Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Soxred93 3

136:. With all those responsibilities, over there, he has not once abused his position there. Nor on the odd case that a mistake been made, has he not been unapproachable, or unwilling to correct it himself. We regularly trust him there with one of the highest levels of access to private data, and, he is mature enough not to misuse that trust. Sysopping here on the english wikipedia entails even less. Based upon a review of his contributions here, he has made a couple mistakes, but, has always been willing to go back, and review and/or correct them just the same here, even if those mistakes are few in number. I personally greatly trust Soxred93, and, cannot see a valid reason that he should be not allowed to help out with the endless maintenance tasks here. 2069:- Even though I thought of making this a "weak support", in many ways I'm actually strongly supporting the candidate. I think he's a great user, perhaps should have been an admin already. ;-) However, while the issues raised in the Oppose/Neutral sections don't concern me very much, as long as he's careful at UAA and with pushing the buttons, I feel very comfortable about Soxred93 as an administrator. Like normal he should just start out slow with the tools, and other than that, I'd think he's very capable and well-experienced. 2895:, as I've come to learn, is an extremely sensitive area that requires some thought and discretion. It's not that Soxred has made a few mistakes out of hundreds and hundreds (that would not be enough to garner an oppose), it's that he obviously has the mentality that such usernames need to be blocked immediately, and if he worked at UAA he'd be that administrator. I cannot support this. It's way too bitey to newcomers and it's not fair for them to be knocked out of Knowledge for such an innocuous reason. 2992:. So, by your math, he's right 95% of the time in that arena, by mine, 98% of the time. Not bad, in my opinion. I bet, if you had caught those as they happened, and noted it on his talkpage, he would have corrected the mistake. I'm just not sure it's really grounds to deny the bit over. Good sysops make mistakes all the time, it's how we deal with those mistakes, that is really important. 902:

they were blocked. Just a message that says "Sorry, you'll have to pick another name" is harmless. If potentially good contributors quit because they had a confusing username, they should really get a thicker skin. They probably aren't suited to editing anyway if they get offended by something as minor as a polite message asking them to choose another name. There's so many worse things.

2794:"(which isn't a good trait for an admin or anyone else), thus the attitude of this user probably isn't the best attitude for an admin to have. However, this user has shown a need for the tools, and a solid knowledge of the policies he will be working with as an admin(for the most part), thus I will support his Rfa. Those two things outweigh his possible attitude problem.-- 212:, I have done a sizable amount of developing work for the tool there (I don't know if people remember that I made the original tool), and also have created a lot of accounts. However, I need to be an admin to fill out a large amount of requests there, as they are too similar to an existing username. I already participate at 3222:

crux of my complaint/concern I think. It's a bitey area. New editors (young in particular) will choose these lackadaisical or frivolous looking usernames unaware of our policies. Soxred has obviously made it clear through his actions that he will block these users without warning or notification. I cannot support that.

1048:-- looked reasonable at the time, but I would recommend checking prior histories before deleting. Sometimes an article has been vandalized. But I saw lots more accurate CSD taggings. I would discard the plus system you use for edit summaries. Something more conventional and less opaque would be better. 3674:

I have to second Xenocidic's comment, and also point out his curious answer to Pedro's question here. I would think being an Admin is primarily about dealing with people of all ages and levels of emotional passion to Knowledge; the buttons are part of the responsibility, not the driving force. While

3628:

Sure if it was a random one-off biting of some newbie, I can understand that, but this is standing message on their talk page pretty much assuming that people are coming to "whine and complain" and smacks of arrogance ("I do not really want to go through your contributions just to find that the error

897:

When I was promoted to admin, there was no such section in the policy that there is today. That a small group of people decided to implement such a thing a couple of months ago is irrelevant to me. Knowledge is supposed to be a respectable website. With names like djdyt6u6rdhgfhgf how can anyone take

901:

We aren't that desperate for people that we should accept any old random string of text as a username. There is such a thing as assuming too much good faith. Yes, you can quote examples of users with confusing names who contributed positively, but they would have done so anyway regardless of whether

3221:

Ok, well we obviously do not agree. Not to divert away from Soxred's RfA, but we allow IP addresses to edit - a rather confusing means of identification if you ask me. Secondly, exactly how would anyone really be confused over the first three examples? Rhetorical perhaps. Anyway, you're missing the

843:

Pretty tall assumption there Majorly. Yeah, let's just hardblock every user who choses a name that looks lazy and random. They couldn't possibly want to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Do you really think we should turn away potential contributors like that? I thought that's how this

3612:

Doesn't everyone bite from time to time? Now probably isn't the best time for me to make this comment actually, cos I'm annoyed at something in RL, but every editor, admin or not, will have been bitey at some point in their wiki-career, whether it be on-wiki, on IRC, to a newbie, to an admin, on a

3107:

I have to agree with wisdom here. Its an issue we must consider. Is it ok to have new users blocked for a something minor like this which they may not realise is problem?. If I was one of those blocked, I would have a very good opinion of the wikipedia community at all. Soxred's mistake is a small

125:, I would nom him myself, had I had the chance to do so. I believe, that it is still early enough in this RFA, to add one more nomination. Had I known about this sooner, I would have added my nomination sooner. If this is inappropriate (I can't see how), please move this to the discussion section. 3337:

See my comments above. I think soxred needs a bit more practice with the UAA reports. Its a bit unfortunate considering he'd be a pretty good admin when it comes to other aspects. But I think if he works at UAA for a while and shows a change in the way he approaches it he should be fine next time

3039:

I appreciate and respect differences of opinion SQL, but as I explained above it's not a matter of a few wrong reports out of a 100 and then computing a rough percentage. Goodness knows people can make a few errors. My problem is that I do not trust this user to block at UAA because it is obvious

306:

I do not think so. Being an admin is about the tools, and the judgement placed with them. While I do think that article writing is a good thing to do, there are the few of us who just don't excel in it. That does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of judgement, or misunderstanding of the

3563:

Adminship is about improving the encyclopedia, the tools are just that, tools. The core business of the encyclopedia is content, and I am unable to locate sufficent engagement with writing content. This combined with the above does not allow me to recomend promortion of this candidate. -

2495:

I was trying to look for a reason to go neutral other then to article building. However, when I find my self looking at the move log, I know I can't find anything. I would've went neutral, but some people might think that me doing so because he likes the Red Sox would be a personal attack.

220:, and I have both bookmarked. I have made many Editprotected requests, and most of the time, they were implemented. Occasionally, I have even been asked by an admin to help complete an EP request. Part of the reason my last RfA failed was due to the fact that I tagged obvious logos with {{ 2863:

I usually try not to heckle opposers (especially you, Wisdom) but if those 5 are his only mistakes among the 100 or so edits he's made to UAA, is that really cause for concern? Also, the last three of those (IMO) were good calls. Is there another reason for your oppose that I don't get?

