Knowledge

:Contentious topics/Comparison with discretionary sanctions - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

36: 58: 1473:("ARCA")) are used for the fair, well-informed, and timely resolution of individual and page restrictions. Editors participating in enforcement cases must disclose fully their involvement with parties (if any). While good-faith statements are welcome, editors are expected to discuss only evidence and procedure; they are not expected to trade insults or engage in character assassination. 128: 1494:
Contentious topics may be designated either as part of the final decision of an arbitration case or by Arbitration Committee motion. When it becomes apparent that a particular contentious topic designation is no longer necessary, the Committee may rescind it. Any editor may request that the Committee
1375:
When no actual violation occurred, or the consensus of uninvolved administrators is that exceptional circumstances are present, which would make the imposition of a sanction inappropriate, administrators may also close a report with no action; if appropriate, they may also warn or advise the editor
1661:
If an enforcing administrator clearly intends to impose a contentious topic restrictions but forgets to label their action, other administrators may label the action (such as through a dummy edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the administrator. When this happens, the original
222:
topics that have attracted more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. Not all topics that are controversial have been designated as contentious topics – this procedure applies only to those topics
1507:
Any restrictions imposed under the prior discretionary sanctions procedure to date remain in force. Any changes to or appeals regarding previously-imposed restrictions will be governed by the current contentious topics procedure, subject to the following transitional rules:
1379:
Administrators wishing to dismiss an enforcement request should act cautiously and be especially mindful that their actions do not give the impression that they are second-guessing the Arbitration Committee or obstructing the enforcement of their decisions.
151:. Contentious topics and discretionary sanctions have a lot in common, but there are some noteworthy changes. If you've previously interacted with the discretionary sanctions system and you're looking for a primer on the changes, you're in the right place. 1485:
are as unacceptable in enforcement discussions as elsewhere on Knowledge. Uninvolved administrators are asked to ensure that enforcement cases are not disrupted, and may remove statements or restrict or block editors to address inappropriate conduct.
136:
Contentious topics are specially-designated topics that have attracted more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project. This system replaced the former discretionary sanctions system, and there are several differences between the
1643:" is in effect, an edit that is challenged by reversion may not be reinstated by the editor who originally made it until the editor (a) posts a talk page message discussing the edit and (b) waits 24 hours from the time of the talk page message. 557:
Administrators should clearly and unambiguously label their actions as contentious topic restrictions (such as in the block summary, page protection summary, edit summary, or talk page message announcing the action, whichever is appropriate).
1180:
Former administrators – that is, editors who have temporarily or permanently relinquished the tools or have been desysopped – may neither act as administrators in arbitration enforcement nor reverse their own previous administrative actions.
533:
If an uninvolved administrator (including the original enforcing administrator) decides that a page restriction is still necessary after one year, the administrator may renew the restriction by re-imposing it under this procedure and
642:
Restrictions imposed by a single administrator become regular admin actions (and may be modified or revoked as such) after one year. This is intended to make it easier to review old restrictions (such as old page restrictions).
304:(special rules on how particular pages can be edited). Some of these abilities may be exercised by a single administrator, while others require a consensus of administrators. All editor and page restrictions may be appealed. 1499:("ARCA"). Unless the Committee specifies otherwise, after rescinding a designation, all restrictions previously-issued under that designation remain in force and continue to be governed by the contentious topics procedure. 1173:
Administrators who fail to meet these expectations may be subject to any remedy the committee considers appropriate, including desysopping. Administrative actions may be peer-reviewed using the regular appeal processes.
1720:
Edits made before an editor was aware of a contentious topic designation may still be considered as part of a pattern of behavior in future enforcement processes if those processes primarily concern post-awareness
1318: 1326: 1275:
requests or appeals pursuant to community-imposed remedies which match the contentious topics procedure, if those requests or appeals are assigned to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard by the community.
1616:
This procedure applies to edits and pages in all namespaces. When considering whether edits fall within the scope of a contentious topic, administrators should be guided by the principles outlined in the
789:
Any administrator who revokes or changes a contentious topic restriction out of process (i.e. without the above conditions being met) may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.
1652:
Other administrators may log the contentious topic restriction on behalf of the original administrator. When this happens, the original administrator is still considered the "enforcing administrator".
