Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/The Notorious B.I.G. - Knowledge

Source 📝

114:#1 Because "Biggie" is a more simple 1-word pseudonym than just "B.I.G." and because it is a more specific and recognizable reference to himself than "Wallace". #2 The reference in the "futher reading" section is just for anyone who might want to find any additional info on Notorious, but that info might not really be imperative to include in the article. Oh yeah, and since I nominated it, 97:
It looks good, but a couple questions before I support: 1) Is there a reason that I'm missing regarding referring to him as "Biggie" as opposed to "B.I.G." or "Wallace" or something else? I'm not sure if the nickname is really the best way to reference him, although I don't know much about general
83:
Covers a very notable topic (a guy widely considered one of the greatest and most influential rappers of all time) and is an excellent source for anyone who wants to learn more about Biggie.
107: 140: 231: 243: 103: 194: 166: 154: 217: 178: 121: 99: 137: 207: 91: 203:
Problem fixed, it was due to some unconstructive edit, I think. Hopefully it won't happen again. But now that's done, will you support please?
151: 258: 136:"Biggie" (or "Big") is his "most popular alias". I also thought it would read better than "The Notorious B.I.G." or "B.I.G.". 40: 30: 17: 132:'s points, Biggie was his original recording name and a name he referred to himself as throughout his career. According to 87:
Those are my reasons. I think this is a really outstanding article, above all. I hope I will get others to agree with me.
77:
It is built entirely of verifiable information and is absolutely fully referenced. There's not a single missing citation.
98:
rap culture. 2) You note a biography in the "further reading" section - any reason why it wasn't used in the text? --
80:
Not too long, not too short. The intro is a good summary. A reasonable number of images, all of which are sourced.
133: 56: 213:
Thanks for doing that. I don't know whether or not to support because I haven't really read the article.--
67:'s Knowledge article for featured status! Here are some reasons why I hope you will support me: 64: 57: 8: 63:
Well, it's about to be 10 years since he died, and to mark the occasion I am nominating
228: 240: 163: 214: 191: 175: 204: 129: 118: 88: 74:
It's neutral and has links to statements of opinion people have made.
257:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
251:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 71:Detailed and well written. Easy to follow along. 261:. No further edits should be made to this page. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 14: 259:Knowledge talk:Featured article review 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 174:References #36 and #37 are broken.-- 23: 190:...as are references #5 and #41.-- 24: 273: 227:per Malomeat. Looks real good. 13: 1: 162:For a well formed article. - 7: 31:featured article nomination 10: 278: 244:23:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 232:22:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 218:22:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 208:19:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 195:16:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 179:05:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 167:01:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 155:22:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 141:21:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 122:21:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 108:18:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 92:23:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 254:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 150:as major contributor. 52:23:04, 16 March 2007. 65:The Notorious B.I.G. 58:The Notorious B.I.G. 106: 269: 256: 102: 48:The article was 38: 277: 276: 272: 271: 270: 268: 267: 266: 265: 252: 128:In addition to 61: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 275: 264: 263: 247: 246: 234: 221: 220: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 182: 181: 169: 157: 144: 143: 125: 124: 111: 110: 100:badlydrawnjeff 85: 84: 81: 78: 75: 72: 60: 55: 54: 46: 45: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 274: 262: 260: 255: 249: 248: 245: 242: 238: 235: 233: 230: 226: 223: 222: 219: 216: 212: 211: 210: 209: 206: 196: 193: 189: 186: 185: 184: 183: 180: 177: 173: 170: 168: 165: 161: 158: 156: 153: 149: 146: 145: 142: 139: 138:81.86.159.134 135: 131: 127: 126: 123: 120: 117: 113: 112: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 94: 93: 90: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 69: 68: 66: 59: 53: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 253: 250: 239:Nice job. -- 236: 224: 202: 187: 171: 159: 147: 115: 86: 62: 49: 47: 35: 28: 229:Cliff smith 164:!Malomeat 50:promoted 237:Support 225:Support 188:Comment 172:Comment 160:Support 152:Laalaaa 148:Support 116:Support 215:Rmky87 192:Rmky87 176:Rmky87 16:< 205:2Pac 130:2Pac 119:2Pac 104:talk 89:2Pac 241:mav 134:MTV 33:.

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article review
The Notorious B.I.G.
The Notorious B.I.G.
2Pac
23:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
badlydrawnjeff
talk
18:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2Pac
21:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2Pac
MTV
81.86.159.134
21:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Laalaaa
22:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
!Malomeat
01:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Rmky87
05:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Rmky87
16:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
2Pac
19:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Rmky87
22:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Cliff smith
22:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.