615:"Radio City was released in January 1974. Like #1 Record it received excellent reviews, critics noting that "the sound is stimulating, the musicianship superb" on what was "a collection of excellent material" and affirming that Alex Chilton had "now emerged as a major talent"." I suggest changing this to "Radio City was released in January 1974, and like #1 Record it received excellent reviews.", and then spend a few sentences detailing those quotes and the publications they came from.
202:) I own Jovanovic's book, and I am a big fan of Big Star and am familiar with their history. In fact, I planned in the back of my head to work on this article forever, but I've been inactive on Knowledge for a while and in the meantime it seems you've picked it up (great work, btw). I've cleaned up a few minor typos and changed a few UK spellings to US ones. Here are some things I noticed along the way reading it (I'll keep adding to this list as I read each section):
728:"Posthumous popularity, critical favor, and influence" is a long title, and I'm not sure I like parts of it. For example, "Posthumous" seems a strange choice, given not only that Big Star is a band and not a person but also that they became influential before reuniting, so it's not really posthumous at all. "Popularity" might be a bit misleading as they're still only a cult act. Perhaps "Legacy and influence" is more succinct?
238:"Chilton had enjoyed commercial success as lead singer with The Box Tops, delivering, at sixteen, the lead vocal for the #1 hit "The Letter"." Is this sentences necessary to the lead? Only one sentence is dedicated to the Box Tops in the article's main body, and the placement at the end of the first paragraph seems out of place. I'd say either remove it or at least make it the first sentence of the lead's second paragraph.
1998:. Too much too soon. All this is true, but it is overkill in its present form. Just go for the usual "formed by.. in..(bass) etc, and save that stuff for the last para. I met this at PR, and most of the body of the article is fine, but the lead remains a problem though easily fixed by a cut and paste and a better opening. Would be leaning towards support once the lead is toned down, very nice work overall.
644:"sales of Radio City were prevented"; this makes it sound as though Colombia deliberately suppressed every copy of Big Star's album, which is not true; Radio City actually sold around 20,000 copies, much better than #1 Record had performed but still not great. Perhaps "sales of Radio City were minimal"? Additionally, the information I mentioned above (from the same page you already cite) is important.
788:"In 1998, #1 Record's "In the Street" was used as the theme song for the sitcom That '70s Show; in 1999, a new version titled "That '70s Song" was recorded by Cheap Trick for the show. This and Big Star's own "September Gurls" were included on the 1999 album That '70s Album (Rockin') released by the television program's producers." Logically, this should be in the "Covers and references" section.
1371:. I've now rendered it "lastfm.com (CBS)" in the notes to make that clearer. The rest don't look too reliable though, I agree. I've substituted better sources for all except two in your list. I drew a blank for Matt Brown's cover version, so I've removed it from the article. The other troublesome one is the R.E.M. Christmas fan club cover version. However, it's listed in the WP article
209:"The band's musical style, influenced by British Invasion groups including The Beatles and The Kinks, as well as The Byrds, The Beach Boys and other U.S. acts, incorporated darker, nihilistic themes, foreshadowing the alternative rock of the 1980s and 1990s." Darker than what? This sentence is awkwardly constructed and should be split into two sentences.
1973:- Checked through most of the sources and I can see no problems. The extensive copyediting and stylistic changes above probably ensured that if there was anything (which I cannot see in the history and from looking at sources I have access to) then it would have been changed from the source. Heavy use of quotations are good.
1854:
of the band's musical style, per their captions, in support of the article text. I hope they can remain but if it does after all transpire there's any violation of WP principles then I would support whatever changes are necessary to bring them in line, whether during this FA review or at a later time.
1853:
No problem, the sound files can be adjusted if necessary; however, the question has been considered with other editors (see talk page if interested) and there are good grounds for this particular range of four sound files for this article. They are specifically selected, each demonstrating one aspect
1995:
Big Star is an
American rock band that created, in its original era 1971–74, a "seminal body of work that never stopped inspiring succeeding generations", earning it recognition decades later as "the quintessential American power pop band" and "one of the most mythic and influential cult acts in all
1556:
That's a very good point; I suspect the detailed list of covers had more value in the past, before other content took over the role of demonstrating the band's notability. I'll look at condensing the list, probably into one sentence that just states artist names with reliable sources. I'll also hunt
1522:
I'm sure you can find a better source than Last.fm, though. This isn't a music reference site; it's a site to show off what you're listening to (yes, I have one). It's routinely discouraged from use in music articles. Try
Allmusic. Even then, to state the cover is notable, you need more than just a
534:
is restored. For example, to pick something up only to put it down again; or, the music got loud and then got quiet again. Used in that sense it has a function in conveying a connection between an action or state and another that preceded it. Anyway, that's by the by and purely for interest in case
1637:
I reviewed this article for GA, and helped copyedit it and dragged some other editors in to have a look. I think it has congealed nicely since then and passes criteria. I suppose I could jiggle a little prose around but no deal-breakers stand out and much of what I might tweak would be subjective.
