9365:, in addition to their primary function, also summarize positions, opinions and arguments. Frequently, this is done with reference to policies and guidelines, so to glibly brand them as "only an essay" or "only a proposal" may be misleading. It also essentially suggests that the opinion of the person citing the page (as well as those of the people who originally wrote the page) is invalid when it may not be. There are many reasons why some arguments presented at deletion debates are invalid, based around the substance of the argument or the logic employed in reaching it. "The page you linked to is an essay or proposal" is not one of them.
5565:
notability be denied based on the subject's newness, inexperience, or youth. The criteria for notability include evidence of the non-trivial discussion of the subject in multiple reliable verifiable independent secondary sources. Assertions based on age or evidence of age are, by themselves, as meaningless as those based on personal knowledge or on dislike of the subject matter. Certainly what is old has had more chance to be noted, and what is new generally has not. But we do not decide which articles to keep and which to delete based on chances, we base it on the quality and nature of its citations.
143:
1663:). Self-promoting wannabes have, for example, tried to get themselves into Knowledge by falsely claiming to pass a notability criterion that they did not actually pass — musicians claiming charting hits that never really charted, writers claiming award nominations they were never really given, etc. — so the notability test is not passed just by stating passage of a notability criterion, but rather requires reliably sourced verification that the claim to passing a notability criterion is true. Additionally, the subject may possibly pass
8635:); these may be effective arguments, but even here caution should be used. Yet a small number of debates do receive wide participation and result in a decision that is effectively final, until new evidence comes along. If you reference such a past debate, and it is clearly a very similar case to the current debate, this can be a strong argument that should not be discounted because of a misconception that this section is a blanket ban on ever referencing other articles or deletion debates.
8639:
Wikipedias may apply different notability standards to certain classes of topic — so the existence of an article on the French or
Swedish or Urdu Wikipedias is not in and of itself an automatic exemption from the topic still having to clear the English Knowledge's existing standards of sourcing and notability. Again, it may be that the other-language article needs to be deleted as well, and just hasn't been noticed by that Knowledge's responsible editors yet.
14384:
8654:? Comparisons can be highly subjective, and so it is better to look at the debates in question and see what policies were cited and make an argument based on how they apply to the current debate than just say "x was kept so this should be too". However, such an argument may be perfectly valid if such can be demonstrated in the same way as one might demonstrate justification for an article's creation. It would be ridiculous to consider deleting an article on
314:– or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective. Some of the infirm arguments covered are those that are irrelevant or at best side issues, do not address the merits of the reason to keep or delete, are based on anecdote rather than evidence, engage in classic logical fallacies and more—and almost all share the trait of not being based upon the issues listed at
8730:
to "Other similar category schemes don't – and shouldn't – exist" may be an appropriate argument for arguing for deletion of a category. There are no hard and fast rules here, and there are cases where existence (or non-existence) of one scheme does not have much bearing on whether a similar scheme should be created in a different tree, but it should be noted that OSE/OCE arguments tend to apply differently in category space than they do in article space.
1302:, and it is not uncommon for attitudes to shift during a deletion discussion. When it seems after just a few days that it'll surely go one way, often one single statement can turn the tide. Also, articles can be improved over the course of a discussion, leading others to change their minds. It can be the statement or the salvaging work of one person who is at first in the minority that makes all the difference.
5185:, however, be useful as a negative test of popular culture topics which one would expect to see sourced via the Internet. A search on an alleged "Internet meme" that returns only one or two distinct sources is a reasonable indication that the topic is not as notable as has been claimed. As well, numerous hits that refer to X as "Y" can demonstrate that "Y" is a plausible redirect to the article on X; the
8601:; but that does not mean it should be kept.) While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument; an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this. While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument, comparing with articles that have been through some kind of quality review such as
8819:. As well, articles that share a superficial commonality do not necessarily all meet the requirements necessary to write a well-referenced, neutral encyclopedia article. While some avant-garde performance artists, or college professors, or elementary schools, or blogs (for example) are mentioned in enough independent, extensive references to write an article, others are not. The existence of
8371:
7025:
into
Knowledge, because the notability claim is strong enough that the geographic range of coverage does not matter, but purely local coverage is not necessarily enough to get a city councillor or school board trustee in the same city, or the mayor of a small town, through the notability door — these people may still qualify for articles if something truly substantial, and referenced to a
4991:. But it goes beyond that. If we wrote articles for everything that existed, we would end up writing about you, or your computer, or that leaf that fell in your pool the other day, or even that rock that keeps tripping you up on your morning walks. The last one was kind of ridiculous, but hopefully you understand what we are trying to say here: existence does not always yield notability!
7049:
the world knows or will have a good chance of knowing. Being a global encyclopedia, Knowledge can cover a wide range of topics, many of them pertaining to the culture of a single country, language, or an ethnic group living in one part of the world. The people living in a single city or town and everything they have built around them are likewise a culture and society of their own.
9661:. Not everybody has access to the same research tools, so the fact that you were able to access a database that provided more coverage than somebody else found in other databases is not, in and of itself, proof that the other editor was negligent in their duties. If you can salvage the article, then just salvage it and don't attack other editors for not finding what you found.
42:
5714:. The continuing existence of an article does not depend on the continuing existence of its subject. Even if it is a thing of the past, if sources can display its notability in the same way as a subject that exists today, then it qualifies no less for an article. It does not matter if the cessation of the subject occurred before or after the creation of the article. Even if
109:
5718:, if the writer(s) of the article do the best possible job of documenting what they are, the article shall meet the standards for reliable sources. Knowledge's goal is not merely to be a directory of things and people that currently exist today – defunct corporations and ghost towns and dead people can still be notable, and can still have legitimate and
6136:, even by their creator, and they are not judged based on who created them, how active that creator is or was on Knowledge, or how many people besides themselves are interested in editing them. It is not uncommon for an individual to create or edit a single article in their lifetime, all while providing valuable information, and then never edit again.
349:, and in making that point, cites evidence that could also be used to support a determination of notability, it is wrong to summarily dismiss that argument just because WP:INTERESTING is a section in this essay. As this essay tries to stimulate people to use sound arguments in deletion discussions, it is important to realize that countering the
4497:, which means that it is not finished nor will it ever be. As in a paper encyclopedia, information on Knowledge will often become inaccurate because it is simply out of date. But unlike a paper encyclopedia, in which a new edition is printed maybe every year or so, Knowledge can be updated anytime. There is a very simple solution to all that:
7056:". Local could mean limited to a city or town. But others may view a state, province, or other similar region as being local. And such divisions vary in size throughout the world. And though the boundaries of a jurisdiction are legally defined, determining a distance from that location in which coverage would be non-local is not possible.
2288:
gets media coverage is a valid notability claim, while a regional, local or special interest award that lacks media coverage and can only be referenced to its own self-published primary source content is not. For some prominent awards that curate and announce shortlists of nominees in advance of announcing the final winner, such as the
10351:. All Knowledge policies are necessary conditions, not necessarily sufficient. If the article meets one condition, it does not mean that it does not violate other policies: original research may be verifiable; articles that seem to be notable may be original research; notable biographies may be a violation of
10118:
Used effectively, this page can be used to point out common types of fallacious reasoning. However, participants must still give a valid rationale in support of their position, rather than merely exposing the flaws in their opponents' reasoning. Moreover, they are not always bad arguments to make. If
9109:
It is unfortunate that editors put effort into writing or maintaining articles that do not meet
Knowledge policy or guidelines. Many editors have seen articles that they invested time and energy into get deleted, and there is no doubt that this can be discouraging. However, the fact of the effort put
8823:
from which a neutral, well-referenced article can be written is an important criterion in deletion discussions, not its presence in a
Knowledge category or similarity to other articles. Similarly, that some articles on a related topic have been rejected does not mean that this one is unsuitable. That
8623:
Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists
8262:
it with dozens of footnotes that aren't actually building notability at all: social media posts, directory entries, blogs, sources that tangentially verify stray facts without actually mentioning the article subject at all, and so forth. The article's sources need to be measured for their quality and
6453:
And keep in mind that while sources such as blogs aren't usually suitable for the purposes of establishing notability, they may be perfectly suitable for verifying information within an article whose notability has already been established by other means. In other words, removing information sourced
4285:
is typically thought of to oppose a creator's rights to have it their own way. It can also be extended to say that once an article has been created and it meets inclusion guidelines, the creator has no obligation thereafter to maintain the article. Therefore, if one creates an article that appears to
2299:
However, there have still been some instances of award nominees and winners who were deleted because of an inability to locate enough solid sources to actually support an article. For example, it may be much harder to actually write and properly source articles about a film's sound technician(s) than
9583:
A deletion discussion is about the article in question itself. Though the suitability of other related articles may be mentioned during the discussion, and some deletions are bundled with other articles, the debate is not about the creator or any other editors of the article, nor is it about the AfD
9196:
Unencyclopedic material does not belong in any article. Material sometimes called "trivia" or "in popular culture" may or may not be appropriate for inclusion, either as a part of a main article or in a spin-off article. But unsourced or totally unimportant material does not belong in either, not in
8356:
On the other hand, the fact that there are no interwikis does not mean that the article should be deleted. It may be the case that nobody has yet written an article on another language's
Knowledge or that it just hasn't been linked to from the English language article. It may also be the case that
8033:
Similarly, parent notability should be established independently; notability is not inherited "up", from notable subordinate to parent, either: not every manufacturer of a notable product is itself notable; not every organization to which a notable person belongs (or which a notable person leads) is
7048:
The same is true about subjects only of interest to those in a single city, town, or region. People who live outside the area who have never visited there or done any research on the area will obviously be unlikely to have ever heard of them. But
Knowledge is not limited to subjects that everyone in
7004:
requires multiple sources independent of the subject to cover the subject in order to establish notability. But this guideline does not specify the locality of the coverage. Having sources that under all circumstances meet this guideline means that it is notable, and therefore, worthy of an article.
2513:
In
Knowledge, verifiability means that anyone using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Knowledge does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if
2307:
generally require holding a notable office rather than just running for one and losing, and non-winning competitors in reality shows are not automatically notable just because they were on a reality show. Note losing in one competition/event does not preclude being notable for other reasons, such as
8729:
nominations regularly point out, for a new scheme, that "Other stuff doesn't exist" – in other words, this is a new scheme that would imply creation of many hundreds or thousands of new categories if expanded globally, and there may not be consensus for expanding it more broadly. As such, an appeal
6847:
coverage, such as locally reported crime, community issues, regularly scheduled sports events, trivial matters, and other topics that are found in the daily paper. It is not here to take the place of the newspaper, regular broadcasts, or other forms of media that are to be expected. Some events are
5564:
These arguments are analogous to those above with regard to article age. Notability is not established by how long a thing has existed, or how far back in time a tradition may go, or how venerable the people are who are involved in it, or how yellowed the pages that once mentioned it. Neither can
5010:
standards. However, Knowledge's role is not to be about everything, or to help under-covered topics create their media presence. We are not a free public relations platform to advertise topics that haven't already received media attention — our role here is to follow media coverage, not to lead it.
4245:
editors from improving it in the future. Conversely it's not enough to promise to make the article better; editors should explain how to do it. If the editor fails to follow through on the promise, other editors who arrive later can step in and keep improving it. This way, the article's fate is not
4081:
in the article to make a hoax seem legitimate, the burden of proof is on the one seeking deletion. This will only occur with definitive proof or knowledge that these sources are really fictitious, and not based simply on a hunch. As with the offline sources themselves, online proof that they do not
3921:
By the same token, asserting that an article merely needs improvement to withstand a deletion nomination is not a persuasive argument to retain it. Perhaps improvement in the form of adding multiple references to reliable, independent, non-trivial discussion of the subject would indeed demonstrate
2241:
Yes, it's true that subjects winning notable awards or landing on "best of" year-end lists by independent publications can significantly impact their notability. However, arguments which base notability or lack thereof upon winning, wins, success or popularity make no use of policies or guidelines.
10183:
is an effective summary of how deletion discussions on
Knowledge tend to be resolved, but using it as the only argument for keeping or deleting an article can lead to circular reasoning. Participants can refer to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES but are expected to further explain their reasoning in discussions.
9895:
Editors sometimes issue ultimatums to get their way, threatening to quit editing. Or they will claim that current or future editors will be driven off by the wrong outcome. Similarly, an editor's desired outcome is tied to some outside criticism of
Knowledge, often in connection with statistics on
9603:
and losers. If a user is disrupting the encyclopedia by continually creating articles that get deleted or continually nominating good articles for deletion, an investigation may be called for into their behavior; this is an independent issue and its result one way or the other should not influence
9201:
articles may be viable, as are articles devoted specifically to aspects such as "use in fiction" or "cultural influences", if reliable sources establish that it is a legitimate encyclopedic topic. But unsourced material of no importance has no place on
Knowledge. Either incorporate the material in
7063:
If so, this is not because Knowledge is ever intended to be this way. Numbers of articles are not written in direct proportion with the population distribution of the world. Each article is written because just one person living wherever chooses to write that article. And some areas just happen to
5976:
is frequently taken into consideration when closing the discussion of an article's deletion, and although consensus is not identical to voting, indication of consensus as demonstrated by a large proportion of well-argued votes on one side or the other of a discussion is likely to factor heavily in
5725:
The only way a subject can be truly declared "no longer notable" is if the actual notability guidelines change to exclude the subject. Many of Knowledge's notability standards are stricter now than they were a decade ago, so some articles that were formerly accepted as notable do fail contemporary
3545:
Knowledge is not a repository of humor. Articles cannot be kept for their humor value alone, nor are they outright disqualified because they are on a topic an editor finds humorous. Furthermore, the intensely subjective nature of humor means that it can never be used as an indicator of worth in an
2925:
It does sometimes happen, of course, that a user will nominate an article for deletion out of a desire to censor or hide the content, but one should be able to respond to these nominations with reliable sources and policy-based arguments. If the deletion rationale really is that thin, it should be
2529:
In general, the scope and purpose of the article must be kept in mind when considering inclusion or exclusion of information or sources. When sources significantly deviate from the scope of an article's topic, or subject, this may create room for disputes. Therefore, careful considerations such as
2287:
Further, awards do not necessarily confer inherent notability on their winners. It is necessary to establish that the award itself is notable in the first place, by virtue of being broadly reported upon by the media as a news story. For instance, a major national film, literary or music award that
2139:
and others should not rush to delete the page unless it is obvious that it can never meet inclusion guidelines. If one is uncertain of this, or if it appears no progress has been made in a reasonable amount of time, the creator should be contacted regarding their intentions, and given a reasonable
7997:
Notability of one or more members of some group or class of subjects may or may not apply to other possible members of that group. Discuss based upon the individual subject, not the subject's overarching classification or type. If a subject under discussion is independently notable, provide the
7024:
to garner coverage. Rather, the question of whether local coverage is enough or not depends on variables like the strength of the basic notability claim and the volume of coverage that can be shown. For example, predominantly or purely local coverage may be enough to get the mayor of a major city
6445:
On the other hand, blogs can be written by professional journalists and subject to editorial control, and personal sites can belong to established experts in the subject. There are also pages bearing the URLs of blogs that have mirrored news articles that do constitute reliable sources. For sites
4277:
Not all articles on Knowledge look perfect. Most readers on Knowledge already know they won't get all the information they are looking for from Knowledge alone. Even if an article is not the best, even if it remains that way for many years, it can still provide some readers with just what they're
1802:
While merely citing a policy or guideline may give other editors a clue as to what the reasoning is, it does not explain specifically how the policy applies to the discussion at hand. When asserting that an article should be deleted, it is important to explain why. The same is true when asserting
1199:
Where reasonable counter-arguments to the nomination have been raised in the discussion, you may wish to explain how you justify your support in your own words and, where possible, marshalling your own evidence. Stating your true position in your own words will also assure others that you are not
4793:
merger and redirection, on relevant grounds. (Since "merger" includes a history merge without redirection, an argument against redirection is not an argument against merger). Since any verifiable topic/content can in principle be redirected/merged to an article on a broader topic, this should be
3045:
Knowledge editors are a pretty diverse group of individuals and our readers and potential readers include everyone on the planet. Any subject or topic may be of interest to someone, somewhere. And on the converse, there are any number of subjects or topics which an individual editor may not care
7976:
is the idea that something qualifies for an article merely because it exists, even if zero independent reliable sources have ever taken notice of the subject. This is usually phrased as "All ____ are notable", for example, "all high schools are notable" or "no elementary schools are notable".
7430:
on Knowledge. To avoid this systemic bias, Knowledge should include all notable topics, even if the subject is not notable within the English-speaking population or within more populous or Internet-connected nations. Likewise, arguments that state that because a subject is lesser known or even
5165:
can be useful in determining how common or well-known a particular topic is, a large number of hits on a search engine is no guarantee that the subject is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge. Similarly, a lack of search engine hits may only indicate that the topic is highly specialized or not
8250:
are also prone to picking up user-comments too. So it is important to specify the actual sources which can be used instead of just linking to a search of them, and to consider whether these sources provide enough information to write a reasonably detailed article on the subject, rather than a
6624:
that involves extracting information is not needed. Merely being mentioned in a source whose primary purpose is to cover an entirely different subject does not necessarily satisfy this guideline. Once notability has been established, some of these sources may be useful in verifying additional
6441:
and personal pages that can be created or edited by anyone with little or no restriction are generally not seen as reliable sources of information. While such sites may be written in good faith and may be seen by some as accurate and/or neutral, there is little or no control or proof of these
6147:
process directly address notability. Experienced editors at both projects may notice a notability issue, and certainly the expectation is that a notability issue will be noticed in both places, but that isn't one of the areas either process directly addresses. In the case of GA, only a single
4229:
Sometimes an article is nominated for deletion that is not being worked on very much, or has not been edited by a person for a long time, and thus might not be in very good shape. This does not necessarily mean that the topic is unsuitable for Knowledge; it may be that the topic is obscure or
3909:
be poorly written, poorly formatted, lack sufficient sources, or not be a comprehensive overview of the subject, can be improved and rewritten to fix its current flaws. That such an article is lacking in certain areas is a relatively minor problem, and such articles can still be of benefit to
8638:
Note that this criterion also applies to the argument that an article has to be kept because it's a straight translation of an article that already exists in another language Knowledge. All Wikipedias are vulnerable to the creation of articles about non-notable topics, and different-language
5371:
Conversely, being a new creation does not protect an article from being nominated for deletion. All articles have to comply with our inclusion policies from the moment they are created; if an article is not suitable for Knowledge it will be deleted, regardless of how new it is. Remember that
5356:
that lasted for more than eight years before getting discovered and deleted. Having survived a long time on Knowledge does not guarantee the article a permanent spot. The article may have achieved its age either because its lack of notability was not discovered until recently, or because the
1410:, has been defined by consensus. However, this includes many types of things, each having its own section within that or another policy. Therefore, the terms "unencyclopedic", and its flip-side "encyclopedic", are too general to be useful in deletion discussions. What we need to know are the
3257:. All of this project's notability criteria imply that knowledge about a subject that meets them is useful. Whether it's through substantial coverage in reliable sources, receipt of major awards, winning international competitions, or writing oft-cited scientific papers, we can infer that
1295:
AfD is a discussion in which all participants are encouraged to give their own independent opinion. It is the ideas of individuals, not the propaganda of others, that is supposed to help determine the outcome. One who bases one's statement on that crowd as a whole is not making any useful
6863:
arguments (or other similar guidelines) to support keeping or deleting an article, it is important to be familiar with the guidelines to be sure what news belongs and what news does not. It may also help to get a sense of what types of events either do or don't customarily have articles.
3178:
Knowledge is an encyclopedia, so it should include encyclopedic content. All encyclopedic content should be useful to someone, but not all content useful to someone is encyclopedic. Stating that something is useful in a vacuum does not help assess its encyclopedic value. You need to say
7631:
taken notice already, not on subjective judgments of why people did not take notice in the past. Focusing on the objective evidence helps the deletion discussion reach a logical conclusion; injecting your personal supposition does not. Note however that articles have been deleted under
8962:: everything would include every idea that has existed or will exist, every person who ever lived, every organization that has existed or exists, every copy of an object that has existed or exists, every website that has existed or exists, etc. The most basic threshold of inclusion is
4188:
This is not the first, not the second, but the tenth time I put this up for deletion, all because the problems were not solved. Each time, User:WantItKept promised they would improve it after the discussion was closed. But that never happened. And User:WantItKept keeps reneging on his
4073:
are just as legitimate as those that are accessible to everyone online. If offline sources, even exclusively offline sources, are used to reference an article, we give the creator (and other contributors) the benefit of the doubt in accepting their accuracy. Since Knowledge is written
5005:
A related phenomenon is the fallacy of entitlement: the notion that mere existence automatically entitles someone or something to a Knowledge article, and thus the need to create an article is so important that any form of sourcing is acceptable regardless of whether or not it meets
3546:
encyclopedia where the merits of an article are determined by objective criteria (what is funny to one person may be dull and uninteresting to another; and perhaps downright offensive to a third.) This does not mean articles on humor-related topics have no place on Knowledge, as the
3676:
While it is certainly a good thing for Knowledge articles to be aesthetically pleasing or well laid out from a graphic design perspective, the mere appearance of an article is not a factor in whether the subject of the article is justifiably suitable for an article on Knowledge.
5971:
Many AfDs in the past have had a outcome that contradicts the numbers, and many will in the future. It is possible for an AfD that has 1 keep and 10 deletes to be kept (or vice versa) if that single argument is really good and the remainder are just votes. However, community
4788:
is not, in and of itself, valid grounds for deleting a page, its content, or its history. If merger and/or redirection is feasible in a given case, either is preferable to deletion. To validly argue for deletion, editors need to additionally advance separate arguments against
8670:
Though a lot of Knowledge's styles are codified in policy, to a large extent minor details are not. In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable, it serves no useful purpose to endlessly argue over the notability of a minority of these items.
8624:
does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet. For this very reason, WAX arguments in AFD discussions sometimes backfire, by directly
9763:), arguing that because the article failed to gain a consensus for deletion before, there is no reason to renominate it. This is a good argument in some circumstances but a bad argument in others. An article that was kept in a past deletion discussion may still be deleted
6820:—articles will not simply be kept because they are of timely importance. Due to its popularity, Knowledge is many people's first port of call to find out more about a breaking story or other current event they've just heard about. Knowledge does have articles that cover
8025:
allow for inherited notability in certain circumstances), or that the subordinate topic cannot be mentioned in the encyclopedia whatsoever. Often, a separate article is created for formatting and display purposes; however, this does not imply an "inherited notability"
4501:! All you have to do is to click "edit", make the necessary changes, and save the changes, writing in the edit summary that you are updating the information. If you do not wish to make the effort to do that yourself but you know it needs to be done, you can also place
1969:. These criteria are a test of what is seen in the article content and only apply to specific subject areas and conditions. If an article on an A7- A9- or A11-eligible topic does not make a credible assertion of importance or significance for that topic, it should be
8049:
Donations of significant amounts of money naturally are reciprocated by a certain amount of publicity, including press releases and even naming of buildings or entire academic departments. The mere giving of money in and of itself does not make the donor notable, and
7542:, and editors should avoid using one when commenting in a deletion discussion. It is difficult to determine precisely what people believe in the present, even more difficult to predict how perceptions will change in the future, and completely unnecessary to even try.
9785:
If an article was kept because it is potentially encyclopedic and can be improved or expanded, one should allow time for editors to improve it. Therefore, it is appropriate for editors to oppose a re-nomination that does not give enough time to improve the article.
9789:
Repeated nominations for deletion do not necessarily indicate that the article is problematic. No extra weight is given to the rationales offered by nominators over rationales offered, whether for or against deletion, by other discussion participants. An article's
4265:
but lacks the time or skills to actually improve it, so the article is nominated for deletion in the hope that another editor will take notice and improve the article during its pending deletion period and before the artificial deadline of the deletion process.
342:. The arguments covered on this page are far from exhaustive. If an argument you were planning on using is listed here, you might want to reconsider using it. However, just because an argument appears in this list does not necessarily mean it is always invalid.
3794:: an article should exist, but the article (and all the versions in history) is too deeply flawed to work from. When that point is reached, deletion provides a reset, and gives editors a clean slate. This in itself is a controversial maxim, as essays such as
2525:
have been written about them that are relevant to the scope of the article, they cannot be included. If your favourite song/computer game/webcomic/whatever is as great as you believe, someone will likely write about it eventually, so please just be patient.
2083:
Such arguments make no use of policy or guidelines whatsoever. They are merely a campaign on the part of the commentator to alter others' points-of-view. They are of no help in reaching a consensus, and anyone responding to such pleas is not helping either.
4814:(that the proposed redirect is clearly positively harmful). The only valid argument for "delete then redirect" is that every revision in the page history of the page otherwise eligible for redirection in question meets the criteria for revision deletion (
2749:
directly above. While some editors may dislike certain kinds of information, that alone isn't enough for something to be deleted. This may be coupled with (or replaced by) the unexplained claim that they feel that the information is "unencyclopedic" (see
2300:
it is about the film's actors or director. Just as with winners, a nomination for a major award of this type is generally sufficient if the article can be reliably sourced, but may not be sufficient if you have to depend exclusively on primary sources.
8966:. The verifiability requirement alone would prevent writing about every particle and limit the information that could be included on every person. Moreover, the community has decided not to document every verifiable fact and accordingly has established
1834:– only sources cited are blogs and chat forum posts". Providing specific reasons why the subject may be original research or improperly sourced gives other editors an opportunity to supply sources that better underpin the claims made in the article.
12873:
2501:
Knowledge editors are a pretty diverse group of individuals, and potentially any subject or topic may be liked or disliked by some editor somewhere. However, personal preference is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article or other content.
7020:, which do require wider regionalized coverage, and non-winning candidates for political office are not accepted as notable just because local coverage of the election campaign exists in the local media where that campaign would have been simply
5964:, not a simple headcount. If you comment on the basis of the numbers already seen as in the above examples, you are just adding a vote to those numbers and not contributing usefully to the discussion. And drawing others to cast such votes may be
10037:– do not view the discussion as being "symbolically" about settling right from wrong for the whole website. If you have a suggestion for how to improve the site unrelated to the discussion you find yourself in, you should use venues such as the
7425:
Conversely, some subjects' notability may be limited to a particular country, region, or culture. However, arguments that state that because a subject is unknown or not well known among English readers it should not have an article encourage a
8352:
was first posted on the Dutch Knowledge and then translated into several other languages, including English. Of course, if the other Knowledge articles cite any reliable sources not in the English Knowledge article, they can be added to it.
7044:
forms of living things, space bodies, or scientific concepts, and few people will ever know about them in the first place in order to even desire to read about them. Yet there is sourced information about them, so they qualify to be included.
1082:" will not make it any more relevant. Try to present persuasive reasons in line with policy or consensus as to why the article/template/category/whatever should be kept/deleted, and try to make sure it is an argument based on cogent reasons.
1191:
If the rationale provided in a comment includes a comprehensive argument, specific policy references and/or a compelling presentation of evidence in favour of keeping or deletion, an endorsement of that argument may be sufficient. (Example:
9584:
nominator or anyone who has commented on the AfD. An article is to be judged on its own merits and not those of its editors or detractors. Even well-respected editors sometimes create pages that others feel should be deleted, and likewise,
3234:
are meant to provide information of direct utility for the reader. In addition, one must consider utility as relating to the rest of the site: e.g. "this list brings together related topics in X, and is useful for navigating that subject."
10913:
2785:. For example, while the "cruft" label is often used for anything perceived to be of minor interest (such as individual songs, or episodes of a TV show), it is worth considering carefully whether or not so-called "cruft" has potential for
3450:
debates, whether or not something is harmful is often a relevant issue, since the rules provide that inherently disruptive pages, for instance, may be deleted. The argument "it's not hurting anything" is less persuasive, however, when
12074:
4416:
who are not familiar with the need to add references or to create incoming links. Some subjects are just very hard to link from anything. If reliable sources can be provided, even if incoming links can't, it is still notable.
4286:
meet guidelines for a standalone article, but abandons any effort to complete or update it thereafter, regardless of whether that editor has been actively editing on Knowledge, the article cannot be deleted on these grounds.
5825:. Conversely, just because an article is popular does not mean it is within the project scope, although article popularity is likely to correspond with some form of notability which should then be straightforward to verify.
8666:
has an article, this may well be a valid point. In this manner, using an "Other Stuff Exists" angle provides for consistency. Unfortunately, most deletion discussions are not as clear-cut, but the principles are the same.
5730:, so such articles do not stay "grandfathered" in Knowledge just because they used to be acceptable, but are deleted (or redirected to a related topic) if they cannot be improved to meet contemporary notability standards.
1188:, just directed at someone's vote instead of the article itself). Participants are always encouraged to provide evidence or arguments that are grounded in policy, practice, or simple good sense to support their positions.
14476:
4409:(having few or no incoming links) can pose some problems. But it does not imply a lack of notability, and therefore is not a valid reason for exclusion. An orphan is still capable of having reliable sources, and many do.
195:
7983:
notability is the idea that something qualifies for an article merely because it was associated with some other, legitimately notable subjects. This is usually phrased as "____ is notable, because it is associated with
3229:
Usefulness is subjective, and a cogent argument must be more specific: who is the content useful for, and why? One has to consider the number of people that are likely to find utility in the information. In particular,
8348:. Many articles in other Wikipedias are based on translations of English Knowledge articles. Moreover, because of the availability of online translation tools, it's easier to create cross-wiki spam. The hoax article
11478:
10459:
1949:(not "notability", as such, though these are often and unfortunately conflated and confused) is related to a potential reason to delete an article, but not one that is relevant at Articles for Deletion, where the
4269:
In some other cases, especially list articles describing a finite set, the article may already be complete and current. Such an article thus hasn't been worked on in X amount of time because there's nothing that
6244:. An article could have many paragraphs or even pages of information. If any of that information is not and cannot be properly sourced, it does not belong, and if none of it belongs, neither does the article.
3261:
has found the subject to be of substantial interest. Therefore, if information about a subject is genuinely of no use here, the better bet is to argue against inclusion on the grounds of a lack of notability.
450:
4326:
4123:
8592:
The nature of Knowledge means that you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether other articles do or do not exist, because there is nothing stopping anyone from creating any article. (This
2382:
Such arguments make no use of policies or guidelines to substantiate claims of non-notability. A thing that is never built may still be historically significant as a proposal, with enough coverage to clear
1057:
states, "The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments" and the same applies to all deletion debates. Any statement that just consists of
7994:. This is why notability is usually neither inherited nor inherent: inherited and inherent notability claims can't be verified with evidence. They are only mere personal opinion as in the examples above.
4074:
collaboratively, it is always possible for other editors to add online sources on top of the offline ones already there. However, this is not a requirement, and they need not exist to sustain the article.
3929:. There is a simple solution to this: rename it! If you are not able to move the article yourself for one reason or another, request someone else do it rather than nominate the whole article for deletion.
10021:
with Knowledge. Pointing out bias and abusive user behavior is not wrong, but doing nothing beside that does not contribute to consensus-building. Even if the outcome of a discussion could be considered
9794:
of multiple AFDs indicates that the reasons given by the nominators, along with those given by others in favor of deletion, repeatedly didn't prevail over the arguments given by those who were opposed.
2387:
regardless of the plan's failure to ever actually come to fruition, and people ten or twenty years from now may very well still be looking for information about what the proposal was and why it failed.
