532:
a summary of all human knowledge, but I guess bios are what other editors are writing. Or at least that's what they're submitting to us. That doesn't seem to have changed much in the ten years since that guideline was written. And I’m fine with US-oriented articles, but again up to half seems very high; it looks like in 2015 we changed our guidelines from ‘roughly half’ to ‘up to half’ of hooks in a set could be US-related because US hooks had become less prevalent. I’d say that trend is continuing; I think we’re probably at two or three US-related hooks in most sets, depending on how you assess them. (For instance, a hook about three women, one of them
American, being inducted into a Canadian hockey hall of fame, with the hall of fame being the target article...does that count as a US-related hook for purposes of setting a prep? Such are the things promoters at DYK think about.) But I love it when I see something really different come over the transom.
252:
if there’s any chance I was even slightly in the wrong, and if I lose a debate or a third opinion goes against me I can move on, though I might take the article off my watch list if it’s something that’s going to continue to bother me. I try really hard to understand others’ points of view, even when they’re behaving badly, and I’ve found that when I respond to someone who is behaving badly by not escalating, often they’ll rise to expectations. This isn’t to say I don’t engage often in vigorous debate on talk pages or make the occasional salty remark, or that I’ve never made a bad decision when dealing with conflict. But most often the conflict I’ve had with other editors tends to take the form of long discussions on talk pages. I’m aware that these tools would increase the likelihood of conflicts not easily resolved by simple discussion.
171:
category: things I’d be happy to do as long as figuring out how to do it without breaking anything seems likely. In general one of the things I love most about WP is its collaborative & generally collegial nature. I’d like to be able to help content contributors just trying to keep their heads down and get on with their work deal with disruption, or respond to other requests for assistance. I would genuinely enjoy being someone people could ask for help. To me this feels like collaboration. My primary goal is to contribute in ways that don’t cause more work for others but instead make others’ volunteer hours more effective.
2371:. Valereee is a good writer and has contributed some good articles. I like her calm temperament which I think is an important quality for an administrator. I also see good communications and a willingness to help others on her talk pages. I am impressed by her recent work at DYK and willingness to help in new areas. I have not had a DYK for more than a year but the last time I did I saw that there were backlogs and delays. More administrators (and others) helping out there always seem to be needed. I think she has done enough to show familiarity with policies. She has established trustworthiness and I support her candidacy.
5785:'s opposition and their rational above. However, I will admit that I find the timing to be inopportune given recent and ongoing events and I don't feel comfortable directly participating in an RfA in the present circumstances. These are difficult days for the community and we all have to act in obedience to our respective consciences. For now, mine is telling me to sit out RfAs until the current unpleasantness is resolved. That said, I bow in respect to all of my fellow editors regardless of where you stand and I particularly thank the candidate for stepping up. -
1457:- From my personal experience: Great with newbies, I mean really great; Goes above and beyond to assist; Pleasant to interact with. Therefore, have no reason to doubt when others attribute other correlative characteristics that I would want in all admins- good temperament, politeness, carefulness, kindness, (most of all) AGF. Nominated/supported by people I've come to know to have good judgement. More focused on making useful contributions than racking up edit counts, as far as I can tell. Commendable edit summary stats. Finally, I have come to appreciate
5928:). It now seems the strength, and integrity, of their gesture has been heard, and we all now await the rresponse. While waiting, I think giving my fellow Wikipedians my answer to a question they have spent years building up to (+decade in both cases), to be a good use of time; it shows that none of the craziness has lessened what it means to be a Wikipedian (something the WMF are still learning), and our respect for one another. For this project to have a future, it needs that respect imho; otherwise, let the machines/WMF run it.
2846:. I've seen Valereee around at the main-page and errors boards, and in various other places, and find them a very competent editor, who will make a great admin. I will also go on record that I find the comments below, from editors I like and trust, quite unfortunate. Everyone's entitled to their view. But to criticise Valereee, even in neutral terms, for stepping forward and offering to take on the mop, just because of a political situation entirely unrelated to them, is not a good thing in my view. Whatever the rights and wrongs of
2265:– Excellent candidate, and well-liked + recommended by other experienced users above. Seems to be reasonably active recently, and Valereee is clearly familiar enough with Knowledge policies to take the next step to adminship. I also like quality of work that Valereee has contributed to this site thus far, and this user seems to be experienced enough. I understand the periods of inactivity in the past - family and work can definitely take a toll on other activities. Concerning any "Oppose" votes because of
218:, but not because I created it. I heard a story on NPR about a new archeological discovery, and I just jumped off a cliff writing it, and it immediately got tagged for notability, and another editor who’d come in to add the subject’s name in Chinese started pulling up Chinese sources. To me, this is the part of Knowledge I love the most: I took a chance and moved to article space before I was 100% sure, and another editor followed the thread, and we ended up with an article. I love that. I took
598:
body language to help us interpret one another’s intent. And our rules are confusing; we include ‘rudeness’ in our list of incivilities, but we’ve separately decided “Fuck off” is not necessarily uncivil. Unfortunately I think the answer to ‘how would you determine if something is a violation or not?” for most of us is “I know it when I see it,” and while that’s never going to be really satisfactory, I don’t know how we fix it.
5897:- the admin has to be seen to be a neutral arbiter. In some cases, timing matters. Valereee did have the ability to determine the timing of the RfA. In view of the spate of admin resignations, an RfA, rightly or (very likely) wrongly, can give the impression of trying to replace the departed. Some time to settle matters down (especially since there is potentially a resolution in sight) I think would have been prudent.
5924:. I hear you and respect your point. We, and Valeree (and Kosack), don't know when this will get sorted, and in what form, so the choice of timing is impossible for them. Many great admins/crats have handed back the tools, however, I consider their gesture to be more significant than that of a "strike", it was to show WMF how serious the situation had become (even Jimbo recognised this now on his talk page saying:
5998:
5143:
3293:(as an understatement) and quite possibly in poor taste. I would frankly advise/urge avoidance on those grounds as they are not productive in determining whether a candidate would make a good administrator. I recognize the view that a successful RfA now would diminish the impact/message that all the resignations have on the project, but adminship is - by definition - supposed to be
1773:
unfailingly calm and helpful. Their content creation relating to women's biographies and food is of an excellent calibre. They have a very positive attitude towards working with other editors, and it's lovely to see someone who approaches DYK and AFD with collaboration in mind; I have no doubt that valereee will put the tools to good use and treat adminship responsibly.
2697:. Trusted nominators, clueful contributions, civil demeanor. On a side note: Despite the current unpleasantness, I don't think one should be withholding support for reasons that have nothing to do with the candidate herself. Valereee is not to blame for the Foundation's current rampage wrt community self-determination and should not be penalized for it. Regards
325:, I'm more likely to find funny than to be personally offended by. I’ve occasionally run across someone who, it seemed, was just itching for a fight, saying things that clearly seemed intended to upset me or rattle me. I feel a lot more protective of other people. I don’t expect anyone to put up with harassment or bullying; it should just plain not happen.
2850:, we're primarily here to build an encyclopedia, and chasing Valereee away is not the best way to achieve that. It doesn't look like it will make any numerical difference, but I nonetheless urge those in the sections below to reconsider, and support the candidacy, unless there's something about the candidate themselves that needs review. Thanks —
348:
guidance I’m confident I can deal with it competently, and if I think I can do it without breaking anything, deal with the situation. If I feel it’s unlikely I can manage it well, ask someone else to manage it. If I make a mistake that I can’t fix or that I suspect I’ll simply make worse by trying to fix, ask for help.
3281:-- After reading the discussion, answers to questions, and supports from the above, I am comfortable putting my support behind this candidate. The opposes (as of yet) have not convinced me otherwise and I disagree (with the utmost respect) that timing should be reason enough for oppose under any circumstances. Yes,
565:
evade the question; it’s just that without having investigated how something is accomplished, I’m not sure whether a look at the instructions would make me think, “Oh, sure! I can do that!” or “Back out slowly, don’t look it in the eye, and don’t make any sudden moves.” I literally had the DYK noms : -->
5680:
You do not care to review the logs of the candidate, but instead comment on your perceptions of the motives of the two nominators - who happen to be among the best regarded contributors currently editing? I am certain the 'crat will give your comments its due worth, which is why I have taken the time
531:
Thanks, Nosebagbear. I’d love to see the mix continue to expand, basically in any way you can think of. It’s not that I have any complaint with the mix we’re dishing up right now; it’s what other editors are nominating. I’m not averse to bios; half does seem like a lot when you consider we're writing
461:
Thanks, Dolotta! My biggest weakness is anything technical. I’m thrilled with some of the bots and scripts and gadgets and forms available and can just about follow the instructions to install/use them and report glitches, but anything beyond that is the point at which I become incompetent. I have no
185:
gets nominated and I think it has more promise than the nominator thought it did (no disrespect meant to good-faith nominators; I’ve researched multiple AfD’d articles and ended up ultimately in agreement with the nom, but it’s fun to see if I can find sources that will go to proving notability for a
5827:
Point taken, but as per my response to SN54129 above (and on the Kosack RfA), even in wartime, people get married and babies are born; I don't think it is fair to blame
Valereee for the WMF's actions. Even if WMF tell us all to "get stuffed" post the ArbCom letter, and everybody leaves and Knowledge
1566:
well-qualified candidate. I have some burnout concerns due to the candidate's activity on-wiki being confined to two relatively short spurts of activity, however, the break in the middle is well explained, adminship is not a big deal, and I'd rather have this candidate available to help out with our
564:
Thanks, OlEnglish. Grunt work doesn’t scare me. Technical might, depending on exactly what it means/involves. I no longer consider myself a fast study. I can follow instructions, but I no longer am able to commit those instructions to memory in one go the way I could when I was 28. I’m not trying to
494:
Thanks, PBS. It's an accept I wouldn't make now, as I'm more familiar with that particular MOS issue and would have recognized it as an incorrect edit. The policy is that pending changes is to prevent vandalism, BLP vios, and copyright vios, not to prevent good-faith but incorrect edits, but I don't
293:
Between 2016 and 2018, we sold a house we’d been in for 17 years, moved to a rental, bought a small elderly house, put on an addition that doubled its size, moved from the rental into the new place, and renovated the rest of it while living there. I didn’t edit much; if I did see a gnomish edit that
251:
I actually think possibly my strongest qualification is temperament. I’m hard to offend (you have to be actively trying to offend me, and even then I’m more likely to find it funny than to become upset). I assume good faith probably to a fault, my patience might actually be 98th %ile, I’ll apologize
186:
subject.) In general assessing arguments to determine consensus/no consensus feels like collaboration to me, whether at AfD or other collaborative debate areas. I’d also like to help with refund to userspace for those who think they’d like to try to keep working on a deleted article without pressure.
2981:
very longterm experienced and uncontentious member of the community. Among other things i have checked her deleted contributions and am not concerned by them. I had advised people not to run during the current crisis, but am reassured that at least in this case the crisis is leading some to abstain
2780:
I understand the concern of the opposes and the neutrals, and to some degree share them. Is this really a good time to run for adminship? But on the other hand this is a good candidate, and, this being a large volunteer community, not everyone can be expected to be aware of everything that goes on.