334:

That is a list to myself, that I'm not sure why I created. I think that I found that I had some experience in admin related areas I wasn't too aware of until then (like the Editprotected requests). Also, multiple people wanted to co-nom, and I just told them to put it in that

3689:

Being an admin is just the technical matter of having a few more buttons, combined with the responsibility not to abuse them. While being able to deal with people is a big plus, it's something that can be done by any editor. I personally feel that adminship is overrated. :-)

1114:

Whilst I have some minor reservations, the lack of article work is balanced by the excellent contributions technically. A dedicated Wikipedian who has worked hard to clear the concerns in earlier RFA's. I'm sure Soxred will tread lightly, so on balance the tools would be a

3071:

Also, about the users being blocked. Administrators aren't perfect either (this is not directed at anyone in particular), so they can make bad calls from time to time. They're human. So, just because a few admins actually blocked the users doesn't really change my stance.

3456:

earned their bitey-ness. At UAA, they didn't do anything but violate a policy they've never heard of. When a guy signs up for Knowledge, and the next day finds himself indef blocked with the block summary "inapropriate username" or "confusing username", all he sees is

1027:

per above. Those usernames were either confusing because of long letter repetitions or appeared to be random. I would have suggested that the user seek a rename before going for the block, but those usernames needed changing. Not enought for me to oppose over.

918:

Well, I suppose I don't have say that I disagree, but I'll do it anyway. What I don't understand then is this. If it's so easy to politely ask a user to change their username with a template (or personal message), and of course there's the existence of

3839:

Adminship is also about understanding core policy and guidelines in the mainspace. An individual who rarely, if ever, writes content might be unfamiliar with the disputes that arise during article building. This would obviously be beneficial for

3403:

Um, UAA is for blocking people. What in the world could a UAA report mean besides "I want this person blocked"? There's nothing to assume. Do you think it's only admin candidates with thousands of edits who deserve good faith, and not newbies?

3523:. Three RfAdm's in 6 months suggests career mandarinship. Answer to question 3 is evasive. Answer to question two is very non-persuasive. Lack of interest in content writing is a bad sign. These three reasons together add up to an oppose. -- 252:

contributions. A lot of people will notice I have had not a lot of real article building experience. This is due to one reason only: English is one of my worst subjects, I am not very good at article writing. Therefore, I have joined the

3202:

policy shouldn't be brought to RFA by opposing candidates that don't agree with or are simply unaware of those motions— especially when there is clearly still disagreement over that section as actually reflecting current policy

3705:

Point taken, but in this case I am getting the sense (based on a couple of responses cited here) that the candidate is more interested in tools than people. Whether he will use them correctly is something I cannot determine.

3310:

The "stuff to volunteer for list" doesn't bother me much, although you should already know where you want to work. But, as Wisdom said, the UAA reports show a certain bitey-ness that makes me think you might need some more

84:) - Part of a co-nomination here. I have seen this user around a lot, and between him and his bots, he really accounts for a lot of positive edits on Knowledge. I think he has the smarts and everything to become an admin. 2781:

The concerns Wisdom has brought up are valid, and worry me a little worried, however, since I see no other issues with this user, I'm going to support him. The correct way to deal with confusing user names according to

299:

You don't appear to have done much, if any, actuall content writing since your last RFA. Do you feel that your lack of recent participation in writing articles could cause problems in being an effective administrator?

1829:

This user's development work to benefit wikipedia (the bots, the tools) is impressive. I see no reason not to trust him/her with the tools. Why not give a great technical contributor the technical buttons?

2284:

as sysop. No major concerns about his wielding the mop, and meets all my standards. My only concern is his deletionism, but I am on record aleady for voting for some others of that ilk, so I will go along.

490: 829:

Per Wisdom89. Thank you for bringing up excellent examples of good reporting! All of those names reported should have been blocked there and then. No serious user would ever make such a confusing username.

484: 3558:

This is the most explicit passing the buck, but there are several on the page. Adminstrator's are required to take responsibility for their own actions, without appeal to developers or IRC or whatnot.

3487:

Ohana, you make it sound like I'm against all UAA reports. No, I'm against irresponsible ones, where there are better ways to fix the problem than blocking but the reporter hasn't tried any of them.

3269:

Per Q2 and Wisdom. When it comes to blocking newbies for stuff that isn't against the policy we link to (at least, confusing wasn't last time I checked), we should darn well look for perfection.

2786:

is to leave a message requesting that the user change his name. After that you should wait, and see if he requests that his name be changed. If he does, then thats great, and if he doesn't, he

1996:

It is quite obvious to me that he can be trusted with the tools. He's been a proven asset to Knowledge for a quite awhile. If he's not worthy of a mop, I honestly don't know who would be.

3548:

way to proceed. While I'm happy to discuss the complexity of this offline, it's unacceptable to me. New contributors (the most likely to make mistakes) are easily driven off. To expect

2676:. I've had good interactions with this user. I think the user's bot did something weird once, and I asked him about it, and user was very friendly and helpful in resolving the problem. 3142:

Right, so it was a mistake for Soxred93 to report him to UAA. Since he needed to be blocked for vandalism (much different in effect from a username block), he should have been on AIV.

2685:

Sheesh, Sox, I see what this is all about. You just can't wait for Tyler to get the anti-spoof override for Account Creator's working, can you? Well, despite this obvious lack of

602:

Indeed, sox had the brilliant idea for a tool in the first place, and, had written and designed the first version of it, and, when school got in the way of development (it's a

171:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

345:

In case of long term abuse, what are your plans? Do you think you will be able to handle this job? Helping track serial sockpuppeters (AKA Grawp) or the other ones... --

267:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

1554:.A brilliant editor. Maintains the best bots on Knowledge(other than the almighty Clue Bot), wont abuse the admin tools, and only wants them to make Knowledge better. 3193: 1059: 1054: 1034: 3715: 3700: 3638: 2573:- I was sure I'd supported this already, oh well. Soxred93 is a fantastic guy - knows a lot about the wiki and is extremely helpful, two very important points. 3675:

I have no criticism on the other responses, I have qualms about giving the tools to this candidate based solely on the response to the fourth question. Sorry.

3178: 3162: 3137: 327:

I have removed that section, because the RfA is going on and I don't need that list anymore. For all those that are wondering what it is, it is in the history.

3834: 3482: 2121: 2110: 3660: 3507: 3447: 3886: 3216: 3098: 2979: 2956: 2921: 2886: 2358: 2346: 2333: 949: 870: 3198:

A quick note: I would have softblocked all of those, because, yes, they are confusing and/or random. Moreover, in my opinion, the attempts to change the

3828:

In #4, I have to agree with Soxred93 here. Adminship is about the tools, not content writing, so I don't know why this question is unsatisfying for you.

3759: 1646:- trustworthy editor. Unconvinced by oppose arguments, four of the five accounts listed by Wisdom89 have been blocked indefinitely; the other received a 1074: 1049: 1029: 980: 685: 3248: 2696:

because I can't open my inbox without having at least one accounts-enwiki e-mail from you, and if that's not dedication, I don't know what is! S.A, aka

1009:

per my esteemed colleagues, above. Sox is a good editor and a skilled bot op, and I think adminship would be a net positive in this case. Full support.

