Knowledge:Teahouse

2130:

provided independent, respected sources. Please look at the materials I posted. You seem to be going blindly by very simplistic rules governing what can be written and what is a valid source. But one has to examine each case individually to understand what is going on. Anyone who can read will see that I have presented overwhelming evidence with strong citations showing that the claim that our paper was "discredited" is wrong. Furthermore, the claim that our results are at variance with the results of other studies on passive smoking is also wrong. If editors at Knowledge don't take the time to look at the specific facts of each case, but just go blindly by something sensational and attention-grabbing that has been published, taking it as "the truth," then we are in big trouble. Lots of wrong and distorted things get published. That doesn't mean they are true. This story got published because it made a GOOD STORY. So no one questioned it or looked at all the other relevant evidence.

8127:

radio shows. Those hosts interviewed Alan Watt, which is to say the "covered him", because he is obscure, but worth knowing about. It seems he worked to not be part of mainstream society, such as Knowledge. Now that he died of a heart attack in 2021. His wife is thinking whether she wants to have Knowledge have a page about her deceased husband or not. If she tells me she does. I want to be ready to write it. I never met Alan Watt in person. I only emailed him a few times. I bought two of his books. And I am in email contact with his wife, Melissa. I thank you for, and agree with, your advice to, "Write it forward" (not "BACKWARD"), meaning after finding reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him. He was well known in certain underground Internet networks or large groups. In 2006, Alex Jones interviewed him on PrisonPlanet.com and Infowars.com. I look forward to reading your kind reply. Thanks, Charles (Writing is easy)

8829:. This is probably something you should discuss on the article's talk page. The editor who reverted you has provided a quote from the source in support of the content they restored. The source might be wrong, but that's something to at least first try to resolve through article talk page discussion. Finally, it might be a good idea to consider the reversion of your edit as having been made in good faith, and refrain from referring to the content in question as a "lie". It's not uncommon for reliable sources to provide conflicting information on the same subject. Whether that's the case here is something to figure out through talk page discussion. Using the word "lie" runs the risk of starting the discussion off on the wrong foot and creating an atmosphere not conducive to friendly discussion. -- 1040:. I then read that article and the notion that its "link density" is too low is simply ludicrous. There are plenty of wikilinks in that article. There must be something seriously wrong with your algorithm. I noticed also that some of the other articles near that article on your list are bibliographies. As long as Knowledge allows bibliography articles to contain works that are not themselves the subject of Knowledge articles, then of course bibliographies of prolific authors will have relatively few wikilinks. That's another problem. So, I am sorry to say this, but I think that you have not yet demonstrated that this "link density" concept is useful for improving the encyclopedia. 1292:: While I have no doubt that you are right, the opening of the gender bias article accidentally highlights a fallacy that can sometimes justly discredit arguments it is intended to support. Disparity and bias are not reliably connected to each other, and neither of them can be used to gauge the other. It's easy to think of situations where disparity can persist despite lack of bias, and easy to see bias occurring despite parity, because they are not in a simple cause-and-effect relationship. Parity cannot just be assumed to be a natural or correct state. Certainly there are situations in which parity is good or expected or desirable, but it is not a universal default. 10170:, oh, I just identified the typo. It really did exist. I must have gotten confused because the introduction of the article repeatedly used "He" to refer to Jiankui, and I mixed it up with an incorrectly capitalized personal pronoun ("He" instead of "he"), which led me to think there had been some recent vandalism. It's a misunderstanding I created, but I want to make it clear that it's just an isolated case that I never imagined was still causing issues for another editor. I sincerely apologize and would like to mention this is unrelated to the de Quintal case, which was even blocked here on Knowledge. Best regards, 5502:: I get it, but to fix this the way you want to fix it you're going to have to travel backwards in time and convince long-dead government officials and bureaucrats to un-write their census categories. We aren't free to decide to give false reports of what it said back then; the census stuff is history, and we can't do present-day politics to it. Real people had to answer that question even though it wasn't a good question, and we can't suddenly claim they were answering a different question. They might have answered differently if the question had been better. 2388:, Ebay isn't a reliable source for WP, but I was able to find a review of your first book and have added the book to your page. Thanks for the heads up re: the typo, which I've fixed. I didn't add a line about the Ungar and Bray article but did add it as a reference. Perhaps some subsequent editor will choose to add some text about it. Due to my lack of an appropriate background, I'm not in a position to assess whether the additional Enstrom & Kabat letter does respond to the "comparison group" isssue, so I haven't added it. Take care, 1604:, thank you for your work. The matter of selecting appropriate categories tends to be hard for new editors, a lot easier with even a little experience. Dialogue in writing is a somewhat abstract subject, which will make category selection a lot harder than if the article were instead something "concrete" (?), like a model of car, a painting, or baseball player. I suggest that you skip categorization for this article, practise it on another, and then perhaps return to this article in order to categorize it. -- 2296:

info about the person him/herself, but not to introduce claims about other people (e.g., not about people who criticized the BMJ article). I'll try to doublecheck that, but it may take a bit before I get an answer. Is there something about yourself that you'd like sourced to the Quillette article? I haven't yet thought about how to introduce a line about the Unger and Bray article. Re: the study you mentioned, I don't think that your upcoming Quillette article is an acceptable source for medical info, per

6434:

as fact is that that person wrote that. One of my battles may be that issue; I have letters written by presidents, governors, senators and superintendents etc. that I use as sources, not so much as that what they said is true but that they said it. Then you may say that sounds like original research, but if it can be backed up by published means it simply adds interest to the article. I have seen examples of letters in Wikip. articles, entered with apparent impunity. Another interesting discussion.

10153:, in the specific case linked, I may have made a mistake due to the language barrier, as I am not a native English speaker. It seemed to me that the summary was misleading because I am unable to identify the typo in the previous text. Could it be a case of preferring the surname over the first name? And I don't receive pings because I disabled them in the settings. But even so, you didn't ping me. You could have reached out to me on my talk page, but you didn't. That makes it complicated... 6317:. So, if the edits you made as seen by others as being in accordanc with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines, they will likely stand the test of time or be used by others as a foundtion for further improving the article. If, on the other hand, others find them to be lacking in some way, they might be reverted (entirely or partially) or otherwise corrected. This is essentially what you're agreeing to everytime you click the "Publish changes" button and acknowledge your acceptance of 8533:, if a living person who is the subject of a Knowledge article writes a reliably published article or book, then there are absolutely no restrictions on use of that reliable non-SPS source, other than normal editorial judgment and our content policies. If a Knowledge article about such a person includes properly cited criticism of them or their work, then, of course, their reliably published rebuttal should be included and summarized with a comparable level of detail as the criticism. 3286:. Once your draft is ready for review, an experienced editor will look it over/give you feedback. Happy volunteering! Welcome to the Teahouse! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Knowledge works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read 841:: you should not just be blindly tagging articles based on the output of a script. The fact that an article is in the lowest 0.5% for link density is not sufficient information to judge whether or not it is underlinked to the point of needing a cleanup tag. It would be much more useful for you to find one article which you think on your own judgement is underlinked, and then add some needed links, than it is for you to blindly tag any number of articles. 39: 12858: 6564: 644: 1296:

the world", Knowledge would be wrong (by its own philosophy) to try to create a false parity inside the encyclopedia. To put it another way, the advice given here in the Teahouse to COI editors, that nothing is admissible without reliable third-party sources, is going to also skew the overall result, because we already know who used to own and operate nearly all the reliable sources (and I'm sure still controls far more than a parity share of them).

12902:; these other articles(what you term "pages") could also be inappropriate and just not yet addressed by a volunteer. We cannot invent sources that do not exist- if government censorship prevents their from being sources, we can do nothing about that- you would need to pressure the UAE to allow a free press/free speech(yes, I know that's not an easy task). You have submitted the draft for review, a volunteer will eventually review it. 8582: 2817: 32: 10877:. I see there that you have had a response, asking you to be clearer and more specific in what edit you seek to have made and why. But you have not responded yet. Please do so there, as the Teahouse is not the place where we intervene in content discussions such as this; instead we advise and help people who need to know more about the practicalities of the editing process. I hope you can achieve the outcome you seek. Regards, 12833:. The plot summary of an a acclaimed film that won many Oscars should be written in the same emotionless "just the facts" style as the plot summary of a clunker that flopped at the box office and was panned by the critics. Concentrate only on the plot when writing plot summaries and ignore reception by fans and critics in that particular section. There are other sections of the article that discuss reception and acclaim. 2094:

scientific papers). SOMEONE AT WIKIPEDIA NEEDS TO TAKE A CAREFUL LOOK AT THIS, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, AND OUTLINE THE STEPS TO CORRECT THIS ARTICLE. Can you please bring this to the attention of those at Knowledge who are in a position to rectify a violation of Knowledge's own rules/principles? The careful case that I have built should be taken seriously by Knowledge. Editors could learn a lot from this incident.

4468:: I think what you're asking for is your User Sandbox. You can paste the German material in there and work on your English version; feel free to make a complete mess, because sandboxes cannot be found through a normal Knowledge search. (But never place anyone's sensitive personal information in there, nor any personal attacks or potential copyright violations, because the sandbox does belong to Knowledge.) 12409:, in my view. My personal metric is the reading level of a high school senior getting better than average grades. But this "reading level" issue is topic specific. Except for the opening sentence or two, we should not expect the same reading level in an article about a pop culture topic as in articles about advanced topics in subatomic physics, biochemistry or advanced mathematics. To name a few. 12981:. Let's suppose for a moment that there are no copyright concerns (and for reasons other than freedom of panorama). We could infer that your picture of Kenny from South Park would also raise no copyright concerns. Then a question would be: Does en:Knowledge want comic characters to be illustrated by people's imitations of authentic representations of those characters? (I have no idea.) -- 1952:. Please don't make essentially the same request simultaneously, though, on multiple noticeboards because this will just make things confusing and might lead some to believe that you're forum shopping. Read the description for each noticeboard given at the top of its page and decide which one best deals with the problems you're having. In addition, please remember that all Wikipedians are 12930:, that makes experienced Knowledge editors immediately concerned. A Knowledge account is for one person and one person only, and team use of a Knowledge account is forbidden. It could possibly be acceptable if every person on the team had their own separate Knowledge account and openly disclosed their membership in that team. I see no other team accounts editing that draft. And your 7748:

parents". In a sense, it's too easily believable. Why "proud"? A significant and regrettable minority of parents aren't proud of their kids; but can't we assume that, unless we have evidence to the contrary, parents are proud of them? (It looks to me as if "proud" was added for politeness' sake or similar.) Another point: you have external links in the body text, for example

86: 2730:? If you're asking whether it's okay to change links when using the visual editor, the answer is yes. Some editors might find it annoying if the wiki markup isn't perfect because of the use of the visual editor, but the end visual result is the same.After reading the next section, I will say that the above generally applies to wikilinks within Knowledge; 12454:, if the reading level of our articles about our most searched topics was too high, then social media would be flooded with complaints like "Wows thet weekipoudua article were 2 kompleekated!!!", and yet for years, we remain the #7 website in traffic and #1 by far in originally written educational content. We have ten plus billion pageviews each month. 7448:

im trying to hint at? It just doesn't make sense .this website is to display the truth but if your stopping me from telling the truth because i didnt waste another 2 to 10 minutes looking for sources to back the truth up, it just doesn't make sense. Its like they expect us to pull out a sheet of sources out of our bums as if we are a real life Google.

13124:), but even after acceptance, articles are subject to perpetual further improvement, and anyone who reads and edits Knowledge (and about 100,000 different individuals edit every month) can both point out an article's deficiencies and/or actively edit it to improve it. Hope this sheds some light. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2292:, first an FYI: when you write a reply, if you click on the figure with the "+" sign next to it that appears above the reply box, that allows you to add the name of a participant in the discussion in a way that the person is notified that you've mentioned them. I happened to check back here; otherwise I wouldn't have known about your reply. 8315:

of topics. But we have articles citing significant coverage in minor news outlets with a political bias (bias doesn't mean unreliable), in niche trade publications, in gaming websites, in academic books, in low-circulation scholarly journals, and other things that aren't considered mainstream; just look at the list of reliable sources in

8933:(see "i"). This way, we demonstrate to the reader that various sources themselves are in conflict about the fact, without us having to do any more than simply point this out. With this in mind, I will now continue this discussion at the article's talk page later today, and I invite you to join me in this constructive effort. Thank you. 892:

some other attention, just tag with the other relevant maintenance tags so it gets to the right editors. (Well, hopefully.) By the way, if you find articles that aren't in any wikiprojects, that's often a reason for them being unattended, and adding the relevant wikiprojects can help sort them into the right maintenance queues. --

10533:

up being banned for two weeks because i pointed out a sock puppet. This same approach of reverting and issuing threats seem to come from accounts that have been in existence for a while but have spurts of activity that seem to concentrate on reverting IP edits. Glad someone with some authority was able to take care of the culprit.

1380:, regardless of the obvious disparity among especially the sources further back in history. For centuries, it seems clear that historians intentionally avoided mentioning most of the notable women. And those women are now literally no longer notable, because there's no documentation. For the historic notable women who 9919:

and Wikimedia Commons and Portuguese Knowledge are three separate projects with separate policies and guidelines. Let me advise you that it is a very bad idea to bring disputes and grudges from other projects and in other languages to the English Knowledge and I encourage you to be very cautious in the future.

9864:(ANI), which is the direction where this discussion seems to be heading after the last couple of posts. Those involved in this disagreement can seek further assistance at ANI if they want, but I strongly suggest they carefully read through the instructions given at the top of the ANI page as well as perhaps 10532:

I knew that first edit they reverted as it added up to the same characteristics that i have encountered recently while editing where things such as spelling s were corrected then reverted with threats of blocking if such vandalism continued. What i was concerned with was last time it happened I ended

8843:

Thanks for yours. There is confusion that needs to be cleared up. This has nothing to do with two sources disagreeing with each other. It’s about correctly interpreting what a source says. The quotation from Nolan does not establish that Richard Rodgers went to Stockton. I have posted my reasoning on

8205:

I don't see a way to present some independent source as VALIDATING Alan Watt and his research findings. I see that his might be a similar situation as Galileo's who discovered some shocking facts, but the establishment put him under house arrest. The only light at the end of this tunnel we seem to be

7570:

policy is rubbish, you are welcome to go to the policy talk page and gain consensus for eliminating it. The policies on Knowledge weren't made up one day out of thin air, but evolved over many years through community discussion. In all due respect, if you cannot be bothered to learn the basics of how

6335:

I'm not aware of 'locked' and I don't think I would approve of that. My background is science and peer review is the only way to arrive at 'truth', if there is such a thing, or at least as close as we can get. If someone can 'revert' a page for bureaucratic reasons without giving the author a chance

5638:

I don't say it's better, I say we have no choice. We must use the old wording for the old stuff and the new wording for the new stuff. We have no right to "fix" the categories to make them say what we'd like them to say, or for convenience or whatever. All we can do is faithfully report what's really

2478:

That's essentially it, yes. When a person deals with issues in a clearly straightforward and honest way, not giving the appearance of trying to put one over on anybody or "game the system" or anything like that, their path here tends to be much smoother and more successful. If a person's actions seem

800:

while yes I agree the case of Fresnel's article is already pretty well linked, it nonetheless showed up as among some of the lowest that my script has found(in the lowest 5k out of the ~million pages scanned so far), I will note that there are a number of references to "biaxial" of various nature, of

338:

images for living people, so Colin's option 2 is not possible. If you have a good relationship with the individuals and already have permission from them to upload to Commons, you can do that on their behalf and then ask that they email the volunteers at Commons to confirm you have been authorised to

12976:

their own work.) "Common sense" may say that we don't have to worry about such niceties because the photo's hosting at Commons (and its use in articles) demonstrates that its copyright status is OK. Wrong, as files hosted by Commons are often removed because of belatedly realized copyright problems.

12058:

If I say "Einstein was important in his field of study", but Knowledge doesn't believe me, I can show articles in major newspapers saying stuff like "Einstein is one of the major scientists of the 20th century", I can show a lot of books about Einstein's work written by people who never met him, ...

11609:

to AfC rather than move it to mainspace. The AfC backlog is not a queue, so it may be reviewed sooner than your think. If to mainspace, in time the New Pages Patrol could move it back to draft. Also either remove or fill in the now-blank sections. What you have is typical for diseases, but there may

11190:

for new editors looking for a satisfying and meaningful task that doesn't take any extra skills. You don't (or shouldn't) need to do any research to fix these articles - most of them are here because they are tagged with "lead too short". Find one of those, read the article, then rewrite the lead so

10262:

when learning to edit here. So the choice is yours. If, despite Previewing your edit, if you make a mess of an edit, you can always click the 'View History' tab straight afterwards to see that latest addition at the top of the list of edits, and then simply click the 'undo' button to revert it back

9918:

which was deleted on 10 September, that was Portuguese language content harshly criticizing other editors. We do not host extended content in other languages anywhere on the English language Knowledge and we do not host "enemies lists" on the English Knowledge. Please be aware that English Knowledge

9668:

Hello, Theairportmant33531, and welcome to the Teahouse. Column sizes in tables are almost always calculated by the browser you are using, according to the width of the window, and the length of the cell contents in the column. While they can be controlled to some extent, this is usually a bad idea,

8738:

page, but it was met with resistance by two editors. The advice I was given then was to have more info about issues that were not just one school, so I revised for that with the Boston Globe article that I believe led to the sense it was one big section with no structure. I am a former journalist so

8265:

Thinking about the coverage requirement, I wonder if it really means that in order for Knowledge to display any statement, some major mainstream media outlet has had to have covered it. And that reminds me of a quote I read on the window of the Brooklyn College Library around 2007. It said something

8189:

I agree that Knowledge is not and should never start being a "memorial site". It is an excellent and unique encyclopedia. "Getting the word out" is an interesting idea. I do want to make Knowledge's users and Internet searchers aware of his research findings. That is why I am interesed in creating a

7447:

Yeah but i just read wiki there's no other sources. And in all due respect, that policy is flipping rubbish. I mean, an AI, that knows everything in the world as it gets updated every hour, tried to edit wikipedia with out citing sources, you lots would still make it not to be put on there. See what

6277:

IDU - there is no reason I can see that edits cannot be fixed. To me a reversion is a 'start from scratch'. I have already been thru' that phase. Now I would much prefer something more productive, like '3rd paragraph needs more citations' or 'citation #19 doesn't work'. We should be here to help

6086:

and edit. If you have any questions and would like to seek help, you could ask anyone that you think is interested or maybe come here to the Teahouse for specific editing questions. Usually, if someone thinks your edit is not constructive or appropriate they will revert and leave a useful message on

5730:

Chasing down sources is kinda fun to be honest. You find yourself diving through all sorts of rabbit holes, but the most important thing I've recognized as a new editor is to find your limit. If research on a specific claim is taking too long, then I think it's best for me to leave a and flag it on

5601:

Since the term "Asian and Pacific Islander" was retired after 2000, I think one solution would be to only show census data from 2000 onward to avoid this predicament. Or, another answer would be to use the term "Asian", but include a footnote saying "Included Pacific Islanders until 2000". Are these

2249:

The second one will come out this week. This second article reports on a new study from the American Cancer Society analyzing the contribution of a wide range of exposures to cancer incidence and showing that smoking is, by far, the most important risk factor for cancer, and that passive smoking had

2193:

This is enormously helpful. Not only did the BMJ NOT retract the study. The Editor-in-chief and a second editor defended publication of the paper. I have cited their responses in the journal. Ungar and Bray is DEFINITELY relevant. Here is an article published by me, giving a lot of information about

2178:

that criticizes some of Knowledge's policies and notes that expert opinion doesn't always meet the reliable sources rule. That said, the page should point out that the BMJ did not retract the study. The Ungar and Bray article may also have some relevant contents. I have no expertise in this area, so

2093:

I don't think it's appropriate for you to suggest that Knowledge can avoid taking responsibility for this wholesale distortion. I've put in hours of work to explain where the error lies. I've provided credible documentation from respected sources (editors at the British Medical Journal and published

964:

during my 48-hour block, with 5000 pages created from 2005 or before with the lowest "link density", since my personal judgement seems to be in conflict with best practice, so I've taken to documenting my opinions/reviews of these pages, I was waiting till I had made more progress on the matter, but

13752:

Hi IP, this is pretty good writing advice, but Knowledge isn't really a place to discuss writing advice. Though you will find that there are many essays about writing, hiding in the User: and Knowledge: sections of the project. If you decide to stick around and make an account, you may want to make

13623:

That maintenance message or 'tag' has not simply 'popped up'. It was placed by another editor some months ago. As these other helpers have explained, the tag is asking editors to help improve the article by supplying additional references - it currently has a lot of material without footnotes - and

11914:

Thank you for the thoughtful responses and your input about the deletion process. I will stay out of the deletion discussion. I see that there are suddenly a lot of links being shared on my article’s Talk page, more than I can keep up with and many seem insubstantial or don’t even mention me. Under

11590:

mostly an accident, since I just couldn't find all that many sources on it, which is to be expected. Though, before I found some of the other sources, I did add verywellhealth.com for a bit but quickly realized its blocked and considered unreliable, or at least inconsistent. Wouldn't be a good look

9494:

Sometimes administrators need to judge a sort of "wikiscore", and it's hard. Occasionally we need to answer the question "is this editor a net positive or net negative for the Knowledge project?" If negative, then we block the editor, which is difficult to do when the editor is trying to contribute

9337:

If you are referring to the + or - number that displays in the article's History, that is nothing to do with whether an edit is "good" or "bad". It just shows how the SIZE of the article changed: longer or shorter. (If that is not what you meant, then can you please provide a bit more information

8314:

There is no requirement that a media outlet be major or mainstream. We require only that it has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, and is independent of the subject it's covering. A media outlet often becomes "mainstream" by virtue of gaining public trust in its coverage of a wide variety

8269:

And all that makes me wonder if some people are being narrow-minded and afraid of new views. Somebody has to be first. It also resembles a Catch-22 situation. It's "almost" like saying: "Hey, we invented the airplane!" And "The New York Times" or "Knowledge's" editors saying, sorry, no major media

8234:

Until you can grasp what "notability" actually means in the context of Knowledge, I do not see a way forward. Please read the pages I lined to earlier if you haven't yet. Notability doesn't mean importance, it doesn't mean value, it doesn't mean validation. It means significant coverage by reliable

7276:

In such a situation (editors being difficult about things that are frankly not important), it's often better to give up for a few months and hope they go away. It's also important in such cases to discuss things on the Talk page, partly because if you end up needing to make a formal complaint, your

6433:

Another interesting issue is the validity of letters as source material. It is frequently stated here that a letter doesn't establish the validity of a statement. True, but if the validity of the letter can be established, like signature or statement of an authority, then what can be established

4632:

isn't obviously impressive. Which would you say are the best three sources about Wiest or her work? Each must treat her or her work in depth, be independent of her -- be disinterested (not one of her publishers) and not based on interviews -- and be independent of each other. The sources don't have

2129:

It doesn't make any sense that editors at Knowledge can be taken in by a politically-motivated hit job against two well-established scientists and publish a totally one-sided and distorted account. And now you tell that there is nothing anyone at Knowledge can do to correct this situation. I have

1299:

Knowledge has essentially committed itself to do no more than hold up a mirror, and has explicitly written non-activism into its most fundamental rules. Aiming for gender parity among the articles on Knowledge falls VERY squarely under the Knowledge prohibition against "righting great wrongs"; it's

891:

get some more attention to the overlooked parts of the article like this, but mostly the editors going through that tag will be looking for easy fixes to do while they dip their toes into wikipedia editing. If your script turns up some article that isn't actually all that underlinked, but could use

10201:

Hello, Historyguy1138. The place to discuss such things is on the Talk page of the article. If there is not much interaction there, there is usually a box at the top of a talk page identifying which WikiProject(s) might be interested in that article - and you can put a note on the talk page of the

8450:

Since you know Knowledge, do you see a way we or I could fulfill that notability requirement? The catch or challenge is that because his research and his conclusions were so esoteric, so different or sometimes opposite the mainstream views, he stayed away from mainstream media. All that presents a

8126:

Good and correct and knowledable advice.I am trying to make people aware of the mountains of data his website makes available. I am endeavoring to, now that he died, having dedicated his life to educating people about the workings of the New World Order. He has been a guest on hundreds of Internet

4125:

The question to be answered is whether the non-free images provides something that can't be represented by a free image. In this case I'd say that the free image currently used on the page represents the subject just as well as the proposed non-free image and so there's no justification to use the

3782:

but the only thing added extra was that section describing his life. After that, nothing on the book changed(except some spelling mistake). The book is about Mizo Ṭawng Upa( roughly translated to Elderly Language, its a bit like idioms and phrases but there is a big difference. They can be somehow

2295:

Re: the substance of what you wrote: I did make a couple of edits to your page, as did someone else, and I also raised a question on the Talk page that might lead to another edit. From what I understand of WP's rules, we can only introduce material written by the subject of a biographical page for

2114:

You have our attention- there is no central authority here to do what you claim- we all do. You've already been told what the next step for you is- get the news to print your claims as a factual report written by an independent reporter supervised and fact checked by an editor in which they state

1295:

I'm not criticizing the thought that parity could be good, I'm criticizing the assumption that bias among Knowledge editors must be what's preventing parity on Knowledge. For example, Knowledge's strict rules on notability mean that we only use outside sources; if there is not parity "out there in

13586:

Knowledge editors with limited experience often decide to show every good thing their subject has ever done, hoping that this will count as "evidence" that the subject should have a Knowledge article. But it doesn't count. Recognition from reliable third-party sources is (nearly) all that counts.

11547:

I can't speak for everyone, but to me, the way you've described your advocacy point of view sounds like it ought to be fine: as long as the article has no elements of advocacy in it, you are who you are. It may be uncomfortable to have to avoid adding things such as advice, treatments that aren't

11139:

Thirdly, even if you can show the novelist meets Knowledge's criterai for notability, writing a new article is a very challenging task for new editors. My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning

9479:

If there was a "wikiscore" that mattered, I think it might somewhat resemble a "signal-to-noise ratio", which might need tricky sabermetrics-style formulas to calculate properly. But unlike in baseball (where "success" is almost exactly equal to "winning games"), relative edit values on Knowledge

5483:

I agree that "Asian" itself is very broad, but why make it even broader and more diverse by dragging another continent into the label? It's simply too broad. Asia is already the largest continent in the world, larger than both Americas combined, and yet the continent has to be made even larger by

5479:

I understand what you're arguing, but saying "Asian and Pacific Islander also wouldn't be accurate for labeling the newer data, since that isn't the term used now. Also, Cleveland's 2020 census reveals that PIs are 0.0% of Cleveland's population, so even if the 1990 numbers are different, I doubt

1516:

When you put a blockquote, you must later put /blockquote to show where that quotation ends. (They both need the angled signs, you'll know what I mean). Also, it appears you may have fixed up the quotation marks by making them curly. Please "un-fix" those by putting the straight ones back again -

287:

So, if your artist is willing to license their work under such a license, then it can be uploaded to Commons. There are three ways they can do this: they can make a public declaration (eg on their website) that it is so licensed; or they can upload the image to Commons themselves, declaring it as

12332:

My opinion: 8th grade level. Not only because our target audience includes 8th-graders, but because many high school graduates read at (what the "experts" call) 8th grade level. Of course there are web-based tools to tell you the reading level for a body of text, so it's not hard to do. It's our

8273:

Also, some scholar said that even if he does not agree with someone's points of view, he supports their right to express them. Is Knowledge a fact source for facts some entities have already arbitrarily, of course, approved? I do also see that not every whimsical idea and viewpoint would work in

7076:

Hello, Handjiski. Please note that Knowledge has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Knowledge is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been

6295:

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "fixed". Are you asking whether mistakes can be "fixed" or whether pages can be "locked"? If you're asking about the former, then for sure mistakes can be corrected as long as doing so is in accordance with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines. If

805:

looks to have a redirect of that name, is not linked on Fresnel's article, and in fact does mention Fresnel in the article itself. I'm not sure where exactly this should/would be reference, but that's one of the reason I added these templates, is that they bring eyes to an issue, the underlinked

12248:

After looking closer at that content, there's enough odd writing and plain inaccuracies to game rules that I started wondering if might have been AI generated. I'm gonna try doing a big rewrite, which will be a big enough edit that I'm intimidated. But I'm sure this essay is going to be a great

11459:

Weeks/months tend to be for articles that are less well written (e.g. missing sections), or for topics no one cares about (random tech investor). The better written an article is, the easier (and more interesting) it is to review. Make sure to tag the talk page with relevant wikiproject banners

7142:

In my opinion, it would be nice to revisit quite often for an event that is very recent, and less often as time passes. But this can cause a problem: at the beginning, many people are passionate about the situation, many are trying to say something, and it's hard for them to stay reasonable and

5126:

Considering the good advice you've already received, it would be nice in your situation if the first few times you remove references you did them one at a time (which makes them easier to undo), and in articles that aren't overwhelmingly complicated. (The part about uncomplicated articles isn't

2148:: The evidence you're trying to give is irrelevant to Knowledge. Knowledge is not a court. There is no one here to plead your case in front of. You're doing the equivalent of trying to sell gloves to a fish. When we see the reporters' explanations in the big newspapers, we will act accordingly. 1384:

documented, good! (Though too many famous historic women were noted at the time merely for being connected with men, which is not as good.) Writers and filmmakers are notorious for neglecting women characters. These omissions were unjust to the point of being ridiculous, yet there's very little

13203:

But "bias" has more than one relevant meaning in this context, those meanings are difficult to untangle, and I think one of the biggest obstacles to dealing effectively with bias on Knowledge is the amount and intensity of hand-waving that ensues when people who are "very certain" of the issue

12569:

in order to be more readable and accurate to the rules of the game, doing my best to keep the discussion and resources here in mind. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to ask for feedback here, but this is the largest edit I've ever made, and with my inexperience I'm worried I may have made some

11007: 10898:

Since the piece you cite from The Hindu is derived from the press release, it is of no value for establishing notability. Knowledge has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Knowledge is almost entirely

6166:

I recall there is a way to see all the edits that have been made to a topic in the previous few months but I can't recall how I got there. And also if there were any reversions/ deletions that were made. Sadly I keep getting to some great new site but then can't recall how I got there. :-{

2342:

I can't tell how much I appreciate your additions, including my third book. I do think you should cite our (Enstrom & Kabat) response to the charge that "there was no comparison group," since that was the first specific criticism made by Michael Thun, and we responded directly to it in our

7511:

You're fully entitled to your opinion, but it's incompatible with Knowledge. So either (A) suppress your opinion and either (i) find and cite good sources or (ii) realize that whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent; or (B) find some other website that's more compatible with your

5429:

to "Asian" without impacting the accuracy of the data represented throughout that entire row.One possible solution would be to add another row for "Pacific Islander" in every table. For the decades that combine the two, you could combine both rows in that column and display a single, combined

1994:

Thanks for this, Marchjuly. I have been very careful to be civil and to try to explain my issue. Could you possibly take a look at the 2 or 3 most recent posts on the "Talk:Geoffrey Kabat" page and suggest what route would be most appropriate for me to take. It's very hard for an outsider to

13647:

Is it true that reference number 1 is a book that he wrote? A book by the subject of the article is generally a poor reference, except in the little parts of the article where that book is being discussed. How would the article be affected if reference number 1 was removed, and replaced with

12145:

The only people who are referring to this event as the "Trump International Golf Club shooting" are the Far Left. Literally every media organization, every federal and state agency, Trump, his political opponents, and even foreign dignitaries have acknowledged it as an assassination attempt.

7747:

I'm not sure that his biography is necessary here. But now (just to look at one area of your draft), there's a one-paragraph biography. It has no references whatever. Why should the reader believe what it says? Well, it does say for example "Miles Anthony Hall was the first born to his proud

7476:

The lead in a Knowledge article is meant be a succinct summary of the content of the article. You added information that was already covered adequately in the following paragraph. It did not need to be mentioned twice. Nor did it need citing, as it was in the lead and thus a summary of cited

11644:

Your best bet it to likely go to the talk page and point out the errors (with sources backing your point, or pointing out how the current refs don't back the claims made in the article), and that things need to be updated. I've removed the InfluenceWatch link as obvious political nonsense.

5758:

to create and submit a draft. Be advised that writing a new article is the most difficult task to attempt on Knowledge, and it is highly recommended that you first gain experience and knowledge by spending much time editing existing articles in areas that interest you, as well as using the

2890:

Thank you. I have had an account for ~2 years, but this is my first article. I created it in the sandbox a few weeks ago and I believe I did submit it for review at that time. I haven't seen any response to the review. I can easily add more information to the page if that is the issue.