1110:
Administrators should seek to create an acceptable collaborative editing environment within contentious topics. Administrators are expected to use their experience and judgment to balance the need to
349:
in a contentious topic. Page restrictions prohibit all editors on a particular page from making edits described in the restriction and may be imposed to minimize disruption in a contentious topic.
972:
Any administrator, if the administrator who first imposed the contentious topic restriction (the "enforcing administrator") affirmatively consents to the change, or is no longer an administrator;
500:
An administrator who imposes an editor restriction must provide a notice on the restricted editor's talk page specifying the reason for the restriction and informing the restricted editor of the
1043:
If the enforcing administrator believes that an editor was not aware that they were editing a designated contentious topic when making inappropriate edits, no editor restrictions (other than a
1693:
This criterion does not apply if the original action was imposed as a result of rough consensus at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, as there would be no single enforcing administrator.
1512:
Previously-enacted single-admin page restrictions are now subject to renewal, modification, and revocation in the same way as ordinary administrator actions after one year in accordance with
1130:
to a minimum. Before imposing a contentious topic restriction, administrators must consider whether a regular administrative action would be sufficient to reduce disruption to the project.
554:
by the administrator who takes the action. Administrators who renew, change, or revoke a contentious topic restriction must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.
1336: 227:). When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge's norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Knowledge administrators have additional authority to reduce disruption to the project. 1093: 1383:
Dismissed requests may not be reopened. However, any interested users may, after discussion with the administrator in question, appeal the dismissal to the Arbitration Committee at "
1269: 752:
The administrator who originally imposed the contentious topic restriction (the "enforcing administrator") affirmatively consents to the change, or is no longer an administrator; or
601: 522: 1315:
Requests and appeals at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may not be closed with a "rough consensus" or "clear consensus" outcome without at least 24 hours of discussion.
1587:. As part of the Committee's decision, the arbitration clerks were given additional authority to update and maintain those templates and guidance pages and would love to help. 1411:
Requests and appeals at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may not be closed with a "rough consensus" or "clear consensus" outcome without at least 24 hours of discussion.
1343:
A consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may refer an arbitration enforcement request to the Arbitration Committee for final decision through a
1177:
Before imposing a delegated enforcement action, administrators must consider whether a regular administrative action would be sufficient to reduce disruption to the project.
466:. Warnings that are logged in the arbitration enforcement log may be appealed like other editor restrictions. An editor may be warned even if the editor was not previously 740:
A rough consensus of administrators at AE or editors at AN may specify a period of up to one year during which no appeals (other than an appeal to ARCA) may be submitted.
1421:
A consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may refer an arbitration enforcement request to the Arbitration Committee for final decision at
1358: 743: 345:
Editor restrictions prohibit a specific editor from making edits described in the restriction and may be imposed on editors who do not follow the expectations listed in
999: 161: 1711:
Editors should exercise caution before re-alerting an editor to the same contentious topic as a previous alert, as there is a presumption that an editor remains aware.
1384: 313:
The lead section is new. It is intended to highlight the key features of the contentious topics system and describe the expectations for editors in contentious topics.
375:("AE") may impose any restriction from the standard set and any other reasonable measures that are necessary and proportionate for the smooth running of the project. 317: 622:
Single administrators may only impose restrictions from the standard set; a rough consensus of administrators may additionally impose any other reasonable measures.
1279:
For all other matters, including content disagreements or the enforcement of other community-imposed sanctions, editors should use the other fora described in the
1478: 1368: 669: 594: 515: 1630:
On pages where "consensus required" is in effect, an edit that is challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page.
1026:
template. Only the officially designated templates should be used for an editor's first contentious topic alert, and these templates may not be placed using a
1047:) should be imposed. Once alerted to a specific contentious topic, editors are presumed to remain aware but may attempt to refute this presumption on appeal. 492:
Additionally, sitewide blocks become ordinary administrator actions one year after imposition, whether or not imposed by a consensus of administrators at AE.
1298: 1244:
requests for administrative action against editors violating a remedy (not merely a principle) or an injunction in an Arbitration Committee decision, or a
748:
An administrator may only modify or revoke a contentious topic restriction if a formal appeal is successful or if one of the following exceptions applies:
445:
other restrictions that have been specifically designated by the Arbitration Committee for use by a single administrator in a particular contentious topic.
