Knowledge:Featured article candidates/The Left Hand of Darkness/archive1

1794:: I would love to have a scan of that entry, even just to satisfy my own curiosity. I looked through the Slusser source, and I have come across the others as well. I have quoted Slusser's piece, though I didn't use it extensively: I have not used the others. It was not that I deliberately chose to exclude these sources; rather, there has been such a vast amount of work on this particular volume, that there was no way I could get everything. So, I did my best to a) consult the best known works, and b) try and get some representativeness in terms of when the sources were published. Erlich's survey was published in 1979, ten years after the novel: in the nearly 40 years since then, a lot more work has been published, and the commentary has evolved over time, as well. This is partly why I chose Donna White's 1999 volume, which looks at the history of critical commentary. If you feel that any of these studies was seminal enough that it must be included, I could try to do that. Regardless, I think I will add Erlich's entry to the further reading section. I hope this addresses your concerns. Regards, 3125:

critical, then I can make an effort to get it. That said: when I first began rewriting this this article, I tried to get hold of and read as many sources about it as I could. These included a number of analyses of the books itself, as well as a couple of meta-analyses, of which Donna White's was by far the most recent and most thorough. However, when actually writing, I have left out many of those analyses because in my view they are far too esoteric for a 5000-word article on the subject (works like "Aliens, androgynes, and anthropology: Le Guin's critique of representation in The Left Hand of Darkness"). These included many of the essays in Bloom's anthology. I tried to use the best written sources of the remainder to build the article, and as I said to Mike Christie above, I have tried to use sources well spread out in time. Finally, I have tried to include every significant theme among reviewers. Now there are somewhere between 500 and 2000

655:

genetic manipulation was certainly practiced by the Colonizers; nothing else explains the hilfs of S or the degenerate winged hominids of Rokanan; will anything else explain Gethenian sexual physiology? Accident, possibly; natural selection, hardly. Their ambisexuality has little or no adaptive value. Why pick so harsh a world for an experiment? No answer. Tinibossol thinks the Colony was introduced during a major Interglacial. Conditions may have been fairly mild for their first 40 or 50,000 years here. By the time the ice was advancing again, the Hainish Withdrawal was complete and the Colonists were on their own, an experiment abandoned." (TLHoD, Chapter 7, first page. Pg. 117 in my edition).

3261:-- Apologies to all for not checking earlier but has anyone done a spotcheck of sources for accurate usage and avoidance of close paraphrasing? This is a hoop we ask all first-time nominators at FAC to jump through, and I think that's the case for you, isn't it, Vanamonde? I did look at a couple of the online sources myself and found no issues but much is sourced to books that don't seem available for preview on Google or Amazon, so it would be helpful if someone can check one or two of those. Cheers, 3103:. It is a blog, but it provides its sources. I get that there is a lot that could be said, and it is not possible to cover everything, but how was it decided what to include and what not to include? It feels like what is currently in the article is a summary of a much wider body of criticism, with some things left out. How does the reader know that this is an accurate and authoritative summary of the history and state of criticism of this work? 1451:"in marked contrast to the (primarily male-authored) science fiction of the time, which was straightforward and linear" by 1969? That seems an overly flat statement to say about the era of, say, Vonnegut and Ellison (I mean the "straightforward and linear" bit. Ten or more years previously, I wouldn't be inclined to quibble. Similarly, the following sentence makes the reviewers appear awfully naive considering it's the same year as 1469:"In this sense, the novel can be thought of as a Bildungsroman, or coming of age story, as the reader experiences the central character's growth. Since the novel is presented as Ai's journey of transformation, Ai's position as the narrator increases the credibility of the story." I wonder if the part "as the reader ... growth" could not be safely deleted. I really don't see anything in there that isn't implied in what's around it. 2695:"Le Guin's works set in the Hainish universe explore the idea of human expansion, similar to the future history novels of other science-fiction authors such as Isaac Asimov": suggest "Le Guin's works set in the Hainish universe explore the idea of human expansion, a theme found in the future history novels of other science-fiction authors such as Isaac Asimov", and then start the next sentence with "The Hainish novels". 2438:

intrigue" and so forth; so it is connected to gender, but not always explicitly. I've added a little bit of detail: it now reads "The behavior of people in Karhide is dictated by shifgrethor, an intricate set of unspoken social rules and formal courtesy. Ai does not understand this system, thus making it difficult for him to understand Estraven's motives, and contributing to his distrust of Estraven." Is that better?

106:. It is a seminal work of science fiction, and has been influential in other literature as well. I have rewritten this article entirely, gotten it through GAN, and sought additional opinions at PR. I believe it meets the FA criteria: I have taken particular effort in examining as many scholarly works about it as possible, and synthesizing major themes from those. I look forward to hearing feedback. Regards, 3392:"The protagonist of the novel, the envoy Genly Ai, is on a planet called Winter ("Gethen" in the language of its own people) to convince the citizens to join the Ekumen. Winter is, as its name indicates, a planet that is always cold": this doesn't appear to be sourced to Watson 1975; since that source was used for the previous sentence I suspect you just picked the wrong source for this. 3170:

and what to exclude is largely invisible to the reader. Is there a way to get across that what is in the article is only a summary of a large body of criticism and academic analysis, and is there a way to state the extent (in size and over time) of that body of criticism and analysis? And then maybe point the reader to further reading on the topic (in the absence of a spin-off article)?

2774:

question I had expected. "Here and now, it means Orgoreyn. But the contract cannot be exclusive. If Sith, or the Island Nations, or Karhide decide to enter the Ekumen, they may. It's a matter of individual choice each time." and later "Heo Hew and three others had taken one and flown over to Sith and the Archipelago, nations of the Sea Hemisphere which I had entirely neglected."

670:: this is the part of the novel which I still remember, with the dramatic battle against the cold and their isolation forcing Ai and Estraven to confront the sexuality issue. Those two aspects could be included here (the following "Over the journey Ai and Estraven learn to trust and accept one another's differences." doesn't do justice to the impact of that part of the story). 3328:, I don't have any of the offline sources, except for Stableford 1995, which I actually found for Vanamonde93 during the FAC. I've read a fair amount of Le Guin criticism, so I can tell you that the article text is at least a reasonably accurate representation of the sources out there, but I can't speak to specifics or paraphrasing I'm afraid. 1518:; actually, you're welcome to go on with the source review. Apart from the points you just added (which I will address shortly) I have fixed and/or responded to everything, I believe. A couple might need further attention from you, as I was either unable to find a solution or reluctant to change for reasons I've provided. Regards, 1919:: Free image, seems like illustrating the author in the section of the background is pertinent enough. Odd camera model. Copies on the web are either more recent or of smaller resolution. No indication of anything improper, other than the odd camera model. Wonder where the caption is sourced from, and where the photo was taken. 2820:"This demonstrates Le Guin's portrayal of loyalty and betrayal as complementary rather than contradictory": "demonstrates" is a bit clunky, and you used it just a couple of sentences earlier. How about "His decision is an example of Le Guin's portrayal of loyalty and betrayal as complementary rather than contradictory". 641:: If I remember correctly (I read the book in the early seventies and it is now hiding somewhere in a box), the genetic modification on Gethen had something to do with an adaptation for survival in the cold climate. If the motivation for the genetic modification is indeed mentioned in the novel, we could include it here. 895:"Including works in the Hainish universe" is what it's trying to say, but it came out dreadfully clunky. I've tweaked the sentence. It's an interesting point that since the Hainish series contains novels, novellas, and short stories, none of those terms can be used to describe all of them collectively...hence "works". 2534:"sent to a far-northern work camp to meet his death by cold, labor, and sterilizing drugs": my copy is in a box, so I can't check, but this makes it sound as if the Sarf intended the sterilizing drugs to be one of the agents of Ai's death, which doesn't square with my recollections. Can you confirm this is right? 1437:"During the border dispute with Orgoreyn, Estraven tries to end the dispute by moving Karhidish farmers out of the disputed territory. Estraven believed that by preventing war he was saving Karhidish lives and being loyal to his country, while King Argaven saw it as a betrayal." Why the shift in tense? 3090:

Briefly, I've been looking at some of the sources that discuss the critical reception of this work, and I noticed that Spivack (1984) has a fair amount to say on this, which isn't really covered in the Knowledge article as it currently stands. Does the meta-review of the criticism by White (1999) say

3053:

