103:
1106:
own work. I vaguely remember posting a shocked comment on Jimbo's talk page about this. So, the last few years, I've collaborated on
Hawaiian history subjects, bios, etc. In particular, those related to the Hawaiian monarchy. I have too much self respect to claim full credit on those works. Wish I could say the same for those who give interviews on a given subject, sounding a lot like Knowledge's text. Sometimes I see new books on subjects of forgotten Hawaiian history, and am fairly certain when I read them that someone used Knowledge as a source, without crediting it. About all I can say ... is that Knowledge is well read.
1003:
information, I recognized the writing style, I knew THE WORDS! Boy, was I surprised to find the
Knowledge article I had personally written being used word for word by the local historical society and being claimed as their own work! They ran several articles one at a time in each newsletter for a dozen or so newsletters, never with any attribution to Knowledge. Since then I have seen the same on Facebook more times than I can count because no one cares, it is too easy to copy and paste it and claim the credit for themselves... -
110:
130:
834:
90:
488:
textbook chapter takes a fair length of time, likely weeks rather than a few days. Looking at the time line, it is questionable whether the OUP ever seriously intended to attribute
Knowledge. While our content passed their review processes, they claimed it was simply an âinadvertent omission of citationâ. It is likely that a replacement chapter was requested immediately after the WMF legal department contacted OUPâs team.
446:
attribute and use an open license would be difficult. The legal team at the WMF, however, was optimistic. Initial emails from OUP indicated that this case would take longer than usual, as the people involved were âall over the world doing important Ebola workâ. This, of course, is not the first time we have come across the academic literature copy and pasting from
Knowledge. In 2012, I discovered a medical textbook had also
120:
36:
140:
100:
1134:
attributes to
Knowledge but doesn't even put an access date. Misplaced anger: I can't help but see a broader pattern of people not understanding that Knowledge is a dynamic document, so the sentence you took from it may not be there anymore when I'm reading it. Then comes the despair that people are using a source without understanding its strengths and its pitfalls. With this article, I see that
150:
346:) collected from the Central African Republic (Peterson 2004). The virus was detected in the carcasses of gorillas, chimpanzees, and duikers during outbreaks in 2001 and 2003, which later became the source of human infections. However, the high mortality from infection in these species makes them unlikely as a natural reservoir.
445:
The reputation of
Knowledge in academia often seems to be that it is good enough for academics to use and even occasionally claim as their own work, but not good enough for either students or the âunwashed massesâ. Thus I believed that convincing one of the worldâs foremost medical publishers to both
1128:
to use sources than to reject them wholesale. For example: to be suspicious of gossip rags because they often publish on crazy deadlines and have little to no editorial oversight, to go back to the original scientific paper the mainstream news piece links to evaluate their methods and how far we can
1105:
Half a decade ago, when I took a series of Audie Murphy articles to FT, his biography from
Knowledge - word for word, punctuation, etc. - ended up in the newspaper of a smallish Texas town ... and the owner of the newspaper had put his byline on it. No credit to Knowledge, he just claimed it as his
348:
Plants, arthropods, and birds have also been considered as possible reservoirs; however, bats are now considered the most likely candidate. Bats were known to reside in the cotton factory in which the Ebola index cases for the 1976 and 1979 outbreaks were employed. They have been implicated in the
1058:
Circular sourcing only continues to be a larger potential problem. The worst part is it's usually only easy to detect by the primary authors of the wikipedia pages. Aside from paying attention when content is audited, I'm not sure of any real solution that presents itself besides running plagiarism
1002:
About 10 years ago, the local
Historical Society ran a series of articles in their printed newsletter on the local tiny communities. As a member of the organization, I received copies of the newsletters in the mail (quarterly, iirc). About halfway through the first article, I realized I knew this
630:
Morvan, J.; Deubel, V.; Gounon, P.; Nakouné, E.; BarriÚre, P.; Murri, S.; PerpÚte, O.; Selekon, B.; Coudrier, D.; Gautier-Hion, A.; Colyn, M.; Volehkov, V. (1999). "Identification of Ebola virus sequences present as RNA or DNA in organs of terrestrial small mammals of the
Central African Republic".