12209:
10943:
3435:
The "it does not do any harm" claim and its rebuttal are at the center of the philosophical editing debate of inclusionism versus deletionism. For more information and arguments, see the Meta articles
8815:
The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing on a particular article. The process may have been applied inappropriately, people may not have seen the other articles yet, or
8069:. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass
2098:, where you can spend as much time as you wish to improve the article until it meets Knowledge's inclusion guidelines. Once this has been accomplished, you can reintroduce it into main article space.
4684:. Sock puppets and canvassers can be traced. Templates can be placed on a page to let readers and editors know how it has to be fixed. If inaccurate information is frequently added erroneously but
10119:
five people have voted to delete per nom and you're the only person considering whether to keep the article, maybe the nominator has laid out the case so well that no more needs to be said. Also,
12760:
345:
Remember that a discussion rationale which arguably could be classified as an "argument to avoid", may still contain the germ of a valid point. For example, if a person argues that an article is
5196:
of the search engine results matters more than the raw number. A more detailed description of the problems that can be encountered using a search engine to determine suitability can be found at
12169:
4082:
exist is not needed. Good faith is assumed just as much if the editor seeking deletion knows beyond a reasonable doubt that the source does not exist or does not state what is in the article.
12640:
11812:
6454:
to a blog is not the same as arguing for the deletion of an article – these are separate acts with different sets of criteria for performing them and should not be conflated.
3265:
Knowledge is not the place to seek publicity for a cause, product, individual, ideology, etc. Promotional or partisan "information" in particular generally fails Knowledge's requirements of
14492:
12321:
10958:
8800:
8782:
246:
11978:
11573:
8482:
5284:
13013:
6997:
Notability is not about assigning an elite status to a select group of subjects. It is about having the ability to write neutral, verifiable, encyclopedic-style information about them.
1648:
Providing specific reasons why the subject may not be notable gives other editors an opportunity to research and supply sources that may establish or confirm the subject's notability.
13289:
12953:
3432:
But the purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information: the potential readership or subjective usefulness of each item does not have to be justified if the material is notable.
2280:
We have articles rather because they are notable and have verifiable and reliable sources. If a celebrity or organization is "failing", then the content can mention that failure in a
15560:
13023:
7718:
policy page, all BLP articles must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article, or it may be proposed for deletion. See also
4810:, in particular. (In some cases it might be a prerequisite requirement to transwiki the page first). Valid arguments against redirection must be based on the criteria specified in
2894:, directly above), while some editors may feel that deleting a page would be playing into the hands of a certain group, that alone isn't enough by itself for something to be kept.
2101:
Over the years, several templates have been created to be placed on top of pages indicating that they are new and may take time to complete to Knowledge's standards. These include
13284:
12575:
11280:
7612:
Subject did not get the media coverage it deserved at the time because reasons, so Knowledge should waive its reliable sourcing requirements in order to rectify that unfairness. –
5011:
Before addressing "how can this topic get into Knowledge if it doesn't have media coverage yet?", the question "why does this topic have to get into Knowledge?" must be answered.
3595:
Knowledge is not a place for you to judge other people's humor. Articles cannot be deleted because of your view on humor, nor can they usually be created as such, even under the
13078:
12813:
12700:
9197:
the main article nor a sub-article split off to keep it separate from the main article. Trivia sections in articles should be avoided, as Knowledge is not a trivia repository.
10625:
9202:
the main article with appropriate sources, find appropriate justification and sources for the spin-off article or consider that the material is not appropriate for Knowledge.
8674:
When an editor introduces a novel type of article in Knowledge, it may be necessary to consider whether such organization of material is compliant with core policies such as
7005:
On the contrary, being spread out around a greater region, such as a country or the whole world, without satisfying notability requirements does not make a subject notable.
3219:
15096:
12765:
11378:
11353:
10534:
5353:
3406:
about the subject, then there is no way to check whether the information in the article is true, and it may damage the reputation of the subject and the project. Even if it
205:
10185:
13063:
6258:
As in a paper encyclopedia, some articles will be several pages long, others just a line or two. There is no minimum or maximum length that qualifies an article, just the
5829:
is an exception to this provision; a redirect is more likely to be deleted if it receives very few hits, on the grounds that it is implausible, than if it receives many.
4309:
While these sorts of arguments may not be good arguments for deletion, they are excellent arguments for a merge in cases where an excessive number of subarticles exists.
15484:
14854:
11676:
706:
11877:
9619:
11408:
11105:
7663:
1671:
may be deleted if they are marginally notable, and must be deleted if they are defamatory. The standards of inclusion don't mandate inclusion; they merely suggest it.
914:
7554:
take notice in the future. Focusing on the objective evidence helps the deletion discussion reach a logical conclusion; injecting your personal predictions does not.
6450:
to an independent professional writer with a record of reliable publishing. News sources that publish in a blog format may be as reliable as a traditional newspaper.
15746:
14471:
13083:
12490:
11130:
11053:
10635:
8401:
4967:
This slipped through the cracks and never got media coverage at all, so using its own self-published documentation is the only way we can rescue it from obscurity. –
582:
572:
200:
5515:
This company has been teaching people to dance like a sandhill crane since before I was born. A tradition of so many years becomes an institution after this long. –
15341:
12530:
12510:
11473:
11443:
11255:
1655:
notable without providing an explanation or source for such a claim of notability; this is often seen when trying to assert notability under a sub-guideline (like
625:
615:
521:
511:
9426:
particular case is one of those exceptions. Guidelines are usually followed for good reasons, so there should be a good reason for departing from their guidance.
8642:
Deletion debates can sometimes be faulty, and even if the debate was correct it can be hard to draw comparisons: would the fact that there is an article on every
6121:
The number of editors involved may point out the level of interest in the subject, but it does not measure the notability, the number of reliable sources, or its
3187:
encyclopedic according to Knowledge's policies. Arguments of something's usefulness, uselessness, or value devoid of further context are not valid or persuasive.
2419:
14502:
13228:
11175:
10755:
241:
10033:
If you believe the opposing side in a discussion is an example of one of Knowledge's greater issues, explain this to them in relation to the article itself and
7267:
that articles on actual numbers over a certain size need to establish several reasons why that particular number is notable, which is a well-defined threshold.
15079:
11767:
11493:
10843:
10770:
10710:
10685:
10675:
10429:
9121:
does hold some weight in discussions of outright article deletion when material has been merged, as all contribution information may be lost, invalidating the
3764:
is not cleanup". Consider that Knowledge is a work in progress and articles should not be deleted as punishment because no one has felt like cleaning them up
15074:
14748:
14446:
12535:
10439:
8691:
5349:
4714:
The fact a subject is not neutrally presented is not a valid reason for deletion. The solution for lack of neutrality is to fix the article, not delete it.
854:
488:
471:
180:
6266:, articles can grow, shrink, merge, split, and change in all different ways over time. But once the subject becomes clearly notable, they do not disappear.
3782:
The question on whether a poor but improvable article ought to be deleted has been a major point of contention, and has given rise to the wiki-philosophies
3429:), keeping them actually can do more harm than one realizes – it sets a precedent that dictates that literally anything can go here. (See below for that.)
15756:
14849:
12615:
12570:
12480:
11696:
11423:
1977:, on the other hand, is based on whether the topic itself meets the criteria – not on what is or is not currently in the article. Thus, whether an article
5532:
Any performer who hasn't been doing stage shows for at least six months can't possibly have achieved notability yet. She has no fan base, and no agent. –
15508:
15225:
14497:
14456:
13123:
11413:
11048:
11033:
10968:
10413:
7029:
volume of media coverage about them, can be shown, but are not guaranteed articles just because one or two pieces of purely local media coverage exist.
3463:
236:
190:
15200:
15069:
12450:
12326:
12239:
11328:
11013:
10963:
6442:
details, and there is even a chance they may have been created or edited by the very same person who created or contributed to the Knowledge article.
2270:
822:
817:
597:
267:
7636:
even when the subject's earlier actions were reported in the press (at a much later date) as a result of later actions (and in the context of those).
14864:
13337:
12605:
12520:
12214:
12159:
12144:
11636:
11488:
11393:
11008:
10978:
10823:
10469:
9588:
and those who have created many unworthy articles still have the potential to contribute good writings and have made many really good contributions.
8950:
Yes, Knowledge is an encyclopedia, and as such, it should convey information on all branches of knowledge. However, "all branches of knowledge" does
8349:
1844:
Also, while citing essays that summarize a position can be useful shorthand, citing an essay (like this one) just by one of its many shortcuts (e.g.
8725:
The accepted practice around OSE applies differently to categories, because in some cases consistency is a desired trait of categorization schemes.
1503:
We keep articles because we know they have sources, not because we assume they have, without having seen them. Any claim that sources exist must be
15432:
14802:
14466:
14441:
13233:
11837:
11578:
11403:
11063:
11038:
10745:
10575:
4393:. This is a group of articles that has no relation to anything else on Knowledge, so Knowledge has no place for them. We should delete them all. –
743:
554:
544:
393:
210:
175:
6251:
can be eligible for inclusion, provided that other inclusion guidelines are met. Even if the article on a subject is very short, it may just be a
4203:
We've been waiting 10 long years for this article to improve. By now we know it'll never happen, and we can all agree this article doesn't belong.
15140:
14859:
14844:
12660:
12610:
12465:
12174:
11757:
11095:
10858:
9384:
to do it. Rather than using a page's "guideline" designation as an excuse to make an exception, suggest reasons why an exception should be made.
812:
526:
262:
8258:
By the same token, do not base a keep argument solely on how many footnotes are present in the article. It is possible to generate footnotes by
3462:. This normally centres around harm (or lack of) to the encyclopedia, e.g. from a redirect being misleading or in the way of other content. See
15324:
15091:
13501:
13193:
11822:
11568:
11305:
11230:
10800:
6144:
4293:
the article, or redirecting some of the articles after merging any useful content to a more general article, are better choices than deleting.
1837:
Keep in mind that articles can often be improved, and may not need to be deleted if the specific problems can be identified and corrected (see
7926:
They've given millions of dollars to a notable charity/school/hospital, which named a building after them. Here's a link to a press release! -
3195:
2094:
If you feel you need more time to work on an article you just created that has been put up for deletion early on, an option may be to request
15019:
14535:
13506:
13088:
12740:
12585:
12505:
12204:
12199:
11923:
11852:
11706:
11003:
4881:
3922:
its notability, but asserting that an article "needs improvement, not deletion" is not the same as providing evidence of such a possibility.
2140:
amount of time to reply. It is recommended for one who is considering putting it up for deletion to consider userfication as an alternative.
28:
4994:
As for the lack of existence, there are rare cases when this can be notable. There have, for example, been hoaxes which attained notability
4412:
De-orphaning articles and providing incoming links is a goal in improving the encyclopedia, not a requirement. Many orphans were created by
318:. It is important when taking part in deletion discussions to anchor one's rationale in relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines, such as
14790:
14420:
13133:
12690:
11897:
11388:
11275:
11265:
11155:
11058:
11043:
8959:
8005:
imply the notability of the subordinate entities. That is not to say that this is always the case (four of the notability guidelines, for
6140:
832:
8955:
1414:
why the article should or should not be included. Otherwise, you just leave us guessing as to what you meant. Simply answer the question,
15285:
15245:
15178:
12943:
12818:
12675:
12645:
12455:
11736:
11185:
11140:
11070:
10838:
9778:
nominated (or renominated) for deletion, then editors are justified in opposing the renomination. Frivolous renominations may constitute
6148:
reviewer is generally needed, so even when a reviewer does consider the question of notability, it represents a single person's opinion.
3398:. Just because an article does not directly hurt anyone does not mean the article should be kept. For example, if there has not been any
694:
592:
7090:
1418:
An example of a well-specified deletion nomination is "The article is nothing more than a dictionary definition, and therefore violates
648:
15741:
15250:
15230:
15188:
14923:
12988:
12179:
11882:
11802:
11433:
10808:
10521:
8631:
Sometimes arguments are made that other articles have been put forward for AfD and survived/deleted (the most famous example being the
872:
769:
587:
357:
arguments of other people, or dismissing them outright, by simply referring them to this essay is not encouraged (see also the section
11787:
9418:
fair to point out that it is not necessary to follow the guidelines 100% of the time if there is a good reason to break them. But you
4910:
There is no doubt that the band exists...there are 3 local newspaper articles about their show dates, plus they have a MySpace page. –
1407:
1352:
14451:
12705:
12420:
11817:
11606:
11503:
11285:
11270:
11115:
11028:
10645:
10630:
4494:
2284:, provided there are reliable sources. In short: Just because a celebrity or organization is "losing" doesn't mean it's not notable!
653:
185:
61:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
7075:
on the other hand does specify locality of coverage, recommending notable events more often have a national or international scope.
5990:
15736:
15592:
15220:
15064:
13294:
13213:
12595:
12555:
12269:
12234:
12149:
11938:
11892:
11318:
11220:
11150:
10938:
10620:
9041:
8092:
6568:
Splatter Road has been the site of 3 homicides in the past 10 years that have all received news coverage mentioning this location –
5549:
This ink in this book isn't even dry yet— shouldn't we give it more of a chance to prove itself before we have an article on it? –
1946:
7061:
does it not make sense that one part of the world has more articles on its local interests than another with a greater population?
4979:
Existence is important. The main purpose of the requirement to have all articles and information drawn from identifiable sources (
658:
408:
15363:
14839:
13073:
12958:
12435:
12184:
12139:
12134:
11872:
11618:
11468:
11110:
10790:
10650:
10454:
9782:, especially when there was a consensus to keep it in the past, or when only a short time has elapsed since the last nomination.
9129:
8497:
7715:
3772:. If there's good, eventually sourceable, content in the article, it should be developed and improved, not deleted. (If there is
3203:
2518:
In other words, a person or group may well be the greatest example of what they do in the history of everything, but if no other
676:
549:
5361:, and an article that was once accepted under Knowledge's guidelines or just by de facto practice could be put up for deletion.
15474:
15255:
15101:
15041:
14669:
12903:
12823:
12296:
12104:
11686:
11563:
10780:
10740:
10547:
8986:
of anything verifiable. So think carefully and exercise judgement when determining what should be included in an encyclopedia.
8108:
5227:
such as books and newspapers, a lack of search results there is not proof in itself that an article should be kept or deleted.
877:
667:
630:
9949:
This discussion is a prime example of the inherent fooism and barism of online communities. Let's not reinforce such things. —
9410:
Now, it does happen that someone will be a proponent of following some notability guideline without any exception. Guidelines
7793:
7012:
require evidence that the sourceability is more than purely local — for instance, corporations and organizations have to meet
5189:
process, unlike articles for deletion, will often hinge on matters such as plausibility and numbers of search engine results.
4953:
He has 10,000 subscribers on YouTube, so we don't need reliable sources because a lot of people want to know more about him. –
4622:
An article about this will never meet Knowledge's neutrality guidelines because there is so much controversy surrounding it. –
15240:
15171:
15162:
15116:
14973:
14938:
14785:
14775:
13218:
13188:
13183:
12978:
12755:
12515:
11943:
11827:
11731:
11180:
11125:
11100:
11080:
11018:
10988:
10893:
10883:
10655:
5079:
4303:
146:
15417:
8682:. Other editors may argue that a certain type of article doesn't exist because of inherent violations of core policies; see
6109:
The only editor who ever contributed to this article has not made any edits in 3 years, so if deleted, it'll not be missed –
15629:
15351:
15235:
13884:
13153:
13028:
12878:
12600:
12500:
12129:
11983:
11832:
11428:
11250:
11200:
10474:
9767:
deletion is supported by strong reasons that were not adequately addressed in the previous deletion discussion; after all,
8357:
the topic is notable in the English-speaking world, but of little relevance to speakers of other languages, or vice versa.
4877:
1433:
921:
390:, these arguments to avoid may also apply to other discussions, such as about deleting article content, moving pages, etc.
220:
8119:
grounds for deletion; subjects can still be notable by other means and even when they are not, often such articles can be
2303:
Note as well that some of our subject-specific notability criteria do in fact take winning into account. For example, our
15459:
15334:
15111:
14886:
14718:
13541:
13383:
13168:
13108:
13033:
12525:
12495:
12415:
12244:
12109:
11215:
11205:
11170:
10983:
10888:
10610:
5916:
This nomination has made the news and been heavily criticized. It would be an embarrassment for Knowledge to delete it. –
3936:
in its current state, then deleting now, and possibly recreating it later, remains an option. For example, problems like
1184:). Comments adding nothing but a statement of support to a prior comment add little to the discussion (and are a form of
563:
493:
293:
4289:
When the article is a very badly-written article on a small aspect of a bigger field, removing unverifiable content and
3250:, for instance—so usefulness is the basis of their inclusion; for these types of pages, usefulness is a valid argument.
15624:
15464:
15449:
15210:
15106:
14780:
14770:
14760:
14664:
14659:
13178:
13043:
13018:
12998:
12898:
12793:
12670:
12224:
12154:
12038:
11998:
11902:
11716:
11558:
11543:
11418:
11023:
10873:
10828:
10785:
10760:
10720:
10570:
10449:
10434:
10348:
9657:
As well, be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's or commenter's perceived failure to follow
9136:
on request to an administrator. It is also usually possible for the information to be restored if the article passes a
4676:
Knowledge has remedies in place to tackle its policy violation issues. Vandals, sock puppets, and edit warriors can be
4306:; less unambiguous cases might well be deleted at articles for deletion, if there is little to no content worth saving.
3459:
2273:
2267:
606:
577:
502:
15545:
3599:. Some articles can be created because of someone's view of humor, but these are usually created as sarcastic essays.
15612:
15572:
15513:
15496:
15469:
14891:
14831:
14649:
14528:
13695:
13320:
13148:
13128:
13053:
13048:
12948:
12620:
12189:
12099:
11752:
11661:
11523:
11498:
11458:
11368:
11358:
11333:
11295:
11290:
11225:
10993:
10953:
10898:
8580:
You guys forced me to delete the article on a CEO, so you have to allow me to delete the article on this activist. –
8239:
and may only be trivial mentions. Notability requires the presence of significant treatment of a subject in reliable
7398:
in a local crochet group, which may make her famous in that community, but that does not necessarily indicate she is
4241:
The article shouldn't be deleted for its current status only because no one has improved it yet. Such deletion would
3911:
3686:
2580:
2415:
886:
734:
639:
620:
516:
425:
62:
6676:
5364:
However, note that the fact that an article has not been edited in a long time is also not grounds for deletion, as
15275:
15167:
15133:
15002:
14881:
14639:
14607:
14413:
13342:
13208:
12745:
12229:
12194:
12119:
12089:
12033:
12018:
11933:
11508:
10853:
10600:
10595:
9332:
8340:
Other Wikipedias may have different inclusion criteria from the English Knowledge. Notability requires coverage in
5994:
5075:
842:
17:
13256:
8958:, which means there are standards for what constitutes information that should be in Knowledge. Imagine how large
4323:– the related fallacy that the article must not be sourceable or otherwise fixable if it hasn't been done already.
15550:
15444:
15392:
15370:
14990:
14874:
14728:
14654:
14634:
13138:
12918:
12883:
12710:
12219:
12114:
12079:
12013:
11656:
11626:
10908:
10680:
9901:
9483:
Creator has a history of writing some really good articles, therefore this one must be good and should be kept. –
8043:
7820:
7278:
7040:, meaning that only a small crowd is familiar with them. For example, few people are aware or interested in some
6805:
No one talks about this any more -- it was in the news a long time ago but you never see anything about it now. –
3761:
3166:: The government of Utopistan notes that military information on this article helps insurgents to plan attacks. –
1054:
462:
215:
12400:
8662:, for instance. If someone were, as part of their reasoning for keep, to say that every other main character in
6848:
indeed notable and worthy of inclusion. The NOTNEWS guideline is not intended to be overused to favor deletion.
4511:
on the top of the page or section. To consider a page for deletion on the basis that it is not up to date is to
2914:, etc. In addition, if such an argument is used against the nominator specifically, it constitutes a failure to
1981:
significance for its topic is not germane when notability is at issue at an AfD discussion; what matters is the
15582:
15535:
15454:
15402:
15319:
15183:
14713:
13304:
13173:
13003:
12730:
12630:
12440:
12316:
11953:
11777:
11726:
11651:
11553:
11538:
11463:
11235:
11085:
10928:
10715:
10660:
10585:
10514:
9265:
8650:
7816:
7065:
4235:
3769:
2256:
1830:: the main claim of subject's notability ('Future Nobel Prize') is unattributed speculation" or "Does not meet
1356:
863:
762:
535:
11887:
9654:
the ban or block, or to pages of topics unrelated to the topic of the ban (unless it is a complete site ban).
1642:"The sources are not independent, and so cannot establish that the subject passes our standards on notability"
15751:
15587:
15380:
15375:
15150:
14303:
13511:
13279:
13093:
13008:
12770:
12715:
12635:
12590:
12545:
12540:
12425:
12259:
12094:
12054:
11762:
11583:
11363:
11338:
11245:
11240:
11120:
10833:
10750:
10665:
10580:
9339:. Sometimes, they will find an existing project page which sums up their reasoning already, and rather than
9259:
9114:
8617:
8240:
8030:, but is often accepted in the context of ease of formatting and navigation, such as with books and albums.
7970:
895:
66:
9525:
Creator has previously created many articles that have been deleted, therefore this one should be deleted. –
7406:, meaning that some things are not suitable for inclusion in Knowledge. Everything in Knowledge needs to be
5498:
This fence post has been standing for more than two hundred years— anything this old is certainly notable. –
5384:
before moving it into mainspace, to avoid it being nominated for deletion in an obviously unfinished state.
3138:: This article is for a really good cause...it is about a charitable group that is trying to save children –
1997:
of the topic that have published detailed content about it, regardless of the present state of the article.
15715:
15705:
15668:
15651:
15636:
15555:
15329:
14723:
14708:
14700:
14681:
14674:
14596:
14521:
14339:
14315:
13904:
13330:
13103:
12983:
12863:
12838:
12665:
12301:
12264:
12254:
11857:
11797:
11646:
10948:
10923:
10878:
10775:
10730:
10705:
10695:
10670:
10444:
10418:
9511:
Nominator has previously nominated a lot of articles that have been kept and therefore made poor choices. –
8018:
8014:
8010:
7032:
Stating an article should be deleted because you and most of the world do not know about it is akin to the
6684:
6680:
5197:
3458:
Whether something is harmful or harmless are also valid arguments for and against deletion of redirects at
3231:
827:
9960:
8307:
given the six interwiki links (de:Foo, es:Foo, fr:Foo, it:Foo, la:Foo, pt:Foo). They can't all be wrong. –
6836:, not a news service, and keep arguments must take this into account. Knowledge even has a sister project
5806:
3455:
clearly prohibits the content in question (e.g. a full-fledged blog in userspace) from being hosted here.
15479:
15427:
15397:
15280:
15145:
15123:
14943:
14905:
14406:
13916:
13660:
13223:
13038:
12923:
12848:
12735:
12655:
12625:
12485:
12475:
12460:
12064:
12028:
11918:
11782:
11701:
11483:
11348:
11313:
11160:
10918:
10868:
10863:
10590:
10479:
9921:
9759:
If an article has been repeatedly nominated for deletion, sometimes users will recommend "Keep" (or even
9571:
indefinitely from editing Knowledge. And even though this page was created before their block, even so! –
9456:
8472:
7812:
7571:
7418:. If the only sources that have written about a subject are those within a small community, it's likely (
6691:); common sense and editorial judgement should be used to reach a consensus about the sources available.
6229:
Article provides so little information, you can easily recreate it should more information be available –
4924:
It is common household vocabulary what a spray stick is. Of course there should be an article about it. –
1819:
1251:
730:
699:
685:
7064:
have more dedicated writers. Anyone, including you, can be devoted to writing about your hometown. (See
4327:
WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages § Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement)
4124:
WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages § Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement)
3728:
15646:
15387:
15346:
15157:
15009:
14985:
14814:
14743:
14556:
13926:
13325:
13274:
12913:
12908:
12868:
12853:
12843:
12720:
12565:
12470:
12164:
12124:
11973:
11963:
11862:
11671:
11533:
10818:
10690:
10484:
10464:
10103:
10018:
9939:
The fact that this is marked for deletion while Foo isn't says a lot about the state of this website. —
9296:
8602:
7249:
6067:
Surely if this many people have contributed to the subject, someone should know where to find sources –
5699:
FunHouse is out of business now. It is a safe bet that an article about them is not an advertisement. -
3551:
3238:
There are some pages within Knowledge that are supposed to be useful navigation tools and nothing more—
2250:
1500:
Don't just claim that there must be sources out there somewhere. Instead, prove it, by providing them.
725:
481:
10147:
3735:
15597:
15491:
15407:
15358:
15014:
14950:
14334:
13891:
13787:
13299:
13068:
12933:
12833:
12750:
12695:
12685:
12650:
12445:
12286:
12008:
11948:
11681:
11518:
11453:
11448:
11438:
11190:
10813:
10565:
10507:
10424:
9973:
Nonsense like this is exactly why we're losing editors! Do the site a favor and close this already. —
9358:
8552:
You say this article is promotional, but there are other articles just as promotional as this one. –
8538:
Look, if we have an article on Pokémon species, we should be able to have an article on this band. –
7808:
7719:
7402:
enough for a Knowledge article. As is mentioned in one of the official Knowledge policies, Knowledge
6127:
if no reliable sources exist at all, then no matter how many editors they are, they will not be found
5376:, and this is not by itself reason to keep an article. It is recommended to work on a new article in
3963:
2348:
2296:, the nomination itself can be a sufficient notability claim for a nominee, whether or not they win.
794:
755:
720:
436:
315:
54:
12680:
8695:
8465:
7126:
6540:
Of course this church is notable. This is where the city council always meets every Tuesday night. –
5387:
However, note also that the current low quality of an article is also not a reason to delete it, as
2424:
This section covers deletion arguments based on personal biases rather than policies or guidelines.
15680:
15663:
15658:
15307:
15086:
15051:
14928:
14755:
14585:
14329:
14169:
13637:
13473:
13429:
12973:
12928:
12291:
11928:
11666:
11195:
10973:
10640:
10180:
10165:
10001:
Knowledge and related projects has a lot of problems, both proven and alleged, both big and small.
9897:
9347:
of why it applies). If someone links to an essay, proposal or guideline, they are not suggesting "
8983:
8865:
7394:
Lots of things are well known to a select group of people. A person may be considered the greatest
6821:
6485:
6241:
5277:
4532:
3838:
3721:
3274:
3243:
2316:), or accomplishing separate notable achievements beyond appearing in a reality show (for example,
1552:
1461:
15539:
10218:
9240:
8716:
7870:
It is a radio program on a notable radio station therefore the program is automatically notable. –
2978:
1321:
15215:
14997:
14619:
14349:
14164:
13680:
13376:
13203:
13143:
13118:
13058:
12968:
12963:
12550:
12367:
12084:
12069:
12059:
11847:
11842:
11260:
10933:
10903:
10735:
10140:
9233:
9024:
8393:
8337:; however, the existence of such articles does not indicate, by itself, that a topic is notable.
8166:
7653:
7245:
5986:
5754:
5589:
4705:
3714:
3328:
3292:
3046:
about. However, personal interest or apathy is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article.
2506:
1831:
1823:
1504:
1447:
1066:" with a signature can easily be dismissed by the admin making the final decision, and changing "
310:
that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should
286:
9226:
8747:
8159:
7769:
7730:, for the related argument that the subject must not be notable if people aren't working on it.)
7112:
6708:
5985:"WP:INVOLVE" redirects here. For policies, guidelines and guidance about users involvement, see
5463:
3700:
3090:
3076:
1454:
1342:
1232:
1101:
15641:
15312:
15056:
14913:
14644:
14271:
14261:
14211:
14185:
13961:
13835:
13802:
13703:
13685:
13585:
13434:
13416:
13163:
13113:
12893:
12888:
12858:
12347:
12311:
12306:
12003:
11807:
11641:
11165:
10998:
10848:
10615:
10386:
10381:
10376:
10197:
9900:. It may be valid to argue that a decision will move the encyclopedia closer to, or away from,
9692:
8606:
8493:
8381:
7457:
7313:
7306:
6656:
5747:
5028:
4858:
4731:
4539:
4247:
3926:
3567:
2950:
2563:
1690:
1538:
8858:
8616:
From the logical perspective, this argument is an example of the logical fallacy known as the
8458:
8444:
8280:
7783:
5643:
Rapid Racers went out of business more than 20 years ago. Why then should we have an article -
5449:
5435:
5421:
5267:
5260:
5246:
5135:
Zero Google hits, so even if she is a tenured professor at Harvard, she must be non-notable. –
5035:
4553:
3925:
Some articles have well-written text and references. But the one thing poor about them is the
3831:
3742:
2021:
1711:
1545:
15034:
14968:
14960:
14826:
14797:
14765:
14624:
14309:
14297:
14277:
14266:
14181:
13994:
13970:
13792:
13748:
13600:
13526:
13439:
13158:
12725:
12580:
11993:
11988:
11772:
11691:
11548:
11210:
10274:
9819:
9760:
9344:
9340:
9219:
9045:
8437:
7762:
7292:
7133:
7119:
7033:
6825:
6290:
6179:
5442:
5042:
4113:
3977:
3623:
3395:
2943:
2895:
2157:
2115:
1994:
1849:
1704:
1351:"WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC" and "WP:BELONG" redirect here. For policy on unencyclopedic content, see
1201:
1000:
346:
9685:
9678:
9618:
However, pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block may be
9110:
into an article does not excuse the article from the requirements of policy and guidelines.
9031:
9003:
7252:. An article on a topic is more likely to pass the notability test with a single article in
6881:
6512:
In all the publicity this school has received, they mention this particular honors student –
6016:
5253:
5049:
4844:
4441:
4434:
4230:
difficult to write about. An article should be assessed based on whether it has a realistic
4160:
I gave them six months for someone to add cites, they didn't, and I have lost my patience. –
4099:
3485:
3410:
true, without the ability to check it, false information could very well start to seep in.
3314:
3097:
2971:
2570:
2341:
2164:
1225:
993:
15710:
15029:
15024:
14629:
14324:
14228:
14192:
14107:
14063:
13899:
13830:
13620:
13449:
13424:
13098:
12560:
12357:
12281:
11145:
11090:
11075:
10605:
10211:
10010:
8489:
8138:
8066:
7776:
7526:
This celeb is just a flash in the pan, and nobody will remember her in a week/month/year. –
7299:
6888:
6735:
I came here to find out more about the arrest and court case...should be kept and updated –
6478:
6471:
6009:
5846:
5611:
IntraState Airlines just went belly-up. Therefore, we should delete the article about it. -
5582:
4851:
4636:
So many people hate this person that a fair article free of BLP violations is impossible. –
4106:
3817:
3707:
3414:
3342:
3278:
2462:
2277:
1871:
1852:), without further explanation, is similarly ill-advised, for the reasons explained above.
1606:
1328:
476:
156:
10066:
10023:
9733:
Article survived previous AFD and should not have to be subjected to this rubbish again. –
9017:
6554:
I always hear on the 5 o'clock news that the police have been called to this gas station –
6172:
5456:
5428:
3616:
3321:
3307:
3083:
2964:
2957:
1646:"The sources do not provide the significant coverage required by the notability standard."