347:
Thanks, JMW! I’d deal with an unfamiliar situation entailing admin tools the same way I deal with an unfamiliar situation that doesn’t involve them now: Do the reading, if necessary ask for guidance from someone I know to be well-intentioned and experienced, assess whether after the reading and the
4881:
and has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with this editor's competence or trustworthiness to take up the mop; the honourable approach would have been for dissenting editors to have made them in the 'neutral' section, in my view. I have had a number of contacts with this editor, and they have my
597:
Hey, RoySmith! I think civility and what violates the civility policy might be the hardest of our policies to really define and to deal with. It varies by culture, it’s often contextual, and it’s complicated by the fact that when we’re interacting online we can’t use vocal tone, facial expression,
406:
ditto, and anywhere any of those pointed at, looking for advice specific to or generalizable to ANI. There are likely others I’d find with more time and research. Once I’d exhausted all of that, I’d likely be asking one the regular closers there to point me at other reading, and once I’d exhausted
226:
and took it to GA, and I’ve created quite a few articles that I’ve taken to DYK. I’m also quite proud of all the gnomish work I’ve done over many years now. I’ve fixed a lot of typos and grammatical errors and made a lot of small rewordings to improve clarity or reduce awkwardness, and I feel this
129:
highly enough. She has excellent skills writing and researching articles. She stays calm and cool when making her arguments on
Knowledge and she communicates well with other editors. I've been so impressed with her research! There are times that I'm going to look for a reference for an article and
6135:
pretty much per Ad
Orientem - Valereee sounds like an excellent candidate however due to the FRAM issues right now I cannot support any RFA, It's a shame these weren't held off a few months once the dust had settled, If it helps in any way if the FRAM thing didn't exist I would've 110% supported,
4352:
is a wonderful thing to see (not merely technical, but picking up new areas). I'm barely DYK-initiated, so I can't ask any hard-pitched questions on the area. Other activity looks fine - clear net positive in lieu of evidence to the contrary. Specifically - if you think Admin activity/recruitment
2622:
I have conducted a thorough review of the candidate's recent-ish DYK work. I have misgivings about the DYK process. But if we are to retain the process we need a strong coterie of capable main-page editors, read administrators, to deal with it. On my review of contributions I saw the occasional
170:
One of the areas that often makes me think "wish I could help" is DYK. I’ve often watched the hours tick by with five or six full preps and zero full queues and wished I could help; simple nagging doesn’t feel at all helpful. There are likely other tasks at Admin backlogs that fall into the same
5871:
Getting married and having babies wasn't an issue in any war I can recall. What's going on now, directly touches on how we operate and the relationship between the community and the WMF, which in turn touches on adminship. If it's over by next Friday, assuming a positive outcome, then I will be
4421:
Amakuru. Oh, good choice, random number generator! I agree that the opposition based on what unrelated third parties are up to is, to put it mildly, stupid. Candidate has good answers to the questions, demonstrated history of dedication to the project, no significant drama, and knows their weak
1772:
and this really did strike me when looking through some of their contributions. An excellent temperament is, in my opinion, far and away the most important quality an admin can have. Looking at their discussions with editors—some hostile, some impolite and some co-operative—it seems valereee is
607:
If I saw something that looked to me like incivility, my first step would be to post to user talk with a diff and an opening bid. Depending on the level of incivility and whether it’s a habit with that editor, that might be anything from, “Hey, EditorX, I'm wondering if maybe you might not have
4603:
Support - Out of good faith, I reviewed the handful of Oppose votes provided so far and they seemed like relatively minor issues that I personally do not see as rising to the level of not being admin-worthy. I understand that there are some important political issues going on with the platform
414:
Perfectly satisfactory thanks. I would just urge caution on which of the regular closers you take advice from. There is a tendency to shutdown valid discussion prematurely, in particular those related to Admin. actions or those of long-established editors. In the Giant
Snowman Arbcom case, AC
180:
I’d like to be able to help more at AfD, which actually feels very collaborative to me. Sometimes I think for a poorly-sourced article with promise, an AfD nomination can be very productive for that article, and if handled well can also be really helpful for newer editors who have an article
5319:
In my limited interactions with the candidate, they have shown poise and good temperament. My research of their contributions shows the same result and great content contributions/collaborative efforts. I think this all-around editor would be a net positive to the encyclopedia. No concerns.
5968:. I know the candidate. If this was in different circumstances, i would have supported/will support. But currently, i cant. It is my humble suggestion to withdraw nomination, and run the RfA after current issues are resolved. But thats just my opinion. Still, i am firmly neutral though. —
2925:
In tumultuous times, leaders emerge through adversity. I have the utmost respect for those that have chosen to give up their added duties recently. But, I believe that the saying "Next one up!" rings true here. This candidate checks all of the boxes as a net+ for the project.
608:
realized this was a very new editor you were talking to here, can you tell me what’s going on?” to “You’re calling names in this edit summary again. You’ve been asked to stop doing this on five separate occasions. Each time, you’ve agreed you would stop. What’s going on?”
5802:
I entirely agree with Ad
Orientem - I don't feel comfortable supporting RfAs given the current crisis. Especially since one of the major symptoms of that crisis is adminstrator resignations. I don't think that it's worthy of an oppose, but the timing is inopportune.
566:
preps instructions hanging on the wall above my screen the first few times I did it because they wanted me to be working in two windows at the same time. If you’ve got a particular backlog in mind, or just want to suggest one, I’d be happy to take a look at those
4441:. The candidate seems to be one of the most competent out there. Not only does she participate in article creation (like DYK), but also is genuinely interested in helping out with more behind-the-scenes tasks as well. Even within this RFA, the fact that Valereee
104:
Having had more spare time recently to commit to the project, Valereee feels she's now in a position to be able to make use of the tools. We need some more sensible and compassionate admins who are good communicators, and hopefully this is a good example of one.
5510:
393:
Thanks, Leaky. ANI’s an area in which I have almost no experience, so I’d be starting from scratch. If for some reason I was needed for a closing at ANI I’d start by reading whatever I could find. I’d be reading through recent ANI archives and looking at
3297:
and to think that an RfX passing now would diminish the impact/message that all resignations have into perpetuity blows things way out of proportion. I also recognize that this comment will probably receive objections, but it has to be said somewhere.
4178:. Answers to questions sensible, has some audited content under their belt, and their participation in AfDs and WP-space discussions looks reasoned and thorough. I don't see drama in another part of the project as a reason to disqualify candidates.
261:
4393:: I can't find much of anything to justify opposition at this point, and admitting that one doesn't know is genuinely heartening to see (if only more persons would say so!). Setting aside the ongoing debate, I'm happy to support the candidate.
4131:
I fully understand the perspective of some in the
Neutral section, in particular Ad Orientem and Fish and karate, i just happen to disagree; the opposes are just not convincing; and we can always use editors with a clue as admins. Happy days,
5401:
nyone seriously thinking of running for RFA or RFB would do well to wait a little while longer. I doubt anyone could run now without some questions relating to current events, and I suspect that there may be no answer that wouldn't lose some
97:. Looking through her talkpage, I can see plenty of examples of her being polite and welcome to anyone wanting to ask questions, and her general standard of conduct is excellent. More recently, I've seen her taking an active interest in the
5893:, I'm going to expand on my rationale a bit. Primarily, I'm not current ready to put in the time required to review an RfA, due to the WMF. However, there is more. Adminship is a role where appearances matter. That's the prime reason for
1160:, I trust Valereee and agree with a lot of the reasons mentioned in other support votes. In addition, I've noticed that DYK is often part of the admin backlog, so I see no reason to keep someone who clearly wants to help from doing so.
5872:
asking for the bit back next weekend. If it's still going on months from now, I will be long gone. In any event I don't want this to become a distraction so I think this is a situation where we are going to have to agree to disagree. -
3820:
Another candidate who seems refreshingly free of drama, and with a solid record of contributions. The oppose comment about "anyone associated with WiR is equally culpable for any of their comments" is irrelevant and deeply unwelcome.
2982:
rather than to oppose. So I'm with the candidate re the RFA, but emotionally and with respect to the WMF, I'm in the neutral section. I was tempted to describe this support as "moral neutral" but thought that might be confusing.
5655:. No judgement on merits and demerits of the candidate. Timing of the RFA suggests it has currrent crisis has been exploited with expectation that fears of losing admins will help. They did indeed and this RFA is going to pass.
214:, three not-even-redlinked women who were quite notable and influential in their field, women’s page journalism, which has really only been recognized as important by academics in the past eight or ten years. I’m thrilled with
5856:
Thanks AO, but that was what I meant about "even in wartime, people get married and babies are born". This affair may go one for months, or conclude by next Friday; regardless, I think we should give the candidates our views?
4298:– I am acquainted with your contributions at DYK and like your answers to the questions. I waited for a while before adding my support in order to see what the "opposers" would dig up, and I find their reasoning uncompelling!
4209:
adminds need the trust of the community and this candidate has it, unlike the ironically named T&S. I am not going to withold support for a worthy candidate just because I disagree with the actions of wanna-be autocrats.
86:) – Valereee is a stalwart of the encyclopedia. She's a no-nonsense, get on with the job type of editor and it shows in her work. She's interested in food and drink and has written several articles on the topic including the
3404:– I have to disagree with the opposing points. The Fram kerfuffle is one thing; this RfA is another. Regardless of who runs Knowledge, we need administrators, and I can't see anything wrong with Valereee becoming one.
5828:
becomes a version of Reddit, Valereee still deserves to know after their years of long service, whether they made the grade or not. That is all
Valereee is asking, and I think we owe it to Valereee to give an answer.
3855:
after review. The candidate should be judged on her individual merits, for which she excels, and should not have to deal with oppose or neutral votes just because of an unrelated controversy elsewhere on
Knowledge.
2802:- delighted to. I've had the privilege of working with the candidate a some, would gladly do lots more. Lots of CLUE, and from the get-go has shown exemplary dedication towards making this a better encyclopedia.
4997:
of FRAMBAN and its fallout. If longtime admins really feel the best thing they can do is resign their tools over this, then I say the sooner the better we get someone the mop who's willing to put that job first.
4163:
Specifically a candidate who is unfamiliar with the bearpit that is WP:ANI, and whose major concern seems to be allowing editors efforts to be properly and promptly promoted within the encyclopedia remit. Yes.
2247:, a clear yes. Good temperament, as others have stated, a look at her talk page shows clear and concise communication with other editors, and a levelheaded approach even if she doesn't agree with someone else.
5709:
I have no trouble with the "Timing of the RFA" nor do I agree with the comment on perceptions of the motives of the two nominators. We need good admins! I am thankful that these candiates have come forward. -
5114:
candidate! I don't think we've crossed paths before, but her articulateness and good judgment are very evident on this page, and a willingness to recognize one's own limitations is exactly what I want to see.
5110:. As I said at the other concurrent RfA, I have concerns about this myself, but I also realize that life goes on, so it's a real pleasure to see the candidate show clue about the situation. But anyway, what a
411:, I’d likely still be wondering if I really understood ANI closings well enough to meddle there and thinking there had to be someone more qualified. I’m sorry, does that even get at the gist of your question?
1461:'s viewpoint a bit more, since the last RfA. Am 100% certain that candidate is not a jerk/dick, has a clue and would not abuse their tools (to the point of over-caution). Total, unreserved, emphatic support.
682:
370:
Actually it’s related to the above: I hate it when other editors have to fix my mistakes. It’s made me cautious with learning curves and very appreciative of the kind patience of other editors when it does
676:
310:
I have seen you around, primarily at DYK, and will probably support regardless of the answer to this question and I hope that you don't take offense by it. One thing that gave me pause was when you said,
6115:
though not through specific fault of the candidate. It's just that now is not a good time to run for adminship, until the air clears. Be that as it may, it looks like this RFA will be passing anyway. --
524:
Within DYK there seem some perennial/ongoing discussions about should there be more/fewer biographical DYKs, a better geographical split etc etc. How would you like to see the "mix" change (if at all)?
4507:
and appreciate you sharing it with the world. :-) Also appreciate the work that you do moving the needle to have more biographies of women. Thank you for volunteering to do extra work. Sydney Poore/
6223:
I see that question 4 came "via email" but there is no indication of who asked it. We don't typically entertain anonymous submissions to RfAs. Could you elaborate on the source of this question?
5611:
unless and until FRAMGATE is sorted out. This is not the time to be discussing new prospects for adminship when it is evident the WMF clearly does not trust and is willing to star-chamber them. —
4767:– Like Orville, I have seen Valeree around in the Teahouse and the Help Desk, and have been impressed by her level-headed responses and her willingness to help – both great traits for an admin. –
3096:
Big yes from me. I've seen this candidate's collaboration with other users and I have no hesitations. Judging by the votes above, I have no reason to believe this candidate will abuse the tools.
4978:
this top-notch candidate whose nominators presented well-reasoned arguments in support of an experienced editor who will undoubtedly do the job with integrity, level-headedness, and panache. –
3418:
This should be judged on its own merits, not by other matters which have no relationship to the candidate. There's no evidence ofany problems with thecandidate, and much evidence of good work.
268:
per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
5542:
3285:
is big and unprecedented, but I would hope that the community would not let it impact any RfX nominations made in good faith and totally unrelated the events at hand. As has been said at
1618:– This is clearly a qualified candidate, and a review of her user talk page makes it eminent that she is a pleasure to work with and will be a pleasure to work with as an administrator.
415:
attempted to make a point, rather poorly, of cautioning against early close of ANI discussions where Admin. actions are concerned. As with many AC edicts, this has been largely ignored.
3289:, the majority of the community is probably entirely unawares and I imagine that not all admins know either (nor may ever). Questions related to the Fram controversy/incident would be
4043:- Changing my mind, struck out my neutral vote. Upon self-introspection, everyone else is right; there is nothing wrong with this candidate, and we need more good admins, not fewer.--
2082:
I'm a newbie and not sure my support counts for much, but I'm bookmarking @valeree's interactions with Lee Siegel as a shining example of how to deal with an angry interaction on WP.
4873:(which I believe should be seen as of increasing importance in today's welcome and shifting climate of improving new editor interaction, retention and respect); and a contributor to
4641:
Great contributor and communicator, and I see no issues in regards to the areas they wish to apply the admin tools (and I appreciate the nominee's open recognition of their limits).
6161:
Uh, I understand how that feels, but something about that comes off as a bit arrogant, and I generally have difficulty supporting people if they come off as trying to be perfect.
5757:
arguing that
Knowledge has a "sports problem" due to the gender gap existing in part as a result of sports biographies, which I find a completely misguided approach to content. --
2829:
After reviewing some recent discussions I can confirm that she is one of the nicest editors I’ve seen here. This is exactly the kind of person we want to represent the community.
3803:
I don't usually pile on supports when the outcome looks almost certian, but at present I'd like to see as many new admins as possible, and I see no reason not to support here. —
5392:
488:(June 2015). Do you still hold the opinion: "My understanding of pendings is that I'm not responsible for making sure good faith information is correct as to content or style"?