487:
On
February 5, 2015, I emailed the OUP offering to rewrite and update the chapter in question in collaboration with fellow Wikipedians. The next day, they replied via e-mail stating that they had already âindependently decided to update the chapter and that that work already in handâ. Writing a
1133:
in their proper historical context and not take them at face value. An even looser analogy: guardians of underage teens of course prohibit their children from drinking but (should) tell them to please call for a ride if you indulge. Even more tangentially (secantly?), it annoys me when someone
1070:
What I really dislike about relatively reliable sources taking information from Knowledge and not crediting it is that, if the information (e.g. the birthdate of a football player) is quite hard to find and can only be found in that RS and Knowledge, I'm always afraid that I accidentally cite
939:
143:
398:
Initially, I made an assumption that someone had copied and pasted from this book into Knowledge. However, thankfully we have the ability to go back and view every version of Knowledge that has ever existed. I could thus determine that the content in question was added to Knowledge
113:
70:
504:
include "The absence of clinical signs in these bats is characteristic of a reservoir species. In a 2002â2003 survey of 1,030 animals which included 679 bats from Gabon and the Republic of the Congo, 13 fruit bats were found to contain Ebolavirus RNA". Knowledge cites
1166:
in Kent. The authors of the Design Statement for the houses which would replace it had thoughtfully provided an appendix listing all the nearby churches and chapels in that area which could in theory be used as an alternative. Copying and pasting the entire 120KB of
1171:âimages, references, wikitext and allâwas an interesting way of doing it! That reminds me â I really ought to finish off that list... On a separate and more reasonable note, rarely a day goes by when one or other of the online local newspapers in my home city of
353:, only bats became infected (Swanepoel 1996). The absence of clinical signs in these bats is characteristic of a reservoir species. In a 2002-2003 survey of 1,030 animales, which included 679 bats from Gabon and the DRC, 13 fruit bats were found to contain
153:
133:
480:, I found more inconsistencies. For example, while parts of the text were exactly the same, the author had not consistently used the same references. The references used on the Knowledge article supported the text, but the references in the
441:
retails for $ 375. I discussed this issue with the legal team at the Wikimedia Foundation, who contacted the Oxford University Press. We were hoping that they could negotiate both attribution and release under an open license.
422:. I contacted the user who had made the majority of the contributions, who turned out to be a virologist in Australia who assured me that while he had contributed to Knowledge, he had never contributed to the
475:
On January 20, 2015, the OUP acknowledged that the content originated from Knowledge and agreed to attribute Knowledge, but were having difficulty with the open licensing. Following further inspection of the
274:
for the 1976 and 1979 outbreaks were employed, and they have also been implicated in Marburg infections in 1975 and 1980. Of 24 plant species and 19 vertebrate species experimentally inoculated with
484:
that were changed did not support the text in question. The question remains as to why the references were changed. As a result of these changes, the quality of the copied content was lowered.
744:
Leroy, E. M.; Kumulungui, B.; Pourrut, X.; Rouquet, P.; Hassanin, A.; Yaba, P.; DĂ©licat, A.; Paweska, J. T.; Gonzalez, J. P.; Swanepoel, R. (2005). "Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus".
257:
during outbreaks in 2001 and 2003, which later became the source of human infections. However, the high mortality from infection in these species makes them unlikely as a natural reservoir.
1091:
William Burges (Architect) âbyâ Lambert M. Surhone (who specialises in this approach) is a complete lift of the WB article. It used to retail on Amazon for more than Mordaunt Crookâs book!