529:
Done: removed. This was a slightly interesting one! The word isn't needed and the style is more encyclopedic without it. As a point of interest, perhaps it's more in
British English then that "again" is commonly used in the sense not of "another time" but of a reaction or response, as a result of
982:
I noticed throughout that there is very little insight from members of the band and/or people who worked with the band. Without going into too much detail, which should of course be reserved for the individual articles about the band's releases, it would be nice to include some quotes from Big
127:
I found this article languishing a couple of months ago and it struck me as a good candidate to develop more fully. I have been working on it since that time, taking it through a GA pass and polishing it further since. In my judgement it now meets the FA criteria and I offer it for review. All
492:
I'm surprised to find that there is virtually no explanation of the sound of each individual Big Star album. The "Musical style and influences" is a good general overview of the band's sound, but surely it's a good idea to explain the differences between each record in their individual
2048:
I do to be honest. You gushed before you even explained what Big Star is. Its academic now anyway, I've reworded a bit. I dont want to fall out over this though, I think the work here is terrific, have been following the development for the last month and a half, and am delighted to
2024:, i.e., as well as summarizing the article, the Lead should explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and should establish notability in the first sentence if possible. I've seen opening sentences taken up with "formed by... (bass)" etc. and they don't have the impact that
1222:" to last paragraph of the lead? It seems more appropriate there, as that is the paragraph where you talk in detail about the group's legacy. Otherwise, it seems a little POV to tell the reader how influential Big Star were before you even lay out the basic facts about them.
1663:
I need to do a thorough run-through of the article in the next few days. I see some things that worry me. I may not get to it right away, so I hope this doesn't suddenly get promoted or something (which has happened before with FACs I wanted to list objections to).
586:"Bell quit for good"; "Hummel too quit for good": I'd suggest removing the "for good" part, as it's not only repetitive but very informally worded. The mention of Hummel's quitting is far enough away from Bell's quitting that I think the "too" is also unnecessary.
1872:
To be perfectly honest, I stopped reading after the first sentence. It reads like an advertisement for the band, and provides very little actual info. As it would be unfair to oppose based on one line, I'm not going to vote, but I hope this can be addressed.
765:
Bearing in mind my response to your previous comment, I've instead made it a subsection of "First era", located immediately after what is now "Legacy and influence". Does that all seem OK, or would you suggest something different from what I've done?
1160:
But these proper names shouldn't be in the alt text. The average reader doesn't know what these people look like, so saying (in effect) "It looks like
Stringfellow" in the alt text won't help them. Can you please remove the proper names from the alt
145:
Check the toolbox to your right, there are several disambiguation links to be fixed. Also, I see you've put in alt text, but it is incorrectly done. What you've done is simply duplicate the image caption, which is not the purpose of alt text. See
1585:
That looks and reads much better. Also, I'd recommened make the Legacy subsection its own separate section, separate fromt he band biography. It's common practice in band articles, as a band's legacy and influence is not part of its biography.
757:
It seems to me that logically, the "Covers and references" section should be a subsection of the "Posthumous popularity, critical favor, and influence" section. They cover similar ground, so it seems strange to see them separated by unrelated
1541:
Actually, reading the article in-depth, you really should get rid of those long lists of cover songs. That's inappropriate minutae for a band article; if it's notable, stick it in the articles about the songs being covered themselves.
1788:
Niggle: most US style guides say no dots in "USA", although the you dot es dot is still clung to, ironically. But in the infobox, I'd go with spelling it out, just once: "United States", as more stylish in isolation. No space problem
699:"The first three Big Star albums are included in Rolling Stone magazine’s 500 Greatest Albums of All Time." "September Gurls" was included in Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs list, a fact which should be noted in that sentence.
931:; I have retained a few parts of the quotes as they're suitably descriptive without getting POV; does this seem an acceptable result or would you suggest it's better to completely eliminate any quotations from the descriptions?