1362:
3722:
1141:
313:
I’m hard to offend (you have to be actively trying to offend me, and even then I’m more likely to find it funny than to become upset). I assume good faith probably to a fault
3995:- great candidate who would be an absolute net positive with a mop in hand, - adept enough so to just about overcome my hesitation to promote admins amidst present turmoil.
315:. Do you think that you will be able to effectively enforce our policies against bullying and harassment, if you are prone to finding things that attempt to offend funny?
5951:
3600:. But this is not a deal breaker since the candidate has indicated that these are not the areas she is interested in. overall, seems like a good candidate for the mop.--
3229:
I'm surprised my mild comment has prompted such an aggrieved response, and yet I fail to see you engage in any tut-tutting about the misogynistic comments. Funny that.
5842:
Hi BF. I'm not objecting to the RfA. Just its timing. And unless I am seriously misreading their comment, I believe the same is true of Bellezzasolo. Best regards... -
5167:
I meant to do this days ago but it slipped my mind. You show good judgement, excellent communication skills, competence, and a level head. You'll make a great admin. —
245:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
5700:
5584:
5416:
I think it would be more difficult than usual for an RFA to succeed right now. At least some would vote against to keep faith with those who have given up their tools
5462:
3471:
Excellent candidate for the position... I fundamentally disagree with the opposes related to the Fram issue. This is about the CANDIDATE, not Fram and not the WMF.
6015:
5937:
5916:
5837:
5881:
5866:
5851:
796:
1041:'s oppose, in my opinion, the English Knowledge currently has an increased need for new administrators, and the candidate seems to be trustworthy and competent.
5719:
791:
5497:
5690:
130:
Valereee has already found and added the reference herself! I'm really glad that Valereee will have more time to devote to Knowledge and is ready to step up.
5555:
5536:
4755:, as I can't really see why you weren't an administrator ages ago. Helpful, kind, smart, and never afraid of being wrong. This is what we need in an admin.
5926:
making it clear (through strikes/retirements) that something is unacceptable is a totally respectable and useful way to move the needle in an important way
5781:
No opinion on the candidate though I am almost always favorably disposed to candidates supported by the nom. And I respectfully disagree with my colleague
5449:
3609:
2891:
it is always a pleasure to support a thoughtful editor who will can be trusted to use the extra buttons of the sysop toolset with wisdom and grace. Best,
554:
You've mentioned you'd like to help out at various collaborative areas of admin work, which is commendable. I'm curious which, if any, other areas of the
5108:
3710:
1007:
6124:
652:
434:
5755:
5565:
3244:
3224:
3207:
3180:
6262:
6244:
1304:: Clearly focused on content and with a great temperament. We must take every opportunity to recruit editors like Valereee as admins. More, please,
6196:
1144:
is satisfactorily resolved, I will support adminship for any editor in good standing who is nominated by an experienced editor in good standing. -
1006:- Experienced in a needed area (DYK), content contributor, always courteous, and has gained the respect of fellow Wikipedians. This will be great.
504:
157:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
3532:
3603:
6277:
1885:
2269:, I absolutely understand that this crisis is likely to affect RfAs at this time more negatively, but I think that any reason for opposing on
945:
1281:
6063:
Candidates can control the timing of their RfAs and in my opinion they should have waited. I cannot support in the current circumstances.--
1354:
139:
2624:
2526:
6234:
5329:
4939:
4579:
4536:
3704:
278:
5442:
2594:
2195:
1403:
Excellent long-time contributor, plus she's a knitter. Knitters are stable, sensible, creative, lovely people. MOAR KNITTERS FOUR ADMINZ
395:
235:, and I try to treat them with kindness and patience while still making sure their COI doesn’t affect the article, and I’m proud of that.
5248:. Not sure if I ever had a chance to directly interact with this user but giving them the tools would appear to be a net positive. Also
4877:. So what's not to like? I note that every single 'oppose' thus far (apart from one SPA which can be ignored) is related to the current
2998:
1449:
6295:
4861:
3396:
3077:
2492:
2294:
1760:
1247:. Know well from AfD. Has the technical competency and the even-temperment to be a good admin; and is also good fun to interact with.
6040:
5645:
4716:
4699:
3515:
2917:
2657:
1830:
1558:
924:
5753:
5751:
5430:
4970:
4930:
4106:
3479:
3358:
3341:
3273:
2794:
2411:
1998:
1728:
1256:
227:
kind of work is extremely valuable, and I’m proud of doing it. I’ve worked with a lot of COI editors, including hostile ones like at
6072:
5981:
5622:
5376:
4252:
4004:
3865:
3812:
3307:
2883:
2543:
2394:
2257:
2043:
2019:
1409:
1222:
998:
115:
5822:
5488:
Could you elaborate on how being a Women in Red member shows poor judgement? (Or tell me if I’ve just misinterpreted your comment)
5082:
4787:
4665:
4474:
3967:
3936:
3903:
3830:
3666:
3066:
2939:
2577:
2476:
2450:
1901:
From what I have seen (admittedly no that much - not my neighbourhood), candidate is knowledgeable, level-minded, and committed. --
1876:
1472:
1374:
1296:
1239:
1015:
876:
6055:
5794:
5483:
5345:
5240:
5007:
4905:
4385:
4370:
4184:
3886:
3496:
3379:
2636:
2617:
2091:
1688:
1665:
1601:
I've encountered this editor before and came away thinking she might already be an admin. No concerns about giving her the mop. –
1480:- I thought you already were an admin!! Your efforts at DYK have been a bonus to the project. Thank you for your service there.
1335:
1195:
932:
Is competent, has a clue and can be trusted. Have seen some of her DYK contributions and it's quite unlike the regular offenders.
152:
6089:
5124:
4891:
4759:
4730:
4454:
4433:
4409:
4324:
4307:
4219:
3637:
3048:
2838:
1943:
1546:
1432:
1169:
862:
403:
6204:
6170:
6149:
5742:
5294:
5212:. The timing could have been better but with the crisis over that's all water under the bridge. Qualified candidate. Good luck!
5159:
4985:
4804:
4771:
4613:
4595:
4442:
4340:
4201:
4035:
3987:
3950:
3847:
3775:
3687:
3584:
3091:
3014:
2900:
2772:
2509:
2363:
2315:
2074:
1743:
1648:
1032:
981:
62:
6187:
6106:
5359:
5311:
5221:
5180:
4682:
4633:
4562:
4514:
4155:
4138:
3758:
3741:
3649:
3618:
3446:
3163:
2689:
2673:
2560:
2380:
2239:
2140:
1811:
1711:
1610:
1073:
1050:
5099:
4821:
4747:
4495:
4290:
4081:
4052:
3920:
3795:
3140:
3031:
2956:
2859:
2741:
2725:
2159:
2123:
2057:
1918:
1893:
1841:
1593:
1489:
1115:
5675:
5277:
4953:
4236:
4123:
3555:
3528:
3463:
3410:
3085:: Solid, long-term contributor. A net positive to the project and we need more admins with common sense and thoughtfulness.
2758:
2332:
2220:
1792:
1529:
1506:
1132:
1096:
734:
639:
148:
Thank you, Ritchie333 and Megalibrarygirl, I accept the nomination. I have never edited for pay, and this is my only account.
5603:
5065:
4276:
3324:
2973:
2821:
2708:
1395:
1317:
5766:
5041:
4021:
3269:
3192:, if the community is forced to endure this kind of misogynistic trolling, then a little pettiness is entirely called for.
1987:
1964:
1867:- Very good contributor, particularly at DYK. I am satisfied by the answer to my question and fully support the candidate.
1859:
1576:
1104:. A competent, even-tempered editor with a clear need for the tools and strong content experience. Exactly what we need. –
844:
5947:
5261:
5204:
5049:; all indications show a competent and dedicated editor who would do further useful things for the project as an admin. ~
4914:
4844:
3429:
2590:
2428:
2273:
are just ridiculous. Anyone qualified for this position deserves our support. If anything, we need more qualified admins.
1627:
1152:
964:
907:
3123:
2323:
Very level headed, good editing history. Basic qualification for any admin is would you trust them with the tools. I do.
2179:
2038:
1217:
430:
4934:
4869:
Reasonable AfD and Admin scores; a steady head and good temperament; has experience of supporting other editors at the
4661:
3437:
Solid candidate. Regarding the opposes (and even some of the neutrals), not everything has to revolve around Framgate.
2627:). But the overall evidence leads me to believe that the candidate will be a net-positive in that area of wikipedia. --
2469:
1469:
94:
1673:. Looks good, and I don't think a controversy elsewhere on-wiki, unrelated to this candidate, is a reason to oppose. —
3375:
2607:
1684:
1191:
943:
341:
If you were placed in an unfamiliar situation that entailed the use of your admin tools, how would you deal with it?
228:
4738:
without any reservations or concerns for the candidate. I do sympathise with Ad Orientem's neutral position though.
646:
6229:
5553:
4428:
4404:
4227:
as meeting my minimum criteria and nothing put forth in opposition that appears directly related to the candidate.
3524:
1277:
860:
113:
33:
17:
5528:
3684:
3576:
3022:. Experienced and trusted candidate and hoping that she will support our bid to improve relations with the WMF.
2456:
2355:
1023:
While I don't know Valereee, they seem like a fine editor and make a compelling case for needing to be an Admin.
555:
5943:
2586:
786:
5325:
2522:
1707:
706:
632:
83:
6210:
5617:
5437:
4924:
4575:
4063:(But seriously, good responses to the questions. Seems level-headed and dedicated to promoting inclusivity.)
3792:
3718:
3700:
1913:
670:
399:
5418:"). Basically, let WP:FRAM blow over first; nothing personal of course. As the feller said, "it's business,
5568:
I think you might find her the sort of WiR participant who wants notable Women to be covered on Knowledge.
2290:
2192:
1635:
A highly qualified candidate. I have no problem with the timing. Thank you for stepping forward, Valereee.
1092:
933:
812:
5019:
brave enough to accept a nomination for adminship during the FRAMBAN incident would make a great admin. -
222:
from a pretty rough article to GA, and I’m working on taking it to FA; it’s at peer review now. I created
5575:
3580:
2989:
2816:
1444:
1382:- comes to the table with excellent references, and we certainly need good, level-headed administrators.
1273:
6276:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
5637:
4857:
3392:
2488:
1756:
1351:
6026:
Knowledge needs more admins. The WMF deserves fewer admins. Not voting but I wish the candidate well.
120:
6034:
5697:
5321:
4712:
4695:
3510:
2913:
2875:
2653:
2518:
1825:
1555:
989:
I find that whenever I see this candidate's edits on my watch pages ~ they have been edited properly
920:
822:
727:
426:
135:
5472:. The candidate shows poor judgement in the timing of this nomination and in her membership of WiR.
4690:
after checking logs, deleted content, this user is versed in the tools, and appears to be sensible.
4012:
I'm left with little choice but to do as vetting checks out and the opposes are best left untouched.
5994:, and Addy, I fixed the indents to make my vote #2. No violation of editing other's comment policy
5933:
5862:
5833:
5782:
5686:
5612:
5423:
4966:
4920:
4571:
4523:
4169:
4097:
3714:
3696:
3354:
3337:
3265:
3113:
2790:
2517:
Seems to be a net positive to the project as an editor, will likely be a net positive as an admin.
2473:
1993:
1724:
1252:
1038:
664:
101:
area of the main page, which is an area of the project where we're frequently starved for admins.
6068:
6006:
5972:
5372:
4000:
3861:
3809:
2539:
2188:
2033:
2014:
1819:. Solid long-term content contributor, calm temperament and good communication with new editors.
1392:
1209:
994:
760:
691:
614:
68:
5911:
5817:
5570:
5478:
5411:
5396:
5078:
4658:
3934:
3899:
3826:
3662:
3215:, I am happy to support Valereee for proper reasons. Trolling in response to trolling--sheesh.
3062:
2984:
2573:
2500:- Fine writer. Collaborative and level-headed over a long period of time. Ready for the mop. --
2465:
2445:
1936:
1872:
1441:
1370:
1293:
1269:
1235:
1011:
872:
207:
4031:
781:
6052:
5877:
5847:
5790:
5633:
5235:
5003:
4853:
4591:
4445:
is a good sign of her level-headed demeanor, something that a lot of us don't have nowadays.
4382:
4366:
3881:
3492:
3388:
3371:
3073:
2632:
2612:
2484:
2274:
2087:
1752:
1678:
1661:
1187:
223:
5772:
5594:
I think we should hold off on all new RfAs until the WMF resolves the current FRAMBAN case.
3873:- displays competence and a suitable temperament for being an administrator. No concerns. --
2568:
looks like a net positive to me, nothing sticks out that would cause me to think otherwise.
834:
776:
6085:
6028:
5738:
5641:
5551:
5493:
5120:
4887:
4726:
4708:
4691:
4503:
All around good contributor. Especially appreciate the work that you do at DYK. And I love
4450:
4400:
4320:
4303:
4215:
3732:
based on candidate's excellent editing and communication history. Thanks for volunteering.