Yes, I wondered at the time whether the quote was about all sf or just hers, but I read it incorrectly. As for "secondary", I got it from the article itself further below: "Le Guin wrote that the theme of gender was only secondary to the novel's primary theme of loyalty and betrayal." But changing it

2830:"A related theme that runs through Le Guin's work is that of being rooted or rootless in society, explored through the experiences of lone individuals on alien planets": this is not really connected to anything else in the section it's in. Can it be better integrated, and made part of the discussion? 2779:

Right; I'd forgotten about them. I think I was thrown off by "Karhide is one of two major nations on Gethen, the other being Orgoreyn" in the plot section; I read it as "one of the two nations". I'll strike this comment, but you might consider a footnote from the earlier point saying something like

2437:

Well, here's one of the relevant quotes: "Nothing succeeds like success. I don't trust Estraven, whose motives are forever obscure; I don't like him; yet I feel and respond to his authority as surely as I do to the warmth of the sun." But there are others as well, where he complains about "effeminate

2301:

Since I haven't read the sources, please feel free to respond to my questions about terminology by saying that's what the sources use. Here's another: you use "thought experiments" to describe what I'm used to seeing called "premises". "Thought experiments" to me encompasses more than a premise; it

1270:

This might be tricky. I've tried to add all the substantive criticism I could find, but essentially all of it is of the "she didn't go far enough" variety. Overall, there is very little criticism of the novel. The "debate" occurred mostly among feminist reviewers, and I don't believe there is much of

1262:

The reception section seems a bit one-sided. Those who did not like it are consigned to one named person, a couple of categories (such as "feminists") and are immediately swept away by the authorial voice. If the sources will allow, possibly a bit more on the naysaying side, with names and quotes.

1228:

s title, and looked ahead to the bibliography. While I gather you are in theory lower casing all but the first word and proper nouns in the titles of short works and using title capitalization for books, you aren't consistent (compare R. Reid with the books listed in the Further Reading section, and

749:

The second lede paragraph seems to me to get bogged down in detail which the reader coming fresh on the subject may not appreciate (I've read the book, and most of Le Guin's stuff, but not for 35 years). Possibly begin with saying it's in the Haimish universe, say briefly what that is (the humans on

279:

This is strangely tricky; I've spent a lot of time searching, and it seems like nobody keeps track of how many copies of a book have been sold. Even trickier because this one has been issues in a number of editions. The information I have there is what a recent magazine article said, and it neglected

3234:

I am happy that some thought has been given to this. I appreciate that it is difficult to fully do justice to something like this. What I would hope is that the interested reader is pointed to further reading if they wanted to read more on the topic. I wouldn't expect a short article like this to do

3219:

I've given some further thought to this, and while I might get around to writing a more detailed article about the criticism at some point, I do think it is fairly balanced in the article right now. In the blog you link, for instance, four major criticisms of the article are included: three of those

3038:

I'm okay with most of your changes, but there are a couple of things that I'm going to rephrase: first, I think calling the other themes "secondary" is a bit of problem, because nobody else does so. Second, her description of what a thought experiment does is generic, not specific to this case, so I

2603:

I'm a little hesitant only because the explanation is a little complex. It's something like "Orgoreyn has claimed Ai to be dead, but when Ai turns up in Karhide it allows Argaven to demonstrate that Orgoreyn is fibbing, and therefore increases Argaven's prestige; but to do that he must accept Ai." I

2265:

an alternative history, and link to that article, but is that a term the sources use? I don't recall ever seeing the book described that way. Usually the term is reserved for cases where it is made clear that something different happened in the past, causing the timelines to diverge. I think most

1240:

Sort of done. What I have tried to do with the citations is to reproduce the original title, so as to respect the capitalization choices made by those authors. I missed that in a couple of places, but I think I have everything now. I've added isbns and locations; the only issue is that locations are

645:

Actually I'm not sure that this is the case. I've skimmed the novel and the sources again, and nowhere can I see something that suggests the experiments were specifically for cold adaptation. Indeed the following passage, which is the one most directly relevant, suggests otherwise: "From field notes

3364:

Don't worry, we don't tend to archive a nom simply because we're waiting for requisite checks. A spotcheck is just what it sounds like and doesn't require examples from all sources used. Worst-case scenario, if someone could check a few of the online sources, plus emailed scans of Cummins and one

3169:

Thank-you. I thought it might be something like that. Do you think there are sufficient sources and meta-sources out there that a spin-off article specifically on the reception of this work might be useful, with a summary in this article? I am asking because the process of selecting what to include

2226:

You mention the Hainish universe before you explain it. I don't think there's any way to avoid mentioning it before the "Setting" section, so I think a very short parenthetical definition would be good on first use, and then a slight rephrasing at the start of the "Settings" section to acknowledge

654:

day 81. It seems likely that they were an experiment. The thought is unpleasant. But now that there is evidence to indicate that the Terran Colony was an experiment, the planting of one Hainish Normal group on a world with its own proto-hominid autochthones, the possibility cannot be ignored. Human

583:

I'm not certain how to handle this, because Ashe is not very important to the story (he has no role besides Estraven's partner) but is a named character in the adaptation described below, so removing him seems a little odd. I've changed it to "a second vow with Ashe Foreth, another partner"; do you

356:

This is also rather difficult, because this "initial difficulty" is not from my own interpretation, but directly taken from Donna White's book; and she doesn't mention specific reviews, but points to a general trend (ie its her own analysis, based on many reviews). Would it help if I stated that in

3146:

Specifically with respect to Spivack's comment, there is a straightforward explanation: Spivack wrote in 1984, and criticism has evolved in the 30 years since. White points to this tendency (specifically with respect to the novel's structure) in a statement that is in the article, and you can also

2538:

Well I guess the intentionality is a little suspect there, because they never state this explicitly. Here is a relevant passage, describing the state of the prisoners: "I took this lifelessness and leveling at first for the effect of the privation of food, warmth, and liberty, but I soon found out

2834:

When I wrote it I thought it connected somewhat to loyalty, but now it doesn't really seem that way. I'm not sure there's a good way to integrate it, a) because the source doesn't go into it in any depth, and b) it's a very general comment about her work, rather than about this novel. The content

709:

I was also going to raise the handling of the feminist reactions, but you and Wehwalt have covered that below, and on second reading I think the paragraph is OK. I have also not been able to think of any better way of handling the "human expansion" issue I was worrying about above, so I've struck

381:

Thanks, this is clear now and you have avoided the rather clumsy "unorthodox enough". You could tighten the text a bit by avoiding some repetition: "Writing in 1999, literary scholar Donna White stated that this unorthodox structure meant that ...". Please also have a look through the article for

3283:

Yes, this is my first nomination, though the article has been through spot checks at both GAN and DYK. I think a few sources are available at least partially online, and I can provide quotations for any of the journal pieces or for the Cummins source. I'm afraid I don't have the White source any

2973:

I'm happy that the lede mentions the theme of loyalty and betrayal, but I think it is a bit underemphasized there, since it assumes nearly equal importance with gender, and is in fact intertwined with it in organic ways, e.g., "The theme of loyalty and trust is related to the novel's other major

2047:

It's nothing too significant: where a single citation supports a specific statement, I've cited it, because I've had too many experiences with people who do not understand the relevant guideline removing stuff saying "uncited." Where the text is my own summary of content summarized from below, I

771:

Those parts of the lede that are directly from the references (such as the quote from Bloom) I have sourced; those things that are my summary of sourced material from the body (such as the second halves of lede paras 2 and 3) I haven't, because they cannot be sourced to a small set of pages in a

3124:

let me take a stab at answering your question, and we'll see where that takes us. Before that, full disclosure: while I relied heavily upon White while writing the article and through the many review processes, I no longer have immediate access to the book. If it turns out that it is absolutely

2773:

Actually, his mission is to all the nations, and there's quite a few. There's a few quotes mentioning this, but these are the most explicit: ""You,‘" Slose repeated, leaning forward intensely: "Does that mean Orgoreyn? or does it mean Gethen as a whole?" I hesitated a moment, for it was not the

1339:

I believe this is the default in many of our citation templates (such as the "cite" drop down menu in the edit window, which has the option to insert today's date under "access date.") It is also the standard outside the US. If you feel it important, I can change this all to month-day-year, but

194:

That is now fine, but it is not really addressing my point (which I probably did not make clearly): the corresponding content in Hainish universe themes refers to "human expansion" and confuses the point by referring to Asimov's universe which was almost exclusively populated by humans of Earth