245:
Done: I've removed it. I added it because it's notable but was never happy with the way it detracts in the Lead; having thought on, I now see that it's notable to
Chilton rather than Big Star. The later mention is sufficient.
887:
Regarding the "Musical style and influences" section: I think that it would make most sense if the first paragraph came after the second, and if the third paragraph were incorporated into the "Second era: 1993 to present"
1900:
has a slight problem. All the rationales are fine, they are reduced quality, and seem to be important to include for the text with reasonable "captions", but the last three audio samples exceed the 10% limit per
1485:
I was under the impression that although last.fm does indeed contain some user-generated content, the cited parts are not user-generated. As you're querying it though, I'll check it out in the morning.
953:"Stringfellow is also known for his work with R.E.M." Not sure about ending a sentence with the last period of R.E.M.'s name... Perhaps reword this or slide the information into an earlier sentence?
2020:
is off the mark... that sentence has been criticized before, but of course it could just be personal preferences. The reason for that particular opening sentence is to meet the guidelines in
1086:
1728:. Trust that is all but please let me know if anything else is needed. The api workaround tool Dab_solver.py generated various other output without saying why, but I think all is now well.
463:
called it "one of the best albums of the year". I think that the publications should be credited in the text, and that new sentences should be devoted to mentioning the additional praise.
1814:
Sorry to be a bore, but I think FAC needs to be reminded (I certainly do) by Black Kite of the issues concerning NFC sound files. There seem to be a lot of them. Let's see what he says.
1673:
268:"Although Big Star disbanded in 1974, only reforming in 1993" the "only reforming in 1993" is unnecessary, you go over this later in the paragraph and sticking it here is out of place.
1135:
2028:
appears to be aiming for, and the reader finds nothing interesting or notable in the first sentence. In view of this, do you still feel it's inappropriate as it is? Do you interpret
1759:
1715:
1653:
1359:
447:"other reviewers wrote that "every cut could be a single" from this "important record that should go to the top"." I looked it up and the publications that printed these quotes were
1264:
1694:
1551:
1458:
1440:
1242:
1480:
2069:
I feel like an idiot, as I have never heard of this band even though I am a music fan. So the article doesn't make much sense to me. How did I miss something as big as this? —
1884:
1023:. While it might not be needed for this article (33⅓ books are usually used in the article for the album they're about and not so much in the band article, although there are
91:
1982:
1609:
1595:
1566:
1536:
1495:
1229:
Actually that sentence was intentionally prominent; not as POV, which I hope it avoids by being composed of cited quotes, but to establish notability in first sentence per
1200:
1186:
1172:
1153:
1077:
All of my points have been met. I believe that, other than a few minor MoS issues which I'm sure will be resolved, that this article is feature-worthy. Good work, PL290! --
2082:
1773:
1737:
1419:
1401:
1384:
225:
176:
1282:
999:
969:
940:
904:
874:
804:
775:
631:
602:
544:
434:
405:
376:
346:
2062:
2041:
2007:
1959:
1935:
1917:
1863:
1844:
1580:
1517:
1049:
833:
744:
715:
686:
573:
509:
479:
313:
284:
255:
557:"according to Fry (quoted by Clark) and Hummel (quoted by Jovanovic)" Why not put direct references directly after Fry's and Hummel's names instead of the parentheses?
1827:
12:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC) PS Except he's away until 19 August; even if this is promoted, we can easily make adjustments if necessary afterwards, and report them at
670:"(The phrase "sister lovers" was" No need for this to be in parentheses. Also, why not briefly explain how #1 Record and Radio City were named in their own sections?
1068:
824:
This was largely taken care of when more material was moved here from two other points. I've taken out a further paragraph break; are you happy with the result?
1107:
alt text should not be a copy of the caption; it has quite a different function from the caption, and it's quite rare for the same text to be good for both.
1016:
159:
137:
917:
In the audio sample boxes, as the quotes about each song are used later, it's a better idea to format the descriptions more in the style of articles like
1805:
817:
The "Second era: 1993 to present" section in general is very choppy, with short paragraphs. It really should be reworked into a better organized section.
82:
1428:
1523:
mention of a tracklisting, since the original doucment (the album itself) could tell you that (and you wouldn't need a citation for that). Also,
500:
Done. It was definitely needed. I've tried not to overdo it, as the album articles are of course where much of the detail should go eventually.