3632:
3505:
3044:
2909:
2834:
2649:
1820:
1606:
1542:
1440:
an excellent contributor with an admirable approach to working with inexperienced editors.
1427:
1265:
1165:
916:
858:
720:
418:
364:
What is your biggest regret from your time on Knowledge, and how have you learned from it?
182:
131:
111:
5382:
3387:
great contributor, no issues at all as far as I can see, net benefit checkbox is ticked.
8:
6200:
6166:
5989:
5929:
5890:
5858:
5829:
5682:
5522:
5290:
5249:
4982:
4962:
4800:
4609:
4338:
4197:
4165:
4091:
3983:
3975:
3843:
3771:
3680:
3592:
would have liked to see more edits from the user. She is not an all rounder since only 4
3572:
3472:
3350:
3333:
3294:
3261:
2896:
2786:
2505:
2404:
2349:
2311:
2303:
2070:
1982:
1740:
1720:
1641:
1417:
1248:
1028:
977:
545:
356:
333:
6183:
6102:
6064:
5894:
5715:
5696:
Difficult to ignore the signature, teal and turquoise, thought I was getting glaucoma.
5458:
5368:
5307:
5217:
5174:
5131:
5073:
Always a calm, helpful, level-headed editor in AfD discussions, will be a great admin.
4678:
4628:
4558:
4511:
4246:
4151:
3996:
3857:
3805:
3754:
3737:
3442:
3299:
3237:
3200:
3156:
2869:
2687:
2669:
2556:
2535:
2389:
2376:
2266:
2249:
2234:
2136:
2108:
2104:
2028:
2009:
1701:
1405:
1204:
1066:
1046:
990:
887:
755:
702:
658:
626:
500:
422:
379:
232:
77:
58:
5395:(which your nominators should, frankly have noted and prepared you for); particularly
2203:- writes good articles, and I love the attitude that she doesn't take offense easily.
6120:
5921:
5898:
5804:
5667:
5473:
5095:
5074:
4878:
4816:
4780:
4743:
4651:
4645:
4604:
leadership but I don't think that they are necessarily relevant to an individual AFD
4489:
4465:
4071:
4048:
3959:
3927:
3916:
3895:
3822:
3788:
3658:
3454:-- solid candidate, with good contribution history and committment to the community,
3136:
3058:
3027:
2952:
2927:
2855:
2782:
2721:
2569:
2461:
2437:
2149:
2052:
1973:
1909:
1889:
1868:
1838:
1589:
1485:
1463:
1458:
1366:
1290:
1231:
1110:
868:
302:
4544:
Happy to support. Answers are satisfactory, contributions are good, --jerk, ++clue.
4027:
455:
What area or areas of the English Knowledge do you find yourself to be the weakest?
6049:
5965:
5873:
5843:
5786:
5599:
5339:
5302:
A solid candidate. Thanks for making yourself available; you make a great admin! -
5269:
No concerns. The timing of this nomination raises a few eyebrows but nothing more.
5231:
5154:
4999:
4949:
4900:
4874:
4504:
4379:
4362:
4232:
4179:
4119:
3874:
3550:
3488:
3459:
3408:
3367:
3366:
Can't really find a reason to oppose. Seems worthy enough to have the admin tools.
3332:
Not a perfect candidate, but looks completely worthy of some community investment.
3220:
3176:
2754:
2628:
2602:
2328:
2216:
2083:
1783:
1674:
1657:
1520:
1502:
1328:
1178:
1128:
1088:
915:
They have thousands of edits and have never been blocked, so they seem good to me.
514:
219:
90:
45:
5543:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement#Appeals_and_modifications
2947:
Went through her contributions and it did not take long for me to get convinced.--
817:
495:
think I worded my response to you particularly well, and I'm cringing a little. --
6224:
6218:
6081:
5762:
5734:
5546:
5504:
5489:
5337:
Don't have true reasons to oppose and Knowledge is in bad need of fresh admins.--
5116:
4883:
4838:
4756:
4722:
4446:
4423:
4396:
4316:
4299:
4271:
4211:
3626:
3320:
3040:
2969:
2830:
2812:
2703:
1929:
1538:
1421:
1386:
1313:
1305:
1161:
853:
588:
584:
485:
274:
203:
106:
2131:
demonstrates a calm, mature and levelheaded approach, and will use the tools. --
387:
What guidance is available to you as an Admin. in closing issues raised at ANI?
6162:
6137:
5515:
5419:
5286:
5148:
5028:
4979:
4796:
4768:
4605:
4587:
4354:
4334:
4193:
4016:
3979:
3945:
3839:
3767:
3676:
3597:
3564:
3286:
3282:
3086:
3005:
2892:
2847:
2768:
2501:
2342:
2307:
2066:
1957:
1854:
1737:
1636:
1572:
1515:
1024:
973:
541:
211:
6289:
6270:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
6254:
6179:
6098:
5711:
5454:
5354:
5303:
5257:
5213:
5198:
5168:
4993:
Beyond all the other respected contributors' arguments here, I am supporting
4911:
4674:
4624:
4545:
4508:
4147:
4134:
3750:
3733:
3657:
per above, and the opposition appears to be entirely for querulous reasons -
3646:
3593:
3438:
3425:
3230:
3212:
3193:
3168:
3149:
2682:
2665:
2645:
2552:
2424:
2372:
2229:
2132:
1804:
1697:
1623:
1602:
1148:
1059:
1042:
899:
622:
575:
496:
126:
98:
73:
54:
2340:. Might have not been the best time to run, but you'll do fine nonetheless.
6116:
5658:
5091:
4870:
4813:
4739:
4483:
4285:
4065:
4044:
3912:
3784:
3132:
3104:
3023:
2948:
2851:
2735:
2717:
2716:. I've reviewed her record and I believe she is more than fit for the job.
2173:
2117:
1903:
1835:
1585:
1481:
1105:
481:
447:
215:
87:
4361:
an admin - you should have resigned or stop pestering the new candidates.
5595:
5270:
4945:
4228:
4115:
3541:
3455:
3405:
3216:
3185:
3172:
2750:
2324:
2212:
1977:
1777:
1498:
1124:
1083:
4260:– a competent, pleasant, trustworthy editor. She'll be a great admin. –
3349:
Opposition is wholly unconvincing, and my review found nothing serious.
2733:
Trustworthy, well-rounded candidate who will be useful in needed areas.
5758:
5050:
4261:
3316:
2965:
2803:
2698:
2623:
case of a DYK article that I don't think should have been promoted (eg
1383:
1309:
6097:
She sounds great but now is not the time, as per User:Fish and Karate.
1926:. Excellent article contributions, and strong communication skills. —
6280:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
5020:
4707:
per Megalibrarygirl, strong in both content creation and discussion.
4013:
1952:
1849:
1568:
841:
5509:
WiR tweeted something controversial about Fram. See mid-way through
1203:
Glad someone qualified has put their hand up. No qualms whatsoever.
884:
Has pretty great AfD stats, and I don't see any immediate problems.
6249:
5253:
5190:
4831:
4114:. Valereee is a good and helpful editor in whose judgment I trust.
3420:
2644:
I'm liking her good-natured take on whimsical food topics like the
2420:
2388:, a check of edits looks good and nothing stands out as a problem.
1770:
I actually think possibly my strongest qualification is temperament
1619:
1518:
related oppose is concerned; something about babies and bathwater.
1145:
955:
894:
705:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review
558:
you'd try to tackle that involve more technical 'grunt' type work?
470:
2749:
Some metrics I'd like to see are low but no red flags, NETPOS. --
712:
587:
problems? How would you determine if something is a violation of
5367:
Stellar candidate and there’s nothing substantial to object too.
3097:
2170:
2785:
issues will not be sorted out, I'll retire to make it even... --
1081:
Level-headed, polite, and reasonable. Definite admin material. —
5541:
Eric cannot reply here as he is topic banned from doing so per
3523:. Very good temperament and attitude. Should be a great admin.
3315:
No evidence they will misuse the tools or abuse the position.--
1554:
based on endorsements by several users who I think trustworthy
591:
or not, and if you decided it was, how would you deal with it?
181:
nominated. I actually get a nerdy thrill when an article like
6245:
Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Anonymous Questions in RFA
4462:-- a fine all-around editor with great communication skills.
2436:
per me learned colleagues above - I see no reason to oppose.
146:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2551:- I can't see any reason not to trust them with admin tools.
1584:
very glad to see new volunteers coming forward at this time.
1346:
Much respect for Valereee for throwing her hat in the ring,
5564:
Dear Eric, if you look at the candidate's edits such as to
4795:- no concerns, seems helpful, would be an asset for DYK. --
2115:
with fellow editors there, regardless of their experience.
2681:. Have seen her work, have consistently appreciated it. —
321:
Thanks, StudiesWorld, sorry, I meant an attempt to offend
6136:
Regardless of my vote I wish you the best of luck here. –
3695:
I see no reason to oppose, certainly not the Fram thing.
1951:- solid, tenured candidate; even-tempered and competent.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
196:
What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?
164:
What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
6159:"I hate it when other editors have to fix my mistakes."
3487:: a trusted contributor; thank you for volunteering. --
1497:
No reason to think this user would abuse the tools. --
5406:
4284:
excellent editor who will do a great job as an admin.
3131:-- I feel comfortable throwing my support her way. --
1719:: a quality contributor who will make a quality admin.
1567:
backlogs. Frankly baffling oppose from Serial Number.
484:
and then looked up our interaction, of which there is
6195:- per Foxnpichu. Wishing the user the best of luck,
3171:, come on now. There is no need for this pettiness.
2419:- Haven't come across her but she looks fine to me.
287:
Can you explain why you were inactive in 2016-2017?
6080:Because of present circumstances onwiki & off.
4812:- seems like an excellent candidate for adminship.
2766:Great candidate, trustworthy, no reason to oppose.
5566:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Cornbleet
5545:, so there's no point prolonging this discussion.
1514:. A fine, mop-deserving editor. And as far as the
1058:Experienced and competent, is helpful and civil.
260:You may ask optional questions below. There is a
6287:
4899:Experienced; no major issues. It's a clear yes.
4852:. Seems to be a prolific and civil contributor.
4146:Definitely a solid candidate. Deserves the mop.
2006:and look forward to her joining the admin corps.
3260:per her satisfactory answer to my questions. –
1268:and has been in project since 2006 and a clear
4378:. Good history of contributions; no concerns.
728:
689:Edit summary usage for Valereee can be found
4443:is able to take negative judgment positively
2625:Template:Did you know nominations/Hu Peizhao
5995:
4089:- Make a friend when you don't need one.___
2534:, no issues, the more moppers the better.
2065:- good candidate, competent and civil. --
2027:Not a jerk, has clue, sounds good enough.
1800:Well qualified, always nice to work with.
735:
721:
396:Knowledge talk:Administrators' noticeboard
53:Final (231/8/12); Closed as successful by
4348:- the candidate's awareness of what they
1140:per my new criteria for adminship: Until
4522:Solid contributor with good judgment. –
2111:and have been impressed with Valereee's
701:Please keep discussion constructive and
404:Knowledge:Advice on closing discussions
231:and very well-intentioned ones like at
14:
6288:
4673:without any reservations or concerns.
3925:I endorse the nomination statement. –
4829:Experienced candidate; no concerns.
4570:No concerns, and DYK needs the help.
716:
462:aspirations to move into those areas.
5393:this discussion on the RFA talk page
5140:
1696:. good chance of being net positive
5399:from {{noping|WereSpielChequers) ("
2964:, a very good editor and candidate.
2187:, I don't see any reason why not. ♠
1177:. We need more (qualified) admins —
742:
294:needed to be made, I didn’t log in.
23:
480:I came across this nomination via
24:
6307:
6296:Successful requests for adminship
5139:I don't see anything wrong here.
1537:Competent with good temperament.
1123:- per Ritchie333's nomination. --
1037:For the same reasons that led to
840:Yes to this excellent candidate.
229:Talk:Lee Siegel (cultural critic)
5996:
5141:
2402:- seems like a good candidate —
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
3766:experienced, qualified editor.
3713:is one more reason to support.
4078:needs to be running more often
953:Based on nominators' support.
13:
1:
2113:patience and good temperament
1656:. Fully qualified candidate.
400:Knowledge:Closing discussions
2867:net positive to the project.
2205:And I really don't like the
1751:Highly qualified candidate.
972:, do not see any red flags--
7:
6048:per Fish and Karate. · · ·
153:Questions for the candidate
10:
6312:
4244:a trustworthy Wikipedian.
2271:those grounds specifically
2228:- Writes tasty articles.
6235:23:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
6016:23:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5982:23:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5882:22:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5867:21:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5852:20:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5838:19:59, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5823:19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5795:18:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5463:20:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
5443:17:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
4961:with no concerns at all.
4422:spots. Happy to support.
4192:. Trustworthy candidate.
4181:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
3540:. No qualms or concerns.