913: 892: 460: 3732: 1792: 1760: 1283: 597: 3066: 3000: 730: 717: 614: 561: 3778: 3300: 2532: 2318: 1917: 3424: 3398: 3119: 3905: 2501: 2048: 396: 3800: 575: 359: 3861: 3223: 3073: 3041: 3034: 2931: 2896: 2833: 1999: 924: 845: 3589:, we hardly knew you), I find the tone of item # 4 on his talk page instructions to be rather bitey. Unbecoming of an admin, at the very least. 1070: 224:}}, a mistake I hadn't learned about. Now, I have learned, and I have helped with the upload log once more. I have gotten no complaints since. 3725: 1279: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2597: 1622: 1392: 1839: 1769: 1714: 694: 418: 413: 278: 122: 1821: 94: 3923: 3570: 2680: 2464: 1988: 1530: 1356: 1249:- SQL's nom say's it all! This user is very trustworthy, fixes his errors and is not immature in the way he manages things. Good Luck! 1241: 2930:

policy. It's been a while since confusing usernames were considered for blocking. There have been many discussions about this before.

2747: 2487: 2229: 1887: 1271: 3623: 3464:. You might as well put up a picture of Jimbo Wales T-Bagging a dead body on COD4 with a little "You →" marker pointing towards it.-- 1703: 1569: 1308: 1180: 1094: 1039: 1019: 923:, why is it so difficult for you to see my position? Surely these options are better than a report to UAA without any communication. 799: 408: 3823: 2708: 1908: 1638: 1441: 1420: 3684: 2729: 2276: 1971: 1929: 1665: 1494: 1001: 65: 3607: 3040:

that they will turn away potential users for non-violations. In other words, they will most likely continue down this bitey path.

2061: 1680: 1581: 1475: 1339: 1086:

Seems ready for the mop. I honestly don't see the problem with Wisdom's diffs, as I would reported those usernames just the same.

166: 160: 2668: 2411: 2381: 2084: 2003: 1372:

since the last RFA is not much of a reason to oppose. The most important matter is whether or not he can use the tools wisely. --

1162: 838: 781: 3329: 2858: 2565: 2549: 2302: 2259: 2147: 2095: 2040: 2020: 1950: 1457: 1322: 1078: 752: 668: 3737: 3015: 2773: 2637: 2620: 2170: 1604: 1287: 1195: 536: 392: 3381: 3349: 2436: 2210: 2183: 1861: 1513: 1135: 643: 110: 3527: 3282: 2516: 2245: 1807: 1737: 1347:- I see growth over the course of your RfA's, and a willingness to heed the well meaning advice of the community. Good luck! 1106: 447: 3204: 2984:

No one is perfect, 100% of the time. 100 UAA reports, if the above is correct, 5 of them in your opinion bad (I should note

2803: 1546: 656: 3006: 2458: 1521:

Good user. Bots and portals are off the beaten path, but everything counts. I disagreee with Wisdom89 in oppose number 1.

821: 1958:

Trusted user, waited a good amount of time before running another RfA, solid noms and answers, and no convincing opposes.

1264: 375:

for updates on him especially, but all sorts of those people. Even though it is a difficult job, I feel that I can do it.

317: 1698: 1092: 1015: 3206: 3019: 2526: 1413: 1219: 454: 1927: 33: 17: 3012: 2961:

Ah, okay. :-) Thanks for clarifying, I think I'm leaning more towards opposing now... But first, I'm off to bed.--

371:, we're finding out new ways that we can stop Grawp (yes, Grawp is at the ACC tool). I plan to occasionally check 1881: 241: 3880: 3480: 3327: 3242: 3092: 3060: 2977: 2950: 2915: 2884: 2852: 2654: 1869:

Quid pro quo, and they're good with bots, helped me out a little, I don't see why Sox wouldnt be a fine admin.

1758: 943: 864: 772: 507: 440: 81: 3009: 2137: 1946: 478: 606:

of work...), asked me to maintain it (I decided to re-write it from scratch, and, had him help me test it).

1618: 2790:

should be blocked. An admin must have the right attitude, and some of this users actions indicate he is "

1380: 3026:

other independent admins that agreed that those were confusing enough to warrant a preventative block.)

2891:

Hey Koji, I don't consider questions heckling at all, especially from you. I'll try to explain further.

2351:

Dang, that's the second time I've done that in the past two weeks — thanks for cleaning up after me! —

3904:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

2510: 1835: 1783: 1728: 708: 128:

Soxred93 is in my opinion, an extremely trusted user. He is an approved user, an administrator, and, a

3542:"Do not revert the bot's edits to your userpages or templates, because the bot will just do it again." 1656:. Given the candidate has made over a 100 user name reports, an occasional mistake is understandable. 1045: 281:, regarding how I deal with it. I don't think there's anything left to say that wasn't in my last RfA. 3565: 2045:

Seen this user around, and didn't see anything negative recently; improved a lot since the last RfA.

1813: 2404: 257:. This allows me to make some good contributions, without worrying about the parts I am not good at. 3552:

to do the work of finding/reading that notice and further to accept it gracefully is just too much.

3174: 3133: 2453: 1984: 1526: 1352: 960:

I am surprised, Majorly. I wouldn't have expected you to so baldly assume bad faith from newbies.

472: 2633: 2574: 2480: 2224: 1876: 1614: 1257: 1116: 807:

Although his blatant POV is obvious in his username, that might be a problem within the cabal. ·

3005:

Oh, of those 5, I should note, I'm not the only one who felt some of them needed to be blocked.

566:

What exactly do you mean by "first real user"? I presume you are talking about the toolserver?

514: 320:

Looks a bit odd to me. Why did you need to remind yourself what to volunteer for during an RFA?

1694: 1562: 1373: 1304: 1295:- This guy has to one of the most helpful people I've ever talked to, definete admin material. 1175: 1090: 244:). These are probably some of my best contributions. In addition, I am pleased with my work at 3814:. The candidate's answers to some of the questions, particularly #1 and #4, are unsatisfying. 3536:

below. Some further concerns I have arise from the warning template on Soxred93's user page.

2988:

is actually policy) of those 5, I agree with 3 out of 5 of those, per my own interpertaion of

3819: 3724:

Neutral. Per that rather strange 'volunteer RfA' list, some dodgy UAA reports and Xenocidic.

3443: 3189: 2985: 2762: 2106: 1904: 1831: 1435: 1407: 1214: 3578: 905:

And despite it apparently being policy, admins still continue to block! Good on them I say.

626: 3711: 3680: 2724: 2272: 2218:

I've seen SoxRed around, and have no reason to doubt his trustworthiness with the tools. --

1965: 1922: 1810: 1661: 1650: 995: 789:

User has my full trust, and I feel aboslutely certain that they would not abuse tools. :-)

2809: 273:

Nothing serious. Just your general conflict. I have recently started to get involved with

8: 3634: 3603: 3595: 3170: 3129: 2677: 2448: 2445: 2355: 2330: 2054: 1980: 1801: 1677: 1522: 1348: 1335: 1232: 85: 60: 3108:

mistake on paper but for the users who were blocked it wouldn't be such a small thing.