3191:

that's an interesting question, and not one I've really considered before. There is certainly plenty of material for such an article; there are, after all, entire books written about it. I'm less certain of whether such an article would be accepted on Knowledge: after all, the issue of tons of

3098:

I don't get this impression from what is currently in the Knowledge article. Was that view held just by Spivack, and have views changed since then? I also noticed some sources commenting on Stanislaw Lem's (critical) views on the work (such as his essay 'Lost Opportunities') - should those be

2949:

In my years on Knowledge, I have always thought that the near-ban on wikilinking terms within direct quotes was quite senseless. But since I have to follow the rules: Do we have a problem with 'Instead, she called it a "thought experiment,"'? Or maybe we should remove the quotes around every

1408:

I would move the last sentence of the first paragraph of the "Loyalty" section elsewhere. You begin the second paragraph with "this conflict" but you've somewhat diverted from the theme to discuss a related one, so "this conflict" is no longer immediately at hand, rendering the "this" a bit

2408:

contribute to his distrust of Estraven? Does Ai distrust Estraven because he is judging Estraven's behaviour by his earth social norms, including heterosexual, or at least bi-gendered, norms, and doesn't realize that some of Estraven's behaviour is governed by his adherence to the rules of

2171:

It's difficult when repeating critics' opinions to avoid using "stated", but it's one of the most over-used ways of doing this. Instead of "Douglas Barbour stated", I think more natural options would be "According to DB,", "DB has argued", or "DB sees the fiction of the Hainish Universe as

3129:

works mentioning the subject, and heaven alone knows how many reviews in the popular press: so I cannot be certain that I have ever fairly represented them all. I will say, though, that I would be quite surprised if you can find a major theme or criticism that I have not included. Regards,

2943:

IIRC it is not explicitly in any of the sources. I did not add this, it was in the article previously, and I didn't change it because it seemed to me at the time to be an accurate descriptor. Having better understood what sequential hermaphrodity means in RL, I think the thoroughly sourced

3094:

Critical reception of The Left Hand of Darkness displayed a tension of opposites appropriate to the novel. Winner of both the Hugo and the Nebula awards and reviewed in major journals, it was clearly acknowledged as a major work. At the same time, however, a debate raged as to its overall

2542:

Yes, it was the intentionality I was wondering about. How about "sent to a far-northern work camp where he suffers harsh cold, is forced into hard labor, and is given debilitating drugs intended to prevent kemmer. His captors expect him to die in the camp, but to Ai's great surprise..."

821:"In addition to the Hugo and Nebula awards," This is a bit of a repetition of paragraph 1, so I might recast it as "In addition to being voted the Hugo and Nebula awards by fans and writers, respectively," or some such. It flows easier into the poll, which is another fan action. 3198:(Also an FA) which has a much larger reception section than this one: but large parts of that section are focused on it's impact on popular culture (or real life, more broadly), an impact which this book, influential as it is, has not had. I will think on this further. 2501:

Actually it's not. I thought it was, too, until I checked earlier today. In any case I've tweaked it a little because I realized I could incorporate more of the quote. The full line goes "To exhibit the perfect uselessness of knowing the answer to the wrong question."

1229:

in Watson, why is "Role" capped?). Also, while we are down here, all books should have the publisher and location in the citation. Also, "The Oregonian" needs to be italicized. (I'll do the source review) (by the way, I would shorten the in-text reference to simply "

945:"At least two "thought experiments" are used in each novel." You seem to be going from the general, to the specific, back to the general again. Maybe part of the paragraph beginning above should be moved to be with other text speaking about the Hainish works generally. 3442:

Vanamonde93 sent me a copy of Cummins and I've checked about a dozen citations. The only problem I found is "Genly Ai tells Argaven after Estraven's death that Estraven served mankind as a whole, just as Ai did"; this is cited to 85-87, but I don't see it there.

2679:

The reception section feels a little listy; in places it seems little more than a recitation of a series of critical opinions. These sections are hard to weave into a narrative, and in fact you do this well in several places, but I think a bit more needs to be

2963:

Huh, I wasn't even aware of this rule. It doesn't make too much sense to me, but here's a compromise. Several reviewers have also used the term, which is why uses that are not meant to be Le Guin's words are not in quotes. So I've gone ahead and linked the

2266:

readers would treat the Hainish origin of humanity as simply part of the science-fictional premise of the book, not as a marker that it belongs to the alternative history sub-genre. However, if the sources are consistent on this, we should echo them.

182:: expand a bit? There are other authors who have used this theme (Larry Ǹiven if I remember correctly, for example). You could alternatively do this in the Hainish universe themes section, where human expansion (subtly different) is mentioned. 1380:"is shown as increasing loyalty to the two countries while decreasing loyalty to the planet as a whole" possibly "is shown as increasing nationalism, making it hard for those in each country to view themselves as citizens of the planet". 361:

Please don't remove the information, it illustrates the ground-breaking nature of the novel. An inline attribution to White (similar to "Darko Suvin, one of the first academics to study science fiction, stated that ...") would be fine.

1905:: Non-free book cover, which is the correct licensing given the lack of evidence of freeness and the age of the book in question. It has one superfluous non-free use rationale for an article it isn't used in. Seems like each point of 1674:

thanks for the support. Since you asked, I actually managed to find a slightly more critical review (still a feminist criticism, though). I've added a couple of sentences; I hope this helps with the issue highlighted above. Regards,

2810:"This conflict is demonstrated by the varying loyalties of the main characters": might be better as "These conflicts", since otherwise it only refers to the Karhide/Orgoreyn conflict, which I don't think is the intended meaning. 211:

To be honest I'm still not entirely sure I understand: both the Hainish cycle and Asimov's works involve human expansion, except that in the Hainish cycle humans evolve on Hain, and expand from there. What would you suggest?

1028:"an art practiced by the foretellers to prove the uselessness of knowing the right answer to the wrong question." I would cut "by the foretellers" as this really adds no info and the word is used a sentence or so later. 2117:

I don't much like "creates a large barrier for Ai" -- "large" doesn't seem a natural adjective here, and I also think we need to tell the reader what it's a barrier to -- assimilation? Understanding? Success in Ai's

673:

This is a good point, but once again, I hesitate. This is just because the plot summary is already rather extensive. Now I could trim another part of it, or just extend this: if you believe it necessary, I will do so.

2726:

Just one left that I can see: "Bloom adds..." You do have the sentences in the criticism sections that refer to Le Guin in the present tense -- e.g. "Le Guin seems to suggest..." -- but I think that's unavoidable.

2392:

an intricate set of unspoken social rules and formal courtesy, which Ai does not understand, contributing to his distrust of Estraven": I don't think I completely get what this sentence is saying. What is it about

2634:

A few sentences later you refer to Estraven's prediction, but include Estraven's death in the clause; perhaps "Estraven's prediction is borne out when Ai's presence in Karhide, along with the fallout of Estraven's

2270:

IIRC I took this from a source, but I can see what you're saying, too. I've unlinked it because it is not an important element of the novel's genre. If you feel it important, I can change to "fictional history".

2042:

What's the thinking behind having some but not all of the lead cited? Nothing that's cited seems particularly controversial; I think you could probably drop all the citations except for the direct quote from

902:

The last paragraph of Background contains the term "science fiction" four times, and also contains sentences containing quotes that ought to be cited immediately after that sentence, our usual practice with

3220:

are in the article right now, two of those identified by name (I did expand Panshin's comment a little bit). So I'm wondering if your concerns have been addressed, so that this nomination can move forward.

3151:, it is true that a fair number of people have criticized the novel: yet all of the criticism I could find is the feminist critique mentioned in the article. See the above discussion with Wehwalt. Regards, 2122:

Replaced with "barrier of understanding." Is that better? That's what the sources suggest. I could also leave out the barrier and say "and makes it difficult for Ai to understand the planet's inhabitants."

555:

Convention required that they separated after they had produced a child together; however, because of the first vow, the vow he makes with Ashe Foreth, which also is broken before the events in Left Hand,

2715:

You go back and forth between using present tense and past tense for critical comments: "Douglas Barbour said", but "Suzanne Reid states"; I think present tense is usually better for this but at least be

1423:" Genly Ai tells Argaven after Estraven's death that the latter served mankind as a whole, just as Ai did" It is unclear from the sentence itself which of the three named persons is the "latter" ("last"?) 1311:

true; but the border conflict is a) the exception that proves the rule, and b) not "war" in the conventional sense; the two sides never actually carry out more than "forays" (raids) into enemy territory.

