516:
109:
99:
33:
119:
79:
477:), only the first proposal (the "Scrabble tile" logo) has been implemented at all. The English Wiktionary, along with some of the other language projects, has retained the original logo. Several users have expressed reservations about that logo, since it poses significant translation and standardization issues. The "Scrabble tile" logo has been adopted by a number of Wiktionary projects, including
129:
89:
317:, most AfDs on such articles are closed with a "keep" result, since they are about populated places. Many users have expressed reservations on the talk page that the proposal would cause many articles on places from small towns in rural England to large cities in Africa to be deleted, due to a lack of secondary sources. Consensus is currently against making this a guideline.
335:
account. Opponents to the proposal have stated that there is no way to determine if a username is actually random, or if it means something to the person who registered it. Supporters have said that disallowing random usernames would reduce confusion (resulting from dealing with two users named "klfasdj" and "klfsadj", for example) and vandalism from one-off accounts.
234:, the process' main proponent, "MRfD is a process that is concerned primarily with content, not subjects, and it seeks to preserve valuable content in a way that improves the quality and depth of Knowledge." MRfD aims to centralize merge discussions so that they can receive wider community input. Opponents have noted that
334:
has suggested that user names consisting of random strings of characters should be blocked on sight. The ensuing discussion centered around the question of how random a name must be to be blocked, the potential loss of good contributors, and the probability that a random account is a throwaway vandal
256:
led to the deprecation of date linking, but several editors later expressed concerns that it did not reflect wider community consensus. The current poll has several options, including whether to use autoformatting, whether months/days/years should be linked (and if so, if they should only be linked
402:
as they inherently reflect a particular point of view. Some users have expressed the viewpoint that the aforementioned words can be used as "straightforward descriptive terms" in certain cases, such as if an event has been characterized in the media as a "terrorist attack". Others have stated that
283:
should be able to be granted and revoked manually (by admins). The status would still be conferred automatically at 10 edits and 4 days, but admins would be given the capability to grant it early. This would decrease certain types of vandalism while allowing certain users who need autoconfirmed
586:
284:
status early to be given it. This would require making "autoconfirmed" an explicit usergroup in MediaWiki. Most users who have commented are in favor of allowing autoconfirmed status to be removed and reinstated, while maintaining the automatic granting that is currently in place.
82:
102:
195:
moved the page back to its original title later that day. The discussion is mostly concerned with whether "speedy" has connotations of "quickly" or "instantly" deleting an article with no application of common sense, and if "summary" brings up
368:. Most users commenting in the discussion have expressed the opinion that transclusion should still be disallowed due to increased server load and the possibility of vandalism, but there are differing opinions on allowing substitution.
312:
a guideline. The proposed guideline, as it stands, would govern the inclusion criteria for small villages and hamlets. According to current practices, articles about small villages and other settlements are allowed, and according to
122:
341:
92:
132:
533:
253:
433:
should be made a guideline. Little discussion has taken place at the latter RfC, but the former is focusing on how much weight a criticism section or article can be given without violating the guidelines on
297:
230:, discussions about whether to merge article content are generally pointed at the article's talk page, where it can take months (and, in extreme cases, years) to effect a merge. According to
352:
asked for confirmation that the policy of disallowing the use of templates in signatures should continue to exist. Transcluding a template in one's signature has been prohibited since
65:
601:
184:
208:"brings up an image of a posse in the old west, hanging a suspect without any evidence of guilt." Other words to be used in place of "speedy" are currently being discussed.
565:
575:
112:
570:
503:
494:
149:
356:, but substitution has been allowed (if generally discouraged, since substitution has historically been used to circumvent the 255-character limit on signatures in
540:
550:
545:
409:
555:
148:
The following is a brief overview of new discussions taking place on the
English Knowledge. For older, yet possibly active, discussions please see our
630:
462:
527:
214:
331:
323:
164:
59:
383:
268:
683:
606:
374:
257:
on first occurrence), and if the Manual of Style should provide any guidance on the matter at all. It is scheduled to run for two weeks.
244:
466:
613:
461:
was conducted to create a new logo for the
Wiktionary projects. While there was a good deal of support for four of the proposals (
309:
180:
21:
658:
176:
435:
653:
648:
458:
426:
643:
365:
223:
156:
227:
470:
353:
289:
155:
474:
252:
A poll was started on March 30 regarding linking dates and the use of autoformatting for logged-in users. A
638:
515:
449:
41:
32:
17:
288:
590:
482:
235:
478:
280:
238:
already exists and is underutilized, and that an additional process may not yield better results.
192:
442:
422:
222:
It has been proposed that a separate process should be created to discuss article mergers, at
187:
that had a rough consensus to rename the speedy deletion process. Some users objected to the
425:) and some have previously survived attempts to delete them. Another RfC has been opened at
664:
417:
Editors are seeking consensus on whether or not "Criticism of..." articles are appropriate
8:
430:
357:
597:
314:
142:
349:
261:
231:
201:
172:
197:
418:
305:
188:
677:
276:
191:
renaming and suggested that further discussion should take place, and
390:. Currently, the guideline strongly discourages the use of the words
361:
269:
Proposal to allow autoconfirmation to be manually granted and revoked
403:
there are other ways to word such events that are less inflammatory.