1167:

Finally someone who can do the complicated and technical template edits that come up in

3870: 3752: 3653: 3475: 3322: 3232: 3082: 3050: 2972: 2940: 2905: 2879: 2866:(I'll admit I'm not terribly familiar with the Username policy or how UAA reports work) 2842: 2739: 2661: 2473: 2398: 2377: 2219: 2155:– Per above, even though I haven't read much of the above. Trustworthy user, though. — 2077: 1871: 1753: 1250: 1153: 933: 854: 769: 590: 554: 503: 466: 434: 153: 75: 525: 3693: 3616: 3183:

I concur. I wouldn't be able to remember the username if I were the account creator.

2697: 2561: 2545: 2387: 2298: 2290: 2140: 2034: 2016: 1942: 1690: 1555: 1296: 1172: 1087: 1010: 792: 727: 682: 665: 3585:

While I would like to support as the editor does great work with their bots (R.I.P.

2293:) 18:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC) P.S. This is not an endorsement of his board candidacy. 760:

Gah! (next time you should tell me before you do something like this){full support}

3815: 3499: 3438: 3416: 3373: 3343: 3184: 3154: 3125: 3113: 2767: 2613: 2163: 2101: 1899: 1632: 1596: 1431: 1399: 1209: 972: 381: 274: 45: 1502:

I've seen this user and his bots around the wiki frequently and he deserves it. —

3792: 3707: 3676: 3556:"Unfortunately, that is a Pywikipedia error. I have no control over that, sorry." 3437:(which is worse than UAA, because they were denied even the chance to register). 3295: 3277: 2717: 2428: 2268: 2198: 2179: 1959: 1657: 1483: 1128: 992: 887: 637: 528:. He is a developer, and an administrator there, as well as our first real user. 3849: 3630: 3599: 3591: 3545: 2926:

Also, for a user who has been editing there regularly, he doesn't seem to know

2506: 2352: 2327: 2241: 2143: 1816: 1777: 1722: 1674: 1577: 1466: 1365: 1331: 1204: 702: 674: 571: 277:, and have dealt with conflicts there. Pretty much the same stuff applies from 254: 249: 245: 55: 1688:

trustworthy, been involved in different areas, will do good with the tools. --

3917: 3898:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3853: 3845: 3841: 3830: 3765: 3743: 3644: 3586: 3465: 3453: 3430: 3396: 3387: 3312: 3032: 2998: 2962: 2892: 2869: 2799: 2646: 2392: 2373: 2316: 2070: 1743: 1146: 920: 907: 832: 808: 763: 654: 612: 581: 545: 534: 521: 430: 388: 372: 368: 217: 213: 209: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 144: 103: 71: 3857: 3470: 3434: 3317: 2967: 2874: 2557: 2541: 2339: 2294: 2286: 2251: 2134: 2117: 2091: 2029: 2012: 1938: 1748: 1450: 1317: 1316:

editor has done good work with SoxBot and not shown any reasons to oppose.

746: 221: 205: 3629:

was yours, not mine"). If the language were softened, I would reconsider.

3357:

per Wisdom. Soxred93 wants to block newbies for extremely minor problems,

2818:- Candidate believes that "confusing" usernames should be blocked at UAA. 1368:, but Adminship is not a big deal, and whether or not Sox has contributed 3488: 3405: 3362: 3339: 3199: 3143: 3109: 2989: 2927: 2783: 2757: 2629: 2608: 2156: 1590: 1186: 961: 876: 3784: 3524: 3289: 3271: 3209: 2423: 2326:

with confidence that this nominee will use the tools appropriately. —

2193: 2175: 1849: 1504: 1122: 881: 347: 289: 208:, and images with no source/license/FUR/orphaned for over 7 days. With 3908:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

2498: 2237: 1610: 1447:

Would have co-nommed but lives on the other side of the world support

1103: 567: 107: 580:

Until I came along, the only accounts on the tool were made by SQL.

3391: 3027: 3022:

which, in my opinion, was probably sufficiently confusing. (that's

2993: 2795: 2311: 1539: 990:

I don't think the 'pedia will asplode if the user is given +sysop.

649: 607: 529: 506:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 117: 1330:

Great bot work, and willingness to act on constructive criticism.

367:

Well, Grawps are pretty obvious. Those, I can handle. In fact, at

121:: I apologize for the late nomination, but, as I said in Soxred's 1673:

We need admins who really know the score. This nominee does. —

1168: 2072: 3128:, it was because he was actually vandalising the encyclopedia. 2079: 1563: 722:

I'm sorry, are you questioning my infallible judgment? Oh, and

133: 102:- Soxred93 runs several bots and also has been helping out at 1556: 141:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

3287:

Strong oppose per Q4 and the bitey banner on his talk page.

2472:

Good editor. I'm sure this user will do great with the mop.

541:

Due to the fact that you asked me to test out the new tool.

2716:- You are an excellent editor. Keep doing what you do. ~~ 1937:-- Thought you already were an admin. = ) Best of luck, -- 2524:

due to no memorable negative interactions. Sincerely, --

29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

3429:

Rspeer, same could have applied to tonnes of pages like

2540:

seems good editor and a skilled bot op. valuable admin.

1428:. My past interactions have been positive. Good luck, 664:, no indication user would abuse or misuse the tools. -- 288:

Additional rather mean but well intended Questions from

234:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

2791: 2035: 2030: 673:

Upon further review, "Soxred" appears to refer to the

1709:

LIKE OMG U CAN HAZ ADMINZ AND CHEEZBURGER SUPPORT!!!1

1203:- Excellent technical contributions, evidently has a 3766: 3169:

I think blocks on all five usernames are justified.

2393: 1397:

I have no problem with his RfA volunteering list. –

809: 3793: 3785: 3534:"Adminship is about the tools, not content writing" 526:

http://toolserver.org/~sql/acc/users.php?viewuser=4

318:

User:Soxred93/Desk#Stuff_to_volunteer_for_in_an_RfA

3598:) 12:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Switching to support. 1847:OMG! HE HAS A EXTREMELY STRONG SUPPORT FROM ME! -- 3915: 1207:(which is more important than you might think!) 875:Wisdom89's opposition is in accordance with the 178:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 3643:I have made it less bitey, per your comments. 2399: 1609:I fully support you for your contributions to 134:tool we use to help with account creation here 635:. Believe he will use the tools responsibly. 3544:As a programmer, I find this a suprisingly 106:. I think he would make a good admin. -- 3742:Did you want that in the support section? 3532:I almost swallowed my biscuit when I read 240:As many of you know, I run many bots (see 726:for you too. Your sig is way too long. -- 3783:I just notified Shapiros about this. -- 2444:- Great editor & vandal fighter. -- 1630:Cant see why not, seen him around heaps 502:Please keep discussion constructive and 53:Final (87/7/3); Closed as successful by 2310:: He's not running for the board AFAIK 14: 3916: 2607: 2525: 2115:You guys won't let me have any fun :p 1979:per noms comments, and answer to Q.4. 3386:And, yet you lectured majorly about 1916:This should've happened a while ago 1069:. Valuable member of the community. 2421: 2338:Indented per support number 42 ;) 1231:as nom, and my otters support too. 520:Soxred93's activity at the present 116:Post-transclusion Co-Nomination by 23: 2481: 690:So you wanna, uh, move your vote? 184:Pretty much I plan to help out at 24: 3935: 3924:Successful requests for adminship 3613:talk page, on a policy page. :-) 419:Requests for adminship/Soxred93 3 414:Requests for adminship/Soxred93 2 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3873: 3863: 3235: 3225: 3085: 3075: 3053: 3043: 2986:Knowledge:U#Confusing_usernames 2943: 2933: 2908: 2898: 2845: 2835: 2706: 2699: 2429: 2424: 2405: 2340: 2253: 2205: 2199: 2194: 1856: 1853: 1540: 1508: 1505: 1451: 1364:, Good editor. I don't want to 936: 926: 857: 847: 409:Requests for adminship/Soxred93 354: 351: 242:Special:Prefixindex/User:SoxBot 3692: 3615: 3476: 3466: 3323: 3313: 2973: 2963: 2880: 2870: 2738: 2698: 2474: 2252: 1966: 1960: 1754: 1744: 1145: 791: 508:Special:Contributions/Soxred93 395:. For the edit count, see the 13: 1: 2725: 2718: 2342:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 1453:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 1387: 1381: 1154: 1044:Further elaboration. I found 3471: 3318: 3016:Gdghdgncfnfgfgfffhfhfhfhfhfh 2968: 2875: 2740: 2691: 2528:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 2202: 1850: 1784: 1778: 1770: 1766: 1749: 1729: 1723: 1715: 1711: 1210: 879:; Majorly's whining is not. 709: 703: 695: 691: 348: 7: 1742:.............Bloody hell.-- 1384: 1374: 1297: 1147: 391:'s edit summary usage with 167:Questions for the candidate 10: 3940: 2628:, seems like a fine user. 1897:Wow, flashing support sign 1895:I trust him, enough said. 1802:Cheese placed, not dropped 1224:17:12, June 13, 2008 (UTC) 3887:19:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3835:17:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3824:06:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3801:22:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3779:20:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3760:20:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3738:15:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3716:07:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3701:16:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3685:13:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3661:19:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3639:18:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3624:16:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3608:19:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3571:00:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3528:18:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3508:05:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3483:05:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3448:05:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3425:04:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3399:04:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3382:04:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3350:06:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 3330:20:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3301:04:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3283:08:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3249:20:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3217:20:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 3194:04:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3179:22:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3163:05:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3138:19:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3120:13:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3099:06:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3067:06:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3035:05:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 3001:05:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2980:04:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2957:04:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2922:04:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2887:04:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2859:03:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2804:02:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 2774:22:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2748:21:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2730:17:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2709:06:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2681:00:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2669:23:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 2638:09:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 2621:06:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 2598:21:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2566:16:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2550:14:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2533:06:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2517:01:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2488:23:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2465:23:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2437:23:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2412:23:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2382:22:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2359:04:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2347:21:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2334:20:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2319:19:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2303:19:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2277:17:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2260:04:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2246:04:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2230:22:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2211:21:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2191:- done some good work. 2184:20:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2171:20:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2148:16:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2122:12:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2111:02:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2096:23:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 2085:12:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2062:12:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2041:12:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2021:06:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2004:04:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 