Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Jochi/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

615:"Jochi also accompanied SÜBE’ETEI BA’TUR’s first campaign against the Qipchaqs (1218–19)", the dates from "Jochi campaigned with Cha’adai and Ögedei in southwest Inner Mongolia (November 1211) and in Hebei and Shanxi (autumn 1213)", and "Chinggis Khan assigned to Jochi KHORAZM and the steppes from the river Chu on west, intending them as a base for the conquest of the Qipchaqs" from Atwood 2004. 665:
included in the article the details that Jochi was assigned Khwarazm and the river Chu's western steppes, even though we say Jochi preferred a less destructive approach during the siege of Gurganj, we don't say who eventually got control of the territories conquered. I believe this is the only detail left to be included.
129:. The disputed circumstances of his birth, his conflicts with his brothers, his growing independence and estrangement from his father, his early death... all have contributed to a murky image of the man. Hopefully, this article will bring some clarity. If successful, this nomination will be used in the 623:
Dunnell 2023 also confirms: "Discord among Chaghadai, Jochi, and Ögödei prolonged the siege (it lasted at least five months), causing a high Mongol casualty rate. When Urgench finally fell in spring of 1221 after great slaughter, the survivors were driven out, divided up, and dispatched in the usual
664:
I had not seen that the Qangli are considered to be of Kipchak origin. That makes the latter part of the following sentence included: "Chinggis Khan assigned to Jochi KHORAZM and the steppes from the river Chu on west, intending them as a base for the conquest of the Qipchaqs". But we haven't
334:
I am very much not familiar with the subject matter, so the review is more surface-level than I prefer my reviews to be, but this appears to be an excellent article. From a nonexpert look, the sourcing all appears to be reputable.
906: 783:
Not really—you won't find any academics arguing passionately for or against Genghis's paternity, and the whole matter is marked down under "we will never know". Back then however ...
796:
You've told us that the events are controversial and contradictory, but then provided one straight narrative. Whose narrative are we using, and why do we trust that one?
530:
Could we add images of the Siege of Gurganj/Gurganj Fort, and the courses of the Irtysh and Angara rivers? I believe these will better illustrate their respective text.
836:"After the brawling brothers were pulled apart" you've gone from shouting one insult to breaking up a brawl with no intervening mention of the actual brawl occurring. 917: 900: 759: 828:"requested him to decide" not sure the grammar works here. "asked him to" would work, or "requested that he decide", but I don't think you can use "requested him" 999: 1014: 602:#41: Source doesn't explicitly say "designed to buttress Ögedei's rule as khan of the empire", it just says "harmonization between the "standard narrative"". 710: 692: 674: 659: 264: 250: 232: 214: 200: 847:
We did not, but it happened (or didn't, I suppose) following the siege, so it fits better afterwards I think. Rewritten anyway, let me know what you think.
71: 365: 67:
As of 25 September 2024, 20:23 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. An FAC coordinator will be responsible for closing the nomination.
641: 567: 881: 741: 951:
Probably will not get to this until the weekend, so if the coordinators see the nomination fit to promote before then, no need to wait for me. –
844:" Jochi's failure to give him his rightful share of the loot" did we establish earlier that Jochi did this? Feels like it comes out of nowhere 325:
Check the page range on Dafeng & Jianyi - the short citation is to p. 190 but this page is outside of the range given in the long citation
807:
Not entirely—there was also the question of whether Temüjin was important enough to propose that in the first place; included both in text.
191:
except the last, which I don't really know what's being asked for. The building itself wasn't ever copyrighted? Could you please explain?
142: 966: 946: 591: 448: 118: 182: 861: 548: 346: 296: 539:
I'll have to check for comprehensiveness, because I somehow feel something is missing in the article. I don't know what though.
978: 17: 852:"One account states...this account" I know you've got the semi-colon, but you still have "account" twice in one sentence 624:
fashion. Jochi parted ways with his brothers and moved north into the steppes, ostensibly to subdue the Qipchaq tribes."