8206:

in might be for some Knowledge judges to read at least one of Alan Watt's articles, or see the video I send you a link to, titled "Reality Check", and thinking for themselves see for themselves that Alan Watt knew things the more intelligent people will be grateful someone told them about.

6377:, but articles are essentially be reviewed by those reading them. So, if someone feels that the content you added isn't an improvement, they are allowed to revert it or correct it. The hope is that they will do so in accordance with relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines, and leave an 578:

You can get the artist to do the email now, without deleting them. You might find that they are removed before the artist's email gets to Commons volunteers but that won't matter as they can be undeleted by the admins there. Make sure the permissions email includes the filenames you used.

12361:

In my opinion, some articles could get away with a lower level, and if they can then they should. There are certainly articles that might require a higher level than you're suggesting, but I think they should do so because they can't get by with less, not because they're free to do more.

10784:

However, in Haryana they are known only as Jat or Jatt or Jutt, a name popularly derived3 from Paninian term Jatta which denotes union or federation or confederation (jana or Sangha) of the Ayudhajivi (warrior tribes) of contemporary Panjab and Sindh, where they are still called Jatta or

8161:

of the subject. Interviews aren't independent of the subject, so those sources don't count toward notability; they can be used only to verify statements he made. And InfoWars fails the reliability requirement; in fact it is blacklisted on Knowledge so you couldn't link to it anyway; see

9480:

aren't clear because there are different interpretations of success; the math might be even harder to do correctly. But "How much good have I done here, minus the sum of (any permanent harm I've caused and any good I've prevented by disruption)" would be interesting if it was possible.

3710:. It is only after the publication of R. Lalrawna that the section describing his life came. How do I know? You may ask. Its because I have the whole book with me. One from 1987 and one from 2018. The newest version was revised a little, with corrections of typing mistakes and such and 11802:

Thank you all for removing InfluenceWatch and nominating the article for deletion. As Anarchonist noted, there is very little existing coverage of me which is why I was so amazed that I had my own Knowledge article. Would it be appropriate for me to comment on the deletion discussion?

6949:

And if nobody happens to review it, the changed version will stay there, and a random reader next year will see the changed version, not your original. If they are clued up on Knowledge, they may notice that it is not sourced, and know to be sceptical. But most users will take what it

10254:

I often shy away from editing tables at times, and I've made some pretty complex tables in the past. So, yes, putting forward your suggested addition via the talk page is a very good solution, with the advantage that someone else can tie themselves in knots getting it sorted for you!

13477:, and thanks for your work on biomedical topics. Generally, yes. If an image is published by a reliable source, and if the image is the best part of the source to cite for a given bit of article content, go for it. I would cite it differently, by specifying the journal article using 2015:

A careful look shows that you are (either mainly or entirely) in the wrong, and need to step back. 1) Knowledge requires independent reliable references without personal testimony; 2) it is ethically wrong to try to clear someone's name regarding something that they did in fact do.

9761:

An interesting undertaking, since I might be just about to create a couple more (as subcategories to existing categories--those are still categories). I doubt if I'm the only one doing things like that. The point is, such a download would probably be out of date within an hour.

11434:: I've thought about submitting it for review, but since I heard it can take some weeks to months for an article to be, and this is still a fairly unknown yet very important topic, I thought it'd be better to put in work to make it ready relatively quickly and publish it directly. 5363:

I know the census did, but I am talking about Knowledge's use of the term API Americans. It's inconsistent across pages and yet when I wish to shorten it to just Asian other users will revert my edits back as if this term must be used. Where on Knowledge should I take this issue?

9115:

More generally: My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

12376:

In theory, a "site-wide consensus" could make provisions for sensible variances, without being overly complex or uselessly vague. Speaking more practically, I doubt the community could withstand the shock. And consensus would become hopelessly mired in debate about the sensible

11701:

and should be merged into the Arabella Advisors article, though you'd want to do a more careful search before nominating. (As a general rule, we look for 2-3 reliable independent sources primarily about the subject, and interviews do not count here). The process is described at

9373:- LOL. If you want to see a summary of your edits, click on "Contributions" near the top of the screen. Then from the Contributions page, click on "Edit count" near the bottom. This will give you more stats than you could ever want about all the edits you have made. Enjoy!-- 6340:

is a different issue and that is how we get closer to 'truth'. That is where we come up with the term 'alternate facts' and those discussions are the most interesting. I don't expect that will be an issue in my present case however, but unless someone responds there can be no

5153:

Meaning: "Acacia acquires public and private companies in technology, energy and industrial/manufacturing sectors", I suppose. ("Generate shareholder value" I suppose means "make money". But readers don't need to be told that profit is the motive.) Feel free to cut the junk. --

12795:

has more information (but very dense). Don't forget to tell us the ending! Many editors try to avoid "spoilers", but one of the most helpful things a wikipedia article can provide about a work is its full plot, since most other websites only carry a teaser-style synopsis. --

11929:

your family is "early life" and where you came from. they are all related to you, found by searching your name and facts known about you. it seems you are a very wealthy person who prefers privacy, yet is involved in democratic politics facing vigorous republican opposition.

12055:: All of the best tips are given to you already – the links in the "declined" notices show you a lot of things to read. All of them show something about what went wrong, and all of them show tips for what to do next. But here's an extra example (it's silly, but it's useful): 5901:: It also helps to simply start in, by improving existing articles that interest you and appear to need work. After doing that for a while, you may notice (from their edit summaries and their contributions on Talk pages) that you are often working alongside the same people. 5480:

that the percentages are. It wouldn't really change the percentages for Asians that much. It is what it is, but I don't know why we as a nation focus so much on a group whose population is often low enough to round down to zero and overall nationwide doesn't even cross 0.5%.

5040:, citation 1 could only cover a single sentence, but citation 4 likely covers multiple sentences. Sometimes, you can tell what content the citation covers from the footnote alone. Other times, it will be hard to say without looking at the actual reference. I would also echo 1104:. They're all newbies, summoned by the newcomer module. It's a good task to tag instead of doing it yourself, if you find an article that is underlinked, because it's a task new editors feel able to do. Those of us who know the ropes already can work on the harder stuff. -- 9017:

Hello. If you are referring to your sandbox, it was declined, not rejected. Rejected has a specific meaning in the draft process, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means that it may be resubmitted. Your draft is completely unsourced. All information, especially

5346: 4449:

Thank you. Assuming the article will stick here, is there a way I can duplicate the article with the approved formatting here so it is easier for me to just edit the article, rather than make a completely new page? Or must I make an entirely new page on English Knowledge?

3736:(even if altered a little for the purposes of fixing errors in spelling, grammar, etc.) is still not independent of the subject who wrote it originally, as it has essentially been reprinted. To the best of my knowledge, Knowledge doesn't believe in what I personally call 1822:

reverted me after I posted here, and actually I see what I did wrong. Wow, this feels like getting my car hit three times, but I think I know how to fix it. I'm amazed that I didn't realize the need to cite each change. Duh! Thank you for your patient and thorough reply.

10814:

About twenty-seven miles towards the west-north-west from Bijapur in the Bombay Presidency, there is a town, the chief town of a Native State, the name of which is Jat, or more strictly Jatt. I have been at the town, more than once. And I know that its true name is Jat,

3674:

of the original book. In the book that I cited, the publisher was R. Lalrawna, a stranger not even related to Dr. James Dokhuma. In the book that I cited, he created a section of the life of James so that people who did not know him well could get to know him. So, it is

5539:" – More than likely, the editor that added the newer data (back when it was released) didn't see an easy way to handle this predicament and just combined the two percentages in the table to avoid disturbing the historical data. This is all a moot point now, since the 12468:

You assume that people care to admit publicly that Knowledge is 2 kompleekated for them—even under the "anonymity" of the internet. The stats tell us there is nothing better available for free. They don't tell us how much the average reader is actually comprehending.

2872:, but I will add the information to your sandbox needed to submit it. However, if you were to submit it, it would likely be declined, as it is far too brief. You will need to (assuming the sources you give already do) summarize what the sources say makes this person 1845:

change needs to be cited, only the changes that bring in a new idea. I guess it depends what you consider "a change" – I'm mainly the type of editor who goes around correcting clumsy sentences and removing statements that are very obvious garbage, so I rarely need to

420:

Thank you so much. I have deleted the images for now. I can see if I can get ahold of the artist directly for this, otherwise I guess I will just have to leave off images. Appreciate your help so much! As I'm sure you can tell I'm new to wiki and learning as I go :)

941:

I want to emphasise this point. You aren't really helping improve wikipedia by tagging lots of pages with underlinked template, especially on the basis of a script. I'd recommend using your script to find pages then actually improving the article with wikilinks.

8107:, before you write a single word. If he's obscure, you may not get traction with Wikiquote. I have removed your addition of his name to the disambiguation page because it seems like you're trying to promote his website. What is your association with this person? ~ 5968:

My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

5294:

indeed look like similar articles, however if you think they are different which I am not so sure seeing the contents (birth, death and origin of the author) all look similar, perhaps you move the title of your draft to another one not having the same spelling as

6945:

What happens then? If somebody who patrols new changes looks at it, they see that some unreferenced material has been changed, but is still unrefernced. They may very well have no idea themselves about the material - so should they leave it, revert it, or remove

401:

and any others you uploaded, you need to get the artist to email the Commons volunteers from an email address that is obviously personal to them, giving the filenames and your username, saying that they have indeed authorised you to license them for Commons. See

8688:. You need a lead paragraph that summarizes the body text, and the body text needs to discuss the subject of the article, not tell a journalistic story - and it isn't a good story because you are tying together unrelated events into one article. That's called a 5072:

used elsewhere in the article as well as at the sentence you are removing. Make sure that it's not the first instance of that reference or you'll start to get a red error messages like "Cite error: xxxxx was invoked but never defined" in the list of references.

3595:

have said about a subject, nothing less, and not very much more. A selected list of a subject's creations/works may be included, but unless the article explains why they are notable (by summarising what published sources have said about them) there is no point.

2227:

FactOrOpinion (talk). As I said 2 days ago, this was extremely helpful and makes me feel I am being heard. You make several good points as to evidence/facts/citations that can be used. Let me list a small number and then ask a question for you or anyone else to

2261:

Now to my question, can you or anyone else suggest what entity at Knowledge I should approach with this material? Should it be some group in the Knowledge Foundation or some group of Wikipedians who handle such cases? Please give me as specific guidance as you

1849:

The most important places to give excellent citations are the ones where someone is likely to jump down your throat right away saying you're wrong. It doesn't even matter if their complaints are trash, you still have to have an airtight citation in that case.

1418:

If this wording doesn't make sense, in a nutshell, I translated the article about Hitler into Cherokee wikipedia, but the article on Cherokee wikipedia isn't showing up when I click on the other languages tab in the article about Hitler on English Knowledge.

3959:

You need more references that show he is notable, I can only see two references repeatedly used. You can also remove statements you can't find references for, that way the article can stand as a stub. But, generally two citations are not enough for biography

12062:

But if I say "I am an important scientist", and Knowledge doesn't believe me, I might ask my friends to vouch for me ... but that's not useful. Nobody has written reports about me. Nobody has written books about me. Knowledge should not believe my friends.

5203:

that are independent of the company and disinterested. We can take the company's word for it when it says that, say, the CEO is such-and-such a person; but claims for what may be called accomplishments need good sources. Knowledge provides a cornucopia of

6507:

by trying to fix it yourself or by removing it. If someone disagrees, you can try to engage them in discussion on the article's talk page to see whether things can be resolved. If they refuse to engage, you can move to the next step of the DR process and

778:, I think you might want to tweak the script a bit so that it takes the size of the article into consideration? A much longer article, if it's not repeating the same wikilinks over and over, will naturally have a lower link density than a shorter one. -- 12810:

In my opinion, a few overenthusiastic people start tending toward too much detail when explaining plots. I know it's only because they love their topic (or they have a thing for detail), but ... A non-passionate telling of the plot often works better.

12001:

Thank you for the quick reply. His work is definitely “notable”, so I have to understand how to show it. I looked up a few pages that would be comparable and was not able to understand based on what they were notable. Could you please explain it to

6304:

by any one particular editor or group of editors. For this reason, pages aren't protected (i.e. "locked") simply for the sake of preserving one editor's or one group of editors' preferred version of the page. Knowledge gives everyone a chance to be

2322:, turns out that I was wrong about how your Quillette "Dogmatism" article could be used, and I've added a line about it to your page, and another about your third book. I think I've done about all that I can do while adhering to WP's policies. 13295:

marked it with having problems of notability. Maybe they would like to reconsider, after your recent addition of another source. You are correct that in view of your COI, you should not yourself remove the tag. Strictly speaking as a declared

10041:

In 2023, Pórokhov started bothering me. Is it just a coincidence that you requested the deletion of a file honoring one of his sockpuppets? Why do you revert my edits and never explain why? I’ve read somewhere that you have connections with a

9554:

You don't necessarily need to defend anything if you haven't been paid for writing, just state in clear and civil way how you have been contributing out of good will. I will suggest you stick to the page dedicated for the issue as stated by

8062:

Thanks! Not knowing if there is a teahouse for wiki quote, I am wondering if someone in the Knowledge teahouse knows if I can, or if anyone can, or is permitted to, submit a quote by someone whose name appears and Knowledge and red letters.

5162:) 22:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) And on second thoughts "is focused on acquiring" may mean just "hopes to acquire", without asserting that any have yet been acquired. This article is bad. Unsheathe your editorial machete and get to work. -- 8201:

The conundrum is that author Alan Watt was a mostly a recluse, but his research reveals the inner workings of the ruling elites throughout the ages. Inner workings conscious individuals like you would probably be very happy to become aware

11185:

Congrats and welcome! From here, the world's your oyster. My suggestion is to get involved with some wikiprojects you're interested in, since that's a good way to find some community. You can also "adopt" a particular backlog. I recommend

9868:

before doing so to make sure they understand what's going to be expected of them. Anything not related to editor behavior that others would like to continue discussing can be done on user talk pages, article talk pages, or other relevant

2630: 3438:

I removed all of the subjective and non-encyclopaedic language. Why do you believe he is notable? As an author? Teacher? What justifies him being referred to as "Dr."? Can you find more references for what people have written about him?

1864:

Thank you for this. I read the reverter's talk page, and it is filled with people complaining that he reverted them without discussion. I was also reverted before him by someone who has had a hearing over his hostile reversion behavior.

13834:

fascinating" is presumptuous and only compounds the literary offense. I shouldn't have to tell you what's wrong with "but new to Knowledge, am I mistaken...", but it doesn't even make sense, and you omitted the necessary question mark.

12198:

Whoever famously said something like "... as simple as possible – but not simpler", I tend to agree with them. I think we should never "dumb down" a TOPIC, but I think, keeping that in mind, we should keep our WORDS reasonably simple.

2503:

There is no literal requirement that something be published in this or that particular source. There are full explanations in the policies of Knowledge, but in this situation the following simplifications might be useful as a starting

11832:

Just so you're aware of the process, a deletion discussion generally lasts for one week, after which the end date is either extended if there has been no participation, or the discussion is closed and the article is kept or deleted.

7724:) once the redirect is already created. I can do so when I am first setting up the redirect, but once made, that category appears blocked from use within visual editor. Does my question now make sense? I apologize if it was unclear. 13225:

Hello, ISAAC CARES, and welcome to the Teahouse. That message is a technical message (nothing to do with the content of what you are writing), and usually means that you have left an editing session open for too long before saving.

8473:

We limit ourselves to quotations which are notable. A quotation can be notable because it has achieved fame due to its enduring relevance to many people, or because it is attributed to a notable individual, or appeared in a notable

7378:

So, you're trying to make two assertions: "The largest settlement is the town of St Neots and the town the district was named after is Huntingdon". And you don't have sources? Then how can you possibly know they are true? Where did

5036:. It depends on the article. If you delete the material covered by a reference, you should also delete that reference. In some articles, nearly every sentence is cited. In others, citations cover whole paragraphs. In the example at 13728:

where promotional concerns are not even mentioned. The current version does not seem excessively promotional to me, except for that section heading. What is lacking is how movie critics assess the film. The concept is fascinating.

1347: 1170: 277:, which allows anybody to reuse or alter the image for any purpose, requiring only that they attribute the source. This licensing by the copyright holder is required, and "permission" of any other sort, from anybody, is irrelevant. 9425:, you don't need to "work it off". There's no negative connotation in having a net reduction in the size of the articles that you edit. In fact, reducing the size of an article can sometimes lead to an improvement in its quality. 12195:: About the article you described, I think there's no need for those words because easier more common ones would be just as good. I would be inclined to edit them out (probably while simplifying a few other things along the way). 11817:

You are certainly allowed to comment, but in general it may be wiser to leave it alone if it is going your way. Wikipedians can react unpredictably to comments from article subjects, particularly on anything related to politics.

2406:

Thanks again for the new additions and the added references. I feel that, thanks to all your work, the page gives a much more complete and balanced account of my career. This is really minor, but reference 22 has "Kabat" spelled

545:

Yes, you did that correctly and the file I linked by the URL is now gone. You need to do the same thing on the files you uploaded to Commons. When deleted, the current blue link to the filename here in this thread will turn red.

398: 8266:

like: For it to be "newsworthy", it has to have been covered by a major media outlet. In order for a major media outlet to cover it, it has to be newsworthy". I am surprised that after so many years I remember a semblance of it.

1781:

and is disallowed), you must write what reliable sources say. In this case, however, you were simply stating what another article already states, so you would be OK reverting it back, with an explanation. In fact, I will do so.

5239:

The biggest problem that I now see with this article is that the references do not include any independent, reliable sources that devote significant coverage to this company. It is all about what the company says about itself.

2672:

It comes from the sources already listed in the article, I read them myself where I added the info. One of them is a thesis on the subject. For example, I put in reference tags for some specific sentences which I found in the

8197:

Do you see of a way his notability requirement could be fulfilled? The challenge is that because his research and his conclusions were so different, sometimes opposite the mainstream views that he stayed away from mainstream

5446:

is still broad, ranging from Pakistani and Indian all the way to Korean and Japanese. One could reasonably present the same argument that each of these groups "have very distinct appearances and culture". The census grouping

1692:

Thanks for all your help. I've left a msg on the talk page as well. The article has been improved, although I'm sure there could be more to add. Should I go ahead and remove the maintenance tag, or leave it to someone else?

1086:, I assumed that the list you asked me to look at was current instead of outdated. That illustrates the proper response to the problem: Add useful wikilinks to articles instead of spending time compiling lists such as this. 8193:

The essence of his notability, of the value of his findings, may ultimately lie in his findings themselves. Anyone who reads some of his findings can rationally decide if they are or are not "notable" and worth sharing on

375:

Yes, you are correct, they are artwork images by an artist. So if the artist themselves have not licenced their images under either wiki commons or creative commons, does that basically mean they cannot be used in my wiki

8753:

Getting there. You don't have to summarize each example in the lead section. The lead section is mainly for a general overview. A reader should be able to read the lead section and have a good idea of the contents of the

6941:

Next month, somebody changes it. Maybe they think you were wrong, maybe they misunderstand what you were saying, maybe they made a mistake, maybe they want to promote something they are associated with, maybe they are a

12969: 10835:

Even today they take pride in being called Jats. The word Jat is the same as Scyth, Zatt, Jatt, Jatt, (a camel- driver) and Gette etc. Everywhere a Jat is an agriculturist. The Sumerians (of the Archaeologists) had two

2989:. Yes, readers could google the former and thereby find the latter, but this shouldn't be necessary. (True, we are in 2024, so most who want to chase up a paper will instead find it via its DOI -- so please investigate 9635: 1584:

Sorry, I missed a couple of things: 1) If you forget to end one of your blockquote sections, the entire rest of the article may be turned into a quotation, as you saw. 2) I don't know anything about categories, sorry.

8068: 13705:

It can be tough to steer an article in a good direction, if there are determined efforts to steer it not-so-good at the same time. Conflict is tricky; fights are bad for Knowledge, even if I'm fighting for the right

11571:

I like the variety of sources that you've used. The one about psychosocial impact would probably be useful for putting something in the ==Society and culture== section (e.g., anything about school and friendship).

5607: 2598: 2469: 13199:

When people ask about bias, they are often implicitly sure that "bias" is a universally-agreed-upon topic, and that preventing it ought therefore to be primarily a matter of responsible administration and policy

13709:

If an editor is really going over the line, bullying and refusing to listen, sometimes something has to be done about it. Very often it turns out that editors on both sides of such an issue are somewhat guilty.

12630:

The copyright law is written so that it is basically impossible for anyone to give up their rights by accident or default. (The law even makes things inconvenient for someone who WANTS to give up their rights!)

8340: 8096: 4406: 1385:

legitimate we can do anymore to repair history. "Crashing down", in the context of my comment, is "becoming an irrelevant project because we allowed POV-pushing and forced gender balance to become core values".

10398: 8235:

independent sources, nothing else. I could self-publish a rock-solid plan for achieving world peace, which is undeniably important and has value, but if there is no coverage of my work, then it isn't notable. ~

3453:

I have not gotten ti what made him notable because as I said, it's a work in progress. But however, he is a notable man as he is one of the leaders of the Mizo insurgency and an autjor of many different books.

2355:

I am going to continue to combat the RICO business and the charge of industry funding/involvement by following another editor's suggestion that I get these points discussed in a reputable magazine or newspaper.

13793:

My answer is yes, IP, this is the wrong place, and sorry, but I don't think there is a right place for it on WP. Your text here isn't very well written, so it seems you haven't applied it to your own writing.

11915:

the list of Chicago resources especially, these links include quite a few that are not about me at all and focus on family members, including people who have passed. The whole thing honestly feels unsettling.

9537:

I believe this is a place to ask questions? I am here, asking what proofs/evidence do I need to provide to defend this claim? Please don't tell me, even this is something that I cannot do or it would not help

48: 8169:

Articles on demonstrably notable topics are kept. Articles on non-notable subjects are deleted (or never started). If those outcomes are against his wife's wishes, there's really nothing she can do about it.

6300:, but this is almost always only done in cases of ongoing serious disruption or a long history of repeated disruption. Knowledge is, after all, intended to be a collaborative editing project and pages aren't 922:

concerns about link density – but only when there are too many. Usually these are placed by someone who wants to inflate the importance of their subject, or by someone who is just eager to add links. I have

12296:

for some little quotations like that, that hit on something important. Mostly, there are enough books better than theirs that they hardly merit a look. The way they ignore their own advice is instructive.

5798:, So, get references first - perhaps park in your Sandbox - then only write content that is verified by those references. What you personally know to be true cannot be used unless verified by references. 13467: 8513:

You can cite a SPS for assertions made by the subject as long as those assertions are attributed properly in prose. The two examples you mentioned are fine (although I wouldn't use the word "lamented").

5105:

mentioned above. The way the Visual Editor handles deleting a named reference that has been used multiple times, is that it will only remove the citation when the last usage has been removed. Good luck,

12972:. Its uploader says that it's their "own work", but it's not clear from this whether the painting too is their own work. (I think that we can assume that the comic character the painting is based on is 12703:

Yeah, I understand. I kept it removed as I'm not acquainted entirely with the rules yet, and I haven't read the page you suggested yet. I'll check it out whenever I have enough time. Thanks for the help

8507: 5222:

I just cut out a lot of corporate fluff cited to press releases and added a short section about legal issues. This company appears to be considered a patent troll, based on my brief search for sources.

5150:

Acacia is focused on acquiring public or private businesses across industries including the mature technology, energy and industrials/manufacturing sectors where it believes it can generate shareholder

2958:(which you should declare) but that's no bar to drafting an article for Knowledge. Keep the draft fairly short initially: your main task is to show that Hoyle meets the special notability guidelines at 1122:

i tried doing just that but i got blocked for that, i supposed because i was trying to document all the problems the page has and being declared that i was tagbombing, thus my solution being this list.

13746: 4482:

Sorry – I forgot. After making sure you are logged in with your username, you can find your sandbox from one of the menus at the top of your screen. On mine it's in the menu with the icon of a person.

13204:

discover that their certainty is merely superficial, that correct answers are much less evident than they thought, and they hunt for ways to revert to the simplistic idea they were sure of yesterday.

1869:. I wrote him a nicer note that you can see below this, but after briefly defending himself (correctly, because he reverted me twice and I thought he had re-reverted me, my error), he did not respond. 12923: 869:

Basically, I'm not blindly tagging upon the list, but using it as a metric to have people look closer at pages that have been overlooked(this page for example has been mostly unchanged since 2008).

474:

Okay got it! I will delete the file. I'm in touch with her gallery to get in touch with the artist directly so hope to have that all cleared up soon. Thank you for your continued help and support!

3740:, where the provenance of content magically changes when it is reprinted by a third party; as far as I can tell, the book still credits Dokhuma as the author as the bulk of it is still his writing. 3185: 2461:

I appreciate this. You’ve made it much clearer. So, when an article appears in Time magazine or in the WSJ, or some such publication, the bio will be modified to reflect the new story? Thank you.

1777:

This was a valid revert. You made an assertion that cannot be verified because you did not provide a reliable source to verify it. On Knowledge, you cannot write what you know (this is considered

10560:

for a general overview of the subject. Perhaps it will give you the information you need or suggest some some sources which might be helpful. You could also try asking more specific questions at

2553:

I have a serious legal issue that I want resolved. Oh look! A rag-tag group of volunteer librarians with no jurisdiction and no legal qualifications! They have a big placard on their desk saying

11987:: You have not shown that he is notable. (Knowledge uses the word "notable" in a special way.) If this is really all the information you can find, it means you cannot make an article about him. 4252:, it should give you a sense of how to establish that the template applies. (I'm on my phone right now, so I can't check the copyright status myself, but I should be able to help later today.) 2034:: Assuming that your username is authentic, then perhaps the best next step for you to take is to go to major news outlets with this revelation. When they've printed it, Knowledge will follow. 8399:. Not what he, or you, or I would regard as reliable sources, but what Knowledge would. As I gaze at his website, I sense that amassing such coverage would be difficult, if not impossible. -- 2981:, when writing for Knowledge one should try to avoid assuming that readers are already familiar with the area they're reading about. Thus for example one should avoid specifying a journal via 8712:: I think that the most important part of Anachronist's advice is that on Knowledge you can't have a story to tell. All you're permitted to do is prove that others have told a story already. 7987: 6992: 4164:

The point is two things: 1) The image you're suggesting isn't free, AND 2) a good-enough image exists that IS free. Non-free images are all ignored, as soon as a good-enough free one exists.

1734: 5451:

could even be considered more broad by definition. It would probably be best to drop this line of reasoning. The stronger argument is following the change made by the U.S. census report. --

4150:, per the attached licensing details. Since the OMD image is also from a press kit of the same period, I am hoping that someone with expertise can determine whether it too is public domain. 4076:

Hello, Greg. If you need a pattern that is not already available then you'll need to create an image. I don't think there's any particular program required for that. But I suggest asking at

4926:

Knowledge is an encyclopedia while fandom is a fan site. They have entirely different purposes. I can assure you that most Knowledge editors do not contribute to Fandom. I certainly don't.

11723: 10899:

interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in

4062:

It helped alot but the thing i didn't understand after reading the article is when creating the patterns. Do i require any specific applications to create the patterns, is so, which one?

2179:

I have no idea whether there's additional relevant literature out there that could help to balance what's there. Some of the literature is also paywalled, which makes the matter harder.

1956:

and someone might not immediately respond to your post. Nobody posting here has any connection to the Wikimedia Foundation or speaks on their behalf; so, if you're looking for that, see

13562:"Primary sources" means "people with firsthand knowledge". Please try to erase all material that comes from "someone who really knows", and replace it with what third parties have said. 12489:

For clarity, "kompleekated" refers to things like word and sentence length in this context. Has nothing to do with the difficulty of the ideas being conveyed, and everything to do with

5867: 1675:

If you're typing directly to Knowledge, then just use the ordinary quotation mark and apostrophe keys on your keyboard, without doing the special keystrokes required to get fancy marks.

12884:

I hope that people with experience and intelligence better than mine will respond soon with more useful information, and I hope the people governing UAE learn fairness and compassion.

7991: 6389:; the former can help establish a consensus one way or the other whereas the latter only leads to disruption. So, if you edits are reverted for some reason and it doesn't appear to be 6344:

Sadly, the only scholars I know about on the subject seem to die just as I learn about them. To wit; H. Roger Grant. I'm hoping my edits will flush out somebody taking up the torch.

1872:

I'll let it go now, I think I'm just stuck with the reversions. What worries me is that his reversions will count against me as an editor. Don't we get a reversion score of some sort?

1652:

Thanks for this. I'll continue tidying up. I'm not sure about the difference between curly and straight quotation marks - can you show me what they look like so I don't do that again.

10195: 9662: 7872: 7842: 7796: 7335:

TooManyFingers, I will quickly add that this wasn't "difficult editors", this IP was blocked for disruptive editing after several warnings. Anyways, here's the source you requested:

4853:

So yes, if it's justified and the items are independently considered high-quality, you can exclude a limited number of items from the "good articles and featured lists" requirement.

1948:

The Teahouse isn't really set up to deal with requests like yours. You'll probably have a much better chance of getting assistance on one of the more specific noticeboards listed at

9514: 5438:), or perhaps an editor at one of those pages can assist (if not, reach back out here, and I'm sure one of us will be glad to).One quick note about your "too broad concern" due to " 5382:: I think it will probably have to continue being shown, every time someone talks about an old census. The old census says what it says, and we can't pretend it said something else. 1437:, you can do the same for other articles by finding the "Wikidata item" link for an article on the sidebar and adding the article name to the list of Knowledge pages at the bottom. 862:

I'll agree that there isn't a minimum amount of links required for a page, however, I've found that low link density can be a sign of other problems, such as the case of me tagging

11568:

It's possible that dropping a simple sentence in each of the empty sections – though theoretically not required – would reassure the admin that it's really an uncontroversial move.

7942:

Every page on Knowledge also has a "talk" page, where discussions take place about improving the content of the page to which the talk page is attached. If you want to discuss the

6499:. As for the examples you might have seen in other articles, Knowledge has over six million articles and many if not most aren't being constanly monitored or assessed. So, lots of 4806:

I didn't create it myself - it's been around for some time now, I overhauled it from what had previously been a two-sentence stub. The lead was intended to mirror that of similar

273:(either by explicit statement of the copyright holder, or by reason of their age), or images which the copyright holder has specifically released under a copyleft licence such as 13022:

with material about, let's say, some company's eco-friendly, economical, and generally amazing opportunities for electrifying these old cars, you might expect some attention. --

1711:: Have all the things mentioned in it been fully solved, so that the person who noted the problems would really have to admit it's fixed now? If that's done, then yes, go ahead. 13113: 11325: 10481:

edit is the expected best practice, and the other edit is also fine. It's common to get reverted, but it was inappropriate for them to leave a warning about it. Don't sweat it,

10124:

it's simple false that I revert them without explaning why... Fox de Quintal is literally harassing me in three projects simultaneously and is trying to pass as the victim! See

6251:

The edits you made can't be fixed in place per se because that's really how Knowledge works. The best you can hope for is that others also feel your edits were improvements and

3894: 3850: 3824:

in a limited fashion, but it doesn't contribute to the (ideally at least) three independent reliable sources that reviewers want to see in drafts to show Dokhuma is wikinotable.

3801: 3784: 3715: 3679: 3657: 3625: 3611: 3567: 3537: 3521: 3507: 3489: 3469: 3455: 3425: 2447:

And we are very adamant about remaining ONLY a second-hand copy. We refuse on principle to publish original material that people bring, and that's why this has happened to you.

9112:, otherwise there can be no article. What you know (or what I know, or what any random person on hte internet knows) is irrelevant, unless it is backed up by published sources. 5352:

They did split it off to "Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islander" some time ago, so this is a good question, but I'm not sure it is one that can be handled by the Teahouse.

13583:: Maybe the best way to know which of the subject's accomplishments should stay in the article is to only keep the ones that have already been mentioned in third-party source. 11068:? It looks to me as if all the citations in that article are either to works by Lachat, or to sites published by organisations he belongs to; in other words, none of them are 3035: 1672:

If you are using a word processor, it may have an easy-to-use control or preference to turn OFF "Smart quotes". That might be easier than having to correct afterwards by hand.

7922:

Ohh wow, Thank you, I would enjoy reading it all at my comfort. What about the policy discussion thing? where do those happen? creating new policy, proposing changes, etc...