415:
other restrictions that have been specifically designated by the Arbitration Committee for use by a single administrator in a particular contentious topic.
1219: 334:
Administrators are authorized to impose contentious topic restrictions in contentious topic areas. Those contentious topic restrictions take the form of
1194: 679: 1387:". Petitioners who forum shop by resubmitting denied enforcement requests without good reason may find themselves cautioned or sanctioned in return. 1016:
When an editor first begins making edits within any contentious topic, anyone may alert the editor of the contentious topic designation using the
485:, if applicable), contentious topic restrictions which were imposed by a single administrator may be amended or revoked without going through the 1123: 383:
The following editor restrictions constitute the standard set of editor restrictions which may be imposed by a single uninvolved administrator:
1439: 1030:
without the prior approval of the Arbitration Committee. When alerting an editor who has previously received any contentious topic alert, the
889: 707:
ask the administrator who first made the contentious topic restrictions (the "enforcing administrator") to reconsider their original decision;
419:
The following page restrictions constitute the standard set of page restrictions which may be imposed by a single uninvolved administrator:
1256: 1245: 885:
A rough consensus of editors at AN or administrators at AE may specify a period up to a year where no appeals are allowed except to ARCA.
854:
As detailed above, single-admin imposed restrictions can be modified or removed a year after they were imposed (or if relevant renewed).
1671:
An uninvolved administrator who enforces a restriction by reversion is performing an administrative action and does not thereby become
1482: 1115: 981:
A majority of the Arbitration Committee voting on a motion in response to a request for amendment filed with the Arbitration Committee.
1566:
Any DS restrictions are governed under the CT procedure for appeals and amendments. However, the following transitional rules apply:
267: 1350: 1308: 1229: 193: 1401:
The community may now decide to authorize AE to hear enforcement requests and appeals for community-authorized general sanctions.
1020: 734: 528: 1059:
When alerting an editor who has never received a contentious topic or discretionary sanction alert for any topic, you must use
767:
A formal appeal is successful only if one of the following agrees with revoking or changing the contentious topic restriction:
561: 1640: 439: 871:
the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
838:
the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
815:
the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
646:
Page restrictions may be renewed by an administrator (even the one who imposed originally), which resets the one-year timer.
935:
Any other restrictions designated by the Arbitration Committee for use by a single admin in a particular contentious topic.
825: 397: 190:
The following section contains section-by-section analysis of changes from the pre-2022 discretionary sanctions procedure.
700:) may be appealed. Only the restricted editor may appeal an editor restriction. Any editor may appeal a page restriction. 473: 566:
Editors must comply with contentious topic restrictions. Editors who disagree with a contentious topic restriction may
1782: 1327:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Referrals from Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard to the full Committee
260: 224: 1583:
If a procedural page, template, or guidance document is unclear, please reach out to the arbitration clerk team at
1138: 1056:
Editors no longer need to be alerted every 12 months, as they are presumed to remain aware after their first alert.
403: 23: 1266:
requests for page restrictions (e.g. revert restrictions) on pages that are being disrupted in contentious topics,
1152: 429: 409: 1531:, become subject to modification and revocation in the same way as ordinary administrator actions after one year. 41: 1730:
An editor who has not received an alert may also be presumed to be aware of a contentious topic if the editor:
1569:
Single-admin DS page restrictions can be renewed, modified and removed in the same way and can also be renewed.
538:
the renewal. The administrator renewing a page restriction then becomes the enforcing administrator. This does
495: 576:
Editors who breach an editor or page restriction may be blocked or subjected to further editor restrictions.
1618: 1474: 632:
Warnings may now be imposed even if the editor was not previously aware of the contentious topic designation.
393: 1280: 1260: 1127: 17: 1684:
The administrator may indicate consent at any time before, during, or after imposition of the restriction.
1290: 1604: 1111: 955:
Indefinite; reversible by any uninvolved administrator after one year. However, page restrictions may be
945:
Any other reasonable measures that are necessary and proportionate for the smooth running of the project.
478:
Contentious topic restrictions may be imposed for any fixed length of time, or for an indefinite period.