1714:

off my shelves and had a look at the entry for this; it's by Richard D. Erlich, and I can email you a scan if you like. He cites several source that you don't mention; were you able to consult these?

1168:"who wish to cease hostilities and reopen trade with Karhide." Given you've just called them the "open trade" faction, I think this could be shortened to "who wish to normalize relations with Karhide". 3466:

My apologies: that should have been page 84, I must have flipped back and not noticed. The quote is "After telling King Argaven that Estraven and he served the same "master""Mankind"" I've fixed it.

2161:, are also anthropologists or social investigators of some kind": suggest "The protagonists of many of Le Guin's novels, such as..."; as it stands this parses incorrectly, as "protagonists such as". 1098:"In contrast to Ai, Estraven is shown with both stereotypically male and female qualities, and used to demonstrate that they are both necessary for survival." I think you need an "is" before "used". 2659: 2587: 2560: 2494: 2378: 2358:

Once again, this is because some things are very obviously and directly supported by pages in the novel, others are a summary of longer sections. Essentially, I've cited where I can do so easily.

2326: 2291: 2143: 2078:

You have quotes around "best novel" in the lead, which I think looks a little odd. The title of the award the book won is "Best Novel", and just giving it in caps would avoid the need for quotes.

1281:"who displays steadily more androgynous behavior over the course of the novel, becoming more patient and caring, and less rationalist" I'm not sure this is phrased in the most understandable way. 3436: 2797: 2744: 2624: 2522: 2458: 2430: 2251: 2196: 2102: 1581:

I don't see any great reason to change the date format just to make work. I'm a little more troubled by the caps issue in the refs. Those works had their own style guides, and we have ours.--

1056:"He is called "Genry" by the Karhiders, who have trouble pronouncing the letter "L" in their language" I might cut "in their language" as, after all, Genly's name is not part of their language. 3359: 2003: 1982: 1964: 1803: 3229: 2020: 750:

the various seeded planets is one possibility) and go on with the plot. Obviously you need to mention the cycle and the placement in it is good detail, but I might put it later in the lede.

3521: 3478: 3244: 3207: 3179: 3160: 3139: 3345: 1839: 1817: 3374: 3305: 1887: 697: 486: 472: 458: 235: 221: 3319: 3072: 3048: 3026: 3006: 1684: 1656: 1642: 1607: 1527: 1944: 437: 391: 371: 292: 350:

The structure of the novel was unorthodox enough that it was initially confusing to reviewers, before it was interpreted as an attempt to follow the trajectory of Ai's changing views.

2835:

that comes closest to it thematically is up in the background which discusses the anthropologists. I could remove it, I suppose, unless you have any bright ideas. It is not critical.

1701: 1621: 1590: 1576: 1543: 1506: 1370: 1354: 1004: 2916: 2891: 2874:-- I've completed a first pass; the points above are generally pretty minor and I think the article is close to FAC quality. I'll read through again once these points are resolved. 2068: 115: 90: 3460: 3413: 352:: Is it possible to give examples, perhaps quotes, to illustrate what seems to be an important evolution of commentary? Do we know who first published the changed interpretation? 2274:

I went ahead and made the change you suggested and have struck the comment; I think "alternative history" has too much freight for some readers for it to be a good choice here.

2607:

I'll think about it but I can see why you hesitate; it's complicated. Perhaps it doesn't need to be there. If I can come up with a good way to say this I'll come back to it.

1462:

I've rewritten this sentence to say "traditional science fiction" rather than "of the time;" Vonnegut may have been a contemporary, but he was equally unorthodox. Is that okay?

3112: 2539:

that it was more specific an effect than that: it was the result of the drugs given all prisoners to keep them out of kemmer." Is it necessary to change the wording a little?

1785: 683: 3270: 2350:

Since the novel is the implied source for the plot, I don't think you require citations everywhere in the plot section, but can you explain why you have citations covering

733: 719: 422: 206: 1861: 328:

Eventually, the two are able to converse directly with mindspeech, but after Ai is able to understand Estraven's motivations, and no longer requires direct communication.

3350:

No worries. {{ping}Lingzhi|Mirokado}} perhaps one of you can help? It would be rather unfortunate if, having come this far, the article fails for lack of spot-checking.

972: 688:

I would quite like a change here, but that is in the realm of "minor improvement" rather than "correction" and can be dealt with at leisure as part of normal editing. --

65: 2982: 2958: 2938: 2705:

Is the "Light is the left hand of darkness" poem laid out like a poem in the book? If so, I'd suggest giving it the same linebreaks as the book does in the blockquote.

860:"Le Guin's father Alfred Louis Kroeber was an anthropologist, and the exposure that this gave Le Guin influenced all of her works." maybe "experience" for "exposure"? 3388:

I can certainly spot check what's online; Vanamonde93, can you email me some relevant pages from Cummins and the relevant pages of a couple of the journal sources?

2599:"Estraven believes that the very appearance of Ai in Karhide will force its acceptance of the Ekumen treaty": can you add a few words on why Estraven believes this? 2179:

I did a draft rewrite of the reception section, but it's really too much for this review page so I'll post it at the article talk page and we can discuss it there.

931:"Explorers from Hain as well as other planets use interstellar ships taking years to travel" I might make clearer that the ships do not travel faster than light. 280:

to provide detail. I've tweaked the sentence a little to say "by 2014" which was when that article was published, and I'm going to keep trying for more detail.

2759:"Le Guin suggests that this focus on positives": it's not clear whether this is her later commentary, or third-party critical analysis of the book itself. 983:"Commentators have suggested the year 4870 AD, based on extrapolation of events in other works, and commentary on her writing by Le Guin" constant comment 2354:

all the text in the that section? Any reason not to make it 100%, or else to remove them? The same comment applies to the "Primary characters" section.

1822:

Agreed; just wanted to see if any of the cited material was of interest. Vanamonde93, send me a Knowledge email and I'll reply with the scanned pages.

1630: 1271:

substance to add. However, I certainly might have used an authorial voice that's too strong; if you have suggestions about that, I'm happy to hear them.

2763:

It's third party analysis, but it's a third party saying "Le Guin portrays..." or something to that effect: so I've changed it to "the novel suggests."

1893: 1808:

Personally, I think a professional reviewing the reviews is superior to what we can do with it, as it is a professional choosing what is significant.--

1241:

not easily available for some of the books. I've added the publishing headquarters as "location" for now, and am digging deeper. Italics and link fixed

724:

Thanks for your prompt responses. It is a pleasure to support this article, which improves our coverage of influential works of science fiction. --

888:"These sympathies can be seen in several of her works of fiction, including the Hainish universe works." I'm not sure what the last word is doing. 1318:"Bloom adds that this is the major difference between Estraven and Ai, and allows Estraven the freedom to carry out actions that Ai cannot" like? 1768:(Jan 70). The ISFDB lists a great many more reviews, but these include some mainstream reviews that are likely to be of more general interest. 626:

The following remarks are not absolutely requesting any change, but I will welcome either a change or your comment justifying the current text.

195:

origin. The Hainish universe themes content needs to be consistent with the Setting content. It will also be necessary to avoid mere repetition.

2401:

Ai's lack of understanding of Shifgrethor. Is that unclear? I'm trying to think of a better way to phrase this, perhaps you could help me out.

2032: 779:"a native of Earth (referred to as "Terra" in the novel)" I would simply put "a native of Terra" and link to Earth, omitting the parenthetical. 807:

I would lead the final lede paragraph with the info "received a highly positive response from reviewers." to try to keep things chronological.

3192:

scholarly coverage is certainly not limited to this book, yet I'm unaware of analogous articles for these. One example which came to mind is

2669:"attempting to assuage the Sinnoth Valley dispute with Orgoreyn": I don't think you can assuage a dispute. How about "resolve", or "settle"? 186:

I've taken a stab at elaborating this; let me know if this addresses your concern. I'm not trying to suggest that that thought experiment is

2868:

It was because it was "novels" as the poll chose to define them, but that's unnecessary nitpicking on my part, so I've removed the quotes.

2858:

Checked: there's nothing on the web since that announcement, except for an unreliable source saying "it seems to have stalled since then."