421:
for article content. Several of these articles exist (for example,
298:
RfC on making
Knowledge:Notability (populated places) a guideline
386:
to state that there are some appropriate usages of the word
360:). The current wording of the guideline was introduced by
485:. Currently, no consensus exists on any of the proposals.
165:
Proposed move of
Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
215:
Proposed creation of
Knowledge:Mergers for discussion
611:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
60:Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
675:
410:RfC on the appropriateness of criticism articles
450:Refreshing and standardizing Wiktionary's logo
382:An RfC has been started on whether to reword
140:
375:RfC on changing the wording of WP:TERRORIST
614:
342:RfC on allowing templates in signatures
181:Knowledge:Criteria for summary deletion
14:
676:
177:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
684:Knowledge Signpost archives 2009-03
27:
514:
31:
28:
695:
596:These comments are automatically
324:RfC on blocking random usernames
245:Date formatting and linking poll
224:Knowledge:Mergers for discussion
127:
117:
107:
97:
87:
77:
631:putting together the next issue
607:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
429:in an attempt to find out if
310:Notability (populated places)
582:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
700:
236:Knowledge:Proposed merges
427:Knowledge talk:Criticism
384:Knowledge:Words to avoid
157:Centralized discussions
604:. To follow comments,
519:
423:Criticism of Microsoft
183:on March 27, citing a
36:
518:
507:"Discussion report" →
228:Articles for deletion
35:
600:from this article's
308:has proposed making
290:Requests for comment
281:autoconfirmed status
204:noted that the word
566:Features and admins
499:"Discussion report"
431:Knowledge:Criticism
358:Special:Preferences
279:has suggested that
254:poll in August 2008
185:previous discussion
591:Discuss this story
576:Arbitration report
520:
193:Ryan Postlethwaite
37:
615:purging the cache
571:Technology report
561:Discussion report
366:February 18, 2009
57:Discussion report
46:Discussion report
691:
667:
629:needs your help
618:
616:
610:
589:
538:
530:
523:
506:
498:
150:previous edition
145:
131:
130:
121:
120:
111:
110:
101:
100:
91:
90:
81:
80:
48:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
663:
661:
656:
651:
646:
641:
634:
623:
622:
620:
612:
605:
594:
593:
587:+ Add a comment
585:
581:
580:
579:
541:From the editor
531:
526:
524:
521:
510:
509:
504:
501:
496:
445:
443:Sister projects
400:freedom fighter
293:
264:
198:summary justice
160:
146:
139:
138:
137:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
78:
72:
69:
58:
51:
49:
45:
44:
42:← Current issue
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
697:
687:
686:
662:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
636:
635:
625:
624:
621:
595:
592:
584:
583:
578:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
551:News and notes
548:
546:License update
543:
537:
525:
513:
512:
511:
502:
493:
492:
491:
489:
487:
486:
454:
453:
444:
441:
440:
439:
414:
413:
405:
404:
379:
378:
370:
369:
346:
345:
337:
336:
328:
327:
319:
318:
302:
301:
292:
287:
286:
285:
273:
272:
263:
260:
259:
258:
249:
248:
240:
239:
219:
218:
210:
209:
169:
168:
159:
154:
136:
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
74:
73:
70:
64:
63:
62:
61:
56:
55:
53:
50:
47:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
685:
682:
681:
679:
666:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
632:
628:
617:
608:
603:
599:
588:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
535:
529:
528:30 March 2009
522:In this issue
517:
508:
500:
490:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
452:
451:
447:
446:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
412:
411:
407:
406:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
377:
376:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:February 2005
351:
348:
347:
344:
343:
339:
338:
333:
330:
329:
326:
325:
321:
320:
316:
311:
307:
304:
303:
300:
299:
295:
294:
291:
282:
278:
275:
274:
271:
270:
266:
265:
255:
251:
250:
247:
246:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
217:
216:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
170:
167:
166:
162:
161:
158:
153:
151:
144:
134:
126:
124:
116:
114:
106:
104:
96:
94:
86:
84:
76:
75:
67:
54:
43:
34:
23:
19:
627:The Signpost
626:
560:
534:all comments
488:
448:
436:undue weight
408:
399:
395:
391:
387:
373:
340:
322:
315:Phil Bridger
296:
267:
243:
213:
205:
163:
147:
143:Hermione1980
52:
665:Suggestions
598:transcluded
556:In the news
457:In 2006, a
350:Allstarecho
232:NickPenguin
202:Fabrictramp
173:Happy-melon
71:Share this
66:Contribute
22:2009-03-30
659:Subscribe
602:talk page
396:terrorist
392:extremist
388:terrorist
332:Shawnhath
306:OrangeDog
262:Proposals
678:Category
654:Newsroom
649:Archives
497:Previous
277:Cenarium
113:LinkedIn
93:Facebook
20: |
483:Italian
206:summary
103:Twitter
479:French
175:moved
123:Reddit
83:E-mail
644:About
419:forks
398:, or
226:. At
16:<
639:Home
505:Next
481:and
459:poll
362:xeno
189:bold
133:Digg
364:on
179:to
141:By
68:—
680::
495:←
473:,
469:,
465:,
394:,
200:.
152:.
633:.
619:.
609:.
536:)
532:(
475:4
471:3
467:2
463:1
438:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