297:"attention was drawn to the early material in the 1980s when R.E.M." should be "the band's discography drew attention in the 1980s when R.E.M."
1685:
Give me three more days to review the article in-depth and figure out if I'm going to field an object. Rather busy off-wiki these days.
40:
199:
147:
30:
17:
1040:
article further. Unfortunately I don't have a copy yet but will hope to address all review points without recourse to that.
112:
1905:. There's a table on that page that id's how much is appropriate with a given song length. (The first sample is ok). --
1273:
for some reason; that's now fixed. I'll go over it again at the end of other editing to check for any other MoS issues.
1527:
is not an appropriate source, not the least because when logged into my account I can edit it to say whatever I want.
735:
Done. I've also made it a subsection of "First era" since its the latter's legacy and influence we're talking about.
359:"He was offered, but turned down as "too commercial", the role of lead vocalist for Blood, Sweat & Tears." --: -->
1393:
For the REM thing, you can't cite the
Knowledge article. You need a source you've seen yourself for the information.
1372:
1336:
522:"existing copies of #1 Record from the stores again." Is the "again" needed? They hadn't been previously removed.
337:
Done. Only the Big Star albums were reissues, however, so I've reworded it to allow for the Bell one being new.
1649:
107:
1027:), it might be good to lighten the dependence on Jovanovic as a source. And it's certainly worth looking into.
360:"He was offered the role of lead vocalist for Blood, Sweat & Tears, but turned down as "too commercial"."
1947:
is all good now (I feel the 4 samples are fine and not excessive and at least backed by discussion). --
1436:
1082:
1064:
193:
535:
that usage is new to any reading this; I do think the style is better without the word in this case.
389:"(or Ice Water)" Is it really necessary to know that this was sometimes spelled slightly differently?
1115:
63:
1882:
1978:
1690:
1669:
1591:
1547:
1532:
1476:
1432:
1345:
Current ref 71 (Big Star perform..) lacks a publisher. And what makes this a reliable source?
1078:
1060:
1034:
Noted - I have in mind to get that, and it will be excellent when it comes to developing the
189:
1269:
I have been attempting to adhere to MoS as I work on the article but had missed italicising
846:"Bogdanov et al. reserve "snarl" for another #1 Record song, "Mod Lang"" "Mod Lang" is on
8:
1196:
1168:
1131:
2078:
1828:
1755:
1711:
1643:
1505:
1398:
1356:
155:
1471:
Last.fm is not a reliable source. It's user-generated content. You need to remove it.
1121:
1875:
1260:
1410:
Removed as no source available. This should now address all the items in your list.
1993:(disclaimer, I'm a big Big Star fan) I dont like the accolades in the 1st sentance
1974:
1902:
1686:
1665:
1587:
1543:
1528:
1472:
2058:
2037:
2003:
1955:
1931:
1913:
1859:
1839:
1822:
1801:
1769:
1733:
1605:
1576:
1562:
1513:
1491:
1454:
1415:
1380:
1278:
1238:
1182:
1149:
1045:
995:
965:
936:
900:
870:
829:
800:
771:
740:
711:
682:
656:
627:
598:
569:
540:
505:
475:
430:
401:
372:
342:
309:
280:
251:
221:
172:
133:
78:
64:
57:
1894:
are all free, with proper attributes and reasonable alt text. No problems there.
2029:
2025:
2021:
2017:
1337:
http://www.inertia-music.com/catalogue/40773/Okkervil_River/Overboard_And_Down/
1230:
1192:
1164:
1127:
1308:
2070:
1751:
1707:
1639:
1500:
Yes, it's as I thought: only certain content on last.fm is editable, such as
1394:
1352:
1110:
1102:
151:
53:
1506:
Content I've cited to demonstrate the existence of a cover version mentioned
1351:
Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool.
1747:
1256:
459:
418:"The four-piece band eventually chose a name" Shouldn't this be "new name"?
1233:. In view of this, would you be happy to leave that sentence where it is?
2054:
2033:
1999:
1948:
1927:
1906:
1855:
1832:
1815:
1797:
1765:
1729:
1601:
1572:
1558:
1509:
1487:
1450:
1411:
1376:
1274:
1234:
1178:
1145:
1041:
1036:
991:
961:
932:
896:
866:
825:
796:
767:
736:
707:
678:
652:
623:
594:
565:
536:
501:
471:
426:
397:
368:
338:
305:
276:
247:
217:
168:
129:
74:
1725:
1329:
1501:
1322:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1706:; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox.