423: 353: 281: 1767:
Ever participated in any process relating to the contentious topic (such as a request or appeal at the
1027: 726: 1603:
The community has its own version of a contentious topics system. These are most often referred to as
1578: 1572:
Single-admin DS editor restrictions do not become subject to modification and revocation after a year.
1133:
While contentious topic restrictions give administrators necessary latitude, administrators must not:
793: 387: 1211: 1040:
template may be used, but any message that conveys the contentious topic designation is acceptable.
675:
or one of the topic specific editnotices must be used to detail that a restriction has been applied.
1249: 798: 378: 1607:(GS), but are sometimes referred to as community sanctions or community discretionary sanctions. 1119: 253: 154:
If you aren't already familiar with discretionary sanctions, it may be more useful to read the
874:
the action was not reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption when first imposed, or
818:
the action was not reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption when first imposed, or
978:
A clear consensus of uninvolved administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard; or
579:
However, breaches of a page restriction may result in a block or editor restriction only if:
570:, but the restriction remains in effect until it is revoked or modified by an administrator. 542:
apply to page restrictions imposed by consensus at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
1063: 841:
the action represents an unreasonable exercise of administrative enforcement discretion, or
508: 1283:. To appeal decisions made directly by the Arbitration Committee, editors should submit a 755:
The contentious topic restriction was imposed (or last renewed) more than a year ago and:
292:
if you are unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations.
110: 103: 8: 507:
An administrator who imposes a page restriction (other than page protection) must add an
96: 1672: 545: 183: 88: 1758: 1083: 703:
The appeal process has three possible stages. An editor appealing a restriction may:
400:(from the entire contentious topic, a subtopic, or specified pages within the topic), 1118:
and to allow responsible contributors maximum editing freedom with the need to keep
1489: 1502: 551: 463: 148: 80: 72: 68: 1702:
Unless the restriction is a block, in which case the maximum length is one year.
210:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
1584: 1496: 1470: 1422: 1344: 1284: 1073: 1034: 831: 722: 155: 144: 76: 1359:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Dismissing an enforcement request
371:
of contentious topic restrictions. A rough consensus of administrators at the
995:
This summarizes the available restrictions, duration, and appeals provisions.
877:
the action is no longer reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption.
821:
the action is no longer reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption.
811:("AN") should revoke or modify a contentious topic restriction on appeal if: 1772: 1768: 1466: 1462: 1456: 1361:. It applies to all enforcement decisions, including in contentious topics. 1329:. It applies to all enforcement decisions, including in contentious topics. 1301:. It applies to all enforcement decisions, including in contentious topics. 1237: 1222:. It applies to all enforcement decisions, including in contentious topics. 975:
A clear consensus of uninvolved editors at the administrators’ noticeboard;
808: 804: 715: 711: 619:
There is now a "standard set" of editor restrictions and page restrictions.
525:), and should generally add a notice to the talk page of restricted pages. 372: 1791:
Has otherwise made edits indicating an awareness of the contentious topic.
834:("ARCA") will generally overturn a contentious topic restriction only if: 785:
a majority of the Arbitration Committee, acting through a motion at ARCA.
170:
Changing the name from "discretionary sanctions" to "contentious topics";
1416:
Referrals from Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard to the full Committee
1319:
Referrals from Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard to the full Committee
449: 166:
Some of the significant changes made by the Committee in 2022 include:
1089:, or any message that the contentious topic designation is in effect. 454:
Administrators may warn editors for conduct that falls short of the
296:
Within contentious topics, administrators have the ability to set
1299:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Noticeboard outcomes
573:
Edits that breach an editor or page restriction may be reverted.
1662:
administrator is still considered the "enforcing administrator".
162:
Q: What has changed from the discretionary sanctions procedure?
1220:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Noticeboard scope
725:("ARCA"). If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by 176:
Reducing the formalities associated with awareness and alerts;
1788:
template for the contentious topic on their own talk page; or
1169:
restrictions or issue a grossly disproportionate restriction.
844:
compelling circumstances warrant the full Committee's action.
489:
process in the same way as an ordinary administrator action.
