52:
403:("Arbcom") retains full jurisdiction over this process; this process should not be considered or construed to limit Arbcom's jurisdiction in any way. At any time, Arbcom may suspend, extend, or vacate the proceedings for any valid reason and issue a summary dismissal with or without prejudice, at their discretion. Arbcom may also at any time elect to supersede an RRA with their own processes or procedures.
108:
281:
regardless of obvious outcome. Discretion is given solely to the bureaucrat closing the process, which includes determining the weight of the comments of any participant—for example, whether to completely discount one. Possible results are within the discretion of the closing bureaucrat and are
386:
While the method/system through which Arbcom reviews an RRA must obviously be on wiki for transparency reasons, the actual methods and systems for Arbcom to respond, void, or validate the process will be decided by Arbcom themselves.
150:
This process is not to be used to address editorial action that does not directly involve the tools or related responsibilities of adminship. Other existing processes which review editorial action, should be used instead.
140:
who has shown a pattern of inappropriate behavior in using the entrusted administrative tools and/or in performing the associated responsibilities of adminship. Once the nomination is certified (see
201:
admin actions in the meantime. If they do, any bureaucrat may immediately temporarily remove adminship from the editor, which may only be restored pending the result of the RRA, or Arbcom action.
184:
Once a party has proposed or certified an RRA, that party may not propose or certify another RRA for a period of 12 months, although the party may participate in proceedings certified by others.
390:
Imposing additional sanction is outside the remit of this process, and would require Arbcom to act within its own processes/procedures, such as a summary motion or a full arbitration case.
243:
the admin - to make it clear that the actions which led to this nomination were clearly inappropriate, but not sufficiently serious enough to warrant removal of adminship in this instance.
324:
If the RRA is determined successful by the bureaucrat, then adminship is immediately removed from the nominated admin. The closing bureaucrat will notify the community by a posting at
213:, including participation requirements, discussion length and format, with certification replacing the nomination sections, and with other cosmetic changes as the community sees fit.
22:
34:
181:
requirement of certification by three experienced administrators (who have at least one year of experience since their first administrative action).
70:
349:("Arbcom"), per existing policy that de-sysopping is under their remit. And Arbcom can of course independently choose to review as well.
156:
144:), this process exists only to address (in relation to the assertions of the contributors to this process) the question,
64:
237:
the admin - to re-affirm policy or to note presumably simple, easily correctable, mistakes or misunderstandings.
415:
309:
that the request was successful, the support to desysop must outweigh the combination of those who oppose
146:
will the community continue to entrust this individual with the tools and responsibilities of adminship?
216:
Each participant should state their reasons, while selecting one of the following options or similar:
274:
Determining consensus of an RRA follows the same standards as RfA, except as noted in the following.
137:
133:
266:
To be clear, participants who declare "Advise" or "Admonish" are opposing removal of adminship.
331:
The editor may re-request adminship of the community at any time through the regular process (
269:
376:
with clarifications on, rebuking of, or adding to, community advisement and/or admonishment
364:
with clarifications on, rebuking of, or adding to, community advisement and/or admonishment
278:
8:
317:
311:
174:
74:
382:
for another RRA, or to re-open/continue the existing RRA, or to take the case themselves
90:
82:
399:
345:
393:
343:
While not required to do so, the editor has up to 30 days to request review by
231:- to assert that removal of adminship would be inappropriate in this instance.
409:
332:
306:
210:
117:
338:
328:, and also notify Arbcom of the results using a method of their choosing.
257:- to assert that removal of adminship would be appropriate in this instance.
325:
188:
116:
A process which provides for a community discussion as a sort of "reverse
204:
168:
192:
177:. However, while any editor may certify the nomination, there is a
155:
RRA is an adjunct process. It does not replace or remove any other
33:
For explanations of each part of this proposal, please read the
21:
195:
concerns. But this also means that they will not be taking
163:
132:(RRA) is a process which allows the community to make a
69:. The proposal may still be in development, under
352:Through the review process Arbcom may by motion:
407:
295:Unsuccessful – The administrator is admonished:
277:The process can only be closed by an uninvolved
289:Unsuccessful – The administrator is advised:
282:generally limited to one of the following:
191:to delay discussion for up to 7 days due to
173:The nomination section is similar to an
408:
102:
46:
370:– adminship is immediately restored
13:
14:
427:
73:, or in the process of gathering
209:The discussion is similar to an
130:Request for removal of adminship
106:
50:
20:
187:The nominee may request at the
141:
1:
7:
10:
432:
157:ways of removing adminship
80:
400:The Arbitration Committee
346:The Arbitration Committee
114:This page in a nutshell:
189:bureaucrats noticeboard
134:motion of no confidence
270:Determining consensus
321:those who admonish.
416:Knowledge proposals
394:Arbcom jurisdiction
380:Reverse and remand
45:
315:those who advise
124:
123:
101:
100:
65:policy, guideline
44:
43:
37:on the talk page.
15:
423:
110:
109:
103:
93:
54:
53:
47:
35:explanatory text
24:
17:
16:
431:
430:
426:
425:
424:
422:
421:
420:
406:
405:
396:
341:
272:
207:
171:
166:
107:
97:
96:
89:
85:
51:
12:
11:
5:
429:
419:
418:
395:
392:
384:
383:
377:
371:
365:
359:
340:
337:
303:
302:
299:
293:
287:
271:
268:
264:
263:
258:
244:
238:
232:
206:
203:
170:
167:
165:
162:
126:
122:
121:
111:
99:
98:
95:
94:
86:
81:
78:
57:The following
55:
42:
41:
40:
39:
25:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
428:
417:
414:
413:
411:
404:
402:
401:
391:
388:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
358:
355:
354:
353:
350:
348:
347:
339:Arbcom review
336:
334:
329:
327:
322:
320:
319:
314:
313:
308:
305:To determine
300:
298:
294:
292:
288:
285:
284:
283:
280:
275:
267:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
214:
212:
202:
200:
199:
194:
190:
185:
182:
180:
176:
161:
160:
158:
152:
148:
147:
143:
139:
138:administrator
135:
131:
127:
119:
115:
112:
105:
104:
92:
88:
87:
84:
79:
77:for adoption.
76:
72:
68:
66:
62:
56:
49:
48:
38:
36:
32:
28:
27:
26:
23:
19:
18:
398:
397:
389:
385:
379:
373:
367:
361:
356:
351:
344:
342:
330:
323:
316:
310:
304:
296:
290:
286:Unsuccessful
276:
273:
265:
260:
254:
250:
246:
240:
234:
228:
224:
220:
215:
208:
197:
196:
186:
183:
178:
172:
154:
153:
149:
145:
129:
128:
125:
113:
67:, or process
60:
58:
30:
29:
301:Successful
279:bureaucrat
205:Discussion
169:Nomination
71:discussion
63:Knowledge
307:consensus
229:No action
193:real life
175:RFC/Admin
75:consensus
410:Category
374:Overturn
368:Overturn
241:Admonish
83:Shortcut
61:proposed
362:Endorse
357:Endorse
261:Neutral
255:Desysop
247:Support
179:minimum
164:Process
333:WP:RFA
251:Remove
235:Advise
225:Retain
221:Oppose
136:in an
91:WP:RRA
326:WP:AN
142:below
59:is a
31:Note:
335:).
318:and
312:and
211:RfA
198:any
118:RfA
412::
253:/
249:/
227:/
223:/
120:".
297:X
291:X
159:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