1220:
seminal body of work that never stopped...in all of rock & roll
564:
Done. Turns out
Jovanovic says both anyway, so I've removed Clark.
453:
330:" (and be sure to link to it so readers understand what this means)
1524:
1013:
327:
1024:
928:
918:
1105:
guidelines. The alt text is simply a copy of the caption. But
1369:
1251:
The article could also do with a MoS polish. For eg: I see
927:
Done: I've formatted the descriptions in the style used by
1746:
Also, please trim down the external links section as per
1365:
1315:
1218:
Could you move the line "in its original era 1971–74, a "
117:
1101:
Images have alt text, but it needs work to satisfy the
1504:
where you can see an "edit" link. I'm not using that.
1431:
a reliable source for the R.E.M. Christmas single. --
1301:
128:
comments are welcome and will be acted on promptly.
92:
Featured article candidates/Big Star (band)/archive1
1255:linked and unitalicised twice in the same section.
2090:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
167:Done: dablinks fixed and new alt texts provided.
1557:down a better source for the July 2009 concert.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1125:) and then have a go at writing good alt text.
1012:You're probably aware of this, but there is a
2096:No further edits should be made to this page.
1373:R.E.M. discography#Christmas fan club singles
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
451:(high praise from an important source!) and
1309:http://www.secondhandsongs.com/medium/29386
1297:What makes the following reliable sources?
1177:Done: proper names removed from alt texts.
2053:. More articles like this please, PL290.
1449:Nice work! Reinstated to use this source.
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
2016:Hmmm... I wonder if my interpretation of
1375:, so I've added that as the cited link.
14:
396:Done - no, not necessary, so removed.
148:Knowledge:Alternative text for images
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
23:
1330:http://www.movie-moron.com/?p=4980
24:
2108:
1323:http://tripatlas.com/3_Lb._Thrill
1144:Done: new alt texts provided.
13:
1:
7:
2083:01:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
2063:13:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
2042:23:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
2008:21:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
1983:14:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
1960:14:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
1936:07:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
1918:23:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1885:20:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1116:WP:ALT #What not to specify
31:featured article nomination
10:
2113:
1864:15:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
1845:12:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
1806:15:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
1774:21:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
1760:20:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
1738:21:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
1716:20:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
1695:06:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
326:"new releases" should be "
1674:08:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1654:15:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
1610:07:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
1596:07:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
1581:13:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1567:11:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1552:10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1537:10:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1518:08:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1496:02:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
1481:23:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1459:22:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1441:21:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1420:17:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1402:17:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1385:16:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1360:13:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1283:12:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1265:12:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1243:12:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1201:23:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1187:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1173:08:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1154:07:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1136:04:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1087:22:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1069:22:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
1050:13:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1000:22:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
970:10:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
941:22:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
905:10:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
875:10:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
834:14:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
805:12:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
776:10:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
745:10:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
716:12:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
687:22:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
632:15:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
603:10:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
574:10:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
545:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
510:17:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
480:15:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
435:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
406:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
377:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
347:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
314:08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
285:07:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
256:07:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
226:07:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
177:07:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
160:21:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
138:20:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
83:20:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
2093:Please do not modify it.
1724:Fixed a newly ambiguous
36:Please do not modify it.
706:Done. Also "Thirteen".
1316:http://www.discogs.com
150:for more information.
56:18:57, 18 August 2009
1996:of rock & roll".
1158:Thanks, much better.
1502:this Big Star review
983:Star-related people.
1364:last.fm is part of
1302:http://www.last.fm
1971:Support - Sources
1782:Tentative support
1508:is not editable.
125:
124:
86:
2104:
2095:
2075:
1952:
1910:
1878:
1842:
1837:
1825:
1820:
1433:Brandt Luke Zorn
1122:WP:ALT #Examples
1079:Brandt Luke Zorn
1061:Brandt Luke Zorn
457:. Additionally,
216:Done: reworded.
190:Brandt Luke Zorn
97:
96:
71:
48:The article was
38:
2112:
2111:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2091:
2071:
1950:
1908:
1876:
1840:
1833:
1823:
1816:
1683:Further comment
532:status quo ante
275:Done: removed.