1944:23:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1919:23:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1894:23:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1877:23:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1860:23:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1842:23:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1831:23:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1812:22:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1793:22:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1761:22:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1744:22:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1729:22:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1712:21:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1689:21:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1666:21:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1649:21:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1628:21:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1611:20:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1594:20:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1577:20:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1559:20:30, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1547:20:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1530:20:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1507:20:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1490:19:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1473:19:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1450:19:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1433:19:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1410:19:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1396:19:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1375:19:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1355:19:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1336:19:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1318:18:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1297:18:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1282:18:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1257:18:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1240:18:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1223:18:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1196:18:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1170:18:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1153:17:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1133:17:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1116:17:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1097:17:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1074:17:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1051:17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1033:17:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
1016:17:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
999:17:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
982:17:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
965:17:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
946:17:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
925:17:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
908:17:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
877:17:06, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
863:17:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
845:17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
805:
769:
748:
574:Additional question from
539:Additional question from
513:Additional question from
469:Additional question from
446:Additional question from
378:Additional question from
355:Additional question from
332:Additional question from
301:Additional question from
273:Additional question from
140:22:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
116:21:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
6273:Please do not modify it.
6263:06:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6205:08:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
6188:16:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
6171:14:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
6150:12:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
6125:19:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6107:19:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6090:18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6073:12:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6056:11:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
6041:06:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5952:10:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
5938:22:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5917:21:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5767:23:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5743:18:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5720:13:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5701:14:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5691:21:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
5676:13:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
5646:07:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
5623:03:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
5604:21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5585:16:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5556:16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5537:15:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5498:15:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5484:14:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
5377:16:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5360:15:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5346:15:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5330:14:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5312:13:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5295:11:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5278:07:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5262:06:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5241:03:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5222:00:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5205:00:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5181:23:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5160:23:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5125:23:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5100:21:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5083:11:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5066:02:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
5042:22:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
5008:20:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4986:12:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4971:12:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4954:12:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4940:12:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4915:07:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4906:03:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4892:02:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4862:02:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4845:00:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
4822:22:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4805:18:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4788:18:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4772:18:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4760:16:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4748:15:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4731:13:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4717:13:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4700:13:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4683:10:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4666:07:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4634:04:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4614:03:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4596:01:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4580:01:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4563:01:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4537:01:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4515:00:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
4496:22:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4475:20:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4455:18:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4434:17:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4410:17:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4386:13:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4371:13:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4341:12:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4325:12:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4308:09:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4291:04:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4277:02:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4253:02:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4237:00:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
4220:23:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4202:22:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4185:22:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4156:19:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4139:19:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4124:18:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4107:18:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4082:17:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4053:17:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4036:17:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4022:16:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
4005:16:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3988:16:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3968:15:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3951:15:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3937:13:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3921:13:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3904:13:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3887:13:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3866:12:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3848:12:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3831:10:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3813:10:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3796:09:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3776:08:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3759:08:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3742:08:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3723:10:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
3705:08:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3688:07:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3674:I see no reason not to.
3667:07:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3650:06:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3638:05:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3619:05:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3596:edits and a few more to
3585:03:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3556:02:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3533:01:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3516:01:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3497:00:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3480:00:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3464:23:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3447:23:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3430:22:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3411:22:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3397:22:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3380:21:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3359:21:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3342:20:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3325:20:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3308:19:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3274:19:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3245:01:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
3225:00:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
3208:20:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3181:18:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
3164:19:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3141:18:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3124:18:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3092:18:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3078:18:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3067:18:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3049:17:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3032:17:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
3015:16:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2999:16:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2974:16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2957:16:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2940:15:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2918:15:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2901:15:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2884:14:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2860:14:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2839:13:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2822:13:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2795:13:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2773:13:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2759:13:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2742:13:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2726:13:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2709:12:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2690:11:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2674:10:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2658:10:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2637:09:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2618:09:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2595:09:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2578:09:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2561:09:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2544:08:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2527:08:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2510:08:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2493:08:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2477:08:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2451:08:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2429:07:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2412:06:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2395:05:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2381:04:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2364:04:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2333:03:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2316:03:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2295:03:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2258:03:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2240:03:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2221:02:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2196:02:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2180:02:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2167:Thorough + thoughtful ~
2160:01:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2141:01:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2124:01:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2092:01:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2075:01:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2058:00:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2044:00:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
2020:00:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
1999:00:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
1965:00:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
1344:per Serial Number 54129.
867:Not a jerk, has a clue.
505:11:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
435:20:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
63:16:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
5188:and don’t F it up :) !
4332:. Welcome aboard :) --
583:How would you approach
38:Please do not modify it
6178:- per Fish+Karate. --
5750:per recent statements
4779:– An excellent editor.
4757:IceKey8297 is awesome.
4621:per everything above.
3039:- trustworthy editor.
1274:Pharaoh of the Wizards
208:Dorothy Misener Jurney
206:(awaiting GA review),
93:, and is a regular at
5644:comment was added at
4315:Calm and coolheaded.
1884:no reason to oppose.
1768:: the candidate says
1325:Excellent candidate.
224:The Tempestry Project
34:request for adminship
5733:– Not the best fit.
5681:to respond instead.
5448:Discussion moved to
4944:per all of above. ‐‐
2519:GreenLipstickLesbian
1266:User:Megalibrarygirl
818:Global contributions
620:Links for Valereee:
183:Yongfeng chili sauce
5783:Serial Number 54129
5391:unfortunately, per
5322:HickoryOughtShirt?4
5107:, partly per this:
5090:Seems well-suited.
4721:Yes, per Ritchie.
4572:Suffusion of Yellow
4353:should stop during
3715:Boing! said Zebedee
3697:Boing! said Zebedee
3148:per Eric Corbett.
2574:click to talk to me
1039:Serial Number 54129
782:Non-automated edits
202:I’m quite proud of
5944:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
5614:A little blue Bori
3838:no reason not to.
2587:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
2585:per TonyBallioni.
1230:per TonyBallioni.
1142:SanFranJanBansFram
1086:
761:Edit summary usage
709:before commenting.
398:and its archives,
233:Talk:Vegan studies
125:I can't recommend
39:
6018:
5914:
5820:
5649:
5534:
5422:, not personal".
5285:Solid candidate.
5203:
5135:
4938:
4882:full confidence.
4664:
4420:
4104:
4061:We need the dues!
4019:
3964:
3911:based on review.
3243:
3206:
3162:
3122:
3102:
3013:
2881:
2393:
2361:
2255:
2210:
1941:
1917:
1829:
1389:
1272:.See no concerns.
1114:
1082:
891:
831:
830:
707:her contributions
437:
421:comment added by
37:
6303:
6275:
6261:
6252:
6222:
6211:General comments
6147:
6142:
6014:
6013:
6011:
6001:
6000:
5999:
5993:
5986:
5980:
5979:
5977:
5912:
5909:
5906:
5901:
5818:
5815:
5812:
5807:
5703:
5674:
5672:
5663:
5634:Sachinthonakkara
5631:
5620:
5582:
5578:
5573:
5531:
5525:
5520:
5518:
5508:
5481:
5476:
5440:
5435:
5428:
5409:
5357:
5275:
5239:
5201:
5196:
5177:
5171:
5158:
5151:
5146:
5145:
5144:
5129:
5063:
5040:
5033:
5025:
4928:
4854:BernardoSulzbach
4843:
4841:
4836:
4819:
4785:
4675:Roger (Dodger67)
4657:
4654:
4648:
4632:
4631:
4553:
4551:
4534:
4527:
4505:Cincinnati chili
4473:
4471:
4468:
4418:
4408:
4337:
4288:
4274:
4269:
4249:
4182:
4096:
4079:
4074:
4068:
4017:
3962:
3944:Good candidate.
3930:
3884:
3879:
3808:
3616:
3613:
3607:
3569:
3548:
3513:
3508:
3477:
3389:The Rambling Man
3305:
3302:
3240:
3235:
3233:
3203:
3198:
3196:
3159:
3154:
3152:
3120:
3118:
3109:
3100:
3089:
3076:
3074:Compassionate727
3053:Very pleased to
3012:
3010:
3003:
2996:
2992:
2987:
2937:
2932:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2872:
2808:
2771:
2738:
2706:
2701:
2685:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2485:Opabinia regalis
2443:
2440:
2409:
2407:
2392:
2358:
2352:
2347:
2345:
2285:
2282:
2279:
2256:
2254:
2252:
2237:
2232:
2204:
2178:
2176:
2157:
2156:
2153:
2120:
2055:
2017:
2012:
1990:
1985:
1962:
1955:
1939:
1935:
1932:
1907:
1906:
1857:
1852:
1823:
1791:
1753:I am One of Many
1646:
1644:Let's discuss it
1526:
1523:
1468:
1466:
1447:
1430:
1424:
1408:
1387:
1333:
1331:
1220:
1212:
1184:
1181:
1108:
1071:
1064:
963:
941:
936:
906:
897:
885:
777:Articles created
737:
730:
723:
714:
713:
694:
686:
645:
544:
416:
402:and essays like
269:
220:Cincinnati chili
91:Cincinnati chili
6311:
6310:
6306:
6305:
6304:
6302:
6301:
6300:
6286:
6285:
6284:
6278:this nomination
6271:
6250:
6248:
6232:
6216:
6213:
6143:
6138:
6050:Peter Southwood
6007:
6004:
6003:
5997:
5987:
5973:
5970:
5969:
5907:
5902:
5899:
5813:
5808:
5805:
5775:
5698:cygnis insignis
5695:
5668:
5659:
5656:
5618:
5580:
5576:
5571:
5529:
5523:
5516:
5511:this discussion
5502:
5479:
5474:
5438:
5431:
5424:
5405:
5385:
5355:
5271:
5230:
5199:
5175:
5169:
5149:
5147:
5142:
5051:
5036:
5035:
5029:
5021:
4839:
4832:
4830:
4817:
4781:
4709:ComplexRational
4692:Graeme Bartlett
4652:
4646:
4627:
4622:
4549:
4548:
4530:
4525:
4469:
4466:
4463:
4431:
4394:
4333:
4286:
4272:
4262:
4247:
4180:
4077:
4076:
4072:
4066:
4018:◊distænt write◊
3965:
3958:no concerns. --
3928:
3882:
3875:
3804:
3611:
3605:
3602:
3565:
3563:Hey why not...
3542:
3511:
3507:Nova Crystallis
3506:
3473:
3303:
3300:
3238:
3231:
3201:
3194:
3157:
3150:
3114:
3111:
3105:
3087:
3071:
3024:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
3006:
3004:
2994:
2990:
2985:
2933:
2928:
2910:Megalibrarygirl
2876:
2871:« Gonzo fan2007
2870:
2868:
2820:
2804:
2767:
2736:
2704:
2699:
2683:
2613:
2608:
2603:
2448:
2441:
2438:
2405:
2403:
2356:
2350:
2343:
2283:
2280:
2277:
2250:
2248:
2235:
2230:
2174:
2168:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2118:
2053:
2015:
2010:
1988:
1983:
1958:
1953:
1937:
1930:
1902:
1855:
1850:
1821:Espresso Addict
1803:
1790:
1774:
1642:
1556:cygnis insignis
1524:
1521:
1464:
1462:
1445:
1428:
1422:
1404:
1391:
1329:
1327:
1289:- no concerns.
1216:
1208:
1182:
1179:
1067:
1060:
954:
937:
934:
895:
893:
837:
832:
827:
801:
765:
744:
743:RfA/RfB toolbox
741:
690:
638:
621:
617:
540:
259:
204:Marjorie Paxson
155:
132:Megalibrarygirl
123:
71:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
6309:
6299:
6298:
6283:
6282:
6267:
6266:
6265:
6238:
6237:
6228:
6212:
6209:
6208:
6207:
6190:
6173:
6152:
6130:
6129:
6128:
6092:
6075:
6058:
6043:
6021:
6020:
6019:
5990:Britishfinance
5962:
5961:
5960:
5959:
5958:
5957:
5956:
5955:
5954:
5930:Britishfinance
5891:Britishfinance
5888:
5887:
5886:
5885:
5884:
5859:Britishfinance
5830:Britishfinance
5797:
5774:
5771:
5770:
5769:
5745:
5728:
5727:
5726:
5725:
5724:
5723:
5722:
5683:LessHeard vanU
5650:
5640:The preceding
5625:
5606:
5589:
5588:
5587:
5562:
5561:
5560:
5559:
5558:
5467:
5466:
5465:
5384:
5381:
5380:
5379:
5362:
5348:
5332:
5314:
5297:
5280:
5264:
5243:
5224:
5207:
5193:
5183:
5162:
5127:
5102:
5085:
5068:
5044:
5027:
5015:anyone who is
5010:
4988:
4973:
4963:Cordless Larry
4956:
4942:
4917:
4910:Absolutely. —
4908:
4894:
4864:
4847:
4824:
4807:
4790:
4774:
4762:
4750:
4733:
4719:
4702:
4685:
4668:
4636:
4616:
4598:
4582:
4565:
4539:
4517:
4498:
4477:
4457:
4436:
4427:
4412:
4388:
4373:
4343:
4327:
4310:
4293:
4279:
4255:
4239:
4222:
4204:
4187:
4173:
4166:LessHeard vanU
4158:
4141:
4126:
4109:
4101:
4094:
4093:CAPTAIN MEDUSA
4084:
4070:
4055:
4038:
4024:
4007:
3990:
3970:
3961:
3953:
3939:
3923:
3906:
3889:
3868:
3850:
3833:
3815:
3798:
3778:
3761:
3744:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3690:
3669:
3652:
3640:
3621:
3587:
3558:
3535:
3518:
3504:Net positive.
