51:
339:
off for the time being at least. Hmm, given that though, I'm thinking maybe the image page and perhaps article caption should at least note the most obvious inaccuracies, even as a way of highlighting that these historical reenactments are often historically inaccurate, and to add to the EV of this particular image ... --
338:
That's a good argument. I'm not sure I'm totally convinced mind you, but well argued nonetheless (and note that I wouldn't really expect them to be acted out strictly by young canon-fodder sporting 19th century lifestyle diseases or the like). I was inclining towards opposing, but that's staved it
302:. For instance, the average military reenactor (like the gents in the photo here) seems to be a healthy middle aged man, while most soldiers are in their teens or early 20s, and in pre-modern periods had high rates of disease. As such, this image is a perfectly good example of
353:
That sounds sensible. I doubt that the people in the photo are in fact 'solders' as the original uploader said: all of those who are visible are middle aged and, um, a bit on the chunky side. I'd change the caption to call them "reenactors" or similar.
281:
239:
article, rather than the original battle(s), then I suppose it only has to be representative of historical reenactments, rather than of actual battles. I have no idea, but there's no reason to suggest this is unrepresentative of reenactments.
298:
It's worth noting that glaring historical inaccuracies are not unusual among military reenactors. A minority go to extraordinary lengths to get things right, but most aim for 'close enough' (see
420:
155:
139:
348:
333:
293:
275:
261:
189:
392:
226:
363:
315:
217:, what evidence is there to suggest that peasant women would have been standing so close to the line of fire in such a battle? Highly unlikely I would have thought. --
205:
438:
122:
462:
306:, which is how it's being used. It's a poor depiction of what the Battle of Waterloo would have looked like, but it's not in that article.
452:
95:
457:
17:
414:
299:
256:
87:
58:
26:
130:- I remember inserting the image in Battle of Waterloo reenactment, then I seem to have forgotten about it. —
185:
284:
where it was suggested that the regiment represented by the reenactors didn't actually fight at
Waterloo. --
213:
This is a nice image as others have said, but I'd like some clarification. Given we're voting on EV for
409:
321:
236:
214:
83:
74:
50:
434:
329:
151:
135:
8:
404:
401:
252:
181:
118:
430:
388:
359:
325:
311:
147:
131:
344:
289:
271:
222:
248:
203:
103:
446:
280:
Further to which, I have some additional concerns having now looked at the
266:
But surely a good reenactment is representative of the actual battle ... --
165:
114:
384:
355:
307:
340:
285:
267:
218:
62:
198:
320:
Yeah, that is my feeling too - I think this is representative of
427:
Promoted File:Bataille
Waterloo 1815 reconstitution 2011 3.jpg
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
324:, since they are rarely totally accurate either.
444:
300:Historical reenactment#Categories of reenactors
96:Knowledge:Featured pictures/People/Others
77:, with high EV and technical excellence.
49:
14:
445:
463:Featured picture nominations/May 2012
73:Exciting, powerful, demonstartion of
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
80:Articles in which this image appears
23:
453:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
474:
235:Because the image is used in the
88:Battle of Waterloo reenactment
59:Battle of Waterloo reenactment
57:– Soldiers firing guns in the
13:
1:
163:- Great angle, excellent EV.
458:Featured picture nominations
7:
10:
479:
383:High quality and good EV.
92:FP category for this image
61:, in front of the wood of
439:04:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
421:03:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
393:00:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
364:10:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
349:10:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
334:00:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
316:00:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
294:15:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
276:15:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
262:14:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
227:08:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
206:09:18, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
190:23:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
156:07:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
140:03:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
123:10:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
322:Historical reenactments
215:historical reenactments
237:Historical reenactment
84:Historical reenactment
75:Historical reenactment
66:
39:Voting period ends on
28:Historical reenactment
53:
111:Support as nominator
304:military reenactors
400:. Nicely done. --
67:
47:
470:
417:
412:
407:
260:
245:
177:
174:
171:
168:
38:
36:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
443:
442:
415:
410:
405:
282:Commons FPC nom
246:
241:
197:good depiction
175:
172:
169:
166:
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
466:
465:
460:
455:
424:
423:
395:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
318:
278:
230:
229:
208:
192:
158:
142:
125:
107:
106:
101:
98:
93:
90:
81:
78:
71:
45:10:50:43 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
450:
448:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
422:
418:
413:
408:
403:
399:
396:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
378:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
263:
258:
254:
250:
244:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
201:
196:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
178:
162:
159:
157:
153:
149:
146:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
120:
116:
112:
109:
108:
105:
102:
99:
97:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
79:
76:
72:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
19:
426:
425:
397:
380:
303:
242:
210:
199:
194:
164:
160:
144:
127:
110:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
431:Jujutacular
326:JJ Harrison
148:JJ Harrison
132:Crisco 1492
41:25 May 2012
447:Categories
63:Hougoumont
243:Grandiose
211:Question.
104:Myrabella
257:contribs
186:contribs
55:Original
402:King of
398:Support
381:Support
195:Support
161:Support
145:Support
128:Support
115:Tomer T
100:Creator
385:Nick-D
356:Nick-D
308:Nick-D
70:Reason
65:, 2011
341:jjron
286:jjron
268:jjron
219:jjron
16:<
435:talk
389:talk
360:talk
345:talk
330:talk
312:talk
290:talk
272:talk
253:talk
223:talk
200:Pine
182:talk
152:talk
136:talk
119:talk
43:at
449::
437:)
429:--
419:♠
391:)
362:)
347:)
332:)
314:)
292:)
274:)
259:)
255:,
251:,
249:me
225:)
188:)
184:•
176:bl
173:ee
170:zw
154:)
138:)
121:)
113:--
86:,
433:(
416:♣
411:♦
406:♥
387:(
358:(
343:(
328:(
310:(
288:(
270:(
247:(
221:(
180:(
167:B
150:(
134:(
117:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