1989:23:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1972:19:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1951:17:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1930:16:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1909:04:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1888:03:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1862:03:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1840:03:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1822:03:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1793:02:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1761:02:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1738:02:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1704:02:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1681:01:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1666:01:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1639:00:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1623:00:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1605:23:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1582:23:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1570:23:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1547:22:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1531:22:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1514:22:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1495:22:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1476:22:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1458:22:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1442:21:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1421:20:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1393:19:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1357:19:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1340:19:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1323:18:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1309:18:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1288:17:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1272:17:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1242:17:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1196:16:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1181:16:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1163:15:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1136:13:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1107:13:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1095:13:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1079:13:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1060:13:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1040:13:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1020:12:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1002:11:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 981:04:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 950:04:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 914:00:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 893:00:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 871:19:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 839:09:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 822:09:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 800:07:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 782:06:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 753:05:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 731:03:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 718:03:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 686:16:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 669:05:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 657:05:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 644:03:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 615:06:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 598:18:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 576:18:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 562:17:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 537:05:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 360:03:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 161:01:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 111:02:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 95:01:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 66:03:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3901:Please do not modify it. 3007:Madsciene666666666666666 844:place thrived. Oh well. 3764:I think so, hehe. :P · 3124:As the guy who blocked 38:Please do not modify it 1345:Red Sox Nation Support 1552:Supper strong support 1046:one dicey CSD tagging 100:Co-nomination by Cobi 34:request for adminship 2694:Super-Strong Support 2100:Definitely netural? 428:Links for Soxred93: 1465:, see no problems. 648:Per my nomination. 403:RfAs for this user: 255:Knowledge Spotlight 3858:dispute resolution 3388:assuming bad faith 3359:without discussion 3020:WUpD8FS1a0r2R09pzJ 2772: 2689:, I'll give you a 2028:Most definitely.-- 2011:Per last time. -- 1860: 1637: 1615:BuickCenturyDriver 510:before commenting. 358: 39: 3882: 3877: 3833: 3736: 3459:You've Just Been 3244: 3239: 3215: 3094: 3089: 3062: 3057: 2952: 2947: 2917: 2912: 2867: 2854: 2849: 2756: 2692:DIVINELY INSPIRED 2645:He'll do fine. -- 2514: 2435: 2408: 2380: 2169: 2060: 1898: 1848: 1702: 1631: 1538:. Seems good. :) 1419: 1375:Mizu onna sango15 1321: 1239: 1225: 1178: 1158: 1134: 1018: 945: 940: 866: 861: 777: 346: 92: 37: 3931: 3903: 3881: 3875: 3871: 3865: 3829: 3795: 3787: 3776: 3756: 3748: 3730: 3728: 3698: 3696: 3657: 3649: 3621: 3619: 3568: 3505: 3502: 3495: 3492: 3478: 3473: 3468: 3422: 3419: 3412: 3409: 3394: 3379: 3376: 3369: 3366: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3243: 3237: 3233: 3227: 3214: 3212: 3160: 3157: 3150: 3147: 3093: 3087: 3083: 3077: 3061: 3055: 3051: 3045: 3030: 2996: 2975: 2970: 2965: 2951: 2945: 2941: 2935: 2916: 2910: 2906: 2900: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2865: 2853: 2847: 2843: 2837: 2770: 2765: 2760: 2746: 2744: 2727: 2722: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2693: 2666: 2659: 2651: 2618: 2616: 2611: 2605:No qualms here. 2594: 2592: 2590: 2588: 2586: 2531: 2529: 2515: 2504: 2485: 2478: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2434: 2431: 2426: 2419: 2409: 2406: 2401: 2395: 2376: 2344: 2314: 2256: 2255: 2227: 2222: 2207: 2204: 2201: 2196: 2161: 2146: 2081: 2074: 2059: 2057: 2046: 2037: 2032: 2002: 1968: 1962: 1896: 1886: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1832:AubreyEllenShomo 1791: 1786: 1780: 1772: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1736: 1731: 1725: 1717: 1689: 1655: 1649: 1635: 1580: 1567: 1560: 1544: 1510: 1507: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1473: 1455: 1440: 1416: 1410: 1405: 1402: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1376: 1320: 1301: 1269: 1262: 1255: 1237: 1235: 1234:Ten Pound Hammer 1212: 1208: 1192: 1176: 1171:! Best of luck, 1160: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1133: 1131: 1120: 1057: 1052: 1037: 1032: 1014: 998: 978: 975: 968: 965: 944: 938: 934: 928: 910: 865: 859: 855: 849: 835: 819: 797: 795: 780: 775: 766: 749: 716: 711: 705: 697: 652: 640: 610: 594: 586: 558: 550: 544: 532: 494: 453: 382:General comments 356: 353: 350: 157: 149: 90: 88: 87:Ten Pound Hammer 63: 3939: 3938: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3906:this nomination 3899: 3885: 3876: 3754: 3746: 3726: 3694: 3655: 3647: 3617: 3581: 3566: 3503: 3500: 3493: 3490: 3420: 3417: 3410: 3407: 3392: 3390:. Interesting. 3377: 3374: 3367: 3364: 3346: 3299: 3281: 3247: 3238: 3210: 3158: 3155: 3148: 3145: 3116: 3097: 3088: 3065: 3056: 3028: 3018:, leaving only 3013:ZODi90000005555 2994: 2955: 2946: 2920: 2911: 2857: 2848: 2812: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2737:- good editor. 2678:Good Ol’factory 2662: 2655: 2647: 2643:Delayed support 2614: 2609: 2584: 2582: 2580: 2578: 2576: 2527: 2497: 2459: 2454: 2449: 2312: 2267:– No concerns. 2225: 2220: 2133: 2055: 2047: 1997: 1882: 1877: 1872: 1870: 1789: 1765:Long story.... 