733:
Appeals submitted at AE or AN must be submitted using the
367:
Single administrators may only impose restrictions in the
158:. This page assumes some familiarity with the old system. 758:
the restriction was imposed by a single administrator, or
173:
Making it easier to change and modify older restrictions;
1733:
Was mentioned by name in the applicable Final Decision;
1523:
Previously-enacted single-admin editor restrictions do
1495:
review a contentious topic designation by submitting a
550:
Contentious topic restrictions must be recorded in the
1255:
requests for an individual enforcement action against
857:
The standard for accepting an appeal at AE/AN is now
458:
in a contentious topic. Administrators may choose to
179:
Clarifying the standards associated with appeals; and
1590: 1376:
being reported, in order to avoid further breaches.
1103:"Administrators' role and expectations" section text 882:
As described above, logged warnings can be appealed.
744:
Changing or revoking a contentious topic restriction
651:
Restrictions imposed by a consensus of admins at AE
584: 470:
that their editing occurred in a contentious topic.
467: 300:(restrictions on editing by particular editors) and 1166: 356:; this contentious topics procedure applies to all 352:Unless otherwise specified, contentious topics are 942:Any action available to single administrators; and 587:that they were editing in a contentious topic, and 1517: 956: 511:to restricted pages using the standard template ( 482: 248:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: 346: 1754:Ever received a discretionary sanctions alert ( 1270:appeals against arbitration enforcement actions 481:However, one year after being imposed (or last 143:The Arbitration Committee recently adopted the 1272:(including contentious topic restrictions), or 1145: 1009:"Awareness of contentious topics" section text 670:contentious topics/page restriction editnotice 595:Contentious topics/page restriction editnotice 516:Contentious topics/page restriction editnotice 1775:, or an Arbitration Committee process page ); 1528: 1513: 775:consensus of uninvolved administrators at AE, 590:The restricted page displayed an editnotice ( 327:"Contentious topic restrictions" section text 655:become regular admin actions after one year. 567: 501: 486: 79:, but in the event of a conflict, only the 184:guidance page for enforcing administrators 277:in force within the area of conflict; and 240:Within contentious topics, you must edit 223:designated by the Arbitration Committee ( 1751:another editor to the contentious topic; 1737: 1556:This section is substantially unchanged. 1546:This section is substantially unchanged. 1469:("AN"), and the Arbitration Committee's 1435:This section is substantially unchanged. 1190:This section is substantially unchanged. 918:Rough consensus of administrators at AE 761:the restriction was an indefinite block. 696:All contentious topic restrictions (and 665:If a page has active page restrictions, 297: 932:of individual or page restrictions; and 360:broadly related to a topic, as well as 268:editorial and behavioural best practice 67:summarises differences between the old 14: 1285:request for clarification or amendment 1259:editors who engage in misconduct in a 1204:"Arbitration enforcement" section text 1028:bot or other form of automated editing 782:consensus of uninvolved editors at AN, 301: 274: 1094:Administrators' role and expectations 807:("AE") and uninvolved editors at the 689:"Appeals and amendments" section text 435:the "consensus required" restriction, 182:Documentation changes, such as a new 156:contentious topics procedure directly 1162:restriction or page restrictions; or 122: 52: 1769:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 1463:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 1238:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 868:An appeal should be accepted when: 830:Arbitrators hearing an appeal at a 805:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 712:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 373:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 30: 604:) specifying the page restriction. 