68:
65:Big Star (band)
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2110:
2099:
2098:
2086:
2085:
2066:
2065:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2011:
2010:
1985:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1939:
1938:
1921:
1920:
1895:
1888:
1887:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1848:
1847:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1791:
1790:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1719:
1718:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1677:
1676:
1657:
1656:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1444:
1443:
1423:
1422:
1405:
1404:
1388:
1387:
1348:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1333:
1326:
1319:
1312:
1305:
1295:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1224:
1223:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1139:
1138:
1113:(particularly
1090:
1089:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1029:
1028:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
985:
984:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
955:
954:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
922:
921:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
890:
889:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
856:
855:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
819:
818:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
790:
789:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
760:
759:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
730:
729:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
701:
700:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
672:
671:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
646:
645:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
617:
616:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
588:
587:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
559:
558:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
524:
523:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
495:
494:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
465:
464:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
420:
419:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
391:
390:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
362:
361:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
332:
331:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
299:
298:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
270:
269:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
240:
239:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
211:
210:
204:
203:
182:
181:
180:
179:
123:
122:
121:
120:
118:External links
115:
110:
102:
101:
95:
94:
88:
87:
73:Nominator(s):
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2109:
2097:
2094:
2088:
2087:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2074:
2068:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2032:differently?
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1992:
1990:
1986:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1946:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1904:
1899:
1896:
1893:
1890:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1871:
1870:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1838:
1836:
1830:
1826:
1821:
1819:
1813:
1812:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1659:
1658:
1655:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:Rolling Stone
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1253:Rolling Stone
1250:
1249:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:Quick comment
1214:
1213:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1123:
1118:
1117:
1112:
1106:
1104:
1099:
1098:Done; thanks.
1095:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
988:
987:
986:
981:
980:
979:
978:
971:
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
925:
924:
923:
920:
916:
915:
914:
913:
906:
902:
898:
894:
893:
892:
891:
886:
885:
884:
883:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
842:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
820:
816:
815:
814:
813:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
791:
787:
786:
785:
784:
777:
773:
769:
764:
763:
762:
761:
756:
755:
754:
753:
746:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:
674:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
658:
654:
650:
649:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
613:
612:
611:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
582:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
556:
555:
554:
553:
546:
542:
538:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
518:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:
496:
491:
490:
489:
488:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
462:
461:
456:
455:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
416:
415:
414:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
358:
357:
356:
355:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
295:
294:
293:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
266:
265:
264:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
184:
183:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
139:
135:
131:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
105:
104:
103:
99:
98:
93:
90:
89:
85:
84:
80:
76:
70:
69:
66:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2092:
2089:
2072:
2050:
1994:
1988:
1987:
1970:
1944:
1897:
1891:
1877:Juliancolton
1874:
1834:
1817:
1781:
1780:
1703:
1682:
1660:
1646:
1634:
1344:
1335:
1328:
1321:
1314:
1307:
1300:
1291:
1270:
1252:
1219:
1215:
1159:
1120:
1114:
1109:Please read
1108:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1074:
1058:
1035:
1020:
862:
851:
847:
531:
460:Record World
458:
452:
448:
196:
185:
142:
141:
126:
113:Citation bot
72:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1975:Ottava Rima
1687:WesleyDodds
1666:WesleyDodds
1588:WesleyDodds
1544:WesleyDodds
1529:WesleyDodds
1473:WesleyDodds
1019:devoted to
1037:Radio City
1025:exceptions
1021:Radio City
848:Radio City
530:which the
1903:WP:SAMPLE
1726:Hyde Park
1193:Eubulides
1165:Eubulides
1128:Eubulides
852:#1 Record
758:sections.
493:sections?
449:Billboard
2073:mattisse
1752:Dabomb87
1708:Dabomb87
1650:contribs
1640:Casliber
1395:Ealdgyth
1353:Ealdgyth
1292:Comments
1191:Thanks.
1163:Thanks.
888:section.
454:Cash Box
328:reissues
200:contribs
186:Comments
152:Dabomb87
108:Analysis
54:Karanacs
50:promoted
2051:Support
2030:Wp:LEAD
2026:Wp:LEAD
2022:Wp:LEAD
2018:Wp:LEAD
1991:Support
1989:Comment
1661:Comment
1635:Support
1257:indopug
1231:WP:LEAD
1094:Comment
1075:Support
861:Done. (
143:Comment
100:Toolbox
1926:Done.
1892:Images
1841:(talk)
1829:WT:FAC
1824:(talk)
1796:Done.