1734: 1653: 1647: 1633: 1613:. Good luck. 1575: 1488: 1486: 1484: 1467: 1429: 1414: 1408: 1400: 1265: 1258: 1251: 1233: 1188: 1159: 1129: 1121: 1055: 1050: 1035: 1030: 996: 976: 973: 966: 963: 948: 939: 908: 891: 877:username policy 869: 860: 833: 793: 778: 764: 761: 747: 714: 677:. Switching to 650: 638: 629: 608: 592: 584: 556: 548: 542: 530: 517: 446: 429: 425: 423: 384: 169: 155: 147: 86: 54: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3937: 3927: 3926: 3911: 3910: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3872: 3868: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3610: 3580: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3553: 3530: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3485: 3452:The people at 3352: 3344: 3332: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3293: 3275: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3234: 3230: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3130:Hiberniantears 3114: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3084: 3080: 3052: 3048: 2982: 2942: 2938: 2924: 2907: 2903: 2844: 2840: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2776: 2750: 2732: 2711: 2683: 2671: 2640: 2623: 2600: 2568: 2552: 2535: 2519: 2490: 2467: 2442:Strong Support 2439: 2414: 2384: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2321: 2279: 2262: 2248: 2232: 2213: 2186: 2173: 2150: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2087: 2064: 2043: 2023: 2006: 1991: 1981:LessHeard vanU 1974: 1953: 1932: 1911: 1890: 1864: 1842: 1824: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1775: 1720: 1706: 1683: 1668: 1641: 1625: 1607: 1584: 1572: 1549: 1533: 1516: 1497: 1478: 1460: 1444: 1423: 1395: 1366:use the cliché 1359: 1349:Hiberniantears 1342: 1325: 1311: 1290: 1277:Strong support 1274: 1247:Strong support 1244: 1238:and his otters 1226: 1198: 1183: 1165: 1151: 1138: 1119:. Good luck. 1109: 1100:Strong support 1097: 1081: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1022: 1004: 985: 984: 983: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 935: 931: 903: 899: 885: 856: 852: 824: 802: 784: 773: 755: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 700: 675:Boston Red Sox 659: 646: 628: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 564: 516: 513: 499: 498: 497: 495: 424: 422: 421: 416: 411: 405: 402: 401: 400: 393:mathbot's tool 383: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 339: 338: 337: 336: 329: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307:tools, though. 285: 284: 283: 282: 261: 260: 259: 258: 246:Portal:Vermont 228: 227: 226: 225: 168: 165: 164: 163: 143:Humbly, I do. 91:and his otters 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3936: 3925: 3922: 3921: 3919: 3909: 3907: 3902: 3896: 3895: 3888: 3883: 3878: 3867: 3866: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3810: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3788: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3775: 3772: 3769: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3758: 3757: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3734: 3729: 3723: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3699: 3697: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3673: 3670: 3669: 3662: 3659: 3658: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3611: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3590: 3588: 3583: 3582: 3572: 3569: 3562: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3535: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3522: 3519: 3509: 3506: 3497: 3496: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3474: 3469: 3463: 3462: 3455: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3446: 3445: 3442: 3441: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3423: 3414: 3413: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3395: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3371: 3370: 3360: 3356: 3353: 3351: 3347: 3341: 3336: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3326: 3321: 3316: 3309: 3306: 3302: 3297: 3292: 3291: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3279: 3274: 3273: 3268: 3250: 3245: 3240: 3229: 3228: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3213: 3207: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3192: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3161: 3152: 3151: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3111: 3106: 3100: 3095: 3090: 3079: 3078: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3063: 3058: 3047: 3046: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3031: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2999: 2997: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2971: 2966: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2953: 2948: 2937: 2936: 2929: 2925: 2923: 2918: 2913: 2902: 2901: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2855: 2850: 2839: 2838: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2761: 2754: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2743: 2742:Sephiroth BCR 2736: 2733: 2731: 2728: 2723: 2721: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2705: 2702: 2695: 2688: 2684: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2672: 2670: 2667: 2665: 2660: 2658: 2652: 2650: 2644: 2641: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2619: 2617: 2612: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2572: 2569: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2523: 2520: 2518: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2500: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2484: 2479: 2477: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2447: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2433: 2432: 2427: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2410: 2402: 2396: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2343: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2263: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2249: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2223: 2217: 2214: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2197: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2160: 2159: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2132: 2129: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2068: 2065: 2063: 2058: 2052: 2051: 2044: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2001: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1963: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1928: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1873:Steve Crossin 1868: 1865: 1863: 1859: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1809: 1803: 1800: 1794: 1790: 1787: 1781: 1774: 1773: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1726: 1719: 1718: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1652: 1645: 1642: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1589:great user. — 1588: 1585: 1583: 1579: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1561: 1559: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1439: 1437: 1433: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1411: 1404: 1403: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1377: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1300: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1254: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1184: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1150: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1118: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1102:per nom. -- 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1058: 1053: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1033: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 999: 994: 989: 986: 982: 979: 970: 969: 959: 951: 946: 941: 930: 929: 922: 917: 916: 915: 912: 911: 904: 900: 898:it seriously? 896: 895: 894: 889: 884: 883: 878: 874: 873: 872: 867: 862: 851: 850: 842: 841: 840: 837: 836: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 812: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 788: 785: 783: 779: 770: 768: 767: 759: 756: 754: 751: 750: 744:Trustworthy. 743: 740: 732: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 715: 712: 706: 699: 698: 689: 688: 687: 684: 680: 679:strong oppose 676: 672: 671: 670: 667: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 647: 645: 642: 641: 634: 631: 630: 616: 613: 611: 605: 601: 600: 599: 596: 595: 589: 588: 587: 579: 578: 577: 573: 569: 565: 563: 560: 559: 553: 552: 551: 540: 539: 538: 535: 533: 527: 523: 519: 518: 512: 511: 509: 505: 496: 492: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 452: 449: 445: 442: 439: 436: 432: 427: 426: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 406: 404: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 374: 370: 366: 363: 362: 361: 357: 344: 341: 340: 333: 330: 328: 325: 322: 321: 319: 316: 313: 312: 305: 302: 301: 298: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 280: 276: 272: 269: 268: 266: 263: 262: 256: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 235: 233: 230: 229: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 179: 177: 174: 173: 172: 162: 159: 158: 152: 151: 150: 142: 139: 138: 137: 135: 131: 126: 124: 120: 119: 113: 112: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 89: 83: 80: 77: 73: 69: 68: 67: 62: 59: 58: 48: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3900: 3897: 3862: 3811: 3791: 3790: 3773: 3770: 3767: 3753: 3745: 3744: 3695:Stwalkerster 3691: 3671: 3654: 3646: 3645: 3618:Stwalkerster 3614: 3584: 3555: 3549: 3541: 3533: 3520: 3489: 3460: 3458: 3444: 3439: 3435:open proxies 3406: 3363: 3358: 3354: 3334: 3307: 3288: 3270: 3224: 3190: 3185: 3144: 3074: 3042: 3023: 2932: 2897: 2834: 2815: 2787: 2779:Weak Support 2778: 2752: 2741: 2734: 2719: 2713: 2700: 2690: 2686: 2673: 2663: 2656: 2648: 2642: 2625: 2606: 2602: 2575: 2570: 2554: 2537: 2521: 2492: 2482: 2475: 2469: 2441: 2422: 2416: 2386: 2369: 2341: 2323: 2307: 2282:Weak Support 2281: 2264: 2250: 2234: 2215: 2192: 2188: 2164: 2157: 2152: 2130: 2116: 2107: 2102: 2090: 2089:Definitely. 