1335:
1283:
Most people are saying it should be deleted, and it looks like that is what will happen. –
1108:
956:
8:
15602:
15523:
15439:
15302:
15292:
15128:
14602:
14564:
14544:
14202:
14101:
14048:
14024:
13947:
13850:
13782:
13708:
13521:
13516:
13493:
13468:
13198:
12808:
12377:
12352:
12331:
11711:
11343:
11135:
10700:
10292:
9812:
8686:
for example. Dismissing such concerns simply by pointing to this essay is inappropriate.
8451:
8389:
8252:
8080:
apply to situations where the fact of having a relationship to another person inherently
7414:
before an article can even be considered for inclusion, otherwise it could be considered
7013:
6829:
6660:
6447:
5973:
5764:
5392:
5056:
4348:
3937:
2455:
2014:
1990:
1815:
1697:
907:
420:
10367:
which describe various relevance fallacies, which should also be avoided in discussions.
9449:
9157:
9010:
8001:
In addition, notability of a parent entity or topic (of a parent-child "tree") does not
7755:
7748:
6283:
4546:
3824:
3492:
3335:
2808:
2556:
2448:
2405:
2171:
2043:
I worked so hard on this article. Do you really want to put my contributions to waste? –
1973:, which is a much faster and simpler process than nomination at Articles for Deletion.
1115:
91:
15607:
15297:
14933:
14918:
14696:
14387:
14320:
14134:
14019:
14004:
13951:
13911:
13860:
13797:
13756:
13733:
13713:
13616:
13460:
13444:
13369:
12372:
12362:
12276:
12249:
11513:
10765:
10391:
10203:
10132:
10058:
9913:
9804:
9670:
9641:
9441:
9388:
9362:
9211:
9149:
9118:
8995:
8979:
8935:
8850:
8825:
8754:
8739:
8708:
8430:
8422:
8397:
8334:
8272:
8151:
8051:
8006:
7740:
7645:
7563:
7449:
7284:
7105:
7097:
7072:
7017:
6873:
6700:
6463:
6275:
6165:
6157:
6001:
5838:
5739:
5574:
5413:
5285:
WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages § Unchallenged material (or content age)
5238:
5020:
4836:
4723:
4697:
4524:
4512:
4426:
4340:
4290:
4091:
3984:
3969:
3945:
3809:
3692:
3608:
3477:
3299:
3239:
3068:
2935:
2800:
2549:
2541:
2441:
2433:
2397:
2333:
2149:
2006:
1863:
1682:
1531:
1516:
1507:, and unless you can indicate what and where the sources are, they are not verifiable.
1439:
1313:
1217:
1093:
978:
965:
This section is about deletion arguments that do not seem to make sense, and otherwise
948:
441:
279:
142:
84:
76:
9414:
explicitly say that there will be common sense exceptions to them. In those cases, it
9184:
If this article is deleted then the stuff in it will end up back in the main article –
7431:
completely unknown outside a given locality does not mean the subject is not notable.
6125:. An article can be made into a good article, either by one person or by a dozen. And
5821:
Simply because a page is not of interest to Knowledge readers does not mean it is not
4594:
Has such a long history of vandalism that has made it an embarrassment to Knowledge. –
3253:
Building a solid case for deletion on the basis of uselessness is unlikely because of
3183:
something is useful or useless. This way, other editors can judge whether it's useful
1524:
986:
127:
Explain why an article does or does not meet specific criteria, guidelines or policies
14980:
14869:
14206:
14043:
14033:
14009:
13986:
13942:
13868:
13820:
13778:
13738:
13580:
13575:
13397:
12874:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
12828:
11792:
11631:
11528:
10725:
10402:
Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates are not considered duplicative
10396:
10371:
10336:
10328:
10318:
10300:
10282:
10264:
10250:
10173:
10111:
10093:
10027:
9888:
9874:
9856:
9842:
9779:
9752:
9738:
9724:
9592:
9576:
9558:
9544:
9530:
9516:
9502:
9488:
9369:
9352:
9348:
9321:
9304:
9287:
9279:
9189:
9102:
9088:
9074:
8943:
8925:
8911:
8897:
8844:
8808:
8790:
8644:
8610:
8585:
8571:
8557:
8543:
8529:
8326:
8312:
8259:
8247:
8228:
8210:
8125:
7963:
7949:
7931:
7917:
7903:
7889:
7875:
7861:
7847:
7691:
7617:
7603:
7539:
7531:
7517:
7503:
7489:
7484:
This movement may be unknown now, but it is going to be really important very soon. –
7387:
7373:
7359:
7345:
7221:
7203:
7177:
7041:
6990:
6976:
6962:
6957:
No one from outside this establishment's hometown has ever heard of it or ever will –
6948:
6934:
6920:
6860:
6810:
6796:
6782:
6768:
6754:
6740:
6605:
6587:
6582:
One source saying she won the Nobel Prize only mentions her once. That's not SIGCOV.
6573:
6559:
6545:
6531:
6517:
6414:
6396:
6382:
6364:
6350:
6336:
6322:
6234:
6220:
6206:
6114:
6100:
6086:
6072:
6058:
6044:
5949:
5935:
5921:
5907:
5893:
5879:
5814:
5796:
5715:
5704:
5690:
5676:
5662:
5648:
5634:
5616:
5556:
5539:
5522:
5505:
5488:
5341:
5327:
5312:
5276:"WP:NEWARTICLE" redirects here. For a step-by-step process to create an article, see
5224:
5172:
Avoid criteria based on search engine statistics (e.g., Google hits or Alexa ranking)
5154:
5140:
5126:
5112:
5098:
4972:
4958:
4944:
4929:
4915:
4900:
4777:
4763:
4681:
4669:
4655:
4641:
4627:
4613:
4599:
4585:
4487:
4473:
4398:
4380:
4222:
4208:
4194:
4179:
4165:
4151:
4070:
4055:
4037:
4029:
4019:
4011:
3898:
3884:
3870:
3669:
3655:
3538:
3524:
3388:
3374:
3171:
3157:
3143:
3129:
3038:
3024:
3010:
2883:
2869:
2855:
2850:. The Fooians don't want anyone to know this, we shouldn't bow to Fooian interests. –
2841:
2738:
2724:
2710:
2696:
2682:
2668:
2654:
2636:
2622:
2608:
2494:
2375:
2234:
2216:
2198:
2088:
2076:
2062:
2048:
1937:
1922:
1903:
1845:
1795:
1777:
1747:
1598:
1584:
1493:
1399:
1385:
1288:
1274:
1255:
1205:
1165:
1147:
1046:
1032:
8235:
Whilst showing the subject is mentioned in a number of sources, not all sources are
5722:
reasons why readers might be looking for information about who and what they were.
4650:
Vandals and sockpuppets will just keep on re-creating the article if it's deleted. –
2778:
1419:
69:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
15527:
14901:
14614:
14356:
14197:
14096:
14038:
13976:
13771:
13650:
13645:
13630:
13595:
13555:
13483:
13478:
11968:
11958:
11867:
10530:
10401:
10310:
10120:
10085:
10034:
9866:
9658:
9600:
9585:
9133:
8975:
8820:
8683:
8255:. This also applies to lists of 'Media Coverage/In the News' sections on websites.
7707:
7264:
7084:
7008:
At the same time, subject-specific notability standards in some areas of endeavour
6688:
6406:
6126:
5965:
5377:
4815:
4498:
4413:
4406:
3949:
3795:
2276:. We do not have articles only because people and/or organizations are successful;
2226:
2125:
2105:
2095:
1656:
1296:
contribution to the discussion, but instead blocking the progress of new opinions.
50:
9372:
is only a guideline, we do not have to follow it". We have policies which tell us
7598:
None of the source coverage would have occurred had the one event not occurred. –
6817:
6446:
including user-generated content, assess whether the content is self-published or
5960:. The outcome of a deletion discussion is determined on the basis of reference to
3436:
15692:
15687:
14738:
14733:
14575:
14113:
14077:
14053:
13873:
13845:
13825:
13673:
13641:
13625:
13590:
11721:
10494:
10489:
10364:
10344:
10245:
It does not matter if it is original research, or non verifiable. It's notable. –
10014:
10006:
9851:
This is the last straw. If we keep this Knowledge isn't worth my time any more. —
9568:
8632:
8202:
8035:
7633:
7403:
7053:
6856:
6850:
There are a variety of reasons an article may be written about a particular event
6849:
6833:
6625:
information, but they should not be used as a reason why the subject is notable.
6263:
5711:
4677:
4505:
4375:
Is an orphan. No articles link to this one, and probably none ever can or will. –
4258:
3547:
2782:
2646:
2321:
2313:
2244:
2193:
The person lost in the competition/event, so they couldn't possibly be notable. –
2132:
1196:
per nom. I find their argument that such and such policy is not met compelling")
7727:
7422:) that those sources are not reliable enough to warrant inclusion in Knowledge.
7354:
Who outside of (name locality) has ever even heard of this person/place/thing? –
6429:
In establishing notability, those sources must meet the guidelines found on the
5365:
3787:
3783:
3440:
15675:
15619:
14809:
14686:
14590:
14014:
13999:
13921:
13840:
13766:
13406:
12993:
12938:
12023:
11323:
10460:
Knowledge:Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
10046:
10038:
10002:
9629:
9328:
8675:
8134:
7991:
7213:
7187:
7161:
6645:
6641:
6252:
5957:
5685:
Victorianville has been wiped off the map and is now the site of a strip mine -
5381:
5208:
4717:
4390:
4078:
3941:
3596:
3266:
2907:
2774:
2304:
2289:
2281:
1769:
331:
8073:. Newborn babies are not notable except for an heir to a throne or similar.
6852:, and this must be taken into consideration when a news event is sent to AfD.
2864:. We can't get rid of an article just because it makes people uncomfortable. –
15730:
14139:
14029:
13761:
13724:
13668:
13536:
13531:
10352:
10042:
9768:
9612:
9608:
9596:
9313:
9137:
8971:
8816:
8726:
8679:
8598:
8198:
8120:
8104:
8070:
8059:
7427:
7415:
7001:
6616:
stipulates that in order for a subject to be worthy of a standalone article,
6613:
6422:
6248:
6133:
6122:
5826:
5727:
5373:
5358:
5186:
5167:
4984:
4819:
4807:
4803:
4799:
4685:
4282:
4251:
4063:
3791:
3563:
3452:
3447:
3191:
2919:
2915:
2770:
2384:
2309:
2293:
2136:
1986:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1787:
1739:
1668:
1660:
1299:
1177:
1173:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
339:
335:
327:
9040:"WP:LOSE" redirects here. For Knowledge is not about losing or winning, see
8648:
character mean there necessarily should be an article on every character on
8566:
We do not have an article on y, so we should not have an article on this. –
7714:, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. However, note that per the
4234:
for expansion, not how frequently it has been edited to date. Remember that
2530:
weight and relevance should also be taken into account in making decisions.
2057:
You would be doing me a big favor if you changed your "deletes" to "keeps" –
14151:
13570:
12075:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
10332:
10314:
10296:
10278:
10260:
10246:
10169:
10107:
10089:
10017:. But a deletion discussion is about a specific article and not a place to
9994:
9984:
9974:
9964:
9950:
9940:
9884:
9870:
9852:
9838:
9748:
9734:
9720:
9572:
9554:
9540:
9526:
9512:
9498:
9484:
9368:
Guidelines do indeed have exceptions; however, it is unhelpful to suggest "
9317:
9300:
9283:
9185:
9098:
9084:
9070:
8939:
8921:
8907:
8893:
8804:
8786:
8581:
8567:
8553:
8539:
8525:
8345:
8322:
8308:
8236:
8224:
8220:
8206:
8194:
8100:
8096:
7959:
7945:
7927:
7913:
7899:
7885:
7871:
7857:
7843:
7687:
7613:
7599:
7527:
7513:
7499:
7485:
7411:
7383:
7369:
7355:
7341:
7236:, that's notable/non-notable". Notability isn't determined by something's
7217:
7199:
7173:
6986:
6972:
6958:
6944:
6930:
6916:
6806:
6792:
6778:
6777:
Huge media interest in this celeb romance...so we should keep the article –
6764:
6750:
6736:
6653:
6621:
6597:
6583:
6569:
6555:
6541:
6527:
6513:
6430:
6410:
6392:
6378:
6360:
6346:
6332:
6318:
6259:
6230:
6216:
6202:
6110:
6096:
6082:
6068:
6054:
6053:
This is a huge project that many editors care about and work on every day –
6040:
5961:
5945:
5931:
5917:
5903:
5889:
5875:
5810:
5792:
5719:
5700:
5686:
5672:
5658:
5644:
5630:
5612:
5550:
5533:
5516:
5499:
5482:
5337:
5323:
5308:
5216:
5204:
5150:
5136:
5122:
5108:
5107:
She's the first Google result for her name, so obviously she's important. –
5094:
5007:
4999:
4968:
4954:
4940:
4925:
4911:
4896:
4773:
4759:
4665:
4651:
4637:
4623:
4609:
4595:
4581:
4483:
4469:
4394:
4376:
4218:
4204:
4190:
4175:
4161:
4147:
4051:
4033:
4015:
3894:
3880:
3866:
3665:
3651:
3588:
3534:
3520:
3426:
3403:
3384:
3370:
3167:
3153:
3139:
3125:
3034:
3020:
3006:
2911:
2879:
2865:
2851:
2837:
2734:
2720:
2706:
2692:
2678:
2664:
2650:
2632:
2618:
2604:
2522:
2514:
you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.
2490:
2371:
2317:
2230:
2212:
2194:
2072:
2058:
2044:
1958:
1954:
1933:
1918:
1899:
1827:
1791:
1773:
1765:
1761:
1743:
1631:
1594:
1580:
1489:
1395:
1381:
1284:
1270:
1161:
1143:
1042:
1028:
307:
13361:
6425:
requires that in order for a subject to be notable, it must be sourced by
4794:
exceptionally difficult. Valid arguments against merger might be based on
4664:
The canvassing campaign has made it impossible to get consensus on this. –
4085:
3554:
are welcome. Articles should be kept or rejected because of ideas such as
1932:
The article's content asserts importance and significance for the topic. –
969:
point at or even make correct usage of policies or guidelines whatsoever.
14344:
14121:
14058:
9963:) don't think this is notable, they just can't see female perspectives. —
9122:
8967:
8963:
8892:
I thought Knowledge's purpose was to provide information on everything. –
8481:
For an essay that discusses precedents outside deletion discussions, see
8039:
7624:
7543:
7407:
7399:
7195:
7169:
7037:
6632:
doesn't require that the subject is the main topic of the source material
6434:
5822:
5223:
search. However, since an article can be verified as notable entirely by
5212:
4988:
4980:
4811:
4795:
4785:
4217:
I really promise I'll improve it, I just have no time now to explain how.
3559:
3555:
3422:
3418:
3399:
3270:
3254:
3247:
2903:
2899:
2786:
2519:
2262:
1974:
1757:
1664:
1635:
323:
319:
7856:
This poet is notable, so all his individual poems must be notable too. –
5175:
4985:
mere existence does not automatically make a subject worthy of inclusion
3566:– not because they meet an editor's subjective view of humor. There are
3211:
2211:, something this horrid album deserves instead of a Knowledge article. —
1053:
This is not an argument for or against deletion at all, it's a vote. As
14254:
14248:
14175:
14087:
10499:
9435:
8659:
8085:
8084:
a public position that is notable in its own right, such as a national
8055:
6971:
Knowledge is an encyclopedia of the entire world, not just Woodsville –
5788:
4987:. There are various other guidelines that must be met, mostly found in
3223:
3207:
14513:
9983:
This article has long been an insult to Knowledge and our standards. —
9883:
A media pundit criticized Knowledge for having this kind of article. —
8115:
make the subject notable. Also, notability not being inherited is not
7627:
is based on objective evidence of whether sufficient reliable sources
7546:
is based on objective evidence of whether sufficient reliable sources
5809:
read it every day, making it Knowledge's 163rd most popular article. –
2489:
The Angry Young Popes are the best rock band in the world right now. –
2266:, are significantly important and covered in several reliable sources
14398:
14361:
14145:
14129:
13812:
11479:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
10546:
10030:
and individual cases will usually not set an example for the future.
9747:
It's already had a bunch of AFDs, obviously people want it deleted. –
9392:
8663:
8095:(significance is a lower standard than notability, used for sections
6437:
some information, but surely not to establish notability. Sites like
14291:
10168:
says that we keep secondary schools so this article should be kept —
7664:
WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages § Inaction by editors
7550:
taken notice already, not on subjective judgments of whether people
7498:
Of course this unreleased single is notable. It's by The Scrotums. –
6671:
that have been used to establish notability and are useful to write
6620:
that addresses the subject in detail is required, to the point that
5671:
The Big Banger has not had a hit record for more than 10 years now -
5393:
Articles should be judged on their potential, not just current state
4482:
Information changes so often, it is impossible to keep up to date. –
4068:
There is no distinction between using online versus offline sources.
3464:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion#When should we delete a redirect?
14562:
For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
14239:
9904:
but a relevant argument should focus on the merits of the article.
8067:
not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article
7382:
Is the only elementary school on Clubbington Street in Eastgrove. –
7191:
7165:
6837:
6763:
When I saw this I immediately looked it/them up here, as did many –
5203:
Note further that searches using Google's specialty tools, such as
3383:
This article is very harmful to many people. Get rid of this now! –
2878:. Baz supporters want to delete it because it makes Baz look bad. –
2208:
14554:
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the
9399:
why the case at hand is different from or should be treated as an
9361:, in general, serve to summarize a position, opinion or argument.
9351:
says we should do this", but rather "I believe we should do this,
9113:
In some cases content can be merged to other relevant articles or
7898:: there are lots of famous people on this list, so it's notable. –
7052:
Another question is where to draw the line on a subject as being "
6255:
waiting for expansion. Being "short" is not grounds for deletion.
6247:
On the other hand, even a small amount of information meeting the
13393:
10944:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
7985:
7395:
6374:
5357:
collective interpretation of our inclusion criteria has evolved.
5219:
that can be useful in improving articles than the default Google
3650:
Very nice format and design, esp. the use of multicolour layout –
3587:
What does this joke even mean? I can't understand modern humor. -
2091:
before you solicit "votes" one way or the other in a discussion.
130:
Always try to make clear, solid arguments in deletion discussions
10232:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
9706:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
9470:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
9254:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
9171:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
9056:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8879:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8768:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8507:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8294:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8180:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7829:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7686:
Nobody has added sources to the article, so it's not notable. –
7673:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7585:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7471:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7327:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
7147:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6902:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6722:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6640:. The spirit and the letter of the guideline are concerned with
6499:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6304:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6193:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
6030:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5860:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5774:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5603:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5408:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5294:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
5149:
A Google Books search returned no hits, so must be non-notable –
5070:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4872:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4745:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4567:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4455:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4362:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
4133:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3998:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3852:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3756:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3637:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3506:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3356:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
3111:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2992:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2822:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2590:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2476:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2362:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2185:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
2035:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1885:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1725:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1566:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1475:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1367:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1246:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1129:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
1014:
of this essay on making solid arguments in deletion discussions.
8620:(also known as "appeal to worse problems" or "not as bad as").
8333:
A notable topic will often be covered by Knowledge articles in
7512:
We all know there will be a US presidential election in 2044. –
7277:
For further information on this concept and more examples, see
5162:
2691:: Got bored of reading. Not of interest to English-speakers. –
2420:
WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages § Personal taste
1613:
the subject may not be notable. This behavior straddles both "
366:
While this page is tailored to deletion discussion, be that of
133:
Avoid short one-liners or simple links (including to this page)
12761:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
7728:§ Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement)
5322:
Article was only created yesterday, I'm still working on it! –
10355:. The policies should be interpreted together and not alone.
9205:
6215:
This article provides too little information on the subject –
3215:
3152:: No one is going to use this content, so we don't need it. –
2769:
This may include subjective opinions concerning the usage of
2762:
that policy applies as the rationale for deletion. (See also
1953:
of notability are determined. This formula is the purview of
12641:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
11813:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
10347:) is a formal fallacy. It basically consists in confusing a
9599:
efforts opposed by the majority. Knowledge is not a club of
8989:
8628:
the other article to be immediately nominated for deletion.
6791:
Knowledge is not news, and there should be no news, period –
6526:
A restaurant that is often reviewed in the community times –
5888:
There is a huge crowd rooting for this article to be kept. –
4718:
Just not notable (I've never heard of merger or redirection)
2131:. If such a template is found on a newly created page, as a
1667:, but fails a more stringent set of standards: for example,
1416:
What policy (or guideline) does it violate or meet, and how?
14493:
List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates
9539:, nominator is a banned user trying to destroy Knowledge. –
8655:
7089:"WP:ARBITRARY" redirects here. For arbitrary category, see
6749:
On the news tonight and on all major newspaper frontpages –
6438:
6242:
Knowledge is not a collection of indiscriminate information
5093:
It has 345,400 Google hits, so it is clearly of interest. –
4047:
2751:
1618:
1614:
359:
27:"WP:ATA" redirects here. For other arguments to avoid, see
12170:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
11979:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
11574:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
10914:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
10259:
It is verifiable, therefore it is not original research. –
10011:
there are often allegations and concerns about power abuse
8954:
necessarily mean "everything". Knowledge is specifically
6824:
as well as those of the past, and it even selects certain
4304:
unambiguous advertising or promotion may be speedy deleted
4077:
If an editor seeking deletion believes the creator placed
3533:
This article is hilarious. Obviously unencyclopedic!!!! –
149:. Try to stay in the top three sections of this hierarchy.
8781:
If you delete this you will have to delete everything in
8597:
be an argument that this article is not bad enough to be
7091:
WP:Overcategorization § Arbitrary inclusion criteria
3776:
usable content, however, it may well be best to delete.)
3124:
This isn't encyclopedic content, but it's still useful. –
2370:
It is still under construction, so it can't be notable. –
1676:
14477:
in place and transportation related deletion discussions
13014:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
8246:, not just the mere presence of the searched-for term.
6081:. It passed DYK/GA. That means the subject is notable. –
5787:, Knowledge does not need pages some handful of people (
4983:) is to prove that everything is true and accurate. But
4939:
I know lots about this subject, so it must be notable. –
4313:
is a perfectly acceptable vote in a deletion discussion.
4146:
Article has been here for 2 years and is still a stub! –
13024:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
9044:. For the essay on losing a discussion gracefully, see
8838:
8344:
secondary sources. Other versions of Knowledge are not
8123:
to the article on the associated subject (see also the
5174:. One would not expect to find thousands of hits on an
4086:
Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement)
2603:: The Great White Dopes are the worst rock band ever. –
12576:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
12210:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
11281:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
10430:
Knowledge:List of policies to cite in deletion debates
9837:
If we don't keep this why should I even edit at all? —
8483:
WP:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments
6427:
multiple reliable sources, independent of the subject.
5991:
WP:Non-admin closure § Editors who are uninvolved
5336:
Article is brand new, has not stood the test of time –
4688:, this can be discussed until a consensus is reached.
4518:
306:
This page details arguments that are commonly seen in
12322:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
10959:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
10440:
User:Hiding/Points to note regarding deletion debates
10186:
this February 2017 RFC on secondary school notability
7794:
Knowledge:Notability (people) § Invalid criteria
7212:
This person's video on YouTube just passed 1 million
6943:
Everyone around the world needs to know about this –
6095:
Only one person has made all the edits to this page –
5791:
in this case) might want to find information about. –
5481:– It's a new company/startup, so it can't be notable.
5166:
generally sourceable via the internet. For instance,
2898:, but this fact does not supersede its guidelines on
1913:
There's no way anyone could be notable just by doing
1605:
Simply stating that the subject of an article is not
1307:
10626:
Editing Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
10052:
9391:
are not actual policy, by virtue of the fact that a
8091:
This does not mean that such associations are never
7807:
a content guideline or policy. Nor does it apply to
6840:, dedicated to hosting user generated news stories.
6331:
The subject's site goes into great detail about it –
4032:. Therefore, we have no way of knowing about this. –
1353:
WP:What Knowledge is not § Encyclopedic content
10414:
Knowledge:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
10372:
Factors that do not automatically render notability
10343:Denying the antecedent (and its variants, like the
8982:'s guidelines, it is also not "everything" and not
7340:
Well I've never heard of it so it must be a hoax. –
6345:
There is a whole web site devoted to this subject –
5657:
FadCo has discontinued the SuperWax Doodlies line -
4278:looking for, and this is enough to make it worthy.
3932:With that said, if an article is so bad that it is
3291:"WP:NOHARM" redirects here. You may be looking for
1826:", consider writing a more detailed summary, e.g. "
247:
Policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates
13285:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
13064:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
9069:because we would lose the information otherwise. –
8828:that may have an impact on a deletion discussion.
7404:is not an indiscriminate collection of information
10548:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
10470:Knowledge:Exceptions should leave the rule intact
9083:because the information is available elsewhere. –
8111:); it simply means that the association does not
7912:The artist is famous, so the album is notable. –
2312:), holding a notable public office (for example,
1810:, deletion discussions are not "votes". They are
15747:Knowledge essays about building the encyclopedia
15728:
11409:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
11354:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
11106:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
9896:the decline in new editors, or criticism of the
9650:. This criteria does not apply to pages created
8266:
7256:than because it has 1 million views on YouTube.
7228:A commonly seen argument at AfD is "Subject has
7216:mark and over 1,000 comments which is notable. –
6359:People are talking about it all over the blogs –
6201:Article has lots of information on the subject –
4468:because this article is very much out of date. –
4329:– the general version, not specific to deletion.
3790:. However, some articles do reach the so-called
3570:, even on Knowledge, than in the article space.
2754:, above). Such claims require an explanation of
2677:: I'm so ashamed this article is on Knowledge. –
1651:Just as problematic is asserting that something
1510:
1406:What shouldn't be included in the encyclopedia,
13084:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
12814:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
12491:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
11131:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
10636:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
9335:, and we encourage people to put forward their
8956:not an indiscriminate collection of information
6929:People from 3000 miles away know what this is –
3952:, need to be resolved as quickly as possible.
2143:
13502:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
12766:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
12511:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
11677:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
11444:Counting and sorting are not original research
10188:describe how school AFDs should be evaluated.
9865:Nobody will edit if we delete this. Aren't we
9387:In particular, while precedents as defined at
8920:This thing exists, so it should be included. –
8692:WP:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
5352:. Take, for example, Gaius Flavius Antoninus,
942:
120:Please remember that deletion discussions are
14529:
14503:How to save an article nominated for deletion
14414:
13507:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises
13377:
11474:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
10756:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
10515:
10028:Knowledge is not governed like a court system
9407:on the basis that it isn't a binding policy.
9403:to it, rather than ignoring or dismissing it
8400:. Please discuss this issue on the article's
8263:depth, in addition to the number of sources.
8056:routine coverage based on such press releases
6596:A restaurant that only has magazine reviews –
5980:
4608:There is a constant edit war going on here. –
4320:
4010:With only offline sources given, there is no
1394:This definitely belongs in an encyclopedia. –
915:
763:
287:
242:How to save an article nominated for deletion
29:Knowledge:Arguments to avoid (disambiguation)
13004:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
11768:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
11494:How to save an article proposed for deletion
10771:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
10711:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
10686:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
10279:You Know Who Else Had A Toothbrush Moustache
9993:Let's rid this site of Foo-political bias. —
8906:You are trying to remove true information! –
7172:with a population of 9,400 is not notable. –
6628:On the other hand, the notability guideline
5944:The only people voting "keep" are spammers –
5902:The cause for keeping this has gone viral. –
4495:Knowledge is a work-in-progress encyclopedia
4174:Creator has totally neglected this article –
4028:All the sources given have fallen victim to
3369:Why delete this, it is not harming anyone. –
2758:policy the content fails and explanation of
2087:You should also make yourself familiar with
15757:Knowledge essays about Wikipedian fallacies
13391:
12536:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
11256:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
10358:
10309:The nominator did not perform the steps in
7819:. It only applies to arguments to avoid at
7639:
7557:
7368:I know it well. It's on my way to school. –
6985:Cumbertown is not the center of the world –
5930:25 people want to have this page deleted. –
5568:
5388:
5350:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
5076:Knowledge:Search engine test § General
4580:Article is likely to be vandalised a lot. –
3912:the remedy for such an article is cleanup,
3664:There is nothing in this article but text -
2777:), and the inclusion of what may be deemed
2308:being notable in other areas (for example,
1488:. There must be plenty of sources. –
14536:
14522:
14421:
14407:
13384:
13370:
13229:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
12616:Notability is not relevance or reliability
12571:News coverage does not decrease notability
12481:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
12431:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
11424:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
11399:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
10522:
10508:
10382:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
10084:. All the "delete" voters are just saying
9907:
9624:if there're no substantial edits by others
9429:
9422:try to make a reasonable argument for why
9206:That's only a guideline, proposal or essay
8034:itself notable. For example, just because
7734:
7438:to be persuasive in deletion discussions.
6915:It's of interest around the entire globe –
6675:sections (see the specific guidelines for
6433:page. A subject's own site can be used to
6123:compliance with other inclusion guidelines
4513:demolish the house while it is being built
2890:And on the converse of that converse (see
2836:: It would be censorship to delete this. –
1857:
1838:
922:
908:
770:
756:
294:
280:
14498:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
14085:
13124:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
11414:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
11034:Identifying and using independent sources
10191:
9380:to do it, and guidelines to help us with
9143:
8990:Do not lose the information or the effort
8702:
5716:links to the sources are no longer active
3803:
2391:
1172:It is important to keep in mind that the
394:WP:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages
237:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
14238:
13290:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
12451:Big events make key participants notable
12399:
11014:Formatting bilateral relations templates
10529:
10490:Knowledge:Myths and facts about deletion
10291:The arguments for keeping are basically
9497:Creator has made only 27 edits so far. –
8524:, and this is just as famous as that. –
8412:
8065:The fact of having a famous relative is
7272:
7198:with a population of 9,400 is notable. –
6843:Basically, Knowledge is not a place for
5995:WP:Administrators § Involved admins
5805:, this is clearly an important list, as
3905:In the Wiki model, an article which may
3680:
3286:
3054:
2891:
1427:
141:
14543:
13338:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
12954:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
12701:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
12606:Notability is not a level playing field
12521:How the presumption of notability works
11637:Contributing to complicated discussions
11489:How the presumption of notability works
11009:Formatting bilateral relations articles
10824:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
10327:The "keep" arguments contain a logical
9664:
8970:on what articles should be kept, and a
8046:does not make that AFT local notable.
7992:Notability requires verifiable evidence
7958:she's only the U.S. President's wife –
6642:having enough content to write articles
6391:Look what I found about it on Twitter –
5874:There are more "keeps" than "deletes" –
4825:
4274:to be added to it at the present time.
3957:
3865:Article is messy and poorly laid out. –
3413:As for articles that do not conform to
2763:
2278:everyone and everything makes mistakes!