12607:

To clarify, the olympiad doesn't present any license for logo usage, but neither any logo copyright, leaving to assume that the logo can be used freely. Just want to confirm

10534: 8064: 6255:. FWIW, being reverted is part of the Knowledge experience; so, it's not really a reason to feel discouraged. If it happens and the revert is not really a clear-cut case of 3249:. But be aware that Knowledge volunteers are not here to do work for you like that, especially if you tell us nothing about the subject and provide no sources demonstrating 8692:, and isn't allowed. The title of the draft implies that multiple examples would be described in different paragraphs, but instead it's one big section with no structure. ~ 2361:

By the way, since you thought to list the third book, there is a first book: Ideology and Imagination: The Image of Society in Dostoevsky (Columbia University Press, 1978.

13273: 9235: 6185:

To see edits for a certain article, click on the View History tab on the right hand side of the navigation bar (after Read, Edit, Edit Source). To see your own edits, use

4392: 4378: 4146:

Perhaps I wasn't altogether clear in my original post: I am not at all advocating for the use of a non-free image. The Duran, Soft Cell and New Order press kit images are

12161: 10646: 6072: 5953:

Hello, User072364. I'm afraid that, like most editors who try to create an article before they have spent time learning how Knowledge works, you have written your draft

5603: 3167: 2594: 2465: 13138:

Note that Knowledge does not claim to be free of bias, as all sources have biases. Sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves.

12661:

That is best, for now. But you might want to explore the rules more carefully, when you have time; there may be reasons why this use is OK and can be put back up. I am

9809:

to make an edit request if you have a specific edit you want made. Note that since you are not extended confirmed and the topic area is under strict sanctions, you are

8270:

has covered it so it is not newsworthy. Newsworthy, and notability, look, at this point, to me, arbitrary, thus closed-minded. Almost like a type of establishment club.

6725:

is a core principle of Knowledge. I could put on anyone's article that they are a space alien from Mars, that doesn't make it true. It need to be verifiable somewhere.

6615:

If there are no sources for sections of the article, then you simply can't write about it for Knowledge. Disclaimers don't help and won't be accepted as we don't allow

8336: 8077:

Dear Hoary: I need to create a new Knowledge page for "Alan Watt" (author and radio commentator). Can you help me do that? Thanks, Charles (username: Writing is easy)

7669: 4245: 1972:, others will respond similarly; if, however, you start to get accusatory, then the responses you receive will likely reflect that. Finally, please also remember that 560:

I thought I could have the artist email Wiki Commons - or do I still have to delete them and then have the artist email them if I reupload them? Thanks for clarifying

1904:

I beleve "deleted edits" refers to edits in articles that are now deleted, not reverted edits. Hundreds of editors can contribute to an article that eventually fails

1471:. Basically scroll to the bottom of the page where there is a "Knowledge" box and add the name of the wikipedia (chr) and the article (in this case Ꭰ⁠Ꮩ⁠l⁠f⁠ ⁠Ꭿ⁠Ꮮ⁠r). 887:, the people who will mostly be directed to a page when you use the "underlinked" tag are newcomers using their newcomer homepage suggestions to make easy edits. You 12601: 5385:

But if people are continuing to use it for newer census data too, because they mistakenly think it's still official, in those cases I think you're absolutely right.

3937:, but reviewers are more likely to ask you to use another source as it's far too close in proximity to the author's writing that makes up the majority of the book. — 2479:

self-serving or suspicious, they tend to face more scrutiny and more roadblocks. You can read Knowledge's main policy on biographies of living persons at this link:

844:

In general both script-assisted editing and adding maintenance tags are things which are probably better off left to people who have some experience with Knowledge.

13550:

It would help to know which article you are referring to, but that is a standard message and it will contain blue links that will lead you to further explanations.

1976:

applies not only to what's written about you on Knowledge, but also what you might write about others on any Knowledge page and be very careful not to fun afoul of

866:

being far too technical, as well as despite describing a "field of study", makes no mention on who is part of this field(i.e. a history of the field of study), etc.

806:

template is in fact a newcomer task and many of the pages I've put it on has had plenty of productive edits made by other newcomers(I still regard myself as such).

12151: 8925:. In the past, when I came across similar situations while creating articles myself, I opted to write a footnote to indicate that the fact in question is disputed 6373:

for more details, but Knowledge articles aren't peered reviewed in the sense that you'd expect from a peer-reviewed journal or other type of publication; there is

446:

but I'm afraid that is not enough. You must delete them from their storage location on the Knowledge servers as well, as they are copyright infringements. Include

13565:"Like a résumé" means "listing every accomplishment, especially those no one cares about". Please cut back the list of accomplishments to just the essential few. 10354:

an editor, and you could have reverted it (though as it is in the "short description", which doesn't appear in the text of the article, it's a bit hard to find).

9860:

The Teahouse isn't really set up to deal with editor behavioral issues beyond providing some general guidance; moreover, it shouldn't be used as a substitute for

7158: 5673: 5517: 5499: 5485: 5466: 5408: 5379: 5365: 2676:

I would call this vandalism now, as this users has AGAIN deleted a good portion of the article, and reverted all of my changes which I spent hrs. and hrs. on....

9154:

A) no references B) after Declined, do not resubmit to AfC without first addressing the comments in the Declined notice, as that just wastes a reviewer's time.

8274:

Knowledge. But, perhaps I am biased because his findings make sense go me, I do think Knowledge's readers would be glad and grateful they could read them there.

3389:

be too soon to make an article, it might not actually be too long before one can be made. They're definitely moving up in the musical world, having worked with

13809: 13780: 13129: 12493:

they are conveyed. Most subjects can be conveyed with simple, Trumanesque language, and the rest could be accommodated under "sensible variances". In theory. ―

10224:

has suggested: Pages like that one are described as 'List articles' and every entry in it should be to an existing Knowledge article. So, my first question is

10129: 8452: 8363: 8301: 8252: 8221: 8128: 8078: 8041: 1995:

understand the workings of Knowledge and how get a one-sided and unfair portrayal of my work corrected. This has been up there since 2025 from what I can tell.

11008:

Hi there, I am new here on this english site and wanted to ask how i could translate a german wiki site, that I created myself in english and publish it here?

3642:

independent reliable sources. Right now you have one - one of the sources you have cited is a book written by the biography subject so it is not independent.

3011:

I fixed the Medler ref. I agree with Turnbull that is is more appropriate to use as references the sources for your journal article rather than your article.

13935: 13903: 13711: 13683: 13649: 13588: 13566: 13449: 13361: 13347: 13205: 13003: 12885: 12826: 12812: 12690: 12672: 12632: 12363: 12298: 12268: 12200: 12064: 12034: 11988: 11920: 11808: 11549: 11231: 9777: 9748: 9642: 9481: 8727: 8713: 7278: 7249: 7144: 6694: 5902: 5640: 5503: 5386: 5128: 5089: 5065: 5033: 4576: 4483: 4469: 4360: 4197: 4165: 3221: 3087: 2641: 2558: 2514: 2486: 2448: 2149: 2049: 2035: 2017: 1851: 1712: 1679: 1639: 1586: 1567: 1534: 1518: 1386: 1337: 1304: 928: 280:

The second way is that English Knowledge (unlike some other language versions) allows non-free images to be used in certain restricted ways, as specified in

11703: 7979: 7951: 5425:

for the 1990 census does not split the two groups, and its data is being directly compared in a table to other decades. You can't simply rename the row at

4545:

Agree with this point....... the reason that many translated articles get deleted is because other Knowledge's don't have the same higher level of sources.

406:. As we don't allow nonfree images of artwork anywhere except in an article specifically about that artwork, you should not use the files in the meantime. 11697:

You can also nominate the article for deletion - taking a quick look at the available sourcing, it looks like it probably doesn't meet our guidelines for

13346:: I'd like to clarify something, just in case: COI is not because you wrote or updated the article. COI is because of who you know and who you work for. 9669:

as it restricts what the browser can do, and may make the display worse on some screen sizes. (The table looks fine to me on a computer and on my phone).

9241:

I will not advise you publish the page with just one reference, what you added so far has been linking the author to other connecting pages on Knowledge.

7720:

No I know how to edit a redirect, I was saying that I do not know how to make a certain type of edit to the redirect (which is adding a template such as

7477:

information in the body of the article. If you want to be treated like a grown up then please behave like one. Your rants here are doing you no favours.

3873:

because it was published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson in the UK, or Little, Brown and Company in the US, even though the author is the subject herself. —

2301: 1745: 13902:(and one of the reasons is that while they are sometimes true, they are often ridiculously false, and there is no reliable way to tell the difference.) 12535:

This is exactly what I was looking for, all of the resources provided as well as the above discussion have been tremendously helpful. Much appreciated.

12022:

I'm not an expert in this subject, but I think the Hagenauer article you linked would probably not be accepted today. Notability standards have gone up.

9455:

My average is probably even more negative. As an administrator, I've deleted entire articles. There isn't an easy way to factor in deletions, however. ~

1321:

a result of editor bias, but it's hard to overlook the fact that such a small proportion of Knowledge editors are female when looking for explanations.

12118: 10370: 8391:

points out that you'd need "reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him". True. It means coverage of him that (i) is independent of him

6397:. Not matter how right you'll might know yourself to be, you won't be given any special consideration if you simply resort to back and forth reverting 1708: 1694: 1653: 1623: 1601: 11437:

Important note: I do want to make it clear that the reason I made this article *is* to raise awareness (so advocacy in a way. I did make sure to read

4659: 12136: 11095: 11031: 10538: 8946:

Thanks for yours. I have figured out that this has nothing to do with two sources disagreeing. I have posted my reasoning on the article’s Talk page.

6994: 6716: 5924: 5878: 2297: 8086: 7983: 2831:

For most links, you can press the "cite" button in the Visual Editor, paste the link into the input box, and it will produce a formatted reference.

1762:

Good question. It would be helpful if you looked at the edit summary of this 'serial reverter'. Looking at your contribution history, it seems that

12850: 11916: 11851: 11804: 9861: 9011: 8283: 5422: 5142: 3159: 3125: 1177: 295:

If they are not so willing, it is possible that a representative work of the artist might be justified as a non-free image - but not more than one.

9214:

I can't find anywhere in your contribution history where you requested a username change. Maybe you started the request and didn't save it? Go to

5777:

If you decide to try this, you should start by assessing if an article about the subject you're thinking of has any chance of being accepted. See

969:, a page that has been written in Spanish since it's 2005 creation; I hope this and my documenting of other pages shows the merit of this metric. 13788: 13606: 13580: 11898:

Um, if you read this discussion, it is clear that he prefers deletion of the article about him. Therefore he has no obligation to find sources. ~

11246: 11042:

in case it is relevant to Germany. I am happy to look it over as well, as someone who frequently translates articles from German to English (see

8988: 5795: 2926:

I find it curious, however, that you are attempting to write a Knowledge article that cites your own work as its primary source of information. ~

2522: 2494: 2473: 1274:

These are all interesting reads for me, Thank you for sharing. I was referring to the non-sentimental and principle of neutrality of Knowledge.

534: 6098:, and more. However, if you use these bots, you should check the results and making sure they're correct. I often forget to do that, sometimes. 13962: 12893: 12665:

an images expert. I just know that when copyright is the issue, be very cautious, and assume that nothing is OK to use – until you really know.

10498: 10240: 7678:

might be the better location of the redirec that I am trying to add the Fr (french) language ISO code to based on the aforementioned template.

7209: 5825: 4775: 2978: 2943: 2892: 13853:

What matters is that you are following the writing guide on Knowledge and that whatever you are writing on follow the notability guide as per

12876: 10594: 10573: 8968:

and will now apply your suggested correction. Thank you for following up on this and please accept my apologies for my part in this confusion.

5709:. I'd say "Yes, baby steps at first: very wise"; except that chasing down sources is hard work. Do please keep chasing them down. Is the page 3529: 3497: 3477: 3433: 13934:

If you're having a hard time looking something up, sure, why not. You can't put ChatGPT into an article, but it might help find a lost item.

13872: 12213:

Thank you for the response. When I get time, I'll see about replacing the words to ones simple enough for someone like me to understand haha

12052: 12009: 11984: 10457:

an admin) has been blocked. As long as your contributions don't violate Knowledge policies, no one will have a sanctionable issue with you. —

8344: 6150:

Thanks for that. I did put my name and interest under 'trains' but there are hundreds there and no response. So I'm stirring the pot. :-}

4625: 4612: 4594: 4465: 4451: 4413: 2531: 2500: 2437: 2411: 2385: 2371: 2319: 2289: 2275: 2214: 2163: 2145: 2131: 2101: 2070: 2031: 2002: 1943: 514: 13770: 11319: 10873:

Hello IP editor, and welcome to the Teahouse. This is a content issue which I see you have already raised (using a different IP address) at

10542: 10523: 10243:. To be frank, these can be extremely difficult for a completely new editor to edit, simply because of the complicated 'markup' used by our 13866: 13247:

Hello, Amitprasad, and welcome to the Teahouse. This place is for getting help with editing Knowledge, not for general knowledge questions.

13097:

before being made visible to search engine webcrawlers. In either case, they are checked to confirm that they are properly corroborated by

12881:

I don't have the skill to answer all of this properly, but I can say one thing: EVERY source is biased, and "biased" does not mean "lying".

11783: 11565: 10627:

Your question isn't rude or improper in any other way; but if you have other questions rather like it, you'd be better off posting them at

10472: 10448: 10423: 9813:

allowed to make edit requests, and cannot discuss the subject otherwise anywhere on Knowledge (including the Teahouse). Keep that in mind.

5699: 5629: 5611: 5205: 3086:

If you add people who do not understand Knowledge policy, unfortunately it makes you appear dishonest – even though you really are honest.

3046:

polls or majority votes. They're a collective assessment of whether an article meets Knowledge's policies and standards. If an argument to

2602: 1935: 13803: 10640: 10492: 10379:. Most editors use the desktop version and don't see that feature. The description is taken from the target article so it was fixed there. 8072: 13053: 10167: 10150: 7982:, with a large number of editors contributing (and also a comment from the Wikimedia Foundation). The RfC was listed on both the general 3933:

Which is why I said the book might be possibly used to establish wikinotability (in a limited fashion) if you're only using that section

2616: 1818:

Thank you for answering so quickly. It was an earlier reversion, not the two that happened after it. Sorry I wasn't clear! Somebody else

8451:

conundrum. An author who was a mostly a recluse, but whose research reveals the inner workings of the ruling elites throughoutthe ages.

1376:

I have read it, though not recently, and I really understand. "Crashing down" was intended for a if gender parity on Knowledge became a

13444:

Or, you might find a similarly complex citation already done by someone else, and copy their format. I guess there's no guarantee that

12918: 10068: 9719: 9244:

You still need more references to back up your claim about the author and these references needs to be Independent and reliable as per

8413:

That website sure doesn't give you a confident feeling, does it? Lots of promotion of self-published works. Even the website about the

7777:

You're demonstrably able to edit Knowledge. (If you weren't, this request of yours wouldn't appear.) Where's the difficulty in editing

5681: 5616:

The footnote sounds feasible as well. Lots of possibilities I'm sure. Probably best to discuss solutions at a WikiProject like the one

4811: 3367:

to determine if he meets the required criteria, but I suspect that like most artists this early in their careers, it will be a case of

11251:

COMMENT to 2A02: Once a query has been answered by an editor it is wrong to delete the query and answer, so I reverted your deletion.

10228:

If so, it should be easy and non-controversial to add it to that List article. If not, consider creating a new article about that war

9994:, you know very well that this is not an isolated case, furthermore, you have never given any explanations for this behavior of yours. 13494: 11179: 7903: 7462:

and straight after i submit it, the same dude who always does it comes to ruin it. If you need me I'll be rethinking my life choices

4938: 4905: 4119: 13657: 9776:

Sometimes, when people say "download", they just mean "see". (People who don't have a lot of computer knowledge say it more often.)

8145:

and shouldn't be used that way. Nor is it a platform for "getting the word out". Knowledge publishes articles about topics that are

7880: 7866: 6827: 252:

So I just saw my article had been reviewed and I guess everything was okay with the images - do you think I can just add them back?

10236: 9828: 8965: 8035: 6516:, you've done your part. If the other party starts getting really out of line, you can seek administrator assistance at one of the 5677: 5281: 3863:

Incorrect. Lalrawna is credited as the publisher in your citation, not the author. The work is still Dokhuma's. That's like saying

3282:

here. Creating an article yourself, is the most likely way to make it happen. Even without a registered account, you can check out

2697:. I'm sorry! I understand that things like this could be a punch to the head for your experience with this website; I do feel you. 9048:. Also, since you are pretty new (5 day old here) , I will suggest you take things slow and master how to edit on Knowledge first 7809: 7587:

This is a message from Amazon. I'm sorry but the person you are trying to speak to has written a custom status "dead". Thank you.

4825:

citations. Perhaps an overreaction on my part, though such citations were necessary on the GMs list for individual trades/claims.

502: 379:

Should I be deleting the images I added to wikicommons then? Colin above mentioned that it does not matter if I had "permission".

13916:

Well, yes, but in this case it's obviously easy to verify if what ChatGPT said is true/useful: just go to the site it gives you.

11187: 7820:

to your user page (be sure to read the instructions for this), and (ii) please make requests and suggestions for that article on

6230:

I went bold like you advised but I would be discouraged if it were reverted. I would much rather get it fixed quickly in place.

5748: 3575: 3545: 3515: 3463: 3448: 2507:- Very clearly outside your sphere of influence, as well as that of your publishers, colleagues, employers, employees, and family 2207:

Many thanks. For the first time, I feel like I am getting responses that are specific to my situation. I will keep working this.

1973: 10263:

to how it was before. That tip has saved my bacon a few times when I've mangled making a tiny edit to a complex table! Regards,

8295:

a person or a thing that is chronologically out of place. especially : one from a former age that is incongruous in the present.

7123:

And make sure the source is checked to be correct or otherwise some other people could undo your edits due to incorrect sources

5373: 5358: 3816:

Exactly the point I'm making. It's still his writing, so it's not independent from him to be used as a source that demonstrates

2809: 1238:

I was emphasising on the standard and the guideline of editing on Knowledge. Perhaps you can tell me more about what you meant.

593:

Thanks Mike! The gallery reached out to her and sent me her info to contact her so I plan to be in touch later this afternoon.

13677: 13544: 13335: 13317: 13167:

Some bias is a good thing. It's also a good thing to have an open mind, but not open to the point where your brain falls out. ~

12959: 12033:

made by publishers who are not connected to him (not the ones who publish his work, not his colleagues or his employees, etc).

11225: 10975: 3969: 3633: 3619: 3605: 2862: 494: 289: 269:

The preferred way is to use free images, which can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. This means either images which are in the

12112: 10771: 9404:

that came from the time I section blanked the Austrian empire. I’m still trying to work that off, I was really dumb back then

7850: 7833: 7804: 7790: 7152: 6796:

is the most relevant. How would a reader know that you had not just made something up if you added it to an article without a

6682: 6668: 6646: 6628: 5493: 4396: 1428: 1303:

Aiming for gender parity among EDITORS, on the other hand, is a worthwhile goal that I support. I wish we were there already.

316:

Thank you for your speedy response! I just want to make sure i'm abiding by the proper rules. I will look into these options.

13893: 13428: 13410: 12185: 12085: 11357: 10892: 10858: 10756: 10745: 10733: 10721: 10709: 10697: 10685: 10673: 9952: 9882: 7876: 7846: 7800: 7630:

is the way to tell an administrator that a page's history contains copyright violations. There's a script to make it easier:

7541: 6809: 4788:

with a massive lead section and 29 references. I hate to be unkind, but can't you see that this is a little bit . . . silly?

4652: 4071: 4057: 3952: 3902: 3888: 3858: 3844: 3809: 3792: 3777: 3723: 3701: 3687: 3665: 3651: 2115:

you are exonerated. I'm guessing that you've tried and they won't do that- in which case there is nothing we can do for you.

671: 12770:

You can simply just delete all of the text on your talk page, though archiving is much more preferred as recommended above.

12544: 11760:

Yes, so why are you listing sources about all of them on the article talk page? Providing no analysis? That isn't helpful. ~

8309: 7118: 5648: 5525: 5511: 5416: 5394: 4382: 4368: 3559: 2971: 666: 602: 588: 569: 555: 483: 469: 430: 415: 352: 13911: 8645:

I've semiprotected the article for now. Adding large quantities of unsourced prose to a BLP isn't permitted on Knowledge. ~

8617:: Welcome to the Teahouse. You may wish to let the user in question know on their user talk page that they run the risk of 7721: 5807: 5095: 4818: 4266:

Thanks for this. The image looks to be permissible along the same lines as the Duran one. I think I've managed the upload.

2706: 1433:

To connect different languages you have to edit the entry in Wikidata. In this case I added the entry on chr for Hitler to

878: 853: 713: 704: 108: 13596: 13373: 13355: 12934:

style of username also raises concern. Your username is problematic and you should change it. As for your statement that

11361: 10191:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

9970: 5841: 5786: 5136: 4732:, when the disruption is coming from a single IP, the solution is to block the IP instead of semi-protecting the article. 4491: 4440: 3273: 3083:

When they discuss keeping or deleting, the topic is not "Do we like it?" – the topic is "Does it follow Knowledge policy?"

2057: 2048:

I neglected to add "... under their byline, as a factual report in which they exonerate you, not as an op-ed or a letter"

1330: 1312: 1201: 370: 13719: 13116:(pending satisfactory improvements) drafts that show obvious bias or imbalance (or anything else contrary to Knowledge's 12978: 12779: 12530: 11949: 11931: 11885: 11747: 11557: 11339: 11296: 10125: 9685: 6702: 6025:

is to a press release service, so does not contribute to confirming Knowledge-notability. 17:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

5933: 5321:

makes it clear that Memnun and Memnon are the same person, in different languages and cultures. But this is also true of

5045: 4281: 4178:

You have done all the due diligence and can confirm the OMD image is not free? The Duran, Soft Cell and New Order images

4107: 4093: 4081: 4019: 3331: 3269: 2797: 2783: 2775: 2188: 1496: 1482: 1462: 1448: 1412: 1142: 961: 756:

I notice no shortage of internal links. I'm puzzled by the addition of the template and not surprised by its removal. --

165: 13504: 13457: 11957: 11454: 10960: 10944: 9756: 9489: 9448: 9434: 8804:

You can contact them on their talk page to point this out, perhaps they didn't see the error you are trying to correct.

8371: 8330: 8260: 8246: 8229: 8181: 8136: 8118: 7314: 7300: 7286: 7271: 7257: 5790: 3994: 3380: 3164:

He has lent his magical touch to a plethora of projects . Recently, he astounded audiences with his directorial genius .

2946:

Your published biography has lots of sources and you would be better to cite those directly where possible. For example

749: 13267: 13213: 13160: 12905:

If you're working with a team of editors, you will want to make that clear on your user pages, to avoid accusations of

12222: 12208: 12147: 12025:

Also, I did not make a mistake when I said "he" (Cardoso) might not be notable. It is not his work, but his notability

11600: 11581: 11264: 11200: 11043: 10987: 10315: 9814: 9506: 8995: 8574: 8501: 7588: 7463: 7449: 7414: 7400: 7357: 7351: 7320: 7306: 7292: 7263: 7233: 7124: 7110: 7038: 7024: 6968: 6921: 6907: 6893: 6879: 6865: 6851: 6837: 6495:; if, others disagree, you'll have to establish a consensus to the contrary through article talk page discussion or at 5117: 5082: 4990: 4241: 3898: 3854: 3805: 3788: 3719: 3683: 3661: 3629: 3615: 3571: 3541: 3525: 3511: 3493: 3473: 3459: 3429: 3410: 2667: 2171: 1720: 1702: 1687: 1661: 1647: 1594: 1526: 1001:

ah! I guess I was indeed hasty, I merely checked the oldest version vs a few of the recent, thanks for the quick work!

17: 13498: 13036:

Fair enough! If that were the case, I definitely wouldn't blame the bot hehe. Thanks for answering my silly question!

13011: 12938:, that idealistic statement indicates that you do not yet understand how Knowledge actually works. Knowledge articles 12820: 12765: 12306: 12287: 12155: 11909: 11893: 11771: 11755: 11619: 11408: 11282: 11140:

about how Knowledge works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as

10886: 10309: 10289: 10272: 10058: 10003: 9964: 9893:

The first thing to do in case of dispute is to discuss it with the person involved. You do not seem to have posted at

9656: 8748: 8721: 8525: 8209: 8027: 8007: 7471: 7422: 7328: 7132: 7046: 6929: 6915: 6901: 6887: 6873: 6859: 6534:

I avoid that at all costs! What I have seen made perfect sense historically and verifiable as legit. Thanks again.

5596: 5474: 5460: 4459: 4444: 2868:

New accounts cannot directly create articles. You will need to submit it for a review, typically this is done via the

2444:

the record. "I'm going to go over there and set the second-hand copy straight!" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

13897: 13844: 13817: 13738: 13691: 13415:

Dear Mike, this looks great, but i still need a way to give the reference... normally i would write "Amy Antin: Song

13121: 12842: 12735: 12714: 12698: 12680: 12656: 12640: 12231: 12177: 12130: 11628: 11212:

Hello, I have a great knowledge. You can find advice about when to quote directly, and how to present quotations, at

10628: 10435:

There isn't a need to link the word Knowledge in that article. I'm not sure why you received a final warning for it.

10211: 10108: 9942: 9906: 9795: 9785: 9771: 9466: 8606: 8018: 7928: 7596: 7582: 7457: 7442: 7408: 7394: 7365: 6845: 6040: 5874: 5859: 5845: 5829: 5347:

Can Knowledge stop using the term "Asian and Pacific Islander"? on the demographics section for pages on U.S. places?

4575:

notability. There are often references that don't do that. (and are therefore only usable as supplementary, if that)

4249: 4219: 4205: 4191: 4173: 3975: 3372: 3229: 2854: 2840: 1283: 1269: 1247: 1233: 936: 849: 522: 13574: 13178: 12579: 12399: 12371: 11939: 11001: 10919: 10798: 10090: 9589: 9567: 9065:, the draft was declined, not rejected. If you want to answer Teahouse questions, please try harder to be accurate. 8564: 7965: 7937: 7917: 7486: 7201: 7187: 7097: 6060: 5910: 5308: 5027: 4584: 4289: 4196:

I thought this had already been settled by the previous person's response. Obviously not. Sorry for misleading you.

3335: 3303: 3095: 2688: 2649: 2174:

elaborates on the fact that truth is not what determines an article's content here. You might also be interested in

1881: 1859: 1575: 1560: 1394: 1371: 530: 498:

as a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion or blanked the page in good faith.

261: 13532: 13133: 13125: 12864: 12593: 11540: 11507: 11392: 11173: 11109: 10013: 9324: 8853: 8838: 8813: 8786: 8768: 8703: 8670: 8656: 7741: 7009:, it would not merit an article at this time. Knowledge is not a place for organizations to tell about themselves. 6976: 6962: 6459:

types of sources at best and can only be used in certain ways, and any interpretations of them might be considered

6209: 6118: 5693: 4917: 4337: 2765: 2751: 1919: 736: 708: 13235: 12805: 12258: 12243: 12072: 12042: 12017: 11996: 11924: 11844: 11812: 11797: 11692: 11103: 10874: 10390: 10363: 10179: 9982: 9413: 9396: 9382: 9361: 9347: 9163: 8542: 8485: 8460: 8408: 8057: 7241: 7227: 7067: 6749: 6016: 5269: 5249: 5059: 4477: 4427:

or your translation will be deleted. Just existing on another WP does not necessarily mean the article will stick

2566: 2539: 2513:- Appearing in publications with reputations such that even an adversary would have to admit they are compelling. 2456: 2274:

I also appreciated the points/feedback from TooManyFingers (talk) jlwoodwa (talk) Mjroots (talk) MarchJuly (talk)

2157: 2043: 2025: 1866: 440: 388: 325: 311: 13994: 13241: 13076: 12627:: When they don't clearly say it's free to use, and license information is not posted, that means it is not free. 12355: 11884:

at a college? Most of the top of the search results that I can see are from conservative or Republican websites.

11741: 11145: 11089: 11059: 10338: 10141: 10023: 10018: 10008: 9951:

It's simple false that I "reverted one of edits without providing any justification in the edit history ". Read

9738: 9711: 9619: 9603: 9549: 9532: 9229: 9171: 9121: 8921:" and in aiming to get it right. As Marchjuly suggested, I am happy to work with you in a collaborative way, per 8472: 7896: 7431:? That is why you are being reverted. Also, if something is obvious as you are implying, it need not be stated. ~ 7018: 6239: 6214: 6176: 6123: 6002: 5974: 5892: 5199:. That was pretty easy. What would take a little longer is determining which parts of what's stated are based on 3283: 2716: 2702: 2694: 2419: 2397: 2379: 2331: 2313: 2283: 2222: 1832: 1813: 1793: 1150: 1113: 1049: 13943: 13929: 13557: 12618: 11128:

Secondly, if you are connected with that novelist, you should read carefully the restrictions on editing with a

11025: 10992:

I'm afraid Knowledge hasn't invented time travel yet. You'll just have to wait 892 years for it to be archived.

9928: 9088: 9074: 8976: 8955: 8284:

https://www.unomaha.edu/office-of-strategic-marketing-and-communications/public-relations/what-is-newsworthy.php

7032: 6734: 6605: 6582: 6543: 6529: 6443: 6424: 6410: 6353: 6330: 6287: 6272: 6145: 5837: 5782: 4759: 4741: 4720: 4698: 4503: 4436: 4006:@jlwoodwa, "Kit" is the standard word for team clothing in sport in Britain: "uniform" is hardly ever used. See 3506:

also, you deleted his works that I have noted down 💀. I haven't completed it so, you will have some questions.

3352: 3133: 3116: 2937: 2194:

the BMJ affair. Also, since we were being attacked, it should be relevant to cite our response to the criticisms

1899: 1215: 951: 447: 14020: 13955: 13699: 13192: 13147: 13002:

The wind is not a person, so really you're fine. But could there be an error like this? Honestly I don't know.

12752: 12508: 12484: 12463: 12446: 12418: 11717: 11668: 11655: 11494: 11379: 11129: 10620: 10300:. It's a large and very active wikiproject. Wikiprojects are a good way to get involved with the community. -- 9822: 9316: 9307: 9271: 8886: 8678: 8640: 8414: 7975: 7661: 7643: 7557: 7521: 7428: 6783: 6769: 6159: 4950: 4671: 4566: 4540: 4275: 4261: 4159: 4141: 4042: 3076: 2485:

That isn't the only policy that might apply in every case, but for certain it is the primary one in this case.

2166:, unfortunately, Knowledge does not aim to capture the truth of a subject. Rather, it tries to summarize what " 2076: 1757: 1036:, I took a brief look at an article near the top of your list about a topic that interests me. That article is 246: 136: 11827: 11342:

of this discussion to see if anyone has suggestions for improvement. Moving over a redirect merely requires a

9523:

I'd suggest confining this to the COI noticeboard where you have already posted, to avoid duplicating effort.

9005: 8442: 8428: 7695: 7675: 6938:

Hello, IP user. Suppose you put in some information which you absolutely know from your experience is correct.

5338: 5234: 4844: 4797: 3201: 3059: 3020: 1741: 1631: 1613: 1078: 1028: 1010: 992: 901: 815: 13984: 13490: 13406: 13313: 13045: 13031: 12990: 12977:

Maybe it's OK on Commons (imaginably it's a freedom-of-panorama matter), maybe not; the best place to ask is

12951: 12526: 12108: 12078: 11674: 11524: 11039: 10519: 10468: 10429: 10419: 9260: 8739:

it is tricky getting the Knowledge style down, but I am trying and appreciate anyone's advice on it. Thanks!

8636: 8602: 7795:

It's not really my strength. I tried last time and got a lot of blowback. So I'm asking for someone who can.

7612: 7535: 7248:

It's possible that citing a source for the naming process might be unnecessary because it's uncontroversial.

6823: 6805: 6664: 6659:, which you have already been pointed to in the comments, specifically says you should not use such sources. 6624: 6022: 5740: 5722: 5078: 4890: 4862: 4518: 3948: 3884: 3840: 3773: 3550:

No one is under any obligation to reply quickly. Do you have a particular need for a speedy resolution here?

