Knowledge

:Don't hijack references - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

138:. Now, that's all right; not all references are accurate, new information can become available, and so on. However, in many cases, the altered or added information will be altered or added in such a manner that the citation referencing the previous information, appears to be referencing the new information as well. Altering numbers, as in census results, climate data, or production total tables, is a common example of this "reference hijacking"; less common, but still happening often enough to be noticed, is slipping in additional prose text inside a sentence that is followed by the citation tag. These are often 42: 119: 188:". But still, if you're adding something: cite it! The usual solution to adding new information to a paragraph that had only one source is to move the citation to before your insertion, add your new material with a new citation, and add a 176:, and with an edit summary repeating the same explanation of the issue. Don't change the numbers in the table and leave the original reference for the entire table; do the same as you would in the first case mentioned. 192:
to the original source at the end of the paragraph. Another approach is to use repeat citations for each sentence in the paragraph other than your addition with its own source.
237: 211: 185: 57:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
154:. When changing referenced content, add a new reference, or remove the original reference if it's erroneous and replace it with a 201: 189: 58: 143: 135: 17: 134:
Sometimes you make an edit, in which information is altered or added to a page, when the previous information was
62: 207: 179:
When adding wholly new information, make sure you are not adding it just before an existing <ref: -->
147:
tags. While it can be passed as a mistake, this trick is, however, also a favourite tactic of vandals.
232: 217: 167: 158: 101: 28: 87: 80: 8: 72: 184:
that used a single citation at the end is admittedly tricky, and a good argument for "
94: 65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 50: 226: 139: 142:
errors by newbies, who simply overlook the existence, or don't know the
27:"WP:HIJACK" redirects here. For the essay about article hijacking, see 195: 127:
Don't just change the content supported by a <ref: -->
186:
don't reference a whole paragraph to one cite at the end
224: 180:tag. Adding new information in the middle of a 214:- essays suggesting to cite every sentence 202:WP:Citing sources § Text–source integrity 204:– the Knowledge guideline on the matter 14: 225: 212:WP:Why most sentences should be cited 113: 36: 238:Knowledge essays about verification 24: 63:thoroughly vetted by the community 59:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 25: 249: 164:tag, preferably an explained one 174:=your explanation of the issue}} 117: 40: 13: 1: 7: 10: 254: 70: 34:Essay on editing Knowledge 26: 125:This page in a nutshell: 152:don't hijack references 208:WP:Citation underkill 190:short repeat citation 146:, of the <ref: --> 61:, as it has not been 102:WP:SOURCEHIJACKING 218:WP:Cuckoo editing 132: 131: 112: 111: 29:WP:Article hijack 16:(Redirected from 245: 233:Knowledge essays 175: 163: 157: 121: 120: 114: 104: 97: 90: 83: 44: 43: 37: 21: 18:Knowledge:HIJACK 253: 252: 248: 247: 246: 244: 243: 242: 223: 222: 198: 173: 168:citation needed 165: 161: 159:citation needed 155: 118: 108: 107: 100: 93: 86: 79: 75: 67: 66: 41: 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 251: 241: 240: 235: 221: 220: 215: 205: 197: 194: 171: 130: 129: 122: 110: 109: 106: 105: 98: 91: 84: 76: 71: 68: 56: 55: 47: 45: 33: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 250: 239: 236: 234: 231: 230: 228: 219: 216: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 199: 193: 191: 187: 183: 177: 169: 160: 153: 150:Bottom line: 148: 145: 141: 137: 126: 123: 116: 115: 103: 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 77: 74: 69: 64: 60: 54: 52: 46: 39: 38: 30: 19: 181: 178: 151: 149: 133: 124: 88:WP:HIJACKING 48: 49:This is an 227:Categories 140:good-faith 136:referenced 182:paragraph 81:WP:HIJACK 73:Shortcuts 196:See also 144:purpose 172:reason 95:WP:HJ 51:essay 210:and 229:: 166:{{ 162:}} 156:{{ 170:| 128:. 53:. 31:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge:HIJACK
WP:Article hijack
essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:HIJACK
WP:HIJACKING
WP:HJ
WP:SOURCEHIJACKING
referenced
good-faith
purpose
citation needed
citation needed
don't reference a whole paragraph to one cite at the end
short repeat citation
WP:Citing sources § Text–source integrity
WP:Citation underkill
WP:Why most sentences should be cited
WP:Cuckoo editing
Categories
Knowledge essays
Knowledge essays about verification

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