468:, which creates open access textbooks mostly based on Knowledge content for first year university students, on how to appropriately attribute. These books were already released under a
368:
Reston ebolavirusâunlike its African counterpartsâis non-pathogenic in humans. The high mortality among monkeys and its recent emergence in pigs makes them unlikely natural reservoirs.
491:
The one good thing that has come out of all of this is that Knowledgeâs content passing a major textbook publisher review processes is some external validation of Knowledgeâs quality.
278:, only bats became infected. The absence of clinical signs in these bats is characteristic of a reservoir species. In a 2002â2003 survey of 1,030 animals which included 679 bats from
1028:
596:
Pourrut, X.; Kumulungui, B.; Wittmann, T.; Moussavou, G.; DĂ©licat, A.; Yaba, P.; Nkoghe, D.; Gonzalez, J. P.; Leroy, E. M. (2005). "The natural history of Ebola virus in Africa".
330:...Between 1976 and 1998, various mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and arthropods from outbreak regions have been studied to determine the natural Fiolovirus reservoir. No
1086:
76:
1153:
1042:, written word-for-word. I posted in the comments a few times, all deleted, before privately contacting the primary author, who decided to put in a link and reword at least...
954:
1193:
1065:
1124:...and so we continue to fail our students, our youth, and the public by failing to teach them digital literacy skills. Like other literacy skills, better to teach people
1012:
318:âunlike its African counterpartsâis non-pathogenic in humans. The high mortality among monkeys and its recent emergence in swine, makes them unlikely natural reservoirs.
1210:
1115:
383:(OUP). I noticed that chapter 31, "Marburg and Ebola viruses", contained a fair bit of text that was nearly identical, word for word, as that in the Knowledge article
928:
888:
868:
123:
1100:
923:
883:
821:
812:
858:
1053:
903:
565:
Both state "Of 24 plant species and 19 vertebrate species experimentally inoculated with Ebolavirus, only bats became infected" and both use the same reference,
913:
898:
873:
863:
458:
878:
997:
851:
690:
Swanepoel, R. L.; Leman, P. A.; Burt, F. J.; Zachariades, N. A.; Braack, L. E.; Ksiazek, T. G.; Rollin, P. E.; Zaki, S. R.; Peters, C. J. (Oct 1996).
1224:
418:
Next, I wondered whether one of these individuals was the author of the OUP chapter, namely, Graham Lloyd of the Special Pathogens Reference Unit at
893:
845:
55:
44:
1168:
918:
395:, with at least the "natural reservoirs" section being nearly verbatim and some parts of the rest of the chapter containing great similarities.
447:
1276:
959:
412:
981:
966:
93:
1175:
does not use one of my public-domain Commons photos to illustrate a story or to provide a thumbnail image alongside the headline.
1122:
The reputation of Knowledge in academia often seems to be that it is...not good enough for either students or the "unwashed masses"
21:
1252:
943:
1247:
1242:
1149:
1237:
437:
as required by Knowledge, and the result was that neither of these have been performed. The hardcover version of the
404:
30:
Text from Knowledge good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own: Five years ago with a different crisis.
1138:
doesn't discriminate between PhDs and the "unwashed masses" (and wow, doesn't the latter phrase rank of contempt).
349:
Marburg infections in 1975 and 1980. Of 24 plant species and 19 vertebrate species experimentally inoculated with
494:
1038:
that was recommended to me by Google algorithms, turns out it had pieces of the semi-obscure article I wrote,
1232:
833:
558:
188:
49:
35:
17:
787:
270:
are considered the most likely candidate. Bats were known to reside in the cotton factory in which the
1143:
1035:
246:
525:
464:
At Knowledge, we are happy to work with publishers. A year or so ago, I helped guide the company
380:
296:
532:
Both include "no Ebolavirus was detected apart from some genetic material found in six rodents (
1182:
985:
210:
1076:
1018:
400:
388:
283:
1258:
1139:
1008:
753:
308:
8:
1159:
1039:
980:, one chapter seemed particularly familiar; it was a verbatim copy of the section of the
465:
408:
384:
206:
757:
1072:
993:
722:
691:
644:
1204:
1177:
1172:
1111:
950:
769:
727:
711:
648:
613:
302:
241:
520:
183:
are those of the authors only; responses and critical commentary are invited in the
1060:
761:
718:
703:
640:
605:
511:
1135:
1050:
1004:
609:
665:
1096:
976:
It's not as uncommon as people may hope. While reading Geoffrey Barton (2017),
545:
506:
163:
566:
1270:
989:
714:
365:) have been identified as carrying the virus while remaining asymptomatic...
