34:
232:
For example, if the new article contains just one line: "John Doe is a fitness trainer", the initial view might be that there is no claim of significance. But if the sources in the same article discuss the subject, chances are, more coverage may exist; and in this case too, the A7, A9 and A11 tags
228:
If there is no evident claim of significance in the article, check the references provided within the article (which is the second way that is listed in the section above). If the references within the article discuss the subject or provide a possible claim of significance, then the A7, A9 and A11
328:, since it is very likely to be true, and since the song "Popular Song" would likely be covered in multiple reliable sources. While this page might make a credible claim of significance, it is possible that Alice might still not be any more notable for Knowledge's
200:
The existence of such a statement of noteworthiness/importance/significance within the article would generally ensure that the A7, A9 and A11 tags cannot be applied. Such a claim of noteworthiness need not be supported by any reference; the fact that such a claim
268:
assuming that the claim were indeed true, could this (or something that "this" might plausibly imply) cause the subject (possibly with other plausible information added) to be notable? Or, does it give plausible indications that research might well discover
373:
A claim of significance need not be self-evidently true, but should not be blatantly false. A blatant hoax, or a claim so improbable that no one of sound mind would believe it, is not a plausible claim of significance — use the {{db-hoax}} template to tag
404:
You may find an article that contains a credible claim of significance, but which you think doesn't belong in
Knowledge. In such cases, do not send the article through the CSD process for these criteria. Instead, consider these options:
140:
if they don't make a "credible claim of significance or importance" (among other requirements specific to each criterion). Wikipedians have often struggled with this aspect of these criteria, and may ask, what does it mean?
441:
391:, such associations can still be considered significant if they meet point #6 above. Also, articles on non-notable subjects that are closely related to a subject that is notable can often still be
171:
384:
Any statement which plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline or in specialized sources) has a chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance.
176:
When assessing an article for such a claim (the first way described above), you should search for a statement within the article that attributes noteworthiness to the subject.
223:
152:
secondary sources may itself be an indication of significance, not including any sources is entirely irrelevant to an assessment under these speedy deletion criteria.
466:
451:
472:
19:
193:
42:
517:
155:
446:
212:
and not John Doe who is the
President of the country of Wiki-Zeland), the article may be tagged for speedy deletion as a hoax (
46:
512:
117:
is a statement in the article that attributes noteworthiness, or information written about the subject in reliable sources.
456:
461:
233:
should generally not be applied (except when it's clear that this is the only coverage that this subject will ever get).
424:
352:
A claim of significance need not be supported by any cited sources, much less by inline citations to reliable sources.
18:"WP:Significance" and "WP:SIGNIF" redirect here. For the now-historical Significance guideline in use until 2006, see
54:
358:
Therefore, a claim of significance need not pass any of the general or specialized notability guidelines, such as
417:
53:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
58:
377:
Any statement which, if reliably sourced, would be likely to persuade some of the commentators at a typical
288:
would most certainly have coverage in multiple reliable sources. However, this claim of course fails part
410:
208:
At the same time, if the claim is evidently false (for example, if initial research confirms that it is
428:
522:
355:
A claim of significance need not amount to a statement that, if sourced, would establish notability.
527:
90:
388:
306:, since it's very-well plausible for this claim to be true. However, it would not pass part
160:
A credible claim of significance can be assessed in an article with two different methods:
23:
97:
8:
344:
The following list below contains important points to keep in mind about the meaning of
76:
83:
68:
110:
Explanatory essay about the several sections of
Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
253:. A good mental test is to consider each part discretely when evaluating an article:
145:
442:
Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as importance or significance not asserted
363:
133:
129:
125:
486:
485:
Remember, even though A7, A9, and A11 are off-limits, editors can still opt to
217:
506:
494:
490:
392:
378:
367:
359:
333:
329:
300:"Jane Doe graduated from their High School as the top student of their class"
149:
137:
121:
399:
339:
213:
292:
of the two-part test, since it is absolutely not plausible to be true.
493:
if they believe that the article, despite its claim, is not broadly
284:
of the two-part test, since a person that's officially named as the
236:
164:
a statement in the article that attributes noteworthiness, or
310:, since the claim is highly unlikely to lead to notability.
435:
318:"Alice is an artist that composed the song 'Popular Song'"
189:"The John Doe recording debuted at #5 on Billboard charts"
167:
information written about the subject in reliable sources.
469:– a list of common indicators for significance/importance
183:"John Doe is the President of the country of Wiki-Zeland"
179:
For example, look for sentences that say things such as:
260:
is the claim being made reasonably plausible to be true?