3086: 2470:

I'd suggest putting "knowing the right answer to the wrong question" in quotes, and citing it, to avoid having it in Knowledge's voice.

120: 40: 1140:"he regularly makes speeches on the radio against Orgoreyn" I might cut the last two words and insert "belligerent" before "speeches". 2172:

containing..." There are other examples later in the article -- thirteen, in total. Anything you can do to reduce this would help.

1847: 738: 659:

Thank you for your thorough response. Clearly I was incorrect! Perhaps I imagined extra details while daydreaming about the story.

639:

were the subjects of genetic experiments, including on Gethen. ... Winter is, as its name indicates, a planet that is always cold.

579:

Ashe Foreth is only mentioned here, either just mention "a second vow with another partner" or explain briefly who Ashe Foreth is,

2921: 1913:

in any case) and the criteria themselves met - it may be worth downsizing further but that is something for editorial discretion.

2899:. This is FA quality. I can attest to the reliability of the sources, but have not checked formatting or done any spotchecks. 3419:

Vanamonde93 sent me Pennington, which was fine, and is going to send me Cummins. Once I've checked that I'll post here again.

1483:"in commemoration of her then-recent 85th birthday" this feels a bit awkward. Maybe "in honor of her 85th birthday" is enough. 1154:" knowing that Estraven and Ai's presence in Karhide mean his own downfall;" I think this has to be "means" rather than "mean". 952:

Hmm, I'm a little hesitant about this, because I see that entire paragraph as pertaining the series as a whole; the mention of

305:: I suggest moving the sentence at the end of the paragraph after the first sentence so that all Budrys' comments are together. 917:"Some of these groups that "seeded" each planet" As you have not mentioned any such groups previously, "these" should be "the" 614:

The 30em columns for the short notes are a bit wide: 24em looks OK and would allow for any slightly longer note line later on.

3491: 397:

You're quite right. I've tweaked that sentence, and replaced many instances of "stated." Let me know if it's still excessive.

30: 17: 3502: 3456: 3432: 3409: 3341: 2912: 2887: 2793: 2740: 2655: 2620: 2583: 2556: 2518: 2490: 2454: 2426: 2374: 2322: 2287: 2247: 2192: 2139: 2098: 2064: 1835: 1781: 1304:"The Gethenians are also not inclined to go to war," yet they've got a border conflict which is one of the big plot-movers. 593:

I would write "which was also ..." rather than "which also was ..." (word order, after taking account of the tense change).

2841:"describes shifgrethor as "this status is not rank, but its opposite": suggest cutting "this status" from the quoted text. 3452: 3428: 3405: 3337: 2930:

Do the cited sources specifically use the term "sequentially hermaphroditic" or is this something Knowledge discovered?

2908: 2883: 2789: 2736: 2651: 2616: 2579: 2552: 2514: 2486: 2450: 2422: 2370: 2318: 2283: 2243: 2188: 2135: 2094: 2060: 1902: 1831: 1777: 2685:"turned her back on opportunity for experimentation": perhaps "on an opportunity" or "on opportunities" would be better? 3235:

more than provide a summary, and the current summary has had careful thought given to it, which is good enough for me.

1978: 1940: 1345:

I don't think the book is particularly associated with the US so I don't think it's worth the trouble to change it.--

71: 3054:

is probably the best thing, I agree... and finally I wonder whether we should put between "Le" and "Guin", or

1042:"and tells Ai that he was responsible for Ai's presence in Orgoreyn." well, maybe responsible for the invitation. 1598:, I believe I have addressed all the points you have raised; if there are further issues, let me know. Regards, 1710:. I don't have time to do a review at the moment, but I'm glad to see this come to FAC. I pulled the Magill 2216:"...those in the Hainish universe. The novels of the Hainish universe...": rephrase to avoid the repetition. 646:

of Ong Tot Oppong, Investigator, of the first Ekumenical landing party on Gethen/ Winter, Cycle 93 E.Y. 1448.

3296:

as the reviewers who engaged most with the source material, I was wondering if you could help out? regards,

1497:

Source review to follow. I'll wait until you're ready, I gather you're still looking at one or two things.--

2404:

My copy's in a box or I'd go re-read it, but what I'm trying to ask is: How does his failure to understand

2037:

I'll add comments below as I go through the article; it might take me a day or two to complete the review.

1969:

Might want to duplicate the caption in the alt of the second image, rather than merely "refer to caption".

793:"the theme of religion, by contrasting the two major religions" I would change one or other to "faith" (s). 956:

is only incidental (so I could not mention it there?) I can't see an easy way to move that content around.

743:

I'm a bit pressed for time right now, so this will be catch as catch can. My standard quibbles (Part I):

1567:

That's all I see. Otherwise all sources seem encyclopedic and are appropriately and consistently cited.--

1394:"explored through the persons of lone individuals on alien planets" suggest "experiences" for "persons" 2302:

includes the implications and working out of consequences, which I think is more than you intend here.

1916: 72: 2780:"Le Guin mentions other minor nations on Gethen but they do not figure in the action of the novel". 2210:

done. I think it came from the source, but wikipedia uses the english variant, so I've changed it.

3448: 3424: 3401: 3333: 2904: 2879: 2785: 2732: 2647: 2612: 2575: 2548: 2510: 2482: 2446: 2418: 2366: 2314: 2279: 2239: 2184: 2131: 2090: 2056: 1974: 1936: 1928: 1827: 1773: 2968:

use, which is not perfect, but perhaps better than removing the link, which is an important one.

1210:"determined by science fiction fans" to avoid the sf repetition, I would say "voted by the fans" 3100: 1909:

is adequately explained in the rationale (a book cover is hardly substantial enough to violate

3355: 3301: 3225: 3203: 3194: 3156: 3135: 3044: 3002: 2720:

I prefer past, to be honest: but thanks for flagging those. I've tried to make it consistent.

1999: 1960: 1883: 1799: 1680: 1638: 1603: 1523: 679: 482: 454: 217: 111: 86: 3240: 3175: 3108: 2477:

Any reason why you cut "right"? It's in the source, isn't it? And I think it works well.

1852:

I'd rate it as a good article. Sorry I don't have time for detailed comments just now. --

8: 2997:

I've addressed all your concerns, I believe. Could you take a look, soon as you're able?

2016: 1014:

Gethen's division into two nations might be worth mentioning early on in the plot summary

3494:

has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see

2570:

I tweaked it again and got rid of a line break introduced by another editor's addition.

587:

This is now OK, well done (I searched for "Foreth" and did not notice the later "Ashe").

3517: 3474: 3444: 3420: 3397: 3370: 3329: 3291: 3266: 2900: 2875: 2781: 2728: 2643: 2608: 2571: 2544: 2506: 2478: 2442: 2414: 2362: 2310: 2275: 2235: 2180: 2127: 2086: 2052: 1987: 1970: 1952: 1932: 1857: 1823: 1791: 1769: 729: 715: 693: 468: 433: 418: 387: 367: 288: 231: 226:

We can leave this for a while, it is a relatively minor point. I will think further. --

202: 3315: 3069: 3023: 2979: 2955: 2935: 1991: 1924: 1813: 1697: 1652: 1617: 1586: 1572: 1539: 1502: 1366: 1350: 1000: 968: 850: 99: 2227:

that this is not a new term, as you give a more detailed explanation for the reader.

3495: 3351: 3297: 3221: 3199: 3152: 3131: 3040: 3013: 2998: 2337: 1995: 1956: 1879: 1795: 1676: 1634: 1599: 1519: 675: 478: 450: 213: 147: 143: 107: 82: 61: 3236: 3214: 3186: 3171: 3119: 3104: 3058: 2206:

Any reason to use "Lev" instead of the more usual (in English) "Leo" for Tolstoy?

1910: 2642:

Struck; I changed it to "fallout from" as I think that's a little more natural.

2012: 1906: 3039:

might reorder that. Otherwise, thanks for the copy-edit, it's an improvement.

1647:

Nope, that's the one I was thinking of. All looks good on the source review.--

240:

Reading this again, I think it is OK as it stands. --19:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

3513: 3470: 3366: 3325: 3278: 3262: 1869: 1853: 1070:"shifgrethor and gender roles and Gethenian sexuality" why the multiple ands? 725: 711: 689: 464: 444: 429: 414: 383: 363: 284: 227: 198: 157: 53: 3101:

Essay: The critical reception of Ursula K. Le Guin's "Left Hand of Darkness"

2855:

not that I am aware of, and I checked when I wrote it, but I'll check again.