3499:
3482:
3466:
3449:
3432:
3413:
3399:
3382:
3361:
3351:Reaper Eternal
3344:
3334:Martinevans123
3327:
3310:
3276:
3262:John M Wolfson
3255:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3143:
3126:
3103:
3094:
3080:
3069:
3051:
3034:
3017:
3001:
2976:
2959:
2942:
2920:
2903:
2886:
2862:
2841:
2824:
2810:
2797:
2787:Stephan Schulz
2775:
2761:
2744:
2728:
2711:
2692:
2676:
2660:
2639:
2620:
2597:
2580:
2563:
2546:
2529:
2512:
2495:
2479:
2453:
2446:
2431:
2414:
2406:Rhododendrites
2397:
2383:
2366:
2335:
2318:
2297:
2260:
2242:
2223:
2198:
2182:
2162:
2143:
2126:
2094:
2077:
2060:
2046:
2022:
2007:
2001:
1967:
1946:
1921:
1896:
1879:
1862:
1844:
1833:
1814:
1801:
1795:
1782:
1766:Strong support
1763:
1746:
1731:
1721:ThatMontrealIP
1714:
1691:
1668:
1651:
1630:
1613:
1596:
1579:
1561:
1549:
1532:
1509:
1492:
1475:
1452:
1435:
1412:
1398:
1385:
1377:
1357:
1341:Strong support
1338:
1320:
1299:
1284:
1259:
1249:Britishfinance
1242:
1225:
1198:
1172:
1155:
1135:
1118:
1099:
1076:
1053:
1035:
1018:
1001:
984:
967:
948:
927:
910:
879:
865:
847:
836:
833:
829:
828:
826:
825:
820:
815:
809:
807:
803:
802:
800:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
773:
771:
767:
766:
764:
763:
758:
752:
750:
746:
745:
740:
739:
732:
725:
717:
698:
697:
696:
687:
616:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
602:
601:
600:
599:
578:
571:
570:
569:
568:
549:
547:
536:
535:
534:
533:
519:
517:
510:
509:
508:
507:
475:
473:
466:
465:
464:
463:
450:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
382:
375:
374:
373:
372:
359:
357:John M Wolfson
352:
351:
350:
349:
336:
334:John M Wolfson
329:
328:
327:
326:
305:
298:
297:
296:
295:
282:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
239:
238:
237:
236:
212:Marie Anderson
190:
189:
188:
187:
175:
174:
173:
172:
154:
151:
150:
149:
122:
119:
70:
67:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6308:
6297:
6294:
6293:
6291:
6281:
6279:
6274:
6268:
6264:
6260:
6258:
6253:
6246:
6242:
6241:
6240:
6239:
6236:
6231:
6226:
6220:
6215:
6214:
6206:
6202:
6198:
6194:
6191:
6189:
6185:
6181:
6177:
6174:
6172:
6168:
6164:
6160:
6156:
6153:
6151:
6148:
6146:
6141:
6134:
6131:
6127:
6126:
6122:
6118:
6114:
6110:
6109:
6108:
6104:
6100:
6096:
6093:
6091:
6087:
6083:
6079:
6076:
6074:
6070:
6066:
6065:Pawnkingthree
6062:
6059:
6057:
6053:
6051:
6047:
6044:
6042:
6039:
6038:
6037:
6032:
6031:
6025:
6022:
6017:
6012:
6010:
6005:usernamekiran
5991:
5985:
5984:
5983:
5978:
5976:
5971:usernamekiran
5967:
5963:
5953:
5949:
5945:
5941:
5940:
5939:
5935:
5931:
5927:
5923:
5920:
5919:
5918:
5915:
5910:
5905:
5896:
5892:
5889:
5883:
5879:
5875:
5870:
5869:
5868:
5864:
5860:
5855:
5854:
5853:
5849:
5845:
5841:
5840:
5839:
5835:
5831:
5826:
5825:
5824:
5821:
5816:
5811:
5801:
5798:
5796:
5792:
5788:
5784:
5780:
5777:
5776:
5768:
5764:
5760:
5756:
5754:
5752:
5749:
5746:
5744:
5740:
5736:
5732:
5729:
5721:
5717:
5713:
5708:
5705:
5704:
5702:
5699:
5694:
5693:
5692:
5688:
5684:
5679:
5678:
5677:
5673:
5671:
5665:
5664:
5662:
5654:
5651:
5647:
5643:
5639:
5635:
5629:
5626:
5624:
5621:
5616:
5615:
5610:
5607:
5605:
5601:
5597:
5593:
5590:
5586:
5583:
5579:
5574:
5567:
5563:
5557:
5554:
5552:
5550:
5549:
5544:
5540:
5539:
5538:
5535:
5532:
5526:
5519:
5512:
5506:
5501:
5500:
5499:
5495:
5491:
5487:
5486:
5485:
5482:
5477:
5471:
5468:
5464:
5460:
5456:
5453:
5451:
5450:the talk page
5446:
5445:
5444:
5441:
5436:
5434:
5429:
5427:
5421:
5417:
5413:
5408:
5403:
5398:
5394:
5390:
5387:
5386:
5378:
5374:
5370:
5369:Grey Wanderer
5366:
5363:
5361:
5358:
5352:
5349:
5347:
5344:
5342:
5341:
5336:
5333:
5331:
5327:
5323:
5318:
5315:
5313:
5309:
5305:
5301:
5298:
5296:
5292:
5288:
5284:
5281:
5279:
5276:
5274:
5268:
5265:
5263:
5259:
5255:
5251:
5247:
5244:
5242:
5237:
5233:
5228:
5225:
5223:
5219:
5215:
5211:
5208:
5206:
5202:
5195:
5194:
5191:
5187:
5184:
5182:
5178:
5172:
5166:
5163:
5161:
5156:
5152:
5138:
5133:
5132:edit conflict
5128:
5126:
5122:
5118:
5113:
5109:
5106:
5103:
5101:
5097:
5093:
5089:
5086:
5084:
5080:
5076:
5072:
5069:
5067:
5064:
5062:
5058:
5054:
5048:
5045:
5043:
5039:
5034:
5032:
5026:
5024:
5018:
5014:
5011:
5009:
5005:
5001:
4996:
4992:
4989:
4987:
4984:
4981:
4977:
4974:
4972:
4968:
4964:
4960:
4957:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4943:
4941:
4936:
4932:
4926:
4922:
4918:
4916:
4913:
4909:
4907:
4904:
4903:
4898:
4895:
4893:
4889:
4885:
4880:
4876:
4872:
4868:
4865:
4863:
4859:
4855:
4851:
4848:
4846:
4842:
4837:
4835:
4828:
4825:
4823:
4820:
4815:
4811:
4808:
4806:
4802:
4798:
4794:
4791:
4789:
4786:
4784:
4778:
4775:
4773:
4770:
4766:
4763:
4761:
4758:
4754:
4751:
4749:
4745:
4741:
4737:
4734:
4732:
4728:
4724:
4720:
4718:
4714:
4710:
4706:
4703:
4701:
4697:
4693:
4689:
4686:
4684:
4680:
4676:
4672:
4669:
4667:
4663:
4660:
4656:
4655:
4650:
4649:
4640:
4637:
4635:
4630:
4626:
4620:
4617:
4615:
4611:
4607:
4602:
4599:
4597:
4593:
4589:
4586:
4583:
4581:
4577:
4573:
4569:
4566:
4564:
4560:
4556:
4555:
4554:
4543:
4540:
4538:
4535:
4533:
4528:
4521:
4518:
4516:
4513:
4510:
4506:
4502:
4499:
4497:
4493:
4492:
4487:
4486:
4481:
4478:
4476:
4472:
4461:
4458:
4456:
4452:
4448:
4444:
4440:
4437:
4435:
4430:
4425:
4416:
4413:
4411:
4406:
4402:
4398:
4392:
4389:
4387:
4384:
4381:
4377:
4374:
4372:
4368:
4364:
4360:
4356:
4351:
4347:
4344:
4342:
4339:
4336:
4331:
4328:
4326:
4322:
4318:
4314:
4311:
4309:
4305:
4301:
4297:
4294:
4292:
4289:
4283:
4280:
4278:
4275:
4270:
4268:
4267:
4259:
4256:
4254:
4251:
4250:
4243:
4240:
4238:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4223:
4221:
4217:
4213:
4208:
4205:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4191:
4188:
4186:
4183:
4177:
4174:
4171:
4167:
4162:
4159:
4157:
4153:
4149:
4145:
4142:
4140:
4137:
4136:
4130:
4127:
4125:
4121:
4117:
4113:
4110:
4108:
4105:
4103:
4102:
4099:
4095:
4092:
4088:
4085:
4083:
4080:
4075:
4069:
4062:
4059:
4056:
4054:
4050:
4046:
4042:
4039:
4037:
4033:
4029:
4026:No concerns.
4025:
4023:
4020:
4015:
4011:
4008:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3997:Stormy clouds
3994:
3991:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3974:
3971:
3969:
3966:
3957:
3954:
3952:
3949:
3948:
3943:
3940:
3938:
3935:
3932:
3931:
3924:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3910:
3907:
3905:
3901:
3897:
3893:
3890:
3888:
3885:
3880:
3878:
3872:
3869:
3867:
3863:
3859:
3858:ZettaComposer
3854:
3851:
3849:
3845:
3841:
3837:
3834:
3832:
3828:
3824:
3819:
3816:
3814:
3811:
3810:Voice of Clam
3807:
3806:O Still Small
3802:
3799:
3797:
3794:
3791:
3790:
3786:
3782:
3779:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3762:
3760:
3756:
3752:
3748:
3745:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3728:
3724:
3720:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3702:
3698:
3694:
3691:
3689:
3686:
3682:
3679:
3678:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3664:
3660:
3656:
3653:
3651:
3648:
3645:
3641:
3639:
3636:
3635:
3630:
3629:
3625:
3622:
3620:
3617:
3615:
3608:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3588:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3568:
3562:
3559:
3557:
3554:
3553:
3549:
3547:
3546:
3539:
3536:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3519:
3517:
3514:
3509:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3483:
3481:
3478:
3476:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3450:
3448:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3433:
3431:
3427:
3423:
3422:
3417:
3414:
3412:
3409:
3407:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3394:
3390:
3386:
3383:
3381:
3377:
3376:contributions
3373:
3369:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3356:
3352:
3348:
3345:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3328:
3326:
3322:
3318:
3314:
3311:
3309:
3306:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3259:
3256:
3246:
3241:
3234:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3213:User:Gamaliel
3211:
3210:
3209:
3204:
3197:
3191:
3187:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3169:User:Gamaliel
3167:
3166:
3165:
3160:
3153:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3119:
3117:
3110:
3108:
3099:
3095:
3093:
3090:
3084:
3081:
3079:
3075:
3070:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3035:
3033:
3029:
3025:
3021:
3018:
3016:
3011:
3009:
3002:
3000:
2997:
2993:
2988:
2980:
2977:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2960:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2936:
2931:
2924:
2921:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2879:
2873:
2866:
2863:
2861:
2857:
2853:
2849:
2845:
2842:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2825:
2823:
2818:
2814:
2809:
2807:
2801:
2798:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2770:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2739:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2712:
2710:
2707:
2702:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2688:
2686:
2680:
2677:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2646:haggis pakora
2643:
2640:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2611:
2606:
2601:
2598:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2536:Coolabahapple
2533:
2530:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2496:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2444:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2408:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2391:
2390:Seraphimblade
2387:
2384:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2367:
2365:
2362:
2359:
2353:
2346:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2319:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2253:
2251:QueerFilmNerd
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2233:
2227:
2224:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2208:
2202:
2199:
2197:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2177:
2172:
2166:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2127:
2125:
2122:
2121:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2101:too much time
2098:
2095:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2051:Per Ritchie.
2050:
2047:
2045:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2026:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2013:
2011:Berean Hunter
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1991:
1986:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1956:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1934:
1933:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1915:
1911:
1905:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1789:
1787:
1780:
1779:
1771:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1739:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1517:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1460:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1443:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1425:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1213:
1211:
1206:
1205:SportingFlyer
1202:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1065:
1063:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1002:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
985:
983:
979:
975:
971:
968:
966:
962:
960:
959:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
940:
931:
928:
926:
922:
918:
917:Bill Williams
914:
911:
909:
905:
903:
898:
889:
888:edit conflict
883:
880:
878:
874:
870:
866:
864:
861:
859:
857:
856:
852:as nominator
851:
848:
846:
843:
839:
838:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
810:
808:
804:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
774:
772:
768:
762:
759:
757:
754:
753:
751:
747:
738:
733:
731:
726:
724:
719:
718:
715:
711:
710:
708:
704:
693:
688:
684:
681:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
660:
657:
654:
651:
648:
644:
641:
637:
634:
631:
628:
624:
619:
618:
606:
605:
604:
603:
596:
593:
592:
590:
586:
582:
579:
577:
573:
572:
567:instructions.