31: 1806: 1449:"General provisions" section text 1430:Dismissing an enforcement request 1357:This section is transcluded from 1351:Dismissing an enforcement request 1325:This section is transcluded from 1297:This section is transcluded from 1218:This section is transcluded from 929: 899:"Procedural summary" section text 803:Uninvolved administrators at the 455: 368: 75:. This page is maintained by the 69:discretionary sanctions procedure 219: 149:former "discretionary sanctions" 126: 56: 34: 1724: 1714: 1705: 1696: 1165:repeatedly issue significantly 1000:Awareness of contentious topics 863:clear and substantial consensus 826:On Arbitration Committee review 602:derived topic-specific template 523:derived topic-specific template 364:that are related to the topic. 1748: 1687: 1678: 1665: 1655: 1646: 1633: 1624: 1610: 1597: 1579:Q: Something is still unclear! 1116:avoid biting genuine newcomers 1021:Contentious topics/alert/first 318:Contentious topic restrictions 13: 1: 1744:within the contentious topic; 1741: 1518:#Renewal of page restrictions 1461:Certain pages (including the 1246:contentious topic restriction 1069:. In other cases you may use 1044: 697: 1675:for administrative purposes. 1475:Insults and personal attacks 1159: 535: 529:Renewal of page restrictions 459: 347:#Editing a contentious topic 145:contentious topics procedure 81:contentious topics procedure 73:contentious topics procedure 18:Knowledge:Contentious topics 7: 1773:administrators' noticeboard 1467:administrators' noticeboard 1337:Adopted on 14 December 2022 1309:Adopted on 14 December 2022 1230:Adopted on 14 December 2022 905: 809:administrators' noticeboard 716:administrators' noticeboard 562:Enforcement of restrictions 552:arbitration enforcement log 464:arbitration enforcement log 388:sitewide and partial blocks 259:comply with all applicable 234:Editing a contentious topic 10: 1811: 1281:dispute resolution process 1155:their enforcement actions; 1137:impose a restriction when 290:err on the side of caution 147:, which replaces ArbCom's 86: 1639:On pages where "enforced 1529:#Duration of restrictions 1514:#Duration of restrictions 969: 966: 951: 922: 917: 914: 911: 1783:Contentious topics/aware 1369:Adopted on 21 April 2017 923:Authorized restrictions 474:Duration of restrictions 134:This page in a nutshell: 1195:Arbitration enforcement 261:policies and guidelines 1471:requests for amendment 710:request review at the 680:Appeals and amendments 487:appeals and amendments 71:and the newly adopted 65:explanatory supplement 1764:) for the same topic; 1497:request for amendment 1345:request for amendment 1144:modify a restriction 915:Single administrator 832:request for amendment 723:request for amendment 254:purposes of Knowledge 1406:Noticeboard outcomes 1291:Noticeboard outcomes 1128:disruptive behaviour 1124:battleground conduct 362:parts of other pages 220:specially designated 1158:repeatedly fail to 1151:repeatedly fail to 908: 907:Procedural summary 799:On community review 735:applicable template 496:Restriction notices 430:revert restrictions 410:revert restrictions 336:editor restrictions 298:editor restrictions 1483:casting aspersions 1440:General provisions 906: 890:Procedural summary 794:Standard of review 442:" restriction, and 212:contentious topics 77:arbitration clerks 1605:general sanctions 1537: 1536: 1527:, as a result of 1396:Noticeboard scope 1392: 1391: 1261:contentious topic 1212:Noticeboard scope 1186: 1185: 1112:assume good faith 1052: 1051: 991: 990: 987: 986: 967:Modifications by 850: 849: 714:("AE") or at the 610: 609: 354:broadly construed 340:page restrictions 309: 308: 302:page restrictions 282:gaming the system 275:page restrictions 203:Lead section text 141: 140: 121: 120: 83:is authoritative. 