1789:there.
1764:Done.
1600:Done.
1571:Done.
1429:Here's
1111:WP:ALT
1103:WP:ALT
990:Done.
960:Done.
929:R.E.M.
919:R.E.M.
895:Done.
850:, not
795:Done.
651:Done.
622:Done.
593:Done.
470:Done.
425:Done.
367:Done.
304:Done.
2055:Ceoil
2034:PL290
2000:Ceoil
1945:Audio
1928:PL290
1898:Audio
1856:PL290
1798:PL290
1766:PL290
1748:WP:EL
1730:PL290
1602:PL290
1573:PL290
1559:PL290
1510:PL290
1488:PL290
1451:PL290
1412:PL290
1377:PL290
1275:PL290
1235:PL290
1179:PL290
1161:text?
1146:PL290
1042:PL290
992:PL290
962:PL290
933:PL290
897:PL290
867:PL290
826:PL290
797:PL290
768:PL290
737:PL290
708:PL290
679:PL290
677:Done.
653:PL290
624:PL290
595:PL290
566:PL290
537:PL290
502:PL290
472:PL290
427:PL290
398:PL290
369:PL290
339:PL290
306:PL290
277:PL290
248:PL290
218:PL290
188:from
169:PL290
130:PL290
75:PL290
16:<
2079:Talk
2059:talk
2038:talk
2004:talk
1979:talk
1951:ASEM
1932:talk
1909:ASEM
1860:talk
1835:Tony
1818:Tony
1802:talk
1770:talk
1756:talk
1734:talk
1712:talk
1704:Dabs
1691:talk
1670:talk
1644:talk
1606:talk
1592:talk
1577:talk
1563:talk
1548:talk
1533:talk
1525:this
1514:talk
1492:talk
1477:talk
1455:talk
1437:talk
1416:talk
1399:Talk
1381:talk
1357:Talk
1279:talk
1261:talk
1239:talk
1197:talk
1183:talk
1169:talk
1150:talk
1132:talk
1119:and
1083:talk
1065:talk
1046:talk
1017:book
996:talk
966:talk
937:talk
901:talk
871:talk
863:Doh!
830:talk
801:talk
772:talk
741:talk
712:talk
683:talk
657:talk
628:talk
599:talk
570:talk
541:talk
506:talk
476:talk
431:talk
402:talk
373:talk
343:talk
310:talk
281:talk
252:talk
222:talk
194:talk
173:talk
156:talk
134:talk
79:talk
1366:CBS
1014:33⅓
52:by
2081:)
2061:)
2040:)
2006:)
1981:)
1958:)
1934:)
1916:)
1881:|
1862:)
1831:.
1804:)
1784:.
1772:)
1758:)
1750:.
1736:)
1714:)
1693:)
1672:)
1652:)
1608:)
1594:)
1579:)
1565:)
1550:)
1535:)
1516:)
1494:)
1479:)
1457:)
1439:)
1418:)
1397:-
1383:)
1368::
1355:-
1281:)
1263:)
1241:)
1199:)
1185:)
1171:)
1152:)
1134:)
1096:.
1085:)
1067:)
1059:--
1048:)
998:)
968:)
939:)
903:)
873:)
865:)
832:)
803:)
774:)
743:)
714:)
685:)
630:)
601:)
572:)
543:)
508:)
478:)
433:)
404:)
375:)
345:)
312:)
283:)
254:)
224:)
175:)
158:)
136:)
81:)
59:.
33:.
2077:(
2057:(
2036:(
2002:(
1977:(
1956:t
1954:(
1949:M
1930:(
1914:t
1912:(
1907:M
1873:–
1858:(
1800:(
1768:(
1754:(
1732:(
1710:(
1689:(
1668:(
1647:·
1642:(
1604:(
1590:(
1575:(
1561:(
1546:(
1531:(
1512:(
1490:(
1475:(
1453:(
1435:(
1414:(
1379:(
1294:-
1277:(
1259:(
1237:(
1195:(
1181:(
1167:(
1148:(
1130:(
1081:(
1063:(
1044:(
994:(
964:(
935:(
899:(
869:(
854:.
828:(
799:(
770:(
739:(
710:(
681:(
659:)
655:(
626:(
597:(
568:(
539:(
504:(
474:(
429:(
400:(
371:(
341:(
308:(
279:(
250:(
220:(
197:·
192:(
171:(
154:(
132:(
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.