3147: 2967: 2747: 2010: 1989: 1197: 1132: 1095: 978: 787: 584: 551: 465: 411: 348: 146: 13988: 13632: 10162: 9149: 9057: 7706:)". Click on the link within that. You're now at the redirect. Edit it, as you'd edit a regular article. -- 7687: 5948: 5772: 3215: 3179: 2588: 2175: 2170:" (as defined by Knowledge) have said about the topic, recognizing that those sources may get things wrong. 2109: 2088: 13516: 12315:, that unreferenced content was written by an editor with little experience who has not edited since 2017. 12088: 11515:

Also, I see I've already heeded your advice! Tagging the talk page with relevant wikiprojects (including {{

11161: 10504:

Welcome to the Teahouse. The user who left the message on your talk page has been indefinitely blocked for

10380: 9202: 9137: 7765: 7699: 5990: 5881:. Anyway check out the visual arts wikiproject page and other pages linked there including the talk page. ~ 5356: 5217: 5185: 5171: 4103: 4067: 3849:

No, its the writing of R. Lalrawna, not Dokhuma. If I am not saying what you mean, please clarify it more.

3364: 3287: 3246: 3101: 2914: 2900: 2885: 2240:

3) Ungar and Bray (2005) give a sociologist's analysis of the storm of criticism in letters to the journal.

1346:? Accounting for external bias isn't a hypothetical, it's been part of a core notability guideline since a 1180:

We don't aim to remove bias, since everyone has some sort of bias. However, as editors it is our policy to

859: 845: 724: 683: 12142:

Additionally, not calling it what it actually is goes against Knowledge's policy about political opinions.

12059:

the Einstein article is easy to support, because there's so much proof that Einstein has major importance.

10585:

Not every Knowledge editor is the world's best writer. Actually, none of them are. Feel free to copyedit.

7733: 7715: 7544:

are over a century old. Perhaps they could be be paraphrased for Knowledge purposes as "if you can't find

5727:

Yup, I'll join the Discord server later when I have some more free time to chat on there. Thanks for that!

4552: 3006: 2253: 2139: 2124: 14015: 13152:

It is unavoidable for there to be bias. Here are a couple of interesting essays about bias on Knowledge:

11252: 9915: 9280:

say about a subject. Knowledge itself is not regarded as a reliable source, because it is user-generated.

9039: 8941: 8930: 8874: 8798: 7771: 7175: 6310: 5916: 5254:

It was worse before. What I cut out was cited to nothing but press releases and other primary sources. I

4898: 4642: 4620: 4606: 1778: 1767: 1763: 765: 11366:

There's that big blue button that says "submit the draft for review". Click that and follow the process.

10828: 1188:. If there are two equally valid opinions, then the article can and should represent them both, without 195: 13925: 13441:

look suitable for this situation? (Scroll down to see the details of what's in them and how they work.)

13102: 13094: 12739: 10949:

Yeah. Now it's resolved. in fact, it was appeared for a moment and disappeared then after refreshing. —

10900: 10579: 9933:

But here it is, if I try to send him a message, he will revert, he has already reverted several times!

9495:

in good faith but keeps leaving messes behind for others to clean up, and shows no sign of improving. ~

9245: 8277:

I admit, the situation is not black and white, it is not mathematical. It is subject to interpretation.

7631: 7078: 5763:. These will greatly increase your chances of success compared to diving right in to article creation. 5556:" – You could be correct, but this would be a personal observation and speculative, which is a form of 5521: 5489: 5470: 5412: 5369: 4077: 3588:

in Knowledge's sense, because if they are not, every single moment spent on the draft is wasted effort.

3028: 2698: 2655: 2440:: I'm sure you'd agree that you came here to set the record straight. The problem is that Knowledge is 2167: 1890:. Perhaps you're thinking about the "Deleted edits" figure in the first section of that page of stats? 1492: 1458: 1424: 636: 9276:

Hello, Lagosman, and welcome to the Teahouse. A Knowledge article should be almost 100% based on what

5582:. All of this came from older U.S. census reports, which are still being cited and compared in tables. 4509:

In addition, make sure the references are notable and they are translated with neutral point of view.

3107:

OK, what is the question you want to ask? A reviewer will let you know the status of your draft soon.

1957: 201: 13887: 13813: 13784: 11638: 11369:

Though I will say with empty sections, it's doubtful people will accept it as ready for prime time.

11351: 10956: 8456: 8367: 8305: 8256: 8225: 8132: 8082: 7947: 3820:, regardless of who the publisher is and whatever addenda were added. You may be able to use it as a 2631:

Article is repeatedly getting edited and major content removed within 1 day between my lengthy edits.

2246: 2202: 662: 12431:

way to know. If I had the energy, I'd do a deeper dive into the literature, which no doubt exists. ―

10909:, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. 10849: 9218:. Your username won't change unless you request it, and the response time isn't unreasonably slow. ~ 8190:

Knowledge page for Alan Watt, an author whose main point was to suggest people think for themselves.

7087:, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. 6503:

gets added that probably shouldn't have been added. So, if you come across some content, you can be

2510:- The reporters' voices are primary; not interviewing you, but reporting on developments in the case 753: 13939: 13907: 13715: 13687: 13653: 13592: 13570: 13486: 13453: 13402: 13369: 13351: 13331: 13323: 13309: 13209: 13007: 12889: 12829:

points out, a "passionate" plot summary is inappropriate because of the core content policy of the

12816: 12728: 12694: 12676: 12636: 12522: 12424: 12406: 12367: 12302: 12204: 12104: 12068: 12038: 11992: 11606: 11553: 10968: 10561: 10285: 10054: 9938: 9781: 9752: 9646: 9485: 9430: 9312:

Thanks - I've learnt something I need ideally minimum three good sources independent of Knowledge.

9249: 9182: 9045: 8717: 7282: 7253: 7197: 7148: 6819: 6801: 6698: 6660: 6620: 5906: 5644: 5541: 5507: 5390: 5132: 5102: 5074: 4580: 4487: 4473: 4364: 4201: 4169: 3982: 3742:

From what I understand, the only significant addition that is only present in the second book is a

3407: 3225: 3091: 2963: 2850: 2793: 2761: 2645: 2562: 2518: 2490: 2452: 2153: 2053: 2039: 2021: 1855: 1771: 1716: 1683: 1643: 1590: 1571: 1522: 1390: 1326: 1308: 1265: 1257: 1253: 1229: 1193: 932: 700: 580: 547: 488:

Okay, I just added the template you gave me - I hope I did it correctly. This message comes up now:

461: 407: 344: 127: 7077:

prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in

4689:, it looks like the disruptive IP user was blocked instead of adding semi=protection to the page. 397:

Apologies, I misunderstood the type of picture you had uploaded. The principles are the same. For

13155: 13106: 12872: 12566: 11953: 11935: 11889: 11751: 11596: 11536: 11450: 11445:) but I will try my darnest to respect wikipedia's rules and help make the article encyclopedic. 11278: 11141: 11133: 10244: 9691: 9615: 9585: 9545: 9117: 8560: 8003: 7624: 6678: 6673:

so what i do to publish that article as no source is available on internet besides Raj era books

6642: 6601: 6588: 6318: 6186: 6095: 6036: 5970: 5572:

itself is very broad, but why make it even broader...by dragging another continent into the label

5353: 4996: 4295: 4285: 4099: 4063: 4053: 4025: 3327: 3265: 3050:

isn't based on a solid understanding of those policies and standards, it won't hold much weight.

2779: 2393: 2327: 2309: 2184: 1146: 1067: 650: 526: 270: 11677:

and use it to propose changes. However, given the dearth of significant coverage about you, the

8103:. Write it forward. That means, find reliable source coverage of him that is independent of him 7855:

Really dude, this was a trivial edit that you could have done yourself. I just did it for you. ~

7812:

suggests that it's a conflict-of-interest matter. If you have a conflict of interest concerning

7427:

Research of your own? Surely you must have found some sources then. Are you aware of our policy

4298:

describes three ways that works can be in the public domain: they are ineligible for copyright (

4028:: I don't know if this entirely answers your question, but it's probably a good start at least: 720: 13725: 13424: 13117: 13083: 11577: 11520: 11474: 11047: 9818: 9444: 9409: 9392: 9357: 8951: 8918: 8849: 7592: 7467: 7453: 7418: 7404: 7361: 7336: 7324: 7310: 7296: 7267: 7237: 7128: 7114: 7042: 7028: 6972: 6925: 6911: 6897: 6883: 6869: 6855: 6841: 6596:

having RAJ Era sources and i also added disclaimer about that, after that it was not accepted.

6570: 6500: 4987: 4302: 3065: 3064:

Hello, LuciaS23, and welcome to the Teahouse. In addition to what others have said, please see

1949: 1886:

I'm not aware of any such score. There are lots of nuggets of information about users though -

1510: 1189: 460:

on each file's page. Alternatively, get the artist to approve retention, as I mentioned above.

224: 13965:: Welcome to the Teahouse. Like all other articles, Bergel would require sources that satisfy 8734:

I made some changes based on your suggestions. Initially I wanted this to be a section in the

7778: 2770:

Citoid, the citation tool integrated in VisualEditor's visual and wikitext modes, may be what

1171:

How does wikipedia prevent political or religious bias from affecting accuracy of information?

13822:

Right off the bat you tell your readers it's the "most fascinating way to write". You should

13478: 13419:

in "First Song in the Morning", 2020" - but then the reference to the book is missing still.

13381: 13173: 12775: 12575: 12540: 12254: 12218: 12170: 11977: 11904: 11881: 11839: 11792: 11766: 11736: 11687: 11615: 11527:) was one of the first things I did after creating the draft, since I saw it recommended in " 11438: 11404: 11260: 11125:

on English Knowledge, you will not succeed and you should not put any further time into this.

10983: 10940: 10925: 10608: 10550: 10386: 9501: 9461: 9224: 9159: 8763: 8698: 8651: 8520: 8423: 8325: 8241: 8176: 8142: 8113: 8022: 7960: 7932: 7912: 7861: 7821: 7577: 7437: 7389: 7344: 6764: 6221:

I just reorganized the Knowledge "Galena and Chicago Union Railroad" history sections titled:

6056: 6012: 5887: 5803: 5264: 5229: 4388: 4374: 4032: 4000: 3444: 3376: 3197: 3016: 2994: 2932: 2663: 2352:

There is a typo in the middle of the para on the BMJ affair (line 7): "on the its conclusion"

1914: 1808: 1788: 1698: 1657: 1627: 1488: 1477: 1454: 1443: 1420: 1343: 983:

Don't be too hasty - I just pulled the English version out of the page history from 2023. --

598: 565: 479: 426: 384: 321: 257: 13300:

editor you should only make very limited changes to the article now it is in mainspace (see

12942:

contribute to notability. Instead, they neutrally describe topics that are already notable.

12272: 11722:

I did a search on Google News and found a few obituaries for people with the same name, and

9649:. I see that you are now discussing this issue with the reverting edtior on your talk page. 8447:

Yes, Hoary, his website is original-looking and unique. Originality and uniqueness are good.

7841:

If you aren't able/willing, I'm sure someone else will assist. It's a pretty simple thing.

6467:

sources, however, can often be cited as long as the secondary sources is considered to be a

2923:

331dot put a submit button at the top of your sandbox draft so you can submit it for review.

1968:

when making your request because either could easily be misconstrued. As long as you remain

13966: 13883: 13879: 13854: 13766: 13555: 13093:

and submitted for assessment, or created directly and then (nearly always) assessed by the

13041: 12801: 12589: 12283: 12126: 11625: 11516: 11464: 11416: 11347: 11310:

You still need to add more independent reliable references for your article to be notable.

11213: 11196: 11153: 11099: 11073: 10950: 10932: 10906: 10882: 10557: 10556:

Hi IP 2600:8800:9E00:D700:2C1C:F56E:3915:5471. You could try reading the Knowledge article

10305: 10268: 10175: 10158: 10137: 9978: 9960: 9894: 9865: 9707: 9654: 9215: 9190: 9186: 9129: 9003: 8782: 8744: 8666: 8499: 7943: 7531: 7482: 7413:

and how could the town Huntingdonshire was named after be any different then Huntingdon?💀

7084: 6374: 6203: 6112: 6028: 5982: 5736: 5431: 5404: 3751: 3279: 1895: 1468: 1109: 1024: 988: 897: 831: 783: 654: 10277:

Thanks Nick. Was having trouble replying to you before. (The reply button was greyed out).

10226:

have you found a Knowledge article about a war involving the US which is not on that list?

9702:. You can adjust the widths of the columns by changing the width number. Happy editing! 7990:. You can also find short but more general discussions about naming rape victims, such as 7571:

an encyclopedia works, then perhaps you should, as you say, rethink your life's choices. ~

7262:

every edit i do without sources gets deleted. Ill even name the people too theres so much

3566:

And also from the Criminal charges, I think one can take a guess to what made him notable

2579:

for anything. I just linked to a help page that I thought you might benefit from reading.

1802:

article, and I cannot see that the sources you cite support the assertion you're making. ~

237: 8: 13862: 13830:

them it's "fascinating", which doesn't actually impart any information. Saying it's the "

13734: 13673: 13638: 13395: 13365: 13343: 13327: 13280: 13263: 13231: 13219: 13098: 13019: 12968:, your question actually raises a number of questions. One is of the copyright status of 12947: 12838: 12710: 12652: 12614: 12518: 12459: 12414: 12320: 12239: 11315: 11291: 11241: 11221: 11169: 11085: 11077: 11055: 10915: 10590: 10569: 10359: 10281: 10217: 10207: 10104: 10050: 9934: 9924: 9911: 9902: 9878: 9767: 9681: 9594:

My suggestion was simply that, out a desire to keep things consolidated in one location.

9563: 9516: 9426: 9303: 9284: 9267: 9145: 9101: 9084: 9070: 9053: 8834: 8809: 8538: 8141:

His wife's desire to have a Knowledge article, or not, doesn't matter. We have a policy:

7817: 7655: 7193: 7093: 6958: 6578: 6539: 6525: 6484: 6476: 6472: 6464: 6456: 6439: 6420: 6406: 6393:, then it's probably better to try and sort things out through talk page discussion than 6390: 6349: 6326: 6314: 6283: 6268: 6256: 6235: 6172: 6155: 5998: 5954: 5815: 5760: 5516:

Okay, but why is it more preferable to use the old, outdated term over the current term?

5304: 5245: 5015: 4946: 4931: 4793: 4755: 4737: 4716: 4694: 4562: 4514: 4271: 4234: 4215: 4187: 4155: 4089: 4015: 3965: 3798: 3601: 3398: 3299: 3239: 3211: 3129: 3112: 3072: 2846: 2836: 2789: 2771: 2757: 2723: 2243:

4) There are two articles by me in Quillette giving a detailed account of the BMJ affair.

1985: 1953: 1753: 1322: 1289: 1279: 1261: 1243: 1225: 1211: 1091: 1045: 947: 690: 366: 307: 13018:

If you were instead "Scirocco745", and you were spotted augmenting/debasing the article

12689:: Just hoping you see this; I don't want you to think removing it was the final answer. 6309:, and disagreements over article content are expected to be resolved in accordance with 4817:

As for the refs, I added (probably too many) citations after feedback at the FL nom for

13840: 13799: 13613: 13512: 13071: 12868: 12785: 12748: 12503: 12479: 12441: 12394: 12350: 11713: 11651: 11592: 11532: 11512:

Ah I see. I'll try to work on fleshing out the placeholder sections, which should help.

11490: 11446: 11442: 11375: 11346:, but a page mover may hesitate to fufill such a request if the draft appears unready. 11333: 11290:, it doesn't reek of self-promo/autobio to me. Just a poorly put together filmography. 11274: 11021: 10997: 10616: 10488: 10334: 10086: 9726: 9611: 9581: 9541: 9378: 9343: 8922: 8820: 8689: 8556: 8530: 8335:

Thank you, Sir. I will be thinking about what you were kind enough to inform me about.

8163: 8100: 7999: 7639: 7221: 7183: 7063: 6674: 6652: 6638: 6612: 6597: 6509: 6480: 6141: 5778: 5625: 5592: 5456: 5181: 5127:

necessarily the most practical advice, just would be a more comfortable introduction.)

5113: 5055: 5023: 4913: 4858: 4667: 4536: 4333: 4257: 4134: 4049: 3990: 3368: 3340: 3318: 3291: 3256: 3055: 2905:

Your account is old enough, but you need 10 edits to create articles, you only have 5.

2684: 2584: 2403: 2389: 2344: 2337: 2323: 2305: 2197: 2180: 2084: 1961: 1887: 1877: 1828: 1556: 1367: 679: 509:

If this file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice.

274: 66: 58: 9044:

The article was declined for lack of reliable independent sources. You can go through

8757:

The "Press coverage" section seems out of place in the middle of a list of examples. ~

7109:

I'd recommend keeping note of sources that they show on tv about that specific report

5684:

might seem better, but responses to suggestions etc posted there are rare indeed.) --

3363:

From googling, he's a 22-y-o musician with one full album released. You need to study

357:

Oh, right. Without looking at the article, I assumed this was about pictures of works

73: 13980: 13434: 13420: 13388: 12825:

The guideline calling for a plot summary of 400 to 700 words is excellent advice. As

11823: 11573: 11270: 11122: 10935:. I don't see issues now or in the version at the time so I guess it's resolved now. 10855: 10806: 10515: 10505: 10464: 10442: 10415: 10297: 10259: 9744: 9734: 9440: 9420: 9405: 9388: 9368: 9353: 9332: 8961: 8947: 8896: 8862: 8845: 8826: 8632: 8618: 8598: 7995: 7729: 7683: 7553: 7168: 6452: 6394: 6386: 6297: 6252: 6091: 6083: 5710: 5334: 4971: 4879: 4833: 3944: 3880: 3836: 3821: 3769: 3697: 3647: 3585: 3418: 3394: 3220:

You meant weasel words. Weevil words would be quite different, but maybe funnier. :)

3189: 2896: 2743: 2726:: Welcome to the Teahouse. Your use of terminology is confusing; what do you mean by 1908:

and gets deleted, and that increases the deleted edit count for all those editors.. ~

335: 161: 13973:. You may wish to draft an article if you're thinking of taking on this endeavour. — 6087:

your talk page. There, you could discuss the matter with the editor about your edit.

4129: 192: 13624:

by changing the writing style, as it currently reads too much like a CV or resume.

13188: 13168: 13143: 13090: 12914: 12771: 12760: 12571: 12536: 12514: 12340:. Wouldn't it be great if there was a site-wide consensus on this? One can dream. ― 12312: 12275: 12250: 12227: 12214: 12192: 12165: 12013: 11899: 11834: 11787: 11761: 11731: 11682: 11663: 11624:

I've nominated the redirect for deletion and can review the AFC once that happens.

11611: 11502: 11424: 11400: 11387: 11256: 11191:

it summarizes it accurately. Now you can remove the "lead too short" tag. Done! --

11035: 11014: 10979: 10936: 10405: 10382: 9806: 9672:

You can centre the data, but I think you have to do so in each row separately. See

9599: 9528: 9496: 9456: 9219: 9155: 9035: 8774: 8758: 8731: 8693: 8685: 8646: 8548: 8515: 8418: 8388: 8320: 8236: 8210:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhrYRzvVssM&list=PL0273C286EBCA0464&index=1

8171: 8108: 8014: 7955: 7924: 7907: 7856: 7813: 7572: 7432: 7384: 7339: 7103: 7014: 6779: 6759: 6745: 6730: 6398: 6370: 6052: 6032: 6008: 5882: 5799: 5768: 5755: 5259: 5224: 4968: 4629: 4616: 4455: 4432: 4322: 3870: 3555: 3440: 3193: 3143: 3012: 2951: 2927: 2910: 2881: 2869: 2659: 2612: 2535: 2415: 2375: 2279: 2218: 2135: 2120: 2105: 2006: 1977: 1909: 1803: 1783: 1539:

If you want to mention an HTML tag (rather than use it), there's a handy template:

1472: 1438: 1300:

exactly the kind of thing that, if it started, could bring Knowledge crashing down.

1128: 1074: 1006: 974: 874: 811: 732: 594: 575: 561: 542: 518: 475: 436: 422: 394: 380: 331: 317: 253: 12384:(Moral: We are limited by our model of decision-making—this is but one example.) ― 12382:

variances. Before you could sneeze, it would be overly complex or uselessly vague.

11484:

might have more), so they get notified when the article is submitted for review.

10603:

English, which uses prepositions with verbs far more than AmEng does. Bare appeal

5560:. We couldn't use this in any way on Knowledge unless it was directly backed by a 5426: 3692:

It is very clearly not independent, the biography subject wrote the book himself.

266:

Hello, CrissCollab. There are two ways for images to be used in English Knowledge.

235: 13762: 13551: 13438: 13301: 13292: 13037: 13027: 12996: 12986: 12965: 12936:

this page would contribute to his notability, free of the influence of government

12797: 12668: 12585: 12279: 12122: 11192: 11065: 10878: 10636: 10326: 10301: 10264: 10171: 10154: 10133: 10036: 9989: 9974: 9956: 9830: 9703: 9650: 9636:

Clarification on Link Removal and Tone of Feedback Regarding Demidov Contribution

9256: 9198: 8999: 8882: 8778: 8740: 8735: 8709: 8662: 8614: 8495: 8481: 8438: 8433:

But the formatting/design has a certain period charm. (1996 or so, perhaps?). --

8404: 8053: 7829: 7786: 7761: 7711: 7614: 7527: 7517: 7478: 6513: 6488: 6336:

to correct it , I think we would both agree that is wrong. Disagreement on the '

6190: 6099: 5855: 5732: 5718: 5706: 5689: 5579: 5213: 5167: 5159: 5098: 5069: 5037: 4964: 4638: 4602: 4353: 4312: 3639: 3348: 3175: 3002: 2959: 2607:

Make sure you log in when posting, so your posts are properly attributed to you.

2237:

2) 2 editors defended their publication of the article and responded to criticism

1969: 1891: 1619: 1609: 1517:

Knowledge only uses the straight type of quotation marks, for technical reasons.

1453:

Can you provide a bit more detail as to how to use the Wikidata item link thing?

1355: 1119: 1105: 1020: 998: 984: 893: 863: 802: 797: 779: 761: 443: 10477:

Yeah, those edits are not disruptive and no admin would block you for them. The

10099:. Make sure you read the notes at the top of the page carefully before posting. 8877:. It's been 16 years since anyone discussed a proposed or actual edit there. -- 8044:, I think you may be mistaking Knowledge (which is where we find ourselves) for 3732:

is trying to make is that the bulk of the content remains autobiographical. The

965:

I feel the need to bring it up because in my review of the pages, I came across

839:

there is no consensus on what constitutes "too few" links. Use editor discretion

13921: 13858: 13730: 13669: 13297: 13259: 13227: 12943: 12906: 12834: 12830: 12756: 12706: 12686: 12671:

is one important place to look. It may have much better news than what I gave.

12648: 12624: 12610: 12455: 12410: 12316: 12235: 11659: 11498: 11383: 11311: 11238: 11217: 11165: 11081: 11051: 10911: 10586: 10565: 10355: 10344: 10322: 10221: 10203: 10119: 10100: 10078: 9920: 9898: 9874: 9763: 9677: 9573: 9559: 9299: 9263: 9141: 9080: 9066: 9062: 9049: 9027: 8906: 8902: 8870: 8830: 8805: 8552: 8534: 7994:, on the BLP talk page. The policy most relevant to this situation is probably 7649: 7089: 7055: 6954: 6574: 6535: 6521: 6504: 6492: 6463:

if written in Knowledge's voice; personal letters which have been discussed in

6448: 6435: 6416: 6402: 6360: 6345: 6322: 6306: 6292: 6279: 6264: 6246: 6231: 6182: 6168: 6151: 6079: 6048: 5994: 5944: 5833: 5300: 5241: 5192: 4942: 4927: 4803: 4789: 4751: 4747: 4733: 4729: 4712: 4704: 4690: 4686: 4680: 4558: 4510: 4267: 4211: 4183: 4151: 4085: 4011: 3961: 3597: 3310: 3295: 3207: 3108: 3068: 2947: 2832: 1981: 1749: 1275: 1239: 1221: 1207: 1181: 1101: 1087: 1055: 1041: 966: 957: 943: 675: 454: 403: 362: 340: 303: 281: 8621:, and that persisting in such an endeavour may bring their actions before the 8490:

I would just add that redlinks are not permitted on disambiguation pages, per

6792:

IP editor. Knowledge is, by consensus based on a number of policies. Of these

4318:), or they have been released into the public domain by the copyright holder ( 3893:

but that section was not created by Dokhuma, so it cannot be an autobiography

233: 190: 14009: 13836: 13795: 13754: 13753:

some reference to this technique in an essay like that yourself. But because

13617: 13616:, where, at least, you gave the additional context that you are asking about 13508: 13305: 13288: 13255: 13062: 12931: 12899: 12744: 12494: 12470: 12451: 12432: 12385: 12341: 11727: 11707: 11698: 11647: 11486: 11481: 11431: 11420: 11371: 11343: 11287: 11157: 11017: 10993: 10809: 10612: 10330: 10115: 10096: 10082: 9870: 9374: 9339: 9313: 9295: 9209: 9178: 9133: 9019: 8625:. Please read the relevant information on those pages for more information. — 8622: 8491: 8360: 8316: 7635: 7545: 7216: 7179: 7059: 7006: 6656: 6496: 6366: 6301: 6260: 6137: 5986: 5898: 5621: 5588: 5546: 5465:

I'm trying to follow your advice on combining two rows but I'm stuck. Sorry.

5452: 5326: 5196: 5177: 5041: 5019: 4909: 4868: 4854: 4708: 4663: 4532: 4424: 4407:

Can I Duplicate An Existing Article on German Knowledge to English Knowledge?

4329: 4253: 3986: 3390: 3051: 2955: 2873: 2680: 2637: 2580: 2480: 2080: 1965: 1905: 1873: 1867:

Here is the kind of notice I found that made me think he is a serial reverter

1838: 1824: 1552: 1363: 742: 12162:

Talk:Trump_International_Golf_Club_shooting#Requested_move_15_September_2024

10772:"Social Environment, Dresses and Food of Two Main Communities before Exodus" 10607:

used in BrEng in legal language, but it isn't common usage. Please see e.g.

7139:

You won't find objectivity, but at least you can be thoughtful and diligent.

7023:

i agree. It primarily depends on how famous it really is to be on wikipedia

2950:

is very useful in showing notability, since it was a review by Usherwood in

1766:

is the edit that was reverted. The reasoning is given in the revert summary

13974: 12098: 12092: 11861: 11857: 11819: 11678: 11206: 11149: 11069: 10509: 10458: 10436: 10409: 10248: 9730: 9277: 9125: 9109: 9023: 8626: 8592: 8396: 7725: 7679: 7567: 7549: 7002: 6797: 6633:

There are no other sources present on the internet or in any books besides

6616: 6517: 6479:. So, if you're considered to clearly be an established content expert per 6468: 6460: 6382: 6378: 6133: 5978: 5561: 5557: 5330: 5318: 5291: 5200: 4872: 4826: 4807: 4781: 4528: 3938: 3874: 3830: 3763: 3729: 3693: 3676: 3643: 3592: 2990: 2737: 1542: 1354:

achievable or desirable, but I don't think efforts in that direction (like

1185: 1063: 1037: 450:

you uploaded to en:Knowledge. Deletion is achieved by placing the template

288:

their own work, and releasing it; or they can email the WMF as detailed at

11704:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_nominate_a_single_page_for_deletion

11564:

This type of situation requires admin help, which can be requested here:

10296:

By the way, if you're interested in military history, I recommend joining

10202:

corresponding WikiProject(s) pointing to the discussion you have started.

7754:

police officers from the Walnut Creek California Police Department{{Efn|}}

7399:

Huntingdon shire wikipedia, research of my own, and i live in st neots 🙂

6385:

is to encourage discussion as a way to resolve content disputes and avoid

13970: 13665: 13626: 13468:

Can I include a hyperlink to the copyrighted image as an inline citation?

13184: 13139: 12910: 12645:

Got it. I'll remove the logo to prevent any problems. Thanks for the info

11118:

You are welcome to contribute, but I would give you a couple of cautions:

10482: 9595: 9577: 9556: 9524: 9031: 8973: 8938: 8866: 8300:

Respectfully, may I ask if you are you more into the past or the future?

7051: 7010: 6815: 6793: 6775: 6741: 6726: 6722: 6487:, then you could possibly add citations to your own work if there are no 5764: 5107: 5049: 4524: 4420: 4280:

the photo has no copyright notice , does that make it public domain?....

3865: 3817: 3551: 3250: 3139: 2906: 2877: 2608: 2116: 1206:

Bias has been eliminated by the principle of Neutral Point of View (NPV)

1124: 1083: 1070: 1033: 1002: 970: 884: 870: 822: 807: 775: 728: 687: 299: 13747:

Does the following writing technique merit being displayed on Knowledge?

12857: 11610:

not be available refs for those sections. Otherwise, interesting topic.

11399:

It's certainly a viable topic with some decent sourcing available/used.

11255:

has been Declined five times, so it may be time to abandon your effort.

7752:. That's not permissible. (If you must have a link there, then perhaps: 7305:

They need to realise the actual truth that we're currently pointing out

6906:

Youll endlessly be scrolling youtube when you search st neots skatepark

6563: 6227:"The 1864 Great Consolidation of the Chicago & NorthWestern Railway" 5877:. It still has sub-pages under the old contemporary arts title, such as 5554:

even if the 1990 numbers are different, I doubt that the percentages are

2362: 643: 13808:

Thanks. May I trouble you to please point out the defects you spotted?

13474: 13291:

on 13 September, so I find it a bit odd that another new page reviewer

13284: 13023: 12982: 12521:

which is the established guidance that answers your original question.

11944:

it really should not feel that unsettling, all these links are already

10632: 9802: 9673: 9194: 8910: 8878: 8684:

The reviewer is correct, it's an essay, not an article. Have a look at

8477: 8434: 8400: 8049: 7825: 7782: 7757: 7707: 7513: 6381:

explaining why. This, however, isn't already the case. The idea behind

6261:

you should try and sort things out through article talk page discussion

6007:

Having an infobox or images has no impact on getting a draft approved.

5851: 5822: 5714: 5685: 5617: 5209: 5176:

Thank you for confirming. And wow, thanks all for the edits already! --

5163: 5155: 5068:

One other pitfall you need to beware of is that the reference may be a

4634: 4598: 3344: 3171: 2998: 2640:: This information you've been adding, what sources does it come from? 2254:

https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21858

1605: 1434: 793: 757: 13775:

The URL for the Amazon.com page where "Write Talking" is displayed is

11156:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 11132:(If you are actually that novelist yourself, please don't try it: see 11121:

First, unless you can show that the novelist meets the conditions for

10453:

Welcome to the Teahouse. It appears that the user who warned you (and

9132:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 8508:

using non-SPS written by a BLP's subject for claim about third parties

5985:, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the 1618:

Thanks for this - the article I want to put categories on is this one

1137:

can you look for the opposite? the nearly orphan articles, such that

13917: 13322:

Sincere thanks to you for the clarification and for the observation @

13251: 10043: 8045: 7143:

civil. Compromise can be necessary, in terms of how quickly you act.

5940: 5400: 5002:

Sometimes, but not always. For example, if the article currently has

4557:

I was referring to a strong independent reference, so yes! Reliable.

4547: 1799: 206: 12292:

Yes, I can see why. To me, Strunk and White is valuable (if at all)

6892:

For clarification they are both good known skateparks across the uk

6619:. See also the comments others have addded to the top of the draft. 5010:, and you delete the second sentence, you should keep the citation: 3829:

No; I am not an AFC reviewer and I have no intention of being one. —

2349:

Also, do you see how to incorporate a sentence about Ungar and Bray?

238: 103:

Your go-to place for friendly help with using and editing Knowledge.

12792: 10564:

or simply just Googling whatever specific information you need. --

9694:: In that table, the width of each column is defined with the code 9193:. (Or so I believe. I may be making one or more mistakes here.) -- 7546:

significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources about a topic

6850:

check the page about "list of skateparks" and go to united kingdom

5826:

Wikipedia_talk:Notability#RfC:_Notability_and_British_Rail_stations

5731:

the talk page along with the other claims I find in the same vein.

4821:, where one user critiqued an already-detailed lead for not having 3624:

btw, what do you think should be the minimum number of references?

3039: 1735:

A serial reverter just reverted me. How do I address it graciously?

774:

why I've had so many watchlist notifications about this category. @

11064:

Hello, Lester1960, and welcome to the Teahouse. I presume this is

10905:

If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish

7083:

If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish

6953:

That is we we prefer (and in many cases required) citing sources.

4007: 2247:

https://quillette.com/2023/09/15/dogmatism-data-and-public-health/

2203:

https://quillette.com/2023/09/15/dogmatism-data-and-public-health/

1666:" ' (The ones we want, whether for quotation marks or apostrophes) 292:. But you cannot do it (though you could be the one to upload it). 13183:

That's a very interesting quote. I'll have to remember that one.