2009:

I have removed the superfluous second fair-use rationale for the first image

1084:

Why is the last sentence of Genly's character description in the past tense?

463:

Hi. I had a "rather hectic" week, I hope to comment further this weekend. --

3311: 3287: 3065: 3033: 3019: 2992: 2975: 2951: 2931: 2306:"Thought experiments" is actually from the source (multiple sources, IIRC) 1875: 1809: 1693: 1669: 1648: 1633:. Is that okay? Is there another guideline I should be following? Regards, 1626: 1613: 1595: 1582: 1568: 1535: 1515: 1498: 1362: 1346: 996: 964: 846: 139: 2769:"the various Gethenian nations": suggest just "two" rather than "various". 330:: "but after" is not clear. Do you mean "after which" or "but only after"? 3509: 57: 1332:

I also note that the retrieval dates are stated as day month year. Why?

1182:

Your capitalization of "Open trade" vs. "open trade" seems inconsistent.

1612:

What did you do about the titles? That's really the only thing left.--

1126:"prime-ministers" It's stylistic, but I really don't see why the hyphen 3091:

much about Spivack's views? I found the following in Spivack's work:

1692:

excellent work. Thank you for bearing with me, as long as it took.--

1217:

this is the only time I use this sentence, thanks to the tweak above.

533:

and the pair begin an 80-day trek ... During their 81-day journey ...

513:: "got" is a bit colloquial, how about "a term coined by her father"? 449:

just wondering if you had had the time to take another look at this.

39:

Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in

3365:

or two of the journals, then that would certainly suffice. Cheers,

569:, we probably need past tense here as for "they separated" earlier, 180:

the background idea of a common origin for all the humanoid species

535:: use either the approximation or the exact figure in both places? 477:

RL happens. No worries; looking forward to hearing your feedback.

2048:

haven't cited anything. If it's bothersome, I can take them out.

413:

I will add a few open comments and questions, I hope tomorrow. --

842:

Yes, it was. Do I need to adjust the wording to make it clearer?

125:

This is a well-written and interesting article. A few comments:

1994:, but I'm not particular, so I've changed it as you suggested. 1224:

I was struck by your lower casing of all but the first word in

2011:- it can be easily restored, if the usage ever changes again. 1629:: Um. Forgot, apologies. I think I've brought it in line with 1555:

You are inconsistent between USA and U.S.A. in the references.

764:

Can you explain why part of the lede is sourced, and some not?

3018:

Please review my changes. Congrats on an excellent article.

3064:

around them, but that is a trivial detail. Congrats again!

2851:

Did Phobos Entertainment ever do anything with their rights?

1274:

The sources are what they are, then. I think it's OK as is.

1189:

It's "Open Trade" in the original; I've fixed it throughout.

2085:

Capped, but no quotes? I think you can remove the quotes.

273:

The novel sold more than a million copies in English alone.

835:" In 1987, Locus ranked it second " was this another poll? 2051:

No, that's fine; just wanted to understand the approach.

668:

the pair begin an 80-day trek across the Gobrin ice sheet

275:: First-edition printings? in the first year? "has sold"? 3147:

see a more general trend in the rest of the literature.

1325:

done. A strange sentence from Bloom, so I've quoted him.

334:

done. Yes, "but only after" is what it should have been.

3469:

Tks guys, I think we can wrap this is up then. Cheers,

2231:

parentheses done: dunno if rephrasing is needed below.

2153:"Many of the protagonists of Le Guin's novels, such as 1955:: I've added alt text. Thanks for the review. Regards, 357:

so many words, or alternatively excised that sentence?

1233:". There's a link if the reader's unfamiliar with it 1077:

because I probably wrote the sentence twice :) fixed

1112:

Consecutive footnotes should be in numerical order.

382:

occurrences of "stated", it is getting overused. --

3396:I checked some of the others and found no issues. 1248:"The Paris Review" (in reception section) italics? 428:Interrupted today: I will post some more later. -- 262:: "overwhelmingly positive" would be better idiom. 3529:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 3310:I'm traveling and don't have access right now.-- 2604:wonder if there is a concise way to phrase this. 2397:that leads to Ai's distrust of Estraven, exactly? 1878:in the Knowledge sense or in the generic sense? 1196:"Hugo award" why no cap when you do for Nebula? 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 565:since the second vow was before the events in 3535:No further edits should be made to this page. 3508:template in place on the talk page until the 757:I've shuffled some sentences. Does this help? 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 3099:included? See something like this for more: 2176:True, it's still excessive. I've cut a few. 2109:um. I thought that's what I was doing. done. 845:I guess it's clear enough, from context.-- 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 1898:Two files currently used in the article: 1742:The Farthest Shores of Ursula K. Le Guin 2987:Adjusted this slightly: is this better? 14: 498:I've read through the article again. 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 511:a term which she got from her father 2944:"ambisexual" should be good enough. 2864:hy is "novels" in quotes in note b? 2441:Yes, I think that's much improved. 1903:File:TheLeftHandOfDarkness1stEd.jpg 772:single reference like the rest can. 23: 2234:You're right, that's good enough. 260:hugely positive critical responses 138:... ranked Left Hand third behind 24: 3547: 2413:(if "rules" is the word I want)? 2220:done: replaced one with "cycle". 1263:After all, there was a "debate". 1874:no worries, but do you mean a 13: 1: 3522:14:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3479:14:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 3461:12:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3437:20:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 3414:16:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 3375:11:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 3360:09:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 3346:15:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 3320:10:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 3306:08:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 3271:07:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 3245:03:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 3230:03:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 2505:Yes, that's better. Struck. 1894:Image review by Jo-Jo Eumerus 283:This is now clear. Thanks. -- 2709:yes, it is. Good point. done 2336:Suggest linking "stasis" to 1748:He also lists five reviews: 1718:Bickman, Martin, "Le Guin's 539:Approximate is better: done. 7: 3503:featured article candidates 3208:12:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 3180:12:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 3161:05:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 3140:05:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 3113:00:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC) 3073:13:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC) 3049:11:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC) 3027:03:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC) 3007:10:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 2983:00:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 2959:00:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 2939:00:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 2917:12:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2892:12:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2798:00:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2745:09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2660:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2625:10:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2588:09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2561:00:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2523:09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2495:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2459:09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2431:00:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2379:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2327:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2292:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2252:23:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2197:00:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 2144:22:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2103:22:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2069:22:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 2021:10:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 1990:: I had done that based on 910:I've modified this sentence 517:Done (not in the lead, fyi) 152:Also mention the author of 31:featured article nomination 10: 3552: 2004:09:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC) 1983:09:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC) 1965:05:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC) 1945:19:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC) 1888:08:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC) 1862:07:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC) 1534:OK, I will review those.-- 64:) 14:45, 9 September 2016 2155:The Left Hand of Darkness 2033:Comments by Mike Christie 1917:File:Ursula K Le Guin.JPG 1840:17:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC) 1818:14:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC) 1804:05:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC) 1786:21:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 1762:Times Literary Supplement 1731:The Left Hand of Darkness 1702:19:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1685:10:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC) 1657:19:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1643:16:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1622:16:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1608:09:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1591:15:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1577:15:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1544:15:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1528:14:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1507:13:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1371:03:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) 1355:15:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 1340:honestly I'd rather not). 1288:tweaked this; take a look 1005:19:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 973:15:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC) 734:16:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 720:19:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 698:16:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 684:06:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC) 584:have a better suggestion? 558:: several problems here: 503:lead (arrr, Background): 487:13:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC) 473:13:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC) 459:10:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC) 438:23:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 392:23:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 377:Tweaked it; take a look. 372:11:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 293:10:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 236:20:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 222:10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC) 207:23:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC) 104:The Left Hand of Darkness 73:The Left Hand of Darkness 3532:Please do not modify it. 874:"the Vietnam war " caps? 423:21:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC) 116:17:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC) 91:17:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC) 36:Please do not modify it. 1712:Survey of SF Literature 3097: 3087:Comments by Carcharoth 98:This article is about 3195:To Kill a Mockingbird 3092: 2309:Fair enough; struck. 1720:Left Hand of Darkness 121:Support from Mirokado 1740:Slusser, George E., 342:Style and structure 2974:theme of gender". 2261:I see why you call 2126:Definitely better. 1848:Comment by GwydionM 1735:Riverside Quarterly 1453:Slaughterhouse-Five 1375:Hopefully finishing 1361:Will finish soon.-- 963:I'd let it stand.-- 739:Comments by Wehwalt 2922:Support by Lingzhi 1758:Publisher's Weekly 1729:Ketterer, David, " 938:Modified this too. 320:and communication 190:because it isn't. 100:Ursula K. Le Guin 94: 3543: 3534: 3507: 3501: 3498:, and leave the 3295: 3282: 3218: 3190: 3123: 3063: 3057: 3037: 3017: 2996: 2388:"...dictated by 2338:stasis (fiction) 2159:Rocannon's World 1929:WP:ACCESSIBILITY 1923:Both files need 1873: 1673: 828:good point, done 710:that bit now. -- 448: 144:Arthur C. Clarke 79: 48:The article was 38: 3551: 3550: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3530: 3505: 3499: 3285: 3276: 3212: 3184: 3117: 3089: 3061: 3055: 3031: 3011: 2990: 2924: 2824:I like it. done 2035: 1896: 1867: 1850: 1766:Top of the News 1750:Library Journal 1667: 741: 442: 160:) for symmetry. 148:Childhood's End 123: 76: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3549: 3538: 3537: 3525: 3524: 3512:goes through. 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3440: 3439: 3394: 3393: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3164: 3163: 3143: 3142: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 2988: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2928: 2923: 2920: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2800: 2776: 2775: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2723:done, I think 2721: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2682: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2564: 2563: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2498: 2497: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2434: 2433: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2006: 1921: 1920: 1914: 1895: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1806: 1764:(1/8/70), and 1746: 1745: 1744:(Borgo, 1976). 1738: 1737:V (April 1973) 1727: 1705: 1704: 1687: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1624: 1610: 1579: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1531: 1530: 1510: 1509: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1457: 1456: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1342: 1341: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1290: 1289: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1235: 1234: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1007: 993: 992: 991: 985: 984: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 958: 957: 947: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 933: 932: 928: 927: 926: 925: 919: 918: 914: 913: 912: 911: 905: 904: 899: 898: 897: 896: 890: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 876: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 862: 861: 857: 856: 855: 854: 843: 837: 836: 832: 831: 830: 829: 823: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 809: 808: 804: 803: 802: 801: 795: 794: 790: 789: 788: 787: 781: 780: 776: 775: 774: 773: 766: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 752: 751: 740: 737: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 661: 660: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 590: 589: 588: 585: 576: 575: 574: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 269: 268: 267: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 238: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 122: 119: 102:'s 1969 novel 96: 95: 81:Nominator(s): 75: 70: 69: 46: 45: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3548: 3536: 3533: 3527: 3526: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3504: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3486: 3485: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3467: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3445:Mike Christie 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3421:Mike Christie 