22:(Redirected from 1802: 1794: 1787: 1781: 1763: 1757: 1728: 1722: 1718: 1712: 1709: 1703: 1700: 1694: 1691: 1685: 1682: 1676: 1669: 1663: 1659: 1653: 1650: 1644: 1637: 1631: 1628: 1622: 1619:topic ban policy 1614: 1608: 1601: 1445: 1444: 1200: 1199: 1167:disproportionate 1153:properly explain 1099: 1098: 1088: 1082: 1078: 1072: 1068: 1062: 1039: 1033: 1025: 1019: 1005: 1004: 909: 895: 894: 685: 684: 674: 668: 599: 593: 520: 514: 462:warnings in the 404:interaction bans 323: 322: 273:comply with any 236: 235: 199: 198: 130: 129: 123: 113: 106: 99: 60: 59: 53: 48: 46: 38: 37: 27: 24:Knowledge:CTVSDS 1810: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1785: 1779: 1761: 1755: 1742:formally warned 1729: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1697: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1679: 1670: 1666: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1638: 1634: 1629: 1625: 1615: 1611: 1602: 1598: 1593: 1581: 1538: 1505: 1492: 1459: 1450: 1442: 1393: 1353: 1321: 1293: 1214: 1205: 1197: 1187: 1104: 1096: 1086: 1080: 1076: 1070: 1066: 1060: 1053: 1037: 1031: 1023: 1017: 1010: 1002: 992: 952:Maximum length 900: 892: 859:clear consensus 851: 828: 801: 796: 746: 698:logged warnings 690: 682: 672: 666: 611: 597: 591: 583:The editor was 564: 548: 531: 518: 512: 498: 476: 452: 424:page protection 381: 328: 320: 310: 294: 233: 232: 204: 196: 164: 127: 117: 116: 109: 102: 95: 91: 57: 51: 50: 44: 42: 39: 35: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1808: 1796: 1795: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1776: 1765: 1752: 1745: 1734: 1723: 1713: 1704: 1695: 1686: 1677: 1664: 1654: 1645: 1632: 1623: 1609: 1595: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1521: 1504: 1501: 1491: 1488: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1390: 1389: 1373: 1372: 1364: 1363: 1352: 1349: 1341: 1340: 1332: 1331: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1304: 1303: 1292: 1289: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1267: 1264: 1253: 1248:imposed by an 1240:may consider: 1234: 1233: 1225: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1184: 1183: 1171: 1170: 1163: 1156: 1149: 1146:out of process 1142: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1057: 1050: 1049: 1045:logged warning 1012: 1011: 1008: 1003: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 989: 988: 985: 984: 983: 982: 979: 976: 973: 968: 964: 963: 960: 953: 949: 948: 947: 946: 943: 938: 937: 936: 933: 930:"standard set" 924: 920: 919: 916: 913: 902: 901: 898: 893: 891: 888: 887: 886: 883: 880: 879: 878: 875: 872: 866: 855: 848: 847: 846: 845: 842: 839: 827: 824: 823: 822: 819: 816: 800: 797: 795: 792: 787: 786: 783: 776: 765: 764: 763: 762: 759: 753: 745: 742: 731: 730: 719: 708: 692: 691: 688: 683: 681: 678: 677: 676: 662: 661: 657: 656: 649: 648: 647: 639: 638: 634: 633: 629: 628: 624: 623: 620: 616: 615: 608: 607: 606: 605: 588: 563: 560: 547: 544: 530: 527: 502:appeal process 497: 494: 475: 472: 451: 448: 447: 446: 443: 438:the "enforced 436: 433: 427: 417: 416: 413: 407: 401: 391: 380: 377: 330: 329: 326: 321: 319: 316: 315: 314: 307: 306: 286: 285: 278: 271: 264: 257: 252:adhere to the 246:constructively 229: 206: 205: 202: 197: 195: 192: 188: 187: 180: 177: 174: 171: 163: 160: 139: 138: 131: 119: 118: 115: 114: 107: 100: 92: 87: 84: 61: 40: 33: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1807: 1790: 1784: 1778:Has placed a 1777: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1760: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1717: 1708: 1699: 1690: 1681: 1674: 1668: 1658: 1649: 1642: 1636: 1627: 1620: 1613: 1606: 1600: 1596: 1588: 1586: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1500: 1498: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1454: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1388: 1386: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1355: 1354: 1348: 1346: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1316: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1288: 1286: 1282: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1250:administrator 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1189: 1188: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1108: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1085: 1075: 1065: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1036: 1029: 1022: 1014: 1013: 1007: 1006: 994: 993: 980: 977: 