1947:assertion of importance or significance
1176:is designed to solicit discussion, not
14:
15729:
14428:
13234:You should not write meaningless lists
12531:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
11838:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
11605:
11579:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
11404:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
10969:Don't hope the house will build itself
10746:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
10576:All Five Pillars are equally important
10313:. Therefore, the article is notable. –
10273:The nominator's argument is basically
9719:Didn't we argue all this last month? –
8960:an encyclopedia on everything would be
8038:was a founding member of a particular
7842:She once worked with someone famous –
5832:
5625:The full citation proves it, Rise and
4882:WP:Existence does not prove notability
3948:, or unsourced negative statements in
3062:
2918:and if severe enough may constitute a
2207:This album has a 1 out of 5 rating on
1677:Just pointing at a policy or guideline
1619:Just pointing at a policy or guideline
14517:
14402:
13365:
13254:
12791:
12661:One sentence does not an article make
12611:Notability is not a matter of opinion
12398:
12327:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
12240:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
11758:A weak personal attack is still wrong
11697:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
11604:
11329:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
11096:Minors and persons judged incompetent
10859:An unfinished house is a real problem
10844:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
10545:
10503:
10349:necessary with a sufficient condition
9097:Lots of people have worked on this. –
7078:
6269:
5080:Knowledge:Google searches and numbers
4895:It is not a hoax. It is truly real. –
3214:. A guide to the best restaurants in
2794:
13194:Things that should not be surprising
12889:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
12215:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
12160:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
12145:Don't call people by their real name
11823:Profanity, civility, and discussions
11231:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
10455:Knowledge:Don't attack the nominator
9395:exists you should provide an actual
8839:Knowledge should be about everything
8364:
5161:Although using a search engine like
3602:
3033:Who cares about this stuff anyway? –
2000:
1803:that something does follow policy.
1669:articles about notable living people
400:
103:
36:
14860:Science, technology and engineering
13089:No one cares about your garage band
12792:
12741:What is and is not routine coverage
12586:No one cares about your garage band
12506:Existence does not prove notability
11924:Assume the assumption of good faith
11853:There is no Divine Right of Editors
11707:Relationships with academic editors
11569:Why was the page I created deleted?
11004:Featured articles may have problems
9553:Politically motivated nomination. –
8801:Category:Knowledge articles about X
8783:Category:Knowledge articles about X
8613:, makes a much more credible case.
8360:
7884:his brother is a notable athlete. –
6867:
6694:
6457:
6039:Has been edited by lots of people –
5121:Zero Google hits, must be a hoax. –
4691:
4519:Susceptibility to policy violations
3396:No content on Knowledge is censored
2929:
2305:notability criteria for politicians
24:
13134:Please do not murder the newcomers
12691:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
12175:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
11898:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
11389:Adjectives in your recommendations
11276:Knowledge is not a reliable source
11266:What an article should not include
11156:The problem with elegant variation
10964:Don't get hung up on minor details
10450:Knowledge:Do not call things cruft
10435:User:Hiding/What notability is not
10007:women are greatly underrepresented
8145:
5374:all articles are works in progress
2535:
2242:In fact, plenty of subjects, like
2225:She won a contest and thus passes
1308:Just unencyclopedic/doesn't belong
1087:
147:Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement
67:thoroughly vetted by the community
63:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
15768:
15742:Knowledge essays about notability
12456:Businesses with a single location
11737:You have a right to remain silent
11186:Restoring part of a reverted edit
11141:Potential, not just current state
11071:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
10126:
10053:Citing this page indiscriminately
10047:places for centralized discussion
9965:All Women's Official Spokesperson
9626:. Such pages must be tagged with
9329:Knowledge is not a system of laws
9042:WP:Knowledge is not about winning
8980:broader than a paper encyclopedia
8978:. Even though that guideline is
8831:
8733:
8335:many languages other than English
7914:The internet's busiest music nerd
7710:, topic notability is based upon
6951:), 05:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
6231:Come back when you're more mature
5733:
5307:Article has existed since 2004. –
3573:
2916:assume the nominator's good faith
2089:Knowledge's canvassing guidelines
1609:does not provide reasoning as to
14924:A nice cup of tea and a sit down
14383:
14382:
13255:
12205:Don't knit beside the guillotine
12200:Don't ignore community consensus
11434:Confusing arguments mean nothing
10475:Knowledge:Existence ≠ Notability
10339:), 12:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
10321:), 12:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
10303:), 12:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
8914:), 15:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
8821:verifiable, reliable information
8799:We've deleted other articles in
8560:), 04:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
8498:WP:Consistency in article titles
8384:to read and navigate comfortably
8369:
7702:are not notable or non-notable,
7434:This argument is not sufficient
6757:), 08:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
4334:
4248:one single editor doing the work
4046:The book sources don't have any
3893:Half the article is in Spanish!
3541:), 12:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
3527:), 12:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
3391:), 15:01, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
3041:), 17:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
2886:), 23:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
2872:), 17:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
2858:), 12:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
2844:), 13:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
2741:), 16:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
2733:It's offensive to my religion. –
2713:), 19:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
2685:), 01:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2201:), 00:00, 31 November 2015 (UTC)
2071:I need more time to work on it –
1807:
1181:
107:
40:
15737:Knowledge essays about deletion
12706:Sources must be out-of-universe
12421:All high schools can be notable
11818:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
11504:Identifying blatant advertising
11286:The world will not end tomorrow
11271:Knowledge is a work in progress
11116:Not everything needs a template
11029:How to write a featured article
10646:External criticism of Knowledge
10631:Editors will sometimes be wrong
10421:(index of essays on this theme)
10267:), 00:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
10253:), 00:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
9091:), 13:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
9077:), 13:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
8323:TrappedBehindTheLanguageBarrier
8044:American Federation of Teachers
7892:), 19:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
7443:
7263:apply to the position taken in
6818:Knowledge is not a news service
6813:), 16:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
6799:), 16:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
6771:), 16:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
6317:Blogs aren't reliable sources –
6151:
5799:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5707:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5693:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5679:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5665:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5651:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5637:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5619:), 12:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
5525:), 12:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
4401:), 13:29, 9 November 1989 (UTC)
4321:§ Past inaction by editors
4168:), 01:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
3220:Knowledge is not a travel guide
3190:A list of all phone numbers in
2727:), 11:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
2633:NecessityIsTheMotherOfInvention
2611:), 02:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
2497:), 02:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
1587:), 16:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
1496:), 01:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
1355:. For page possessiveness, see
1211:
1035:), 01:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
15546:Wikimedia Foundation elections
15221:Dispute resolution noticeboard
14865:Knowledge assistance and tasks
13880:Correlation implies causation
13295:Avoid writing redundant essays
13214:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
12944:Don't stuff beans up your nose
12819:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
12646:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
12596:Notability cannot be purchased
12556:Masking the lack of notability
11893:Knowledge is not about winning
11319:Copyediting reception sections
11221:Temporary versions of articles
11151:Principle of Some Astonishment
10939:Creating controversial content
10839:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
10495:Knowledge:I don't see why not!
10285:), 21:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
10176:), 12:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
10121:some stuff exists for a reason
9130:restored to your personal page
8938:, Knowledge has space for it –
8329:), 01:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
8315:), 14:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
8213:), 18:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
8076:Note, however, that this does
7906:), 18:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
7694:), 20:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
7240:of members, but rather by the
6855:If you plan to use either the
5559:), 01:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
5508:), 09:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
5491:), 01:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
5398:
5344:), 01:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
5315:), 01:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
5232:
5014:
4772:Fails N and all relevant SNG –
4672:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4658:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4644:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4630:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4616:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4602:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4588:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4490:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4476:), 03:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
4420:
4383:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4252:written in a collaborative way
4225:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4211:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4197:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4182:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4154:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4058:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4040:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
4022:), 03:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
3901:), 01:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3887:), 01:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3879:It's not referenced properly –
3552:unintentionally funny articles
3050:
2746:
2705:: This makes me look stupid! –
2257:Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing
2237:), 00:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
1818:. Rather than merely writing "
1185:
1049:), 23:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
972:
13:
1:
15226:Biographies of living persons
13321:About policies and guidelines
13074:List of jokes about Knowledge
12436:Articles with a single source
11883:Two wrongs don't make a right
11873:The rules of polite discourse
11803:It's not the end of the world
11564:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
11111:Not everything needs a navbox
10979:Don't "teach the controversy"
10791:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
10651:Here to build an encyclopedia
10114:), 13:25 2 January 2017 (UTC)
10096:), 12:01 1 January 2017 (UTC)
9975:This Will Bring Them All Back
9891:), 19:89, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
9561:), 00:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
9547:), 04:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
9343:they will link to it (with a
9117:. Note that an argument from
8900:), 12:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
8811:), 03:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
8793:), 12:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
8618:fallacy of relative privation
8267:Wikipedias in other languages
8231:), 18:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
8221:Did you even look for sources
7966:), 18:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
7864:), 14:15, 03 March 2009 (UTC)
7850:), 14:15, 03 March 2009 (UTC)
7716:Biographies of living persons
7620:), 21:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
7606:), 10:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
7520:), 01:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
7506:), 01:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
5542:), 07:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
4784:The fact that a topic is not
4780:), 06:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
4766:), 01:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
4261:: an editor wants an article
3471:
3255:Knowledge's notability policy
3204:Knowledge is not a dictionary
2671:), 01:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
1971:nominated for speedy deletion
1898:No assertion of notability. –
1814:with the goal of determining
1798:), 01:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
1511:Just notable/Just not notable
1434:WP:But there must be sources!
1402:), 22:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
1388:), 06:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
206:Template deletion discussions
196:Place/transportation deletion
14472:in file deletion discussions
12904:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
12824:Alternatives to edit warring
11687:Maintaining a friendly space
10781:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
10445:Knowledge:Does deletion help
10419:Knowledge:Arguments to avoid
9997:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9987:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9977:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9967:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9959:Of course any male editors (
9953:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9943:15:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
9798:
9741:), 12:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
9727:), 04:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
9607:Remember, when you comment,
9533:), 11:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
9519:), 11:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
9505:), 11:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
9491:), 11:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
9324:), 18:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
9307:), 18:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
9290:), 18:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
9192:), 06:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
9105:), 16:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
8984:an indiscriminate collection
8946:), 01:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
8928:), 01:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
8803:, so this needs to go too. –
8588:), 04:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
8574:), 04:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
8546:), 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
8532:), 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
8109:criteria for speedy deletion
7920:), 9:29 15 August 2015 (UTC)
7878:), 15:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
7534:), 18:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
7492:), 18:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
7390:), 07:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
7376:), 14:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
7362:), 14:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
7348:), 00:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
7194:with 37,000 subscribers / a
7168:with 37,000 subscribers / a
7164:with only 3,000 members / a
7036:argument. Many subjects are
7002:General Notability Guideline
6993:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6979:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6965:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6937:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6923:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6834:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
6785:), 21:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
6743:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6614:general notability guideline
6608:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6590:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6576:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6562:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6548:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6534:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6520:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6423:general notability guideline
6417:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6399:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6385:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6367:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6353:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6339:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6325:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6249:general notability guideline
6237:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6223:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
6209:), 13:13, 08 June 2007 (UTC)
5215:, are more likely to return
5157:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
5143:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
5129:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
5115:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
5101:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
4975:), 15:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
4932:), 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
4918:), 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
4903:), 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
4830:
3950:biographies of living people
3873:), 13:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
3519:This article is hilarious. –
3196:Knowledge is not a directory
3174:), 06:17, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
3160:), 03:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
2699:), 03:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
2657:), 16:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
2639:), 06:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
2625:), 03:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
2427:
2327:
2144:Won or did not win something
1967:criteria for speedy deletion
1940:), 23:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1925:), 01:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1906:), 01:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
1291:), 04:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
1277:), 04:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
1168:), 11:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1150:), 04:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
340:biographies of living people
7:
15065:Administrators' noticeboard
14939:Compliment before criticism
14776:Featured article candidates
13189:The Five Pillars of Untruth
13184:The first rule of Knowledge
12979:Editing under the influence
12756:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
12516:Google searches and numbers
12235:Don't template the regulars
12150:Don't call the kettle black
11944:Be excellent to one another
11828:Revert notification opt-out
11732:We are all Wikipedians here
11181:Put a little effort into it
11126:Obtain peer review comments
11081:Introduction to structurism
11019:Fruit of the poisonous tree
10989:Editors are not mindreaders
10894:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
10884:Beef up that first revision
10656:Leave it to the experienced
10621:Don't search for objections
10480:Knowledge:Follow the leader
10407:
10363:The following links are to
9877:), 01:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
9859:), 13:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
9755:), 16:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
9355:explains the reasons why".
8689:
8392:content into sub-articles,
7952:), 11:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
7858:All the trees in the forest
7725:
7500:Mycrystalballisinforservice
7073:Events Notability Guideline
6638:more than a trivial mention
5712:Notability is not temporary
5330:), 12:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
4961:), 07:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
4947:), 04:04 4 April 2006 (UTC)
3910:Knowledge. In other words,
3672:), 05:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
3658:), 05:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
3591:10:37, 9 January 1022 (UTC)
3377:), 05:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
3198:. A page defining the word
2219:), 00:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
2079:), 01:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
2065:), 01:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
2051:), 01:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
1788:we should ignore all rules!
1628:, consider instead saying,
1601:), 09:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
943:Arguments without arguments
10:
15773:
14304:I'm entitled to my opinion
13219:Why not create an account?
13154:Requirements for adminship
13029:How to vandalize correctly
12959:Don't delete the main page
12879:Avoid using preview button
12601:Notability comparison test
12185:Don't fight fire with fire
12180:Don't eat the troll's food
12140:Don't call a spade a spade
12135:Don't bludgeon the process
11984:Encourage full discussions
11833:Shadowless Fists of Death!
11469:Don't attack the nominator
11429:But there must be sources!
11251:Try not to leave it a stub
11201:Source your plot summaries
10485:Knowledge:Minimum coverage
10465:Knowledge:Discussing cruft
10387:Encourage full discussions
10362:
10297:I Am Weightless, I Am Rust
10201:
10195:
10130:
10106:is not a valid argument. —
10056:
9911:
9845:), 11:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
9802:
9668:
9579:), 22:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
9439:
9433:
9282:is an essay, not policy. –
9263:
9257:
9209:
9147:
9115:contributed to other wikis
9039:
8993:
8848:
8842:
8817:consensus may have changed
8737:
8706:
8611:WikiProject A class rating
8487:
8480:
8420:
8270:
8149:
7791:
7738:
7661:
7643:
7561:
7447:
7282:
7276:
7095:
7088:
7082:
6871:
6698:
6667:(i.e. nontrivial) mentions
6663:are examples of short but
6461:
6273:
6262:of the information. Since
6155:
6117:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
6103:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
6089:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
6075:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
6061:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
6047:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5999:
5984:
5981:Number of editors involved
5952:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5938:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5924:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5910:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5896:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5882:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5836:
5817:), 13:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
5762:
5737:
5572:
5411:
5282:
5275:
5236:
5073:
5018:
4998:they were hoaxes, such as
4875:
4834:
4721:
4695:
4522:
4424:
4338:
4316:
4121:
4089:
4014:that this is not a hoax. –
3967:
3961:
3807:
3690:
3687:WP:Deletion is not cleanup
3684:
3606:
3475:
3297:
3290:
3146:) 18:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
3132:), 05:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
3066:
3027:), 05:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
3013:), 05:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
2933:
2798:
2578:
2539:
2431:
2413:
2395:
2378:), 00:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
2331:
2251:Birdemic: Shock and Terror
2147:
2004:
1993:sources that are entirely
1861:
1780:), 01:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
1750:), 01:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
1680:
1514:
1437:
1431:
1350:
1311:
1249:
1215:
1091:
976:
946:
360:Just a policy or guideline
221:But there must be sources!
124:decided through head count
74:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge
26:
15701:
15571:
15522:
15416:
15266:
15199:
15050:
14959:
14900:
14825:
14695:
14574:
14551:
14485:
14434:
14378:
14287:
14226:
14160:
14076:
13985:
13960:
13935:
13859:
13811:
13747:
13722:
13694:
13659:
13609:
13563:
13554:
13492:
13458:
13414:
13405:
13313:
13267:
13263:
13250:
13169:Sarcasm is really helpful
13109:Notability is not eternal
13034:How to win a citation war
12804:
12800:
12787:
12496:Every snowflake is unique
12416:Advanced source searching
12411:
12407:
12394:
12340:
12297:No, you can't have a pony
12245:Do not insult the vandals
12105:Don't be high-maintenance
12047:
11911:
11745:
11662:Encouraging the newcomers
11617:
11613:
11600:
11377:
11304:
11206:Specialized-style fallacy
11171:Pruning article revisions
10999:Endorsements (commercial)
10984:Editing on mobile devices
10889:Blind men and an elephant
10864:Articles have a half-life
10799:
10611:Dissent is not disloyalty
10581:Avoid vague introductions
10558:
10554:
10541:
10425:Knowledge:Beyond civility
10377:Avoid repeating arguments
9885:Just want them to like us
9331:. Deletion processes are
8974:policy on what facts are
7934:) 11:05, 11 February 2022
7410:information published in
6652:Critical commentary from
6377:page tells all about it –
5324:Think of the New Articles
4878:WP:Existence ≠ Notability
4257:A variation of this is a
4050:, so they must be fake. –
3770:Knowledge has no deadline
3564:lack of original research
3402:information published in
2896:Knowledge is not censored
833:Perennial deletion review
316:Knowledge:Deletion policy
201:File deletion discussions
15325:Copyright investigations
14771:Good article nominations
14761:Articles for improvement
14447:in adminship discussions
14330:Motte-and-bailey fallacy
13430:Affirming the consequent
13179:The Night Before Wikimas
13044:Ignore every single rule
13019:How to get away with UPE
12899:Before they were notable
12671:Overreliance upon Google
12466:Common sourcing mistakes
12039:Settle the process first
11999:Imagine others complexly
11903:Writing for the opponent
11878:There is no common sense
11559:Unopposed AFD discussion
11544:Relisting can be abusive
11419:Avoid repeated arguments
11024:Give an article a chance
10874:Avoid mission statements
10834:Advanced text formatting
10829:Advanced article editing
10786:Knowledge is a community
10761:The rules are principles
10721:Product, process, policy
10571:Articles must be written
10359:Other arguments to avoid
10229:
9922:WP:CITINGGREATERPROBLEMS
9898:reliability of Knowledge
9703:
9613:accusations of bad faith
9573:Indefinite Discriminator
9467:
9457:WP:IDONTLIKETHENOMINATOR
9251:
9168:
9053:
8964:verifiability, not truth
8940:JohnPaulSartre&Ringo
8922:JohnPaulSartre&Ringo
8876:
8765:
8504:
8473:WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST
8291:
8177:
7826:
7821:WP:Articles for deletion
7670:
7640:Past inaction by editors
7582:
7572:WP:ONLYBECAUSEITHAPPENED
7558:Past inaction by sources
7468:
7324:
7279:WP:Subjective importance
7144:
6899:
6719:
6496:
6347:Make It Notable Yourself
6301:
6190:
6027:
5857:
5827:Redirects for discussion
5771:
5600:
5569:Subject no longer exists
5405:
5291:
5187:redirects for discussion
5067:
4926:Everyone knows Mr. Fresh
4869:
4742:
4564:
4452:
4359:
4130:
3995:
3849:
3760:A common maxim is that "
3753:
3634:
3503:
3460:Redirects for discussion
3353:
3108:
2989:
2866:PoliticallyIncorrectHero
2819:
2745:This is the converse to
2587:
2473:
2359:
2231:AllAwardsAreCreatedEqual
2182:
2032:
1882:
1722:
1624:Instead of just saying,
1563:
1472:
1364:
1243:
1126:
1055:WP:Articles for deletion
1011:
744:Administrator guidelines
268:Redirects for discussion
115:This page in a nutshell:
14724:Articles needing images
14719:Images needing articles
14462:in deletion discussions
14350:Two wrongs make a right
13681:Denying the correlative
13314:Policies and guidelines
13149:Requests for medication
13129:Please bite the newbies
13054:Mess with the templates
12621:Notability means impact
12155:Don't call things cruft
12130:Don't be the Fun Police
12060:Knowledge:Because I can
11939:Avoid the word "vandal"
11753:A thank you never hurts
11524:Liar liar pants on fire
11459:Deletion is not cleanup
11369:Writing better articles
11359:Write the article first
11334:Gender-neutral language
11306:Writing article content
11296:Writing better articles
11291:Write the article first
11226:Tertiary-source fallacy
10994:Encourage the newcomers
10954:Dictionaries as sources
10899:Build content to endure
10392:Liar Liar Pants on Fire
9951:Internet Justice Police
9908:Citing greater problems
9430:Arguments to the person
9266:WP:Quote your own essay
7998:evidence to show that.
7735:Notability is inherited
7420:but not always the case
7254:Encyclopedia Britannica
7224:), 04:56, 7 August 2006
7206:), 04:56, 7 August 2006
7190:with 3,000 members / a
7180:), 04:56, 7 August 2006
7066:WP:Geographic imbalance
6945:Reporting on importance
5962:policies and guidelines
5181:The search-engine test
4191:Last straw was long ago
3729:WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP
3568:more appropriate places
3448:miscellany for deletion
2581:WP:I just don't like it
2416:WP:I just don't like it
1858:Assertion of notability
1357:WP:Ownership of content
15276:Regional notice boards
15168:Requests for adminship
14892:Organizations category
14882:Counter-Vandalism Unit
14640:Centralized discussion
14457:in feature discussions
14335:Psychologist's fallacy
14272:Argument to moderation
14262:Argument from anecdote
14212:Chronological snobbery
13836:Quoting out of context
13803:Overwhelming exception
13686:Suppressed correlative
13586:Quoting out of context
13461:quantificational logic
13435:Denying the antecedent
13343:Policy writing is hard
13209:Knowledge is an MMORPG
13049:Is that even an essay?
12746:What notability is not
12501:Existence ≠ Notability
12110:Don't be inconsiderate
12034:Read before commenting
12019:Mind your own business
11934:Avoid personal remarks
11509:Identifying test edits
10854:A navbox on every page
10809:100K featured articles
10606:Concede lost arguments
10601:Competence is required
10198:Denying the antecedent
10192:Denying the antecedent
10003:There is a lot of bias
9604:deletion discussions.
9333:discussions, not votes
9316:is only a guideline. –
9260:WP:The value of essays
9199:Foo in popular culture
9144:Better here than there
8703:Other categories exist
8520:There's an article on
8093:claims of significance
7034:I've never heard of it
6669:
6657:professional reviewers
6634:
4760:I don't like redirects
3938:copyright infringement
3804:Poorly written article
2735:MyGodIsBetterThanYours
2516:
2392:Personal point of view
1285:SelfFulfillingProphecy
150:
15573:Directories, indexes,
15293:Asking questions
15246:Neutral point of view
15179:Arbitration Committee
14729:Articles for creation
14635:The Knowledge Library
14298:The Four Great Errors
14278:Argumentum ad populum
14267:Argument from silence
13971:Argumentum ad baculum
13749:Faulty generalization
13440:Argument from fallacy
13139:Pledge of Tranquility
12884:Avoid using wikilinks
12711:Subjective importance
12225:Don't spite your face
12014:Keep it down to earth
11778:Beware of the tigers!
11717:Too long; didn't read
11657:Edit at your own pace
11627:Accepting other users
11394:AfD is not a war zone
10741:There is no seniority
10681:Neutrality of sources
10148:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMESSAYS
9902:what Knowledge is not
9341:reinventing the wheel
9299:is only a proposal. –
8968:notability guidelines
8676:neutral point of view
8609:, or have achieved a
8554:Bleigh Tant Marqueter
8309:Interwikis=Notability
7273:Subjective importance
6650:
6646:neutral point of view
6630:
6405:There is an entry in
5629:of the Third Reich. -
5198:WP:Search engine test
5170:specifically states,
4876:Further information:
4283:ownership of articles
4162:My Way or the Highway
4079:fictitious references
3962:Further information:
3762:Articles for Deletion
3736:WP:DELETIONNOTCLEANUP
3681:Surmountable problems
3287:It's harmful/harmless
3218:would be useful, but
3202:would be useful, but
3194:would be useful, but
3168:SaveTheTroops!Please!
2908:neutral point of view
2511:
2282:neutral point-of-view
2213:Editor In The Shadows
1900:If It Was It'd Say So
1839:surmountable problems
1822:", or "Does not meet
1428:There must be sources
1408:what Knowledge is not
823:Common outcomes (TfD)
818:Common outcomes (RfD)
813:Common outcomes (AfD)
503:Templates and modules
332:neutral point of view
328:what Knowledge is not
263:Articles for deletion
216:Subjective importance
181:Adminship discussions
163:Arguments to avoid in
157:Knowledge discussions
145:
65:, as it has not been
15752:Knowledge discussion
15536:Requests for comment
15320:Copyright assistance
15251:No original research
15231:Conflict of interest
15211:Requests for comment
15042:Controversial issues
14845:Culture and the arts
14714:Most-wanted articles
14316:Invincible ignorance
14122:Reductio ad Stalinum
14108:Reductio ad Hitlerum
14064:Wisdom of repugnance
13831:Moving the goalposts
13696:Illicit transference
13621:Begging the question
13542:Undistributed middle
13450:Mathematical fallacy
13425:Affirming a disjunct
13305:Quote your own essay
13174:Sausages for tasting
12999:Five Fs of Knowledge
12949:Don't-give-a-fuckism
12919:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
12731:Vanispamcruftisement
12631:Notability sub-pages
12441:Avoid template creep
12401:Essays on notability
12317:There are no oracles
12100:Don't be a WikiBigot
11954:Call a spade a spade
11727:Unblock perspectives
11554:The Heymann Standard
11539:Overzealous deletion
11499:I just don't like it
11236:There is no deadline
11101:"Murder of" articles
10929:Common-style fallacy
10801:Article construction
10716:Process is important
10661:Levels of competence
10586:Be a reliable source
10315:Use Head Before Hand
10108:Stuff stuffity stuff
10045:or one of the other
9941:We Live In A Society
9780:disrupting Knowledge
9769:consensus can change
9665:Repeated nominations
9345:suitable explanation
9128:Deleted work can be
8826:there are precedents
8680:no original research
8205:sources available. –
8121:merged or redirected
8007:creative professions
7944:are useless cruft. –
7817:deletion discussions
7514:Everyone's a psychic
6618:significant coverage
5977:the final decision.
5807:almost 14,000 people
5728:consensus can change
5359:Consensus can change
5176:ancient Estonian god
4955:YouTube Is The World
4826:Notability fallacies
4774:Who cares about ATD?
4405:An article being an
4236:there is no deadline
3958:Offline sources only
3535:Meta-Parliamentarian
2349:WP:UNDERCONSTRUCTION
1380:as unencyclopedic. –
1300:Consensus can change
1269:per everyone else. –
1252:WP:Follow the leader
887:Proposals and policy
873:Guide to arbitration
864:Arbitration (Arbcom)
845:Bureaucratship (RfB)
409:Deletion discussions
336:no original research
312:generally be avoided
308:deletion discussions
171:Deletion discussions
15588:Edit summary legend
15308:Reference desk
14855:History and society
14798:Article translation
14545:Knowledge community
14467:in deletion reviews
14442:On discussion pages
14049:Parade of horribles
14025:In-group favoritism
13851:Syntactic ambiguity
13494:Syllogistic fallacy
13417:propositional logic
13094:No one really cares
13009:Go ahead, vandalize
12771:Two prongs of merit
12716:Third-party sources
12636:Notabilitymandering
12591:No one really cares
12546:Inherent notability
12541:Independent sources
12426:Alternative outlets
12260:Nationalist editing
12230:Don't take the bait
12195:Don't help too much
12120:Don't be prejudiced
12090:Don't be an ostrich
12055:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
11788:Deletion as revenge
11763:Advice for hotheads
11584:No Encyclopedic Use
11464:Does deletion help?
11364:Writing about women
11246:The deadline is now
11241:There is a deadline
11121:Nothing is in stone
10751:Tendentious editing
10666:Levels of consensus
10104:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
9646:name of banned user
9634:name of banned user
9297:WP:Notability (ABC)
9186:APlaceForEverything
9085:Redundant Redundant
9071:Essential Essential
8466:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
8413:What about article
8207:IFoundLotsofSources
8058:) will not satisfy
7712:source availability
7127:WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE
6828:for display on the
6264:nothing is in stone
6097:My Personal Article
6069:Who has the secret?
5956:AfDs are not about
5833:Support for article
5765:Help:Pageview stats
5720:reliably sourceable
5137:GoogleMeasuresWorth
4969:FixingTheOversights
4470:Last Year's Edition
3140:SaveTheKids!Please!
3063:It's useful/useless
2752:Just unencyclopedic
2707:Reputation Defender
2137:new page patrollers
1615:Just unencyclopedic
1593:Topic is notable. –
896:Perennial proposals
843:Adminship (RfA) and
451:Request a copy of a
211:On discussion pages
191:Feature discussions
15669:Citation templates
15556:Voting is not evil
15504:Arguments to avoid
15267:Other noticeboards
14709:Requested articles
14435:Arguments to avoid
14429:Arguments to avoid
14135:Poisoning the well
13952:Proof by assertion
13927:Texas sharpshooter
13861:Questionable cause
13798:Slothful induction
13757:Anecdotal evidence
13617:Circular reasoning
13512:Exclusive premises
13474:Illicit conversion
13104:No sorcery threats
12984:Embrace Stop Signs
12864:Assume good wraith
12839:Anti-Wikipedianism
12676:Perennial websites
12666:Other stuff exists
12302:Passive aggression
12265:No angry mastodons
12255:Hate is disruptive
12115:Don't be obnoxious
12080:Don't be a fanatic
11858:Most ideas are bad
11798:Forgive and forget
11607:Essays on civility
11216:Run an edit-a-thon
10949:Deprecated sources
10924:Citation underkill
10909:Chesterton's fence
10879:Be neutral in form
10776:Knowledge in brief
10731:Reasonability rule
10696:Oversimplification
10671:Most ideas are bad
10247:Original scientist
10019:right great wrongs
9871:Knowledge is dying
9541:Tenacious Defender
9301:Idontlikeproposals
8866:WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING
8248:Search aggregators
7815:, as they are not
7801:: This section is
7720:WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP
7540:not a crystal ball
7528:Shortattentionspan
7079:Arbitrary quantity
6973:Why Should I Care?
6807:Gone and Forgotten
6661:prestigious awards
6486:WP:TRIVIALCOVERAGE
6270:Unreliable sources
6083:PeerReviewIsEnough
5811:Penguin enthusiast
5535:Incredulitiousness
4680:. Articles can be
4533:WP:LIKELYVIOLATION
4302:Articles that are
4034:Evidence Destroyed
3964:WP:Offline sources
3839:WP:ITSUNREFERENCED
3722:WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP
3019:Not interesting. –
2795:They don't like it
2764:Pointing at policy
2719:This offends me. –
2617:: It's annoying. –
2372:Under Construction
1553:WP:Clearly notable
1490:The Great Presumer
1462:WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST
1182:§ Just a vote
855:Arguments to avoid
828:Overcategorisation
808:Arguments to avoid
151:
15724:
15723:
15509:Arguments to make
15398:General sanctions
15342:Resource requests
15281:Requests for help
15124:Revision deletion
14961:Maintenance tasks
14944:Kindness Campaign
14576:General community
14511:
14510:
14396:
14395:
14374:
14373:
14370:
14369:
14310:Ignoratio elenchi
14222:
14221:
14072:
14071:
14034:Not invented here
13739:Converse accident
13661:Correlative-based
13638:Compound question
13581:False attribution
13576:False equivalence
13550:
13549:
13359:
13358:
13355:
13354:
13351:
13350:
13246:
13245:
13242:
13241:
13224:Yes legal threats
13039:Ignore all essays
12924:Complete bollocks
12849:Asshole John rule
12783:
12782:
12779:
12778:
12736:What BLP1E is not
12656:One hundred words
12626:Notability points
12390:
12389:
12386:
12385:
12190:Don't give a fuck
12065:Civil POV pushing
12029:Mutual withdrawal
11919:Assume good faith
11888:Knowledge clichés
11783:Civility warnings
11702:Please say please
11652:Editors' pronouns
11596:
11595:
11592:
11591:
11484:Follow the leader
11349:Use our own words
11314:Avoid thread mode
11161:Pro and con lists
10919:Citation overkill
10869:Autosizing images
10591:Civil POV pushing
10228:Please study the
10219:WP:NOTIDONTLIKEIT
10181:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
10170:School spirit guy
10166:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
10090:Bucking the trend
9774:If an article is
9702:Please study the
9567:Creator has been
9466:Please study the
9250:Please study the
9241:WP:ONLYSUPPLEMENT
9167:Please study the
9125:for the article.