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3398:Mike Christie 3391: 3390: 3389: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3330:Mike Christie 3327: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3293: 3292:Mike Christie 3289: 3280: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3216: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3196: 3188: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3145: 3144: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3128: 3121: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3096: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3060: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3035: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3021: 3015: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2994: 2989: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2977: 2972: 2967: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2948: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2925: 2919: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901:Mike Christie 2898: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876:Mike Christie 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2857: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2849: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2803: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782:Mike Christie 2778: 2777: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2750: 2749: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2729:Mike Christie 2725: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644:Mike Christie 2641: 2640: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609:Mike Christie 2606: 2605: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572:Mike Christie 2569: 2568: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545:Mike Christie 2541: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2507:Mike Christie 2504: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2479:Mike Christie 2476: 2475: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2443:Mike Christie 2440: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2415:Mike Christie 2412: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2363:Mike Christie 2361:Good enough. 2360: 2359: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2339: 2334: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2311:Mike Christie 2308: 2307: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2276:Mike Christie 2273: 2272: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2259: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2236:Mike Christie 2233: 2232: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2224: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2204: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181:Mike Christie 2178: 2177: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128:Mike Christie 2125: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087:Mike Christie 2084: 2083: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053:Mike Christie 2050: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988:Jo-Jo Eumerus 1986: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1979:contributions 1976: 1972: 1971:Jo-Jo Eumerus 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1953:Jo-Jo Eumerus 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1941:contributions 1938: 1934: 1933:Jo-Jo Eumerus 1930: 1926: 1918: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824:Mike Christie 1821: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792:Mike Christie 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1770:Mike Christie 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1671: 1666: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1550:Source review 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 988: 987: 986: 982: 981: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 950: 949: 948: 944: 943: 937: 936: 935: 934: 930: 929: 923: 922: 921: 920: 916: 915: 909: 908: 907: 906: 901: 900: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 886: 880: 879: 878: 877: 873: 872: 866: 865: 864: 863: 859: 858: 852: 848: 844: 841: 840: 839: 838: 834: 833: 827: 826: 825: 824: 820: 819: 813: 812: 811: 810: 806: 805: 799: 798: 797: 796: 792: 791: 785: 784: 783: 782: 778: 777: 770: 769: 768: 767: 763: 762: 756: 755: 754: 753: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 736: 735: 731: 727: 722: 721: 717: 713: 699: 695: 691: 687: 686: 685: 681: 677: 672: 671: 669: 666: 665: 664:Plot summary 663: 662: 658: 657: 656: 644: 643: 642: 640: 636: 635: 633: 632: 629: 628: 627: 617: 616: 615: 612: 611: 609: 608: 605: 596: 595: 594: 591: 586: 582: 581: 580: 577: 572: 571: 570: 568: 563: 562: 560: 559: 557: 552: 551: 549: 548: 545: 538: 537: 536: 534: 530: 529: 527: 526: 523: 516: 515: 514: 512: 508: 507: 505: 504: 501: 500: 499: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 470: 466: 462: 461: 460: 456: 452: 446: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 396: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 379: 378: 376: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 359: 358: 355: 354: 353: 351: 347: 346: 344: 343: 340: 333: 332: 331: 329: 325: 324: 322: 321: 319: 315: 308: 307: 306: 304: 300: 294: 290: 286: 282: 281: 278: 277: 276: 274: 270: 265: 264: 263: 261: 257: 256: 255: 252: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 191: 189: 185: 184: 183: 181: 177: 176: 174: 173: 170: 163: 162: 161: 159: 158:Frank Herbert 155: 151: 149: 145: 141: 135: 134: 132: 131: 128: 127: 126: 118: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 93: 92: 88: 84: 78: 77: 74: 68: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3531: 3528: 3488:Closing note 3487: 3441: 3395: 3387: 3258: 3257: 3193: 3148: 3126: 3093: 2965: 2896: 2895: 2873: 2863: 2850: 2840: 2829: 2819: 2809: 2768: 2758: 2714: 2704: 2694: 2684: 2678: 2668: 2633: 2598: 2533: 2469: 2410: 2405: 2394: 2389: 2387: 2351: 2349: 2335: 2300: 2262: 2260: 2225: 2215: 2205: 2170: 2158: 2154: 2152: 2116: 2077: 2041: 2036: 2008: 1922: 1897: 1876:good article 1851: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1747: 1741: 1734: 1730: 1723: 1719: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1689: 1452: 1230: 1225: 995:More anon.-- 953: 742: 723: 708: 667: 653: 638: 637: 634: 630: 625: 613: 610: 607:References: 606: 592: 578: 566: 564: 561: 554: 553: 550: 546: 532: 531: 528: 524: 510: 509: 506: 502: 497: 412: 380: 360: 349: 348: 345: 341: 327: 326: 323: 317: 316: 302: 301: 272: 271: 259: 258: 253: 193: 187: 179: 178: 175: 171: 153: 137: 136: 133: 129: 124: 103: 97: 80: 49: 47: 35: 28: 3014:Vanamonde93 2950:instance? 2716:consistent. 2411:shifgrethor 2406:shifgrethor 2395:shifgrethor 2390:shifgrethor 1760:(1/27/69), 1752:(6/15/70), 1635:Vanamonde93 1600:Vanamonde93 1520:Vanamonde93 903:quotations. 525:80 or 81?: 318:Shifgrethor 214:Vanamonde93 108:Vanamonde93 83:Vanamonde93 3259:Coord note 3237:Carcharoth 3215:Carcharoth 3187:Carcharoth 3172:Carcharoth 3120:Carcharoth 3105:Carcharoth 2814:true. done 1992:WP:ALTTEXT 1925:WP:ALTTEXT 1724:SF Studies 1063:True. done 1009:Back again 547:Estraven: 3496:WP:FAC/ar 3492:candidate 3352:Vanamonde 3298:Vanamonde 3222:Vanamonde 3200:Vanamonde 3153:Vanamonde 3132:Vanamonde 3127:scholarly 3041:Vanamonde 2999:Vanamonde 2635:death..." 2263:Left Hand 2013:GermanJoe 1996:Vanamonde 1957:Vanamonde 1931:reasons. 1911:WP:NFCC#2 1880:Vanamonde 1796:Vanamonde 1756:(11/69), 1726:IV (1977) 1677:Vanamonde 1295:Looks OK. 954:Left Hand 676:Vanamonde 631:Setting: 567:Left Hand 479:Vanamonde 451:Vanamonde 254:Reception 3514:Ian Rose 3490:: This 3471:Ian Rose 3453:contribs 3429:contribs 3406:contribs 3367:Ian Rose 3338:contribs 3284:longer. 3279:Ian Rose 3263:Ian Rose 3095:success. 2927:Support. 2909:contribs 2884:contribs 2790:contribs 2737:contribs 2652:contribs 2617:contribs 2580:contribs 2553:contribs 2515:contribs 2487:contribs 2451:contribs 2423:contribs 2371:contribs 2319:contribs 2284:contribs 2244:contribs 2189:contribs 2136:contribs 2118:mission? 2095:contribs 2061:contribs 1870:GwydionM 1854:GwydionM 1832:contribs 1778:contribs 1754:F&SF 1409:dubious. 726:Mirokado 712:Mirokado 690:Mirokado 465:Mirokado 445:Mirokado 430:Mirokado 415:Mirokado 384:Mirokado 364:Mirokado 285:Mirokado 228:Mirokado 199:Mirokado 172:Setting 54:Ian Rose 50:promoted 3457:library 3433:library 3410:library 3342:library 3324:Sorry, 3312:Wehwalt 3288:Wehwalt 3066:Lingzhi 3034:Lingzhi 3020:Lingzhi 2993:Lingzhi 2976:Lingzhi 2952:Lingzhi 2932:Lingzhi 2913:library 2897:Support 2888:library 2794:library 2741:library 2656:library 2621:library 2584:library 2557:library 2519:library 2491:library 2455:library 2427:library 2375:library 2323:library 2288:library 2248:library 2193:library 2140:library 2099:library 2065:library 1907:WP:NFCC 1836:library 1810:Wehwalt 1782:library 1708:Comment 1694:Wehwalt 1690:Support 1670:Wehwalt 1649:Wehwalt 1627:Wehwalt 1614:Wehwalt 1596:Wehwalt 1583:Wehwalt 1569:Wehwalt 1536:Wehwalt 1516:Wehwalt 1499:Wehwalt 1363:Wehwalt 1347:Wehwalt 997:Wehwalt 965:Wehwalt 847:Wehwalt 188:unique, 3070:(talk) 3059:nowrap 3024:(talk) 2980:(talk) 2966:second 2956:(talk) 2936:(talk) 2567:done. 2352:nearly 2043:Bloom. 1226:Locus' 303:Budrys 58:FACBot 2680:done. 2639:done 2474:done 2082:done 1733:, in 1722:, in 1562:fixed 1231:Locus 130:Lead 16:< 3518:talk 3475:talk 3449:talk 3425:talk 3402:talk 3371:talk 3356:talk 3334:talk 3316:talk 3302:talk 3290:and 3267:talk 3241:talk 3226:talk 3204:talk 3176:talk 3157:talk 3149:Also 3136:talk 3109:talk 3045:talk 3003:talk 2905:talk 2880:talk 2845:done 2804:done 2786:talk 2751:done 2733:talk 2699:done 2689:done 2673:done 2648:talk 2613:talk 2576:talk 2549:talk 2511:talk 2483:talk 2447:talk 2419:talk 2367:talk 2344:done 2315:talk 2280:talk 2240:talk 2185:talk 2165:done 2157:and 2132:talk 2091:talk 2057:talk 2017:talk 2000:talk 1975:talk 1961:talk 1937:talk 1927:for 1884:talk 1858:talk 1828:talk 1814:talk 1800:talk 1774:talk 1698:talk 1681:talk 1653:talk 1639:talk 1631:this 1618:talk 1604:talk 1587:talk 1573:talk 1540:talk 1524:talk 1503:talk 1490:done 1476:done 1444:done 1430:done 1416:done 1401:done 1387:done 1367:talk 1351:talk 1255:done 1203:done 1175:done 1161:done 1147:done 1133:done 1119:done 1105:done 1091:done 1049:done 1035:done 1021:done 1001:talk 990:done 969:talk 924:done 881:done 867:done 851:talk 814:done 800:done 786:done 730:talk 716:talk 694:talk 680:talk 618:done 597:done 573:done 556:...' 483:talk 469:talk 455:talk 434:talk 419:talk 388:talk 368:talk 309:done 289:talk 266:done 232:talk 218:talk 203:talk 164:done 154:Dune 142:and 140:Dune 112:talk 87:talk 62:talk 56:via 3510:bot 3455:- 3431:- 3408:- 3340:- 3326:Ian 2911:- 2886:- 2792:- 2739:- 2654:- 2619:- 2582:- 2555:- 2517:- 2489:- 2453:- 2425:- 2373:- 2321:- 2286:- 2246:- 2191:- 2138:- 2097:- 2063:- 1834:- 1780:- 146:'s 52:by 3520:) 3506:}} 3500:{{ 3477:) 3459:) 3451:- 3435:) 3427:- 3412:) 3404:- 3373:) 3358:) 3344:) 3336:- 3318:) 3304:) 3269:) 3243:) 3228:) 3206:) 3178:) 3159:) 3138:) 3111:) 3068:♦ 3062:}} 3056:{{ 3047:) 3022:♦ 3005:) 2978:♦ 2954:♦ 2934:♦ 2915:) 2907:- 2890:) 2882:- 2796:) 2788:- 2743:) 2735:- 2658:) 2650:- 2623:) 2615:- 2586:) 2578:- 2559:) 2551:- 2521:) 2513:- 2493:) 2485:- 2457:) 2449:- 2429:) 2421:- 2377:) 2369:- 2325:) 2317:- 2290:) 2282:- 2250:) 2242:- 2195:) 2187:- 2142:) 2134:- 2101:) 2093:- 2067:) 2059:- 2019:) 2002:) 1981:) 1977:, 1963:) 1943:) 1939:, 1886:) 1860:) 1838:) 1830:- 1816:) 1802:) 1784:) 1776:- 1700:) 1683:) 1655:) 1641:) 1620:) 1606:) 1589:) 1575:) 1542:) 1526:) 1505:) 1369:) 1353:) 1003:) 971:) 732:) 718:) 696:) 682:) 485:) 471:) 457:) 436:) 421:) 390:) 370:) 362:-- 291:) 234:) 220:) 205:) 197:-- 114:) 89:) 67:. 33:. 3516:( 3473:( 3447:( 3423:( 3400:( 3369:( 3354:( 3332:( 3314:( 3300:( 3294:: 3286:@ 3281:: 3277:@ 3265:( 3239:( 3224:( 3217:: 3213:@ 3202:( 3189:: 3185:@ 3174:( 3155:( 3134:( 3122:: 3118:@ 3107:( 3043:( 3036:: 3032:@ 3016:: 3012:@ 3001:( 2995:: 2991:@ 2903:( 2878:( 2784:( 2731:( 2646:( 2611:( 2574:( 2547:( 2509:( 2481:( 2445:( 2417:( 2365:( 2340:. 2313:( 2278:( 2238:( 2183:( 2130:( 2089:( 2055:( 2015:( 1998:( 1973:( 1959:( 1935:( 1882:( 1872:: 1868:@ 1856:( 1826:( 1812:( 1798:( 1772:( 1696:( 1679:( 1672:: 1668:@ 1651:( 1637:( 1616:( 1602:( 1585:( 1571:( 1538:( 1522:( 1501:( 1455:. 1365:( 1349:( 999:( 967:( 853:) 849:( 728:( 714:( 692:( 678:( 481:( 467:( 453:( 447:: 443:@ 432:( 417:( 386:( 366:( 287:( 230:( 216:( 201:( 156:( 150:. 110:( 85:( 60:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/The Left Hand of Darkness/archive1 - Knowledge

Index