( 1165:( 1145:( 1121:( 1101:( 1052:( 1037:( 1006:( 992:( 977:( 963:( 948:( 929:( 911:( 889:( 873:( 842:( 828:( 804:( 788:/ 770:( 755:( 719:( 691:( 663:( 629:( 611:( 593:( 530:( 507:( 476:( 453:( 410:( 379:( 347:( 304:( 285:( 233:( 210:( 175:( 150:( 134:( 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:STiki/Archive 10 - Knowledge

Index