9052:Please study the
8875:Please study the
8764:Please study the
8717:WP:OTHERCATSEXIST
8568:EmpressOtherstuff
8526:EmperorOtherstuff
8503:Please study the
8410:
8409:
8290:Please study the
8260:reference bombing
8176:Please study the
7986:Important Subject
7825:Please study the
7813:proposed deletion
7688:ArticleNotNotable
7669:Please study the
7581:Please study the
7467:Please study the
7416:original research
7323:Please study the
7244:of the subject's
7143:Please study the
6898:Please study the
6826:newsworthy topics
6718:Please study the
6636:, only that it's
6622:original research
6495:Please study the
6448:can be attributed
6379:Say What You Want
6333:Propaganda=Gospel
6300:Please study the
6260:reliable sourcing
6189:Please study the
6132:Articles are not
6026:Please study the
5856:Please study the
5770:Please study the
5701:Honorable Mention
5599:Please study the
5404:Please study the
5309:Age Before Beauty
5290:Please study the
5278:WP:Article wizard
5066:Please study the
5008:reliable sourcing
4868:Please study the
4741:Please study the
4563:Please study the
4451:Please study the
4358:Please study the
4129:Please study the
4064:assume good faith
4062:On Knowledge, we
4016:The Secret Keeper
3994:Please study the
3848:Please study the
3792:TNT tipping point
3752:Please study the
3633:Please study the
3603:It looks good/bad
3548:"Humour" category
3502:Please study the
3352:Please study the
3275:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
3107:Please study the
2988:Please study the
2979:WP:NOTINTERESTING
2912:original research
2818:Please study the
2586:Please study the
2472:Please study the
2358:Please study the
2181:Please study the
2031:Please study the
2001:Begging for mercy
1881:Please study the
1828:Original research
1820:Original research
1721:Please study the
1579:as non-notable. –
1562:Please study the
1471:Please study the
1363:Please study the
1322:WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC
1242:Please study the
1125:Please study the
1029:ThoughtlessMcKeep
1010:Please study the
939:
938:
932:
931:
780:
779:
703:
686:Proposed deletion
485:
304:
303:
229:Arguments to make
140:
139:
102:
101:
16:(Redirected from
15764:
15403:Editor sanctions
15364:Page importation
15256:Reliable sources
15107:User permissions
15015:Category tracker
15010:Database reports
14557:Community portal
14538:
14531:
14524:
14515:
14514:
14423:
14416:
14409:
14400:
14399:
14386:
14385:
14357:Special pleading
14236:
14235:
14097:Appeal to motive
14083:
14082:
14059:Stirring symbols
14039:Island mentality
13977:Wishful thinking
13958:
13957:
13674:Perfect solution
13651:No true Scotsman
13646:Complex question
13631:Leading question
13610:Question-begging
13596:No true Scotsman
13561:
13560:
13484:Quantifier shift
13479:Proof by example
13412:
13411:
13386:
13379:
13372:
13363:
13362:
13300:Finding an essay
13265:
13264:
13252:
13251:
12914:Butterfly effect
12909:Boston Tea Party
12869:Assume stupidity
12854:Assume bad faith
12844:Articlecountitis
12802:
12801:
12789:
12788:
12721:Trivial mentions
12566:Minimum coverage
12409:
12408:
12396:
12395:
12095:Don't be ashamed
11974:Discussing cruft
11964:Deny recognition
11863:Nothing is clear
11672:Expect no thanks
11615:
11614:
11602:
11601:
11534:Nothing is clear
11381:deleting content
11064:Tertiary sources
10819:Acronym overkill
10691:The one question
10556:
10555:
10543:
10542:
10536:
10531:Knowledge essays
10524:
10517:
10510:
10501:
10500:
10233:
10221:
10214:
10150:
10143:
10141:WP:OUTCOMESBASED
10069:
10015:how to handle it
9995:Bar Politics Fan
9924:
9839:It stays or I go
9822:
9815:
9707:
9695:
9688:
9681:
9649:
9637:
9620:speedily deleted
9609:personal attacks
9595:in having one's
9471:
9459:
9452:
9318:GuidelinesNoGood
9255:
9243:
9236:
9234:WP:ONLYGUIDELINE
9229:
9222:
9172:
9160:
9057:
9034:
9027:
9025:WP:IWORKEDSOHARD
9020:
9013:
9006:
8880:
8868:
8861:
8769:
8757:
8750:
8719:
8699:
8603:Featured article
8599:speedily deleted
8508:
8475:
8468:
8461:
8454:
8447:
8440:
8433:
8405:
8373:
8372:
8365:
8361:Individual merit
8346:reliable sources
8295:
8283:
8181:
8169:
8167:WP:LOTSOFSOURCES
8162:
8139:WP:Summary Style
8129:section above).
8126:Just not notable
7940:All examples of
7900:Adrian Listmaker
7830:
7786:
7779:
7772:
7765:
7758:
7751:
7731:
7674:
7656:
7654:WP:NOIMPROVEMENT
7600:Lookherenotthere
7586:
7574:
7472:
7460:
7412:reliable sources
7328:
7316:
7309:
7302:
7295:
7250:reliable sources
7148:
7136:
7129:
7122:
7115:
7108:
6903:
6891:
6884:
6868:Geographic scope
6779:NeedGoode..Luvin
6723:
6711:
6695:It's in the news
6556:NuisanceProperty
6500:
6488:
6481:
6474:
6458:Trivial coverage
6431:reliable sources
6409:on the subject –
6407:Urban Dictionary
6361:Talk of the Town
6305:
6293:
6286:
6194:
6182:
6175:
6168:
6143:process nor the
6031:
6019:
6012:
5987:WP:Third opinion
5861:
5849:
5775:
5757:
5755:WP:NOBODYREADSIT
5750:
5645:No One Remembers
5604:
5592:
5590:WP:OUTOFBUSINESS
5585:
5552:WetBehindTheEars
5484:NewCompanyNoGood
5466:
5459:
5452:
5445:
5438:
5431:
5424:
5409:
5295:
5270:
5263:
5256:
5249:
5217:reliable sources
5071:
5059:
5052:
5045:
5038:
5031:
4873:
4861:
4854:
4847:
4746:
4734:
4708:
4706:WP:ITSNOTNEUTRAL
4692:It's not neutral
4610:We Just Disagree
4568:
4556:
4549:
4542:
4535:
4510:
4504:
4456:
4444:
4437:
4363:
4351:
4134:
4116:
4109:
4102:
3999:
3987:
3980:
3853:
3841:
3834:
3827:
3820:
3757:
3745:
3738:
3731:
3724:
3717:
3715:WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP
3710:
3703:
3638:
3626:
3619:
3597:"Humor" category
3550:shows, and even
3507:
3495:
3488:
3427:reliable sources
3415:our basic tenets
3404:reliable sources
3357:
3345:
3338:
3331:
3324:
3317:
3310:
3293:WP:Avoiding harm
3112:
3100:
3093:
3086:
3079:
2993:
2981:
2974:
2967:
2960:
2953:
2946:
2930:It's interesting
2926:easy to refute.
2823:
2811:
2619:IAmReallyAnnoyed
2591:
2573:
2566:
2559:
2552:
2523:reliable sources
2507:WP:Verifiability
2477:
2465:
2458:
2451:
2444:
2408:
2363:
2351:
2344:
2195:Jesse NoVotewens
2186:
2174:
2167:
2160:
2130:
2124:
2120:
2114:
2110:
2104:
2036:
2024:
2017:
1886:
1874:
1832:WP:Verifiability
1824:WP:Verifiability
1726:
1714:
1707:
1700:
1693:
1661:internet content
1632:reliable sources
1567:
1555:
1548:
1541:
1534:
1527:
1476:
1464:
1457:
1450:
1448:WP:MUSTBESOURCES
1412:specific reasons
1368:
1345:
1338:
1331:
1324:
1247:
1235:
1228:
1186:§ I like it
1160:'s statement. –
1159:
1130:
1118:
1111:
1104:
1015:
1003:
996:
989:
959:
924:
917:
910:
787:Common decisions
784:
783:
772:
765:
758:
697:
479:
405:
404:
401:
296:
289:
282:
176:Deletion reviews
153:
152:
111:
110:
104:
94:
87:
44:
43:
37:
21:
18:Knowledge:EFFORT
15772:
15771:
15767:
15766:
15765:
15763:
15762:
15761:
15727:
15726:
15725:
15720:
15697:
15625:Manual of Style
15575:
15567:
15518:
15419:
15412:
15408:Long-term abuse
15352:History mergers
15335:Media questions
15268:
15262:
15241:Fringe theories
15202:
15201:Content dispute
15195:
15151:Title blacklist
15102:Page protection
15087:Admin dashboard
15054:
15046:
14955:
14896:
14829:
14821:
14691:
14577:
14570:
14561:
14547:
14542:
14512:
14507:
14481:
14430:
14427:
14397:
14392:
14366:
14340:Rationalization
14283:
14230:
14218:
14156:
14078:Genetic fallacy
14068:
13981:
13956:
13931:
13855:
13846:Sorites paradox
13826:False precision
13807:
13788:Double counting
13743:
13718:
13690:
13655:
13642:Loaded question
13626:Loaded language
13605:
13546:
13488:
13454:
13401:
13390:
13360:
13347:
13309:
13280:Value of essays
13259:
13238:
13069:Legal vandalism
12934:Counting juntas
12834:Anti-Wikipedian
12796:
12794:Humorous essays
12775:
12751:What to include
12696:Run-of-the-mill
12686:Read the source
12651:Offline sources
12446:Bare notability
12403:
12382:
12336:
12287:No Confederates
12085:Don't be a jerk
12043:
12009:Keep it concise
11949:Beyond civility
11907:
11741:
11682:How to be civil
11647:Don't retaliate
11609:
11588:
11519:Keep it concise
11454:Delete the junk
11449:Delete or merge
11439:Content removal
11380:
11373:
11339:Myth vs fiction
11300:
11191:Robotic editing
11054:Science sources
11049:Primary sources
11039:History sources
10814:Abandoned stubs
10795:
10566:Article content
10550:
10537:
10528:
10410:
10368:
10361:
10345:fallacy fallacy
10227:
10225:
10224:
10217:
10210:
10206:
10200:
10194:
10184:The results of
10154:
10153:
10146:
10139:
10135:
10129:
10073:
10072:
10065:
10061:
10055:
10035:existing policy
9985:Begin The Purge
9928:
9927:
9920:
9916:
9910:
9853:It goes or I go
9826:
9825:
9818:
9811:
9807:
9801:
9701:
9699:
9698:
9691:
9684:
9677:
9673:
9667:
9639:
9627:
9465:
9463:
9462:
9455:
9448:
9444:
9438:
9432:
9268:
9262:
9249:
9247:
9246:
9239:
9232:
9227:WP:ONLYPROPOSAL
9225:
9218:
9214:
9208:
9166:
9164:
9163:
9156:
9152:
9146:
9138:deletion review
9134:draft namespace
9051:
9049:
9038:
9037:
9030:
9023:
9016:
9009:
9002:
8998:
8992:
8874:
8872:
8871:
8864:
8857:
8853:
8847:
8841:
8834:
8763:
8761:
8760:
8753:
8748:WP:ALLORNOTHING
8746:
8742:
8736:
8723:
8722:
8715:
8711:
8705:
8696:WP:Pokémon test
8523:
8502:
8500:
8494:WP:OTHERCONTENT
8486:
8479:
8478:
8471:
8464:
8457:
8450:
8443:
8436:
8429:
8425:
8419:
8416:
8406:
8387:
8374:
8370:
8363:
8289:
8287:
8286:
8279:
8275:
8269:
8175:
8173:
8172:
8165:
8160:WP:SOURCESEARCH
8158:
8154:
8148:
8146:Lots of sources
8036:Albert Einstein
7824:
7809:speedy deletion
7796:
7790:
7789:
7782:
7775:
7770:WP:NOTINHERITED
7768:
7761:
7754:
7747:
7743:
7737:
7668:
7666:
7660:
7659:
7652:
7648:
7642:
7580:
7578:
7577:
7570:
7566:
7560:
7466:
7464:
7463:
7456:
7452:
7446:
7322:
7320:
7319:
7312:
7305:
7298:
7291:
7287:
7281:
7275:
7200:Countvonnotable
7142:
7140:
7139:
7132:
7125:
7118:
7113:WP:NOTBIGENOUGH
7111:
7104:
7100:
7094:
7087:
7081:
6897:
6895:
6894:
6887:
6880:
6876:
6870:
6793:Press-Free Zone
6717:
6715:
6714:
6709:WP:ITSINTHENEWS
6707:
6703:
6697:
6542:EveryWordCounts
6494:
6492:
6491:
6484:
6477:
6470:
6466:
6460:
6299:
6297:
6296:
6289:
6282:
6278:
6272:
6188:
6186:
6185:
6178:
6171:
6164:
6160:
6154:
6032:
6025:
6023:
6022:
6015:
6008:
6004:
5998:
5983:
5862:
5855:
5853:
5852:
5845:
5841:
5835:
5793:Trafficdirector
5789:about 3 per day
5769:
5767:
5761:
5760:
5753:
5746:
5742:
5736:
5598:
5596:
5595:
5588:
5581:
5577:
5571:
5560:
5543:
5526:
5509:
5492:
5470:
5469:
5464:WP:JUSTASTARTUP
5462:
5455:
5448:
5441:
5434:
5427:
5420:
5416:
5403:
5401:
5389:explained above
5366:explained above
5345:
5316:
5289:
5287:
5281:
5274:
5273:
5266:
5259:
5252:
5245:
5241:
5235:
5225:offline sources
5082:
5065:
5063:
5062:
5055:
5048:
5041:
5034:
5027:
5023:
5017:
4933:
4912:LoveGarageBandz
4904:
4884:
4867:
4865:
4864:
4857:
4850:
4843:
4839:
4833:
4828:
4818:). See further
4740:
4738:
4737:
4730:
4726:
4720:
4712:
4711:
4704:
4700:
4694:
4624:Abortion Clinic
4562:
4560:
4559:
4552:
4545:
4538:
4531:
4527:
4521:
4508:
4502:
4450:
4448:
4447:
4440:
4433:
4429:
4423:
4357:
4355:
4354:
4347:
4343:
4337:
4332:
4281:The concept of
4250:; Knowledge is
4205:Time to give up
4128:
4126:
4120:
4119:
4112:
4105:
4098:
4094:
4088:
4071:Offline sources
4000:
3993:
3991:
3990:
3983:
3976:
3972:
3966:
3960:
3946:patent nonsense
3847:
3845:
3844:
3837:
3830:
3823:
3816:
3812:
3806:
3751:
3749:
3748:
3741:
3734:
3727:
3720:
3713:
3706:
3701:WP:SURMOUNTABLE
3699:
3695:
3689:
3683:
3632:
3630:
3629:
3622:
3615:
3611:
3605:
3576:
3501:
3499:
3498:
3491:
3484:
3480:
3474:
3385:BiographyPolice
3351:
3349:
3348:
3341:
3334:
3327:
3320:
3313:
3306:
3302:
3296:
3289:
3106:
3104:
3103:
3096:
3091:WP:WEDONTNEEDIT
3089:
3082:
3077:WP:ITSIMPORTANT
3075:
3071:
3065:
3055:I don't like it
2987:
2985:
2984:
2977:
2970:
2963:
2956:
2949:
2942:
2938:
2932:
2920:personal attack
2892:I don't like it
2838:For We Are Many
2817:
2815:
2814:
2807:
2803:
2797:
2771:fair use images
2679:Mortified_Molly
2585:
2583:
2577:
2576:
2569:
2562:
2555:
2548:
2544:
2538:
2536:I don't like it
2471:
2469:
2468:
2461:
2454:
2447:
2440:
2436:
2430:
2422:
2412:
2411:
2404:
2400:
2394:
2357:
2355:
2354:
2347:
2340:
2336:
2330:
2322:Jennifer Hudson
2314:Hillary Clinton
2180:
2178:
2177:
2170:
2163:
2156:
2152:
2146:
2133:common courtesy
2128:
2122:
2118:
2112:
2108:
2102:
2030:
2028:
2027:
2020:
2013:
2009:
2003:
1965:, three of the
1941:
1926:
1907:
1880:
1878:
1877:
1870:
1866:
1860:
1720:
1718:
1717:
1710:
1703:
1696:
1689:
1685:
1679:
1561:
1559:
1558:
1551:
1544:
1537:
1530:
1523:
1519:
1513:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1455:WP:SOURCESEXIST
1453:
1446:
1442:
1436:
1430:
1362:
1360:
1349:
1348:
1343:WP:DOESNTBELONG
1341:
1334:
1327:
1320:
1316:
1310:
1258:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1233:WP:EVERYONEELSE
1231:
1224:
1220:
1214:
1157:
1124:
1122:
1121:
1114:
1107:
1102:WP:PERNOMINATOR
1100:
1096:
1090:
1088:Per nominator/X
1009:
1007:
1006:
999:
992:
985:
981:
975:
963:
962:
955:
951:
945:
940:
928:
847:
844:
788:
776:
740:
668:Speedy deletion
455:
453:deleted article
452:
446:
437:Deletion review
430:
300:
255:Common outcomes
136:
108:
98:
97:
90:
83:
79:
71:
70:
59:
55:deletion policy
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
15770:
15760:
15759:
15754:
15749:
15744:
15739:
15722:
15721:
15719:
15718:
15713:
15708:
15702:
15699:
15698:
15696:
15695:
15690:
15685:
15684:
15683:
15673:
15672:
15671:
15661:
15656:
15655:
15654:
15649:
15644:
15634:
15633:
15632:
15622:
15617:
15616:
15615:
15605:
15600:
15595:
15593:Editor's index
15590:
15585:
15579:
15577:
15569:
15568:
15566:
15565:
15564:
15563:
15558:
15548:
15543:
15532:
15530:
15520:
15519:
15517:
15516:
15514:Article Rescue
15511:
15506:
15501:
15500:
15499:
15489:
15488:
15487:
15477:
15472:
15467:
15462:
15457:
15452:
15447:
15442:
15437:
15436:
15435:
15424:
15422:
15414:
15413:
15411:
15410:
15405:
15400:
15395:
15390:
15385:
15384:
15383:
15378:
15368:
15367:
15366:
15356:
15355:
15354:
15344:
15339:
15338:
15337:
15332:
15327:
15317:
15316:
15315:
15310:
15305:
15303:Help desk
15300:
15290:
15289:
15288:
15278:
15272:
15270:
15269:and assistance
15264:
15263:
15261:
15260:
15259:
15258:
15253:
15248:
15243:
15238:
15236:External links
15233:
15228:
15218:
15213:
15207:
15205:
15197:
15196:
15194:
15193:
15192:
15191:
15186:
15176:
15175:
15174:
15172:bureaucratship
15160:
15155:
15154:
15153:
15148:
15138:
15137:
15136:
15126:
15121:
15120:
15119:
15114:
15109:
15104:
15099:
15092:Admin requests
15089:
15084:
15083:
15082:
15077:
15072:
15061:
15059:
15052:Administrators
15048:
15047:
15045:
15044:
15039:
15038:
15037:
15035:Recent changes
15032:
15022:
15020:Dusty articles
15017:
15012:
15007:
15006:
15005:
14995:
14994:
14993:
14991:Admin category
14988:
14978:
14977:
14976:
14965:
14963:
14957:
14956:
14954:
14953:
14948:
14947:
14946:
14941:
14931:
14929:Charitableness
14926:
14921:
14916:
14910:
14908:
14898:
14897:
14895:
14894:
14889:
14884:
14879:
14878:
14877:
14875:Recent changes
14867:
14862:
14857:
14852:
14847:
14842:
14836:
14834:
14832:collaborations
14823:
14822:
14820:
14819:
14818:
14817:
14807:
14806:
14805:
14795:
14794:
14793:
14788:
14783:
14773:
14768:
14763:
14758:
14756:Vital articles
14753:
14752:
14751:
14746:
14741:
14736:
14726:
14721:
14716:
14711:
14705:
14703:
14693:
14692:
14690:
14689:
14684:
14679:
14678:
14677:
14672:
14667:
14662:
14657:
14652:
14642:
14637:
14632:
14627:
14622:
14617:
14612:
14611:
14610:
14605:
14600:
14588:
14586:Administration
14582:
14580:
14572:
14571:
14552:
14549:
14548:
14541:
14540:
14533:
14526:
14518:
14509:
14508:
14506:
14505:
14500:
14495:
14489:
14487:
14486:Good arguments
14483:
14482:
14480:
14479:
14474:
14469:
14464:
14459:
14454:
14449:
14444:
14438:
14436:
14432:
14431:
14426:
14425:
14418:
14411:
14403:
14394:
14393:
14391:
14390:
14379:
14376:
14375:
14372:
14371:
14368:
14367:
14365:
14364:
14359:
14354:
14353:
14352:
14342:
14337:
14332:
14327:
14318:
14313:
14306:
14301:
14294:
14288:
14285:
14284:
14282:
14281:
14274:
14269:
14264:
14259:
14258:
14257:
14244:
14242:
14233:
14224:
14223:
14220:
14219:
14217:
14216:
14215:
14214:
14200:
14195:
14190:
14189:
14188:
14179:
14172:
14170:Accomplishment
14161:
14158:
14157:
14155:
14154:
14149:
14142:
14137:
14132:
14127:
14126:
14125:
14118:
14117:
14116:
14099:
14093:
14091:
14080:
14074:
14073:
14070:
14069:
14067:
14066:
14061:
14056:
14051:
14046:
14041:
14036:
14027:
14022:
14017:
14012:
14007:
14002:
13997:
13991:
13989:
13983:
13982:
13980:
13979:
13974:
13966:
13964:
13955:
13954:
13945:
13939:
13937:
13933:
13932:
13930:
13929:
13924:
13922:Slippery slope
13919:
13914:
13909:
13908:
13907:
13897:
13896:
13895:
13888:
13878:
13877:
13876:
13865:
13863:
13857:
13856:
13854:
13853:
13848:
13843:
13841:Slippery slope
13838:
13833:
13828:
13823:
13817:
13815:
13809:
13808:
13806:
13805:
13800:
13795:
13790:
13785:
13776:
13775:
13774:
13769:
13767:Cherry picking
13759:
13753:
13751:
13745:
13744:
13742:
13741:
13736:
13730:
13728:
13720:
13719:
13717:
13716:
13711:
13706:
13700:
13698:
13692:
13691:
13689:
13688:
13683:
13678:
13677:
13676:
13665:
13663:
13657:
13656:
13654:
13653:
13648:
13635:
13634:
13633:
13623:
13613:
13611:
13607:
13606:
13604:
13603:
13598:
13593:
13588:
13583:
13578:
13573:
13567:
13565:
13558:
13552:
13551:
13548:
13547:
13545:
13544:
13539:
13534:
13529:
13524:
13519:
13514:
13509:
13504:
13498:
13496:
13490:
13489:
13487:
13486:
13481:
13476:
13471:
13465:
13463:
13456:
13455:
13453:
13452:
13447:
13442:
13437:
13432:
13427:
13421:
13419:
13409:
13403:
13402:
13389:
13388:
13381:
13374:
13366:
13357:
13356:
13353:
13352:
13349:
13348:
13346:
13345:
13340:
13335:
13334:
13333:
13328:
13317:
13315:
13311:
13310:
13308:
13307:
13302:
13297:
13292:
13287:
13282:
13277:
13271:
13269:
13261:
13260:
13248:
13247:
13244:
13243:
13240:
13239:
13237:
13236:
13231:
13226:
13221:
13216:
13211:
13206:
13201:
13196:
13191:
13186:
13181:
13176:
13171:
13166:
13161:
13156:
13151:
13146:
13141:
13136:
13131:
13126:
13121:
13116:
13111:
13106:
13101:
13096:
13091:
13086:
13081:
13076:
13071:
13066:
13061:
13056:
13051:
13046:
13041:
13036:
13031:
13026:
13021:
13016:
13011:
13006:
13001:
12996:
12991:
12986:
12981:
12976:
12974:Editsummarisis
12971:
12966:
12961:
12956:
12951:
12946:
12941:
12936:
12931:
12929:Counting forks
12926:
12921:
12916:
12911:
12906:
12901:
12896:
12891:
12886:
12881:
12876:
12871:
12866:
12861:
12856:
12851:
12846:
12841:
12836:
12831:
12826:
12821:
12816:
12811:
12805:
12798:
12797:
12785:
12784:
12781:
12780:
12777:
12776:
12774:
12773:
12768:
12763:
12758:
12753:
12748:
12743:
12738:
12733:
12728:
12723:
12718:
12713:
12708:
12703:
12698:
12693:
12688:
12683:
12678:
12673:
12668:
12663:
12658:
12653:
12648:
12643:
12638:
12633:
12628:
12623:
12618:
12613:
12608:
12603:
12598:
12593:
12588:
12583:
12578:
12573:
12568:
12563:
12558:
12553:
12548:
12543:
12538:
12533:
12528:
12523:
12518:
12513:
12508:
12503:
12498:
12493:
12488:
12486:Don't cite GNG
12483:
12478:
12473:
12468:
12463:
12461:But it's true!