2078: 2071: 2066: 2049: 2025: 2008: 1993: 1976: 1964: 1955: 1934: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1905: 1900: 1892: 1866: 1844: 1826: 1806: 1805: 1768: 1767: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1691:ÐeadΣyeДrrow 1685: 1670: 1643: 1627: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1586: 1564: 1557: 1551: 1541: 1535: 1518: 1503: 1499: 1480: 1469: 1468: 1462: 1452: 1446: 1430: 1425: 1406: 1398: 1379: 1369: 1361: 1344: 1327: 1313: 1299:Sunderland06 1298: 1292: 1276: 1266: 1259: 1252: 1246: 1228: 1220: 1215: 1200: 1189: 1173:PeterSymonds 1144: 1140: 1123: 1117:net positive 1111: 1099: 1088:Juliancolton 1083: 1066: 1024: 1011:UltraExactZZ 1006: 991: 987: 962: 925: 906: 880: 846: 831: 826: 816: 813: 810: 804: 794:Stwalkerster 790: 786: 762: 757: 745: 741: 723: 693: 692: 678: 661: 636: 632: 603: 591: 583: 582: 555: 547: 546: 501: 500: 487: 481: 475: 469: 463: 457: 450: 443: 437: 364: 342: 331: 326: 323: 314: 303: 296: 287: 286: 270: 264: 248:, and other 237: 231: 181: 175: 170: 154: 146: 145: 140: 129: 127: 115: 114: 99: 98: 78: 70: 56: 52: 51: 46: 30: 28: 3816:Majoreditor 3440:OhanaUnited 3335:Weak oppose 3311:practice.-- 3186:OhanaUnited 3126:TommmmmmmyT 3010:TommmmmmmyT 2816:Weak Oppose 2701:L'Aquatique 2103:OhanaUnited 2056:Talk to me 1901:OhanaUnited 1651:uw-username 1634:Fattyjwoods 1432:Malinaccier 1401:thedemonhog 1211:RichardΩ612 279:my last RfA 3708:Ecoleetage 3677:Ecoleetage 3546:unfriendly 2792:BITE|bitty 2720:Meldshal42 2407:Disclaimer 2269:EdJohnston 1658:PhilKnight 1598:discussion 1485:Shapiros10 765:·Add§hore· 515:Discussion 123:second RFA 31:successful 3631:xenocidic 3600:xenocidic 3592:xenocidic 3567:brenneman 2353:Athaenara 2328:Athaenara 2050:NHRHS2010 1804:. I'm an 1675:Athaenara 1611:Knowledge 1578:paranomia 1470:Wizardman 1332:xenocidic 1143:per nom. 1056:cierekim 1036:cierekim 473:block log 397:talk page 275:WP:MEDCAB 222:subst:nld 130:developer 3918:Category 3864:Wisdom89 3587:SoxBot V 3338:around. 3226:Wisdom89 3076:Wisdom89 3044:Wisdom89 2934:Wisdom89 2899:Wisdom89 2836:Wisdom89 2687:patience 2511:contribs 2476:Schfifty 2374:DerHexer 2000:ShinmaWa 1785:Contribs 1730:Contribs 1699:Contribs 1671:Support. 1148:Vishnava 1016:Evidence 927:Wisdom89 909:Al Tally 848:Wisdom89 834:Al Tally 805:Support. 710:Contribs 441:contribs 431:Soxred93 389:Soxred93 132:for the 82:contribs 72:Soxred93 47:Soxred93 3850:WP:RFPP 3812:Neutral 3747:Soxred 3672:Neutral 3648:Soxred 3579:Neutral 3171:Yechiel 2753:Support 2735:Support 2714:Support 2674:Support 2626:Support 2603:Support 2571:Support 2558:Deli nk 2555:Support 2542:BlueQ99 2538:Support 2522:Support 2470:Support 2446:King of 2417:Support 2370:support 2324:Support 2295:Bearian 2287:Bearian 2265:Support 2254:miranda 2235:Support 2221:Rodhull 2216:Support 2189:Support 2153:Support 2131:Support 2118:Sceptre 2092:Sceptre 2067:Support 2026:Support 2009:Support 1994:Support 1977:Support 1956:Support 1939:Cameron 1935:Support 1914:Support 1893:Support 1883:(email) 1867:Support 1845:Support 1827:Support 1686:Support 1644:Support 1628:Support 1587:Support 1542:Anthøny 1536:Support 1523:Yechiel 1519:Support 1500:Support 1481:Support 1463:Support 1426:Support 1370:majorly 1362:Support 1328:Support 1314:Support 1293:Support 1260:Helpful 1229:Support 1201:Support 1169:CAT:PER 1141:Support 1112:Support 1084:Support 1071:MrPrada 1067:Support 1025:Support 1007:Support 988:Support 827:Support 787:Support 758:Support 748:MBisanz 742:Support 728:Rory096 683:Rory096 666:Rory096 662:Support 633:Support 627:Support 585:Soxred 549:Soxred 448:deleted 250:WP:WPVT 148:Soxred 3854:WP:DRV 3846:WP:AFD 3842:WP:3RR 3771:ndonic 3727:Rudget 3521:Oppose 3454:WP:AIV 3355:Oppose 3340:Ziphon 3308:Oppose 3175:Shalom 3110:Ziphon 2893:WP:UAA 2810:Oppose 2784:policy 2726:(talk) 2630:Stifle 2610:hmwith 2394:Keeper 2378:(Talk) 2226:andemu 2158:Animum 1878:(talk) 1808:Editor 1591:αἰτίας 1565:Of War 1527:Shalom 1280:Bstone 1177:(talk) 921:WP:RFC 814:ndonic 724:oppose 524:tool: 522:WP:ACC 373:WP:LTA 369:WP:ACC 218:WP:UAA 214:WP:AIV 210:WP:ACC 202:WP:CSD 198:WP:UAA 194:WP:AIV 190:WP:AFD 186:WP:ACC 104:WP:ACC 61:scribe 3786:RyRy5 3525:Irpen 3501:ɹəəds 3494:speer 3461:PWNED 3418:ɹəəds 3411:speer 3375:ɹəəds 3368:speer 3290:giggy 3272:giggy 3211:slakr 3208:). -- 3156:ɹəəds 3149:speer 2649:jonny 2483:Three 2195:jj137 2176:Gurch 2073:Jamie 1967:Cobra 1961:Glass 1924:fusco 1574:Duh. 1558:Gears 1489:Here 1415:edits 1185:Yup. 1155:talk 1130:Chat 1124:Pedro 974:ɹəəds 967:speer 882:giggy 639:BradV 504:civil 455:count 335:list. 324:Note: 290:Pedro 206:WP:EP 16:< 3856:and 3831:macy 3820:talk 3794:talk 3733:Help 3712:talk 3681:talk 3635:talk 3604:talk 3596:talk 3550:them 3477:Dude 3467:Koji 3433:and 3345:ears 3324:Dude 3314:Koji 3200:WP:U 3134:talk 3115:ears 2990:WP:U 2974:Dude 2964:Koji 2928:WP:U 2881:Dude 2871:Koji 2800:talk 2788:then 2634:talk 2562:talk 2546:talk 2507:talk 2308:Note 2299:talk 2291:talk 2273:talk 2242:talk 2238:Bwrs 2203:talk 2180:talk 2165:talk 2135:Lego 2031:Kero 2017:talk 1985:talk 1919:Alex 1851:Crea 1836:talk 1817:wiki 1779:Talk 1771:CWii 1755:Dude 1745:Koji 1724:Talk 1716:CWii 1695:Talk 1662:talk 1619:talk 1436:talk 1409:talk 1388:珊瑚15 1353:talk 1336:talk 1305:talk 1284:talk 1205:clue 1104:Cobi 1075:talk 1051:Dloh 1031:Dloh 704:Talk 696:CWii 681:. -- 572:talk 568:Bwrs 485:rfar 467:logs 435:talk 387:See 349:Crea 216:and 108:Cobi 76:talk 3431:AIV 3393:SQL 3029:SQL 2995:SQL 2796:SJP 2759:Hús 2493:Yes 2425:Ree 2403:| 2397:| 2388:Yup 2313:SQL 2080:S93 2036:tan 2013:Avi 1998:-- 1814:the 1506:Wen 1487:Wuz 1449:. 1267:One 1253:The 1240:• 1187:Max 776:ont 651:SQL 609:SQL 604:lot 531:SQL 491:spi 461:AfD 204:, 118:SQL 93:• 64:at 57:WjB 3920:: 3879:/ 3860:. 3852:, 3848:, 3844:, 3822:) 3799:) 3755:93 3735:?) 3714:) 3683:) 3656:93 3637:) 3606:) 3504:ɹ 3498:/ 3421:ɹ 3415:/ 3378:ɹ 3372:/ 3361:. 3348:) 3296::O 3278::O 3241:/ 3177:) 3159:ɹ 3153:/ 3136:) 3118:) 3091:/ 3059:/ 2949:/ 2914:/ 2868:-- 2851:/ 2830:, 2827:, 2824:, 2821:, 2802:) 2769:nd 2755:-- 2636:) 2593:te 2591:ai 2589:hw 2587:et 2585:tl 2583:os 2579:an 2577:Ry 2564:) 2548:) 2509:| 2502:40 2499:Mm 2463:♠ 2430:dy 2400:76 2391:. 2356:✉ 2331:✉ 2301:) 2275:) 2244:) 2182:) 2053:| 2039:- 2019:) 1987:) 1949:) 1857:y! 1838:) 1811:of 1697:- 1678:✉ 1664:) 1654:}} 1648:{{ 1621:) 1529:) 1509:li 1412:• 1355:) 1338:) 1318:BJ 1307:) 1286:) 1193:em 1127:: 1077:) 993:ff 977:ɹ 971:/ 942:/ 888::O 863:/ 593:93 574:) 557:93 543::P 479:lu 365:A. 355:y! 343:6. 332:A. 315:5. 304:A. 297:4. 271:A: 265:3. 238:A: 232:2. 200:, 196:, 192:, 188:, 182:A: 176:1. 156:93 36:. 3884:) 3874:T 3869:( 3818:( 3789:( 3774:O 3768:A 3731:( 3710:( 3679:( 3633:( 3602:( 3594:( 3491:r 3472:† 3408:r 3365:r 3342:( 3319:† 3298:) 3294:( 3280:) 3276:( 3246:) 3236:T 3231:( 3203:( 3173:( 3146:r 3132:( 3112:( 3096:) 3086:T 3081:( 3064:) 3054:T 3049:( 3024:4 2969:† 2954:) 2944:T 2939:( 2919:) 2909:T 2904:( 2876:† 2856:) 2846:T 2841:( 2798:( 2764:ö 2664:t 2657:m 2653:- 2632:( 2615:τ 2581:P 2560:( 2544:( 2513:) 2505:( 2460:♣ 2455:♦ 2450:♥ 2420:— 2372:— 2297:( 2289:( 2271:( 2240:( 2206:) 2200:( 2178:( 2168:) 2162:( 2144:M 2141:T 2138:K 2015:( 1983:( 1947:C 1945:| 1943:T 1941:( 1854:m 1834:( 1788:) 1782:| 1776:( 1750:† 1733:) 1727:| 1721:( 1701:) 1693:( 1660:( 1617:( 1602:• 1594:• 1576:— 1525:( 1438:) 1434:( 1385:女 1382:水 1378:/ 1351:( 1334:( 1303:( 1282:( 1221:ɸ 1216:Ɣ 1190:S 1073:( 1013:~ 997:m 964:r 947:) 937:T 932:( 890:) 886:( 868:) 858:T 853:( 817:O 811:A 774:C 771:/ 713:) 707:| 701:( 570:( 493:) 488:· 482:· 476:· 470:· 464:· 458:· 451:· 444:· 438:· 433:( 399:. 352:m 79:· 74:( 40:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Soxred93 3 - Knowledge

Index