110:
130:
174:
307:
90:
120:
36:
140:
100:
465:
150:
103:
641:
In one poll, there was no opposition, but just before the final conclusion and the formal consensus was reached, one of the agreeing voters crossed out his vote and registered a dissenting vote. He was asked: Now that you have broken the consensus, at least explain why you changed your mind? - The
528:
While I'm responsible for the
Gallery in my user space and "authored" it, I did not have anything to do with this Signpost page. I think it was a bit much, to put it mildly: a section or two with some commentary about why Bri thought it was worthy of Signpost inclusion would have been more
402:
496:
The signature gallery project probably self-taught me as much about html markup and wikipedia editing details as any article I wrote. I started it on my talk page, of all places, trying the patience of some experienced editors at the time
587:. We shouldn't create a fancy gallery for these. Furthermore, I dislike the idea of adding fancy colors and HTML tags to a signature. If someone has something important to say, the arguments should stand out, not the signature.
143:
251:
239:
113:
275:
227:
215:
263:
153:
133:
439:
This piece was a neat idea; the signatures we see communicate individuality that make us real people, not just machines. I will point out that my favorite signature has always been
76:
621:
356:
386:
366:
346:
576:
351:
331:
186:
651:
557:
540:
376:
636:
596:
361:
336:
70:
123:
417:
324:
458:
665:
440:
484:
341:
318:
182:
55:
44:
517:
294:
285:
547:
391:
381:
716:
647:
642:
user honestly replied: Honestly, I did not change my mind, I just changed my signature and could not find another place to try it!
602:
21:
692:
422:
406:
643:
687:
682:
567:
While all of these signatures are lovely, I've always been a fan for the good ole classic default one. Can't beat a classic.
429:
498:
677:
93:
629:
672:
306:
49:
35:
17:
612:
605:, at the time, mine was suggestion number 5. I'm not sure where that would fit in the article above.
451:
584:
628:
Side point, but if you're a killjoy like me who prefers not to see custom signatures, there is:
607:
572:
197:
250:
698:
238:
8:
554:
537:
514:
445:
592:
274:
226:
245:
568:
413:
214:
262:
233:
30:
Signed with pride: A gallery of user signatures created by
Wikipedians themselves.
474:
Golly, this year has started off with a bang for my
Knowledge Signature Gallery!
551:
534:
511:
190:
710:
633:
588:
269:
221:
529:
interesting. But this is
Knowledge, where the editing never stops: hey,
173:
487:) and now this month somebody copied nearly the whole darned thing?!?
510:
What the heck, anyway, here's another doozy, what's not to love? –
530:
464:
163:
546:"By Athaenara" in the byline really bothered me, so I removed it (
209:
632:
which transforms everything to a uniform style when you view. --
601:
That reminds me, It is now almost ten years since we have had a
257:
583:
Anyone "flying" an image (not emoji) flag is violating
427:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
708:
485:The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages
161:
483:First a mention in last month's Signpost (
200:. Here it is – reformatted slightly for
533:, it's not to late to pare it down! –
430:
14:
709:
54:
29:
717:Knowledge Signpost archives 2019-02
27:
463:
305:
273:
261:
249:
237:
225:
213:
172:
56:
34:
28:
728:
664:is written by editors like you –
412:These comments are automatically
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
499:first six sigs in November 2006
423:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
597:19:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
577:17:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
518:13:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
459:11:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
398:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
585:Knowledge:Signatures#Images
10:
733:
204:– for readers' enjoyment.
637:09:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
622:23:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
603:Request for signatureship
558:23:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
541:05:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
652:11:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
468:
420:. To follow comments,
310:
278:
266:
254:
246:Wingdings and dingbats
242:
230:
218:
177:
39:
467:
309:
277:
265:
253:
241:
229:
217:
176:
38:
416:from this article's
234:Playing out the line
181:The January issue's
469:
407:Discuss this story
357:Arbitration report
311:
279:
267:
255:
243:
231:
219:
178:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
560:
431:purging the cache
387:From the archives
367:Technology report
347:Discussion report
198:signature gallery
187:DiplomatTesterMan
71:Signed with pride
50:View Latest Issue
724:
701:
619:
615:
610:
545:
457:
454:
448:
434:
432:
426:
405:
352:Featured content
332:From the editors
329:
321:
319:28 February 2019
314:
297:
289:
270:Infinite variety
222:Flying the flags
195:
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
57:28 February 2019
732:
731:
727:
726:
725:
723:
722:
721:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
697:
695:
690:
685:
680:
675:
668:
658:
657:
617:
613:
608:
452:
446:
444:
436:
428:
421:
410:
409:
403:+ Add a comment
401:
397:
396:
395:
377:Recent research
322:
317:
315:
312:
301:
300:
295:
292:
287:
281:
280:
272:
260:
248:
236:
224:
212:
206:
193:
179:
168:
167:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
730:
720:
719:
696:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
670:
669:
660:
659:
656:
655:
654:
639:
625:
624:
599:
580:
579:
564:
563:
562:
561:
543:
523:
522:
521:
520:
505:
504:
503:
502:
491:
490:
489:
488:
478:
477:
476:
475:
462:
461:
447:Chris Troutman
411:
408:
400:
399:
394:
389:
384:
379:
374:
369:
364:
362:Traffic report
359:
354:
349:
344:
339:
337:News and notes
334:
328:
316:
304:
303:
302:
293:
284:
283:
282:
271:
268:
259:
256:
247:
244:
235:
232:
223:
220:
211:
208:
207:
171:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
729:
718:
715:
714:
712:
700:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
667:
663:
653:
649:
645:
644:Arbabi second
640:
638:
635:
631:
627:
626:
623:
620:
616:
611:
604:
600:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
559:
556:
553:
549:
544:
542:
539:
536:
532:
527:
526:
525:
524:
519:
516:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
500:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:
472:
471:
470:
466:
460:
455:
449:
442:
438:
437:
433:
424:
419:
415:
404:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
326:
320:
313:In this issue
308:
299:
291:
276:
264:
252:
240:
228:
216:
205:
203:
199:
192:
188:
184:
175:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
662:The Signpost
661:
606:
569:TonyBallioni
371:
325:all comments
210:Boxing it up
202:The Signpost
201:
180:
94:PDF download
699:Suggestions
630:this script
414:transcluded
298:"Gallery" →
258:Upside down
144:X (Twitter)
589:~ ToBeFree
441:Chrissymad
189:mentioned
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2019-02-28
693:Subscribe
552:Athaenara
535:Athaenara
512:Athaenara
418:talk page
290:"Gallery"
191:Athaenara
185:piece by
711:Category
688:Newsroom
683:Archives
666:join in!
634:LukeSurl
618:Chequers
342:In focus
288:Previous
183:In focus
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
372:Gallery
68:Gallery
550:). –
392:Humour
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
678:About
614:Spiel
382:Essay
16:<
673:Home
648:talk
609:Ϣere
593:talk
573:talk
548:diff
453:talk
443:'s.
296:Next
531:Bri
164:Bri
162:By
79:—
713::
650:)
595:)
575:)
555:✉
538:✉
515:✉
501:).
286:←
196:s
646:(
591:(
571:(
497:(
456:)
450:(
435:.
425:.
327:)
323:(
194:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