10803:

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

10343:

Hello, Waldohammer. Thank you for pointing out this vandalism to

7215:

What type of "largest" is it meant to be? Area? Population? 🇺🇦

6818:

They were blocked on 7 September but are currently not, I think.

4904:

This used to be common on Knowledge, but is now discouraged. See

3706:

no. The the person Dr James, wrote the book Ṭawng Un Hrilhfiahna

3343:, it was unthinking use of the "Reply" function, most likely. -- 2736:

offers great advice for dealing with citing and external links. —

2234:

1) page should point out that the BMJ did not retract the article

1220:

I don't think it's true to say that Knowledge is free from bias,

38: 13857:

and that they are sourced using reliable independent reference.

10399:

Why can't you just delete an article instead of "cleaning it up"

8319:. As for my username, see the second sentence on my user page. ~ 5873:

The contemporary art wikiproject has apparently been renamed to

5868:

How to Connect with Fellow Wikipedians for Collaborative Writing

1960:. If you do decide to post on a noticeboard, I suggest avoiding 10776:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research

10478: 10196:

Wanting to add to the List of wars involving the United States.

9663:

Orlando International Airport - Annual traffic table adjustment

9645:

You added bare url with no explanation whatsoever. Please read

7192:

Thank you for your help! This was just what I was looking for.

6090:

You can use a variety of bots to clean up citations, including

5296: 5287: 5258:

citations to independent sources in the legal issues section. ~

4523:

I think that's slightly incorrect. References don't need to be

4359:

Where on Knowledge did you try? Which CNN article do you mean?

12405:

As for the 8th grade reading level, that style belongs on the

12164:, where there is a lengthy discussion about exactly that. :) 12029:

that they are talking about. Knowledge is looking for reports

10376: 8251:

Thank you. I will be studying your quick and kind reply, Sir.

7952:

Talk:2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident#RfC: Name of victim

6593: 4294:

No; by default, all copyright-eligible works are copyrighted.

3036:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fabio Mancini (2nd nomination)

239: 207: 11591:

for the article to use it instead of higher quality sources.

11115:

Hello, IP user, and welcome to the Teahouse and to Knowledge.

10974:

This is the encyclopedia Knowledge. We have an article about

4246:

c:File:Soft Cell (1983 Sire publicity photo) 02.jpg § Summary

3714:. If you are still not clear, just ask it very specifically. 2788:

Thank you, :) I noticed that VisualEditor needs more update.

13533:"This figure illustrates dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease" 11548:

well recognized yet, or unofficial symptoms to the article.

11326:

How should I move Draft:Childhood dementia to the mainspace?

9259:

was written for further sample on how to edit yours to meet

7337:

http://abcounties.com/huntingdonshire/about-huntingdonshire/

12006: 11868:

that have biographical information about you? For example

9729:

is a list of all categories on English-language Knowledge.

5322: 4711:: Turns out another user will have to protect the article. 13761:

you write on the project, it will probably be deleted. --

10247:, or the limitations of our alternative editing tool, the 7174:

or a similar template, then the procedure is described at

6920:

And adrenaline alley is Europe's largest indoor skatepark

5545:

above should solve that concern, assuming you can achieve

13776: 13644:

I doubt if a submission button is really needed today ...

13274:

Adding more citations and removing a maintenance template

11865: 10648: 10599:

Please bear in mind that "appeal against" is standard in

10074: 9747:. It has several options for seeing where everything is. 9236:

This article needs additional citations for verification.

8585: 8361:

https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?lang=es&q=Q90023730

7291:

Nah they need to accept not everything had to be sourced

7005:

have written about your organization and shown how it is

6836:

while they were doing that i was just learning it myself

5850:

Thanks! I have also posted this at the Wikiproject page.

5299:. This is the main issue as pointed out by the reviewer. 5148:

Yes, it's soporific corporate advertising speak. Sample:

3042:'s closing statement? In short, deletion discussions are 2820: 2732: 1068:

the state of the article when I had initially assessed it

11080:

are a bit different, and I don't fully understand them.

9189:

in some Knowledge. With that accomplished, you become a

9185:

in some Knowledge. With that accomplished, you become a

6073:

Editing and creating content re Iowa railroads 1850-1880

5828:

may be of interest to you. Consider asking for input at

3758:

for citations will be limited due to its proximity with

3245:

You can create an account. Or you can leave an entry at

85: 12249:

starting point to help me out. Thank you so much!!! ❤️

10631:: there'd be a greater appetite for answering them. -- 10375:"Related Articles" is a feature of the mobile version: 7670:

Adding a template to a redirect using the visual editor

7037:

and also as how wikipedia defines it, as you mentioned

5048:. Good luck, and feel free to ask follow-up questions, 4967:

and does not add any understanding for the reader. See

3584:

with the references that establish that the subject is

674:, If it's a simple and uncontroversial change, you can 399:

File:Prosia DeAnn L Oasis LineEtching 12x12 in 2022.jpg

13612:

You also asked this question under a help template on

12602:

Inquiry about images (logos from student competitions)

9572:

Alright. Noted with thanks. Appreciate the direction @

9338:

about where you are seeing a number go up or down?) --

8355: 8099:

and submit it for review, but don't write the article

3797:

Also, can you please review my draft pls? the link is

2658:

need to discuss this on the Talk page of the article.

2577:

suggest that Knowledge can avoid taking responsibility

196: 10732:

harvnb error: no target: CITEREFEhsan_Yarshater2015 (

10095:

Fox de Quintal: the place to request such actions is

9352:

Oh ok. I thought there was some kind of point system

7548:, don't start a Knowledge article about that topic". 6047:

Do you work for The Destination Channel? If so, then

5832:. You can perhaps pick a few bad ones (3-4 perhaps), 5537:

also wouldn't be accurate for labeling the newer data

1798:

Actually, I may have acted too soon. You created the

339:

do the uploads on their behalf. This is explained at

202: 13448:

done it right, but it would be better than nothing.

11076:

in English Knowledge - though the requirements for

9846:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

8996:

Knowledge:Orphan#Step 1: Finding an orphaned article

7159:

Editing references to provide Internet archive links

3580:

Hello, I have a great knowledge. Writing an article

3468:

also, I forgot to add why he was notable. sorry. 😅

2345:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC188404/

2198:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC188404/

1678:

I hope that makes sense and actually works for you.

13682:Sorry – I didn't think to check for more articles. 13505:

Knowledge:Copyrights § Linking to copyrighted works

9401:

lol my average edit change number is -432.4 bytes.

7007:

notable as Knowledge defines a notable organization

5939:. (Click on the link to see the available fields.) 5403:page will say Asian and Pacific Islander, but it's 13826:your readers how something is interesting and not 13326:. I will consider the addition via the Talk Page. 11232:I do not understand why my draft is being rejected 7702:. Near the top of this, you see "(Redirected from 6296:you're asking about the latter, then pages can be 5430:percentage just as the sources do. Have a look at 3869:is a source that can establish wikinotability for 2367:Once again, I really appreciate your work on this. 1746:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 1350:. I agree in principle that absolute parity isn't 748:I looked at your list of contributions and picked 13724:The best place by far to discuss these issues is 12517:I don't think that anyone has yet pointed you to 12423:I think you're relegating half of our readers to 9100:Like most beginners, you have written your draft 6995:Draft:Macedonian Student Organization in Slovenia 6130:you could ask anyone that you think is interested 5879:Knowledge:WikiProject Contemporary Art/Notability 5206:templates to warn of sourcing problems/inadequacy 2250:a small-to-negligible effect on cancer incidence. 2210:Any more suggestions will be greatly appreciated. 182:Completed questions are archived within 2-3 days. 14007: 11273:be writing about oneself in the first place. -- 8964:; I have replied to your entry at the article's 8873:suggests, you and Pdebee should discuss this on 6415:That does sound ugly, and unproductive. Thanks. 5580:Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought 5399:Yes, newer census data split the AA and PI. The 3184:IF you intend to try again, title your draft as 12119:c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ethiopia 11782:I have nominated the article for deletion. See 11681:article could also be nominated for deletion. ~ 11072:. This is not normally sufficient to establish 10727: 10696:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFʿAthamina1998 ( 9862:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3371:. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 3206:A lot of weavil words and exaggeration sighted 13250:Unless you can find the answer in our article 12338:skills, and not to show how smart Knowledge is 12137:Second Attempted assassination of Donald Trump 12117:We have information on Ethiopian copyright at 10755:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBosworth2012 ( 8097:Draft:Alan Watt (author and radio commentator) 6717:Why is it so vital to cite stuff and source it 5407:for the 2020 statistic splits the two groups. 5046:Knowledge:Citing sources#Text–source integrity 4182:free, and they too are from 1980s press kits. 3750:could be used as a source if it satisfies the 678:, otherwise you should discuss changes on the 12851:Help with validity of sources and notability? 12274:. I was surprised - I expected to find it in 10720:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFAnthony2011 ( 10672:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFMaclean1984 ( 9849:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 9012:Hia, i would like to know why it was rejected 5961:find the (independent reliable) sources, and 5143:Does this read like an ad / promotional copy? 4373:You can delete this.. it was an issue wthe u 13664:Please link the draft you're asking about. 11948:. you even had publicity in High School. ... 11784:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Eric Kessler 11566:Knowledge:Requested moves/Technical requests 10684:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFNizami1994 ( 8989:Where do I help for linking orphan articles? 7277:own behaviour is up for discussion as well. 5578:isn't being "made" by Wikipedians. In fact, 31: 11726:, but that's all. I think it qualifies for 10744:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFMalik2020 ( 10611:, which lists British usage first. cheers, 10499:Vandalism and Eliminating redundant phrases 9805:, if a talk page is protected, you can use 8476:" Perhaps not a good fit for Alan Watt. -- 7950:. And for that Kolkata discussion, it's at 7210:I need someone to help me back up this page 6132:, another place to find such people is the 4776:Featured lists and inclusion in good topics 2874:a notable person as Knowledge uses the term 14001:{{#if:{{Knowledge:Main Page/Tomorrow}}||}} 13873:How to use ChatGPT to overcome dead sites? 12427:(to their embarrassment), but there is no 12333:mission to inform, not to improve reading 12007:https://en.wikipedia.org/Joachim_Hagenauer 10708:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFWink2002 ( 10377:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Connor_Stalions 9515:Targeted for COI for creation of the page 9097:Hello, Kaul7, and welcome to the Teahouse. 8397:what Knowledge regards as reliable sources 7810:User talk:Christopher from Brinkhaven#Name 5682:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Asian Americans 4812:List of Detroit Red Wings general managers 3670:oh, no, no. The one that I am citing is a 3294:; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! ~ 🦝 2845:thank you and I appreciate your support. 2593:Thanks, your explanation is very helpful. 2231:Relevant evidence/facts/citations include: 217: 13437:: Does one of the templates mentioned at 10875:the appropriate talk page for the article 10691: 9725:I don't know about downloading them. But 8777:Thanks for the feedback! Will work on it. 7904:Knowledge:List of policies and guidelines 5700:How to start engaging with the community? 5434:on how this can be accomplished (example 4939:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Trivia sections 4906:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Trivia sections 3826:Also, can you please review my draft pls? 2774:needs. every template has a grammar. ... 2550:Another way of explaining the same thing: 2265:Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. 1638:I did the "Example" section to show you. 36: 13485:parameter to specify the figure number. 13256:Humanities section of the Reference Desk 13054:Who governs the censorship in Knowledge? 12160:Hey there! See the active discussion at 11160:cycle), then you might be ready to read 11136:for why this is hardly ever successful.) 10751: 10651:article narration Possible COI Influence 10237:List of wars involving the United States 9136:cycle), then you might be ready to read 6758:blocked, 10 days ago. Not blocked now. ~ 6224:"Looking at Iowa and the Missouri River" 6136:relevant to whatever you're working on. 5989:cycle), then you might be ready to read 5678:Knowledge talk:WikiProject United States 3290:. If you haven't already also check out 284:. Permission from anybody is irrelevant. 11786:. Anyone is welcome to comment there. ~ 11188:Category:Knowledge introduction cleanup 10715: 10667: 10535:2603:8000:D300:3650:1847:225A:5EE0:EECA 10506:not being here to build an encyclopedia 10077:: Yes, the English Knowledge does have 10049:You have NEVER given any explanations! 9720:How do you download all the catergories 8065:2600:1017:B8C0:CF4A:3D87:1ED5:A326:20E9 6864:I added st neot and corby, with citing 6399:absent any real serious policy problems 4230:The relevant public domain template is 3712:the addition of the section of his life 3186:Draft:Sumit Kumar Singh (film director) 3034:Have you read the notice at the top of 2555:"Absolutely no self-published material" 1974:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 1252:I had in mind the issues documented in 723:. I suggest 122.176.122.147 discuss on 14: 14008: 12402:Edited 08:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12358:Edited 07:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11880:? So, were you involved trying to ban 11529:Improving your odds of a speedy review 11180:Learned basics of editing - What next? 10976:National Television Company of Ukraine 10769: 10679: 9291:with the reliable independent sources. 7319:But in case, i still need the sources 5676:, how about bringing up the matter at 5440:very distinct appearances and cultures 4120:Requesting help with band photo upload 4038:. (That template, in turn, is used in 3656:Can you please review my draft again? 2557:. Surely they will solve this for me. 719:The key number, 1.62 m/s, agrees with 29: 11164:carefully, and try creating a draft. 10847: 10826: 10796: 10739: 9140:carefully, and try creating a draft. 8036:Alan Watt (author, radio commentator) 5993:carefully, and try creating a draft. 5604:2601:248:601:A010:F0F3:40DE:7D21:1E74 5282:Expert Advice about an Esoteric topic 5016:this section on text–source integrity 4419:. en-WP articles must be inline with 4242:c:File:Duran Duran 1983.jpg § Summary 3744:publisher's(?) note on who Dokhuma is 2595:2601:41:4300:F4E0:11D5:6264:BDA7:87C0 2466:2601:41:4300:F4E0:11D5:6264:BDA7:87C0 2363:https://www.ebay.com/itm/256380837675 2358:I will look into the BLP noticeboard. 2300:. Re: your question, you can try the 27:Community Q&A hub for new editors 12970:the Homer Simpson photo you point to 12734:Best practice is to archive things. 12565:I have rewritten the description of 11038:as Lectonar suggested and check out 10703: 10663: 10661: 9969:And one of Commons's administrators 9840:The following discussion is closed. 9022:, must bs sourced to an independent 8337:2604:2000:6FC0:4:3161:7469:3434:D60C 7722:Template:R from alternative language 5749:How do I submit a Knowledge article? 4871:Much appreciated, and good to know. 4819:List of Vegas Golden Knights players 4250:c:File:New Order, 1985.jpg § Summary 3124:Draft:Sumit Kumar Singh - Knowledge 927:heard a complaint of too few links. 174:Note: Newer questions appear at the 13545:Not sure what they are looking for. 12960:Question about copyright and images 12924:UndergradSolidarity4AcademicFreedom 11237:IMDB is not a reliable source, per 11044:Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen 10854:. Anthropological Survey of India. 10258:That said, we do encourage folk to 9079:Now, this will gear me up. Cheers! 7946:policy, for example, you would use 7176:Template:Cite web/doc § archive-url 5195:and I have cut some of the waffle, 4571:Probably meant to say they need to 2863:Publishing new article from sandbox 1622:, but I don't know how to do that. 24: 13755:wikipedia is not a hosting service 13364:, that is helpful and understood. 13161:User:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. 12186:Reading complexity within articles 11531:" on the AfC submission template. 10978:but are not affiliated with them. 10893:Seeking feedback about a reference 9608:Yes, i understand. Thanks a bunch. 8356:https://www.wikidata.org/Q90023730 7978:about this issue on the article's 7974:There is an extensive and ongoing 5705:Thank you for your contributions, 5421:But therein lies the problem. The 4653:Requesting articles for protection 2756:Thank you for your kind response. 1317:Sure, disparity in coverage isn't 1100:But look at who added the links, @ 1017:(that I also make all the time...) 682:of the relevant article, which is 441:deleted the files from the article 46: 43: 25: 14032: 13304:), and add most new material via 12736:Help:Archiving (plain and simple) 12232:Knowledge:Writing better articles 11746:there are a lot of Eric Kesslers 11706:, or I can do it on your behalf. 10658: 10629:Knowledge:Reference desk/Language 6637:books regarding "Bagri Kumhars." 6512:. As long as you remain cool and 5875:Knowledge:WikiProject Visual arts 5830:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Trains 4963:Because usually its inclusion is 166:introduction to contributing page 106: 13668:has been submitted for review. 12979:c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright 12865:Draft:Nasser Bin Ghaith Al Marri 12856: 12791:Full is great, outline is fine. 10187:The discussion above is closed. 8917:Thank you for your interest in " 8580: 8555:, thank you both for your help! 8288:What is the meaning of the word 8143:Knowledge is not a memorial site 6562: 4662:yet? Someone's responded there. 4435:carefully, it goes into detail. 3591:An article is a summary of what 3424:Btw its still a work in progess 3138:Are you writing about yourself? 2815: 2679:How do I get an admin involved. 1669:“ ” ‘ ’ (The ones we don't want) 1413:Issues with translating articles 1062:a sufficient amount of links on 642: 334:Just to say that we don't allow 84: 37: 30: 13648:references from third parties? 13482: 10827:Sumra, Mahar Abdul Haq (1992). 10316:Editing ‘Related Articles’ text 8929:, as I did in the first entry, 8575:Lucy R. Lippard unsourced edits 7753: 7749: 6471:, the source is used in proper 5004:The sun is big. The sun is hot. 3746:. Theoretically, whoever wrote 3708:without the section of his life 3284:Knowledge:Articles for creation 3278:Welcome to Teahouse! We're all 2527:Okay, thanks. I see your point! 2258:I'll leave it at that, for now. 1936:"Geoffrey Kabat" Knowledge page 493:This file may meet Knowledge's 92: 13989:04:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13944:06:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13930:05:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13912:04:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13898:03:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13867:01:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13845:00:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13818:00:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 13804:23:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13789:23:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13771:23:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13739:17:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13720:17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13692:16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13678:16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13658:16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13633:16:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13597:17:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13575:15:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13558:15:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13525: 13517:20:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13499:14:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13458:16:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13429:13:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13411:13:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13374:17:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13356:16:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13336:17:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13318:13:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13268:10:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13236:10:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13214:21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13193:20:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13179:16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13148:15:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13134:10:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13077:09:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13046:07:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13032:07:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 13012:07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12991:07:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12952:08:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12919:07:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12894:07:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12877:06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12843:08:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12821:03:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12806:03:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12780:01:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12766:00:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12715:16:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12699:15:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12681:22:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12657:22:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12641:22:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12619:21:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12594:21:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12580:21:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12545:14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12531:13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12509:08:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12485:08:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12464:07:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12447:07:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12419:07:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12400:07:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12372:06:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12356:06:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12307:06:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12288:03:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12259:02:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12244:01:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12223:20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12209:20:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12178:20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12156:20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12131:03:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 12113:23:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12073:22:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12043:20:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 12018:20:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11997:19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11958:20:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11940:20:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11925:20:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11910:17:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11894:17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11845:16:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11828:21:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11813:20:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11798:19:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11772:20:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11756:18:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11742:19:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11718:19:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11693:19:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11669:18:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11629:18:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11620:06:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11601:20:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11582:20:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11558:19:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11541:20:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11508:19:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11455:18:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11409:18:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11393:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11362:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11320:07:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11297:18:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11283:18:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11265:17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11247:16:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11226:16:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11201:15:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11174:14:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11104:14:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 11090:14:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11060:14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11026:14:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 11002:20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10988:12:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10961:13:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10952:𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨 10945:12:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10920:09:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10887:09:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10841: 10820: 10790: 10763: 10641:07:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10621:07:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10595:06:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10574:01:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10543:06:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10524:01:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10493:04:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10473:01:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10449:01:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10424:01:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10391:22:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10364:21:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10339:21:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10321:I'm not seeing anything about 10310:05:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10290:13:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10280:Great tips. You guys Rock. (: 10273:00:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10212:21:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10180:00:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10163:00:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 10142:21:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10109:21:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10091:21:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10059:20:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 10019:(I ask him to forget about me) 9983:18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9965:18:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9943:19:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9929:17:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9907:16:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9883:00:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9823:14:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9796:Exploding pagers article image 9786:03:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9772:21:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9757:17:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9739:15:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9712:14:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 9686:14:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9657:12:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9620:11:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9604:11:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9590:10:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9568:10:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9550:10:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9533:10:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9507:19:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9490:18:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9467:14:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9449:11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9435:11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9414:11:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9397:11:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9383:11:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9362:10:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9348:09:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9317:17:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9308:10:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9272:10:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9230:14:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9203:10:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9164:12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9150:09:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9089:09:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9075:09:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9058:09:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9040:09:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 9006:08:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8977:07:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8956:19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8942:11:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8887:08:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8854:19:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8839:07:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8814:06:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8787:02:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8769:01:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8749:00:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8722:17:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8704:05:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8671:10:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8657:01:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8641:01:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8607:01:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8565:13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8543:04:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8526:01:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8502:08:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8486:02:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8461:15:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8443:02:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8429:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8415:Pacific Northwest tree octopus 8409:01:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8372:16:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8345:23:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8331:16:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8310:16:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8261:16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8247:16:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8230:15:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 8182:19:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8137:17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8119:01:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8087:16:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 8073:00:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8058:23:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 8028:02:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 8008:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7966:02:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7938:02:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7918:23:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7881:23:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7867:23:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7851:23:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7834:23:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7805:22:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7791:22:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7766:22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7734:15:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7716:21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7688:21:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7662:20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7644:20:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7597:06:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7583:23:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7558:11:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7536:21:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7522:21:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7487:21:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7472:21:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7458:21:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7443:20:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7429:Knowledge:No original research 7423:20:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7409:19:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7395:19:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7366:21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7352:19:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7329:19:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7315:19:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7301:19:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7287:19:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7272:19:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7258:19:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7242:19:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7228:19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7202:12:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7188:19:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7153:19:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7133:18:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7119:18:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7098:09:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 7068:19:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7047:18:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7033:18:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 7019:18:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6977:18:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6963:18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6930:18:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6916:18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6902:18:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6888:17:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6874:17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6860:17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6846:17:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6828:17:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6810:17:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6784:17:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6770:17:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6750:17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6740:Looks like they were blocked. 6735:17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6703:17:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6683:17:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6669:17:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6647:17:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6629:17:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6606:16:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6583:15:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6544:03:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6530:03:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6491:issues and you can do so in a 6444:04:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6425:03:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6411:02:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 6354:03:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6331:00:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 6288:22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6273:21:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6240:21:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6215:21:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6177:21:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6160:23:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 6146:16:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6124:15:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6061:17:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6017:17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 6003:15:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5949:14:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5911:18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5893:14:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5860:08:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5846:08:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5808:17:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5791:07:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5773:06:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5741:06:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5723:05:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5694:05:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5649:00:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 5630:16:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5612:14:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5597:08:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5526:20:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5512:17:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5494:14:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5475:03:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5461:22:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5432:HELP:TABLE#Colspan and rowspan 5417:19:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5395:19:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5374:03:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5359:00:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5339:07:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5329:, who have separate articles. 5309:07:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5270:04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5250:02:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5235:02:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5218:02:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5186:14:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5172:23:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 5137:18:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5118:04:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 5083:13:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5060:04:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5028:22:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 5006:, where the citation supports 4991:22:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4951:22:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4918:22:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4891:22:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4863:22:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4845:22:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4798:22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4760:22:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4742:22:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4721:21:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4699:21:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4672:21:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4643:23:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4621:13:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4607:22:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4585:21:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4567:20:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4553:19:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4541:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4519:19:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4492:18:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4478:18:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4460:13:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4445:19:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4397:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4383:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4369:18:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4338:20:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 4290:20:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 4276:18:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4262:18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4220:21:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4206:21:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4192:18:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4174:18:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4160:17:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4142:17:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4108:06:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4094:16:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4072:16:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4058:15:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4020:15:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3995:14:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3981:Does "kit" mean uniform, e.g. 3976:Association Football Club Kits 3970:18:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3953:16:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3903:16:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3889:16:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3859:15:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3845:15:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3810:14:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3793:14:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3778:01:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3724:16:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3702:15:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3688:15:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3666:16:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3652:14:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3634:14:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3620:14:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3606:15:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3576:15:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3560:15:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3546:15:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3530:15:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3516:15:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3498:15:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3478:15:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3464:15:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3449:14:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3434:14:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3411:13:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3381:13:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3353:22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3336:13:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3304:11:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3274:10:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3230:21:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3216:18:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3202:12:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3180:07:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3148:08:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3134:08:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3117:06:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3096:06:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3077:09:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3060:06:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3021:02:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3007:23:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2972:17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2938:16:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2915:15:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2901:13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2886:13:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2855:00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2841:13:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2798:02:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 2784:20:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 2766:00:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2752:13:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2707:20:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2689:11:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2668:11:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2650:00:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2617:07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2603:21:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2589:18:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2567:21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2540:12:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2523:06:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2495:05:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2474:21:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2457:20:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2420:00:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2398:23:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2380:20:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2332:19:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2314:00:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 2284:17:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2223:23:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2189:21:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2158:20:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2140:13:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2125:12:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2110:11:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2089:06:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2077:Knowledge:FAQ/Article subjects 2058:02:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2044:02:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2026:00:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2011:23:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1990:22:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1920:14:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1900:10:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1882:20:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1860:18:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1833:01:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1814:20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1794:20:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1758:20:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1721:20:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1703:06:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1688:00:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1662:22:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1648:07:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1632:22:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1614:07:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1595:06:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1576:21:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1561:18:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1527:06:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1497:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1483:19:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1463:19:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1449:18:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1429:18:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1395:16:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1372:05:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1331:07:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1313:22:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1284:06:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1270:08:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1248:21:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1234:19:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1216:09:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1202:17:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1151:20:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 1133:04:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1114:04:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1096:04:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1079:04:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1050:04:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1029:03:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1011:03:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 993:03:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 979:03:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 952:05:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 937:19:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 902:19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 879:16:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 854:15:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 816:13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 788:12:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 766:11:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 737:18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 714:04:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 667:03:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 603:19:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 589:17:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 570:17:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 556:17:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 531:14:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 484:14:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 470:10:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 431:17:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 416:14:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 389:21:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 371:21:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 353:17:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 326:17:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 312:17:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 262:16:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 216:To read the newest questions, 13: 1: 12005:Like this one for instance : 11675:Knowledge:Edit Request Wizard 11150:reliable, independent sources 11110:Add an entry on an individual 10404:Welcome to the Teahouse. See 10239:is structured entirely using 9325:How do I check my edit score? 