205:
deems that the A7, A9 and A11 tags cannot be applied.
467:
Knowledge:Common claims of significance or importance
186:"John Doe was the first cricketer to bat left-handed"
22:. For Knowledge's current notability guideline, see
504:
452:Knowledge:Field guide to proper speedy deletion
381:to keep the article is a claim of significance.
192:"The invention of the Wiki-transporter won the
172:A claim is asserted in the article (method one)
473:User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7
156:Identifying a credible claim of significance
20:Knowledge:Notability/Historical/Significance
194:National Medal of Technology and Innovation
280:. This claim would certainly satisfy part
224:Research of reliable sources (method two)
245:is a two-part test: The claim has to be
302:. This claim would of course pass part
505:
447:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
144:Significance is a lower standard than
47:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
320:. This claim likely passes both part
457:Knowledge:Over-hasty Speedy Deleters
389:notability generally isn't inherited
28:
462:Knowledge:Knowledge is not censored
416:nominating it for deletion via the
409:nominating it for deletion via the
13:
216:), or alternatively have deletion
59:thoroughly vetted by the community
55:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
539:
379:articles for deletion discussion
136:state that certain pages can be
32:
518:Knowledge essays about deletion
332:, and thus still be deleted at
479:
368:biography notability guideline
286:actual King of the planet Mars
278:"John Doe is the King of Mars"
243:credible claim of significance
115:credible claim of significance
45:about the several sections of
1:
489:for articles or take them to
513:Knowledge supplemental pages
497:and should still be deleted.
360:general notability guideline
229:tags should not be applied.
7:
10:
544:
66:
17:
148:. While the inclusion of
425:alternatives to deletion
423:implementing any of the
249:, and it also has to be
203:exists and has been made
418:articles for deletion
334:articles for deletion
330:notability guidelines
393:merged or redirected
24:Knowledge:Notability
395:instead of deleted.
57:as it has not been
429:proposing a merger
427:methods, such as
411:proposed deletion
400:What happens next
340:Pitfalls to avoid
108:
107:
43:explanatory essay
535:
523:Knowledge essays
498:
487:propose deletion
483:
364:music notability
138:speedily deleted
100:
93:
86:
79:
36:
35:
29:
543:
542:
538:
537:
536:
534:
533:
532:
528:Speedy deletion
503:
502:
501:
484:
480:
438:
402:
342:
239:
226:
174:
158:
122:speedy deletion
111:
104:
103:
96:
91:WP:SIGNIFICANCE
89:
82:
75:
71:
63:
62:
33:
27:
12:
11:
5:
541:
531:
530:
525:
520:
515:
500:
499:
477:
476:
475:
470:
464:
459:
454:
449:
444:
437:
434:
433:
432:
421:
414:
401:
398:
397:
396:
385:
382:
375:
371:
356:
353:
348:on Knowledge:
341:
338:
271:
270:
262:
261:
238:
235:
225:
222:
198:
197:
190:
187:
184:
173:
170:
169:
168:
165:
157:
154:
109:
106:
105:
102:
101:
94:
87:
80:
72:
67:
64:
52:
51:
39:
37:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
540:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
510:
508:
496:
492:
488:
482:
478:
474:
471:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
439:
430:
426:
422:
419:
415:
412:
408:
407:
406:
394:
390:
386:
383:
380:
376:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
351:
350:
349:
347:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
267:
264:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
252:
248:
244:
237:Two-part test
234:
230:
221:
219:
215:
211:
206:
204:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
181:
180:
177:
166:
163:
162:
161:
153:
151:
147:
142:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
116:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
73:
70:
65:
60:
56:
49:
48:
44:
38:
31:
30:
25:
21:
16:
481:
403:
346:significance
345:
343:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
265:
257:
250:
246:
242:
240:
231:
227:
209:
207:
202:
199:
178:
175:
159:
143:
120:Knowledge's
119:
114:
112:
40:
15:
420:process, or
269:notability?
251:significant
41:This is an
507:Categories
146:notability
387:Although
324:and part
241:The term
124:criteria
98:WP:SIGNIF
69:Shortcuts
436:See also
413:process,
247:credible
218:proposed
210:Jane Doe
150:reliable
495:notable
314:Example
296:Example
274:Example
77:WP:CCOS
374:those.
214:CSD G3
84:WP:CCS
366:, or
132:and
491:AFD
134:A11
509::
362:,
336:.
316::
298::
276::
266:B.
258:A.
220:.
196:".
130:A9
128:,
126:A7
113:A
50:.
431:.
370:.
326:B
322:A
308:B
304:A
290:A
282:B
61:.
26:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.