563:
560:
559:
557:
556:admin backlog
553:
550:
548:
546:
543:
538:
537:
530:
527:
526:
523:
520:
518:
516:
512:
511:
506:
502:
498:
493:
490:
489:
487:
483:
479:
476:
474:
472:
468:
467:
460:
457:
456:
454:
451:
449:
445:
444:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:Leaky caldron
420:
413:
412:
410:
405:
401:
397:
392:
389:
388:
386:
383:
381:
377:
376:
369:
366:
365:
363:
360:
358:
354:
353:
346:
343:
342:
340:
337:
335:
331:
330:
324:
320:
317:
316:
314:
309:
306:
304:
300:
299:
292:
289:
288:
286:
283:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
267:
266:two questions
263:
250:
247:
246:
244:
241:
240:
234:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
197:
195:
192:
191:
184:
179:
178:
177:
176:
169:
166:
165:
163:
160:
159:
158:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
128:
121:Co-nomination
118:
117:
114:
112:
110:
109:
102:
100:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
79:
75:
66:
65:
64:
60:
56:
48:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
6272:
6269:
6256:
6192:
6175:
6158:
6154:
6144:
6139:
6132:
6112:
6111:
6094:
6077:
6060:
6045:
6035:
6029:
6027:
6023:
6008:
5974:
5925:
5922:Bellezzasolo
5904:Bellezzasolo
5903:
5810:Bellezzasolo
5809:
5799:
5778:
5747:
5730:
5706:
5669:
5660:
5657:
5652:
5627:
5613:
5608:
5591:
5569:
5547:
5514:
5469:
5447:
5433:SerialNumber
5432:
5425:
5415:
5400:
5388:
5364:
5350:
5343:
5338:
5334:
5316:
5299:
5282:
5272:
5266:
5250:WP:NOBIGDEAL
5245:
5229:, per noms.
5226:
5209:
5189:
5185:
5164:
5136:
5111:
5104:
5087:
5075:RebeccaGreen
5070:
5060:
5056:
5052:
5046:
5037:
5030:
5022:
5016:
5012:
4994:
4990:
4975:
4958:
4901:
4896:
4866:
4849:
4833:
4826:
4809:
4792:
4783:CAPTAIN RAJU
4782:
4776:
4764:
4752:
4735:
4704:
4687:
4670:
4644:
4642:
4638:
4618:
4600:
4584:
4567:
4547:
4546:
4541:
4531:
4524:
4519:
4500:
4490:
4484:
4479:
4459:
4438:
4419:(rolls dice)
4414:
4390:
4375:
4358:
4349:
4345:
4329:
4312:
4295:
4281:
4265:
4263:
4257:
4245:
4241:
4224:
4206:
4189:
4175:
4160:
4143:
4133:
4128:
4111:
4098:
4090:
4086:
4064:
4060:
4057:
4040:
4009:
3992:
3976:WP:NOBIGDEAL
3972:
3955:
3946:
3941:
3929:Juliancolton
3926:
3908:
3896:Double sharp
3891:
3876:
3870:
3852:
3835:
3823:Andy Dingley
3817:
3800:
3787:
3780:
3763:
3746:
3729:
3692:
3675:
3671:
3659:David Gerard
3654:
3643:
3633:
3627:
3623:
3601:
3589:
3566:
3560:
3551:
3544:
3543:
3537:
3520:
3501:
3484:
3474:
3468:
3451:
3434:
3419:
3415:
3401:
3384:
3363:
3346:
3329:
3312:
3290:
3278:
3257:
3190:au contraire
3189:
3145:
3128:
3115:
3106:
3082:
3059:Innisfree987
3054:
3036:
3019:
3007:
2983:
2978:
2961:
2944:
2934:
2929:
2922:
2905:
2888:
2864:
2843:
2826:
2805:
2799:
2777:
2763:
2746:
2734:
2730:
2713:
2694:
2678:
2662:
2641:
2599:
2582:
2570:Peacemaker67
2565:
2548:
2531:
2514:
2497:
2481:
2462:filelakeshoe
2455:
2433:
2416:
2399:
2385:
2368:
2341:
2337:
2320:
2304:WP:NOBIGDEAL
2299:
2276:
2275:
2270:
2262:
2244:
2225:
2206:
2200:
2184:
2164:
2145:
2128:
2116:
2112:
2100:
2096:
2079:
2062:
2048:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2003:
1981:
1974:Usedtobecool
1969:
1959:
1948:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1898:
1881:
1869:StudiesWorld
1864:
1846:
1816:
1806:
1805:
1797:
1785:
1776:
1769:
1765:
1748:
1733:
1716:
1704:
1693:
1681:
1670:
1653:
1643:
1637:
1632:
1615:
1598:
1581:
1563:
1551:
1534:
1519:
1511:
1494:
1477:
1465:Usedtobecool
1459:TonyBallioni
1454:
1437:
1414:
1400:
1379:
1367:Gerda Arendt
1359:
1347:
1343:
1340:
1326:
1322:
1301:
1286:
1261:
1244:
1232:Gog the Mild
1227:
1215:
1207:
1200:
1174:
1157:
1137:
1120:
1101:
1078:
1068:
1061:
1055:
1020:
1008:MarginalCost
1003:
986:
969:
957:
956:
950:
938:
929:
912:
901:
881:
869:TonyBallioni
854:
849:
700:
699:
679:
673:
667:
661:
655:
649:
642:
635:
629:
594:
580:
561:
551:
528:
521:
491:
477:
458:
452:
417:— Preceding
408:
390:
384:
367:
361:
344:
338:
322:
318:
312:
307:
303:StudiesWorld
290:
284:
265:
258:
248:
242:
216:Zhang Dongju
199:
193:
167:
161:
156:
145:
124:
107:
103:
99:Did you know
95:Women in Red
88:good article
80:
72:
52:
51:
46:
30:
28:
5942:Well said.
5895:WP:INVOLVED
5874:Ad Orientem
5844:Ad Orientem
5787:Ad Orientem
5670:)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
5353:- Why not.
5340:Jetstreamer
5000:Daniel Case
4902:William2001
4363:Nosebagbear
4350:didn't know
3894:. Why not?
3877:Laser brain
3783:why not? –
3749:per DGG. –
3489:K.e.coffman
3368:VibeScepter
3295:no big deal
3186:User:Drmies
2908:as co-nom.
2817:revolutions
2629:Mkativerata
2267:WP:FRAMGATE
2109:WP:Teahouse
2105:WP:Helpdesk
2084:Logophile59
1658:Newyorkbrad
1330:scope_creep
1270:Net Postive
823:User rights
813:CentralAuth
515:Nosebagbear
6225:Ivanvector
6219:Ritchie333
6082:Shearonink
5735:CLCStudent
5548:Ritchie333
5505:Trialpears
5490:Trialpears
5117:Tryptofish
4884:Nick Moyes
4879:WP:FRAMBAN
4723:GoldenRing
4447:epicgenius
4424:Ivanvector
4397:Javert2113
4357:, and you
4317:Malcolmxl5
4300:Cwmhiraeth
4212:Find bruce
3978:. Thanks.
3304:SandDoctor
3041:PhilKnight
3008:Sandstein
2831:Trialpears
2783:WP:FRAMBAN
2148:Why not? -
1931:Newslinger
1539:JohnThorne
1429:Parlez Moi
1423:Guerillero
1348:especially
1162:Clovermoss
1043:~ ToBeFree
855:Ritchie333
806:Cross-wiki
797:AfD closes
615:Discussion
275:Ritchie333
108:Ritchie333
69:Nomination
31:successful
6243:Also see
6197:Willbb234
6163:Foxnpichu
5517:Anarchyte
5287:Shellwood
5232:Vanamonde
5112:wonderful
4980:Athaenara
4875:WP:WOMRED
4797:DannyS712
4769:FlyingAce
4606:Michepman
4588:Antrocent
4194:Vexations
4028:Mélencron
3980:Mike Peel
3947:Jianhui67
3840:Danski454
3768:GermanJoe
3677:Sasquatch
3567:Doc James
3088:Montanabw
2893:Barkeep49
2769:EggRoll97
2650:Andrew D.
2502:Rosiestep
2447:(blether)
2344:Anarchyte
2308:Guettarda
2236:(discuss)
2067:Ajraddatz
1972:- citing
1781:(he/him)
1738:Mackensen
1698:Cas Liber
1025:Chetsford
974:Ymblanter
792:AfD votes
787:BLP edits
665:block log
279:via email
6290:Category
6180:CptViraj
6099:Ingratis
5712:Ret.Prof
5707:Comment:
5642:unsigned
5581:Chequers
5455:Primefac
5404:"), and
5356:FitIndia
5351:Support:
5317:Support:
5304:Ret.Prof
5300:Support:
5254:Aoi (青い)
5170:Rutebega
4935:Articles
4931:Contribs
4921:Johannes
4871:Teahouse
4827:Support.
4671:Suppport
4662:Contribs
4526:Broccoli
4509:FloNight
4148:Rollidan
3909:Support.
3751:Ammarpad
3734:Bakazaka
3693:Support.
3672:Support.
3647:Armbrust
3642:Pile-on
3577:contribs
3439:Pichpich
3435:Support'
3270:contribs
3232:Gamaliel
3195:Gamaliel
3151:Gamaliel
2995:Chequers
2684:kashmīrī
2666:Lectonar
2553:Hugsyrup
2373:Donner60
2284:Dark2000
2231:Hawkeye7
2133:Tom (LT)
2099:I spend
1984:starship
1914:contribs
1807:Rosguill
1802:signed,
1736:. Sure.
1708:contribs
1685:contribs
1603:Muboshgu
1482:— Maile
1418:Why not?
1363:precious
1192:contribs
1093:contribs
1079:Support.
1062:Schazjmd
930:Support.
913:Support.
882:Support.
770:Analysis
749:Counters
633:contribs
623:Valereee
589:WP:CIVIL
585:WP:CIVIL
576:RoySmith
497:valereee
486:only one
431:contribs
419:unsigned
127:Valereee
84:contribs
74:Valereee
55:Primefac
47:Valereee
6193:Neutral
6176:Neutral
6155:Neutral
6133:Neutral
6117:WaltCip
6113:Neutral
6095:Neutral
6078:Neutral
6061:Neutral
6046:Neutral
6024:Neutral
5913:Discuss
5819:Discuss
5800:Neutral
5779:Neutral
5773:Neutral
5661:AhmadLX
5480:Corbett
5407:Wehwalt
5365:Support
5335:Support
5283:Support
5267:Support
5246:Support
5227:Support
5210:Support
5186:Support
5165:Support
5150:Invalid
5137:Support
5105:Support
5092:Collect
5088:Support
5071:Support
5047:Support
5017:foolish
5013:Support
4995:because
4991:Support
4976:Support
4959:Support
4897:Support
4867:Support
4850:Support
4814:the wub
4810:Support
4793:Support
4777:Support
4765:Support
4753:Support
4740:Loopy30
4736:Support
4705:Support
4688:Support
4653:Hamster
4639:Support
4619:Support
4601:Support
4585:Support
4568:Support
4542:Support
4520:Support
4501:Support
4485:MRD2014
4480:Support
4470:Writer
4460:Support
4439:Support
4415:Support
4401:Siarad.
4391:Support
4376:Support
4355:WP:FRAM
4346:Support
4330:Support
4313:Support
4296:Support
4282:Support
4258:Support
4242:Support
4225:Support
4207:Support
4190:Support
4176:Support
4161:Support
4144:Support
4135:Lindsay
4129:Support
4112:Support
4087:Support
4067:caknuck
4058:Support
4045:WaltCip
4041:Support
4010:Support
3993:Support
3973:Support
3960:Cameron
3956:Support
3942:Support
3913:Kierzek
3892:Support
3871:Support
3853:Support
3836:Support
3818:Support
3801:Support
3781:Support
3764:Support
3747:Support
3730:Support
3655:Support
3644:support
3624:Support
3598:WP:RFPP
3590:Support
3561:Support
3538:Support
3521:Support
3502:Support
3485:Support
3469:Support
3452:Support
3416:Support
3402:Support
3385:Support
3364:Support
3347:Support
3330:Support
3313:Support
3287:WP:FRAM
3283:WP:FRAM
3279:Support
3258:Support
3146:Support
3133:Dolotta
3129:Support
3083:Support
3055:support
3037:Support
3020:Support
2979:Support
2962:Support
2949:Snaevar
2945:Support
2930:Striker
2923:Support
2906:Support
2889:Support
2865:Support
2852:Amakuru
2848:WP:FRAM
2844:Support
2827:Support
2813:spin me
2800:Support
2781:If the
2778:Support
2764:Support
2747:Support
2737:Spencer
2731:Support
2718:agucova
2714:Support
2695:Support
2679:Support
2663:Support
2642:Support
2600:Support
2583:Support
2566:Support
2549:Support
2532:Support
2515:Support
2498:Support
2482:Support
2457:Support
2434:Support
2417:Support
2400:Support
2386:Support
2369:Support
2338:Support
2321:Support
2300:Support
2263:Support
2245:Support
2226:Support
2209:oppose.