582:
Thinking of doing spot checks for 10 refs, about 20% of total refs. Will try to get these done within this week. Cheers
972: 799:
That is the accepted narrative, containing elements from both the SHM and Rashid al-Din. I have specified that in text.
632:
Also, we should list the probable Mongol casualties at Gurganj to give context on why Genghis considered it a failure.
864:(which I've just made), which trims out a lot of the empty space and the random family to close in on the building 416: 492:"Upon the city's eventual fall": "after" instead of "upon"? Idk why but the latter seems grammatically incorrect. 425:
Is there any reason you can't fit it into the module? I've gotten the military infobox to work as a module for
92: 995: 914: 896: 878: 755: 738: 688: 655: 361: 260: 228: 196: 138: 114: 51: 429: 463:"reorder his new nation, dividing the nation": "it" instead of "the nation"? The latter is repetitive. 925: 47: 905:
Looking good to me, I'm a support. (As a side note, if you have any interest in commenting, I have
406: 991: 910: 892: 888: 874: 751: 747: 734: 684: 651: 444: 377: 357: 256: 224: 192: 134: 110: 1010: 728: 39: 477:"triumphant return from battle": do we know which battle this was? Does the SHM reveal this? 314: 87: 706: 670: 637: 587: 563: 544: 422:. If you have a way to fit the parameters of the latter into the former, much appreciated. 246: 210: 178: 8: 573: 804:"this proposal was taken as insulting" I assume because of Mr Jochi's messy parentage? 522:"Ulytau Region, Kazakhstan, has...": rephrase to "Ulytau Region in Kazakhstan has..."? 440: 341: 306: 291: 280: 147: 59: 1006: 984: 486: 986: 371: 168:
File:Khwarezmian_Empire_1190_-_1220_(AD).PNG needs a source for the data presented
959: 939: 702: 680: 666: 647: 633: 583: 559: 540: 242: 220: 206: 188: 174: 873:
That's all I have. A nice tightly-written little article, great work as usual. ♠
618:
Added the dates for the Chinese campaigns. The other details are in the article.
55: 780:"were considered highly controversial" - were, past tense, as in not anymore? 533:
We don't have high-quality depictions of the siege. Added a map of the Irtysh.
982: 353: 336: 286: 130: 436: 205:
It will be in the public domain due to age, but just needs a tag for that.
820:
insert here my usual complaint about breaking the left header with images
238: 988: 125:
Jochi was, and remains, the most mysterious of the sons of Genghis Khan
954: 934: 43: 788:
I think you can ditch both uses of "highly" in this sentence as well
646:
I don't believe I am aware of any estimates. Thanks for the comments
173:
File:Dzhuchi_khan_mausoleum.jpg needs a tag for the original work.
26: 317:
seems preferable given the uncertainty over the date of his death
400:
In the infobox, can we list the campaigns Jochi participated in?
392:"excluded from succession": prefix a "the" before "succession"? 313:
I don't think the 1227 deaths category is strictly appropriate,
163:
File:Batu_Khan_on_the_Throne_by_Rashid_al-Din.jpg needs a US tag
302:
Religion of Tengrism seems only to be mentioned in the infobox
823:
insert my usual rejoinder that I don't mind it in moderation.
34: 27: 387:
I believe they mean the same thing; what's the improvement?
97: 460:"named Qutlugh Khatun...": "namely" instead of "named"? 219:
Can you please specify what type of tag is applicable
612:
On comprehensivess, why don't we have these details:
579:
All sources are from reliable publishers and authors.