9126:reliable, independent sources 8149:, with notability defined as 7742:Help editing to get published 6395:though dueling edit summaries 6391:a clear-cut case of vandalism 6023:Draft:The Destination Channel 5979:reliable, independent sources 5044:'s advice above to check out 4784:, you have created a list of 3315:Why are you telling me this? 2987:Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1360:bring Knowledge crashing down 13995:Question about the Main Page 13609:and welcome to the Teahouse. 13242:number of lakes in bangalore 11034:! In short, absolutely. See 9283:You have written your draft 9278:independent reliable sources 9172:Regarding a username change… 9110:indpendent published sources 7897:Help, not related to editing 7871:Thanks. That's all I asked. 7700:Notes on the Cinematographer 5929:It looks as though you need 5836:them and see what happens. 3593:independent reliable sources 3365:Knowledge:Notability (music) 2717:Link converter for Knowledge 1958:foundationsite:About/Contact 725:Talk:Gravitation of the Moon 684:Talk:Gravitation of the Moon 495:criteria for speedy deletion 290:donating copyright materials 230: 187: 7: 13956:Hans Bergel: Is it Notable? 13700:Child Star 2024 Demi Lovato 13503:You might be interested in 13060:Ut oh. <covers head: --> 12928:Myself and a team of others 12738:explains the simplest way. 12271:it was Einstein, probably: 11253:Draft:Aggelina Papadopoulou 9973:. And now, Mr. do Quintal? 9916:User:Fox de Quintal/sandbox 9181:. You start by becoming an 8679:Feedback on a draft article 7873:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7843:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7797:Christopher from Brinkhaven 7704:Notes sur le cinématographe 7696:Notes sur le cinématographe 7676:Notes sur le cinématographe 6475:and the source is properly 5965:write your draft from them. 3760:Dokhuma's reprinted content 3397:on a song early this year. 1742:handling edit war guideline 247:Adding images to an article 175: 10: 14037: 13391:I think that the template 13254:, I suggest asking at the 12740:Help:Archiving a talk page 12234:to be well worth reading. 12079:Ethiopian Government Works 11586:Haha. I think the variety 10430:I don’t want to be blocked 8935:With kind regards for now; 8875:Talk:There's a Small Hotel 8578: 7779:Knox County, Ohio#Villages 7632:User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel 7164:If the reference is using 6518:administrator noticeboards 6082:I think it's okay to just 5934:Infobox television channel 5535:Asian and Pacific Islander 4810:FLs, specifically that of 4685:According to the reply at 4078:Template talk:Football kit 2826:Merging with above section 2813: 1184:the opinions expressed in 160:New to Knowledge? See our 56: 9856:Non-administrator comment 9439:Yea but section blanking 9255:On a final note, see how 9028:Referencing for beginners 8591:Adjusted heading level. — 7948:Knowledge talk:Notability 7750:police officers from the 7001:Hello. If no independent 6021:Your one 'reference' for 4658:Have you checked back on 3734:content from the original 3102:regarding a page approval 2343:response to the critics: 13878:Alas, ChatGPT's answers 13112:The assessors will also 12425:Simple English Knowledge 12407:Simple English Knowledge 11607:Draft:Childhood dementia 10562:Knowledge:Reference desk 10347:, which I have reverted. 10189:Please do not modify it. 9914:, as for the version of 9843:Please do not modify it. 9248:. You should also check 8844:the article’s Talk page. 8799:Factual errors in citing 8623:edit warring noticeboard 7772:Updating linking article 7054:isn't quite the same as 5917:About section right side 4899:No Trivia like on FANDOM 3983:File:WHL-Uniform-VIC.png 3895:I have a great knowledge 3851:I have a great knowledge 3802:I have a great knowledge 3785:I have a great knowledge 3748:the biographical section 3716:I have a great knowledge 3680:I have a great knowledge 3658:I have a great knowledge 3626:I have a great knowledge 3612:I have a great knowledge 3568:I have a great knowledge 3538:I have a great knowledge 3522:I have a great knowledge 3508:I have a great knowledge 3490:I have a great knowledge 3470:I have a great knowledge 3456:I have a great knowledge 3426:I have a great knowledge 3188:as there is an existing 1467:There is a help page on 1258:Racial bias on Knowledge 1254:Gender bias on Knowledge 162:tutorial for new editors 97:Welcome to the Teahouse! 13967:Knowledge's golden rule 13156:Knowledge:Systemic bias 13109:the facts they contain. 11860:, can you show us some 11605:I recommend you submit 11078:notability of academics 10833:. Beacon Books. p. 78. 10580:Redundant words removal 10235:However, I notice that 10009:(Sandbox, Maria Marçal) 9177:Here's the easier way, 7383:get this information? ~ 6319:foundation:Terms of Use 6187:Special:MyContributions 6096:User:InternetArchiveBot 5754:Hello. You may use the 4296:Knowledge:Public domain 4082:WT:WikiProject Football 3029:Fabio Mancini wiki page 2954:. You obviously have a 2728:required grammar format 2075:You might want to read 1469:wikidata:Help:Sitelinks 1141:is nearly zero?.... 860:Caeciliusinhorto-public 846:Caeciliusinhorto-public 651:Gravitation of the Moon 637:Gravitation of The Moon 13777:https://a.co/d/a10Esyv 13726:Talk:Child Star (film) 13360:Thanks for the input @ 11639:Question about my page 11344:technical move request 11048:Works Constitution Act 11040:WP:Wikiproject Germany 10782:(May-June-2016): 543. 9829:Recurring Issues with 8417:was more convincing. ~ 6571:User:MarkWHowe/sandbox 5574:" – To be clear, this 5427:Cleveland#Demographics 5317:The first sentence of 5014:For more details, see 4852: 4750:Oh! That explains it. 3815: 3754:, but I suspect using 3385:Although I'd agree it 3121:Approval of this draft 1950:Knowledge:Noticeboards 51: 14021:Knowledge help forums 13880:cannot be relied upon 13479:Template:Cite journal 13289:artciles for creation 13287:was accepted through 12831:Neutral point of view 12729:Clearing my talk page 12311:For what it's worth, 12091:a few months ago, by 11882:Coors Brewing Company 11626:Sincerely, Dilettante 11158:Bold, Revert, Discuss 11146:neutral point of view 11094:Thank you very much! 11030:Welcome to Teahouse @ 10969:Copy of a documentary 10848:Singh, K. S. (1994). 10797:Fleet, J. F. (1901). 10770:Pushpa (2018-06-02). 9743:You can also look at 9287:, in that you didn't 9134:Bold, Revert, Discuss 9122:neutral point of view 9104:: writing an article 9020:about a living person 8919:There's a Small Hotel 7822:Talk:Brinkhaven, Ohio 6451:Personal letters are 5987:Bold, Revert, Discuss 5975:neutral point of view 4851: 4633:to be in English. -- 4527:, but they should be 4308:), they are too old ( 4043:Infobox football club 4001:Template:Football kit 3814: 3288:WP:Your first article 3247:WP:Requested articles 2995:Template:Cite journal 2810:Inquiry for reference 2699:WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - 2656:WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - 2442:a second-hand copy of 960:I bring to attention 827:The instructions for 50: 13401:does what you want. 13089:Articles are either 12089:Template:PD-Ethiopia 11340:WikiProject Medicine 11130:conflict of interest 10728:Ehsan Yarshater 2015 10609:Cambridge dictionary 10558:Age of Enlightenment 10220:Just adding to what 10069:Prohibit interaction 9895:User talk:RodRabelo7 9866:Knowledge:ANI advice 9517:Hassan & Roshaan 8865:, your "someone" is 8280:Thanks, Anachronist. 8151:significant coverage 8123:Thanks, Anachronist. 7944:Knowledge:Notability 6589:Regarding an Article 6311:WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION 5620:suggested below. -- 5602:solutions feasible? 5097:The reference was a 4997:Deleting a reference 4593:Who is this author, 4423:and, if it applies, 3799:Draft:James Dokhuma# 3520:pls ignore this one 3192:who is in politics. 2956:conflict of interest 1779:WP:Original research 1549:</blockquote: --> 721:this NASA Fact Sheet 13614:your user talk page 13487:Firefangledfeathers 13324:Michael D. Turnbull 13020:Volkswagen Scirocco 12742:has more details. 12570:critical mistakes. 9955:: "wrong section". 9700:style="width:100px" 7818:Template:UserboxCOI 6690:- find good sources 5484:including Oceania. 3672:republished version 1748:if it continues. -- 1511:Dialogue in writing 1182:represent neutrally 138:Articles to improve 14016:Knowledge Teahouse 13382:to formate a quote 13308:on its Talk Page. 12932:Right great wrongs 12900:other stuff exists 12567:Blades in the Dark 11978:Help with my draft 11946:PUBLICLY AVAILABLE 11162:your first article 10926:Error in Reference 10551:Direct information 9696:style="width:75px" 9692:Theairportman33531 9261:WP:Notable(people) 9138:your first article 8970:With kind regards; 8927:across the sources 8220:"Writing is Easy" 6993:Lack of refrences 6687:Your only choices: 5991:your first article 5838:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 5783:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 5542:earlier suggestion 5354:Just Step Sideways 5094:This edit worked: 4504:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 4437:Gråbergs Gråa Sång 4210:Ah no worries. :) 4026:Soccerking.greg127 3783:grouped together) 3728:I think the point 2985:and instead write 1998:Thanks in advance, 1015:A rookie mistake! 962:a wikitable i made 225:About the Teahouse 52: 18:Knowledge:TEAHOUSE 13177: 12926:, when you write 12176: 12103:can you explain? 11908: 11843: 11796: 11770: 11740: 11691: 11337: 11269:Also, one really 10910: 10860:978-81-7304-091-7 10024:(Commons in 2024) 9859: 9647:WP:External links 9505: 9465: 9228: 9108:by finding solid 8824: 8767: 8702: 8655: 8524: 8427: 8329: 8245: 8186:Dear Anachronist: 8180: 8117: 7964: 7916: 7865: 7581: 7566:If you think the 7441: 7393: 7350: 7088: 6768: 6617:original research 6213: 6122: 6092:User:Citation bot 6044: 6031:comment added by 5891: 5761:new user tutorial 5711:Knowledge:Discord 5558:original research 5268: 5233: 4888: 4842: 4240:. If you look at 4126:non-free image. 3999:Hello, Greg. See 3738:source laundering 3190:Sumit Kumar Singh 2936: 1980:when posting. -- 1966:legal terminology 1918: 1888:this, for example 1812: 1792: 1772:WP:RELIABLESOURCE 1018: 712: 657:The Lonely Pather 538: 204: 198: 16:(Redirected from 14028: 13977: 13639:Draft submission 13629: 13537: 13536: 13529: 13484: 13400: 13394: 13220:No Stash Content 13171: 13103:Reliable sources 13095:New Pages Patrol 13079: 13074: 13069: 12860: 12764: 12584:Looks great! -- 12506: 12501: 12482: 12477: 12444: 12439: 12397: 12392: 12353: 12348: 12276:Strunk and White 12175: 12173: 12168: 12102: 11902: 11864:and third party 11856:as an expert on 11855: 11837: 11790: 11764: 11734: 11710: 11685: 11667: 11506: 11479: 11473: 11469: 11463: 11391: 11331: 11294: 11293:Babysharkboss2!! 11244: 11243:Babysharkboss2!! 11036:Help:Translation 11015:Help:Translation 10953: 10904: 10901:reliable sources 10865: 10864: 10845: 10839: 10838: 10824: 10818: 10817: 10794: 10788: 10787: 10767: 10761: 10760: 10749: 10737: 10725: 10713: 10701: 10689: 10677: 10665: 10512: 10485: 10461: 10445: 10439: 10412: 10374: 10245:WP:Source Editor 10123: 10079:interaction bans 10040: 9993: 9971:do agree with me 9857: 9853: 9845: 9701: 9697: 9499: 9459: 9424: 9372: 9336: 9246:reliable sources 9222: 9213: 8818: 8761: 8696: 8649: 8629: 8609: 8595: 8584: 8583: 8518: 8471:Wikiquote says " 8421: 8323: 8239: 8174: 8155:reliable sources 8111: 8095:Create the page 8026: 8015:`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 7958: 7936: 7925:`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 7910: 7859: 7814:Brinkhaven, Ohio 7755: 7751: 7698:. You arrive at 7658: 7652: 7629: 7623: 7575: 7435: 7387: 7349: 7347: 7342: 7224: 7219: 7173: 7167: 7082: 7079:reliable sources 7003:reliable sources 6762: 6655:Yes, indeed and 6566: 6364: 6250: 6208: 6199: 6196: 6193: 6117: 6108: 6105: 6102: 6026: 5938: 5932: 5928: 5885: 5816:Railway stations 5674:JohnIllinois1827 5544: 5518:JohnIllinois1827 5500:JohnIllinois1827 5486:JohnIllinois1827 5467:JohnIllinois1827 5409:JohnIllinois1827 5380:JohnIllinois1827 5366:JohnIllinois1827 5262: 5227: 5201:reliable sources 5152: 5110: 5093: 5052: 4984: 4981: 4978: 4975: 4889: 4887: 4884: 4877: 4843: 4841: 4838: 4831: 4684: 4630:de:Brianna Wiest 4550: 4433:Help:Translation 4389:SeashellPirate22 4375:SeashellPirate22 4327: 4321: 4317: 4311: 4307: 4301: 4239: 4233: 4137: 4132: 4047: 4041: 4037: 4031: 3941: 3935:and nothing else 3877: 3871:Malala Yousafzai 3833: 3766: 3761: 3757: 3749: 3745: 3735: 3638:You should have 3536:pls reply quick 3334: 3325: 3321: 3314: 3272: 3263: 3259: 3240:Declan J Donovan 3165: 2930: 2827: 2819: 2818: 2740: 2735: 2168:reliable sources 2074: 1964:and any kind of 1947: 1912: 1806: 1786: 1563: 1550: 1546: 1538: 1489:RedactedHumanoid 1480: 1475: 1455:RedactedHumanoid 1446: 1441: 1421:RedactedHumanoid 1341: 1260:, for instance. 1186:reliable sources 1016: 836: 830: 826: 716: 694: 659: 646: 512: 459: 453: 240: 220: 208: 205: 199: 183: 179: 169: 153: 152: 151: 149: 142: 141: 139: 133: 132: 130: 124: 123: 121: 113: 111: 101: 100: 88: 76: 69: 49: 41: 34: 21: 14036: 14035: 14031: 14030: 14029: 14027: 14026: 14025: 14006: 14005: 13997: 13975: 13958: 13884:Rotideypoc41352 13875: 13810:Writing is easy 13781:Writing is easy 13749: 13702: 13641: 13627: 13547: 13542: 13541: 13540: 13531: 13530: 13526: 13470: 13398: 13392: 13384: 13293:User:MaxnaCarta 13276: 13244: 13222: 13084:WP:Not censored 13072: 13063: 13059: 13056: 12999: 12962: 12853: 12788: 12786:Plot for movies 12743: 12731: 12604: 12504: 12495: 12480: 12471: 12442: 12433: 12395: 12386: 12383: 12380: 12351: 12342: 12339: 12336: 12230:, you may find 12188: 12171: 12166: 12139: 12096: 12081: 11980: 11849: 11708: 11646: 11641: 11485: 11477: 11471: 11467: 11461: 11417:Rotideypoc41352 11370: 11348:Rotideypoc41352 11328: 11292: 11242: 11234: 11209: 11182: 11112: 11066:de:Mario Lachat 11010: 10971: 10951: 10933:Perfectodefecto 10928: 10895: 10870: 10869: 10868: 10861: 10846: 10842: 10825: 10821: 10795: 10791: 10768: 10764: 10754: 10743: 10731: 10719: 10707: 10695: 10683: 10671: 10666: 10659: 10653: 10582: 10553: 10510: 10501: 10483: 10459: 10443: 10437: 10432: 10410: 10401: 10368: 10327:Connor Stalions 10318: 10198: 10193: 10192: 10128:and better yet 10113: 10071: 10046:of of Pórokhov. 10034: 10004:(Commons, 2023) 9987: 9890: 9855: 9841: 9834: 9831:User:RodRabelo7 9798: 9722: 9699: 9695: 9665: 9638: 9520: 9418: 9366: 9330: 9327: 9257:M. Visvesvaraya 9238: 9207: 9174: 9024:reliable source 9014: 8994:Have you tried 8991: 8915:Dear Colleague, 8801: 8736:private schools 8681: 8627: 8610: 8593: 8590: 8588: 8581: 8577: 8510: 8453:Writing is easy 8364:Writing is easy 8302:Writing is easy 8253:Writing is easy 8222:Writing is easy 8129:Writing is easy 8079:Writing is easy 8042:Writing is easy 8038: 8013: 8012:Thanks!! <3 7988:BLP Noticeboard 7923: 7899: 7816:, then (i) add 7774: 7744: 7672: 7656: 7650: 7627: 7621: 7618: 7615:Plummer Terrier 7345: 7340: 7222: 7217: 7212: 7171: 7165: 7161: 7106: 6998: 6798:reliable source 6719: 6608: 6591: 6501:WP:OTHERCONTENT 6358: 6244: 6206: 6197: 6194: 6191: 6115: 6106: 6103: 6100: 6075: 5936: 5930: 5922: 5919: 5870: 5818: 5751: 5702: 5562:reliable source 5540: 5349: 5284: 5149: 5145: 5108: 5099:named reference 5087: 5070:named reference 5050: 5038:User:Rjjiii/TSI 5012:The sun is big. 4999: 4982: 4979: 4976: 4973: 4901: 4886: 4880: 4873: 4840: 4834: 4827: 4778: 4678: 4655: 4611:Brianna Wiest. 4546: 4409: 4356: 4325: 4319: 4315: 4309: 4305: 4299: 4237: 4231: 4135: 4130: 4122: 4045: 4039: 4035: 4029: 3978: 3939: 3875: 3831: 3764: 3759: 3755: 3747: 3743: 3733: 3421: 3323: 3317: 3316: 3308: 3261: 3255: 3254: 3242: 3163: 3104: 3066:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY 3031: 2983:Behav Brain Sci 2865: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2816: 2812: 2738: 2731: 2719: 2633: 2530:Geoffrey Kabat 2464:Geoffrey Kabat 2370:Geoffrey Kabat 2302:BLP Noticeboard 2213:Geoffrey Kabat 2100:Geoffrey Kabat 2068: 2001:Geoffrey Kabat 1941: 1938: 1744:and proceed to 1737: 1620:Katherine Heiny 1548: 1545:|blockquote|c}} 1540: 1532: 1531: 1513: 1478: 1473: 1444: 1439: 1415: 1335: 1173: 1139:What links here 864:Acoustic theory 834: 828: 820: 803:Index ellipsoid 752:. As I look at 745: 672:122.176.122.147 655: 639: 457: 451: 444:DeAnn L. Prosia 249: 244: 243: 242: 241: 236: 229: 218: 212: 211: 210: 209: 200: 194: 193: 181: 178:of the Teahouse 173: 159: 156: 155: 154: 147: 145: 144: 143: 137: 135: 134: 129:Meet your hosts 128: 126: 125: 119: 117: 116: 114: 109: 107: 104: 94: 93: 91: 90: 89: 81: 80: 79: 72: 65: 61: 53: 47: 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 14034: 14024: 14023: 14018: 14004: 14003: 14002: 13996: 13993: 13992: 13991: 13971:wikinotability 13957: 13954: 13953: 13952: 13951: 13950: 13949: 13948: 13947: 13946: 13936:TooManyFingers 13904:TooManyFingers 13874: 13871: 13870: 13869: 13851: 13850: 13849: 13848: 13847: 13791: 13773: 13748: 13745: 13744: 13743: 13742: 13741: 13712:TooManyFingers 13707: 13701: 13698: 13697: 13696: 13695: 13694: 13684:TooManyFingers 13661: 13660: 13650:TooManyFingers 13645: 13640: 13637: 13636: 13635: 13621: 13610: 13602: 13601: 13600: 13599: 13589:TooManyFingers 13584: 13567:TooManyFingers 13563: 13560: 13546: 13543: 13539: 13538: 13523: 13522: 13521: 13520: 13519: 13501: 13481:and using the 13469: 13466: 13465: 13464: 13463: 13462: 13461: 13460: 13450:TooManyFingers 13442: 13383: 13380: 13379: 13378: 13377: 13376: 13366:MotionMogul123 13362:TooManyFingers 13348:TooManyFingers 13344:MotionMogul123 13340: 13339: 13338: 13328:MotionMogul123 13281:MotionMogul123 13275: 13272: 13271: 13270: 13248: 13243: 13240: 13239: 13238: 13221: 13218: 13217: 13216: 13206:TooManyFingers 13201: 13197: 13196: 13195: 13165: 13164: 13163: 13158: 13150: 13136: 13110: 13087: 13080: 13055: 13052: 13051: 13050: 13049: 13048: 13015: 13014: 13004:TooManyFingers 12998: 12995: 12994: 12993: 12961: 12958: 12957: 12956: 12955: 12954: 12903: 12896: 12886:TooManyFingers 12882: 12879: 12862:Courtesy link: 12852: 12849: 12848: 12847: 12846: 12845: 12827:TooManyFingers 12813:TooManyFingers 12808: 12787: 12784: 12783: 12782: 12768: 12730: 12727: 12726: 12725: 12724: 12723: 12722: 12721: 12720: 12719: 12718: 12717: 12704: 12691:TooManyFingers 12683: 12673:TooManyFingers 12666: 12646: 12633:TooManyFingers 12628: 12608: 12603: 12600: 12599: 12598: 12597: 12596: 12563: 12562: 12561: 12560: 12559: 12558: 12557: 12556: 12555: 12554: 12553: 12552: 12551: 12550: 12549: 12548: 12547: 12487: 12381: 12378: 12364:TooManyFingers 12337: 12334: 12330: 12329: 12328: 12327: 12326: 12325: 12324: 12299:TooManyFingers 12269:TooManyFingers 12265: 12264: 12263: 12262: 12261: 12201:TooManyFingers 12196: 12187: 12184: 12183: 12182: 12181: 12180: 12143: 12138: 12135: 12134: 12133: 12115: 12080: 12077: 12076: 12075: 12065:TooManyFingers 12060: 12056: 12049: 12048: 12047: 12046: 12045: 12035:TooManyFingers 12023: 12003: 11989:TooManyFingers 11979: 11976: 11975: 11974: 11973: 11972: 11971: 11970: 11969: 11968: 11967: 11966: 11965: 11964: 11963: 11962: 11961: 11960: 11830: 11780: 11779: 11778: 11777: 11776: 11775: 11774: 11695: 11671: 11640: 11637: 11636: 11635: 11634: 11633: 11632: 11631: 11622: 11569: 11562: 11561: 11560: 11550:TooManyFingers 11545: 11544: 11543: 11513: 11480:come to mind, 11439:WP:NOTADVOCACY 11435: 11428: 11415:Ah, thank you 11412: 11411: 11396: 11395: 11367: 11364: 11338:I've notified 11327: 11324: 11323: 11322: 11308: 11305: 11304: 11303: 11302: 11301: 11300: 11299: 11233: 11230: 11229: 11228: 11208: 11205: 11204: 11203: 11181: 11178: 11177: 11176: 11137: 11126: 11119: 11116: 11111: 11108: 11107: 11106: 11092: 11062: 11028: 11009: 11006: 11005: 11004: 10990: 10970: 10967: 10966: 10965: 10964: 10963: 10927: 10924: 10923: 10922: 10894: 10891: 10890: 10889: 10867: 10866: 10859: 10840: 10819: 10789: 10762: 10692:ʿAthamina 1998 10656: 10655: 10654: 10652: 10645: 10644: 10643: 10625: 10624: 10623: 10581: 10578: 10577: 10576: 10552: 10549: 10548: 10547: 10546: 10545: 10527: 10526: 10500: 10497: 10496: 10495: 10475: 10451: 10431: 10428: 10427: 10426: 10400: 10397: 10396: 10395: 10394: 10393: 10348: 10345:Sherrone Moore 10341: 10323:Sherrone Moore 10317: 10314: 10313: 10312: 10294: 10293: 10292: 10282:Historyguy1138 10278: 10256: 10252: 10233: 10218:Historyguy1138 10214: 10197: 10194: 10186: 10185: 10184: 10183: 10182: 10147: 10146: 10145: 10144: 10093: 10070: 10067: 10066: 10065: 10064: 10063: 10062: 10061: 10051:Fox de Quintal 10047: 10027: 10026: 10021: 10016: 10014:(DARIO SEVERI) 10011: 10006: 10000: 9999: 9998: 9997: 9996: 9995: 9949: 9948: 9947: 9946: 9945: 9935:Fox de Quintal 9912:Fox de Quintal 9889: 9888: 9887: 9886: 9885: 9836: 9835: 9833: 9827: 9826: 9825: 9797: 9794: 9793: 9792: 9791: 9790: 9789: 9788: 9778:TooManyFingers 9749:TooManyFingers 9741: 9721: 9718: 9717: 9716: 9715: 9714: 9670: 9664: 9661: 9660: 9659: 9643:Kimon fioretos 9637: 9634: 9633: 9632: 9631: 9630: 9629: 9628: 9627: 9626: 9625: 9624: 9623: 9622: 9609: 9539: 9519: 9513: 9512: 9511: 9510: 9509: 9482:TooManyFingers 9477: 9476: 9475: 9474: 9473: 9472: 9471: 9470: 9469: 9453: 9452: 9451: 9427:Mike Marchmont 9402: 9399: 9326: 9323: 9322: 9321: 9320: 9319: 9292: 9281: 9274: 9253: 9250:citing sources 9242: 9237: 9234: 9233: 9232: 9205: 9191:global renamer 9173: 9170: 9169: 9168: 9167: 9166: 9113: 9098: 9095: 9094: 9093: 9092: 9091: 9046:citing sources 9042: 9013: 9010: 9009: 9008: 8990: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8984: 8983: 8982: 8981: 8980: 8979: 8971: 8969: 8936: 8934: 8916: 8913: 8899: 8890: 8889: 8859: 8858: 8857: 8856: 8816: 8800: 8797: 8796: 8795: 8794: 8793: 8792: 8791: 8790: 8789: 8755: 8728:TooManyFingers 8714:TooManyFingers 8706: 8680: 8677: 8676: 8675: 8674: 8673: 8643: 8579: 8576: 8573: 8572: 8571: 8570: 8569: 8568: 8567: 8509: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8488: 8469: 8468: 8467: 8466: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8448: 8385: 8384: 8383: 8382: 8381: 8380: 8379: 8378: 8377: 8376: 8375: 8374: 8358: 8353: 8352: 8351: 8350: 8349: 8348: 8347: 8298: 8297: 8296: 8286: 8281: 8278: 8275: 8271: 8267: 8218: 8215: 8212: 8207: 8203: 8199: 8195: 8191: 8187: 8167: 8124: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8090: 8089: 8037: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8030: 7972: 7971: 7970: 7969: 7968: 7898: 7895: 7894: 7893: 7892: 7891: 7890: 7889: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7883: 7839: 7773: 7770: 7769: 7768: 7743: 7740: 7739: 7738: 7737: 7736: 7691: 7690: 7671: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7625:copyvio-revdel 7617: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7608: 7607: 7606: 7605: 7604: 7603: 7602: 7601: 7600: 7599: 7564: 7563: 7562: 7561: 7560: 7500: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7495: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7489: 7425: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7356:Thanks legend 7333: 7332: 7331: 7303: 7279:TooManyFingers 7250:TooManyFingers 7246: 7245: 7244: 7211: 7208: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7194:HelenaBertrand 7160: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7145:TooManyFingers 7140: 7137: 7136: 7135: 7105: 7102: 7101: 7100: 7074: 7073: 7072: 7071: 7070: 7049: 6997: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6988: 6987: 6986: 6985: 6984: 6983: 6982: 6981: 6980: 6979: 6967:Thanks Colin. 6951: 6947: 6943: 6939: 6936: 6935: 6934: 6933: 6932: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6830: 6790: 6789: 6788: 6787: 6786: 6737: 6718: 6715: 6714: 6713: 6712: 6711: 6710: 6709: 6708: 6707: 6706: 6705: 6695:TooManyFingers 6691: 6688: 6592: 6590: 6587: 6586: 6585: 6568:Courtesy link: 6560: 6559: 6558: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6554: 6553: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6549: 6548: 6547: 6546: 6431: 6430: 6429: 6428: 6427: 6342: 6228: 6225: 6222: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6201: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6110: 6088: 6074: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6068: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6063: 5966: 5951: 5918: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5903:TooManyFingers 5895: 5869: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5817: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5775: 5756:Article Wizard 5750: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5728: 5701: 5698: 5697: 5696: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5641:TooManyFingers 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5565: 5550: 5504:TooManyFingers 5481: 5387:TooManyFingers 5383: 5348: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5312: 5311: 5283: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5144: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5129:TooManyFingers 5124: 5123: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5090:Cherie.phoenix 5066:Cherie.phoenix 5034:cherie.phoenix 5030: 5008:both sentences 4998: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4961: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4953: 4900: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4815: 4777: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4675: 4674: 4654: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4628:, the article 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4577:TooManyFingers 4569: 4555: 4507: 4502:I agree with @ 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4484:TooManyFingers 4470:TooManyFingers 4408: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4361:TooManyFingers 4355: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4198:TooManyFingers 4166:TooManyFingers 4121: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4022: 4004: 3997: 3977: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3828: 3822:primary source 3818:wikinotability 3795: 3741: 3668: 3640:at least three 3622: 3589: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3420: 3419:Draft checking 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3222:TooManyFingers 3204: 3170:, I think. -- 3158:Let me quote, 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3122: 3103: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3088:TooManyFingers 3084: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 2993:; or, better, 2976: 2975: 2974: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2870:article wizard 2864: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2847:Goodtiming8871 2814: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2790:Goodtiming8871 2772:Goodtiming8871 2758:Goodtiming8871 2724:Goodtiming8871 2718: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2677: 2674: 2670: 2642:TooManyFingers 2632: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2559:TooManyFingers 2551: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2528: 2515:TooManyFingers 2511: 2508: 2505: 2497: 2487:TooManyFingers 2483: 2462: 2449:TooManyFingers 2445: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2408: 2368: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2340: 2316: 2298:this guideline 2293: 2272: 2271:Geoffrey Kabat 2269: 2266: 2263: 2259: 2256: 2251: 2244: 2241: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2211: 2208: 2205: 2200: 2195: 2150:TooManyFingers 2098: 2095: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2050:TooManyFingers 2036:TooManyFingers 2028: 2018:TooManyFingers 1999: 1996: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1870: 1852:TooManyFingers 1847: 1796: 1775: 1760: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1713:TooManyFingers 1680:TooManyFingers 1676: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1640:TooManyFingers 1636: 1635: 1634: 1598: 1597: 1587:TooManyFingers 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1568:TooManyFingers 1535:TooManyFingers 1519:TooManyFingers 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1387:TooManyFingers 1344:WP:MULTSOURCES 1342:Have you seen 1338:TooManyFingers 1333: 1323:Cordless Larry 1305:TooManyFingers 1301: 1297: 1293: 1290:Cordless Larry 1286: 1262:Cordless Larry 1226:Cordless Larry 1204: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1116: 1052: 967:Colegio Tarbut 954: 939: 929:TooManyFingers 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 867: 842: 744: 741: 740: 739: 717: 691:ClaudineChionh 676:do it yourself 669: 648:Courtesy link: 638: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 513:This page was 510: 507: 489: 377: 296: 293: 285: 278: 267: 248: 245: 234: 232: 231: 228: 227: 222: 219:skip to bottom 213: 191: 189: 188: 186: 185: 171: 157: 120:Question forum 115: 110:Ask a question 105: 102: 83: 82: 78: 77: 70: 62: 57: 55: 54: 45: 44: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 14033: 14022: 14019: 14017: 14014: 14013: 14011: 14000: 13999: 13998: 13990: 13986: 13982: 13978: 13972: 13969:to establish 13968: 13964: 13960: 13959: 13945: 13941: 13937: 13933: 13932: 13931: 13927: 13923: 13919: 13915: 13914: 13913: 13909: 13905: 13901: 13900: 13899: 13895: 13892: 13889: 13885: 13881: 13877: 13876: 13868: 13864: 13860: 13856: 13852: 13846: 13842: 13838: 13833: 13829: 13825: 13821: 13820: 13819: 13815: 13811: 13807: 13806: 13805: 13801: 13797: 13792: 13790: 13786: 13782: 13778: 13774: 13772: 13768: 13764: 13760: 13756: 13751: 13750: 13740: 13736: 13732: 13727: 13723: 13722: 13721: 13717: 13713: 13708: 13704: 13703: 13693: 13689: 13685: 13681: 13680: 13679: 13675: 13671: 13667: 13663: 13662: 13659: 13655: 13651: 13646: 13643: 13642: 13634: 13631: 13630: 13622: 13619: 13618:Chuck Douglas 13615: 13611: 13608: 13604: 13603: 13598: 13594: 13590: 13585: 13582: 13578: 13577: 13576: 13572: 13568: 13564: 13561: 13559: 13556: 13553: 13549: 13548: 13534: 13528: 13524: 13518: 13514: 13510: 13506: 13502: 13500: 13496: 13492: 13488: 13480: 13476: 13472: 13471: 13459: 13455: 13451: 13447: 13443: 13440: 13436: 13432: 13431: 13430: 13426: 13422: 13418: 13414: 13413: 13412: 13408: 13404: 13403:Mike Turnbull 13397: 13390: 13386: 13385: 13375: 13371: 13367: 13363: 13359: 13358: 13357: 13353: 13349: 13345: 13341: 13337: 13333: 13329: 13325: 13321: 13320: 13319: 13315: 13311: 13310:Mike Turnbull 13307: 13306:edit requests 13303: 13299: 13294: 13290: 13286: 13282: 13278: 13277: 13269: 13265: 13261: 13257: 13253: 13249: 13246: 13245: 13237: 13233: 13229: 13224: 13223: 13215: 13211: 13207: 13202: 13198: 13194: 13190: 13186: 13182: 13181: 13180: 13175: 13170: 13166: 13162: 13159: 13157: 13154: 13153: 13151: 13149: 13145: 13141: 13137: 13135: 13131: 13127: 13123: 13119: 13115: 13111: 13108: 13104: 13100: 13096: 13092: 13088: 13085: 13082:Firstly, see 13081: 13078: 13075: 13070: 13068: 13067: 13058: 13057: 13047: 13043: 13039: 13035: 13034: 13033: 13029: 13025: 13021: 13017: 13016: 13013: 13009: 13005: 13001: 13000: 12992: 12988: 12984: 12980: 12975: 12971: 12967: 12964: 12963: 12953: 12949: 12945: 12941: 12937: 12933: 12929: 12925: 12922: 12921: 12920: 12916: 12912: 12908: 12907:sock puppetry 12904: 12901: 12897: 12895: 12891: 12887: 12883: 12880: 12878: 12874: 12870: 12869:DoubleGrazing 12866: 12863: 12859: 12855: 12854: 12844: 12840: 12836: 12832: 12828: 12824: 12823: 12822: 12818: 12814: 12809: 12807: 12803: 12799: 12794: 12790: 12789: 12781: 12777: 12773: 12769: 12767: 12762: 12758: 12754: 12750: 12746: 12741: 12737: 12733: 12732: 12716: 12712: 12708: 12705: 12702: 12701: 12700: 12696: 12692: 12688: 12684: 12682: 12678: 12674: 12670: 12667: 12664: 12660: 12659: 12658: 12654: 12650: 12647: 12644: 12643: 12642: 12638: 12634: 12629: 12626: 12622: 12621: 12620: 12616: 12612: 12609: 12606: 12605: 12595: 12591: 12587: 12583: 12582: 12581: 12577: 12573: 12568: 12564: 12546: 12542: 12538: 12534: 12533: 12532: 12528: 12524: 12523:Mike Turnbull 12520: 12516: 12512: 12511: 12510: 12507: 12502: 12500: 12499: 12492: 12488: 12486: 12483: 12478: 12476: 12475: 12467: 12466: 12465: 12461: 12457: 12453: 12450: 12449: 12448: 12445: 12440: 12438: 12437: 12430: 12426: 12422: 12421: 12420: 12416: 12412: 12408: 12404: 12403: 12401: 12398: 12393: 12391: 12390: 12375: 12374: 12373: 12369: 12365: 12360: 12359: 12357: 12354: 12349: 12347: 12346: 12331: 12322: 12318: 12314: 12310: 12309: 12308: 12304: 12300: 12295: 12291: 12290: 12289: 12285: 12281: 12277: 12273: 12270: 12266: 12260: 12256: 12252: 12247: 12246: 12245: 12241: 12237: 12233: 12229: 12226: 12225: 12224: 12220: 12216: 12212: 12211: 12210: 12206: 12202: 12197: 12194: 12190: 12189: 12179: 12174: 12169: 12163: 12159: 12158: 12157: 12153: 12149: 12144: 12141: 12140: 12132: 12128: 12124: 12120: 12116: 12114: 12110: 12106: 12100: 12094: 12090: 12087: 12083: 12082: 12074: 12070: 12066: 12061: 12057: 12054: 12050: 12044: 12040: 12036: 12032: 12031:about Cardoso 12028: 12024: 12021: 12020: 12019: 12015: 12011: 12008: 12004: 12000: 11999: 11998: 11994: 11990: 11986: 11982: 11981: 11959: 11955: 11951: 11950:69.181.17.113 11947: 11943: 11942: 11941: 11937: 11933: 11932:69.181.17.113 11928: 11927: 11926: 11922: 11918: 11913: 11912: 11911: 11906: 11901: 11897: 11896: 11895: 11891: 11887: 11886:69.181.17.113 11883: 11879: 11875: 11871: 11867: 11863: 11859: 11853: 11848: 11847: 11846: 11841: 11836: 11831: 11829: 11825: 11821: 11816: 11815: 11814: 11810: 11806: 11801: 11800: 11799: 11794: 11789: 11785: 11781: 11773: 11768: 11763: 11759: 11758: 11757: 11753: 11749: 11748:69.181.17.113 11745: 11744: 11743: 11738: 11733: 11729: 11725: 11721: 11720: 11719: 11715: 11711: 11705: 11700: 11696: 11694: 11689: 11684: 11680: 11676: 11672: 11670: 11665: 11661: 11657: 11653: 11649: 11643: 11642: 11630: 11627: 11623: 11621: 11617: 11613: 11608: 11604: 11603: 11602: 11598: 11594: 11593:Irina Rainbow 11589: 11585: 11584: 11583: 11579: 11575: 11570: 11567: 11563: 11559: 11555: 11551: 11546: 11542: 11538: 11534: 11533:Irina Rainbow 11530: 11526: 11522: 11521:WP Disability 11518: 11514: 11511: 11510: 11509: 11504: 11500: 11496: 11492: 11488: 11483: 11482:Talk:Dementia 11476: 11475:WP Disability 11466: 11458: 11457: 11456: 11452: 11448: 11447:Irina Rainbow 11444: 11440: 11436: 11433: 11429: 11426: 11422: 11418: 11414: 11413: 11410: 11406: 11402: 11398: 11397: 11394: 11389: 11385: 11381: 11377: 11373: 11368: 11365: 11363: 11359: 11356: 11353: 11349: 11345: 11341: 11335: 11334:edit conflict 11330: 11329: 11321: 11317: 11313: 11309: 11306: 11298: 11295: 11289: 11286: 11285: 11284: 11280: 11276: 11275:DoubleGrazing 11272: 11268: 11267: 11266: 11262: 11258: 11254: 11250: 11249: 11248: 11245: 11240: 11236: 11235: 11227: 11223: 11219: 11215: 11214:WP:Quotations 11211: 11210: 11202: 11198: 11194: 11189: 11184: 11183: 11175: 11171: 11167: 11163: 11159: 11155: 11151: 11147: 11143: 11142:verifiability 11138: 11135: 11134:autobiography 11131: 11127: 11124: 11120: 11117: 11114: 11113: 11105: 11101: 11097: 11093: 11091: 11087: 11083: 11079: 11075: 11071: 11067: 11063: 11061: 11057: 11053: 11050:) etc.. ~ 🦝 11049: 11045: 11041: 11037: 11033: 11029: 11027: 11023: 11019: 11016: 11012: 11011: 11003: 10999: 10995: 10991: 10989: 10985: 10981: 10977: 10973: 10972: 10962: 10958: 10954: 10948: 10947: 10946: 10942: 10938: 10934: 10930: 10929: 10921: 10917: 10913: 10908: 10902: 10897: 10896: 10888: 10884: 10880: 10876: 10872: 10871: 10862: 10857: 10853: 10852: 10844: 10837: 10832: 10831: 10823: 10816: 10811: 10808: 10804: 10800: 10799:"Tagara; Tēr" 10793: 10786: 10781: 10777: 10773: 10766: 10758: 10753: 10752:Bosworth 2012 10747: 10741: 10735: 10729: 10723: 10717: 10711: 10705: 10699: 10693: 10687: 10681: 10675: 10669: 10664: 10662: 10657: 10650: 10642: 10638: 10634: 10630: 10626: 10622: 10618: 10614: 10610: 10606: 10602: 10598: 10597: 10596: 10592: 10588: 10584: 10583: 10575: 10571: 10567: 10563: 10559: 10555: 10554: 10544: 10540: 10536: 10531: 10530: 10529: 10528: 10525: 10521: 10517: 10513: 10507: 10503: 10502: 10494: 10490: 10486: 10480: 10476: 10474: 10470: 10466: 10462: 10456: 10452: 10450: 10446: 10440: 10434: 10433: 10425: 10421: 10417: 10413: 10407: 10403: 10402: 10392: 10388: 10384: 10381: 10378: 10372: 10367: 10366: 10365: 10361: 10357: 10353: 10349: 10346: 10342: 10340: 10336: 10332: 10328: 10324: 10320: 10319: 10311: 10307: 10303: 10299: 10295: 10291: 10287: 10283: 10279: 10276: 10275: 10274: 10270: 10266: 10261: 10257: 10253: 10250: 10249:Viusal Editor 10246: 10242: 10238: 10234: 10231: 10227: 10223: 10219: 10215: 10213: 10209: 10205: 10200: 10199: 10190: 10181: 10177: 10173: 10169: 10166: 10165: 10164: 10160: 10156: 10152: 10149: 10148: 10143: 10139: 10135: 10131: 10127: 10121: 10117: 10112: 10111: 10110: 10106: 10102: 10098: 10094: 10092: 10088: 10084: 10080: 10076: 10073: 10072: 10060: 10056: 10052: 10048: 10045: 10038: 10033: 10032: 10031: 10030: 10029: 10028: 10025: 10022: 10020: 10017: 10015: 10012: 10010: 10007: 10005: 10002: 10001: 9991: 9986: 9985: 9984: 9980: 9976: 9972: 9968: 9967: 9966: 9962: 9958: 9954: 9950: 9944: 9940: 9936: 9932: 9931: 9930: 9926: 9922: 9917: 9913: 9910: 9909: 9908: 9904: 9900: 9896: 9892: 9891: 9884: 9880: 9876: 9872: 9867: 9863: 9852: 9851: 9850: 9847: 9844: 9838: 9837: 9832: 9824: 9820: 9816: 9812: 9808: 9804: 9800: 9799: 9787: 9783: 9779: 9775: 9774: 9773: 9769: 9765: 9760: 9759: 9758: 9754: 9750: 9746: 9742: 9740: 9736: 9732: 9728: 9724: 9723: 9713: 9709: 9705: 9693: 9689: 9688: 9687: 9683: 9679: 9675: 9671: 9667: 9666: 9658: 9655: 9652: 9648: 9644: 9640: 9639: 9621: 9617: 9613: 9612:WikiProCreate 9610: 9607: 9606: 9605: 9601: 9597: 9593: 9592: 9591: 9587: 9583: 9582:WikiProCreate 9579: 9575: 9571: 9570: 9569: 9565: 9561: 9558: 9553: 9552: 9551: 9547: 9543: 9542:WikiProCreate 9540: 9536: 9535: 9534: 9530: 9526: 9522: 9521: 9518: 9508: 9503: 9498: 9493: 9492: 9491: 9487: 9483: 9478: 9468: 9463: 9458: 9454: 9450: 9446: 9442: 9438: 9437: 9436: 9432: 9428: 9422: 9417: 9416: 9415: 9411: 9407: 9403: 9400: 9398: 9394: 9390: 9386: 9385: 9384: 9380: 9376: 9370: 9365: 9364: 9363: 9359: 9355: 9351: 9350: 9349: 9345: 9341: 9334: 9329: 9328: 9318: 9315: 9311: 9310: 9309: 9305: 9301: 9297: 9293: 9290: 9286: 9282: 9279: 9275: 9273: 9269: 9265: 9262: 9258: 9254: 9251: 9247: 9243: 9240: 9239: 9231: 9226: 9221: 9217: 9216:WP:CHU/Simple 9211: 9206: 9204: 9200: 9196: 9192: 9188: 9184: 9183:administrator 9180: 9176: 9175: 9165: 9161: 9157: 9153: 9152: 9151: 9147: 9143: 9139: 9135: 9131: 9127: 9123: 9119: 9118:verifiability 9114: 9111: 9107: 9103: 9099: 9096: 9090: 9086: 9082: 9078: 9077: 9076: 9072: 9068: 9064: 9061: 9060: 9059: 9055: 9051: 9047: 9043: 9041: 9037: 9033: 9029: 9026:. Please see 9025: 9021: 9016: 9015: 9007: 9004: 9001: 8997: 8993: 8992: 8978: 8975: 8967: 8963: 8959: 8958: 8957: 8953: 8949: 8945: 8944: 8943: 8940: 8932: 8928: 8924: 8920: 8914: 8912: 8908: 8904: 8900: 8898: 8894: 8893: 8892: 8891: 8888: 8884: 8880: 8876: 8872: 8868: 8864: 8861: 8860: 8855: 8851: 8847: 8842: 8841: 8840: 8836: 8832: 8828: 8822: 8821:edit conflict 8817: 8815: 8811: 8807: 8803: 8802: 8788: 8784: 8780: 8776: 8772: 8771: 8770: 8765: 8760: 8756: 8752: 8751: 8750: 8746: 8742: 8737: 8733: 8729: 8725: 8724: 8723: 8719: 8715: 8711: 8707: 8705: 8700: 8695: 8691: 8687: 8683: 8682: 8672: 8668: 8664: 8660: 8659: 8658: 8653: 8648: 8644: 8642: 8638: 8634: 8630: 8624: 8620: 8616: 8612: 8611: 8608: 8604: 8600: 8596: 8587: 8566: 8562: 8558: 8557:FactOrOpinion 8554: 8550: 8546: 8545: 8544: 8540: 8536: 8532: 8531:FactOrOpinion 