100:
42:
86:
116:
Knowledge is naturally collaborative. Probably there are very few other software projects that serve collaboration better. However I think we should think about and discuss implementation of teamwork.
163:
Sometimes we need a collaboration across national
Wikipedias. Usually national Wikipedias take from the English one but Wikipedians from, for instance, Catalonia can help with entries like
27:
120:
Some
Wikpedia entries easily gather around themselves several people that in a relatively short time and without much debate produce quite acceptable Knowledge articles.
154:
So put in the details you know, leave out the ones you don't, and wait for someone to refactor it. Leave a message in the
Summary: line, if you want to encourage them.
213:
21:
149:-- I might know something about human heart but vertebrates have differently build heart. I know that but not the details.
123:
My proposition is to start a new page with a link from the
Homepage that would organize teams for work on some subjects.
106:
The talk page of an archived item is unlikely to be monitored, so start a discussion at an active venue like the
142:. These issues require some more thought on design and some planning and some cross-sectional discussion.
61:
41:
17:
107:
8:
68:
191:
If they don't check /Talk, they're probably not that interested in collaboration. --
183:
Would
Wikipedians follow? Would people from other national Wikipedias know? --
131:
207:
164:
199:
192:
177:
135:
184:
168:
157:
139:
146:
67:don't necessarily represent current information or
205:
198:WTF? Don't change my lines, whoever you are! --
28:Knowledge:Historical archive/Wikipedia teamwork
145:Some subjects need such collaboration, like
94:Brief early discussion about collaboration
214:Items in the Knowledge historical archive
130:article, rather more broad subjects like
14:
206:
104:Looking to revive discussion on this?
36:
65:. As an archive item, its contents
34:
35:
225:
98:
84:
40:
13:
1:
174:Why not use <subject: -->
48:Knowledge historical archive
18:Knowledge:Historical archive
7:
59:in the English Knowledge's
10:
230:
175:/Talk or <subject: -->
51:This discussion page is
57:preserved for reference
126:I don't mean just
71:on project matters
62:historical archive
114:
113:
90:Item description:
26:(Redirected from
221:
102:
101:
96:
88:
87:
49:
44:
37:
31:
229:
228:
224:
223:
222:
220:
219:
218:
204:
203:
99:
92:
85:
73:.It was active
47:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
227:
217:
216:
196:
189:
188:
187:
172:
161:
151:
132:existentialism
112:
111:
45:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
226:
215:
212:
211:
209:
202:
201:
195:
194:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
171:
170:
166:
165:Antonio Gaudi
160:
159:
155:
150:
148:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
124:
121:
118:
109:
105:
97:
95:
91:
82:
80:
76:
72:
70:
64:
63:
58:
54:
46:
43:
39:
38:
29:
23:
19:
197:
190:
173:
162:
153:
152:
144:
127:
125:
122:
119:
115:
108:village pump
103:
93:
89:
83:
78:
74:
66:
60:
56:
52:
50:
22:WikiProjects
136:art nouveau
79:August 2001
138:style, or
176:/Team? --
69:consensus
208:Category
140:cytology
110:instead.
53:inactive
20: |
200:Yooden
193:Yooden
178:Yooden
185:Kpjas
169:Kpjas
147:heart
16:<
167:. --
55:and
158:GWO
128:one
77:in
210::
156:--
134:,
81:.
75:
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