384:"one of their number": "members" instead of number? 495:"take his time hunting": "spend" instead of "take"? 457:"badly contradictory": "highly" instead of "badly"? 812:"He also began" think you can ditch "also" here 498:"greatly fond of": "very" instead of "greatly"? 599:#5, #51, #45, #38, #37, #32, #28, #21, #9: ok. 356:—any and all improvements are always helpful. 466:"in the expectation": "with" instead of "in"? 241:align with what is known about the building? 72:Featured article candidates/Jochi/archive1 862:File:Dzhuchi khan mausoleum (cropped).jpg 558:from me on the general text then. Cheers 517:I don't think that's necessary, but done. 127:(I haven't got around to his sisters yet) 469:Link to Christopher Atwood in the body? 14: 867:Done, and thanks muchly for the crop. 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 839:It was a fairly short one, but done. 23: 990:could I nominate another article? 887:thanks very much for the comments 765:Technically I'm only a day out :P 24: 1026: 769:"However, during" - ditch however 511:Add spaces after 1225 and 1227? 1015:13:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1000:12:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 967:03:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 947:01:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 918:00:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 901:18:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC) 882:00:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 760:10:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 742:18:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 627:All of this is in the article. 449:15:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 13: 1: 711:16:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 693:15:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 675:16:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 660:12:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 642:09:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 592:17:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 568:16:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 549:17:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 366:11:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 347:00:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 297:23:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 265:11:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 251:00:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 233:15:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 215:00:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 201:23:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 183:17:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 143:15:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 119:15:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 973:Request for the coordinators 772:"had begun to" - "began to" 733:Within the week hopefully. ♠ 7: 10: 1031: 907:another McQueen collection 485:"captured Otrar": link to 66: 510:Sources for 1227:" -: --> 352:Thanks for the comments 697:The source review is a 417:Infobox military person 305:Removed as not fitting 285:I'll review this soon. 158:Don't use fixed px size 153:Suggest adding alt text 605:Adjusted page numbers. 255:It does. Many thanks. 992:~~ AirshipJungleman29 893:~~ AirshipJungleman29 752:~~ AirshipJungleman29 685:~~ AirshipJungleman29 652:~~ AirshipJungleman29 358:~~ AirshipJungleman29 315:Category:1220s deaths 257:~~ AirshipJungleman29 225:~~ AirshipJungleman29 193:~~ AirshipJungleman29 135:~~ AirshipJungleman29 111:~~ AirshipJungleman29 650:; much appreciated. 926:Comments from Aza24 891:, responses above. 860:Suggest subbing in 223:? I'm a bit stuck. 931:Will do shortly – 889:Premeditated Chaos 748:Premeditated Chaos 506:"Sources for 1225: 378:AirshipJungleman29 307:MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE 487:Otrar Catastrophe 430:Infobox scientist 121: 105: 104: 1022: 979:FAC coordinators 964: 962: 957: 944: 942: 937: 831:Done the latter. 