8529: 8528: 8527: 8522: 8517: 8512: 8511: 8503: 8500: 8497: 8493: 8489: 8487: 8483: 8479: 8475: 8470: 8462: 8458: 8454: 8449: 8446: 8445: 8444: 8440: 8436: 8432: 8431: 8430: 8425: 8420: 8416: 8412: 8411: 8410: 8406: 8402: 8398: 8395:(ii) is from 8394: 8390: 8387: 8386: 8373: 8369: 8365: 8362: 8359: 8357: 8354: 8346: 8342: 8338: 8334: 8333: 8332: 8327: 8322: 8318: 8313: 8312: 8311: 8307: 8303: 8299: 8294: 8293: 8291: 8287: 8285: 8282: 8279: 8276: 8272: 8268: 8264: 8263: 8262: 8258: 8254: 8250: 8249: 8248: 8243: 8238: 8233: 8232: 8231: 8227: 8223: 8219: 8216: 8214:All the best, 8213: 8211: 8208: 8204: 8200: 8196: 8192: 8188: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8178: 8173: 8168: 8165: 8160: 8156: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8140: 8139: 8138: 8134: 8130: 8125: 8122: 8121: 8120: 8115: 8110: 8106: 8102: 8098: 8094: 8088: 8084: 8080: 8076: 8075: 8074: 8070: 8066: 8061: 8060: 8059: 8055: 8051: 8047: 8043: 8040: 8039: 8029: 8024: 8020: 8016: 8011: 8010: 8009: 8005: 8001: 8000:FactOrOpinion 7997: 7993: 7989: 7985: 7981: 7977: 7973: 7967: 7962: 7957: 7953: 7949: 7945: 7941: 7940: 7939: 7934: 7930: 7926: 7921: 7920: 7919: 7914: 7909: 7905: 7901: 7900: 7882: 7878: 7874: 7870: 7869: 7868: 7863: 7858: 7854: 7853: 7852: 7848: 7844: 7840: 7838:Really, dude? 7837: 7836: 7835: 7831: 7827: 7823: 7819: 7815: 7811: 7808: 7807: 7806: 7802: 7798: 7794: 7793: 7792: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7776: 7775: 7767: 7763: 7759: 7746: 7745: 7735: 7731: 7727: 7723: 7719: 7718: 7717: 7713: 7709: 7705: 7701: 7697: 7693: 7692: 7689: 7685: 7681: 7677: 7674: 7673: 7663: 7659: 7653: 7647: 7646: 7645: 7641: 7637: 7633: 7626: 7620: 7619: 7616: 7598: 7594: 7590: 7586: 7585: 7584: 7579: 7574: 7569: 7565: 7559: 7555: 7551: 7547: 7543: 7539: 7538: 7537: 7533: 7529: 7525: 7524: 7523: 7519: 7515: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7506: 7505: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7501: 7488: 7484: 7480: 7475: 7474: 7473: 7469: 7465: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7455: 7451: 7446: 7445: 7444: 7439: 7434: 7430: 7426: 7424: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7406: 7402: 7398: 7397: 7396: 7391: 7386: 7382: 7377: 7367: 7363: 7359: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7348: 7343: 7338: 7334: 7330: 7326: 7322: 7318: 7317: 7316: 7312: 7308: 7304: 7302: 7298: 7294: 7290: 7289: 7288: 7284: 7280: 7275: 7274: 7273: 7269: 7265: 7261: 7260: 7259: 7255: 7251: 7247: 7243: 7239: 7235: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7225: 7220: 7214: 7213: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7185: 7181: 7177: 7170: 7163: 7162: 7154: 7150: 7146: 7141: 7138: 7134: 7130: 7126: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7116: 7112: 7108: 7107: 7104:Breaking News 7099: 7095: 7091: 7086: 7080: 7075: 7069: 7065: 7061: 7057: 7053: 7050: 7048: 7044: 7040: 7036: 7035: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7022: 7021: 7020: 7016: 7012: 7008: 7004: 7000: 6999: 6996: 6978: 6974: 6970: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6960: 6956: 6952: 6948: 6944: 6940: 6937: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6919: 6918: 6917: 6913: 6909: 6905: 6904: 6903: 6899: 6895: 6891: 6890: 6889: 6885: 6881: 6877: 6876: 6875: 6871: 6867: 6863: 6862: 6861: 6857: 6853: 6849: 6848: 6847: 6843: 6839: 6835: 6834: 6829: 6825: 6821: 6820:Mike Turnbull 6817: 6813: 6812: 6811: 6807: 6803: 6802:Mike Turnbull 6799: 6795: 6791: 6785: 6781: 6777: 6773: 6772: 6771: 6766: 6761: 6757: 6754: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6738: 6736: 6732: 6728: 6724: 6723:Verifiability 6721: 6720: 6704: 6700: 6696: 6692: 6689: 6686: 6685: 6684: 6680: 6676: 6675:Tizzythewhale 6672: 6671: 6670: 6666: 6662: 6661:Mike Turnbull 6658: 6654: 6653:Tizzythewhale 6650: 6649: 6648: 6644: 6640: 6639:Tizzythewhale 6636: 6632: 6631: 6630: 6626: 6622: 6621:Mike Turnbull 6618: 6614: 6613:Tizzythewhale 6610: 6609: 6607: 6603: 6599: 6598:Tizzythewhale 6595: 6584: 6580: 6576: 6572: 6569: 6565: 6561: 6545: 6541: 6537: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6527: 6523: 6519: 6515: 6511: 6506: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6486: 6482: 6478: 6477:WP:ATTRIBUTEd 6474: 6470: 6466: 6462: 6458: 6454: 6450: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6441: 6437: 6432: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6408: 6404: 6400: 6396: 6392: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6376: 6375:WP:PEERREVIEW 6372: 6368: 6362: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6351: 6347: 6343: 6339: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6328: 6324: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6308: 6303: 6299: 6294: 6291: 6290: 6289: 6285: 6281: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6262: 6258: 6254: 6248: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6237: 6233: 6229: 6226: 6223: 6220: 6216: 6211: 6205: 6200: 6188: 6184: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6153: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6143: 6139: 6135: 6131: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6120: 6114: 6109: 6097: 6093: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6076: 6062: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6046: 6045: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6030: 6024: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5980: 5976: 5972: 5971:verifiability 5967: 5964: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5935: 5926: 5921: 5920: 5912: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5894: 5889: 5884: 5880: 5876: 5872: 5871: 5861: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5843: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5824: 5820: 5819: 5809: 5805: 5801: 5797: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5788: 5784: 5780: 5776: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5757: 5753: 5752: 5742: 5738: 5734: 5729: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5708: 5704: 5703: 5695: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5679: 5675: 5672: 5671: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5637: 5631: 5627: 5623: 5619: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5609: 5605: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5586: 5581: 5577: 5573: 5571: 5566: 5563: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5548: 5543: 5538: 5536: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5523: 5519: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5482: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5472: 5468: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5414: 5410: 5406: 5402: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5384: 5381: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5371: 5367: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5357: 5355: 5351: 5350: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5320: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5293: 5289: 5286: 5285: 5271: 5266: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5231: 5226: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5191: 5187: 5183: 5179: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5147: 5146: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5125: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5104: 5103:Mike Turnbull 5100: 5096: 5091: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5075:Mike Turnbull 5071: 5067: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4992: 4989: 4986: 4985: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4935: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4908:for details. 4907: 4903: 4902: 4892: 4885: 4883: 4878: 4876: 4870: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4860: 4856: 4850: 4846: 4839: 4837: 4832: 4830: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4780: 4779: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4682: 4677: 4676: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4656: 4644: 4640: 4636: 4631: 4627: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4574: 4570: 4568: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4554: 4549: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4505: 4501: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4415: 4411: 4410: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4357: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4324: 4314: 4304: 4303:PD-ineligible 4297: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4282:69.181.17.113 4279: 4278: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4236: 4229: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4133: 4124: 4123: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4050:DoubleGrazing 4044: 4034: 4027: 4023: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4002: 3998: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3979: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3936: 3932: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3872: 3868: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3800: 3796: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3753: 3739: 3731: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3678: 3675:independent.@ 3673: 3669: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3594: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3488: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3412: 3409: 3408: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3396: 3392: 3391:Martin Garrix 3388: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3324:Pigsonthewing 3320: 3312: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3280:WP:Volunteers 3277: 3276: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3262:Pigsonthewing 3258: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3032: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964:Mike Turnbull 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2925: 2922: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2822: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776:69.181.17.113 2773: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2734: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2720: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2675: 2671: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2634: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2482: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2410:Best wishes. 2409: 2405: 2404:FactOrOpinion 2401: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2390:FactOrOpinion 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2341: 2339: 2338:FactOrOpinion 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324:FactOrOpinion 2321: 2317: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2306:FactOrOpinion 2303: 2299: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2270: 2268:Thanks again! 2267: 2264: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181:FactOrOpinion 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2072: 2067: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1954:WP:VOLUNTEERs 1951: 1945: 1940: 1939: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1868: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1544: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1447: 1442: 1436: 1435:wikidata:Q352 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1417: 1416: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1194:Mike Turnbull 1191: 1190:false balance 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1143:69.181.17.113 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 990: 986: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 968: 963: 959: 955: 953: 949: 945: 940: 938: 934: 930: 926: 921: 918:I have heard 917: 916: 903: 899: 895: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 868: 865: 861: 857: 856: 855: 851: 847: 843: 840: 833: 824: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 804: 799: 795: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 746: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 715: 710: 706: 702: 698: 693: 692: 685: 681: 677: 673: 670: 668: 664: 660: 658: 652: 649: 645: 641: 640: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 581:Mike Turnbull 577: 573: 572: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 553: 549: 548:Mike Turnbull 544: 540: 539: 536: 535:0 seconds ago 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 511: 508: 506: 504: 499: 497: 496: 490: 487: 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 462:Mike Turnbull 456: 449: 445: 442: 438: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 408:Mike Turnbull 405: 400: 396: 392: 391: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 350: 346: 345:Mike Turnbull 342: 337: 333: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 294: 291: 286: 283: 279: 276: 272: 271:public domain 268: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250: 226: 223: 221: 215: 214: 184: 177: 170: 167: 163: 150: 148:Become a host 140: 131: 122: 112: 99: 98: 87: 75: 71: 68: 64: 63: 60: 40: 33: 19: 13890: 13831: 13827: 13823: 13758: 13757:, if that's 13625: 13527: 13445: 13435:Naomi Hennig 13421:Naomi Hennig 13416: 13389:Naomi Hennig 13283:The article 13200:application. 13101:referencing 13065: 13064: 12997:Username COI 12973: 12939: 12935: 12927: 12861: 12662: 12519:WP:TECHNICAL 12497: 12496: 12490: 12473: 12472: 12435: 12434: 12428: 12388: 12387: 12344: 12343: 12293: 12148:72.218.87.16 12030: 12026: 11945: 11877: 11873: 11869: 11858:Eric Kessler 11724:this article 11679:Eric Kessler 11587: 11574:WhatamIdoing 11528: 11354: 10850: 10843: 10834: 10829: 10822: 10813: 10802: 10792: 10783: 10779: 10775: 10765: 10716:Anthony 2011 10668:Maclean 1984 10604: 10600: 10454: 10351: 10325:on the page 10229: 10225: 10188: 10130:this comment 9871:noticeboards 9848: 9842: 9839: 9815:57.140.16.35 9810: 9764:Uporządnicki 9441:Cornishrom20 9421:Cornishrom20 9406:Cornishrom20 9389:Cornishrom20 9369:Cornishrom20 9354:Cornishrom20 9333:Cornishrom20 9288: 9105: 8948:Roryjohnston 8926: 8897:Roryjohnston 8863:Roryjohnston 8846:Roryjohnston 8827:Roryjohnston 8619:edit warring 8392: 8289: 8158: 8154: 8150: 8146: 8104: 7703: 7589:94.192.32.22 7512:opinion. -- 7464:94.192.32.22 7450:94.192.32.22 7415:94.192.32.22 7401:94.192.32.22 7380: 7358:94.192.32.22 7321:94.192.32.22 7307:94.192.32.22 7293:94.192.32.22 7264:94.192.32.22 7234:94.192.32.22 7125:94.192.32.22 7111:94.192.32.22 7039:94.192.32.22 7025:94.192.32.22 6969:94.192.32.22 6922:94.192.32.22 6908:94.192.32.22 6894:94.192.32.22 6880:94.192.32.22 6866:94.192.32.22 6852:94.192.32.22 6838:94.192.32.22 6794:verification 6755: 6739: 6634: 6594:Bagri Kumhar 6567: 6485:WP:EXPERTSPS 6473:WP:RSCONTEXT 6465:WP:SECONDARY 6457:WP:ABOUTSELF 6337: 6315:WP:CONSENSUS 6298:WP:PROTECTed 6278:each other. 6257:WP:VANDALISM 6129: 6027:— Preceding 5962: 5958: 5713:helpful? -- 5575: 5569: 5568: 5553: 5534: 5533: 5448: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5319:Draft:Memnun 5292:Draft:Memnun 5255: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4972: 4937:Please read 4881: 4874: 4835: 4828: 4822: 4785: 4660:your request 4572: 4428: 4416: 4354:Cnn blocked? 4179: 4147: 4128: 4127: 4033:Football kit 3934: 3864: 3825: 3756:that section 3737: 3711: 3707: 3671: 3581: 3484:in the draft 3406: 3402: 3399: 3386: 3341:Andy Mabbett 3332:Andy's edits 3328:Talk to Andy 3319:Andy Mabbett 3270:Andy's edits 3266:Talk to Andy 3257:Andy Mabbett 3047: 3043: 2991:Template:DOI 2986: 2982: 2727: 2576: 2554: 2441: 2176:this article 1842: 1820:legitimately 1819: 1487:Ok, thanks. 1381: 1377: 1359: 1356:Women in Red 1351: 1318: 1138: 1064:Display size 1059: 1038:Display size 924: 919: 888: 838: 771: 696: 689: 656: 647: 500: 492: 491: 358: 172: 158: 118: 96: 95: 13666:Draft:Lusei 13169:Anachronist 12898:Please see 12772:TheWikiToby 12572:LaffyTaffer 12537:LaffyTaffer 12515:LaffyTaffer 12313:LaffyTaffer 12251:LaffyTaffer 12228:LaffyTaffer 12215:LaffyTaffer 12193:LaffyTaffer 12027:as a person 11900:Anachronist 11835:Anachronist 11788:Anachronist 11762:Anachronist 11732:Anachronist 11683:Anachronist 11612:David notMD 11517:WP Medicine 11465:WP Medicine 11443:WP:ADVOCACY 11425:Bon courage 11401:Bon courage 11257:David notMD 10980:PrimeHunter 10937:PrimeHunter 10836:traditions: 10830:The Soomras 10680:Nizami 1994 10647:Comment on 10383:PrimeHunter 10371:Waldohammer 9497:Anachronist 9457:Anachronist 9294:Please see 9220:Anachronist 9156:David notMD 8972:Patrick. ツ 8937:Patrick. ツ 8923:WP:DISPUTED 8775:Anachronist 8759:Anachronist 8732:Anachronist 8694:Anachronist 8690:WP:COATRACK 8661:Thank you! 8647:Anachronist 8549:Anachronist 8516:Anachronist 8419:Anachronist 8389:Anachronist 8321:Anachronist 8290:anachronist 8237:Anachronist 8172:Anachronist 8164:WP:INFOWARS 8159:independent 8109:Anachronist 8101:WP:BACKWARD 7956:Anachronist 7908:Anachronist 7857:Anachronist 7648:Thank you. 7613:COPYVIO on 7573:Anachronist 7526:Wise words 7433:Anachronist 7385:Anachronist 7232:Population 6760:Anachronist 6510:WP:SEEKHELP 6481:WP:CITESELF 6387:WP:EDITWARs 6134:WikiProject 6053:David notMD 6033:David notMD 6009:David notMD 5883:Anachronist 5800:David notMD 5779:WP:BACKWARD 5260:Anachronist 5225:Anachronist 4573:demonstrate 4048:.) HTH, -- 4010:, sense 6. 3866:I Am Malala 3752:golden rule 3441:David notMD 3395:Third Party 3373:94.6.83.137 3369:WP:Too soon 3292:WP:TUTORIAL 3194:David notMD 3013:David notMD 2928:Anachronist 2660:David notMD 1962:WP:SHOUTING 1910:Anachronist 1804:Anachronist 1784:Anachronist 1709:Blackballnz 1695:Blackballnz 1654:Blackballnz 1624:Blackballnz 1602:Blackballnz 1378:requirement 1352:necessarily 1319:necessarily 832:underlinked 754:the article 595:CrissCollab 576:CrissCollab 562:CrissCollab 543:CrissCollab 519:CrissCollab 515:last edited 476:CrissCollab 437:CrissCollab 423:CrissCollab 395:CrissCollab 381:CrissCollab 361:an artist. 332:CrissCollab 318:CrissCollab 300:Help:Upload 254:CrissCollab 14010:Categories 13976:Tenryuu 🐲 13855:WP:Notable 13763:asilvering 13552:Shantavira 13396:Poem quote 13285:Eurospares 13126:94.1.171.3 13118:principles 13038:Sirocco745 12966:WeInTheUSA 12798:asilvering 12586:asilvering 12379:variances. 12280:asilvering 12123:asilvering 11870:Early life 11699:notability 11525:and others 11193:asilvering 11154:notability 11123:notability 11096:Lester1960 11074:notability 11070:indepedent 11054:(he/him • 11032:Lester1960 10907:notability 10879:Nick Moyes 10740:Malik 2020 10511:Tenryuu 🐲 10460:Tenryuu 🐲 10411:Tenryuu 🐲 10302:asilvering 10298:WP:MILHIST 10265:Nick Moyes 10260:WP:BE BOLD 10172:RodRabelo7 10155:RodRabelo7 10134:RodRabelo7 10037:RodRabelo7 9990:RodRabelo7 9975:RodRabelo7 9957:RodRabelo7 9745:WP:EXPLORE 9704:GoingBatty 9674:Help:Table 9651:Shantavira 9387:Ok thanks 9187:bureaucrat 9130:notability 9000:Shantavira 8960:Thank you 8779:Angel94117 8741:Angel94117 8710:Angel94117 8663:Curiocurio 8628:Tenryuu 🐲 8615:Curiocurio 8594:Tenryuu 🐲 8496:Shantavira 8194:Knowledge. 7996:WP:BLPNAME 7542:wise words 7528:10mmsocket 7479:10mmsocket 7085:notability 7052:Notability 6878:st neots* 6693:- give up 6453:WP:PRIMARY 6253:WP:SILENCE 6084:WP:be bold 5983:notability 5925:User972364 5733:Sirocco745 5707:Sirocco745 5639:on there. 4786:two people 4235:PD-US-1989 4098:Thank you 3940:Tenryuu 🐲 3876:Tenryuu 🐲 3832:Tenryuu 🐲 3765:Tenryuu 🐲 3298:(he/him • 3251:notability 2739:Tenryuu 🐲 2733:Creamastra 2172:This essay 2097:Thank you. 1892:10mmsocket 1120:Asilvering 1106:asilvering 1058:there are 1021:asilvering 999:Asilvering 985:asilvering 894:asilvering 798:Asilvering 780:asilvering 743:On tagging 653:Cheers, -- 336:WP:NONFREE 302:for more. 13859:Tesleemah 13731:Cullen328 13670:RudolfRed 13417:Ivo Ringe 13260:ColinFine 13252:Bangalore 13228:ColinFine 13099:citations 12944:Cullen328 12835:Cullen328 12707:G4B-XD-3l 12687:G4B-XD-3l 12649:G4B-XD-3l 12625:G4B-XD-3l 12611:G4B-XD-3l 12456:Cullen328 12411:Cullen328 12317:Cullen328 12236:Cullen328 12084:That was 11917:EJKessler 11874:Education 11852:EJKessler 11805:EJKessler 11312:Tesleemah 11271:shouldn't 11218:ColinFine 11207:Citations 11166:ColinFine 11082:ColinFine 11052:Shushugah 10912:ColinFine 10810:0035-869X 10704:Wink 2002 10587:Cullen328 10566:Marchjuly 10406:WP:BEFORE 10356:ColinFine 10222:ColinFine 10204:ColinFine 10120:ColinFine 10101:ColinFine 9921:Cullen328 9899:ColinFine 9875:Marchjuly 9807:WP:RFPP/E 9678:ColinFine 9574:Tesleemah 9560:Tesleemah 9300:ColinFine 9285:BACKWARDS 9264:Tesleemah 9142:ColinFine 9102:BACKWARDS 9081:Tesleemah 9067:Cullen328 9063:Tesleemah 9050:Tesleemah 8966:talk page 8907:Marchjuly 8903:Tesleemah 8871:Marchjuly 8831:Marchjuly 8806:Tesleemah 8686:WP:LAYOUT 8553:Cullen328 8535:Cullen328 8157:that are 8046:Wikiquote 7980:talk page 7694:Click on 7651:Svampesky 7090:ColinFine 6955:ColinFine 6575:ColinFine 6536:MarkWHowe 6522:Marchjuly 6436:MarkWHowe 6417:MarkWHowe 6403:Marchjuly 6371:WP:EXPERT 6361:MarkWHowe 6346:MarkWHowe 6323:Marchjuly 6280:MarkWHowe 6265:Marchjuly 6247:MarkWHowe 6232:MarkWHowe 6183:MarkWHowe 6169:MarkWHowe 6152:MarkWHowe 6080:MarkWHowe 6051:applies. 5995:ColinFine 5955:BACKWARDS 5576:broadness 5549:to do so. 5547:consensus 5401:Cleveland 5301:Tesleemah 5242:Cullen328 5193:Cullen328 4969:WP:TRIVIA 4943:Cullen328 4928:Cullen328 4804:Cullen328 4790:Cullen328 4752:Sparkbean 4748:Cullen328 4734:Cullen328 4730:Sparkbean 4713:Sparkbean 4705:RudolfRed 4691:RudolfRed 4681:Sparkbean 4559:Tesleemah 4511:Tesleemah 4268:Paulie302 4212:Paulie302 4184:Paulie302 4152:Paulie302 4086:ColinFine 4012:ColinFine 3962:Tesleemah 3598:ColinFine 3400:Commissar 3311:Shushugah 3296:Shushugah 3208:Tesleemah 3166:Ripe for 3160:Sumitfilm 3126:Sumitfilm 3109:Tesleemah 3069:ColinFine 2948:this .pdf 2833:Cremastra 2695:Talk page 2693:Check my 2575:I didn't 1982:Marchjuly 1978:WP:OUTING 1800:Lagenlook 1750:Ratekreel 1276:Tesleemah 1240:Tesleemah 1222:Tesleemah 1208:Tesleemah 1178:Tomsinsky 1102:Cullen328 1088:Cullen328 1056:Cullen328 1042:Cullen328 958:Cullen328 944:Newystats 680:talk page 363:ColinFine 304:ColinFine 203:Knowledge 59:Shortcuts 13926:contribs 13894:contribs 13837:Carlstak 13796:Carlstak 13628:— jmcgnh 13607:Dehmling 13581:Dehmling 13509:jlwoodwa 13495:contribs 13439:WP:CITET 13302:WP:ASFAQ 13122:policies 13066:Mandruss 12793:MOS:PLOT 12745:Headbomb 12669:WP:LOGOS 12498:Mandruss 12474:Mandruss 12452:Mandruss 12436:Mandruss 12389:Mandruss 12345:Mandruss 12086:added to 11709:Rusalkii 11648:Headbomb 11487:Headbomb 11432:Headbomb 11421:Headbomb 11372:Headbomb 11358:contribs 11018:Lectonar 10994:jlwoodwa 10957:𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔 10718:, p. 178 10706:, p. 156 10694:, p. 355 10613:Struway2 10331:jlwoodwa 10116:Jlwoodwa 10083:jlwoodwa 9897:at all. 9375:Gronk Oz 9340:Gronk Oz 9314:Lagosman 9210:Alexysun 9179:Alexysun 8754:article. 7992:this one 7986:and the 7984:RfC page 7636:jlwoodwa 7180:jlwoodwa 7169:cite web 7060:jlwoodwa 6514:WP:CIVIL 6489:WP:UNDUE 6302:WP:OWNed 6138:jlwoodwa 6041:contribs 6029:unsigned 5899:IlEssere 5796:Boys4tam 5622:GoneIn60 5589:GoneIn60 5453:GoneIn60 5197:Colinstu 5178:Colinstu 5042:jlwoodwa 5020:jlwoodwa 4965:WP:UNDUE 4910:jlwoodwa 4869:Jlwoodwa 4855:jlwoodwa 4709:Jlwoodwa 4664:jlwoodwa 4533:jlwoodwa 4529:reliable 4330:jlwoodwa 4254:jlwoodwa 4080:, or at 4008:wikt:kit 3987:jlwoodwa 3168:deletion 3052:jlwoodwa 2960:WP:NPROF 2681:Jjamulla 2654:You and 2638:Jjamulla 2581:jlwoodwa 2407:"Rabat." 2081:jlwoodwa 1970:WP:CIVIL 1874:Fortunaa 1839:Fortunaa 1825:Fortunaa 1566:Thanks! 1553:jlwoodwa 1364:jlwoodwa 1348:2018 RfC 705:contribs 523:contribs 448:this one 376:article? 275:CC-BY-SA 13963:Kavya79 13706:things. 13446:they've 13298:WP:PAID 13114:decline 13091:Drafted 12172:MemeGod 12099:CtasACT 12093:CtasACT 11820:MrOllie 11460:(here, 11239:WP:IMDB 10851:Haryana 10805:: 543. 10742:, p. 42 10682:, p. 57 10670:, p. 45 10601:British 10438:Knitsey 9731:Maproom 8974:Pdebee. 8939:Pdebee. 8217:Charles 8147:notable 7726:Iljhgtn 7680:Iljhgtn 7550:Shirt58 7346:MemeGod 6942:vandal. 6774:Thanks 6635:RAJ Era 6505:WP:BOLD 6493:WP:NPOV 6341:review. 6307:WP:BOLD 6049:WP:PAID 5834:WP:PROD 5331:Maproom 5327:Jupiter 5032:Hello, 4782:The Kip 4687:WP:RFPP 4525:notable 4431:. Read 4323:PD-self 3730:MrOllie 3694:MrOllie 3677:MrOllie 3644:MrOllie 3586:notable 2979:Smedler 2944:Smedler 2893:Smedler 2673:thesis. 2228:answer. 1774:needed. 1358:) will 697:she/her 404:WP:IOWN 341:WP:IOWN 13605:Hello 13185:331dot 13140:331dot 13107:verify 12940:do not 12911:331dot 12335:skills 12053:Strlbr 12010:Strlbr 11985:Strlbr 11878:Family 11728:WP:AFD 11673:Go to 11519:}}, {{ 11423:, and 11152:, and 10730:, p. 7 10479:turnip 10241:TABLES 10097:WP:ANI 10044:friend 9596:331dot 9578:331dot 9557:331dot 9525:331dot 9296:WP:YFA 9128:, and 9106:begins 9032:331dot 8901:Copy: 8867:Pdebee 8492:WP:DDD 8317:WP:RSP 8198:media. 7976:WP:RfC 7756:.) -- 7540:Those 7223:Faddle 7218:Fiddle 7011:331dot 6816:331dot 6776:331dot 6742:331dot 6727:331dot 6657:WP:RAJ 6497:WP:RSN 6367:WP:VNT 6338:facts' 6210:✏️cons 6204:💬pros 6119:✏️cons 6113:💬pros 5981:, and 5765:331dot 5423:source 5405:source 5297:Memnon 5288:Memnon 5151:value. 4988:(talk) 4823:enough 4626:Sa2840 4613:Sa2840 4595:Sa2840 4466:Sa2840 4452:Sa2840 4425:WP:BLP 4414:Sa2840 4313:PD-old 4248:, and 3582:starts 3552:331dot 3140:331dot 3038:, and 2997:.) -- 2952:Nature 2907:331dot 2878:331dot 2609:331dot 2532:Gkabat 2504:point: 2501:Gkabat 2481:WP:BLP 2438:Gkabat 2412:Gkabat 2386:Gkabat 2372:Gkabat 2320:Gkabat 2290:Gkabat 2276:Gkabat 2215:Gkabat 2164:Gkabat 2146:Gkabat 2132:Gkabat 2117:331dot 2102:Gkabat 2071:Gkabat 2032:Gkabat 2003:Gkabat 1944:Gkabat 1906:WP:AFD 1841:: Not 1547:gives 1479:rabbit 1445:rabbit 1125:Akaibu 1084:Akaibu 1071:Akaibu 1066:, see 1034:Akaibu 1003:Akaibu 971:Akaibu 885:Akaibu 871:Akaibu 823:Akaibu 808:Akaibu 801:which 776:Akaibu 770:Oh is 729:Jc3s5h 503:CSD G7 176:bottom 67:WP:TEA 13475:PecMo 13105:that 13024:Hoary 12983:Hoary 12278:. -- 12121:. -- 11862:WP:RS 10815:Jatt. 10785:Jutt. 10633:Hoary 10455:isn't 10230:first 9873:. -- 9803:OGWFP 9576:and @ 9289:start 9195:Hoary 8911:Hoary 8879:Hoary 8869:. As 8730:and @ 8478:Hoary 8474:work. 8435:Hoary 8401:Hoary 8105:first 8050:Hoary 8048:. -- 7826:Hoary 7824:. -- 7783:Hoary 7781:? -- 7758:Hoary 7708:Hoary 7568:WP:OR 7556:) 🦘 7514:Hoary 7226:🇺🇦 6950:says. 6520:. -- 6469:WP:RS 6461:WP:OR 6401:. -- 6383:WP:DR 6379:WP:ES 6321:. -- 6263:. -- 5959:first 5852:Pygos 5823:Pygos 5715:Hoary 5686:Hoary 5618:Hoary 5570:Asian 5449:Black 5444:Asian 5256:added 5210:Hoary 5208:. -- 5164:Hoary 5156:Hoary 5101:like 4808:WP:IH 4707:and @ 4635:Hoary 4599:Hoary 4597:? -- 4417:Maybe 4131:fr33k 3403:Doggo 3345:Hoary 3172:Hoary 2999:Hoary 1846:cite. 1843:every 1606:Hoary 1474:Recon 1440:Recon 925:never 889:might 794:Hoary 758:Hoary 709:email 529:) at 455:Db-g7 74:WP:TH 13940:talk 13922:talk 13918:Elli 13908:talk 13888:talk 13863:talk 13841:talk 13832:most 13828:tell 13824:show 13814:talk 13800:talk 13785:talk 13767:talk 13735:talk 13716:talk 13688:talk 13674:talk 13654:talk 13593:talk 13571:talk 13513:talk 13491:talk 13454:talk 13425:talk 13407:talk 13370:talk 13352:talk 13332:talk 13314:talk 13264:talk 13232:talk 13210:talk 13189:talk 13174:talk 13144:talk 13130:talk 13120:and 13042:talk 13028:talk 13008:talk 12987:talk 12948:talk 12915:talk 12890:talk 12873:talk 12839:talk 12817:talk 12802:talk 12776:talk 12711:talk 12695:talk 12677:talk 12653:talk 12637:talk 12615:talk 12590:talk 12576:talk 12541:talk 12527:talk 12460:talk 12429:easy 12415:talk 12368:talk 12321:talk 12303:talk 12294:only 12284:talk 12255:talk 12240:talk 12219:talk 12205:talk 12152:talk 12127:talk 12109:talk 12069:talk 12039:talk 12014:talk 11993:talk 11954:talk 11936:talk 11921:talk 11905:talk 11890:talk 11866:URLs 11840:talk 11824:talk 11809:talk 11793:talk 11767:talk 11752:talk 11737:talk 11714:talk 11688:talk 11616:talk 11597:talk 11578:talk 11554:talk 11537:talk 11470:and 11451:talk 11441:and 11405:talk 11352:talk 11316:talk 11279:talk 11261:talk 11222:talk 11197:talk 11170:talk 11100:talk 11086:talk 11056:talk 11022:talk 11013:See 10998:talk 10984:talk 10941:talk 10916:talk 10883:talk 10856:ISBN 10807:ISSN 10757:help 10746:help 10734:help 10722:help 10710:help 10698:help 10686:help 10674:help 10649:Jats 10637:talk 10617:talk 10591:talk 10570:talk 10539:talk 10489:talk 10444:talk 10387:talk 10360:talk 10350:You 10335:talk 10306:talk 10286:talk 10269:talk 10255:LOL. 10208:talk 10176:talk 10168:Hftf 10159:talk 10151:Hftf 10138:talk 10132:... 10126:here 10118:and 10105:talk 10087:talk 10055:talk 9979:talk 9961:talk 9939:talk 9925:talk 9903:talk 9879:talk 9819:talk 9811:only 9782:talk 9768:talk 9753:talk 9735:talk 9727:here 9708:talk 9682:talk 9616:talk 9600:talk 9586:talk 9564:talk 9546:talk 9529:talk 9502:talk 9486:talk 9462:talk 9445:talk 9431:talk 9410:talk 9393:talk 9379:talk 9358:talk 9344:talk 9304:talk 9268:talk 9225:talk 9199:talk 9160:talk 9146:talk 9085:talk 9071:talk 9054:talk 9036:talk 8962:Rory 8952:talk 8931:here 8895:To: 8883:talk 8850:talk 8835:talk 8810:talk 8783:talk 8764:talk 8745:talk 8718:talk 8699:talk 8667:talk 8652:talk 8561:talk 8539:talk 8521:talk 8482:talk 8457:talk 8439:talk 8424:talk 8405:talk 8368:talk 8341:talk 8326:talk 8306:talk 8257:talk 8242:talk 8226:talk 8177:talk 8133:talk 8114:talk 8083:talk 8069:talk 8054:talk 8023:Talk 8004:talk 7961:talk 7933:Talk 7913:talk 7902:See 7877:talk 7862:talk 7847:talk 7830:talk 7801:talk 7787:talk 7762:talk 7730:talk 7712:talk 7684:talk 7657:talk 7640:talk 7593:talk 7578:talk 7554:talk 7532:talk 7518:talk 7483:talk 7468:talk 7454:talk 7438:talk 7419:talk 7405:talk 7390:talk 7362:talk 7325:talk 7311:talk 7297:talk 7283:talk 7268:talk 7254:talk 7238:talk 7198:talk 7184:talk 7149:talk 7129:talk 7115:talk 7094:talk 7064:talk 7056:fame 7043:talk 7029:talk 7015:talk 6973:talk 6959:talk 6926:talk 6912:talk 6898:talk 6884:talk 6870:talk 6856:talk 6842:talk 6824:talk 6806:talk 6780:talk 6765:talk 6756:Were 6746:talk 6731:talk 6699:talk 6679:talk 6665:talk 6643:talk 6625:talk 6602:talk 6579:talk 6540:talk 6526:talk 6483:and 6455:and 6440:talk 6421:talk 6407:talk 6369:and 6365:See 6350:talk 6327:talk 6313:and 6284:talk 6269:talk 6236:talk 6198:namm 6195:real 6173:talk 6156:talk 6142:talk 6128:For 6107:namm 6104:real 6057:talk 6037:talk 6013:talk 5999:talk 5963:then 5945:talk 5941:Deor 5907:talk 5888:talk 5856:talk 5842:talk 5804:talk 5787:talk 5769:talk 5737:talk 5719:talk 5690:talk 5645:talk 5626:talk 5608:talk 5593:talk 5522:talk 5508:talk 5490:talk 5471:talk 5457:talk 5442:"... 5413:talk 5391:talk 5370:talk 5335:talk 5325:and 5323:Zeus 5305:talk 5290:and 5265:talk 5246:talk 5230:talk 5214:talk 5182:talk 5168:talk 5160:talk 5133:talk 5114:talk 5079:talk 5056:talk 5024:talk 4947:talk 4932:talk 4914:talk 4859:talk 4794:talk 4756:talk 4738:talk 4717:talk 4695:talk 4668:talk 4639:talk 4617:talk 4603:talk 4581:talk 4563:talk 4548:Moxy 4537:talk 4515:talk 4488:talk 4474:talk 4456:talk 4441:talk 4429:here 4421:WP:N 4393:talk 4387:Url 4379:talk 4365:talk 4334:talk 4286:talk 4272:talk 4258:talk 4216:talk 4202:talk 4188:talk 4170:talk 4156:talk 4148:free 4104:talk 4100:Greg 4090:talk 4068:talk 4064:Greg 4054:talk 4016:talk 3991:talk 3966:talk 3899:talk 3855:talk 3806:talk 3789:talk 3720:talk 3698:talk 3684:talk 3662:talk 3648:talk 3630:talk 3616:talk 3602:talk 3572:talk 3556:talk 3542:talk 3526:talk 3512:talk 3494:talk 3474:talk 3460:talk 3445:talk 3430:talk 3393:and 3387:may 3377:talk 3349:talk 3300:talk 3226:talk 3212:talk 3198:talk 3176:talk 3144:talk 3130:talk 3113:talk 3092:talk 3073:talk 3056:talk 3048:keep 3017:talk 3003:talk 2968:talk 2933:talk 2911:talk 2897:talk 2882:talk 2851:talk 2837:talk 2794:talk 2780:talk 2762:talk 2703:talk 2685:talk 2664:talk 2646:talk 2613:talk 2599:talk 2585:talk 2563:talk 2536:talk 2519:talk 2491:talk 2470:talk 2453:talk 2416:talk 2394:talk 2376:talk 2328:talk 2310:talk 2280:talk 2262:can. 2219:talk 2185:talk 2154:talk 2136:talk 2121:talk 2106:talk 2085:talk 2054:talk 2040:talk 2022:talk 2007:talk 1986:talk 1915:talk 1896:talk 1878:talk 1856:talk 1829:talk 1809:talk 1789:talk 1768:here 1764:this 1754:talk 1740:See 1717:talk 1699:talk 1684:talk 1658:talk 1644:talk 1628:talk 1610:talk 1591:talk 1572:talk 1557:talk 1523:talk 1493:talk 1459:talk 1425:talk 1391:talk 1382:were 1368:talk 1327:talk 1309:talk 1280:talk 1266:talk 1256:and 1244:talk 1230:talk 1212:talk 1198:talk 1147:talk 1129:talk 1110:talk 1092:talk 1075:talk 1046:talk 1025:talk 1007:talk 989:talk 975:talk 948:talk 933:talk 920:many 898:talk 875:talk 850:talk 837:say 812:talk 784:talk 772:that 762:talk 750:this 733:talk 701:talk 663:talk 599:talk 585:talk 566:talk 552:talk 527:logs 501:See 480:talk 466:talk 439:You 427:talk 412:talk 385:talk 367:talk 349:talk 322:talk 308:talk 298:See 282:NFCC 258:talk 197:Help 13759:all 13483:at= 13473:Hi 12974:not 12867:-- 12663:not 12491:how 12167:Sir 12002:me? 11730:. ~ 11523:}} 11430:To 11307:Hi! 11288:IDK 10931:Ho 10508:. — 10484:Rjj 10408:. — 10352:are 10075:FYI 9698:or 9538:me? 8825:Hi 8586:FYI 8551:, @ 8393:and 8202:of. 8153:in 7954:. ~ 7906:. ~ 7381:you 7341:Sir 6946:it? 5680:? ( 5587:-- 5436:BBB 5109:Rjj 5051:Rjj 4983:Fir 4980:een 4977:rgr 4974:Eve 4882:Kip 4875:The 4836:Kip 4829:The 4551:🍁 4328:). 4180:are 4136:man 3762:. — 3610:kk 3326:); 3264:); 3044:not 3040:Liz 2821:FYI 1543:tag 1060:now 1019:-- 517:by 164:or 14012:: 13987:) 13985:📝 13983:• 13981:💬 13979:( 13942:) 13928:) 13924:| 13910:) 13896:) 13882:. 13865:) 13843:) 13816:) 13802:) 13787:) 13779:. 13769:) 13737:) 13718:) 13690:) 13676:) 13656:) 13595:) 13573:) 13515:) 13507:. 13497:) 13493:/ 13456:) 13427:) 13409:) 13399:}} 13393:{{ 13372:) 13354:) 13334:) 13316:) 13266:) 13258:. 13234:) 13212:) 13191:) 13146:) 13132:) 13044:) 13030:) 13010:) 12989:) 12950:) 12917:) 12909:. 12892:) 12875:) 12841:) 12819:) 12804:) 12778:) 12759:· 12755:· 12751:· 12713:) 12697:) 12679:) 12655:) 12639:) 12617:) 12592:) 12578:) 12543:) 12529:) 12462:) 12417:) 12370:) 12305:) 12286:) 12257:) 12242:) 12221:) 12207:) 12154:) 12129:) 12111:) 12105:DS 12095:. 12071:) 12041:) 12016:) 11995:) 11956:) 11938:) 11923:) 11892:) 11876:, 11872:, 11826:) 11811:) 11754:) 11716:) 11662:· 11658:· 11654:· 11618:) 11599:) 11588:is 11580:) 11556:) 11539:) 11501:· 11497:· 11493:· 11478:}} 11472:{{ 11468:}} 11462:{{ 11453:) 11419:, 11407:) 11386:· 11382:· 11378:· 11360:) 11318:) 11281:) 11263:) 11224:) 11216:. 11199:) 11172:) 11148:, 11144:, 11102:) 11088:) 11058:) 11046:, 11024:) 11000:) 10986:) 10959:) 10943:) 10918:) 10903:. 10885:) 10812:. 10801:. 10778:. 10774:. 10750:; 10738:; 10726:; 10714:; 10702:; 10690:; 10678:; 10660:^ 10639:) 10619:) 10605:is 10593:) 10572:) 10541:) 10522:) 10520:📝 10518:• 10516:💬 10514:( 10491:) 10471:) 10469:📝 10467:• 10465:💬 10463:( 10447:) 10422:) 10420:📝 10418:• 10416:💬 10414:( 10389:) 10362:) 10337:) 10329:. 10308:) 10288:) 10271:) 10210:) 10178:) 10161:) 10140:) 10107:) 10089:) 10081:. 10057:) 9981:) 9963:) 9953:it 9941:) 9927:) 9905:) 9881:) 9821:) 9784:) 9770:) 9755:) 9737:) 9710:) 9684:) 9676:. 9618:) 9602:) 9588:) 9580:. 9566:) 9548:) 9531:) 9488:) 9447:) 9433:) 9412:) 9395:) 9381:) 9360:) 9346:) 9306:) 9298:. 9270:) 9201:) 9162:) 9148:) 9124:, 9120:, 9087:) 9073:) 9056:) 9038:) 9030:. 8998:? 8954:) 8909:, 8905:, 8885:) 8852:) 8837:) 8812:) 8785:) 8747:) 8720:) 8669:) 8639:) 8637:📝 8635:• 8633:💬 8631:( 8605:) 8603:📝 8601:• 8599:💬 8597:( 8589:– 8563:) 8541:) 8494:. 8484:) 8459:) 8441:) 8407:) 8370:) 8343:) 8308:) 8292:? 8259:) 8228:) 8135:) 8085:) 8071:) 8056:) 8021:• 8017:( 8006:) 7998:. 7931:• 7927:( 7879:) 7849:) 7832:) 7803:) 7789:) 7764:) 7732:) 7714:) 7686:) 7660:) 7642:) 7634:. 7628:}} 7622:{{ 7595:) 7534:) 7520:) 7485:) 7470:) 7456:) 7421:) 7407:) 7364:) 7327:) 7313:) 7299:) 7285:) 7270:) 7256:) 7240:) 7200:) 7186:) 7178:. 7172:}} 7166:{{ 7151:) 7131:) 7117:) 7096:) 7081:. 7066:) 7058:. 7045:) 7031:) 7017:) 6975:) 6961:) 6928:) 6914:) 6900:) 6886:) 6872:) 6858:) 6844:) 6826:) 6808:) 6800:? 6782:) 6748:) 6733:) 6701:) 6681:) 6667:) 6645:) 6627:) 6604:) 6581:) 6573:-- 6542:) 6528:) 6442:) 6423:) 6409:) 6352:) 6329:) 6286:) 6271:) 6259:, 6238:) 6207:· 6192:My 6189:. 6175:) 6158:) 6144:) 6116:· 6101:My 6094:, 6059:) 6043:) 6039:• 6015:) 6001:) 5977:, 5973:, 5957:: 5947:) 5937:}} 5931:{{ 5909:) 5858:) 5844:) 5806:) 5789:) 5781:. 5771:) 5739:) 5721:) 5692:) 5647:) 5628:) 5610:) 5595:) 5524:) 5510:) 5492:) 5473:) 5459:) 5415:) 5393:) 5372:) 5337:) 5307:) 5248:) 5216:) 5184:) 5170:) 5135:) 5116:) 5081:) 5058:) 5026:) 5018:. 4949:) 4941:. 4934:) 4916:) 4861:) 4796:) 4758:) 4740:) 4719:) 4697:) 4670:) 4641:) 4619:) 4605:) 4583:) 4565:) 4539:) 4531:. 4517:) 4490:) 4476:) 4458:) 4443:) 4395:) 4381:) 4367:) 4336:) 4326:}} 4320:{{ 4316:}} 4310:{{ 4306:}} 4300:{{ 4288:) 4274:) 4260:) 4244:, 4238:}} 4232:{{ 4218:) 4204:) 4190:) 4172:) 4158:) 4106:) 4092:) 4084:. 4070:) 4056:) 4046:}} 4040:{{ 4036:}} 4030:{{ 4018:) 3993:) 3985:? 3968:) 3951:) 3949:📝 3947:• 3945:💬 3943:( 3901:) 3887:) 3885:📝 3883:• 3881:💬 3879:( 3857:) 3843:) 3841:📝 3839:• 3837:💬 3835:( 3808:) 3791:) 3776:) 3774:📝 3772:• 3770:💬 3768:( 3722:) 3700:) 3686:) 3664:) 3650:) 3632:) 3618:) 3604:) 3574:) 3558:) 3544:) 3528:) 3514:) 3496:) 3476:) 3462:) 3447:) 3432:) 3379:) 3351:) 3330:; 3302:) 3268:; 3253:. 3228:) 3214:) 3200:) 3178:) 3162:: 3146:) 3132:) 3115:) 3094:) 3075:) 3058:) 3019:) 3005:) 2970:) 2962:. 2913:) 2899:) 2884:) 2876:. 2853:) 2839:) 2824:– 2796:) 2782:) 2764:) 2750:) 2748:📝 2746:• 2744:💬 2742:( 2705:) 2687:) 2666:) 2648:) 2615:) 2601:) 2587:) 2565:) 2538:) 2521:) 2493:) 2472:) 2455:) 2418:) 2396:) 2378:) 2330:) 2312:) 2304:. 2282:) 2221:) 2187:) 2156:) 2138:) 2123:) 2108:) 2087:) 2079:. 2056:) 2042:) 2024:) 2009:) 1988:) 1898:) 1880:) 1858:) 1831:) 1770:: 1756:) 1719:) 1701:) 1686:) 1660:) 1646:) 1630:) 1612:) 1593:) 1574:) 1559:) 1551:. 1541:{{ 1525:) 1495:) 1461:) 1427:) 1393:) 1370:) 1362:. 1329:) 1311:) 1282:) 1268:) 1246:) 1232:) 1224:. 1214:) 1200:) 1192:. 1149:) 1131:) 1112:) 1094:) 1077:) 1048:) 1027:) 1009:) 991:) 977:) 950:) 935:) 900:) 877:) 852:) 835:}} 829:{{ 814:) 786:) 764:) 735:) 727:. 707:· 703:· 699:· 688:— 665:) 601:) 587:) 568:) 554:) 525:| 482:) 468:) 458:}} 452:{{ 429:) 414:) 387:) 369:) 359:by 351:) 343:. 324:) 310:) 260:) 180:. 13961:@ 13938:( 13920:( 13906:( 13891:· 13886:( 13861:( 13839:( 13812:( 13798:( 13783:( 13765:( 13733:( 13714:( 13686:( 13672:( 13652:( 13620:. 13591:( 13579:@ 13569:( 13554:| 13535:. 13511:( 13489:( 13452:( 13433:@ 13423:( 13405:( 13387:@ 13368:( 13350:( 13342:@ 13330:( 13312:( 13279:@ 13262:( 13230:( 13208:( 13187:( 13176:) 13172:( 13142:( 13128:( 13086:. 13073:☎ 13061:― 13040:( 13026:( 13006:( 12985:( 12946:( 12913:( 12888:( 12871:( 12837:( 12815:( 12800:( 12774:( 12763:} 12761:b 12757:p 12753:c 12749:t 12747:{ 12709:( 12693:( 12685:@ 12675:( 12651:( 12635:( 12623:@ 12613:( 12588:( 12574:( 12539:( 12525:( 12513:@ 12505:☎ 12481:☎ 12469:― 12458:( 12443:☎ 12413:( 12396:☎ 12366:( 12352:☎ 12323:) 12319:( 12301:( 12282:( 12267:@ 12253:( 12238:( 12217:( 12203:( 12191:@ 12150:( 12125:( 12107:( 12101:: 12097:@ 12067:( 12051:@ 12037:( 12012:( 11991:( 11983:@ 11952:( 11934:( 11919:( 11907:) 11903:( 11888:( 11854:: 11850:@ 11842:) 11838:( 11833:~ 11822:( 11807:( 11795:) 11791:( 11769:) 11765:( 11750:( 11739:) 11735:( 11712:( 11690:) 11686:( 11666:} 11664:b 11660:p 11656:c 11652:t 11650:{ 11614:( 11595:( 11576:( 11552:( 11535:( 11505:} 11503:b 11499:p 11495:c 11491:t 11489:{ 11449:( 11427:. 11403:( 11390:} 11388:b 11384:p 11380:c 11376:t 11374:{ 11355:· 11350:( 11336:) 11332:( 11314:( 11277:( 11259:( 11220:( 11195:( 11168:( 11098:( 11084:( 11020:( 10996:( 10982:( 10955:( 10939:( 10914:( 10881:( 10863:. 10780:4 10759:) 10748:) 10736:) 10724:) 10712:) 10700:) 10688:) 10676:) 10635:( 10615:( 10589:( 10568:( 10537:( 10487:( 10441:( 10385:( 10373:: 10369:@ 10358:( 10333:( 10304:( 10284:( 10267:( 10251:. 10232:. 10216:@ 10206:( 10174:( 10157:( 10136:( 10122:: 10114:@ 10103:( 10085:( 10053:( 10039:: 10035:@ 9992:: 9988:@ 9977:( 9959:( 9937:( 9923:( 9901:( 9877:( 9858:) 9854:( 9817:( 9801:@ 9780:( 9766:( 9751:( 9733:( 9706:( 9690:@ 9680:( 9653:| 9641:@ 9614:( 9598:( 9584:( 9562:( 9555:@ 9544:( 9527:( 9504:) 9500:( 9484:( 9464:) 9460:( 9443:( 9429:( 9423:: 9419:@ 9408:( 9391:( 9377:( 9371:: 9367:@ 9356:( 9342:( 9335:: 9331:@ 9302:( 9266:( 9252:. 9227:) 9223:( 9212:: 9208:@ 9197:( 9158:( 9144:( 9083:( 9069:( 9052:( 9034:( 9002:| 8950:( 8881:( 8848:( 8833:( 8823:) 8819:( 8808:( 8781:( 8773:@ 8766:) 8762:( 8743:( 8726:@ 8716:( 8708:@ 8701:) 8697:( 8665:( 8654:) 8650:( 8613:@ 8559:( 8547:@ 8537:( 8523:) 8519:( 8514:~ 8498:| 8480:( 8455:( 8437:( 8426:) 8422:( 8403:( 8366:( 8339:( 8328:) 8324:( 8304:( 8255:( 8244:) 8240:( 8224:( 8179:) 8175:( 8170:~ 8166:. 8131:( 8116:) 8112:( 8081:( 8067:( 8052:( 8025:) 8019:C 8002:( 7963:) 7959:( 7935:) 7929:C 7915:) 7911:( 7875:( 7864:) 7860:( 7845:( 7828:( 7799:( 7785:( 7760:( 7728:( 7710:( 7682:( 7654:( 7638:( 7591:( 7580:) 7576:( 7552:( 7530:( 7516:( 7481:( 7466:( 7452:( 7440:) 7436:( 7417:( 7403:( 7392:) 7388:( 7360:( 7323:( 7309:( 7295:( 7281:( 7266:( 7252:( 7236:( 7196:( 7182:( 7147:( 7127:( 7113:( 7092:( 7062:( 7041:( 7027:( 7013:( 6971:( 6957:( 6924:( 6910:( 6896:( 6882:( 6868:( 6854:( 6840:( 6822:( 6814:@ 6804:( 6778:( 6767:) 6763:( 6744:( 6729:( 6697:( 6677:( 6663:( 6651:@ 6641:( 6623:( 6611:@ 6600:( 6577:( 6538:( 6524:( 6449: 6438:( 6419:( 6405:( 6363:: 6359:@ 6348:( 6325:( 6293: 6282:( 6267:( 6249:: 6245:@ 6234:( 6212:) 6202:( 6181:@ 6171:( 6154:( 6140:( 6121:) 6111:( 6078:@ 6055:( 6035:( 6011:( 5997:( 5943:( 5927:: 5923:@ 5905:( 5897:@ 5890:) 5886:( 5854:( 5840:( 5821:@ 5802:( 5785:( 5767:( 5735:( 5717:( 5688:( 5643:( 5624:( 5606:( 5591:( 5567:" 5564:. 5552:" 5532:" 5520:( 5506:( 5498:@ 5488:( 5469:( 5455:( 5411:( 5389:( 5378:@ 5368:( 5333:( 5303:( 5267:) 5263:( 5244:( 5232:) 5228:( 5223:~ 5212:( 5180:( 5166:( 5158:( 5131:( 5112:( 5092:: 5088:@ 5077:( 5064:@ 5054:( 5022:( 4945:( 4930:( 4912:( 4867:@ 4857:( 4814:. 4802:@ 4792:( 4754:( 4746:@ 4736:( 4715:( 4703:@ 4693:( 4683:: 4679:@ 4666:( 4637:( 4615:( 4601:( 4579:( 4561:( 4535:( 4513:( 4506:. 4486:( 4472:( 4464:@ 4454:( 4439:( 4412:@ 4391:( 4377:( 4363:( 4332:( 4284:( 4270:( 4256:( 4214:( 4200:( 4186:( 4168:( 4154:( 4102:( 4088:( 4066:( 4052:( 4024:@ 4014:( 4003:. 3989:( 3964:( 3897:( 3853:( 3804:( 3787:( 3718:( 3696:( 3682:( 3660:( 3646:( 3628:( 3614:( 3600:( 3570:( 3554:( 3540:( 3524:( 3510:( 3492:( 3472:( 3458:( 3443:( 3428:( 3375:( 3347:( 3322:( 3313:: 3309:@ 3260:( 3224:( 3210:( 3196:( 3174:( 3142:( 3128:( 3111:( 3090:( 3071:( 3054:( 3015:( 3001:( 2966:( 2942:@ 2935:) 2931:( 2909:( 2895:( 2880:( 2849:( 2835:( 2792:( 2778:( 2760:( 2722:@ 2701:( 2683:( 2662:( 2644:( 2636:@ 2611:( 2597:( 2583:( 2561:( 2534:( 2517:( 2499:@ 2489:( 2468:( 2451:( 2436:@ 2414:( 2402:@ 2392:( 2384:@ 2374:( 2336:@ 2326:( 2318:@ 2308:( 2288:@ 2278:( 2217:( 2183:( 2162:@ 2152:( 2144:@ 2134:( 2119:( 2104:( 2083:( 2073:: 2069:@ 2052:( 2038:( 2030:@ 2020:( 2005:( 1984:( 1946:: 1942:@ 1917:) 1913:( 1894:( 1876:( 1854:( 1837:@ 1827:( 1811:) 1807:( 1791:) 1787:( 1782:~ 1752:( 1715:( 1707:@ 1697:( 1682:( 1656:( 1642:( 1626:( 1608:( 1589:( 1570:( 1555:( 1537:: 1533:@ 1521:( 1491:( 1457:( 1423:( 1389:( 1366:( 1340:: 1336:@ 1325:( 1307:( 1288:@ 1278:( 1264:( 1242:( 1228:( 1210:( 1196:( 1176:@ 1145:( 1127:( 1118:@ 1108:( 1090:( 1073:( 1054:@ 1044:( 1023:( 1005:( 997:@ 987:( 973:( 956:@ 946:( 931:( 896:( 883:@ 873:( 858:@ 848:( 825:: 821:@ 810:( 796:@ 792:@ 782:( 760:( 731:( 711:) 695:( 686:. 661:( 597:( 583:( 574:@ 564:( 550:( 541:@ 537:) 533:( 521:( 505:. 478:( 464:( 435:@ 425:( 410:( 393:@ 383:( 365:( 347:( 330:@ 320:( 306:( 256:( 168:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.