312:) have been identified as carrying the virus while remaining asymptomatic...
225:
215:
Between 1976 and 1998, from 30,000 mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and
407:. From this I could conclude that it was partly written by the Wikipedians
1200:
1163:
1107:
788:"Ebola-Reston Virus in Pigs: Disease situation in swine in the Philippines"
772:
707:
651:
616:
434:
392:
71:
Text from Knowledge good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
730:
1075:
without knowing it. God damn, that annoys me. Cite your sources, people!
419:
403:
and was subsequently edited and expanded between then and 2010, when the
1043:
544:) collected from the Central African Republic". Knowledge cites it to
271:
266:, and birds have also been considered as possible reservoirs; however,
263:
1092:
291:
216:
765:
334:
was detected apart from some genetic material found in six rodents (
223:
was detected apart from some genetic material found in six rodents (
469:
595:
472:
license. We attempted to work with the OUP in the same fashion.
692:"Experimental inoculation of plants and animals with Ebola virus"
250:
231:
1162:
to support the demolition of a disused chapel in the village of
254:
577:
743:
689:
279:
259:
236:
180:
1017:
Did you ever contact the Historical Society regarding this?
357:
RNA (Pourrut 2009). As of 2005, three fruit bat species (
790:. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
629:
267:
174:
This op-ed was originally published on February 25, 2015.
1129:
actually extrapolate, to place works of literature like
202:
429:
Finally, I looked for attribution of Knowledge in the
988:
article I'd taken to FAC the day the year before. -
964:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
187:. Editors wishing to submit their own op-ed should
1268:
1059:checks and seeing when the Wikitext dates from.
978:The Tottenham Outrage and Walthamstow Tram Chase
1169:List of places of worship in Sevenoaks District
461:on the misappropriation of Wikimedia content.)
591:
589:
587:
249:. The virus was detected in the carcasses of
161:
584:
359:Hypsignathus monstrosus, Epomops franqueti
1198:Great story. Thanks for writing it up! --
721:
623:
598:Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur
967:
14:
1269:
1158:The oddest one I came across was on a
982:Immigration and demographics in London
286:, 13 fruit bats were found to contain
1201:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
205:
54:
29:
433:and a release of this book under an
1277:Knowledge Signpost archives 2020-03
785:
562:which does not support the content.
27:
832:
666:"Fruit bats may carry Ebola virus"
219:sampled from outbreak regions, no
56:
34:
28:
1288:
949:These comments are automatically
552:which does support it, while the
448:extensively copied from Knowledge
375:Last October, I came across the
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
960:add the page to your watchlist
779:
737:
683:
658:
515:, which does support it. The
13:
1:
645:10.1016/S1286-4579(99)00242-7
184:
179:The views expressed in these
935:
696:Emerging Infectious Diseases
610:10.1016/j.micinf.2005.04.006
571:Emerging Infectious Diseases
559:Emerging Infectious Diseases
529:, which does not support it.