12458:
12453:
12448:
12443:
12438:
12433:
12428:
12423:
12418:
12412:
12405:
12404:
12392:
12391:
12388:
12387:
12384:
12383:
12381:
12380:
12375:
12370:
12365:
12360:
12358:WikiHarassment
12355:
12350:
12344:
12342:
12338:
12337:
12335:
12334:
12329:
12324:
12319:
12314:
12309:
12304:
12299:
12294:
12292:No queerphobia
12289:
12284:
12279:
12274:
12273:
12272:
12262:
12257:
12252:
12247:
12242:
12237:
12232:
12227:
12222:
12217:
12212:
12207:
12202:
12197:
12192:
12187:
12182:
12177:
12172:
12167:
12162:
12157:
12152:
12147:
12142:
12137:
12132:
12127:
12122:
12117:
12112:
12107:
12102:
12097:
12092:
12087:
12082:
12077:
12072:
12067:
12062:
12057:
12051:
12049:
12045:
12044:
12042:
12041:
12036:
12031:
12026:
12021:
12016:
12011:
12006:
12001:
11996:
11991:
11986:
11981:
11976:
11971:
11966:
11961:
11956:
11951:
11946:
11941:
11936:
11931:
11929:Assume no clue
11926:
11921:
11915:
11913:
11909:
11908:
11906:
11905:
11900:
11895:
11890:
11885:
11880:
11875:
11870:
11865:
11860:
11855:
11850:
11845:
11840:
11835:
11830:
11825:
11820:
11815:
11810:
11805:
11800:
11795:
11790:
11785:
11780:
11775:
11770:
11765:
11760:
11755:
11749:
11747:
11743:
11742:
11740:
11739:
11734:
11729:
11724:
11719:
11714:
11709:
11704:
11699:
11694:
11689:
11684:
11679:
11674:
11669:
11667:Enjoy yourself
11664:
11659:
11654:
11649:
11644:
11639:
11634:
11629:
11623:
11621:
11611:
11610:
11598:
11597:
11594:
11593:
11590:
11589:
11587:
11586:
11581:
11576:
11571:
11566:
11561:
11556:
11551:
11546:
11541:
11536:
11531:
11526:
11521:
11516:
11511:
11506:
11501:
11496:
11491:
11486:
11481:
11476:
11471:
11466:
11461:
11456:
11451:
11446:
11441:
11436:
11431:
11426:
11421:
11416:
11411:
11406:
11401:
11396:
11391:
11385:
11383:
11375:
11374:
11372:
11371:
11366:
11361:
11356:
11351:
11346:
11341:
11336:
11331:
11326:
11321:
11316:
11310:
11308:
11302:
11301:
11299:
11298:
11293:
11288:
11283:
11278:
11273:
11268:
11263:
11258:
11253:
11248:
11243:
11238:
11233:
11228:
11223:
11218:
11213:
11208:
11203:
11198:
11196:Sham consensus
11193:
11188:
11183:
11178:
11173:
11168:
11163:
11158:
11153:
11148:
11143:
11138:
11133:
11128:
11123:
11118:
11113:
11108:
11103:
11098:
11093:
11088:
11083:
11078:
11073:
11068:
11067:
11066:
11061:
11056:
11051:
11046:
11041:
11031:
11026:
11021:
11016:
11011:
11006:
11001:
10996:
10991:
10986:
10981:
10976:
10971:
10966:
10961:
10956:
10951:
10946:
10941:
10936:
10931:
10926:
10921:
10916:
10911:
10906:
10901:
10896:
10891:
10886:
10881:
10876:
10871:
10866:
10861:
10856:
10851:
10846:
10841:
10836:
10831:
10826:
10821:
10816:
10811:
10805:
10803:
10797:
10796:
10794:
10793:
10788:
10783:
10778:
10773:
10768:
10763:
10758:
10753:
10748:
10743:
10738:
10733:
10728:
10723:
10718:
10713:
10708:
10703:
10698:
10693:
10688:
10683:
10678:
10673:
10668:
10663:
10658:
10653:
10648:
10643:
10641:Explanationism
10638:
10633:
10628:
10623:
10618:
10613:
10608:
10603:
10598:
10593:
10588:
10583:
10578:
10573:
10568:
10562:
10560:
10552:
10551:
10539:
10538:
10527:
10526:
10519:
10512:
10504:
10498:
10497:
10492:
10487:
10482:
10477:
10472:
10467:
10462:
10457:
10452:
10447:
10442:
10437:
10432:
10427:
10422:
10416:
10409:
10406:
10405:
10404:
10399:
10394:
10389:
10384:
10379:
10374:
10360:
10357:
10341:
10340:
10322:
10304:
10286:
10275:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
10268:
10254:
10223:
10222:
10215:
10207:
10202:
10193:
10190:
10178:
10177:
10152:
10151:
10144:
10136:
10131:
10128:
10127:Outcomes based
10125:
10116:
10115:
10097:
10071:
10070:
10062:
10057:
10054:
10051:
9999:
9998:
9988:
9978:
9968:
9954:
9944:
9926:
9925:
9917:
9912:
9909:
9906:
9893:
9892:
9878:
9867:losing editors
9860:
9846:
9824:
9823:
9816:
9808:
9803:
9800:
9797:
9793:
9777:
9766:
9757:
9756:
9742:
9728:
9697:
9696:
9693:WP:KEEPLISTING
9689:
9682:
9674:
9669:
9666:
9663:
9653:
9625:
9581:
9580:
9562:
9548:
9534:
9520:
9506:
9492:
9461:
9460:
9453:
9445:
9440:
9431:
9428:
9425:
9421:
9417:
9413:
9406:
9402:
9398:
9383:
9379:
9375:
9338:
9326:
9325:
9308:
9291:
9284:DissentingView
9245:
9244:
9237:
9230:
9223:
9215:
9210:
9207:
9204:
9194:
9193:
9162:
9161:
9153:
9148:
9145:
9142:
9107:
9106:
9092:
9078:
9046:WP:How to lose
9036:
9035:
9028:
9021:
9014:
9007:
8999:
8994:
8991:
8988:
8976:minority views
8953:
8948:
8947:
8929:
8915:
8901:
8870:
8869:
8862:
8854:
8849:
8840:
8837:
8833:
8832:Meta-reasoning
8830:
8813:
8812:
8794:
8759:
8758:
8751:
8743:
8738:
8735:
8734:All or nothing
8732:
8721:
8720:
8712:
8707:
8704:
8701:
8645:Grey's Anatomy
8596:
8590:
8589:
8575:
8561:
8547:
8533:
8521:
8477:
8476:
8469:
8462:
8455:
8448:
8441:
8434:
8426:
8421:
8418:
8414:
8411:
8408:
8407:
8396:it, or adding
8377:
8375:
8368:
8362:
8359:
8331:
8330:
8321:No interwiki –
8316:
8285:
8284:
8276:
8271:
8268:
8265:
8233:
8232:
8225:SourceSearcher
8214:
8171:
8170:
8163:
8155:
8150:
8147:
8144:
8052:press releases
7968:
7967:
7953:
7935:
7921:
7907:
7893:
7879:
7872:Wheredoesitend
7865:
7851:
7788:
7787:
7780:
7773:
7766:
7759:
7752:
7744:
7739:
7736:
7733:
7696:
7695:
7658:
7657:
7649:
7644:
7641:
7638:
7622:
7621:
7607:
7576:
7575:
7567:
7562:
7559:
7556:
7536:
7535:
7521:
7507:
7493:
7462:
7461:
7458:WP:ATA#CRYSTAL
7453:
7448:
7445:
7442:
7392:
7391:
7377:
7370:Myneighborhood
7363:
7349:
7318:
7317:
7314:WP:UNKNOWNHERE
7310:
7307:WP:IDONTKNOWIT
7303:
7296:
7288:
7283:
7274:
7271:
7226:
7225:
7207:
7188:Internet forum
7181:
7162:Internet forum
7138:
7137:
7130:
7123:
7116:
7109:
7101:
7096:
7080:
7077:
6995:
6994:
6980:
6966:
6959:Total Stranger
6952:
6938:
6931:Coast to Coast
6924:
6917:World Traveler
6893:
6892:
6885:
6877:
6872:
6869:
6866:
6822:current events
6815:
6814:
6800:
6786:
6772:
6758:
6744:
6713:
6712:
6704:
6699:
6696:
6693:
6610:
6609:
6591:
6577:
6563:
6549:
6535:
6521:
6490:
6489:
6482:
6475:
6467:
6462:
6459:
6456:
6419:
6418:
6400:
6386:
6368:
6354:
6340:
6326:
6295:
6294:
6287:
6279:
6274:
6271:
6268:
6239:
6238:
6224:
6210:
6203:Book of Wealth
6184:
6183:
6176:
6169:
6161:
6156:
6153:
6150:
6119:
6118:
6104:
6090:
6076:
6062:
6048:
6021:
6020:
6013:
6005:
6000:
5982:
5979:
5954:
5953:
5939:
5925:
5911:
5897:
5890:Petition Drive
5883:
5851:
5850:
5842:
5837:
5834:
5831:
5819:
5818:
5800:
5759:
5758:
5751:
5748:WP:POPULARPAGE
5743:
5738:
5735:
5734:Pageview stats
5732:
5709:
5708:
5694:
5680:
5666:
5652:
5638:
5620:
5594:
5593:
5586:
5578:
5573:
5570:
5567:
5562:
5561:
5544:
5527:
5510:
5493:
5468:
5467:
5460:
5453:
5446:
5439:
5432:
5425:
5417:
5412:
5400:
5397:
5354:a hoax article
5347:
5346:
5331:
5317:
5272:
5271:
5264:
5257:
5250:
5242:
5237:
5234:
5231:
5209:Google Scholar
5159:
5158:
5144:
5130:
5116:
5102:
5061:
5060:
5053:
5046:
5039:
5032:
5029:WP:LOTSOFGHITS
5024:
5019:
5016:
5013:
4977:
4976:
4962:
4948:
4934:
4919:
4905:
4863:
4862:
4859:WP:BUTITEXISTS
4855:
4848:
4840:
4835:
4832:
4829:
4827:
4824:
4782:
4781:
4767:
4758:Non-notable –
4736:
4735:
4732:WP:IGNORINGATD
4727:
4722:
4719:
4716:
4710:
4709:
4701:
4696:
4693:
4690:
4674:
4673:
4659:
4645:
4638:Already Judged
4631:
4617:
4603:
4589:
4558:
4557:
4550:
4543:
4540:WP:SUSCEPTIBLE
4536:
4528:
4523:
4520:
4517:
4492:
4491:
4477:
4446:
4445:
4438:
4430:
4425:
4422:
4419:
4403:
4402:
4384:
4353:
4352:
4344:
4339:
4336:
4333:
4331:
4330:
4324:
4315:
4314:
4307:
4227:
4226:
4212:
4198:
4183:
4169:
4155:
4118:
4117:
4110:
4103:
4095:
4090:
4087:
4084:
4060:
4059:
4041:
4023:
3989:
3988:
3981:
3973:
3968:
3959:
3956:
3903:
3902:
3888:
3874:
3843:
3842:
3835:
3828:
3821:
3813:
3808:
3805:
3802:
3747:
3746:
3739:
3732:
3725:
3718:
3711:
3704:
3696:
3691:
3682:
3679:
3674:
3673:
3659:
3628:
3627:
3620:
3612:
3607:
3604:
3601:
3593:
3592:
3575:
3574:I don't get it
3572:
3543:
3542:
3528:
3497:
3496:
3489:
3481:
3476:
3473:
3470:
3393:
3392:
3378:
3347:
3346:
3339:
3332:
3329:WP:DOESN'THARM
3325:
3318:
3311:
3303:
3298:
3288:
3285:
3240:disambiguation
3182:
3176:
3175:
3161:
3147:
3133:
3102:
3101:
3094:
3087:
3080:
3072:
3067:
3064:
3061:
3043:
3042:
3028:
3021:Borrrrrinnnnng
3014:
3005:Interesting. –
2983:
2982:
2975:
2968:
2961:
2954:
2951:WP:INTERESTING
2947:
2939:
2934:
2931:
2928:
2888:
2887:
2873:
2859:
2845:
2813:
2812:
2804:
2799:
2796:
2793:
2743:
2742:
2728:
2714:
2700:
2686:
2672:
2658:
2640:
2626:
2612:
2575:
2574:
2567:
2564:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
2560:
2553:
2545:
2540:
2537:
2534:
2499:
2498:
2467:
2466:
2459:
2452:
2445:
2437:
2432:
2429:
2426:
2410:
2409:
2401:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2380:
2379:
2353:
2352:
2345:
2337:
2332:
2329:
2326:
2290:Academy Awards
2271:unusual amount
2239:
2238:
2220:
2202:
2176:
2175:
2168:
2161:
2153:
2148:
2145:
2142:
2081:
2080:
2073:NotFinishedYet
2066:
2052:
2026:
2025:
2018:
2010:
2005:
2002:
1999:
1943:
1942:
1927:
1908:
1876:
1875:
1867:
1862:
1859:
1856:
1850:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1800:
1799:
1781:
1751:
1716:
1715:
1708:
1701:
1694:
1691:WP:JUSTAPOLICY
1686:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1603:
1602:
1588:
1557:
1556:
1549:
1542:
1539:WP:JUSTNOTABLE
1535:
1528:
1520:
1515:
1512:
1509:
1498:
1497:
1466:
1465:
1458:
1451:
1443:
1438:
1429:
1426:
1404:
1403:
1389:
1347:
1346:
1339:
1332:
1325:
1317:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1293:
1292:
1278:
1237:
1236:
1229:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1202:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1170:
1169:
1151:
1120:
1119:
1112:
1105:
1097:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1051:
1050:
1043:DeleteyMcSheep
1036:
1005:
1004:
997:
990:
982:
977:
974:
971:
961:
960:
952:
947:
944:
941:
937:
936:
930:
929:
927:
926:
919:
912:
904:
901:
900:
899:
898:
890:
889:
883:
882:
881:
880:
875:
867:
866:
860:
859:
858:
857:
849:
848:
841:
838:
837:
836:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
802:
801:
791:
790:
781:
778:
777:
775:
774:
767:
760:
752:
749:
748:
747:
746:
741:
739:
738:
728:
723:
717:
712:
711:
710:
709:
704:
689:
688:
682:
681:
680:
679:
671:
670:
664:
663:
662:
661:
656:
651:
643:
642:
636:
635:
634:
633:
628:
623:
618:
610:
609:
603:
602:
601:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
567:
566:
560:
559:
558:
557:
552:
547:
539:
538:
532:
531:
530:
529:
524:
519:
514:
506:
505:
499:
498:
497:
496:
491:
486:
474:
466:
465:
459:
458:
457:
456:
449:
447:
445:
444:
439:
433:
431:
429:
428:
423:
421:Deletion today
417:
412:
411:
399:
313:
302:
301:
299:
298:
291:
284:
276:
273:
272:
271:
270:
265:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
249:
244:
239:
231:
230:
226:
225:
224:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
165:
164:
160:
159:
138:
137:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
117:
112:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
80:
75:
72:
60:
47:
45:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
15769:
15758:
15755:
15753:
15750:
15748:
15745:
15743:
15740:
15738:
15735:
15734:
15732:
15717:
15714:
15712:
15709:
15707:
15704:
15703:
15700:
15694:
15691:
15689:
15686:
15682:
15679:
15678:
15677:
15674:
15670:
15667:
15666:
15665:
15662:
15660:
15657:
15653:
15650:
15648:
15645:
15643:
15640:
15639:
15638:
15635:
15631:
15628:
15627:
15626:
15623:
15621:
15618:
15614:
15613:Abbreviations
15611:
15610:
15609:
15606:
15604:
15601:
15599:
15596:
15594:
15591:
15589:
15586:
15584:
15581:
15580:
15578:
15576:and summaries
15574:
15570:
15562:
15559:
15557:
15554:
15553:
15552:
15549:
15547:
15544:
15541:
15537:
15534:
15533:
15531:
15529:
15525:
15521:
15515:
15512:
15510:
15507:
15505:
15502:
15498:
15495:
15494:
15493:
15490:
15486:
15483:
15482:
15481:
15478:
15476:
15473:
15471:
15468:
15466:
15463:
15461:
15458:
15456:
15453:
15451:
15448:
15446:
15443:
15441:
15438:
15434:
15431:
15430:
15429:
15426:
15425:
15423:
15421:
15415:
15409:
15406:
15404:
15401:
15399:
15396:
15394:
15391:
15389:
15386:
15382:
15379:
15377:
15374:
15373:
15372:
15369:
15365:
15362:
15361:
15360:
15357:
15353:
15350:
15349:
15348:
15345:
15343:
15340:
15336:
15333:
15331:
15330:Text problems
15328:
15326:
15323:
15322:
15321:
15318:
15314:
15311:
15309:
15306:
15304:
15301:
15299:
15296:
15295:
15294:
15291:
15287:
15284:
15283:
15282:
15279:
15277:
15274:
15273:
15271:
15265:
15257:
15254:
15252:
15249:
15247:
15244:
15242:
15239:
15237:
15234:
15232:
15229:
15227:
15224:
15223:
15222:
15219:
15217:
15216:Third opinion
15214:
15212:
15209:
15208:
15206:
15204:
15198:
15190:
15187:
15185:
15182:
15181:
15180:
15177:
15173:
15169:
15166:
15165:
15164:
15161:
15159:
15156:
15152:
15149:
15147:
15144:
15143:
15142:
15139:
15135:
15132:
15131:
15130:
15127:
15125:
15122:
15118:
15115:
15113:
15110:
15108:
15105:
15103:
15100:
15098:
15095:
15094:
15093:
15090:
15088:
15085:
15081:
15078:
15076:
15073:
15071:
15068:
15067:
15066:
15063:
15062:
15060:
15058:
15053:
15049:
15043:
15040:
15036:
15033:
15031:
15028:
15027:
15026:
15025:Special pages
15023:
15021:
15018:
15016:
15013:
15011:
15008:
15004:
15001:
15000:
14999:
14998:Edit requests
14996:
14992:
14989:
14987:
14984:
14983:
14982:
14979:
14975:
14972:
14971:
14970:
14967:
14966:
14964:
14962:
14958:
14952:
14949:
14945:
14942:
14940:
14937:
14936:
14935:
14932:
14930:
14927:
14925:
14922:
14920:
14917:
14915:
14912:
14911:
14909:
14907:
14903:
14899:
14893:
14890:
14888:
14887:Accessibility
14885:
14883:
14880:
14876:
14873:
14872:
14871:
14868:
14866:
14863:
14861:
14858:
14856:
14853:
14851:
14848:
14846:
14843:
14841:
14838:
14837:
14835:
14833:
14828:
14824:
14816:
14813:
14812:
14811:
14808:
14804:
14801:
14800:
14799:
14796:
14792:
14789:
14787:
14784:
14782:
14779:
14778:
14777:
14774:
14772:
14769:
14767:
14764:
14762:
14759:
14757:
14754:
14750:
14747:
14745:
14742:
14740:
14737:
14735:
14732:
14731:
14730:
14727:
14725:
14722:
14720:
14717:
14715:
14712:
14710:
14707:
14706:
14704:
14702:
14698:
14694:
14688:
14685:
14683:
14680:
14676:
14673:
14671:
14670:Miscellaneous
14668:
14666:
14663:
14661:
14658:
14656:
14653:
14651:
14648:
14647:
14646:
14643:
14641:
14638:
14636:
14633:
14631:
14628:
14626:
14623:
14621:
14620:Mailing lists
14618:
14616:
14613:
14609:
14606:
14604:
14601:
14599:
14598:
14594:
14593:
14592:
14589:
14587:
14584:
14583:
14581:
14579:
14573:
14569:
14567:
14566:
14559:
14558:
14550:
14546:
14539:
14534:
14532:
14527:
14525:
14520:
14519:
14516:
14504:
14501:
14499:
14496:
14494:
14491:
14490:
14488:
14484:
14478:
14475:
14473:
14470:
14468:
14465:
14463:
14460:
14458:
14455:
14453:
14450:
14448:
14445:
14443:
14440:
14439:
14437:
14433:
14424:
14419:
14417:
14412:
14410:
14405:
14404:
14401:
14389:
14381:
14380:
14377:
14363:
14360:
14358:
14355:
14351:
14348:
14347:
14346:
14343:
14341:
14338:
14336:
14333:
14331:
14328:
14326:
14322:
14319:
14317:
14314:
14312:
14311:
14307:
14305:
14302:
14300:
14299:
14295:
14293:
14290:
14289:
14286:
14280:
14279:
14275:
14273:
14270:
14268:
14265:
14263:
14260:
14256:
14253:
14252:
14251:
14250:
14246:
14245:
14243:
14241:
14237:
14234:
14232:
14225:
14213:
14210:
14209:
14208:
14204:
14201:
14199:
14196:
14194:
14191:
14187:
14183:
14180:
14178:
14177:
14173:
14171:
14168:
14167:
14166:
14163:
14162:
14159:
14153:
14150:
14148:
14147:
14143:
14141:
14138:
14136:
14133:
14131:
14128:
14124:
14123:
14119:
14115:
14112:
14111:
14110:
14109:
14105:
14104:
14103:
14100:
14098:
14095:
14094:
14092:
14090:
14089:
14084:
14081:
14079:
14075:
14065:
14062:
14060:
14057:
14055:
14052:
14050:
14047:
14045:
14042:
14040:
14037:
14035:
14031:
14030:Invented here
14028:
14026:
14023:
14021:
14018:
14016:
14013:
14011:
14008:
14006:
14003:
14001:
13998:
13996:
13993:
13992:
13990:
13988:
13984:
13978:
13975:
13973:
13972:
13968:
13967:
13965:
13963:
13959:
13953:
13949:
13946:
13944:
13941:
13940:
13938:
13934:
13928:
13925:
13923:
13920:
13918:
13915:
13913:
13910:
13906:
13903:
13902:
13901:
13898:
13894:
13893:
13889:
13887:
13886:
13882:
13881:
13879:
13875:
13872:
13871:
13870:
13867:
13866:
13864:
13862:
13858:
13852:
13849:
13847:
13844:
13842:
13839:
13837:
13834:
13832:
13829:
13827:
13824:
13822:
13819:
13818:
13816:
13814:
13810:
13804:
13801:
13799:
13796:
13794:
13793:False analogy
13791:
13789:
13786:
13784:
13780:
13777:
13773:
13770:
13768:
13765:
13764:
13763:
13762:Sampling bias
13760:
13758:
13755:
13754:
13752:
13750:
13746:
13740:
13737:
13735:
13732:
13731:
13729:
13727:
13726:
13725:Secundum quid
13721:
13715:
13712:
13710:
13707:
13705:
13702:
13701:
13699:
13697:
13693:
13687:
13684:
13682:
13679:
13675:
13672:
13671:
13670:
13669:False dilemma
13667:
13666:
13664:
13662:
13658:
13652:
13649:
13647:
13643:
13639:
13636:
13632:
13629:
13628:
13627:
13624:
13622:
13618:
13615:
13614:
13612:
13608:
13602:
13599:
13597:
13594:
13592:
13589:
13587:
13584:
13582:
13579:
13577:
13574:
13572:
13569:
13568:
13566:
13562:
13559:
13557:
13553:
13543:
13540:
13538:
13537:Illicit minor
13535:
13533:
13532:Illicit major
13530:
13528:
13525:
13523:
13520:
13518:
13515:
13513:
13510:
13508:
13505:
13503:
13500:
13499:
13497:
13495:
13491:
13485:
13482:
13480:
13477:
13475:
13472:
13470:
13467:
13466:
13464:
13462:
13457:
13451:
13448:
13446:
13443:
13441:
13438:
13436:
13433:
13431:
13428:
13426:
13423:
13422:
13420:
13418:
13413:
13410:
13408:
13404:
13399:
13395:
13387:
13382:
13380:
13375:
13373:
13368:
13367:
13364:
13344:
13341:
13339:
13336:
13332:
13329:
13327:
13324:
13323:
13322:
13319:
13318:
13316:
13312:
13306:
13303:
13301:
13298:
13296:
13293:
13291:
13288:
13286:
13283:
13281:
13278:
13276:
13273:
13272:
13270:
13266:
13262:
13258:
13253:
13249:
13235:
13232:
13230:
13227:
13225:
13222:
13220:
13217:
13215:
13212:
13210:
13207:
13205:
13204:Watchlistitis
13202:
13200:
13199:The WikiBible
13197:
13195:
13192:
13190:
13187:
13185:
13182:
13180:
13177:
13175:
13172:
13170:
13167:
13165:
13162:
13160:
13157:
13155:
13152:
13150:
13147:
13145:
13144:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
13142:
13140:
13137:
13135:
13132:
13130:
13127:
13125:
13122:
13120:
13119:Play the game
13117:
13115:
13112:
13110:
13107:
13105:
13102:
13100:
13097:
13095:
13092:
13090:
13087:
13085:
13082:
13080:
13077:
13075:
13072:
13070:
13067:
13065:
13062:
13060:
13059:My local pond
13057:
13055:
13052:
13050:
13047:
13045:
13042:
13040:
13037:
13035:
13032:
13030:
13027:
13025:
13022:
13020:
13017:
13015:
13012:
13010:
13007:
13005:
13002:
13000:
12997:
12995:
12992:
12990:
12987:
12985:
12982:
12980:
12977:
12975:
12972:
12970:
12969:Edits Per Day
12967:
12965:
12964:Editcountitis
12962:
12960:
12957:
12955:
12952:
12950:
12947:
12945:
12942:
12940:
12937:
12935:
12932:
12930:
12927:
12925:
12922:
12920:
12917:
12915:
12912:
12910:
12907:
12905:
12902:
12900:
12897:
12895:
12892:
12890:
12887:
12885:
12882:
12880:
12877:
12875:
12872:
12870:
12867:
12865:
12862:
12860:
12857:
12855:
12852:
12850:
12847:
12845:
12842:
12840:
12837:
12835:
12832:
12830:
12827:
12825:
12822:
12820:
12817:
12815:
12812:
12810:
12807:
12806:
12803:
12799:
12795:
12790:
12786:
12772:
12769:
12767:
12764:
12762:
12759:
12757:
12754:
12752:
12749:
12747:
12744:
12742:
12739:
12737:
12734:
12732:
12729:
12727:
12724:
12722:
12719:
12717:
12714:
12712:
12709:
12707:
12704:
12702:
12699:
12697:
12694:
12692:
12689:
12687:
12684:
12682:
12679:
12677:
12674:
12672:
12669:
12667:
12664:
12662:
12659:
12657:
12654:
12652:
12649:
12647:
12644:
12642:
12639:
12637:
12634:
12632:
12629:
12627:
12624:
12622:
12619:
12617:
12614:
12612:
12609:
12607:
12604:
12602:
12599:
12597:
12594:
12592:
12589:
12587:
12584:
12582:
12579:
12577:
12574:
12572:
12569:
12567:
12564:
12562:
12559:
12557:
12554:
12552:
12551:Insignificant
12549:
12547:
12544:
12542:
12539:
12537:
12534:
12532:
12529:
12527:
12524:
12522:
12519:
12517:
12514:
12512:
12509:
12507:
12504:
12502:
12499:
12497:
12494:
12492:
12489:
12487:
12484:
12482:
12479:
12477:
12474:
12472:
12469:
12467:
12464:
12462:
12459:
12457:
12454:
12452:
12449:
12447:
12444:
12442:
12439:
12437:
12434:
12432:
12429:
12427:
12424:
12422:
12419:
12417:
12414:
12413:
12410:
12406:
12402:
12397:
12393:
12379:
12376:
12374:
12371:
12369:
12368:WikiLawyering
12366:
12364:
12361:
12359:
12356:
12354:
12351:
12349:
12346:
12345:
12343:
12341:WikiRelations
12339:
12333:
12330:
12328:
12325:
12323:
12320:
12318:
12315:
12313:
12310:
12308:
12305:
12303:
12300:
12298:
12295:
12293:
12290:
12288:
12285:
12283:
12280:
12278:
12275:
12271:
12268:
12267:
12266:
12263:
12261:
12258:
12256:
12253:
12251:
12248:
12246:
12243:
12241:
12238:
12236:
12233:
12231:
12228:
12226:
12223:
12221:
12218:
12216:
12213:
12211:
12208:
12206:
12203:
12201:
12198:
12196:
12193:
12191:
12188:
12186:
12183:
12181:
12178:
12176:
12173:
12171:
12168:
12166:
12165:Don't cry COI
12163:
12161:
12158:
12156:
12153:
12151:
12148:
12146:
12143:
12141:
12138:
12136:
12133:
12131:
12128:
12126:
12125:Don't be rude
12123:
12121:
12118:
12116:
12113:
12111:
12108:
12106:
12103:
12101:
12098:
12096:
12093:
12091:
12088:
12086:
12083:
12081:
12078:
12076:
12073:
12071:
12070:Cyberbullying
12068:
12066:
12063:
12061:
12058:
12056:
12053:
12052:
12050:
12046:
12040:
12037:
12035:
12032:
12030:
12027:
12025:
12022:
12020:
12017:
12015:
12012:
12010:
12007:
12005:
12002:
12000:
11997:
11995:
11992:
11990:
11987:
11985:
11982:
11980:
11977:
11975:
11972:
11970:
11967:
11965:
11962:
11960:
11957:
11955:
11952:
11950:
11947:
11945:
11942:
11940:
11937:
11935:
11932:
11930:
11927:
11925:
11922:
11920:
11917:
11916:
11914:
11910:
11904:
11901:
11899:
11896:
11894:
11891:
11889:
11886:
11884:
11881:
11879:
11876:
11874:
11871:
11869:
11866:
11864:
11861:
11859:
11856:
11854:
11851:
11849:
11848:The last word
11846:
11844:
11843:The grey zone
11841:
11839:
11836:
11834:
11831:
11829:
11826:
11824:
11821:
11819:
11816:
11814:
11811:
11809:
11806:
11804:
11801:
11799:
11796:
11794:
11791:
11789:
11786:
11784:
11781:
11779:
11776:
11774:
11771:
11769:
11766:
11764:
11761:
11759:
11756:
11754:
11751:
11750:
11748:
11744:
11738:
11735:
11733:
11730:
11728:
11725:
11723:
11720:
11718:
11715:
11713:
11710:
11708:
11705:
11703:
11700:
11698:
11695:
11693:
11690:
11688:
11685:
11683:
11680:
11678:
11675:
11673:
11670:
11668:
11665:
11663:
11660:
11658:
11655:
11653:
11650:
11648:
11645:
11643:
11640:
11638:
11635:
11633:
11630:
11628:
11625:
11624:
11622:
11620:
11616:
11612:
11608:
11603:
11599:
11585:
11582:
11580:
11577:
11575:
11572:
11570:
11567:
11565:
11562:
11560:
11557:
11555:
11552:
11550:
11547:
11545:
11542:
11540:
11537:
11535:
11532:
11530:
11527:
11525:
11522:
11520:
11517:
11515:
11512:
11510:
11507:
11505:
11502:
11500:
11497:
11495:
11492:
11490:
11487:
11485:
11482:
11480:
11477:
11475:
11472:
11470:
11467:
11465:
11462:
11460:
11457:
11455:
11452:
11450:
11447:
11445:
11442:
11440:
11437:
11435:
11432:
11430:
11427:
11425:
11422:
11420:
11417:
11415:
11412:
11410:
11407:
11405:
11402:
11400:
11397:
11395:
11392:
11390:
11387:
11386:
11384:
11382:
11376:
11370:
11367:
11365:
11362:
11360:
11357:
11355:
11352:
11350:
11347:
11345:
11342:
11340:
11337:
11335:
11332:
11330:
11327:
11325:
11322:
11320:
11317:
11315:
11312:
11311:
11309:
11307:
11303:
11297:
11294:
11292:
11289:
11287:
11284:
11282:
11279:
11277:
11274:
11272:
11269:
11267:
11264:
11262:
11261:Walled garden
11259:
11257:
11254:
11252:
11249:
11247:
11244:
11242:
11239:
11237:
11234:
11232:
11229:
11227:
11224:
11222:
11219:
11217:
11214:
11212:
11209:
11207:
11204:
11202:
11199:
11197:
11194:
11192:
11189:
11187:
11184:
11182:
11179:
11177:
11174:
11172:
11169:
11167:
11164:
11162:
11159:
11157:
11154:
11152:
11149:
11147:
11144:
11142:
11139:
11137:
11134:
11132:
11129:
11127:
11124:
11122:
11119:
11117:
11114:
11112:
11109:
11107:
11104:
11102:
11099:
11097:
11094:
11092:
11089:
11087:
11086:Mine a source
11084:
11082:
11079:
11077:
11074:
11072:
11069:
11065:
11062:
11060:
11057:
11055:
11052:
11050:
11047:
11045:
11042:
11040:
11037:
11036:
11035:
11032:
11030:
11027:
11025:
11022:
11020:
11017:
11015:
11012:
11010:
11007:
11005:
11002:
11000:
10997:
10995:
10992:
10990:
10987:
10985:
10982:
10980:
10977:
10975:
10972:
10970:
10967:
10965:
10962:
10960:
10957:
10955:
10952:
10950:
10947:
10945:
10942:
10940:
10937:
10935:
10934:Concept cloud
10932:
10930:
10927:
10925:
10922:
10920:
10917:
10915:
10912:
10910:
10907:
10905:
10904:Cherrypicking
10902:
10900:
10897:
10895:
10892:
10890:
10887:
10885:
10882:
10880:
10877:
10875:
10872:
10870:
10867:
10865:
10862:
10860:
10857:
10855:
10852:
10850:
10847:
10845:
10842:
10840:
10837:
10835:
10832:
10830:
10827:
10825:
10822:
10820:
10817:
10815:
10812:
10810:
10807:
10806:
10804:
10802:
10798:
10792:
10789:
10787:
10784:
10782:
10779:
10777:
10774:
10772:
10769:
10767:
10764:
10762:
10759:
10757:
10754:
10752:
10749:
10747:
10744:
10742:
10739:
10737:
10736:Systemic bias
10734:
10732:
10729:
10727:
10724:
10722:
10719:
10717:
10714:
10712:
10709:
10707:
10704:
10702:
10699:
10697:
10694:
10692:
10689:
10687:
10684:
10682:
10679:
10677:
10674:
10672:
10669:
10667:
10664:
10662:
10659:
10657:
10654:
10652:
10649:
10647:
10644:
10642:
10639:
10637:
10634:
10632:
10629:
10627:
10624:
10622:
10619:
10617:
10614:
10612:
10609:
10607:
10604:
10602:
10599:
10597:
10594:
10592:
10589:
10587:
10584:
10582:
10579:
10577:
10574:
10572:
10569:
10567:
10564:
10563:
10561:
10557:
10553:
10549:
10544:
10540:
10532:
10525:
10520:
10518:
10513:
10511:
10506:
10505:
10502:
10496:
10493:
10491:
10488:
10486:
10483:
10481:
10478:
10476:
10473:
10471:
10468:
10466:
10463:
10461:
10458:
10456:
10453:
10451:
10448:
10446:
10443:
10441:
10438:
10436:
10433:
10431:
10428:
10426:
10423:
10420:
10417:
10415:
10412:
10411:
10403:
10400:
10398:
10395:
10393:
10390:
10388:
10385:
10383:
10380:
10378:
10375:
10373:
10370:
10369:
10366:
10356:
10354:
10350:
10346:
10338:
10334:
10330:
10326:
10323:
10320:
10316:
10312:
10308:
10305:
10302:
10298:
10294:
10290:
10287:
10284:
10280:
10276:
10272:
10269:
10266:
10262:
10258:
10255:
10252:
10248:
10244:
10241:
10240:
10239:
10238:
10234:
10231:
10220:
10216:
10213:
10209:
10208:
10205:
10199:
10189:
10187:
10182:
10175:
10171:
10167:
10164:
10161:
10160:
10159:
10158:
10149:
10145:
10142:
10138:
10137:
10134:
10124:
10122:
10113:
10109:
10105:
10101:
10098:
10095:
10091:
10087:
10083:
10080:
10079:
10078:
10077:
10068:
10064:
10063:
10060:
10050:
10048:
10044:
10040:
10036:
10031:
10029:
10025:
10020:
10016:
10012:
10008:
10004:
9996:
9992:
9989:
9986:
9982:
9979:
9976:
9972:
9969:
9966:
9962:
9958:
9955:
9952:
9948:
9945:
9942:
9938:
9935:
9934:
9933:
9932:
9923:
9919:
9918:
9915:
9905:
9903:
9899:
9890:
9886:
9882:
9879:
9876:
9872:
9868:
9864:
9861:
9858:
9854:
9850:
9847:
9844:
9840:
9836:
9833:
9832:
9831:
9830:
9821:
9817:
9814:
9810:
9809:
9806:
9796:
9791:
9787:
9783:
9781:
9775:
9772:
9770:
9764:
9762:
9761:"speedy keep"
9754:
9750:
9746:
9743:
9740:
9736:
9732:
9729:
9726:
9722:
9718:
9715:
9714:
9713:
9712:
9708:
9705:
9694:
9690:
9687:
9683:
9680:
9676:
9675:
9672:
9662:
9660:
9655:
9651:
9647:
9643:
9635:
9631:
9623:
9621:
9616:
9614:
9610:
9605:
9602:
9598:
9594:
9589:
9587:
9578:
9574:
9570:
9566:
9563:
9560:
9556:
9552:
9549:
9546:
9542:
9538:
9535:
9532:
9528:
9524:
9521:
9518:
9514:
9510:
9507:
9504:
9500:
9496:
9493:
9490:
9486:
9482:
9479:
9478:
9477:
9476:
9472:
9469:
9458:
9454:
9451:
9447:
9446:
9443:
9437:
9427:
9423:
9419:
9415:
9411:
9408:
9404:
9400:
9396:
9394:
9390:
9385:
9381:
9377:
9373:
9371:
9366:
9364:
9360:
9356:
9354:
9350:
9346:
9342:
9336:
9334:
9330:
9323:
9319:
9315:
9312:
9309:
9306:
9302:
9298:
9295:
9292:
9289:
9285:
9281:
9278:
9275:
9274:
9273:
9272:
9267:
9261:
9256:
9253:
9242:
9238:
9235:
9231:
9228:
9224:
9221:
9217:
9216:
9213:
9203:
9200:
9191:
9187:
9183:
9180:
9179:
9178:
9177:
9173:
9170:
9159:
9155:
9154:
9151:
9141:
9139:
9135:
9131:
9126:
9124:
9120:
9116:
9111:
9104:
9100:
9096:
9093:
9090:
9086:
9082:
9079:
9076:
9072:
9068:
9065:
9064:
9063:
9062:
9058:
9055:
9047:
9043:
9033:
9029:
9026:
9022:
9019:
9015:
9012:
9008:
9005:
9001:
9000:
8997:
8987:
8985:
8981:
8977:
8973:
8969:
8965:
8961:
8957:
8951:
8945:
8941:
8937:
8933:
8930:
8927:
8923:
8919:
8916:
8913:
8909:
8905:
8902:
8899:
8895:
8891:
8888:
8887:
8886:
8885:
8881:
8878:
8867:
8863:
8860:
8859:WP:EVERYTHING
8856:
8855:
8852:
8846:
8836:
8829:
8827:
8822:
8818:
8810:
8806:
8802:
8798:
8795:
8792:
8788:
8784:
8780:
8777:
8776:
8775:
8774:
8770:
8767:
8756:
8752:
8749:
8745:
8744:
8741:
8731:
8728:
8718:
8714:
8713:
8710:
8700:
8697:
8693:
8687:
8685:
8681:
8677:
8672:
8668:
8665:
8661:
8657:
8653:
8652:
8647:
8646:
8640:
8636:
8634:
8629:
8627:
8621:
8619:
8614:
8612:
8608:
8604:
8600:
8594:
8587:
8583:
8579:
8576:
8573:
8569:
8565:
8562:
8559:
8555:
8551:
8548:
8545:
8541:
8540:PokemonPerson
8537:
8534:
8531:
8527:
8519:
8516:
8515:
8514:
8513:
8509:
8506:
8499:
8495:
8491:
8490:WP:Notability
8484:
8474:
8470:
8467:
8463:
8460:
8459:WP:OTHERSTUFF
8456:
8453:
8449:
8446:
8445:WP:WHATABOUTX
8442:
8439:
8435:
8432:
8428:
8427:
8424:
8403:
8399:
8395:
8391:
8385:
8383:
8378:This section
8376:
8367:
8366:
8358:
8354:
8351:
8347:
8343:
8338:
8336:
8328:
8324:
8320:
8317:
8314:
8310:
8306:
8303:
8302:
8301:
8300:
8296:
8293:
8282:
8281:WP:OTHERLANGS
8278:
8277:
8274:
8264:
8261:
8256:
8254:
8253:hopeless stub
8249:
8245:
8243:
8238:
8230:
8226:
8222:
8218:
8215:
8212:
8208:
8204:
8200:
8196:
8192:
8189:
8188:
8187:
8186:
8182:
8179:
8168:
8164:
8161:
8157:
8156:
8153:
8143:
8142:
8140:
8136:
8135:WP:Notability
8130:
8128:
8127:
8122:
8118:
8114:
8110:
8106:
8102:
8098:
8094:
8089:
8087:
8083:
8079:
8074:
8072:
8068:
8063:
8061:
8057:
8053:
8047:
8045:
8041:
8037:
8031:
8029:
8024:
8020:
8016:
8012:
8008:
8004:
7999:
7995:
7993:
7989:
7987:
7982:
7978:
7975:
7973:
7965:
7961:
7957:
7954:
7951:
7947:
7946:Class Warfare
7943:
7939:
7936:
7933:
7929:
7925:
7922:
7919:
7915:
7911:
7908:
7905:
7901:
7897:
7894:
7891:
7887:
7883:
7880:
7877:
7873:
7869:
7866:
7863:
7859:
7855:
7852:
7849:
7845:
7841:
7838:
7837:
7836:
7835:
7831:
7828:
7822:
7818:
7814:
7810:
7806:
7805:
7800:
7795:
7785:
7784:WP:NOTINHERIT
7781:
7778:
7774:
7771:
7767:
7764:
7760:
7757:
7753:
7750:
7746:
7745:
7742:
7732:
7729:
7723:
7721:
7717:
7713:
7709:
7705:
7701:
7693:
7689:
7685:
7682:
7681:
7680:
7679:
7675:
7672:
7665:
7655:
7651:
7650:
7647:
7637:
7635:
7630:
7626:
7619:
7615:
7611:
7608:
7605:
7601:
7597:
7594:
7593:
7592:
7591:
7587:
7584:
7573:
7569:
7568:
7565:
7555:
7553:
7549:
7545:
7541:
7538:Knowledge is
7533:
7529:
7525:
7522:
7519:
7515:
7511:
7508:
7505:
7501:
7497:
7494:
7491:
7487:
7483:
7480:
7479:
7478:
7477:
7473:
7470:
7459:
7455:
7454:
7451:
7441:
7439:
7437:
7432:
7429:
7428:systemic bias
7423:
7421:
7417:
7413:
7409:
7405:
7401:
7397:
7389:
7385:
7381:
7378:
7375:
7371:
7367:
7364:
7361:
7357:
7353:
7350:
7347:
7343:
7339:
7336:
7335:
7334:
7333:
7329:
7326:
7315:
7311:
7308:
7304:
7301:
7297:
7294:
7290:
7289:
7286:
7280:
7270:
7268:
7266:
7262:
7257:
7255:
7251:
7247:
7243:
7239:
7235:
7231:
7223:
7219:
7215:
7211:
7208:
7205:
7201:
7197:
7193:
7189:
7185:
7182:
7179:
7175:
7171:
7167:
7163:
7159:
7156:
7155:
7154:
7153:
7149:
7146:
7135:
7131:
7128:
7124:
7121:
7117:
7114:
7110:
7107:
7103:
7102:
7099:
7092:
7086:
7076:
7074:
7069:
7067:
7062:
7059:One may ask:
7057:
7055:
7050:
7046:
7043:
7039:
7035:
7030:
7028:
7023:
7019:
7015:
7011:
7006:
7003:
6998:
6992:
6988:
6984:
6981:
6978:
6974:
6970:
6967:
6964:
6960:
6956:
6953:
6950:
6946:
6942:
6939:
6936:
6932:
6928:
6925:
6922:
6918:
6914:
6911:
6910:
6909:
6908:
6904:
6901:
6890:
6886:
6883:
6879:
6878:
6875:
6865:
6862:
6858:
6853:
6851:
6846:
6841:
6839:
6835:
6831:
6827:
6823:
6819:
6812:
6808:
6804:
6801:
6798:
6794:
6790:
6787:
6784:
6780:
6776:
6773:
6770:
6766:
6762:
6759:
6756:
6752:
6748:
6745:
6742:
6738:
6734:
6731:
6730:
6729:
6728:
6724:
6721:
6710:
6706:
6705:
6702:
6692:
6690:
6686:
6682:
6678:
6674:
6668:
6666:
6662:
6658:
6655:
6649:
6647:
6643:
6639:
6633:
6629:
6626:
6623:
6619:
6615:
6607:
6603:
6601:
6595:
6592:
6589:
6585:
6584:HennyYoungman
6581:
6578:
6575:
6571:
6567:
6564:
6561:
6557:
6553:
6550:
6547:
6543:
6539:
6536:
6533:
6529:
6525:
6522:
6519:
6515:
6511:
6508:
6507:
6506:
6505:
6501:
6498:
6487:
6483:
6480:
6476:
6473:
6469:
6468:
6465:
6455:
6451:
6449:
6443:
6440:
6436:
6432:
6428:
6424:
6416:
6412:
6411:Street Speech
6408:
6404:
6401:
6398:
6394:
6390:
6387:
6384:
6380:
6376:
6372:
6369:
6366:
6362:
6358:
6355:
6352:
6348:
6344:
6341:
6338:
6334:
6330:
6327:
6324:
6320:
6316:
6313:
6312:
6311:
6310:
6306:
6303:
6292:
6288:
6285:
6281:
6280:
6277:
6267:
6265:
6261:
6256:
6254:
6250:
6245:
6243:
6236:
6232:
6228:
6225:
6222:
6218:
6214:
6211:
6208:
6204:
6200:
6197:
6196:
6195:
6192:
6181:
6177:
6174:
6170:
6167:
6163:
6162:
6159:
6149:
6146:
6142:
6137:
6135:
6130:
6128:
6124:
6116:
6112:
6108:
6105:
6102:
6098:
6094:
6091:
6088:
6084:
6080:
6077:
6074:
6070:
6066:
6063:
6060:
6056:
6052:
6049:
6046:
6042:
6038:
6035:
6034:
6033:
6029:
6018:
6014:
6011:
6007:
6006:
6003:
5996:
5992:
5988:
5978:
5975:
5969:
5967:
5963:
5959:
5951:
5947:
5946:IDontLikeSpam
5943:
5940:
5937:
5933:
5932:Down The Well
5929:
5926:
5923:
5919:
5918:Public Appeal
5915:
5912:
5909:
5905:
5901:
5898:
5895:
5891:
5887:
5884:
5881:
5877:
5873:
5870:
5869:
5868:
5867:
5863:
5859:
5848:
5844:
5843:
5840:
5830:
5828:
5824:
5816:
5812:
5808:
5804:
5801:
5798:
5794:
5790:
5786:
5783:
5782:
5781:
5780:
5776:
5773:
5766:
5756:
5752:
5749:
5745:
5744:
5741:
5731:
5729:
5723:
5721:
5717:
5713:
5706:
5702:
5698:
5695:
5692:
5688:
5684:
5681:
5678:
5674:
5670:
5667:
5664:
5660:
5656:
5653:
5650:
5646:
5642:
5639:
5636:
5632:
5628:
5624:
5621:
5618:
5614:
5610:
5607:
5606:
5605:
5602:
5591:
5587:
5584:
5580:
5579:
5576:
5566:
5558:
5554:
5553:
5548:
5545:
5541:
5537:
5536:
5531:
5528:
5524:
5520:
5519:
5514:
5511:
5507:
5503:
5502:
5501:BetterWithAge
5497:
5494:
5490:
5486:
5485:
5480:
5477:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5465:
5461:
5458:
5454:
5451:
5450:WP:NEWCOMPANY
5447:
5444:
5440:
5437:
5436:WP:NEWSUBJECT
5433:
5430:
5426:
5423:
5422:WP:OLDSUBJECT
5419:
5418:
5415:
5410:
5407:
5396:
5394:
5390:
5385:
5383:
5379:
5375:
5369:
5367:
5362:
5360:
5355:
5351:
5343:
5339:
5335:
5332:
5329:
5325:
5321:
5318:
5314:
5310:
5306:
5303:
5302:
5301:
5300:
5296:
5293:
5286:
5279:
5269:
5268:WP:OLDARTICLE
5265:
5262:
5261:WP:NEWARTICLE
5258:
5255:
5251:
5248:
5247:WP:ARTICLEAGE
5244:
5243:
5240:
5230:
5228:
5226:
5222:
5218:
5214:
5210:
5206:
5201:
5199:
5195:
5192:Overall, the
5190:
5188:
5184:
5179:
5177:
5173:
5169:
5164:
5156:
5152:
5148:
5145:
5142:
5138:
5134:
5131:
5128:
5124:
5120:
5117:
5114:
5110:
5106:
5103:
5100:
5096:
5092:
5089:
5088:
5087:
5086:
5081:
5077:
5072:
5069:
5058:
5054:
5051:
5047:
5044:
5040:
5037:
5036:WP:GOOGLEHITS
5033:
5030:
5026:
5025:
5022:
5012:
5009:
5003:
5001:
4997:
4992:
4990:
4986:
4982:
4974:
4970:
4966:
4963:
4960:
4956:
4952:
4949:
4946:
4942:
4938:
4935:
4931:
4927:
4923:
4920:
4917:
4913:
4909:
4906:
4902:
4898:
4894:
4891:
4890:
4889:
4888:
4883:
4879:
4874:
4871:
4860:
4856:
4853:
4849:
4846:
4842:
4841:
4838:
4823:
4821:
4817:
4813:
4809:
4805:
4801:
4797:
4792:
4787:
4779:
4775:
4771:
4768:
4765:
4761:
4757:
4754:
4753:
4752:
4751:
4747:
4744:
4733:
4729:
4728:
4725:
4715:
4707:
4703:
4702:
4699:
4689:
4687:
4686:in good faith
4683:
4679:
4671:
4667:
4663:
4660:
4657:
4653:
4649:
4646:
4643:
4639:
4635:
4632:
4629:
4625:
4621:
4618:
4615:
4611:
4607:
4604:
4601:
4597:
4593:
4590:
4587:
4583:
4582:Graffiti Wall
4579:
4576:
4575:
4574:
4573:
4569:
4566:
4555:
4554:WP:EASYTARGET
4551:
4548:
4544:
4541:
4537:
4534:
4530:
4529:
4526:
4516:
4514:
4507:
4500:
4496:
4489:
4485:
4481:
4478:
4475:
4471:
4467:
4464:
4463:
4462:
4461:
4457:
4454:
4443:
4439:
4436:
4432:
4431:
4428:
4418:
4415:
4410:
4408:
4400:
4396:
4392:
4391:walled garden
4389:Is part of a
4388:
4385:
4382:
4378:
4377:Foster Parent
4374:
4371:
4370:
4369:
4368:
4364:
4361:
4350:
4346:
4345:
4342:
4335:Orphan status
4328:
4325:
4322:
4319:
4318:
4312:
4308:
4305:
4301:
4300:
4299:
4298:
4294:
4292:
4287:
4284:
4279:
4275:
4273:
4267:
4264:
4260:
4255:
4253:
4249:
4246:dependent on
4244:
4239:
4237:
4233:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4213:
4210:
4206:
4202:
4199:
4196:
4192:
4187:
4184:
4181:
4177:
4176:Plant and run
4173:
4170:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4156:
4153:
4149:
4148:TheyDidntWork
4145:
4142:
4141:
4140:
4139:
4135:
4132:
4125:
4115:
4111:
4108:
4104:
4101:
4097:
4096:
4093:
4083:
4080:
4075:
4072:
4069:
4065:
4057:
4053:
4049:
4045:
4042:
4039:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4024:
4021:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4006:
4005:
4004:
4003:
3997:
3986:
3982:
3979:
3975:
3974:
3971:
3965:
3955:
3953:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3935:
3930:
3928:
3923:
3919:
3917:
3915:
3908:
3900:
3896:
3892:
3889:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3875:
3872:
3868:
3867:LostWillToFix
3864:
3861:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3854:
3851:
3840:
3836:
3833:
3832:WP:LOUSYTITLE
3829:
3826:
3822:
3819:
3815:
3814:
3811:
3801:
3799:
3798:demonstrate.
3797:
3793:
3789:
3785:
3781:
3777:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3758:
3755:
3744:
3743:WP:NOTCLEANUP
3740:
3737:
3733:
3730:
3726:
3723:
3719:
3716:
3712:
3709:
3705:
3702:
3698:
3697:
3694:
3688:
3678:
3671:
3667:
3663:
3660:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3639:
3636:
3625:
3621:
3618:
3614:
3613:
3610:
3600:
3598:
3590:
3586:
3583:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3571:
3569:
3565:
3561:
3560:verifiability
3557:
3553:
3549:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3529:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3515:
3514:
3513:
3512:
3508:
3505:
3494:
3490:
3487:
3483:
3482:
3479:
3469:
3467:
3465:
3461:
3456:
3454:
3449:
3446:Note that in
3444:
3442:
3438:
3433:
3430:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3419:verifiability
3416:
3411:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3390:
3386:
3382:
3379:
3376:
3372:
3368:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3358:
3355:
3344:
3340:
3337:
3333:
3330:
3326:
3323:
3319:
3316:
3312:
3309:
3305:
3304:
3301:
3294:
3284:
3282:
3280:
3279:WP:NOBLECAUSE
3276:
3272:
3271:verifiability
3268:
3263:
3260:
3256:
3251:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3236:
3233:
3227:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3192:New York City
3188:
3186:
3180:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3162:
3159:
3155:
3151:
3148:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3134:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3113:
3110:
3099:
3095:
3092:
3088:
3085:
3081:
3078:
3074:
3073:
3070:
3060:
3058:
3056:
3052:
3047:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3029:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3015:
3012:
3008:
3004:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2994:
2991:
2980:
2976:
2973:
2969:
2966:
2962:
2959:
2955:
2952:
2948:
2945:
2941:
2940:
2937:
2927:
2923:
2921:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2904:verifiability
2901:
2897:
2893:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2874:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2860:
2857:
2853:
2849:
2846:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2828:
2824:
2821:
2810:
2806:
2805:
2802:
2792:
2790:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2767:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2748:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2729:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2715:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2701:
2698:
2694:
2693:HastyHannigan
2690:
2687:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2673:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2659:
2656:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2641:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2627:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2613:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2589:
2582:
2572:
2568:
2565:
2561:
2558:
2554:
2551:
2547:
2546:
2543:
2533:
2531:
2527:
2524:
2521:
2515:
2510:
2508:
2505:As stated at
2503:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2475:
2464:
2460:
2457:
2453:
2450:
2446:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2435:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2407:
2403:
2402:
2399:
2389:
2386:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2361:
2350:
2346:
2343:
2339:
2338:
2335:
2325:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2310:Cynthia Nixon
2306:
2301:
2297:
2295:
2294:Grammy Awards
2291:
2285:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2272:
2269:
2265:
2264:
2259:
2258:
2253:
2252:
2247:
2246:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2221:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2203:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2173:
2169:
2166:
2162:
2159:
2155:
2154:
2151:
2141:
2138:
2134:
2127:
2117:
2107:
2099:
2097:
2092:
2090:
2085:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2067:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2034:
2023:
2022:WP:PLEASEDONT
2019:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2008:
1998:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1939:
1935:
1934:WhoNeedsProof
1931:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1873:
1869:
1868:
1865:
1855:
1853:
1851:
1847:
1842:
1840:
1835:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1804:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1713:
1712:WP:VAGUEWAVES
1709:
1706:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1687:
1684:
1674:
1672:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1637:
1633:
1627:
1626:"Non-notable"
1622:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1589:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1565:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1546:WP:ITSNOTABLE
1543:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1518:
1508:
1506:
1501:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1474:
1463:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1449:
1445:
1444:
1441:
1435:
1425:
1423:
1421:
1420:WP:NOT#DICDEF
1417:
1413:
1409:
1401:
1397:
1396:TrustMeItFits
1393:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1358:
1354:
1344:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1305:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1245:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1197:
1195:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1167:
1163:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1117:
1113:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1085:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1002:
998:
995:
991:
988:
984:
983:
980:
970:
968:
958:
954:
953:
950:
935:
925:
920:
918:
913:
911:
906:
905:
903:
902:
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
884:
879:
876:
874:
871:
870:
869:
868:
865:
862:
861:
856:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
840:
839:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
805:
804:
803:
800:
798:
793:
792:
789:and arguments
786:
785:
782:
773:
768:
766:
761:
759:
754:
753:
751:
750:
745:
742:
736:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
718:
716:
715:
714:
713:
708:
705:
701:
696:
693:
692:
691:
690:
687:
684:
683:
678:
675:
674:
673:
672:
669:
666:
665:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
641:
638:
637:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
608:
605:
604:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
570:
569:
568:
565:
562:
561:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
534:
533:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
501:
500:
495:
492:
490:
487:
483:
478:
475:
473:
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
461:
460:
454:
448:
443:
440:
438:
435:
434:
432:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
407:
406:
403:
402:
398:
397:
395:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
362:
361:
356:
352:
348:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:verifiability
321:
317:
311:
309:
297:
292:
290:
285:
283:
278:
277:
275:
274:
269:
266:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
253:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
227:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
161:
158:
155:
154:
148:
144:
132:
129:
126:
123:
119:
118:
116:
113:
106:
105:
93:
89:
86:
82:
81:
78:
73:
68:
64:
58:
56:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
19:
15642:Five pillars
15551:WP Democracy
15503:
15313:Adopt-a-user
15163:Bureaucrats'
15117:Open proxies
15075:Edit warring
15057:noticeboards
14914:Reward board
14850:Geographical
14827:WikiProjects
14645:Village pump
14608:In the media
14597:The Signpost
14595:
14563:
14555:
14553:
14461:
14452:in edit wars
14325:Naturalistic
14308:
14296:
14276:
14247:
14231:of relevance
14174:
14152:Whataboutism
14144:
14120:
14114:Godwin's law
14106:
14086:
13969:
13962:Consequences
13943:Law/Legality
13917:Single cause
13890:
13883:
13723:
13591:Loki's Wager
13571:Equivocation
13564:Equivocation
13268:About essays
13257:About essays
13164:Rouge editor
13114:Oops Defense
12894:Barnstaritis
12859:Assume faith
12681:Pokémon test
12526:High Schools
12430:
12348:WikiBullying
12312:Superhatting
12307:POV railroad
12004:Just drop it
11808:Nobody cares
11642:Divisiveness
11398:
11166:Printability
11059:Style guides
10849:Amnesia test
10706:Paraphrasing
10342:
10324:
10306:
10293:WP:ITSUSEFUL
10288:
10270:
10261:VerifiableOR
10256:
10242:
10236:
10235:
10230:introduction
10226:
10179:
10162:
10156:
10155:
10117:
10099:
10081:
10075:
10074:
10039:Village pump
10032:
10000:
9990:
9980:
9970:
9956:
9946:
9936:
9930:
9929:
9894:
9880:
9862:
9848:
9834:
9828:
9827:
9820:WP:BLACKMAIL
9788:
9784:
9773:
9758:
9744:
9730:
9716:
9710:
9709:
9704:introduction
9700:
9656:
9648:}}
9645:
9640:{{
9636:}}
9633:
9628:{{
9617:
9615:never help.
9606:
9590:
9582:
9564:
9550:
9536:
9522:
9508:
9494:
9485:BrandLoyalty
9480:
9474:
9473:
9468:introduction
9464:
9409:
9386:
9367:
9357:
9327:
9310:
9293:
9276:
9270:
9269:
9252:introduction
9248:
9220:WP:ONLYESSAY
9198:
9195:
9181:
9175:
9174:
9169:introduction
9165:
9127:
9112:
9108:
9094:
9080:
9066:
9060:
9059:
9054:introduction
9050:
8949:
8931:
8917:
8903:
8894:AllInclusive
8889:
8883:
8882:
8877:introduction
8873:
8835:
8814:
8805:NothingOrAll
8796:
8787:AllOrNothing
8778:
8772:
8771:
8766:introduction
8762:
8724:
8688:
8673:
8669:
8649:
8643:
8641:
8637:
8633:Pokémon test
8630:
8625:
8622:
8615:
8607:Good article
8591:
8577:
8563:
8549:
8535:
8517:
8511:
8510:
8505:introduction
8501:
8438:WP:WHATABOUT
8379:
8355:
8341:
8339:
8332:
8318:
8304:
8298:
8297:
8292:introduction
8288:
8257:
8241:
8234:
8216:
8193:: there are
8190:
8184:
8183:
8178:introduction
8174:
8132:
8131:
8124:
8116:
8112:
8090:
8081:
8077:
8075:
8064:
8048:
8032:
8027:
8022:
8002:
8000:
7996:
7990:
7980:
7979:
7971:
7969:
7955:
7941:
7937:
7928:Eleemosynary
7923:
7909:
7895:
7881:
7867:
7853:
7839:
7833:
7832:
7827:introduction
7803:
7802:
7798:
7797:
7763:WP:INHERITED
7724:
7711:
7703:
7699:
7698:In general,
7697:
7683:
7677:
7676:
7671:introduction
7667:
7628:
7623:
7609:
7595:
7589:
7588:
7583:introduction
7579:
7551:
7547:
7537:
7523:
7509:
7495:
7481:
7475:
7474:
7469:introduction
7465:
7444:Crystal ball
7440:
7435:
7433:
7424:
7419:
7393:
7379:
7365:
7356:Notknownhere
7351:
7342:Iknownothing
7337:
7331:
7330:
7325:introduction
7321:
7293:WP:LOCALFAME
7269:
7260:
7258:
7253:
7241:
7237:
7233:
7229:
7227:
7209:
7183:
7174:Notbigenough
7157:
7151:
7150:
7145:introduction
7141:
7134:WP:ARBITRARY
7120:WP:BIGNUMBER
7070:
7060:
7058:
7051:
7047:
7031:
7026:
7021:
7014:WP:CORPDEPTH
7009:
7007:
7000:Knowledge's
6999:
6996:
6982:
6968:
6954:
6940:
6926:
6912:
6906:
6905:
6900:introduction
6896:
6854:
6844:
6842:
6816:
6802:
6788:
6774:
6760:
6751:NeedsToKnow2
6746:
6737:NeedsToKnow1
6732:
6726:
6725:
6720:introduction
6716:
6672:
6670:
6664:
6651:
6637:
6635:
6631:
6627:
6617:
6611:
6599:
6593:
6579:
6565:
6551:
6537:
6523:
6509:
6503:
6502:
6497:introduction
6493:
6452:
6444:
6426:
6421:Knowledge's
6420:
6402:
6388:
6370:
6356:
6342:
6328:
6319:Format Error
6314:
6308:
6307:
6302:introduction
6298:
6291:WP:JUSTABLOG
6257:
6246:
6240:
6226:
6212:
6198:
6191:introduction
6187:
6180:WP:TOOLITTLE
6152:Article size
6139:Neither the
6138:
6131:
6120:
6106:
6092:
6078:
6064:
6050:
6041:Busy at work
6036:
6028:introduction
6024:
5970:
5955:
5941:
5927:
5913:
5899:
5885:
5871:
5865:
5864:
5858:introduction
5854:
5820:
5802:
5784:
5778:
5777:
5772:introduction
5768:
5724:
5710:
5696:
5682:
5673:Out of print
5668:
5654:
5640:
5626:
5622:
5608:
5601:introduction
5597:
5563:
5551:
5546:
5534:
5529:
5517:
5512:
5500:
5495:
5483:
5478:
5472:
5471:
5443:WP:ITSTOONEW
5406:introduction
5402:
5386:
5370:
5363:
5348:
5333:
5319:
5304:
5298:
5297:
5292:introduction
5288:
5229:
5220:
5205:Google Books
5202:
5193:
5191:
5182:
5180:
5171:
5160:
5146:
5132:
5118:
5104:
5090:
5084:
5083:
5068:introduction
5064:
5043:WP:YAHOOHITS
5004:
5000:Piltdown Man
4995:
4993:
4978:
4964:
4950:
4936:
4921:
4907:
4892:
4886:
4885:
4870:introduction
4866:
4790:
4783:
4769:
4755:
4749:
4748:
4743:introduction
4739:
4713:
4675:
4661:
4647:
4633:
4619:
4605:
4591:
4577:
4571:
4570:
4565:introduction
4561:
4509:}}
4503:{{
4493:
4479:
4465:
4459:
4458:
4453:introduction
4449:
4411:
4404:
4386:
4372:
4366:
4365:
4360:introduction
4356:
4310:
4296:
4295:
4288:
4280:
4276:
4271:
4268:
4262:
4256:
4242:
4240:
4231:
4228:
4214:
4200:
4185:
4171:
4157:
4143:
4137:
4136:
4131:introduction
4127:
4114:WP:IMPATIENT
4076:
4067:
4061:
4043:
4025:
4007:
4001:
3996:introduction
3992:
3978:WP:PAPERONLY
3954:
3933:
3931:
3924:
3920:
3913:
3906:
3904:
3890:
3876:
3862:
3856:
3855:
3850:introduction
3846:
3800:
3779:
3778:
3773:
3768:. Remember,
3765:
3759:
3754:introduction
3750:
3675:
3661:
3647:
3641:
3640:
3635:introduction
3631:
3624:WP:LOOKSGOOD
3594:
3589:Humor Critic
3584:
3578:
3577:
3544:
3530:
3521:ComedyExpert
3516:
3510:
3509:
3504:introduction
3500:
3468:
3457:
3445:
3437:Inclusionism
3434:
3431:
3425:, and using
3412:
3407:
3394:
3380:
3371:Hippocrates2
3366:
3360:
3359:
3354:introduction
3350:
3283:
3264:
3258:
3252:
3237:
3228:
3199:
3189:
3184:
3177:
3163:
3149:
3135:
3126:Usefulisgood
3121:
3115:
3114:
3109:introduction
3105:
3059:
3048:
3044:
3030:
3016:
3002:
2996:
2995:
2990:introduction
2986:
2944:WP:IDONTCARE
2924:
2889:
2875:
2861:
2847:
2833:
2826:
2825:
2820:introduction
2816:
2791:
2768:
2759:
2755:
2744:
2730:
2721:OnTheDefense
2716:
2702:
2688:
2674:
2665:NoTriviaHere
2663:as trivia. –
2660:
2642:
2631:: No need. –
2628:
2614:
2600:
2594:
2593:
2588:introduction
2584:
2532:
2528:
2517:
2512:
2504:
2500:
2486:
2480:
2479:
2474:introduction
2470:
2423:
2381:
2367:
2360:introduction
2356:
2318:Jon Dorenbos
2302:
2298:
2286:
2268:due to their
2261:
2255:
2249:
2243:
2240:
2222:
2204:
2190:
2183:introduction
2179:
2158:WP:DIDNOTWIN
2129:}}
2123:{{
2119:}}
2116:construction
2113:{{
2109:}}
2103:{{
2100:
2096:userfication
2093:
2086:
2082:
2068:
2054:
2040:
2033:introduction
2029:
1982:
1978:
1950:
1944:
1929:
1919:Not a chance
1914:
1910:
1895:
1889:
1888:
1883:introduction
1879:
1854:
1843:
1836:
1811:
1805:
1801:
1783:
1753:
1735:
1729:
1728:
1723:introduction
1719:
1705:WP:VAGUEWAVE
1673:
1652:
1650:
1645:
1641:
1629:
1625:
1623:
1610:
1604:
1595:OracleOfNote
1590:
1576:
1570:
1569:
1564:introduction
1560:
1502:
1499:
1485:
1479:
1478:
1473:introduction
1469:
1424:
1415:
1411:
1405:
1391:
1377:
1371:
1370:
1365:introduction
1361:
1304:
1298:
1294:
1280:
1266:
1260:
1259:
1244:introduction
1240:
1212:Per majority
1198:
1193:
1190:
1171:
1156:as per User:
1153:
1139:
1133:
1132:
1127:introduction
1123:
1084:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1052:
1038:
1024:
1018:
1017:
1012:introduction
1008:
1001:WP:JUSTAVOTE
966:
964:
933:
807:
796:
442:Deletion log
391:
365:
358:
354:
350:
344:
305:
170:
121:
114:
48:
15693:Wiki markup
15583:Departments
15420:discussions
15189:Enforcement
15112:Sockpuppets
14969:Task Center
14766:Peer review
14625:Wikipedians
14345:Red herring
14102:Association
13783:Conjunction
13704:Composition
13601:Reification
13517:Existential
13469:Existential
13275:Essay guide
13159:Rouge admin
12726:Video links
12581:No big loss
12270:just madmen
12220:Don't shout
11994:How to lose
11989:Get over it
11773:Be the glue
11692:Negotiation
11549:Relist bias
11379:Removing or
11211:Stub Makers
11044:Law sources
10974:Don't panic
10333:Wholly Chao
10024:problematic
9776:frivolously
9731:Speedy Keep
9686:WP:NOTAGAIN
9679:WP:LASTTIME
9499:NewbieHater
9389:WP:OUTCOMES
9258:Main page:
9119:WP:PRESERVE
9032:WP:SUNKCOST
9004:WP:HARDWORK
8936:WP:NOTPAPER
8908:AllTruthful
8398:subheadings
8350:Jean Moufot
8242:independent
8040:local union
7886:Family Tree
7218:Lotsofviews
7196:micronation
7170:micronation
7027:significant
7018:WP:ORGDEPTH
6882:WP:ITSLOCAL
6665:significant
6528:HighRatings
6017:WP:PASSEDGA
5904:YouTube Fan
5726:standards;
5399:Subject age
5378:draft space
5254:WP:LONGTIME
5233:Article age
5213:Google News
5151:PrintIsDead
5123:MustBeAHoax
5109:FirstIsBest
5050:WP:BINGHITS
5015:Google test
4941:Know-it-all
4845:WP:ITEXISTS
4442:WP:UPTODATE
4435:WP:OUTDATED
4421:Out of date
4297:Exceptions:
4100:WP:NOEFFORT
3942:advertising
3895:MonoLingual
3788:eventualism
3784:immediatism
3666:UseImages98
3652:Bauhaus11:0
3486:WP:ITSFUNNY
3441:Deletionism
3315:WP:HARMLESS
3273:. See also
3098:WP:VALUABLE
3035:Indifferent
2972:WP:WHOCARES
2789:inclusion.