2201:Support
2185:Support
2165:Support
2146:Support
2129:Support
2119:Orville
2103:at the
2097:Support
2080:Support
2063:Support
2054:Lourdes
2049:Support
2025:Support
2004:Support
1970:Support
1949:Support
1924:Support
1904:Elmidae
1899:Support
1886:Banedon
1882:Support
1865:Support
1847:Support
1817:Support
1798:Support
1749:Support
1734:Support
1717:Support
1694:Support
1675:Granger
1671:Support
1654:Support
1633:Support
1616:Support
1599:Support
1586:Mccapra
1582:Support
1564:Support
1552:Support
1535:Support
1516:WP:FRAM
1512:Support
1495:Support
1478:Support
1455:Support
1438:Support
1415:Support
1401:Support
1380:Support
1360:Support
1323:Support
1306:Ritchie
1302:Support
1294:Snowman
1287:Support
1262:Support
1245:Support
1228:Support
1201:Support
1175:Support
1158:Support
1138:Support
1121:Support
1102:Support
1056:Support
1021:Support
1004:Support
991:~mitch~
987:Support
970:Support
951:Support
850:Support
835:Support
640:deleted
448:Dolotta
371:happen.
6036:Karate
6009:(talk)
5975:(talk)
5748:Oppose
5731:Oppose
5653:Oppose
5648:(UTC).
5628:Oppose
5609:Oppose
5596:Hlevy2
5592:Oppose
5470:Oppose
5389:Oppose
5383:Oppose
5273:Nihlus
5214:Haukur
5192:N.J.A.
4946:1997kB
4552:Thomas
4532:Coffee
4529:&
4467:Cactus
4380:Deryck
4229:Ifnord
4116:Drmies
3883:(talk)
3594:WP:AIV
3545:bd2412
3512:(Talk)
3456:Sadads
3406:Kurtis
3291:loaded
3217:Drmies
3173:Drmies
2877:(talk)
2751:ferret
2442:Summit
2325:SusunW
2213:GRuban
2207:timing
2193:(talk)
2155:ASTILY
2016:(talk)
1989:.paint
1978:Bilorv
1960:(talk)
1856:{talk}
1851:~SS49~
1778:Bilorv
1741:(talk)
1638:Cullen
1499:rogerd
1180:python
1125:MrClog
1084:Aranya
1069:(talk)
756:XTools
210:, and
6230:Edits
6140:Davey
5759:Pudeo
5619:v^_^v
5577:Spiel
5439:54129
5420:Sonny
5402:votes
4647:Super
4625:Leviv
4429:Edits
4287:Gizza
3963:11598
3628:Seren
3581:email
3426:talk
3317:MONGO
2991:Spiel
2966:14GTR
2935:force
2806:78.26
2614:bolly
2604:Tolly
2439:Girth
2278:Light
2035:Hyper
1525:intan
1406:Katie
1350:now.
1310:RexxS
1291:Giant
1183:coder
703:civil
647:count
482:WP:AE
380:Leaky
262:limit
61:) at
16:<
6257:Talk
6201:talk
6167:talk
6145:2010
6121:talk
6103:talk
6086:talk
6069:talk
6030:Fish
5966:Addy
5964:per
5948:talk
5934:talk
5878:talk
5863:talk
5848:talk
5834:talk
5791:talk
5763:talk
5739:talk
5716:talk
5687:talk
5638:talk
5600:talk
5572:Ϣere
5530:work
5524:talk
5494:talk
5475:Eric
5459:talk
5412:said
5410:who
5397:this
5373:talk
5326:talk
5308:talk
5291:talk
5258:talk
5236:Talk
5218:talk
5200:talk
5176:talk
5155:talk
5121:talk
5096:talk
5079:talk
5023:ZLEA
5004:talk
4967:talk
4950:talk
4925:Talk
4888:talk
4858:talk
4818:"?!"
4801:talk
4744:talk
4727:talk
4713:talk
4696:talk
4679:talk
4659:Talk
4610:talk
4576:talk
4559:talk
4512:♥♥♥♥
4491:talk
4451:talk
4417:per
4367:talk
4321:talk
4304:talk
4264:brad
4233:talk
4216:talk
4198:talk
4170:talk
4152:talk
4120:talk
4100:talk
4049:talk
4032:talk
4014:L3X1
4001:talk
3984:talk
3917:talk
3900:talk
3862:talk
3844:talk
3827:talk
3785:Tera
3772:talk
3755:talk
3738:talk
3719:talk
3711:this
3709:And
3701:talk
3663:talk
3634:Dept
3573:talk
3529:talk
3525:WOPR
3493:talk
3475:Noah
3460:talk
3443:talk
3393:talk
3372:talk
3355:talk
3338:talk
3321:talk
3266:talk
3239:talk
3221:talk
3202:talk
3177:talk
3158:talk
3137:talk
3063:talk
3045:talk
3028:talk
2986:Ϣere
2970:talk
2953:talk
2914:talk
2897:talk
2856:talk
2835:talk
2791:talk
2755:talk
2722:talk
2670:talk
2654:talk
2633:talk
2591:talk
2557:talk
2540:talk
2523:talk
2506:talk
2489:talk
2425:talk
2377:talk
2357:work
2351:talk
2329:talk
2312:talk
2302:per
2291:talk
2289:🌀 (
2217:talk
2137:talk
2107:and
2088:talk
2071:talk
2040:cube
2030:Semi
1994:talk
1976:and
1954:Kuru
1938:talk
1910:talk
1890:talk
1873:talk
1836:Step
1826:talk
1786:talk
1757:talk
1725:talk
1702:talk
1679:talk
1662:talk
1624:talk
1607:talk
1590:talk
1573:talk
1569:ST47
1543:talk
1503:talk
1486:talk
1388:Talk
1371:talk
1314:talk
1308:. --
1278:talk
1264:Per
1253:talk
1236:talk
1188:talk
1166:talk
1129:talk
1111:talk
1089:talk
1047:talk
1029:talk
1012:talk
995:talk
978:talk
921:talk
902:Talk
873:talk
842:El_C
692:here
677:rfar
659:logs
627:talk
501:talk
427:talk
409:that
136:talk
78:talk
59:talk
6251:MJL
6247:. –
5414:, "
4933:) (
4834:AGK
4629:ich
4359:are
4248:JTP
3789:tix
3612:ray
3606:Big
3421:DGG
3374:) (
3301:The
2705:Why
2421:Deb
2410:\\
2281:and
2189:PMC
1839:hen
1620:Mz7
1442:gnu
1352:GAB
1151:🖋
1106:Joe
939:WBG
896:MJL
683:spi
653:AfD
581:13.
552:12.
522:11.
478:10.
471:PBS
264:of
6292::
6233:)
6227:(/
6203:)
6186:)
6184:📧
6169:)
6157:-
6123:)
6105:)
6088:)
6071:)
6054::
5950:)
5936:)
5880:)
5865:)
5850:)
5836:)
5793:)
5765:)
5741:)
5718:)
5689:)
5632:—
5630:-
5602:)
5527:|
5513:.
5496:)
5461:)
5426:——
5375:)
5328:)
5310:)
5293:)
5260:)
5252:.
5220:)
5197:|
5179:)
5123:)
5115:--
5098:)
5081:)
5006:)
4983:✉
4969:)
4952:)
4927:)
4919:--
4912:🦊
4890:)
4860:)
4803:)
4746:)
4729:)
4715:)
4698:)
4681:)
4623:–
4612:)
4594:)
4592:♫♬
4578:)
4561:)
4494:)
4482:—
4464:—
4453:)
4432:)
4426:(/
4383:C.
4369:)
4323:)
4306:)
4273:🍁
4235:)
4218:)
4200:)
4154:)
4122:)
4051:)
4034:)
4003:)
3986:)
3933:|
3919:)
3902:)
3864:)
3846:)
3829:)
3774:)
3757:)
3740:)
3721:)
3703:)
3665:)
3583:)
3579:·
3575:·
3531:)
3495:)
3462:)
3445:)
3428:)
3395:)
3378:)
3357:)
3340:)
3323:)
3298:--
3272:)
3268:•
3223:)
3188:,
3179:)
3139:)
3112:•
3098:MX
3065:)
3057:.
3047:)
3030:)
2972:)
2955:)
2916:)
2899:)
2880:@
2858:)
2837:)
2815:/
2793:)
2757:)
2724:)
2700:So
2672:)
2656:)
2648:.
2635:)
2593:)
2576:)
2559:)
2542:)
2525:)
2508:)
2491:)
2474:🐱
2472:)
2468:/
2460:–
2427:)
2379:)
2354:|
2331:)
2314:)
2306:.
2293:)
2219:)
2211:--
2191:♠
2171:SJ
2169:–
2139:)
2090:)
2073:)
2008:—
1980:.
1912:·
1892:)
1875:)
1775:—
1759:)
1727:)
1710:)
1687:)
1664:)
1626:)
1609:)
1592:)
1575:)
1545:)
1505:)
1488:)
1446:57
1426:|
1420:--
1393:📧
1373:)
1365:--
1316:)
1280:)
1255:)
1238:)
1194:)
1190:|
1168:)
1146:Mr
1131:)
1095:)
1091:|
1049:)
1031:)
1014:)
997:)
980:)
961:iz
923:)
875:)
671:lu
595:A:
562:A:
529:A:
503:)
492:A:
459:A:
453:9.
433:)
429:•
391:A.
385:8.
368:A:
362:7.
345:A:
339:6.
323:me
319:A:
308:5.
291:A:
285:4.
249:A:
243:3.
200:A:
194:2.
168:A:
162:1.
138:)
36:.
6259:‐
6255:‐
6221::
6217:@
6199:(
6182:(
6165:(
6119:(
6101:(
6084:(
6067:(
6033:+
6002:—
5992::
5988:@
5946:(
5932:(
5908:✡
5900:∰
5876:(
5861:(
5846:(
5832:(
5814:✡
5806:∰
5789:(
5761:(
5737:(
5714:(
5685:(
5666:-
5636:(
5598:(
5533:)
5521:(
5507::
5503:@
5492:(
5457:(
5452:.
5371:(
5324:(
5306:(
5289:(
5256:(
5238:)
5234:(
5216:(
5173:(
5157:)
5153:(
5134:)
5130:(
5119:(
5094:(
5077:(
5061:a
5059:c
5057:z
5055:a
5053:m
5038:\
5031:T
5002:(
4965:(
4948:(
4937:)
4929:(
4923:(
4886:(
4856:(
4840:■
4799:(
4742:(
4725:(
4711:(
4694:(
4677:(
4643:~
4608:(
4590:(
4574:(
4557:(
4550:C
4488:(
4449:(
4407:)
4405:¤
4403:|
4399:(
4395:—
4365:(
4335:œ
4319:(
4302:(
4266:v
4231:(
4214:(
4196:(
4172:)
4168:(
4150:(
4118:(
4073:°
4047:(
4030:(
3999:(
3982:(
3915:(
3898:(
3860:(
3842:(
3825:(
3793:₵
3770:(
3753:(
3736:(
3717:(
3699:(
3685:c
3683:|
3681:t
3661:(
3631:_
3614:ᗙ
3610:X
3604:D
3571:(
3552:T
3527:(
3491:(
3458:(
3441:(
3424:(
3391:(
3370:(
3353:(
3336:(
3319:(
3264:(
3242:)
3236:(
3219:(
3205:)
3199:(
3175:(
3161:)
3155:(
3135:(
3121:)
3116:✎
3107:✉
3101:(
3072:—
3061:(
3043:(
3026:(
2968:(
2951:(
2912:(
2895:(
2854:(
2833:(
2819:)
2811:(
2789:(
2753:(
2720:(
2668:(
2652:(
2631:(
2609:4
2589:(
2572:(
2555:(
2538:(
2521:(
2504:(
2487:(
2470:c
2466:t
2464:(
2423:(
2375:(
2360:)
2348:(
2327:(
2310:(
2215:(
2175:+
2152:F
2135:(
2086:(
2069:(
1996:)
1992:(
1916:)
1908:(
1888:(
1871:(
1828:)
1824:(
1788:)
1784:(
1755:(
1723:(
1705:·
1700:(
1682:·
1677:(
1660:(
1622:(
1605:(
1588:(
1571:(
1541:(
1522:Y
1501:(
1484:(
1470:✨
1369:(
1312:(
1276:(
1251:(
1234:(
1218:C
1214:·
1210:T
1186:(
1164:(
1149:X
1127:(
1113:)
1109:(
1087:(
1045:(
1027:(
1010:(
993:(
976:(
958:L
935:∯
919:(
904:‐
900:‐
892:–
890:)
886:(
871:(
736:e
729:t
722:v
695:.
685:)
680:·
674:·
668:·
662:·
656:·
650:·
643:·
636:·
630:·
625:(
542:œ
499:(
425:(
281:)
277:(
134:(
81:·
76:(
57:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.