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
554:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
517:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
502:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
482:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
478:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
439:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
431:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
424:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
405:greatest similarities occur
377:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
325:Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses
10:
1293:
1211:08:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
1194:22:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
1087:16:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
1066:21:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
1054:21:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
1029:16:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
1013:20:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
998:18:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
322:
204:
1154:16:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
1116:17:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
1101:13:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1062:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
323:
495:A look at the references
247:Central African Republic
526:BMC Infectious Diseases
500:Both Knowledge and the
381:Oxford University Press
297:Hypsignathus monstrosus
290:RNA. As of 2005, three
211:15:21, 25 December 2010
1225:looking for new talent
986:Siege of Sidney Street
957:. To follow comments,
837:
708:10.3201/eid0204.960407
633:Microbes and Infection
550:Microbes and Infection
39:
836:
825:"From the archives" â
284:Republic of the Congo
245:) collected from the
38:
1160:planning application
953:from this article's
389:A page from the book
379:(2011) published by
363:Myonycteris torquata
309:Myonycteris torquata
1131:The Little Red Book
1040:Waterfall furniture
817:"From the archives"
758:2005Natur.438..575L
385:Ebola virus disease
253:, chimpanzees, and
207:Ebola virus disease
1036:Here's a blog post
944:Discuss this story
929:On the bright side
889:Arbitration report
869:WikiProject report
838:
604:(7â8): 1005â1014.
45:â Back to Contents
40:
1189:
1173:Brighton and Hove
1079:âBiscuit-in-Chief
1021:âBiscuit-in-Chief
968:purging the cache
924:News from the WMF
909:From the archives
884:Discussion report
752:(7068): 575â576.
639:(14): 1193â1201.
542:Sylvisorex ollula
540:) and one shrew (
450:. (Also see the
373:
372:
344:sylvisorex ollula
342:) and one shrew (
327:(2011). page 364
316:Reston ebolavirus
303:Epomops franqueti
242:Sylvisorex ollula
68:From the archives
50:View Latest Issue
1284:
1261:
1207:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1083:
1080:
1063:
1048:
1025:
1022:
971:
969:
963:
942:
859:From the editors
856:
848:
841:
824:
816:
799:
798:
796:
795:
783:
777:
776:
741:
735:
734:
725:
687:
681:
680:
678:
677:
662:
656:
655:
627:
621:
620:
593:
456:
203:
197:
185:comments section
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1228:
1217:
1216:
1209:
1205:
1188:(Floreat Hova!)
1186:
1183:
1176:
1140:Rotideypoc41352
1081:
1078:
1061:
1044:
1023:
1020:
984:section of the
973:
965:
958:
947:
946:
940:+ Add a comment
938:
934:
933:
932:
904:Recent research
849:
844:
842:
839:
828:
827:
822:
819:
814:
808:
807:
803:
802:
793:
791:
786:Lubroth, Juan.
784:
780:
766:10.1038/438575a
742:
738:
688:
684:
675:
673:
664:
663:
659:
628:
624:
594:
585:
580:
497:
454:
391:may be seen on
195:
168:
167:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1290:
1280:
1279:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1199:
1196:
1156:
1120:Tangentially:
1118:
1103:
1089:
1068:
1056:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1000:
948:
945:
937:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
914:Traffic report
911:
906:
901:
899:Community view
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
874:Special report
871:
866:
864:News and notes
861:
855:
843:
831:
830:
829:
820:
811:
810:
809:
805:
801:
800:
778:
736:
702:(4): 321â325.