2605:SuperCritic
2571:WP:ITSCRUFT
2342:WP:NOTBUILT
2263:Hotel Mario
2165:WP:RUNNERUP
2059:Mindchanger
2045:DoNotHurtMe
1995:independent
1812:discussions
1744:Policylover
1638:notability"
1581:NotableGuru
1432:Main page:
1226:WP:MAJORITY
1174:AfD process
1142:per nom. –
1078:" or even "
1076:Speedy keep
1072:Strong keep
994:WP:NOREASON
973:Just a vote
347:interesting
49:This is an
15731:Categories
15652:Guidelines
15630:Simplified
15561:Milestones
15497:Undeletion
15470:Miscellany
15460:Categories
15203:resolution
14974:Open tasks
14630:Statistics
14321:Moralistic
14255:Sealioning
14249:Ad nauseam
14176:Ipse dixit
14088:Ad hominem
13912:Regression
13714:Ecological
13527:Four terms
13445:Masked man
13331:Guidelines
13099:No, really
13079:LTTAUTMAOK
12561:Make stubs
12282:No racists
12024:Say "MOBY"
11746:Philosophy
11619:The basics
11176:Publicists
11146:Presentism
11091:Merge Test
11076:Inaccuracy
10559:Philosophy
10329:WP:FALLACY
10212:WP:FALLACY
10196:See also:
9597:good-faith
9527:BadCreator
9436:Ad hominem
9434:See also:
9376:to do and
9370:WP:EXAMPLE
9353:WP:EXAMPLE
9349:WP:EXAMPLE
9280:WP:EXAMPLE
9264:See also:
9132:or to the
9099:TheyWorked
8972:due weight
8845:WP:NOTHING
8843:See also:
8690:(See also
8660:Mace Windu
8651:The Office
8488:See also:
8394:condensing
8086:First Lady
7974:notability
7960:First Lady
7792:See also:
7777:WP:INHERIT
7726:(See also
7706:are. Per
7662:See also:
7625:Notability
7614:FixThePast
7544:Notability
7486:Youwillsee
7436:on its own
7408:verifiable
7384:OnlySchool
7300:WP:IKNOWIT
7259:This does
7246:verifiable
7232:number of
7083:See also:
6987:Geocentric
6889:WP:FARAWAY
6861:WP:NOTNEWS
6570:DangerZone
6479:WP:TRIVCOV
6472:WP:TRIVIAL
6111:Who Cares?
6010:WP:INVOLVE
5966:canvassing
5847:WP:SUPPORT
5763:See also:
5687:Ghost Town
5659:Get-A-Life
5631:WeRemember
5583:WP:DEFUNCT
5283:See also:
5074:See also:
4852:WP:ITEXIST
4666:MurkyWater
4652:WhackAMole
4484:Scoreboard
4317:See also:
4219:WantItKept
4122:See also:
4107:WP:NEGLECT
4052:IAmANumber
3818:WP:RUBBISH
3708:WP:PROBLEM
3685:See also:
3556:notability
3472:It's funny
3423:notability
3400:verifiable
3343:WP:HARMFUL
3267:neutrality
3244:categories
3226:for that.
3224:Wikivoyage
3222:; we have
3208:Wiktionary
3206:; we have
3154:Judgmental
3007:Fascinated
2900:notability
2852:AntiFooian
2787:verifiable
2773:(see also
2579:See also:
2520:verifiable
2463:WP:ILIKEIT
2414:See also:
2274:of failure
1975:Notability
1872:WP:ASSERTN
1846:WP:ILIKEIT
1841:, below.)
1792:Anarwikist
1774:Pilingiton
1505:verifiable
1329:WP:UNENCYC
1256:WP:OUTCAST
1250:See also:
1208:position.
1206:WP:ILIKEIT
1180:(see also
878:Principles
795:Deletion (
677:candidates
640:Miscellany
564:Categories
426:Undeletion
392:(see also
384:stub types
380:categories
320:notability
15716:Templates
15664:Templates
15659:Shortcuts
15524:Elections
15465:Redirects
15450:Templates
15393:Education
15381:Whitelist
15376:Blacklist
15141:Usernames
15129:Oversight
15080:Vandalism
15070:Incidents
15030:New pages
14840:Directory
14810:Main Page
14665:Technical
14660:Proposals
14603:Goings-on
14565:Dashboard
14362:Straw man
14240:Arguments
14229:fallacies
14203:Tradition
14193:Etymology
14165:Authority
14146:Tu quoque
14130:Bulverism
13900:Gambler's
13869:Animistic
13813:Ambiguity
13779:Base rate
13522:Necessity
13394:fallacies
12809:Adminitis
12378:WikiPeace
12353:WikiCrime
12332:UPPERCASE
11712:Thank you
11344:Proseline
11136:Permastub
10701:Paradoxes
10616:Don't lie
10311:WP:BEFORE
10237:Examples:
10204:Shortcuts
10133:Shortcuts
10086:WP:PERNOM
10076:Examples:
10067:WP:ATAATA
9931:Examples:
9829:Examples:
9805:Shortcuts
9799:Blackmail
9711:Examples:
9671:Shortcuts
9659:WP:BEFORE
9642:db-banned
9591:There is
9555:POVPusher
9475:Examples:
9442:Shortcuts
9401:exception
9393:precedent
9363:Proposals
9271:Examples:
9212:Shortcuts
9123:licensing
9061:Examples:
9018:WP:EFFORT
8996:Shortcuts
8884:Examples:
8851:Shortcuts
8773:Examples:
8740:Shortcuts
8684:WP:ATTACK
8664:Star Wars
8512:Examples:
8423:Shortcuts
8402:talk page
8390:splitting
8388:Consider
8185:Examples:
8152:Shortcuts
8133:See also
8117:by itself
8113:by itself
7981:Inherited
7834:Examples:
7741:Shortcuts
7708:WP:NEXIST
7678:Examples:
7590:Examples:
7476:Examples:
7396:crocheter
7332:Examples:
7285:Shortcuts
7265:WP:NUMBER
7152:Examples:
7098:Shortcuts
7085:WP:OLDAGE
6907:Examples:
6874:Shortcuts
6830:Main Page
6727:Examples:
6673:Reception
6654:reputable
6602:FrontPage
6598:Didn'tSee
6504:Examples:
6464:Shortcuts
6309:Examples:
6276:Shortcuts
6217:Flashcard
6173:WP:PLENTY
6158:Shortcuts
6002:Shortcuts
5974:consensus
5740:Shortcuts
5575:Shortcuts
5457:WP:NEWORG
5429:WP:ITSOLD
5414:Shortcuts
5382:userspace
5239:Shortcuts
5095:GoogleBoy
5085:Examples:
5021:Shortcuts
4887:Examples:
4837:Shortcuts
4831:Existence
4816:WP:REVDEL
4750:Examples:
4682:protected
4596:Tarnished
4572:Examples:
4525:Shortcuts
4499:Change it
4460:Examples:
4427:Shortcuts
4367:Examples:
4232:potential
4138:Examples:
4092:Shortcuts
4002:Examples:
3970:Shortcuts
3907:currently
3857:Examples:
3810:Shortcuts
3796:WP:TNTTNT
3693:Shortcuts
3617:WP:PRETTY
3609:Shortcuts
3511:Examples:
3478:Shortcuts
3361:Examples:
3322:WP:NOGOOD
3308:WP:NOHARM
3300:Shortcuts
3248:redirects
3084:WP:USEFUL
3069:Shortcuts
3057:, above.
3051:I like it
3049:See also
2997:Examples:
2965:WP:APATHY
2958:WP:BORING
2936:Shortcuts
2880:OccupyBaz
2747:I like it
2651:Cruftbane
2595:Examples:
2542:Shortcuts
2434:Shortcuts
2428:I like it
2334:Shortcuts
2328:Not built
2227:WP:ANYBIO
2150:Shortcuts
2007:Shortcuts
1991:secondary
1983:existence
1890:Examples:
1816:consensus
1806:As noted
1730:Examples:
1683:Shortcuts
1634:found to
1571:Examples:
1517:Shortcuts
1480:Examples:
1440:Shortcuts
1372:Examples:
1336:WP:BELONG
1314:Shortcuts
1261:Examples:
1218:Shortcuts
1200:hiding a
1144:Trustfull
1134:Examples:
1109:WP:PERNOM
1094:Shortcuts
1080:Weak keep
1019:Examples:
979:Shortcuts
957:WP:NOTARG
607:Redirects
388:redirects
372:templates
186:Edit wars
77:Shortcuts
15711:Category
15647:Policies
15608:Glossary
15480:Proposed
15445:Articles
15418:Deletion
15298:Teahouse
15286:Category
15184:Requests
15146:Changing
15003:Category
14986:Category
14934:WikiLove
14919:Contests
14906:feedback
14786:Pictures
14744:Creation
14739:WP:AFC/C
14734:WP:AFC/R
14697:Contents
14682:Holidays
14650:Idea lab
14388:Category
14020:Ridicule
14005:Flattery
13995:Children
13892:Post hoc
13772:McNamara
13734:Accident
13709:Division
13556:Informal
13326:Policies
12476:Coatrack
12373:WikiLove
12363:WikiHate
12277:No Nazis
12250:Griefing
11514:Immunity
10766:Trifecta
10596:Cohesion
10408:See also
10157:Example:
10059:Shortcut
10043:Teahouse
9914:Shortcut
9813:WP:IQUIT
9792:survival
9749:TryAgain
9593:no shame
9337:opinions
9176:Example:
9150:Shortcut
8709:Shortcut
8452:WP:OTHER
8382:too long
8342:reliable
8299:Examples
8273:Shortcut
8237:reliable
7972:Inherent
7700:articles
7646:Shortcut
7634:WP:BLP1E
7564:Shortcut
7450:Shortcut
7238:quantity
7192:magazine
7166:magazine
7038:esoteric
7022:expected
6857:WP:EVENT
6838:Wikinews
6765:CNNfan:)
6701:Shortcut
6600:TheTimes
6514:WayToGo!
6393:Tweet Me
6055:Teamwork
5876:OutVoted
5866:Examples
5839:Shortcut
5779:Examples
5613:Liquid8R
5473:Examples
5299:Examples
5057:WP:GHITS
4724:Shortcut
4698:Shortcut
4349:WP:ORPHS
4341:Shortcut
4291:stubbing
4263:improved
4259:WP:POINT
4189:promise.
3916:deletion
3642:Examples
3579:Examples
3259:somebody
3116:Example:
2827:Examples
2801:Shortcut
2491:SuperFan
2481:Example:
2456:WP:ILIKE
2398:Shortcut
2245:The Room
2209:AllMusic
2015:WP:MERCY
1987:reliable
1864:Shortcut
1786:because
1772:, etc. –
1698:WP:JUSTA
1158:IvanIdea
949:Shortcut
463:Articles
368:articles
363:below).
15347:Mergers
15134:Request
15097:Closure
14981:Backlog
14951:Thanks!
14870:Patrols
14701:grading
14615:Meetups
14207:Novelty
14182:Poverty
14044:Loyalty
14010:Novelty
13987:Emotion
13936:Appeals
13905:Inverse
13885:Cum hoc
13874:Furtive
13392:Common
12989:Emerson
12829:ANI flu
11793:Failure
11632:Apology
11529:Nothing
10726:Purpose
10397:Nothing
9601:winners
9586:newbies
9569:blocked
9450:WP:ATTP
9158:WP:BHTT
9011:WP:LOSE
8626:causing
8380:may be
8244:sources
8107:of the
8082:defines
8042:of the
7799:Caution
7756:WP:ITSA
7749:WP:NINI
7400:notable
7242:quality
7042:obscure
6845:routine
6689:artists
6644:from a
6375:MySpace
6284:WP:UNRS
5823:notable
5518:OldFeet
5338:Catch22
5194:quality
4996:because
4786:notable
4678:blocked
4547:WP:SUSC
4414:newbies
4243:prevent
4030:linkrot
3934:harmful
3825:WP:UGLY
3493:WP:LULZ
3336:WP:HURT
3242:pages,
2809:WP:TDLI
2775:WP:NFCC
2557:WP:IDLI
2449:WP:LIKE
2406:WP:PPOV
2292:or the
2172:WP:TOP4
2126:newlist
2106:newpage
1979:asserts
1770:WP:NPOV
1617:" and "
1607:notable
1382:Cyclops
1271:Grouper
1116:WP:PERX
726:Process
659:closing
626:closing
593:working
583:closing
555:closing
527:holding
522:closing
489:closing
92:WP:AADD
53:on the
15598:Essays
15528:voting
15492:Review
15475:Speedy
14902:Awards
14815:Errors
14791:Topics
14655:Policy
14578:topics
14292:Cliché
14227:Other
14198:Nature
14186:Wealth
13821:Accent
13407:Formal
12471:Clones
12048:Don'ts
11969:Desist
11959:Candor
11868:Reader
10533:
10365:essays
10353:WP:BLP
10325:Delete
10289:Delete
10100:Delete
10041:, the
10009:, and
9991:Delete
9981:Delete
9881:Delete
9849:Delete
9745:Delete
9735:Yawner
9721:DejaVu
9652:before
9644:|
9632:|
9565:Delete
9523:Delete
9513:BadNom
9495:Delete
9420:should
9405:solely
9397:reason
9359:Essays
9314:WP:XYZ
9311:Delete
9294:Delete
9081:Delete
8824:said,
8797:Delete
8755:WP:AON
8727:WP:CFD
8582:NoFair
8578:Delete
8564:Delete
8496:, and
8431:WP:WAX
8319:Delete
8103:, and
8071:WP:GNG
8060:WP:GNG
8028:per se
8003:always
7956:Delete
7938:Delete
7844:Keeper
7704:topics
7684:Delete
7596:Delete
7552:should
7524:Delete
7352:Delete
7338:Delete
7158:Delete
7106:WP:BIG
6983:Delete
6969:Delete
6955:Delete
6832:. But
6803:Delete
6789:Delete
6594:Delete
6580:Delete
6435:verify
6315:Delete
6227:Delete
6213:Delete
6166:WP:ASZ
6107:Delete
6093:Delete
5993:, and
5958:voting
5942:Delete
5928:Delete
5785:Delete
5683:Delete
5669:Delete
5655:Delete
5641:Delete
5623:Delete
5609:Delete
5547:Delete
5530:Delete
5479:Delete
5380:or in
5334:Delete
5211:, and
5168:WP:BIO
5163:Google
5147:Delete
5133:Delete
5119:Delete
5078:, and
4897:DavidH
4820:WP:ATD
4808:WP:BLP
4804:WP:NOT
4800:WP:NOR
4770:Delete
4756:Delete
4634:Delete
4620:Delete
4606:Delete
4592:Delete
4578:Delete
4506:update
4480:Delete
4466:Delete
4407:orphan
4395:Berlin
4387:Delete
4373:Delete
4201:Delete
4186:Delete
4172:Delete
4158:Delete
4144:Delete
4044:Delete
4026:Delete
4008:Delete
3985:WP:OSO
3891:Delete
3877:Delete
3863:Delete
3662:Delete
3585:Delete
3562:, and
3531:Delete
3453:WP:NOT
3381:Delete
3246:, and
3232:tables
3200:useful
3164:Delete
3150:Delete
3031:Delete
3017:Delete
2779:trivia
2731:Delete
2717:Delete
2703:Delete
2689:Delete
2675:Delete
2661:Delete
2643:Delete
2629:Delete
2615:Delete
2601:Delete
2550:WP:IDL
2442:WP:ILI
2385:WP:GNG
2368:Delete
2260:, and
2205:Delete
2191:Delete
2121:, and
1955:CSD A7
1951:merits
1911:Delete
1896:Delete
1754:Delete
1740:WP:NOR
1738:Meets
1636:verify
1577:Delete
1532:WP:JNN
1378:Delete
1281:Delete
1194:Delete
1140:Delete
1074:" or "
1070:" to "
1064:Delete
1062:" or "
1039:Delete
967:do not
934:
735:Images
721:Policy
700:sorted
598:manual
588:speedy
482:sorted
376:images
355:delete
85:WP:ATA
15706:Media
15688:Tools
15681:Today
15637:Rules
15455:Files
15440:Today
15433:Admin
15428:Guide
15359:Moves
14803:Pages
14781:Lists
14054:Spite
13948:Stone
11722:Truce
9630:db-g5
8019:music
8015:films
8011:books
7214:views
7054:local
6685:music
6681:films
6677:books
6439:blogs
6373:This
6134:owned
5320:Keep.
5305:Keep.
4311:Merge
4272:needs
4048:ISBNs
4012:proof
3927:title
3881:Lazy1
3780:Note:
3216:Paris
2783:cruft
2781:, or
2756:which
2647:cruft
1808:above
1766:WP:OR
1762:WP:RS
1657:music
1644:, or
1640:, or
1525:WP:JN
1178:votes
987:WP:JV
731:Guide
649:today
616:today
573:today
545:today
536:Files
512:today
472:today
386:, or
51:essay
15676:Tips
15620:Help
15603:FAQs
15540:meta
15526:and
15388:Bots
15371:Spam
15170:and
15158:OTRS
15055:and
14904:and
14830:and
14749:Help
14699:and
14687:Bots
14591:News
14140:Tone
14015:Pity
14000:Fear
13398:list
12994:Fart
12939:Crap
11324:Coup
10676:Need
10337:talk
10319:talk
10307:Keep
10301:talk
10283:talk
10271:Keep
10265:talk
10257:Keep
10251:talk
10243:Keep
10174:talk
10163:Keep
10112:talk
10094:talk
10082:Keep
10013:and
9971:Keep
9961:84%!
9957:Keep
9947:Keep
9937:Keep
9889:talk
9875:talk
9863:Keep
9857:talk
9843:talk
9835:Keep
9753:talk
9739:talk
9725:talk
9717:Keep
9611:and
9577:talk
9559:talk
9551:Keep
9545:talk
9537:Keep
9531:talk
9517:talk
9509:Keep
9503:talk
9489:talk
9481:Keep
9424:this
9374:what
9322:talk
9305:talk
9288:talk
9277:Keep
9190:talk
9182:Keep
9103:talk
9095:Keep
9089:talk
9075:talk
9067:Keep
8944:talk
8934:Per
8932:Keep
8926:talk
8918:Keep
8912:talk
8904:Keep
8898:talk
8890:Keep
8809:talk
8791:talk
8779:Keep
8694:and
8678:and
8656:Yoda
8586:talk
8572:talk
8558:talk
8550:Keep
8544:talk
8536:Keep
8530:talk
8518:Keep
8327:talk
8313:talk
8305:Keep
8229:talk
8217:Keep
8211:talk
8203:many
8199:many
8195:many
8191:Keep
8137:and
8054:(or
8017:and
7964:talk
7950:talk
7942:faah
7932:talk
7924:Keep
7918:talk
7910:Keep
7904:talk
7896:Keep
7890:talk
7882:Keep
7876:talk
7868:Keep
7862:talk
7854:Keep
7848:talk
7840:Keep
7692:talk
7629:have
7618:talk
7610:Keep
7604:talk
7548:have
7532:talk
7518:talk
7510:Keep
7504:talk
7496:Keep
7490:talk
7482:Keep
7388:talk
7380:Keep
7374:talk
7366:Keep
7360:talk
7346:talk
7222:talk
7210:Keep
7204:talk
7184:Keep
7178:talk
7071:The
6991:talk
6977:talk
6963:talk
6949:talk
6941:Keep
6935:talk
6927:Keep
6921:talk
6913:Keep
6811:talk
6797:talk
6783:talk
6775:Keep
6769:talk
6761:Keep
6755:talk
6747:Keep
6741:talk
6733:Keep
6687:and
6659:and
6612:The
6606:talk
6588:talk
6574:talk
6566:Keep
6560:talk
6552:Keep
6546:talk
6538:Keep
6532:talk
6524:Keep
6518:talk
6510:Keep
6415:talk
6403:Keep
6397:talk
6389:Keep
6383:talk
6371:Keep
6365:talk
6357:Keep
6351:talk
6343:Keep
6337:talk
6329:Keep
6323:talk
6253:stub
6235:talk
6221:talk
6207:talk
6199:Keep
6115:talk
6101:talk
6087:talk
6079:Keep
6073:talk
6065:Keep
6059:talk
6051:Keep
6045:talk
6037:Keep
5950:talk
5936:talk
5922:talk
5914:Keep
5908:talk
5900:Keep
5894:talk
5886:Keep
5880:talk
5872:Keep
5815:talk
5803:Keep
5797:talk
5705:talk
5697:Keep
5691:talk
5677:talk
5663:talk
5649:talk
5635:talk
5627:Fall
5617:talk
5557:talk
5540:talk
5523:talk
5513:Keep
5506:talk
5496:Keep
5489:talk
5342:talk
5328:talk
5313:talk
5155:talk
5141:talk
5127:talk
5113:talk
5105:Keep
5099:talk
5091:Keep
4989:WP:N
4981:WP:V
4973:talk
4965:Keep
4959:talk
4951:Keep
4945:talk
4937:Keep
4930:talk
4922:Keep
4916:talk
4908:Keep
4901:talk
4893:Keep
4880:and
4812:WP:R
4796:WP:V
4791:both
4778:talk
4764:talk
4670:talk
4662:Keep
4656:talk
4648:Keep
4642:talk
4628:talk
4614:talk
4600:talk
4586:talk
4488:talk
4474:talk
4399:talk
4381:talk
4223:talk
4215:Keep
4209:talk
4195:talk
4180:talk
4166:talk
4152:talk
4056:talk
4038:talk
4020:talk
3899:talk
3885:talk
3871:talk
3786:and
3670:talk
3656:talk
3648:Keep
3539:talk
3525:talk
3517:Keep
3439:and
3389:talk
3375:talk
3367:Keep
3277:and
3269:and
3212:that
3210:for
3172:talk
3158:talk
3144:talk
3136:Keep
3130:talk
3122:Keep
3053:and
3039:talk
3025:talk
3011:talk
3003:Keep
2884:talk
2876:Keep
2870:talk
2862:Keep
2856:talk
2848:Keep
2842:talk
2834:Keep
2766:.)
2739:talk
2725:talk
2711:talk
2697:talk
2683:talk
2669:talk
2655:talk
2637:talk
2623:talk
2609:talk
2495:talk
2487:Keep
2418:and
2376:talk
2320:and
2235:talk
2223:Keep
2217:talk
2199:talk
2077:talk
2069:Keep
2063:talk
2055:Keep
2049:talk
2041:Keep
1961:and
1938:talk
1930:Keep
1923:talk
1915:that
1904:talk
1796:talk
1784:Keep
1778:talk
1758:WP:V
1756:per
1748:talk
1736:Keep
1665:WP:N
1630:"No
1599:talk
1591:Keep
1585:talk
1494:talk
1486:Keep
1400:talk
1392:Keep
1386:talk
1289:talk
1275:talk
1267:Keep
1254:and
1166:talk
1154:Keep
1148:talk
1068:Keep
1060:Keep
1047:talk
1033:talk
1025:Keep
707:BLPs
351:keep
338:and
15485:BLP
14675:WMF
13459:In
13415:In
11912:Dos
10535:(?)
10295:. –
10277:. –
10088:. —
9869:? —
9638:or
9382:how
9378:why
8952:not
8785:. –
8658:or
8595:may
8223:? –
8105:A11
8078:not
8062:.
7988:."
7811:or
7804:not
7261:not
7186:An
7160:An
7068:.)
7016:or
6859:or
6141:DYK
5368:.
5221:web
5183:may
5178:.
4806:or
3914:not
3766:yet
3185:and
3181:why
2760:why
2649:. –
2645:as
2324:).
1985:of
1963:A11
1945:An
1917:. –
1848:or
1659:or
1621:".
1611:why
1422:".
1204:or
1162:Sup
799:fD)
695:all
654:all
631:log
621:all
578:all
550:all
517:all
494:log
477:all
353:or
122:not
15733::
14323:/
14205:/
14184:/
14032:/
13950:/
13781:/
13644:/
13640:/
13619:/
10123:.
10102:.
10049:.
10026:,
10005:,
9771:.
9765:if
9622:,
9416:is
9412:do
9140:.
8698:.)
8605:,
8492:,
8219::
8201:,
8197:,
8101:A9
8099:,
8097:A7
8088:.
8023:do
8021:,
8013:,
8009:,
7823:.
7722:.
7248:,
7010:do
6683:,
6679:,
6648:.
6145:GA
6129:.
5989:,
5968:.
5395:.
5391:.
5207:,
5200:.
5002:.
4822:.
4802:,
4798:,
4515:.
4254:.
4238:.
4066:.
3944:,
3940:,
3918:.
3774:no
3558:,
3466:.
3443:.
3421:,
3408:is
3281:.
2922:.
2910:,
2906:,
2902:,
2829::
2509::
2254:,
2248:,
2135:,
2111:,
1989:,
1959:A9
1957:,
1768:,
1764:,
1760:,
1653:is
382:,
378:,
374:,
370:,
334:,
330:,
326:,
322:,
15542:)
15538:(
14568:.
14560:.
14537:e
14530:t
14523:v
14422:e
14415:t
14408:v
13400:)
13396:(
13385:e
13378:t
13371:v
10523:e
10516:t
10509:v
10335:(
10331:.
10317:(
10299:(
10281:(
10263:(
10249:(
10172:(
10110:(
10092:(
9887:(
9873:(
9855:(
9841:(
9751:(
9737:(
9723:(
9575:(
9557:(
9543:(
9529:(
9515:(
9501:(
9487:(
9320:(
9303:(
9286:(
9188:(
9101:(
9087:(
9073:(
9048:.
8942:(
8924:(
8910:(
8896:(
8807:(
8789:(
8584:(
8570:(
8556:(
8542:(
8528:(
8522:x
8485:.
8417:?
8415:x
8404:.
8386:.
8325:(
8311:(
8227:(
8209:(
8141:.
7962:(
7948:(
7930:(
7916:(
7902:(
7888:(
7874:(
7860:(
7846:(
7690:(
7616:(
7602:(
7530:(
7516:(
7502:(
7488:(
7386:(
7372:(
7358:(
7344:(
7234:Y
7230:X
7220:(
7202:(
7176:(
7093:.
6989:(
6975:(
6961:(
6947:(
6933:(
6919:(
6809:(
6795:(
6781:(
6767:(
6753:(
6739:(
6604:(
6586:(
6572:(
6558:(
6544:(
6530:(
6516:(
6413:(
6395:(
6381:(
6363:(
6349:(
6335:(
6321:(
6233:(
6219:(
6205:(
6113:(
6099:(
6085:(
6071:(
6057:(
6043:(
5997:.
5948:(
5934:(
5920:(
5906:(
5892:(
5878:(
5813:(
5795:(
5703:(
5689:(
5675:(
5661:(
5647:(
5633:(
5615:(
5555:(
5538:(
5521:(
5504:(
5487:(
5340:(
5326:(
5311:(
5280:.
5153:(
5139:(
5125:(
5111:(
5097:(
4971:(
4957:(
4943:(
4928:(
4914:(
4899:(
4776:(
4762:(
4668:(
4654:(
4640:(
4626:(
4612:(
4598:(
4584:(
4486:(
4472:(
4397:(
4379:(
4221:(
4207:(
4193:(
4178:(
4164:(
4150:(
4054:(
4036:(
4018:(
3897:(
3883:(
3869:(
3668:(
3654:(
3537:(
3523:(
3417:(
3387:(
3373:(
3295:.
3170:(
3156:(
3142:(
3128:(
3037:(
3023:(
3009:(
2882:(
2868:(
2854:(
2840:(
2737:(
2723:(
2709:(
2695:(
2681:(
2667:(
2653:(
2635:(
2621:(
2607:(
2493:(
2374:(
2233:(
2229:-
2215:(
2197:(
2075:(
2061:(
2047:(
1936:(
1921:(
1902:(
1794:(
1790:–
1776:(
1746:(
1742:–
1597:(
1583:(
1492:(
1398:(
1384:(
1359:.
1287:(
1273:(
1192:"
1164:(
1146:(
1058:"
1045:(
1041:–
1031:(
1027:–
923:e
916:t
909:v
797:X
771:e
764:t
757:v
737:)
733:(
702:)
698:(
484:)
480:(
396:)
295:e
288:t
281:v
57:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.