974: 971: 970: 965: 961: 958: 954: 950: 944: 941: 940: 939: 934: 931: 927: 926: 925: 921: 910: 904: 903: 897: 896: 884: 881: 876: 873: 870: 869: 867: 864: 860: 856: 853: 852: 843: 840: 837: 836: 835: 833: 820: 817: 814: 813: 812: 810: 806: 791: 784: 781: 777: 774: 770: 769: 768: 760: 757: 756: 754: 751: 750: 749: 741: 738: 736: 728: 724: 720: 717: 713: 709: 706: 705: 704: 701: 699: 694: 693: 687: 686: 671: 664: 663: 659: 658: 654: 650: 645: 644: 641: 640: 636: 635: 631: 630: 626: 625: 621: 618: 617: 613: 612: 603: 596: 589: 586: 582: 581: 580: 577: 574: 571: 569: 559: 555: 553: 543: 541: 537: 526: 524: 517: 510: 505: 503: 493: 490: 488: 484: 479: 471: 469: 465: 461: 457: 444: 441: 437: 434: 431: 428: 425: 422: 421: 420: 414: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 395: 392: 389: 386: 385: 384: 376: 374: 370: 365: 363: 359: 355: 350: 348: 343: 341: 337: 332: 331: 325: 324: 312: 311: 305: 303: 299: 293: 291: 283: 280:refrain from 279: 276: 272: 269: 265: 262: 258: 255: 251: 250: 249: 247: 243: 238: 237: 228: 226: 221: 218:). These are 217: 214:(abbreviated 213: 208: 207: 201: 200: 191: 185: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 168: 167: 159: 157: 152: 150: 146: 135: 132: 125: 124: 112: 108: 105: 101: 98: 94: 93: 90: 85: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 55: 54: 49: 25: 19: 1726: 1716: 1707: 1698: 1689: 1680: 1667: 1657: 1648: 1635: 1626: 1612: 1599: 1582: 1524: 1506: 1493: 1465:("AE"), the 1460: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1367: 1356: 1342: 1335: 1324: 1314: 1307: 1296: 1278: 1235: 1228: 1217: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1132: 1120:edit-warring 1109: 1042: 1015: 962:Indefinite. 912:Imposed by: 862: 861:(previously 858: 829: 802: 788: 779: 772: 766: 747: 739: 732: 702: 695: 652: 614:Standard set 578: 575: 572: 565: 556: 549: 539: 532: 506: 499: 491: 480: 477: 456:expectations 453: 418: 382: 379:Standard set 369:standard set 366: 361: 357: 351: 344: 339: 335: 333: 295: 289: 287: 245: 241: 239: 231: 230: 215: 211: 209: 194:Lead section 189: 165: 153: 142: 133: 64: 1551:Designation 1490:Designation 1064:alert/first 718:("AN"); and 288:You should 43:Arbitration 1738:restricted 1561:Continuity 1503:Continuity 1479:soapboxing 509:editnotice 394:topic bans 1736:Was ever 721:submit a 660:Templates 568:appeal it 398:page bans 242:carefully 111:WP:CTVSDS 104:WP:DSVSCT 89:Shortcuts 47:Committee 1759:ds/alert 1721:conduct. 1673:involved 1139:involved 1084:alert/DS 637:Duration 627:Warnings 450:Warnings 97:WP:CT/DS 1749:alerted 1585:WP:AC/C 1541:Decorum 1457:Decorum 1423:WP:ARCA 957:renewed 546:Logging 536:logging 483:renewed 266:follow 1771:, the 1126:, and 1747:Ever 1591:Notes 1257:aware 1114:, to 1074:alert 1035:alert 780:clear 773:clear 727:email 653:don't 600:or a 585:aware 521:or a 468:aware 412:, and 358:pages 63:This 16:< 1516:and 1481:and 1385:ARCA 1236:The 928:The 396:and 338:and 244:and 225:list 137:two. 1740:or 1641:BRD 1525:not 1160:log 540:not 504:. 460:log 440:BRD 342:. 1786:}} 1780:{{ 1762:}} 1756:{{ 1477:, 1347:. 1287:. 1122:, 1087:}} 1081:{{ 1079:, 1077:}} 1071:{{ 1067:}} 1061:{{ 1038:}} 1032:{{ 1024:}} 1018:{{ 959:. 778:a 771:a 737:. 673:}} 667:{{ 598:}} 592:{{ 519:}} 513:{{ 216:CT 1621:. 1520:. 1425:. 1263:, 1252:, 1148:; 1141:; 865:) 729:. 432:, 426:, 406:, 390:, 284:. 270:; 263:; 256:; 186:. 45:​ 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Contentious topics
Knowledge:CTVSDS
Arbitration​Committee
discretionary sanctions procedure
contentious topics procedure
arbitration clerks
contentious topics procedure
Shortcuts
WP:CT/DS
WP:DSVSCT
WP:CTVSDS
contentious topics procedure
former "discretionary sanctions"
contentious topics procedure directly
guidance page for enforcing administrators
specially designated
list
purposes of Knowledge
policies and guidelines
editorial and behavioural best practice
page restrictions
gaming the system
editor restrictions
page restrictions
#Editing a contentious topic
broadly construed
standard set
arbitration enforcement noticeboard
sitewide and partial blocks
topic bans

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