682:
657:
622:
582:
581:
579:
576:
575:
574:
567:a 1996 article
563:
546:a 2005 article
530:
521:a 2009 article
507:a 2005 article
496:
493:
459:special report
409:ChyranandChloe
371:
370:
328:
321:
320:
213:
201:
200:
176:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1289:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1272:
1260:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1226:
1222:
1212:
1208:
1202:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1181:
1180:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1074:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1041:
1037:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1001:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
974:
970:
961:
956:
952:
941:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
853:
847:
846:29 March 2020
840:In this issue
835:
826:
818:
806:
789:
782:
774:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
740:
732:
729:
724:
720:
716:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
686:
671:
667:
661:
653:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
626:
618:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
592:
590:
588:
583:
572:
568:
564:
561:
560:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:Mus setulosus
531:
528:
527:
522:
518:
514:
513:
508:
503:
499:
498:
492:
489:
485:
483:
479:
473:
471:
467:
462:
460:
453:
449:
443:
440:
436:
432:
427:
425:
421:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
396:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
345:
341:
337:
336:Mus setulosus
333:
329:
326:
319:
317:
313:
311:
310:
305:
304:
299:
298:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
234:
233:
228:
227:
226:Mus setulosus
222:
218:
214:
212:
208:
199:
192:
190:
186:
182:
177:
175:
172:
171:
165:
164:James Heilman
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
57:29 March 2020
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1221:The Signpost
1220:
1178:
1164:Dunton Green
1146:
1130:
1125:
1121:
1077:
1045:
1019:
977:
908:
879:In the media
852:all comments
804:
792:. Retrieved
781:
749:
745:
739:
699:
695:
685:
674:. Retrieved
672:. 2005-12-11
669:
660:
636:
632:
625:
601:
597:
570:
557:
556:cites from
553:
549:
541:
537:
533:
524:
516:
510:
501:
490:
486:
481:
477:
474:
463:
451:
444:
438:
435:open license
430:
428:
423:
417:
401:back in 2006
397:
393:Google Books
376:
374:
367:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
324:
315:
314:
307:
301:
295:
287:
275:
258:
240:
230:
224:
220:
194:
178:
173:
94:PDF download
1259:Suggestions
1073:WP:CIRCULAR
951:transcluded
420:Porton Down
272:index cases
144:X (Twitter)
1206:reply here
1005:Adolphus79
794:2009-09-27
676:2008-02-25
578:References
355:Ebolavirus
351:Ebolavirus
332:Ebolavirus
288:Ebolavirus
276:Ebolavirus
264:arthropods
235:) and one
221:Ebolavirus
217:arthropods
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2020-03-29
1253:Subscribe
1136:ignorance
955:talk page
715:1080-6040
466:Boundless
294:species (
292:fruit bat
198:s editor.
1271:Category
1248:Newsroom
1243:Archives
1179:Hassocks
1150:contribs
1108:â Maile
990:SchroCat
894:In focus
815:Previous
773:16319873
670:BBC News
652:10580275
617:16002313
470:CC BY SA
452:Signpost
282:and the
251:gorillas
193:Signpost
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
919:Gallery
754:Bibcode
731:8969248
723:2639914
538:Praomys
457:s 2012
340:Praomys
255:duikers
232:Praomys
1051:(talk)
746:Nature
519:cites
512:Nature
361:, and
306:, and
260:Plants
181:op-eds
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
1238:About
569:from
548:from
523:from
509:from
280:Gabon
237:shrew
189:email
16:<
1233:Home
1184:5489
1144:talk
1112:talk
1097:talk
1093:KJP1
1009:talk
994:talk
823:Next
770:PMID
728:PMID
712:ISSN
649:PMID
614:PMID
536:and
413:Rhys
411:and
338:and
268:bats
229:and
191:the
1223:is
1126:how
1082::-)
1024::-)
762:doi
750:438
719:PMC
704:doi
641:doi
606:doi
415:.
162:By
79:â
1273::
1152:)
1114:)
1099:)
1011:)
996:)
813:â
768:.
760:.
748:.
726:.
717:.
710:.
698:.
694:.
668:.
647:.
635:.
612:.
600:.
586:^
426:.
387:.
300:,
262:,
209:,
1227:.
1203:|
1147:·
1142:(
1110:(
1095:(
1046:ɱ
1007:(
992:(
972:.
962:.
854:)
850:(
797:.
775:.
764::
756::
733:.
706::
700:2
679:.
654:.
643::
637:1
619:.
608::
602:7
573:.
455:'
239:(
196:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