729:Support from PMC 434: 428: 421: 415: 411: 405: 128: 108: 77: 76: 64: 63: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1020: 1019: 975: 960: 955: 953: 940: 935: 933: 928: 731: 576: 432: 426: 419: 413: 409: 407:Infobox royalty 403: 380:, my comments: 374: 345: 295: 283: 150: 126: 68: 37: 33: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1028: 1018: 1017: 974: 971: 970: 969: 949: 927: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 871: 870: 869: 868: 858: 857: 856: 850: 849: 848: 842: 841: 840: 834: 833: 832: 826: 825: 824: 818: 817: 816: 810: 809: 808: 802: 801: 800: 794: 793: 792: 786: 785: 784: 778: 777: 776: 770: 763: 762: 730: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 630: 629: 628: 621: 620: 619: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 600: 580: 575: 572: 571: 570: 537: 536: 535: 534: 528: 527: 526: 520: 519: 518: 508: 507: 504: 503: 502: 496: 493: 490: 483: 482: 481: 475: 474: 473: 467: 464: 461: 458: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 398: 397: 396: 390: 389: 388: 373: 370: 369: 368: 339: 332: 331: 330: 329: 323: 322: 321: 311: 310: 309: 289: 282: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 170: 169: 165: 164: 160: 159: 155: 154: 149: 146: 123: 122: 109:Nominator(s): 103: 102: 101: 100: 98:External links 95: 90: 82: 81: 75: 74: 30: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1027: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 987: 985: 983: 980: 968: 965: 963: 958: 950: 948: 945: 943: 938: 930: 929: 919: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 885: 884: 883: 880: 876: 866: 865: 863: 859: 854: 853: 851: 846: 845: 843: 838: 837: 835: 830: 829: 827: 822: 821: 819: 814: 813: 811: 806: 805: 803: 798: 797: 795: 790: 789: 787: 782: 781: 779: 774: 773: 771: 768: 767: 766: 761: 757: 753: 749: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 736: 712: 708: 704: 701:then. Cheers 700: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 677: 676: 672: 668: 663: 662: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 631: 626: 625: 622: 617: 616: 614: 613: 611: 604: 603: 601: 598: 597: 596:Spot checks: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 581: 578: 577: 574:Source review 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 532: 531: 529: 524: 523: 521: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 505: 500: 499: 497: 494: 491: 488: 484: 479: 478: 476: 471: 470: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 450: 446: 442: 441:ThaesOfereode 438: 431: 424: 423: 418: 412:is used, not 408: 402: 401: 399: 394: 393: 391: 386: 385: 383: 382: 381: 379: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 344: 343: 338: 327: 326: 324: 319: 318: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 301: 300: 299: 298: 294: 293: 288: 266: 262: 258: 254: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171: 167: 166: 162: 161: 157: 156: 152: 151: 145: 144: 140: 136: 132: 120: 116: 112: 107: 106: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 83: 79: 78: 73: 70: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 36: 29: 19: 1007:Gog the Mild 976: 952: 932: 872: 764: 750:gentle poke 732: 698: 555: 538: 509: 437:this article 375: 340: 333: 290: 284: 281:HF - support 148:Image review 124: 93:Citation bot 32: 328:Ah, a typo. 791:Good call. 775:Done both. 703:Matarisvan 681:Matarisvan 667:Matarisvan 648:Matarisvan 634:Matarisvan 584:Matarisvan 560:Matarisvan 541:Matarisvan 480:Clarified. 372:Matarisvan 243:Nikkimaria 221:Nikkimaria 207:Nikkimaria 189:Nikkimaria 187:All fixed 175:Nikkimaria 1005:You may. 909:at FAC) ♠ 501:All done. 472:All done. 395:Adjusted. 855:Removed. 354:Hog Farm 337:Hog Farm 320:Adjusted 287:Hog Farm 88:Analysis 556:support 131:WikiCup 80:Toolbox 48:history 961:(talk) 941:(talk) 915:(talk) 879:(talk) 739:(talk) 679:Added 237:Would 956:Aza24 936:Aza24 815:Done. 525:Done. 56:watch 52:links 35:Jochi 28:Jochi 16:< 1011:talk 996:talk 897:talk 756:talk 707:talk 699:pass 689:talk 671:talk 656:talk 638:talk 588:talk 564:talk 545:talk 445:talk 362:talk 342:Talk 292:Talk 261:talk 247:talk 239:this 229:talk 211:talk 197:talk 179:talk 139:talk 115:talk 60:logs 44:talk 40:edit 911:PMC 875:PMC 735:PMC 435:on 376:Hi 1013:) 998:) 981:: 913:♠ 899:) 877:♠ 758:) 737:♠ 709:) 691:) 683:. 673:) 658:) 640:) 590:) 566:) 554:A 547:) 447:) 439:. 433:}} 427:{{ 420:}} 414:{{ 410:}} 404:{{ 364:) 263:) 249:) 231:) 213:) 199:) 181:) 141:) 133:. 117:) 58:| 54:| 50:| 46:| 42:| 1009:( 994:( 977:@ 895:( 754:( 705:( 687:( 669:( 654:( 636:( 586:( 562:( 543:( 489:? 443:( 360:( 259:( 245:( 227:( 209:( 195:( 177:( 137:( 113:( 62:) 38:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
Jochi
Jochi
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Featured article candidates/Jochi/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
15:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
15:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Nikkimaria
talk
17:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Nikkimaria
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
23:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Nikkimaria
talk
00:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.